[Pages S5544-S5548]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                          LEGISLATIVE SESSION

  Mr. THUNE. I ask consent that the Senate resume legislative session.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.


                          Waiving Quorum Call

  Mr. THUNE. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to waive the 
mandatory quorum call with respect to the

[[Page S5545]]

motion to proceed to Calendar No. 115, S. 2296.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Rhode Island.


                   National Defense Authorization Act

  Mr. REED. Mr. President, I rise to discuss the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026.
  The Armed Services Committee approved this bill in July by a wide 
bipartisan vote of 26 to 1. I appreciated the opportunity to work with 
Senator Wicker and commend him for his leadership in this regard and 
also my colleagues on the committee who worked to produce this bill 
that we are now considering on the floor.
  But before I turn to the details of the bill, I must take a moment to 
address the ongoing deployment of National Guard troops here in the 
capital and across the country. Over the past several months, President 
Trump has drastically escalated his use of the military for political 
purposes, first in Los Angeles--in fact, a judge, today, found that it 
violated the Posse Comitatus Act with his actions--and now in 
Washington and very likely soon in other major cities. The President 
has abused his power as Commander in Chief to order thousands of 
military servicemembers to conduct law enforcement in American cities. 
This is antithetical to the core principles of our country. Our 
military is there to fight our wars. Police officers, under local 
jurisdiction, are there to enforce the laws. And then there are Federal 
laws that can be enforced by Federal authorities, not military 
personnel.
  I have always been a proponent of strong law enforcement and safety 
in our communities. That is why I supported the COPS and Byrne-JAG 
Programs, among others. But using military forces to police American 
citizens blurs the vital line between civilian law enforcement and the 
armed forces, and it damages public trust. Public trust in the military 
is hard-won and easily lost. And I fear the President is causing severe 
harm to that relationship.
  These deployments threaten the very freedoms our servicemembers swear 
to protect, and I urge my Republican colleagues to join us in calling 
for them to end immediately, this use of military personnel to enforce 
the civil laws of the United States.
  To that end, the fiscal year 2026 NDAA establishes important 
congressional oversight of Defense Support of Civil Authorities. The 
bill reinstates mandatory training for all servicemembers on the rules 
of engagement, domestic operations, ethics, and the code of conduct to 
prevent escalation during deployments on American soil--legal 
deployments--under both title 10 and title 32. It requires personnel 
deployed alongside law enforcement to wear clear service identification 
on their uniforms and ensures military lawyers remain fully qualified 
and in good standing.
  The bill also mandates reviews of military costs incurred supporting 
the Department of Homeland Security, reporting on the use of military 
facilities for migrant detention, and transparency when military 
aircraft and resources are diverted for immigration enforcement. We are 
accumulating a multi-multimillion-dollar bill in the Department of 
Defense for functions that are the responsibility of the Department of 
Homeland Security. That is not smart spending. That is not a wise 
investment in our military.
  Together, the provisions I described provide greater assurances that 
when our troops are deployed domestically and legally, their role is 
tightly defined, accountable, and consistent with American values.
  More broadly, this is a defense bill that is laser-focused on the 
threats we face. It addresses a broad range of pressing issues from 
