[Pages H3382-H3589]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014

Mr. McKEON. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that during further
consideration of H.R. 1960, pursuant to House Resolution 260, amendment
Nos. 18, 19, and 20 printed in part B of House Report 113-108 may be
considered out of sequence.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from California?
There was no objection.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to House Resolution 260 and rule
XVIII, the Chair declares the House in the Committee of the Whole House
on the state of the Union for the further consideration of the bill,
H.R. 1960.
Will the gentleman from Nebraska (Mr. Terry) kindly take the chair.

{time} 1436

In the Committee of the Whole

Accordingly, the House resolved itself into the Committee of the
Whole House on the state of the Union for the further consideration of
the bill (H.R. 1960) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2014
for military activities of the Department of Defense and for military
construction, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal
year, and for other purposes, with Mr. Terry (Acting Chair) in the
chair.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The Acting CHAIR. When the Committee of the Whole rose on Wednesday,
June 12, 2013, all time for general debate pursuant to House Resolution
256 had expired.
Pursuant to House Resolution 260, no further general debate shall be
in order. In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute
recommended by the Committee on Armed Services, printed in the bill, it
shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of
amendment under the 5-minute rule an amendment in the nature of a
substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 113-13,
modified by the amendment printed in part A of House Report 113-108.
The amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as
read.
The text of the amendment in the nature of a substitute is as
follows:

H.R. 1960

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014''.

SEC. 2. ORGANIZATION OF ACT INTO DIVISIONS; TABLE OF
CONTENTS.

(a) Divisions.--This Act is organized into four divisions
as follows:
(1) Division A--Department of Defense Authorizations.
(2) Division B--Military Construction Authorizations.
(3) Division C--Department of Energy National Security
Authorizations and Other Authorizations.
(4) Division D--Funding Tables.
(b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents for this Act
is as follows:

Sec. 1. Short title.
Sec. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents.
Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees.

DIVISION A--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS

TITLE I--PROCUREMENT

Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 101. Authorization of appropriations.

Subtitle B--Army Programs

Sec. 111. Limitation on availability of funds for Stryker vehicle
program.

Subtitle C--Navy Programs

Sec. 121. Multiyear procurement authority for E-2D aircraft program.
Sec. 122. Cost limitation for CVN-78 aircraft carriers.

Subtitle D--Air Force Programs

Sec. 131. Multiyear procurement authority for multiple variants of the
C-130J aircraft program.
Sec. 132. Prohibition on cancellation or modification of avionics
modernization program for C-130 aircraft.
Sec. 133. Retirement of KC-135R aircraft.
Sec. 134. Competition for evolved expendable launch vehicle providers.

Subtitle E--Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters

Sec. 141. Multiyear procurement authority for ground-based
interceptors.
Sec. 142. Multiyear procurement authority for tactical wheeled
vehicles.
Sec. 143. Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of RQ-4
Global Hawk unmanned aircraft systems.
Sec. 144. Personal protection equipment procurement.
Sec. 145. Repeal of certain F-35 reporting requirements.
Sec. 146. Study on procurement of personal protection equipment.

TITLE II--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION

Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations.

Subtitle B--Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations

Sec. 211. Limitation on availability of funds for ground combat vehicle
engineering and manufacturing phase.
Sec. 212. Limitation on Milestone A activities for Unmanned Carrier-
launched Surveillance and Strike system program.
Sec. 213. Limitation on availability of funds for Air Force logistics
transformation.
Sec. 214. Limitation on availability of funds for defensive cyberspace
operations of the Air Force.
Sec. 215. Limitation on availability of funds for precision extended
range munition program.
Sec. 216. Limitation on availability of funds for the program manager
for biometrics of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 217. Unmanned combat air system demonstration testing requirement.
Sec. 218. Long-range standoff weapon requirement.
Sec. 219. Review of software development for F-35 aircraft.
Sec. 220. Evaluation and assessment of the Distributed Common Ground
System.
Sec. 221. Requirement to complete individual carbine testing.
Sec. 222. Establishment of funding line and fielding plan for Navy
laser weapon system.
Sec. 223. Sense of Congress on importance of aligning common missile
compartment of Ohio-class replacement program with the
United Kingdom's Vanguard successor program.
Sec. 224. Sense of congress on counter-electronics high power microwave
missile project.

Subtitle C--Missile Defense Programs

Sec. 231. Prohibition on use of funds for MEADS program.
Sec. 232. Additional missile defense site in the United States for
optimized protection of the homeland.
Sec. 233. Limitation on removal of missile defense equipment from East
Asia.
Sec. 234. Improvements to acquisition accountability reports on
ballistic missile defense system.
Sec. 235. Analysis of alternatives for successor to precision tracking
space system.
Sec. 236. Plan to improve organic kill assessment capability of the
ground-based midcourse defense system.
Sec. 237. Availability of funds for Iron Dome short-range rocket
defense program.
Sec. 238. NATO and the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in
Europe.
Sec. 239. Sense of Congress on procurement of capability enhancement II
exoatmospheric kill vehicle.
Sec. 240. Sense of Congress on 30th anniversary of the Strategic
Defense Initiative.

Subtitle D--Reports

Sec. 251. Annual Comptroller General report on the amphibious combat
vehicle acquisition program.
Sec. 252. Report on strategy to improve body armor.
Sec. 253. Report on main battle tank fuel efficiency initiative.
Sec. 254. Report on powered rail system.

Subtitle E--Other Matters

Sec. 261. Establishment of Cryptographic Modernization Review and
Advisory Board.

[[Page H3383]]

Sec. 262. Clarification of eligibility of a State to participate in
defense experimental program to stimulate competitive
research.
Sec. 263. Extension and expansion of mechanisms to provide funds for
defense laboratories for research and development of
technologies for military missions.
Sec. 264. Extension of authority to award prizes for advanced
technology achievements.
Sec. 265. Five-year extension of pilot program to include technology
protection features during research and development of
certain defense systems.
Sec. 266. Briefing on power and energy research conducted at university
affiliated research centers.

TITLE III--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 301. Operation and maintenance funding.

Subtitle B--Energy and Environment

Sec. 311. Deadline for submission of reports on proposed budgets for
activities relating to operational energy strategy.
Sec. 312. Facilitation of interagency cooperation in conservation
programs of the Departments of Defense, Agriculture, and
Interior to avoid or reduce adverse impacts on military
readiness activities.
Sec. 313. Reauthorization of Sikes Act.
Sec. 314. Cooperative agreements under Sikes Act for land management
related to Department of Defense readiness activities.
Sec. 315. Exclusions from definition of ``chemical substance'' under
Toxic Substances Control Act.
Sec. 316. Exemption of Department of Defense from alternative fuel
procurement requirement.
Sec. 317. Clarification of prohibition on disposing of waste in open-
air burn pits.
Sec. 318. Limitation on plan, design, refurbishing, or construction of
biofuels refineries.
Sec. 319. Limitation on procurement of biofuels.

Subtitle C--Logistics and Sustainment

Sec. 321. Littoral Combat Ship Strategic Sustainment Plan.
Sec. 322. Review of critical manufacturing capabilities within Army
arsenals.
Sec. 323. Inclusion of Army arsenals capabilities in solicitations.

Subtitle D--Reports

Sec. 331. Additional reporting requirements relating to personnel and
unit readiness.
Sec. 332. Repeal of annual Comptroller General report on Army progress.
Sec. 333. Revision to requirement for annual submission of information
regarding information technology capital assets.

Subtitle E--Limitations and Extensions of Authority

Sec. 341. Limitation on reduction of force structure at Lajes Air Force
Base, Azores.
Sec. 342. Prohibition on performance of Department of Defense flight
demonstration teams outside the United States.

Subtitle F--Other Matters

Sec. 351. Requirement to establish policy on joint combat uniforms.

TITLE IV--MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS

Subtitle A--Active Forces

Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces.
Sec. 402. Revision in permanent active duty end strength minimum
levels.

Subtitle B--Reserve Forces

Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve.
Sec. 412. End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the
reserves.
Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status).
Sec. 414. Fiscal year 2014 limitation on number of non-dual status
technicians.
Sec. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on
active duty for operational support.

Subtitle C--Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 421. Military personnel.

TITLE V--MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY

Subtitle A--Officer Personnel Policy Generally

Sec. 501. Limitations on number of general and flag officers on active
duty.

Subtitle B--Reserve Component Management

Sec. 511. Minimum notification requirements for members of reserve
components before deployment or cancellation of
deployment related to a contingency operation.
Sec. 512. Information to be provided to boards considering officers for
selective early removal from reserve active-status list.
Sec. 513. Temporary authority to maintain active status and inactive
status lists of members in the inactive National Guard.
Sec. 514. Review of requirements and authorizations for reserve
component general and flag officers in an active status.
Sec. 515. Feasability study on establishing a unit of the National
Guard in American Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands.

Subtitle C--General Service Authorities

Sec. 521. Review of Integrated Disability Evaluation System.
Sec. 522. Compliance requirements for organizational climate
assessments.
Sec. 523. Command responsibility and accountability for remains of
members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps
who die outside the United States.
Sec. 524. Contents of Transition Assistance Program.
Sec. 525. Procedures for judicial review of military personnel
decisions relating to correction of military records.
Sec. 526. Establishment and use of consistent definition of gender-
neutral occupational standard for military career
designators.
Sec. 527. Expansion and enhancement of authorities relating to
protected communications of members of the Armed Forces
and prohibited retaliatory actions.
Sec. 528. Applicability of medical examination requirement regarding
post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury
to proceedings under the Uniform Code of Military
Justice.
Sec. 529. Protection of the religious freedom of military chaplains to
close a prayer outside of a religious service according
to the traditions, expressions, and religious exercises
of the endorsing faith group.
Sec. 530. Expansion and implementation of protection of rights of
conscience of members of the Armed Forces and chaplains
of such members.
Sec. 530A. Servicemembers' Accountability, Rights, and Responsibilities
Training.
Sec. 530B. Inspector General of the Department of Defense review of
separation of members of the Armed Forces who made
unrestricted reports of sexual assault.
Sec. 530C. Report on data and information collected in connection with
Department of Defense review of laws, policies, and
regulations restricting service of female members of the
Armed Forces.
Sec. 530D. Sense of Congress regarding the Women in Service
Implementation Plan.

Subtitle D--Military Justice, Including Sexual Assault Prevention and
Response

Sec. 531. Limitations on convening authority discretion regarding
court-martial findings and sentence.
Sec. 532. Elimination of five-year statute of limitations on trial by
court-martial for additional offenses involving sex-
related crimes.
Sec. 533. Discharge or dismissal for certain sex-related offenses and
trial of offenses by general courts-martial.
Sec. 534. Regulations regarding consideration of application for
permanent change of station or unit transfer by victims
of sexual assault.
Sec. 535. Consideration of need for, and authority to provide for,
temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a
member on active duty who is accused of committing a
sexual assault or related offense.
Sec. 536. Victims' Counsel for victims of sex-related offenses and
related provisions.
Sec. 537. Inspector General investigation of allegations of retaliatory
personnel actions taken in response to making protected
communications regarding sexual assault.
Sec. 538. Secretary of Defense report on role of commanders in military
justice process.
Sec. 539. Review and policy regarding Department of Defense
investigative practices in response to allegations of
sex-related offenses.
Sec. 540. Uniform training and education programs for sexual assault
prevention and response program.
Sec. 541. Development of selection criteria for assignment as Sexual
Assault Response and Prevention Program Managers, Sexual
Assault Response Coordinators, Sexual Assault Victim
Advocates, and Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners-Adult/
Adolescent.
Sec. 542. Extension of crime victims' rights to victims of offenses
under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Sec. 543. Defense counsel interview of complaining witnesses in
presence of counsel for the complaining witness or a
Sexual Assault Victim Advocate.
Sec. 544. Participation by complaining witnesses in clemency phase of
courts-martial process.
Sec. 545. Eight-day incident reporting requirement in response to
unrestricted report of sexual assault in which the victim
is a member of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 546. Amendment to Manual for Courts-Martial to eliminate
considerations relating to character and military service
of accused in initial disposition of sex-related
offenses.
Sec. 547. Inclusion of letter of reprimands, nonpunitive letter of
reprimands and counseling statements.

[[Page H3384]]

Sec. 548. Enhanced protections for prospective members and new members
of the Armed Forces during entry-level processing and
training.
Sec. 549. Independent reviews and assessments of Uniform Code of
Military Justice and judicial proceedings of sexual
assault cases.
Sec. 550. Review of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal
Opportunity role in sexual harassment cases.

Subtitle E--Military Family Readiness

Sec. 551. Department of Defense recognition of spouses of members of
the Armed Forces who serve in combat zones.
Sec. 552. Protection of child custody arrangements for parents who are
members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 553. Treatment of relocation of members of the Armed Forces for
active duty for purposes of mortgage refinancing.
Sec. 554. Family support programs for immediate family members of
members of the Armed Forces assigned to special
operations forces.

Subtitle F--Education and Training Opportunities and Wellness

Sec. 561. Inclusion of Freely Associated States within scope of Junior
Reserve Officers' Training Corps program.
Sec. 562. Improved climate assessments and dissemination and tracking
of results.
Sec. 563. Service-wide 360 assessments.
Sec. 564. Health welfare inspections.
Sec. 565. Review of security of military installations, including
barracks and multi-family residences.
Sec. 566. Enhancement of mechanisms to correlate skills and training
for military occupational specialties with skills and
training required for civilian certifications and
licenses.
Sec. 567. Use of educational assistance for courses in pursuit of
civilian certifications or licenses.

Subtitle G--Defense Dependents' Education

Sec. 571. Continuation of authority to assist local educational
agencies that benefit dependents of members of the Armed
Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees.
Sec. 572. Support for efforts to improve academic achievement and
transition of military dependent students.
Sec. 573. Treatment of tuition payments received for virtual elementary
and secondary education component of Department of
Defense education program.

Subtitle H--Decorations and Awards

Sec. 581. Fraudulent representations about receipt of military
decorations or medals.
Sec. 582. Repeal of limitation on number of medals of honor that may be
awarded to the same member of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 583. Standardization of time-limits for recommending and awarding
Medal of Honor, Distinguished-Service Cross, Navy Cross,
Air Force Cross, and Distinguished-Service Medal.
Sec. 584. Recodification and revision of Army, Navy, Air Force, and
Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll requirements.
Sec. 585. Treatment of victims of the attacks at recruiting station in
Little Rock, Arkansas, and at Fort Hood, Texas.
Sec. 586. Retroactive award of Army Combat Action Badge.
Sec. 587. Report on Navy review, findings, and actions pertaining to
Medal of Honor nomination of Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael
Peralta.
Sec. 588. Authorization for award of the Distinguished-Service Cross to
Sergeant First Class Robert F. Keiser for acts of valor
during the Korean War.

Subtitle I--Other Matters

Sec. 591. Revision of specified senior military colleges to reflect
consolidation of North Georgia College and State
University and Gainesville State College.
Sec. 592. Authority to enter into concessions contracts at Army
National Military Cemeteries.
Sec. 593. Commission on Military Behavioral Health and Disciplinary
Issues.
Sec. 594. Commission on Service to the Nation.

TITLE VI--COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS

Subtitle A--Pay and Allowances

Sec. 601. Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates
of basic allowance for housing under certain
circumstances.

Subtitle B--Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays

Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay
authorities for reserve forces.
Sec. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay
authorities for health care professionals.
Sec. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for
nuclear officers.
Sec. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37
consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus
authorities.
Sec. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of
other title 37 bonuses and special pays.
Sec. 616. One-year extension of authority to provide incentive pay for
members of precommissioning programs pursuing foreign
language proficiency.
Sec. 617. Authority to provide bonus to certain cadets and midshipmen
enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps.

Subtitle C--Disability, Retired Pay, Survivor, and Transitional
Benefits

Sec. 621. Transitional compensation and other benefits for dependents
of certain members separated for violation of the Uniform
Code of Military Justice.
Sec. 622. Prevention of retired pay inversion for members whose retired
pay is computed using high-three average.

Subtitle D--Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality
Benefits and Operations

Sec. 631. Expansion of protection of employees of nonappropriated fund
instrumentalities from reprisals.
Sec. 632. Purchase of sustainable products, local food products, and
recyclable materials for resale in commissary and
exchange store systems.
Sec. 633. Correction of obsolete references to certain nonappropriated
fund instrumentalities.

Subtitle E--Other Matters

Sec. 641. Authority to provide certain expenses for care and
disposition of human remains retained by the Department
of Defense for forensic pathology investigation.
Sec. 642. Provision of status under law by honoring certain members of
the reserve components as veterans.
Sec. 643. Survey of military pay and benefits preferences.

TITLE VII--HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS

Subtitle A--Improvements to Health Benefits

Sec. 701. Mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 702. Periodic mental health assessments for members of the Armed
Forces.

Subtitle B--Health Care Administration

Sec. 711. Future availability of TRICARE Prime for certain
beneficiaries enrolled in TRICARE Prime.
Sec. 712. Cooperative health care agreements between the military
departments and non-military health care entities.
Sec. 713. Limitation on availability of funds for integrated electronic
health record program.
Sec. 714. Pilot program on increased third-party collection
reimbursements in military medical treatment facilities.

Subtitle C--Other Matters

Sec. 721. Display of budget information for embedded mental health
providers of the reserve components.
Sec. 722. Authority of Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences
to enter into contracts and agreements and make grants to
other nonprofit entities.
Sec. 723. Mental health support for military personnel and families.
Sec. 724. Research regarding hydrocephalus.
Sec. 725. Traumatic brain injury research.

TITLE VIII--ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED
MATTERS

Subtitle A--Acquisition Policy and Management

Sec. 801. Modification of reporting requirement for Department of
Defense business system acquisition programs when initial
operating capability is not achieved within five years of
Milestone A approval.
Sec. 802. Enhanced transfer of technology developed at Department of
Defense laboratories.
Sec. 803. Extension of limitation on aggregate annual amount available
for contract services.

Subtitle B--Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures,
and Limitations

Sec. 811. Additional contractor responsibilities in regulations
relating to detection and avoidance of counterfeit
electronic parts.
Sec. 812. Amendments relating to detection and avoidance of counterfeit
electronic parts.
Sec. 813. Government-wide limitations on allowable costs for contractor
compensation.
Sec. 814. Inclusion of additional cost estimate information in certain
reports.
Sec. 815. Amendment relating to compelling reasons for waiving
suspension or debarment.
Sec. 816. Requirement that cost or price to the Federal Government be
given at least equal importance as technical or other
criteria in evaluating competitive proposals for defense
contracts.
Sec. 817. Requirement to buy American flags from domestic sources.

Subtitle C--Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of Contingency
Operations in Iraq or Afghanistan

Sec. 821. Amendments relating to prohibition on contracting with the
enemy.

[[Page H3385]]

Sec. 822. Collection of data relating to contracts in Iraq and
Afghanistan.

Subtitle D--Other Matters

Sec. 831. Extension of pilot program on acquisition of military purpose
nondevelopmental items.
Sec. 832. Extension of authority to acquire products and services
produced in countries along a major route of supply to
Afghanistan.

TITLE IX--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT

Subtitle A--Department of Defense Management

Sec. 901. Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the Department
of the Navy and Marine Corps.
Sec. 902. Revisions to composition of transition plan for defense
business enterprise architecture.

Subtitle B--Space Activities

Sec. 911. National security space satellite reporting policy.
Sec. 912. National security space defense and protection.
Sec. 913. Space acquisition strategy.
Sec. 914. Space control mission report.
Sec. 915. Responsive launch.

Subtitle C--Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities

Sec. 921. Revision of Secretary of Defense authority to engage in
commercial activities as security for intelligence
collection activities.
Sec. 922. Department of Defense intelligence priorities.
Sec. 923. Defense Clandestine Service.
Sec. 924. Prohibition on National Intelligence Program consolidation.

Subtitle D--Cyberspace-Related Matters

Sec. 931. Modification of requirement for inventory of Department of
Defense tactical data link systems.
Sec. 932. Defense Science Board assessment of United States Cyber
Command.
Sec. 933. Mission analysis for cyber operations of Department of
Defense.
Sec. 934. Notification of investigations related to compromise of
critical program information.
Sec. 935. Additional requirements relating to the software licenses of
the Department of Defense.

Subtitle E--Total Force Management

Sec. 941. Requirement to ensure sufficient levels of Government
oversight of functions closely associated with inherently
Governmental functions.
Sec. 942. Five-year requirement for certification of appropriate
manpower performance.

TITLE X--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Subtitle A--Financial Matters

Sec. 1001. General transfer authority.
Sec. 1002. Budgetary effects of this Act.
Sec. 1003. Audit of Department of Defense fiscal year 2018 financial
statements.
Sec. 1004. Authority to transfer funds to the National Nuclear Security
Administration to sustain nuclear weapons modernization.

Subtitle B--Counter-Drug Activities

Sec. 1011. Extension of authority to support unified counter-drug and
counterterrorism campaign in Colombia.
Sec. 1012. Extension of authority for joint task forces to provide
support to law enforcement agencies conducting counter-
terrorism activities.
Sec. 1013. Two-year extension of authority to provide additional
support for counter-drug activities of certain foreign
governments.
Sec. 1014. Sense of Congress regarding the National Guard Counter-
Narcotic Program.

Subtitle C--Naval Vessels and Shipyards

Sec. 1021. Clarification of sole ownership resulting from ship
donations at no cost to the navy.
Sec. 1022. Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation of
Ticonderoga class cruisers or dock landing ships.
Sec. 1023. Repair of vessels in foreign shipyards.
Sec. 1024. Sense of Congress regarding a balanced future naval force.
Sec. 1025. Authority for short-term extension or renewal of leases for
vessels supporting the Transit Protection System Escort
Program.

Subtitle D--Counterterrorism

Sec. 1030. Clarification of procedures for use of alternate members on
military commissions.
Sec. 1031. Modification of Regional Defense Combating Terrorism
Fellowship Program reporting requirement.
Sec. 1032. Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify
facilities in the United States to house detainees
transferred from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo
Bay, Cuba.
Sec. 1033. Requirements for certifications relating to the transfer of
detainees at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay,
Cuba, to foreign countries and other foreign entities.
Sec. 1034. Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release
of individuals detained at United States Naval Station,
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Sec. 1035. Unclassified summary of information relating to individuals
detained at Parwan, Afghanistan.
Sec. 1036. Assessment of affiliates and adherents of al-Qaeda outside
the United States.
Sec. 1037. Designation of Department of Defense senior official for
facilitating the transfer of individuals detained at
United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Sec. 1038. Rank of chief prosecutor and chief defense counsel in
military commissions established to try individuals
detained at Guantanamo.
Sec. 1039. Report on capability of Yemeni government to detain,
rehabilitate, and prosecute individuals detained at
Guantanamo who are transferred to Yemen.
Sec. 1040. Report on attachment of rights to individuals detained at
Guantanamo if transferred to the United States.
Sec. 1040A. Summary of information relating to individuals detained at
Guantanamo who became leaders of foreign terrorist
groups.

Subtitle E--Sensitive Military Operations

Sec. 1041. Congressional notification of sensitive military operations.
Sec. 1042. Report on process for determining targets of lethal
operations.
Sec. 1043. Counterterrorism operational briefings.

Subtitle F--Nuclear Forces

Sec. 1051. Prohibition on elimination of the nuclear triad.
Sec. 1052. Limitation on availability of funds for reduction of nuclear
forces.
Sec. 1053. Limitation on availability of funds for reduction or
consolidation of dual-capable aircraft based in Europe.
Sec. 1054. Statement of policy on implementation of any agreement for
further arms reduction below the levels of the New START
Treaty; limitation on retirement or dismantlement of
strategic delivery systems.
Sec. 1055. Sense of congress on compliance with nuclear arms control
agreements.
Sec. 1056. Retention of capability to redeploy multiple independently
targetable reentry vehicles.
Sec. 1057. Assessment of nuclear weapons program of the People's
Republic of China.
Sec. 1058. Cost estimates for nuclear weapons.
Sec. 1059. Report on New START Treaty.

Subtitle G--Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations

Sec. 1061. Enhancement of capacity of the United States Government to
analyze captured records.
Sec. 1062. Extension of authority to provide military transportation
services to certain other agencies at the Department of
Defense reimbursement rate.
Sec. 1063. Limitation on availability of funds for modification of
force structure of the Army.
Sec. 1064. Limitation on use of funds for public-private cooperation
activities.

Subtitle H--Studies and Reports

Sec. 1071. Oversight of combat support agencies.
Sec. 1072. Inclusion in annual report of description of interagency
coordination relating to humanitarian demining
technology.
Sec. 1073. Extension of deadline for Comptroller General report on
assignment of civilian employees of the Department of
Defense as advisors to foreign ministries of defense.
Sec. 1074. Repeal of requirement for Comptroller General assessment of
Department of Defense efficiencies.
Sec. 1075. Matters for inclusion in the assessment of the 2013
quadrennial defense review.
Sec. 1076. Review and assessment of United States Special Operations
Forces and United States Special Operations Command.
Sec. 1077. Reports on unmanned aircraft systems.
Sec. 1078. Online availability of reports submitted to Congress.
Sec. 1079. Provision of defense planning guidance and contingency
operation plan information to Congress.

Subtitle I--Other Matters

Sec. 1081. Technical and clerical amendments.
Sec. 1082. Transportation of supplies for the United States by aircraft
operated by United States air carriers.
Sec. 1083. Reduction in costs to report critical changes to major
automated information system programs.
Sec. 1084. Extension of authority of Secretary of Transportation to
issue non-premium aviation insurance.
Sec. 1085. Revision of compensation of members of the National
Commission on the Structure of the Air Force.
Sec. 1086. Protection of tier one task critical assets from
electromagnetic pulse and high-powered microwave systems.
Sec. 1087. Strategy for future military information operations
capabilities.
Sec. 1088. Compliance of military departments with minimum safe
staffing standards.
Sec. 1089. Determination and Disclosure of Transportation Costs
Incurred by Secretary of Defense for congressional trips
outside the United States.

[[Page H3386]]

TITLE XI--CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS

Sec. 1101. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation
on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for
Federal civilian employees working overseas.
Sec. 1102. One-year extension of discretionary authority to grant
allowances, benefits, and gratuities to personnel on
official duty in a combat zone.
Sec. 1103. Extension of voluntary reduction-in-force authority for
civilian employees of Department of Defense.
Sec. 1104. Extension of authority to make lump-sum severance payments
to Department of Defense employees.
Sec. 1105. Revision to amount of financial assistance under Department
of Defense Science, Mathematics, and Research for
Transformation (SMART) Defense Education Program.
Sec. 1106. Extension of program for exchange of information-technology
personnel.
Sec. 1107. Defense Science Initiative for Personnel.

TITLE XII--MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS

Subtitle A--Assistance and Training

Sec. 1201. Modification and extension of authorities relating to
program to build the capacity of foreign military forces.
Sec. 1202. Three-year extension of authorization for non-conventional
assisted recovery capabilities.
Sec. 1203. Global Security Contingency Fund.
Sec. 1204. Codification of National Guard State Partnership Program.
Sec. 1205. Authority to conduct activities to enhance the capability of
certain foreign countries to respond to incidents
involving weapons of mass destruction in Syria and the
region.
Sec. 1206. One-year extension of authority to support foreign forces
participating in operations to disarm the Lord's
Resistance Army.

Subtitle B--Matters Relating to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan

Sec. 1211. One-year extension and modification of authority for
reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support
provided to United States military operations.
Sec. 1212. One-year extension of authority to use funds for
reintegration activities in Afghanistan.
Sec. 1213. Extension of Commanders' Emergency Response Program in
Afghanistan.
Sec. 1214. Extension of authority to support operations and activities
of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq.
Sec. 1215. One-year extension and modification of authority for program
to develop and carry out infrastructure projects in
Afghanistan.
Sec. 1216. Special immigrant visas for certain Iraqi and Afghan allies.
Sec. 1217. Requirement to withhold Department of Defense assistance to
Afghanistan in amount equivalent to 100 percent of all
taxes assessed by Afghanistan to extent such taxes are
not reimbursed by Afghanistan.

Subtitle C--Matters Relating to Afghanistan Post 2014

Sec. 1221. Modification of report on progress toward security and
stability in Afghanistan.
Sec. 1222. Sense of Congress on United States military support in
Afghanistan.
Sec. 1223. Defense intelligence plan.
Sec. 1224. Limitation on availability of funds for certain authorities
for Afghanistan.

Subtitle D--Matters Relating to Iran

Sec. 1231. Report on United States military partnership with Gulf
Cooperation Council countries.
Sec. 1232. Additional elements in annual report on military power of
Iran.
Sec. 1233. Sense of Congress on the defense of the Arabian Gulf.

Subtitle E--Reports and Other Matters

Sec. 1241. Report on posture and readiness of United States Armed
Forces to respond to future terrorist attacks in Africa
and the Middle East.
Sec. 1242. Role of the Government of Egypt to United States national
security.
Sec. 1243. Sense of Congress on the military developments on the Korean
peninsula.
Sec. 1244. Sense of Congress on defense cooperation with Georgia.
Sec. 1245. Limitation on establishment of Regional Special Operations
Forces Coordination Centers.
Sec. 1246. Additional reports on military and security developments
involving the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
Sec. 1247. Amendments to annual report under Arms Control and
Disarmament Act.
Sec. 1248. Limitation on funds to provide the Russian Federation with
access to certain missile defense technology.
Sec. 1249. Reports on actions to reduce support of ballistic missile
programs of China, Syria, Iran, and North Korea.
Sec. 1250. Congressional notifications relating to status of forces
agreements.
Sec. 1251. Sense of Congress on the conflict in Syria.
Sec. 1252. Revision of statutory references to former NATO support
organizations and related NATO agreements.
Sec. 1253. Limitation on funds to implement executive agreements
relating to United States missile defense capabilities.
Sec. 1254. Limitation on availability of funds for Threat Reduction
Engagement activities and United States contributions to
the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization.
Sec. 1255. Sense of Congress on military-to-military cooperation
between the United States and Burma.
Sec. 1256. Sense of Congress on the stationing of United States forces
in Europe.
Sec. 1257. Sense of Congress on military capabilities of the People's
Republic of China.
Sec. 1258. Rule of construction.

TITLE XIII--COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION

Sec. 1301. Specification of cooperative threat reduction programs and
funds.
Sec. 1302. Funding allocations.
Sec. 1303. Extension for use of contributions to the Cooperative Threat
Reduction Program.

TITLE XIV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

Subtitle A--Military Programs

Sec. 1401. Working capital funds.
Sec. 1402. National defense sealift fund.
Sec. 1403. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense.
Sec. 1404. Drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, defense-wide.
Sec. 1405. Defense Inspector General.
Sec. 1406. Defense Health Program.

Subtitle B--National Defense Stockpile

Sec. 1411. Use of National Defense Stockpile for the conservation of a
strategic and critical materials supply.
Sec. 1412. Authority to acquire additional materials for the National
Defense Stockpile.

Subtitle C--Other Matters

Sec. 1421. Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of
Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility
Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health
Care Center, Illinois.
Sec. 1422. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement
Home.
Sec. 1423. Cemeterial expenses.

TITLE XV--AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR OVERSEAS
CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS

Subtitle A--Authorization of Additional Appropriations

Sec. 1501. Purpose.
Sec. 1502. Procurement.
Sec. 1503. Research, development, test, and evaluation.
Sec. 1504. Operation and maintenance.
Sec. 1505. Military personnel.
Sec. 1506. Working capital funds.
Sec. 1507. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide.
Sec. 1508. Defense Inspector General.
Sec. 1509. Defense Health Program.

Subtitle B--Financial Matters

Sec. 1521. Treatment as additional authorizations.
Sec. 1522. Special transfer authority.

Subtitle C--Limitations and Other Matters

Sec. 1531. Afghanistan Security Forces Fund.
Sec. 1532. Future role of Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat
Organization.
Sec. 1533. Limitation on intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance
support for Operation Observant Compass.
Sec. 1534. Report on United States force levels and costs of military
operations in Afghanistan.

TITLE XVI--INDUSTRIAL BASE MATTERS

Sec. 1601. Periodic audits of contracting compliance by Inspector
General of Department of Defense.
Sec. 1602. Expansion of the procurement technical assistance program to
advance small business growth.
Sec. 1603. Amendments relating to Procurement Technical Assistance
Cooperative Agreement Program.
Sec. 1604. Strategic plan for requirements for war reserve stocks of
meals ready-to-eat.
Sec. 1605. Foreign commercial satellite services.
Sec. 1606. Proof of Concept Commercialization Pilot Program.

DIVISION B--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS

Sec. 2001. Short title.
Sec. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be
specified by law.
Sec. 2003. Effective date.

TITLE XXI--ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2102. Family housing.
Sec. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army.
Sec. 2104. Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004
project.
Sec. 2105. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2010 project.

[[Page H3387]]

Sec. 2106. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2011 project.
Sec. 2107. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2010
projects.
Sec. 2108. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011
projects.

TITLE XXII--NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2202. Family housing.
Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy.
Sec. 2205. Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain
fiscal year 2014 project.
Sec. 2206. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2011 project.
Sec. 2207. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2012 project.
Sec. 2208. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011
projects.

TITLE XXIII--AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition
projects.
Sec. 2302. Family housing.
Sec. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force.
Sec. 2305. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2013 project.
Sec. 2306. Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain
fiscal year 2014 project.
Sec. 2307. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011
project.

TITLE XXIV--DEFENSE AGENCIES MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Subtitle A--Defense Agency Authorizations

Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land
acquisition projects.
Sec. 2402. Authorized energy conservation projects.
Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies.

Subtitle B--Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations

Sec. 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization
construction, defense-wide.

TITLE XXV--NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY INVESTMENT
PROGRAM

Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO.

TITLE XXVI--GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES

Subtitle A--Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land
acquisition projects.
Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition
projects.
Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve
construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land
acquisition projects.
Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land
acquisition projects.
Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve.

Subtitle B--Other Matters

Sec. 2611. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2013 project.
Sec. 2612. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011
projects.

TITLE XXVII--BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES

Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and
closure activities funded through Department of Defense
Base Closure Account.

Subtitle B--Other Matters

Sec. 2711. Prohibition on conducting additional Base Realignment and
Closure (BRAC) round.
Sec. 2712. Elimination of quarterly certification requirement regarding
availability of military health care in National Capital
Region.

TITLE XXVIII--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS

Subtitle A--Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing
Changes

Sec. 2801. Modification of authority to carry out unspecified minor
military construction.
Sec. 2802. Repeal of requirements for local comparability of room
patterns and floor areas for military family housing and
submission of net floor area information.
Sec. 2803. Repeal of separate authority to enter into limited
partnerships with private developers of housing.
Sec. 2804. Military construction standards to reduce vulnerability of
structures to terrorist attack.
Sec. 2805. Treatment of payments received for providing utilities and
services in connection with use of alternative authority
for acquisition and improvement of military housing.
Sec. 2806. Repeal of advance notification requirement for use of
military housing investment authority.
Sec. 2807. Additional element for annual report on military housing
privatization projects.
Sec. 2808. Extension of temporary, limited authority to use operation
and maintenance funds for construction projects in
certain areas outside the United States.

Subtitle B--Real Property and Facilities Administration

Sec. 2811. Codification of policies and requirements regarding closure
and realignment of United States military installations
in foreign countries.

Subtitle C--Energy Security

Sec. 2821. Continuation of limitation on use of funds for Leadership in
Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) gold or platinum
certification.

Subtitle D--Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military Realignment

Sec. 2831. Change from previous calendar year to previous fiscal year
for period covered by annual report of Interagency
Coordination Group of Inspectors General for Guam
Realignment.
Sec. 2832. Repeal of certain restrictions on realignment of Marine
Corps forces in Asia-Pacific region.

Subtitle E--Land Conveyances

Sec. 2841. Real property acquisition, Naval Base Ventura County,
California.
Sec. 2842. Land conveyance, former Oxnard Air Force Base, Ventura
County, California.
Sec. 2843. Land conveyance, Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania.
Sec. 2844. Land conveyance, Camp Williams, Utah.
Sec. 2845. Conveyance, Air National Guard radar site, Francis Peak,
Wasatch Mountains, Utah.
Sec. 2846. Land conveyance, former Fort Monroe, Hampton, Virginia.
Sec. 2847. Land conveyance, Mifflin County United States Army Reserve
Center, Lewistown, Pennsylvania.

Subtitle F--Other Matters

Sec. 2861. Repeal of annual Economic Adjustment Committee reporting
requirement.
Sec. 2862. Redesignation of the Asia-Pacific Center for Security
Studies as the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for
Security Studies.
Sec. 2863. Redesignation of the Graduate School of Nursing at the
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences as
the Daniel K. Inouye Graduate School of Nursing.
Sec. 2864. Renaming site of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National
Historical Park, Ohio.
Sec. 2865. Designation of Distinguished Flying Cross National Memorial
in Riverside, California.

TITLE XXIX--OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Sec. 2901. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition project.

TITLE XXX--MILITARY LAND TRANSFERS AND WITHDRAWALS TO SUPPORT READINESS
AND SECURITY

Subtitle A--Limestone Hills Training Area, Montana

Sec. 3001. Withdrawal and reservation of public lands for Limestone
Hills Training Area, Montana.
Sec. 3002. Management of withdrawn and reserved lands.
Sec. 3003. Special rules governing minerals management.
Sec. 3004. Grazing.
Sec. 3005. Duration of withdrawal and reservation.
Sec. 3006. Payments in lieu of taxes.
Sec. 3007. Hunting, fishing and trapping.
Sec. 3008. Water rights.
Sec. 3009. Brush and range fire prevention and suppression.
Sec. 3010. On-going decontamination.
Sec. 3011. Application for renewal of a withdrawal and reservation.
Sec. 3012. Limitation on subsequent availability of lands for
appropriation.
Sec. 3013. Relinquishment.

Subtitle B--White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico

Sec. 3021. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, White Sands Missile
Range, New Mexico.
Sec. 3022. Water rights.
Sec. 3023. Withdrawal.

Subtitle C--Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California

Sec. 3031. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Naval Air Weapons
Station China Lake, California.
Sec. 3032. Water rights.
Sec. 3033. Withdrawal.

Subtitle D--Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, California

Sec. 3041. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Chocolate Mountain
Aerial Gunnery Range, California.

[[Page H3388]]

Sec. 3042. Management and use of transferred land.
Sec. 3043. Realignment of range boundary and related transfer of title.
Sec. 3044. Effect of termination of military use.
Sec. 3045. Temporary extension of existing withdrawal period.
Sec. 3046. Water rights.

Subtitle E--Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms,
California

Sec. 3051. Designation of Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle
Recreation Area.
Sec. 3052. Limited biannual Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center
Twentynine Palms use of Johnson Valley National Off-
Highway Vehicle Recreation Area.
Sec. 3053. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Southern Study
Area, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine
Palms, California.
Sec. 3054. Water rights.

Subtitle F--Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada

Sec. 3061. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Naval Air Station
Fallon, Nevada.
Sec. 3062. Water rights.
Sec. 3063. Withdrawal.

DIVISION C--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND
OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

TITLE XXXI--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS

Subtitle A--National Security Programs Authorizations

Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration.
Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup.
Sec. 3103. Other defense activities.
Sec. 3104. Energy security and assurance.

Subtitle B--Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations

Sec. 3111. Clarification of principles of National Nuclear Security
Administration.
Sec. 3112. Termination of Department of Energy employees to protect
national security.
Sec. 3113. Modification of independent cost estimates on life extension
programs and new nuclear facilities.
Sec. 3114. Plan for retrieval, treatment, and disposition of tank farm
waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation.
Sec. 3115. Enhanced procurement authority to manage supply chain risk.
Sec. 3116. Limitation on availability of funds for National Nuclear
Security Administration.
Sec. 3117. Limitation on availability of funds for Office of the
Administrator.
Sec. 3118. Limitation on availability of funds for Global Threat
Reduction Initiative.
Sec. 3119. Establishment of Center for Security Technology, Analysis,
Testing, and Response.
Sec. 3120. Cost-benefit analyses for competition of management and
operating contracts.
Sec. 3121. W88-1 warhead and W78-1 warhead life extension options.
Sec. 3122. Extension of principles of pilot program to additional
facilities of the nuclear security enterprise.

Subtitle C--Reports

Sec. 3131. Annual report and certification on status of the security of
the nuclear security enterprise.
Sec. 3132. Modifications to annual reports regarding the condition of
the nuclear weapons stockpile.
Sec. 3133. Repeal of certain reporting requirements.

Subtitle D--Other Matters

Sec. 3141. Congressional advisory panel on the governance of the
nuclear security enterprise.
Sec. 3142. Study of potential reuse of nuclear weapon secondaries.
Sec. 3143. Clarification of role of Secretary of Energy.
Sec. 3144. Technical amendment to Atomic Energy Act of 1954.

TITLE XXXII--DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

Sec. 3201. Authorization.
Sec. 3202. Improvements to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.

TITLE XXXIV--NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES

Sec. 3401. Authorization of appropriations.

TITLE XXXV--MARITIME ADMINISTRATION

Sec. 3501. Authorization of appropriations for national security
aspects of the Merchant Marine for fiscal year 2014.
Sec. 3502. 5-year reauthorization of vessel war risk insurance program.
Sec. 3503. Sense of Congress.

DIVISION D--FUNDING TABLES

Sec. 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables.

TITLE XLI--PROCUREMENT

Sec. 4101. Procurement.
Sec. 4102. Procurement for overseas contingency operations.

TITLE XLII--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION

Sec. 4201. Research, development, test, and evaluation.
Sec. 4202. Research, development, test, and evaluation for overseas
contingency operations.

TITLE XLIII--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Sec. 4301. Operation and maintenance.
Sec. 4302. Operation and maintenance for overseas contingency
operations.

TITLE XLIV--MILITARY PERSONNEL

Sec. 4401. Military personnel.
Sec. 4402. Military personnel for overseas contingency operations.

TITLE XLV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

Sec. 4501. Other authorizations.
Sec. 4502. Other authorizations for overseas contingency operations.

TITLE XLVI--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Sec. 4601. Military construction.

TITLE XLVII--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS

Sec. 4701. Department of Energy national security programs.

SEC. 3. CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES.

In this Act, the term ``congressional defense committees''
has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) of
title 10, United States Code.

DIVISION A--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS

TITLE I--PROCUREMENT

Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

SEC. 101. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2014 for procurement for the Army, the Navy and the
Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as
specified in the funding table in section 4101.

Subtitle B--Army Programs

SEC. 111. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR STRYKER
VEHICLE PROGRAM.

(a) Limitation.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated
by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014
for weapons and tracked combat vehicles, Army, for the
procurement or upgrade of Stryker vehicles, not more than 75
percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 15
days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of
the Army submits the report under subsection (b).
(b) Report Required.--The Secretary of the Army shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report on
the status of the Stryker vehicle spare parts inventory
located in Auburn, Washington, cited in the report of the
Inspector General of the Department of Defense (number 2013-
025) dated November 30, 2012. The report submitted under this
subsection shall include the following:
(1) The status of the implementation by the Secretary of
the recommendations specified on pages 30 to 34 of the report
by the Inspector General.
(2) The value of the parts remaining in warehouse that may
still be used by the Secretary for the repair, upgrade, or
reset of Stryker vehicles.
(3) The value of the parts remaining in the warehouse that
are no longer usable by the Secretary for the repair,
upgrade, or reset of Stryker vehicles.
(4) A cost estimate of the monthly cost of maintaining the
inventory of parts no longer usable by the Secretary.
(5) Any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate.

Subtitle C--Navy Programs

SEC. 121. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR E-2D AIRCRAFT
PROGRAM.

(a) Authority for Multiyear Procurement.--Subject to
section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary
of the Navy may enter into--
(1) one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the
fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of E-2D
aircraft; and
(2) one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the
fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of mission
equipment with respect to aircraft procured under a contract
entered into under paragraph (1).
(b) Condition for Out-year Contract Payments.--A contract
entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any
obligation of the United States to make a payment under the
contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 is subject
to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for
such later fiscal year.

SEC. 122. COST LIMITATION FOR CVN-78 AIRCRAFT CARRIERS.

(a) In General.--Section 122 of the John Warner National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law
109-364; 120 Stat. 2104) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 122. ADHERENCE TO NAVY COST ESTIMATES FOR CVN-78 CLASS
OF AIRCRAFT CARRIERS.

``(a) Limitation.--
``(1) Lead ship.--The total amount obligated from funds
appropriated or otherwise made available for Shipbuilding and
Conversion, Navy, or for any other procurement account, for
the aircraft carrier designated as CVN-78 may not exceed
$12,887,000,000 (as adjusted pursuant to subsection (b)).
``(2) Follow-on ships.--The total amount obligated from
funds appropriated or otherwise made available for
Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy, or for any other
procurement account, for the construction of any ship that is
constructed in the CVN-78 class of aircraft carriers after
the lead ship of that class may not exceed $11,411,000,000
(as adjusted pursuant to subsection (b)).
``(b) Adjustment of Limitation Amount.--The Secretary of
the Navy may adjust the amount set forth in subsection (a)
for any ship constructed in the CVN-78 class of aircraft
carriers by the following:
``(1) The amounts of increases or decreases in costs
attributable to economic inflation after September 30, 2013.

[[Page H3389]]

``(2) The amounts of increases or decreases in costs
attributable to compliance with changes in Federal, State, or
local laws.
``(3) The amounts of outfitting costs and post-delivery
costs incurred for that ship.
``(4) The amounts of increases or decreases in costs of
that ship that are attributable to insertion of new
technology into that ship, as compared to the technology
baseline as it was defined in the approved acquisition
program baseline estimate of December 2005.
``(5) The amounts of increases or decreases to nonrecurring
design and engineering cost attributable to achieving
compliance with the cost limitation.
``(6) The amounts of increases or decreases to cost
required to correct deficiencies that may affect the safety
of the ship and personnel or otherwise preclude the ship from
safe operations and crew certification.
``(7) With respect to the aircraft carrier designated as
CVN-78, the amounts of increases or decreases in costs of
that ship that are attributable to the shipboard test
program.
``(c) Limitation on Technology Insertion Cost Adjustment.--
The Secretary of the Navy may use the authority under
paragraph (4) of subsection (b) to adjust the amount set
forth in subsection (a) for a ship referred to in that
subsection with respect to insertion of new technology into
that ship only if--
``(1) the Secretary determines, and certifies to the
congressional defense committees, that insertion of the new
technology would lower the life-cycle cost of the ship; or
``(2) the Secretary determines, and certifies to the
congressional defense committees, that insertion of the new
technology is required to meet an emerging threat and the
Secretary of Defense certifies to those committees that such
threat poses grave harm to national security.
``(d) Notice.--
``(1) Requirement.--The Secretary of the Navy shall submit
to the congressional defense committees each year, at the
same time that the budget is submitted under section 1105(a)
of title 31, United States Code, for the next fiscal year,
written notice of--
``(A) any change in the amount set forth in subsection (a)
during the preceding fiscal year that the Secretary has
determined to be associated with a cost referred to in
subsection (b); and
``(B) the most accurate estimate possible of the Secretary
with respect to the total cost compared to the amount set
forth in subsection (a), as adjusted by subsection (b), and
the steps the Secretary is taking to reduce the costs below
such amount.
``(2) Effective date.--The requirement in paragraph (1)
shall become effective with the budget request for the year
of procurement of the first ship referred to in subsection
(a).''.
(b) Conforming Amendment.--The table of contents at the
beginning of such Act is amended by striking the item
relating to section 122 and inserting the following:

``Sec. 122. Adherence to Navy cost estimates for CVN-78 class of
aircraft carriers.''.

Subtitle D--Air Force Programs

SEC. 131. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR MULTIPLE
VARIANTS OF THE C-130J AIRCRAFT PROGRAM.

(a) Authority for Multiyear Procurement.--Subject to
section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary
of the Air Force may enter into--
(1) one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the
fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of
multiple variants of C-130J aircraft for the Department of
the Navy and the Department of the Air Force; and
(2) one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the
fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of mission
equipment with respect to aircraft procured under a contract
entered into under paragraph (1).
(b) Condition for Out-year Contract Payments.--A contract
entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any
obligation of the United States to make a payment under the
contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 is subject
to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for
such later fiscal year.

SEC. 132. PROHIBITION ON CANCELLATION OR MODIFICATION OF
AVIONICS MODERNIZATION PROGRAM FOR C-130
AIRCRAFT.

(a) Prohibition.--The Secretary of the Air Force may not
take any action to cancel or modify the avionics
modernization program of record for C-130 aircraft.
(b) Conforming Repeal.--Section 143 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239;
126 Stat. 1662) is repealed.

SEC. 133. RETIREMENT OF KC-135R AIRCRAFT.

(a) Treatment of Retired KC-135R Aircraft.--Except as
provided by subsection (b) and (c), the Secretary of the Air
Force shall maintain each KC-135R aircraft that is retired by
the Secretary in a condition that would allow recall of that
aircraft to future service in the Air Force Reserve, Air
National Guard, or active forces aerial refueling force
structure.
(b) Exception.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to a KC-135R
aircraft that the Secretary transfers or sells to allies or
partner nations of the United States.
(c) Delivery of KC-46A Aircraft.--For each KC-46A aircraft
that is delivered to the Air Force and the Commander of the
Air Mobility Command initially certifies as mission capable,
the Secretary may waive the requirements of subsection (a)
with respect to one retired KC-135R aircraft.
(d) Conforming Repeal.--Section 135 of the John Warner
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007
(Public Law 109-364; 120 Stat. 2114) is repealed.

SEC. 134. COMPETITION FOR EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE
PROVIDERS.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) The new acquisition strategy for the evolved expendable
launch vehicle program of the Air Force will maintain mission
assurance, reduce costs, and provide opportunities for
competition for certified launch providers.
(2) The method in which the current and potential future
certified launch providers will be evaluated in a competition
is still under development.
(b) Plan.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of the Air Force shall
develop and implement a plan to ensure the fair evaluation of
competing contractors in awarding a contract to a certified
evolved expendable launch vehicle provider.
(2) Comparison.--The plan under paragraph (1) shall include
a description of how the following areas will be addressed in
the evaluation:
(A) The proposed cost, schedule, and performance.
(B) Mission assurance activities.
(C) The manner in which the contractor will operate under
the Federal Acquisition Regulation.
(D) The effect of other contracts in which the contractor
is entered into with the Federal Government, such as the
evolved expendable launch vehicle launch capability contract
and the space station commercial resupply services contracts.
(E) Any other areas the Secretary determines appropriate.
(c) Submission to Congress.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall--
(A) submit to the appropriate congressional committees a
report that includes the plan under subsection (b)(1); or
(B) provide to such committees a briefing on such plan.
(2) GAO review.--The Comptroller General of the United
States shall--
(A) submit to the appropriate congressional committees a
review of the plan under subsection (b)(1); or
(B) provide to such committees a briefing on such plan.
(3) Appropriate congressional committees defined.--In this
subsection, the term ``appropriate congressional committees''
means the following:
(A) The congressional defense committees.
(B) The Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the
House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation of the Senate.
(C) The Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the
House of Representatives and the Select Committee on
Intelligence of the Senate.

Subtitle E--Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters

SEC. 141. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR GROUND-BASED
INTERCEPTORS.

(a) Authority for Multiyear Procurement.--Subject to
section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Director
of the Missile Defense Agency may enter into one or more
multiyear contracts, beginning with the fiscal year 2014
program year, for the procurement of 14 ground-based
interceptors.
(b) Authority for Advance Procurement.--The Director may
enter into one or more contracts for advance procurement
associated with the ground-based interceptors for which
authorization to enter into a multiyear procurement contract
is provided under subsection (a).
(c) Condition for Out-year Contract Payments.--A contract
entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any
obligation of the United States to make a payment under the
contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 is subject
to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for
such later fiscal year.

SEC. 142. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR TACTICAL
WHEELED VEHICLES.

(a) Authority for Multiyear Procurement.--Subject to
section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary
of Defense may enter into one or more multiyear, multivehicle
contracts, beginning with the fiscal year 2014 program year,
for the procurement of core tactical wheeled vehicles.
(b) Condition for Out-year Contract Payments.--A contract
entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any
obligation of the United States to make a payment under the
contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 is subject
to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for
such later fiscal year.
(c) Notification Required.--Not later than 180 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall
notify the congressional defense committees of--
(1) whether the Secretary will enter into a contract under
subsection (a); and
(2) if not, an explanation for why the Secretary will not
enter into such a contract.
(d) Annual Reports.--For each fiscal year in which the
Secretary is entered into a contract under this section, the
Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense
committees, as part of the material submitted in support of
the budget of the President for such fiscal year, as
submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105(a) of title
31, United States Code, the following:
(1) The status of procurements under such contract.
(2) A detailed analysis of any cost savings achieved for
each class of vehicle procured under such contract.
(3) A description of any challenges to the Secretary in
carrying out this section or in achieving any such cost
savings.
(4) Any recommendations for future implementation of a
program for multiyear, multi-vehicle procurement.

[[Page H3390]]

(e) Termination of Authority.--The Secretary may not enter
into a contract under this section after September 30, 2018.
During the five-year period beginning on October 1, 2018, the
Secretary may continue to carry out any contract entered into
under this section before such date using funds made
available to the Secretary for such purpose before such date.
(f) Core Tactical Vehicles Defined.--In this section, the
term ``core tactical wheeled vehicles'' means--
(1) the family of medium tactical vehicles;
(2) medium tactical wheeled vehicle replacements;
(3) the family of heavy tactical vehicles; and
(4) logistics vehicle system replacements.

