Report text available as:

  • TXT
  • PDF   (PDF provides a complete and accurate display of this text.) Tip ?

109th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    109-154

======================================================================



 
                WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2005

                                _______
                                

 June 24, 2005.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
              State of the Union and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

     Mr. Young of Alaska, from the Committee on Transportation and 
                Infrastructure, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                        [To accompany H.R. 2864]

      [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office]

  The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, to whom 
was referred the bill (H.R. 2864) To provide for the 
conservation and development of water and related resources, to 
authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various 
projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United 
States, and for other purposes, having considered the same, 
report favorably thereon with an amendment and recommend that 
the bill as amended do pass.
  The amendment is as follows:
  Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the 
following:

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

  (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water Resources 
Development Act of 2005''.
  (b) Table of Contents.--

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Definition of Secretary.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

Sec. 1001. Project authorizations.
Sec. 1002. Small projects for flood damage reduction.
Sec. 1003. Small projects for emergency streambank protection.
Sec. 1004. Small projects for navigation.
Sec. 1005. Small projects for improvement of the quality of the 
environment.
Sec. 1006. Small projects for aquatic ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 1007. Small projects for shoreline protection.
Sec. 1008. Small projects for snagging and sediment removal.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 2001. Non-Federal contributions.
Sec. 2002. Harbor cost sharing.
Sec. 2003. Funding to process permits.
Sec. 2004. National shoreline erosion control development and 
demonstration program.
Sec. 2005. Small shore and beach restoration and protection projects.
Sec. 2006. Written agreement for water resources projects.
Sec. 2007. Assistance for remediation, restoration, and reuse.
Sec. 2008. Compilation of laws.
Sec. 2009. Dredged material disposal.
Sec. 2010. Wetlands mitigation.
Sec. 2011. Remote and subsistence harbors.
Sec. 2012. Beneficial uses of dredged material.
Sec. 2013. Cost-sharing provisions for certain areas.
Sec. 2014. Revision of project partnership agreement.
Sec. 2015. Cost sharing.
Sec. 2016. Credit for work performed before partnership agreement.
Sec. 2017. Recreation user fee revenues.
Sec. 2018. Expedited actions for emergency flood damage reduction.
Sec. 2019. Watershed and river basin assessments.
Sec. 2020. Tribal partnership program.
Sec. 2021. Wildfire firefighting.
Sec. 2022. Credit for nonconstruction services.
Sec. 2023. Technical assistance.
Sec. 2024. Coordination and scheduling of Federal, State, and local 
actions.
Sec. 2025. Project streamlining.
Sec. 2026. Lakes program.
Sec. 2027. Mitigation for fish and wildlife losses.
Sec. 2028. Cooperative agreements.
Sec. 2029. Project planning.
Sec. 2030. Independent peer review.
Sec. 2031. Training funds.
Sec. 2032. Access to water resource data.
Sec. 2033. Shore protection projects.
Sec. 2034. Ability to pay.
Sec. 2035. Aquatic ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 2036. Small flood damage reduction projects.
Sec. 2037. Leasing authority.
Sec. 2038. Cost estimates.
Sec. 2039. Studies and reports for water resources projects.
Sec. 2040. Fiscal transparency report.

                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

Sec. 3001. King Cove Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 3002. St. Paul Harbor, St. Paul Island, Alaska.
Sec. 3003. Sitka, Alaska.
Sec. 3004. Tatitlek, Alaska.
Sec. 3005. Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto basin, Arkansas.
Sec. 3006. Osceola Harbor, Arkansas.
Sec. 3007. Pine Mountain Dam, Arkansas.
Sec. 3008. Saint Francis Basin, Arkansas.
Sec. 3009. American River Watershed, California.
Sec. 3010. Compton Creek, California.
Sec. 3011. Grayson Creek/Murderer's Creek, California.
Sec. 3012. Hamilton Airfield, California.
Sec. 3013. John F. Baldwin Ship Channel and Stockton Ship Channel, 
California.
Sec. 3014. Kaweah River, California.
Sec. 3015. Larkspur Ferry Channel, Larkspur, California.
Sec. 3016. Llagas Creek, California.
Sec. 3017. Los Angeles Harbor, California.
Sec. 3018. Magpie Creek, California.
Sec. 3019. Pacific Flyway Center, Sacramento, California.
Sec. 3020. Pinole Creek, California.
Sec. 3021. Prado Dam, California.
Sec. 3022. Sacramento and American Rivers Flood Control, California.
Sec. 3023. Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, California.
Sec. 3024. Sacramento River, Glenn-Colusa, California.
Sec. 3025. Santa Cruz Harbor, California.
Sec. 3026. Seven Oaks Dam, California.
Sec. 3027. Upper Guadalupe River, California.
Sec. 3028. Walnut Creek Channel, California.
Sec. 3029. Wildcat/San Pablo Creek Phase I, California.
Sec. 3030. Wildcat/San Pablo Creek Phase II, California.
Sec. 3031. Yuba River Basin project, California.
Sec. 3032. Intracoastal Waterway, Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, 
Delaware and Maryland.
Sec. 3033. Brevard County, Florida.
Sec. 3034. Broward County and Hillsboro Inlet, Florida.
Sec. 3035. Canaveral Harbor, Florida.
Sec. 3036. Gasparilla and Estero Islands, Florida.
Sec. 3037. Jacksonville Harbor, Florida.
Sec. 3038. Lido Key Beach, Sarasota, Florida.
Sec. 3039. Miami Harbor, Florida.
Sec. 3040. Peanut Island, Florida.
Sec. 3041. Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel, Florida.
Sec. 3042. Tampa Harbor Cut B, Florida.
Sec. 3043. Allatoona Lake, Georgia.
Sec. 3044. Latham River, Glynn County, Georgia.
Sec. 3045. Dworshak Dam and Reservoir improvements, Idaho.
Sec. 3046. Beardstown Community Boat Harbor, Beardstown, Illinois.
Sec. 3047. Cache River Levee, Illinois.
Sec. 3048. Chicago River, Illinois.
Sec. 3049. Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, Illinois.
Sec. 3050. Emiquon, Illinois.
Sec. 3051. LaSalle, Illinois.
Sec. 3052. Spunky Bottoms, Illinois.
Sec. 3053. Fort Wayne and vicinity, Indiana.
Sec. 3054. Koontz Lake, Indiana.
Sec. 3055. Little Calumet River, Indiana.
Sec. 3056. White River, Indiana.
Sec. 3057. Des Moines River and Greenbelt, Iowa.
Sec. 3058. Prestonsburg, Kentucky.
Sec. 3059. Amite River and Tributaries, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge 
Parish Watershed.
Sec. 3060. Atchafalaya Basin, Louisiana.
Sec. 3061. Bayou Plaquemine, Louisiana.
Sec. 3062. Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, Louisiana.
Sec. 3063. J. Bennett Johnston Waterway, Mississippi River to 
Shreveport, Louisiana.
Sec. 3064. Mississippi Delta Region, Louisiana.
Sec. 3065. New Orleans to Venice, Louisiana.
Sec. 3066. West bank of the Mississippi River (East of Harvey Canal), 
Louisiana.
Sec. 3067. Camp Ellis, Saco, Maine.
Sec. 3068. Union River, Maine.
Sec. 3069. Gwynns Falls Watershed, Baltimore, Maryland.
Sec. 3070. Boston Harbor, Massachusetts.
Sec. 3071. Detroit River Shoreline, Detroit, Michigan.
Sec. 3072. St. Joseph Harbor, Michigan.
Sec. 3073. Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan.
Sec. 3074. Ada, Minnesota.
Sec. 3075. Duluth Harbor, McQuade Road, Minnesota.
Sec. 3076. Grand Portage Harbor, Minnesota.
Sec. 3077. Granite Falls, Minnesota.
Sec. 3078. Knife River Harbor, Minnesota.
Sec. 3079. Red Lake River, Minnesota.
Sec. 3080. Silver Bay, Minnesota.
Sec. 3081. Taconite Harbor, Minnesota.
Sec. 3082. Two Harbors, Minnesota.
Sec. 3083. Deer Island, Harrison County, Mississippi.
Sec. 3084. Pearl River Basin, Mississippi.
Sec. 3085. Festus and Crystal City, Missouri.
Sec. 3086. Monarch-Chesterfield, Missouri.
Sec. 3087. River Des Peres, Missouri.
Sec. 3088. Antelope Creek, Lincoln, Nebraska.
Sec. 3089. Sand Creek watershed, Wahoo, Nebraska.
Sec. 3090. Lower Cape May Meadows, Cape May Point, New Jersey.
Sec. 3091. Passaic River Basin flood management, New Jersey.
Sec. 3092. Buffalo Harbor, New York.
Sec. 3093. Orchard Beach, Bronx, New York.
Sec. 3094. Port of New York and New Jersey, New York and New Jersey.
Sec. 3095. New York State Canal System.
Sec. 3096. Lower Girard Lake Dam, Ohio.
Sec. 3097. Mahoning River, Ohio.
Sec. 3098. Arcadia Lake, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3099. Waurika Lake, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3100. Willamette River temperature control, McKenzie Subbasin, 
Oregon.
Sec. 3101. Delaware River, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware.
Sec. 3102. Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3103. Sheraden Park Stream and Chartiers Creek, Allegheny County, 
Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3104. Solomon's Creek, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3105. South Central Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3106. Wyoming Valley, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3107. Cedar Bayou, Texas.
Sec. 3108. Freeport Harbor, Texas.
Sec. 3109. Johnson Creek, Arlington, Texas.
Sec. 3110. Lake Kemp, Texas.
Sec. 3111. Lower Rio Grande Basin, Texas.
Sec. 3112. North Padre Island, Corpus Christi Bay, Texas.
Sec. 3113. Pat Mayse Lake, Texas.
Sec. 3114. Proctor Lake, Texas.
Sec. 3115. San Antonio Channel, San Antonio, Texas.
Sec. 3116. James River, Virginia.
Sec. 3117. Lee, Russell, Scott, Smyth, Tazewell, and Wise Counties, 
Virginia.
Sec. 3118. Tangier Island Seawall, Virginia.
Sec. 3119. Duwamish/Green, Washington.
Sec. 3120. Yakima River, Port of Sunnyside, Washington.
Sec. 3121. Greenbrier River Basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 3122. Lesage/Greenbottom Swamp, West Virginia.
Sec. 3123. Northern West Virginia.
Sec. 3124. Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin.
Sec. 3125. Mississippi River headwaters reservoirs.
Sec. 3126. Continuation of project authorizations.
Sec. 3127. Project reauthorizations.
Sec. 3128. Project deauthorizations.
Sec. 3129. Land conveyances.
Sec. 3130. Extinguishment of reversionary interests and use 
restrictions.

                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

Sec. 4001. John Glenn Great Lakes Basin program.
Sec. 4002. Lake Erie dredged material disposal sites.
Sec. 4003. Southwestern United States drought study.
Sec. 4004. Upper Mississippi River comprehensive plan.
Sec. 4005. Knik Arm, Cook Inlet, Alaska.
Sec. 4006. Kuskokwim River, Alaska.
Sec. 4007. St. George Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 4008. Susitna River, Alaska.
Sec. 4009. Gila Bend, Maricopa, Arizona.
Sec. 4010. Searcy County, Arkansas.
Sec. 4011. Dry Creek Valley, California.
Sec. 4012. Elkhorn Slough estuary, California.
Sec. 4013. Fresno, Kings, and Kern Counties, California.
Sec. 4014. Los Angeles River, California.
Sec. 4015. Lytle Creek, Rialto, California.
Sec. 4016. Mokelumne River, San Joaquin County, California.
Sec. 4017. Napa River, St. Helena, California.
Sec. 4018. Orick, California.
Sec. 4019. Rialto, Fontana, and Colton, California.
Sec. 4020. Sacramento River, California.
Sec. 4021. San Diego County, California.
Sec. 4022. San Francisco Bay, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California.
Sec. 4023. South San Francisco Bay shoreline study, California.
Sec. 4024. Twentynine Palms, California.
Sec. 4025. Yucca Valley, California.
Sec. 4026. Boulder Creek, Boulder, Colorado.
Sec. 4027. Roaring Fork River, Basalt, Colorado.
Sec. 4028. Delaware and Christina Rivers and Shellpot Creek, 
Wilmington, Delaware.
Sec. 4029. Collier County beaches, Florida.
Sec. 4030. Vanderbilt Beach Lagoon, Florida.
Sec. 4031. Meriwether County, Georgia.
Sec. 4032. Tybee Island, Georgia.
Sec. 4033. Kaukonahua-Helemano watershed, Oahu, Hawaii.
Sec. 4034. West Maui, Maui, Hawaii.
Sec. 4035. Boise River, Idaho.
Sec. 4036. Ballard's Island Side Channel, Illinois.
Sec. 4037. Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 4038. South Branch, Chicago River, Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 4039. Utica, Illinois.
Sec. 4040. Lake and Porter Counties, Indiana.
Sec. 4041. Salem, Indiana.
Sec. 4042. Buckhorn Lake, Kentucky.
Sec. 4043. Dewey Lake, Kentucky.
Sec. 4044. Louisville, Kentucky.
Sec. 4045. Bastrop-Morehouse Parish, Louisiana.
Sec. 4046. Offshore oil and gas fabrication ports, Louisiana.
Sec. 4047. Vermilion River, Louisiana.
Sec. 4048. West Feliciana Parish, Louisiana.
Sec. 4049. Patapsco River, Maryland.
Sec. 4050. Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts and Rhode Island.
Sec. 4051. Hamburg and Green Oak Townships, Michigan.
Sec. 4052. St. Clair River, Michigan.
Sec. 4053. Duluth-Superior Harbor, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Sec. 4054. Wild Rice River, Minnesota.
Sec. 4055. Mississippi coastal area, Mississippi.
Sec. 4056. Northeast Mississippi.
Sec. 4057. St. Louis, Missouri.
Sec. 4058. Dredged material disposal, New Jersey.
Sec. 4059. Bayonne, New Jersey.
Sec. 4060. Carteret, New Jersey.
Sec. 4061. Elizabeth River, Elizabeth, New Jersey.
Sec. 4062. Gloucester County, New Jersey.
Sec. 4063. Perth Amboy, New Jersey.
Sec. 4064. Wreck Pond, Monmouth County, New Jersey.
Sec. 4065. Batavia, New York.
Sec. 4066. Big Sister Creek, Evans, New York.
Sec. 4067. East Chester Bay, Turtle Cove, New York.
Sec. 4068. Finger Lakes, New York.
Sec. 4069. Hudson-Raritan Estuary, New York and New Jersey.
Sec. 4070. Lake Erie Shoreline, Buffalo, New York.
Sec. 4071. Newtown Creek, New York.
Sec. 4072. Niagara River, New York.
Sec. 4073. Upper Delaware River watershed, New York.
Sec. 4074. Lincoln County, North Carolina.
Sec. 4075. Wilkes County, North Carolina.
Sec. 4076. Yadkinville, North Carolina.
Sec. 4077. Cincinnati, Ohio.
Sec. 4078. Euclid, Ohio.
Sec. 4079. Lake Erie, Ohio.
Sec. 4080. Ohio River, Ohio.
Sec. 4081. Sutherlin, Oregon.
Sec. 4082. Tillamook Bay and Bar, Oregon.
Sec. 4083. Ecosystem restoration and fish passage improvements, Oregon.
Sec. 4084. Walla Walla River Basin, Oregon.
Sec. 4085. Chartiers Creek watershed, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4086. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4087. North Central Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4088. Northampton and Lehigh Counties streams, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4089. Western Pennsylvania flood damage reduction.
Sec. 4090. Williamsport, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4091. Yardley Borough, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4092. Rio Valenciano, Juncos, Puerto Rico.
Sec. 4093. Crooked Creek, Bennettsville, South Carolina.
Sec. 4094. Broad River, York County, South Carolina.
Sec. 4095. Georgetown and Williamsburg Counties, South Carolina.
Sec. 4096. Chattanooga, Tennessee.
Sec. 4097. Cleveland, Tennessee.
Sec. 4098. Cumberland River, Nashville, Tennessee.
Sec. 4099. Lewis, Lawrence, and Wayne Counties, Tennessee.
Sec. 4100. Wolf River and Nonconnah Creek, Memphis Tennessee.
Sec. 4101. Abilene, Texas.
Sec. 4102. Coastal Texas ecosystem protection and restoration, Texas.
Sec. 4103. Fort Bend County, Texas.
Sec. 4104. Harris County, Texas.
Sec. 4105. Port of Galveston, Texas.
Sec. 4106. Roma Creek, Texas.
Sec. 4107. Walnut Creek, Texas.
Sec. 4108. Grand County and Moab, Utah.
Sec. 4109. Southwestern Utah.
Sec. 4110. Chowan River Basin, Virginia and North Carolina.
Sec. 4111. James River, Richmond, Virginia.
Sec. 4112. Elliott Bay Seawall, Seattle, Washington.
Sec. 4113. Monongahela River Basin, Northern West Virginia.
Sec. 4114. Kenosha Harbor, Wisconsin.
Sec. 4115. Wauwatosa, Wisconsin.

                   TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Sec. 5001. Maintenance of navigation channels.
Sec. 5002. Watershed management.
Sec. 5003. Dam safety.
Sec. 5004. Structural integrity evaluations.
Sec. 5005. Flood mitigation priority areas.
Sec. 5006. Additional assistance for authorized projects.
Sec. 5007. Expedited completion of reports and construction for certain 
projects.
Sec. 5008. Expedited completion of reports for certain projects.
Sec. 5009. Southeastern water resources assessment.
Sec. 5010. Upper Mississippi River environmental management program.
Sec. 5011. Missouri and Middle Mississippi Rivers enhancement project.
Sec. 5012. Great Lakes fishery and ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 5013. Great Lakes remedial action plans and sediment remediation.
Sec. 5014. Great Lakes tributary model.
Sec. 5015. Susquehanna, Delaware, and Potomac River Basins.
Sec. 5016. Chesapeake Bay Environmental Restoration and Protection 
Program.
Sec. 5017. Chesapeake Bay oyster restoration.
Sec. 5018. Hypoxia assessment.
Sec. 5019. Potomac River Watershed Assessment and Tributary Strategy 
Evaluation and Monitoring Program.
Sec. 5020. Lock and dam security.
Sec. 5021. Pinhook Creek, Huntsville, Alabama.
Sec. 5022. Tallapoosa, Alabama.
Sec. 5023. Alaska.
Sec. 5024. Barrow, Alaska.
Sec. 5025. Coffman Cove, Alaska.
Sec. 5026. Fort Yukon, Alaska.
Sec. 5027. Kotzebue Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 5028. Lowell Creek Tunnel, Seward, Alaska.
Sec. 5029. St. Herman and St. Paul Harbors, Kodiak, Alaska.
Sec. 5030. Tanana River, Alaska.
Sec. 5031. Valdez, Alaska.
Sec. 5032. Whittier, Alaska.
Sec. 5033. Wrangell Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 5034. Augusta and Clarendon, Arkansas.
Sec. 5035. Des Arc levee protection, Arkansas.
Sec. 5036. Helena and vicinity, Arkansas.
Sec. 5037. Loomis Landing, Arkansas.
Sec. 5038. St. Francis River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri.
Sec. 5039. White River basin, Arkansas.
Sec. 5040. Cambria, California.
Sec. 5041. Contra Costa Canal, Oakley and Knightsen, California; 
Mallard Slough, Pittsburg, California.
Sec. 5042. Dana Point Harbor, California.
Sec. 5043. East San Joaquin County, California.
Sec. 5044. Eastern Santa Clara Basin, California.
Sec. 5045. Pine Flat Dam and Reservoir, California.
Sec. 5046. Sacramento deep water ship channel, California.
Sec. 5047. San Francisco, California.
Sec. 5048. San Francisco, California, waterfront area.
Sec. 5049. Santa Venetia, California.
Sec. 5050. Stockton, California.
Sec. 5051. Victor V. Veysey Dam, California.
Sec. 5052. Whittier, California.
Sec. 5053. Charles Hervey Townshend Breakwater, New Haven Harbor, 
Connecticut.
Sec. 5054. Christina River shipwreck, Delaware.
Sec. 5055. Anacostia River, District of Columbia, Maryland, and 
Virginia.
Sec. 5056. Florida Keys water quality improvements.
Sec. 5057. Lake Worth, Florida.
Sec. 5058. Lake Lanier, Georgia.
Sec. 5059. Riley Creek Recreation Area, Idaho.
Sec. 5060. Reconstruction of Illinois flood protection projects.
Sec. 5061. Kaskaskia River Basin, Illinois, restoration.
Sec. 5062. Floodplain mapping, Little Calumet River, Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 5063. Natalie Creek, Midlothian and Oak Forest, Illinois.
Sec. 5064. Illinois River basin restoration.
Sec. 5065. Promontory Point, Lake Michigan, Illinois.
Sec. 5066. Burns Waterway Harbor, Indiana.
Sec. 5067. Calumet region, Indiana.
Sec. 5068. Floodplain mapping, Missouri River, Iowa.
Sec. 5069. Rathbun Lake, Iowa.
Sec. 5070. Cumberland River basin, Kentucky.
Sec. 5071. Louisville, Kentucky.
Sec. 5072. Mayfield Creek and tributaries, Kentucky.
Sec. 5073. North Fork, Kentucky River, Breathitt County, Kentucky.
Sec. 5074. Paducah, Kentucky.
Sec. 5075. Southern and eastern Kentucky.
Sec. 5076. Winchester, Kentucky.
Sec. 5077. Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Sec. 5078. Calcasieu Ship Channel, Louisiana.
Sec. 5079. Cross Lake, Shreveport, Louisiana.
Sec. 5080. West Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana.
Sec. 5081. Charlestown, Maryland.
Sec. 5082. Delmarva Conservation Corridor, Maryland and Delaware.
Sec. 5083. Massachusetts dredged material disposal sites.
Sec. 5084. Ontonagon Harbor, Michigan.
Sec. 5085. St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair, Michigan.
Sec. 5086. Crookston, Minnesota.
Sec. 5087. Garrison and Kathio Township, Minnesota.
Sec. 5088. Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Sec. 5089. Northeastern Minnesota.
Sec. 5090. Harrison, Hancock, and Jackson Counties, Mississippi.
Sec. 5091. Mississippi River, Missouri, and Illinois.
Sec. 5092. St. Louis, Missouri.
Sec. 5093. Acid Brook, Pompton Lakes, New Jersey.
Sec. 5094. Hackensack Meadowlands area, New Jersey.
Sec. 5095. Central New Mexico, New Mexico.
Sec. 5096. Atlantic Coast of New York.
Sec. 5097. College Point, New York City, New York.
Sec. 5098. Flushing Bay and Creek, New York City, New York.
Sec. 5099. Hudson River, New York.
Sec. 5100. Mount Morris Dam, New York.
Sec. 5101. Onondaga Lake, New York.
Sec. 5102. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, North Carolina.
Sec. 5103. Stanly County, North Carolina.
Sec. 5104. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, North Carolina.
Sec. 5105. Ohio.
Sec. 5106. Toussaint River, Ohio.
Sec. 5107. Eugene, Oregon.
Sec. 5108. John Day Lock and Dam, Lake Umatilla, Oregon and Washington.
Sec. 5109. Lowell, Oregon.
Sec. 5110. Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5111. Lehigh River, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5112. Northeast Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5113. Upper Susquehanna River Basin, Pennsylvania and New York.
Sec. 5114. Cano Martin Pena, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Sec. 5115. Beaufort and Jasper Counties, South Carolina.
Sec. 5116. Fritz Landing, Tennessee.
Sec. 5117. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Tennessee.
Sec. 5118. Town Creek, Lenoir City, Tennessee.
Sec. 5119. Tennessee River partnership.
Sec. 5120. Upper Mississippi Embayment, Tennessee, Arkansas, and 
Mississippi.
Sec. 5121. Bosque River watershed, Texas.
Sec. 5122. Dallas Floodway, Dallas, Texas.
Sec. 5123. Harris County, Texas.
Sec. 5124. Onion Creek, Texas.
Sec. 5125. Dyke Marsh, Fairfax County, Virginia.
Sec. 5126. Eastern Shore and southwest Virginia.
Sec. 5127. James River, Virginia.
Sec. 5128. Baker Bay and Ilwaco Harbor, Washington.
Sec. 5129. Hamilton Island campground, Washington.
Sec. 5130. Puget Island, Washington.
Sec. 5131. Willapa Bay, Washington.
Sec. 5132. Bluestone, West Virginia.
Sec. 5133. West Virginia and Pennsylvania flood control.
Sec. 5134. Lower Kanawha River Basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 5135. Central West Virginia.
Sec. 5136. Southern West Virginia.
Sec. 5137. Johnsonville Dam, Johnsonville, Wisconsin.
Sec. 5138. Construction of flood control projects by non-Federal 
interests.
Sec. 5139. Use of Federal hopper dredge fleet.

                      TITLE VI--FLORIDA EVERGLADES

Sec. 6001. Hillsboro and Okeechobee Aquifer, Florida.
Sec. 6002. Pilot projects.
Sec. 6003. Maximum cost of projects.
Sec. 6004. Project authorization.
Sec. 6005. Credit.
Sec. 6006. Outreach and assistance.
Sec. 6007. Critical restoration projects.
Sec. 6008. Deauthorizations.
Sec. 6009. Modified water delivery.

                   TITLE VII--LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA

Sec. 7001. Definitions.
Sec. 7002. Additional Reports.
Sec. 7003. Coastal Louisiana ecosystem protection and restoration task 
force.
Sec. 7004. Investigations.
Sec. 7005. Construction.
Sec. 7006. Non-Federal cost share.
Sec. 7007. Project justification.
Sec. 7008. Statutory Construction.

    TITLE VIII--UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ILLINOIS WATERWAY SYSTEM

Sec. 8001. Definitions.
Sec. 8002. Navigation improvements and restoration.
Sec. 8003. Authorization of construction of navigation improvements.
Sec. 8004. Ecosystem restoration authorization.
Sec. 8005. Comparable progress.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY.

  In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the Army.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

SEC. 1001. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

  Except as otherwise provided in this section, the following projects 
for water resources development and conservation and other purposes are 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in 
accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, described in 
the respective reports designated in this section:
          (1) Akutan, alaska.--
                  (A) In general.--The project for navigation, Akutan, 
                Alaska: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 
                20, 2004, at a total cost of $19,700,000.
                  (B) Treatment of certain dredging.--The headlands 
                dredging for the mooring basin shall be considered a 
                general navigation feature for purposes of estimating 
                the non-Federal share of the cost of the project.
          (2) Haines small boat harbor, haines, alaska.--The project 
        for navigation, Haines Small Boat Harbor, Haines, Alaska: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 20, 2004, at a 
        total of $12,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $9,700,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,500,000.
          (3) Tanque verde creek, arizona.--The project for 
        environmental restoration, Tanque Verde Creek, Arizona: Report 
        of the Chief of Engineers, dated July 22, 2003, at a total cost 
        of $4,978,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $3,236,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,742,000.
          (4) Va shily' ay akimel, salt river restoration, arizona.--
        The project for ecosystem restoration, Va Shily' Ay Akimel, 
        Salt River, Arizona: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        January 3, 2005, at a total cost of $138,968,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $90,129,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $48,839,000.
          (5) Hamilton city, california.--The project for flood damage 
        reduction and ecosystem restoration, Hamilton City, California: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 22, 2004, at a 
        total cost of $50,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $33,000,000 and estimated non-Federal cost of $17,600,000.
          (6) Imperial beach, california.--The project for storm damage 
        reduction, Imperial Beach, California: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers, dated December 30, 2003, at a total cost of 
        $11,862,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $7,592,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $4,270,000, and at an 
        estimated total cost of $38,004,000 for periodic beach 
        nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $19,002,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $19,002,000.
          (7) Matilija dam, ventura county, california.--The project 
        for ecosystem restoration, Matilija Dam and Ventura River 
        Watershed, Ventura County, California: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated December 20, 2004, at a total cost of 
        $130,335,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $78,973,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $51,362,000.
          (8) Middle creek, lake county, california.--The project for 
        ecosystem restoration and flood damage reduction, Middle Creek, 
        Lake County, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        November 29, 2004, at a total cost of $41,793,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $27,256,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $14,537,000.
          (9) Napa river salt marsh, california.--
                  (A) In general.--The project for ecosystem 
                restoration, Napa River Salt Marsh, Nap River, 
                California: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
                December 22, 2004, at a total cost of $100,500,000, 
                with an estimated Federal cost of $64,000,000 and an 
                estimated non-Federal cost of $36,500,000.
                  (B) Project features.--In carrying out the project, 
                the Secretary shall include construction of a recycled 
                water pipeline extending from the Sonoma Valley County 
                Sanitation District Waste Water Treatment Plant and the 
                Napa Sanitation District Waste Water Treatment Plant as 
                part of the project and restoration and enhancement of 
                Salt Ponds 1, 1A, 2, and 3.
          (10) South platte river, denver, colorado.--The project for 
        environmental restoration Denver County Reach, South Platte 
        River, Denver, Colorado: Report of the Chief of Engineers, 
        dated May 16, 2003, at a total cost of $18,824,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $12,236,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $6,588,000.
          (11) Miami harbor, miami-dade county, florida.--
                  (A) In general.--The project for navigation, Miami 
                Harbor, Miami-Dade County, Florida: Report of the Chief 
                of Engineers dated April 25, 2005, at a total cost of 
                $121,127,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
                $64,843,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                $56,284,000.
                  (B) General reevaluation report.--The non-Federal 
                share of the cost of the general reevaluation report 
                that resulted in the report of the Chief of Engineers 
                referred to in subparagraph (A) shall be the same 
                percentage as the non-Federal share of cost of 
                construction of the project.
                  (C) Agreement.--The Secretary shall enter into a new 
                partnership with the non-Federal interest to reflect 
                the cost sharing required by subparagraph (B).
          (12) East st. louis and vicinity, illinois.--The project for 
        ecosystem restoration, East St. Louis and vicinity, Illinois: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 22, 2004, at a 
        total cost of $191,158,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $123,807,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $67,351,000.
          (13) Peoria riverfront, illinois.--The project for 
        environmental restoration, Peoria Riverfront, Illinois: Report 
        of the Chief of Engineers, dated July 28, 2003, at a total cost 
        of $16,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $10,400,000 
        and an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,600,000.
          (14) Bayou sorrel lock, louisiana.--The project for 
        navigation, Bayou Sorrel Lock, Louisiana: Report of the Chief 
        of Engineers dated January 3, 2005, at a total cost of 
        $9,000,000. The costs of construction of the project shall be 
        paid \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the general fund of 
        the Treasury and \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the 
        Inland Waterways Trust Fund.
          (15) Morganza to the gulf of mexico, louisiana.--
                  (A) In general.--The project for hurricane and storm 
                damage reduction, Morganza to the Gulf of Mexico, 
                Louisiana: Reports of the Chief of Engineers, dated 
                August 23, 2002, and July 22, 2003, at a total cost of 
                $788,000,000 with an estimated Federal cost of 
                $512,200,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                $275,800,000.
                  (B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the 
                non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost 
                of design and construction work carried out by the non-
                Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
                agreement for the project if the Secretary determines 
                that the work is integral to the project.
          (16) Swope park industrial area, missouri.--The project for 
        flood damage reduction, Swope Park Industrial Area, Missouri: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated December 30, 2003, at a 
        total cost of $15,683,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $10,194,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,489,000.
          (17) Manasquan to barnegat inlet, new jersey.--The project 
        for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Manasquan to Barnegat 
        Inlet, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        December 30, 2003, at a total cost of $65,800,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $42,800,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $23,000,000, and at an estimated total cost of 
        $108,000,000 for periodic beach nourishment over the 50-year 
        life of the project, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $54,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $54,000,000.
          (18) South river, new jersey.--The project for hurricane and 
        storm damage reduction and environmental restoration, South 
        River, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated July 
        22, 2003, at a total cost of $112,623,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $73,205,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $39,418,000.
          (19) Southwest valley, albuquerque, new mexico.--The project 
        for flood damage reduction, Southwest Valley, Albuquerque, New 
        Mexico: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated November 29, 
        2004, at a total cost of $19,494,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $12,671,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $6,823,000.
          (20) Corpus christi ship channel, corpus christi, texas.--The 
        project for navigation and environmental restoration, Corpus 
        Christi Ship Channel, Texas, Channel Improvement Project: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 2, 2003, at a total 
        cost of $172,940,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $80,086,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $92,823,000.
          (21) Gulf intracoastal waterway, high island to brazos river, 
        texas.--The project for navigation, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, 
        Sabine River to Corpus Christi, Texas: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers, dated April 16, 2004, at a total cost of 
        $13,104,000. The costs of construction of the project are to be 
        paid \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the general fund of 
        the Treasury and \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the 
        Inland Waterways Trust Fund.
          (22) Matagorda bay, texas.--The project for navigation, Gulf 
        Intracoastal Waterway, Brazos River to Port O'Connor, Matagorda 
        Bay Re-Route, Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated 
        December 24, 2002, at a total cost of $15,960,000. The costs of 
        construction of the project are to be paid \1/2\ from amounts 
        appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury and \1/2\ 
        from amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund.
          (23) Riverside oxbow, fort worth, texas.--
                  (A) In general.--The project for environmental 
                restoration, Riverside Oxbow, Fort Worth, Texas: Report 
                of the Chief of Engineers dated May 29, 2003, at a 
                total cost of $25,200,000, with an estimated Federal 
                cost of $10,400,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
                of $14,800,000.
                  (B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the 
                non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost 
                of design and construction work carried out on the 
                Beach Street Dam and associated features by the non-
                Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
                agreement for the project if the Secretary determines 
                that the work is integral to the project.
          (24) Deep creek, chesapeake, virginia.--The project for the 
        Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Bridge Replacement, Deep Creek, 
        Chesapeake, Virginia: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated 
        March 3, 2003, at a Federal cost of $35,573,000.
          (25) Chehalis river, centralia, washington.--
                  (A) In general.--The project for flood damage 
                reduction, Chehalis River, Centralia, Washington: 
                Report of the Chief of Engineers dated September 27, 
                2004, at a total cost of $109,850,000, with an 
                estimated Federal cost of $66,425,000 and an estimated 
                non-Federal cost of $43,425,000.
                  (B) Credit.--The Secretary shall--
                          (i) credit up to $6,500,000 toward the non-
                        Federal share of the cost of the project for 
                        the cost of planning and design work carried 
                        out by the non-Federal interest in accordance 
                        with the project study plan dated November 28, 
                        1999; and
                          (ii) credit toward the non-Federal share of 
                        the cost of the project the cost of design and 
                        construction work carried out by the non-
                        Federal interest before the date of the 
                        partnership agreement for the project if the 
                        Secretary determines that the work is integral 
                        to the project.
                  (C) Additional flood storage at skookumchuck dam.--
                The Secretary shall integrate into the project the 
                locally preferred plan to provide an additional 9,000 
                acre-feet of storage capacity at Skookumchuck Dam, 
                Washington, upon a determination by the Secretary that 
                providing such additional storage capacity is feasible.