strategic competition with China and Russia to countering defense from 
Iran, North Korea, and violent extremists.
  The bill authorizes important investments in key technology like 
artificial intelligence, unmanned systems, and hypersonics, and makes 
real progress toward modernizing our ships, aircraft, and combat 
vehicles.
  Most importantly, this NDAA delivers key wins for servicemembers and 
their families. It authorizes a 3.8-percent pay raise for our troops 
and provides important new resources, such as improved housing and 
barracks, additional childcare assistance benefits, and expanded 
programs to address traumatic brain injuries. It also strengthens 
education support for military children and requires more transparency 
in how pay and housing allowances are calculated.
  Our greatest asset in this country are the men and women of our Armed 
Forces. They deserve and they have earned these benefits. Bringing into 
the military qualified Americans from all ranks and all sections and 
all regions, both genders, is critical to the success of our military 
forces.
  Additionally, this bill reaffirms America's role on the world stage. 
It extends and expands the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative and 
commits the Department of Defense to continue providing military and 
intelligence support to Ukraine.
  It also strengthens our alliances in Asia by fully funding the 
Pacific Deterrence Initiative and providing new authority for U.S. 
military cooperation with Taiwan. The bill would help modernize our 
partnership with Japan and the Philippines and ensure our defense 
industrial base works hand in hand with our allies to counter shared 
threats. Importantly, the bill will also prohibit any reckless 
reductions in our force posture in Europe and the Indo-Pacific.
  Building upon progress directed by Congress the past several years, 
this year's bill further improves defense acquisition processes by 
enabling the Department to rapidly invest in and field cutting-edge 
commercial technologies. By improving defense small business programs 
and partnerships with high-tech companies, this legislation will help 
meet the defense, industrial, and civilian needs of the United States.
  Similarly, to compete successfully abroad, our military services and 
combat commanders must have the resources they need. This legislation 
broadly supports the procurement of naval vessels, combat aircraft, 
armored vehicles, weapon systems, and munitions requested in the 
President's defense budget for fiscal year 2026.
  The bill provides additional funding for the procurement of Virginia- 
and Columbia-class submarines, which are critical to power projection 
and deterrence around the world. Importantly, this NDAA also provides 
greater predictability and stability in our naval acquisition programs 
and improves the U.S. shipbuilding infrastructure through modernization 
efforts.
  And as we navigate the threats of nuclear escalation from Russia and 
increasing capabilities from China, this Defense bill strengthens our 
deterrence strategy by helping to modernize the U.S. nuclear triad. It 
makes progress in ensuring the safety, security, and reliability of our 
nuclear stockpile, our delivery systems, and our infrastructure, 
increasing capacity in theater and homeland missile defense and 
strengthening nonproliferation programs.
  There are many more provisions in this bill that will help equip the 
Department and our warfighters with the tools they need to succeed. I 
look forward to discussing them throughout this process on the floor.
  Let me conclude by, once again, thanking Senator Wicker and my 
colleagues for working, thoughtfully, on a bipartisan basis to develop 
this important piece of legislation. I look forward to a very 
thoughtful debate on the issues that face our national defense and our 
Department of Defense.
  I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. WICKER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.