SEC. 143. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR RETIREMENT
OF RQ-4 GLOBAL HAWK UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS.

(a) Limitation.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for
fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be
obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, or place
in storage an RQ-4 Block 30 Global Hawk unmanned aircraft
system.
(b) Maintained Levels.--During the period preceding
December 31, 2016, in supporting the operational requirements
of the combatant commands, the Secretary of the Air Force
shall maintain the operational capability of each RQ-4 Block
30 Global Hawk unmanned aircraft system belonging to the Air
Force or delivered to the Air Force during such period.
(c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 154 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law
112-239; 126 Stat. 1666) is amended--
(1) by striking ``(a) Limitation.--''; and
(2) by striking subsection (b).

SEC. 144. PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT.

(a) Procurement.--The Secretary of Defense shall ensure
that personal protection equipment is procured using funds
authorized to be appropriated by section 101 and available
for such purpose as specified in the funding table in
sections 4101 and 4102.
(b) Procurement Line Item.--In the budget materials
submitted to the President by the Secretary of Defense in
connection with the submission to Congress, pursuant to
section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, of the budget
for fiscal year 2015, and each subsequent fiscal year, the
Secretary shall ensure that within each military department
procurement account, a separate, dedicated procurement line
item is designated for personal protection equipment.
(c) Personal Protection Equipment Defined.--In this
section, the term ``personal protection equipment'' means the
following:
(1) Body armor components.
(2) Combat helmets.
(3) Combat protective eyewear.
(4) Protective clothing.
(5) Other items as determined appropriate by the Secretary.

SEC. 145. REPEAL OF CERTAIN F-35 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.

Section 122 of the Ike Skelton National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383;
124 Stat. 4157) is amended--
(1) by striking subsection (b); and
(2) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (b).

SEC. 146. STUDY ON PROCUREMENT OF PERSONAL PROTECTION
EQUIPMENT.

(a) Study.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 30 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
enter into a contract with a federally funded research and
development center to conduct a study to identify and assess
alternative and effective means for stimulating competition
and innovation in the personal protection equipment
industrial base.
(2) Submission.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the federally funded research and
development center conducting the study under paragraph (1)
shall submit to the Secretary the study, including any
findings and recommendations.
(b) Report.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 270 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on the study
conducted under subsection (a)(1).
(2) Matters included.--The report under paragraph (1) shall
include the following:
(A) The study, findings, and recommendations submitted to
the Secretary under subsection (a)(2).
(B) An assessment of current and future technologies that
could markedly improve body armor, including by decreasing
weight, increasing survivability, and making other relevant
improvements.
(C) An analysis of the capability of the personal
protection equipment industrial base to leverage such
technologies to produce the next generation body armor.
(D) An assessment of alternative body armor acquisition
models, including different types of contracting and
budgeting practices of the Department of Defense.
(c) Personal Protection Equipment.--In this section, the
term ``personal protection equipment'' includes body armor.

TITLE II--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION

Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

SEC. 201. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2014 for the use of the Department of Defense for
research, development, test, and evaluation as specified in
the funding table in section 4201.

Subtitle B--Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations

SEC. 211. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR GROUND
COMBAT VEHICLE ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING
PHASE.

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act
or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Army
may be obligated or expended for post-Milestone B engineering
and manufacturing phase development activities for the ground
combat vehicle program until a period of 30 days has elapsed
following the date on which the Secretary of the Army submits
to the congressional defense committees a report that
includes the following:
(1) An independent assessment of the draft milestone B
documentation for the ground combat vehicle that--
(A) is performed by the Director of Cost Assessment and
Program Evaluation, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for
Research and Engineering, or other similar official; and
(B) analyzes whether there is a sufficient business case to
proceed with the engineering and manufacturing development
phase for the ground combat vehicle using only one
contractor.
(2) A certification by the Secretary that the ground combat
vehicle program has--
(A) feasible and fully-defined requirements;
(B) fully mature technologies;
(C) independent and high-confidence cost estimates;
(D) available funding; and
(E) a realistic and achievable schedule.

SEC. 212. LIMITATION ON MILESTONE A ACTIVITIES FOR UNMANNED
CARRIER-LAUNCHED SURVEILLANCE AND STRIKE SYSTEM
PROGRAM.

The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology,
and Logistics may not award a Milestone A technology
development contract with respect to the Unmanned Carrier-
launched Surveillance and Strike system program until a
period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the
Under Secretary certifies to the congressional defense
committees that the software and system engineering designs
for the control system and connectivity and aircraft carrier
segments of such program can achieve, with low level of
integration risk, successful compatibility and
interoperability with the air vehicle segment selected for
contract award with respect to such program.

SEC. 213. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR AIR FORCE
LOGISTICS TRANSFORMATION.

Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or
otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for
procurement, Air Force, or research, development, test, and
evaluation, Air Force, for logistics information technology,
including for the expeditionary combat support system, not
more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the
date that is 30 days after the date on which the Secretary of
the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees
a report on how the Secretary will modernize and update the
logistics information technology systems of the Air Force
following the cancellation of the expeditionary combat
support system. Such report shall include--
(1) strategies to--
(A) in the near term, address any gaps in capability with
respect to logistics information technology; and
(B) during the period covered by the current future-years
defense plan, provide for long-term modernization of
logistics information technology;
(2) an analysis of the root causes leading to the failure
of the expeditionary combat support system program; and
(3) a plan of action by the Secretary to ensure that the
lessons learned under such analysis are--
(A) shared throughout the Department of Defense and the
military departments; and
(B) considered in program planning for similar logistics
information technology systems.

SEC. 214. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEFENSIVE
CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS OF THE AIR FORCE.

(a) Limitation.-- Of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for
fiscal year 2014 for procurement, Air Force, or research,
development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for Defensive
Cyberspace Operations (Program Element 0202088F), not more
than 90 percent may be obligated or expended until a period
of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the
Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional
defense committees a report on the Application Software
Assurance Center of Excellence.
(b) Matters Included.--The report under subsection (a)
shall include the following:
(1) A description of how the Application Software Assurance
Center of Excellence is used to support the software
assurance activities of the Air Force and other elements of
the Department of Defense, including pursuant to section 933
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2013 (Public Law 112-239; 10 U.S.C. 2224 note).
(2) A description of the resources used to support the
Center of Excellence from the beginning of the Center through
fiscal year 2014.
(3) The plan of the Secretary for sustaining the Center of
Excellence during the period covered by the future-years
defense program submitted in 2013 under section 221 of title
10, United States Code.

SEC. 215. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR PRECISION
EXTENDED RANGE MUNITION PROGRAM.

[[Page H3391]]

Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and
Logistics submits to the congressional defense committees
written certification that--
(1) such program is necessary to meet a valid operational
need that cannot be met by the existing precision guided
mortar munition of the Army, other indirect fire weapons, or
aerial-delivered joint fires; and
(2) a sufficient business case exists to proceed with
development and production of such program.

SEC. 216. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR THE PROGRAM
MANAGER FOR BIOMETRICS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE.

(a) Limitation.-- Of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for
fiscal year 2014 for research, development, test, and
evaluation for the Department of Defense program manager for
biometrics for future biometric architectures or systems, not
more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until a
period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the
Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense
committees a report assessing the future program structure
for biometrics oversight and execution and architectural
requirements for biometrics enabling capability.
(b) Matters Included.--The report under subsection (a)
shall include the following:
(1) An assessment of the roles and responsibilities of the
principal staff assistant for biometrics, the program manager
for biometrics, and the Biometrics Identity Management
Agency, including an analysis of alternatives to evaluate--
(A) how to better align responsibilities for the multiple
elements of the military departments and the Department of
Defense with responsibility for biometrics, including the
Navy and the Marine Corps; the Office of the Provost Marshall
General, and the intelligence community; and
(B) whether the program management responsibilities of the
Department of Defense program manager for biometrics should
be retained by the Army or transferred to another military
department or element of the Department based on the expected
future operating environment.
(2) An assessment of the current requirements for the
biometrics enabling capability to ensure the capability
continues to meet the needs of the relevant military
departments and elements of the Department of Defense based
on the future operating environment after the drawdown in
Afghanistan.
(3) An analysis of the need to merge the program management
structures and systems architecture and requirements
development process for biometrics and forensics
applications.

SEC. 217. UNMANNED COMBAT AIR SYSTEM DEMONSTRATION TESTING
REQUIREMENT.

Not later than October 1, 2014, the Secretary of the Navy
shall demonstrate, with respect to the X-47B unmanned combat
air system aircraft, the following:
(1) Unmanned autonomous rendezvous and aerial-refueling
operations using the receptacle and probe equipment of the X-
47B aircraft.
(2) The ability of such aircraft to on-load fuel from
airborne tanker aircraft using both the boom and drogue
equipment installed on the tanker aircraft.

SEC. 218. LONG-RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON REQUIREMENT.

The Secretary of the Air Force shall develop a follow-on
air-launched cruise missile to the AGM-86 that--
(2) achieves initial operating capability for both
conventional and nuclear missions by not later than 2030; and
(3) is certified for internal carriage and employment for
both conventional and nuclear missions on the next-generation
long-range strike bomber by not later than 2034.

SEC. 219. REVIEW OF SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FOR F-35 AIRCRAFT.

(a) Review.--The Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall establish an
independent team consisting of subject matter experts to
review the development of software for the F-35 aircraft
program (in this section referred to as the ``software
development program''), including by reviewing the progress
made in--
(1) managing the software development program; and
(2) delivering critical software capability in accordance
with current program milestones.
(b) Report.--Not later than March 3, 2014, the Under
Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a report on the review under subsection (a). Such
report shall include the following:
(1) An assessment by the independent team with respect to
whether the software development program--
(A) has been successful in meeting the key milestone dates
occurring before the date of the report; and
(B) will be successful in meeting the established program
schedule.
(2) Any recommendations of the independent team with
respect to improving the software development program to
ensure that, in support of the start of initial operational
testing, the established program schedule is met on time.
(3) If the independent team determines that the software
development program will be unable to deliver the full
complement of software within the established program
schedule, any potential alternatives that the independent
team considers appropriate to deliver such software within
such schedule.

SEC. 220. EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT OF THE DISTRIBUTED COMMON
GROUND SYSTEM.

(a) Project Codes for Budget Submissions.--In the budget
transmitted by the President to Congress under section 1105
of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2015 and
each subsequent fiscal year, each capability component within
the distributed common ground system program shall be set
forth as a separate project code within the program element
line, and each covered official shall submit supporting
justification for the project code within the program element
descriptive summary.
(b) Analysis.--
(1) Requirement.--The Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall conduct an
analysis of commercial link analysis tools that are compliant
with the intelligence community data standards and could be
used to meet the requirements of the distributed common
ground system program.
(2) Elements.--The analysis required under paragraph (1)
shall include the following:
(A) Revalidation of the distributed common ground system
program requirements for link analysis tools based on current
program needs, recent operational experience, and the
requirement for nonproprietary solutions that adhere to open-
architecture principles.
(B) Market research of current commercially available link
analysis tools to determine which tools, if any, could
potentially satisfy the requirements described in
subparagraph (A).
(C) Analysis of the competitive acquisition options for any
commercially available link analysis tools identified in
subparagraph (B).
(3) Submission.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary shall submit
to the congressional defense committees the results of the
analysis conducted under paragraph (1).
(c) Competition Required.--
(1) In general.--Except as provided by paragraph (3), if
the Under Secretary identifies one or more commercial link
analysis tools under subsection (b) (other than such tools
offered by the current technology provider) that meet the
requirements for the distributed common ground system
program, including the requirement for nonproprietary
solutions that adhere to open-architecture principles, each
covered official shall initiate a request for proposals for
such link analysis tools by not later than 180 days after the
Under Secretary makes such identification. Such a request for
proposals shall be based on market research and competitive
procedures in accordance with applicable law and the Defense
Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement.
(2) Notification.--Each covered official shall submit to
the congressional defense committees written notification of
any request for proposals issued under paragraph (1) by not
later than 30 days after such request is issued.
(3) Waiver of rfp timeline.--If a covered official
determines that issuing a request for proposals by the date
specified in paragraph (1) would not be aligned with the
acquisition or developmental milestones of the distributed
common ground station program, the covered official may waive
the requirement to issue such a request for proposals by such
date if the covered official submits to the congressional
defense committees a written notification of such waiver that
includes--
(A) the reasons for making such a waiver; and
(B) identification of when in the acquisition timeline of
such program that the covered official plans to issue the
request for proposals.
(d) Covered Official Defined.--In this section, the term
``covered official'' means the following:
(1) The Secretary of the Army, with respect to matters
concerning the Army.
(2) The Secretary of the Navy, with respect to matters
concerning the Navy.
(3) The Secretary of the Air Force, with respect to matters
concerning the Air Force.
(4) The Commandant of the Marine Corps, with respect to
matters concerning the Marine Corps.
(5) The Commander of the United States Special Operations
Command, with respect to matters concerning the United States
Special Operations Command.

SEC. 221. REQUIREMENT TO COMPLETE INDIVIDUAL CARBINE TESTING.

The Secretary of the Army may not cancel the individual
carbine program unless the Secretary--
(1) completes the Phase III down-select and user-evaluation
phase of the individual carbine competitors;
(2) conducts the required comprehensive business case
analysis of such program; and
(3) submits to the congressional defense committees--
(A) the results of the down-select and user evaluation
described in paragraph (1); and
(B) the business case analysis described in paragraph (2).

SEC. 222. ESTABLISHMENT OF FUNDING LINE AND FIELDING PLAN FOR
NAVY LASER WEAPON SYSTEM.

(a) In General.--The Secretary shall ensure that each
future-years defense program submitted to Congress under
section 221 of title 10, United States Code, that covers any
of fiscal years 2018 through 2028 includes a funding line and
fielding plan for a Navy laser weapon system with respect to
such fiscal years.
(b) Alternative Report.--If the Secretary determines that
the technology and maturation efforts of a Navy laser weapon
system conducted prior to fiscal year 2016 do not indicate
that suitable technology warranting a program of record for
such system will be available by 2018, the Secretary may
waive the requirements of subsection (a) if the Secretary
submits to the congressional defense committees written
justification of such determination, including a description
of the technical shortcomings of such system, by not later
than March 30, 2016.

[[Page H3392]]

SEC. 223. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON IMPORTANCE OF ALIGNING COMMON
MISSILE COMPARTMENT OF OHIO-CLASS REPLACEMENT
PROGRAM WITH THE UNITED KINGDOM'S VANGUARD
SUCCESSOR PROGRAM.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) The Polaris Sales Agreement of 1963 formally arranged
for the Polaris missile system to be purchased by the United
Kingdom for its submarines. It was extended in 1982 to
include the Trident missile system and this agreement
continues to underpin the independent nuclear deterrent of
the United Kingdom.
(2) April 2013 marked the 50-year anniversary of the
agreement.
(3) Since the inception of the agreement, the agreement has
been a tremendous success and provided great benefits to both
nations by creating major cost savings, stronger nuclear
deterrence, and a stronger alliance.
(4) The Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine replacement
of the United States and the Vanguard-class ballistic missile
successor of the United Kingdom will share a common missile
compartment and the Trident II/D5 strategic weapon system.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that
the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Navy should
make every effort to ensure that the common missile
compartment associated with the Ohio-class ballistic missile
submarine replacement program stays on schedule and is
aligned with the Vanguard-successor program of the United
Kingdom in order for the United States to fulfill its
longstanding commitment to our ally and partner in sea-based
strategic deterrence.

SEC. 224. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON COUNTER-ELECTRONICS HIGH POWER
MICROWAVE MISSILE PROJECT.

It is the sense of the Congress that--
(1) following the successful joint technology capability
demonstration that the counter-electronics high power
microwave missile project (in this section referred to as
``CHAMP'') conducted last year, the Air Force should examine
the results of the demonstration and consider the
demonstration as a potential solution during any analysis of
alternatives conducted in 2014;
(2) an analysis of alternatives is an important step in the
long term-term development of a high power microwave weapon;
(3) additionally, a near-term option may be available to
get such capability to commanders of the combatant commands
should the capability be required;
(4) the Secretary of the Air Force should pursue both near-
and long-term high power microwave weapon systems;
(5) CHAMP could be developed as a cruise missile delivered
weapon with target availability to commanders of the
combatant commands by 2016; and
(6) such development should not prohibit or divert
resources from an analysis of alternatives and long-term
development of a high power microwave weapon.

Subtitle C--Missile Defense Programs

SEC. 231. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR MEADS PROGRAM.

(a) Prohibition.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for
fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be
obligated or expended for the medium extended air defense
system.
(b) Harvesting Technology.--
(1) Notice and wait.--The Secretary of Defense may not
carry out actions described in paragraph (2) until a period
of 120 days has elapsed following the date on which the
Secretary notifies the congressional defense committees of
the plans of the Secretary to carry out such actions.
(2) Actions described.--Actions described in this paragraph
are actions relating to harvesting technology of the medium
extended air defense system.
(c) Report.--
(1) In general.--Not later than February 15, 2014, the
Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional
defense committees a report on the opportunities to harvest
technology of the medium extended air defense system to
modernize the various air and missile defense systems and
integrated architecture of the Army, based on the report
required by section 226 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat.
1678).
(2) Matters included.--The report under paragraph (1) shall
include the following:
(A) A review of current Army and joint requirements to
which any harvested technology of the medium extended air
defense system might be applied.
(B) The timeline of the Secretary for completion of an
analysis of alternatives to technologies and systems being
considered for harvesting.
(C) An overview of the planned acquisition strategy for any
major systems being considered for harvesting and for
insertion into the integrated air and missile defense
architecture.
(d) Application.--The prohibition in subsection (a) may not
be superseded except by a provision of law that specifically
supersedes, repeals, or modifies such subsection.

SEC. 232. ADDITIONAL MISSILE DEFENSE SITE IN THE UNITED
STATES FOR OPTIMIZED PROTECTION OF THE
HOMELAND.

(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
(1) President George W. Bush and President Barack Obama
have each recognized the necessity for an additional measure
of protection-beyond missile defense sites in Alaska and
California-for defending the United States against
intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) threats emanating
from the Middle East.
(2) General Jacoby, the Commander of the United States
Northern Command, testified before Congress that ``we should
consider that Iran has a capability within the next few years
of flight testing ICBM capable technologies'' and that ``the
Iranians are intent on developing an ICBM''.
(3) General Kehler, the Commander of the United States
Strategic Command, testified before Congress that ``I am
confident that we can defend against a limited attack from
Iran, although we are not in the most optimum posture to do
that today. . .it doesn't provide total defense today''.
(4) General Jacoby also testified before Congress that ``I
would agree that a third site, wherever the decision is to
build a third site, would give me better weapons access,
increased GBI inventory and allow us the battle space to more
optimize our defense against future threats from Iran and
North Korea''.
(5) Section 227 of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1678)
directs the Missile Defense Agency--
(A) to conduct environmental impact studies for three
potential locations for an additional missile defense site
capable of protecting the homeland; and
(B) to develop a contingency plan in case the President
determines to proceed with deployment of such an additional
site.
(6) According the Missile Defense Agency, the cost to
deploy up to 20 ground-based interceptors (GBIs) at a new
missile defense site on the East Coast of the United States
is approximately $3,000,000,000 and would require
approximately 5 to 6 years to complete.
(b) Additional Missile Defense Site.--
(1) In general.--The Missile Defense Agency shall construct
and make operational in fiscal year 2018 an additional
homeland missile defense site capable of protecting the
homeland, designed to complement existing sites in Alaska and
California, to deal more effectively with the long-range
ballistic missile threat from the Middle East.
(2) Requirement in addition to other required activities
regarding missile defense sites.--The Missile Defense Agency
shall carry out the requirement in paragraph (1) to construct
and deploy an additional homeland missile defense site
(including any advance procurement and engineering and design
in connection with such site) while continuing to meet the
requirement to prepare environmental impact statements and a
contingency plan under section 227 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 for the missile
defense sites described in that section.
(3) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Director of the Missile Defense
Agency shall submit to Congress a report on the missile
defense site required to be constructed and deployed under
paragraph (1). The report shall include a description of the
current estimate of the funding to be required for
construction and deployment of the missile defense site,
including for advance procurement, engineering and design,
materials and construction, interceptor missiles, and
sensors.

SEC. 233. LIMITATION ON REMOVAL OF MISSILE DEFENSE EQUIPMENT
FROM EAST ASIA.

(a) Policy.--It is the policy of the United States that--
(1) the missile defenses of the United States provide
defense against multiple threats, including threats to the
United States, allies of the United States, and the deployed
forces of the United States; and
(2) the elimination of one threat, for example the illegal
nuclear weapons program of a rogue state, does not eliminate
the reason the United States deploys missile defenses to a
particular region, including to defend allies of the United
States and deployed forces of the United States from other
regional threats.
(b) Limitation.--Except as provided by subsection (c) or
(d), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this
Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 or any
fiscal year thereafter may be obligated or expended to remove
missile defense equipment of the United States from East Asia
until a period of 180 days has elapsed following the date on
which the President certifies to the congressional defense
committees the following:
(1) Each country in East Asia that poses a threat to allies
of the United States has verifiably dismantled the nuclear
weapons and ballistic missile programs of such country.
(2) The President has consulted with such allies with
respect to the dismantlement described in paragraph (1)
that--
(A) such dismantlement has occurred; and
(B) the missile defense platforms of the United States
located in East Asia are no longer needed.
(c) Waiver.--The President may waive the limitation in
subsection (b) with respect to removing missile defense
equipment of the United States from East Asia if--
(1) the President submits to the congressional defense
committees--
(A) a certification that such waiver is in the national
security interest of the United States; and
(B) a report, in unclassified form, explaining--
(i) why the President cannot make a certification for such
removal under subsection (b);
(ii) the national security interest covered by the
certification made under subparagraph (A); and
(iii) how the President will provide a commensurate level
of defense for the United States, allies of the United
States, and deployed forces of the United States, as provided
by such missile defense equipment being removed; and
(2) a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on
which the President submits the information under paragraph
(1).

[[Page H3393]]

(d) Exception.--The limitation in subsection (b) shall not
apply to destroyers and cruisers of the Navy equipped with
the Aegis ballistic missile defense system.

SEC. 234. IMPROVEMENTS TO ACQUISITION ACCOUNTABILITY REPORTS
ON BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM.

(a) In General.--Section 225 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended--
(1) in subsection (b)(3)(A), by inserting ``comprehensive''
before ``life-cycle''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
``(e) Quality of Cost Estimates.--(1) The Director shall
ensure that each cost estimate included in an acquisition
baseline pursuant to subsection (b)(3) includes all operation
and support costs, regardless of funding source, for which
the Director is responsible.
``(2) In each such baseline submitted to the congressional
defense committees, the Director shall state whether the
underlying cost estimates in such baseline meet the criteria
of the Comptroller General of the United States to be
considered a high-quality estimate. If the Director states
that such estimates do not meet such criteria, the Director
shall include in such baseline the actions, including a
schedule, that the Director plans to carry out for the
estimates to meet such criteria.''.
(b) Report.--Not later than February 15, 2014, the Director
of the Missile Defense Agency shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report of the plans and
schedule of the Director with respect to when the Director
will meet the quality and criteria of cost estimates required
by section 225(e) of title 10, United States Code, as added
by subsection (a)(2).

SEC. 235. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES FOR SUCCESSOR TO PRECISION
TRACKING SPACE SYSTEM.

(a) Analysis of Alternatives Required.--
(1) In general.--The Director of the Missile Defense
Agency, in cooperation with the Director of Cost Assessment
and Program Evaluation and the Defense Space Council, shall
perform an analysis of alternatives for a successor to the
precision tracking space system.
(2) Consideration.--The Director shall ensure that the
analysis of alternatives under paragraph (1) considers the
following:
(A) Current and future terrestrial, airborne, and space
capabilities and capability gaps for missile defense sensing
requirements.
(B) Current and planned overhead persistent infrared
architecture and the potential for the future exploitability
of such architecture.
(C) Lessons learned from the space tracking and
surveillance system and precision tracking space system
technology development programs.
(D) Opinions of private industry based on the experience of
such industry with delivering space capabilities.
(E) Opportunities for such successor system to contribute
to nonmissile defense missions with unmet requirements,
including space situational awareness.
(3) Role of other departments.--In conducting the analysis
of alternatives under paragraph (1), the Director shall
compare the advantages and disadvantages, including in terms
of costs, with respect to the Director--
(A) developing a successor to the precision tracking space
system solely for the Missile Defense Agency; and
(B) cooperating with other heads of departments and
agencies of the United States to develop space systems that
are multi-mission, including by hosting payloads.
(b) Submission Required.--
(1) Terms of reference.--Not later than 60 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit
to the congressional defense committees the terms of
reference of the analysis of alternatives performed under
subsection (a)(1).
(2) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report including--
(A) the analysis of alternatives for a successor to the
precision tracking space system performed under subsection
(a)(1); and
(B) a description of the potential platforms on which a
hosted payload could be hosted.
(3) Form.--The report required by paragraph (2) shall be
submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified
annex.
(c) Conforming Repeal.--Section 224 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239;
126 Stat. 1675) is repealed.

SEC. 236. PLAN TO IMPROVE ORGANIC KILL ASSESSMENT CAPABILITY
OF THE GROUND-BASED MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SYSTEM.

(a) Organic Kill Assessment Capability.--The Director of
the Missile Defense Agency and the Commander of the United
States Northern Command, in consultation with the Commander
of the United States Strategic Command, shall jointly
develop--
(1) options to achieve an organic kill assessment
capability for the ground-based midcourse defense system that
can be developed by not later than December 31, 2019,
including by improving the command, control, battle
management, and communications program and the sensor and
communications architecture of the Agency; and
(2) a plan to carry out such options that gives priority to
including such capabilities in at least some of the 14
ground-based interceptors that will be procured by the
Director, as announced by the Secretary of Defense on March
15, 2013.
(b) Improved Hit Assessment.--The Director and the
Commander of the United States Northern Command, in
consultation with the Commander of the United States
Strategic Command, shall jointly develop an interim
capability for improved hit assessment for the ground-based
midcourse defense system that can be integrated into near-
term enhanced kill vehicle upgrades and refurbishment.
(c) Submission to Congress.--Not later than March 15, 2014,
the Director and the Commander of the United States Northern
Command shall jointly submit to the congressional defense
committees a report on--
(1) the development of an organic kill assessment
capability under subsection (a), including the plan developed
under paragraph (2) of such subsection; and
(2) the development of an interim capability for improved
hit assessment under subsection (b).

SEC. 237. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR IRON DOME SHORT-RANGE
ROCKET DEFENSE PROGRAM.

Of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year
2014 by section 201 for research, development, test, and
evaluation, Defense-wide, and available for the Missile
Defense Agency, $15,000,000 may be obligated or expended for
enhancing the capability for producing the Iron Dome short-
range rocket defense program in the United States, including
for infrastructure, tooling, transferring data, special test
equipment, and related components.

SEC. 238. NATO AND THE PHASED, ADAPTIVE APPROACH TO MISSILE
DEFENSE IN EUROPE.

(a) NATO Funding.--
(1) Phase i of epaa.--Not later than 60 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the President shall consult
with the North Atlantic Council and the Secretary General of
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (in this section
referred to as ``NATO'') on--
(A) the funding of the phased, adaptive approach to missile
defense in Europe; and
(B) establishing a plan for NATO to provide at least 50
percent of the infrastructure and operations and maintenance
costs of phase I of the phased, adaptive approach to missile
defense in Europe.
(2) Phases ii and iii of epaa.--The President shall use the
NATO Military Common-Funded Resources process to seek to fund
at least 50 percent of the costs for phases II and III of the
phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe.
(3) Reports.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, and each 180-day period thereafter,
the President shall submit to the congressional defense
committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of
the Senate a report on the funding provided by NATO pursuant
to paragraphs (1) and (2).
(b) Interceptors.--If the Secretary of Defense determines
that it is useful to the interests of the United States, the
Secretary shall seek to engage with members of NATO to
establish a NATO common pool of Aegis standard missile-3
block IA, standard missile-3 block IB, and standard missile-3
block IIA interceptors to defend NATO members through the
phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe.

SEC. 239. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON PROCUREMENT OF CAPABILITY
ENHANCEMENT II EXOATMOSPHERIC KILL VEHICLE.

It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense
should not procure a Capability Enhancement II exoatmospheric
kill vehicle for deployment until after the date on which a
successful operational flight test of the Capability
Enhancement II ground-based interceptor has occurred unless
such procurement is for test assets or to maintain a warm
line for the industrial base.

SEC. 240. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON 30TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE
STRATEGIC DEFENSE INITIATIVE.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) President Ronald Reagan in March 1983, in a speech from
the oval office, laid the corner stone for a long-term
research and development program to begin to achieve our
ultimate goal of eliminating the threat posed by strategic
nuclear missiles.
(2) President Reagan stated, ``I've become more and more
deeply convinced that the human spirit must be capable of
rising above dealing with other nations and human beings by
threatening their existence. . . What if free people could
live secure in the knowledge that their security did not rest
upon the threat of instant U.S. retaliation to deter a Soviet
attack, that we could intercept and destroy strategic
ballistic missiles before they reached our own soil or that
of our allies?''.
(3) The Strategic Defense Initiative, also known as ``Star
Wars'', challenged the nation to accomplish the impossible by
moving beyond the obvious possibilities of the day to set the
United States and our allies up for success.
(4) In 1999, the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization
(BMDO), National Missile Defense (NMD) prototype interceptor
successfully demonstrated ``hit-to-kill'' technology
intercepting a modified Minuteman intercontinental Ballistic
Missile (ICBM).
(5) Congress passed the National Missile Defense Act of
1999 (Public Law 106-38) (signed by President Clinton), which
stated, ``It is the policy of the United States to deploy, as
soon as is technologically possible, an effective National
Missile Defense system capable of defending the territory of
the United States against limited ballistic missile attack
(whether accidental, unauthorized, or deliberate)''.
(6) On December 13, 2001, President George W. Bush
announced ``I have concluded the ABM treaty hinders our
government's ability to develop ways to protect our people
from future terrorist or rogue state missile attacks''.
(7) Russian President Vladimir Putin said the move was
``not a threat to the security of the Russian Federation''.
(8) Since 2001, the United States has deployed considerable
Missile Defense capability: 30 ground-based interceptors
defending the continental U.S. today; 32 Aegis BMD ships; 113
SM-

[[Page H3394]]

3 IA interceptors; 25 SM-3 IB interceptors; 3 THAAD batteries
and 89 interceptors; and 8 AN/TPY-2 forward-based sensors.
(9) The United States has partnerships with 22 nations, and
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), for missile
defense cooperation. Likewise, India and South Korea are
developing missile defenses and the Russian Federation and
People's Republic of China are also developing and improving
missile defenses.
(10) Since 2001 when they began development, United States
missile defenses have had a test record of 58 of 73 hit-to-
kill intercept attempts and have been successful across all
programs of the integrated system, including Aegis Ballistic
Missile Defense (BMD), Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD),
Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), and PATRIOT
Advanced Capability-3.
(11) In July of 2004, the United States missile defense
system was declared operational with limited capability.
Since that time, it has offered defense against limited
threats to the continental United States.
(12) The United States has cooperatively developed with our
Israeli allies a number of missile defense systems including
Arrow, Arrow 3 and David's Sling, systems which will
protector our Israeli allies and contribute technology and
expertise to U.S. systems.
(13) The United States in support of NATO deployed a
Patriot missile battery to defend the population and
territory of Turkey and provide material support for Article
V of the North Atlantic Treaty in the event of spillover from
the Syrian civil war and has deployed Phase I of the European
Phased Adaptive Approach, which includes a transportable x-
band radar array and an on-station AEGIS ballistic missile
defense ship armed with Standard Missile 3 block IA missile
interceptors.
(14) When United States territory, deployed forces and
allies were threatened by North Korean ballistic missiles the
United States had the operational capability and national
will to deploy THAAD units to Guam to provide a defensive
shield.
(15) The United States continues to work jointly with Japan
to improve the Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD)
which in addition to providing missile defense in the Pacific
is also a keystone in the Phased Adaptive Approach for
European missile defense.
(16) On-going research and development under the auspices
of the Missile Defense Agency will continue to expand the
technology envelope to deploy a layered missile defense
system capable of defending the homeland, our military forces
deployed overseas, friendly nations and our allies against
all ballistic missiles from launch and orbit to reentry.
(17) A credible ballistic missile defense system is
critical to the national defense of the United States.
(b) Sense of Congress.--Congress--
(1) recognizes the inspiring leadership of President Ronald
Reagan to ``maintain the peace through strength'';
(2) recognizes the enduring obligation President as
Commander in Chief to`` preserve, protect, and defend the
Constitution'';
(3) commemorates the vision of President Reagan on the 30th
anniversary of the Strategic Defense Initiative;
(4) believes that it is imperative that the United States
continue fielding a robust missile defense system, including
additional ground based interceptors; and
(5) commits to supporting continued investments in future
missile defense capabilities and emerging technologies such
as directed energy and railguns.

Subtitle D--Reports

SEC. 251. ANNUAL COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON THE AMPHIBIOUS
COMBAT VEHICLE ACQUISITION PROGRAM.

(a) Annual GAO Review.--During the period beginning on the
date of the enactment of this Act and ending on March 1,
2018, the Comptroller General of the United States shall
conduct an annual review of the amphibious combat vehicle
acquisition program.
(b) Annual Reports.--
(1) In general.--Not later than March 1 of each year
beginning in 2014 and ending in 2018, the Comptroller General
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report
on the review of the amphibious combat vehicle acquisition
program conducted under subsection (a).
(2) Matters to be included.--Each report under paragraph
(1) shall include the following:
(A) The extent to which the program is meeting development
and procurement cost, schedule, performance, and risk
mitigation goals.
(B) With respect to meeting the desired initial operational
capability and full operational capability dates for the
amphibious combat vehicle, the progress and results of--
(i) developmental and operational testing of the vehicle;
and
(ii) plans for correcting deficiencies in vehicle
performance, operational effectiveness, reliability,
suitability, and safety.
(C) An assessment of procurement plans, production results,
and efforts to improve manufacturing efficiency and supplier
performance.
(D) An assessment of the acquisition strategy of the
amphibious combat vehicle, including whether such strategy is
in compliance with acquisition management best-practices and
the acquisition policy and regulations of the Department of
Defense.
(E) An assessment of the projected operations and support
costs and the viability of the Marine Corps to afford to
operate and sustain the amphibious combat vehicle.
(3) Additional information.--In submitting to the
congressional defense committees the first report under
paragraph (1) and a report following any changes made by the
Secretary of the Navy to the baseline documentation of the
amphibious combat vehicle acquisition program, the
Comptroller General shall include, with respect to such
program, an assessment of the sufficiency and objectivity
of--
(A) the analysis of alternatives;
(B) the initial capabilities document; and
(C) the capabilities development document.

SEC. 252. REPORT ON STRATEGY TO IMPROVE BODY ARMOR.

(a) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit
to the congressional defense committees a report on the
comprehensive research and development strategy of the
Secretary to achieve significant reductions in the weight of
body armor.
(b) Matters Included.--The report under subsection (a)
shall include the following:
(1) A brief description of each solution for body armor
weight reduction that is being developed as of the date of
the report.
(2) For each such solution--
(A) the costs, schedules, and performance requirements;
(B) the research and development funding profile;
(C) a description of the materials being used in the
solution; and
(D) the feasibility and technology readiness levels of the
solution and the materials.
(3) A strategy to provide resources for future research and
development of body armor weight reduction.
(4) An explanation of how the Secretary is using a modular
or tailorable solution to approach body armor weight
reduction.
(5) A description of how the Secretary coordinates the
research and development of body armor weight reduction being
carried out by the military departments.
(6) Any other matter the Secretary considers appropriate.

SEC. 253. REPORT ON MAIN BATTLE TANK FUEL EFFICIENCY
INITIATIVE.

Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on the investment
strategy to accelerate fuel efficiency improvements to the
current engine and transmission of the M1 Abrams series main
battle tank as part of the Army's Engineering Change Proposal
Phase I strategy.

SEC. 254. REPORT ON POWERED RAIL SYSTEM.

(a) Report Required.--Not later than 90 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report on
the powered rail system compared to currently fielded
solutions. Such report shall include each of the following:
(1) Verification of relevant studies previously conducted
by the Army, including that of the Maneuver Center of
Excellence, which show that a typical infantry platoon
requires approximately 430 pounds of batteries for a 72-hour
mission, or roughly 10 pounds per soldier, and that the per-
soldier, per-year procurement, storage, transport and
disposal costs of these batteries are between $50,000 and
$65,000.
(2) An assessment of the comparative total cost of
ownership, including procurement, fielding, training, and
sustainment of the existing rail system and associated rail-
mounted devices with respect to battery types and usage, when
compared to that of a powered rail or intelligent rail system
with a consolidated power source.
(3) An assessment of the specific effects of excessive
battery weight on soldier mobility, endurance and lethality
determined through side-by-side time, endurance, motion and
lethality tests between soldiers operating with existing
rail-mounted weapon accessories and soldiers using the
powered rail or intelligent rail solution.
(4) An assessment of the advantages to the Army of
incorporating the high-speed communications capability
embedded in the powered rail or intelligent rail technology,
including the integration of existing Army devices and
devices in development such as the family of weapons sights
and the enhanced night vision goggles, with the powered rail
technology, and the connection of these previously
unconnected devices to the soldier network.
(b) Testing.--Any testing conducted in order to produce the
report required by subsection (a) shall be supervised and
validated by the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation
of the Department of Defense.

Subtitle E--Other Matters

SEC. 261. ESTABLISHMENT OF CRYPTOGRAPHIC MODERNIZATION REVIEW
AND ADVISORY BOARD.

(a) In General.--Chapter 7 of title 10, United States Code,
is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``Sec. 189. Cryptographic Modernization Review and Advisory
Board

``(a) Establishment.--There shall be in the Department of
Defense a Cryptographic Modernization Review and Advisory
Board (in this section referred to as the `Board') to review
and assess the cryptographic modernization activities of the
Department and provide advice to the Secretary with respect
to such activities pursuant to the roles and responsibilities
outlined in the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
Instruction 6510.02D.
``(b) Members.--(1) The Secretary shall determine the
number of members of the Board.
``(2) The Secretary shall appoint officers in the grade of
general or admiral and civilian employees of the Department
of Defense in the Senior Executive Service to serve as
members of the Board.
``(c) Responsibilities.--The Board shall--
``(1) review compliance with cease-use dates for specific
cryptographic systems based on rigorous analysis of technical
and threat factors and issue guidance, as needed, to relevant
program executive offices and program managers;

[[Page H3395]]

``(2) monitor the overall cryptographic modernization
efforts of the Department, including while such efforts are
being executed;
``(3) convene in-depth technical program reviews, as
needed, for specific cryptographic modernization developments
with respect to validating current and in-draft requirements
of systems of the Department of Defense and identifying
programmatic risks;
``(4) develop a five-year cryptographic modernization plan
to--
``(A) make recommendations to the Joint Requirements
Oversight Council with respect to updating or modifying
requirements for cryptographic modernization; and
``(B) identify previously unidentified requirements;
``(5) develop a long-term roadmap to--
``(A) ensure synchronization with major planning documents;
``(B) anticipate risks and issues in 10- and 20-year
timelines; and
``(C) ensure that the expertise and insights of the
military departments, Defense Agencies, the combatant
commands, industry, academia, and key allies are included in
the course of developing and carrying out cryptographic
modernization activities;
``(6) develop a concept of operations for how cryptographic
systems should function in a system-of-systems environment;
and
``(7) advise the Secretary on the development of a
cryptographic asset visibility system.
``(d) Exclusion of Certain Programs.--The Board shall not
include programs funded under the National Intelligence
Program (as defined in section 3(6) of the National Security
Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(6))) in carrying out this
section.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by adding after the item
relating to section 188 the following new item:

``189. Cryptographic Modernization Review and Advisory Board.''.

SEC. 262. CLARIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY OF A STATE TO
PARTICIPATE IN DEFENSE EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM TO
STIMULATE COMPETITIVE RESEARCH.

Subparagraph (A) of section 257(d)(2) of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law
103-337; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended to read as follows:
``(A) the State is eligible for the experimental program to
stimulate competitive research under section 113 of the
National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 1988 (42
U.S.C. 1862g); and''.

SEC. 263. EXTENSION AND EXPANSION OF MECHANISMS TO PROVIDE
FUNDS FOR DEFENSE LABORATORIES FOR RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT OF TECHNOLOGIES FOR MILITARY
MISSIONS.

(a) Clarification of Availability of Funds.--Section 219 of
the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended--
(1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections
(c) and (d), respectively; and
(2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new
subsection (b):
``(b) Availability of Funds for Infrastructure
Revitalization Projects.--
``(1) In general.--Subject to the provisions of this
subsection, funds available under a mechanism under
subsection (a) for specific laboratory infrastructure
revitalization projects shall be available for such projects
until expended.
``(2) Prior notice of costs of projects.--Funds shall be
available in accordance with paragraph (1) for a project
referred to in that paragraph only if the congressional
defense committees are notified of the total cost of the
project before the commencement of the project.
``(3) Accumulation of funds for projects.--Funds may
accumulate under a mechanism under subsection (a) for a
project referred to in paragraph (1) for not more than five
years.
``(4) Limitation on total cost of project.--Funds shall be
available in accordance with paragraph (1) for a project
referred to in that paragraph only if the cost of the project
does not exceed $4,000,000.''.
(b) Extension.--Subsection (d) of such section, as
redesignated by subsection (a)(1) of this section, is amended
by striking ``September 30, 2016'' and inserting ``September
30, 2020''.
(c) Application.--Subsection (b) of section 219 of the
Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note), as added by subsection
(a)(2), shall apply with respect to funds made available
under such section 219 after the date of the enactment of
this Act.

SEC. 264. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO AWARD PRIZES FOR ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY ACHIEVEMENTS.

Section 2374a(f) of chapter 139 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by striking ``September 30, 2013'' and
inserting ``September 30, 2018''.

SEC. 265. FIVE-YEAR EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM TO INCLUDE
TECHNOLOGY PROTECTION FEATURES DURING RESEARCH
AND DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN DEFENSE SYSTEMS.

Section 243(d) of the Ike Skelton National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383;
10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended by striking ``October 1,
2015'' and inserting ``October 1, 2020''.

SEC. 266. BRIEFING ON POWER AND ENERGY RESEARCH CONDUCTED AT
UNIVERSITY AFFILIATED RESEARCH CENTERS.

(a) Briefing.--Not later than March 31, 2014, the Secretary
of Defense shall brief the Committees on Armed Services of
the Senate and the House of Representatives on power and
energy research conducted at the university affiliated
research centers.
(b) Matters Included.--The briefing under subsection (a)
shall include the following:
(1) A description of current and planned research on power
grid issues conducted with other university-based energy
centers.
(2) A description of current and planned collaboration
efforts regarding power grid issues with university-based
research centers that have an expertise in energy efficiency
and renewable energy, including efforts with respect to--
(A) system failure and losses, including--
(i) utility logistics and supply chain management for
events resulting in system failure or other major damage;
(ii) near real-time utility and law enforcement access to
damage assessment information during events resulting in
system failure or other major damage;
(B) mitigation and response to disasters and attacks;
(C) variable energy resource integration on the bulk power
system;
(D) integration of high penetrations of distributed energy
technologies on the electric distribution system;
(E) substation and asset hardening techniques appropriate
for use in civilian areas;
(F) facilitating development of training programs to
support significant increase in required technical skills of
present and future utility field forces, including hands-on
training; and
(G) facilitating increased consumer self-sufficiency.

TITLE III--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

SEC. 301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FUNDING.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other
activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for
expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and
maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section
4301.

Subtitle B--Energy and Environment

SEC. 311. DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF REPORTS ON PROPOSED
BUDGETS FOR ACTIVITIES RELATING TO OPERATIONAL
ENERGY STRATEGY.

Section 138c(e) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended--
(1) in paragraph (4), by striking ``Not later than 30 days
after the date on which the budget for a fiscal year is
submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31,
the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on
the proposed budgets for that fiscal year'' and inserting
``The Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report
on the proposed budgets for a fiscal year''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(6) The report required by paragraph (4) for a fiscal
year shall be submitted by the later of the following dates:
``(A) The date that is 30 days after the date on which the
budget for that fiscal year is submitted to Congress pursuant
to section 1105 of title 31.
``(B) March 31 of the previous fiscal year.''.

SEC. 312. FACILITATION OF INTERAGENCY COOPERATION IN
CONSERVATION PROGRAMS OF THE DEPARTMENTS OF
DEFENSE, AGRICULTURE, AND INTERIOR TO AVOID OR
REDUCE ADVERSE IMPACTS ON MILITARY READINESS
ACTIVITIES.

(a) Use of Funds Under Certain Agreements.--Section 2684a
of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by redesignating subsections (h) and (i) as subsections
(i) and (j); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (g) the following new
subsection (h):
``(h) Interagency Cooperation in Conservation Programs To
Avoid or Reduce Adverse Impacts on Military Readiness
Activities.--In order to facilitate interagency cooperation
and enhance the effectiveness of actions that will protect
both the environment and military readiness, the recipient of
funds provided pursuant an agreement under this section or
under the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. et seq.) may, with regard to
the lands and waters within the scope of the agreement, use
such funds to satisfy any matching funds or cost-sharing
requirement of any conservation program of the Department of
Agriculture or the Department of the Interior notwithstanding
any limitation of such program on the source of matching or
cost-sharing funds.''.
(b) Sunset.--This section and subsection (h) of section
2684a of title 10, United States Code, as added by this
section, shall expire on October 1, 2019, except that any
agreement referred to in such subsection that is entered into
on or before September 30, 2019, shall continue according to
its terms and conditions as if this section has not expired.

SEC. 313. REAUTHORIZATION OF SIKES ACT.

Section 108 of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670f) is amended by
striking ``fiscal years 2009 through 2014'' each place it
appears and inserting ``fiscal years 2014 through 2019''.

SEC. 314. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS UNDER SIKES ACT FOR LAND
MANAGEMENT RELATED TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
READINESS ACTIVITIES.

(a) Multiyear Agreements To Fund Long-Term Management.--
Subsection (b) of section 103A of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C.
670c-1) is amended--
(1) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``Funds''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(2) In the case of a cooperative agreement under
subsection (a)(2), funds referred to in paragraph (1)--
``(A) may be paid in a lump sum and include an amount
intended to cover the future costs of

[[Page H3396]]

the natural resource maintenance and improvement activities
provided for under the agreement; and
``(B) may be invested by the recipient in accordance with
the recipient's own guidelines for the management and
investment of financial assets, and any interest or income
derived from such investment may be applied for the same
purposes as the principal.''.
(b) Availability of Funds and Relation to Other Laws.--
Subsection (c) of such section is amended to read as follows:
``(c) Availability of Funds and Relation to Other Laws.--
(1) Cooperative agreements and interagency agreements entered
into under this section shall be subject to the availability
of funds.
``(2) Notwithstanding chapter 63 of title 31, United States
Code, a cooperative agreement under this section may be used
to acquire property or services for the direct benefit or use
of the United States Government.
``(3) Amounts available to the Department of Defense that
are provided to any Federal, State, local, or nongovernmental
entity for conservation and rehabilitation of natural
resources in an area that is not on a military installation--
``(A) may only be used for payment of direct costs
associated with the management of such area; and
``(B) may be used to pay not more than 3 percent of total
project administrative costs, fees, and management charges.
``(4) Amounts available to the Department of Defense may
not be used under this Act to acquire fee title interest in
real property for natural resources projects that are not on
a military installation.''.
(c) Annual Audits.--Such section is further amended by
adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(d) Annual Audits.--The Inspector General of the
Department of Defense shall annually audit each natural
resources project funded with amounts available to the
Department of Defense under this Act that is not on a
military installation.''.
(d) Sunset.--This section and the provisions of law enacted
by the amendments made by this section shall expire on
October 1, 2019, except that any cooperative agreement
referred to in such provisions that is entered into on or
before September 30, 2019, shall continue according to its
terms and conditions as if this section has not expired.

SEC. 315. EXCLUSIONS FROM DEFINITION OF ``CHEMICAL
SUBSTANCE'' UNDER TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT.

Section 3(2)(B)(v) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (15
U.S.C. 2602(2)(B)(v)) is amended by striking ``, and'' and
inserting ``and any component of such an article (including,
without limitation, shot, bullets and other projectiles,
propellants when manufactured for or used in such an article,
and primers), and''.

SEC. 316. EXEMPTION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FROM ALTERNATIVE
FUEL PROCUREMENT REQUIREMENT.

Section 526 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of
2007 (Public Law 110-140; 42 U.S.C. 17142) is amended by
adding at the end the following: ``This section shall not
apply to the Department of Defense.''.

SEC. 317. CLARIFICATION OF PROHIBITION ON DISPOSING OF WASTE
IN OPEN-AIR BURN PITS.

For the purposes of Department of Defense Instruction
4715.19, issued as required by section 317 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law
111-84; 10 U.S.C. 2701 note) or any successor instruction,
the term ``covered waste'' specifically includes, in addition
to the materials already specified in subparagraphs (A) and
(B) of subsection (c)(2) of such section, the following:
(1) Tires.
(2) Treated wood.
(3) Batteries.
(4) Plastics, except insignificant amounts of plastic
remaining after a good-faith effort to remove or recover
plastic materials from the solid waste stream.
(5) Munitions and explosives, the destruction of which is
covered in Department of Defense Instruction 6055.09-M
(Reference (i)).
(6) Compressed gas cylinders, unless empty with valves
removed.
(7) Fuel containers, unless completely evacuated of its
contents.
(8) Aerosol cans.
(9) Polychlorinated biphenyls.
(10) Petroleum, oils, and lubricants products (other than
waste fuel for initial combustion).
(11) Asbestos.
(12) Mercury.
(13) Foam tent material.
(14) Any item containing any of the materials referred to
in a preceding paragraph.

SEC. 318. LIMITATION ON PLAN, DESIGN, REFURBISHING, OR
CONSTRUCTION OF BIOFUELS REFINERIES.

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary
of Defense may not enter into a contract for the planning,
design, refurbishing, or construction of a biofuels refinery
any other facility or infrastructure used to refine biofuels
unless such planning, design, refurbishing, or construction
is specifically authorized by law.

SEC. 319. LIMITATION ON PROCUREMENT OF BIOFUELS.

(a) In General.--Except as provided in subsection (b), none
of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or
otherwise made available for the Department of Defense may be
used to purchase or produce biofuels until the earlier of the
following dates:
(1) The date on which the cost of the biofuel is equal to
the cost of conventional fuels purchased by the Department.
(2) The date on which the Budget Control Act of 2011
(Public Law 112-25), and the sequestration in effect by
reason of such Act, are no longer in effect.
(b) Exceptions.--The limitation under subsection (a) shall
not apply to biofuels purchased--
(1) in limited quantities necessary to complete test and
certification; or
(2) for the biofuel research and development efforts of the
Department.

Subtitle C--Logistics and Sustainment

SEC. 321. LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP STRATEGIC SUSTAINMENT PLAN.

(a) In General.--Not later than 120 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall
submit to the congressional defense committees and to the
Comptroller General of the United States a strategic
sustainment plan for the Littoral Combat Ship. Such plan
shall include each of the following:
(1) An estimate of the cost and schedule of implementing
the plan.
(2) An identification of the requirements and planning for
the long-term sustainment of the Littoral Combat Ship and its
mission modules in accordance with section 2366b of title 10,
United States Code, as amended by section 801 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law
112-81; 125 Stat. 1482).
(3) A description of the current and future operating
environments of the Littoral Combat Ship, as specified or
referred to in strategic guidance and planning documents of
the Department of Defense.
(4) The facility, supply, and logistics systems
requirements of the Littoral Combat Ship when forward
deployed, and an estimate of the cost and personnel required
to conduct the necessary maintenance activities.
(5) Any required updates to host-nation agreements to
facilitate the forward-deployed maintenance requirements of
the Littoral Combat Ship, including a discussion of overseas
management of Ship ordnance and hazardous materials and
delivery of equipment and spare parts needed for emergent
repair.
(6) An evaluation of the forward-deployed maintenance
requirements of the Littoral Combat Ship and a schedule of
pier-side maintenance timelines when forward-deployed,
including requirements for multiple ships and variants.
(7) An assessment of the total quantity of equipment, spare
parts, permanently forward-stationed personnel, and size of
fly away teams required to support forward-deployed
maintenance requirements for the U.S.S. Freedom while in
Singapore, and estimates for follow-on deployments of
Littoral Combat Ships of both variants.
(8) A detailed description of the continuity of operations
plans for the Littoral Combat Ship Squadron and of any plans
to increase the number of Squadron personnel.
(9) An identification of mission critical single point of
failure equipment for which a sufficient number spare parts
are necessary to have on hand, and determination of Littoral
Combat Ship forward deployed equipment and spare parts
locations and levels.
(b) Form.--The plan required under subsection (a) shall be
submitted in unclassified form but may have a classified
annex.

SEC. 322. REVIEW OF CRITICAL MANUFACTURING CAPABILITIES
WITHIN ARMY ARSENALS.