SEC. 1002. SMALL PROJECTS FOR FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is 
feasible, may carry out the project under section 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s):
          (1) Haleyville, alabama.--Project for flood damage reduction, 
        Haleyville, Alabama.
          (2) Weiss lake, alabama.--Project for flood damage reduction, 
        Weiss Lake, Alabama.
          (3) Chino valley wash, arizona.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Chino Valley Wash, Arizona.
          (4) Little colorado river levee, arizona.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Little Colorado River Levee, Arizona.
          (5) Cache river basin, grubbs, arkansas.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Cache River Basin, Grubbs, Arkansas.
          (6) Barrel springs wash, palmdale, california.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Barrel Springs Wash, Palmdale, 
        California.
          (7) Borrego springs, california.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Borrego Springs, California.
          (8) Colton, california.--Project for flood damage reduction, 
        Colton, California.
          (9) Dunlap stream, san bernardino, california.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Dunlap Stream, San Bernardino, 
        California.
          (10) Hunts canyon wash, palmdale, california.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Hunts Canyon Wash, Palmdale, 
        California.
          (11) Wildwood creek, yucaipa, california.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Wildwood Creek, Yucaipa, California.
          (12) Utica and vicinity, illinois.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Utica and vicinity, Illinois.
          (13) Des moines and raccoon rivers, iowa.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Des Moines and Raccoon Rivers, Iowa.
          (14) Peabody, massachusetts.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Peabody, Massachusetts.
          (15) Salem, massachusetts.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Salem, Massachusetts.
          (16) Cass river, michigan.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Cass River, Vassar and vicinity, Michigan.
          (17) Crow river, rockford, minnesota.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Crow River, Rockford, Minnesota.
          (18) Itasca county, minnesota.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Trout Lake and Canisteo Pit, Itasca County, 
        Minnesota.
          (19) Marsh creek, minnesota.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Marsh Creek, Minnesota.
          (20) Roseau river, roseau, minnesota.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Roseau River, Roseau, Minnesota.
          (21) South branch of the wild rice river, borup, minnesota.--
        Project for flood damage reduction, South Branch of the Wild 
        Rice River, Borup, Minnesota.
          (22) Blacksnake creek, st. joseph, missouri.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Blacksnake Creek, St. Joseph, Missouri.
          (23) Cannisteo river, addison, new york.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Cannisteo River, Addison, New York.
          (24) Cohocton river, campbell, new york.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Cohocton River, Campbell, New York.
          (25) East river, silver beach, new york city, new york.--
        Project for flood damage reduction, East River, Silver Beach, 
        New York City, New York.
          (26) East valley creek, andover, new york.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, East Valley Creek, Andover, New York.
          (27) Sunnyside brook, westchester county, new york.--Project 
        for flood damage reduction, Sunnyside Brook, Westchester 
        County, New York.
          (28) Little yankee run, ohio.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Little Yankee Run, Ohio.
          (29) Little neshaminy creek, warrenton, pennsylvania.--
        Project for flood damage reduction, Little Neshaminy Creek, 
        Warrenton, Pennsylvania.
          (30) Southampton creek watershed, southampton, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for flood damage reduction, Southampton 
        Creek watershed, Southampton, Pennsylvania.
          (31) Spring creek, lower macungie township, pennsylvania.--
        Project for flood damage reduction, Spring Creek, Lower 
        Macungie Township, Pennsylvania.
          (32) Yardley aqueduct, silver and brock creeks, yardley, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for flood damage reduction, Yardley 
        Aqueduct, Silver and Brock Creeks, Yardley, Pennsylvania.
          (33) Surfside beach, south carolina.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Surfside Beach and vicinity, South Carolina.
          (34) Congelosi ditch, missouri city, texas.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Congelosi Ditch, Missouri City, Texas.
          (35) Dilley, texas.--Project for flood damage reduction, 
        Dilley, Texas.
  (b) Special Rules.--
          (1) Cache river basin, grubbs, arkansas.--The Secretary may 
        proceed with the project for the Cache River Basin, Grubbs, 
        Arkansas, referred to in subsection (a)(5), notwithstanding 
        that the project is located within the boundaries of the flood 
        control project, Cache River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri, 
        authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950, (64 
        Stat. 172) and modified by section 99 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 41).
          (2) Wildwood creek, yucaipa, california.--The Secretary shall 
        review the locally prepared plan for the project for flood 
        damage, Wildwood Creek, California, referred to in subsection 
        (a)(11) and, if the Secretary determines that the plan meets 
        the evaluation and design standards of the Corps of Engineers 
        and that the plan is feasible, the Secretary may use the plan 
        to carry out the project and shall provide credit toward the 
        non-Federal share of the cost of the project for the cost of 
        work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of 
        the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
        determines that the work is integral to the project.
          (3) Borup, minnesota.--In carrying out the project for flood 
        damage reduction, South Branch of the Wild Rice River, Borup, 
        Minnesota, referred to in subsection (a)(21) the Secretary may 
        consider national ecosystem restoration benefits in determining 
        the Federal interest in the project and shall allow the non-
        Federal interest to participate in the financing of the project 
        in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the extent that the 
        Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying such section is 
        necessary to implement the project.
          (4) Itasca county, minnesota.--In carrying out the project 
        for flood damage reduction, Itasca County, Minnesota, referred 
        to in subsection (a)(18) the Secretary may consider national 
        ecosystem restoration benefits in determining the Federal 
        interest in the project.
          (5) Dilley, texas.--The Secretary shall carry out the project 
        for flood damage reduction, Dilley, Texas, referred to in 
        subsection (a)(35) if the Secretary determines that the project 
        is feasible.

SEC. 1003. SMALL PROJECTS FOR EMERGENCY STREAMBANK PROTECTION.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 
1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r):
          (1) Ouachita and black rivers, arkansas and louisiana.--
        Projects for emergency streambank protection, Ouachita and 
        Black Rivers, Arkansas and Louisiana.
          (2) Franklin point park, anne arundel county, maryland.--
        Project for emergency streambank protection, Franklin Point 
        Park, Anne Arundel County, Maryland.
          (3) Mayo beach park, anne arundel county, maryland.--Project 
        for emergency streambank protection, Mayo Beach Park, Anne 
        Arundel County, Maryland.
          (4) Piney point lighthouse, st. mary's county, maryland.--
        Project for emergency streambank protection, Piney Point 
        Lighthouse, St. Mary's County, Maryland.
          (5) St. joseph harbor, michigan.--Project for emergency 
        streambank protection, St. Joseph Harbor, Michigan.
          (6) Pug hole lake, minnesota.--Project for emergency 
        streambank protection, Pug Hole Lake, Minnesota.
          (7) Middle fork grand river, gentry county, missouri.--
        Project for emergency streambank protection, Middle Fork Grand 
        River, Gentry County, Missouri.
          (8) Platte river, platte city, missouri.--Project for 
        emergency streambank protection, Platte River, Platte City, 
        Missouri.
          (9) Rush creek, parkville, missouri.--Project for emergency 
        streambank protection, Rush Creek, Parkville, Missouri, 
        including measures to address degradation of the creek bed.
          (10) Keuka lake, hammondsport, new york.--Project for 
        emergency streambank protection, Keuka Lake, Hammondsport, New 
        York.
          (11) Kowawese unique area and hudson river, new windsor, new 
        york.--Project for emergency streambank protection, Kowawese 
        Unique Area and Hudson River, New Windsor, New York.
          (12) Howard road outfall, shelby county, tennessee.--Project 
        for emergency streambank protection, Howard Road outfall, 
        Shelby County, Tennessee.
          (13) Mitch farm ditch and lateral d, shelby county, 
        tennessee.--Project for emergency streambank protection, Mitch 
        Farm Ditch and Lateral D, Shelby County, Tennessee.
          (14) Wolf river tributaries, shelby county, tennessee.--
        Project for emergency streambank protection, Wolf River 
        tributaries, Shelby County, Tennessee.
          (15) Johnson creek, arlington, texas.--Project for emergency 
        streambank protection, Johnson Creek, Arlington, Texas.
          (16) Wells river, newbury, vermont.--Project for emergency 
        streambank protection, Wells River, Newbury, Vermont.

SEC. 1004. SMALL PROJECTS FOR NAVIGATION.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is 
feasible, may carry out the project under section 107 of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577):
          (1) Blytheville county harbor, arkansas.--Project for 
        navigation, Blytheville County Harbor, Arkansas.
          (2) Mahukona beach park, hawaii.--Project for navigation, 
        Mahukona Beach Park, Hawaii.
          (3) North kohala harbor, hawaii.--Project for navigation, 
        North Kohala Harbor in the vicinity of Kailua Kona, Hawaii.
          (4) Wailoa small boat harbor, hawaii.--Project for 
        navigation, Wailoa Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii.
          (5) Mississippi river ship channel, louisiana.--Project for 
        navigation, Mississippi River Ship Channel, Louisiana.
          (6) Port tobacco river and goose creek, maryland.--Project 
        for navigation, Port Tobacco River and Goose Creek, Maryland.
          (7) St. jerome creek, st. mary's county, maryland.--Project 
        for navigation, St. Jerome Creek, St. Mary's County, Maryland.
          (8) East basin, cape cod canal, sandwich, massachusetts.--
        Project for navigation, East Basin, Cape Cod Canal, Sandwich, 
        Massachusetts.
          (9) Lynn harbor, lynn, massachusetts.--Project for 
        navigation, Lynn Harbor, Lynn, Massachusetts.
          (10) Merrimack river, haverhill, massachusetts.--Project for 
        navigation, Merrimack River, Haverhill, Massachusetts.
          (11) Oak bluffs harbor, oak bluffs, massachusetts.--Project 
        for navigation, Oak Bluffs Harbor, Oak Bluffs, Massachusetts.
          (12) Woods hole great harbor, falmouth, massachusetts.--
        Project for navigation, Woods Hole Great Harbor, Falmouth, 
        Massachusetts.
          (13) Au sable river, michigan.--Project for navigation, Au 
        Sable River in the vicinity of Oscoda, Michigan.
          (14) Traverse city harbor, traverse city, michigan.--Project 
        for navigation, Traverse City Harbor, Traverse City, Michigan.
  (b) Special Rules.--
          (1) Blytheville county harbor, arkansas.--The Secretary shall 
        carry out the project for navigation, Blytheville County 
        Harbor, Arkansas, referred to in subsection (a)(1) if the 
        Secretary determines that the project is feasible.
          (2) Traverse city harbor, traverse city, michigan.--The 
        Secretary shall review the locally prepared plan for the 
        project for navigation, Traverse City Harbor, Michigan, 
        referred to in subsection (a)(14), and, if the Secretary 
        determines that the plan meets the evaluation and design 
        standards of the Corps of Engineers and that the plan is 
        feasible, the Secretary may use the plan to carry out the 
        project and shall provide credit toward the non-Federal share 
        of the cost of the project for the cost of work carried out by 
        the non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
        agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that the 
        work is integral to the project.

SEC. 1005. SMALL PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE QUALITY OF THE 
                    ENVIRONMENT.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is 
appropriate, may carry out the project under section 1135 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a):
          (1) Ballona creek, los angeles county, california.--Project 
        for improvement of the quality of the environment, Ballona 
        Creek, Los Angeles County, California.
          (2) Ballona lagoon tide gates, marina del rey, california.--
        Project for improvement of the quality of the environment, 
        Ballona Lagoon Tide Gates, Marina Del Rey, California.
          (3) Rathbun lake, iowa.--Project for improvement of the 
        quality of the environment, Rathbun Lake, Iowa.
          (4) Smithville lake, missouri.--Project for improvement of 
        the quality of the environment, Smithville Lake, Missouri.
          (5) Delaware bay, new jersey and delaware.--Project for 
        improvement of the quality of the environment, Delaware Bay, 
        New Jersey and Delaware, for the purpose of oyster restoration.
          (6) Tioga-hammond lakes, pennsylvania.--Project for 
        improvement of the quality of the environment, Tioga-Hammond 
        Lakes, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 1006. SMALL PROJECTS FOR AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is 
appropriate, may carry out the project under section 206 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330):
          (1) Cypress creek, montgomery, alabama.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Cypress Creek, Montgomery, Alabama.
          (2) Ben lomond dam, santa cruz, california.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Ben Lomond Dam, Santa Cruz, 
        California.
          (3) Dockweiler bluffs, los angeles county, california.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Dockweiler Bluffs, 
        Los Angeles County, California.
          (4) Salt river, california.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Salt River, California.
          (5) Santa rosa creek, santa rosa, california.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Santa Rosa Creek in the vicinity 
        of the Prince Memorial Greenway, Santa Rosa, California.
          (6) Stockton deep water ship channel and lower san joaquin 
        river, california.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
        Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel and lower San Joaquin River, 
        California.
          (7) Sweetwater reservoir, san diego county, california.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Sweetwater 
        Reservoir, San Diego County, California, including efforts to 
        address invasive aquatic plant species.
          (8) Bayou texar, pensacola, florida.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Bayou Texar, Pensacola, Florida.
          (9) Biscayne bay, florida.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Biscayne Bay, Key Biscayne, Florida.
          (10) Clam bayou and dinkins bayou, sanibel island, florida.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Clam Bayou and 
        Dinkins Bayou, Sanibel Island, Florida.
          (11) Destin harbor, florida.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Destin Harbor, Florida.
          (12) Chattahoochee fall line, georgia and alabama.--Project 
        for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Chattahoochee Fall Line, 
        Georgia and Alabama.
          (13) Longwood cove, gainesville, georgia.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Longwood Cove, Gainesville, 
        Georgia.
          (14) City park, university lakes, louisiana.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, City Park, University Lakes, 
        Louisiana.
          (15) Mill pond, littleton, massachusetts.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Mill Pond, Littleton, 
        Massachusetts.
          (16) Pine tree brook, milton, massachusetts.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Pine Tree Brook, Milton, 
        Massachusetts.
          (17) Kalamazoo river watershed, battle creek, michigan.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Kalamazoo River 
        watershed, Battle Creek, Michigan.
          (18) Rush lake, minnesota.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Rush Lake, Minnesota.
          (19) South fork of the crow river, hutchinson, minnesota.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, South Fork of the 
        Crow River, Hutchinson, Minnesota.
          (20) St. louis county, missouri.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, St. Louis County, Missouri.
          (21) Truckee river, reno, nevada.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Truckee River, Reno, Nevada, including 
        features for fish passage.
          (22) Grover's mill pond, new jersey.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Grover's Mill Pond, New Jersey.
          (23) Dugway creek, bratenahl, ohio.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Dugway Creek, Bratenahl, Ohio.
          (24) Johnson creek, gresham, oregon.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Johnson Creek, Gresham, Oregon.
          (25) Beaver creek, beaver and salem, pennsylvania.--Project 
        for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Beaver Creek, Beaver and 
        Salem, Pennsylvania.
          (26) Cementon dam, lehigh river, pennsylvania.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Cementon Dam, Lehigh River, 
        Pennsylvania.
          (27) Delaware river, philadelphia naval shipyard, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
        Delaware River in the vicinity of the Philadelphia Naval 
        Shipyard, Pennsylvania.
          (28) Saucon creek, northampton county, pennsylvania.--Project 
        for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Saucon Creek, Northampton 
        County, Pennsylvania.
          (29) Blackstone river, rhode island.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Blackstone River, Rhode Island.
          (30) Wilson branch, cheraw, south carolina.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Wilson Branch, Cheraw, South 
        Carolina.
          (31) White river, bethel, vermont.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, White River, Bethel, Vermont.

SEC. 1007. SMALL PROJECTS FOR SHORELINE PROTECTION.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act 
authorizing Federal participation in the cost of protecting the shores 
of publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 
426g):
          (1) Nelson lagoon, alaska.--Project for shoreline protection, 
        Nelson Lagoon, Alaska.
          (2) Sanibel island, florida.--Project for shoreline 
        protection, Sanibel Island, Florida.
          (3) Apra harbor, guam.--Project for shoreline protection, 
        Apra Harbor, Guam.
          (4) Piti, cabras island, guam.--Project for shoreline 
        protection, Piti, Cabras Island, Guam.
          (5) Narrows and gravesend bay, upper new york bay, brooklyn, 
        new york.--Project for shoreline protection in the vicinity of 
        the confluence of the Narrows and Gravesend Bay, Upper New York 
        Bay, Brooklyn, New York.
          (6) Delaware river, philadelphia naval shipyard, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for shoreline protection, Delaware River 
        in the vicinity of the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, 
        Pennsylvania.
          (7) Port aransas, texas.--Project for shoreline protection, 
        Port Aransas, Texas.

SEC. 1008. SMALL PROJECTS FOR SNAGGING AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study for the following project and, if 
the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, the Secretary 
may carry out the project under section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 
August 28, 1937 (33 U.S.C. 701g): Project for removal of snags and 
clearing and straightening of channels for flood control, Kowawese 
Unique Area and Hudson River, New Windsor, New York.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

SEC. 2001. NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTIONS.

  Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2213) is amended by adding at the end the following:
  ``(n) Non-Federal Contributions.--
          ``(1) Prohibition on solicitation of excess contributions.--
        The Secretary may not solicit contributions from non-Federal 
        interests for costs of constructing authorized water resources 
        development projects or measures in excess of the non-Federal 
        share assigned to the appropriate project purposes listed in 
        subsections (a), (b), and (c) or condition Federal 
        participation in such projects or measures on the receipt of 
        such contributions.
          ``(2) Limitation on statutory construction.--Nothing in this 
        subsection shall be construed to affect the Secretary's 
        authority under section 903(c) of this Act.''.

SEC. 2002. HARBOR COST SHARING.

  (a) Payments During Construction.--Section 101(a)(1) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211(a)(1); 100 Stat. 
4082) is amended in each of subparagraphs (B) and (C) by striking ``45 
feet'' and inserting ``53 feet''.
  (b) Operation and Maintenance.--Section 101(b)(1) of such Act (33 
U.S.C. 2211(b)(1)) is amended by striking ``45 feet'' and inserting 
``53 feet''.
  (c) Definitions.--Section 214 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 2241; 100 Stat. 
4108) is amended in each of paragraphs (1) and (3) by striking ``45 
feet'' and inserting ``53 feet''.
  (d) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsections (a), (b), and 
(c) shall apply only to a project, or separable element of a project, 
on which a contract for physical construction has not been awarded 
before October 1, 2003.
  (e) Revision of Partnership Agreement.--The Secretary shall revise 
any partnership agreement entered into after October 1, 2003, for any 
project to which the amendments made by subsections (a), (b), and (c) 
apply to take into account the change in non-Federal participation in 
the project as a result of such amendments.

SEC. 2003. FUNDING TO PROCESS PERMITS.

  Section 214 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 
2201 note; 114 Stat. 2594; 117 Stat. 1836) is amended--
          (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``In fiscal years 2001 
        through 2005, the'' and inserting ``The''; and
          (2) by adding at the end the following:
  ``(c) Duration of Authority.--The authority provided under this 
section shall be in effect from October 1, 2000, through December 31, 
2007.''.

SEC. 2004. NATIONAL SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT AND 
                    DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.

  (a) Extension of Program.--Section 5(a) of the Act entitled ``An Act 
authorizing Federal participation in the cost of protecting the shores 
of publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 
426h(a)), is amended by striking ``6 years'' and inserting ``10 
years''.
  (b) Extension of Planning, Design, and Construction Phase.--Section 
5(b)(1)(A) of such Act (33 U.S.C. 426h(b)(1)(A)) is amended by striking 
``3 years'' and inserting ``6 years''.
  (c) Cost Sharing; Removal of Projects.--Section 5(b) of such Act (33 
U.S.C. 426h(b)) is amended--
          (1) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as paragraphs (5) 
        and (6), respectively; and
          (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:
          ``(3) Cost sharing.--The Secretary may enter into a cost 
        sharing agreement with a non-Federal interest to carry out a 
        project, or a phase of a project, under the erosion control 
        program in cooperation with the non-Federal interest.
          ``(4) Removal of projects.--The Secretary may pay all or a 
        portion of the costs of removing a project, or an element of a 
        project, constructed under the erosion control program if the 
        Secretary determines during the term of the program that the 
        project or element is detrimental to the environment, private 
        property, or public safety.''.
  (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 5(e)(2) of such Act (33 
U.S.C. 426h(e)(2)) is amended by striking ``$21,000,000'' and inserting 
``$31,000,000''.

SEC. 2005. SMALL SHORE AND BEACH RESTORATION AND PROTECTION PROJECTS.

  Section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing Federal 
participation in the cost of protecting the shores of publicly owned 
property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g), is amended by 
striking ``$3,000,000'' and inserting ``$5,000,000''.

SEC. 2006. WRITTEN AGREEMENT FOR WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS.

  (a) Partnership Agreements.--Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b) is amended--
          (1) in subsection (a)--
                  (A) by striking ``under the provisions'' and all that 
                follows through ``under any other'' and inserting 
                ``under any'';
                  (B) by striking ``to furnish its required cooperation 
                for'' and inserting ``under which each party agrees to 
                carry out its responsibilities and requirements for 
                implementation or construction of''; and
                  (C) by inserting after ``$25,000.'' the following: 
                ``Such agreement may include a provision for damages in 
                the event of a failure of one or more parties to 
                perform.'';
          (2) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and
          (3) by inserting after subsection (d) the following:
  ``(e) Limitation.--Nothing in subsection (a) shall be construed as 
limiting the authority of the Secretary to ensure that an agreement 
under this section meets all requirements of law and policies of the 
Secretary in effect on the date of entry into the agreement.''.
  (b) Local Cooperation.--Section 912(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (101 Stat. 4190) is amended--
          (1) in paragraph (2)--
                  (A) by striking ``shall'' the first place it appears 
                and inserting ``may''; and
                  (B) by striking the last sentence; and
          (2) in paragraph (4)--
                  (A) by inserting after ``injunction, for'' the 
                following: ``payment of damages or, for'';
                  (B) by striking ``to collect a civil penalty imposed 
                under this section,''; and
                  (C) by striking ``any civil penalty imposed under 
                this section,'' and inserting ``any damages,''.
  (c) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) 
only apply to partnership agreements entered into after the date of 
enactment of this Act; except that at the request of a non-Federal 
interest for a project, the district engineer for the district in which 
the project is located may amend a project partnership agreement 
entered into on or before such date and under which construction on the 
project has not been initiated as of such date of enactment for the 
purpose of incorporating such amendments.
  (d) Partnership and Cooperative Arrangements.--
          (1) In general.--A goal of agreements entered into under 
        section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
        5(b)) shall be to further partnership and cooperative 
        arrangements, and the agreements shall be referred to as 
        ``partnership agreements''.
          (2) References to cooperation agreements.--Any reference in a 
        law, regulation, document, or other paper of the United States 
        to a cooperation agreement or project cooperation agreement 
        shall be considered to be a reference to a partnership 
        agreement or a project partnership agreement, respectively.
          (3) References to partnership agreements.--Any reference to a 
        partnership agreement or project partnership agreement in this 
        Act (other than this section) shall be considered as a 
        reference to a cooperation agreement or a project cooperation 
        agreement, respectively.
  (e) Delegation of Authority.--Not later than September 30, 2006, the 
Secretary shall issue policies and guidelines for partnership 
agreements that delegate to the district engineers, at a minimum--
          (1) the authority to approve any policy in a partnership 
        agreement that has appeared in an agreement previously approved 
        by the Secretary;
          (2) the authority to approve any policy in a partnership 
        agreement the specific terms of which are dictated by law, or 
        by a final feasibility study, final environmental impact 
        statement, or other final decision document for a water 
        resources development project;
          (3) the authority to approve any partnership agreement that 
        complies with the policies and guidelines issued by the 
        Secretary; and
          (4) the authority to sign any partnership agreement for any 
        water resources development project unless, within 30 days of 
        the date of authorization of the project, the Secretary 
        notifies the district engineer in which the project will be 
        carried out that the Secretary wishes to retain the prerogative 
        to sign the partnership agreement for that project.
  (f) Report to Congress.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
enactment of this Act, and every year thereafter, the Secretary shall 
submit to Congress a report detailing the following:
          (1) the number of partnership agreements signed by district 
        engineers and the number of partnership agreements signed by 
        the Secretary, and
          (2) for any partnership agreement signed by the Secretary, an 
        explanation of why delegation to the district engineer was not 
        appropriate.
  (g) Public Availability.--Not later than the 120th day following the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Chief of Engineers shall ensure that 
each district engineer has made available on the Internet all 
partnership agreements entered into under section 221 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5(b)) within the preceding 10 
years and all partnership agreements for water resources development 
projects currently being carried out in that district and shall make 
any partnership agreements entered into after such date of enactment 
available on the Internet within 7 days of the date on which such 
agreement is entered into.

SEC. 2007. ASSISTANCE FOR REMEDIATION, RESTORATION, AND REUSE.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide to State and local 
governments assessment, planning, and design assistance for 
remediation, environmental restoration, or reuse of areas located 
within the boundaries of such State or local governments where such 
remediation, environmental restoration, or reuse will contribute to the 
improvement of water quality or the conservation of water and related 
resources of drainage basins and watersheds within the United States.
  (b) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
assistance provided under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent.
  (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2006 through 2010.

SEC. 2008. COMPILATION OF LAWS.

  Within one year after the date of enactment of this Act, the laws of 
the United States relating to the improvement of rivers and harbors, 
flood control, beach erosion, and other water resources development 
enacted after November 8, 1966, and before January 1, 2006, shall be 
compiled under the direction of the Secretary and the Chief of 
Engineers and printed for the use of the Department of the Army, 
Congress, and the general public. The Secretary shall reprint the 
volumes containing such laws enacted before November 8, 1966. In 
addition, the Secretary shall include an index in each volume so 
compiled or reprinted. Not later than December 1, 2006, the Secretary 
shall transmit at least 25 copies of each such volume to the Committee 
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 
and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate. The 
Secretary shall also ensure that such compilations are available 
through electronic means, including the Internet.

SEC. 2009. DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL.

  Section 217 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 
2326a; 110 Stat. 3694-3696) is amended--
          (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d);
          (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
  ``(c) Governmental Partnerships.--
          ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may enter into cost sharing 
        agreements with one or more non-Federal public interests with 
        respect to a project, or group of projects within a geographic 
        region if appropriate, for the acquisition, design, 
        construction, management, or operation of a dredged material 
        processing, treatment, contaminant reduction, or disposal 
        facility (including any facility used to demonstrate potential 
        beneficial uses of dredged material, which may include 
        effective sediment contaminant reduction technologies) using 
        funds provided in whole or in part by the Federal Government. 
        One or more of the parties of the agreement may perform the 
        acquisition, design, construction, management, or operation of 
        a dredged material processing, treatment, or disposal facility. 
        If appropriate, the Secretary may combine portions of separate 
        construction or maintenance appropriations from separate 
        Federal projects with the appropriate combined cost sharing 
        between the various projects when the facility serves to manage 
        dredged material from multiple Federal projects located in the 
        geographic region of the facility.
          ``(2) Public financing.--
                  ``(A) Agreements.--
                          ``(i) Specified federal funding sources and 
                        cost sharing.--The cost-sharing agreement used 
                        shall clearly specify the Federal funding 
                        sources and combined cost sharing when 
                        applicable to multiple Federal navigation 
                        projects and the responsibilities and risks of 
                        each of the parties related to present and 
                        future dredged material managed by the 
                        facility.
                          ``(ii) Management of sediments.--The cost-
                        sharing agreement may include the management of 
                        sediments from the maintenance dredging of 
                        Federal navigation projects that do not have 
                        partnership agreements. The cost-sharing 
                        agreement may allow the non-Federal sponsor to 
                        receive reimbursable payments from the Federal 
                        Government for commitments made by the sponsor 
                        for disposal or placement capacity at dredged 
                        material treatment, processing, contaminant 
                        reduction, or disposal facilities.
                          ``(iii) Credit.--The cost-sharing agreement 
                        may allow costs incurred prior to execution of 
                        a partnership agreement for construction or the 
                        purchase of equipment or capacity for the 
                        project to be credited according to existing 
                        cost-sharing rules.
                  ``(B) Credit.--Nothing in this subsection supersedes 
                or modifies existing agreements between the Federal 
                Government and any non-Federal sponsors for the cost 
                sharing, construction, and operation and maintenance of 
                Federal navigation projects. Subject to the approval of 
                the Secretary and in accordance with existing laws, 
                regulations, and policies, a non-Federal public sponsor 
                of a Federal navigation project may seek credit for 
                funds provided in the acquisition, design, 
                construction, management, or operation of a dredged 
                material processing, treatment, or disposal facility to 
                the extent the facility is used to manage dredged 
                material from the Federal navigation project. The non-
                Federal sponsor shall be responsible for providing all 
                necessary lands, easements, rights-of-way, or 
                relocations associated with the facility and shall 
                receive credit for these items.''; and
          (3) in each of subsections (d)(1) and (d)(2)(A), as so 
        redesignated--
                  (A) by inserting ``and maintenance'' after 
                ``operation''; and
                  (B) by inserting ``processing, treatment, or'' after 
                ``dredged material'' the first place it appears.

SEC. 2010. WETLANDS MITIGATION.

  In carrying out a water resources project that involves wetlands 
mitigation and that has impacts that occur within the service area of a 
mitigation bank, the Secretary, to the maximum extent practicable and 
where appropriate, shall give preference to the use of the mitigation 
bank if the bank contains sufficient available credits to offset the 
impact and the bank is approved in accordance with the Federal Guidance 
for the Establishment, Use and Operation of Mitigation Banks (60 Fed. 
Reg. 58605) or other applicable Federal law (including regulations).

SEC. 2011. REMOTE AND SUBSISTENCE HARBORS.

  (a) In General.--In conducting a study of harbor and navigation 
improvements, the Secretary may recommend a project without the need to 
demonstrate that the project is justified solely by national economic 
development benefits if the Secretary determines that--
          (1)(A) the community to be served by the project is at least 
        70 miles from the nearest surface accessible commercial port 
        and has no direct rail or highway link to another community 
        served by a surface accessible port or harbor; or
          (B) the project would be located in the Commonwealth of 
        Puerto Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 
        Islands, or American Samoa;
          (2) the harbor is economically critical such that over 80 
        percent of the goods transported through the harbor would be 
        consumed within the community served by the harbor and 
        navigation improvement; and
          (3) the long-term viability of the community would be 
        threatened without the harbor and navigation improvement.
  (b) Justification.--In considering whether to recommend a project 
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider the benefits of the 
project to--
          (1) public health and safety of the local community, 
        including access to facilities designed to protect public 
        health and safety;
          (2) access to natural resources for subsistence purposes;
          (3) local and regional economic opportunities;
          (4) welfare of the local population; and
          (5) social and cultural value to the community.

SEC. 2012. BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL.

  (a) In General.--Section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326) is amended by striking subsections (c) through 
(g) and inserting the following:
  ``(c) In General.--The Secretary may carry out projects to transport 
and place sediment obtained in connection with the construction, 
operation, or maintenance of an authorized water resources project at 
locations selected by a non-Federal entity for use in the construction, 
repair, or rehabilitation of projects determined by the Secretary to be 
in the public interest and associated with navigation, flood damage 
reduction, hydroelectric power, municipal and industrial water supply, 
agricultural water supply, recreation, hurricane and storm damage 
reduction, aquatic plant control, and environmental protection and 
restoration.
  ``(d) Cooperative Agreement.--Any project undertaken pursuant to this 
section shall be initiated only after non-Federal interests have 
entered into an agreement with the Secretary in which the non-Federal 
interests agree to pay the non-Federal share of the cost of 
construction of the project and 100 percent of the cost of operation, 
maintenance, replacement, and rehabilitation of the project in 
accordance with section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213).
  ``(e) Special Rule.--Construction of a project under subsection (a) 
for one or more of the purposes of protection, restoration, or creation 
of aquatic and ecologically related habitat, the cost of which does not 
exceed $750,000 and which will be located in a disadvantaged community 
as determined by the Secretary, may be carried out at Federal expense.
  ``(f) Determination of Construction Costs.--Costs associated with 
construction of a project under this section shall be limited solely to 
construction costs that are in excess of those costs necessary to carry 
out the dredging for construction, operation, or maintenance of the 
authorized water resources project in the most cos- effective way, 
consistent with economic, engineering, and environmental criteria.
  ``(g) Selection of Sediment Disposal Method.--In developing and 
carrying out a water resources project involving the disposal of 
sediment, the Secretary may select, with the consent of the non-Federal 
interest, a disposal method that is not the least cost option if the 
Secretary determines that the incremental costs of such disposal method 
are reasonable in relation to the environmental benefits, including the 
benefits to the aquatic environment to be derived from the creation of 
wetlands and control of shoreline erosion. The Federal share of such 
incremental costs shall be determined in accordance with subsections 
(d) and (f).
  ``(h) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), for any project carried out 
under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a nonprofit 
entity, with the consent of the affected local government.
  ``(i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $30,000,000 annually for projects under this section of 
which not more than $3,000,000 annually may be used for construction of 
projects described in subsection (e). Such sums shall remain available 
until expended.
  ``(j) Regional Sediment Management Planning.--In consultation with 
appropriate State and Federal agencies, the Secretary may develop, at 
Federal expense, plans for regional management of sediment obtained in 
conjunction with the construction, operation, or maintenance of water 
resources projects, including potential beneficial uses of sediment for 
construction, repair, or rehabilitation of public projects for 
navigation, flood damage reduction, hydroelectric power, municipal and 
industrial water supply, agricultural water supply, recreation, 
hurricane and storm damage reduction, aquatic plant control, and 
environmental protection and restoration.
  ``(k) Use of Funds.--
          ``(1) Non-federal interest.--The non-Federal interest for a 
        project described in this section may use, and the Secretary 
        shall accept, funds provided under any other Federal program, 
        to satisfy, in whole or in part, the non-Federal share of the 
        cost of such project if such funds are authorized to be used to 
        carry out such project.
          ``(2) Other federal agencies.--The non-Federal share of the 
        cost of construction of a project under this section may be met 
        through contributions from a Federal agency made directly to 
        the Secretary, with the consent of the affected local 
        government, if such funds are authorized to be used to carry 
        out such project. Before initiating a project to which this 
        paragraph applies, the Secretary shall enter into an agreement 
        with a non-Federal interest in which the non-Federal interest 
        agrees to pay 100 percent of the cost of operation, 
        maintenance, replacement, and rehabilitation of the project.''.
  (b) Repeal.--
          (1) In general.--Section 145 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j) is repealed.
          (2) Hold harmless.--The repeal made by paragraph (1) shall 
        not affect the authority of the Secretary to complete any 
        project being carried out under such section 145 on the day 
        before the date of enactment of this Act.
  (c) Priority Areas.--In carrying out section 204 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326), the Secretary shall 
give priority to the following:
          (1) A project at Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, Arkansas.
          (2) A project at Egmont Key, Florida.
          (3) A project in the vicinity of Calcasieu Ship Channel, 
        Louisiana.
          (4) A project in the vicinity of the Smith Point Park 
        Pavilion and the TWA Flight 800 Memorial, Brookhaven, New York.
          (5) A project in the vicinity of Morehead City, North 
        Carolina.
          (6) A project in the vicinity of Galveston Bay, Texas.