                   National Defense Authorization Act

  Mr. WICKER. Mr. President, the Senate is about to take up this year's 
National Defense Authorization Act. My colleagues and I on the Senate 
Armed Services Committee have worked hard to bring this bill to the 
floor for consideration by all of our fellow Senators, and we bring it 
to our colleagues with a resounding committee action.
  In our committee markup, we voted in a landslide--26 yeses and only 1 
nay--to advance the bill--a nearly unanimous endorsement of this 
legislation. My colleagues and I have spent

[[Page S5546]]

the past 7 months listening to the Nation's top military officials. 
These officials from command stations all over the world have detailed 
the dangerous threat environment facing the United States. This NDAA is 
a direct response to their testimony. In our overwhelmingly positive 
committee vote, we send a clear message: We agree with the testimony of 
our military officials. Both Republicans and Democrats agree that we 
are not where we need to be on national defense. This bill helps close 
that gap.
  The committee's fiscal year 2026 NDAA is focused on two things: 
rebuild and reform. Again, by a vote of 26 to 1, we adopted a bill with 
a $924.7 billion top line--an increase that recognizes the urgent need 
to rebuild our military. We also adopted numerous reforms to the 
Pentagon's antiquated business processes captured in my FoRGED Act--the 
most significant acquisition reform proposal in decades.
  This NDAA will help rebuild the U.S. military so that our 
servicemembers are better equipped for the threats of the 21st century. 
This bill makes investments in cutting-edge technology, such as 
artificial intelligence, cyber defenses, drone production, and the 
means to defend ourselves against drones. We authorized a 3.8-percent 
pay raise for servicemembers, and we expanded programs to continue 
President Trump's successful military recruitment surge. This NDAA 
supports the DOD's role in border security and rolls back statutory 
requirements for diversity, equity, and inclusion programs at the 
Pentagon.
  Throughout, we sought to give the President the tools needed to keep 
the homeland safe. This NDAA helps equip the United States to counter 
the Chinese Communist Party. The committee included authorizations to 
replenish munitions used earlier this year against Iran, to accelerate 
shipbuilding, and to support the Golden Dome initiative and many other 
important initiatives.
  This National Defense Authorization Act would bring the Pentagon's 
acquisition process into the modern day. As one example, in just a 
single provision of this bill, we repeal 86 outdated or unnecessary 
acquisition policies. Actions like that help turn the page on an 
outdated system as we look to the future.
  This bill streamlines decision-making processes at the Pentagon and 
brings more competition to the procurement process. The committee 
recognizes that America is full of innovators who are developing 
exactly the kinds of technologies that dominate the battlefields of the 
21st century. We have produced an NDAA that taps into that talent.
  Our deliberations resulted in an overwhelming vote count. Perhaps one 
reason for such a consensus was that our drafting process was 
collaborative and involved. The bill contains 985 items that were 
driven by Members of this body. Of that, 78 items were Member requests 
for military construction. Another 136 items came from Senators 
requesting budget increases for procurement operations and maintenance 
and research and development, and 771 items were policy ideas directly 
responding to Member requests. In total, those 985 items totaled 60 
more than last year and are a sign of a strong, bipartisan consensus 
that we need to move quickly to modernize our Armed Forces. As those 
statistics bear out, this is a highly Member-driven bill.
  Our committee markup was characterized by that same collaborative 
spirit. We conducted 49 votes on amendments, working from 9:30 a.m. to 
7:30 p.m., only 10 hours--perhaps a record--and I am certain it was an 
efficient and effective process.
  As I look at that 26-to-1 committee vote--have I emphasized that 
enough, a 26-yes, 1-no committee vote?--I want to thank my colleagues 
on the committee.
  My dear friend, the ranking member, Jack Reed of Rhode Island, has 
already spoken. He deserves credit. He and his colleagues contributed 
thoughtful and decisive ideas to this bill, and our staffs worked 
closely throughout the process.
  As I prepare to conclude, may I stress that a regular order process 
will always yield the best results. I regret that, last summer, the 
NDAA was not given full consideration on the Senate floor. This is our 
opportunity to correct that. I am confident that Leader Thune will want 
to do things differently this week and next. We need an open amendment 
process undertaken in the light of day. My fellow Senators have already 
filed hundreds of amendments. The American people deserve to see how 
their elected officials are voting on important national security 
matters.
  It has not been that long since we have had an open amendment process 
with multiple managers' packages and dozens of votes. As recently as 
2023, we considered 900 amendments during floor debate, and we adopted 
121 of them--the most amendments adopted to the Senate NDAA in years. 
We can do it again, and I ask my colleagues to join us in showing this 
great body by working as the Founders intended.
  In an increasingly dangerous world, this is our moment to provide a 
strong national defense. My colleagues on the Armed Services Committee 
stand fully behind this bill. We are eager to begin working with the 
rest of our colleagues in the Senate as we consider this year's 
National Defense Authorization Act on the floor. Let's have a 
resounding ``yes'' vote in just a few minutes, and then let's get to 
work.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Mississippi.
  Mr. WICKER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the 
previously scheduled rollcall vote commence immediately.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.


                             Cloture Motion

  Pursuant to rule XXII, the Chair lays before the Senate the pending 
cloture motion, which the clerk will state.
  The legislative clerk read as follows:

                             Cloture Motion

       We, the undersigned Senators, in accordance with the 
     provisions of rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate, 
     do hereby move to bring to a close debate on the motion to 
     proceed to Calendar No. 115, S. 2296, a bill to authorize 
     appropriations for fiscal year 2026 for military activities 
     of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and 
     for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to 
     prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, 
     and for other purposes.
         John Thune, Roger F. Wicker, Markwayne Mullin, John 
           Barrasso, Tim Sheehy, Pete Ricketts, Bernie Moreno, 
           Steve Daines, Mike Rounds, Rick Scott of Florida, Eric 
           Schmitt, Tommy Tuberville, Jim Banks, Thom Tillis, 
           David McCormick, James Lankford, Jon Husted.