(a) Review.--The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with
the Secretaries of the military departments and the directors
of the Defense Agencies, shall conduct a review of the
current and expected manufacturing requirements across the
Department of Defense to identify critical manufacturing
competencies, supplies, components, end items, parts,
assemblies, and sub-assemblies for which no or a limited
domestic commercial source exists. In conducting the review
under this section, the Secretary--
(1) shall assess which of the competencies for which no or
a limited domestic commercial source exists could be executed
by an arsenal owned by the United States; and
(2) may review other manufacturing capabilities, as the
Secretary determines appropriate, to determine if such
capabilities could be executed by an arsenal owned by the
United States.
(b) Congressional Briefing.--Not later than 180 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall
brief the congressional defense committees on the results of
the review conducted under subsection (a).

SEC. 323. INCLUSION OF ARMY ARSENALS CAPABILITIES IN
SOLICITATIONS.

(a) Determination of Use of Arsenals.--
(1) Solicitation of information.--When undertaking a make-
or-buy analysis, a Program Executive Officer or Program
Manager of a military service or Defense Agency shall solicit
information from an arsenal owned by the United States
regarding the capability of the arsenal to fulfill a
manufacturing requirement.
(2) Submittal of material solution.--Upon a determination,
that an arsenal owned by the United States is capable of
fulfilling a manufacturing requirement, a Program Executive
Officer or Program Manager shall allow the arsenal to submit
a material solution in response to the requirement.
(b) Notification of Solicitations.--When issuing a
solicitation, a Program Executive Officer or Program Manager
shall notify each arsenal owned by the United States of any
manufacturing requirement that the arsenal has the capability
to fulfill and allow the arsenal to submit a proposal in
response to the requirement.

Subtitle D--Reports

SEC. 331. ADDITIONAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO
PERSONNEL AND UNIT READINESS.

(a) Assessment of Assigned Missions and Contractor
Support.--Section 482 of title 10, United States Code, is
amended--
(1) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (j); and

[[Page H3397]]

(2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following new
subsections:
``(g) Combatant Command Assigned Mission Assessments.--(1)
Each report shall also include an assessment by each
commander of a geographic or functional combatant command of
the ability of the command to successfully execute each of
the assigned missions of the command. Each such assessment
for a combatant command shall also include a list of the
mission essential tasks for each assigned mission of the
command and an assessment of the ability of the command to
successfully complete each task within prescribed timeframes.
``(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term `assigned
mission' means any contingency response program plan, theater
campaign plan, or named operation that is approved and
assigned by the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
``(h) Risk Assessment of Dependence on Contractor
Support.--Each report shall also include an assessment by the
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the level of risk
incurred by using contract support in contingency operations
as required under Department of Defense Instruction 1100.22,
`Policies and Procedures for Determining Workforce Mix'.
``(i) Combat Support Agencies Assessment.--(1) Each report
shall also include an assessment by the Secretary of Defense
of the military readiness of the combat support agencies,
including, for each such agency--
``(A) a determination with respect to the responsiveness
and readiness of the agency to support operating forces in
the event of a war or threat to national security,
including--
``(i) a list of mission essential tasks and an assessment
of the ability of the agency to successfully perform those
tasks;
``(ii) an assessment of how the ability of the agency to
accomplish the tasks referred to in subparagraph (A) affects
the ability of the military departments and the unified and
geographic combatant commands to execute operations and
contingency plans by number;
``(iii) any readiness deficiencies and actions recommended
to address such deficiencies; and
``(iv) key indicators and other relevant information
related to any deficiency or other problem identified;
``(B) any recommendations that the Secretary considers
appropriate.
``(2) In this subsection, the term `combat support agency'
means any of the following Defense Agencies:
``(A) The Defense Information Systems Agency.
``(B) The Defense Intelligence Agency.
``(C) The Defense Logistics Agency.
``(D) The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (but only
with respect to combat support functions that the agencies
perform for the Department of Defense).
``(E) The Defense Contract Management Agency.
``(F) The Defense Threat Reduction Agency.
``(G) The National Reconnaissance Office.
``(H) The National Security Agency (but only with respect
to combat support functions that the agencies perform for the
Department of Defense) and Central Security Service.
``(I) Any other Defense Agency designated as a combat
support agency by the Secretary of Defense.''.
(b) Conforming Amendment.--Such section is further amended
in subsection (a), by striking ``and (f)'' and inserting
``(f), (g), (h), and (i)''.

SEC. 332. REPEAL OF ANNUAL COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON ARMY
PROGRESS.

Section 323 of the John Warner National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109-364;
120 Stat. 2146; 10 U.S.C. 229 note) is amended--
(1) by striking subsection (d);
(2) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections
(d) and (e), respectively; and
(3) in subsection (e), as so redesignated, by striking ``or
(d)''.

SEC. 333. REVISION TO REQUIREMENT FOR ANNUAL SUBMISSION OF
INFORMATION REGARDING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
CAPITAL ASSETS.

Section 351(a)(1) of the Bob Stump National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107-314;
10 U.S.C. 221 note) is amended by striking ``in excess of
$30,000,000'' and all that follows and inserting ``(as
computed in fiscal year 2000 constant dollars) in excess of
$32,000,000 or an estimated total cost for the future-years
defense program for which the budget is submitted (as
computed in fiscal year 2000 constant dollars) in excess of
$378,000,000, for all expenditures, for all increments,
regardless of the appropriation and fund source, directly
related to the assets definition, design, development,
deployment, sustainment, and disposal.''.

Subtitle E--Limitations and Extensions of Authority

SEC. 341. LIMITATION ON REDUCTION OF FORCE STRUCTURE AT LAJES
AIR FORCE BASE, AZORES.

The Secretary of the Air Force may not reduce the force
structure at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores, relative to the
force structure at such Air Force Base as of October 1, 2013,
until 30 days after the Secretary of Defense concludes the
European Infrastructure Consolidation Assessment initiated by
the Secretary on January 25, 2013, and briefs the
congressional defense committees regarding such Assessment.
Such briefing shall include a specific assessment of the
efficacy of Lajes Air Force Base, Azores, in supporting the
United Stated overseas force posture.

SEC. 342. PROHIBITION ON PERFORMANCE OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
FLIGHT DEMONSTRATION TEAMS OUTSIDE THE UNITED
STATES.

(a) Prohibition.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated or otherwise available to the Secretary of
Defense for fiscal year 2014 or 2015 may be used for the
performance of flight demonstration teams under the
jurisdiction of the Secretary at any location outside the
United States.
(b) United States.--In this section, the term ``United
States'' means the several States of the United States, the
District of Columbia, and the commonwealths, territories, and
possessions of the United States.

Subtitle F--Other Matters

SEC. 351. REQUIREMENT TO ESTABLISH POLICY ON JOINT COMBAT
UNIFORMS.

(a) Establishment of Policy.--It is the policy of the
United States that by not later than October 1, 2018, the
Secretary of Defense shall require all military services to
use a joint combat camouflage uniform, including color and
pattern variants designed for specific combat environments.
(b) Prohibition.--Except as provided in subsection (c),
each military service shall be prohibited from adopting a new
combat camouflage uniform, unless--
(1) the combat camouflage utility uniform will be a joint
uniform adopted by all military services; or
(2) the military services adopt a uniform currently in use
by another military service.
(c) Exceptions.--Nothing in subsection (b) shall be
construed as--
(1) prohibiting the development or fielding of combat and
camouflage utility uniforms for use by personnel assigned to
or operating in support of the unified combatant command for
special operations forces described in section 167 of title
10, United States Code;
(2) prohibiting the military services from fielding
ancillary uniform items, including headwear, footwear, or
other such items as determined by the Secretaries of the
military departments; or
(3) prohibiting the military services from issuing working
or vehicle crew uniforms.
(d) Guidance Required.--Not later than 180 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense
shall issue guidance to implement this section. At a minimum,
such guidance shall--
(1) require the Secretaries of the military departments to
collaborate on the development of joint criteria for the
design, development, fielding, and characteristics of combat
camouflage uniforms;
(2) require the Secretaries of the military departments to
ensure that new combat and camouflage utility uniforms meet
the geographic and operational requirements of the commanders
of the combatant commands; and
(3) require the Secretaries of the military departments to
ensure that all new combat and camouflage utility uniforms
achieve interoperability with other components of individual
war fighter systems, including organizational clothing and
individual equipment such as body armor and other individual
protective systems.
(e) Waiver.--The Secretary of Defense may waive the
prohibition in subsection (b) if the Secretary certifies to
Congress that there are exceptional operational circumstances
that require the development or fielding of a new combat
camouflage uniform.
(f) Repeal of Policy.--Section 352 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84,
123 Stat. 2262; 10 U.S.C. 771 note prec.) is hereby repealed.

TITLE IV--MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS

Subtitle A--Active Forces

SEC. 401. END STRENGTHS FOR ACTIVE FORCES.

The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for active duty
personnel as of September 30, 2014, as follows:
(1) The Army, 520,000.
(2) The Navy, 323,600.
(3) The Marine Corps, 190,200.
(4) The Air Force, 327,600.

SEC. 402. REVISION IN PERMANENT ACTIVE DUTY END STRENGTH
MINIMUM LEVELS.

Section 691(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended
by striking paragraphs (1) through (4) and inserting the
following new paragraphs:
``(1) For the Army, 520,000.
``(2) For the Navy, 323,600.
``(3) For the Marine Corps, 190,200.
``(4) For the Air Force, 327,600.''.

Subtitle B--Reserve Forces

SEC. 411. END STRENGTHS FOR SELECTED RESERVE.

(a) In General.--The Armed Forces are authorized strengths
for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as
of September 30, 2014, as follows:
(1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 354,200.
(2) The Army Reserve, 205,000.
(3) The Navy Reserve, 59,100.
(4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 39,600.
(5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 105,400.
(6) The Air Force Reserve, 70,400.
(7) The Coast Guard Reserve, 9,000.
(b) End Strength Reductions.--The end strengths prescribed
by subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve
component shall be proportionately reduced by--
(1) the total authorized strength of units organized to
serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component
which are on active duty (other than for training) at the end
of the fiscal year; and
(2) the total number of individual members not in units
organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such
component who are on active duty (other than for training or
for unsatisfactory participation in training) without their
consent at the end of the fiscal year.
(c) End Strength Increases.--Whenever units or individual
members of the Selected Reserve of any reserve component are
released

[[Page H3398]]

from active duty during any fiscal year, the end strength
prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected Reserve of
such reserve component shall be increased proportionately by
the total authorized strengths of such units and by the total
number of such individual members.

SEC. 412. END STRENGTHS FOR RESERVES ON ACTIVE DUTY IN
SUPPORT OF THE RESERVES.

Within the end strengths prescribed in section 411(a), the
reserve components of the Armed Forces are authorized, as of
September 30, 2014, the following number of Reserves to be
serving on full-time active duty or full-time duty, in the
case of members of the National Guard, for the purpose of
organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing, or
training the reserve components:
(1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 32,060.
(2) The Army Reserve, 16,261.
(3) The Navy Reserve, 10,159.
(4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 2,261.
(5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 14,734.
(6) The Air Force Reserve, 2,911.

SEC. 413. END STRENGTHS FOR MILITARY TECHNICIANS (DUAL
STATUS).

The minimum number of military technicians (dual status) as
of the last day of fiscal year 2014 for the reserve
components of the Army and the Air Force (notwithstanding
section 129 of title 10, United States Code) shall be the
following:
(1) For the Army National Guard of the United States,
27,210.
(2) For the Army Reserve, 8,395.
(3) For the Air National Guard of the United States,
21,875.
(4) For the Air Force Reserve, 10,429.

SEC. 414. FISCAL YEAR 2014 LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF NON-DUAL
STATUS TECHNICIANS.

(a) Limitations.--
(1) National guard.--Within the limitation provided in
section 10217(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, the
number of non-dual status technicians employed by the
National Guard as of September 30, 2014, may not exceed the
following:
(A) For the Army National Guard of the United States,
1,600.
(B) For the Air National Guard of the United States, 350.
(2) Army reserve.--The number of non-dual status
technicians employed by the Army Reserve as of September 30,
2014, may not exceed 595.
(3) Air force reserve.--The number of non-dual status
technicians employed by the Air Force Reserve as of September
30, 2014, may not exceed 90.
(b) Non-dual Status Technicians Defined.--In this section,
the term ``non-dual status technician'' has the meaning given
that term in section 10217(a) of title 10, United States
Code.

SEC. 415. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF RESERVE PERSONNEL AUTHORIZED TO
BE ON ACTIVE DUTY FOR OPERATIONAL SUPPORT.

During fiscal year 2014, the maximum number of members of
the reserve components of the Armed Forces who may be serving
at any time on full-time operational support duty under
section 115(b) of title 10, United States Code, is the
following:
(1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 17,000.
(2) The Army Reserve, 13,000.
(3) The Navy Reserve, 6,200.
(4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 3,000.
(5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 16,000.
(6) The Air Force Reserve, 14,000.

Subtitle C--Authorization of Appropriations

SEC. 421. MILITARY PERSONNEL.

(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the
use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of
the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise
provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the
funding table in section 4401.
(b) Construction of Authorization.--The authorization of
appropriations in subsection (a) supersedes any other
authorization of appropriations (definite or indefinite) for
such purpose for fiscal year 2014.

TITLE V--MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY

Subtitle A--Officer Personnel Policy Generally

SEC. 501. LIMITATIONS ON NUMBER OF GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICERS
ON ACTIVE DUTY.

(a) Per-service Limitations; Limited Joint Duty
Exclusions.--Section 526 of title 10, United States Code, as
amended by section 502 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1387)
and section 501(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1714), is
amended--
(1) in subsection (a)--
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``231'' and inserting
``226''
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``162'' and inserting
``157''; and
(C) in paragraph (3), by striking ``198'' and inserting
``193''; and
(2) in subsection (b)--
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``310'' and inserting
``300''; and
(B) in paragraph (2)--
(i) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``85'' and inserting
``81'';
(ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``61'' and inserting
``59'';
(iii) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``73'' and inserting
``70''; and
(iv) in subparagraph (D), by striking ``21'' and inserting
``20''.
(b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section
shall take effect on October 1, 2014.

Subtitle B--Reserve Component Management

SEC. 511. MINIMUM NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF
RESERVE COMPONENTS BEFORE DEPLOYMENT OR
CANCELLATION OF DEPLOYMENT RELATED TO A
CONTINGENCY OPERATION.

Section 12301 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in subsection (e), by striking ``The period'' and
inserting ``Subject to subsection (i), the period''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(i)(1) The Secretary concerned shall provide not less
than 120 days advance notice to a unit of the reserve
components that--
``(A) will be ordered to active duty for deployment in
connection with a contingency operation; or
``(B) having been notified of such a deployment, has such
deployment canceled, postponed, or otherwise altered.
``(2) If a member of the reserve components is not assigned
to a unit organized to serve as a unit or is to be ordered to
active duty apart from the member's unit, the required notice
under paragraph (1) shall be provided directly to the member.
``(3) If the Secretary concerned fails to provide timely
notification as required by paragraph (1) or (2), the
Secretary concerned shall submit, within 30 days after the
date of the failure, written notification to the Committees
on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the
Senate explaining the reason for the failure and the units
and members of the reserve components affected.''.

SEC. 512. INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED TO BOARDS CONSIDERING
OFFICERS FOR SELECTIVE EARLY REMOVAL FROM
RESERVE ACTIVE-STATUS LIST.

(a) Officers to Be Considered; Exclusions.--Section
14704(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``Whenever'' ;
(2) by striking ``all officers on that list'' and inserting
``officers on the reserve active-status list'';
(3) by striking ``the reserve active-status list, in the
number specified by the Secretary by each grade and
competitive category.'' and inserting ``that list.''; and
(4) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
``(2) Except as provided in paragraph (3), the list of
officers in a reserve component whose names are submitted to
a board under paragraph (1) shall include each officer on the
reserve active-status list for that reserve component in the
same grade and competitive category whose position on the
reserve active-status list is between--
``(A) that of the most junior officer in that grade and
competitive category whose name is submitted to the board;
and
``(B) that of the most senior officer in that grade and
competitive category whose name is submitted to the board.
``(3) A list submitted to a board under paragraph (1) may
not include an officer who--
``(A) has been approved for voluntary retirement; or
``(B) is to be involuntarily retired under any provision of
law during the fiscal year in which the board is convened or
during the following fiscal year.''.
(b) Specification of Number of Officers Who May Be
Recommended for Removal.--Such section is further amended--
(1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections
(c) and (d), respectively; and
(2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new
subsection:
``(b) Specification of Number of Officers Who May Be
Recommended for Separation.--The Secretary of the military
department concerned shall specify the number of officers
described in subsection (a)(1) that a board may recommend for
separation under subsection (c).''.

SEC. 513. TEMPORARY AUTHORITY TO MAINTAIN ACTIVE STATUS AND
INACTIVE STATUS LISTS OF MEMBERS IN THE
INACTIVE NATIONAL GUARD.

(a) Authority to Maintain Active and Inactive Status Lists
in the Inactive National Guard.--
(1) Active and inactive status lists authorized.--The
Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Air Force may
maintain an active status list and an inactive status list of
members in the inactive Army National Guard and the inactive
Air National Guard, respectively.
(2) Total number on all lists at one time.--The total
number of members of the Army National Guard and members of
the Air National Guard on the active status lists and the
inactive status lists assigned to the inactive National Guard
may not exceed a total of 10,000 at any time.
(3) Total number on active status lists at one time.--The
total number of members of the Army National Guard and
members of the Air National Guard on the active status lists
of the inactive National Guard may not exceed 4,000 at any
time.
(4) Condition of implementation.--Before the authority
provided by this subsection is used to establish an active
status list and an inactive status list of members in the
inactive Army National Guard or the inactive Air National
Guard, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
Committees on Armed Services of the House

[[Page H3399]]

of Representatives and the Senate a copy of the
implementation guidance to be used to execute this authority.
(b) Additional Enlisted Member Transfer Authority.--In
addition to the transfer authority provided by section 303(b)
of title 32, United States Code, while an inactive status
list for the inactive National Guard exists--
(1) an enlisted member of the active Army National Guard
may be transferred to the inactive Army National Guard
without regard to whether the member was formerly enlisted in
the inactive Army National Guard; and
(2) an enlisted member of the active Air National Guard may
be transferred to the inactive Air National Guard without
regard to whether the member was formerly enlisted in the
inactive Air National Guard.
(c) Removal of Restrictions on Transfer of Officers.--While
an inactive status list for the inactive National Guard
exists, nothing in chapter 3 of title 32, United States Code,
shall be construed to prevent any of the following:
(1) An officer of the Army National Guard who fills a
vacancy in a federally recognized unit of the Army National
Guard from being transferred from the active Army National
Guard to the inactive Army National Guard.
(2) An officer of the Air National Guard who fills a
vacancy in a federally recognized unit of the Air National
Guard from being transferred from the active Air National
Guard to the inactive Air National Guard.
(3) An officer of the Army National Guard transferred to
the inactive Army National Guard from being transferred from
the inactive Army National Guard to the active Army National
Guard to fill a vacancy in a federally recognized unit.
(4) An officer of the Air National Guard transferred to the
inactive Air National Guard from being transferred from the
inactive Air National Guard to the active Air National Guard
to fill a vacancy in a federally recognized unit.
(d) Status and Training Categories for Members in Inactive
Status.--While an inactive status list for the inactive Army
National Guard or inactive Air National Guard exists--
(1) the first sentence of subsection (b) of section 10141
of title 10, United States Code, shall apply only with
respect to members of the reserve components assigned to the
inactive Army National Guard or inactive Air National Guard
who are assigned to such inactive status list; and
(2) the exclusion of the Army National Guard of the United
States or Air National Guard of the United States under the
first sentence of subsection (c) of such section shall not
apply.
(e) Eligibility for Inactive-duty Training Pay.--While an
inactive status list for the inactive National Guard exists,
the limitation on pay for inactive-duty training contained in
section 206(c) of title 37, United States Code, shall apply
only to persons assigned to the inactive status list of the
inactive National Guard, rather than to all persons enlisted
in the inactive National Guard.
(f) Conforming Amendments.--
(1) Modification of active status definition.--Section
101(d)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by
adding at the end the following new sentence: ``However,
while an inactive status list for the inactive Army National
Guard or inactive Air National Guard exists, such term means
the status of a member of the Army National Guard of the
United States or Air National Guard of the United States who
is not assigned to the inactive status list of the inactive
Army National Guard or inactive Air National Guard, on
another inactive status list, or in the Retired Reserve.''.
(2) Computation of years of service for entitlement to
retired pay.--Paragraph (3) of section 12732(b) of such title
is amended to read as follows:
``(3) Service in the inactive National Guard (for any
period other than a period in which an inactive status list
for the inactive National Guard exists) and service while
assigned to the inactive status list of the inactive National
Guard (for any period in which an inactive status list for
the inactive National Guard exists).''.
(g) Evaluation of Use of Authority.--
(1) Independent study required.--Before the end of the
period specified in subsection (h), the Secretary of Defense
shall commission an independent study to evaluate the
effectiveness of using an active status list for the inactive
National Guard to improve the readiness of the Army National
Guard and the Air National Guard.
(2) Elements.--As part of the study required by this
subsection, the entity conducting the study shall determine,
for each year in which the temporary authority provided by
subsection (a) is used--
(A) how many members of the Army National Guard and the Air
National Guard were transferred to the active status list of
the inactive National Guard;
(B) how many of these vacancies were filled with personnel
new to the Army National Guard;
(C) the additional cost of filling these positions; and
(D) the impact on drill and annual training participation
rates.
(3) Additional consideration.--The study required by this
subsection also shall include an assessment of the impact of
the use of the temporary authority provided by subsection (a)
on medical readiness category 3B personnel transferred to the
active status inactive National Guard, including--
(A) how long it took them to complete the Integrated
Disability Evaluation System (IDES) process; and
(B) how satisfied they were with their unit's management
and collaboration during the IDES process.
(4) Submission of results.--Not later than 180 days after
completion of the study required by this subsection, the
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed
Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a
report containing the results of the study.
(h) Duration of Authority.--The authority provided by
subsection (a) for the maintenance of both an active status
list and inactive status list of members in the inactive
National Guard exists only during the period beginning on
October 1, 2013, and ending on December 31, 2018.

SEC. 514. REVIEW OF REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORIZATIONS FOR
RESERVE COMPONENT GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICERS IN
AN ACTIVE STATUS.

(a) Review Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall
conduct a review of the general officer and flag officer
requirements for members of the reserve component in an
active status.
(b) Purpose of Review.--The purpose of the review is to
ensure that the authorized strengths provided in section
12004 of title 10, United States Code, for reserve general
officers and reserve flag officers in an active status--
(1) are based on an objective requirements process and are
sufficient for the effective management, leadership, and
administration of the reserve components;
(2) provide a qualified, sufficient pool from which reserve
component general and flag officers can continue to be
assigned on active duty in joint duty and in-service military
positions;
(3) reflect a review of the appropriateness and number of
exemptions provided by subsections (b), (c), and (d) of
section 12004 of title 10, United States Code;
(4) reflect the efficiencies that can be achieved through
downgrading or elimination of reserve component general or
flag officer positions, including through the conversion of
certain reserve component general or flag officer positions
to senior civilian positions; and
(5) are subjected to periodic review, control, and
adjustment.
(c) Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit
to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the
House of Representatives a report containing the results of
the review, including such recommendations for changes in law
and policy related to authorized reserve general and flag
officers strengths as the Secretary considers to be
appropriate.

SEC. 515. FEASABILITY STUDY ON ESTABLISHING A UNIT OF THE
NATIONAL GUARD IN AMERICAN SAMOA AND IN THE
COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS.

(a) Study Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall conduct
a study to determine the feasibility of establishing--
(1) a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa; and
(2) a unit of the National Guard in the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands.
(b) Force Structure Elements of Study.--In conducting the
study required under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense
shall consider the following:
(1) The allocation of National Guard force structure and
manpower to American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands in the event of the establishment of
a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and in the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the impact
of this allocation on existing National Guard units in the 50
states, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands,
Guam, and the District of Columbia.
(2) The Federal funding that would be required to support
pay, benefits, training operations, and missions of members
of a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, based on the
allocation derived from paragraph (1), and the equipment,
including maintenance, required to support such force
structure.
(3) The presence of existing infrastructure to support a
unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the
requirement for additional infrastructure, including
information technology infrastructure, to support such force
structure, based on the allocation derived from paragraph
(1).
(4) How a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and
the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Island would
accommodate the National Guard Bureau's ``Essential Ten''
homeland defense capabilities (i.e., aviation, engineering,
civil support teams, security, medical, transportation,
maintenance, logistics, joint force headquarters, and
communications) and reflect regional needs.
(5) The manpower cadre, both military personnel and full-
time support, including National Guard technicians, required
to establish, maintain, and sustain a unit of the National
Guard in American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, and the ability of American Samoa and of the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands to support
demographically a unit of the National Guard at each
location.
(6) The ability of a unit of the National Guard in American
Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands to
maintain unit readiness and the logistical challenges
associated with transportation, communications, supply/
resupply, and training operations and missions.
(c) Submission of Results.--Not later than 180 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees
a report containing the results of the study conducted under
subsection (a). The report shall also include the following:

[[Page H3400]]

(1) A determination of whether the executive branch of
American Samoa and of the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands has enacted and implemented statutory
authorization for an organized militia as a prerequisite for
establishing a unit of the National Guard, and a description
of any other steps that such executive branches must take to
request and carry out the establishment of a National Guard
unit.
(2) A list of any amendments to titles 10, 32, and 37,
United States Code, that would have to be enacted by Congress
to provide for the establishment of a unit of the National
Guard in American Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands.
(3) A description of any required Department of Defense
actions to establish a unit of the National Guard in American
Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands.
(4) A suggested timeline for completion of the steps and
actions described in the preceding paragraphs.

Subtitle C--General Service Authorities

SEC. 521. REVIEW OF INTEGRATED DISABILITY EVALUATION SYSTEM.

(a) Review.--The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a
review of--
(1) the backlog of pending cases in the Integrated
Disability Evaluation System with respect to members of the
reserve components of the Armed Forces for the purpose of
addressing the matters specified in paragraph (1) of
subsection (b); and
(2) the improvements to the Integrated Disability
Evaluation System specified in paragraph (2) of such
subsection.
(b) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the
Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives
and the Senate a report on the review under subsection (a).
Such report shall include the following:
(1) With respect to the reserve components of the Armed
Forces--
(A) the number of pending cases that exist as of the date
of the report, listed by military department, component, and,
with respect to the National Guard, State;
(B) as of the date of the report, the average time it takes
to process a case in the Integrated Disability Evaluation
System;
(C) a description of the steps the Secretary will take to
resolve the backlog of cases in the Integrated Disability
Evaluation System; and
(D) the date by which the Secretary plans to resolve such
backlog for each military department.
(2) With respect to the regular components and reserve
components of the Armed Forces--
(A) a description of the progress being made to transition
the Integrated Disability Evaluation System to an integrated
and readily accessible electronic format that a member of the
Armed Forces may access and see the status of the member
during each phase of the system;
(B) an estimate of the cost to complete the transition to
an integrated and readily accessible electronic format; and
(C) an assessment of the feasibility of improving in-
transit visibility of pending cases, including by
establishing a method of tracking a pending case when a
military treatment facility is assigned a packet and pending
case for action regarding a member.
(c) Pending Case Defined.--In this section, the term
``pending case'' means a case involving a member of the Armed
Forces who, as of the date of the review under subsection
(a), is within the Integrated Disability Evaluation System
and has been referred to a medical evaluation board.

SEC. 522. COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE
ASSESSMENTS.

(a) Verification and Tracking Requirements.--The Secretary
of Defense shall direct the Secretaries of the military
departments to verify and track the compliance of commanding
officers in conducting organizational climate assessments
required as part of the comprehensive policy for the
Department of Defense sexual assault prevention and response
program pursuant to section 572(a)(3) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239;
126 Stat. 1753).
(b) Implementation.--No later than 90 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and
House of Representatives a report containing--
(1) a description of the progress of the development of the
system that will verify and track the compliance of
commanding officers in conducting organizational climate
assessments; and
(2) an estimate of when the system will be completed and
implemented.

SEC. 523. COMMAND RESPONSIBILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY FOR
REMAINS OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMY, NAVY, AIR
FORCE, AND MARINE CORPS WHO DIE OUTSIDE THE
UNITED STATES.

Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall take such steps as
may be necessary to ensure that there is continuous,
designated military command responsibility and accountability
for the care, handling, and transportation of the remains of
each deceased member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine
Corps who died outside the United States, beginning with the
initial recovery of the remains, through the defense mortuary
system, until the interment of the remains or the remains are
otherwise accepted by the person designated as provided by
section 1482(c) of title 10, United States Code, to direct
disposition of the remains.

SEC. 524. CONTENTS OF TRANSITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

(a) In General.--Section 1144 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended--
(1) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the following
new paragraph:
``(9) Provide information about disability-related
employment and education protections.''.
(2) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e), as
subsections (d), (e), and (f), respectively; and
(3) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new
subsection (c):
``(c) Additional Elements of Program.--The mandatory
program carried out by this section shall include--
``(1) for any such member who plans to use the member's
entitlement to educational assistance under title 38--
``(A) instruction providing an overview of the use of such
entitlement; and
``(B) courses of post-secondary education appropriate for
the member, courses of post-secondary education compatible
with the member's education goals, and instruction on how to
finance the member's post-secondary education; and
``(2) instruction in the benefits under laws administered
by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and in other subjects
determined by the Secretary concerned.''.
(b) Deadline for Implementation.--The program carried out
under section 1144 of title 10, United States Code, shall
comply with the requirements of subsections (b)(9) and (c) of
such section, as added by subsection (a), by not later than
April 1, 2015.
(c) Feasibility Study.--Not later than 270 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs shall submit to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs
and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the
Committee on Veterans' Affairs and the Committee on Armed
Services of the House of Representatives the results of a
study carried out by the Secretary to determine the
feasibility of providing the instruction described in
subsection (b) of section 1142 of title 10, United States
Code, at all overseas locations where such instruction is
provided by entering into a contract jointly with the
Secretary of Labor for the provision of such instruction.

SEC. 525. PROCEDURES FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF MILITARY
PERSONNEL DECISIONS RELATING TO CORRECTION OF
MILITARY RECORDS.

(a) Availability of Judicial Review; Limitations.--
(1) In general.--Chapter 79 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new
section:

``Sec. 1560. Judicial review of decisions relating to
correction of military records

``(a) Availability of Judicial Review.--
``(1) In general.--Pursuant to sections 1346 and 1491 of
title 28 and chapter 7 of title 5 any person adversely
affected by a records correction final decision may obtain
judicial review of the decision in a court with jurisdiction
to hear the matter.
``(2) Records correction final decision defined.--In this
section, the term `records correction final decision' means
any of the following decisions:
``(A) A final decision issued by the Secretary concerned
pursuant to section 1552 of this title.
``(B) A final decision issued by the Secretary concerned
pursuant to section 1034(f) of this title.
``(C) A final decision issued by the Secretary of Defense
pursuant to section 1034(g) of this title.
``(b) Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies.--
``(1) General rule.--Except as provided in paragraphs (3)
and (4), judicial review of a matter that could be subject to
correction under a provision of law specified in subsection
(a)(2) may not be obtained under this section or any other
provision of law unless--
``(A) the petitioner has requested a correction under
section 1552 of this title (including such a request in a
matter arising under section 1034 of this title); and
``(B) the Secretary concerned has rendered a final decision
denying that correction in whole or in part.
``(2) Whistleblower cases.--When the final decision of the
Secretary concerned is subject to review by the Secretary of
Defense under section 1034(g) of this title, the petitioner
is not required to seek such review before obtaining judicial
review, but if the petitioner does seek such review, judicial
review may not be sought until the earlier of the following
occurs:
``(A) The Secretary of Defense makes a decision in the
matter.
``(B) The period specified in section 1034(g) of this title
for the Secretary to make a decision in the matter expires.
``(3) Class actions.--If judicial review of a records
correction final decision is sought, and the petitioner for
such judicial review also seeks to bring a class action with
respect to a matter for which the petitioner requested a
correction under section 1552 of this title (including such a
request in a matter arising under section 1034 of this title)
and the court issues an order certifying a class in the case,
paragraphs (1) and (2) do not apply to any member of the
certified class (other than the petitioner) with respect to
any matter covered by a claim for which the class is
certified.
``(4) Timeliness.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply if the
records correction final decision of the Secretary concerned
is not issued by the date that is 18 months after the date on
which the petitioner requests a correction.
``(c) Statutes of Limitation.--
``(1) Six years from final decision.--A records correction
final decision (other than in a matter to which paragraph (2)
applies) is not subject to judicial review under this section
or otherwise subject to review in any court unless petition
for such review is filed in a court not

[[Page H3401]]

later than six years after the date of the records correction
final decision.
``(2) Six years for certain claims that may result in
payment of money.--(A) In a case of a records correction
final decision described in subparagraph (B), the records
correction final decision (or the portion of such decision
described in such subparagraph) is not subject to judicial
review under this section or otherwise subject to review in
any court unless petition for such review is filed in a court
before the end of the six-year period that began on the date
of discharge, retirement, release from active duty, or death
while on active duty, of the person whose military records
are the subject of the correction request. Such six-year
period does not include any time between the date of the
filing of the request for correction of military records
leading to the records correction final decision and the date
of the final decision.
``(B) Subparagraph (A) applies to a records correction
final decision or portion of the decision that involves a
denial of a claim that, if relief were to be granted by the
court, would support, or result in, the payment of money,
other than payments made under chapter 73 of this title,
either under a court order or under a subsequent
administrative determination.
``(d) Habeas Corpus.--This section does not affect any
cause of action arising under chapter 153 of title 28.''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the
following new item:

``1560. Judicial review of decisions.''.

(b) Effect of Denial of Request for Correction of Records
When Prohibited Personnel Action Alleged.--
(1) Notice of denial; procedures for judicial review.--
Subsection (f) of section 1034 of such title is amended by
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(7) In any case in which the final decision of the
Secretary concerned results in denial, in whole or in part,
of any requested correction of the record of the member or
former member, the Secretary concerned shall provide the
member or former member--
``(A) a concise written statement of the basis for the
decision; and
``(B) a notification of the availability of judicial review
of the decision pursuant to section 1560 of this title and
the time period for obtaining such review in accordance with
the applicable statute of limitations.''.
(2) Secretary of defense review; notice of denial.--
Subsection (g) of such section is amended--
(A) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``Upon the completion of
all''; and
(B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(2) The submittal of a matter to the Secretary of Defense
by the member or former member under paragraph (1) must be
made within 90 days of the receipt by the member or former
member of the final decision of the Secretary of the military
department concerned in the matter. In any case in which the
final decision of the Secretary of Defense results in denial,
in whole or in part, of any requested correction of the
record of the member or former member, the Secretary of
Defense shall provide the member or former member--
``(A) a concise written statement of the basis for the
decision; and
``(B) a notification of the availability of judicial review
of the decision pursuant to section 1560 of this title and
the time period for obtaining such review in accordance with
the applicable statute of limitations.''.
(3) Sole basis for judicial review.--Such section is
further amended--
(A) by redesignating subsections (h) and (i) as subsections
(i) and (j), respectively; and
(B) by inserting after subsection (g) the following new
subsection (h):
``(h) Judicial Review.--(1) A decision of the Secretary of
Defense under subsection (g) shall be subject to judicial
review only as provided in section 1560 of this title.
``(2) In a case in which review by the Secretary of Defense
under subsection (g) was not sought, a decision of the
Secretary of a military department under subsection (f) shall
be subject to judicial review only as provided in section
1560 of this title.
``(3) A decision by the Secretary of Homeland Security
under subsection (f) shall be subject to judicial review only
as provided in section 1560 of this title.''.
(c) Effect of Denial of Other Requests for Correction of
Military Records.--Section 1552 of such title is amended by
adding at the end the following new subsections:
``(h) In any case in which the final decision of the
Secretary concerned results in denial, in whole or in part,
of any requested correction, the Secretary concerned shall
provide the claimant--
``(1) a concise written statement of the basis for the
decision; and
``(2) a notification of the availability of judicial review
of the decision pursuant to section 1560 of this title and
the time period for obtaining such review in accordance with
the applicable statute of limitations.
``(i) A decision by the Secretary concerned under this
section shall be subject to judicial review only as provided
in section 1560 of this title.''.
(d) Effective Date and Application.--
(1) In general.--The amendments made by this section shall
take effect on January 1, 2015, and shall apply to all final
decisions of the Secretary of Defense under section 1034(g)
of title 10, United States Code, and of the Secretary of a
military department and the Secretary of Homeland Security
under sections 1034(f) or 1552 of such title rendered on or
after such date.
(2) Treatment of existing cases.--This section and the
amendments made by this section do not affect the authority
of any court to exercise jurisdiction over any case that was
properly before the court before the effective date specified
in paragraph (1).
(e) Implementation.--The Secretary of a military department
and the Secretary of Homeland Security (in the case of the
Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the
Department of the Navy) may prescribe regulations, and
interim guidance before prescribing such regulations, to
implement the amendments made by this section. Regulations or
interim guidance prescribed by the Secretary of a military
department may not take effect until approved by the
Secretary of Defense.

SEC. 526. ESTABLISHMENT AND USE OF CONSISTENT DEFINITION OF
GENDER-NEUTRAL OCCUPATIONAL STANDARD FOR
MILITARY CAREER DESIGNATORS.

(a) Establishment of Definitions.--Section 543 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994
(Public Law 103-160; 10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by adding
at the end the following new subsection:
``(d) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) Gender-neutral occupational standard.--The term
`gender-neutral occupational standard', with respect to a
military career designator, means that all members of the
Armed Forces serving in or assigned to the military career
designator must meet the same physical and performance
outcome-based standards for the successful accomplishment of
the necessary and required specific tasks associated with the
qualifications and duties performed while serving in or
assigned to the military career designator.
``(2) Military career designator.--The term `military
career designator' refers to--
``(A) in the case of enlisted members and warrant officers
of the Armed Forces, military occupational specialties,
specialty codes, enlisted designators, enlisted
classification codes, additional skill identifiers, and
special qualification identifiers; and
``(B) in the case of commissioned officers (other than
commissioned warrant officers), officer areas of
concentration, occupational specialties, specialty codes,
additional skill identifiers, and special qualification
identifiers.''.
(b) Use of Definitions.--Such section is further amended--
(1) in subsection (a)--
(A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking
``military occupational career field'' and inserting
``military career designator''; and
(B) in paragraph (1), by striking ``common, relevant
performance standards'' and inserting ``an occupational
standard'';
(2) in subsection (b)--
(A) in paragraph (1)--
(i) by striking ``any military occupational specialty'' and
inserting ``any military career designator''; and
(ii) by striking ``requirements for members in that
specialty and shall ensure (in the case of an occupational
specialty'' and inserting ``requirements as part of the
gender-neutral occupational standard for members in that
career designator and shall ensure (in the case of a career
designator''; and
(B) in paragraph (2)--
(i) by striking ``an occupational specialty'' and inserting
``a military career designator'';
(ii) by striking ``that occupational specialty'' and
inserting ``that military career designator''; and
(iii) by striking ``that specialty'' and inserting ``that
military career designator''; and
(3) in subsection (c)--
(A) by striking ``the occupational standards for a military
occupational field'' and inserting ``the gender-neutral
occupational standard for a military career designator''; and
(B) by striking ``that occupational field'' and inserting
``that military career designator''.

SEC. 527. EXPANSION AND ENHANCEMENT OF AUTHORITIES RELATING
TO PROTECTED COMMUNICATIONS OF MEMBERS OF THE
ARMED FORCES AND PROHIBITED RETALIATORY
ACTIONS.

(a) Expansion of Prohibited Retaliatory Personnel
Actions.--Subsection (b) of section 1034 of title 10, United
States Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1)(B)--
(A) by striking ``or'' at the end of clause (iv);
(B) by redesignating clause (v) as clause (vi); and
(C) by inserting after clause (iv) the following new clause
(v):
``(v) a court-martial proceeding; or''; and
(2) in paragraph (2), by inserting after ``any favorable
action'' the following: ``, or a significant change in a
member's duties, responsibilities, or working conditions''.
(b) Inspector General Investigations of Allegations.--
Subsection (c) of such section is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``paragraph (3)'' and
inserting ``paragraph (4)'';
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking subparagraph (A) and
inserting the following new subparagraph (A):
``(A) Any violation of any law, rule, or regulation,
including a law or regulation prohibiting rape, sexual
assault, or other sexual misconduct in sections 920 through
920c of this title (articles 120 through 120c of the Uniform
Code of Military Justice), sexual harassment or unlawful
discrimination.'';
(3) by redesignating paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) as
paragraphs (4), (5), and (6), respectively;
(4) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new
paragraph (3):
``(3) A communication described in paragraph (2) shall not
be excluded from the protections provided in this section
because--
``(A) the communication was made to a person who
participated in an activity that the member

[[Page H3402]]

reasonably believed to be covered by paragraph (2);
``(B) the communication revealed information that had
previously been communicated;
``(C) of the member's motive for making the communication;
``(D) the communication was not made in writing;
``(E) the communication was made while the member was off
duty;
``(F) the communication was made during the normal course
of duties of the member.'';
(5) in subparagraph (D) of paragraph (4), as redesignated
by paragraph (3) of this subsection, by inserting before the
period at the end of the second sentence the following: ``,
with the consent of the member'';
(6) in paragraph (5), as so redesignated--
(A) by striking ``paragraph (3)(A)'' and inserting
``paragraph (4)(A)'';
(B) by striking ``paragraph (3)(D)'' and inserting
``paragraph (4)(D)''; and
(C) by striking ``60 days'' and inserting ``one year''.
(c) Inspector General Investigations of Underlying
Allegations.--Subsection (d) of such section is amended by
striking ``subparagraph (A) or (B) of subsection (c)(2)'' and
inserting ``subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of subsection
(c)(2)''.
(d) Reports on Investigations.--Subsection (e) of such
section is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1)--
(A) by striking ``subsection (c)(3)(E)'' both places it
appears and inserting ``subsection (c)(4)(E)'';
(B) by striking ``the Secretary of Defense'' and inserting
``the Secretary of the military department concerned'';
(C) by striking ``to the Secretary,'' and inserting ``to
such Secretary,'';
(2) in paragraph (3), by striking ``the Secretary of
Defense'' and inserting ``the Secretary of the military
department concerned'';
(3) in paragraph (4), by striking the second sentence and
inserting the following new sentence: ``The report shall
include an explicit determination as to whether a personnel
action prohibited by subsection (b) has occurred and a
recommendation as to the disposition of the complaint,
including appropriate corrective action for the member.''.
(e) Action in Case of Violations.--Section 1034 of title
10, United States Code, is further amended--
(1) by redesignating subsections (i) and (j), as
redesignated by section 525(b) of this Act, as subsections
(k) and (l), respectively; and
(2) by inserting after subsection (h), as added by section
525(b), the following new subsection:
``(i) Action in Case of Violations.--(1) If an Inspector
General reports under subsection (e) that a personnel action
prohibited by subsection (b) has occurred, not later than 30
days after receiving such report from the Inspector General,
the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Secretary of the
military department concerned, as applicable, shall order
such action as is necessary to correct the record of a
personnel action prohibited by subsection (b), taking into
account the recommendations in the report by the Inspector
General. Such Secretary shall take any appropriate
disciplinary action against the individual who committed such
prohibited personnel action.
``(2) If the Secretary of Homeland Security or the
Secretary of the military department concerned, as
applicable, determines that an order for corrective or
disciplinary action is not appropriate, not later than 30
days after making the determination, such Secretary shall--
``(A) provide to the Secretary of Defense, the Committees
on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives, and the member or former member, a notice of
the determination and the reasons for not taking action; and
``(B) refer the report to the appropriate board for the
correction of military records for further review under
subsection (g).''.
(f) Correction of Records.--Subsection (f) of such section
is amended--
(1) in paragraph (2)(C), by striking ``may'' and inserting
``upon the request of the member or former member, after an
initial determination that a complaint is not frivolous and
has not previously been addressed by the board, shall''; and
(2) in paragraph (3)--
(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking
``board elects to hold'' and inserting ``board holds''; and
(B) in subparagraph (A)--
(i) by striking ``may be provided'' and inserting ``shall
be provided''; and
(ii) in clause (ii), by striking ``the case is unusually
complex or otherwise requires'' and inserting ``the member or
former member would benefit from''.
(g) Burdens of Proof.--Such section is further amended by
inserting after subsection (i), as added by subsection (e) of
this section, the following new subsection:
``(j) Burdens of Proof.--The burdens of proof specified in
section 1221(e) of title 5 shall apply in any investigation
conducted by an Inspector General, and any review conducted
by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland
Security, and any board for the correction of military
records, under this section.''.
(h) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section
shall take effect on the date that is 30 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to
allegations pending or submitted under section 1034 of title
10, United States Code, on or after that date.

SEC. 528. APPLICABILITY OF MEDICAL EXAMINATION REQUIREMENT
REGARDING POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER OR
TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY TO PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE
UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE.

Section 1177 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by
striking subsection (c).

SEC. 529. PROTECTION OF THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM OF MILITARY
CHAPLAINS TO CLOSE A PRAYER OUTSIDE OF A
RELIGIOUS SERVICE ACCORDING TO THE TRADITIONS,
EXPRESSIONS, AND RELIGIOUS EXERCISES OF THE
ENDORSING FAITH GROUP.

(a) United States Army.--Section 3547 of title 10, United
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following
new subsection:
``(c) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a
religious service, a chaplain shall have the prerogative to
close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions,
and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group.''.
(b) United States Military Academy.--Section 4337 of such
title is amended--
(1) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``There''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(b) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a
religious service, the Chaplain shall have the prerogative to
close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions,
and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group.''.
(c) United States Navy and Marine Corps.--Section 6031 of
such title is amended by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
``(d) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a
religious service, a chaplain shall have the prerogative to
close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions,
and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group.''.
(d) United States Air Force.--Section 8547 of such title is
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(c) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a
religious service, a chaplain shall have the prerogative to
close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions,
and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group.''.
(e) United States Air Force Academy.--Section 9337 of such
title is amended--
(1) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``There''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(b) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a
religious service, the Chaplain shall have the prerogative to
close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions,
and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group.''.

SEC. 530. EXPANSION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PROTECTION OF
RIGHTS OF CONSCIENCE OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED
FORCES AND CHAPLAINS OF SUCH MEMBERS.

(a) Accommodation of Members' Beliefs, Actions, and
Speech.--Subsection (a)(1) of section 533 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law
112-239; 126 Stat. 1727; 10 U.S.C. prec. 1030 note) is
amended--
(1) by striking ``The Armed Forces shall accommodate the
beliefs'' and inserting ``Except in cases of military
necessity, the Armed Forces shall accommodate the beliefs,
actions, and speech''; and
(2) by inserting ``, actions, or speech'' after ``such
beliefs''.
(b) Narrow Exception.--Subsection (a)(2) of such section is
amended by striking ``that threaten'' and inserting ``that
actually harm''.
(c) Deadline for Regulations; Consultation.--The
implementation regulations required by subsection (c) of such
section shall be issued not later than 120 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act. In preparing such
regulations, the Secretary of Defense shall consult with the
official military faith-group representatives who endorse
military chaplains.

SEC. 530A. SERVICEMEMBERS' ACCOUNTABILITY, RIGHTS, AND
RESPONSIBILITIES TRAINING.

(a) Responsibilities of Secretary of Defense.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense, acting through
the Secretaries of the military departments, shall ensure
that all members of the Armed Forces understand and comply
with the rights and responsibilities specified in subsections
(b) and (c).
(2) Implementation.--The Secretary of Defense shall have
discretion regarding the manner in which this information
will be disseminated to members, except that, at a minimum,
the Secretary shall require acknowledgment of these rights
and responsibilities by a member at these occurrences during
the military service of the member:
(A) Recruitment.
(B) Enlistment and reenlistment.
(C) Commissioning.
(D) Promotion in rank.
(E) Selection for command.
(b) Member Rights.--Each member of the Armed Forces has the
following rights:
(1) To a workplace and battlespace free from the threat of
sexual violence, including harassment, abuse, assault, and
rape.
(2) To have every instance of illegal activity
appropriately investigated. Law enforcement agencies will
investigate every allegation of criminal behavior, and
commanders will respond appropriately to every report of
wrongdoing.
(3) To make a restricted or unrestricted report of a sex-
based criminal act. Victims will have access to vital
services whether they pursue an investigation or not.
(4) To use any and all reporting and prosecution avenues to
pursue an allegation of sexual assault.
(5) To not face retaliation for reporting a criminal
offense or harmful behavior.
(c) Member Responsibilities.--Each member of the Armed
Forces has the following responsibilities:
(1) To responsibly intervene in any situation that involves
the presence or threat of criminal behavior.
(2) To never leave another member behind in a situation of
risk to self or others, on the battlefield or anywhere else.
(3) To immediately report observation or knowledge of
criminal behavior to appropriate officials.

[[Page H3403]]

SEC. 530B. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
REVIEW OF SEPARATION OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED
FORCES WHO MADE UNRESTRICTED REPORTS OF SEXUAL
ASSAULT.

(a) Review Required.--The Inspector General of the
Department of Defense shall conduct a review--
(1) to identify all members of the Armed Forces who, since
January 1, 2002, were separated from the Armed Forces after
making an unrestricted report of sexual assault;
(2) to determine the circumstances of and grounds for each
such separation, including--
(A) whether the separation was in retaliation for or
influenced by the identified member making an unrestricted
report of sexual assault; and
(B) whether the identified member requested an appeal; and
(3) if an identified member was separated on the grounds of
having a personality or adjustment disorder, to determine
whether the separation was carried out in compliance with
Department of Defense Instruction 1332.14 and any other
applicable Department of Defense regulations, directives, and
policies.
(b) Submission of Results and Recommendations.--Not later
than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act,
the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall
submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and
the House of Representatives the results of the review
conducted under subsection (a), including such
recommendations as the Inspector General of the Department of
Defense considers necessary.

SEC. 530C. REPORT ON DATA AND INFORMATION COLLECTED IN
CONNECTION WITH DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REVIEW OF
LAWS, POLICIES, AND REGULATIONS RESTRICTING
SERVICE OF FEMALE MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

(a) Report Required.--Not later than 30 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and
the House of Representatives a report containing the specific
results and data produced during the research programs,
tests, surveys, consultant reports, assessments, and similar
projects conducted to comply with the requirement of section
535 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4217) to
review laws, policies, and regulations that may restrict the
service of female members of the Armed Forces.
(b) Public Availability.--Subject to subsection (c), the
Secretary of Defense shall make the report required by
subsection (a) publically available.
(c) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be
construed as a request or authority for the Secretary of
Defense to provide in the report required by subsection (a)
any personal information that would identify, or violate the
privacy of, members of the Armed Forces, including members
who participated in the research programs, tests, surveys,
reports, assessments, and similar projects conducted
regarding the possible future assignments of female members
of the Armed Forces.

SEC. 530D. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING THE WOMEN IN SERVICE
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.

(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
(1) In February 2012, the Secretary of Defense notified
Congress of the intent of the Secretary to rescind the co-
location restriction and to implement policy exceptions to
allow female members of the Armed Forces to be assigned to
specified positions in ground combat units at the battalion
level.
(2) On January 24, 2013, the Secretary of Defense and the
Joint Chiefs of Staff issued guidance to rescind the direct
combat exclusion rule for female members of the Armed Forces
and eliminate all unnecessary gender-based barriers to
service in the Armed Forces.
(3) The Secretaries of the military departments were
required to develop and submit their plans for implementation
of the rescission of the direct combat exclusion rule by May
15, 2013.
(4) As of 2013, there are approximately 202,000 female
members of the Armed Forces, approximately 20,000 female
members have served in Iraq and Afghanistan, and more than 60
female members have been killed in combat.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that
the Secretaries of the military departments--
(1) no later than September 2015, should develop, review,
and validate individual occupational standards, using
validated gender-neutral occupational standards, so as to
assess and assign members of the Armed Forces to units,
including Special Operations Forces; and
(2) no later than January 1, 2016, should complete all
assessments.

Subtitle D--Military Justice, Including Sexual Assault Prevention and
Response

SEC. 531. LIMITATIONS ON CONVENING AUTHORITY DISCRETION
REGARDING COURT-MARTIAL FINDINGS AND SENTENCE.