SEC. 2013. COST-SHARING PROVISIONS FOR CERTAIN AREAS.

  Section 1156 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2310; 100 Stat. 4256) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 1156. COST-SHARING PROVISIONS FOR CERTAIN AREAS.

  ``(a) In General.--The Secretary shall waive local cost-sharing 
requirements up to $500,000 for all studies and projects in the 
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of 
the Northern Mariana Islands, and the United States Virgin Islands, in 
Indian country (as defined in section 1151 of title 18, United States 
Code, and including lands that are within the jurisdictional area of an 
Oklahoma Indian tribe, as determined by the Secretary of the Interior, 
and are recognized by the Secretary of the Interior as eligible for 
trust land status under part 151 of title 25, Code of Federal 
Regulations) or on land in the State of Alaska owned by an Alaska 
Native Regional Corporation or an Alaska Native Village Corporation (as 
those terms are defined in the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 
U.S.C. 1601 et seq.)) or the Metlakatla Indian community.
  ``(b) Use of Funds.--The non-Federal interest for a study or project 
for an area described in subsection (a) may use, and the Secretary 
shall accept, funds provided under any other Federal program, to 
satisfy, in whole or in part, the non-Federal share of such study or 
project if such funds are authorized to be used to carry out such study 
or project.''.

SEC. 2014. REVISION OF PROJECT PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT.

  Upon authorization by law of an increase in the maximum amount of 
Federal funds that may be allocated for a project or an increase in the 
total cost of a project authorized to be carried out by the Secretary, 
the Secretary shall revise the project partnership agreement for the 
project to take into account the change in Federal participation in the 
project.

SEC. 2015. COST SHARING.

  An increase in the maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
allocated for a project or an increase in the total cost of a project 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary shall not affect any 
cost-sharing requirement applicable to the project under title I of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211 et seq.).

SEC. 2016. CREDIT FOR WORK PERFORMED BEFORE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT.

  If the Secretary is authorized to credit toward the non-Federal share 
the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the 
date of the partnership agreement for the project and such work has not 
been carried out as of the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
shall enter into an agreement with the non-Federal interest for the 
project under which the non-Federal interest shall carry out such work, 
and the credit shall apply only to work carried out under the 
agreement.

SEC. 2017. RECREATION USER FEE REVENUES.

  Section 225 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
297-298) is amended--
          (1) in subsection (a)(1)--
                  (A) by striking ``During fiscal years 1999 through 
                2002, the'' and inserting ``The''; and
                  (B) by striking ``$34,000,000'' and inserting 
                ``$42,000,000''; and
          (2) in subsection (a)(3) by striking ``September 30, 2005'' 
        and inserting ``expended''.

SEC. 2018. EXPEDITED ACTIONS FOR EMERGENCY FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION.

  The Secretary shall expedite any authorized planning, design, and 
construction of any project for flood damage reduction for an area 
that, within the preceding 5 years, has been subject to flooding that 
resulted in the loss of life and caused damage of sufficient severity 
and magnitude to warrant a declaration of a major disaster by the 
President under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster and Emergency Relief 
Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.).

SEC. 2019. WATERSHED AND RIVER BASIN ASSESSMENTS.

  (a) In General.--Section 729 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2267a; 114 Stat. 2587-2588; 100 Stat. 4164) is 
amended--
          (1) in subsection (d)--
                  (A) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (4);
                  (B) by striking the period at the end of paragraph 
                (5) and inserting ``; and''; and
                  (C) by adding at the end the following:
          ``(6) Tuscarawas River Basin, Ohio;
          ``(7) Sauk River Basin, Snohomish and Skagit Counties, 
        Washington;
          ``(8) Niagara River Basin, New York; and
          ``(9) Genesee River Basin, New York.'';
          (2) by striking paragraph (1) of subsection (f) and inserting 
        the following:
          ``(1) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of the costs 
        of an assessment carried out under this section on or after 
        December 11, 2000, shall be 25 percent.''; and
          (3) by striking subsection (g).
  (b) Revision of Partnership Agreement.--The Secretary shall revise 
the partnership agreement for any assessment being carried out under 
such section 729 to take into account the change in non-Federal 
participation in the assessment as a result of the amendments made by 
subsection (a).

SEC. 2020. TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM.

  (a) Scope.--Section 203(b)(1)(B) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2269(b)(1)(B); 114 Stat. 2589) is amended by 
inserting after ``Code'' the following: ``, and including lands that 
are within the jurisdictional area of an Oklahoma Indian tribe, as 
determined by the Secretary of the Interior, and are recognized by the 
Secretary of the Interior as eligible for trust land status under part 
151 of title 25, Code of Federal Regulations''.
  (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 203(e) of such Act is 
amended by striking ``2006'' and inserting ``2010''.

SEC. 2021. WILDFIRE FIREFIGHTING.

  Section 309 of Public Law 102-154 (42 U.S.C. 1856a-1; 105 Stat. 1034) 
is amended by inserting ``the Secretary of the Army,'' after ``the 
Secretary of Energy,''.

SEC. 2022. CREDIT FOR NONCONSTRUCTION SERVICES.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to allow a non-Federal 
interest credit toward its share of project costs for any authorized 
water resources development project for the cost of materials and in-
kind services, including design and management services but not 
including construction, provided by the non-Federal interest for 
carrying out the project.
  (b) Limitation.--Credit authorized under subsection (a)--
          (1) shall not exceed the non-Federal share of project costs;
          (2) shall not alter any other requirements that require a 
        non-Federal interest to provide lands, easements, rights-of-
        way, and dredged material disposal areas for the project;
          (3) shall not exceed the actual and reasonable costs of the 
        materials or in-kind services provided by the non-Federal 
        interest, as determined by the Secretary; and
          (4) shall not be allowed unless the Secretary has determined 
        that such materials or services are integral to the project.

SEC. 2023. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.

  Section 22 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 
1962d-16) is amended--
          (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``The Secretary'' and 
        inserting the following:
  ``(a) Federal State Cooperation.--
          ``(1) Comprehensive plans.--The Secretary'';
          (2) by inserting after the last sentence in subsection (a) 
        the following:
          ``(2) Technical assistance.--
                          ``(A) In general.--At the request of a 
                        governmental agency or non-Federal interest, 
                        the Secretary may provide, at Federal expense, 
                        technical assistance to such agency or non-
                        Federal interest in managing water resources.
                          ``(B) Types of assistance.--Technical 
                        assistance under this paragraph may include 
                        provision and integration of hydrologic, 
                        economic, and environmental data and 
                        analyses.'';
          (3) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ``this section'' each 
        place it appears and inserting ``subsection (a)(1)'';
          (4) in subsection (b)(2) by striking ``Up to 1/2 of the'' and 
        inserting ``The'';
          (5) in subsection (c) by striking ``(c) There is'' and 
        inserting the following:
  ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--
          ``(1) Federal and state cooperation.--There is'';
          (6) in subsection (c)(1) (as designated by paragraph (5))--
                  (A) by striking ``the provisions of this section'' 
                and inserting ``subsection (a)(1);''; and
                  (B) by striking ``$500,000'' and inserting 
                ``$1,000,000'';
          (7) by inserting at the end of subsection (c) the following:
          ``(2) Technical assistance.--There is authorized to be 
        appropriated $5,000,000 annually to carry out subsection 
        (a)(2), of which not more than $2,000,000 annually may be used 
        by the Secretary to enter into cooperative agreements with 
        nonprofit organizations to provide assistance to rural and 
        small communities.'';
          (8) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
          (9) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:
  ``(d) Annual Submission of Proposed Activities.--Concurrent with the 
President's submission to Congress of the President's request for 
appropriations for the Civil Works Program for a fiscal year, the 
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report describing the 
individual activities proposed for funding under subsection (a)(1) for 
that fiscal year.''.

SEC. 2024. COORDINATION AND SCHEDULING OF FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL 
                    ACTIONS.

  (a) Notice of Intent.--Upon request of the non-Federal interest in 
the form of a written notice of intent to construct or modify a non-
Federal water supply, wastewater infrastructure, flood damage 
reduction, storm damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, or navigation 
project that requires the approval of the Secretary, the Secretary 
shall initiate, subject to subsection (g)(1), procedures to establish a 
schedule for consolidating Federal, State, and local agency and Indian 
tribe environmental assessments, project reviews, and issuance of all 
permits for the construction or modification of the project. The non-
Federal interest shall submit to the Secretary, with the notice of 
intent, studies and documentation, including environmental reviews, 
that may be required by Federal law for decisionmaking on the proposed 
project. All States and Indian tribes having jurisdiction over the 
proposed project shall be invited by the Secretary, but shall not be 
required, to participate in carrying out this section with respect to 
the project.
  (b) Procedural Requirements.--Within 15 days after receipt of notice 
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall publish such notice in the 
Federal Register. The Secretary also shall provide written notification 
of the receipt of a notice under subsection (a) to all State and local 
agencies and Indian tribes that may be required to issue permits for 
the construction of the project or related activities. The Secretary 
shall solicit the cooperation of those agencies and request their entry 
into a memorandum of agreement described in subsection (c) with respect 
to the project. Within 30 days after publication of the notice in the 
Federal Register, State and local agencies and Indian tribes that 
intend to enter into the memorandum of agreement with respect to the 
project shall notify the Secretary of their intent in writing.
  (c) Scheduling Agreement.--Within 90 days after the date of receipt 
of notice under subsection (a) with respect to a project, the Secretary 
of the Interior, the Secretary of Commerce, and the Administrator of 
the Environmental Protection Agency, as necessary, and any State or 
local agencies that have notified the Secretary under subsection (b) 
shall enter into an agreement with the Secretary establishing a 
schedule of decisionmaking for approval of the project and permits 
associated with the project and with related activities.
  (d) Contents of Agreement.--An agreement entered into under 
subsection (c) with respect to a project, to the extent practicable, 
shall consolidate hearing and comment periods, procedures for data 
collection and report preparation, and the environmental review and 
permitting processes associated with the project and related 
activities. The agreement shall detail, to the extent possible, the 
non-Federal interest's responsibilities for data development and 
information that may be necessary to process each permit required for 
the project, including a schedule when the information and data will be 
provided to the appropriate Federal, State, or local agency or Indian 
tribe.
  (e) Revision of Agreement.--The Secretary may revise an agreement 
entered into under subsection (c) with respect to a project once to 
extend the schedule to allow the non-Federal interest the minimum 
amount of additional time necessary to revise its original application 
to meet the objections of a Federal, State, or local agency or Indian 
tribe that is a party to the agreement.
  (f) Final Decision.--Not later than the final day of a schedule 
established by an agreement entered into under subsection (c) with 
respect to a project, the Secretary shall notify the non-Federal 
interest of the final decision on the project and whether the permit or 
permits have been issued.
  (g) Reimbursement.--
          (1) Costs of coordination.--The costs incurred by the 
        Secretary to establish and carry out a schedule to consolidate 
        Federal, State, and local agency and Indian tribe environmental 
        assessments, project reviews, and permit issuance for a project 
        under this section shall be paid by the non-Federal interest.
          (2) Costs incurred to expedite permits and reviews.--
                  (A) Acceptance of non-federal funds.--The Secretary 
                may accept funds from the non-Federal interest to hire 
                additional staff or obtain the services of consultants, 
                or to provide financial, technical, and administrative 
                support to agencies that have entered into an agreement 
                with the Secretary under subsection (c) with respect to 
                a project in order to facilitate the timely processing, 
                review, and completion of applicable Federal, State, 
                and local agency and Indian tribe environmental 
                assessments, project reviews, and permits for the 
                project.
                  (B) Use of funds.--Funds accepted under this 
                paragraph shall be used to supplement existing 
                resources of the Secretary or a participating agency.
                  (C) Assurance of level of service and impartiality.--
                The Secretary shall ensure that the Department of the 
                Army and any participating agency that accepts funds 
                under this paragraph shall continue to provide the same 
                level of service to other projects and other 
                responsibilities not covered by this section as it 
                would provide, notwithstanding any activities carried 
                out under this section, and that acceptance of such 
                funds will not impact impartial decisionmaking either 
                substantively or procedurally.
  (h) Report on Timesavings Methods.--Not later than 3 years after the 
date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall prepare and 
transmit to Congress a report estimating the time required for the 
issuance of all Federal, State, local, and tribal permits for the 
construction of non-Federal projects for water supply, wastewater 
infrastructure, flood damage reduction, storm damage reduction, 
ecosystem restoration, and navigation. The Secretary shall include in 
that report recommendations for further reducing the amount of time 
required for the issuance of those permits, including any proposed 
changes in existing law.

SEC. 2025. PROJECT STREAMLINING.

  (a) Policy.--The benefits of water resources projects are important 
to the Nation's economy and environment, and recommendations to 
Congress regarding such projects should not be delayed due to 
uncoordinated and sequential environmental reviews or the failure to 
timely resolve disputes during the development of water resources 
projects.
  (b) Scope.--This section shall apply to each study initiated after 
the date of enactment of this Act to develop a feasibility report under 
section 905 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2282), or a reevaluation report, for a water resources project if the 
Secretary determines that such study requires an environmental impact 
statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
  (c) Water Resources Project Review Process.--The Secretary shall 
develop and implement a coordinated review process for water resources 
projects.
  (d) Coordinated Reviews.--
          (1) In general.--The coordinated review process under this 
        section shall provide that all environmental reviews, analyses, 
        opinions, permits, licenses, and approvals that must be issued 
        or made by a Federal, State, or local government agency or 
        Indian tribe for a water resources project will be conducted 
        concurrently, to the maximum extent practicable, and completed 
        within a time period established by the Secretary, in 
        cooperation with the agencies identified under subsection (e) 
        with respect to the project.
          (2) Agency participation.--Each Federal agency identified 
        under subsection (e) shall formulate and implement 
        administrative, policy, and procedural mechanisms to enable the 
        agency to ensure completion of environmental reviews, analyses, 
        opinions, permits, licenses, and approvals described in 
        paragraph (1) in a timely and environmentally responsible 
        manner.
  (e) Identification of Jurisdictional Agencies.--With respect to each 
water resources project, the Secretary shall identify, as soon as 
practicable, all Federal, State, and local government agencies and 
Indian tribes that may have jurisdiction over environmental-related 
matters that may be affected by the project or may be required by law 
to conduct an environmental-related review or analysis of the project 
or determine whether to issue an environmental-related permit, license, 
or approval for the project.
  (f) State Authority.--If a coordinated review process is being 
implemented under this section by the Secretary with respect to a water 
resources project within the boundaries of a State, the State, 
consistent with State law, may choose to participate in such process 
and provide that all State agencies that have jurisdiction over 
environmental-related matters that may be affected by the project or 
may be required by law to conduct an environmental-related review or 
analysis of the project or determine whether to issue an environmental-
related permit, license, or approval for the project, be subject to the 
process.
  (g) Memorandum of Understanding.--The coordinated review process 
developed under this section may be incorporated into a memorandum of 
understanding for a project between the Secretary and the heads of 
other Federal, State, and local government agencies and Indian tribes 
identified under subsection (e) with respect to the project and the 
non-Federal interest for the project.
  (h) Effect of Failure to Meet Deadline.--
          (1) Notification of congress and ceq.--If the Secretary 
        determines that a Federal, State, or local government agency, 
        Indian tribe, or non-Federal interest that is participating in 
        a coordinated review process under this section with respect to 
        a project has not met a deadline established under subsection 
        (d) for the project, the Secretary shall notify, within 30 days 
        of the date of such determination, the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives, the Committee on Environment and Public Works 
        of the Senate, the Council on Environmental Quality, and the 
        agency, Indian tribe, or non-Federal interest involved about 
        the failure to meet the deadline.
          (2) Agency report.--Not later than 30 days after the date of 
        receipt of a notice under paragraph (1), the Federal, State, or 
        local government agency, Indian tribe, or non-Federal interest 
        involved shall submit a report to the Secretary, the Committee 
        on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives, the Committee on Environment and Public Works 
        of the Senate, and the Council on Environmental Quality 
        explaining why the agency, Indian tribe, or non-Federal 
        interest did not meet the deadline and what actions it intends 
        to take to complete or issue the required review, analysis, 
        opinion, permit, license, or approval.
  (i) Purpose and Need and Determination of Reasonable Alternatives.--
          (1) In general.--As an official of the lead Federal agency 
        that is responsible for carrying out a study to which this 
        section applies and its associated process for meeting the 
        requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
        (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and as the Federal agency with 
        expertise in water resources development, the Secretary, in 
        carrying out such study and process, shall--
                  (A) define the purpose and need for the proposed 
                water resources project; and
                  (B) determine which alternatives are reasonable and 
                may be reasonably anticipated to meet project purposes 
                and needs.
          (2) Streamlining study.--To streamline a study to which this 
        section applies and its associated process for meeting the 
        requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
        (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the Secretary may eliminate from 
        consideration any alternatives the Secretary determines are not 
        reasonable or are not reasonably anticipated to meet project 
        purposes and needs.
  (j) Solicitation and Consideration of Comments.--In applying 
subsection (i), the Secretary shall solicit, consider, and respond to 
comments from interested persons and governmental entities.
  (k) Categorical Exclusions.--Not later than 120 days after the date 
of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall develop and publish a 
list of categorical exclusions from the requirement that an 
environmental assessment or an environmental impact statement be 
prepared under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 
4321 et seq.) for water resources projects.
  (l) Limitations.--Nothing in this section shall preempt or interfere 
with--
          (1) any practice of seeking public comment;
          (2) any power, jurisdiction, or authority that a Federal, 
        State, or local government agency, Indian tribe, or non-Federal 
        interest has with respect to carrying out a water resources 
        project; or
          (3) any obligation to comply with the provisions of the 
        National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4371 et 
        seq.) and the regulations issued by the Council on 
        Environmental Quality to carry out such Act.
  (m) Benchmarks.--Within 12 months of the date of enactment of this 
Act, the Chief of Engineers shall establish benchmarks for determining 
the length of time it should take to conduct a feasibility study for a 
water resources development project and its associated review process 
under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4371 et 
seq.). Benchmarks may be established for activities based on project 
type, size, cost, and complexity. The Chief of Engineers shall use such 
benchmarks as a management tool to make the feasibility study process 
more efficient in all districts of the Army Corps of Engineers.

SEC. 2026. LAKES PROGRAM.

  Section 602(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4148; 110 Stat. 3758; 113 Stat. 295) is amended--
          (1) by striking ``and'' at end of paragraph (18);
          (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (19) and 
        inserting a semicolon; and
          (3) by adding at the end the following:
          ``(20) Kinkaid Lake, Jackson County, Illinois, removal of 
        silt and aquatic growth and measures to address excessive 
        sedimentation;
          ``(21) McCarter Pond, Borough of Fairhaven, New Jersey, 
        removal of silt and measures to address water quality;
          ``(22) Rogers Pond, Franklin Township, New Jersey, removal of 
        silt and restoration of structural integrity;
          ``(23) Greenwood Lake, New York and New Jersey, removal of 
        silt and aquatic growth;
          ``(24) Lake Rodgers, Creedmoor, North Carolina, removal of 
        silt and excessive nutrients and restoration of structural 
        integrity; and
          ``(25) Lake Luxembourg, Pennsylvania.''.

SEC. 2027. MITIGATION FOR FISH AND WILDLIFE LOSSES.

  (a) Mitigation Plan Contents.--Section 906(d) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283(d)) is amended by adding at the 
end the following:
          ``(3) Contents.--A mitigation plan shall include--
                  ``(A) a description of the physical action to be 
                undertaken to achieve the mitigation objectives within 
                the watershed in which such losses occur and, in any 
                case in which mitigation must take place outside the 
                watershed, a justification detailing the rationale for 
                undertaking the mitigation outside of the watershed;
                  ``(B) a description of the lands or interests in 
                lands to be acquired for mitigation and the basis for a 
                determination that such lands are available for 
                acquisition;
                  ``(C) the type, amount, and characteristics of the 
                habitat being restored;
                  ``(D) success criteria for mitigation based on 
                replacement of lost functions and values of the 
                habitat, including hydrologic and vegetative 
                characteristics; and
                  ``(E) a plan for any necessary monitoring to 
                determine the success of the mitigation, including the 
                cost and duration of any monitoring and, to the extent 
                practicable, the entities responsible for any 
                monitoring.
          ``(4) Responsibility for monitoring.--In any case in which it 
        is not practicable to identify in a mitigation plan for a water 
        resources project, the entity responsible for monitoring at the 
        time of a final report of the Chief of Engineers or other final 
        decision document for the project, such entity shall be 
        identified in the partnership agreement entered into with the 
        non-Federal interest.''.
  (b) Status Report.--
          (1) In general.--Concurrent with the President's submission 
        to Congress of the President's request for appropriations for 
        the Civil Works Program for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall 
        submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of 
        the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment 
        and Public Works of the Senate a report on the status of 
        construction of projects that require mitigation under section 
        906 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
        2283; 100 Stat. 4186) and the status of such mitigation.
          (2) Projects included.--The status report shall include the 
        status of all projects that are under construction, all 
        projects for which the President requests funding for the next 
        fiscal year, and all projects that have completed construction, 
        but have not completed the mitigation required under section 
        906 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986.

SEC. 2028. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.

  (a) In General.--For the purpose of expediting the cost-effective 
design and construction of wetlands restoration that is part of an 
authorized water resources project, the Secretary may enter into 
cooperative agreements under section 6305 of title 31, United States 
Code, with nonprofit organizations with expertise in wetlands 
restoration to carry out such design and construction on behalf of the 
Secretary.
  (b) Limitations.--
          (1) Per project limit.--A cooperative agreement under this 
        section shall not obligate the Secretary to pay the nonprofit 
        organization more than $1,000,000 for any single wetlands 
        restoration project.
          (2) Annual limit.--The total value of work carried out under 
        cooperative agreements under this section may not exceed 
        $5,000,000 in any fiscal year.

SEC. 2029. PROJECT PLANNING.

  (a) Objectives.--
          (1) Flood damage reduction, navigation, and hurricane and 
        storm damage reduction projects.--The Federal objective of any 
        study of the feasibility of a water resources project carried 
        out by the Secretary for flood damage reduction, navigation, or 
        hurricane and storm damage reduction shall be to maximize the 
        net national economic development benefits associated with the 
        project, consistent with protecting the Nation's environment.
          (2) Ecosystem restoration projects.--The Federal objective of 
        any study of the feasibility of a water resources project for 
        ecosystem restoration carried out by the Secretary shall be to 
        maximize the net national ecosystem restoration benefits 
        associated with the project, consistent with national economic 
        development.
          (3) Projects with multiple purposes.--In the case of a study 
        that includes multiple project purposes, the primary and other 
        project purposes shall be evaluated, based on the relevant 
        Federal objective identified under paragraphs (1) and (2).
          (4) Selection of project alternatives.--
                  (A) In general.--Notwithstanding the Federal 
                objectives identified in this subsection, the Secretary 
                may select a project alternative that does not maximize 
                net benefits if there is an overriding reason based 
                upon other Federal, State, local, or international 
                concerns.
                  (B) Flood damage reduction, navigation, and hurricane 
                storm damage reduction projects.--With respect to a 
                water resources project described in paragraph (1), an 
                overriding reason for selecting a plan other than the 
                plan that maximizes national economic development 
                benefits may be if the Secretary determines, and the 
                non-Federal interest concurs, that an alternative plan 
                is feasible and achieves the project purposes while 
                providing greater ecosystem restoration benefits.
                  (C) Ecosystem restoration projects.--With respect to 
                a water resources project described in paragraph (2), 
                an overriding reason for selecting a plan other than 
                the plan that maximizes national ecosystem restoration 
                benefits may be if the Secretary determines, and the 
                non-Federal interest concurs, that an alternative plan 
                is feasible and achieves the project purposes while 
                providing greater economic development benefits.
  (b) Identifying Additional Benefits and Projects.--
          (1) Primarily economic benefits.--In conducting a study of 
        the feasibility of a project where the primary benefits are 
        expected to be economic, the Secretary may identify ecosystem 
        restoration benefits that may be achieved in the study area 
        and, after obtaining the participation of a non-Federal 
        interest, may study and recommend construction of additional 
        measures, a separate project, or separable project element to 
        achieve those benefits.
          (2) Primarily ecosystem restoration benefits.--In conducting 
        a study of the feasibility of a project where the primary 
        benefits are expected to be associated with ecosystem 
        restoration, the Secretary may identify economic benefits that 
        may be achieved in the study area and, after obtaining the 
        participation of a non-Federal interest, may study and 
        recommend construction of additional measures, a separate 
        project, or separable project element to achieve those 
        benefits.
          (3) Rules applicable to certain measures, projects, and 
        elements.--Any additional measures, separate project, or 
        separable element identified under paragraph (1) or (2) and 
        recommended for construction shall not be considered integral 
        to the underlying project and, if authorized, shall be subject 
        to a separate partnership agreement, unless a non-Federal 
        interest agrees to share in the cost of the additional 
        measures, project, or separable element.
  (c) Calculation of Benefits and Costs for Flood Damage Reduction 
Projects.--A feasibility study for a project for flood damage reduction 
shall include, as part of the calculation of benefits and costs--
          (1) a calculation of the residual risk of flooding following 
        completion of the proposed project;
          (2) a calculation of any upstream or downstream impacts of 
        the proposed project; and
          (3) calculations to ensure that the benefits and costs 
        associated with structural and nonstructural alternatives are 
        evaluated in an equitable manner.

SEC. 2030. INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW.

  (a) Project Studies Subject to Independent Peer Review.--
          (1) In general.--Project studies shall be subject to a peer 
        review by an independent panel of experts as determined under 
        this section.
          (2) Scope.--The peer review may include a review of the 
        economic and environmental assumptions and projections, project 
        evaluation data, economic analyses, environmental analyses, 
        engineering analyses, formulation of alternative plans, methods 
        for integrating risk and uncertainty, models used in evaluation 
        of economic or environmental impacts of proposed projects, and 
        any biological opinions of the project study.
          (3) Project studies subject to peer review.--
                  (A) Mandatory.--A project study shall be subject to 
                peer review under paragraph (1) if the project has an 
                estimated total cost of more than $50,000,000, 
                including mitigation costs, and is not determined by 
                the Chief of Engineers to be exempt from peer review 
                under paragraph (6).
                  (B) Discretionary.--A project study may be subject to 
                peer review if--
                          (i) the Governor of an affected State 
                        requests a peer review by an independent panel 
                        of experts;
                          (ii) the head of a Federal or State agency 
                        charged with reviewing the project study 
                        determines that the project is likely to have a 
                        significant adverse impact on environmental, 
                        cultural, or other resources under the 
                        jurisdiction of the agency after implementation 
                        of proposed mitigation plans and requests a 
                        peer review by an independent panel of experts; 
                        or
                          (iii) the Chief of Engineers determines that 
                        the project study is controversial.
          (4) Controversial projects.--Upon receipt of a written 
        request under paragraph (3)(B) or on the initiative of the 
        Chief of Engineers, the Chief of Engineers shall determine 
        whether a project study is controversial.
          (5) Factors to consider.--In determining whether a project 
        study is controversial, the Chief of Engineers shall consider 
        if--
                  (A) there is a significant public dispute as to the 
                size, nature, or effects of the project; or
                  (B) there is a significant public dispute as to the 
                economic or environmental costs or benefits of the 
                project.
          (6) Project studies excluded from peer review.--Project 
        studies that may be excluded from peer review under paragraph 
        (1) are--
                  (A) a study for a project the Chief of Engineers 
                determines--
                          (i) is not controversial;
                          (ii) has no more than negligible adverse 
                        impacts on scarce or unique cultural, historic, 
                        or tribal resources;
                          (iii) has no substantial adverse impacts on 
                        fish and wildlife species and their habitat 
                        prior to the implementation of mitigation 
                        measures; and
                          (iv) has, before implementation of mitigation 
                        measures, no more than a negligible adverse 
                        impact on a species listed as endangered or 
                        threatened species under the Endangered Species 
                        Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1539 et seq.) or the 
                        critical habitat of such species designated 
                        under such Act; and
                  (B) a study for a project pursued under section 205 
                of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), 
                section 2 of the Flood Control Act of August 28, 1937 
                (33 U.S.C. 701g), section 14 of the Flood Control Act 
                of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r), section 107(a) of the River 
                and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577(a)), section 3 of 
                the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing Federal 
                participation in the cost of protecting the shores of 
                publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 
                U.S.C. 426g), section 111 of the River and Harbor Act 
                of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i), section 3 of the Act entitled 
                ``An Act authorizing the construction, repair, and 
                preservation of certain public works on rivers and 
                harbors, and for other purposes'', approved March 2, 
                1945 (33 U.S.C. 603a), section 1135 of the Water 
                Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), 
                section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
                1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), or section 204 of the Water 
                Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326).
          (7) Appeal.--The decision of the Chief of Engineers whether 
        to peer review a project study shall be published in the 
        Federal Register and shall be subject to appeal by a person 
        referred to in paragraph (3)(B)(i) or (3)(B)(ii) to the 
        Secretary of the Army if such appeal is made within the 30-day 
        period following the date of such publication.
          (8) Determination of project cost.--For purposes of 
        determining the estimated total cost of a project under 
        paragraph (3)(A), the project cost shall be based upon the 
        reasonable estimates of the Chief of Engineers at the 
        completion of the reconnaissance study for the project. If the 
        reasonable estimate of project costs is subsequently determined 
        to be in excess of the amount in paragraph (3)(A), the Chief of 
        Engineers shall make a determination whether a project study 
        should be reviewed under this section.
  (b) Timing of Peer Review.--The Chief of Engineers shall determine 
the timing of a peer review of a project study under subsection (a). In 
all cases, the peer review shall occur during the period beginning on 
the date of the completion of the reconnaissance study for the project 
and ending on the date the draft report of the Chief of Engineers for 
the project is made available for public comment. Where the Chief of 
Engineers has not initiated a peer review of a project study, the Chief 
of Engineers shall consider, at a minimum, whether to initiate a peer 
review at the time that--
          (1) the without-project conditions are identified;
          (2) the array of alternatives to be considered are 
        identified; and
          (3) the preferred alternative is identified.
Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to require the Chief of 
Engineers to conduct multiple peer reviews for a project study.
  (c) Establishment of Panels.--
          (1) In general.--For each project study subject to peer 
        review under subsection (a), as soon as practicable after the 
        Chief of Engineers determines that a project study will be 
        subject to peer review, the Chief of Engineers shall contract 
        with the National Academy of Sciences (or a similar independent 
        scientific and technical advisory organization), or an eligible 
        organization, to establish a panel of experts to peer review 
        the project study for technical and scientific sufficiency.
          (2) Membership.--A panel of experts established for a project 
        study under this section shall be composed of independent 
        experts who represent a balance of areas of expertise suitable 
        for the review being conducted.
          (3) Limitation on appointments.--An individual may not be 
        selected to serve on a panel of experts established for a 
        project study under this section if the individual has a 
        financial or close professional association with any 
        organization or group with a strong financial or organizational 
        interest in the project.
          (4) Congressional notification.--Upon identification of a 
        project study for peer review under this section, but prior to 
        initiation of any review, the Chief of Engineers shall notify 
        the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and 
        the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House 
        of Representatives of such review.
  (d) Duties of Panels.--A panel of experts established for a peer 
review for a project study under this section shall, consistent with 
the scope of the referral for review--
          (1) conduct a peer review for the project study submitted to 
        the panel for review;
          (2) assess the adequacy and acceptability of the economic and 
        environmental methods, models, and analyses used by the Chief 
        of Engineers;
          (3) provide timely written and oral comments to the Chief of 
        Engineers throughout the development of the project study, as 
        requested; and
          (4) submit to the Chief of Engineers a final report 
        containing the panel's economic, engineering, and environmental 
        analysis of the project study, including the panel's assessment 
        of the adequacy and acceptability of the economic and 
        environmental methods, models, and analyses used by the Chief 
        of Engineers, to accompany the publication of the project 
        study.
  (e) Duration of Project Study Peer Reviews.--
          (1) Deadline.--A panel of experts shall--
                  (A) complete its peer review under this section for a 
                project study and submit a report to the Chief of 
                Engineers under subsection (d)(4) within 180 days after 
                the date of establishment of the panel, or, if the 
                Chief of Engineers determines that a longer period of 
                time is necessary, such period of time established by 
                the Chief of Engineers, but in no event later than 90 
                days after the date a draft project study is made 
                available for public review; and
                  (B) terminate on the date of submission of the 
                report.
          (2) Failure to meet deadline.--If a panel does not complete 
        its peer review of a project study under this section and 
        submit a report to the Chief of Engineers under subsection 
        (d)(4) on or before the deadline established by paragraph (1) 
        for the project study, the Chief of Engineers shall continue 
        the project study for the project that is subject to peer 
        review by the panel without delay.
  (f) Recommendations of Panel.--
          (1) Consideration by the chief of engineers.--After receiving 
        a report on a project study from a panel of experts under this 
        section and before entering a final record of decision for the 
        project, the Chief of Engineers shall consider any 
        recommendations contained in the report and prepare a written 
        response for any recommendations adopted or not adopted.
          (2) Public availability and transmittal to congress.--After 
        receiving a report on a project study from a panel of experts 
        under this section, the Chief of Engineers shall--
                  (A) make a copy of the report and any written 
                response of the Chief of Engineers on recommendations 
                contained in the report available to the public; and
                  (B) transmit to Congress a copy of the report, 
                together with any such written response, on the date of 
                a final report of the Chief of Engineers or other final 
                decision document for a project study that is subject 
                to peer review by the panel.
  (g) Costs.--
          (1) In general.--The costs of a panel of experts established 
        for a peer review under this section--
                  (A) shall be a Federal expense; and
                  (B) shall not exceed $500,000.
          (2) Waiver.--The Chief of Engineers may waive the $500,000 
        limitation contained in paragraph (1)(B) in cases that the 
        Chief of Engineers determines appropriate.
  (h) Applicability.--This section shall apply to--
          (1) project studies initiated during the 2-year period 
        preceding the date of enactment of this Act and for which the 
        array of alternatives to be considered has not been identified; 
        and
          (2) project studies initiated during the period beginning on 
        such date of enactment and ending 4 years after such date of 
        enactment.
  (i) Report.--Within 4 1/2 years of the date of enactment of this 
section, the Chief of Engineers shall submit a report to Congress on 
the implementation of this section.
  (j) Nonapplicability of FACA.--The Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to any peer review panel established under 
this section.
  (k) Savings Clause.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to 
affect any authority of the Chief of Engineers to cause or conduct a 
peer review of a water resources project existing on the date of 
enactment of this section.
  (l) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions apply:
          (1) Project study.--The term ``project study'' means a 
        feasibility study or reevaluation study for a project. The term 
        also includes any other study associated with a modification or 
        update of a project that includes an environmental impact 
        statement, including the environmental impact statement.
          (2) Affected state.--The term ``affected State'', as used 
        with respect to a project, means a State all or a portion of 
        which is within the drainage basin in which the project is or 
        would be located and would be economically or environmentally 
        affected as a consequence of the project.
          (3) Eligible organization.--The term ``eligible 
        organization'' means an organization that--
                  (A) is described in section 501(c)(3), and exempt 
                from Federal tax under section 501(a), of the Internal 
                Revenue Code of 1986;
                  (B) is independent;
                  (C) is free from conflicts of interest;
                  (D) does not carry out or advocate for or against 
                Federal water resources projects; and
                  (E) has experience in establishing and administering 
                peer review panels.