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. By unanimous consent, the mandatory quorum 
call under rule XXII has been waived.
  The question is, Is it the sense of the Senate that debate on the 
motion to proceed to S. 2296, a bill to authorize appropriations for 
fiscal year 2026 for military activities of the Department of Defense, 
for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department 
of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal 
year, and for other purposes, shall be brought to a close?
  The yeas and nays are mandatory under the rule.
  The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk called the roll.
  Mr. BARRASSO. The following Senators are necessarily absent: the 
Senator from South Carolina (Mr. Scott) and the Senator from North 
Carolina (Mr. Tillis).
  Further, if present and voting: the Senator from North Carolina (Mr. 
Tillis) would have voted ``yea.''
  The yeas and nays resulted--yeas 84, nays 14, as follows:

                      [Rollcall Vote No. 500 Leg.]

                                YEAS--84

     Alsobrooks
     Banks
     Barrasso
     Bennet
     Blackburn
     Blumenthal
     Blunt Rochester
     Boozman
     Britt
     Budd
     Cantwell
     Capito
     Cassidy
     Collins
     Coons
     Cornyn
     Cortez Masto
     Cotton
     Cramer
     Crapo
     Cruz
     Curtis
     Daines
     Duckworth
     Durbin
     Ernst
     Fetterman
     Fischer
     Gallego
     Gillibrand
     Graham
     Grassley
     Hagerty
     Hassan
     Hawley
     Heinrich
     Hickenlooper
     Hirono
     Hoeven
     Husted
     Hyde-Smith
     Johnson
     Justice
     Kaine
     Kelly
     Kim
     King
     Klobuchar
     Lankford
     Lee
     Lujan
     Lummis
     Marshall
     McConnell
     McCormick
     Moody
     Moran
     Moreno
     Mullin
     Murkowski
     Murphy
     Murray
     Ossoff
     Peters
     Reed
     Ricketts
     Risch
     Rosen
     Rounds
     Schiff
     Schmitt
     Schumer
     Scott (FL)
     Shaheen
     Sheehy
     Slotkin
     Sullivan
     Thune
     Tuberville
     Warner
     Warnock
     Whitehouse
     Wicker
     Young

[[Page S5547]]


  


                                NAYS--14

     Baldwin
     Booker
     Kennedy
     Markey
     Merkley
     Padilla
     Paul
     Sanders
     Schatz
     Smith
     Van Hollen
     Warren
     Welch
     Wyden

                             NOT VOTING--2

     Scott (SC)
     Tillis
       
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. On this vote, the yeas are 84, the nays of 14.
  Three-fifths of the Senate, duly chosen and sworn, have voted in the 
affirmative. The motion is agreed to.
  The motion was agreed to.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Rhode Island.