(a) Elimination of Unlimited Command Prerogative and
Discretion.--Paragraph (1) of section 860(c) of title 10,
United States Code (article 60(c) of the Uniform Code of
Military Justice) is amended by striking the first sentence.
(b) Limitations on Discretion Regarding Court-martial
Findings.--Paragraph (3) of section 860(c) of title 10,
United States Code (article 60(c) of the Uniform Code of
Military Justice) is amended to read as follows:
``(3)(A) Action on the findings of a court-martial by the
convening authority or by another person authorized to act
under this section is not required.
``(B) If the convening authority or another person
authorized to act under this section acts on the findings of
a court-martial, the convening authority or other person may
not--
``(i) dismiss any charge or specification, other than a
charge or specification for a qualifying offense, by setting
aside a finding of guilty thereto; or
``(ii) change a finding of guilty to a charge or
specification, other than a charge or specification for a
qualifying offense, to a finding of guilty to an offense that
is a lesser included offense of the offense stated in the
charge or specification.
``(C) If the convening authority or another person
authorized to act under this section acts on the findings to
dismiss or change any charge or specification for a
qualifying offense, the convening authority or other person
shall provide, at that same time, a written explanation of
the reasons for such action. The written explanation shall be
made a part of the record of the trial and action thereon.
``(D)(i) In this paragraph, the term `qualifying offense'
means, except in the case of an offense specified in clause
(ii), an offense under this chapter for which--
``(I) the maximum sentence of confinement that may be
adjudged does not exceed two years; and
``(II) the sentence adjudged does not include dismissal, a
dishonorable or bad-conduct discharge, or confinement for
more than six months.
``(ii) Such term does not include the following:
``(I) An offense under section 920 of this title (article
120).
``(II) An offense under section 928 of this title (article
128), if such offense consisted of assault consummated by
battery upon child under 16 years of age.
``(III) An offense under section 934 of this title (article
134), if such offense consisted of indecent language
communicated to child under the age of 16 years.
``(IV) Such other offenses as the Secretary of Defense may
exclude by regulation.''.
(c) Limitations on Discretion to Modify an Adjudged
Sentence.--Section 860(c) of title 10, United States Code
(article 60(c) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is
amended--
(1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``The convening
authority'' and inserting the following:
``(B) Except as provided in paragraph (4), the convening
authority''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(4)(A) Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C),
the convening authority or another person authorized to act
under this section may not modify an adjudged sentence of
confinement or a punitive discharge or disapprove, commute,
or suspend an adjudged sentence of confinement or a punitive
discharge in whole or in part.
``(B)(i) Upon the recommendation of the trial counsel, the
convening authority or another person authorized to act under
this section shall have the authority to impose a sentence
below a level established by statute as a minimum sentence,
to impose a sentence of confinement below the adjudged
confinement sentence, or to disapprove, commute, or suspend
the adjudged sentence in whole or in part in recognition of
the substantial assistance by the accused in the
investigation or prosecution of another person who has
committed an offense.
``(ii) If a mandatory minimum sentence exists for a charge,
the convening authority or another person authorized to act
under this section may not modify an adjudged sentence to
reduce the sentence to less than the mandatory minimum
sentence or disapprove, commute, or suspend the adjudged
mandatory minimum sentence in whole or in part. This
limitation does not restrict the discretion of the convening
authority or another person authorized to act under this
section to modify, disapprove, commute, or suspend any
portion of the adjudged sentence that is in addition to the
mandatory minimum sentence.
``(C) In addition, if a mandatory minimum sentence does not
exist for a charge and a pre-trial agreement has been entered
into by the convening authority and the accused, as
authorized by Rule for Court-Martial 705, the convening
authority or another person authorized to act under this
section may take action to reduce, dismiss, or suspend an
adjudged sentence of confinement in whole or in part pursuant
to the terms of the pre-trial agreement.''.
(d) Explanation for Any Decision Disapproving, Commuting,
or Suspending Court-martial Sentence.--Section 860(c)(2) of
title 10, United States Code (article 60(c)(2) of the Uniform
Code of Military Justice), as amended by subsection (c)(1),
is further amended--
(1) by inserting ``(A)'' after ``(2)''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
``(C) If the convening authority or another person
authorized to act under this section acts to disapprove,
commute, or suspend the sentence in whole or in part, the
convening authority or other person shall provide, at that
same time, a written explanation of the reasons for such
action. The written explanation shall be made a part of the
record of the trial and action thereon.''.
(e) Conforming Amendment to Other Authority for Convening
Authority to Suspend Sentence.--Section 871(d) of such title
(article 71(d) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is
amended by adding at the end the following new sentence:
``Paragraphs (2) and (4) of subsection (c) of section 860 of
this title (article 60) shall apply to any decision by the
convening authority or such person to suspend the execution
of any sentence or part thereof under this subsection.''.
(f) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section
shall take effect 180 days after

[[Page H3404]]

the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply with
respect to findings and sentences of courts-martial reported
to convening authorities under section 860 of title 10,
United States Code (article 60 of the Uniform Code of
Military Justice), as amended by this section, on or after
that effective date.

SEC. 532. ELIMINATION OF FIVE-YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON
TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL FOR ADDITIONAL OFFENSES
INVOLVING SEX-RELATED CRIMES.

(a) Inclusion of Additional Offenses.--Section 843(a) of
title 10, United States Code (article 43(a) of the Uniform
Code of Military Justice) is amended by striking ``rape, or
rape of a child'' and inserting ``rape or sexual assault, or
rape or sexual assault of a child''.
(b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 843(b)(2)(B)(i) of title
10, United States Code (article 43(b)(2)(B)(i) of the Uniform
Code of Military Justice) is amended by inserting before the
period at the end the following: ``, unless the offense is
covered by subsection (a)''.
(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section
shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act,
and shall apply with respect to an offense covered by section
920(b) or 920b(b) of title 10, United States Code (article
120(b) or 120b(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice)
that is committed on or after that date.

SEC. 533. DISCHARGE OR DISMISSAL FOR CERTAIN SEX-RELATED
OFFENSES AND TRIAL OF OFFENSES BY GENERAL
COURTS-MARTIAL.

(a) Mandatory Discharge or Dismissal Required.--
(1) Imposition.--Section 856 of title 10, United States
Code (article 56 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is
amended--
(A) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``The punishment''; and
(B) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(b)(1) While a person subject to this chapter who is
found guilty of an offense specified in paragraph (2) shall
be punished as a general court-martial may direct, such
punishment must include, at a minimum, dismissal or
dishonorable discharge.
``(2) Paragraph (1) applies to the following offenses:
``(A) An offense in violation of subsection (a) or (b) of
section 920 (article 120(a) or (b)).
``(B) Forcible sodomy under section 925 of this title
(article 125).
``(C) An attempt to commit an offense specified in
subparagraph (A) or (B) that is punishable under section 880
of this title (article 80).''.
(2) Clerical amendments.--
(A) Section heading.--The heading of such section is
amended to read as follows:

``Sec. 856. Art. 56. Maximum and minimum limits''.

(B) Table of sections.--The table of sections at the
beginning of subchapter VIII of chapter 47 of such title is
amended by striking the item relating to section 856 and
inserting the following new item:

``856. Art 56. Maximum and minimum limits.''.

(b) Jurisdiction Limited to General Courts-martial.--
Section 818 of title 10, United States Code (article 18 of
the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended--
(1) by inserting ``(a)'' before the first sentence;
(2) in the third sentence, by striking ``However, a general
court-martial'' and inserting the following:
``(b) A general court-martial''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(c) Consistent with sections 819, 820, and 856(b) of this
title (articles 19, 20, and 56(b)), only general courts-
martial have jurisdiction over an offense specified in
section 856(b)(2) of this title (article 56(b)(2)).''.
(c) Additional Duties for Independent Panels.--
(1) Response systems panel.--The independent panel
established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection
(a)(1) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1758)
shall assess the appropriateness of statutorily mandated
minimum sentencing provisions for additional offenses under
the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The panel shall include
the results of the assessment in the report required by
subsection (c)(1) of such section.
(2) Judicial proceedings panel.--The independent panel
established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection
(a)(2) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1758)
shall assess the implementation and effect of the mandatory
minimum sentences established by section 856(b) of title 10,
United States Code (article 56(b) of the Uniform Code of
Military Justice), as added by subsection (a) of this
section. The panel shall include the results of the
assessment in one of the reports required by subsection
(c)(2)(B) of such section 576.
(d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section
shall take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, and apply to offenses specified in section
856(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code (article 56(b)(2)
of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by
subsection (a)(1), committed after that date.

SEC. 534. REGULATIONS REGARDING CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION
FOR PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION OR UNIT
TRANSFER BY VICTIMS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT.

Section 673(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended
by striking ``The Secretaries of the military departments''
and inserting ``The Secretary concerned''.

SEC. 535. CONSIDERATION OF NEED FOR, AND AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE
FOR, TEMPORARY ADMINISTRATIVE REASSIGNMENT OR
REMOVAL OF A MEMBER ON ACTIVE DUTY WHO IS
ACCUSED OF COMMITTING A SEXUAL ASSAULT OR
RELATED OFFENSE.

(a) In General.--Chapter 39 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by inserting after section 673 the following
new section:

``Sec. 674. Temporary administrative reassignment or removal
of a member on active duty accused of committing a sexual
assault or related offense

``(a) Guidance for Timely Consideration and Action.--The
Secretary concerned may provide guidance, within guidelines
provided by the Secretary of Defense, for commanders
regarding their authority to make a timely determination, and
to take action, regarding whether a member of the armed
forces serving on active duty who is alleged to have
committed a sexual assault or other sex-related offense
covered by section 920, 920a, 920b, or 920c of this title
(article 120, 120a, 120b, or 120c of the Uniform Code of
Military Justice) should be temporarily reassigned or removed
from a position of authority or assignment, not as a punitive
measure, but solely for the purpose of maintaining good order
and discipline within the member's unit.
``(b) Time for Determinations.--A determination described
in subsection (a) may be made at any time after receipt of
notification of an unrestricted report of a sexual assault or
other sex-related offense that identifies the member as an
alleged perpetrator.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the
item relating to section 673 the following new item:

``674. Temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a member on
active duty accused of committing a sexual assault or
related offense.''.

(c) Additional Training Requirement for Commanders.--The
Secretary of Defense shall provide for inclusion of
information and discussion regarding the availability and use
of the authority provided by section 674 of title 10, United
States Code, as added by subsection (a), as part of the
training for new and prospective commanders at all levels of
command required by section 585(b) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 10
U.S.C. 1561 note).

SEC. 536. VICTIMS' COUNSEL FOR VICTIMS OF SEX-RELATED
OFFENSES AND RELATED PROVISIONS.

(a) Designation and Duties.--
(1) In general.--Chapter 53 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by inserting after section 1044d the
following new section:

``Sec. 1044e. Victims' Counsel for victims of sex-related
offenses

``(a) Designation; Purposes.--The Secretary concerned shall
designate legal counsel (to be known as `Victims' Counsel')
for the purpose of providing legal assistance to an
individual eligible for military legal assistance under
section 1044 of this title who is the victim of an alleged
sex-related offense, regardless of whether the report of that
offense is restricted or unrestricted.
``(b) Types of Legal Assistance Authorized.--The types of
legal assistance authorized by subsection (a) include the
following:
``(1) Legal consultation regarding potential criminal
liability of the victim stemming from or in relation to the
circumstances surrounding the alleged sex-related offense and
the victim's right to seek military defense services.
``(2) Legal consultation regarding the Victim Witness
Assistance Program, including--
``(A) the rights and benefits afforded the victim;
``(B) the role of the Victim Witness Assistance Program
liaison and what privileges do or do not exist between the
victim and the liaison; and
``(C) the nature of communication made to the liaison in
comparison to communication made to a Victims' Counsel or a
legal assistance attorney under section 1044 of this title.
``(3) Legal consultation regarding the responsibilities and
support provided to the victim by the Sexual Assault Response
Coordinator, a unit or installation Sexual Assault Victim
Advocate or domestic abuse advocate, to include any
privileges that may exist regarding communications between
those persons and the victim.
``(4) Legal consultation regarding the potential for civil
litigation against other parties (other than the Department
of Defense).
``(5) Legal consultation regarding the military justice
system, including--
``(A) the roles and responsibilities of the trial counsel,
the defense counsel, and investigators;
``(B) any proceedings of the military justice process in
which the victim may observe or participate as a witness or
other party;
``(C) the Government's authority to compel cooperation and
testimony; and
``(D) the victim's responsibility to testify, and other
duties to the court.
``(6) Accompanying the victim at any proceedings in
connection with the reporting, military investigation, and
military prosecution of the alleged sex-related offense.
``(7) Legal consultation regarding--
``(A) services available from appropriate agencies or
offices for emotional and mental health counseling and other
medical services;
``(B) eligibility for and requirements for obtaining any
available military and veteran benefits, such as transitional
compensation benefits found in section 1059 of this title and
other State and Federal victims' compensation programs; and
``(C) the availability of, and any protections offered by,
civilian and military restraining orders.
``(8) Legal consultation and assistance in personal civil
legal matters in accordance with section 1044 of this title.
``(9) Such other legal assistance as the Secretary of
Defense (or, in the case of the Coast

[[Page H3405]]

Guard, the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast
Guard is operating) may authorize in the regulations
prescribed under subsection (g).
``(c) Qualifications.--An individual may not be designated
as a Victims' Counsel under this section unless the
individual--
``(1) meets the qualifications specified in section
1044(d)(2) of this title; ; and
``(2) is certified as competent to be designated as a
Victims' Counsel by the Judge Advocate General of the Armed
Force in which the judge advocate is a member or by which the
civilian attorney is employed.
``(d) Administrative Responsibility.--(1) Consistent with
the regulations prescribed under subsection (g), the Judge
Advocate General (as defined in section 801(1) of this title)
under the jurisdiction of the Secretary, and within the
Marine Corps the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of
the Marine Corps, is responsible for the establishment and
supervision of individuals designated as Victims' Counsel.
``(2) The Secretary of Defense (and, in the case of the
Coast Guard, the Secretary of the Department in which the
Coast Guard is operating) shall conduct a periodic evaluation
of the Victims' Counsel programs operated under this section.
``(e) Availability of Victims' Counsel.--(1) An individual
eligible for military legal assistance under section 1044 of
this title who is the victim of an alleged sex-related
offense shall be offered the option of receiving assistance
from a Victims' Counsel upon report of an alleged sex-related
offense or at the time the victim seeks assistance from a
Sexual Assault Response Coordinator, a Sexual Assault Victim
Advocate, a military criminal investigator, a victim/witness
liaison, a trial counsel, a healthcare provider, or any other
personnel designated by the Secretary concerned for purposes
of this subsection.
``(2) The assistance of a Victims' Counsel under this
subsection shall be available to an individual eligible for
military legal assistance under section 1044 of this title
regardless of whether the individual elects unrestricted or
restricted reporting of the alleged sex-related offense. The
individual shall also be informed that the assistance of a
Victims' Counsel may be declined, in whole or in part, but
that declining such assistance does not preclude the
individual from subsequently requesting the assistance of a
Victims' Counsel.
``(f) Alleged Sex-related Offense Defined.--In this
section, the term `alleged sex-related offense' means any
allegation of--
``(1) a violation of section 920, 920a, 920b, 920c, or 925
of ths title (article 120, 120a, 120b, 120c, or 125 of the
Uniform Code of Military Justice); or
``(2) an attempt to commit an offense specified in a
paragraph (1) as punishable under section 880 of this title
(article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).
``(g) Regulations.--The Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is
operating shall prescribe regulations to carry out this
section.''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the
item relating to section 1044d the following new item:

``1044e. Victims' Counsel for victims of sex-related offenses.''.

(3) Conforming amendments.--
(A) Qualifications of persons providing legal assistance.--
Section 1044(d)(2) of such title is amended by inserting
before the period at the end the following: ``and, for
purposes of service as a Victims' Counsel under section 1044e
of this title, meets the additional qualifications specified
in subsection (c)(2) of such section.''.
(B) Inclusion in definition of military legal assistance.--
Section 1044(d)(3)(B) of such title is amended by striking
``and 1044d'' and inserting ``1044d, 1044e, and
1565b(a)(1)(A)''.
(C) Access to legal assistance and services.--Section
1565b(a)(1)(A) of such title is amended by striking ``section
1044'' and inserting ``sections 1044 and 1044e''.
(4) Implementation.--Section 1044e of title 10, United
States Code, as added by paragraph (1), shall be implemented
within six months after the date of the enactment of this
Act.
(b) Enhanced Training Requirement.--The Secretary of each
military department, and the Secretary of Homeland Security
with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a
service in the Department of the Navy, shall implement,
consistent with the guidelines provided under section 1044e
of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a),
in-depth and advanced training for all military and civilian
attorneys providing legal assistance under section 1044 or
1044e of such to support victims of alleged sex-related
offenses.
(c) Secretary of Defense Implementation Report.--
(1) Report required.--Not later than 90 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in
coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security with
respect to the Coast Guard, shall submit to the Committees on
Armed Services and Commerce, Science, and Transportation of
the Senate and the Committees on Armed Services and
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
Representatives a report describing how the Armed Forces will
implement the requirements of section 1044e of title 10,
United States Code, as added by subsection (a).
(2) Additional submission requirement.--The report required
by paragraph (1) shall also be submitted to the independent
review panel established by the Secretary of Defense under
section 576(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1758) and
to the Joint Services Committee on Military Justice.
(c) Additional Duties for Independent Panels.--
(1) Response systems panel.--The independent panel
established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection
(a)(1) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1758)
shall conduct an assessment regarding whether the roles,
responsibilities, and authorities of Victims' Counsel to
provide legal assistance under section 1044e of title 10,
United States Code, as added by subsection (a), to victims of
alleged sex-related offenses should be expanded to include
legal standing to represent the victim during investigative
and military justice proceedings in connection with the
prosecution of the offense. The panel shall include the
results of the assessment in the report required by
subsection (c)(1) of such section.
(2) Judicial proceedings panel.--The independent panel
established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection
(a)(2) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1758)
shall conduct an assessment of the implementation and effect
of section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, as added by
subsection (a), and make such recommendations for
modification of such section 1044e as the panel considers
appropriate. The panel shall include the results of the
assessment and its recommendations in one of the reports
required by subsection (c)(2)(B) of such section 576.

SEC. 537. INSPECTOR GENERAL INVESTIGATION OF ALLEGATIONS OF
RETALIATORY PERSONNEL ACTIONS TAKEN IN RESPONSE
TO MAKING PROTECTED COMMUNICATIONS REGARDING
SEXUAL ASSAULT.

Section 1034(c)(2)(A) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by striking ``sexual harassment or'' and inserting
``rape, sexual assault, or other sexual misconduct in
violation of sections 920 through 920c of this title
(articles 120 through 120c of the Uniform Code of Military
Justice), sexual harassment, or''.

SEC. 538. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE REPORT ON ROLE OF COMMANDERS
IN MILITARY JUSTICE PROCESS.

Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a report containing--
(1) an assessment of the current role and authorities of
commanders in the administration of military justice and the
investigation, prosecution, and adjudication of offenses
under the Uniform Code of Military Justice; and
(2) a recommendation by the Secretary of Defense regarding
whether the role and authorities of commanders should be
further modified or repealed.

SEC. 539. REVIEW AND POLICY REGARDING DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
INVESTIGATIVE PRACTICES IN RESPONSE TO
ALLEGATIONS OF SEX-RELATED OFFENSES.

(a) Review.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct
a review of the practices of the military criminal
investigative organizations (Army Criminal Investigation
Command, Naval Criminal Investigative Service, and Air Force
Office of Special Investigation) regarding the investigation
of alleged sex-related offenses involving members of the
Armed Forces, including the extent to which the military
criminal investigative organizations make a recommendation
regarding whether an allegation of a sex-related offense
appears founded or unfounded.
(b) Policy.--After conducting the review required by
subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall develop a
uniform policy for the Armed Forces, to the extent
practicable, regarding the use of case determinations to
record the results of the investigation of a sex-related
offense. In developing the policy, the Secretary shall
consider the feasibility of adopting case determination
methods, such as the uniform crime report, used by
nonmilitary law enforcement agencies.
(c) Sex-related Offense Defined.--In this section, the term
``sex-related offense'' includes--
(1) any offense covered by section 920, 920a, 920b, 920c,
or 925 of title 10, United States Code (article 120, 120a,
120b, 120c, or 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice);
or
(2) an attempt to commit an offense specified in a
paragraph (1) as punishable under section 880 of such title
(article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

SEC. 540. UNIFORM TRAINING AND EDUCATION PROGRAMS FOR SEXUAL
ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PROGRAM.

Section 585(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1434; 10
U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1)--
(A) in the first sentence, by striking ``Not later than one
year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the
Secretary of each military department shall develop a
curriculum to provide sexual assault prevention and response
training and education for members of the Armed Forces under
the jurisdiction of the Secretary and civilian employees of
the military department'' and inserting ``Not later than June
30, 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a uniform
curriculum to provide sexual assault prevention and response
training and education for members of the Armed Forces and
civilian employees of the Department of Defense''; and
(B) in the second sentence, by inserting ``including lesson
plans to achieve core competencies and learning objectives,''
after ``curriculum,''; and
(2) in paragraph (3)--
(A) by striking ``Consistent training.--The Secretary of
Defense shall ensure'' and inserting

[[Page H3406]]

``Uniform training.--The Secretary of Defense shall
require''; and
(B) by striking ``consistent'' and inserting ``uniform''.

SEC. 541. DEVELOPMENT OF SELECTION CRITERIA FOR ASSIGNMENT AS
SEXUAL ASSAULT RESPONSE AND PREVENTION PROGRAM
MANAGERS, SEXUAL ASSAULT RESPONSE COORDINATORS,
SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIM ADVOCATES, AND SEXUAL
ASSAULT NURSE EXAMINERS-ADULT/ADOLESCENT.

(a) Qualifications for Assignment.--Section 1602(e)(2) of
the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note; 124 Stat.
4431) is amended--
(1) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C);
and
(2) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the
following new subparagraphs:
``(A) the qualifications necessary for a member of the
Armed Forces or a civilian employee of the Department of
Defense to be selected for assignment to duty as a Sexual
Assault Response and Prevention Program Manager, Sexual
Assault Response Coordinator, or Sexual Assault Victim
Advocate, whether assigned to such duty on a full-time or
part-time basis;
``(B) consistent with section 584(c) of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law
112-81; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note; 125 Stat. 1433), the training,
certification, and status of members of the Armed Forces and
civilian employees of the department assigned to duty as
Sexual Assault Response and Prevention Program Managers,
Sexual Assault Response Coordinators, and Sexual Assault
Victim Advocates for the Armed Forces; and''.
(b) Assignment of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners-Adult/
Adolescent to Certain Military Units.--
(1) Assignment to certain military units.--Section 584 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(Public Law 112-81; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended--
(A) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections
(d) and (e), respectively; and
(B) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new
subsection (c):
``(c) Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners-Adult/Adolescent.--
``(1) Assignment requirements.--The Secretary of each
military department shall assign at least one Sexual Assault
Nurse Examiner-Adult/Adolescent to each brigade or equivalent
unit level of each armed force under the jurisdiction of that
Secretary unless assignment to other units is determined to
be more practicable and effective by the Secretary of
Defense. The Secretary of the military department concerned
may assign additional Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners-Adult/
Adolescent as necessary based on the demographics or needs of
a military unit. The Secretary of the military department
concerned may waive the assignment requirement for a specific
unit level if that Secretary determines that compliance will
impose an undue burden, except that the Secretary shall
notify Congress of each waiver and explain how compliance
would impose an undue burden.
``(2) Eligible persons.--On and after October 1, 2015, only
members of the armed forces and civilian employees of the
Department of Defense may be assigned to duty as a Sexual
Assault Nurse Examiner-Adult/Adolescent. The Secretary of the
military department concerned may satisfy paragraph (1)
through the assignment of additional personnel to a unit or
by assigning the duties of a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner-
Adult/Adolescent to current personnel of the unit, so long as
such personnel meet the training and certification
requirements of subsection (d).''.
(2) Training and certification.--Subsection (d) of such
section, as redesignated by paragraph (1)(A), is amended--
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``assigned under
subsection (a) and Sexual Assault Victim Advocates assigned
under subsection (b)'' and inserting ``, Sexual Assault
Victim Advocates, and Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners-Adult/
Adolescent assigned under this section'';
(B) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the following
new sentence: ``In the case of the curriculum and other
components of the program for certification of Sexual Assault
Nurse Examiners-Adult/Adolescent, the Secretary of Defense
shall utilize the most recent guidelines and standards as
outlined by the Department of Justice, Office on Violence
Against Women, in the National Training Standards for Sexual
Assault Medical Forensic Examiners.''; and
(C) in paragraph (3), by adding at the end the following
new sentence: ``On and after October 1, 2015, before a member
or civilian employee may be assigned to duty as a Sexual
Assault Nurse Examiner-Adult/Adolescent under subsection (c),
the member or employee must have completed the training
program required by paragraph (1) and obtained the
certification.''.
(c) Conforming Amendments.--Section 584 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law
112-81; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note; 125 Stat. 1432) is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)(2), by inserting ``who satisfy the
selection criteria established under section 1602(e)(2) of
the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note; 124 Stat.
4431)'' after ``Defense''; and
(2) in subsection (b)(2), by inserting ``who satisfy the
selection criteria established under section 1602(e)(2) of
the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2011'' after ``Defense''.
(d) Clerical Amendment.--The heading of section 584 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(Public Law 112-81; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended to read
as follows:

``SEC. 584. SEXUAL ASSAULT RESPONSE COORDINATORS, SEXUAL
ASSAULT VICTIM ADVOCATES, AND SEXUAL ASSAULT
NURSE EXAMINERS-ADULT/ADOLESCENT.''.

SEC. 542. EXTENSION OF CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS TO VICTIMS OF
OFFENSES UNDER THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY
JUSTICE.

(a) Victims' Rights.--
(1) In general.--Subchapter I of chapter 47 of title 10,
United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is
amended by adding at the end the following new section
(article):

``Sec. 806b. Art. 6b. Rights of victims of offenses under
this chapter

``(a) Rights of a Victim of a Military Crime.--A victim of
a military crime has the following rights:
``(1) The right to be reasonably protected from the
accused.
``(2) The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice
of any public proceeding in an investigation under section
832 of this title (article 32), court-martial, involuntary
plea hearing, pre-sentencing hearing, or parole hearing
involving the offense or of any release or escape of the
accused.
``(3) The right not to be excluded from any such public
proceeding, referred to in paragraph (2) unless the military
judge, after receiving clear and convincing evidence,
determines that testimony by the victim of a military crime
would be materially altered if the victim of a military crime
heard other testimony at that proceeding.
``(4) The reasonable right to confer with the trial counsel
in the case.
``(5) The right to full and timely restitution as provided
in law.
``(6) The right to proceedings free from unreasonable
delay.
``(7) The right to be treated with fairness and with
respect for the dignity and privacy of the victim of a
military crime.
``(b) Duty of Military Judge.--In any court-martial
proceeding involving an offense against a victim of a
military crime, the military judge shall ensure that the
victim of a military crime is afforded the rights described
in subsection (a). Before making a determination described in
subsection (a)(3), the military judge shall make every effort
to permit the fullest attendance possible by the victim of a
military crime and shall consider reasonable alternatives to
the exclusion of the victim of a military crime from the
criminal proceeding. The reasons for any decision denying
relief under this subsection shall be clearly stated on the
record.
``(c) Best Efforts Required.--(1) Military judges, trial
and defense counsel, military criminal investigation
organizations, services, and personnel, and other members and
personnel of the Department of Defense engaged in the
detection, investigation, or prosecution of offenses under
this chapter (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) shall
make their best efforts to see that a victim of a military
crime is notified of, and accorded, the rights described in
subsection .
``(2) The trial counsel in a case shall advise a victim of
a military crime that the victim of a military crime can seek
the advice of an attorney with respect to the rights
described in subsection (a).
``(3) Notice of release otherwise required pursuant to this
chapter shall not be given if such notice may endanger the
safety of any person.
``(d) Victim of a Military Crime Defined.--
``(1) Definition.--In this section, the term `victim of a
military crime' means a person who has suffered direct
physical, emotional, or pecuniary harm as a result of the
commission of a crime in violation of this chapter (the
Uniform Code of Military Justice) or in violation of the law
of another jurisdiction if any portion of the investigation
of the violation of that law was conducted primarily by a
military criminal investigative organization (Army Criminal
Investigation Command, Naval Criminal Investigative Service,
or Air Force Office of Special Investigation). The term shall
include, at a minimum, the following:
``(A) Members of the armed forces and their dependents.
``(B) Civilian employees of the Department of Defense and
contractor employees stationed outside the continental United
States and their dependents residing with them.
``(C) Such other individuals as the Secretary of Defense
determines should be included.
``(2) Treatment of certain victims.--In the case of a
victim of a military crime who is under 18 years of age,
incompetent, incapacitated, or deceased, the term shall also
include an individual acting on behalf of the victim who is
(in order of precedence) a spouse, parent, legal guardian,
child, sibling, or another dependent of the victim or another
person designated by the military judge, but in no event
shall an accused be designated or included.''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of subchapter I of chapter 47 of such title (the
Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by adding at the
end the following new item:

``806b. Art. 6b. Victims' rights of victims of offenses under this
chapter.''.

(b) Procedures To Promote Compliance.--
(1) In general.--Not later than one year after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
recommend to the President changes to the Manual for Courts-
Martial, and prescribe such other regulations as the
Secretary considers appropriate, to implement section 806b of
title 10, United States Code (article 6b of the Uniform Code
of Military Justice), as added by subsection (a).
(2) Elements.--The modifications and regulations issued
pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) The designation of an administrative authority within
the Department of Defense to

[[Page H3407]]

oversee the implementation of such section 806(b), and within
each Armed Force, an authority to receive and investigate
complaints relating to the provision or violation of the
rights of victims of military crimes.
(B) A requirement for a course of training for judge
advocates and other appropriate members of the Armed Forces
and personnel of the Department to promote compliance with
and implementation of such section 806b and assist such
personnel in responding more effectively to the needs of
victims of military crimes.
(C) Disciplinary sanctions for members of the Armed Forces
and other personnel of the Department of Defense, including
suspension or termination from employment in the case of
employees of the Department, who willfully or wantonly fail
to comply with such section 806b.
(D) Mechanisms to ensure that the Secretary of Defense
shall be the final arbiter of a complaint authorized pursuant
to subparagraph (A) by a victim of a military crime that the
victim was not afforded a right under such section 806b.
(c) Additional Duty for Response Systems Independent
Panel.--The independent panel established by the Secretary of
Defense under subsection (a)(1) of section 576 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1758) shall assess the
feasibility and appropriateness of extending to victims of
military crimes the additional right afforded a crime victim
in civilian criminal legal proceedings under subsection
(a)(4) of section 3771 of title 18, United States Code, and
the legal standing to seek enforcement of crime victim rights
provided by subsection (d) of such section. The panel shall
include the results of the assessment in the report required
by subsection (c)(1) of such section.

SEC. 543. DEFENSE COUNSEL INTERVIEW OF COMPLAINING WITNESSES
IN PRESENCE OF COUNSEL FOR THE COMPLAINING
WITNESS OR A SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIM ADVOCATE.

Section 846 of title 10, United States Code (article 46 of
the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended--
(1) by inserting ``(a) Opportunity To Obtain Witnesses and
Other Evidence.--''before ``The trial counsel'';
(2) by striking ``Process issued'' and inserting the
following:
``(c) Process.--Process issued''; and
(3) by inserting after subsection (a), as designated by
paragraph (1), the following new subsection (b):
``(b) Interview of Complaining Witnesses by Defense
Counsel.--(1) Upon notice by trial counsel to defense counsel
of the name and address of the complaining witness or
witnesses trial counsel intends to call to testify in any
portion of an investigation under section 832 of this title
(article 32) or a court-martial under this chapter, defense
counsel shall make all requests to interview any such
complaining witness through trial counsel.
``(2) If requested by a complaining witness subject to a
request for interview under paragraph (1), any interview of
the witness by defense counsel shall take place only in the
presence of counsel for the complaining witness or a Sexual
Assault Victim Advocate.
``(3) In this subsection, the term `complaining witness'
means a person who has suffered a direct physical, emotional,
or pecuniary harm as a result of a commission of an offense
under this chapter (the Uniform Code of Military Justice).''.

SEC. 544. PARTICIPATION BY COMPLAINING WITNESSES IN CLEMENCY
PHASE OF COURTS-MARTIAL PROCESS.

Section 860(b) of title 10, United States Code (article
60(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended--
(1) by inserting ``(A)'' after ``(b)(1)'';
(2) by redesignating paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) as
subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D), respectively, and, in such
subparagraphs as so redesignated, by striking ``paragraph
(1)'' each place it appears and inserting ``subparagraph
(A)''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
``(2)(A) In any case in which findings and sentence have
been adjudged for an offense involving a complaining witness,
the complaining witness shall be provided an opportunity to
submit matters for consideration by the convening authority
or by another person authorized to act under this section
before the convening authority or such other person takes
action under this section. Such a submission shall be made
within 10 days after the complaining witness has been given
an authenticated record of trial and, if applicable, the
recommendation of the staff judge advocate or legal officer
under subsection (d).
``(B) If a complaining witness shows that additional time
is required for submission of matters under subparagraph (A),
the convening authority or other person taking action under
this section, for good cause, may extend the submission
period for not more than an additional 20 days.
``(C) In this paragraph, the term `complaining witness'
means a person who has suffered a direct physical, emotional,
or pecuniary harm as a result of a commission of an offense
under this chapter (the Uniform Code of Military Justice).
``(3) The convening authority shall not consider under this
section any submitted matters that go to the character of a
complaining witness unless such matters were presented at the
trial.''.

SEC. 545. EIGHT-DAY INCIDENT REPORTING REQUIREMENT IN
RESPONSE TO UNRESTRICTED REPORT OF SEXUAL
ASSAULT IN WHICH THE VICTIM IS A MEMBER OF THE
ARMED FORCES.

(a) Incident Reporting Policy Requirement.--The Secretary
of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the
Coast Guard is operating shall establish and maintain a
policy to require the submission by a designated person of a
written incident report not later than eight days after an
unrestricted report of sexual assault has been made in which
a member of the Armed Forces is the victim. At a minimum,
this incident report shall be provided to the following:
(1) The installation commander, if such incident occurred
on or in the vicinity of a military installation.
(2) The first officer in the grade of 0-6 in the chain of
command of the victim.
(3) The first general officer or flag officer in the chain
of command of the victim.
(b) Purpose of the Report.--The purpose of the required
incident report under subsection (a) is to detail the actions
taken or in progress to provide the necessary care and
support to the victim of the assault, to refer the allegation
of sexual assault to the appropriate investigatory agency,
and to provide initial notification of the serious incident
when that notification has not already taken place.
(c) Elements of Report.--
(1) In general.--The report of an incident under subsection
(a) shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(A) Time/Date/Location of incident.
(B) Type of offense allegation.
(C) Service affiliation, assigned unit, and location of the
victim.
(D) Service affiliation, assigned unit, and location of the
alleged offender, including information regarding whether the
alleged offender has been temporarily transferred or removed
from an assigned billet or ordered to pretrial confinement or
otherwise restricted, if applicable.
(E) Post-incident actions taken in connection with the
incident, including the following:
(i) Referral of the victim to medical services and all
other services available for members of the Armed Forces who
are victims of sexual assault, including the date of each
such referral.
(ii) Receipt and processing status of a request for
expedited victim transfer, if applicable.
(iii) Notification of incident to appropriate investigatory
offices, including the organization notified and date of such
notification.
(iv) Issuance of any military protective orders in
connection with the incident.
(2) Modification.--
(A) In general.--The Secretary of Defense may modify the
elements required in a report under this section regarding an
incident involving a member of the Armed Forces (including
the Coast Guard when it is operating as service in the
Department of the Navy) if the Secretary determines that such
modification will facilitate compliance with best practices
for such reporting as identified by the Sexual Assault
Prevention and Response Office of the Department of Defense.
(B) Coast guard.--The Secretary of the Department in which
the Coast Guard is operating may modify the elements required
in a report under this section regarding an incident
involving a member of the Coast Guard if the Secretary
determines that such modification will facilitate compliance
with best practices for such reporting as identified by the
Coast Guard Office of Work-Life Programs.
(3) For official use only.--A report under this section
shall be intended for official use only and shall not be
distributed beyond the requirements listed above.
(d) Regulations.--Not later than 180 days after enactment,
The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department
in which the Coast Guard is operating shall prescribe
regulations to carry out this section.

SEC. 546. AMENDMENT TO MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL TO ELIMINATE
CONSIDERATIONS RELATING TO CHARACTER AND
MILITARY SERVICE OF ACCUSED IN INITIAL
DISPOSITION OF SEX-RELATED OFFENSES.

(a) Amendment Required.--Not later than 180 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense
shall submit to the President a proposed amendment to rule
306 of the Manual for Courts-Martial (relating to policy on
initial disposition of offenses) to eliminate the character
and military service of the accused from the list of factors
that may be considered by the disposition authority in
disposing of a sex-related offense.
(b) Sex-related Offense Defined.--In this section, a ``sex-
related offense'' includes--
(1) any offense covered by section 920, 920a, 920b, 920c,
or 925 of title 10, United States Code (article 120, 120a,
120b, 120c, or 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice);
or
(2) an attempt to commit an offense specified in a
paragraph (1) as punishable under section 880 of such title
(article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

SEC. 547. INCLUSION OF LETTER OF REPRIMANDS, NONPUNITIVE
LETTER OF REPRIMANDS AND COUNSELING STATEMENTS.

(a) Inclusion in Performance Evaluation Reports.--The
Secretary of Defense shall require commanders to include
letter of reprimands, nonpunitive letter of actions and
counseling statements involving substantiated cases of sexual
harassment or sexual assault in the performance evaluation
report of a member of the Armed Forces for the purpose of--
(1) providing commanders increased visibility of the
background information of members of the unit;
(2) identifying and preventing trends of bad behavior early
and effectively disciplining repeated actions which hinder
units from fostering a healthy climate; and
(3) preventing the transfer of sexual offenders.
(b) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``sexual harassment'' has the meaning given
such term in Department of Defense Directive 1350.2,
Department of Defense Military Equal Opportunity Program.

[[Page H3408]]

(2) The term ``sexual assault'' means any of the offenses
described in section 920 of title 10, United States Code
(article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

SEC. 548. ENHANCED PROTECTIONS FOR PROSPECTIVE MEMBERS AND
NEW MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES DURING ENTRY-
LEVEL PROCESSING AND TRAINING.

(a) Defining Inappropriate and Prohibited Relationships,
Communication, Conduct, and Contact Between Certain
Members.--
(1) Policy required.--The Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is
operating shall establish and maintain a policy to uniformly
define and prescribe, for the persons described in paragraph
(2), what constitutes an inappropriate and prohibited
relationship, communication, conduct, or contact, including
when such an action is consensual, between a member of the
Armed Forces described in paragraph (2)(A) and a prospective
member or member of the Armed Forces described in paragraph
(2)(B).
(2) Covered members.--The policy required by paragraph (1)
shall apply to--
(A) a member of the Armed Forces who is superior in rank
to, exercises authority or control over, or supervises a
person described in subparagraph (B) during the entry-level
processing or training of the person; and
(B) a prospective member of the Armed Forces or a member of
the Armed Forces undergoing entry-level processing or
training.
(3) Inclusion of certain members required.--The members of
the Armed Forces covered by paragraph (2)(A) shall include,
at a minimum, military personnel assigned or attached to
duty--
(A) for the purpose of recruiting or assessing persons for
enlistment or appointment as a commissioned officer, warrant
officer, or enlisted member of the Armed Forces;
(B) at a Military Entrance Processing Station; or
(C) at an entry-level training facility or school of an
Armed Force.
(b) Effect of Violations.--A member of the Armed Forces who
violates the policy established pursuant to subsection (a)
shall be subject to prosecution under the Uniform Code of
Military Justice.
(c) Processing for Administrative Separation.--
(1) In general.--(A) The Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is
operating shall require the processing for administrative
separation of any member of the Armed Forces described in
subsection (a)(2)(A) in response to the first substantiated
violation by the member of the policy established pursuant to
subsection (a), when the member is not otherwise punitively
discharged or dismissed from the Armed Forces for that
violation.
(B) The Secretary of each military department shall revise
regulations applicable to the Armed Forces under the
jurisdiction of the Secretary as necessary to ensure
compliance with the requirement under subparagraph (A).
(2) Required elements.--(A) In imposing the requirement
under paragraph (1), the Secretaries shall ensure that any
separation decision regarding a member of the Armed Forces is
based on the full facts of the case and that due process
procedures are provided under existing law or regulations or
additionally prescribed, as considered necessary by the
Secretaries, pursuant to subsection (f).
(B) The requirement imposed by paragraph (1) shall not be
interpreted to limit or alter the authority of the Secretary
of a military department and the Secretary of the Department
in which the Coast Guard is operating to process members of
the Armed Forces for administrative separation--
(i) for reasons other than a substantiated violation of the
policy established pursuant to subsection (a); or
(ii) under other provisions of law or regulation.
(3) Substantiated violation.--For purposes of paragraph
(1), a violation by a member of the Armed Forces described in
subsection (a)(2)(A) of the policy established pursuant to
subsection (a) shall be treated as substantiated if--
(A) there has been a court-martial conviction for violation
of the policy, but the adjudged sentence does not include
discharge or dismissal; or
(B) a nonjudicial punishment authority under section 815 of
title 10, United States Code (article 15 of the Uniform Code
of Military Justice) has determined that a member has
committed an offense in violation of the policy and imposed
nonjudicial punishment upon the member.
(d) Proposed Uniform Code of Military Justice Punitive
Article.--Not later than one year after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit
to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the
House of Representatives--
(1) a proposed amendment to chapter 47 of title 10, United
States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) to create
an additional article under subchapter X of such chapter
regarding violations of the policy required by subsection
(a); and
(2) the conforming changes to part IV, punitive articles,
in the Manual for Courts-Martial that will be necessary upon
adoption of such article.
(e) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``entry-level processing or training'', with
respect to a member of the Armed forces, means the period
beginning on the date on which the member became a member of
the Armed Forces and ending on the date on which the member
physically arrives at that member's first duty assignment
following completion of initial entry training (or its
equivalent), as defined by the Secretary of the military
department concerned or the Secretary of the Department in
which the Coast Guard is operating.
(2) The term ``prospective member of the Armed Forces''
means a person who has had a face-to-face meeting with a
member of the Armed Forces assigned or attached to duty
described in subsection (a)(3)(A) regarding becoming a member
of the Armed Forces, regardless of whether the person
eventually becomes a member of the Armed Forces.
(f) Regulations.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is
operating shall issue such regulations as may be necessary to
carry out this section. The Secretary of Defense shall ensure
that, to the extent practicable, the regulations are uniform
for each armed force under the jurisdiction of that
Secretary.

SEC. 549. INDEPENDENT REVIEWS AND ASSESSMENTS OF UNIFORM CODE
OF MILITARY JUSTICE AND JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF
SEXUAL ASSAULT CASES.

(a) Additional Duties for Response Systems Panel Regarding
Disposition Authority.--
(1) In general.--The independent panel established by the
Secretary of Defense under subsection (a)(1) of section 576
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1758) shall--
(A) conduct an assessment of the impact, if any, that
removing from the chain of command any disposition authority
regarding charges preferred under the Uniform Code of
Military Justice would have on overall reporting and
prosecution of sexual assault cases; and
(B) review and provide comment on the report of the
Secretary of Defense on the role of military commanders in
the military justice process, which is required pursuant to
section 538 of this Act.
(2) Submission of results.--The panel shall include the
results of the assessment and review and its recommendations
and comments in the report required by subsection (c)(1) of
such section 576, as amended by subsection (b) of this
section.
(b) Earlier Submission Deadline for Report of the Response
Systems Panel.--Subsection (c) of section 576 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law
112-239; 126 Stat. 1758) is amended by striking paragraph (1)
and inserting the following new paragraph:
``(1) Response systems panel.--Not later than one year
after the date of the first meeting of the panel established
under subsection (a)(1), the panel shall submit a report of
its findings and recommendations, through the Secretary of
Defense, to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate
and the House of Representatives. The panel shall terminate
30 days after submission of such report.''.

SEC. 550. REVIEW OF THE OFFICE OF DIVERSITY MANAGEMENT AND
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ROLE IN SEXUAL HARASSMENT
CASES.

(a) Review Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall
conduct a review of the Office of Diversity Management and
Equal Opportunity for the purposes specified in subsection
(b).
(b) Elements of Study.--In conducting the review under
subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall--
(1) identify and evaluate the resource and personnel gaps
in the Office;
(2) identify and evaluate the role of the Office in sexual
harassment cases; and
(3) evaluate how the Office works with the Sexual Assault
Prevention and Response Office to address sexual harassment
in the Armed Forces.
(c) Definition.--In this section, the term ``sexual
harassment'' has the meaning given such term in Department of
Defense Directive 1350.2, Department of Defense Military
Equal Opportunity Program.

Subtitle E--Military Family Readiness

SEC. 551. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE RECOGNITION OF SPOUSES OF
MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES WHO SERVE IN COMBAT
ZONES.

(a) Establishment and Presentation of Lapel Buttons.--
Chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by
inserting after section 1126 the following new section:

``Sec. 1126a. Spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button:
eligibility and presentation

``(a) Design and Eligibility.--A lapel button, to be known
as the spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button, shall be
designed, as approved by the Secretary of Defense, to
identify and recognize the spouse of a member of the armed
forces who is serving or has served in a combat zone for a
period of more than 30 days.
``(b) Presentation.--The Secretary concerned may authorize
the use of appropriated funds to procure spouse-of-a-combat-
veteran lapel buttons and to provide for their presentation
to eligible spouses of members.
``(c) Exception to Time-period Requirement.--The 30-day
period specified in subsection (a) does not apply if the
member is killed or wounded in the combat zone before the
expiration the period.
``(d) License to Manufacture and Sell Lapel Buttons.--
Section 901(c) of title 36 shall apply with respect to the
spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button authorized by this
section.
``(e) Combat Zone Defined.--In this section, the term
`combat zone' has the meaning given that term in section
112(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
``(f) Regulations.--The Secretary of Defense shall issue
such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this
section. The Secretary shall ensure that the regulations are
uniform for each armed force to the extent practicable.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the
item relating to section 1126 the following new item:

[[Page H3409]]

``1126a. Spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button: eligibility and
presentation.''.

(c) Sense of Congress Regarding Implementation.--It is the
sense of Congress that, as soon as practicable once the
spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button becomes available,
the Secretary of Defense should--
(1) widely announce the availability of spouse-of-a-combat-
veteran lapel buttons through military and public information
channels; and
(2) encourage commanders at all levels to conduct
ceremonies recognizing the support provided by spouses of
members of the Armed Forces and to use the ceremonies as an
opportunity for members to present their spouses with a
spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button.

SEC. 552. PROTECTION OF CHILD CUSTODY ARRANGEMENTS FOR
PARENTS WHO ARE MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

(a) Child Custody Protection.--Title II of the
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 521 et seq.)
is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 208. CHILD CUSTODY PROTECTION.

``(a) Restriction on Temporary Custody Order.--If a court
renders a temporary order for custodial responsibility for a
child based solely on a deployment or anticipated deployment
of a parent who is a servicemember, then the court shall
require that, upon the return of the servicemember from
deployment, the custody order that was in effect immediately
preceding the temporary order shall be reinstated, unless the
court finds that such a reinstatement is not in the best
interest of the child, except that any such finding shall be
subject to subsection (b).
``(b) Limitation on Consideration of Member's Deployment in
Determination of Child's Best Interest.--If a motion or a
petition is filed seeking a permanent order to modify the
custody of the child of a servicemember, no court may
consider the absence of the servicemember by reason of
deployment, or the possibility of deployment, as the sole
factor in determining the best interest of the child.
``(c) No Federal Jurisdiction or Right of Action or
Removal.--Nothing in this section shall create a Federal
right of action or otherwise give rise to Federal
jurisdiction or create a right of removal.
``(d) Preemption.--In any case where State law applicable
to a child custody proceeding involving a temporary order as
contemplated in this section provides a higher standard of
protection to the rights of the parent who is a deploying
servicemember than the rights provided under this section
with respect to such temporary order, the appropriate court
shall apply the higher State standard.
``(e) Deployment Defined.--In this section, the term
`deployment' means the movement or mobilization of a
servicemember to a location for a period of longer than 60
days and not longer than 540 days pursuant to temporary or
permanent official orders--
``(1) that are designated as unaccompanied;
``(2) for which dependent travel is not authorized; or
``(3) that otherwise do not permit the movement of family
members to that location.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents in section
1(b) of such Act is amended by adding at the end of the items
relating to title II the following new item:

``208. Child custody protection.''.

SEC. 553. TREATMENT OF RELOCATION OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED
FORCES FOR ACTIVE DUTY FOR PURPOSES OF MORTGAGE
REFINANCING.

(a) In General.--Title III of the Servicemembers Civil
Relief Act is amended by inserting after section 303 (50
U.S.C. App. 533) the following new section:

``SEC. 303A. TREATMENT OF RELOCATION OF SERVICEMEMBERS FOR
ACTIVE DUTY FOR PURPOSES OF MORTGAGE
REFINANCING.

``(a) Treatment of Absence From Residence Due to Active
Duty.--While a servicemember who is the mortgagor under an
existing mortgage does not reside in the residence that
secures the existing mortgage because of a relocation
described in subsection (c)(1)(B), if the servicemember
inquires about or applies for a covered refinancing mortgage,
the servicemember shall be considered, for all purposes
relating to the covered refinancing mortgage (including such
inquiry or application and eligibility for, and compliance
with, any underwriting criteria and standards regarding such
covered refinancing mortgage) to occupy the residence that
secures the existing mortgage to be paid or prepaid by such
covered refinancing mortgage as the principal residence of
the servicemember during the period of such relocation.
``(b) Limitation.--Subsection (a) shall not apply with
respect to a servicemember who inquires about or applies for
a covered refinancing mortgage if, during the 5-year period
preceding the date of such inquiry or application, the
servicemember entered into a covered refinancing mortgage
pursuant to this section.
``(c) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) Existing mortgage.--The term `existing mortgage'
means a mortgage that is secured by a 1- to 4-family
residence, including a condominium or a share in a
cooperative ownership housing association, that was the
principal residence of a servicemember for a period that--
``(A) had a duration of 13 consecutive months or longer;
and
``(B) ended upon the relocation of the servicemember caused
by the servicemember receiving military orders for a
permanent change of station or to deploy with a military
unit, or as an individual in support of a military operation,
for a period of not less than 18 months that did not allow
the servicemember to continue to occupy such residence as a
principal residence.
``(2) Covered refinancing mortgage.--The term `covered
refinancing mortgage' means any mortgage that--
``(A) is made for the purpose of paying or prepaying, and
extinguishing, the outstanding obligations under an existing
mortgage or mortgages; and
``(B) is secured by the same residence that secured such
existing mortgage or mortgages.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents in section
1(b) of such Act is amended by inserting after the item
relating to section 303 the following new item:

``303A. Treatment of relocation of servicemembers for active duty for
purposes of mortgage refinancing.''.

SEC. 554. FAMILY SUPPORT PROGRAMS FOR IMMEDIATE FAMILY
MEMBERS OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES ASSIGNED
TO SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES.

(a) Pilot Programs Authorized.--Consistent with such
regulations as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe to
carry out this section, the Commander of the United States
Special Operations Command may conduct up to three pilot
programs to assess the feasibility and benefits of providing
family support activities for the immediate family members of
members of the Armed Forces assigned to special operations
forces.
(b) Selection of Programs.--In selecting the pilot programs
to be conducted under subsection (a), the Commander shall--
(1) identify family support activities that have a direct
and concrete impact on the readiness of special operations
forces, but that are not being provided to the immediate
family members of members of the Armed Forces assigned to
special operations forces by the Secretary of a military
department; and
(2) conduct a cost-benefit analysis of each family support
activity proposed to be included in a pilot program.
(c) Evaluation.--The Commander shall develop outcome
measurements to evaluate the success of each family support
activity included in a pilot program under subsection (a).
(d) Additional Authority.--The Commander may expend up to
$5,000,000 during each fiscal year specified in subsection
(f) to carry out the pilot programs under subsection (a).
(e) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``Commander'' means the Commander of the
United States Special Operations Command.
(2) The term ``immediate family members'' has the meaning
given that term in section 1789(c) of title 10, United States
Code.
(3) The term ``special operations forces'' means those
forces of the Armed Forces identified as special operations
forces under section 167(i) of such title.
(f) Duration of Pilot Program Authority.--The authority
provided by subsection (a) is available to the Commander
during fiscal years 2014 through 2016.
(g) Report.--Not later than 180 days after completing a
pilot program under subsection (a), the Commander shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report
describing the results of the pilot program.

Subtitle F--Education and Training Opportunities and Wellness

SEC. 561. INCLUSION OF FREELY ASSOCIATED STATES WITHIN SCOPE
OF JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICERS' TRAINING CORPS
PROGRAM.

Section 2031(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(3) If a secondary educational institution in the
Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall
Islands, or the Republic of Palau otherwise meets the
conditions imposed by subsection (b) on the establishment and
maintenance of units of the Junior Reserve Officers' Training
Corps, the Secretary of a military department may establish
and maintain a unit of the Junior Reserve Officers' Training
Corps at the secondary educational institution even though
the secondary educational institution is not a United States
secondary educational institution.''.

SEC. 562. IMPROVED CLIMATE ASSESSMENTS AND DISSEMINATION AND
TRACKING OF RESULTS.