SEC. 2031. TRAINING FUNDS.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary may include individuals not employed 
by the Department of the Army in training classes and courses offered 
by the Corps of Engineers in any case in which the Secretary determines 
that it is in the best interest of the Federal Government to include 
those individuals as participants.
  (b) Expenses.--
          (1) In general.--An individual not employed by the Department 
        of the Army attending a training class or course described in 
        subsection (a) shall pay the full cost of the training provided 
        to the individual.
          (2) Payments.--Payments made by an individual for training 
        received under paragraph (1), up to the actual cost of the 
        training--
                  (A) may be retained by the Secretary;
                  (B) shall be credited to an appropriation or account 
                used for paying training costs; and
                  (C) shall be available for use by the Secretary, 
                without further appropriation, for training purposes.
          (3) Excess amounts.--Any payments received under paragraph 
        (2) that are in excess of the actual cost of training provided 
        shall be credited as miscellaneous receipts to the Treasury of 
        the United States.

SEC. 2032. ACCESS TO WATER RESOURCE DATA.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out a program to provide 
public access to water resource and related water quality data in the 
custody of the Corps of Engineers.
  (b) Data.--Public access under subsection (a) shall--
          (1) include, at a minimum, access to data generated in water 
        resources project development and regulation under section 404 
        of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344); 
        and
          (2) appropriately employ geographic information system 
        technology and linkages to water resource models and analytical 
        techniques.
  (c) Partnerships.--To the maximum extent practicable, in carrying out 
activities under this section, the Secretary shall develop 
partnerships, including cooperative agreements with State, tribal, and 
local governments and other Federal agencies.
  (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000 for each fiscal year.

SEC. 2033. SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS.

  (a) In General.--In accordance with the Act of July 3, 1930 (33 
U.S.C. 426), and notwithstanding administrative actions, it is the 
policy of the United States to promote beach nourishment for the 
purposes of flood damage reduction and hurricane and storm damage 
reduction and related research that encourage the protection, 
restoration, and enhancement of sandy beaches, including beach 
restoration and periodic beach renourishment for a period of 50 years, 
on a comprehensive and coordinated basis by the Federal Government, 
States, localities, and private enterprises.
  (b) Preference.--In carrying out the policy, preference shall be 
given to--
          (1) areas in which there has been a Federal investment of 
        funds for the purposes described in subsection (a); and
          (2) areas with respect to which the need for prevention or 
        mitigation of damage to shores and beaches is attributable to 
        Federal navigation projects or other Federal activities.
  (c) Applicability.--The Secretary shall apply the policy to each 
shore protection and beach renourishment project (including shore 
protection and beach renourishment projects constructed before the date 
of enactment of this Act).

SEC. 2034. ABILITY TO PAY.

  (a) Criteria and Procedures.--Section 103(m)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)(2)) is amended by 
striking ``180 days after such date of enactment'' and inserting 
``August 31, 2005''.
  (b) Projects.--The Secretary shall apply the criteria and procedures 
referred to in section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)) to the following projects:
          (1) St. johns bayou and new madrid floodway, missouri.--The 
        project for flood control, St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid 
        Floodway, Missouri, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4118).
          (2) Lower rio grande basin, texas.--The project for flood 
        control, Lower Rio Grande Basin, Texas, authorized by section 
        401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
        Stat. 4125).
          (3) West virginia and pennsylvania projects.--The projects 
        for flood control authorized by section 581 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3790-3791).

SEC. 2035. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

  Section 206(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2330) is amended by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting 
``$40,000,000''.

SEC. 2036. SMALL FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECTS.

  Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) is 
amended by striking ``$50,000,000'' and inserting ``$60,000,000''.

SEC. 2037. LEASING AUTHORITY.

  Section 4 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction 
of certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and 
other purposes'', approved December 22, 1944 (16 U.S.C. 460d) is 
amended--
          (1) by inserting ``federally-recognized Indian tribes and'' 
        before ``Federal'' the first place it appears;
          (2) by inserting ``Indian tribes or'' after ``considerations, 
        to such''; and
          (3) by inserting ``federally-recognized Indian tribe'' after 
        ``That in any such lease or license to a''.

SEC. 2038. COST ESTIMATES.

   The estimated Federal and non-Federal costs of projects authorized 
to be carried out by the Secretary before, on, or after the date of 
enactment of this Act are for informational purposes only and shall not 
be interpreted as affecting the cost sharing responsibilities 
established by law.

SEC. 2039. STUDIES AND REPORTS FOR WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS.

  (a) Studies.--
          (1) Cost-sharing requirements.--Section 105(a) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215(a)) is 
        amended by adding at the end the following:
          ``(3) Detailed project reports.--The requirements of this 
        subsection that apply to a feasibility study also shall apply 
        to a study that results in a detailed project report, except 
        that--
                  ``(A) the first $100,000 of the costs of a study that 
                results in a detailed project report shall be a Federal 
                expense; and
                  ``(B) paragraph (1)(C)(ii) shall not apply to such a 
                study.''.
          (2) Planning and engineering.--Section 105(b) of such Act (33 
        U.S.C. 2215(b)) is amended by striking ``authorized by this 
        Act''.
          (3) Definitions.--Section 105 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 2215) is 
        amended by adding at the end the following:
  ``(d) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions apply:
          ``(1) Detailed project report.--The term `detailed project 
        report' means a report for a project not specifically 
        authorized by Congress in law or otherwise that determines the 
        feasibility of the project with a level of detail appropriate 
        to the scope and complexity of the recommended solution and 
        sufficient to proceed directly to the preparation of contract 
        plans and specifications. The term includes any associated 
        environmental impact statement and mitigation plan. For a 
        project for which the Federal cost does not exceed $1,000,000, 
        the term includes a planning and design analysis document.
          ``(2) Feasibility study.--The term `feasibility study' means 
        a study that results in a feasibility report under section 905, 
        and any associated environmental impact statement and 
        mitigation plan, prepared by the Corps of Engineers for a water 
        resources project. The term includes a study that results in a 
        project implementation report prepared under title VI of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680-2694), 
        a general reevaluation report, and a limited reevaluation 
        report.''.
  (b) Reports.--
          (1) Preparation.--Section 905(a) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282(a); 100 Stat. 4185) is 
        amended--
                  (A) by striking ``(a) In the case of any'' and 
                inserting the following:
  ``(a) Preparation of Reports.--
          ``(1) In general.--In the case of any'';
                  (B) by striking ``the Secretary, the Secretary 
                shall'' and inserting ``the Secretary that results in 
                recommendations concerning a project or the operation 
                of a project and that requires specific authorization 
                by Congress in law or otherwise, the Secretary shall 
                perform a reconnaissance study and'';
                  (C) by striking ``Such feasibility report'' and 
                inserting the following:
          ``(2) Contents of feasibility reports.--A feasibility 
        report'';
                  (D) by striking ``The feasibility report'' and 
                inserting ``A feasibility report''; and
                  (E) by striking the last sentence and inserting the 
                following:
          ``(3) Applicability.--This subsection shall not apply to--
                  ``(A) any study with respect to which a report has 
                been submitted to Congress before the date of enactment 
                of this Act;
                  ``(B) any study for a project, which project is 
                authorized for construction by this Act and is not 
                subject to section 903(b);
                  ``(C) any study for a project which does not require 
                specific authorization by Congress in law or otherwise; 
                and
                  ``(D) general studies not intended to lead to 
                recommendation of a specific water resources project.
          ``(4) Feasibility report defined.--In this subsection, the 
        term `feasibility report' means each feasibility report, and 
        any associated environmental impact statement and mitigation 
        plan, prepared by the Corps of Engineers for a water resources 
        project. The term includes a project implementation report 
        prepared under title VI of the Water Resources Development Act 
        of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680-2694), a general reevaluation report, 
        and a limited reevaluation report.''.
          (2) Projects not specicially authorized by congress.--Section 
        905 of such Act is further amended--
                  (A) in subsection (b) by inserting ``Reconnaissance 
                Studies.--'' before ``Before initiating'';
                  (B) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e) as 
                subsections (d), (e), and (f), respectively;
                  (C) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
  ``(c) Projects not Specifically Authorized by Congress.--In the case 
of any water resources project-related study authorized to be 
undertaken by the Secretary without specific authorization by Congress 
in law or otherwise, the Secretary shall prepare a detailed project 
report.'';
                  (D)  in subsection  (d) (as  so redesignated)  by 
                inserting  ``Indian Tribes.--'' before ``For purposes 
                of''; and
                  (E) in subsection (e) (as so redesignated) by 
                inserting ``Standard and Uniform Procedures and 
                Practices.--'' before ``The Secretary shall'' .

SEC. 2040. FISCAL TRANSPARENCY REPORT.

  (a) In General.--On the third Tuesday of January of each year 
beginning January 2006, the Chief of Engineers shall submit to the 
Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives a report on the expenditures for the preceding fiscal 
year and estimated expenditures for the current fiscal year and, for 
projects and activities that are not scheduled for completion in the 
current fiscal year, the estimated expenditures necessary in the 
following fiscal year for each project or activity to maintain the same 
level of effort being achieved in the current fiscal year.
  (b) Contents.--In addition to the information described in subsection 
(a), the report shall contain a detailed accounting of the following 
information:
          (1) With respect to general construction, information on--
                  (A) projects currently under construction, 
                including--
                          (i) allocations to date;
                          (ii) the number of years remaining to 
                        complete construction;
                          (iii) the estimated annual Federal cost to 
                        maintain that construction schedule; and
                          (iv) a list of projects the Corps of 
                        Engineers expects to complete during the 
                        current fiscal year; and
                  (B) projects for which there is a signed cost-sharing 
                agreement and completed planning, engineering, and 
                design, including--
                          (i) the number of years the project is 
                        expected to require for completion; and
                          (ii) estimated annual Federal cost to 
                        maintain that construction schedule.
          (2) With respect to operation and maintenance of the inland 
        and intracoastal waterways under section 206 of Public Law 95-
        502 (33 U.S.C. 1804)--
                  (A) the estimated annual cost to maintain each 
                waterway for the authorized reach and at the authorized 
                depth; and
                  (B) the estimated annual cost of operation and 
                maintenance of locks and dams to ensure navigation 
                without interruption.
          (3) With respect to general investigations and reconnaissance 
        and feasibility studies--
                  (A) the number of active studies;
                  (B) the number of completed studies not yet 
                authorized for construction;
                  (C) the number of initiated studies; and
                  (D) the number of studies expected to be completed 
                during the fiscal year.
          (4) Funding received and estimates of funds to be received 
        for interagency and international support activities under 
        section 318(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
        (33 U.S.C. 2323(a)).
          (5) Recreation fees and lease payments.
          (6) Hydropower and water storage fees.
          (7) Deposits into the Inland Waterway Trust Fund and the 
        Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund.
          (8) Other revenues and fees collected.

                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

SEC. 3001. KING COVE HARBOR, ALASKA.

  The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for navigation, King Cove Harbor, Alaska, being carried out 
under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), 
shall be $8,000,000.

SEC. 3002. ST. PAUL HARBOR, ST. PAUL ISLAND, ALASKA.

  (a) Small Boat Harbor.--No elements of the project for navigation, 
St. Paul Harbor, St. Paul Island, Alaska, authorized by section 
101(b)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3667) and modified by section 303 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 298) and section 105 of the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriations Act, 2003 (117 Stat. 139), shall be treated 
by the Secretary as separable.
  (b) Limitation on Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share for the 
project shall not exceed $14,400,000.

SEC. 3003. SITKA, ALASKA.

  The Thompson Harbor, Sitka, Alaska, element of the project for 
navigation Southeast Alaska Harbors of Refuge, Alaska, authorized by 
section 101 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 
4801), is modified to direct the Secretary to take such action as may 
be necessary to correct design deficiencies in such element, at a 
Federal expense of $6,300,000.

SEC. 3004. TATITLEK, ALASKA.

  The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for navigation, Tatitlek, Alaska, being carried out under 
section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), shall 
be $10,000,000.

SEC. 3005. GRAND PRAIRIE REGION AND BAYOU METO BASIN, ARKANSAS.

  The Secretary shall review the general reevaluation report for the 
Bayou Meto basin element of the project for Grand Prairie Region and 
Bayou Meto Basin, Arkansas, reauthorized by section 363(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3730), and make a 
determination of whether the element is feasible, regardless of mission 
priorities.

SEC. 3006. OSCEOLA HARBOR, ARKANSAS.

  (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Osceola Harbor, 
Arkansas, constructed under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 
1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), is modified to allow non-Federal interests to 
construct a mooring facility within the existing authorized harbor 
channel, subject to all necessary permits, certifications, and other 
requirements.
  (b) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this section 
shall be construed as affecting the responsibility of the Secretary to 
maintain the general navigation features of the project at a bottom 
width of 250 feet.

SEC. 3007. PINE MOUNTAIN DAM, ARKANSAS.

  The Pine Mountain Dam feature of the project for flood protection, 
Lee Creek, Arkansas and Oklahoma, authorized by section 204 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1078), is modified--
          (1) to add environmental restoration as a project purpose; 
        and
          (2) to direct the Secretary to finance the non-Federal share 
        of the cost of the project over a 30-year period in accordance 
        with section 103(k) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(k)).

SEC. 3008. SAINT FRANCIS BASIN, ARKANSAS.

  The project for flood control, Saint Francis Basin, Missouri and 
Arkansas, authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 
(64 Stat. 172), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct 
improvements along Ditch No. 1 that consist of a gated culvert through 
the Saint Francis Levee and related channel improvements.

SEC. 3009. AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED, CALIFORNIA.

  Section 128 of Public Law 108-137 (117 Stat. 1838) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
  ``(c) Dam Safety Modifications at L.L. Anderson Dam.--In determining 
improvements for dam safety that are necessary at the L.L. Anderson 
Dam, the Secretary shall consider the without-project condition to be 
the dam as it existed on December 1, 2003.
  ``(d) Cost Allocation.--In allocating costs for the project 
authorized in subsection (a), the Secretary shall use the project cost 
allocations for flood damage reduction and dam safety that are 
contained in the American River Watershed, California, long-term study 
final supplemental plan formulation report dated February 2002.''.

SEC. 3010. COMPTON CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

  The project for flood control, Los Angeles Drainage Area, California, 
authorized by section 101(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1990 (104 Stat. 4611), is modified to add environmental restoration and 
recreation as project purposes.

SEC. 3011. GRAYSON CREEK/MURDERER'S CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

  The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Grayson Creek/
Murderer's Creek, California, being carried out under section 206 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share 
of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out by the non-
Federal interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
project and to authorize the Secretary to consider national ecosystem 
restoration benefits in determining the Federal interest in the 
project.

SEC. 3012. HAMILTON AIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA.

   The project for environmental restoration, Hamilton Airfield, 
California, authorized by section 101(b)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 279), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to construct the project substantially in accordance with the 
report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 19, 2004, at a total cost 
of $205,226,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $153,840,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $51,386,000.

SEC. 3013. JOHN F. BALDWIN SHIP CHANNEL AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNEL, 
                    CALIFORNIA.

  The project for navigation, San Francisco to Stockton, California, 
authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 
1091) is modified--
          (1) to provide that the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
        John F. Baldwin Ship Channel and Stockton Ship Channel element 
        of the project may be provided in the form of in-kind services 
        and materials; and
          (2) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of such element the cost of planning and 
        design work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the 
        date of an agreement for such planning and design if the 
        Secretary determines that such work is integral to such 
        element.

SEC. 3014. KAWEAH RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

  The project for flood control, Terminus Dam, Kaweah River, 
California, authorized by section 101(b)(5) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3658), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project, or provide reimbursement not to exceed $800,000, for the costs 
of any work carried out by the non-Federal interest before, on, or 
after the date of the project partnership agreement if the Secretary 
determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3015. LARKSPUR FERRY CHANNEL, LARKSPUR, CALIFORNIA.

  The project for navigation, Larkspur Ferry Channel, Larkspur, 
California, authorized by section 601(d) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to determine whether maintenance of the project is feasible, 
and if the Secretary determines that maintenance of the project is 
feasible, to carry out such maintenance.

SEC. 3016. LLAGAS CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

  The project for flood damage reduction, Llagas Creek, California, 
authorized by section 501(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1999 (113 Stat. 333), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry 
out the project at a total cost of $105,000,000.

SEC. 3017. LOS ANGELES HARBOR, CALIFORNIA.

  The project for navigation, Los Angeles Harbor, California, 
authorized by section 101(b)(5) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2000 (114 Stat. 2577), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
carry out the project at a total cost of $222,000,000.

SEC. 3018. MAGPIE CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

  (a) In General.--The project for Magpie Creek, California, authorized 
under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to apply the cost-sharing requirements 
of section 103(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4085) for the portion of the project consisting of land 
acquisition to preserve and enhance existing floodwater storage.
  (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share 
of the cost of the project the cost of planning and design work carried 
out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that the work is 
integral to the project.

SEC. 3019. PACIFIC FLYWAY CENTER, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA.

  The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Pacific Flyway Center, 
Sacramento, California, being carried out under section 206 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is modified 
to authorize the Secretary to expend $2,000,000 to enhance public 
access to the project.

SEC. 3020. PINOLE CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

  The project for improvement of the quality of the environment, Pinole 
Creek Phase I, California, being carried out under section 1135 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), is modified 
to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the 
cost of the project the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal 
interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the project 
if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3021. PRADO DAM, CALIFORNIA.

  Upon completion of the modifications to the Prado Dam element of the 
project for flood control, Santa Ana River Mainstem, California, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4113), the Memorandum of Agreement for the Operation 
for Prado Dam for Seasonal Additional Water Conservation between the 
Department of the Army and the Orange County Water District (including 
all the conditions and stipulations in the memorandum) shall remain in 
effect for volumes of water made available prior to such modifications.

SEC. 3022. SACRAMENTO AND AMERICAN RIVERS FLOOD CONTROL, CALIFORNIA.

  (a) Determination of Federal Costs Paid by Non-Federal Interest.--
          (1) Federal costs paid by non-federal interest.--The 
        Secretary shall determine the amount paid by the Sacramento 
        Area Flood Control Agency towards the Federal share of the cost 
        of the project for the Natomas levee features authorized by 
        section 9159(b) of the Department of Defense Appropriations 
        Act, 1993 (106 Stat. 1944) of the project for flood control and 
        recreation, Sacramento and American Rivers, California.
          (2) Reimbursements to non-federal interest.--The Secretary 
        shall determine the amount of reimbursements paid to the 
        Sacramento Flood Control Agency for payment of the Federal 
        share of the cost of the project referred to in paragraph (1).
          (3) Determination of federal share.--In carrying out 
        paragraph (1), the Secretary shall include in the total cost of 
        the project all costs of the following activities that the 
        Secretary determines to be integral to the project:
                  (A) Planning, engineering, and construction.
                  (B) Acquisition of project lands, easements, and 
                rights-of-way.
                  (C) Performance of relocations.
                  (D) Environmental mitigation for all project 
                elements.
  (b) Credit.--
          (1) In general.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of any flood damage reduction 
        project, authorized before the date of enactment of this Act, 
        for which the non-Federal interest is the Sacramento Area Flood 
        Control Agency an amount equal to the total amount determined 
        under subsection (a)(1) reduced by the amount determined under 
        subsection (a)(2).
          (2) Allocation of credit.--The Secretary shall allocate the 
        amount to be credited under paragraph (1) toward the non-
        Federal share of such projects as are requested by the 
        Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency.

SEC. 3023. SACRAMENTO DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

  The project for navigation, Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, 
California, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4092), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project the cost of planning and design work carried out by the non-
Federal interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
project.

SEC. 3024. SACRAMENTO RIVER, GLENN-COLUSA, CALIFORNIA.

  The project for flood control, Sacramento River, California, 
authorized by section 2 of the Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the 
control of the floods of the Mississippi River and of the Sacramento 
River, California, and for other purposes'', approved March 1, 1917 (39 
Stat. 949), and modified by section 102 of the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriations Act, 1990 (103 Stat. 649), section 301(b)(3) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3110), title 
I of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1999 (112 
Stat. 1841), and section 305 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1999 (113 Stat. 299), is further modified to direct the Secretary to 
credit the non-Federal interest up to $4,000,000 toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project for costs incurred by the non-Federal 
interest in carrying out activities (including the provision of lands, 
easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and dredged material disposal 
areas) associated with environmental compliance for the project if the 
Secretary determines that the activities are integral to the project.

SEC. 3025. SANTA CRUZ HARBOR, CALIFORNIA.

  The project of navigation, Santa Cruz Harbor, California, authorized 
by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 300) and 
modified by section 809 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(100 Stat. 4168) and section 526 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (113 Stat. 346), is modified to direct the Secretary--
          (1) to renegotiate the memorandum of agreement with the non-
        Federal interest to increase the annual payment to reflect the 
        updated cost of operation and maintenance that is the Federal 
        and non-Federal share as provided by law based on the project 
        purpose; and
          (2) to revise the memorandum of agreement to include terms 
        that revise such payments for inflation.

SEC. 3026. SEVEN OAKS DAM, CALIFORNIA.

  The project for flood control, Santa Ana Mainstem, authorized by 
section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4113) and modified by section 104 of the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriations Act, 1988 (101 Stat. 1329-11), section 
102(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4611), 
and section 311 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3713), is further modified to direct the Secretary to conduct a 
study for the reallocation of water storage at the Seven Oaks Dam, 
California, for water conservation.

SEC. 3027. UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

  The project for flood damage reduction and recreation, Upper 
Guadalupe River, California, described as the Bypass Channel Plan of 
the Chief of Engineers dated August 19, 1998, authorized by section 
101(a)(9) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
275), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project, 
at a total cost of $212,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$106,050,000, and an estimated non-Federal cost of $106,050,000. The 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project shall be subject to 
section 103(a)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2213(a)(3)).

SEC. 3028. WALNUT CREEK CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

  The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Walnut Creek Channel, 
California, being carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest before 
the date of the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
determines that the work is integral to the project and to authorize 
the Secretary to consider national ecosystem restoration benefits in 
determining the Federal interest in the project.

SEC. 3029. WILDCAT/SAN PABLO CREEK PHASE I, CALIFORNIA.

  The project for improvement of the quality of the environment, 
Wildcat/San Pablo Creek Phase I, California, being carried out under 
section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2309a), is modified to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-
Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out 
by the non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that the work is 
integral to the project.

SEC. 3030. WILDCAT/SAN PABLO CREEK PHASE II, CALIFORNIA.

  The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Wildcat/San Pablo 
Creek Phase II, California, being carried out under section 206 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is modified 
to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the 
cost of the project the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal 
interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the project 
if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project 
and to authorize the Secretary to consider national ecosystem 
restoration benefits in determining the Federal interest in the 
project.

SEC. 3031. YUBA RIVER BASIN PROJECT, CALIFORNIA.

  The project for flood damage reduction, Yuba River Basin, California, 
authorized by section 101(a)(10) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (113 Stat. 275), is modified--
          (1) to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a 
        total cost of $107,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $70,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $37,700,000; 
        and
          (2) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out 
        by the non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
        agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that the 
        work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3032. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, 
                    DELAWARE AND MARYLAND.

  The project for navigation, Intracoastal Waterway, Delaware River to 
Chesapeake Bay, Delaware and Maryland, authorized by the first section 
of the Rivers and Harbors Act of August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1030), and 
section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 1249), is 
modified to add recreation as a project purpose.

SEC. 3033. BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA.

  (a) Shoreline.--The project for shoreline protection, Brevard County, 
Florida, authorized by section 101(b)(7) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3667), is modified--
          (1) to direct the Secretary to establish the reach of the 
        project as the reach between the Florida department of 
        environmental protection monuments 75.4 to 118.3, a distance of 
        7.6 miles; and
          (2) to direct the Secretary to expedite the general 
        reevaluation report required by section 418 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2637).
  (b) Credit.--Section 310 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1999 (113 Stat. 301) is amended by adding at the end the following:
  ``(d) Credit.--After completion of the study, the Secretary shall 
credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost 
of nourishment and renourishment associated with the shore protection 
project incurred by the non-Federal interest to respond to damages to 
Brevard County beaches that are the result of a Federal navigation 
project, as determined in the final report for the study.''.

SEC. 3034. BROWARD COUNTY AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLORIDA.

  The project for shore protection, Broward County and Hillsboro Inlet, 
Florida, authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 
(79 Stat. 1090), and modified by section 311 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 301), is further modified to direct 
the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project the cost of mitigation construction and derelict erosion 
control structure removal carried out by the non-Federal interest 
before the date of the partnership agreement for the project if the 
Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3035. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLORIDA.

  In carrying out the project for navigation, Canaveral Harbor, 
Florida, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 
(76 Stat. 1174), the Secretary shall construct a sediment trap.

SEC. 3036. GASPARILLA AND ESTERO ISLANDS, FLORIDA.

  The project for shore protection, Gasparilla and Estero Island 
segments, Lee County, Florida, authorized under section 201 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1073) by Senate Resolution dated 
December 17, 1970, and by House Resolution dated December 15, 1970, and 
modified by section 309 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2602), is further modified to direct the Secretary to credit 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that 
the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3037. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FLORIDA.

  (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Jacksonville Harbor, 
Florida, authorized by section 101(a)(17) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 276), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to extend the navigation features in accordance with the 
Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated July 22, 2003, at a total cost 
of $14,658,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $9,636,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $5,022,000.
  (b) General Reevaluation Reports.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
of the general reevaluation report that resulted in the report of the 
Chief of Engineers for the project and the non-Federal share of the 
cost of the general reevaluation report for Jacksonville Harbor, 
Florida, being conducted on June 1, 2005, shall each be the same 
percentage as the non-Federal share of the cost of construction of the 
project.
  (c) Agreement.--The Secretary shall enter into new partnership 
agreements with the non-Federal interest to reflect the cost sharing 
required by subsection (b).

SEC. 3038. LIDO KEY BEACH, SARASOTA, FLORIDA.

  (a) In General.--The project for shore protection, Lido Key Beach, 
Sarasota, Florida, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor 
Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1819), deauthorized under section 1001(b) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)), and 
reauthorized by section 364(2)(A) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 313), is modified to direct the Secretary to 
construct the project substantially in accordance with the report of 
the Chief of Engineers dated December 22, 2004, at a total cost of 
$14,809,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $9,088,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $5,721,000, and at an estimated total 
cost of $58,635,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of 
the project.
  (b) Construction of Shoreline Protection Projects by Non-Federal 
Interests.--The Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement with 
the non-Federal sponsor in accordance with section 206 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 426i-1) for the modified 
project.

SEC. 3039. MIAMI HARBOR, FLORIDA.

  The project for navigation, Miami Harbor Channel, Florida, authorized 
by section 101(a)(9) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
(104 Stat. 4606) and modified by section 315 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 302), is further modified--
          (1) to include as a project purpose environmental mitigation 
        required before July 18, 2003, by a Federal, State, or local 
        environmental agency for unauthorized or unanticipated 
        environmental impacts within, or in the vicinity of, the 
        authorized project; and
          (2) to direct the Secretary to reimburse the non-Federal 
        interest for costs it has incurred in construction of the 
        project in accordance with section 204 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2232).

SEC. 3040. PEANUT ISLAND, FLORIDA.

  The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for improvement of the quality of the environment, Peanut 
Island, Palm Beach County, Florida, being carried out under section 
1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) 
shall be $9,750,000.

SEC. 3041. TAMPA HARBOR-BIG BEND CHANNEL, FLORIDA.

  The project for navigation, Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel, Florida, 
authorized by section 101(a)(18) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (113 Stat. 276) is modified to direct the Secretary to credit 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
planning, design, and construction work carried out by the non-Federal 
interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the project 
if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3042. TAMPA HARBOR CUT B, FLORIDA.

  (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Tampa Harbor, Florida, 
authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 
1818), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct passing 
lanes in an area approximately 3.5 miles long and centered on Tampa 
Harbor Cut B if the Secretary determines that such improvements are 
necessary for navigation safety.
  (b) General Reevaulation Report.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
of the general reevaluation report for Tampa Harbor, Florida, being 
conducted on June 1, 2005, shall be the same percentage as the non-
Federal share of the cost of construction of the project.
  (c) Agreement.--The Secretary shall enter into a new partnership 
agreement with the non-Federal interest to reflect the cost sharing 
required by subsection (b).

SEC. 3043. ALLATOONA LAKE, GEORGIA.

  (a) Land Exchange.--
          (1) In general.--The Secretary may exchange lands above 863 
        feet in elevation at Allatoona Lake, Georgia, identified in the 
        Real Estate Design Memorandum prepared by the Mobile district 
        engineer, April 5, 1996, and approved October 8, 1996, for 
        lands on the north side of Allatoona Lake that are needed for 
        wildlife management and for protection of the water quality and 
        overall environment of Allatoona Lake.
          (2) Terms and conditions.--The basis for all land exchanges 
        under this subsection shall be a fair market appraisal so that 
        lands exchanged are of equal value.
  (b) Disposal and Acquisition of Lands, Allatoona Lake, Georgia.--
          (1) In general.--The Secretary may also sell lands above 863 
        feet in elevation at Allatoona Lake, Georgia, identified in the 
        memorandum referred to in subsection (a)(1) and may use the 
        proceeds to pay costs associated with the purchase of lands 
        needed for wildlife management and for protection of the water 
        quality and overall environment of Allatoona Lake.
          (2) Terms and conditions.--Land sales and purchases to be 
        conducted under this subsection shall be subject to the 
        following terms and conditions:
                  (A) Lands acquired under this subsection shall be by 
                negotiated purchase from willing sellers only.
                  (B) The basis for all transactions under the program 
                shall be a fair market appraisal acceptable to the 
                Secretary.
                  (C) The purchasers shall share in the associated 
                environmental and real estate costs, to include surveys 
                and associated fees in accordance with the memorandum 
                referred to in subsection (a)(1).
                  (D) Any other conditions that the Secretary may 
                impose.
  (c) Repeal.--Section 325 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 (106 Stat. 4849) is repealed.

SEC. 3044. LATHAM RIVER, GLYNN COUNTY, GEORGIA.

  The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for improvement of the quality of the environment, Latham 
River, Glynn County, Georgia, being carried out under section 1135 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) shall be 
$6,175,000.

SEC. 3045. DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR IMPROVEMENTS, IDAHO.

  The Secretary may carry out improvements to recreational facilities 
at the Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, North Fork, Clearwater River, Idaho, 
authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 
1193), to accommodate lower pool levels.

SEC. 3046. BEARDSTOWN COMMUNITY BOAT HARBOR, BEARDSTOWN, ILLINOIS.

  (a) Partnership Agreement.--The project for navigation, Muscooten 
Bay, Illinois River, Beardstown Community Boat Harbor, Beardstown, 
Illinois, constructed under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 
1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), is modified to direct the Secretary to enter into 
a partnership agreement with the city of Beardstown to replace the 
August 18, 1983, local cooperation agreement with the Beardstown 
Community Park District. The partnership agreement shall include the 
same rights and responsibilities as the agreement, changing only the 
identity of the non-Federal sponsor.
  (b) Maintenance.--Following execution of the partnership agreement 
referred to in subsection (a), the Secretary may carry out maintenance 
of the project referred to in subsection (a) on an annual basis.

SEC. 3047. CACHE RIVER LEVEE, ILLINOIS.

  The Cache River Levee portion of the project for flood control, Cache 
River, Illinois, authorized by the Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 
1215), is modified to add environmental restoration as a project 
purpose.

SEC. 3048. CHICAGO RIVER, ILLINOIS.

  The navigation channel for the North Branch Canal portion of the 
Chicago River, authorized by the first section of the Rivers and 
Harbors Appropriations Act of March 3, 1899 (30 Stat. 1129), extending 
from 100 feet downstream of the Halsted Street Bridge to 100 feet 
upstream of the Division Street Bridge is modified to be no wider than 
66 feet.