                      Remembering Frank T. Caprio

  Mr. REED. Mr. President, I rise today with my colleague Senator 
Whitehouse to pay tribute to a legendary Rhode Islander, Judge Frank T. 
Caprio, whose limitless compassion while serving as the chief judge of 
the Municipal Court of Providence made him a beloved figure not only in 
Rhode Island but around the world.
  Judge Caprio's illustrious career was marked by a special dedication 
to serving others, and it spanned nearly 40 years with the Providence 
Municipal Court, where he established a reputation for his empathy in 
the application of justice.
  Judge Caprio passed away on August 20, 2025, at the age of 88 after a 
long and courageous battle with pancreatic cancer. In his signature 
optimistic and heartwarming way, Judge Caprio did not let his diagnosis 
dampen his good spirits, and he continued to spread his warmth to the 
many fans he earned through the Emmy-nominated television show ``Caught 
in Providence.''
  This show, ``Caught in Providence,'' was a worldwide phenomenon. It 
was picked up virtually all across the globe, which made him an 
international celebrity, not just a local Rhode Island personality. 
Through national syndication and social media, the ``Nicest Judge in 
the World'' scored legions of admirers.
  Following his example, we want to take a moment to honor his legacy, 
which will undoubtedly continue to live on through the many lives he 
touched in the courtroom and throughout the world.
  Let me be very, very clear. Frank Caprio was a great man. His 
greatness came from two fundamental principles: He never forgot where 
he came from and who he came from.
  As a son of an immigrant father and a Providence native mother, Judge 
Caprio grew up in the Italian neighborhood of Federal Hill in 
Providence, just down the street from the courthouse where he presided.
  He learned from his father to work hard and to help others wherever 
possible. He spoke often of shining shoes to make a little extra cash 
as well as his father's apt advice to always put himself in the other 
person's shoes, to understand who people are and what brought them to 
where they are today.
  His message as a judge was never about punishment. He saw people 
first and sought fairness in justice. He was committed not just to 
enforcing the law but to doing justice. In word and deed, Judge Caprio 
exemplified his father's advice.
  Speaking with CBS News after his diagnosis--again demonstrating his 
unyielding humility--Judge Caprio said:

       I'm just a small-town municipal court judge, just trying to 
     do good. That's how I am. . . . [I try] to take into 
     consideration the circumstances surrounding the people before 
     me. And remember what my dad told me . . . when someone 
     appears before you, put yourself in their shoes . . . imagine 
     it's you before them. How do you want to be treated?

  As much as he tried to play down his contributions, Judge Caprio was 
much more than ``a small-town municipal court judge''; he was the 
premier example of noble public service and the embodiment of the ideal 
form of justice, one that focuses less on punishment and judgment and 
more on overcoming our mistakes, seeking forgiveness, and forging a 
stronger community.
  Before his time on the court, his dedication to service was apparent. 
He was a teacher, a member of the Rhode Island Army National Guard, and 
a local elected official. Judge Caprio was also a dedicated lawyer, an 
accomplished restauranteur, and a business owner.
  He also treasured the wisdom his parents shared and valued the 
opportunities that education brought him. He wanted to see others share 
in that success, so he worked to create scholarships and served for a 
decade as chairman of the Rhode Island Board of Governors for Higher 
Education.
  Judge Caprio's compassion and generosity inspired the best in others. 
After seeing his kindness online and on TV, viewers from around the 
world sent in unsolicited donations to support Judge Caprio's mission--
so many donations, in fact, they inspired the establishment of a fund 
known as the Filomena Fund, which was named after Judge Caprio's 
beloved mother. The fund celebrates the generosity of his mother--a 
trait so clearly inherited by Judge Caprio. Even after Judge Caprio's 
retirement, the Filomena Fund continues to support charitable work in 
and around his beloved neighborhood of Federal Hill.
  His support for philanthropic causes, and the scholarships he 
established to support those seeking to make a difference in their 
community, further exemplified Judge Caprio's work to lift up those 
around him.
  A true believer in the power of empathy, Judge Caprio used his wit, 
wisdom, and grace to make the world a better place.
  He often said:

       Kindness is the one gift that costs nothing but means 
     everything.