(a) Improved Dissemination of Results in Chain of
Command.--The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the
results of command climate assessments are provided to the
relevant individual commander and to the next higher level of
command.
(b) Performance Tracking.--
(1) Evidence of compliance.--The Secretary of each military
department shall include in the performance evaluations and
assessments used by each Armed Force under the jurisdiction
of the Secretary a designated form where senior commanders
can indicate whether the commander has conducted the required
climate assessments.
(2) Effect of failure to conduct assessment.--If a
commander is found to not have conducted the required climate
assessments, the failure shall be noted in the commander's
performance evaluation and be considered a serious factor
during consideration for any subsequent promotion.
(c) Tracking System.--The Inspector General of the
Department of Defense shall develop a system to track whether
commanders are conducting command climate assessments.
(d) Unit Compliance Reports.--Working with the Inspector
General of the Department of Defense, unit commanders shall
gather all the climate assessments from the unit and develop
a compliance report that, at a minimum, shall include the
following:

[[Page H3410]]

(1) A comprehensive overview of the concerns members of the
unit expressed in the climate assessments.
(2) Data showing how leadership is perceived in the unit.
(3) A detailed strategic plan on how leadership plans to
address the expressed concerns.

SEC. 563. SERVICE-WIDE 360 ASSESSMENTS.

(a) Adoption of 360-degree Approach.--The Secretary of each
military department shall develop an assessment program
modeled after the current Department of the Army Multi-Source
Assessment and Feedback (MSAF) Program, known in this section
as the ``360-degree approach''.
(b) Report on Inclusion in Performance Evaluation
Reports.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit
to Congress a report containing the results of an assessment
of the feasibility of including the 360-degree approach as
part of the performance evaluation reports.
(c) Individual Counseling.--The Secretary of each military
department shall include individual counseling as part of the
performance evaluation process.

SEC. 564. HEALTH WELFARE INSPECTIONS.

The Secretary of each military department shall conduct
health welfare inspections on a monthly basis in order to
ensure and maintain security, military readiness, good order,
and discipline of all units of the Armed Forces under the
jurisdiction of the Secretary. Results of the Health Welfare
Inspections shall be provided to both the commander and
senior commander.

SEC. 565. REVIEW OF SECURITY OF MILITARY INSTALLATIONS,
INCLUDING BARRACKS AND MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCES.

(a) Review of Security Measures.--The Secretary of Defense
shall conduct a review of security measures on United States
military installations, specifically with regard to barracks
and multi-family residences on military installations, for
the purpose of ensuring the safety of members of the Armed
Forces and their dependents who reside on military
installations.
(b) Elements of Study.--In conducting the review under
subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall--
(1) identify security gaps on military installations; and
(2) evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of using 24-
hour electronic monitoring or placing security personnel at
all points of entry into barracks and multi-family residences
on military installation.
(c) Submission of Results.--Not later than 90 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
Defense shall submit to Congress a report containing the
results of the study conducted under subsection (a),
including an estimate of the costs--
(1) to eliminate all security gaps identified under
subsection (b)(1); and
(2) to provide 24-hour security monitoring as evaluated
under subsection (b)(2).

SEC. 566. ENHANCEMENT OF MECHANISMS TO CORRELATE SKILLS AND
TRAINING FOR MILITARY OCCUPATIONAL SPECIALTIES
WITH SKILLS AND TRAINING REQUIRED FOR CIVILIAN
CERTIFICATIONS AND LICENSES.

(a) Improvement of Information Available to Members of the
Armed Forces About Correlation.--
(1) In general.--The Secretaries of the military
departments, in coordination with the Under Secretary of
Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall, to the maximum
extent practicable, make information on civilian
credentialing opportunities available to members of the Armed
Forces beginning with, and at every stage of, training of
members for military occupational specialties, in order to
permit members--
(A) to evaluate the extent to which such training
correlates with the skills and training required in
connection with various civilian certifications and licenses;
and
(B) to assess the suitability of such training for
obtaining or pursuing such civilian certifications and
licenses.
(2) Coordination with transition goals plans success
program.--Information shall be made available under paragraph
(1) in a manner consistent with the Transition Goals Plans
Success (GPS) program.
(3) Types of information.--The information made available
under paragraph (1) shall include, but not be limited to, the
following:
(A) Information on the civilian occupational equivalents of
military occupational specialties (MOS).
(B) Information on civilian license or certification
requirements, including examination requirements.
(C) Information on the availability and opportunities for
use of educational benefits available to members of the Armed
Forces, as appropriate, corresponding training, or continuing
education that leads to a certification exam in order to
provide a pathway to credentialing opportunities.
(4) Use and adaptation of certain programs.--In making
information available under paragraph (1), the Secretaries of
the military departments may use and adapt appropriate
portions of the Credentialing Opportunities On-Line (COOL)
programs of the Army and the Navy and the Credentialing and
Educational Research Tool (CERT) of the Air Force.
(b) Improvement of Access of Accredited Civilian
Credentialing Agencies to Military Training Content.--
(1) In general.--The Secretaries of the military
departments, in coordination with the Under Secretary of
Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall, to the maximum
extent practicable consistent with national security
requirements, make available to accredited civilian
credentialing agencies that issue certifications or licenses,
upon request of such agencies, information such as military
course training curricula, syllabi, and materials, levels of
military advancement attained, and professional skills
developed.
(2) Central repository.--The actions taken pursuant to
paragraph (1) may include the establishment of a central
repository of information on training and training materials
provided members in connection with military occupational
specialities that is readily accessible by accredited
civilian credentialing agencies described in that paragraph
in order to meet requests described in that paragraph.

SEC. 567. USE OF EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR COURSES IN
PURSUIT OF CIVILIAN CERTIFICATIONS OR LICENSES.

(a) Courses Under Department of Defense Educational
Assistance Authorities.--
(1) In general.--Chapter 101 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by inserting after section 2015 the
following new section:

``Sec. 2015a. Civilian certifications and licenses: use of
educational assistance for courses in pursuit of civilian
certifications or licenses

``(a) Limitation on Use of Assistance.--In the case of a
member of the armed forces who is enrolled in an educational
institution in a State for purposes of obtaining employment
in an occupation or profession requiring the approval or
licensure of a board or agency of that State, educational
assistance specified in subsection (b) may be used by the
member for a course offered by the educational institution
that is a required element of the curriculum to be satisfied
to obtain employment in that occupation or profession only
if--
``(1) the successful completion of the curriculum fully
qualifies a student to--
``(A) take any examination required for entry into the
occupation or profession, including satisfying any State or
professionally mandated programmatic and specialized
accreditation requirements; and
``(B) be certified or licensed or meet any other
academically related pre-conditions that are required for
entry into the occupation or profession; and
``(2) in the case of State licensing or professionally
mandated requirements for entry into the occupation or
profession that require specialized accreditation, the
curriculum meets the requirement for specialized
accreditation through its accreditation or pre-accreditation
by an accrediting agency or association recognized by the
Secretary of Education or designated by that State as a
reliable authority as to the quality or training offered by
the institution in that program.
``(b) Covered Educational Assistance.--The educational
assistance specified in this subsection is educational
assistance as follows:
``(1) Educational assistance for members of the armed
forces under section 2007 and 2015 of this title.
``(2) Educational assistance for persons enlisting for
active duty under chapter 106A of this title.
``(3) Educational assistance for members of the armed
forces held as captives under section 2183 of this title.
``(4) Educational assistance for members of the Selected
Reserve under chapter 1606 of this title.
``(5) Educational assistance for reserve component members
supporting contingency operations and other operations under
chapter 1607 of this title.
``(6) Such other educational assistance provided members of
the armed force under the laws the administered by the
Secretary of Defense or the Secretaries of the military
departments as the Secretary of Defense shall designate for
purposes of this section.''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of chapter 101 of such title is amended by
inserting after the item relating to section 2015 the
following new item:

``2015a. Civilian certifications and licenses: use of educational
assistance for courses in pursuit of civilian
certifications or licenses.''.

(b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section
shall take effect on August 1, 2014, and shall apply with
respect to courses pursued on or after that date.

Subtitle G--Defense Dependents' Education

SEC. 571. CONTINUATION OF AUTHORITY TO ASSIST LOCAL
EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES THAT BENEFIT DEPENDENTS OF
MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES.

(a) Assistance to Schools With Significant Numbers of
Military Dependent Students.--Of the amount authorized to be
appropriated for fiscal year 2014 by section 301 and
available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide
activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301,
$20,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of
providing assistance to local educational agencies under
subsection (a) of section 572 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109-163;
20 U.S.C. 7703b).
(b) Assistance to Schools With Enrollment Changes Due to
Base Closures, Force Structure Changes, or Force
Relocations.--
(1) Extension of authority to provide assistance.--Section
572(b)(4) of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2006 (20 U.S.C. 7703b(b)(4)) is amended by
striking ``September 30, 2014'' and inserting ``September 30,
2015''.
(2) Amount of assistance authorized.--Of the amount
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 by section
301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-
wide activities as specified in the funding table in section
4301, $5,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of
providing assistance to local educational agencies under
subsection (b) of section

[[Page H3411]]

572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2006 (20 U.S.C. 7703b).
(c) Local Educational Agency Defined.--In this section, the
term ``local educational agency'' has the meaning given that
term in section 8013(9) of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7713(9)).

SEC. 572. SUPPORT FOR EFFORTS TO IMPROVE ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT
AND TRANSITION OF MILITARY DEPENDENT STUDENTS.

The Secretary of Defense may make grants to nonprofit
organizations that provide services to improve the academic
achievement of military dependent students, including those
nonprofit organizations whose programs focus on improving the
civic responsibility of military dependent students and their
understanding of the Federal Government through direct
exposure to the operations of the Federal Government.

SEC. 573. TREATMENT OF TUITION PAYMENTS RECEIVED FOR VIRTUAL
ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION COMPONENT OF
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM.

(a) Crediting of Payments.--Section 2164(l) of title 10,
United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the
following new paragraph:
``(3) Any payments received by the Secretary of Defense
under this subsection shall be credited to the account
designated by the Secretary for the operation of the virtual
educational program under this subsection. Payments so
credited shall be merged with other funds in the account and
shall be available, to the extent provided in advance in
appropriation Acts, for the same purposes and the same period
as other funds in the account.''.
(b) Application of Amendment.--The amendment made by
subsection (a) shall apply only with respect to tuition
payments received under section 2164(l) of title 10, United
States Code, for enrollments authorized by such section,
after the date of the enactment of this Act, in the virtual
elementary and secondary education program of the Department
of Defense education program.

Subtitle H--Decorations and Awards

SEC. 581. FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT RECEIPT OF
MILITARY DECORATIONS OR MEDALS.

(a) In General.--Section 704 of title 18, United States
Code, is amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ``wears,''; and
(2) so that subsection (b) reads as follows:
``(b) Fraudulent Representations About Receipt of Military
Decorations or Medals.--Whoever, with intent to obtain money,
property, or other tangible benefit, fraudulently holds
oneself out to be a recipient of a decoration or medal
described in subsection (c)(2) or (d) shall be fined under
this title, imprisoned not more than one year, or both.''.
(b) Addition of Certain Other Medals.--Section 704(d) of
title 18, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by striking ``If a decoration'' and inserting the
following:
``(1) In general.--If a decoration'';
(2) by inserting ``a combat badge,'' after ``1129 of title
10,''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(2) Combat badge defined.--In this subsection, the term
`combat badge' means a Combat Infantryman's Badge, Combat
Action Badge, Combat Medical Badge, Combat Action Ribbon, or
Combat Action Medal.''.
(c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 704 of title 18, United
States Code, is amended in each of subsections (c)(1) and (d)
by striking ``or (b)''.

SEC. 582. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF MEDALS OF HONOR
THAT MAY BE AWARDED TO THE SAME MEMBER OF THE
ARMED FORCES.

(a) Army.--Section 3744(a) of title 10, United States Code,
is amended by striking ``medal of honor, distinguished-
service cross,'' and inserting ``distinguished-service
cross''.
(b) Navy and Marine Corps.--Section 6247 of title 10,
United States Code, is amended by striking ``medal of
honor,''.
(c) Air Force.--Section 8744(a) of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by striking ``medal of honor, Air Force
cross,'' and inserting ``Air Force Cross''.

SEC. 583. STANDARDIZATION OF TIME-LIMITS FOR RECOMMENDING AND
AWARDING MEDAL OF HONOR, DISTINGUISHED-SERVICE
CROSS, NAVY CROSS, AIR FORCE CROSS, AND
DISTINGUISHED-SERVICE MEDAL.

(a) Army.--Section 3744(b) of title 10, United States Code,
is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``three years'' and
inserting ``five years''; and
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``two years'' and
inserting ``three years''.
(b) Air Force.--Section 8744(b) of such title is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``three years'' and
inserting ``five years''; and
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``two years'' and
inserting ``three years''.

SEC. 584. RECODIFICATION AND REVISION OF ARMY, NAVY, AIR
FORCE, AND COAST GUARD MEDAL OF HONOR ROLL
REQUIREMENTS.

(a) Automatic Enrollment and Furnishing of Certificate.--
(1) In general.--Chapter 57 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by inserting after section 1134 the
following new section:

``Sec. 1134a. Medal of honor: Army, Navy, Air Force, and
Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll

``(a) Establishment.--There shall be in the Department of
the Army, the Department of the Navy, the Department of the
Air Force, and the Department in which the Coast Guard is
operating a roll designated as the `Army, Navy, Air Force,
and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll'.
``(b) Enrollment.--The Secretary concerned shall enter and
record on the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of
Honor Roll the name of each person who has served on active
duty in the armed forces and who has been awarded a medal of
honor pursuant to section 3741, 6241, or 8741 of this title
or section 491 of title 14.
``(c) Issuance of Enrollment Certificate.--Each living
person whose name is entered on the Army, Navy, Air Force,
and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll shall be issued a
certificate of enrollment on the roll.
``(d) Entitlement to Special Pension; Notice to Secretary
of Veterans Affairs.--The Secretary concerned shall deliver
to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs a certified copy of each
certificate of enrollment issued under subsection (c). The
copy of the certificate shall authorize the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs to pay the special pension provided by
section 1562 of title 38 to the person named in the
certificate.''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the
item relating to section 1134 the following new item:

``1134a. Medal of honor: Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal
of Honor Roll.''.

(b) Special Pension.--
(1) Automatic entitlement.--Subsection (a) of section 1562
of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
(A) by striking ``each person'' and inserting ``each living
person'';
(B) by striking ``Honor roll'' and inserting ``Honor
Roll'';
(C) by striking ``subsection (c) of section 1561 of this
title'' and inserting ``subsection (d) of section 1134a of
title 10''; and
(D) by striking ``date of application therefor under
section 1560 of this title'' and inserting ``date on which
the person's name is entered on the Army, Navy, Air Force,
and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll under subsection (b) of
such section''.
(2) Election to decline special pension.--Such section is
further amended by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
``(g)(1) A person who is entitled to special pension under
subsection (a) may elect not to receive special pension by
notifying the Secretary of such election in writing.
``(2) Upon receipt of an election made by a person under
paragraph (1) not to receive special pension, the Secretary
shall cease payments of special pension to the person.''.
(c) Conforming Amendments.--
(1) Repeal of recodified provisions.--Sections 1560 and
1561 of title 38, United States Code, are repealed.
(2) Clerical amendments.--The table of sections at the
beginning of chapter 15 of such title is amended by striking
the items relating to sections 1560 and 1561.
(d) Application of Amendments.--The amendments made by this
section shall apply with respect to Medals of Honor awarded
on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 585. TREATMENT OF VICTIMS OF THE ATTACKS AT RECRUITING
STATION IN LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS, AND AT FORT
HOOD, TEXAS.

(a) Award of Purple Heart Required.--The Secretary of the
military department concerned shall award the Purple Heart to
the members of the Armed Forces who were killed or wounded in
the attacks that occurred at the recruiting station in Little
Rock, Arkansas, on June 1, 2009, and at Fort Hood, Texas, on
November 5, 2009.
(b) Exception.--This section shall not apply to a member of
the Armed Forces whose death or wound in an attack described
in subsection (a) was the result of the willful misconduct of
the member.

SEC. 586. RETROACTIVE AWARD OF ARMY COMBAT ACTION BADGE.

(a) Authority To Award.--The Secretary of the Army may
award the Army Combat Action Badge (established by order of
the Secretary of the Army through Headquarters, Department of
the Army Letter 600-05-1, dated June 3, 2005) to a person
who, while a member of the Army, participated in combat
during which the person personally engaged, or was personally
engaged by, the enemy at any time during the period beginning
on December 7, 1941, and ending on September 18, 2001 (the
date of the otherwise applicable limitation on retroactivity
for the award of such decoration), if the Secretary
determines that the person has not been previously recognized
in an appropriate manner for such participation.
(b) Procurement of Badge.--The Secretary of the Army may
make arrangements with suppliers of the Army Combat Action
Badge so that eligible recipients of the Army Combat Action
Badge pursuant to subsection (a) may procure the badge
directly from suppliers, thereby eliminating or at least
substantially reducing administrative costs for the Army to
carry out this section.

SEC. 587. REPORT ON NAVY REVIEW, FINDINGS, AND ACTIONS
PERTAINING TO MEDAL OF HONOR NOMINATION OF
MARINE CORPS SERGEANT RAFAEL PERALTA.

Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of
Representatives a report describing the Navy review,
findings, and actions pertaining to the Medal of Honor
nomination of Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta. The
report shall account for all evidence submitted with regard
to the case.

[[Page H3412]]

SEC. 588. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE DISTINGUISHED-
SERVICE CROSS TO SERGEANT FIRST CLASS ROBERT F.
KEISER FOR ACTS OF VALOR DURING THE KOREAN WAR.

(a) Authorization.--Notwithstanding the time limitations
specified in section 3144 of title 10, United States Code, or
any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of
certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the
Secretary of the Army is authorized and requested to award
the Distinguished-Service Cross under section 3742 of such
title to Sergeant First Class Robert F. Keiser for the acts
of valor referred to in subsection (b) during the Korean War.
(b) Acts of Valor Described.--The acts of valor referred to
in subsection (a) are the actions of Robert F. Keiser's on
November 30, 1950, as a member of the 2d Military Police
Company, 2d Infantry Division, United States Army, during the
Division's successful withdrawal from the Kunuri-Sunchon
Pass.

Subtitle I--Other Matters

SEC. 591. REVISION OF SPECIFIED SENIOR MILITARY COLLEGES TO
REFLECT CONSOLIDATION OF NORTH GEORGIA COLLEGE
AND STATE UNIVERSITY AND GAINESVILLE STATE
COLLEGE.

Paragraph (6) of section 2111a(f) of title 10, United
States Code, is amended to read as follows:
``(6) The University of North Georgia.''.

SEC. 592. AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO CONCESSIONS CONTRACTS AT
ARMY NATIONAL MILITARY CEMETERIES.

(a) In General.--Chapter 446 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new
section:

``Sec. 4727. Cemetery concessions contracts

``(a) Contracts Authorized.--The Secretary of the Army may
enter into a contract with an appropriate entity for the
provision of transportation, interpretative, or other
necessary or appropriate concession services to visitors at
the Army National Military Cemeteries.
``(b) Special Requirements.--(1) The Secretary of the Army
shall establish and include in each concession contract such
requirements as the Secretary determines are necessary to
ensure the protection, dignity, and solemnity of the cemetery
at which services are provided under the contract.
``(2) A concession contract shall not include operation of
the gift shop at Arlington National Cemetery without the
specific prior authorization by an Act of Congress.
``(c) Term of Contracts.--(1) Except as provided in
paragraph (2), a concession contract may be awarded for a
period of not more than 10 years.
``(2)(A) If the Secretary of the Army determines that the
terms and conditions of a concession contract to be entered
into under this section, including any required construction
of capital improvements, warrant entering into the contract
for a period of greater than 10 years, the Secretary may
award the contract for a period of up to 20 years.
``(B) If a concession contract is intended solely for the
provision of transportation services, the Secretary may enter
into the contract for a period of not more than five years
and may extend the period of the contract for one or more
successive five-year periods pursuant to an option included
in the contract or a modification of the contract. The
aggregate period of any such contract, including extensions,
may not exceed 10 years.
``(d) Franchise Fees.--A concession contract shall provide
for payment to the United States of a franchise fee or such
other monetary consideration as determined by the Secretary
of the Army. The Secretary shall ensure that the objective of
generating revenue for the United States is subordinate to
the objectives of honoring the service and sacrifices of the
deceased members of the armed forces and of providing
necessary and appropriate services for visitors to the
Cemeteries at reasonable rates.
``(e) Special Account.--All franchise fees (and other
monetary consideration) collected by the United States under
subsection (d) shall be deposited into a special account
established in the Treasury of the United States. The funds
deposited in such account shall be available for expenditure
by the Secretary of the Army, to the extent authorized and in
such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriations
Acts, to support activities at the Cemeteries. The funds
deposited into the account shall remain available until
expended.
``(f) Concession Contract Defined.--In this section, the
term `concession contract' means a contract authorized and
entered into under this section.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the
following new item:

``4727. Cemetery concessions contracts.''.

SEC. 593. COMMISSION ON MILITARY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AND
DISCIPLINARY ISSUES.

(a) Establishment of Commission.--There is established the
Commission on Military Behavioral Health and Disciplinary
Issues (in this section referred to as the ``Commission'').
(b) Membership.--
(1) Composition.--The Commission shall be composed of 10
members, of whom--
(A) two shall be appointed by the President;
(B) two shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee
on Armed Services of the Senate;
(C) two shall be appointed by the Ranking Member of the
Committee on Armed Services of the Senate;
(D) two shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee
on Armed Services of the House of Representatives; and
(E) two shall be appointed by the Ranking Member of the
Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives.
(2) Appointment date.--The appointments of the members of
the Commission shall be made not later than 30 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act. If one or more
appointments under a subparagraph of paragraph (1) is not
made by such appointment date, the authority to make such
appointment or appointments shall expire, and the number of
members of the Commission shall be reduced by the number
equal to the number of appointments not made.
(3) Expertise.--In making appointments under this
subsection, consideration should be given to individuals with
expertise in service-connected mental disorders, post-
traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), traumatic brain injury
(TBI), psychiatry, behavioral health, neurology, as well as
disciplinary matters and military justice.
(4) Period of appointment; vacancies.--Members shall be
appointed for the life of the Commission. Any vacancy in the
Commission shall not affect its powers, but shall be filled
in the same manner as the original appointment.
(5) Initial meeting.--Not later than 30 days after the
appointment date specified in paragraph (2), the Commission
shall hold its first meeting.
(6) Meetings.--The Commission shall meet at the call of the
Chair. A majority of the members of the Commission shall
constitute a quorum, but a lesser number of members may hold
hearings.
(7) Chair and vice chairman.--The Commission shall select a
Chair and Vice Chair from among its members.
(c) Study and Report.--
(1) Study required.--The Commission shall undertake a
comprehensive study of whether--
(A) the Department of Defense mechanisms for disciplinary
action adequately address the impact of service-connected
mental disorders and TBI on the basis for the disciplinary
action; and
(B) whether the disciplinary mechanisms should be revisited
in light of new information regarding the connection between
service-connected mental disorders and TBI, behavioral
problems, and disciplinary action.
(2) Considerations.--In considering the Department of
Defense mechanisms for disciplinary action, the Commission
shall give particular consideration to evaluating a structure
that examines those members diagnosed with or reasonably
asserting post traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain
injury that have been deployed overseas in support of a
contingency operation during the previous 24 months and how
that injury or deployment may constitute matters in
extenuation that relate to the basis for administrative
separation under conditions other than honorable or the
overall characterization of service of the member as other
than honorable.
(3) Report.--Not later than June 30, 2014, the Commission
shall submit to the President and the congressional defense
committees a report containing a detailed statement of the
findings and conclusions of the Commission as a result of the
study required by this subsection, together with its
recommendations for such legislation and administrative
actions it may consider appropriate in light of the results
of the study.
(d) Powers of the Commission.--
(1) Hearings.--The Commission may hold such hearings, sit
and act at such times and places, take such testimony, and
receive such evidence as the Commission considers advisable
to carry out this section.
(2) Information from federal agencies.--The Commission may
secure directly from any Federal department or agency such
information as the Commission considers necessary to carry
out this section. Upon request of the Chair of the
Commission, the head of such department or agency shall
furnish such information to the Commission.
(e) Commission Personnel Matters.--
(1) Compensation of members.--All members of the Commission
who are officers or employees of the United States shall
serve without compensation in addition to that received for
their services as officers or employees of the United States.
(2) Travel expenses.--The members of the Commission shall
be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of
subsistence, at rates authorized for employees of agencies
under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States
Code, while away from their homes or regular places of
business in the performance of services for the Commission.
(3) Staff.--The Chair of the Commission may, without regard
to the civil service laws and regulations, appoint and
terminate an executive director and such other additional
personnel from as may be necessary to enable the Commission
to perform its duties. The employment of an executive
director shall be subject to confirmation by the Commission.
The staff members should be officers or employees of the
United States.
(f) Termination Date.--The Commission shall terminate 30
days after the date on which the Commission submits its
report.

SEC. 594. COMMISSION ON SERVICE TO THE NATION.

(a) Establishment.--There is established a commission to be
known as the ``Commission on Service to the Nation''.
(b) Duties.--
(1) Study.--The Commission shall carry out a study of the
following:
(A) The effect of warfare, focusing on recent wars and
conflicts, on members of the Armed Forces, the families of
members, and the communities of members.
(B) The outgoing experience and transition between military
and civilian life.
(C) The gaps between the military and those Americans who
do not participate directly in the military community.
(2) Testimony and research.--In carrying out the study
under paragraph (1), the Commission shall--

[[Page H3413]]

(A) hear testimony from all aspects of military and
civilian life, including public, private, individual and
institutional stakeholders, with personal testimony, expert
testimony, academic testimony, as well as testimony from
association and community leaders, and other testimony as
appropriate;
(B) hear and accept testimony in an open and public manner,
accepting testimony in a wide variety of ways for each
hearing, including submissions made through a public internet
website, and testimony heard remotely if appropriate;
(C) retain the records of all hearings and artifacts of
testimony for the purposes of historical documentation and
research;
(D) assess the social, mental, and physical effects of war
on active members of the Armed Forces, the families of
members, and the communities of members and the preparation
they receive for transitioning out of the military; and
(E) assess the existing academic and social science
research and analysis on transition from active military to
civilian life.
(3) Recommendations.--The Commission shall make
recommendations, based on the analyses in subparagraphs (A)
through (C) of paragraph (1), on how to better--
(A) support the transition to civilian life of a member of
the Armed Forces;
(B) support the families and communities of the member; and
(C) better connect the military community and civilians.
(4) Website.--The Commission shall maintain an Internet
website available to the public to--
(A) share the schedule of the Commission;
(B) notify the public of events;
(C) accept feedback; and
(D) post records of events and other information to inform
the public in a manner consistent with the mission of the
Commission.
(c) Composition.--
(1) Members.--The Commission shall be composed of 15
members appointed as follows:
(A) Four members appointed by Majority Leader of the
Senate, in consultation with the chairman of the Committee on
Armed Services of the Senate.
(B) Four members appointed by the Speaker of the House of
Representatives, in consultation with the chairman of the
Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives.
(C) Two members appointed by the Minority Leader of the
Senate, in consultation with the ranking minority member of
the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate.
(D) Two members appointed by the Minority Leader of the
House of Representatives, in consultation with the ranking
minority member of the Committee on Armed Service of the
House of Representatives.
(E) Three members appointed by the President.
(2) Qualifications.--The members of the Commission shall be
appointed from among persons who have knowledge and expertise
in the following areas:
(A) The effects of war on members of the Armed Forces,
their families, and society.
(B) The process of transitioning out of the Armed Forces.
(C) The resources available to members and their families
as members transition out of the Armed Forces and into
society.
(D) Personnel benefits, including healthcare and job
training, available to members.
(E) Policy making and policy analysis.
(3) Service requirement.--Not less than one member of the
Commission appointed under each of subparagraphs (A) through
(E) of paragraph (1) shall have served in the Armed Forces.
(4) Duration and vacancies.--Members of the Commission
shall be appointed for the life of the Commission. A vacancy
in the membership of the Commission shall not affect the
powers of the Commission, but shall be filled in the same
manner as the original appointment.
(5) Chairman.--The President shall designate a member of
the Commission to serve as chairman of the Commission.
(6) Deadline for appointment.--The members shall be
appointed by not later than 90 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act
(d) Procedures.--
(1) Initial meeting.--The Commission shall hold its initial
meeting not later than 30 days after the date on which all
members of the Commission have been appointed.
(2) Meetings.--After the initial meeting under paragraph
(1), the Commission shall meet at the call of the chairman.
(3) Quorum.--Four members of the Commission shall
constitute a quorum, but a lesser number of members may hold
hearings.
(4) Procedure.--The Commission shall act by resolution
agreed to by a majority of the members of the Commission.
(5) Panels.--The Commission may establish panels composed
of less than the full membership of the Commission for the
purpose of carrying out the Commission's duties. The actions
of each such panel shall be subject to the review and control
of the Commission. Any findings and determinations made by
such a panel shall not be considered the findings and
determinations of the Commission unless approved by the
Commission.
(e) Compensation and Staff.--
(1) Pay.--Each member of the Commission shall be paid at a
rate equal to the daily equivalent of the annual rate of
basic pay payable for level IV of the Executive Schedule
under section 5316 of title 5, United States Code, for each
day (including travel time) during which the member is
engaged in the performance of the duties of the Commission.
All members of the Commission who are officers or employees
of the United States shall serve without pay in addition to
that received for their services as officers or employees of
the United States.
(2) Travel expenses.--The members of the Commission shall
be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of
subsistence, at rates authorized for employees of agencies
under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States
Code, while away from their homes or regular places of
business in the performance of services for the Commission.
(3) Executive director.--The Commission shall appoint and
fix the rate of basic pay for an Executive Director in
accordance with section 3161 of title 5, United States Code.
(4) Staff.--The Executive Director, with the approval of
the Commission, may appoint and fix the rate of basic pay for
additional personnel as staff of the Commission in accordance
with section 3161 of title 5, United States Code.
(5) Detail of government employees.--Upon request of the
chairman of the Commission, the head of any Federal
department or agency may detail, on a nonreimbursable basis,
any personnel of that department or agency to the Commission
to assist it in carrying out its duties.
(f) Powers.--
(1) Hearings.--For the purpose of carrying out this Act,
the Commission (or on the authority of the Commission, any
subcommittee or member) may hold such hearings and forums,
and sit and act at such times and places, take such
testimony, receive such evidence, and administer such oaths
as the Commission considers appropriate. The Commission shall
hold not less than one hearing in each State and the District
of Columbia, and may hold hearings and forums in any
commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States
as the Commission determines appropriate.
(2) Information from federal agencies.--The Commission, or
designated staff member, may secure directly from any
department or agency of the United States information
necessary to enable it to carry out this Act. Upon request of
the chairman of the Commission, the chairman of any
subcommittee created by a majority of the Commission, or any
member designated by a majority of the Commission, the head
of that department or agency shall furnish that information
to the Commission.
(3) Miscellaneous administrative and support services.--The
Secretary of Defense shall furnish the Commission, on a
reimbursable basis, any administrative and support services
requested by the Commission.
(4) Procurement of temporary and intermittent services.--
The chairman of the Commission may procure temporary and
intermittent services under section 3109(b) of title 5,
United States Code, at rates for individuals which do not
exceed the daily equivalent of the annual rate of basic pay
payable for level V of the Executive Schedule under section
5316 of such title.
(5) Gifts.--The Commission may accept, use, and dispose of
gifts, bequests, or devises of services or property, both
real and personal, for the purpose of aiding or facilitating
the work of the Commission. Gifts, bequests, or devises of
money and proceeds from sales of other property received as
gifts, bequests, or devises shall be deposited in the
Treasury and shall be available for disbursement upon order
of the chairman, vice chairman, or designee.
(g) Reports.--
(1) Initial report.--Not later than 90 days after the
initial meeting of the Commission, the Commission shall
submit to the President, the Secretary of Defense, and the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives, and release to the public, a report setting
forth--
(A) a strategic plan for the work of the Commission;
(B) a discussion of the activities of the Commission; and
(C) any initial findings of the Commission.
(2) Final report.--Not later than 18 months after the
initial meeting of the Commission, the Commission shall
submit to the President, the Secretary of Defense, and the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives, and release to the public, a final report.
Such report shall include any recommendations developed under
subsection (b)(3) that the Commission determines appropriate,
including any recommended legislation, policies, regulations,
directives, and practices.
(h) Termination.--The Commission shall terminate 90 days
after the date on which the final report is submitted under
subsection (g)(2).

TITLE VI--COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS

Subtitle A--Pay and Allowances

SEC. 601. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY
INCREASE IN RATES OF BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR
HOUSING UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES.

Section 403(b)(7)(E) of title 37, United States Code, is
amended by striking ``December 31, 2013'' and inserting
``December 31, 2014''.

Subtitle B--Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays

SEC. 611. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BONUS AND SPECIAL PAY
AUTHORITIES FOR RESERVE FORCES.

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are
amended by striking ``December 31, 2013'' and inserting
``December 31, 2014'':
(1) Section 308b(g), relating to Selected Reserve
reenlistment bonus.
(2) Section 308c(i), relating to Selected Reserve
affiliation or enlistment bonus.
(3) Section 308d(c), relating to special pay for enlisted
members assigned to certain high-priority units.
(4) Section 308g(f)(2), relating to Ready Reserve
enlistment bonus for persons without prior service.
(5) Section 308h(e), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment
and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service.
(6) Section 308i(f), relating to Selected Reserve
enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior
service.

[[Page H3414]]

(7) Section 478a(e), relating to reimbursement of travel
expenses for inactive-duty training outside of normal
commuting distance.
(8) Section 910(g), relating to income replacement payments
for reserve component members experiencing extended and
frequent mobilization for active duty service.

SEC. 612. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BONUS AND SPECIAL PAY
AUTHORITIES FOR HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS.

(a) Title 10 Authorities.--The following sections of title
10, United States Code, are amended by striking ``December
31, 2013'' and inserting ``December 31, 2014'':
(1) Section 2130a(a)(1), relating to nurse officer
candidate accession program.
(2) Section 16302(d), relating to repayment of education
loans for certain health professionals who serve in the
Selected Reserve.
(b) Title 37 Authorities.--The following sections of title
37, United States Code, are amended by striking ``December
31, 2013'' and inserting ``December 31, 2014'':
(1) Section 302c-1(f), relating to accession and retention
bonuses for psychologists.
(2) Section 302d(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for
registered nurses.
(3) Section 302e(a)(1), relating to incentive special pay
for nurse anesthetists.
(4) Section 302g(e), relating to special pay for Selected
Reserve health professionals in critically short wartime
specialties.
(5) Section 302h(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for
dental officers.
(6) Section 302j(a), relating to accession bonus for
pharmacy officers.
(7) Section 302k(f), relating to accession bonus for
medical officers in critically short wartime specialties.
(8) Section 302l(g), relating to accession bonus for dental
specialist officers in critically short wartime specialties.

SEC. 613. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF SPECIAL PAY AND BONUS
AUTHORITIES FOR NUCLEAR OFFICERS.

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are
amended by striking ``December 31, 2013'' and inserting
``December 31, 2014'':
(1) Section 312(f), relating to special pay for nuclear-
qualified officers extending period of active service.
(2) Section 312b(c), relating to nuclear career accession
bonus.
(3) Section 312c(d), relating to nuclear career annual
incentive bonus.

SEC. 614. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO TITLE
37 CONSOLIDATED SPECIAL PAY, INCENTIVE PAY, AND
BONUS AUTHORITIES.

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are
amended by striking ``December 31, 2013'' and inserting
``December 31, 2014'':
(1) Section 331(h), relating to general bonus authority for
enlisted members.
(2) Section 332(g), relating to general bonus authority for
officers.
(3) Section 333(i), relating to special bonus and incentive
pay authorities for nuclear officers.
(4) Section 334(i), relating to special aviation incentive
pay and bonus authorities for officers.
(5) Section 335(k), relating to special bonus and incentive
pay authorities for officers in health professions.
(6) Section 351(h), relating to hazardous duty pay.
(7) Section 352(g), relating to assignment pay or special
duty pay.
(8) Section 353(i), relating to skill incentive pay or
proficiency bonus.
(9) Section 355(h), relating to retention incentives for
members qualified in critical military skills or assigned to
high priority units.

SEC. 615. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO
PAYMENT OF OTHER TITLE 37 BONUSES AND SPECIAL
PAYS.

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are
amended by striking ``December 31, 2013'' and inserting
``December 31, 2014'':
(1) Section 301b(a), relating to aviation officer retention
bonus.
(2) Section 307a(g), relating to assignment incentive pay.
(3) Section 308(g), relating to reenlistment bonus for
active members.
(4) Section 309(e), relating to enlistment bonus.
(5) Section 324(g), relating to accession bonus for new
officers in critical skills.
(6) Section 326(g), relating to incentive bonus for
conversion to military occupational specialty to ease
personnel shortage.
(7) Section 327(h), relating to incentive bonus for
transfer between armed forces.
(8) Section 330(f), relating to accession bonus for officer
candidates.

SEC. 616. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE
INCENTIVE PAY FOR MEMBERS OF PRECOMMISSIONING
PROGRAMS PURSUING FOREIGN LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY.

Section 316a(g) of title 37, United States Code is amended
by striking ``December 31, 2013'' and inserting ``December
31, 2014''.

SEC. 617. AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE BONUS TO CERTAIN CADETS AND
MIDSHIPMEN ENROLLED IN THE SENIOR RESERVE
OFFICERS' TRAINING CORPS.

(a) Bonus Authorized.--Chapter 5 of title 37, United States
Code, is amended by inserting after section 335 the following
new section:

``Sec. 336. Contracting bonus for cadets and midshipmen
enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps

``(a) Contracting Bonus Authorized.--The Secretary
concerned may pay a bonus under this section to a cadet or
midshipman enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers' Training
Corps who executes a written agreement described in
subsection (c).
``(b) Amount of Bonus.--The amount of a bonus under
subsection (a) may not exceed $5,000.
``(c) Agreement.--A written agreement referred to in
subsection (a) is a written agreement by the cadet or
midshipman--
``(1) to complete field training or a practice cruise under
section 2104(b)(6)(A)(ii) of title 10;
``(2) to complete advanced training under chapter 103 of
title 10;
``(3) to accept a commission or appointment as an officer
of the armed forces; and
``(4) to serve on active duty.
``(d) Payment Method.--Upon acceptance of a written
agreement under subsection (a) by the Secretary concerned,
the total amount of the bonus payable under the agreement
becomes fixed. The agreement shall specify when the bonus
will be paid and whether the bonus will be paid in a lump sum
or in installments.
``(e) Repayment.--A person who, having received all or part
of a bonus under subsection (a), fails to fulfill the terms
of the written agreement required by such subsection for
receipt of the bonus shall be subject to the repayment
provisions of section 373 of this title.
``(f) Regulations.--The Secretary concerned shall issue
such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this
section.
``(g) Termination of Authority.--No agreement under this
section may be entered into after December 31, 2015.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the
item relating to section 335 the following new item:

``336. Contracting bonus for cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the
Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps.''.

Subtitle C--Disability, Retired Pay, Survivor, and Transitional
Benefits

SEC. 621. TRANSITIONAL COMPENSATION AND OTHER BENEFITS FOR
DEPENDENTS OF CERTAIN MEMBERS SEPARATED FOR
VIOLATION OF THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY
JUSTICE.

(a) In General.--Chapter 53 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by inserting after section 1059 the
following new section:

``Sec. 1059a. Dependents of certain members separated for
Uniform Code of Military Justice offenses: transitional
compensation; commissary and exchange benefits

``(a) Authority To Pay Compensation.--The Secretary of
Defense, with respect to the armed forces (other than the
Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the
Navy), and the Secretary of Homeland Security, with respect
to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in
the Navy, may each establish a program under which the
Secretary may pay monthly transitional compensation in
accordance with this section to dependents or former
dependents of a member of the armed forces described in
subsection (b) who is under the jurisdiction of the
Secretary.
``(b) Members and Punitive Actions Covered.--This section
applies in the case of a member of the armed forces who,
after completing more than 20 years of active service or more
than 20 years of service computed under section 12732 of this
title--
``(1) is convicted by court-martial of an offense under
chapter 47 of this title (the Uniform Code of Military
Justice);
``(2) is separated from active duty pursuant to the
sentence of the court-martial; and
``(3) forfeits all pay and allowances pursuant to the
sentence of the court-martial.
``(c) Recipient of Payments.--(1) In the case of a member
of the armed forces described in subsection (b), the
Secretary may pay compensation under this section to
dependents or former dependents of the member as follows:
``(A) If the member was married at the time of the
commission of the offense resulting in separation from the
armed forces, such compensation may be paid to the spouse or
former spouse to whom the member was married at that time,
including an amount for each, if any, dependent child of the
member who resides in the same household as that spouse or
former spouse.
``(B) If there is a spouse or former spouse who is or, but
for subsection (d)(2), would be eligible for compensation
under this section and if there is a dependent child of the
member who does not reside in the same household as that
spouse or former spouse, compensation under this section may
be paid to each such dependent child of the member who does
not reside in that household.
``(C) If there is no spouse or former spouse who is or, but
for subsection (d)(2), would be eligible under this section,
compensation under this section may be paid to the dependent
children of the member.
``(2) A dependent or former dependent of a member described
in subsection (b) is not eligible for transitional
compensation under this section if the Secretary concerned
determines (under regulations prescribed under subsection
(g)) that the dependent or former dependent was an active
participant in the conduct constituting the offense under
chapter 47 of this title (the Uniform Code of Military
Justice) for which the member was convicted and separated
from the armed forces.
``(d) Commencement and Duration of Payment.--(1) If
provided under this section, the payment of transitional
compensation under this section shall commence--
``(A) as of the date the court-martial sentence is adjudged
if the sentence, as adjudged, includes--
``(i) a dismissal, dishonorable discharge, or bad conduct
discharge; and
``(ii) forfeiture of all pay and allowances; or

[[Page H3415]]

``(B) if there is a pretrial agreement that provides for
disapproval or suspension of the dismissal, dishonorable
discharge, bad conduct discharge, or forfeiture of all pay
and allowances, as of the date of the approval of the court-
martial sentence by the person acting under section 860(c) of
this title (article 60(c) of the Uniform Code of Military
Justice) if the sentence, as approved, includes--
``(i) an unsuspended dismissal, dishonorable discharge, or
bad conduct discharge; and
``(ii) forfeiture of all pay and allowances.
``(2) Paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (e), paragraphs
(1) and (2) of subsection (g), and subsections (f) and (h) of
section 1059 of this title shall apply in determining--
``(A) the amount of transitional compensation to be paid
under this section;
``(B) the period for which such compensation may be paid;
and
``(C) the circumstances under which the payment of such
compensation may or will cease.
``(e) Commissary and Exchange Benefits.--A dependent or
former dependent who receives transitional compensation under
this section shall, while receiving such payments, be
entitled to use commissary and exchange stores in the same
manner as provided in subsection (j) of section 1059 of this
title.
``(f) Coordination of Benefits.--The Secretary concerned
may not make payments to a spouse or former spouse under both
this section and section 1059 or 1408(h)(1) of this title. In
the case of a spouse or former spouse for whom a court order
provides for payments by the Secretary pursuant to section
1408(h)(1) of this title and to whom the Secretary offers
payments under this section or section 1059, the spouse or
former spouse shall elect which payments to receive.
``(g) Regulations.--If the Secretary of Defense (or the
Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to the Coast
Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy)
establishes a program to provide transitional compensation
under this section, that Secretary shall prescribe
regulations to carry out the program.
``(h) Dependent Child Defined.--In this section, the term
`dependent child', with respect to a member or former member
of the armed forces referred to in subsection (b), has the
meaning given such term in subsection (l) of section 1059 of
this title, except that status as a `dependent child' shall
be determined as of the date on which the member described in
subsection (b) is convicted of the offense concerned.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of chapter 53 of such title is amended by inserting
after the item relating to section 1059 the following new
item:

``1059a. Dependents of certain members separated for Uniform Code of
Military Justice offenses: transitional compensation;
commissary and exchange benefits.''.

(c) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (i) of section 1059
of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as
follows:
``(i) Coordination of Benefits.--The Secretary concerned
may not make payments to a spouse or former spouse under both
this section and section 1059a or 1408(h)(1) of this title.
In the case of a spouse or former spouse for whom a court
order provides for payments by the Secretary pursuant to
section 1408(h)(1) of this title and to whom the Secretary
offers payments under this section or section 1059a, the
spouse or former spouse shall elect which payments to
receive.''.

SEC. 622. PREVENTION OF RETIRED PAY INVERSION FOR MEMBERS
WHOSE RETIRED PAY IS COMPUTED USING HIGH-THREE
AVERAGE.

(a) Clarification of Rule for Members Who Became Members on
or After September 8, 1980.--Section 1401a(f)(1) of title 10,
United States Code, is amended--
(1) by striking ``Notwithstanding any other provision of
law, the monthly retired pay of a member or a former member
of an armed force'' and inserting the following:
``(A) Members with retired pay computed using final basic
pay.--The monthly retired pay of a member or former member of
an armed force who first became a member of a uniformed
service before September 8, 1980, and''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
``(B) Members with retired pay computed using high-three.--
Subject to subsections (d) and (e), the monthly retired pay
of a member or former member of an armed force who first
became a member of a uniformed service on or after September
8, 1980, may not be less, on the date on which the member or
former member initially becomes entitled to such pay, than
the monthly retired pay to which the member or former member
would be entitled on that date if the member or former member
had become entitled to retired pay on an earlier date,
adjusted to reflect any applicable increases in such pay
under this section. However, in the case of a member or
former member whose retired pay is computed subject to
section 1407(f) of this title, subparagraph (A) (rather than
the preceding sentence) shall apply in the same manner as if
the member or former member first became a member of a
uniformed service before September 8, 1980, but only with
respect to a calculation as of the date on which the member
or former member first became entitled to retired pay.''.
(b) Applicability.--Subparagraph (B) of section 1401a(f)(1)
of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection
(a)(2), applies to the computation of retired pay or retainer
pay of any member or former member of an Armed Force who
first became a member of a uniformed service on or after
September 8, 1980, regardless of the date on which the member
first becomes entitled to retired or retainer pay.

Subtitle D--Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality
Benefits and Operations

SEC. 631. EXPANSION OF PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEES OF
NONAPPROPRIATED FUND INSTRUMENTALITIES FROM
REPRISALS.

Section 1587(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended
by striking ``take or fail to take'' and inserting ``take,
threaten to take, or fail to take''.

SEC. 632. PURCHASE OF SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTS, LOCAL FOOD
PRODUCTS, AND RECYCLABLE MATERIALS FOR RESALE
IN COMMISSARY AND EXCHANGE STORE SYSTEMS.

(a) Improved Purchasing Efforts.--Section 2481(c) of title
10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the
following new paragraph:
``(3)(A) The governing body established pursuant to
paragraph (2) shall endeavor to increase the purchase for
resale at commissary stores and exchange stores of
sustainable products, local food products, and recyclable
materials.
``(B) As part of its efforts under subparagraph (A), the
governing body shall develop--
``(i) guidelines for the identification of fresh meat,
poultry, seafood, and fish, fresh produce, and other products
raised or produced through sustainable methods; and
``(ii) goals, applicable to all commissary stores and
exchange stores world-wide, to maximize, to the maximum
extent practical, the purchase of sustainable products, local
food products, and recyclable materials by September 30,
2018.''.
(b) Deadline for Establishment and Guidelines.--The initial
guidelines required by paragraph (3)(B)(i) of section 2481(c)
of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a),
shall be issued not later than two years after the date of
the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 633. CORRECTION OF OBSOLETE REFERENCES TO CERTAIN
NONAPPROPRIATED FUND INSTRUMENTALITIES.

Section 2105(c) of title 5, United States Code, is amended
by striking ``Army and Air Force Motion Picture Service, Navy
Ship's Stores Ashore'' and inserting ``Navy Ships Stores
Program''.

Subtitle E--Other Matters

SEC. 641. AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE CERTAIN EXPENSES FOR CARE AND
DISPOSITION OF HUMAN REMAINS RETAINED BY THE
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FOR FORENSIC PATHOLOGY
INVESTIGATION.

(a) Disposition of Remains of Persons Whose Death Is
Investigated by the Armed Forces Medical Examiner.--
(1) Covered decedents.--Section 1481(a) of title 10, United
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following
new paragraph:
``(10) To the extent authorized under section 1482(g) of
this title, any person not otherwise covered by the preceding
paragraphs whose remains (or partial remains) have been
retained by the Secretary concerned for purposes of a
forensic pathology investigation by the Armed Forces Medical
Examiner under section 1471 of this title.''.
(2) Authorized expenses relating to care and disposition of
remains.--Section 1482 of such title is amended by adding at
the end the following new subsection:
``(g)(1) The payment of expenses incident to the recovery,
care, and disposition of the remains of a decedent covered by
section 1481(a)(10) of this title is limited to those
expenses that, as determined under regulations prescribed by
the Secretary of Defense, would not have been incurred but
for the retention of those remains for purposes of a forensic
pathology investigation by the Armed Forces Medical Examiner
under section 1471 of this title. The Secretary concerned
shall pay all other expenses authorized to be paid under this
section only on a reimbursable basis. Amounts reimbursed to
the Secretary concerned under this subsection shall be
credited to appropriations available at the time of
reimbursement for the payment of such expenses.
``(2) In a case covered by paragraph (1), if the person
designated under subsection (c) to direct disposition of the
remains of a decedent does not direct disposition of the
remains that were retained for the forensic pathology
investigation, the Secretary may pay for the transportation
of those remains to, and interment or inurnment of those
remains in, an appropriate place selected by the Secretary,
in lieu of the transportation authorized to be paid under
subsection (a)(8).
``(3) In a case covered by paragraph (1), expenses that may
be paid do not include expenses with respect to an escort
under subsection (a)(8), whether or not on a reimbursable
basis.''.
(b) Clarification of Coverage of Inurnment.--Section
1482(a)(9) of such title is amended by inserting ``or
inurnment'' after ``Interment''.
(c) Technical Amendment.--Section 1482(f) of such title is
amended in the third sentence by striking ``this subsection''
and inserting ``this section''.

SEC. 642. PROVISION OF STATUS UNDER LAW BY HONORING CERTAIN
MEMBERS OF THE RESERVE COMPONENTS AS VETERANS.

(a) Veteran Status.--
(1) In general.--Chapter 1 of title 38, United States Code,
is amended by inserting after section 107 the following new
section:

``Sec. 107A. Honoring as veterans certain persons who
performed service in the reserve components

``Any person who is entitled under chapter 1223 of title 10
to retired pay for nonregular service or, but for age, would
be entitled under such chapter to retired pay for nonregular
service shall be honored as a veteran but shall not

[[Page H3416]]

be entitled to any benefit by reason of this section.''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the
item relating to section 107 the following new item:

``107A. Honoring as veterans certain persons who performed service in
the reserve components.''.

(b) Clarification Regarding Benefits.--No person may
receive any benefit under the laws administered by the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs solely by reason of section
107A of title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection
(a).

SEC. 643. SURVEY OF MILITARY PAY AND BENEFITS PREFERENCES.

(a) Survey Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall carry
out a anonymous survey of random members of the Armed Forces
regarding military pay and benefits.
(b) Content of Survey.--A survey under this section shall
be conducted for the purpose of soliciting information on the
following:
(1) The value that members of the Armed Forces place on the
following forms of compensation relative to one another:
(A) Basic pay.
(B) Allowances for housing and subsistence.
(C) Bonuses and special pays.
(D) Dependent healthcare benefits.
(E) Healthcare benefits for retirees under 65 years old.
(F) Healthcare benefits for Medicare-eligible retirees.
(G) Retirement pay.
(2) How the members value different levels of pay or
benefits, including the impact of co-payments or deductibles
on the value of benefits.
(3) Any other issues related to military pay and benefits
as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate.
(4) How information collected pursuant to a previous
paragraph varies by age, rank, dependent status, and other
factors the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate.
(c) Submission of Results.--Upon the completion of a survey
conducted under this section, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to Congress and make publicly available a report
containing the results of the survey, including both the
analyses and the raw data collected.

TITLE VII--HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS

Subtitle A--Improvements to Health Benefits

SEC. 701. MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED
FORCES.

(a) In General.--Section 1074m of title 10, United States
Code, is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)(1)--
(A) by redesignating subparagraph (B) and (C) as
subparagraph (C) and (D), respectively; and
(B) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following:
``(B) Once during each 180-day period during which a member
is deployed.''; and
(2) in subsection (c)(1)(A)--
(A) in clause (i), by striking ``; and'' and inserting a
semicolon;
(B) by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii); and
(C) by inserting after clause (i) the following:
``(ii) by personnel in deployed units whose
responsibilities include providing unit health care services
if such personnel are available and the use of such personnel
for the assessments would not impair the capacity of such
personnel to perform higher priority tasks; and''.
(b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1074m(a)(2) of title 10,
United States Code, is amended by striking ``subparagraph (B)
and (C)'' and inserting ``subparagraph (C) and (D)''.

SEC. 702. PERIODIC MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF
THE ARMED FORCES.