SEC. 3049. CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL, ILLINOIS.

  (a) Existing Barrier.--The Secretary shall upgrade and make 
permanent, at Federal expense, the existing Chicago Sanitary and Ship 
Canal Dispersal Barrier Chicago, Illinois, constructed as a 
demonstration project under section 1202(i)(3) of the Nonindigenous 
Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 
4722(i)(3)).
  (b) Operation and Maintenance.--The barrier referred to in subsection 
(a) and the barrier in the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal being 
constructed under section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) shall be operated and maintained, at Federal 
expense, as a system in a manner to optimize effectiveness. Operation 
and maintenance includes investigating and eliminating potential 
pathways that may allow aquatic species in the Des Plaines River and 
Illinois and Michigan Canal to bypass the barriers in the Chicago 
Sanitary and Ship Canal.
  (c) Feasibility Study.--The Secretary, in consultation with 
appropriate Federal, State, local, and nongovernmental entities, shall 
conduct a feasibility study, at Federal expense, of the range of 
options and technologies available to prevent the spread of aquatic 
species between the Great Lakes and Mississippi River Basins through 
the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and other pathways.

SEC. 3050. EMIQUON, ILLINOIS.

  (a) Maximum Amount.--The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
expended for the project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Emiquon, 
Illinois, being carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), shall be $7,500,000.
  (b) Limitation.--Nothing in this section shall affect the eligibility 
of the project for emergency repair assistance under section 5(a) of 
the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of certain 
public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for other 
purposes'', approved August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n).

SEC. 3051. LASALLE, ILLINOIS.

  In carrying out section 312 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1990 (104 Stat. 4639-4640), the Secretary shall give priority to work 
in the vicinity of LaSalle, Illinois, on the Illinois and Michigan 
Canal.

SEC. 3052. SPUNKY BOTTOMS, ILLINOIS.

  (a) Project Purpose.--The project for flood control, Spunky Bottoms, 
Illinois, authorized by section 5 of the Flood Control Act of June 26, 
1936 (35 Stat. 1584), is modified to add environmental restoration as a 
project purpose.
  (b) Maximum Amount.--The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
expended for the project for improvement of the quality of the 
environment, Spunky Bottoms, Illinois, being carried out under section 
1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), 
shall be $7,500,000.
  (c) Limitation.--Nothing in this section shall affect the eligibility 
of the project for emergency repair assistance under section 5(a) of 
the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of certain 
public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for other 
purposes'', approved August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n).

SEC. 3053. FORT WAYNE AND VICINITY, INDIANA.

  The project for flood control Fort Wayne, St. Mary's and Maumee 
Rivers, Indiana, authorized by section 101(a)(11) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4604), is modified--
          (1) to direct the Secretary to provide a 100-year level of 
        flood protection at the Berry-Thieme, Park-Thompson, Woodhurst, 
        and Tillman sites along the St. Mary's River, Fort Wayne and 
        vicinity, Indiana, at a total cost of $5,300,000; and
          (2) to allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the 
        financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to 
        the extent that the Secretary's evaluation indicates that 
        applying such section is necessary to implement the project.

SEC. 3054. KOONTZ LAKE, INDIANA.

  The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Koontz Lake, Indiana, 
being carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330) and modified by section 520 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2655), is further modified 
to direct the Secretary to seek to reduce the cost of the project by 
using innovative technologies and cost reduction measures determined 
from a review of non-Federal lake dredging projects in the vicinity of 
Koontz Lake.

SEC. 3055. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, INDIANA.

  The project for flood control, Little Calumet River, Indiana, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4115), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry 
out the project in accordance with the postauthorization change report 
dated August 2000, at a total cost of $198,000,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $148,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$49,500,000.

SEC. 3056. WHITE RIVER, INDIANA.

  The project for flood control, Indianapolis on West Fork of White 
River, Indiana, authorized by section 5 of the Act entitled ``An Act 
authorizing the construction of certain public works on rivers and 
harbors for flood control, and for other purposes'', approved June 22, 
1936 (49 Stat. 1586), and modified by section 323 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3716) and section 322 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 303-304), is 
further modified--
          (1) to authorize the Secretary to undertake the riverfront 
        alterations described in the Central Indianapolis Waterfront 
        Concept Plan, dated February 1994, for the Fall Creek Reach 
        feature at a total cost of $28,545,000; and
          (2) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of the project the cost of planning, design, 
        and construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
        before the date of the partnership agreement for the project if 
        the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
        project.

SEC. 3057. DES MOINES RIVER AND GREENBELT, IOWA.

  The project for the Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, 
Iowa, authorized by Public Law 99-88 and modified by section 604 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4153), is modified 
to include enhanced public access and recreational enhancements, at a 
Federal cost of $3,000,000.

SEC. 3058. PRESTONSBURG, KENTUCKY.

  The Prestonsburg, Kentucky, element of the project for flood control, 
Levisa and Tug Fork of the Big Sandy and Cumberland Rivers, West 
Virginia, Virginia, and Kentucky, authorized by section 202(a) of the 
Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 1339), 
is modified to direct the Secretary to take measures to provide a 100-
year level of flood protection for the city of Prestonsburg.

SEC. 3059. AMITE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, LOUISIANA, EAST BATON ROUGE 
                    PARISH WATERSHED.

  The project for flood damage reduction and recreation, Amite River 
and Tributaries, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge Parish Watershed, 
authorized by section 101(a)(21) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (113 Stat. 277) and modified by section 116 of division D of 
Public Law 108-7 (117 Stat. 140), is further modified--
          (1) to direct the Secretary to carry out the project with the 
        cost sharing for the project determined in accordance with 
        section 103(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
        (33 U.S.C. 2213(a)), as in effect on October 11, 1996;
          (2) to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a 
        total cost of $178,000,000; and
          (3) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out 
        by the non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
        agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that the 
        work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3060. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LOUISIANA.

  (a) In General.--Section 315(a)(1) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2603-2604) is amended to read as follows:
          ``(1) is authorized to study, design, construct, operate, and 
        maintain, at Federal expense, a Type A Regional Visitor Center 
        in the vicinity of Morgan City, Louisiana, in consultation with 
        the State of Louisiana, to provide information to the public on 
        the Atchafalaya River system and other associated waterways 
        that have influenced surrounding communities, and national and 
        local water resources development of the Army Corps of 
        Engineers in South Central Louisiana; and''.
  (b) Technical Correction.--Section 315(b) of such Act is amended by 
striking ``(a)'' and inserting ``(a)(2)''.
  (c) Donations.--Section 315 of such Act is amended by adding at the 
end the following:
  ``(c) Donations.--In carrying out subsection (a)(1), the Mississippi 
River Commission is authorized to accept the donation of cash, funds, 
lands, materials, and services from non-Federal governmental entities 
and nonprofit corporations.''.

SEC. 3061. BAYOU PLAQUEMINE, LOUISIANA.

  The project for the improvement of the quality of the environment, 
Bayou Plaquemine, Louisiana, being carried out under section 1135 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309(a)), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share 
of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out by the non-
Federal interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
project.

SEC. 3062. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LOUISIANA.

  The public access feature of the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System 
project, Louisiana, authorized by section 601(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act 1986 (100 Stat. 4142), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to acquire from willing sellers the fee interest, exclusive 
of oil, gas, and minerals, of an additional 20,000 acres of land within 
the Lower Atchafalaya Basin Floodway for the public access feature of 
the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, to enhance fish and wildlife 
resources, at a total cost of $4,000,000.

SEC. 3063. J. BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, MISSISSIPPI RIVER TO 
                    SHREVEPORT, LOUISIANA.

  The project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses, J. Bennett 
Johnston Waterway, Mississippi River to Shreveport, Louisiana, 
authorized by section 601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4142) and modified by section 4(h) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4016), section 102(p) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4613), section 
301(b)(7) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3710), and section 316 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2572), is further modified--
          (1) to authorize the purchase and reforesting lands that have 
        been cleared or converted to agricultural uses; and
          (2) to incorporate current wildlife and forestry management 
        practices for the purpose of improving species diversity on 
        mitigation lands that meet Federal and State of Louisiana 
        habitat goals and objectives.

SEC. 3064. MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LOUISIANA.

  The Mississippi Delta Region project, Louisiana, authorized as part 
of the project for hurricane-flood protection on Lake Pontchartrain, 
Louisiana, by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 
1077) and modified by section 365 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3739), is further modified to direct the 
Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project the costs of relocating oyster beds in the Davis Pond project 
area if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
Mississippi Delta Region project.

SEC. 3065. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LOUISIANA.

  The New Orleans to Venice, Louisiana, project for hurricane 
protection, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 
(76 Stat. 1184), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out 
the work on the St. Jude to City Price, Upper Reach A back levee. The 
Federal share of the cost of such work shall be 70 percent.

SEC. 3066. WEST BANK OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER (EAST OF HARVEY CANAL), 
                    LOUISIANA.

  Section 328 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
304-305) is amended--
          (1) in subsection (a)--
                  (A) by striking ``operation and maintenance'' and 
                inserting ``operation, maintenance, rehabilitation, 
                repair, and replacement''; and
                  (B) by striking ``Algiers Channel'' and inserting 
                ``Algiers Canal Levees''; and
          (2) by adding at the end the following:
  ``(c) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
shall be 35 percent.''.

SEC. 3067. CAMP ELLIS, SACO, MAINE.

  The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project being carried out under section 111 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i) for the mitigation of shore damages 
attributable to the project for navigation, Camp Ellis, Saco, Maine, 
shall be $25,000,000.

SEC. 3068. UNION RIVER, MAINE.

  The project for navigation, Union River, Maine, authorized by the 
first section of the Act entitled ``An Act making appropriations for 
the construction, repair, and preservation of certain public works on 
rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', approved June 3, 1896 (29 
Stat. 215), is modified by redesignating as an anchorage area that 
portion of the project consisting of a 6-foot turning basin and lying 
northerly of a line commencing at a point N315,975.13, E1,004,424.86, 
thence running north 61 degrees 27 minutes 20.71 seconds west about 
132.34 feet to a point N316,038.37, E1,004,308.61.

SEC. 3069. GWYNNS FALLS WATERSHED, BALTIMORE, MARYLAND.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out the project for 
ecosystem restoration, Gwynns Falls, Maryland, in accordance with the 
Baltimore Metropolitan Water Resources Gwynns Falls Watershed Study-
Draft Feasibility Report and Integrated Environmental Assessment 
prepared by the Corps of Engineers and the city of Baltimore, Maryland, 
dated April 2004.
  (b) Special Rule for Gwynns Falls, Maryland.--The report on the 
project for environmental restoration at Gwynns Falls, Maryland, shall 
be treated as being consistent and in compliance with the consent 
decree entered into between the United States and the Mayor and City 
Council of Baltimore, Maryland, filed with the United States District 
Court for the District of Maryland on April 26, 2002.
  (c) Repeal.--Section 123 of Public Law 108-137 (117 Stat. 1837) is 
repealed.

SEC. 3070. BOSTON HARBOR, MASSACHUSETTS.

  The project for navigation, Boston Harbor, Massachusetts, authorized 
by section 101(a)(13) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
(104 Stat. 4607), is modified to provide that no funds may be expended 
for the dredging of Chelsea Creek until the city of Boston and the 
United States Coast Guard complete the replacement of the Chelsea 
Street Bridge, as identified in the limited reevaluation report for the 
project dated June 1996.

SEC. 3071. DETROIT RIVER SHORELINE, DETROIT, MICHIGAN.

  (a) In General.--The project for emergency streambank and shoreline 
protection, Detroit River Shoreline, Detroit, Michigan, being carried 
out under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r), 
is modified to include measures to enhance public access.
  (b) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal funds 
that may be expended for the project shall be $3,000,000.

SEC. 3072. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MICHIGAN.

  The Secretary shall expedite development of the dredged material 
management plan for the project for navigation St. Joseph Harbor, 
Michigan, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 
(72 Stat. 299).

SEC. 3073. SAULT SAINTE MARIE, MICHIGAN.

  (a) In General.--The text of section 1149 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4254) is amended to read as follows:
  ``The Secretary shall construct at Federal expense a second lock, of 
the same dimensions as the existing Poe Lock, adjacent to the existing 
lock at Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan, generally in accordance with the 
report of the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors, dated May 19, 
1986, and the limited reevaluation report dated February 2004 at a 
total cost of $341,714,000.''.
  (b) Conforming Repeals.--The following provisoins are repealed:
          (1) Section 107(a)(8) of the Water Resources Development Act 
        of 1990 (104 Stat. 4620).
          (2) Section 330 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1996 (110 Stat. 3717-3718).
          (3) Section 330 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1999 (113 Stat. 305).

SEC. 3074. ADA, MINNESOTA.

  (a) In General.--The project for flood damage reduction, Wild Rice 
River, Ada, Minnesota, being carried out under section 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to consider national ecosystem restoration benefits in 
determining the Federal interest in the project.
  (b) Evaluation of Benefits and Costs.--In evaluating the economic 
benefits and costs for the project, the Secretary shall not consider 
the emergency levee adjacent to Judicial Ditch No. 51 in the 
determination of conditions existing prior to construction of the 
project.
  (c) Special Rule.--In evaluating and implementing the project, the 
Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the 
financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the extent that 
the Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying such section is 
necessary to implement the project.

SEC. 3075. DULUTH HARBOR, MCQUADE ROAD, MINNESOTA.

  (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Duluth Harbor, McQuade 
Road, Minnesota, being carried out under section 107 of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) and modified by section 321 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2605), is further 
modified to authorize the Secretary to provide public access and 
recreational facilities as generally described in the Detailed Project 
Report and Environmental Assessment, McQuade Road Harbor of Refuge, 
Duluth, Minnesota, dated August 1999.
  (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall provide credit toward the non-
Federal share of the cost of the project for the costs of design work 
carried out before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
project.
  (c) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal funds 
that may be expended for the project shall be $5,000,000.

SEC. 3076. GRAND PORTAGE HARBOR, MINNESOTA.

  The Secretary shall provide credit toward the non-Federal share of 
the cost of the navigation project for Grand Portage Harbor, Minnesota, 
carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 
U.S.C. 577) and modified by section 312 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2605), for the costs of design work 
carried out before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
project.

SEC. 3077. GRANITE FALLS, MINNESOTA.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary is directed to implement under section 
205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) the locally 
preferred plan for flood damage reduction, Granite Falls, Minnesota, 
substantially in accordance with the detailed project report dated 
2002, at a total cost of $12,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$8,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $4,000,000.
  (b) Project Financing.--In evaluating and implementing the project 
under this section, the Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interests 
to participate in the financing of the project in accordance with 
section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4184), to the extent that the detailed project report evaluation 
indicates that applying such section is necessary to implement the 
project.
  (c) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share 
of the project the cost of design and construction work carried out by 
the non-Federal interest before date of execution of a partnership 
agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that the work is 
integral to the project.
  (d) Maximum Funding.--The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
expended for the flood damage reduction shall be $8,000,000.

SEC. 3078. KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MINNESOTA.

  The project for navigation, Harbor at Knife River, Minnesota, 
authorized by section 2 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 2, 1945 
(59 Stat. 19), is modified to direct the Secretary to develop a final 
design and prepare plans and specifications to correct the harbor 
entrance and mooring conditions at the project.

SEC. 3079. RED LAKE RIVER, MINNESOTA.

  The project for flood control, Red Lake River, Crookston, Minnesota, 
authorized by section 101(a)(23) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (113 Stat. 278), is modified to include flood protection for 
the adjacent and interconnected areas generally known as the Sampson 
and Chase/Loring neighborhoods, in accordance with the Feasibility 
Report Supplement, Local Flood Protection, Crookston, Minnesota, at a 
total cost of $17,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$11,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $6,000,000.

SEC. 3080. SILVER BAY, MINNESOTA.

  The project for navigation, Silver Bay, Minnesota, authorized by 
section 2 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 19), 
is modified to include operation and maintenance of the general 
navigation facilities as a Federal responsibility.

SEC. 3081. TACONITE HARBOR, MINNESOTA.

  The project for navigation, Taconite Harbor, Minnesota, carried out 
under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), 
is modified to include operation and maintenance of the general 
navigation facilities as a Federal responsibility.

SEC. 3082. TWO HARBORS, MINNESOTA.

  (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Two Harbors, Minnesota, 
being carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 
(33 U.S.C. 577), is modified to include construction of a dredged 
material disposal facility, including actions required to clear the 
site.
  (b) Lands, Easements, and Rights-of-Way.--Non-Federal interests shall 
be responsible for providing all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and 
relocations necessary for the construction of the dredged material 
disposal facility.
  (c) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal funds 
that may be expended for the project shall be $5,000,000.

SEC. 3083. DEER ISLAND, HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.

  The project for ecosystem restoration, Deer Island, Harrison County, 
Mississippi, being carried out under section 204 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326), is modified to authorize the 
non-Federal interest to provide any portion of the non-Federal share of 
the cost of the project in the form of in-kind services and materials.

SEC. 3084. PEARL RIVER BASIN, MISSISSIPPI.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary shall complete a feasibility study for 
the project for flood damage reduction, Pearl River Watershed, 
Mississippi.
  (b) Comparison of Alternatives.--The feasibility study shall identify 
both the plan that maximizes national economic development benefits and 
the locally preferred plan and shall compare the level of flood damage 
reduction provided by each plan to that portion of Jackson, 
Mississippi, located below the Ross Barnett Reservoir Dam.
  (c) Recommended Plan.--If the Secretary determines that the locally 
preferred plan provides a level of flood damage reduction that is equal 
to or greater than the level of flood damage reduction provided by the 
national economic development plan, and the locally preferred plan is 
technically feasible and environmentally protective, the Secretary 
shall recommend construction of the locally preferred plan.
  (d) Evaluation of Project Cost.--For the purposes of determining 
compliance with the first section of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 
1936 (33 U.S.C. 701a), the Secretary shall consider only the costs of 
the national economic development plan, and shall exclude incremental 
costs associated with the locally preferred plan that are in excess of 
such costs, if the non-Federal interest agrees to pay 100 percent of 
such incremental costs.
  (e) Non-Federal Cost Share.--If the locally preferred plan is 
authorized for construction, the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project shall be the same percentage as the non-Federal share of the 
cost of the national economic development plan plus all additional 
costs of construction associated with the locally preferred plan.

SEC. 3085. FESTUS AND CRYSTAL CITY, MISSOURI.

  Section 102(b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 282) is amended by striking ``$10,000,000'' and inserting 
``$12,000,000''.

SEC. 3086. MONARCH-CHESTERFIELD, MISSOURI.

  The project for flood damage reduction, Monarch-Chesterfield, 
Missouri, authorized by section 101(b)(18) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project the cost of the planning, design, and construction work carried 
out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that the work is 
integral to the project.

SEC. 3087. RIVER DES PERES, MISSOURI.

  The projects for flood control, River Des Peres, Missouri, authorized 
by section 101(a)(17) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
(104 Stat. 4607) and section 102(13) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3668), are each modified to direct the Secretary 
to credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the 
cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of 
the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary determines 
that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3088. ANTELOPE CREEK, LINCOLN, NEBRASKA.

  The project for flood damage reduction, Antelope Creek, Lincoln, 
Nebraska, authorized by section 101(b)(19) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is modified--
          (1) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of the project the cost of design, and 
        construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
        before the date of the partnership agreement for the project if 
        the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
        project; and
          (2) to allow the non-Federal sponsor for the project to use, 
        and to direct the Secretary to accept, funds provided under any 
        other Federal program, to satisfy, in whole or in part, the 
        non-Federal share of the project if such funds are authorized 
        to be used to carry out the project.

SEC. 3089. SAND CREEK WATERSHED, WAHOO, NEBRASKA.

  The project for ecosystem restoration and flood damage reduction, 
Sand Creek watershed, Wahoo, Nebraska, authorized by section 101(b)(20) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is 
modified--
          (1) to direct the Secretary to provide credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the project or reimbursement for 
        the costs of any work that has been or will be performed by the 
        non-Federal interest before, on, or after the approval of the 
        project partnership agreement, including work performed by the 
        non-Federal interest in connection with the design and 
        construction of 7 upstream detention storage structures, if the 
        Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project;
          (2) to require that in-kind work to be credited under 
        paragraph (1) be subject to audit; and
          (3) to direct the Secretary to accept advance funds from the 
        non-Federal interest as needed to maintain the project 
        schedule.

SEC. 3090. LOWER CAPE MAY MEADOWS, CAPE MAY POINT, NEW JERSEY.

  The project for navigation mitigation, ecosystem restoration, shore 
protection, and hurricane and storm damage reduction, Lower Cape May 
Meadows, Cape May Point, New Jersey, authorized by section 101(a)(25) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 278), is 
modified to incorporate the project for shoreline erosion control, Cape 
May Point, New Jersey, carried out under section 5 of the Act entitled 
``An Act authorizing Federal participation in the cost of protecting 
the shores of publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 
U.S.C. 426h), if the Secretary determines that such incorporation is 
feasible.

SEC. 3091. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN FLOOD MANAGEMENT, NEW JERSEY.

  The project for flood control, Passaic River, New Jersey and New 
York, authorized by section 101(a)(18) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4607) and modified by section 327 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2607), is 
further modified to direct the Secretary to include the benefits and 
costs of preserving natural flood storage in any future economic 
analysis of the project.

SEC. 3092. BUFFALO HARBOR, NEW YORK.

  The project for navigation, Buffalo Harbor, New York, authorized by 
section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1176), is 
modified to include measures to enhance public access, at Federal cost 
of $500,000.

SEC. 3093. ORCHARD BEACH, BRONX, NEW YORK.

  The project for shoreline protection, Orchard Beach, Bronx, New York, 
authorized by section 554 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (110 Stat. 3781), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
construct the project, at a total cost of $20,000,000.

SEC. 3094. PORT OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY.

  The navigation project, Port of New York and New Jersey, New York and 
New Jersey, authorized by section 101(a)(2) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2576), is modified--
          (1) to authorize the Secretary to allow the non-Federal 
        interest to construct a temporary dredged material storage 
        facility to receive dredged material from the project if--
                  (A) the non-Federal interest submits, in writing, a 
                list of potential sites for the temporary storage 
                facility to the Committee on Transportation and 
                Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, the 
                Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
                Senate, and the Secretary at least 180 days before the 
                selection of the final site; and
                  (B) at least 70 percent of the dredged material 
                generated in connection with the project suitable for 
                beneficial reuse will be used at sites in the State of 
                New Jersey to the extent that there are sufficient 
                sites available; and
          (2) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of the project the cost of construction of 
        the temporary storage facility if the Secretary determines that 
        the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3095. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM.

  Section 553(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3781) is amended to read as follows:
  ``(c) New York State Canal System Defined.--In this section, the term 
`New York State Canal System' means the 524 miles of navigable canal 
that comprise the New York State Canal System, including the Erie, 
Cayuga-Seneca, Oswego, and Champlain Canals and the historic alignments 
of these canals, including the cities of Albany and Buffalo.''.

SEC. 3096. LOWER GIRARD LAKE DAM, OHIO.

  Section 507(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3758) is amended by striking ``$2,500,000'' and inserting 
``$6,000,000''.

SEC. 3097. MAHONING RIVER, OHIO.

  In carrying out the project for environmental dredging, authorized by 
section 312(f)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 
U.S.C. 1272(f)(4)), the Secretary is directed to credit toward the non-
Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out 
by the non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that the work is 
integral to the project.

SEC. 3098. ARCADIA LAKE, OKLAHOMA.

  Payments made by the city of Edmond, Oklahoma, to the Secretary in 
October 1999 of costs associated with present and future water storage 
at Arcadia Lake, Oklahoma, under Arcadia Lake Water Storage Contract 
Number DACW56-79-C-0072 shall satisfy the obligations of the city under 
that contract for such costs, including accrued interest.

SEC. 3099. WAURIKA LAKE, OKLAHOMA.

  The remaining obligation of the Waurika Project Master Conservancy 
District payable to the United States Government in the amounts, rates 
of interest, and payment schedules is set at the amounts, rates of 
interest, and payment schedules that existed, and that both parties 
agreed to, on June 3, 1986, and may not be adjusted, altered, or 
changed without a specific, separate, and written agreement between the 
District and the United States Government.

SEC. 3100. WILLAMETTE RIVER TEMPERATURE CONTROL, MCKENZIE SUBBASIN, 
                    OREGON.

  (a) In General.--The project for environmental restoration, 
Willamette River temperature control, McKenzie Subbasin, Oregon, 
authorized by section 101(a)(25) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3665) and modified by section 344 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 308), is further modified 
to direct the Secretary to pay, subject to the availability of 
appropriations, compensation for losses to small business attributable 
to the implementation of the drawdown conducted as a part of project 
implementation in 2002.
  (b) Establishment of Program.--Not later than 120 days after the date 
of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish, and provide 
public notice of, a program--
          (1) to receive claims for compensation for losses to small 
        business attributable to the implementation of the drawdown 
        conducted as a part of project implementation in 2002;
          (2) to evaluate claims for such losses; and
          (3) to pay claims for such losses.
  (c) Implementation of Program.--In carrying out the program 
established under subsection (b), the Secretary shall provide--
          (1) public notice of the existence of the program sufficient 
        to reach those in the area that may have suffered losses to 
        small businesses;
          (2) a period for the submission of claims of not fewer than 
        45 days and not greater than 75 days from the date of the first 
        public notice of the existence of the program;
          (3) for the evaluation of each claim submitted to the 
        Secretary under the program and a determination of whether the 
        claim constitutes a loss to a small business on or before the 
        last day of the 30-day period beginning on the date of 
        submission of the claim; and
          (4) for the payment of each claim that the Secretary 
        determines constitutes a loss to a small business on or before 
        the last day of the 30-day period beginning on the date of the 
        Secretary's determination.
  (d) Loss to a Small Business Defined.--In this section, the term 
``loss to a small business'' means documented financial losses 
associated with commercial activity of a small business that can be 
attributed to the turbidity levels in the McKenzie River being higher 
than those anticipated in the original planning documents and public 
announcements existing before the initiation of the drawdown in 2002. 
Commercial losses include decline in sales, loss of revenue (including 
loss of revenue from canceled or delayed reservations at lodging 
establishments), and any other financial losses that can be shown to be 
associated with the elevated turbidity levels in the McKenzie River in 
2002.
  (e) Payment of Claims.--The payment of claims for losses to small 
businesses shall be a Federal responsibility.

SEC. 3101. DELAWARE RIVER, PENNSYLVANIA, NEW JERSEY, AND DELAWARE.

  The Secretary may remove debris from the project for navigation, 
Delaware River, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware, Philadelphia to 
the Sea.

SEC. 3102. RAYSTOWN LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA.

  The Secretary may take such action as may be necessary, including 
construction of a breakwater, to prevent shoreline erosion between .07 
and 2.7 miles south of Pennsylvania State route 994 on the east shore 
of Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 3103. SHERADEN PARK STREAM AND CHARTIERS CREEK, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, 
                    PENNSYLVANIA.

  The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Sheraden Park Stream 
and Chartiers Creek, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, being carried out 
under section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2330), is modified to direct the Secretary to credit up to 
$400,000 toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project for 
planning and design work carried out by the non-Federal interest before 
the date of the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3104. SOLOMON'S CREEK, WILKES-BARRE, PENNSYLVANIA.

  The project for flood control, Wyoming Valley, Pennsylvania, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4124), is modified to include as a project element the 
project for flood control for Solomon's Creek, Wilkes-Barre, 
Pennsylvania.

SEC. 3105. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA.

  Section 313 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 
4845; 109 Stat. 407; 110 Stat. 3723; 113 Stat. 310; 117 Stat. 142) is 
amended--
          (1) in subsection (g)(1) by striking ``$180,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$200,000,000''; and
          (2) in subsection (h)(2) by striking ``Allegheny, Armstrong, 
        Beford, Blair, Cambria, Clearfield, Fayette, Franklin, Fulton, 
        Greene, Huntingdon, Indiana, Juniata, Mifflin, Somerset, 
        Snyder, Washington, and Westmoreland Counties'' and inserting 
        ``Allegheny, Armstrong, Bedford, Blair, Cambria, Fayette, 
        Franklin, Fulton, Greene, Huntingdon, Indiana, Juniata, 
        Somerset, Washington, and Westmoreland Counties''.

SEC. 3106. WYOMING VALLEY, PENNSYLVANIA.

  In carrying out the project for flood control, Wyoming Valley, 
Pennsylvania, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4124), the Secretary shall 
coordinate with non-Federal interests to review opportunities for 
increased public access.

SEC. 3107. CEDAR BAYOU, TEXAS.

  (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Cedar Bayou, Texas, 
reauthorized by section 349(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2632), is modified to direct the Secretary to 
credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost 
of planning and design work carried out by the non-Federal interest for 
the project if the Secretary determines that such work is integral to 
the project.
  (b) Cost Sharing.--Cost sharing for construction and operation and 
maintenance of the project shall be determined in accordance with 
section 101 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2211).

SEC. 3108. FREEPORT HARBOR, TEXAS.

  The project for navigation, Freeport Harbor, Texas, authorized by 
section 101 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1818), is 
modified.--
          (1) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of the project the cost of the planning, 
        design, and construction work carried out by the non-Federal 
        interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
        project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral 
        to the project; and
          (2) to direct the Secretary to remove the sunken vessel 
        ``COMSTOCK'' at Federal expense.

SEC. 3109. JOHNSON CREEK, ARLINGTON, TEXAS.

  The project for flood damage reduction, environmental restoration, 
and recreation, authorized by section 101(b)(14) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 280), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to carry out the project at a total cost of $29,717,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $20,670,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost $9,047,000.

SEC. 3110. LAKE KEMP, TEXAS.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary may not take any legal or 
administrative action seeking to remove a Lake Kemp improvement before 
the earlier of January 1, 2020, or the date of any transfer of 
ownership of the improvement occurring after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
  (b) Limitation on Liability.--The United States, or any of its 
officers, agents, or assignees, shall not be liable for any injury, 
loss, or damage accruing to the owners of a Lake Kemp improvement, 
their lessees, or occupants as a result of any flooding or inundation 
of such improvements by the waters of the Lake Kemp reservoir, or for 
such injury, loss, or damage as may occur through the operation and 
maintenance of the Lake Kemp dam and reservoir in any manner.
  (c) Lake Kemp Improvement Defined.--In this section, the term ``Lake 
Kemp improvement'' means an improvement (including dwellings) located 
within the flowage easement of Lake Kemp, Texas, below elevation 1159 
feet mean sea level.

SEC. 3111. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TEXAS.

  The project for flood control, Lower Rio Grande Basin, Texas, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4125), is modified--
          (1) to include as part of the project flood protection works 
        to reroute drainage to Raymondville Drain constructed by the 
        non-Federal interests in Hidalgo County in the vicinity of 
        Edinburg, Texas, if the Secretary determines that such work 
        meets feasibility requirements;
          (2) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of the project the cost of planning, design, 
        and construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
        before the date of the partnership agreement for the project if 
        the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
        project; and
          (3) to direct the Secretary, in calculating the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of the project, to make a determination 
        within 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act under 
        section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
        (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)) on the non-Federal interest's ability to 
        pay.

SEC. 3112. NORTH PADRE ISLAND, CORPUS CHRISTI BAY, TEXAS.

  The project for ecosystem restoration and storm damage reduction, 
North Padre Island, Corpus Christi Bay, Texas, authorized by section 
556 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 353), is 
modified to include recreation as a project purpose.

SEC. 3113. PAT MAYSE LAKE, TEXAS.

  The Secretary is directed to accept from the city of Paris, Texas, 
$3,461,432 as payment in full of monies owed to the United States for 
water supply storage space in Pat Mayse Lake, Texas, under contract 
number DA-34-066-CIVENG-65-1272, including accrued interest.

SEC. 3114. PROCTOR LAKE, TEXAS.

  The Secretary is authorized to purchase fee simple title to all 
properties located within the boundaries, and necessary for the 
operation, of the Proctor Lake project, Texas, authorized by section 
203 of the Flood Control Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 1259).

SEC. 3115. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.

  The project for flood control, San Antonio Channel, Texas, authorized 
by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 1259) as part 
of the comprehensive plan for flood protection on the Guadalupe and San 
Antonio Rivers in Texas and modified by section 103 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2921) and section 335 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2611), is 
further modified to authorize the Secretary to credit toward the non-
Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of design and 
construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
project.

SEC. 3116. JAMES RIVER, VIRGINIA.

   The project for navigation, James River, Virginia, authorized by the 
first section of the River and Harbor Appropriations Act of July 5, 
1884 (23 Stat. 138), is further modified to authorize the Secretary to 
enlarge the turning basin adjacent to the Richmond Deepwater Terminal 
at a total cost of $1,511,000 if the Secretary determines that the such 
enlargement is necessary for navigation safety.

SEC. 3117. LEE, RUSSELL, SCOTT, SMYTH, TAZEWELL, AND WISE COUNTIES, 
                    VIRGINIA.

  The project for flood control, Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy 
River and Upper Cumberland River, authorized by section 202 of the 
Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 1339) 
and modified by section 352 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (110 Stat. 3724-3725) and section 336 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2611), is further modified to direct 
the Secretary to determine the ability of Lee, Russell, Scott, Smyth, 
Tazewell, and Wise Counties, Virginia, to pay the non-Federal share of 
the cost of the project based solely on the criterion specified in 
section 103(m)(3)(A)(i) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(33 U.S.C. 2213(m)(3)(A)(i)).

SEC. 3118. TANGIER ISLAND SEAWALL, VIRGINIA.

  Section 577(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3789) is amended by striking ``at a total cost of $1,200,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $900,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $300,000.'' and inserting ``at a total cost of $3,000,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $2,250,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $750,000.''.

SEC. 3119. DUWAMISH/GREEN, WASHINGTON.

   The project for ecosystem restoration, Duwamish/Green, Washington, 
authorized by section 101(b)(26) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2000 (114 Stat. 2579), is modified--
          (1) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out 
        by the non-Federal interest before, on, or after the date of 
        the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
        determines that the work is integral to the project; and
          (2) to authorize the non-Federal interest to provide any 
        portion of the non-Federal share of the cost of the project in 
        the form of in-kind services and materials.

SEC. 3120. YAKIMA RIVER, PORT OF SUNNYSIDE, WASHINGTON.