  A humble and benevolent man of integrity, Judge Caprio was bestowed 
with the Mother Teresa Award for Social Justice in 2023.
  Judge Caprio was a mentor to generations of Rhode Island leaders. I 
always enjoyed catching up with him over a cup of coffee. We spoke of 
current events, the state of our Nation, and about our families. I 
valued his wisdom, optimism, and sensibility, and I will remember him 
fondly for his generous spirit, his personal example of leadership and, 
indeed, his many, many kindnesses to me.
  Along with Senator Whitehouse, I want to express our deepest 
condolences to Judge Caprio's beloved wife of more than 60 years, 
Joyce. I also want to extend my condolences to Judge Caprio's entire 
family--Frank, David, Marissa, John, and Paul, his children, along with 
his seven grandchildren and two great-grandchildren, who filled him 
with enormous joy.
  Know that your husband, father, grandfather, and great-grandfather is 
a shining example of a great man and a cherished public servant. 
Through you, his love and empathy will live on.
  And now I yield to my colleague Senator Whitehouse to continue this 
tribute to this truly good and decent man whose life has brought honor 
to every Rhode Islander.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Rhode Island.
  Mr. WHITEHOUSE. Mr. President, I thank Senator Reed, and I am very 
cognizant of the honor of having the chance to reflect on Judge Frank 
Caprio, who was indeed, as Senator Reed has said, a Rhode Island 
legend.
  Judge Caprio was Rhode Island through and through. He was born on 
Federal Hill, an iconic Italian-American neighborhood in Providence. He 
started helping his milkman father about age 10. A lot of the 
apartments there were three-decker tenements. Somebody had to run the 
milk bottles up to that third floor. An energetic 10-year-old was just 
the one to do it.
  He went on to study in Providence's public schools and, to earn 
money, served as a dishwasher and a shoeshiner while he was a student.
  He graduated and went on to Providence College, the first in his 
family of dozens of cousins to attend college. And, of course, he 
graduated. And then he went back to teach at Hope High School to give 
back to the Providence school system that had lifted him up and taught 
him so well.
  He also served in Rhode Island's Army National Guard for years.
  Eventually, he became a lawyer. It wasn't easy. He had to work. So he 
had to take night classes up in Boston, and Providence to Boston for 
night classes is a considerable effort.
  He became a Providence city councilman, and, ultimately, he became 
chief judge of the Providence Municipal Court, chief judge for 38 
years. It was there where the man found his mission, and the mission 
found its man and that was, while presiding over literally thousands of 
cases, to become an exemplar of what is right and what is decent

[[Page S5548]]

when somebody is coming before you having a very bad day.
  He heard cases related to unpaid parking tickets and traffic 
violations, and he listened to everyone who came before him.
  His authenticity quickly captured the hearts and minds of Rhode 
Islanders. His TV show from the courtroom, ``Caught in Providence,'' 
first became a treasure of Rhode Island Public Access TV, but then it 
exploded. Judge Caprio and his court officer and straight man Ziggy 
Quinn turned the tedium of traffic court into a beloved and enduring 
human spectacle, and people from around the world tuned in. People told 
Judge Caprio their stories of personal hardship, and he listened. 
Whenever he could, he gave the benefit of the doubt and offered advice 
and encouragement, delivered in that signature Federal Hill voice.
  Sometimes there were tears of relief. Sometimes there was laughter. 
Some of those moments went viral online, racking up more than a billion 
views. People were attracted to Judge Caprio because he did not fake 
authenticity. He was the real deal.
  The show became nationally syndicated in 2018. And when that 
syndication deal was announced, Judge Caprio called it ``a dream.'' It 
was wonderful that he could have his dream come true in his lifetime.
  So the world got to witness Judge Caprio's compassion. The empathetic 
judge from Rhode Island became an ambassador for our capital city and 
for our State and for his solid, old-school values. He did it his way. 
And we all got to enjoy it.
  At the end, stricken with pancreatic cancer, he was still giving back 
and still being compassionate. At the last PurpleStride pancreatic 
cancer walk that he attended, he and I sat next to each other for 15 
minutes chatting and catching up. He was, by then, quite the celebrity. 
He could have hustled in and hustled back out, gone to do other things. 
No. He wanted to just hang out with people and be there and make sure 
that the entire proceedings went off well. He did not treat himself as 
a star, but he was one.
  Judge Caprio's son David said that the Judge's parting advice to him 
was this:

       Take care of each other. Keep the family close. And help 
     people if you can.

  That sums it up nicely.
  I offer my condolences to his wife Joyce of more than 60 years and to 
their five children: David, who also served in government in Rhode 
Island; Marissa; Frank, who also served in government in Rhode Island, 
was our treasurer; Paul; and John. Quite a family. It has lost its 
patriarch. Our hearts are with them.
  I yield the floor.
  Mr. REED. I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Ms. LUMMIS. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________