(a) In General.--Chapter 55 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by inserting after section 1074m the
following new section:

``Sec. 1074n. Periodic mental health assessments for members
of the armed forces

``(a) In General.--The Secretary of Defense shall provide
periodic, person-to-person mental health assessments to each
member of the armed forces serving on active duty.
``(b) Frequency.--The Secretary shall determine the
frequency of the mental health assessments provided under
subsection (a).
``(c) Elements.--(1) The mental health assessments provided
under subsection (a) shall meet the requirements for mental
health assessments as described in section 1074m(c)(1) of
this title.
``(2) The Secretary may treat health assessments and other
person-to-person assessments that are provided to members of
the armed forces, including examinations under sections 1074f
and 1074m of this title, as meeting the requirements for
mental health assessments required under subsection (a) if
the Secretary determines that such assessments and person-to-
person assessments meet the requirements for mental health
assessments established by this section.
``(d) Sharing of Information.--Section 1074m(e) of this
title, regarding the sharing of information with the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall apply to mental health
assessments provided under subsection (a).
``(e) Regulations.--The Secretary of Defense, in
consultation with the other administering Secretaries, shall
prescribe regulations for the administration of this
section.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the
item relating to section 1074m the following new item:

``1074n. Periodic mental health assessments for members of the armed
forces.''.

Subtitle B--Health Care Administration

SEC. 711. FUTURE AVAILABILITY OF TRICARE PRIME FOR CERTAIN
BENEFICIARIES ENROLLED IN TRICARE PRIME.

Section 732 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1816) is
amended--
(1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
(2) by inserting the following new subsection:
``(b) Access to TRICARE Prime.--
``(1) One-time election.--Subject to paragraph (3), the
Secretary shall ensure that each affected eligible
beneficiary who is enrolled in TRICARE Prime as of September
30, 2013, may make a one-time election to continue such
enrollment in TRICARE Prime, notwithstanding that a contract
described in subsection (a)(2)(A) does not allow for such
enrollment based on the location in which such beneficiary
resides. The beneficiary may continue such enrollment in
TRICARE Prime so long as the beneficiary resides in the same
ZIP code as the ZIP Code in which the beneficiary resided at
the time of such election.
``(2) Enrollment in tricare standard.--If an affected
eligible beneficiary makes the one-time election under
paragraph (1), the beneficiary may thereafter elect to enroll
in TRICARE Standard at any time in accordance with a contract
described in subsection (a)(2)(A).
``(3) Residence at time of election.--An affected eligible
beneficiary may not make the one-time election under
paragraph (1) if, at the time of such election, the
beneficiary does not reside in a ZIP code that is in a region
described in subsection (c)(1)(B).''.

SEC. 712. COOPERATIVE HEALTH CARE AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE
MILITARY DEPARTMENTS AND NON-MILITARY HEALTH
CARE ENTITIES.

Section 713 of the National Defense Authorization Act of
2010 (Public Law 111-84; 10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ``Secretary of Defense''
and inserting ``Secretary concerned'';
(2) in subsection (b)--
(A) by striking ``Secretary shall'' and inserting
``Secretary concerned shall'';
(B) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting ``if the Secretary
establishing such agreement is the Secretary of Defense''
before the semicolon; and
(C) in paragraph (3), by inserting ``or the military
department concerned'' after ``the Department of Defense'';
and
(3) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(e) Secretary Concerned Defined.--In this section, the
term `Secretary concerned' means--
``(1) the Secretary of a military department; or
``(2) the Secretary of Defense.''.

SEC. 713. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR INTEGRATED
ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD PROGRAM.

(a) Limitation.-- Of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for
fiscal year 2014 for procurement or research, development,
test, and evaluation for the Department of Defense for the
integrated electronic health record program, not more than 75
percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 30
days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of
Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a
report detailing an analysis of alternatives for the plan of
the Secretary to proceed with such program.
(b) Matters Included.--The report under subsection (a)
shall include the following:
(1) A description of the key performance requirements for
the integrated electronic health record program capability.
(2) An analysis of alternatives for how to acquire and
implement an integrated electronic health record capability
that meets such requirements.
(3) An assessment of the budgetary resources and timeline
required for each of the evaluated alternatives.
(4) A recommendation by the Secretary with respect to the
alternative preferred by the Secretary.

SEC. 714. PILOT PROGRAM ON INCREASED THIRD-PARTY COLLECTION
REIMBURSEMENTS IN MILITARY MEDICAL TREATMENT
FACILITIES.

(a) Pilot Program.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense, in coordination
with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall carry
out a pilot program to demonstrate and assess the feasibility
of implementing processes described in paragraph (2) to
increase the amounts collected under section 1095 of title
10, United States Code, from a third-party payer for charges
for health care services incurred by the United States at a
military medical treatment facility.
(2) Processes described.--The processes described in this
paragraph are revenue-cycle management processes, including
cash-flow management and accounts-receivable processes.
(b) Requirements.--In carrying out the pilot program under
subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall--
(1) identify and analyze the best practice option,
including commercial best practices, with respect to the
processes described in subsection (a)(2) that are used in
nonmilitary health care facilities; and
(2) conduct a cost-benefit analysis to assess measurable
results of the pilot program, including an analysis of--
(A) the different processes used in the pilot program;
(B) the amount of third-party collections that resulted
from such processes;
(C) the cost to implement and sustain such processes; and
(D) any other factors the Secretary determines appropriate
to assess the pilot program.
(c) Locations.--The Secretary shall carry out the pilot
program under subsection (a)(1)--
(1) at military installations that have a military medical
treatment facility with inpatient and outpatient
capabilities;
(2) at a number of such installations at different military
departments that the Secretary

[[Page H3417]]

determines sufficient to fully assess the results of the
pilot program.
(d) Duration.--The Secretary shall commence the pilot
program under subsection (a)(1) by not later than 270 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act and shall carry
out such program for three years.
(e) Report.--Not later than 180 days after completing the
pilot program under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report
describing the results of the program, including--
(1) a comparison of--
(A) the processes described in subsection (a)(2) that were
used in the military medical treatment facilities
participating in the program; and
(B) the third-party collection processes used by military
medical treatment facilities not included in the program;
(2) a cost analysis of implementing the processes described
in subsection (a)(2) for third-party collections at military
medical treatment facilities; and
(3) an assessment of the program, including any
recommendations to improve third-party collections.

Subtitle C--Other Matters

SEC. 721. DISPLAY OF BUDGET INFORMATION FOR EMBEDDED MENTAL
HEALTH PROVIDERS OF THE RESERVE COMPONENTS.

(a) In General.--Chapter 9 of title 10, United States Code,
is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``Sec. 236. Embedded mental health providers of the reserve
components: display of budget information

``The Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress, as a
part of the documentation that supports the President's
annual budget for the Department of Defense, a budget
justification display with respect to embedded mental health
providers within each reserve component, including the amount
requested for each such component.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the
following new item:

``236. Embedded mental health providers of the reserve components:
display of budget information.''.

SEC. 722. AUTHORITY OF UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF
HEALTH SCIENCES TO ENTER INTO CONTRACTS AND
AGREEMENTS AND MAKE GRANTS TO OTHER NONPROFIT
ENTITIES.

Section 2113(g)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended--
(1) in subparagraph (B)--
(A) by inserting ``, or any other nonprofit entity'' after
``Military Medicine''; and
(B) by inserting ``, or nonprofit entity,'' after ``such
Foundation''; and
(2) in subparagraph (C)--
(A) by inserting ``, or any other nonprofit entity,'' after
``Military Medicine''; and
(B) by inserting ``, or nonprofit entity,'' after ``such
foundation''.

SEC. 723. MENTAL HEALTH SUPPORT FOR MILITARY PERSONNEL AND
FAMILIES.

The Secretary of Defense may carry out collaborative
programs to--
(1) respond to the escalating suicide rates and combat
stress related arrest rates of members of the Armed Forces;
and
(2) train active duty members to recognize and respond to
combat stress disorder, suicide risk, substance addiction,
risk-taking behaviors, and family violence.

SEC. 724. RESEARCH REGARDING HYDROCEPHALUS.

In conducting the Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program,
the Secretary of Defense may consider selecting medical
research projects relating to hydrocephalus.

SEC. 725. TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY RESEARCH.

The Secretary of Defense shall carry out research,
development, test, and evaluation activities with respect to
traumatic brain injury and psychological health, including
activities regarding drug development to halt
neurodegeneration following traumatic brain injury.

TITLE VIII--ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED
MATTERS

Subtitle A--Acquisition Policy and Management

SEC. 801. MODIFICATION OF REPORTING REQUIREMENT FOR
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEM
ACQUISITION PROGRAMS WHEN INITIAL OPERATING
CAPABILITY IS NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN FIVE YEARS OF
MILESTONE A APPROVAL.

(a) Submission to Pre-certification Authority.--Subsection
(b) of section 811 of the John Warner National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109-364;
120 Stat. 2316; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note) is amended by striking
``the system shall be deemed to have undergone'' and all that
follows through the period and inserting ``the appropriate
official shall report such failure, along with the facts and
circumstances surrounding the failure, to the appropriate
pre-certification authority for that system under section
2222 of title 10, United States Code, and the information so
reported shall be considered by the pre-certification
authority in the decision whether to recommend certification
of obligations under that section.''.
(b) Covered Systems.--Subsection (c) of such section is
amended--
(1) by striking ``3542(b)(2) of title 44'' and inserting
``section 2222(j)(2) of title 10''; and
(2) by inserting ``, and that is not designated in section
2445a of title 10, United States Code, as a `major automated
information system program' or an `other major information
technology investment program' '' before the period at the
end.
(c) Updated References to DOD Issuances.--Subsection (d) of
such section is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``Department of Defense
Instruction 5000.2'' and inserting ``Department of Defense
Directive 5000.01''; and
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``Department of Defense
Instruction 5000.2, dated May 12, 2003'' and inserting
``Department of Defense Instruction 5000.02, dated December
3, 2008''.

SEC. 802. ENHANCED TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPED AT
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE LABORATORIES.

(a) Definitions.--As used in this section:
(1) The term ``military department'' has the meaning
provided in section 101 of title 10, United States Code.
(2) The term ``DOD laboratory'' or ``laboratory'' means any
facility or group of facilities that--
(A) is owned, leased, operated, or otherwise used by the
Department of Defense; and
(B) meets the definition of ``laboratory'' as provided in
subsection (d)(2) of section 12 of the Stevenson-Wydler
Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3710a).
(b) Authority.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary
of a military department each may authorize the heads of DOD
laboratories to grant nonexclusive, exclusive, or partially
exclusive licenses, royalty free or for royalties or for
rights to other intellectual property, for computer software
and its related documentation developed at a DOD laboratory,
but only if--
(A) the computer software and related documentation would
be a trade secret under the meaning of section 552(b)(4) of
title 5, United States Code, if the information had been
obtained from a non-Federal party;
(B) the public is notified of the availability of the
software and related documentation for licensing and
interested parties have a fair opportunity to submit
applications for licensing;
(C) such licensing activities and licenses comply with the
requirements under section 209 of title 35, United States
Code; and
(D) the software originally was developed to meet the
military needs of the Department of Defense.
(2) Protections against unauthorized disclosure.--The
Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of a military
department each shall provide appropriate precautions against
the unauthorized disclosure of any computer software or
documentation covered by paragraph (1)(A), including
exemption from section 552 of title 5, United States Code,
for a period of up to 5 years after the development of the
computer software by the DOD laboratory.
(c) Royalties.--
(1) Use of royalties.--Except as provided in paragraph (2),
any royalties or other payments received by the Department of
Defense or a military department from licensing computer
software or documentation under paragraph (b)(1) shall be
retained by the Department of Defense or the military
department and shall be disposed of as follows:
(A)(i) The Department of Defense or the military department
shall pay each year the first $2,000, and thereafter at least
15 percent, of the royalties or other payments, to be divided
among the employees who developed the computer software.
(ii) The Department of Defense or the military department
may provide appropriate lesser incentives, from the royalties
or other payments, to laboratory employees who are not
developers of such computer software but who substantially
increased the technical value of the software.
(iii) The Department of Defense or the military department
shall retain the royalties and other payments received until
it makes payments to employees of a DOD laboratory under
clause (i) or (ii).
(iv) The Department of Defense or the military department
may retain an amount reasonably necessary to pay expenses
incidental to the administration and distribution of
royalties or other payments under this section by an
organizational unit of the Department of Defense or military
department other than its laboratories.
(B) The balance of the royalties or other payments shall be
transferred by the Department of Defense or the military
department to its laboratories, with the majority share of
the royalties or other payments going to the laboratory where
the development occurred. The royalties or other payments so
transferred to any DOD laboratory may be used or obligated by
that laboratory during the fiscal year in which they are
received or during the 2 succeeding fiscal years--
(i) to reward scientific, engineering, and technical
employees of the DOD laboratory, including developers of
sensitive or classified technology, regardless of whether the
technology has commercial applications;
(ii) to further scientific exchange among the laboratories
of the agency;
(iii) for education and training of employees consistent
with the research and development missions and objectives of
the Department of Defense, military department, or DOD
laboratory, and for other activities that increase the
potential for transfer of the technology of the laboratories;
(iv) for payment of expenses incidental to the
administration and licensing of computer software or other
intellectual property made at that DOD laboratory, including
the fees or other costs for the services of other agencies,
persons, or organizations for intellectual property
management and licensing services; or
(v) for scientific research and development consistent with
the research and development missions and objectives of the
DOD laboratory.
(C) All royalties or other payments retained by the
Department of Defense, military department, or DOD laboratory
after payments have been made pursuant to subparagraphs (A)
and (B) that are unobligated and unexpended at the

[[Page H3418]]

end of the second fiscal year succeeding the fiscal year in
which the royalties and other payments were received shall be
paid into the Treasury of the United States.
(2) Exception.--If, after payments under paragraph (1)(A),
the balance of the royalties or other payments received by
the Department of Defense or the military department in any
fiscal year exceed 5 percent of the funds received for use by
the DOD laboratory for research, development, engineering,
testing, and evaluation or other related administrative,
processing or value-added activities for that year, 75
percent of such excess shall be paid to the Treasury of the
United States and the remaining 25 percent may be used or
obligated under paragraph (1)(B). Any funds not so used or
obligated shall be paid into the Treasury of the United
States.
(3) Status of payments to employees.--Any payment made to
an employee under this section shall be in addition to the
regular pay of the employee and to any other awards made to
the employee, and shall not affect the entitlement of the
employee to any regular pay, annuity, or award to which the
employee is otherwise entitled or for which the employee is
otherwise eligible or limit the amount thereof except that
the monetary value of an award for the same project or effort
shall be deducted from the amount otherwise available under
this paragraph. Payments, determined under the terms of this
paragraph and made to an employee developer as such, may
continue after the developer leaves the DOD laboratory or the
Department of Defense or military department. Payments made
under this section shall not exceed $75,000 per year to any
one person, unless the President approves a larger award
(with the excess over $75,000 being treated as a Presidential
award under section 4504 of title 5, United States Code).
(d) Information in Report.--The report required by section
2515(d) of title 10, United States Code, shall include
information regarding the implementation and effectiveness of
this section.
(e) Expiration.--The authority provided in this section
shall expire on December 31, 2018.

SEC. 803. EXTENSION OF LIMITATION ON AGGREGATE ANNUAL AMOUNT
AVAILABLE FOR CONTRACT SERVICES.

Section 808 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1489) is
amended--
(1) by striking ``fiscal year 2012 or 2013'' each place it
appears and inserting ``fiscal year 2012, 2013, 2014 or
2015''; and
(2) by striking ``fiscal years 2012 and 2013'' each place
it appears and inserting ``fiscal years 2012, 2013, 2014, and
2015''.

Subtitle B--Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures,
and Limitations

SEC. 811. ADDITIONAL CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITIES IN
REGULATIONS RELATING TO DETECTION AND AVOIDANCE
OF COUNTERFEIT ELECTRONIC PARTS.

Section 818(c)(2)(B) of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1493;
10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended--
(1) in clause (i), by inserting ``electronic'' after
``avoid counterfeit''; and
(2) in clause (ii), by striking ``were provided'' and
inserting the following: ``were--

``(I) procured from an original manufacturer or its
authorized dealer or from a trusted supplier in accordance
with regulations described in paragraph (3); or
``(II) provided''.

SEC. 812. AMENDMENTS RELATING TO DETECTION AND AVOIDANCE OF
COUNTERFEIT ELECTRONIC PARTS.

Section 818(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note)
is amended--
(1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``and'' at the end;
(2) in subparagraph (B), at the end of clause (iii), by
striking the period and inserting ``; and''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
``(C) the cost of counterfeit electronic parts and suspect
counterfeit electronic parts and the cost of rework or
corrective action that may be required to remedy the use or
inclusion of obsolete parts are not allowable costs under
Department contracts, unless--
``(i) the offeror's proposal in response to a Department of
Defense solicitation for maintenance, refurbishment, or
remanufacture work identifies obsolete electronic parts and
includes a plan to ensure trusted sources of supply for
obsolete electronic parts, or to implement design
modifications to eliminate obsolete electronic parts;
``(ii) the Department elects not to fund design
modifications to eliminate obsolete electronic parts; and
``(iii) the contractor applies inspections and tests
intended to detect counterfeit electronic parts and suspect
counterfeit electronic parts when purchasing electronic parts
from other than the original manufacturers or their
authorized dealers, pursuant to paragraph (3).''.

SEC. 813. GOVERNMENT-WIDE LIMITATIONS ON ALLOWABLE COSTS FOR
CONTRACTOR COMPENSATION.

(a) Defense Contracts.--
(1) Amendments relating to contractor employees.--
Subparagraph (P) of section 2324(e)(1) of title 10, United
States Code, is amended to read as follows:
``(P) Costs of compensation of any contractor employee for
a fiscal year, regardless of the contract funding source, to
the extent that such compensation exceeds $763,029 adjusted
annually for the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment
Cost Index for total compensation for private industry
workers, by occupational and industry group not seasonally
adjusted, except that the Secretary of Defense may establish
narrowly targeted exceptions for positions in the science,
technology, engineering, mathematics, medical, and
manufacturing fields upon a determination that such
exceptions are needed to ensure that the Department of
Defense has continued access to needed skills and
capabilities.''.
(2) Amendments relating to senior executives of certain
contractors.--Section 2324(e)(1) of such title is further
amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
``(Q) Costs of compensation of senior executives of a
covered contractor.''.
(3) Definitions.--Section 2324(l) of such title is
amended--
(A) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new
paragraph (5):
``(5) The term `senior executives', with respect to a
covered contractor, means the five most highly compensated
employees of the contractor. In determining the five most
highly compensated employees in the case of a contractor with
components (such as subsidiaries or divisions), the
determination shall be made using the five most highly
compensated employees contractor-wide, not within each
component.''; and
(B) by inserting after paragraph (6) the following new
paragraph (7):
``(7) The term `covered contractor', with respect to a
fiscal year, means a contractor that was awarded Federal
contracts in an amount totaling more than $500,000,000 during
the previous fiscal year.''.
(b) Civilian Agency Contracts.--
(1) Amendments relating to contractor employees.--Paragraph
(16) of section 4304(a) of title 41, United States Code, is
amended to read as follows:
``(16) Costs of compensation of any contractor employee for
a fiscal year, regardless of the contract funding source, to
the extent that such compensation exceeds $763,029 adjusted
annually for the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment
Cost Index for total compensation for private industry
workers, by occupational and industry group not seasonally
adjusted, except that the executive agency may establish
narrowly targeted exceptions for positions in the science,
technology, engineering, mathematics, medical, and
manufacturing fields upon a determination that such
exceptions are needed to ensure that the executive agency has
continued access to needed skills and capabilities.''.
(2) Amendments relating to senior executives of certain
contractors.--Section 4304(a) of such title is further
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(17) Costs of compensation of senior executives of a
covered contractor.''.
(3) Definitions.--Section 4301 of such title is amended by
striking paragraph (4) and inserting the following new
paragraphs (4) and (5):
``(4) The term `senior executives', with respect to a
covered contractor, means the five most highly compensated
employees of the contractor. In determining the five most
highly compensated employees in the case of a contractor with
components (such as subsidiaries or divisions), the
determination shall be made using the five most highly
compensated employees contractor-wide, not within each
component.
``(5) The term `covered contractor', with respect to a
fiscal year, means a contractor that was awarded Federal
contracts in an amount totaling more than $500,000,000 during
the previous fiscal year.''.
(c) Conforming Amendments.--Chapter 11 of title 41, United
States Code, is amended--
(1) by striking section 1127; and
(2) by striking the item relating to that section in the
table of sections at the beginning of such chapter.
(d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section
shall apply with respect to costs of compensation incurred
under contracts entered into on or after the date that is 180
days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 814. INCLUSION OF ADDITIONAL COST ESTIMATE INFORMATION
IN CERTAIN REPORTS.

(a) Additional Cost Estimate Information Required to Be
Included in Selected Acquisition Reports.--Section 2432(c)(1)
of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by redesignating subparagraphs (B), (C) and (D) as
subparagraphs (C), (D), and (F), respectively;
(2) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following new
subparagraph (B):
``(B) for each major defense acquisition program or
designated major subprogram included in the report--
``(i) the Baseline Estimate (as that term is defined in
section 2433(a)(2) of this title), along with the associated
risk curve and sensitivity of that estimate;
``(ii) the original Baseline Estimate (as that term is
defined in section 2435(d)(1) of this title), along with the
associated risk curve and sensitivity of that estimate;
``(iii) if the original Baseline Estimate was adjusted or
revised pursuant to section 2435(d)(2) of this title, such
adjusted or revised estimate, along with the associated risk
curve and sensitivity of that estimate; and
``(iv) the primary risk parameters associated with the
current procurement cost for the program (as that term is
used in section 2432(e)(4) of this title);'';
(3) in subparagraph (D), as so redesignated, by striking
``and'' at the end; and
(4) by inserting after subparagraph (D), as so
redesignated, the following new subparagraph (E):
``(E) estimated contract termination costs; and''.
(b) Additional Duties of Director of Cost Assessment and
Program Evaluation With Respect to SAR.--
(1) Review required.--Section 2334(a) of title 10, United
States Code, is amended--

[[Page H3419]]

(A) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (6);
(B) by striking the period and inserting ``; and'' at the
end of paragraph (7); and
(C) by adding at the end the following new paragraph (8):
``(8) annually review the cost estimates and associated
information required to be included, by section 2432(c)(1)(B)
of this title, in the Selected Acquisition Reports required
by that section.''.
(2) Additional information required in annual report.--
Section 2334(f)(1) of such title is amended--
(A) by striking ``report, an assessment of--'' and
inserting ``report--'';
(B) in each of subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), by
inserting ``an assessment of'' before the first word of the
text;
(C) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``and'' at the end;
(D) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end
and inserting ``; and''; and
(E) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
``(D) a summary of the cost estimate information reviewed
under subsection (a)(8), an identification of any trends in
that information, an aggregation of the cumulative risk of
the portfolio of systems reviewed under that subsection, and
recommendations for improving cost estimates on the basis of
the review under that subsection.''.

SEC. 815. AMENDMENT RELATING TO COMPELLING REASONS FOR
WAIVING SUSPENSION OR DEBARMENT.

Section 2393(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended
by inserting after the first sentence the following: ``The
Secretary of Defense shall also make the determination
described in subsection (a)(2) available on a publicly
accessible website.''.

SEC. 816. REQUIREMENT THAT COST OR PRICE TO THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT BE GIVEN AT LEAST EQUAL IMPORTANCE
AS TECHNICAL OR OTHER CRITERIA IN EVALUATING
COMPETITIVE PROPOSALS FOR DEFENSE CONTRACTS.

(a) Requirement.--Subparagraph (A) of section 2305(a)(3) of
title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking
``proposals; and'' at the end of clause (ii) and all that
follows through the end of the subparagraph and inserting the
following: ``proposals and that must be assigned importance
at least equal to all evaluation factors other than cost or
price when combined.''.
(b) Waiver.--Section 2305(a)(3) of such title is further
amended by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the
following:
``(B) The requirement of subparagraph (A)(ii) relating to
assigning at least equal importance to evaluation factors of
cost or price may be waived by the head of the agency.''.
(c) Report.--Section 2305(a)(3) of such title is further
amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
``(C) Not later than 180 days after the end of each fiscal
year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress, and
post on a publicly available website of the Department of
Defense, a report containing a list of each waiver issued by
the head of an agency under subparagraph (B) during the
preceding fiscal year.''.

SEC. 817. REQUIREMENT TO BUY AMERICAN FLAGS FROM DOMESTIC
SOURCES.

Section 2533a(b) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(3) A flag of the United States of America (within the
meaning of chapter 1 of title 4).''.

Subtitle C--Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of Contingency
Operations in Iraq or Afghanistan

SEC. 821. AMENDMENTS RELATING TO PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING
WITH THE ENEMY.

(a) Amendments Relating to Prohibition.--Section 841(a)(1)
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2012 (Public Law 112-81; 126 Stat. 1510) is amended--
(1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking
``Commander of the United States Central Command'' and
inserting ``commander of a covered combatant command'';
(2) in subparagraph (A)--
(A) by striking ``Commander of the United States Central
Command'' and inserting ``commander of the covered combatant
command''; and
(B) by striking ``United States Central Command theater of
operations'' and inserting ``theater of operations of that
command'';
(3) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``United States
Central Command theater of operations'' and inserting
``theater of operations of the covered combatant command'';
and
(4) in subparagraph (C)--
(A) by striking ``Commander of the United States Central
Command'' and inserting ``commander of the covered combatant
command''; and
(B) by striking ``United States Central Command theater of
operations'' and inserting ``theater of operations of that
command''.
(b) Amendments Relating to Contract Clause.--Section
841(b)(3) of such Act is amended--
(1) by striking ``$100,000'' and inserting ``$50,000''; and
(2) by striking ``United States Central Command theater of
operations'' and inserting ``theater of operations of a
covered combatant command''.
(c) Amendments Relating to Identification of Contracts.--
Section 841(c) of such Act is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1)--
(A) by striking ``, acting through the Commander of the
United States Central Command,''; and
(B) by striking ``United States Central Command theater of
operations'' and inserting ``theaters of operations of
covered combatant commands'';
(2) in paragraph (2)--
(A) by striking ``Commander of the United States Central
Command'' and inserting ``commander of a covered combatant
command''; and
(B) by striking ``Commander may notify'' and inserting
``commander may notify''; and
(3) in paragraph (3), by striking ``Commander of the United
States Central Command'' and inserting ``commander of a
covered combatant command''.
(d) Amendments Relating to Nondelegation of
Responsibilities.--Section 841(d)(2) of such Act is amended
by striking ``Commander of the United States Central
Command'' and inserting ``commander of a covered combatant
command''.
(e) Amendments Relating to Definitions.--Section 841(f) of
such Act is amended--
(1) by striking the subsection heading and inserting
``Definitions.--'';
(2) by striking ``In this section, the term'' and inserting
the following: ``In this section:
``(1) Contingency operation.--The term''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(2) Covered combatant command.--The term `covered
combatant command' means the United States Central Command,
the United States European Command, the United States
Southern Command, and the United States Pacific Command.''.
(f) Repeal of Sunset.--Subsection (g) of section 841 of
such Act is repealed.
(g) Technical Amendments.--
(1) Conforming amendment to section heading.--
(A) The heading of section 841 of such Act is amended by
striking ``IN THE UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND THEATER OF
OPERATIONS''.
(B) The item relating to section 841 in the table of
sections at the beginning of title VIII and in section 2 of
such Act is amended to read as follows:

``Sec. 841. Prohibition on contracting with the enemy.''.

(2) Repeal of superseded deadlines.--Paragraph (1) of each
of subsections (a), (b), and (c) of section 841 of such Act
is amended by striking ``Not later than 30 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the'' and inserting
``The''.
(h) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section
shall apply to contracts entered into on or after the date
that is 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 822. COLLECTION OF DATA RELATING TO CONTRACTS IN IRAQ
AND AFGHANISTAN.

(a) Penalties.--Section 861 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181;
10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by adding at the end the
following new subsection:
``(e) Penalties for Failure to Comply.--Any contract in
Afghanistan entered into or modified after the date of the
enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2014 may include a clause requiring the
imposition of a penalty on any contractor that does not
comply with the policies or guidance issued or the
regulations prescribed pursuant to subsection (c). Compliance
with such policies, guidance, or regulations may be
considered as a factor in the determination of award and
incentive fees.''.
(b) Penalty Information Covered in Report.--Section 863(c)
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2008 (Public Law 110-181; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(4) Any penalties imposed on contractors for failing to
comply with requirements under section 861(e), including
requirements to provide information for the common databases
identified under section 861(b)(4).''.

Subtitle D--Other Matters

SEC. 831. EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM ON ACQUISITION OF
MILITARY PURPOSE NONDEVELOPMENTAL ITEMS.

Section 866(f)(1) of the Ike Skelton National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383;
124 Stat. 4296; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking
``the date that is five years after the date of the enactment
of this Act.'' and inserting ``December 31, 2019.''.

SEC. 832. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE PRODUCTS AND
SERVICES PRODUCED IN COUNTRIES ALONG A MAJOR
ROUTE OF SUPPLY TO AFGHANISTAN.

Section 801(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2399), as
amended by section 841(a) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239;
126 Stat. 1845), is amended by striking ``December 31, 2014''
and inserting ``December 31, 2015''.

TITLE IX--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT

Subtitle A--Department of Defense Management

SEC. 901. REDESIGNATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY AS THE
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY AND MARINE CORPS.

(a) Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the
Department of the Navy and Marine Corps.--
(1) Redesignation of military department.--The military
department designated as the Department of the Navy is
redesignated as the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps.
(2) Redesignation of secretary and other statutory
offices.--
(A) Secretary.--The position of the Secretary of the Navy
is redesignated as the Secretary of the Navy and Marine
Corps.
(B) Other statutory offices.--The positions of the Under
Secretary of the Navy, the

[[Page H3420]]

four Assistant Secretaries of the Navy, and the General
Counsel of the Department of the Navy are redesignated as the
Under Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps, the Assistant
Secretaries of the Navy and Marine Corps, and the General
Counsel of the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps,
respectively.
(b) Conforming Amendments to Title 10, United States
Code.--
(1) Definition of ``military department''.--Paragraph (8)
of section 101(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended
to read as follows:
``(8) The term `military department' means the Department
of the Army, the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps, and
the Department of the Air Force.''.
(2) Organization of department.--The text of section 5011
of such title is amended to read as follows: ``The Department
of the Navy and Marine Corps is separately organized under
the Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps.''.
(3) Position of secretary.--Section 5013(a)(1) of such
title is amended by striking ``There is a Secretary of the
Navy'' and inserting ``There is a Secretary of the Navy and
Marine Corps''.
(4) Chapter headings.--
(A) The heading of chapter 503 of such title is amended to
read as follows:

``CHAPTER 503--DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY AND MARINE CORPS''.

(B) The heading of chapter 507 of such title is amended to
read as follows:

``CHAPTER 507--COMPOSITION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY AND MARINE
CORPS''.

(5) Other amendments.--
(A) Title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking
``Department of the Navy'' and ``Secretary of the Navy'' each
place they appear other than as specified in paragraphs (1),
(2), (3), and (4) (including in section headings, subsection
captions, tables of chapters, and tables of sections) and
inserting ``Department of the Navy and Marine Corps'' and
``Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps'', respectively, in
each case with the matter inserted to be in the same typeface
and typestyle as the matter stricken.
(B)(i) Sections 5013(f), 5014(b)(2), 5016(a), 5017(2),
5032(a), and 5042(a) of such title are amended by striking
``Assistant Secretaries of the Navy'' and inserting
``Assistant Secretaries of the Navy and Marine Corps''.
(ii) The heading of section 5016 of such title, and the
item relating to such section in the table of sections at the
beginning of chapter 503 of such title, are each amended by
inserting ``and Marine Corps'' after ``of the Navy'', with
the matter inserted in each case to be in the same typeface
and typestyle as the matter amended.
(c) Other Provisions of Law and Other References.--
(1) Title 37, united states code.--Title 37, United States
Code, is amended by striking ``Department of the Navy'' and
``Secretary of the Navy'' each place they appear and
inserting ``Department of the Navy and Marine Corps'' and
``Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps'', respectively.
(2) Other references.--Any reference in any law other than
in title 10 or title 37, United States Code, or in any
regulation, document, record, or other paper of the United
States, to the Department of the Navy shall be considered to
be a reference to the Department of the Navy and Marine
Corps. Any such reference to an office specified in
subsection (a)(2) shall be considered to be a reference to
that office as redesignated by that section.
(d) Effective Date.--This section and the amendments made
by this section shall take effect on the first day of the
first month beginning more than 60 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act.

SEC. 902. REVISIONS TO COMPOSITION OF TRANSITION PLAN FOR
DEFENSE BUSINESS ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE.

Section 2222(e) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``defense business
enterprise architecture'' and inserting ``target defense
business systems computing environment described in
subsection (d)(3)'';
(2) in paragraph (2)--
(A) by striking ``existing as of September 30, 2011 (known
as `legacy systems') that will not be part of the defense
business enterprise architecture'' and inserting ``that will
be phased out of the defense business systems computing
environment within three years after review and certification
as `legacy systems' by the investment management process
established under subsection (g)''; and
(B) by striking ``that provides for reducing the use of
those legacy systems in phases''; and
(3) in paragraph (3), by striking ``legacy systems
(referred to in subparagraph (B)) that will be a part of the
target defense business systems computing environment
described in subsection (d)(3)'' and inserting ``existing
systems that are part of the target defense business systems
computing environment''.

Subtitle B--Space Activities

SEC. 911. NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE SATELLITE REPORTING POLICY.

(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the Department of Defense depends on national security
space programs to support, among other critical
capabilities--
(A) communications;
(B) missile warning;
(C) position, navigation, and timing;
(D) intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance; and
(E) environmental monitoring; and
(2) foreign threats to national security space systems are
increasing.
(b) Notification of Foreign Interference of National
Security Space.--Chapter 135 of title 10, United States Code,
is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``Sec. 2278. Notification of foreign interference of national
security space

``(a) Notice Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall,
with respect to each attempt by a foreign actor to disrupt,
degrade, or destroy a United States national security space
capability, provide to the appropriate congressional
committees--
``(1) not later than 48 hours after the Secretary
determines that there is reason to believe such attempt
occurred, notice of such attempt; and
``(2) not later than 10 days after the date on which the
Secretary determines that there is reason to believe such
attempt occurred, a notification described in subsection (b)
with respect to such attempt.
``(b) Notification Description.--A notification described
in this subsection is a notification that includes--
``(1) the name and a brief description of the national
security space capability that was impacted by an attempt by
a foreign actor to disrupt, degrade, or destroy a United
States national security space capability;
``(2) a description of such attempt, including the foreign
actor, the date and time of such attempt, and any related
capability outage and the mission impact of such outage; and
``(3) any other information the Secretary considers
relevant.
``(c) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--The
term `appropriate congressional committees' means--
``(1) the congressional defense committees; and
``(2) with respect to a notice or notification related to
an attempt by a foreign entity to disrupt, degrade, or
destroy a United States national security space capability
that is intelligence-related, the Permanent Select Committee
on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the
Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.''.
(c) Table of Sections Amendment.--The table of sections at
the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end
the following item:

``2278. Notification of foreign interference of national security
space.''.

SEC. 912. NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE DEFENSE AND PROTECTION.

(a) Review.--The Secretary of the Air Force shall enter
into an arrangement with the National Research Council to--
(1) in response to the near-term and long-term threats to
the national security space systems of the United States,
conduct a review of--
(A) the range of strategic options available to address
such threats, in terms of deterring hostile actions,
defeating hostile actions, or surviving hostile actions until
such actions conclude;
(B) strategies and plans to counter such threats, including
resilience, reconstitution, disaggregation, and other
appropriate concepts; and
(C) existing and planned architectures, warfighter
requirements, technology development, systems, workforce, or
other factors related to addressing such threats; and
(2) identify recommend courses of action to address such
threats, including potential barriers or limiting factors in
implementing such courses of action.
(b) Report.--
(1) In general.--Not later than one year after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the National Research Council
shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of
Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of
the Senate a report containing the results of the review
conducted pursuant to the arrangement under subsection (a)
and the recommended courses of action identified pursuant to
such arrangement.
(2) Form.--The report required under paragraph (1) shall be
submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified
annex.
(c) Space Protection Strategy.--Section 911(f)(1) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (10
U.S.C. 2271 note) is amended by striking ``including each of
the matters required by subsection (c).'' and inserting the
following: ``including--
``(A) each of the matters required by subsection (c); and
``(B) a description of how the Department of Defense and
the intelligence community plan to provide necessary national
security capabilities, through alternative space, airborne,
or ground systems, if a foreign actor degrades, denies access
to, or destroys United States national security space
capabilities.''.

SEC. 913. SPACE ACQUISITION STRATEGY.

(a) Strategy Required.--The Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in consultation with
the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense,
shall establish a strategy to enable the multi-year
procurement of commercial satellite services.
(b) Basis.--The strategy required under subsection (a)
shall include and be based on--
(1) an analysis of financial or other benefits to acquiring
satellite services through multi-year acquisition approaches;
(2) an analysis of the risks associated with such
acquisition approaches;
(3) an identification of methods to address planning,
programming, budgeting, and execution challenges to such
approaches, including methods to address potential
termination liability or cancellation costs generally
associated with multi-year contracts;
(4) an identification of any changes needed in the
requirements development and approval

[[Page H3421]]

processes of the Department of Defense to facilitate
effective and efficient implementation of such strategy,
including an identification of any consolidation of
requirements for such services across the Department that may
achieve increased buying power and efficiency; and
(5) an identification of any necessary changes to policies,
procedures, regulations, or statutes.
(c) Submission.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in consultation with
the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense,
shall submit to the congressional defense committees the
strategy required under subsection (a), including the
elements required under subsection (b).

SEC. 914. SPACE CONTROL MISSION REPORT.

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on the space
control mission of the Department of Defense. Such report
shall include--
(1) an identification of existing offensive and defensive
space control systems, policies, and technical possibilities
of future systems;
(2) an identification of any gaps or risks in existing
space control system architecture and possibilities for
improvement or mitigation of such gaps or risks;
(3) a description of existing and future sensor coverage
and ground processing capabilities for space situational
awareness;
(4) an explanation of the extent to which all relevant and
available information is being utilized for space situational
awareness to detect, track, and identify objects in space;
(5) a description of existing space situational awareness
data sharing practices, including what information is being
shared and what the benefits and risks of such sharing are to
the national security of the United States; and
(6) plans for the future space control mission.

SEC. 915. RESPONSIVE LAUNCH.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) United States Strategic Command has identified three
needs as a result of dramatically increased demand and
dependence on space capabilities as follows:
(A) To rapidly augment existing space capabilities when
needed to expand operational capability.
(B) To rapidly reconstitute or replenish critical space
capabilities to preserve continuity of operations capability.
(C) To rapidly exploit and infuse space technological or
operational innovations to increase the advantage of the
United States.
(2) Operationally responsive low cost launch could assist
in addressing such needs of the combatant commands.
(b) Study.--The Department of Defense Executive Agent for
Space shall conduct a study on responsive, low-cost launch
efforts. Such study shall include--
(1) a review of existing and past operationally responsive,
low-cost launch efforts by domestic or foreign governments or
industry;
(2) a technology assessment of various methods to develop
an operationally responsive, low-cost launch capability; and
(3) an assessment of the viability of greater utilization
of innovative methods, including the use of secondary payload
adapters on existing launch vehicles.
(c) Report.--Not later than one year after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Department of Defense Executive
Agent for Space shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a report containing--
(1) the results of the study conducted under subsection
(b); and
(2) a consolidated plan for development within the
Department of Defense of an operationally responsive, low-
cost launch capability.

Subtitle C--Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities

SEC. 921. REVISION OF SECRETARY OF DEFENSE AUTHORITY TO
ENGAGE IN COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES AS SECURITY FOR
INTELLIGENCE COLLECTION ACTIVITIES.

(a) Period for Required Audits.--Section 432(b)(2) of title
10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in the first sentence, by striking ``annually'' and
inserting ``biennially''; and
(2) in the second sentence, by striking ``the intelligence
committees'' and all that follows and inserting ``the
congressional defense committees and the congressional
intelligence committees (as defined in section 437(c)).''
(b) Repeal of Designation of Defense Intelligence Agency as
Required Oversight Authority Within Department of Defense.--
Section 436(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by striking ``Defense Intelligence Agency'' and
inserting ``Department of Defense''; and
(2) by striking ``management and supervision'' and
inserting ``oversight''.
(c) Congressional Oversight.--Section 437 of title 10,
United States Code, is amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ``the intelligence
committees'' and inserting ``congressional defense committees
and the congressional intelligence committees'';
(2) in subsection (b), by striking ``the intelligence
committees'' and inserting ``congressional defense committees
and the congressional intelligence committees''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(c) Congressional Intelligence Committees Defined.--In
this section, the term `congressional intelligence
committees' has the meaning given the term in section 3 of
the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).''.

SEC. 922. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE PRIORITIES.

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall--
(1) establish a written policy governing the internal
coordination and prioritization of intelligence priorities of
the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the
combatant commands, and the military departments to improve
identification of the intelligence needs of the Department of
Defense;
(2) identify any significant intelligence gaps of the
Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the
combatant commands, and the military departments; and
(3) provide to the congressional defense committees, the
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of
Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of
the Senate a briefing on the policy established under
paragraph (1) and the gaps identified under paragraph (2).

SEC. 923. DEFENSE CLANDESTINE SERVICE.

(a) Certification Required.--Not more than 50 percent of
the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or
otherwise available to the Department of Defense for the
Defense Clandestine Service for fiscal year 2014 may be
obligated or expended for the Defense Clandestine Service
until such time as the Secretary of Defense certifies to the
covered congressional committees that--
(1) the Defense Clandestine Service is designed primarily
to--
(A) fulfill priorities of the Department of Defense that
are unique to the Department of Defense or otherwise unmet;
and
(B) provide unique capabilities to the intelligence
community (as defined in section 3(4) of the National
Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4))); and
(2) the Secretary of Defense has designed metrics that will
be used to ensure that the Defense Clandestine Service is
employed as described in paragraph (1).
(b) Annual Assessments.--Not later than 120 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter
for five years, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
covered congressional committees a detailed assessment of
Defense Clandestine Service employment and performance based
on the metrics referred to in subsection (a)(2).
(c) Notification of Future Changes to Design.--Following
the submittal of the certification referred to in subsection
(a), in the event that any significant change is made to the
Defense Clandestine Service, the Secretary shall promptly
notify the covered congressional committees of the nature of
such change.
(d) Quarterly Briefings.--The Secretary of Defense shall
quarterly provide to the covered congressional committees a
briefing on the deployments and collection activities of
personnel of the Defense Clandestine Service.
(e) Covered Congressional Committees Defined.--In this
section, the term ``covered congressional committees'' means
the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives,
and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.

SEC. 924. PROHIBITION ON NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM
CONSOLIDATION.

(a) Prohibition.--No amounts authorized to be appropriated
or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may
be used during the period beginning on the date of the
enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2014, to
execute--
(1) the separation of the National Intelligence Program
budget from the Department of Defense budget;
(2) the consolidation of the National Intelligence Program
budget within the Department of Defense budget; or
(3) the establishment of a new appropriations account or
appropriations account structure for the National
Intelligence Program budget.
(b) Briefing Requirement.--Not later than 30 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense
and the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly
provide to the congressional defense committees, the
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of
Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of
the Senate a briefing regarding any planning relating to the
future execution of the activities described in subsection
(a) that has occurred during the two-year period ending on
such date and any anticipated future planning relating to
such execution or related efforts.
(c) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) National intelligence program.--The term ``National
Intelligence Program'' has the meaning given the term in
section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C.
3003).
(2) National intelligence program budget.--The term
``National Intelligence Program budget'' means the portions
of the Department of Defense budget designated as part of the
National Intelligence Program.

Subtitle D--Cyberspace-Related Matters

SEC. 931. MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENT FOR INVENTORY OF
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TACTICAL DATA LINK
SYSTEMS.

Section 934(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2013 (10 U.S.C. 2225 note; Public Law 112-
239; 126 Stat. 1885) is amended by inserting ``and an
assessment of vulnerabilities to such systems in anti-access
or area-denial environments'' before the semicolon.

SEC. 932. DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD ASSESSMENT OF UNITED STATES
CYBER COMMAND.

(a) Assessment.--The Defense Science Board shall conduct an
assessment of the organization,

[[Page H3422]]

missions, and authorities of the United States Cyber Command.
(b) Elements.--The assessment required by subsection (a)
shall include the following:
(1) A review of the existing organizational structure of
the United States Cyber Command, including--
(A) the positive and negative impact on the Command
resulting from a single individual simultaneously serving as
the Commander of the United States Cyber Command and the
Director of the National Security Agency;
(B) the oversight activities undertaken by the Commander
and the Director with regard to the Command and the Agency,
respectively, including how the respective oversight
activities affect the ability of each entity to complete the
respective missions of such entity;
(C) the dependencies of the Command and the Agency on one
another under the existing management structure of both
entities, including an examination of the advantages and
disadvantages attributable to the unity of command and unity
of effort resulting from a single individual simultaneously
serving as the Commander of the United States Cyber Command
and the Director of the National Security Agency;
(D) the ability of the existing management structure of the
Command and the Agency to identify and adequately address
potential conflicts of interest between the roles of the
Commander of the United States Cyber Command and the Director
of the National Security Agency; and
(E) the ability of the Department of Defense to train and
develop, through professional assignment, individuals with
the appropriate subject-matter expertise and management
experience to support both the cyber operations missions of
the Command and the signals intelligence missions of the
Agency.
(2) A review of the missions of the Command, including
whether the reliance of the Command on the Agency for
critical warfighting infrastructure, organization, and
personnel contributes to or detracts from the ability of the
Command to achieve the missions of the Command.
(3) A review of how the Commander of the United States
Cyber Command and the Director of the National Security
Agency implement authorities where missions intersect to
ensure that the activities of each entity are conducted only
pursuant to the respective authorities of each entity.
(c) Report.--
(1) Report required.--Not later than 300 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Defense Science Board
shall submit to the Secretary of Defense, the Director of
National Intelligence, the congressional defense committees,
the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House
of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence
of the Senate a report containing--
(A) the results of the assessment required by subsection
(a); and
(B) recommendations for improvements or changes to the
organization, missions, or authorities of the United States
Cyber Command.
(2) Additional evaluation required.--Not later than 60 days
after the date on which the committees referred to in
paragraph (1) receive the report required by such paragraph,
the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National
Intelligence shall jointly submit to such committees an
evaluation of the findings and recommendations contained in
such report.
(3) Form.--The report required by paragraph (1) shall be
submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified
annex.
(d) Intelligence Community Defined.--In this section, the
term ``intelligence community'' has the meaning given the
term in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50
U.S.C. 3003(4)).

SEC. 933. MISSION ANALYSIS FOR CYBER OPERATIONS OF DEPARTMENT
OF DEFENSE.

(a) Mission Analysis Required.--Not later than one year
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
Defense shall conduct a mission analysis of the cyber
operations of the Department of Defense.
(b) Elements.--The mission analysis under subsection (a)
shall include the following:
(1) The concept of operations and concept of employment for
cyber operations forces.
(2) An assessment of the manpower needs for cyber
operations forces, including military requirements for both
active and reserve components and civilian requirements.
(3) A description of the alignment of the organization and
reporting chains of the Department, the military departments,
and the combatant commands.
(4) An assessment of the current, as of the date of the
analysis, and projected equipping needs of cyber operations
forces.
(5) An analysis of how the Secretary, for purposes of cyber
operations, depends upon organizations outside of the
Department, including industry and international partners.
(6) Methods for ensuring resilience, mission assurance, and
continuity of operations for cyber operations.
(7) An evaluation of the potential roles of the reserve
components in the concept of operations and concept of
employment for cyber operations forces required under
paragraph (1).
(c) Report Required.--Not later than 30 days after the
completion of the mission analysis under subsection (a), the
Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a report containing--
(1) the results of the mission analysis; and
(2) recommendations for improving or changing the roles,
organization, missions, concept of operations, or authorities
related to the cyber operations of the Department.
(d) National Guard Assessment.--Not later than 30 days
after the date on which the Secretary submits the report
required under subsection (c), the Chief of the National
Guard Bureau shall submit to the congressional defense
committees an assessment of the role of the National Guard in
supporting the cyber operations mission of the Department of
Defense as such mission is described in such report.
(e) Form.--The report under subsection (c) shall be
submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified
annex.

SEC. 934. NOTIFICATION OF INVESTIGATIONS RELATED TO
COMPROMISE OF CRITICAL PROGRAM INFORMATION.

(a) Notification of Investigation Initiation.--
(1) Notification.--Not later than 30 days after the date of
the initiation of any investigation related to the potential
compromise of Department of Defense critical program
information related to a weapons system or other
developmental activity, the Secretary of Defense shall submit
to the congressional defense committees a written
notification of such investigation including the elements
required under paragraph (2).
(2) Elements.--The written notification required under
paragraph (1) shall include, with respect to an investigation
described in such subsection, the following elements:
(A) A statement of the reason for such investigation.
(B) An identification of each party affected by such
investigation.
(C) An identification of the party responsible for
conducting such investigation.
(D) Any preliminary observations, findings, or
recommendations related to such investigation.
(E) A timeline and methodology for conducting such
investigation.
(b) Notification of Completion of Certain Investigations.--
Not later than 30 days after the date of the completion of
any investigation conducted or overseen by the Damage
Assessment Management Office of the Department of Defense,
the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional
defense committees a written notification of such
investigation, including a summary of the findings and
recommendations of such investigation.
(c) Report on Intrusions After January 1, 2000.--Not later
than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional
defense committees a report detailing the known network cyber
intrusions that occurred on or after January 1, 2000, and
before August 1, 2013, and resulted in the compromise of
critical program information related to a weapons system,
information system development, or another research and
development initiative of the Department of Defense. Such
report shall include a description of the critical program
information that was compromised, the source of each network
that was compromised, the systems or developmental activities
that were compromised, and the suspected origin of each cyber
intrusion.

SEC. 935. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE SOFTWARE
LICENSES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

(a) Updated Plan.--
(1) Update.--The Chief Information Officer of the
Department of the Defense shall, in consultation with the
chief information officers of the military departments and
the Defense Agencies, update the plan for the inventory of
selected software licenses of the Department of Defense
required under section 937 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 10 U.S.C.
2223 note) to include a plan for the inventory of all
software licenses of the Department of Defense for which a
military department spends more than $5,000,000 annually on
any individual title, including a comparison of licenses
purchased with licenses installed and of those uninstalled
and then reinstalled.
(2) Elements.--The update required under paragraph (1)
shall--
(A) be done in a comprehensive and auditable format that is
verified by an independent third party;
(B) include details on the process and business systems
necessary to regularly perform reviews, a procedure for
validating and reporting deregistering and registering new
software, and a mechanism and plan to relay that information
to the enterprise provider; and
(C) a proposed timeline for implementation of the updated
plan in accordance with paragraph (3).
(3) Implementation.--Not later than September 30, 2013, the
Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall
implement the updated plan required under paragraph (1).
(b) Performance Plan.--If the Chief Information Officer of
the Department of Defense determines through the update
required by subsection (a) that the number of software
licenses of the Department for an individual title for which
a military department spends greater than $5,000,000 annually
exceeds the needs of the Department for such software
licenses, or the inventory discloses that there is a
discrepancy between the number of software licenses purchased
and those in actual use, the Secretary of Defense shall
implement a plan to bring the number of such software
licenses into balance with the needs of the Department and
the terms of any relevant contract.

Subtitle E--Total Force Management

SEC. 941. REQUIREMENT TO ENSURE SUFFICIENT LEVELS OF
GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT OF FUNCTIONS CLOSELY
ASSOCIATED WITH INHERENTLY GOVERNMENTAL
FUNCTIONS.

(a) Requirement.--Section 129a of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
``(g) Requirement for Oversight or Appropriate Corrective
Actions.--For purposes of

[[Page H3423]]

subsection (f)(3)(B), if insufficient levels of Government
oversight are found, the Secretary of the military department
or head of the Defense Agency responsible shall provide such
oversight or take appropriate corrective actions, including
potential conversion to Government performance, consistent
with this section and sections 129 and 2463 of this title.''.
(b) Amendment Relating to Review of Certain Contracts.--
Subsection (e)(2)(C) of section 2330a of such title is
amended by adding after ``governmental functions'' the
following: ``in which there is inadequate oversight of the
contractor personnel performing such functions''.

SEC. 942. FIVE-YEAR REQUIREMENT FOR CERTIFICATION OF
APPROPRIATE MANPOWER PERFORMANCE.

Section 2330a of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) as subsections
(h) and (i), respectively; and
(2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following new
section (g):
``(g) Certifications of Appropriate Manpower Performance.--
(1) Beginning in fiscal year 2014 and continuing through
fiscal year 2018, the Secretary of Defense, or an official
designated personally by the Secretary, no later than
February 1 of each reporting year, shall submit to the
congressional defense committees the findings of the reviews
required under subsection (e) and certify in writing that--
``(A) all Department of Defense contractor positions
identified as being responsible for the performance of
inherently governmental functions have been eliminated;
``(B) each Department of Defense contract that is a
personal services contract has been entered into, and is
being performed, in accordance with applicable laws and
regulations; and
``(C) any contract for services that includes any functions
that are closely associated with inherently governmental
functions or designated as critical have been reviewed to
determine if those activities should be--
``(i) subject to action pursuant to section 2463 of this
title; or
``(ii) converted to an acquisition approach that would be
more advantageous to the Department of Defense.
``(2) If the certifications required in paragraph (1) are
not submitted by the date required in a reporting year, the
Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall assess
the Department's compliance with subsection (e) and determine
why the Secretary could not make the certifications required
in paragraph (1). The Inspector General shall submit to the
congressional defense committees, not later than May 1 of the
reporting year, a report on such assessment and
determination.
``(3) Not later than May 1 of each reporting year, the
Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report containing the
Comptroller General's assessment of the reviews conducted
under subsection (e) and the actions taken to resolve the
findings of the reviews.''.