  The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Yakima River, Port of 
Sunnyside, Washington, being carried out under section 206 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is modified to 
direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
of the project the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
before the date of the partnership agreement for the project if the 
Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3121. GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.

  Section 579(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3790; 113 Stat. 312) is amended by striking ``$47,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$99,000,000''.

SEC. 3122. LESAGE/GREENBOTTOM SWAMP, WEST VIRGINIA.

  Section 30(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 
Stat. 4030; 114 Stat. 2678) is amended to read as follows:
  ``(d) Historic Structure.--The Secretary shall ensure the 
preservation and restoration of the structure known as the `Jenkins 
House', and the reconstruction of associated buildings and landscape 
features of such structure located within the Lesage/Greenbottom Swamp 
in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's standards for the 
treatment of historic properties. Amounts made available for 
expenditure for the project authorized by section 301(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4110) shall be available 
for the purposes of this subsection.''.

SEC. 3123. NORTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.

  Section 557 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
353) is amended in the first sentence by striking ``favorable''.

SEC. 3124. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WISCONSIN.

  The project for navigation, Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin, authorized 
by the River and Harbor Act of August 30, 1852, is modified to direct 
the Secretary to deepen the upstream reach of the navigation channel 
from 12 feet to 18 feet, at a total cost of $300,000.

SEC. 3125. MISSISSIPPI RIVER HEADWATERS RESERVOIRS.

  Section 21 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 
4027) is amended--
          (1) in subsection (a)--
                  (A) by striking ``1276.42'' and inserting 
                ``1278.42'';
                  (B) by striking ``1218.31'' and inserting 
                ``1221.31''; and
                  (C) by striking ``1234.82'' and inserting 
                ``1235.30''; and
          (2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
  ``(b) Exception.--The Secretary may operate the headwaters reservoirs 
below the minimum or above the maximum water levels established in 
subsection (a) in accordance with water control regulation manuals (or 
revisions thereto) developed by the Secretary, after consultation with 
the Governor of Minnesota and affected tribal governments, landowners, 
and commercial and recreational users. The water control regulation 
manuals (and any revisions thereto) shall be effective when the 
Secretary transmits them to Congress. The Secretary shall report to 
Congress at least 14 days before operating any such headwaters 
reservoir below the minimum or above the maximum water level limits 
specified in subsection (a); except that notification is not required 
for operations necessary to prevent the loss of life or to ensure the 
safety of the dam or where the drawdown of lake levels is in 
anticipation of flood control operations.''.

SEC. 3126. CONTINUATION OF PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

  (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 1001(b)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)), the following 
projects shall remain authorized to be carried out by the Secretary:
          (1) The project for flood control, Agana River, Guam, 
        authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development 
        Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4127).
          (2) The project for navigation, Fall River Harbor, 
        Massachusetts, authorized by section 101 of the River and 
        Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731); except that the authorized 
        depth of that portion of the project extending riverward of the 
        Charles M. Braga, Jr. Memorial Bridge, Fall River and Somerset, 
        Massachusetts, shall not exceed 35 feet.
  (b) Limitation.--A project described in subsection (a) shall not be 
authorized for construction after the last day of the 5-year period 
beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, unless, during such 
period, funds have been obligated for the construction (including 
planning and design) of the project.

SEC. 3127. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS.

  Each of the following projects may be carried out by the Secretary 
and no construction on any such project may be initiated until the 
Secretary determines that the project is feasible:
          (1) Menominee harbor and river, michigan and wisconsin.--The 
        project for navigation, Menominee Harbor and River, Michigan 
        and Wisconsin, authorized by section 101 of the River and 
        Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 482) and deauthorized on April 15, 
        2002, in accordance with section 1001(b)(2) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)).
          (2) Manitowoc harbor, wisconsin.--That portion of the project 
        for navigation, Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin, consisting of the 
        channel in the south part of the outer harbor, deauthorized by 
        section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 
        1176).

SEC. 3128. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.

  (a) In General.--The following projects are not authorized after the 
date of enactment of this Act:
          (1) Bridgeport harbor, connecticut.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut, 
        authorized by the first section of the River and Harbor Act of 
        July 3, 1930 (46 Stat. 919), consisting of an 18-foot channel 
        in Yellow Mill River and described as follows: Beginning at a 
        point along the eastern limit of the existing project, 
        N123,649.75, E481,920.54, thence running northwesterly about 
        52.64 feet to a point N123,683.03, E481,879.75, thence running 
        northeasterly about 1,442.21 feet to a point N125,030.08, 
        E482,394.96, thence running northeasterly about 139.52 feet to 
        a point along the eastern limit of the existing channel, 
        N125,133.87, E482,488.19, thence running southwesterly about 
        1,588.98 feet to the point of origin.
          (2) Mystic river, connecticut.--The portion of the project 
        for navigation, Mystic River, Connecticut, authorized by the 
        first section of the River and Harbor Approriations Act of 
        September 19, 1890 (26 Stat. 436) consisting of a 12-foot-deep 
        channel, approximately 7,554 square feet in area, starting at a 
        point N193,086.51, E815,092.78, thence running north 59 degrees 
        21 minutes 46.63 seconds west about 138.05 feet to a point 
        N193,156.86, E814,974.00, thence running north 51 degrees 04 
        minutes 39.00 seconds west about 166.57 feet to a point 
        N193,261.51, E814,844.41, thence running north 43 degrees 01 
        minutes 34.90 seconds west about 86.23 feet to a point 
        N193,324.55, E814,785.57, thence running north 06 degrees 42 
        minutes 03.86 seconds west about 156.57 feet to a point 
        N193,480.05, E814,767.30, thence running south 21 degrees 21 
        minutes 17.94 seconds east about 231.42 feet to a point 
        N193,264.52, E814,851.57, thence running south 53 degrees 34 
        minutes 23.28 seconds east about 299.78 feet to the point of 
        origin.
          (3) Falmouth harbor, massachusetts.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, Falmouth Harbor, Massachusetts, 
        authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1948 
        (62 Stat. 1172), beginning at a point along the eastern side of 
        the inner harbor N200,415.05, E845,307.98, thence running north 
        25 degrees 48 minutes 54.3 seconds east 160.24 feet to a point 
        N200,559.20, E845,377.76, thence running north 22 degrees 7 
        minutes 52.4 seconds east 596.82 feet to a point N201,112.15, 
        E845,602.60, thence running north 60 degrees 1 minute 0.3 
        seconds east 83.18 feet to a point N201,153.72, E845,674.65, 
        thence running south 24 degrees 56 minutes 43.4 seconds west 
        665.01 feet to a point N200,550.75, E845,394.18, thence running 
        south 32 degrees 25 minutes 29.0 seconds west 160.76 feet to 
        the point of origin.
          (4) Island end river, massachusetts.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, Island End River, Massachusetts, 
        carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 
        1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), described as follows: Beginning at a 
        point along the eastern limit of the existing project, 
        N507,348.98, E721,180.01, thence running northeast about 35 
        feet to a point N507,384.17, E721,183.36, thence running 
        northeast about 324 feet to a point N507,590.51, E721,433.17, 
        thence running northeast about 345 feet to a point along the 
        northern limit of the existing project, N507,927.29, 
        E721,510.29, thence running southeast about 25 feet to a point 
        N507,921.71, E721,534.66, thence running southwest about 354 
        feet to a point N507,576.65, E721,455.64, thence running 
        southwest about 357 feet to the point of origin.
          (5) City waterway, tacoma, washington.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, City Waterway, Tacoma, Washington, 
        authorized by the first section of the River and Harbor 
        Appropriations Act of June 13, 1902 (32 Stat. 347), consisting 
        of the last 1,000 linear feet of the inner portion of the 
        waterway beginning at station 70+00 and ending at station 
        80+00.
  (b) Anchorage Area, New London Harbor, Connecticut.--The portion of 
the project for navigation, New London Harbor, Connecticut, authorized 
by the River and Harbor Appropriations Act of June 13, 1902 (32 Stat. 
333), that consists of a 23-foot waterfront channel and that is further 
described as beginning at a point along the western limit of the 
existing project, N188, 802.75, E779, 462.81, thence running 
northeasterly about 1,373.88 feet to a point N189, 554.87, E780, 
612.53, thence running southeasterly about 439.54 feet to a point N189, 
319.88, E780, 983.98, thence running southwesterly about 831.58 feet to 
a point N188, 864.63, E780, 288.08, thence running southeasterly about 
567.39 feet to a point N188, 301.88, E780, 360.49, thence running 
northwesterly about 1,027.96 feet to the point of origin, shall be 
redesignated as an anchorage area.
  (c) Southport Harbor, Fairfield, Connecticut.--The project for 
navigation, Southport Harbor, Fairfield, Connecticut, authorized by 
section 2 of the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1829, and by the 
first section of the River and Harbor Act of August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 
1029), and section 364 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3733-3734), is further modified to redesignate a portion of 
the 9-foot-deep channel to an anchorage area, approximately 900 feet in 
length and 90,000 square feet in area, and lying generally north of a 
line with points at coordinates N108,043.45, E452,252.04 and 
N107938.74, E452265.74.
  (d) Mystic River, Massachusetts.--The portion of the project for 
navigation, Mystic River, Massachusetts, authorized by the first 
section of the River and Harbor Appropriations Act of July 13, 1892 (27 
Stat. 96), between a line starting at a point N515,683.77, E707,035.45 
and ending at a point N515,721.28, E707,069.85 and a line starting at a 
point N514,595.15, E707,746.15 and ending at a point N514,732.94, 
E707,658.38 shall be relocated and reduced from 100 foot to a 50-foot 
wide channel after the date of enactment of this Act described as 
follows: Beginning at a point N515,721.28, E707,069.85, thence running 
southeasterly about 840.50 feet to a point N515,070.16, E707,601.27, 
thence running southeasterly about 177.54 feet to a point N514,904.84, 
E707,665.98, thence running southeasterly about 319.90 feet to a point 
with coordinates N514,595.15, E707,746.15, thence running northwesterly 
about 163.37 feet to a point N514,732.94, E707,658.38, thence running 
northwesterly about 161.58 feet to a point N514.889.47, E707,618.30, 
thence running northwesterly about 166.61 feet to a point N515.044.62, 
E707,557.58, thence running northwesterly about 825.31 feet to a point 
N515,683.77, E707,035.45, thence running northeasterly about 50.90 feet 
returning to a point N515,721.28, E707,069.85.
  (e) Green Bay Harbor, Green Bay, Wisconsin.--The portion of the inner 
harbor of the Federal navigation channel, Green Bay Harbor, Green Bay, 
Wisconsin, authorized by the first section of the River and Harbor Act 
of June 23, 1866, beginning at station 190+00 to station 378+00 is 
authorized to a width of 75 feet and a depth of 6 feet.
  (f) Additional Deauthorizations.--The following projects are not 
authorized after the date of enactment of this Act, except with respect 
to any portion of such a project which portion has been completed 
before such date or is under construction on such date:
          (1) The project for flood control, Cache Creek Basin, Clear 
        Lake Outlet Channel, California, authorized by section 401(a) 
        of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
        4112).
          (2) The project for flood protection on Atascadero Creek and 
        its tributaries of Goleta, California, authorized by section 
        201 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1826).
          (3) The project for flood control, central and southern 
        Florida, Shingle Creek basin, Florida, authorized by section 
        203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1182).
          (4) The project for flood control, Middle Wabash, Greenfield 
        Bayou, Indiana, authorized by section 10 of the Flood Control 
        Act of July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 649).
          (5) The project for flood damage reduction, Lake George, 
        Hobart, Indiana, authorized by section 602(a)(2) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148).
          (6) The project for flood control, Green Bay Levee and 
        Drainage District No. 2, Iowa, authorized by section 401(a) of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4115), 
        deauthorized in fiscal year 1991, and reauthorized by section 
        115(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
        Stat. 4821).
          (7) The project for flood control, Hazard, Kentucky, 
        authorized by section 3(a)(7) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1988 (100 Stat. 4014) and section 108 of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4621).
          (8) The recreation portion of the project for flood control, 
        Taylorsville Lake, Kentucky, authorized by section 203 of the 
        Flood Control Act of 1966 (80 Stat. 1421).
          (9) The project for flood control, western Kentucky 
        tributaries, Kentucky, authorized by section 204 of the Flood 
        Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1076) and modified by section 210 
        of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1829).
          (10) The project for flood damage reduction, Tensas-Cocodrie 
        area, Louisiana, authorized by section 3 of the Flood Control 
        Act of August 18, 1941 (55 Stat. 643).
          (11) The project for flood control, Eastern Rapides and 
        South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, Louisiana, authorized by 
        section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1825).
          (12) The bulkhead and jetty features at Lake Borgne and Chef 
        Menteur, Louisiana, of the project for navigation, Mississippi 
        River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico, barge channel through 
        Devils Swamp, Louisiana, authorized by the first section of the 
        River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 635).
          (13) The project for navigation Red River Waterway, 
        Shreveport, Louisiana to Daingerfield, Texas, authorized by the 
        River and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731).
          (14) The project for flood damage reduction Brockton, 
        Massachusetts, authorized by section 401(c) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4129).
          (15) The project for navigation, Grand Haven Harbor, 
        Michigan, authorized by section 202 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4093).
          (16) The project for hydropower, Libby Dam, Montana, (Units 
        6-8), authorized by section 549 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3779).
          (17) The project for flood damage reduction, Platte River 
        Flood and Related Streambank Erosion Control, Nebraska, 
        authorized by section 603(f)(6) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4150).
          (18) The project for navigation, Outer Harbor, Buffalo, New 
        York, authorized by section 110 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4817).
          (19) The project for flood control, Sugar Creek Basin, North 
        Carolina and South Carolina, authorized by section 401(a) of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4121).
          (20) The project for flood control, Miami River, Fairfield, 
        Ohio, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4122).
          (21) The project for shoreline protection, Maumee Bay, Lake 
        Erie, Ohio, authorized by section 501(a) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4135).
          (22) The project for flood control and water supply, Parker 
        Lake, Muddy Boggy Creek, Oklahoma, authorized by section 601 of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4144).
          (23) The project for the Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, 
        Hammond, Oregon, authorized by title I of the Energy and Water 
        Development Appropriations Act, 1991 (104 Stat. 2078).
          (24) The project for bulkhead repairs, Quonset Point-
        Davisville, Rhode Island, authorized by section 571 of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3788).
          (25) The project for flood damage reduction, Harris Fork 
        Creek, Tennessee and Kentucky, authorized by section 102 of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2921).
          (26) The Arroyo Colorado, Texas, feature of the project for 
        flood control Lower Rio Grande, Texas, authorized by section 
        401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
        Stat. 4125).
          (27) The structural portion of the project for flood control, 
        Cypress Creek, Texas, authorized by section 3(a)(13) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4014).
          (28) The project for flood protection, East Fork Channel 
        Improvement, Increment 2, East Fork of the Trinity River, 
        Texas, authorized by section 202 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1962 (76 Stat. 1185).
          (29) The project for flood control, Falfurrias, Texas, 
        authorized by section 3(a)(14) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4014).
          (30) The project for streambank erosion, Kanawha River, 
        Charleston, West Virginia, authorized by section 603(f)(13) of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4153).
  (g) Conditions.--The first sentence of section 1001(b)(2) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)) is 
amended--
          (1) by striking ``two years'' and inserting ``year''; and
          (2) by striking ``7'' and inserting ``5''.

SEC. 3129. LAND CONVEYANCES.

  (a) St. Francis Basin, Arkansas and Missouri.--
          (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the State of 
        Arkansas, without monetary consideration and subject to 
        paragraph (2), all right, title, and interest to real property 
        within the State acquired by the Federal Government as 
        mitigation land for the project for flood control, St. Francis 
        Basin, Arkansas and Missouri Project, authorized by the Flood 
        Control Act of May 15, 1928 (33 U.S.C. 702a et seq.)
          (2) Terms and conditions.--
                  (A) In general.--The conveyance by the United States 
                under this subsection shall be subject to--
                          (i) the condition that the State of Arkansas 
                        agree to operate, maintain, and manage the real 
                        property for fish and wildlife, recreation, and 
                        environmental purposes at no cost or expense to 
                        the United States; and
                          (ii) such other terms and conditions as the 
                        Secretary determines to be in the interest of 
                        the United States.
                  (B) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the 
                real property conveyed under paragraph (1) ceases to be 
                held in public ownership or the State ceases to 
                operate, maintain, and manage the real property in 
                accordance with this subsection, all right, title, and 
                interest in and to the property shall revert to the 
                United States, at the option of the Secretary.
          (3) Mitigation.--Nothing in this subsection extinguishes the 
        responsibility of the Federal Government or the non-Federal 
        interest for the project referred to in paragraph (1) from the 
        obligation to implement mitigation for such project that 
        existed on the day prior to the transfer authorized by this 
        subsection.
  (b) Milford, Kansas.--
          (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey by quitclaim deed 
        without consideration to the Geary County Fire Department, 
        Milford, Kansas, all right, title, and interest of the United 
        States in and to real property consisting of approximately 7.4 
        acres located in Geary County, Kansas, for construction, 
        operation, and maintenance of a fire station.
          (2) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the real 
        property conveyed under paragraph (1) ceases to be held in 
        public ownership or to be used for any purpose other than a 
        fire station, all right, title, and interest in and to the 
        property shall revert to the United States, at the option of 
        the United States.
  (c) Pike County, Missouri.--
          (1) In general.--At such time as S.S.S., Inc., conveys all 
        right, title and interest in and to the real property described 
        in paragraph (2)(A) to the United States, the Secretary shall 
        convey all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
        and to the real property described in paragraph (2)(B) to 
        S.S.S., Inc.
          (2) Land description.--The parcels of land referred to in 
        paragraph (1) are the following:
                  (A) Non-federal land.--Approximately 42 acres, the 
                exact legal description to be determined by mutual 
                agreement of S.S.S., Inc., and the Secretary, subject 
                to any existing flowage easements situated in Pike 
                County, Missouri, upstream and northwest, about a 200-
                foot distance from Drake Island (also known as Grimes 
                Island).
                  (B) Federal land.--Approximately 42 acres, the exact 
                legal description to be determined by mutual agreement 
                of S.S.S. Inc., and the Secretary, situated in Pike 
                County, Missouri, known as Government Tract Numbers 
                MIs-7 and a portion of FM-46 (both tracts on Buffalo 
                Island), administered by the Corps of Engineers.
          (3) Conditions.--The exchange of real property under 
        paragraph (1) shall be subject to the following conditions:
                  (A) Deeds.--
                          (i) Non-federal land.--The conveyance of the 
                        real property described in paragraph (2)(A) to 
                        the Secretary shall be by a warranty deed 
                        acceptable to the Secretary.
                          (ii) Federal land.--The instrument of 
                        conveyance used to convey the real property 
                        described in paragraph (2)(B) to S.S.S., Inc., 
                        shall be by quitclaim deed and contain such 
                        reservations, terms, and conditions as the 
                        Secretary considers necessary to allow the 
                        United States to operate and maintain the 
                        Mississippi River 9-Foot Navigation Project.
                  (B) Removal of improvements.--S.S.S., Inc., may 
                remove, and the Secretary may require S.S.S., Inc., to 
                remove, any improvements on the land described in 
                paragraph (2)(A).
                  (C) Time limit for exchange.--The land exchange under 
                paragraph (1) shall be completed not later than 2 years 
                after the date of enactment of this Act.
          (4) Value of properties.--If the appraised fair market value, 
        as determined by the Secretary, of the real property conveyed 
        to S.S.S., Inc., by the Secretary under paragraph (1) exceeds 
        the appraised fair market value, as determined by the 
        Secretary, of the real property conveyed to the United States 
        by S.S.S., Inc., under paragraph (1), S.S.S., Inc., shall make 
        a payment to the United States equal to the excess in cash or a 
        cash equivalent that is satisfactory to the Secretary.
  (d) Boardman, Oregon.--Section 501(g)(1) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3751) is amended--
          (1) by striking ``city of Boardman,'' and inserting ``the 
        Boardman Park and Recreation District, Boardman,''; and
          (2) by striking ``such city'' and inserting ``the city of 
        Boardman''.
  (e) Tioga Township, Pennsylvania.--
          (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey by quitclaim deed 
        to the Tioga Township, Pennsylvania, without consideration, all 
        right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the 
        parcel of real property located on the northeast end of Tract 
        No. 226, a portion of the Tioga-Hammond Lakes flood control 
        project, Tioga County, Pennsylvania, consisting of 
        approximately 8 acres, together with any improvements on that 
        property, for public ownership and use as the site of the 
        administrative offices and road maintenance complex for the 
        Township.
          (2) Reservation of interests.--The Secretary shall reserve 
        such rights and interests in and to the property to be conveyed 
        as the Secretary considers necessary to preserve the 
        operational integrity and security of the Tioga-Hammond Lakes 
        flood control project.
          (3) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the property 
        conveyed under paragraph (1) ceases to be held in public 
        ownership, or to be used as a site for the Tioga Township 
        administrative offices and road maintenance complex or for 
        related public purposes, all right, title, and interest in and 
        to the property shall revert to the United States, at the 
        option of the United States.
  (f) Richard B. Russell Lake, South Carolina.--
          (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the State of 
        South Carolina, by quitclaim deed, at fair market value, all 
        right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the 
        real property described in paragraph (2) that is managed, as of 
        the date of enactment of this Act, by the South Carolina 
        department of commerce for public recreation purposes for the 
        Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, South Carolina, project 
        authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1966 (80 
        Stat. 1420).
          (2) Land description.--Subject to paragraph (3), the real 
        property referred to in paragraph (1) is the parcel contained 
        in the portion of real property described in Army Lease Number 
        DACW21-1-92-0500.
          (3) Reservation of interests.--The United States shall 
        reserve--
                  (A) ownership of all real property included in the 
                lease referred to in paragraph (2) that would have been 
                acquired for operational purposes in accordance with 
                the 1971 implementation of the 1962 Army/Interior Joint 
                Acquisition Policy; and
                  (B) such other rights and interests in and to the 
                real property to be conveyed as the Secretary considers 
                necessary for authorized project purposes, including 
                easement rights-of-way to remaining Federal land.
          (4) No effect on shore management policy.--The Shoreline 
        Management Policy (ER-1130-2-406) of the Corps of Engineer 
        shall not be changed or altered for any proposed development of 
        land conveyed under this subsection.
          (5) Cost sharing.--In carrying out the conveyance under this 
        subsection, the Secretary and the State shall comply with all 
        obligations of any cost-sharing agreement between the Secretary 
        and the State with respect to the real property described in 
        paragraph (2) in effect as of the date of the conveyance.
          (6) Land not conveyed.--The State shall continue to manage 
        the real property described in paragraph (3) not conveyed under 
        this subsection in accordance with the terms and conditions of 
        Army Lease Number DACW21-1-92-0500.
  (g) Generally Applicable Provisions.--
          (1) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact acreage 
        and the legal description of any real property to be conveyed 
        under this section shall be determined by a survey that is 
        satisfactory to the Secretary.
          (2) Applicability of property screening provisions.--Section 
        2696 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply to any 
        conveyance under this section.
          (3) Additional terms and conditions.--The Secretary may 
        require that any conveyance under this section be subject to 
        such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary considers 
        appropriate and necessary to protect the interests of the 
        United States.
          (4) Costs of conveyance.--An entity to which a conveyance is 
        made under this section shall be responsible for all reasonable 
        and necessary costs, including real estate transaction and 
        environmental documentation costs, associated with the 
        conveyance.
          (5) Liability.--An entity to which a conveyance is made under 
        this section shall hold the United States harmless from any 
        liability with respect to activities carried out, on or after 
        the date of the conveyance, on the real property conveyed. The 
        United States shall remain responsible for any liability with 
        respect to activities carried out, before such date, on the 
        real property conveyed.

SEC. 3130. EXTINGUISHMENT OF REVERSIONARY INTERESTS AND USE 
                    RESTRICTIONS.

  (a) Idaho.--
          (1) In general.--With respect to the property covered by each 
        deed in paragraph (2)--
                  (A) the reversionary interests and use restrictions 
                relating to port and industrial use purposes are 
                extinguished;
                  (B) the restriction that no activity shall be 
                permitted that will compete with services and 
                facilities offered by public marinas is extinguished;
                  (C) the human habitation or other building structure 
                use restriction is extinguished if the elevation of the 
                property is above the standard project flood elevation; 
                and
                  (D) the use of fill material to raise areas of the 
                property above the standard project flood elevation is 
                authorized, except in any area for which a permit under 
                section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 
                (33 U.S.C. 1344) is required.
          (2) Affected deeds.--The deeds with the following county 
        auditor's file numbers are referred to in paragraph (1):
                  (A) Auditor's Instruments No. 399218 and No. 399341 
                of Nez Perce County, Idaho--2.07 acres.
                  (B) Auditor's Instruments No. 487437 and No. 339341 
                of Nez Perce County, Idaho--7.32 acres.
  (b) Old Hickory Lock and Dam, Cumberland River, Tennessee.--
          (1) Release of retained rights, interests, reservations.--
        With respect to land conveyed by the Secretary to the Tennessee 
        Society of Crippled Children and Adults, Incorporated (now 
        known as ``Easter Seals Tennessee''), at Old Hickory Lock and 
        Dam, Cumberland River, Tennessee, under section 211 of the 
        Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1087), the reversionary 
        interests and the use restrictions relating to recreation and 
        camping purposes are extinguished.
          (2) Instrument of release.--As soon as possible after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall execute and 
        file in the appropriate office a deed of release, amended deed, 
        or other appropriate instrument effectuating the release of 
        interests required by paragraph (1).
  (c) Port of Pasco, Washington.--
          (1) Extinguishment of use restrictions and flowage 
        easement.--With respect to the property covered by the deed in 
        paragraph (3)(A)--
                  (A) the flowage easement and human habitation or 
                other building structure use restriction is 
                extinguished if the elevation of the property is above 
                the standard project flood elevation; and
                  (B) the use of fill material to raise areas of the 
                property above the standard project flood elevation is 
                authorized, except in any area for which a permit under 
                section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 
                (33 U.S.C. 1344) is required.
          (2) Extinguishment of flowage easement.--With respect to the 
        property covered by each deed in paragraph (3)(B), the flowage 
        easement is extinguished if the elevation of the property is 
        above the standard project flood elevation.
          (3) Affected deeds.--The deeds referred to in paragraphs (1) 
        and (2) are as follows:
                  (A) Auditor's File Number 262980 of Franklin County, 
                Washington.
                  (B) Auditor's File Numbers 263334 and 404398 of 
                Franklin County, Washington.
  (d) No Effect on Other Rights.--Nothing in this section affects the 
remaining rights and interests of the Corps of Engineers for authorized 
project purposes.

                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

SEC. 4001. JOHN GLENN GREAT LAKES BASIN PROGRAM.

  Section 455 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (42 U.S.C. 
1962d-21) is amended by adding at the end the following:
  ``(g) In-Kind Contributions for Study.--The non-Federal interest may 
provide up to 100 percent of the non-Federal share required under 
subsection (f) in the form of in-kind services and materials.''.

SEC. 4002. LAKE ERIE DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL SITES.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the nature and 
frequency of avian botulism problems in the vicinity of Lake Erie 
associated with dredged material disposal sites and shall make 
recommendations to eliminate the conditions that result in such 
problems.

SEC. 4003. SOUTHWESTERN UNITED STATES DROUGHT STUDY.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary of 
the Interior, the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Commerce, 
and other appropriate agencies, shall conduct, at Federal expense, a 
comprehensive study of drought conditions in the southwestern United 
States, with a particular emphasis on the Colorado River basin, the Rio 
Grande River basin, and the Great Basin.
  (b) Inventory of Actions.--In conducting the study, the Secretary 
shall assemble an inventory of actions taken or planned to be taken to 
address drought-related situations in the southwestern United States.
  (c) Purpose.--The purpose of the study shall be to develop 
recommendations to more effectively address current and future drought 
conditions in the southwestern United States.
  (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $7,000,000. 
Such funds shall remain available until expended.

SEC. 4004. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

  Section 459(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 333; 114 Stat. 2635) is amended by striking ``3 years after the 
first date on which funds are appropriated to carry out this section'' 
and inserting ``December 30, 2006''.

SEC. 4005. KNIK ARM, COOK INLET, ALASKA.

   The Secretary shall conduct, at Federal expense, a study to 
determine the potential impacts on navigation of construction of a 
bridge across Knik Arm, Cook Inlet, Alaska.

SEC. 4006. KUSKOKWIM RIVER, ALASKA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigation, Kuskokwim River, Alaska, in the 
vicinity of the village of Crooked Creek.

SEC. 4007. ST. GEORGE HARBOR, ALASKA.

  The Secretary shall conduct, at Federal expense, a study to determine 
the feasibility of providing navigation improvements at St. George 
Harbor, Alaska.

SEC. 4008. SUSITNA RIVER, ALASKA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for hydropower, recreation, and related purposes 
on the Susitna River, Alaska.

SEC. 4009. GILA BEND, MARICOPA, ARIZONA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Gila Bend, Maricopa, 
Arizona. In conducting the study, the Secretary shall review plans and 
designs developed by non-Federal interests and shall incorporate such 
plans and designs into the Federal study if the Secretary determines 
that such plans and designs are consistent with Federal standards.

SEC. 4010. SEARCY COUNTY, ARKANSAS.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
using Greers Ferry Lake as a water supply source for Searcy County, 
Arkansas.

SEC. 4011. DRY CREEK VALLEY, CALIFORNIA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project to provide recycled water for agricultural water 
supply, Dry Creek Valley, California, including a review of the 
feasibility of expanding the Geysers recharge project north of 
Healdsburg, California.

SEC. 4012. ELKHORN SLOUGH ESTUARY, CALIFORNIA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study of the Elkhorn Slough estuary, 
California, to determine the feasibility of conserving, enhancing, and 
restoring estuarine habitats by developing strategies to address 
hydrological management issues.

SEC. 4013. FRESNO, KINGS, AND KERN COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply for Fresno, Kings, and Kern 
Counties, California.

SEC. 4014. LOS ANGELES RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and 
ecosystem restoration, Los Angeles River, California.
  (b) Revitalization Plan.--In conducting the study, the Secretary 
shall review the Los Angeles River revitalization plan developed by 
non-Federal interests and shall incorporate such plan into the Federal 
study if the Secretary determines that such plan is consistent with 
Federal standards.

SEC. 4015. LYTLE CREEK, RIALTO, CALIFORNIA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and groundwater 
recharge, Lytle Creek, Rialto, California.

SEC. 4016. MOKELUMNE RIVER, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply along the 
Mokelumne River, San Joaquin County, California.
  (b) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this section 
shall be construed to invalidate, preempt, or create any exception to 
State water law, State water rights, or Federal or State permitted 
activities or agreements.

SEC. 4017. NAPA RIVER, ST. HELENA, CALIFORNIA.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive study of 
the Napa River in the vicinity of St. Helena, California, for the 
purposes of improving flood management through reconnecting the river 
to its floodplain; restoring habitat, including riparian and aquatic 
habitat; improving fish passage and water quality; and restoring native 
plant communities.
  (b) Plans and Designs.--In conducting the study, the Secretary shall 
review plans and designs developed by non-Federal interests and shall 
incorporate such plans and designs into the Federal study if the 
Secretary determines that such plans and designs are consistent with 
Federal standards.

SEC. 4018. ORICK, CALIFORNIA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and ecosystem 
restoration, Orick, California. In conducting the study, the Secretary 
shall determine the feasibility of restoring or rehabilitating the 
Redwood Creek Levees, Humboldt County, California.

SEC. 4019. RIALTO, FONTANA, AND COLTON, CALIFORNIA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply for Rialto, Fontana, and 
Colton, California.

SEC. 4020. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive study to determine the 
feasibility of, and alternatives for, measures to protect water 
diversion facilities and fish protective screen facilities in the 
vicinity of river mile 178 on the Sacramento River, California.

SEC. 4021. SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, San Diego County, California, 
including a review of the feasibility of connecting 4 existing 
reservoirs to increase usable storage capacity.

SEC. 4022. SAN FRANCISCO BAY, SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, CALIFORNIA.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of the beneficial use of dredged material from the San 
Francisco Bay in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, 
including the benefits and impacts of salinity in the Delta and the 
benefits to navigation, flood damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, 
water quality, salinity control, water supply reliability, and 
recreation.
  (b) Cooperation.--In conducting the study, the Secretary shall 
cooperate with the California Department of Water Resources and 
appropriate Federal and State entities in developing options for the 
beneficial use of dredged material from San Francisco Bay for the 
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta area.
  (c) Review.--The study shall include a review of the feasibility of 
using Sherman Island as a rehandling site for levee maintenance 
material, as well as for ecosystem restoration. The review may include 
monitoring a pilot project using up to 150,000 cubic yards of dredged 
material and being carried out at the Sherman Island site, examining 
larger scale use of dredged materials from the San Francisco Bay and 
Suisun Bay Channel, and analyzing the feasibility of the potential use 
of saline materials from the San Francisco Bay for both rehandling and 
ecosystem restoration purposes.

SEC. 4023. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BAY SHORELINE STUDY, CALIFORNIA.

  (a) In General.--In conducting the South San Francisco Bay shoreline 
study, the Secretary shall--
          (1) review the planning, design, and land acquisition 
        documents prepared by the California State Coastal Conservancy, 
        the Santa Clara Valley Water District, and other local 
        interests in developing recommendations for measures to provide 
        flood protection of the South San Francisco Bay shoreline, 
        restoration of the South San Francisco Bay salt ponds 
        (including lands owned by the Department of the Interior), and 
        other related purposes; and
          (2) incorporate such planning, design, and land acquisition 
        documents into the Federal study if the Secretary determines 
        that such documents are consistent with Federal standards.
  (b) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2008, the Secretary shall 
transmit a feasibility report for the South San Francisco Bay shoreline 
study to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
Works of the Senate.
  (c) Credit.--
          (1) In general.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of any project authorized by law as a 
        result of the South San Francisco Bay shoreline study the cost 
        of work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date 
        of the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
        determines that the work is integral to the project.
          (2) Limitation.--In no case may work that was carried out 
        more than 5 years before the date of enactment of this Act be 
        eligible for credit under this subsection.

SEC. 4024. TWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Pinto Cove Wash, in 
the vicinity of Twentynine Palms, California.

SEC. 4025. YUCCA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, West Burnt Mountain 
basin, in the vicinity of Yucca Valley, California.

SEC. 4026. BOULDER CREEK, BOULDER, COLORADO.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction in the Boulder Creek 
floodplain, Colorado.

SEC. 4027. ROARING FORK RIVER, BASALT, COLORADO.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and other purposes 
for the Roaring Fork River, Basalt, Colorado.

SEC. 4028. DELAWARE AND CHRISTINA RIVERS AND SHELLPOT CREEK, 
                    WILMINGTON, DELAWARE.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and related purposes 
along the Delaware and Christina Rivers and Shellpot Creek, Wilmington, 
Delaware.

SEC. 4029. COLLIER COUNTY BEACHES, FLORIDA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for hurricane and storm damage reduction and 
flood damage reduction in the vicinity of Vanderbilt, Park Shore, and 
Naples beaches, Collier County, Florida.

SEC. 4030. VANDERBILT BEACH LAGOON, FLORIDA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration, water supply, and 
improvement of water quality at Vanderbilt Beach Lagoon, Florida.

SEC. 4031. MERIWETHER COUNTY, GEORGIA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Meriwether County, Georgia.

SEC. 4032. TYBEE ISLAND, GEORGIA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
including the northern end of Tybee Island extending from the north 
terminal groin to the mouth of Lazaretto Creek as a part of the project 
for beach erosion control, Tybee Island, Georgia, carried out under 
section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5).

SEC. 4033. KAUKONAHUA-HELEMANO WATERSHED, OAHU, HAWAII.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Kaukonahua-Helemano 
watershed, Oahu, Hawaii.

SEC. 4034. WEST MAUI, MAUI, HAWAII.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for water resources development, environmental 
restoration, and natural resources protection, West Maui, Maui, Hawaii.

SEC. 4035. BOISE RIVER, IDAHO.

  The study for flood control, Boise River, Idaho, authorized by 
section 414 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
324), is modified--
          (1) to add ecosystem restoration and water supply as project 
        purposes to be studied; and
          (2) to require the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of the study the cost, not to exceed 
        $500,000, of work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
        before the date of the partnership agreement for the project if 
        the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
        project.

SEC. 4036. BALLARD'S ISLAND SIDE CHANNEL, ILLINOIS.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for ecosystem restoration, Ballard's Island, 
Illinois.

SEC. 4037. CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

  Section 425(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2638) is amended by inserting ``Lake Michigan and'' before ``the 
Chicago River''.

SEC. 4038. SOUTH BRANCH, CHICAGO RIVER, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for ecosystem restoration at the South Fork of 
the South Branch of the Chicago River, Chicago, Illinois.

SEC. 4039. UTICA, ILLINOIS.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction in the vicinity of 
Utica, Illinois.

SEC. 4040. LAKE AND PORTER COUNTIES, INDIANA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for riverfront development, including enhanced 
public access, recreation, and environmental restoration along Lake 
Michigan, Hammond, Whiting, East Chicago, Gary, and Portage, Indiana.

SEC. 4041. SALEM, INDIANA.

  The Secreatry shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project to provide an additional water supply source for 
Salem, Indiana.

SEC. 4042. BUCKHORN LAKE, KENTUCKY.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of modifying the project for flood damage reduction, 
Buckhorn Lake, Kentucky, authorized by section 2 of the Flood Control 
Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1217), to add ecosystem restoration, 
recreation, and improved access as project purposes, including 
permanently raising the winter pool elevation of the project.
  (b) In-Kind Contributions.--The non-Federal interest may provide the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the study in the form of services, 
materials, supplies, or other in-kind contributions.

SEC. 4043. DEWEY LAKE, KENTUCKY.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
modifying the project for Dewey Lake, Kentucky, to add water supply as 
a project purpose.

SEC. 4044. LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study of the project for flood control, 
Louisville, Kentucky, authorized by section 4 of the Flood Control Act 
of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1217), to investigate measures to address 
the rehabilitation of the project.

SEC. 4045. BASTROP-MOREHOUSE PARISH, LOUISIANA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Bastrop-Morehouse Parish, 
Louisiana.

SEC. 4046. OFFSHORE OIL AND GAS FABRICATION PORTS, LOUISIANA.

  (a) Benefits.--In conducting a feasibility study for each of the 
following projects for navigation, the Secretary shall include in the 
calculation of national economic development benefits all economic 
benefits associated with contracts for new energy exploration and 
contracts for the fabrication of energy infrastructure that would 
result from carrying out the project:
          (1) Atchafalaya River, Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, 
        Louisiana, being conducted under section 430 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2639).
          (2) Iberia Port, Louisiana, being conducted under section 431 
        of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 
        2639).
  (b) Repeal.--Section 6009 of the Emergency Supplemental 
Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Tsunami 
Relief, 2005 (Public Law 109-13; 119 Stat. 282) is repealed.

SEC. 4047. VERMILION RIVER, LOUISIANA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigation on the Vermilion River, 
Louisiana, from the intersection of the Vermilion River and the Gulf 
Intracoastal Waterway to the industrial area north of the Vermilion 
River.

SEC. 4048. WEST FELICIANA PARISH, LOUISIANA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for riverfront development, including enhanced 
public access, recreation, and environmental restoration, on the 
Mississippi River in West Feliciana Parish, Louisiana.

SEC. 4049. PATAPSCO RIVER, MARYLAND.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine and assess the 
impact of debris in the Patapsco River basin, Maryland, on wetlands, 
water quality, and public health and to identify management measures to 
reduce the inflow of debris into the Patapsco River.

SEC. 4050. FALL RIVER HARBOR, MASSACHUSETTS AND RHODE ISLAND.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
deepening that portion of the navigation channel of the navigation 
project for Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts and Rhode Island, 
authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 
731), seaward of the Charles M. Braga, Jr. Memorial Bridge, Fall River 
and Somerset, Massachusetts.

SEC. 4051. HAMBURG AND GREEN OAK TOWNSHIPS, MICHIGAN.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction on Ore Lake and the 
Huron River for Hamburg and Green Oak Townships, Michigan.

SEC. 4052. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MICHIGAN.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out a study of the 
relationships among dredging of the St. Clair River for navigation, 
erosion in the river, and declining water levels in the river and in 
Lake Michigan and Lake Huron.
  (b) Recommendations.--The report on the results of the study may 
include recommendations to address water level declines in Lake 
Michigan and Lake Huron.

SEC. 4053. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MINNESOTA AND WISCONSIN.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study and prepare a 
report to evaluate the integrity of the bulkhead system located on and 
in the vicinity of Duluth-Superior Harbor, Duluth, Minnesota, and 
Superior, Wisconsin.
  (b) Contents.--The report shall include--
          (1) a determination of causes of corrosion of the bulkhead 
        system;
          (2) recommendations to reduce corrosion of the bulkhead 
        system;
          (3) a description of the necessary repairs to the bulkhead 
        system; and
          (4) an estimate of the cost of addressing the causes of the 
        corrosion and carrying out necessary repairs.

SEC. 4054. WILD RICE RIVER, MINNESOTA.

  The Secretary shall review the project for flood protection and other 
purposes on Wild Rice River, Minnesota, authorized by section 201 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1825), to develop alternatives 
to the Twin Valley Lake feature.

SEC. 4055. MISSISSIPPI COASTAL AREA, MISSISSIPPI.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
making improvements or modifications to existing improvements in the 
coastal area of Mississippi in the interest of hurricane and storm 
damage reduction, prevention of saltwater intrusion, preservation of 
fish and wildlife, prevention of erosion, and other related water 
resource purposes.

SEC. 4056. NORTHEAST MISSISSIPPI.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
modifying the project for navigation, Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, 
Alabama and Mississippi, to provide water supply for northeast 
Mississippi.

SEC. 4057. ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, St. Louis, Missouri, 
to restore or rehabilitate the levee system feature of the project for 
flood protection, St. Louis, Missouri, authorized by the first section 
of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing construction of certain public 
works on the Mississippi River for the protection of Saint Louis, 
Missouri'', approved August 9, 1955 (69 Stat. 540).

SEC. 4058. DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL, NEW JERSEY.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project in the vicinity of the Atlantic Intracoastal 
Waterway, New Jersey, for the construction of a dredged material 
disposal transfer facility to make dredged material available for 
beneficial reuse.

SEC. 4059. BAYONNE, NEW JERSEY.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration, including 
improved water quality, enhanced public access, and recreation, on the 
Kill Van Kull, Bayonne, New Jersey.

SEC. 4060. CARTERET, NEW JERSEY.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration, including 
improved water quality, enhanced public access, and recreation, on the 
Raritan River, Carteret, New Jersey.

SEC. 4061. ELIZABETH RIVER, ELIZABETH, NEW JERSEY.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out ecosystem restoration improvements in the Elizabeth River 
watershed, Elizabeth, New Jersey.

SEC. 4062. GLOUCESTER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Gloucester, New 
Jersey, including the feasibility of restoring the flood protection 
dikes in Gibbstown, New Jersey, and the associated tidegates in 
Gloucester, New Jersey.

SEC. 4063. PERTH AMBOY, NEW JERSEY.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for riverfront development, including enhanced 
public access, recreation, and environmental restoration, on the Arthur 
Kill, Perth Amboy, New Jersey.

SEC. 4064. WRECK POND, MONMOUTH COUNTY, NEW JERSEY.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration at Wreck Pond, New 
Jersey, including Black Creek and associated waters.

SEC. 4065. BATAVIA, NEW YORK.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for hydropower and related purposes in the 
vicinity of Batavia, New York.

SEC. 4066. BIG SISTER CREEK, EVANS, NEW YORK.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Big 
Sister Creek, Evans, New York.
  (b) Evaluation of Potential Solutions.--In conducting the study, the 
Secretary shall evaluate potential solutions to flooding from all 
sources, including flooding that results from ice jams.

SEC. 4067. EAST CHESTER BAY, TURTLE COVE, NEW YORK.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigation, East Chester Creek, Chester Bay, 
Turtle Cove, New York.

SEC. 4068. FINGER LAKES, NEW YORK.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for aquatic ecosystem restoration and 
protection, Finger Lakes, New York, to address water quality and 
invasive species.

SEC. 4069. HUDSON-RARITAN ESTUARY, NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY.

  In conducting the study for environmental restoration, Hudson-Raritan 
Estuary, New York and New Jersey, the Secretary shall establish and 
utilize watershed restoration teams composed of estuary restoration 
experts from the Corps of Engineers, the New Jersey Department of 
Environmental Protection, and the Port Authority of New York and New 
Jersey and other experts designated by the Secretary for the purpose of 
developing habitat restoration and water quality enhancement.

SEC. 4070. LAKE ERIE SHORELINE, BUFFALO, NEW YORK.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for storm damage reduction and shoreline 
protection in the vicinity of Gallagher Beach, Lake Erie Shoreline, 
Buffalo, New York.

SEC. 4071. NEWTOWN CREEK, NEW YORK.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out ecosystem restoration improvements on Newtown Creek, 
Brooklyn and Queens, New York.

SEC. 4072. NIAGARA RIVER, NEW YORK.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for a low-head hydroelectric generating facility 
in the Niagara River, New York.

SEC. 4073. UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED, NEW YORK.

  Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)) and with the consent of the affected local 
government, a nonprofit organization may serve as the non-Federal 
interest for a study for the Upper Delaware River watershed, New York, 
being carried out under Committee Resolution 2495 of the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, 
adopted May 9, 1996.

SEC. 4074. LINCOLN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study of existing water and water 
quality-related infrastructure in Lincoln County, North Carolina, to 
assist local interests in determining the most efficient and effective 
way to connect county infrastructure.

SEC. 4075. WILKES COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Wilkes County, North Carolina.

SEC. 4076. YADKINVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Yadkinville, North Carolina.

SEC. 4077. CINCINNATI, OHIO.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for ecosystem restoration and 
recreation on the Ohio River, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  (b) Design.--While conducting the study, the Secretary may continue 
to carry out design work for the project as authorized by section 118 
of division H of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004 (118 Stat. 
439).
  (c) Existing Plans.--In conducting the study, the Secretary shall 
review the Central Riverfront Park Master Plan, dated December 1999, 
and incorporate any components of the plan that the Secretary 
determines are consistent with Federal standards.
  (d) Credit.--
          (1) In general.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of any project authorized by law as a 
        result of the study the cost of work carried out by the non-
        Federal interest before the date of the partnership agreement 
        for the project if the Secretary determines that the work is 
        integral to the project.
          (2) Limitation.--In no case may work that was carried out 
        more than 5 years before the date of enactment of this Act be 
        eligible for credit under this subsection.

SEC. 4078. EUCLID, OHIO.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigation, ecosystem restoration, and 
recreation on Lake Erie, in the vicinity of the Euclid Lakefront, 
Euclid, Ohio.

SEC. 4079. LAKE ERIE, OHIO.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for power generation at confined disposal 
facilities along Lake Erie, Ohio.

SEC. 4080. OHIO RIVER, OHIO.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for flood damage reduction on the Ohio River in 
Mahoning, Columbiana, Jefferson, Belmont, Noble, Monroe, Washington, 
Athens, Meigs, Gallia, Lawrence, and Scioto Counties, Ohio.

SEC. 4081. SUTHERLIN, OREGON.

  (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of water resources 
along Sutherlin Creek in the vicinity of Sutherlin, Oregon, to 
determine the feasibility of carrying out a project to restore and 
enhance aquatic resources using a combination of structural and 
bioengineering techniques and, if the Secretary determines that the 
project is feasible, the Secretary may carry out the project.
  (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $2,500,000.

SEC. 4082. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OREGON.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study of the project for navigation, 
Tillamook Bay and Bar, Oregon, authorized by the first section of the 
River and Harbor Appropriations Act of July 25, 1912 (37 Stat. 220), to 
investigate measures to address dangerous and hazardous wave and ocean 
conditions.

SEC. 4083. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION AND FISH PASSAGE IMPROVEMENTS, OREGON.

  (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of undertaking ecosystem restoration and fish passage 
improvements on rivers throughout the State of Oregon.
  (b) Requirements.--In carrying out the study, the Secretary shall--
          (1) work in coordination with the State of Oregon, local 
        governments, and other Federal agencies; and
          (2) place emphasis on--
                  (A) fish passage and conservation and restoration 
                strategies to benefit species that are listed or 
                proposed for listing as threatened or endangered 
                species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 
                U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); and
                  (B) other watershed restoration objectives.
  (c) Pilot Program.--
          (1) In general.--In conjunction with conducting the study 
        under subsection (a), the Secretary may carry out pilot 
        projects to demonstrate the effectiveness of ecosystem 
        restoration and fish passages.
          (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to 
        be appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this subsection.

SEC. 4084. WALLA WALLA RIVER BASIN, OREGON.

  In conducting the study of determine the feasibility of carrying out 
a project for ecosystem restoration, Walla Walla River Basin, Oregon, 
the Secretary shall--
          (1) credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
        study the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
        before the date of the partnership agreement for the project if 
        the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
        project; and
          (2) allow the non-Federal interest to provide the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of the study in the form of in-kind services 
        and materials.

SEC. 4085. CHARTIERS CREEK WATERSHED, PENNSYLVANIA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Chartiers Creek 
watershed, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 4086. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, PENNSYLVANIA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study of the project for flood control, 
Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Warren, Pennsylvania, authorized by 
section 5 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1570), 
and modified by section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 (52 
Stat. 1215), section 2 of the Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941 (55 
Stat. 646), and section 4 of the Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944 
(58 Stat. 887), to review operations of and identify modifications to 
the project to expand recreational opportunities.

SEC. 4087. NORTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out project for aquatic ecosystem restoration and protection 
in Warren, McKean, Potter, Tioga, Lycoming, Centre, Cameron, Elk, 
Clearfield, Jefferson, Clarion, Venango, Forest, Clinton, Crawford, and 
Mifflin Counties, Pennsylvania, particularly as related to abandoned 
mine drainage abatement and reestablishment of stream and river 
channels.

SEC. 4088. NORTHAMPTON AND LEHIGH COUNTIES STREAMS, PENNSYLVANIA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for ecosystem restoration, floodplain 
management, flood damage reduction, water quality control, and 
watershed management, for the streams of Northampton and Lehigh 
Counties, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 4089. WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of structural 
and nonstructural flood damage reduction, stream bank protection, storm 
water management, channel clearing and modification, and watershed 
coordination measures in the Mahoning River basin, Pennsylvania, the 
Allegheny River basin, Pennsylvania, and the Upper Ohio River basin, 
Pennsylvania, to provide a level of flood protection sufficient to 
prevent future losses to communities located in such basins from 
flooding such as occurred in September 2004, but not less than a 100-
year level of flood protection.
  (b) Priority Communities.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary shall give priority to the following Pennsylvania 
communities: Marshall Township, Ross Township, Shaler Township, Jackson 
Township, Harmony, Zelienople, Darlington Township, Houston Borough, 
Chartiers Township, Washington, Canton Township, Tarentum Borough, and 
East Deer Township.

SEC. 4090. WILLIAMSPORT, PENNSYLVANIA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study of the project for flood control, 
Williamsport, Pennsylvania, authorized by section 5 of the Flood 
Control Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1570), to investigate measures 
to rehabilitate the project.

SEC. 4091. YARDLEY BOROUGH, PENNSYLVANIA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, at Yardley Borough, 
Pennsylvania, including the alternative of raising River Road.

SEC. 4092. RIO VALENCIANO, JUNCOS, PUERTO RICO.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to reevaluate 
the project for flood damage reduction and water supply, Rio 
Valenciano, Juncos, Puerto Rico, authorized by section 209 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1197) and section 204 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1828), to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out the project.
  (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share 
of the cost of the study the cost of work carried out by the non-
Federal interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
project.

SEC. 4093. CROOKED CREEK, BENNETTSVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Crooked Creek, Bennettsville, 
South Carolina.

SEC. 4094. BROAD RIVER, YORK COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Broad River, York County, 
South Carolina.

SEC. 4095. GEORGETOWN AND WILLIAMSBURG COUNTIES, SOUTH CAROLINA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply for Georgetown and Williamsburg 
Counties, South Carolina, including the viability and practicality of 
constructing a desalinization water treatment facility to meet such 
water supply needs.

SEC. 4096. CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Chattanooga Creek, 
Dobbs Branch, Chattanooga, Tennessee.

SEC. 4097. CLEVELAND, TENNESSEE.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Cleveland, 
Tennessee.

SEC. 4098. CUMBERLAND RIVER, NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for recreation on, riverbank protection for, and 
environmental protection of, the Cumberland River and riparian habitats 
in the city of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee.

SEC. 4099. LEWIS, LAWRENCE, AND WAYNE COUNTIES, TENNESSEE.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply for Lewis, Lawrence, and Wayne 
Counties, Tennessee.

SEC. 4100. WOLF RIVER AND NONCONNAH CREEK, MEMPHIS TENNESSEE.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction along Wolf River and 
Nonconnah Creek, in the vicinity of Memphis, Tennessee, to include the 
repair, replacement, rehabilitation, and restoration of the following 
pumping stations: Cypress Creek, Nonconnah Creek, Ensley, Marble Bayou, 
and Bayou Gayoso.

SEC. 4101. ABILENE, TEXAS.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Abilene, Texas.

SEC. 4102. COASTAL TEXAS ECOSYSTEM PROTECTION AND RESTORATION, TEXAS.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary shall develop a comprehensive plan to 
determine the feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage 
reduction, hurricane and storm damage reduction, and ecosystem 
restoration in the coastal areas of the State of Texas.
  (b) Scope.--The comprehensive plan shall provide for the protection, 
conservation, and restoration of wetlands, barrier islands, shorelines, 
and related lands and features that protect critical resources, 
habitat, and infrastructure from the impacts of coastal storms, 
hurricanes, erosion, and subsidence.
  (c) Definition.--For purposes of this section, the term ``coastal 
areas in the State of Texas'' means the coastal areas of the State of 
Texas from the Sabine River on the east to the Rio Grande River on the 
west and includes tidal waters, barrier islands, marches, coastal 
wetlands, rivers and streams, and adjacent areas.

SEC. 4103. FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Fort Bend County, 
Texas.

SEC. 4104. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Harris County, 
Texas.

SEC. 4105. PORT OF GALVESTON, TEXAS.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study of the feasibility of carrying 
out a project for dredged material disposal in the vicinity of the 
project for navigation and environmental restoration, Houston-Galveston 
Navigation Channels, Texas, authorized by section 101(a)(30) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3666).

SEC. 4106. ROMA CREEK, TEXAS.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Roma Creek, Texas.

SEC. 4107. WALNUT CREEK, TEXAS.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, environmental 
restoration, and erosion control, Walnut Creek, Texas.

SEC. 4108. GRAND COUNTY AND MOAB, UTAH.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply for Grand County and the city 
of Moab, Utah, including a review of the impact of current and future 
demands on the Spanish Valley Aquifer.

SEC. 4109. SOUTHWESTERN UTAH.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Santa Clara River, 
Washington, Iron, and Kane Counties, Utah.

SEC. 4110. CHOWAN RIVER BASIN, VIRGINIA AND NORTH CAROLINA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, environmental 
restoration, navigation, and erosion control, Chowan River basin, 
Virginia and North Carolina.

SEC. 4111. JAMES RIVER, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for the James River 
in the vicinity of Richmond, Virginia, including the Shockoe Bottom 
area.

SEC. 4112. ELLIOTT BAY SEAWALL, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON.

  (a) In General.--The study for rehabilitation of the Elliott Bay 
Seawall, Seattle, Washington, being carried out under Committee 
Resolution 2704 of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
of the House of Representatives adopted September 25, 2002, is modified 
to include a determination of the feasibility of reducing future damage 
to the seawall from seismic activity.
  (b) Acceptance of Contributions.--In carrying out the study, the 
Secretary may accept contributions in excess of the non-Federal share 
of the cost of the study from the non-Federal interest to the extent 
that the Secretary determines that the contributions will facilitate 
completion of the study.
  (c) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share 
of the cost of any project authorized by law as a result of the study 
the value of contributions accepted by the Secretary under subsection 
(b).

SEC. 4113. MONONGAHELA RIVER BASIN, NORTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out aquatic ecosystem restoration and protection projects in 
the watersheds of the Monongahela River Basin lying within the counties 
of Hancock, Ohio, Marshall, Wetzel, Tyler, Pleasants, Wood, Doddridge, 
Monongalia, Marion, Harrison, Taylor, Barbour, Preston, Tucker, 
Mineral, Grant, Gilmer, Brooke, and Rithchie, West Virginia, 
particularly as related to abandoned mine drainage abatement.

SEC. 4114. KENOSHA HARBOR, WISCONSIN.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigation, Kenosha Harbor, Wisconsin, 
including the extension of existing piers.

SEC. 4115. WAUWATOSA, WISCONSIN.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and environmental 
restoration, Menomonee River and Underwood Creek, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, 
and greater Milwaukee watersheds, Wisconsin.

                   TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

SEC. 5001. MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION CHANNELS.

  (a) In General.--Upon request of a non-Federal interest, the 
Secretary shall be responsible for maintenance of the following 
navigation channels and breakwaters constructed or improved by the non-
Federal interest if the Secretary determines that such maintenance is 
economically justified and environmentally acceptable and that the 
channel or breakwater was constructed in accordance with applicable 
permits and appropriate engineering and design standards:
          (1) Manatee Harbor basin, Florida.
          (2) Bayou LaFourche Channel, Port Fourchon, Louisiana.
          (3) Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, Louisiana.
          (4) Pidgeon Industrial Harbor, Pidgeon Industrial Park, 
        Memphis Harbor, Tennessee.
          (5) Pix Bayou Navigation Channel, Chambers County, Texas.
          (6) Racine Harbor, Wisconsin.
  (b) Completion of Assessment.--Not later than 6 months after the date 
of receipt of a request from a non-Federal interest for Federal 
assumption of maintenance of a channel listed in subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall make a determination as provided in subsection (a) and 
advise the non-Federal interest of the Secretary's determination.

SEC. 5002. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide technical, planning, and 
design assistance to non-Federal interests for carrying out watershed 
management, restoration, and development projects at the locations 
described in subsection (d).
  (b) Specific Measures.--Assistance provided under subsection (a) may 
be in support of non-Federal projects for the following purposes:
          (1) Management and restoration of water quality.
          (2) Control and remediation of toxic sediments.
          (3) Restoration of degraded streams, rivers, wetlands, and 
        other waterbodies to their natural condition as a means to 
        control flooding, excessive erosion, and sedimentation.
          (4) Protection and restoration of watersheds, including urban 
        watersheds.
          (5) Demonstration of technologies for nonstructural measures 
        to reduce destructive impacts of flooding.
  (c) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
assistance provided under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent.
  (d) Project Locations.--The locations referred to in subsection (a) 
are the following:
          (1) Cucamonga basin, Upland, California.
          (2) Charlotte Harbor watershed, Florida.
          (3) Big Creek watershed, Roswell, Georgia.
          (4) Those portions of the watersheds of the Chattahoochee, 
        Etowah, Flint, Ocmulgee, and Oconee Rivers lying within the 
        counties of Bartow, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, 
        Douglas, Fayette, Fulton, Forsyth, Gwinnett, Hall, Henry, 
        Paulding, Rockdale, and Walton, Georgia.
          (5) Kinkaid Lake, Jackson County, Illinois.
          (6) Amite River basin, Louisiana.
          (7) East Atchafalaya River basin, Iberville Parish and Pointe 
        Coupee Parish, Louisiana.
          (8) Red River watershed, Louisiana.
          (9) Taunton River basin, Massachusetts.
          (10) Lower Platte River watershed, Nebraska.
          (11) Rio Grande watershed, New Mexico.
          (12) Marlboro Township, New Jersey.
          (13) Buffalo River watershed, New York.
          (14) Cattaragus Creek watershed, New York.
          (15) Eighteenmile Creek watershed, Niagara County, New York.
          (16) Esopus, Plattekill, and Rondout Creeks, Greene, 
        Sullivan, and Ulster Counties, New York.
          (17) Genesee River watershed, New York.
          (18) Greenwood Lake watershed, New York and New Jersey.
          (19) Long Island Sound watershed, New York.
          (20) Oswego River basin, New York.
          (21) Ramapo River watershed, New York.
          (22) Tonawanda Creek watershed, New York.
          (23) Tuscarawas River basin, Ohio.
          (24) Western Lake Erie basin, Ohio.
          (25) Those portions of the watersheds of the Beaver, Upper 
        Ohio, Connoquenessing, Lower Allegheny, Kiskiminetas, Lower 
        Monongahela, Youghiogheny, Shenango, and Mahoning Rivers lying 
        within the counties of Beaver, Butler, Lawrence, and Mercer, 
        Pennsylvania.
          (26) Otter Creek watershed, Pennsylvania.
          (27) Unami Creek watershed, Milford Township, Pennsylvania.
          (28) Sauk River basin, Washington.
          (29) Greater Milwaukee watersheds, Wisconsin.
  (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $15,000,000.

SEC. 5003. DAM SAFETY.

  (a) Assistance.--The Secretary may provide assistance to enhance dam 
safety at the following locations:
          (1) Fish Creek Dam, Blaine County, Idaho.
          (A) Hamilton Dam, Saginaw River, Flint, Michigan.
          (B) Candor Dam, Candor, New York.
          (C) State Dam, Auburn, New York.
          (D) Whaley Lake Dam, Pawling, New York.
          (E) Ingham Spring Dam, Solebury Township, Pennsylvania.
          (F) Leaser Lake Dam, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
          (G) Stillwater Dam, Monroe County, Pennsylvania.
          (H) Wissahickon Creek Dam, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania.
  (b) Special Rule.--The assistance provided under subsection (a) for 
State Dam, Auburn, New York, shall be for a project for rehabilitation 
in accordance with the report on State Dam Rehabilitation, Owasco Lake 
Outlet, New York, dated March 1999, if the Secretary determines that 
the project is feasible.
  (c) Fern Ridge Dam, Oregon.--It is the sense of Congress that the 
Secretary should immediately carry out a project to remedy the 
situation at Fern Ridge Dam, Oregon, due to the rapid deterioration of 
the dam. Cost sharing for the project shall be as provided by section 
1203 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 467n).
  (d) Kehly Run Dams, Pennsylvania.--Section 504(a)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 338; 117 Stat. 1842) is 
amended by striking ``Dams'' and inserting ``Dams No. 1-5''.
  (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out subsection (a) $6,000,000.

SEC. 5004. STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY EVALUATIONS.

  (a) In General.--Upon request of a non-Federal interest, the 
Secretary shall evaluate the structural integrity and effectiveness of 
a project for flood damage reduction and, if the Secretary determines 
that the project does not meet such minimum standards as the Secretary 
may establish and, absent action by the Secretary, the project will 
fail, the Secretary may take such action as may be necessary to restore 
the integrity and effectiveness of the project.
  (b) Priority.--The Secretary shall evaluate under subsection (a) the 
following projects:
          (1) Project for flood damage reduction, Arkansas River 
        Levees, river mile 205 to river mile 308.4, Arkansas.
          (2) Project for flood damage reduction, Nonconnah Creek, 
        Tennessee.

SEC. 5005. FLOOD MITIGATION PRIORITY AREAS.

  (a) In General.--Section 212(e) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1999 (33 U.S.C. 2332(e); 114 Stat. 2599) is amended--
          (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraphs (23) and 
        (27);
          (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (28) and 
        inserting a semicolon; and
          (3) by adding at the end the following:
          ``(29) Ascension Parish, Louisiana;
          ``(30) East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana;
          ``(31) Iberville Parish, Louisiana;
          ``(32) Livingston Parish, Louisiana; and
          ``(33) Pointe Coupee Parish, Louisiana.''.
  (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 212(i)(1) of such Act 
(33 U.S.C. 2332(i)(1)) is amended by striking ``section--'' and all 
that follows before the period at the end and inserting ``section 
$20,000,000''.

SEC. 5006. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR AUTHORIZED PROJECTS.

  (a) In General.--Section 219(e) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 334) is 
amended--
          (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (7);
          (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (8) and 
        inserting a semicolon; and
          (3) by adding at the end the following:
          ``(9) $35,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(18);
          ``(10) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(20);
          ``(11) $35,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(23);
          ``(12) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(25);
          ``(13) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(26);
          ``(14) $35,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(27);
          ``(15) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(28); and
          ``(16) $30,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(40).''.
  (b) East Arkansas Enterprise Community, Arkansas.--Federal assistance 
made available under the rural enterprise zone program of the 
Department of Agriculture may be used toward payment of the non-Federal 
share of the costs of the project described in section 219(c)(20) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A-219) if 
such assistance is authorized to be used for such purposes.

SEC. 5007. EXPEDITED COMPLETION OF REPORTS AND CONSTRUCTION FOR CERTAIN 
                    PROJECTS.

  The Secretary shall expedite completion of the reports and, if the 
Secretary determines the project is feasible, shall expedite completion 
of construction for the following projects:
          (1) Fulmer Creek, Village of Mohawk, New York, being carried 
        out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 
        U.S.C. 701s).
          (2) Moyer Creek, Village of Frankfort, New York, being 
        carried out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 
        (33 U.S.C. 701s).
          (3) Steele Creek, Village of Ilion, New York, being carried 
        out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 
        U.S.C. 701s).
          (4) Oriskany Wildlife Management Area, Rome, New York, being 
        carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
          (5) Whitney Point Lake, Otselic River, Whitney Point, New 
        York, being carried out under section 1135 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a).
          (6) Newton Creek, Bainbridge, New York, being carried out 
        under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 
        701r).
          (7) Chenango Lake, Chenango County, New York, being carried 
        out under section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).

SEC. 5008. EXPEDITED COMPLETION OF REPORTS FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary shall expedite completion of the 
reports for the following projects and, if the Secretary determines 
that a project is justified in the completed report, proceed directly 
to project preconstruction, engineering, and design:
          (1) Project for water supply, Little Red River, Arkansas.
          (2) Project for shoreline stabilization at Egmont Key, 
        Florida.
          (3) Project for ecosystem restoration, University Lake, Baton 
        Rouge, Louisiana.
          (4) Project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Montauk 
        Point, New York.
  (b) Special Rule for Egmont Key, Florida.--In carrying out the 
project for shoreline stabilization at Egmont Key, Florida, referred to 
in subsection (a)(2), the Secretary shall waive any cost share to be 
provided by non-Federal interests for any portion of the project that 
benefits federally owned property.
  (c)  Special Rule for Montauk Point, New York.--The Secretary shall 
complete the report for the project referred to in subsection (a)(4) 
not later than September 30, 2005, notwithstanding the ownership of the 
property to be protected.

SEC. 5009. SOUTHEASTERN WATER RESOURCES ASSESSMENT.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct, at Federal expense, an 
assessment of the water resources needs of the river basins and 
watersheds of the southeastern United States.
  (b) Cooperative Agreements.--In carrying out the assessment, the 
Secretary may enter into cooperative agreements with State and local 
agencies, non-Federal and nonprofit entities, and regional researchers.
  (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $7,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5010. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.

  Section 1103(e)(7) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 652(e)(7)) is amended--
          (1) by adding at the end of subparagraph (A) the following: 
        ``The non-Federal interest may provide the non-Federal share of 
        the cost of the project in the form of in-kind services and 
        materials.''; and
          (2) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following:
  ``(C) Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
(42 U.S.C. 1962d-5(b)), for any project undertaken under this section, 
a non-Federal interest may include a nonprofit entity, with the consent 
of the affected local government.''.

SEC. 5011. MISSOURI AND MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVERS ENHANCEMENT PROJECT.

  Section 514(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 343; 117 Stat. 142) is amended by striking ``and 2004'' and 
inserting ``through 2015''.

SEC. 5012. GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

  Section 506(f)(3)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(42 U.S.C. 1962d-22; 114 Stat. 2646) is amended by striking ``50 
percent'' and inserting ``100 percent''.

SEC. 5013. GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS AND SEDIMENT REMEDIATION.

  Section 401(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 
U.S.C. 1268 note; 114 Stat. 2613) is amended by striking ``2006'' and 
inserting ``2011''.

SEC. 5014. GREAT LAKES TRIBUTARY MODEL.

  Section 516(g)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2326b(g)(2)) is amended by striking ``2006'' and inserting 
``2011''.

SEC. 5015. SUSQUEHANNA, DELAWARE, AND POTOMAC RIVER BASINS.