TITLE X--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Subtitle A--Financial Matters

SEC. 1001. GENERAL TRANSFER AUTHORITY.

(a) Authority to Transfer Authorizations.--
(1) Authority.--Upon determination by the Secretary of
Defense that such action is necessary in the national
interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of
authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in
this division for fiscal year 2014 between any such
authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions
thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be
merged with and be available for the same purposes as the
authorization to which transferred.
(2) Limitation.--Except as provided in paragraph (3), the
total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may
transfer under the authority of this section may not exceed
$3,500,000,000.
(3) Exception for transfers between military personnel
authorizations.--A transfer of funds between military
personnel authorizations under title IV shall not be counted
toward the dollar limitation in paragraph (2).
(b) Limitations.--The authority provided by subsection (a)
to transfer authorizations--
(1) may only be used to provide authority for items that
have a higher priority than the items from which authority is
transferred; and
(2) may not be used to provide authority for an item that
has been denied authorization by Congress.
(c) Effect on Authorization Amounts.--A transfer made from
one account to another under the authority of this section
shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for the
account to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal
to the amount transferred.
(d) Notice to Congress.--The Secretary shall promptly
notify Congress of each transfer made under subsection (a).

SEC. 1002. BUDGETARY EFFECTS OF THIS ACT.

The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of
complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall
be determined by reference to the latest statement titled
``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation'' for this Act,
submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the
Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the House of
Representatives, as long as such statement has been submitted
prior to the vote on passage of this Act.

SEC. 1003. AUDIT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FISCAL YEAR 2018
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

(a) Sense of Congress.--Congress--
(1) reaffirms the findings of the Panel on Defense
Financial Management and Auditability Reform of the Committee
on Armed Services of the House of Representatives;
(2) points to the Government Accountability Office's most
recent High Risk List recommendations;
(3) is encouraged by the important progress the Department
of Defense has made in achieving auditability; and
(4) stands ready to continue helping in this effort.
(b) Sense of Congress on DOD Financial Management Reform.--
It is the sense of Congress that, in the aftermath of the
effects of sequestration as enacted by the Budget Control Act
of 2011 (Public Law 112-25), financial management reform is
imperative, and the Department of Defense should place
continued importance on, and remain vigilant in, its
financial management reform efforts.
(c) Audit of DOD Financial Statements.--In addition to the
requirement under section 1003(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law
111-84; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note) that the Financial Improvement
and Audit Readiness Plan describe specific actions to be
taken and the costs associated with ensuring that the
financial statements of the Department of Defense are
validated as ready for audit by not later than September 30,
2017, upon the conclusion of fiscal year 2018, the Secretary
of Defense shall ensure that a full audit is performed on the
financial statements of the Department of Defense for such
fiscal year. The Secretary shall submit to Congress the
results of that audit by not later than March 31, 2019.

SEC. 1004. AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER FUNDS TO THE NATIONAL
NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO SUSTAIN
NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION.

(a) Transfer Authorized.--If the amount authorized to be
appropriated for the weapons activities of the National
Nuclear Security Administration under section 3101 or
otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 is less than
$8,400,000,000 (the amount projected to be required for such
activities in fiscal year 2014 as specified in the report
under section 1251 of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2549)),
the Secretary of Defense may transfer, from amounts
authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense
for fiscal year 2014 pursuant to this Act, to the Secretary
of Energy an amount, not to exceed $150,000,000, to be
available only for weapons activities of the National Nuclear
Security Administration.
(b) Notice to Congress.--In the event of a transfer under
subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall promptly
notify Congress of the transfer, and shall include in such
notice the Department of Defense account or accounts from
which funds are transferred.
(c) Transfer Mechanism.--Any funds transferred under this
section shall be transferred in accordance with established
procedures for reprogramming under section 1001 or successor
provisions of law.
(d) Construction of Authority.--The transfer authority
provided under subsection (a) is in addition to any other
transfer authority provided under this Act.

Subtitle B--Counter-Drug Activities

SEC. 1011. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO SUPPORT UNIFIED COUNTER-
DRUG AND COUNTERTERRORISM CAMPAIGN IN COLOMBIA.

Section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108-375;
118 Stat. 2042), as most recently amended by section 1010 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1907), is amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ``2013'' and inserting
``2014''; and
(2) in subsection (c), by striking ``2013'' and inserting
``2014''.

SEC. 1012. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR JOINT TASK FORCES TO
PROVIDE SUPPORT TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES
CONDUCTING COUNTER-TERRORISM ACTIVITIES.

Section 1022(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108-136; 117 Stat. 1594; 10
U.S.C. 371 note), as most recently amended by section 1011 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1907) is amended by striking
``2013'' and inserting ``2014''.

SEC. 1013. TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE
ADDITIONAL SUPPORT FOR COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES
OF CERTAIN FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS.

Subsection (a)(2) of section 1033 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105-85;
111 Stat. 1881), as most recently amended by section 1006(a)
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1557), is amended by
striking ``2013'' and inserting ``2015''.

SEC. 1014. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING THE NATIONAL GUARD
COUNTER-NARCOTIC PROGRAM.

It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the National Guard Counter-Narcotic Program is a
valuable tool to counter-drug operations across the United
States, especially on the southwest border;
(2) the National Guard has an important role in combating
drug trafficking into the United States; and
(3) the program should received continued funding.

Subtitle C--Naval Vessels and Shipyards

SEC. 1021. CLARIFICATION OF SOLE OWNERSHIP RESULTING FROM
SHIP DONATIONS AT NO COST TO THE NAVY.

(a) Clarification of Transfer Authority.--Subsection (a) of
section 7306 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to
read as follows:

[[Page H3424]]

``(a) Authority to Make Transfer.--The Secretary of the
Navy may convey, by donation, all right, title, and interest
to any vessel stricken from the Naval Vessel Register or any
captured vessel, for use as a museum or memorial for public
display in the United States, to--
``(1) any State, the District of Columbia, any Commonwealth
or possession of the United States, or any municipal
corporation or political subdivision thereof; or
``(2) any nonprofit entity.''.
(b) Clarification of Limitations on Liability and
Responsibility.--Subsection (b) of such section is amended to
read as follows:
``(b) Limitations on Liability and Responsibility.--(1) The
United States and all departments and agencies thereof, and
their officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or
in equity for any injury or damage to any person or property
occurring on a vessel donated under this section.
``(2) Notwithstanding any other law, the United States and
all departments and agencies thereof, and their officers and
employees, shall have no responsibility or obligation to
make, engage in, or provide funding for, any improvement,
upgrade, modification, maintenance, preservation, or repair
to a vessel donated under this section.''.
(c) Clarification That Transfers to Be Made at No Cost to
United States.--Subsection (c) of such section is amended by
inserting after ``under this section'' the following: ``, the
maintenance and preservation of that vessel as a museum or
memorial, and the ultimate disposal of that vessel, including
demilitarization of Munitions List items at the end of the
useful life of the vessel as a museum or memorial,''.
(d) Application of Environmental Laws; Definitions.--Such
section is further amended by adding at the end the following
new subsections:
``(e) Application of Environmental Laws.--Nothing in this
section shall affect the applicability of Federal, State,
interstate, and local environmental laws and regulations,
including the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2601 et
seq.) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et
seq.), to the Department of Defense or to a donee.
``(f) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) The term `nonprofit entity' means any entity
qualifying as an exempt organization under section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
``(2) The term `Munitions List' means the United States
Munitions List created and controlled under section 38 of the
Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).
``(3) The term `donee' means any entity receiving a vessel
pursuant to subsection (a).''.
(e) Clerical Amendments.--
(1) Section heading.--The heading of such section is
amended to read as follows:

``Sec. 7306. Vessels stricken from Naval Vessel Register;
captured vessels: conveyance by donation''.

(2) Table of sections.--The item relating to such section
in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 633 of
such title is amended to read as follows:

``7306. Vessels stricken from Naval Vessel Register; captured vessels:
conveyance by donation.' '''.

SEC. 1022. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR RETIREMENT OR
INACTIVATION OF TICONDEROGA CLASS CRUISERS OR
DOCK LANDING SHIPS.

(a) Limitation on Availability of Funds.--
(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), none
of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or
otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the
Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to retire,
prepare to retire, inactivate, or place in storage a cruiser
or dock landing ship.
(2) Exception.--Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the funds
referred to in such subsection may be obligated or expended
to retire the U.S.S. Denver, LPD9.
(b) Authority to Transfer Authorizations.--
(1) Authority.--Subject to the availability of
appropriations for such purpose, the Secretary of Defense may
transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the
Department of Defense for fiscal year 2013 specifically for
the modernization of vessels referred to in subsection
(a)(1). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be
merged with and be available for the same purposes as the
authorization to which transferred.
(2) Limitation.--The total amount of authorizations that
the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this
subsection may not exceed $914,676,000.
(3) Additional authority.--The transfer authority provided
by this subsection is in addition to the transfer authority
provided under section 1001 of this Act and under section
1001 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1902).

SEC. 1023. REPAIR OF VESSELS IN FOREIGN SHIPYARDS.

(a) Nonhomeported Vessels.--Subsection (a) of section 7310
of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by striking ``A naval'' and inserting ``(1) A naval'';
and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(2) For purposes of this section, a naval vessel that
does not have a designated homeport shall be treated as being
homeported in the United States or Guam.''.
(b) Voyage Repair.--Such section is further amended--
(1) in subsection (c)(3)(C), by striking ``as defined in
Commander Military Sealift Command Instruction 4700.15C
(September 13, 2007) or Joint Fleet Maintenance Manual
(Commander Fleet Forces Command Instruction 4790.3 Revision
A, Change 7), Volume III''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(d) Voyage Repair Defined.--In this section, the term
`voyage repair' has the meaning given such term in Navy
Instruction COMFLTFORCOMINST 4790.3B.''.

SEC. 1024. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING A BALANCED FUTURE
NAVAL FORCE.

(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The battle force of the Navy must be sufficiently sized
and balanced in capability to meet current and anticipated
future national security objectives.
(2) A robust and balanced naval force is required for the
Department of Defense to fully execute the President's
National Security Strategy.
(3) To develop and sustain required capabilities the Navy
must balance investment and maintenance costs across various
ship types, including--
(A) aircraft carriers;
(B) surface combatants;
(C) submarines;
(D) amphibious assault ships; and
(E) other auxiliary vessels, including support vessels
operated by the Military Sealift Command.
(4) Despite a Marine Corps requirement for 38 amphibious
assault ships, the Navy possesses only 30 amphibious assault
ships with an average of 22 ships available for surge
deployment.
(5) The inadequate level of investment in Navy shipbuilding
over the last 20 years has resulted in--
(A) a fragile shipbuilding industrial base, both in the
construction yards and secondary suppliers of materiel and
equipment; and
(B) increased costs per vessel stemming from low production
volume.
(6) The Department of Defense, Military Construction and
Veterans Affairs, and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act
for Fiscal Year 2013 provided $263,000,000 towards the
advance procurement of materiel and equipment required to
continue the San Antonio LPD 17 amphibious transport dock
class to a total of 12 ships, a key first step in rebalancing
the amphibious assault ship force structure.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the Sense of Congress that--
(1) the Department of Defense and the Department of the
Navy must prioritize funding towards increased shipbuilding
rates to enable the Navy to meet the full-range of combatant
commander requests;
(2) the Department of the Navy's future budget requests and
the Long Range Plan for the Construction of Naval Forces must
realistically anticipate and reflect the true investment
necessary to meet stated force structure goals;
(3) without modification to Long Range Plan for the
Construction of Naval Forces shipbuilding plan, the future of
the industrial base that enables construction of large,
combat-survivable amphibious assault ships is at significant
risk; and
(4) the Department of Defense and Congress should act
expeditiously to restore the force structure and capability
balance of the Navy fleet as quickly as possible.

SEC. 1025. AUTHORITY FOR SHORT-TERM EXTENSION OR RENEWAL OF
LEASES FOR VESSELS SUPPORTING THE TRANSIT
PROTECTION SYSTEM ESCORT PROGRAM.

(a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 2401 of title 10,
United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy may extend or
renew the lease of not more than four blocking vessels
supporting the Transit Protection System Escort Program after
the date of the expiration of the lease of such vessels, as
in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. Such an
extension shall be for a term that is the shorter of--
(1) the period beginning on the date of the expiration of
the lease in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act
and ending on the date on which the Secretary determines that
a substitute is available for the capabilities provided by
the lease, or that the capabilities provided by the vessel
are no longer required; or
(2) 180 days.
(b) Funding.--Amounts authorized to be appropriated by
section 301 and available for operation and maintenance,
Navy, as specified in the funding tables in section 4301, may
be available for the extension or renewal of a lease under
subsection (a).
(c) Notice to Congress.--Prior to extending or renewing a
lease under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy shall
submit to the congressional defense committees notification
of the proposed extension or renewal. Such notification shall
include--
(1) a detailed description of the term of the proposed
contract for the extension or renewal of the lease and a
justification for extending or renewing the lease rather than
obtaining the capability provided for by the lease, charter,
or services involved through purchase of the vessel; and
(2) a plan for meeting the capability provided for by the
lease upon the completion of the term of the lease contract,
as extended or renewed under subsection (a).

Subtitle D--Counterterrorism

SEC. 1030. CLARIFICATION OF PROCEDURES FOR USE OF ALTERNATE
MEMBERS ON MILITARY COMMISSIONS.

(a) Primary and Alternate Members.--
(1) Number of members.--Subsection (a) of section 948m of
title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(A) in paragraph (1)--
(i) by striking ``at least five members'' and inserting
``at least five primary members and as many alternate members
as the convening authority shall detail''; and

[[Page H3425]]

(ii) by adding at the end the following new sentence:
``Alternate members shall be designated in the order in which
they will replace an excused primary member.'' and
(B) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``primary'' after ``the
number of''.
(2) General rules.--Such section is further amended--
(A) by redesignating subsection (b) and (c) as subsections
(d) and (e), respectively; and
(B) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new
subsections (b) and (c):
``(b) Primary Members.--Primary members of a military
commission under this chapter are voting members.
``(c) Alternate Members.--(1) A military commission may
include alternate members to replace primary members who are
excused from service on the commission.
``(2) Whenever a primary member is excused from service on
the commission, an alternate member, if available, shall
replace the excused primary member and the trial may
proceed.''.
(3) Excuse of members.--Subsection (d) of such section, as
redesignated by paragraph (2)(A), is amended--
(A) in the matter before paragraph (1), by inserting
``primary or alternate'' before ``member'';
(B) by striking ``or'' at the end of paragraph (2),
(C) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (3) and
inserting ``; or''; and
(D) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(4) in the case of an alternate member, in order to
reduce the number of alternate members required for service
on the commission, as determined by the convening
authority.''.
(4) Absent and additional members.--Subsection (e) of such
section, as redesignated by paragraph (2)(A), is amended--
(A) in the first sentence--
(i) by inserting ``the number of primary members of'' after
``Whenever'';
(ii) by inserting ``primary'' before ``members required
by''; and
(iii) by inserting ``and there are no remaining alternate
members to replace the excused primary members'' after
``subsection (a)''; and
(B) by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``An
alternate member who was present for the introduction of all
evidence shall not be considered to be a new or additional
member.''.
(b) Challenges.--Section 949f of such title is amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``primary or
alternate'' before ``member''; and
(2) by adding at the end of subsection (b) the following
new sentence: ``Nothing in this section prohibits the
military judge from awarding to each party such additional
peremptory challenges as may be required in the interests of
justice.''.
(c) Number of Votes Required.--Section 949m of such title
is amended--
(1) by inserting ``primary'' before ``members'' each place
it appears; and
(2) by adding at the end of subsection (b) the following
new paragraph:
``(4) The primary members present for a vote on a sentence
need not be the same primary members who voted on the
conviction if the requirements of section 948m(d) of this
title are met.''.

SEC. 1031. MODIFICATION OF REGIONAL DEFENSE COMBATING
TERRORISM FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM REPORTING
REQUIREMENT.

(a) In General.--Section 2249c(c) of title 10, United
States Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (3), by inserting ``, including engagement
activities for program alumni,'' after ``effectiveness of the
program'';
(2) in paragraph (4), by inserting after ``program'' the
following: ``, including a list of any unfunded or unmet
training requirements and requests''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(5) A discussion and justification of how the program
fits within the theater security priorities of each of the
commanders of the geographic combatant commands.''.
(b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a)
shall apply with respect to a report submitted for a fiscal
year beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 1032. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO CONSTRUCT OR MODIFY
FACILITIES IN THE UNITED STATES TO HOUSE
DETAINEES TRANSFERRED FROM UNITED STATES NAVAL
STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA.

(a) In General.--No amounts authorized to be appropriated
or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may
be used during the period beginning on the date of the
enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2014, to
construct or modify any facility in the United States, its
territories, or possessions to house any individual detained
at Guantanamo for the purposes of detention or imprisonment
in the custody or under the control of the Department of
Defense unless authorized by Congress.
(b) Exception.--The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not
apply to any modification of facilities at United States
Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
(c) Individual Detained at Guantanamo Defined.--In this
section, the term ``individual detained at Guantanamo'' has
the meaning given that term in section 1033(f)(2).

SEC. 1033. REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATIONS RELATING TO THE
TRANSFER OF DETAINEES AT UNITED STATES NAVAL
STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA, TO FOREIGN
COUNTRIES AND OTHER FOREIGN ENTITIES.

(a) Certification Required Prior to Transfer.--
(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2) and
subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may not use any
amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise available
to the Department of Defense to transfer, during the period
beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending
on December 31, 2014, any individual detained at Guantanamo
to the custody or control of the individual's country of
origin, any other foreign country, or any other foreign
entity unless the Secretary submits to Congress the
certification described in subsection (b) not later than 30
days before the transfer of the individual.
(2) Exception.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any action
taken by the Secretary to transfer any individual detained at
Guantanamo to effectuate an order affecting the disposition
of the individual that is issued by a court or competent
tribunal of the United States having lawful jurisdiction
(which the Secretary shall notify Congress of promptly after
issuance).
(b) Certification.--A certification described in this
subsection is a written certification made by the Secretary
of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State
and in consultation with the Director of National
Intelligence, that--
(1) the government of the foreign country or the recognized
leadership of the foreign entity to which the individual
detained at Guantanamo is to be transferred--
(A) is not a designated state sponsor of terrorism or a
designated foreign terrorist organization;
(B) maintains control over each detention facility in which
the individual is to be detained if the individual is to be
housed in a detention facility;
(C) is not, as of the date of the certification, facing a
threat that is likely to substantially affect its ability to
exercise control over the individual;
(D) has taken or agreed to take effective actions to ensure
that the individual cannot take action to threaten the United
States, its citizens, or its allies in the future;
(E) has taken or agreed to take such actions as the
Secretary of Defense determines are necessary to ensure that
the individual cannot engage or reengage in any terrorist
activity; and
(F) has agreed to share with the United States any
information that--
(i) is related to the individual or any associates of the
individual; and
(ii) could affect the security of the United States, its
citizens, or its allies; and
(2) includes an assessment, in classified or unclassified
form, of the capacity, willingness, and past practices (if
applicable) of the foreign country or entity in relation to
the Secretary's certifications.
(c) Prohibition in Cases of Prior Confirmed Recidivism.--
(1) Prohibition.--Except as provided in paragraph (2) and
subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may not use any
amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made
available to the Department of Defense to transfer any
individual detained at Guantanamo to the custody or control
of the individual's country of origin, any other foreign
country, or any other foreign entity if there is a confirmed
case of any individual who was detained at United States
Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, at any time after
September 11, 2001, who was transferred to such foreign
country or entity and subsequently engaged in any terrorist
activity.
(2) Exception.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any action
taken by the Secretary to transfer any individual detained at
Guantanamo to effectuate an order affecting the disposition
of the individual that is issued by a court or competent
tribunal of the United States having lawful jurisdiction
(which the Secretary shall notify Congress of promptly after
issuance).
(d) National Security Waiver.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense may waive the
applicability to a detainee transfer of a certification
requirement specified in subparagraph (D) or (E) of
subsection (b)(1) or the prohibition in subsection (c), if
the Secretary certifies the rest of the criteria required by
subsection (b) for transfers prohibited by subsection (c)
and, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State and in
consultation with the Director of National Intelligence,
determines that--
(A) alternative actions will be taken to address the
underlying purpose of the requirement or requirements to be
waived;
(B) in the case of a waiver of subparagraph (D) or (E) of
subsection (b)(1), it is not possible to certify that the
risks addressed in the paragraph to be waived have been
completely eliminated, but the actions to be taken under
subparagraph (A) will substantially mitigate such risks with
regard to the individual to be transferred;
(C) in the case of a waiver of subsection (c), the
Secretary has considered any confirmed case in which an
individual who was transferred to the country subsequently
engaged in terrorist activity, and the actions to be taken
under subparagraph (A) will substantially mitigate the risk
of recidivism with regard to the individual to be
transferred; and
(D) the transfer is in the national security interests of
the United States.
(2) Reports.--Whenever the Secretary makes a determination
under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the
appropriate committees of Congress, not later than 30 days
before the transfer of the individual concerned, the
following:
(A) A copy of the determination and the waiver concerned.
(B) A statement of the basis for the determination,
including--
(i) an explanation why the transfer is in the national
security interests of the United States;
(ii) in the case of a waiver of subparagraph (D) or (E) of
subsection (b)(1), an explanation

[[Page H3426]]

why it is not possible to certify that the risks addressed in
the paragraph to be waived have been completely eliminated;
and
(iii) a classified summary of--

(I) the individual's record of cooperation while in the
custody of or under the effective control of the Department
of Defense; and
(II) the agreements and mechanisms in place to provide for
continuing cooperation.

(C) A summary of the alternative actions to be taken to
address the underlying purpose of, and to mitigate the risks
addressed in, the paragraph or subsection to be waived.
(D) The assessment required by subsection (b)(2).
(e) Record of Cooperation.--In assessing the risk that an
individual detained at Guantanamo will engage in terrorist
activity or other actions that could affect the security of
the United States if released for the purpose of making a
certification under subsection (b) or a waiver under
subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may give favorable
consideration to any such individual--
(1) who has substantially cooperated with United States
intelligence and law enforcement authorities, pursuant to a
pre-trial agreement, while in the custody of or under the
effective control of the Department of Defense; and
(2) for whom agreements and effective mechanisms are in
place, to the extent relevant and necessary, to provide for
continued cooperation with United States intelligence and law
enforcement authorities.
(f) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``appropriate committees of Congress'' means--
(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on
Appropriations, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the
Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on
Appropriations, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of
Representatives.
(2) The term ``individual detained at Guantanamo'' means
any individual located at United States Naval Station,
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of October 1, 2009, who--
(A) is not a citizen of the United States or a member of
the Armed Forces of the United States; and
(B) is--
(i) in the custody or under the control of the Department
of Defense; or
(ii) otherwise under detention at United States Naval
Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
(3) The term ``foreign terrorist organization'' means any
organization so designated by the Secretary of State under
section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.
1189).

SEC. 1034. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF FUNDS FOR THE TRANSFER
OR RELEASE OF INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT UNITED
STATES NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA.

No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made
available to the Department of Defense may be used during the
period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and
ending on December 31, 2014, to transfer, release, or assist
in the transfer or release to or within the United States,
its territories, or possessions of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or
any other detainee who--
(1) is not a United States citizen or a member of the Armed
Forces of the United States; and
(2) is or was held on or after January 20, 2009, at United
States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by the Department
of Defense.

SEC. 1035. UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY OF INFORMATION RELATING TO
INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT PARWAN, AFGHANISTAN.

Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall make publicly
available an unclassified summary of information relating to
the individuals detained by the Department of Defense at the
Detention Facility at Parwan, Afghanistan, pursuant to the
Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40;
50 U.S.C. 1541 note) who have been determined to represent an
enduring security threat to the United States. Such summary
shall cover any individual detained at such facility as of
the date of the enactment of this Act and any individual so
detained during the two-year period preceding the date of the
enactment of this Act. Such summary shall include for each
such covered individual--
(1) a description of the relevant organization or
organizations with which the individual is affiliated;
(2) whether the individual had ever been in the custody or
under the effective control of the United States at any time
before being detained at such facility and, if so, where the
individual had been in such custody or under such effective
control; and
(3) whether the individual has been directly linked to the
death of any member of the United States Armed Forces or any
United States Government employee.

SEC. 1036. ASSESSMENT OF AFFILIATES AND ADHERENTS OF AL-QAEDA
OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.

Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the President, acting through the Secretary of
Defense, shall submit to the congressional defense committees
an assessment containing each of the following:
(1) An identification of any group operating outside the
United States that is an affiliate or adherent of, or
otherwise related to, al-Qaeda.
(2) A summary of relevant information relating to each such
group, including--
(A) the extent to which members or leaders of the group
have--
(i) conducted or planned to conduct lethal or significant
operations outside the borders of the state or states in
which the group ordinarily operates;
(ii) conducted fundraising or recruiting outside the
borders of such state or states; and
(iii) have demonstrated any interest in conducting
activities described in clauses (i) and (ii) outside the
borders of such state or states;
(B) the extent to which the connection of the group to the
senior leadership of al-Qaeda has changed over time; and
(C) whether the group has attacked or planned to
purposefully attack United States citizens, members of Armed
Forces of the United States, or other representatives of the
United States, or is likely to do so in the future.
(3) An assessment of whether each group is part of or
substantially supporting al-Qaeda or the Taliban, or
constitutes an associated force that is engaged in
hostilities against the United States or its coalition
partners.
(4) The criteria used to determine the nature and extent of
each group's relationship to al-Qaeda.

SEC. 1037. DESIGNATION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SENIOR
OFFICIAL FOR FACILITATING THE TRANSFER OF
INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT UNITED STATES NAVAL
STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA.

Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall--
(1) designate a senior official of the Department of
Defense as the official with principal responsibility for
coordination and management of the transfer of individuals
detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay,
Cuba; and
(2) set forth the responsibilities of that senior official
with respect to such transfers.

SEC. 1038. RANK OF CHIEF PROSECUTOR AND CHIEF DEFENSE COUNSEL
IN MILITARY COMMISSIONS ESTABLISHED TO TRY
INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT GUANTANAMO.

For purposes of any military commission established under
chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code, to try an alien
unprivileged enemy belligerent (as such terms are defined in
section 948a of such title) who is detained at United States
Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the chief defense
counsel and the chief prosecutor shall have the same rank.

SEC. 1039. REPORT ON CAPABILITY OF YEMENI GOVERNMENT TO
DETAIN, REHABILITATE, AND PROSECUTE INDIVIDUALS
DETAINED AT GUANTANAMO WHO ARE TRANSFERRED TO
YEMEN.

Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State
shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees,
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of
the Senate a report on the capability of the government of
Yemen to detain, rehabilitate, and prosecute individuals
detained at Guantanamo (as such term is defined in section
1033(f)(2)) who are transferred to Yemen. Such report shall
include an assessment of any humanitarian issues that may be
encountered in transferring individuals detained at
Guantanamo to Yemen.

SEC. 1040. REPORT ON ATTACHMENT OF RIGHTS TO INDIVIDUALS
DETAINED AT GUANTANAMO IF TRANSFERRED TO THE
UNITED STATES.

Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General
shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees,
the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of
Representatives, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the
Senate a report that includes each of the following:
(1) A description of the extent to which an individual
detained at Guantanamo, if transferred to the United States,
could become eligible, by reason of such transfer, for--
(A) relief from removal from the United States, including
pursuant to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel,
Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment;
(B) any required release from immigration detention,
including pursuant to the decision of the Supreme Court in
Zadvydas v. Davis;
(C) asylum or withholding of removal; or
(D) any additional constitutional right.
(2) For any right referred to in paragraph (1) for which
the Secretary and Attorney General determine such an
individual could become eligible if so transferred, a
description of the reasoning behind such determination and an
explanation of the nature of the right.

SEC. 1040A. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION RELATING TO INDIVIDUALS
DETAINED AT GUANTANAMO WHO BECAME LEADERS OF
FOREIGN TERRORIST GROUPS.

(a) In General.--Not later than 90 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
make publicly available a summary of information relating to
individuals who were formerly detained at United States Naval
Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, who have, since being
transferred or released from such detention, have become
leaders or involved in the leadership structure of a foreign
terrorist group.
(b) Form of Summary.--The summary required under subsection
(a) shall be in unclassified form, but may contain a
classified annex.

Subtitle E--Sensitive Military Operations

SEC. 1041. CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE MILITARY
OPERATIONS.

(a) Notification Required.--
(1) In general.--Chapter 3 of title 10, United States Code,
is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``Sec. 130f. Congressional notification of sensitive military
operations

``(a) In General.--The Secretary of Defense shall promptly
submit to the congressional defense committees notice in
writing of any sensitive military operation following such
operation.

[[Page H3427]]

``(b) Procedures.--(1) The Secretary of Defense shall
establish and submit to the congressional defense committees
procedures for complying with the requirements of subsection
(a) consistent with the national security of the United
States and the protection of operational integrity.
``(2) The congressional defense committees shall ensure
that committee procedures designed to protect from
unauthorized disclosure classified information relating to
national security of the United States are sufficient to
protect the information that is submitted to the committees
pursuant to this section.
``(c) Sensitive Military Operation Defined.--The term
`sensitive military operation' means a lethal operation or
capture operation conducted by the armed forces outside the
United States pursuant to--
``(1) the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public
Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note); or
``(2) any other authority except--
``(A) a declaration of war; or
``(B) a specific statutory authorization for the use of
force other than the authorization referred to in paragraph
(1).
``(d) Exception.--The notification requirement under
subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to a sensitive
military operation executed within the territory of
Afghanistan pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military
Force (Public Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note).
``(e) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall
be construed to provide any new authority or to alter or
otherwise affect the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1541 et
seq.), the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public
Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note), or any requirement under
the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3001 et
seq.).''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the
item relating to section 130e the following new item:

``130f. Congressional notification regarding sensitive military
operations.''.

(b) Effective Date.--Section 130f of title 10, United
States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with
respect to any sensitive military operation (as defined in
subsection (c) of such section) executed on or after the date
of the enactment of this Act.
(c) Deadline for Submittal of Procedures.--The Secretary of
Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees
the procedures required under section 130f(b) of title 10,
United States Code, as added by subsection (a), by not later
than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 1042. REPORT ON PROCESS FOR DETERMINING TARGETS OF
LETHAL OPERATIONS.

Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report containing an
explanation of the legal and policy considerations and
approval processes used in determining whether an individual
or group of individuals could be the target of a lethal
operation or capture operation conducted by the Armed Forces
of the United States outside the United States.

SEC. 1043. COUNTERTERRORISM OPERATIONAL BRIEFINGS.

(a) Briefings Required.--Chapter 23 of title 10, United
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following
new section:

``Sec. 492. Quarterly briefings: counterterrorism operations

``(a) Briefings Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall
provide to the congressional defense committees quarterly
briefings outlining Department of Defense counterterrorism
operations and related activities.
``(b) Elements.--Each briefing under subsection (a) shall
include each of the following:
``(1) A global update on activity within each geographic
combatant command.
``(2) An overview of authorities and legal issues including
limitations.
``(3) An outline of interagency activities and initiatives.
``(4) Any other matters the Secretary considers
appropriate.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the
following new item:

``492. Quarterly briefings: counterterrorism operations.''.

Subtitle F--Nuclear Forces

SEC. 1051. PROHIBITION ON ELIMINATION OF THE NUCLEAR TRIAD.

(a) Prohibition on Triad Reductions.--None of the funds
authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made
available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense
may be obligated or expended to reduce, convert, or
decommission any strategic delivery system if such reduction,
conversion, or decommissioning would eliminate a leg of the
nuclear triad.
(b) Nuclear Triad Defined.--The term ``nuclear triad''
means the nuclear deterrent capabilities of the United States
composed of the following:
(1) Land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles.
(2) Submarine-launched ballistic missiles and associated
ballistic missile submarines.
(3) Nuclear-certified strategic bombers.

SEC. 1052. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR REDUCTION
OF NUCLEAR FORCES.

(a) Limitation.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for
fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense or the
National Nuclear Security Administration may be obligated or
expended to carry out reductions to the nuclear forces of the
United States required by the New START Treaty until--
(1) the Secretary of Defense submits to the appropriate
congressional committees the plan required by section 1042(a)
of the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2012
(Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1575); and
(2) the President certifies to the appropriate
congressional committees that any further reductions to such
forces that result in such forces being reduced below the
level required by the New START Treaty will be carried out
only pursuant to--
(A) a treaty or international agreement specifically
approved with the advice and consent of the Senate pursuant
to Article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution; or
(B) an Act of Congress specifically authorizing such
reductions.
(b) Exception.--The limitation in subsection (a) shall not
apply to the following:
(1) Reductions made to ensure the safety, security,
reliability, and credibility of the nuclear weapons stockpile
and strategic delivery systems, including activities related
to surveillance, assessment, certification, testing, and
maintenance of nuclear warheads and strategic delivery
systems.
(2) Nuclear warheads that are retired or awaiting
dismantlement on the date of the enactment of this Act.
(3) Inspections carried out pursuant to the New START
Treaty.
(c) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means
the following:
(A) The congressional defense committees.
(B) The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the
Senate.
(2) The term ``New START Treaty'' means the Treaty between
the United States of America and the Russian Federation on
Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of
Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on April 8, 2010, and
entered into force on February 5, 2011.

SEC. 1053. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR REDUCTION
OR CONSOLIDATION OF DUAL-CAPABLE AIRCRAFT BASED
IN EUROPE.

(a) Limitation.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for
fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be used to
reduce or consolidate the basing of dual-capable aircraft of
the United States that are based in Europe until a period of
90 days has elapsed after the date on which the Secretary of
Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees
that--
(1) the Russian Federation has carried out similar
reductions or consolidations with respect to dual-capable
aircraft of Russia;
(2) the Secretary has consulted with the member states of
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization with respect to the
planned reduction or consolidation of the Secretary; and
(3) there is a consensus among such member states in
support of such planned reduction or consolidation.
(b) Dual-capable Aircraft Defined.--In this section, the
term ``dual-capable aircraft'' means aircraft that can
perform both conventional and nuclear missions.

SEC. 1054. STATEMENT OF POLICY ON IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY
AGREEMENT FOR FURTHER ARMS REDUCTION BELOW THE
LEVELS OF THE NEW START TREATY; LIMITATION ON
RETIREMENT OR DISMANTLEMENT OF STRATEGIC
DELIVERY SYSTEMS.

(a) Finding; Statement of Policy.--
(1) Finding.--Congress finds that it was the Declaration of
the United States Senate in its Resolution of Advice and
Consent to the New START Treaty that ``[t]he Senate declares
that further arms reduction agreements obligating the United
States to reduce or limit the Armed Forces or armaments of
the United States in any militarily significant manner may be
made only pursuant to the treaty-making power of the
President as set forth in Article II, section 2, clause 2 of
the Constitution of the United States''.
(2) Statement of policy.--Congress reaffirms the
Declaration described in paragraph (1) and states that any
agreement for further arms reduction below the levels of the
New START Treaty, including those that may seek to use the
Treaty's verification regime, may only be made pursuant to
the treaty-making power of the President as set forth in
Article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution of the
United States or by Act of Congress, as set forth in the Arms
Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2551 et seq.).
(b) Limitation.--
(1) In general.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for
fiscal year 2014 or any fiscal year thereafter for the
Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to retire,
dismantle, or deactivate, or prepare to retire, dismantle, or
deactivate, any covered strategic delivery vehicle if such
action reduces the number of covered strategic delivery
vehicles to less than the 800 required to implement the New
START Treaty.
(2) Waiver.--In accordance with subsection (c), the
President may waive the limitation under paragraph (1) with
respect to a fiscal year if the President submits to the
appropriate congressional committees written notification
that--
(A) the Senate has given its advice and consent to
ratification of a nuclear arms reduction treaty with the
Russian Federation that requires Russia to significantly and
proportionally reduce its number of nonstrategic nuclear
warheads, or an international agreement for such purpose is
entered into pursuant to an Act of Congress as set forth in
the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2551 et
seq.);
(B) such treaty or agreement has entered into force; and
(C) such waiver is required during such fiscal year to
implement such treaty or agreement.

[[Page H3428]]

(c) Additional Limitations.--
(1) Certain compliance of nuclear arms control
agreements.--If the President makes a waiver under subsection
(b)(2), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by
this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 or
any fiscal year thereafter for the Department of Defense may
be obligated or expended to retire, dismantle, or deactivate,
or prepare to retire, dismantle, or deactivate, any covered
strategic delivery vehicle until 30 days elapses following
the date on which the President submits to the appropriate
congressional committees and the congressional intelligence
committees written certification that the Russian Federation
is in compliance with its nuclear arms control agreements and
obligations with the United States.
(2) Certain intelligence.--If the President makes a waiver
under subsection (b)(2), none of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for
fiscal year 2014 or any fiscal year thereafter for the
Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to retire,
dismantle, or deactivate, or prepare to retire, dismantle, or
deactivate, any covered strategic delivery vehicle in
accordance with a treaty or international agreement entered
into pursuant to an Act of Congress requiring such actions
unless the President submits to the appropriate congressional
committees and the congressional intelligence committees
written certification that the intelligence community has
high confidence judgments with respect to--
(A) the nuclear weapons production capacity of the People's
Republic of China;
(B) the nature, number, location, and targetability of the
nuclear weapons and strategic delivery systems of China; and
(C) the nuclear doctrine of China.
(d) Exception.--The limitations in subsection (b) and (c)
shall not apply to reductions made to ensure the safety,
security, reliability, and credibility of the nuclear weapons
stockpile and strategic delivery systems of the United
States, including activities related to surveillance,
assessment, certification, testing, and maintenance of
nuclear warheads and strategic delivery system.
(e) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means
the following:
(A) The congressional defense committees.
(B) The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the
Senate.
(2) The term ``congressional intelligence committees''
means the following:
(A) The Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the
House of Representatives.
(B) The Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.
(3) The term ``covered strategic delivery vehicle'' means
the following:
(A) B-52H bomber aircraft.
(B) B-2 Spirit bomber aircraft.
(C) Trident ballistic missile submarines.
(D) Trident II D5 submarine launched ballistic missiles.
(E) Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles.
(4) The term ``New START Treaty'' means the Treaty between
the United States of America and the Russian Federation on
Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of
Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on April 8, 2010, and
entered into force on February 5, 2011.

SEC. 1055. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON COMPLIANCE WITH NUCLEAR ARMS
CONTROL AGREEMENTS.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) President Obama stated in Prague in April 2009 that
``Rules must be binding. Violations must be punished. Words
must mean something.''.
(2) President Obama's Nuclear Posture Review of 2010
stated, ``it is not enough to detect non-compliance;
violators must know that they will face consequences when
they are caught.''.
(3) The July 2010 Verifiability Assessment released by the
Department of State on the New START Treaty stated, ``The
costs and risks of Russian cheating or breakout, on the other
hand, would likely be very significant. In addition to the
financial and international political costs of such an
action, any Russian leader considering cheating or breakout
from the New START Treaty would have to consider that the
United States will retain the ability to upload large numbers
of additional nuclear warheads on both bombers and missiles
under the New START, which would provide the ability for a
timely and very significant U.S. response.''.
(4) Subsection (a) of the Resolution of Advice and Consent
to Ratification of the New START Treaty of the Senate, agreed
to on December 22, 2010, listed conditions of the Senate to
the ratification of the New START Treaty that are binding
upon the President, including the condition under paragraph
(1)(B) of such subsection that requires the President to take
certain actions in response to actions by the Russian
Federation that are in violation of or inconsistent with such
treaty, including to ``seek on an urgent basis a meeting with
the Russian Federation at the highest diplomatic level with
the objective of bringing the Russian Federation into full
compliance with its obligations under the New START Treaty''.
(5) The Obama Administration demonstrated that violations
of treaty obligations by other parties require corresponding
action by the United States when, on November 22, 2011, the
Department of State announced that the United States would
``cease carrying out certain obligations under the
Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty with regard
to Russia. This announcement in the CFE Treaty's
implementation group comes after the United States and NATO
Allies have tried over the past 4 years to find a diplomatic
solution following Russia's decision in 2007 to cease
implementation with respect to all other 29 CFE States. Since
then, Russia has refused to accept inspections and ceased to
provide information to other CFE Treaty parties on its
military forces as required by the Treaty.''.
(6) On October 17, 2012, the Chairman of the Committee on
Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the
Chairman of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of
the House of Representatives wrote a classified letter to the
President stating their concerns about a major arms control
violation by the Russian Federation.
(7) The Chairmen followed up their classified letter with
unclassified letters on February 14 and April 12, 2013--in
their latest letter, the Chairmen stated that they expect the
Administration to ``directly confront the Russian violations
and circumventions of this and other treaties. . .[we]
further ask, again, for your engagement in correcting this
behavior. We also seek your commitment not to undertake
further reductions to the U.S. nuclear deterrent or extended
deterrent until this Russian behavior is corrected. We are in
full agreement with your policy as you articulated it in
Prague four years ago this month, `rules must be binding,
Violations must be punished. Words must mean something.' ''.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that
the President should consider not seeking to further limit or
reduce the nuclear forces of the United States, including by
negotiation, with a foreign country that remains in active
noncompliance with existing nuclear arms obligations, such as
the Russian Federation.
(c) Obligations of the President in the Event of
Noncompliance.--If the President determines that a foreign
country is not in compliance with its obligations under a
nuclear arms control agreement, treaty, or commitment to
which the United States is a party or in which the United
States is a participating government, including the Missile
Technology Control Regime, the President shall--
(1) immediately consult with Congress regarding the
implications of such noncompliance for--
(A) the viability of such agreement, treaty, or commitment;
and
(B) the national security interests of the United States
and the allies of the United States;
(2) submit to Congress a plan concerning the diplomatic
strategy of the President to engage such foreign country at
the highest diplomatic level with the objective of bringing
such country into full compliance with such obligations; and
(3) at the earliest date practicable following the
submission of the plan under paragraph (2), submit to
Congress a report detailing--
(A) whether adherence by the United States to such
obligation remains in the national security interests of the
United States or the allies of the United States; and
(B) how the United States will redress the effect of such
noncompliance to the national security interests of the
United States or such allies.

SEC. 1056. RETENTION OF CAPABILITY TO REDEPLOY MULTIPLE
INDEPENDENTLY TARGETABLE REENTRY VEHICLES.

(a) Deployment Capability.--The Secretary of the Air Force
shall ensure that the Air Force is capable of--
(1) deploying multiple independently targetable reentry
vehicles to Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic
missiles, and any ground-based strategic deterrent follow-on
to such missiles; and
(2) commencing such deployment not later than 270 days
after the date on which the President determines such
deployment necessary.
(b) Warhead Capability.--The Nuclear Weapons Council
established by section 179 of title 10, United States Code,
shall ensure that--
(1) the nuclear weapons stockpile contains a sufficient
number of nuclear warheads that are capable of being deployed
as multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles with
respect to Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles,
and any ground-based strategic deterrent follow-on to such
missiles; and
(2) such deployment is capable of being commenced not later
than 270 days after the date on which the President
determines such deployment necessary.

SEC. 1057. ASSESSMENT OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS PROGRAM OF THE
PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA.

Section 1045(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1933) is
amended--
(1) in paragraph (4), by striking ``August 15, 2013'' and
inserting ``August 15, 2014''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(5) Limitation.--Of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2014 or otherwise made available for fiscal year
2014 for the Office of the Secretary of Defense for travel,
not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until a
period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the
Secretary of Defense notifies the appropriate congressional
committees that the Secretary has entered into an agreement
under paragraph (1) with a federally funded research and
development center.''.

SEC. 1058. COST ESTIMATES FOR NUCLEAR WEAPONS.

Section 1043(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1576), as
amended by section 1041 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat.
1931), is amended--
(1) in paragraph (2)(F), by inserting ``personnel,'' after
``maintenance,''; and
(2) in paragraph (3), by inserting before the period at the
end the following: ``, including how and which locations were
counted''.

[[Page H3429]]

SEC. 1059. REPORT ON NEW START TREATY.

Not later than January 15, 2014, the Secretary of Defense
and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall jointly
submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee
on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the
Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on
whether the New START Treaty (as defined in section
494(a)(2)(D)(ii)) of title 10, United States Code) is in the
national security interests of the United States.

Subtitle G--Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations

SEC. 1061. ENHANCEMENT OF CAPACITY OF THE UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENT TO ANALYZE CAPTURED RECORDS.

(a) In General.--Chapter 21 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by inserting after section 426 the following
new section:

``Sec. 427. Conflict Records Research Center

``(a) Center Authorized.--The Secretary of Defense may
establish a center to be known as the `Conflict Records
Research Center' (in this section referred to as the
`Center').
``(b) Purposes.--The purposes of the Center shall be the
following:
``(1) To establish a digital research database including
translations and to facilitate research and analysis of
records captured from countries, organizations, and
individuals, now or once hostile to the United States, with
rigid adherence to academic freedom and integrity.
``(2) Consistent with the protection of national security
information, personally identifiable information, and
intelligence sources and methods, to make a significant
portion of these records available to researchers as quickly
and responsibly as possible while taking into account the
integrity of the academic process and risks to innocents or
third parties.
``(3) To conduct and disseminate research and analysis to
increase the understanding of factors related to
international relations, counterterrorism, and conventional
and unconventional warfare and, ultimately, enhance national
security.
``(4) To collaborate with members of academic and broad
national security communities, both domestic and
international, on research, conferences, seminars, and other
information exchanges to identify topics of importance for
the leadership of the United States Government and the
scholarly community.
``(c) Concurrence of the Director of National
Intelligence.--The Secretary of Defense shall seek the
concurrence of the Director of National Intelligence to the
extent the efforts and activities of the Center involve the
entities referred to in subsection (b)(4).
``(d) Support From Other United States Government
Departments or Agencies.--The head of any non-Department of
Defense department or agency of the United States Government
may--
``(1) provide to the Secretary of Defense services,
including personnel support, to support the operations of the
Center; and
``(2) transfer funds to the Secretary of Defense to support
the operations of the Center.
``(e) Acceptance of Gifts and Donations.--(1) Subject to
paragraph (3), the Secretary of Defense may accept from any
source specified in paragraph (2) any gift or donation for
purposes of defraying the costs or enhancing the operations
of the Center.
``(2) The sources specified in this paragraph are the
following:
``(A) The government of a State or a political subdivision
of a State.
``(B) The government of a foreign country.
``(C) A foundation or other charitable organization,
including a foundation or charitable organization that is
organized or operates under the laws of a foreign country.
``(D) Any source in the private sector of the United States
or a foreign country.
``(3) The Secretary may not accept a gift or donation under
this subsection if acceptance of the gift or donation would
compromise or appear to compromise--
``(A) the ability of the Department of Defense, any
employee of the Department, or any member of the armed forces
to carry out the responsibility or duty of the Department in
a fair and objective manner; or
``(B) the integrity of any program of the Department or of
any person involved in such a program.
``(4) The Secretary shall provide written guidance setting
forth the criteria to be used in determining the
applicability of paragraph (3) to any proposed gift or
donation under this subsection.
``(f) Crediting of Funds Transferred or Accepted.--Funds
transferred to or accepted by the Secretary of Defense under
this section shall be credited to appropriations available to
the Department of Defense for the Center, and shall be
available for the same purposes, and subject to the same
conditions and limitations, as the appropriations with which
merged. Any funds so transferred or accepted shall remain
available until expended.
``(g) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) The term `captured record' means a document, audio
file, video file, or other material captured during combat
operations from countries, organizations, or individuals, now
or once hostile to the United States.
``(2) The term `gift or donation' means any gift or
donation of funds, materials (including research materials),
real or personal property, or services (including lecture
services and faculty services).''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of subchapter I of such chapter is amended by
inserting after the item relating to section 426 the
following new item:

``427. Conflict Records Research Center.''.

SEC. 1062. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE MILITARY
TRANSPORTATION SERVICES TO CERTAIN OTHER
AGENCIES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
REIMBURSEMENT RATE.

(a) In General.--Section 2642(a) of title 10, United States
Code, is amended--
(1) by striking ``airlift'' each place it appears and
inserting ``transportation''; and
(2) in paragraph (3)--
(A) by striking ``October 28, 2014'' and inserting
``September 30, 2019'';
(B) by inserting and ``military transportation services
provided in support of foreign military sales'' after
``Department of Defense''; and
(C) by striking ``air industry'' and inserting
``transportation industry''.
(b) Technical Amendment.--The heading for such section is
amended by striking ``Airlift'' and inserting
``Transportation''.
(c) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of chapter 157 of such title is amended by striking
the item relating to section 2642 and inserting the following
new item:

``2642. Transportation services provided to certain other agencies: use
of Department of Defense reimbursement rates''.

SEC. 1063. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR
MODIFICATION OF FORCE STRUCTURE OF THE ARMY.

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act
or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the
Department of the Army may be used to modify the force
structure or basing strategy of the Army until the Secretary
of the Army--
(1) submits to Congress the report on force structure
required by section 1066 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239;
126 Stat. 1943); and
(2) provides to the congressional defense committees a
briefing on the most recent force mix analysis conducted by
the Secretary, including--
(A) the assumptions and scenarios used to determine the
type and mix of Brigade Combat Teams;
(B) the rationale for the recommended force mix; and
(C) the risks involved with the recommended force mix.

SEC. 1064. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR PUBLIC-PRIVATE
COOPERATION ACTIVITIES.

No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made
available to the Department of Defense by this Act or any
other Act may be obligated or expended on any public-private
cooperation activity undertaken by a combatant command until
the Secretary of Defense submits to the Committee on Armed
Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of
the House of Representatives the report on the conclusions of
the Defense Business Board that the Secretary was directed to
provide under the Report of the Committee on Armed Services
to accompany H.R. 4310 of the 112th Congress (H. Rept. 112-
479).

Subtitle H--Studies and Reports

SEC. 1071. OVERSIGHT OF COMBAT SUPPORT AGENCIES.

Section 193(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by inserting
``and the congressional defense committees'' after ``the
Secretary of Defense''.

SEC. 1072. INCLUSION IN ANNUAL REPORT OF DESCRIPTION OF
INTERAGENCY COORDINATION RELATING TO
HUMANITARIAN DEMINING TECHNOLOGY.

Section 407(d) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended--
(1) in paragraph (3), by striking ``and'' at the end;
(2) in paragraph (4), by striking the period and inserting
``; and''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(5) a description of interagency efforts to coordinate
and improve research, development, test, and evaluation for
humanitarian demining technology and mechanical clearance
methods, including the transfer of relevant counter-
improvised explosive device technology with potential
humanitarian demining applications.''.

SEC. 1073. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR COMPTROLLER GENERAL
REPORT ON ASSIGNMENT OF CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES OF
THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AS ADVISORS TO
FOREIGN MINISTRIES OF DEFENSE.

Section 1081(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law. 112-81; 125 Stat. 1599; 10
U.S.C. 168 note) is amended by striking ``December 30, 2013''
and inserting ``December 30, 2014''.

SEC. 1074. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR COMPTROLLER GENERAL
ASSESSMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
EFFICIENCIES.

Section 1054 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1582) is
repealed.

SEC. 1075. MATTERS FOR INCLUSION IN THE ASSESSMENT OF THE
2013 QUADRENNIAL DEFENSE REVIEW.

(a) In General.--For purposes of conducting the assessment
of the 2013 quadrennial defense review under section 118 of
title 10, United States Code, the National Defense Panel
established under subsection (f) of such section (hereinafter
in this section referred to as the ``Panel'') shall--
(1) conduct an assessment of the recommendation included in
the assessment of the 2009 quadrennial defense review under
such section regarding the establishment of a standing,
independent strategic review panel;
(2) include in the report required by paragraph (7) of such
subsection the recommendations of the Panel regarding the
establishment of such a standing panel; and

[[Page H3430]]

(3) take into consideration the Strategic Choices and
Management Review directed by the Secretary of Defense during
2013, particularly in carrying out the responsibilities of
the Panel under clauses (i), (ii), and (v) of paragraph (5)
of such subsection.
(b) Updates From Secretary of Defense.--In providing
updates to the panel regarding the 2013 quadrennial defense
review under paragraph (8) of such subsection, or providing
information requested by the panel pursuant to paragraph
(9)(A) of such subsection, the Secretary of Defense or head
of the department or agency, as appropriate, shall also
provide information related to the Strategic Choices and
Management Review.

SEC. 1076. REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF UNITED STATES SPECIAL
OPERATIONS FORCES AND UNITED STATES SPECIAL
OPERATIONS COMMAND.