  (a) Ex Officio Member.--Notwithstanding section 3001(a) of the 1997 
Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Recovery From Natural 
Disasters, and for Overseas Peacekeeping Efforts, Including Those in 
Bosnia (111 Stat. 176) and section 2.2 of both the Susquehanna River 
Basin Compact (Public Law 91-575) and the Delaware River Basin Compact 
(Public Law 87-328), beginning in fiscal year 2005 and thereafter, the 
Division Engineer, North Atlantic Division, Corps of Engineers, shall 
be the ex officio United States member under the Susquehanna River 
Basin Compact and the Delaware River Basin Compact, who shall serve 
without additional compensation and who may designate an alternate 
member or members in accordance with the terms of those respective 
compacts.
  (b) Authorization to Allocate.--The Secretary may allocate funds to 
the Susquehanna River Basin Commission, Delaware River Basin 
Commission, and the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 
(Potomac River Basin Compact (Public Law 91-407)) to fulfill the 
equitable funding requirements of their respective interstate compacts.
  (c) Water Supply and Conservation Storage.--The Secretary shall enter 
into an agreement with the Delaware River Basin Commission to provide 
temporary water supply and conservation storage at the Francis E. 
Walter Dam, Pennsylvania, during any period in which the Commission has 
determined that a drought warning or drought emergency exists. The 
agreement shall provide that the cost for any such water supply and 
conservation storage shall not exceed the incremental operating costs 
associated with providing the storage.

SEC. 5016. CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PROTECTION 
                    PROGRAM.

  (a) Form of Assistance.--Section 510(a)(2) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3759) is amended by striking ``, and 
beneficial uses of dredged material'' and inserting ``, beneficial uses 
of dredged material, and restoration of submerged aquatic vegetation''.
  (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 510(i) of such Act (110 
Stat. 3761) is amended by striking ``$10,000,000'' and inserting 
``$50,000,000''.

SEC. 5017. CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RESTORATION.

  The second sentence of section 704(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2263(b)) is amended by striking 
``$20,000,000'' and inserting ``$30,000,000''.

SEC. 5018. HYPOXIA ASSESSMENT.

  The Secretary may participate with Federal, State, and local 
agencies, non-Federal and nonprofit entities, regional researchers, and 
other interested parties to assess hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico.

SEC. 5019. POTOMAC RIVER WATERSHED ASSESSMENT AND TRIBUTARY STRATEGY 
                    EVALUATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM.

  The Secretary may participate in the Potomac River Watershed 
Assessment and Tributary Strategy Evaluation and Monitoring Program to 
identify a series of resource management indicators to accurately 
monitor the effectiveness of the implementation of the agreed upon 
tributary strategies and other public policies that pertain to natural 
resource protection of the Potomac River watershed.

SEC. 5020. LOCK AND DAM SECURITY.

  (a) Standards.--The Secretary, in consultation with the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, the Tennessee Valley Authority, and the 
Coast Guard, shall develop standards for the security of locks and 
dams, including the testing and certification of vessel exclusion 
barriers.
  (b) Site Surveys.--At the request of a lock or dam owner, the 
Secretary shall provide technical assistance, on a reimbursible basis, 
to improve lock or dam security.
  (c) Cooperative Agreement.--The Secretary may enter into a 
cooperative agreement with a nonprofit alliance of public and private 
organizations that has the mission of promoting safe waterways and 
seaports to carry out testing and certification activities, and to 
perform site surveys, under this section.
  (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $3,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5021. PINHOOK CREEK, HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA.

  The Secretary shall design and construct the locally preferred plan 
for flood protection at Pinhook Creek, Huntsville, Alabama, under the 
authority of section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 
701s). The Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interest to 
participate in the financing of the project in accordance with section 
903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) 
to the extent that the Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying 
such section is necessary to implement the project.

SEC. 5022. TALLAPOOSA, ALABAMA.

  The Secretary may provide technical assistance relating to water 
supply to the Middle Tallapoosa Water Supply District, Alabama. There 
is authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5023. ALASKA.

  Section 570 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
369) is amended--
          (1) in subsection (c) by inserting ``environmental 
        restoration,'' after ``water supply and related facilities,'';
          (2) in subsection (e)(3)(B) by striking the last sentence;
          (3) in subsection (h) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$45,000,000''; and
          (4) by adding at the end the following:
  ``(i) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
undertaken under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity, with the consent of the affected local government.
  ``(j) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Ten percent of the amounts 
appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps of 
Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section at 
100 percent Federal expense.''.

SEC. 5024. BARROW, ALASKA.

  The Secretary shall carry out, under section 117 of the Energy and 
Water Development Appropriations Act, 2005 (118 Stat. 2944), a 
nonstructural project for coastal erosion and storm damage prevention 
and reduction at Barrow, Alaska, including relocation of 
infrastructure.

SEC. 5025. COFFMAN COVE, ALASKA.

  The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project for navigation, 
Coffman Cove, Alaska, at a total cost of $3,000,000.

SEC. 5026. FORT YUKON, ALASKA.

  The Secretary shall make repairs to the dike at Fort Yukon, Alaska, 
so that the dike meets Corps of Engineers standards.

SEC. 5027. KOTZEBUE HARBOR, ALASKA.

  The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project for navigation, 
Kotzebue Harbor, Kotzebue, Alaska, at at total cost of $2,200,000.

SEC. 5028. LOWELL CREEK TUNNEL, SEWARD, ALASKA.

  (a) Long-Term Maintenance and Repair.--The Secretary shall assume 
responsibility for the long-term maintenance and repair of the Lowell 
Creek Tunnel.
  (b) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine whether 
alternative methods of flood diversion in Lowell Canyon are feasible.

SEC. 5029. ST. HERMAN AND ST. PAUL HARBORS, KODIAK, ALASKA.

  The Secretary shall carry out, on an emergency basis, necessary 
removal of rubble, sediment, and rock impeding the entrance to the St. 
Herman and St. Paul Harbors, Kodiak, Alaska, at a Federal cost of 
$2,000,000.

SEC. 5030. TANANA RIVER, ALASKA.

  The Secretary shall carry out, on an emergency basis, the removal of 
the hazard to navigation on the Tanana River, Alaska, near the mouth of 
the Chena River, as described in the January 3, 2005, memorandum from 
the Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard District, to the Corps of 
Engineers, Alaska District, Anchorage, Alaska.

SEC. 5031. VALDEZ, ALASKA.

   The Secretary is authorized to construct a small boat harbor in 
Valdez, Alaska, at a total cost of $20,000,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $10,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$9,500,000.

SEC. 5032. WHITTIER, ALASKA.

  (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct, at Federal expense, a study 
to determine the feasibility of carrying out projects for navigation at 
Whittier, Alaska, to construct a new boat harbor at the head of 
Whittier Bay and to expand the existing harbor and, if the Secretary 
determines that a project is feasible, the Secretary may carry out the 
project.
  (b) Non-Federal Cost Share.--The non-Federal interest may use, and 
the Secretary shall accept, funds provided under any other Federal 
program to satisfy, in whole or in part, the non-Federal share of the 
construction of any project carried out under this section if such 
funds are authorized to be used to carry out such project.
  (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $35,200,000.

SEC. 5033. WRANGELL HARBOR, ALASKA.

  (a) General Navigation Features.--In carrying out the project for 
navigation, Wrangell Harbor, Alaska, authorized by section 101(b)(1) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 279), the 
Secretary shall consider the dredging of the mooring basin and 
construction of the inner harbor facilities to be general navigation 
features for purposes of estimating the non-Federal share of project 
costs.
  (b) Revision of Partnership Agreement.--The Secretary shall revise 
the partnership agreement for the project to reflect the change 
required by subsection (a).

SEC. 5034. AUGUSTA AND CLARENDON, ARKANSAS.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to perform operation, 
maintenance, and rehabilitation of authorized and completed levees on 
the White River between Augusta and Clarendon, Arkansas.
  (b) Reimbursement.--After performing the operation, maintenance, and 
rehabilitation under subsection (a), the Secretary shall seek 
reimbursement from the Secretary of the Interior of an amount equal to 
the costs allocated to benefits to a Federal wildlife refuge of such 
operation, maintenance, and rehabilitation.

SEC. 5035. DES ARC LEVEE PROTECTION, ARKANSAS.

  The Secretary shall review the project for flood control, Des Arc, 
Arkansas, to determine whether bank and channel scour along the White 
River threaten the existing project and whether the scour is as a 
result of a design deficiency. If the Secretary determines that such 
conditions exist as a result of a deficiency, the Secretary shall carry 
out measures to eliminate the deficiency.

SEC. 5036. HELENA AND VICINITY, ARKANSAS.

  The Secretary shall accept as fulfilling the non-Federal cost-sharing 
responsibilities for the project for flood control, Helena and 
Vicinity, Arkansas, authorized by section 401 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4112), the non-Federal cash 
contribution of $568,000 and the lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
relocations, and dredged material disposal areas provided by the non-
Federal sponsor as of September 1, 2003, and the Secretary shall not 
seek to recover any reimbursement from the non-Federal sponsor related 
to advanced payments to, or work performed for, the non-Federal sponsor 
under the authority of sections 103 and 104 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213, 2214).

SEC. 5037. LOOMIS LANDING, ARKANSAS.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study of shore damage in the vicinity 
of Loomis Landing, Arkansas, to determine if the damage is the result 
of a Federal navigation project, and, if the Secretary determines that 
the damage is the result of a Federal navigation project, the Secretary 
shall carry out a project to mitigate the damage under section 111 of 
the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i).

SEC. 5038. ST. FRANCIS RIVER BASIN, ARKANSAS AND MISSOURI.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study of increased siltation and 
streambank erosion in the St. Francis River Basin, Arkansas and 
Missouri, to determine if the siltation or erosion, or both, are the 
result of a Federal flood control project and, if the Secretary 
determines that the siltation or erosion, or both, are the result of a 
Federal flood control project, the Secretary shall carry out a project 
to mitigate the siltation or erosion, or both.

SEC. 5039. WHITE RIVER BASIN, ARKANSAS.

  (a) Minimum Flows.--
          (1) In general.--In carrying out section 304 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2601), the 
        Secretary shall implement alternatives BS-3 and NF-7, as 
        described in the White River Minimum Flows Reallocation Study 
        Report, Arkansas and Missouri, dated July 2004.
          (2) Cost sharing.--Reallocation of storage and installation 
        of facilities under this subsection shall be considered fish 
        and wildlife enhancement that provides national benefits and 
        shall be a Federal expense in accordance with section 906(e)(1) 
        of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
        2283(e)(1)).
          (3) Offset.--In carrying out this subsection, losses to 
        hydropower shall be offset by a reduction, not to exceed 
        $17,000,000, in the costs allocated to hydropower, as 
        determined by the present value of the estimated replacement 
        cost of the electrical energy and capacity at the time of the 
        implementation.
  (b) Fish Hatchery.--In operating the fish hatchery at Beaver Lake, 
Arkansas, authorized by section 105 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2921), losses to hydropower shall be offset by a 
reduction, not to exceed $2,200,000, in the costs allocated to 
hydropower, as determined by the present value of the estimated 
replacement cost of the electrical energy and capacity at the time of 
the implementation.
  (c) Repeal.--Section 374 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1999 (113 Stat. 321) is repealed.

SEC. 5040. CAMBRIA, CALIFORNIA.

  Section 219(f)(48) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(114 Stat. 2763A-220) is amended--
          (1) by striking ``$10,300,000'' and inserting the following:
                  ``(A) In general.--$10,300,000'';
          (2) by adding at the end the following:
                  ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the 
                non-Federal share of the cost of the project not to 
                exceed $3,000,000 for the cost of planning and design 
                work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the 
                date of the partnership agreement for the project if 
                the Secretary determines that the work is integral to 
                the project.''; and
          (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph (A) 
        (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with 
        subparagraph (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section).

SEC. 5041. CONTRA COSTA CANAL, OAKLEY AND KNIGHTSEN, CALIFORNIA; 
                    MALLARD SLOUGH, PITTSBURG, CALIFORNIA.

  Sections 512 and 514 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2650) are each amended by adding at the end the following: 
``All planning, study, design, and construction on the project shall be 
carried out by the office of the district engineer, San Francisco, 
California.''.

SEC. 5042. DANA POINT HARBOR, CALIFORNIA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study of the causes of water quality 
degradation within Dana Point Harbor, California, to determine if the 
degradation is the result of a Federal navigation project, and, if the 
Secretary determines that the degradation is the result of a Federal 
navigation project, the Secretary shall carry out a project to mitigate 
the degradation at Federal expense.

SEC. 5043. EAST SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

  Section 219(f)(22) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(113 Stat. 336) is amended--
          (1) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting the following:
                  ``(A) In general.--$25,000,000'';
          (2) by adding at the end the following:
                  ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the 
                non-Federal share of the cost of the project (i) the 
                cost of design and construction work carried out by the 
                non-Federal interest before, on, or after the date of 
                the partnership agreement for the project if the 
                Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
                project; and (ii) the cost of provided for the project 
                by the non-Federal interest.
                  ``(C) In-kind contributions.--The non-Federal 
                interest may provide any portion of the non-Federal 
                share of the cost of the project in the form of in-kind 
                services and materials.''; and
          (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph (A) 
        (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with 
        subparagraph (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section).

SEC. 5044. EASTERN SANTA CLARA BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

  Section 111(c) of the Miscellaneous Appropriations Act, 2001 (as 
enacted into law by Public Law 106-554; 114 Stat. 2763A-224) is 
amended--
          (1) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$28,000,000''; and
          (2) by striking ``$7,000,000'' and inserting ``$10,000,000''.

SEC. 5045. PINE FLAT DAM AND RESERVOIR, CALIFORNIA.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary shall review the Kings River Fisheries 
Management Program Framework Agreement, dated May 29, 1999, among the 
California Department of Fish and Game, the Kings River Water 
Association, and the Kings River Conservation District and, if the 
Secretary determines that the management program is feasible, the 
Secretary may participate in the management program.
  (b) Prohibition.--Nothing in this section authorizes any project for 
the raising of, or the construction of, a multilevel intake structure 
at Pine Flat Dam, California.
  (c) Use of Existing Studies.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary shall use, to the maximum extent practicable, studies in 
existence on the date of enactment of this Act, including data and 
environmental documentation in the Report of the Chief of Engineers, 
Pine Flat Dam and Reservoir, Fresno County, California, dated July 19, 
2002.
  (d) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share 
of the cost of the project the cost of planning, design, and 
construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the 
date of the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
determines that the work is integral to the project.
  (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to $20,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5046. SACRAMENTO DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to transfer title to the 
Bascule Bridge, deauthorized by section 347(a)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114. Stat. 2618), to the city of 
West Sacramento, California, subject to the execution of an agreement 
by the Secretary and the city which specifies the terms and conditions 
for such transfer. The terms and conditions of the transfer shall 
include a provision authorizing the Secretary to participate in the 
construction of a replacement bridge following the removal of the 
Bascule Bridge.
  (b) Authorization of Appropriation.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $5,000,000 for the Secretary to participate in the 
construction of a replacement bridge under this section.

SEC. 5047. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the Port of San 
Francisco, California, may carry out the project for repair and 
removal, as appropriate, of Piers 35, 36, and 80 in San Francisco, 
California, substantially in accordance with the Port's redevelopment 
plan.
  (1) Authorization of Appropriation.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $20,000,000 to carry out this subsection.

SEC. 5048. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, WATERFRONT AREA.

  (a) Area to Be Declared Nonnavigable; Public Interest.--Unless the 
Secretary finds, after consultation with local and regional public 
officials (including local and regional public planning organizations), 
that the proposed projects to be undertaken within the boundaries of 
the portion of the San Francisco, California, waterfront area described 
in subsection (b) are not in the public interest, such portion is 
declared to be nonnavigable waters of the United States.
  (b) Northern Embarcadero South of Bryant Street.--The portion of the 
San Francisco, California, waterfront area referred to in subsection 
(a) is as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the northeasterly 
prolongation of that portion of the northwesterly line of Bryant Street 
lying between Beale Street and Main Street with the southwesterly line 
of Spear Street, which intersection lies on the line of jurisdiction of 
the San Francisco Port Commission; following thence southerly along 
said line of jurisdiction as described in the State of California 
Harbor and Navigation Code Section 1770, as amended in 1961, to its 
intersection with the easterly line of Townsend Street along a line 
that is parallel and distant 10 feet distant from the existing southern 
boundary of Pier 40 produced to its point of intersection with the 
United States Government pier-head line; thence northerly along said 
pier-head line to its intersection with a line parallel with, and 
distant 10 feet easterly from, the existing easterly boundary line of 
Pier 30-32; thence northerly along said parallel line and its northerly 
prolongation, to a point of intersection with a line parallel with, and 
distant 10 feet northerly from, the existing northerly boundary of Pier 
30-32, thence westerly along last said parallel line to its 
intersection with the United States Government pier-head line; to the 
northwesterly line of Bryant Street produced northwesterly; thence 
southwesterly along said northwesterly line of Bryant Street produced 
to the point of beginning.
  (c) Requirement That Area Be Improved.--The declaration of 
nonnavigability under subsection (a) applies only to those parts of the 
area described in subsection (b) that are or will be bulkheaded, 
filled, or otherwise occupied by permanent structures and does not 
affect the applicability of any Federal statute or regulation 
applicable to such parts the day before the date of enactment of this 
Act, including sections 9 and 10 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 
401 and 403; 30 Stat. 1151), commonly known as the Rivers and Harbors 
Appropriation Act of 1899, section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution 
Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), and the National Environmental Policy Act 
of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
  (d) Expiration Date.--If, 20 years from the date of enactment of this 
Act, any area or part thereof described in subsection (b) is not 
bulkheaded or filled or occupied by permanent structures, including 
marina facilities, in accordance with the requirements set out in 
subsection (c), or if work in connection with any activity permitted in 
subsection (c) is not commenced within 5 years after issuance of such 
permits, then the declaration of nonnavigability for such area or part 
thereof shall expire.

SEC. 5049. SANTA VENETIA, CALIFORNIA.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out a project for flood 
damage reduction under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1958 (33 
U.S.C. 701s), Santa Venetia, California, if the Secretary determines 
that the project is feasible.
  (b) Project Financing.--In carrying out the project under this 
section, the Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interests to 
participate in the financing of the project in accordance with section 
903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184), 
to the extent that the Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying 
such section is necessary to implement the project.

SEC. 5050. STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA.

  (a) Reevaluation.--The Secretary shall reevaluate the feasibility of 
the Lower Mosher Slough element and the levee extensions on the Upper 
Calaveras River element of the project for flood control, Stockton 
Metropolitan Area, California, carried out under section 211(f)(3) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3683), to 
determine the eligibility of such elements for reimbursement under 
section 211 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 701b-13).
  (b) Special Rules for Reevaluation.--In conducting the reevaluation 
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall not reject a feasibility 
determination based on one or more of the policies of the Corps of 
Engineers concerning the frequency of flooding, the drainage area, and 
the amount of runoff.
  (c) Reimbursement.--If the Secretary determines that the elements 
referred to subsection (a) are feasible, the Secretary shall reimburse, 
subject to appropriations, the non-Federal interest under section 211 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 for the Federal share of 
the cost of such elements.

SEC. 5051. VICTOR V. VEYSEY DAM, CALIFORNIA.

  (a) Designation.--The Prado Dam, authorized by the Flood Control Act 
of 1936 (49 Stat. 1570), shall be known and designated as the ``Victor 
V. Veysey Dam''.
  (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the dam referred to in 
subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Victor V. 
Veysey Dam''.

SEC. 5052. WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA.

  The Secretary shall carry out a project for flood damage reduction 
under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) in 
the vicinity of Whittier, California, if the Secretary determines that 
the project is feasible.

SEC. 5053. CHARLES HERVEY TOWNSHEND BREAKWATER, NEW HAVEN HARBOR, 
                    CONNECTICUT.

  (a) Designation.--The western breakwater for the project for 
navigation, New Haven Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the first 
section of the Act of September 19, 1890 (26 Stat. 426), shall be known 
and designated as the ``Charles Hervey Townshend Breakwater''.
  (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the breakwater referred 
to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Charles 
Hervey Townshend Breakwater''.

SEC. 5054. CHRISTINA RIVER SHIPWRECK, DELAWARE.

  The Secretary may carry out the removal of the debris associated with 
the steamship ``STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA'' and other derelict vessels from 
the Christina River, Delaware, under section 202 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2945).

SEC. 5055. ANACOSTIA RIVER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MARYLAND, AND 
                    VIRGINIA.

  (a) Comprehensive Action Plan.--Not later than 1 year after the date 
of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in coordination with the Mayor 
of the District of Columbia, the Governor of Maryland, the Governor of 
Virginia, the County Executives of Montgomery County and Prince 
George's County, Maryland, and other interested persons, shall develop 
a 10-year comprehensive action plan for the restoration and protection 
of the ecological integrity of the Anacostia River and its tributaries.
  (b) Public Availability.--Upon completion of the plan, the Secretary 
shall make the plan available to the public.

SEC. 5056. FLORIDA KEYS WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS.

  Section 109(e)(2) of the Miscellaneous Appropriations Act, 2001 
(enacted into law by Public Law 106-554) (114 Stat. 2763A-222) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
                  ``(C) Credit for work prior to execution of the 
                partnership agreement.--The Secretary shall credit 
                toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
                (i) the cost of construction work carried out by the 
                non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
                agreement for the project if the Secretary determines 
                that the work is integral to the project; and (ii) the 
                cost of land acquisition carried out by the non-Federal 
                interest for projects to be carried out under this 
                section.''.

SEC. 5057. LAKE WORTH, FLORIDA.

  The Secretary may carry out necessary repairs for the Lake Worth 
bulkhead replacement project, West Palm Beach, Florida, at an estimated 
total cost of $9,000,000.

SEC. 5058. LAKE LANIER, GEORGIA.

  The Secretary may assist local interests with planning, design, and 
construction of facilities at the Lake Lanier Olympic Center, Georgia, 
at a total cost of $5,300,000.

SEC. 5059. RILEY CREEK RECREATION AREA, IDAHO.

  The Secretary is authorized to carry out the Riley Creek Recreation 
Area Operation Plan of the Albeni Falls Management Plan, dated October 
2001, for the Riley Creek Recreation Area, Albeni Falls Dam, Bonner 
County, Idaho.

SEC. 5060. RECONSTRUCTION OF ILLINOIS FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the reconstruction 
of an eligible flood control project if the Secretary determines that 
such reconstruction is not required as a result of improper operation 
and maintenance of the project by the non-Federal interest.
  (b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the costs for the 
reconstruction of a flood control project authorized by this section 
shall be the same non-Federal share that was applicable to construction 
of the project. The non-Federal interest shall be responsible for 
operation and maintenance and repair of a project for which 
reconstruction is undertaken under this section.
  (c) Reconstruction Defined.--In this section, the term 
``reconstruction'', as used with respect to a project, means addressing 
major project deficiencies caused by long-term degradation of the 
foundation, construction materials, or engineering systems or 
components of the project, the results of which render the project at 
risk of not performing in compliance with its authorized project 
purposes. In addressing such deficiencies, the Secretary may 
incorporate current design standards and efficiency improvements, 
including the replacement of obsolete mechanical and electrical 
components at pumping stations, if such incorporation does not 
significantly change the scope, function, and purpose of the project as 
authorized.
  (d) Eligible Projects.--The following flood control projects are 
eligible for reconstruction under this section:
          (1) Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, Illinois.
          (2) Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District, 
        Illinois.
          (3) Wood River Drainage and Levee District, Illinois.
          (4) Cairo, Illinois Mainline Levee, Cairo, Illinois.
          (5) Goose Pond Pump Station, Cairo, Illinois.
          (6) Cottonwood Slough Pump Station, Alexander County, 
        Illinois.
          (7) 10th and 28th Street Pump Stations, Cairo, Illinois.
          (8) Flood control levee projects in Brookport, Shawneetown, 
        Old Shawneetown, Golconda, Rosiclare, Harrisburg, and 
        Reevesville, Illinois.
  (e) Justification.--The reconstruction of a project authorized by 
this section shall not be considered a separable element of the 
project.
  (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated--
          (1) $15,000,000 to carry out the projects described in 
        paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (d); and
          (2) $15,000,000 to carry out the projects described in 
        subsection (d)(8).
Such sums shall remain available until expended.

SEC. 5061. KASKASKIA RIVER BASIN, ILLINOIS, RESTORATION.

  (a) Kaskaskia River Basin Defined.--In this section, the term 
``Kaskaskia River Basin'' means the Kaskaskia River, Illinois, its 
backwaters, its side channels, and all tributaries, including their 
watersheds, draining into the Kaskaskia River.
  (b) Comprehensive Plan.--
          (1) Development.--The Secretary shall develop, as 
        expeditiously as practicable, a comprehensive plan for the 
        purpose of restoring, preserving, and protecting the Kaskaskia 
        River Basin.
          (2) Technologies and innovative approaches.--The 
        comprehensive plan shall provide for the development of new 
        technologies and innovative approaches--
                  (A) to enhance the Kaskaskia River as a 
                transportation corridor;
                  (B) to improve water quality within the entire 
                Kaskaskia River Basin;
                  (C) to restore, enhance, and preserve habitat for 
                plants and wildlife;
                  (D) to increase economic opportunity for agriculture 
                and business communities; and
                  (E) to reduce the impacts of flooding to communities 
                and landowners.
          (3) Specific components.--The comprehensive plan shall 
        include such features as are necessary to provide for--
                  (A) the development and implementation of a program 
                for sediment removal technology, sediment 
                characterization, sediment transport, and beneficial 
                uses of sediment;
                  (B) the development and implementation of a program 
                for the planning, conservation, evaluation, and 
                construction of measures for fish and wildlife habitat 
                conservation and rehabilitation, and stabilization and 
                enhancement of land and water resources in the basin;
                  (C) the development and implementation of a long-term 
                resource monitoring program;
                  (D) the development and implementation of a 
                computerized inventory and analysis system; and
                  (E) the development and implementation of a systemic 
                plan to reduce flood impacts by means of ecosystem 
                restoration projects.
          (4) Consultation.--The comprehensive plan shall be developed 
        by the Secretary in consultation with appropriate Federal 
        agencies, the State of Illinois, and the Kaskaskia River 
        Coordinating Council.
          (5) Report to congress.--Not later than 2 years after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to 
        Congress a report containing the comprehensive plan.
          (6) Additional studies and analyses.--After transmission of a 
        report under paragraph (5), the Secretary shall conduct studies 
        and analyses of projects related to the comprehensive plan that 
        are appropriate and consistent with this subsection.
  (c) General Provisions.--
          (1) Water quality.--In carrying out activities under this 
        section, the Secretary's recommendations shall be consistent 
        with applicable State water quality standards.
          (2) Public participation.--In developing the comprehensive 
        plan under subsection (b), the Secretary shall implement 
        procedures to facilitate public participation, including 
        providing advance notice of meetings, providing adequate 
        opportunity for public input and comment, maintaining 
        appropriate records, and making a record of the proceedings of 
        meetings available for public inspection.
  (d) Coordination.--The Secretary shall integrate activities carried 
out under this section with ongoing Federal and State programs, 
projects, and activities, including the following:
          (1) Farm programs of the Department of Agriculture.
          (2) Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (State of 
        Illinois) and Conservation 2000 Ecosystem Program of the 
        Illinois Department of Natural Resources.
          (3) Conservation 2000 Conservation Practices Program and the 
        Livestock Management Facilities Act administered by the 
        Illinois Department of Agriculture.
          (4) National Buffer Initiative of the Natural Resources 
        Conservation Service.
          (5) Nonpoint source grant program administered by the 
        Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.
  (e) Cost Sharing.--
          (1) In general.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
        activities carried out under this section shall be 35 percent.
          (2) In-kind services.--The Secretary may credit the cost of 
        in-kind services provided by the non-Federal interest for an 
        activity carried out under this section toward not more than 80 
        percent of the non-Federal share of the cost of the activity. 
        In-kind services shall include all State funds expended on 
        programs that accomplish the goals of this section, as 
        determined by the Secretary. The programs may include the 
        Kaskaskia River Conservation Reserve Program, the Illinois 
        Conservation 2000 Program, the Open Lands Trust Fund, and other 
        appropriate programs carried out in the Kaskaskia River Basin.

SEC. 5062. FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide assistance for a project 
to develop maps identifying 100- and 500-year flood inundation areas 
along the Little Calumet River, Chicago, Illinois.
  (b) Requirements.--Maps developed under the project shall include 
hydrologic and hydraulic information and shall accurately show the 
flood inundation of each property by flood risk in the floodplain. The 
maps shall be produced in a high resolution format and shall be made 
available to all flood prone areas along the Little Calumet River, 
Chicago, Illinois, in an electronic format.
  (c) Participation of FEMA.--The Secretary and the non-Federal 
interests for the project shall work with the Director of the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency to ensure the validity of the maps 
developed under the project for flood insurance purposes.
  (d) Forms of Assistance.--In carrying out the project, the Secretary 
may enter into contracts or cooperative agreements with the non-Federal 
interests or provide reimbursements of project costs.
  (e) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the project 
shall be 50 percent.
  (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $2,000,000.

SEC. 5063. NATALIE CREEK, MIDLOTHIAN AND OAK FOREST, ILLINOIS.

  The Secretary shall carry out a project for flood damage reduction 
under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), 
Natalie Creek, Midlothian and Oak Forest, Illinois, if the Secretary 
determines that the project is feasible.

SEC. 5064. ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN RESTORATION.

  (a) Extension of Authorization.--Section 519(c)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2654) is amended by 
striking ``2004'' and inserting ``2010''.
  (b) In-Kind Services.--Section 519(g)(3) of such Act (114 Stat. 2655) 
is amended by inserting before the period at the end of the first 
sentence ``if such services are provided not more than 5 years before 
the date of initiation of the project or activity''.
  (c) Nonprofit Entities and Monitoring.--Section 519 of such Act (114 
Stat. 2654) is amended by adding at the end the following:
  ``(h) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), a non-Federal 
interest may include a nonprofit entity with the consent of the 
affected local government.
  ``(i) Monitoring.--The Secretary shall develop an Illinois river 
basin monitoring program to support the plan referred to in subsection 
(b). Data collected under the monitoring program shall incorporate data 
provided by the State of Illinois and shall be publicly accessible 
through electronic means.''.

SEC. 5065. PROMONTORY POINT, LAKE MICHIGAN, ILLINOIS.

  In carrying out the project for storm damage reduction and shoreline 
erosion protection, Lake Michigan, authorized by section 101(a)(12) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3664), the 
Secretary shall reevaluate the feasibility of reconstructing the 
Promontory Point section consistent with the original limestone step 
design.

SEC. 5066. BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, INDIANA.

  The Secretary shall conduct a study of shoaling in the vicinity of 
Burns Waterway Harbor, Indiana, to determine if the shoaling is the 
result of a Federal navigation project, and, if the Secretary 
determines that the shoaling is the result of a Federal navigation 
project, the Secretary shall carry out a project to mitigate the 
shoaling under section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 
U.S.C. 426).

SEC. 5067. CALUMET REGION, INDIANA.

  Section 219(f)(12) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(113 Stat. 335; 117 Stat. 1843) is amended--
          (1) by striking ``$30,000,000'' and inserting the following:
                  ``(A) In general.--$30,000,000'';
          (2) by adding at the end the following:
                  ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the 
                non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost 
                of planning and design work carried out by the non-
                Federal interest before, on, or after the date of the 
                partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
                determines that the work is integral to the project.''; 
                and
          (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph (A) 
        (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with 
        subparagraph (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section).

SEC. 5068. FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, MISSOURI RIVER, IOWA.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide assistance for a project 
to develop maps identifying 100- and 500-year flood inundation areas in 
the State of Iowa, along the Missouri River.
  (b) Requirements.--Maps developed under the project shall include 
hydrologic and hydraulic information and shall accurately portray the 
flood hazard areas in the floodplain. The maps shall be produced in a 
high resolution format and shall be made available to the State of Iowa 
in an electronic format.
  (c) Participation of FEMA.--The Secretary and the non-Federal 
interests for the project shall work with the Director of the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency to ensure the validity of the maps 
developed under the project for flood insurance purposes.
  (d) Forms of Assistance.--In carrying out the project, the Secretary 
may enter into contracts or cooperative agreements with the non-Federal 
interests or provide reimbursements of project costs.
  (e) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the project 
shall be 50 percent.
  (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $3,000,000.

SEC. 5069. RATHBUN LAKE, IOWA.

  (a) Conveyance.--The Secretary shall convey the remaining water 
supply storage allocation in Rathbun Lake, Iowa, to the Rathbun 
Regional Water Association (in this section referred to as the ``Water 
Association'').
  (b) Cost Sharing.--Notwithstanding the Water Supply Act of 1958 (43 
U.S.C. 390b), the Water Association shall pay 100 percent of the cost 
of the water supply storage allocation to be conveyed under subsection 
(a). The Secretary shall credit toward such non-Federal share the cost 
of any structures and facilities constructed by the Water Association 
at the project.
  (c) Terms and Conditions.--Before conveying the water supply storage 
allocation under subsection (a), the Secretary shall enter into an 
agreement with the Water Association, under which the Water Association 
shall agree to--
          (1) in accordance with designs approved by the Chief of 
        Engineers, construct structures and facilities referred to in 
        subsection (b) that have a value equal to or greater than the 
        amount that otherwise would be paid to the Federal Government 
        for the costs of the water supply storage under the Water 
        Supply Act of 1958 (43 U.S.C. 390b);
          (2) be responsible for operating and maintaining the 
        structures and facilities;
          (3) pay all operation and maintenance costs allocated to the 
        water supply storage space;
          (4) use any revenues generated at the structures and 
        facilities that are above those required to operate and 
        maintain or improve the complex to undertake, subject to the 
        approval of the Chief of Engineers, activities that will 
        improve the quality of the environment in the Rathbun Lake 
        watershed area; and
          (5) such other terms and conditions as the Secretary 
        considers necessary to protect the interests of the United 
        States.

SEC. 5070. CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KENTUCKY.

  At reservoirs managed by the Secretary above Cumberland River mile 
385.5 within the Cumberland River basin, Kentucky, the Secretary shall 
charge fees associated with storage and maintenance of water supply 
that do not exceed the fees in effect on October 1, 2002.

SEC. 5071. LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY.

  (a) In General.--Section 557 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (113 Stat. 353) is amended--
          (1) in the section heading by inserting ``kentucky 
        and