(a) In General.--The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a
review of the United States Special Operations Forces
organization, capabilities, and structure.
(b) Report.--Not later than the date on which the budget of
the President is submitted to Congress under section 1105(a)
of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2015, the
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional
defense committees a report on the review conducted under
subsection (a). Such report shall include an analysis of each
of the following:
(1) The organizational structure of the United States
Special Operations Command and each subordinate component, as
in effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(2) The policy and civilian oversight structures for
Special Operations Forces within the Department of Defense,
as in effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act,
including the statutory structures and responsibilities of
the Office of the Secretary of Defense for Special Operations
and Low Intensity Conflict within the Department.
(3) The roles and responsibilities of United States Special
Operations Command and Special Operations Forces under
section 167 of title 10, United States Code.
(4) Current and future special operations peculiar
requirements of the commanders of the geographic combatant
commands, Theater Special Operations Commands, and command
relationships between United States Special Operations
Command and the geographic combatant commands.
(5) The funding authorities, uses, and oversight mechanisms
of Major Force Program-11.
(6) Changes to structure, authorities, oversight
mechanisms, Major Force Program-11 funding, roles, and
responsibilities assumed in the 2014 Quadrennial Defense
Review.
(7) Any other matters the Secretary of Defense determines
are appropriate to ensure a comprehensive review and
assessment.
(c) In General.--Not later than 60 days after the date on
which the report required by subsection (b) is submitted, the
Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a review of the report. Such
review shall include an assessment of United States Special
Operations Forces organization, capabilities, and force
structure with respect to conventional force structures and
national military strategies.

SEC. 1077. REPORTS ON UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS.

(a) Report on Collaboration, Demonstration, and Use Cases
and Data Sharing.--Not later than 90 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, the
Secretary of Transportation, the Administrator of the Federal
Aviation Administration, and the Administrator of the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, on behalf of
the UAS Executive Committee, shall submit jointly to the
appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth the
following:
(1) The collaboration, demonstrations, and initial fielding
of unmanned aircraft systems at test sites within and outside
of restricted airspace.
(2) The progress being made to develop public and civil
sense-and-avoid and command-and-control technology.
(3) An assessment on the sharing of operational,
programmatic, and research data relating to unmanned aircraft
systems operations by the Federal Aviation Administration,
the Department of Defense, and the National Aeronautics and
Space Administration to help the Federal Aviation
Administration establish civil unmanned aircraft systems
certification standards, pilot certification and licensing,
and air traffic control procedures, including identifying the
locations selected to collect, analyze, and store the data.
(b) Report on Resource Requirements Needed for Unmanned
Aircraft Systems Described in the Five-year Roadmap.--Not
later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this
Act, the Secretary of Defense, on behalf of the UAS Executive
Committee, shall submit to the appropriate committees of
Congress a report setting forth the resource requirements
needed to meet the milestones for unmanned aircraft systems
integration described in the five-year roadmap under section
332(a)(5) of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act (Public Law
112-95; 49 U.S.C. 40101 note).
(c) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``appropriate committees of Congress'' means--
(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on
Commerce, Science and Transportation, and the Committee on
Appropriations of the Senate; and
(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure, the Committee on Science,
Space, and Technology, and the Committee on Appropriations of
the House of Representatives.
(2) The term ``UAS Executive Committee'' means the
Department of Defense-Federal Aviation Administration
executive committee described in section 1036(b) of the
Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat. 4596) established by
the Secretary of Defense and the Administrator of the Federal
Aviation Administration.

SEC. 1078. ONLINE AVAILABILITY OF REPORTS SUBMITTED TO
CONGRESS.

(a) In General.--Subsection (a)(1) of section 122a of title
10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
``(1) made available on a publicly accessible Internet
website of the Department of Defense; and''.
(b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a)
shall apply with respect to reports submitted to Congress
after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 1079. PROVISION OF DEFENSE PLANNING GUIDANCE AND
CONTINGENCY OPERATION PLAN INFORMATION TO
CONGRESS.

(a) In General.--Section 113(g) of title 10, United States
Code is amended by adding at the end, the following new
paragraph:
``(3) At the time of the budget submission by the President
for a fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to
the congressional defense committees an annual report
containing summaries of the guidance developed under
paragraphs (1) and (2), as well as summaries of any plans
developed in accordance with the guidance developed under
paragraph (2). Such summaries shall be sufficient to allow
the congressional defense committees to evaluate fully the
requirements for military forces, acquisition programs, and
operations and maintenance funding in the President's annual
budget request for the Department of Defense.''.
(b) Report Required.--Notwithstanding the requirement under
paragraph (3) of section 113(g) of title 10, United States
Code, as added by subsection (a), that the Secretary of
Defense submit reports under that paragraph at the time of
the President's annual budget submission, the Secretary shall
submit to the congressional defense committees the first
report required under that paragraph by not later than 120
days after the date of the enactment of this Act,
(c) Limitation on Obligation of Funds Pending Report.--Of
the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for
Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide, for the office of
the Secretary of Defense, not more than 75 percent may be
obligated or expended before the date that is 15 days after
the date on which the Secretary submits the report described
in subsection (b).

Subtitle I--Other Matters

SEC. 1081. TECHNICAL AND CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.

(a) Title 10.--Title 10, United States Code, is amended as
follows:
(1) The table of chapters at the beginning of subtitle A,
and at the beginning of part I of such subtitle, are each
amended by striking the item relating to chapter 24 and
inserting the following:

24. Nuclear Posture.............................................491....

(2) Section 122a(a) is amended by striking ``subsection (b)
is'' and inserting ``subsection (b) is--''.
(3) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 3 is
amended by striking the item relating to section 130e and
inserting the following new item:

``130e. Treatment under Freedom of Information Act of critical
infrastructure security information.''.

(4) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 9 is
amended by striking the item relating to section 231 and
inserting the following new item:

``231. Budgeting for construction of naval vessels: annual plan and
certification.''.

(5) Section 231a(a) is amended by striking ``fiscal year of
Defense'' and inserting ``fiscal year, the Secretary of
Defense''.
(6) Chapter 24 is amended by adding a period at the end of
the enumerator of section 498.
(7) Section 494(c) is amended by striking ``the date of the
enactment of this Act'' each place it appears and inserting
``December 31, 2011''.
(8) Section 673(a) is amended by inserting ``of the Uniform
Code of Military Justice'' after ``120c''.
(9) Section 1401a is amended by striking ``before the
enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2008'' in subsections (d) and (e) and inserting
``before January 28, 2008''.
(10) Section 2359b(k)(4)(B) is amended by adding a period
at the end.
(11) Section 2461(a)(5)(E)(i) is amended by striking ``the
a'' and inserting ``the''.
(b) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2013.--Effective as of January 2, 2013, and as if included
therein as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239) is amended as
follows:
(1) Section 322(e)(2) (126 Stat. 1695) is amended by
striking ``Section 2366b(A)(3)(F)'' and inserting ``Section
2366b(a)(3)(F)''.
(2) Section 371(a)(1) (126 Stat. 1706) is amended by
striking ``subsections (f) and (g) as subsections (g) and
(h), respectively'' and inserting ``subsection (f) as
subsection (g)''.
(3) Section 611(7) (126 Stat. 1776) is amended by striking
``Section 408a(e)'' and inserting ``Section 478a(e)''.
(4) Section 822(b) (126 Stat. 1830) is amended by striking
``such Act'' and inserting ``such section''.
(5) Section 1031(b)(3)(B) (126 Stat.1918) is amended by
striking the subclause (III) immediately below clause (iv).

[[Page H3431]]

(6) Section 1031(b)(4) (126 Stat.1919) is amended by
striking ``Section 1031(b)'' and inserting ``Section
1041(b)''.
(7) Section 1086(d)(1) (126 Stat.1969) is amended by
striking ``paragraph (1)'' and inserting ``paragraph (2)''.
(8) Section 1221(a)(2) (126 Stat. 1992) is amended by
striking ``fiscal'' both places it appears and inserting
``Fiscal''.
(9) Section 1804 (126 Stat. 2111) is amended--
(A) in subsection (h)(1)(B), by striking ``inserting `;
and';'' and inserting ``inserting a semicolon;''; and
(B) in subsection (i), by inserting after ``it appears''
the following: ``(except in those places in which
`Administrator of FEMA' already appears)''.
(c) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2012.--Effective as of December 31, 2011, and as if included
therein as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81) is amended as
follows:
(1) Section 312(b)(6)(F) (125 Stat. 1354) is amended by
striking ``subsection (D)'' and inserting ``subsection (d)''.
(2) Section 585(a)(1) (125 Stat. 1434; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note)
is amended ``experts sexual'' and inserting ``experts in
sexual''.
(d) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2004.--Section 338(a) of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108-136; 10 U.S.C. 5013
note), as most recently amended by section 321 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1694), is amended by striking
``subsection 4703'' and inserting ``section 4703''.
(e) Amendment to Title 41.--Section 4712(i) is amended by
inserting before ``the enactment'' the following: ``that is
180 days after the date''.
(f) Coordination With Other Amendments Made by This Act.--
For purposes of applying amendments made by provisions of
this Act other than this section, the amendments made by this
section shall be treated as having been enacted immediately
before any amendment made by other provisions of this Act.

SEC. 1082. TRANSPORTATION OF SUPPLIES FOR THE UNITED STATES
BY AIRCRAFT OPERATED BY UNITED STATES AIR
CARRIERS.

(a) Department of Defense.--
(1) In general.--Chapter 157 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by inserting after section 2631a the
following new section:

``Sec. 2631b. Supplies: preference to United States aircraft

``(a) Preference.--Only aircraft owned by the United
States, or aircraft operated by or under the supervision of
United States air carriers holding a certificate under
section 41102 of title 49 and registered in the Civil Reserve
Air Fleet, may be used for the transportation by air of
supplies on behalf of any component of the Department of
Defense. However, if the President finds that the rates
charged for the use of those aircraft is excessive or
otherwise unreasonable, contracts for transportation may be
made as otherwise provided by law. Charges made for the
transportation of those supplies by those aircraft may not be
higher than the charges made for transporting like goods for
private persons.
``(b) Outsize and Oversize Cargoes.--(1) The preference
under subsection (a) shall not apply to outsize or oversize
cargoes if no air carrier registered in the Civil Reserve Air
Fleet nor any aircraft owned by the United States is capable
and available of transporting such a cargo.
``(2) The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that, to the
maximum extent practicable, outsize and oversize cargoes are
transported by aircraft owned and operated by the United
States or by air carriers in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet.
``(3) Not later than March 30 of each year, the Secretary
of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a report on outsize and oversize cargo flights.
Each such report shall include, for the year covered by the
report, each of the following:
``(A) The number of outsize and oversize cargo flights,
including the number of flights and tonnage of each flight,
flown both by aircraft owned and operated by the United
States and by carriers in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet.
``(B) For any cargo carried by aircraft that is neither
owned and operated by the United States nor by an air carrier
in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet, an explanation for the use of
such a carrier.''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the
item relating to section 2631a the following new item:

``2631b. Supplies: preference to United States aircraft.''.

(b) Other Departments and Agencies.--
(1) In general.--Chapter 401 of title 49, United States
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new
section:

``Sec. 40131. Air transportation procured by the United
States Government

``(a) Guarantee.--Consistent with the provisions of section
40118 of title 49, when the United States procures, enters
into a contract for, or otherwise obtains for its own
account, or furnishes to or for the account of a foreign
country, organization, or person without provision for
reimbursement, any equipment, materials, or commodities, or
provides financing in any way with Federal funds for the
account of any person unless otherwise exempted, within or
without the United States, or advances funds or credits, or
guarantees the convertibility of foreign currencies in
connection with the furnishing or obtaining of the equipment,
materials, or commodities, the appropriate agencies shall
take steps necessary and practicable to ensure that at least
50 percent of the gross tonnage of the equipment, materials,
or commodities which may be transported on fixed wing
aircraft are transported on privately-owned commercial
aircraft that are owned, operated, or otherwise supervised by
air carriers holding a certificate under section 41102 of
this title and registered in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet, to
the extent those aircraft are appropriate and available at
fair and reasonable rates.
``(b) Exception.--
``(1) In general.--The requirements of this section shall
not apply to any equipment, materials, or commodities
transported for the use of the military services of the
United States or to respond to a humanitarian disaster.
``(2) Humanitarian disaster defined.--For purposes of this
subsection, the term `humanitarian disaster' means a man-made
or natural occurrence that causes loss of life, health,
property, or livelihood, inflicting severe destruction and
distress.
``(c) Waiver.--
``(1) In general.--The President, the Secretary of
Transportation, or the Secretary of State, in coordination
with the Secretary of Defense, as appropriate, may issue a
temporary waiver of this section--
``(A) to respond to an emergency; or
``(B) if such a waiver is in the national interests of the
United States.
``(2) Committee notice.--The President, the Secretary of
Transportation, or the Secretary of State, as appropriate,
shall notify the following Committees within 30 days of
exercising a waiver under paragraph (1):
``(A) The Committees on Armed Services and Appropriations
of the Senate and the House of Representatives.
``(B) The Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation of the Senate.
``(C) The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of
the House of Representatives.
``(D) The Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.
``(E) The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives.
``(3) Expiration and renewal of waiver.--Any waiver issued
under paragraph (1) shall expire not later than 180 days
after the date on which it is issued. The President, the
Secretary of Transportation, or the Secretary of State, as
appropriate, may renew an expired or expiring waiver as long
as the President or Secretary provides notice to the
committees referred to in paragraph (2) in accordance with
that paragraph.
``(d) Regulations.--Each department or agency of the
Government shall administer its air transport operations
according to regulations and guidance issued by the Secretary
of Transportation.
``(e) Enforcement.--The Secretary of Transportation may
impose on any person violating this section, or a regulation
issued under this section, a civil penalty of up to $25,000
for each violation knowingly committed, with each day of a
continuing violation following the initial shipment to be a
separate violation.''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the
following new item:

``40131. Air transportation procured by the United States
Government.''.

SEC. 1083. REDUCTION IN COSTS TO REPORT CRITICAL CHANGES TO
MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEM PROGRAMS.

(a) Extension of a Program Defined.--Section 2445a of title
10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the
following new subsection:
``(g) Extension of a Program.--In this chapter, the term
`extension of a program' means, with respect to a major
automated information system program or other major
information technology investment program, the further
deployment or planned deployment to additional users of the
system which has already been found operationally effective
and suitable by an independent test agency or the Director of
Operational Test and Evaluation, beyond the scope planned in
the original estimate or information originally submitted on
the program.''.
(b) Reports on Critical Changes in MAIS Programs.--
Subsection (d) of section 2445c of such title is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``paragraph (2)'' and
inserting ``paragraph (3)'';
(2) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and
(3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new
paragraph (2):
``(2) Notification when variance due to congressional
action or extension of program.--If a senior Department of
Defense official who, following receipt of a quarterly report
described in paragraph (1) and making a determination
described in paragraph (3), also determines that the
circumstances resulting in the determination described in
paragraph (3) either (A) are primarily the result of
congressional action, or (B) are primarily due to an
extension of a program, the official may, in lieu of carrying
out an evaluation and submitting a report in accordance with
paragraph (1), submit to the congressional defense
committees, within 45 days after receiving the quarterly
report, a notification that the official has made those
determinations. If such a notification is submitted, the
limitation in subsection (g)(1) does not apply with respect
to that determination under paragraph (3).''.
(c) Conforming Cross-reference Amendment.--Subsection
(g)(1) of such section is amended by striking ``subsection
(d)(2)'' and inserting ``subsection (d)(3)''.
(d) Total Acquisition Cost Information.--Title 10, United
States Code, is further amended--
(1) in section 2445b(b)(3), by striking ``development
costs'' and inserting ``total acquisition costs''; and

[[Page H3432]]

(2) in section 2445c--
(A) in subparagraph (B) of subsection (c)(2), by striking
``program development cost'' and inserting ``total
acquisition cost''; and
(B) in subparagraph (C) of subsection (d)(3) (as
redesignated by subsection (b)(2)), by striking ``program
development cost'' and inserting ``total acquisition cost''.
(e) Clarification of Cross-reference.--Section 2445c(g)(2)
of such title is amended by striking ``in compliance with the
requirements of subsection (d)(2)'' and inserting ``under
subsection (d)(1)(B)''.

SEC. 1084. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF
TRANSPORTATION TO ISSUE NON-PREMIUM AVIATION
INSURANCE.

Section 44310 of title 49, United States Code, is
amended--
(1) by inserting ``(a) In General.--'' before ``The
authority'';
(2) by striking ``this chapter'' and inserting ``any
provision of this chapter other than section 44305''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(b) Insurance of United States Government Property.--The
authority of the Secretary of Transportation to provide
insurance and reinsurance for a department, agency, or
instrumentality of the United States Government under section
44305 is not effective after December 31, 2018.''.

SEC. 1085. REVISION OF COMPENSATION OF MEMBERS OF THE
NATIONAL COMMISSION ON THE STRUCTURE OF THE AIR
FORCE.

(a) Revision.--Section 365(a) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239;
126 Stat.1705) is amended--
(1) by striking ``shall be compensated'' and inserting
``may be compensated'';
(2) by striking ``equal to'' and inserting ``not to
exceed''; and
(3) by inserting ``of $155,400'' after ``annual rate''.
(b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a)
shall apply with respect to compensation for a duty performed
on or after April 2, 2013.

SEC. 1086. PROTECTION OF TIER ONE TASK CRITICAL ASSETS FROM
ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSE AND HIGH-POWERED
MICROWAVE SYSTEMS.

(a) Certification Required.--Not later than June 1, 2014,
the Secretary of the Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees certification that defense
critical assets designated as tier one task critical assets
(hereinafter referred to as ``TCAs'') are protected from the
adverse effects of man-made or naturally occurring
electromagnetic pulse and high-powered microwave weapons. Any
such assets found not to be so protected shall be included in
the plan required under subsection (b).
(b) Plan Required.--Not later than January 1, 2015, the
Secretary of the Defense shall submit to the congressional
defense committees a plan for tier one TCAs to receive
electricity by means that are protected from the adverse
effects of man-made or naturally occurring electromagnetic
pulse and high-powered microwave weapons. The plan shall
include the following elements:
(1) An analysis of how the Department of Defense plans to
mitigate any risks to mission assurance for non-certified
tier one TCAs, including any steps that may be needed for
remediation.
(2) The development or adoption by the Department of a
standard of resistance or protection against man-made and
natural electromagnetic threats for electricity sources that
supply electricity to tier one TCAs.
(3) The development by the Department of a strategy to
certify by December 31, 2015, that all electricity sourced to
tier one TCAs is provided by facilities that meet the
standard developed under paragraph (2).
(c) Preparation of Plan.--In preparing the plan required by
subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall use the
guidance and recommendations of the Commission to Assess the
Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse Attack
established by section 1401 of the Floyd D. Spence National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted
into law by Public Law 106-398; 114. Stat. 1654A-345).
(d) Form of Submission.--The plan required by subsection
(b) shall be submitted in classified form.
(e) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``task critical asset'' means an asset of such
extraordinary importance to operations in peace, crisis, and
war that its incapacitation or destruction would have a
debilitating effect on the ability of the Department of
Defense to fulfill its missions.
(2) The term ``tier one'' with respect to a task critical
asset means such an asset the loss, incapacitation, or
disruption of which could result in mission (or function)
failure at the Department of Defense, military department,
combatant command, sub-unified command, Defense Agency, or
defense infrastructure sector level.

SEC. 1087. STRATEGY FOR FUTURE MILITARY INFORMATION
OPERATIONS CAPABILITIES.

(a) Strategy Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall
develop and implement a strategy for developing and
sustaining military information operations capabilities for
future contingencies. The Secretary shall submit such
strategy to the congressional defense committees by not later
than February 1, 2014.
(b) Contents of Strategy.--The strategy required in
subsection (a) shall include each of the following:
(1) A plan for the sustainment of existing capabilities
that have been developed during the ten-year period prior to
the date of the enactment of this Act, including such
capabilities developed using funds authorized to be
appropriated for overseas contingency operations.
(2) A discussion of how the capabilities referred to in
paragraph (1) are being integrated into both operational
plans (OPLANS) and contingency plans (CONPLANS).
(3) An assessment of the force structure that is necessary
to support operational planning and potential contingency
operations, including the relative balance across the active
and reserve components.
(4) Estimates of the steady-state resources needed to
support the force structure referred to in paragraph (3), as
well as estimates for resources that might be needed based on
selected OPLANS and CONPLANS.
(5) A description of how new and emerging technologies can
be incorporated into the projected force structure and future
OPLANS and CONPLANS.
(6) A description of new capabilities that may be needed to
fill any identified gaps and programs that might be required
to develop such capabilities.

SEC. 1088. COMPLIANCE OF MILITARY DEPARTMENTS WITH MINIMUM
SAFE STAFFING STANDARDS.

In implementing the sequester required by section 251A of
the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of
1985, as ordered on March 1, 2013, the Secretary of Defense
shall ensure that all military departments remain fully
compliant with minimum safe staffing standards, as outlined
in the Department of Defense Fire and Emergency Services
Program (DoD Instruction 6055.06).

SEC. 1089. DETERMINATION AND DISCLOSURE OF TRANSPORTATION
COSTS INCURRED BY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR
CONGRESSIONAL TRIPS OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.

(a) Determination and Disclosure of Costs by Secretary.--In
the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of
the House of Representatives or Senate in carrying out
official duties outside the United States for which the
Department of Defense provides transportation, the Secretary
of Defense shall--
(1) determine the cost of the transportation provided with
respect to the Member, officer, or employee;
(2) not later than 10 days after completion of the trip
involved, provide a written statement of the cost--
(A) to the Member, officer, or employee involved, and
(B) to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of
Representatives (in the case of a trip taken by a Member,
officer, or employee of the House) or the Committee on Armed
Services of the Senate (in the case of a trip taken by a
Member, officer, or employee of the Senate); and
(3) upon providing a written statement under paragraph (2),
make the statement available for viewing on the Secretary's
official public website until the expiration of the 4-year
period which begins on the final day of the trip involved.
(b) Exceptions.--
(1) Exceptions described.--This section does not apply with
respect to any trip for which any of the following applies:
(A) The purpose of the trip is to visit one or more United
States military installations or to visit United States
military personnel in a war zone (or both).
(B) The use of transportation provided by the Department of
Defense is necessary to protect the safety and security of
the individuals taking the trip.
(2) Consultation.--In determining whether or not a trip is
described in paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall
consult with the Speaker of the House of Representatives (in
the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of
the House) or the Majority Leader of the Senate (in the case
of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of the
Senate).
(c) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Member.--The term ``Member'', with respect to the House
of Representatives, includes a Delegate or Resident
Commissioner to the Congress.
(2) United states.--The term ``United States'' means the
several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and any
other territory or possession of the United States.
(d) Effective Date.--This section shall apply with respect
to trips taken on or after the date of the enactment of this
Act, except that this section does not apply with respect to
any trip which began prior to such date.

TITLE XI--CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS

SEC. 1101. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO WAIVE ANNUAL
LIMITATION ON PREMIUM PAY AND AGGREGATE
LIMITATION ON PAY FOR FEDERAL CIVILIAN
EMPLOYEES WORKING OVERSEAS.

Effective January 1, 2014, section 1101(a) of the Duncan
Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2009 (Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat. 4615), as most recently
amended by section 1101 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat.
1973), is further amended by striking ``through 2013'' and
inserting ``through 2014''.

SEC. 1102. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY TO
GRANT ALLOWANCES, BENEFITS, AND GRATUITIES TO
PERSONNEL ON OFFICIAL DUTY IN A COMBAT ZONE.

Paragraph (2) of section 1603(a) of the Emergency
Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War
on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109-234;
120 Stat. 443), as added by section 1102 of the Duncan Hunter
National Defense Authorization Act for

[[Page H3433]]

Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat. 4616) and
most recently amended by section 1104 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239;
125 Stat. 1973), is further amended by striking ``2014'' and
inserting ``2015''.

SEC. 1103. EXTENSION OF VOLUNTARY REDUCTION-IN-FORCE
AUTHORITY FOR CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES OF DEPARTMENT
OF DEFENSE.

Section 3502(f)(5) of title 5, United States Code, is
amended by striking ``September 30, 2014'' and inserting
``September 30, 2015''.

SEC. 1104. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO MAKE LUMP-SUM SEVERANCE
PAYMENTS TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EMPLOYEES.

Section 5595(i)(4) of title 5, United States Code, is
amended by striking ``October 1, 2014'' and inserting
``October 1, 2018''.

SEC. 1105. REVISION TO AMOUNT OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE UNDER
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS, AND
RESEARCH FOR TRANSFORMATION (SMART) DEFENSE
EDUCATION PROGRAM.

Paragraph (2) of section 2192a(b) of title 10, United
States Code, is amended by striking ``the amount determined''
and all that follows through ``room and board'' and inserting
``an amount determined by the Secretary of Defense''.

SEC. 1106. EXTENSION OF PROGRAM FOR EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION-
TECHNOLOGY PERSONNEL.

(a) In General.--Section 1110(d) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (5 U.S.C. 3702 note)
is amended by striking ``2013.'' and inserting ``2023.''.
(b) Reporting Requirement.--Section 1110(i) of such Act is
amended by striking ``2015,'' and inserting ``2024,''.

SEC. 1107. DEFENSE SCIENCE INITIATIVE FOR PERSONNEL.

(a) Statement of Policy.--It is the policy of the United
States to assure the scientific and technological preeminence
of its defense laboratories, which are essential to the
national security, by requiring the Department of Defense to
provide to its science and technology laboratories--
(1) the personnel and support services needed to carry out
their mission; and
(2) decentralized management authority.
(b) Establishment of Initiative.--There is hereby
established within the Department of Defense a program to be
known as the Defense Science Initiative for Personnel
(hereinafter in this section referred to as the
``Initiative'').
(c) Laboratories Covered by Initiative.--The laboratories
covered by the Initiative--
(1) shall be those designated as Science and Technology
Reinvention Laboratories (hereinafter in this section
referred to as ``STRLs'') by the Secretary or by paragraph
(2); and
(2) shall include the laboratories enumerated in section
1105 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2010 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note), which laboratories are
hereby designated as STRLs.
(d) Science and Engineering Degreed and Technical Positions
at STRLs.--
(1) In general.--The director of any STRL may appoint
qualified candidates, without regard to sections 3309-3319 of
title 5, United States Code, directly to scientific,
technical, engineering, mathematical, or medical positions
within such STRL, on either a temporary, term, or permanent
basis.
(2) Qualified candidate defined.--Notwithstanding any
provision of chapter 51 of title 5, United States Code, for
purposes of this subsection, the term ``qualified candidate''
means an individual who is--
(A) a candidate who has earned a bachelor's or master's
degree;
(B) a student enrolled in a program of undergraduate or
graduate instruction leading to a bachelor's or master's
degree in a scientific, technical, engineering, mathematical,
or medical course of study at an institution of higher
education (as that term is defined in section 101 of the
Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001)); or
(C) a veteran, as defined in section 2108 of title 5,
United States Code, who served in the armed forces in an
engineering, scientific, or medical technician occupational
specialty.
(3) Rule of construction.--Any exercise of authority under
paragraph (1) shall be considered to satisfy section
2301(b)(1) of title 5, United States Code.
(e) Exclusion From Personnel Limitations, etc.--The
director of any STRL shall manage the workforce strength of
such STRL--
(1) without regard to any limitation on appointments or any
allocation of positions with respect to such STRL, subject to
paragraph (2); and
(2) in a manner consistent with the budget available with
respect to such STRL.
(f) Senior Executive Service Rotation Authority.--Section
3131 of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (5), by striking ``mission;'' and
inserting ``mission, subject to paragraph (15);'';
(2) in paragraph (13), by striking ``and'' at the end;
(3) in paragraph (14), by striking the period and inserting
``; and''; and
(4) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(15) permit the director of each Science and Technology
Reinvention Laboratory (as described in section 1107(c) of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014)
to determine the duration of appointments for senior
executives (which shall in no event be less than 5 years),
consistent with carrying out the mission of that
laboratory.''.
(g) Senior Scientific Technical Managers.--
(1) Establishment.--There is hereby established in each
STRL a category of senior professional scientific positions,
the incumbents of which shall be designated as ``senior
scientific technical managers'' and which shall be positions
classified above GS-15 of the General Schedule pursuant to
section 5108 of title 5, United States Code. The primary
functions of such positions shall be--
(A) to engage in research and development in the physical,
biological, medical, or engineering sciences, or another
field closely related to the mission of such STRL; and
(B) to carry out technical supervisory responsibilities.
(2) Appointments.--The positions described in paragraph (1)
may be filled, and shall be managed, by the director of the
STRL involved, under criteria established pursuant to section
342(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 1995 (Public Law 103-337; 108 Stat. 2721), relating to
personnel demonstration projects at laboratories of the
Department of Defense, except that the director of the
laboratory involved shall determine the number of such
positions at such laboratory, not to exceed 3 percent of the
number of scientists and engineers (determined on a full-time
equivalent basis) employed at such laboratory at the end of
the fiscal year prior to the fiscal year in which any
appointments subject to that numerical limitation are made.
(h) Selection and Compensation of Specially-qualified
Scientific and Professional Personnel.--Section 3104 of title
5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the
following new subsection:
``(d) In addition to the number of positions authorized by
subsection (a), the director of each Science and Technology
Reinvention Laboratory (as described in section 1107(c) of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014),
may establish, without regard to the second sentence of
subsection (a), such number of scientific or professional
positions as may be necessary to carry out the research and
development functions of the laboratory and which require the
services of specially-qualified personnel. The selection
process governing appointments made under this subsection
shall be determined by the director of the laboratory
involved, and the rate of basic pay for the employee holding
any such position shall be set by the laboratory director at
a rate not to exceed the rate for level II of the Executive
Schedule.''.

TITLE XII--MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS

Subtitle A--Assistance and Training

SEC. 1201. MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING
TO PROGRAM TO BUILD THE CAPACITY OF FOREIGN
MILITARY FORCES.

(a) Authority.--Subsection (a) of section 1206 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006
(Public Law 109-163; 119 Stat. 3456), as most recently
amended by section 1206 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417;
122 Stat. 4625), is further amended--
(1) in paragraph (1)--
(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``or'' at the end;
(B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end
and inserting ``; or''; and
(C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
``(C) support the theater security priorities of a
Geographic Combatant Commander.''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(3) To build the capacity of a foreign country's security
forces to conduct counterterrorism operations.''.
(b) Annual Funding Limitation.--Subsection (c)(1) of
section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2006, as so amended, is further amended by
striking ``$350,000,000'' and inserting ``$425,000,000''.
(c) Notification of Planning and Execution of Funds.--
Subsection (e) of section 1206 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, as most recently
amended by section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat.
1979), is further amended--
(1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4);
(2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new
paragraph:
``(3) Notification of planning and execution of funds.--In
the budget materials submitted to the President by the
Secretary of Defense in connection with the submission to
Congress, pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States
Code, of the budget for fiscal year 2016, and each subsequent
fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall include the
following:
``(A) For programs to be conducted or supported under
subsection (a) (other than subsection (a)(1)(C)) for such
fiscal year, a description of the proposed planning and
execution of not less than 50 percent of the total amount of
funds to be made available for such programs.
``(B) For programs to be conducted or supported under
subsection (a)(1)(C) for such fiscal year, a description of
the proposed planning and execution of 100 percent of the
total amount of funds to be made available for such
programs.''; and
(3) in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (4), as so
redesignated, by striking ``Committee on International
Relations'' and inserting ``Committee on Foreign Affairs''.
(d) Termination of Program.--Subsection (g) of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, as most
recently amended by section 1201 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, is further amended by
striking ``2014'' each place it appears and inserting
``2016''.

[[Page H3434]]

(e) Repeal of Authority to Build the Capacity of Certain
Counterterrorism Forces in Yemen and East Africa.--Section
1203 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1980) is hereby
repealed.

SEC. 1202. THREE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION FOR NON-
CONVENTIONAL ASSISTED RECOVERY CAPABILITIES.

Section 943(h) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417;
122 Stat. 4579), as amended by section 1205(g) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1624), is further amended by
striking ``2013'' and inserting ``2016''.

SEC. 1203. GLOBAL SECURITY CONTINGENCY FUND.

(a) Authority.--Subsection (b) of section 1207 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1625; 22 U.S.C. 2151 note) is
amended--
(1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting
``or regions'' after ``countries''; and
(2) in paragraph (1)--
(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking
``and other national security forces'' and inserting ``or
other national security forces''; and
(B) in subparagraph (A)--
(i) by striking ``and counterterrorism operations'' and
inserting ``or counterterrorism operations''; and
(ii) by striking ``and'' at the end and inserting ``or''.
(b) Notices to Congress.--Subsection (l) of such section is
amended to read as follows:
``(l) Notices to Congress.--Not less than 30 days before
initiating an activity under a program of assistance under
subsection (b), the Secretary of State and the Secretary of
Defense shall jointly submit to the specified congressional
committees a notification that includes the following:
``(1) A request for the transfer of funds into the Fund
under subsection (f) or any other authority, including the
original source of the funds.
``(2) A detailed justification for the total anticipated
program plan for each country to include total anticipated
costs and the specific activities contained therein.
``(3) The budget, execution plan and timeline, and
anticipated completion date for the activity.
``(4) A list of other security-related assistance or
justice sector and stabilization assistance that the United
States is currently providing the country concerned and that
is related to or supported by the activity.
``(5) Such other information relating to the program or
activity as the Secretary of State or Secretary of Defense
considers appropriate.''.
(c) Transitional Authorities; Annual Reports; Guidance and
Processes for Exercise of Authority.--Such section, as so
amended, is further amended--
(1) by striking subsection (n);
(2) by redesignating subsection (m) as subsection (n); and
(3) by inserting after subsection (l), as so amended, the
following new subsection:
``(m) Guidance and Processes for Exercise of Authority.--
The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense shall
jointly submit a report to the specified congressional
committees 15 days after the date on which the necessary
guidance has been issued and processes for implementation of
the authority in subsection (b). The Secretary of State and
Secretary of Defense shall jointly submit additional reports
not later than 15 days after the date on which any future
modifications to the guidance and processes for
implementation of the authority in subsection (b) are
issued.''.
(d) Funding.--Subsection (o) of such section is amended by
striking ``(o) Funding.--'' and all that follows through
``(2) fiscal years 2013 and after.--'' and inserting ``(o)
Funding.--''.

SEC. 1204. CODIFICATION OF NATIONAL GUARD STATE PARTNERSHIP
PROGRAM.

(a) State Partnership Program.--
(1) In general.--Chapter 1 of title 32, United States Code,
is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``Sec. 116. State Partnership Program

``(a) Purposes of Program.--The purposes of the State
Partnership Program of the National Guard are the following:
``(1) To support the objectives of the commander of the
combatant command for the theater of operations in which such
contacts and activities are conducted.
``(2) To support the objectives of the United States chief
of mission of the partner nation with which contacts and
activities are conducted.
``(3) To build international partnerships and defense and
security capacity.
``(4) To strengthen cooperation between the departments and
agencies of the United States Government and agencies of
foreign governments to support building of defense and
security capacity.
``(5) To facilitate intergovernmental collaboration between
the United States Government and foreign governments in the
areas of defense and security.
``(6) To facilitate and enhance the exchange of information
between the United States Government and foreign governments
on matters relating to defense and security.
``(b) Availability of Appropriated Funds for Program.--(1)
Funds appropriated to the Department of Defense, including
funds appropriated for the Air and Army National Guard, shall
be available for the payment of costs incurred by the
National Guard to conduct activities under the State
Partnership Program, whether those costs are incurred inside
or outside the United States.
``(2) Costs incurred by the National Guard and covered
under paragraph (1) may include the following:
``(A) Costs of pay and allowances of members of the
National Guard.
``(B) Travel and necessary expenses of United States
personnel outside of the Department of Defense in support of
the State Partnership Program.
``(C) Travel and necessary expenses of foreign participants
directly supporting activities under the State Partnership
Program.
``(c) Limitations on Use of Funds.--(1) Funds shall not be
available under subsection (b) for activities conducted in a
foreign country unless jointly approved by--
``(A) the commander of the combatant command concerned; and
``(B) the chief of mission concerned, with the concurrence
of the Secretary of State.
``(2) Funds shall not be available under subsection (b) for
the participation of a member of the National Guard in
activities in a foreign country unless the member is on
active duty in the armed forces at the time of such
participation.
``(3) Funds shall not be available under subsection (b) for
interagency activities involving United States civilian
personnel or foreign civilian personnel unless the
participation of such personnel in such activities--
``(A) contributes to responsible management of defense
resources;
``(B) fosters greater respect for and understanding of the
principle of civilian control of the military;
``(C) contributes to cooperation between the United States
armed forces and civilian governmental agencies and foreign
military and civilian government agencies; or
``(D) improves international partnerships and capacity on
matters relating to defense and security.
``(d) Reimbursement.--(1) In the event of the participation
of United States Government participants (other than
personnel of the Department of Defense) in activities for
which payment is made under subsection (b), the head of the
department or agency concerned shall reimburse the Secretary
of Defense for the costs associated with the participation of
such personnel in such contacts and activities.
``(2) Amounts received under paragraph (1) shall be
deposited in the appropriation or account from which amounts
for the payment concerned were derived. Any amounts so
deposited shall be merged with amounts in such appropriation
or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and
subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in
such appropriation or account.
``(e) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) The term `State Partnership Program' means a program
that establishes a defense and security relationship between
the National Guard of a State or territory and the military
and security forces, and related disaster management,
emergency response, and security ministries, of a foreign
country.
``(2) The term `activities', for purposes of the State
Partnership Program, means any military-to-military
activities or interagency activities for a purpose set forth
in subsection (a)(1).
``(3) The term `interagency activities' means the
following:
``(A) Contacts between members of the National Guard and
foreign civilian personnel outside the ministry of defense of
the foreign country concerned on a matter within the core
competencies of the National Guard.
``(B) Contacts between United States civilian personnel and
members of the military and security forces of a foreign
country or foreign civilian personnel on a matter within the
core competencies of the National Guard.
``(4) The term `matter within the core competencies of the
National Guard' means matters with respect to the following:
``(A) Disaster response and mitigation.
``(B) Defense support to civil authorities.
``(C) Consequence management and installation protection.
``(D) Response to a chemical, biological, radiological,
nuclear, or explosives (CBRNE) event.
``(E) Border and port security and cooperation with
civilian law enforcement.
``(F) Search and rescue.
``(G) Medicine.
``(H) Counter-drug and counter-narcotics activities.
``(I) Public affairs.
``(J) Employer support and family support for reserve
forces.
``(5) The term `United States civilian personnel' means the
following:
``(A) Personnel of the United States Government (including
personnel of departments and agencies of the United States
Government other than the Department of Defense) and
personnel of State and local governments of the United
States.
``(B) Members and employees of the legislative branch of
the United States Government.
``(C) Non-governmental individuals.
``(6) The term `foreign civilian personnel' means the
following:
``(A) Civilian personnel of a foreign government at any
level (including personnel of ministries other than
ministries of defense).
``(B) Non-governmental individuals of a foreign country.''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of chapter 1 of such title is amended by adding at
the end the following new item:

``116. State Partnership Program.''.

(b) Repeal of Superseded Authority.--Section 1210 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010
(Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2517; 32 U.S.C. 107 note) is
repealed.

[[Page H3435]]

SEC. 1205. AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT ACTIVITIES TO ENHANCE THE
CAPABILITY OF CERTAIN FOREIGN COUNTRIES TO
RESPOND TO INCIDENTS INVOLVING WEAPONS OF MASS
DESTRUCTION IN SYRIA AND THE REGION.

(a) Authority.--The Secretary of Defense, with the
concurrence of the Secretary of State, may provide assistance
to the military and civilian response organizations of
Jordan, Kuwait, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq,
Turkey, and other countries in the region of Syria in order
for such countries to respond effectively to incidents
involving weapons of mass destruction in Syria and the
region.
(b) Authorized Elements.--Assistance provided under this
section may include training, equipment, and supplies.
(c) Availability of Funds for Activities Across Fiscal
Years.--The Secretary of Defense may use up to $4,000,000 of
the funds made available to the Department of Defense for
operation and maintenance for a fiscal year to carry out the
program authorized in subsection (a) and may provide
assistance under such program that begins in that fiscal year
but ends in the next fiscal year.
(d) Report.--Not later than 60 days after the date on which
the authority of subsection (a) is first exercised, and
annually thereafter through December 31, 2015, the Secretary
of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State,
shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the
Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the
Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives
an annual report to include at least the following:
(1) A detailed description by country of assistance
provided.
(2) An overview of how such assistance fits into, and is
coordinated with, other United States efforts to build the
capability and capacity of countries in the region of Syria
to counter the threat of weapons of mass destruction in Syria
and the region.
(3) A listing of equipment and supplies provided to
countries in the region of Syria.
(4) Any other matters the Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of State determine appropriate.
(e) Expiration.--The authority provided under subsection
(a) may not be exercised after September 30, 2015.

SEC. 1206. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO SUPPORT FOREIGN
FORCES PARTICIPATING IN OPERATIONS TO DISARM
THE LORD'S RESISTANCE ARMY.

(a) Funding.--Subsection (c)(1) of section 1206 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1624) is amended--
(1) by striking ``fiscal years 2012 and 2013'' and
inserting ``fiscal years 2012, 2013, and 2014''; and
(2) by striking ``for operation and maintenance'' and
inserting ``to provide additional operation and maintenance
funds for overseas contingency operations being carried out
by the Armed Forces as specified in the funding table in
section 4302''.
(b) Expiration.--Subsection (h) of such section is amended
by striking ``September 30, 2013'' and inserting ``September
30, 2014''.

Subtitle B--Matters Relating to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan

SEC. 1211. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY
FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF CERTAIN COALITION NATIONS
FOR SUPPORT PROVIDED TO UNITED STATES MILITARY
OPERATIONS.

(a) Extension of Authority.--Subsection (a) of section 1233
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2008 (Public Law 110-181; 122 Stat. 393), as most recently
amended by section 1227 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat.
2000), is further amended by striking ``for fiscal year
2013'' and inserting ``for fiscal year 2014''.
(b) Limitation on Amounts Available.--Subsection (d) of
such section, as so amended, is further amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``during fiscal year 2013
may not exceed $1,650,000,000'' and inserting ``during fiscal
year 2014 may not exceed $1,500,000,000''; and
(2) in paragraph (3), by striking ``Fiscal Year 2013'' and
inserting ``Fiscal Year 2014''.
(c) Limitation on Reimbursement of Pakistan in Fiscal Year
2014 Pending Certification on Pakistan.--
(1) In general.--Effective as of the date of the enactment
of this Act, no amounts authorized to be appropriated by this
Act, and no amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
years before fiscal year 2014 that remain available for
obligation, may be used for reimbursements of Pakistan under
the authority in subsection (a) of section 1233 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008, as
amended by this section, until the Secretary of Defense
certifies to the congressional defense committees each of the
following:
(A) That Pakistan is maintaining security and is not
through its actions or inactions at any level of government
limiting or otherwise restricting the movement of United
States equipment and supplies along the Ground Lines of
Communications (GLOCs) through Pakistan to Afghanistan so
that such equipment and supplies can be transshipped and such
equipment and supplies can be retrograded out of Afghanistan.
(B) That Pakistan is taking demonstrable steps to--
(i) support counterterrorism operations against al Qaeda,
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, and other militant extremists
groups such as the Haqqani Network and the Quetta Shura
Taliban located in Pakistan;
(ii) disrupt the conduct of cross-border attacks against
United States, coalition, and Afghanistan security forces
located in Afghanistan by such groups (including the Haqqani
Network and the Quetta Shura Taliban) from bases in Pakistan;
(iii) counter the threat of improvised explosive devices,
including efforts to attack improvised explosive device
networks, monitor known precursors used in improvised
explosive devices, and systematically address the misuse of
explosive materials (including calcium ammonium nitrate) and
accessories and their supply to legitimate end-users in a
manner that impedes the flow of improvised explosive devices
and improvised explosive device components into Afghanistan;
and
(iv) conduct cross-border coordination and communication
with Afghan security forces and United States Armed Forces in
Afghanistan.
(2) Waiver authority.--The Secretary of Defense may waive
the limitation in paragraph (1) if the Secretary certifies to
the congressional defense committees in writing that the
waiver is in the national security interests of the United
States and includes with such certification a justification
for the waiver.

SEC. 1212. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO USE FUNDS FOR
REINTEGRATION ACTIVITIES IN AFGHANISTAN.

Section 1216 of the Ike Skelton National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383;
124 Stat. 4392), as most recently amended by section 1218 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1990), is further amended--
(1) in subsection (a)--
(A) by striking ``$35,000,000'' and inserting
``$25,000,000''; and
(B) by striking ``for fiscal year 2013'' and inserting
``for fiscal year 2014''; and
(2) in subsection (e), by striking ``December 31, 2013''
and inserting ``December 31, 2014''.

SEC. 1213. EXTENSION OF COMMANDERS' EMERGENCY RESPONSE
PROGRAM IN AFGHANISTAN.

(a) One Year Extension.--
(1) In general.--Section 1201 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81;
125 Stat. 1619), as amended by section 1221 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law
112-239; 126 Stat. 1992), is amended by striking ``fiscal
year 2013'' each place it appears and inserting ``fiscal year
2014''.
(2) Conforming amendment.--The heading of subsection (a) of
such section is amended by striking ``Fiscal Year 2013'' and
inserting ``Fiscal Year 2014''.
(b) Amount of Funds Available During Fiscal Year 2014.--
Subsection (a) of such section is further amended by striking
``$200,000,000'' and inserting ``$60,000,000''.

SEC. 1214. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO SUPPORT OPERATIONS AND
ACTIVITIES OF THE OFFICE OF SECURITY
COOPERATION IN IRAQ.

(a) Limitation on Amount.--Subsection (c) of section 1215
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1631), as amended by
section 1211 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1982), is
further amended by striking ``fiscal year 2012'' and all that
follows and inserting ``fiscal year 2014 may not exceed
$209,000,000.''.
(b) Source of Funds.--Subsection (d) of such section, as so
amended, is further amended--
(1) by striking ``fiscal year 2012 or fiscal year 2013''
and inserting ``fiscal year 2014''; and
(2) by striking ``fiscal year 2012 or 2013, as the case may
be,'' and inserting ``that fiscal year''.
(c) Additional Authority for the Activities of the Office
of Security Cooperation in Iraq.--Subsection (f) of such
section, as so amended, is further amended--
(1) by striking ``fiscal year 2013'' and inserting ``fiscal
year 2014''; and
(2) by striking ``and Counter Terrorism Service''.

SEC. 1215. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY
FOR PROGRAM TO DEVELOP AND CARRY OUT
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IN AFGHANISTAN.

Section 1217(f) of the Ike Skelton National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383;
124 Stat. 4393), as most recently amended by section 1219 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1991), is further amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by adding at the end the following
new subparagraph:
``(C) Up to $279,000,000 made available to the Department
of Defense for operation and maintenance for fiscal year
2014.'';
(2) in paragraph (2)--
(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)--
(i) by striking ``fiscal year 2011'' and inserting ``fiscal
year 2013''; and
(ii) by inserting ``, or phase of a project,'' after ``each
project'';
(B) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (D);
and
(C) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following new
subparagraph:
``(C) An assessment of the capability of the Afghan
National Security Forces (ANSF) to provide security for such
project after January 1, 2015, including ANSF force levels
required to secure the project. Such assessment should
include the estimated costs of providing security and whether
or not the Government of Afghanistan is committed to
providing such security.''; and
(3) in paragraph (3), by adding at the end the following
new subparagraph:
``(D) In the case of funds for fiscal year 2014, until
September 30, 2015.''.

[[Page H3436]]

SEC. 1216. SPECIAL IMMIGRANT VISAS FOR CERTAIN IRAQI AND
AFGHAN ALLIES.

(a) Protection for Afghan Allies.--Section 602(b) of the
Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C.1101 note) is
amended--
(1) in paragraph (2)(A)(ii), by striking ``on or after
October 7, 2001,'' and inserting ``during the period
beginning on October 7, 2001, and ending on December 31,
2014,'';
(2) in paragraph (2)(D), by adding at the end the
following: ``A principal alien described in subparagraph (A)
seeking special immigrant status under this section shall
apply for an approval described in this subparagraph not
later than September 30, 2015.''; and
(3) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ``2013.'' and
inserting ``2013, and may not exceed 435 for each of fiscal
years 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018.''.
(b) Special Immigrant Status for Certain Iraqis.--Section
1244(a)(1) of the Refugee Crisis in Iraq Act of 2007 (8
U.S.C. 1157 note) is amended by striking the semicolon at the
end and inserting ``on or before the date of the enactment of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2014;''.

SEC. 1217. REQUIREMENT TO WITHHOLD DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
ASSISTANCE TO AFGHANISTAN IN AMOUNT EQUIVALENT
TO 100 PERCENT OF ALL TAXES ASSESSED BY
AFGHANISTAN TO EXTENT SUCH TAXES ARE NOT
REIMBURSED BY AFGHANISTAN.

(a) Requirement to Withhold Assistance to Afghanistan.--An
amount equivalent to 100 percent of the total taxes assessed
during fiscal year 2013 by the Government of Afghanistan on
all Department of Defense assistance shall be withheld by the
Secretary of Defense from obligation from funds appropriated
for such assistance for fiscal year 2014 to the extent that
the Secretary of Defense certifies and reports in writing to
the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House
of Representatives that such taxes have not been reimbursed
by the Government of Afghanistan to the Department of Defense
or the grantee, contractor, or subcontractor concerned.
(b) Waiver Authority.--The Secretary of Defense may waive
the requirement in subsection (a) if the Secretary determines
that such a waiver is necessary to achieve United States
goals in Afghanistan.
(c) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit
to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the
House of Representatives a report on the total taxes assessed
during fiscal year 2013 by the Government of Afghanistan on
all Department of Defense assistance.
(d) Department of Defense Assistance Defined.--In this
section, the term ``Department of Defense assistance'' means
funds provided during fiscal year 2013 to Afghanistan by the
Department of Defense, either directly or through grantees,
contractors, or subcontractors.

Subtitle C--Matters Relating to Afghanistan Post 2014

SEC. 1221. MODIFICATION OF REPORT ON PROGRESS TOWARD SECURITY
AND STABILITY IN AFGHANISTAN.

(a) In General.--Section 1230 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181;
122 Stat. 385), as most recently amended by section 1214(a)
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1986), is further
amended--
(1) by redesignating subsections (f), (g), and (h) as
subsections (g), (h), and (i), respectively; and
(2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new
subsection:
``(f) Matters to Be Included: Redeployment of United States
Armed Forces From Afghanistan.--The report required under
subsection (a) shall include a detailed description of the
following matters relating to the redeployment of United
States Armed Forces from Afghanistan:
``(1) The number and a description of United States Armed
Forces redeployed, vehicles and equipment redeployed, and
bases closed during the reporting period.
``(2) A summary of tasks and functions conducted by the
United States Armed Forces or the Department of Defense that
have been transferred to other United States Government
departments and agencies, Afghan Government ministries and
agencies, other foreign governments, or nongovernmental
organizations, or discontinued during the reporting period.
The summary shall include a discussion of the formal and
informal arrangements and working groups that have been
established to coordinate and execute the transfer of such
tasks and functions.''.
(b) Effective Date.--The amendments made this section apply
with respect to any report required to be submitted under
section 1230 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181; 122 Stat. 385) on or
after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 1222. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON UNITED STATES MILITARY
SUPPORT IN AFGHANISTAN.

It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) since the United States engagement in Afghanistan
beginning in 2001, United States and coalition forces have
achieved substantial progress toward security and stability
in Afghanistan, including the training of the Afghan National
Security Forces;
(2) a stable and secure Afghanistan with a credible
government is in the long-term national security interests of
the United States and would contribute to the overall
stability and security in the region;
(3) as the United States accelerates transfer of the lead
for security to the Afghan National Security Forces by the
spring of 2013, the United States should assist the Afghan
National Security Forces to maintain gains in security and
should continue to evaluate the capability and capacity of
the Afghan National Security Forces through the fighting
season in 2013;
(4) following the duration of the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization (NATO) mission on December 31, 2014, the United
States should continue efforts to disrupt, dismantle, and
defeat al Qaeda;
(5) the Haqqani Network continues to be the most important
enabler of al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan;
(6) the operational requirements of the Afghan National
Security Forces, in part due to the threat to the Government
of Afghanistan from the Haqqani Network, al Qaeda, and other
associated groups, necessitate that the Afghan Security
National Forces have sufficient operational capacity to
maintain the security of Afghanistan, including enabler
capabilities such as aviation, casualty evacuation,
logistics, intelligence, and indirect fire;
(7) the United States, with its Afghan partners, should
provide assistance to the Government of Afghanistan so that
the Taliban, the Haqqani Network, and associated terrorist
and insurgent groups cannot militarily overthrow the
Government of Afghanistan or plan and launch attacks against
United States and Afghan interests from safe havens in
Afghanistan;
(8) the United States military's transition to
counterterrorism and advise and assist missions should occur
consistent with agreements between the United States,
Afghanistan, and international partners as well as conditions
on the ground;
(9) a bilateral security agreement that preserves vital
United States interests between the United States and the
Government of Afghanistan, achieved at the earliest
practicable time, is critical to the long-term stability of
Afghanistan as well as United States' long term interests;
however, the United States should not sign a bilateral
security agreement that is antithetical to United States
national security interests or commits to funding not
directly linked to achieving those interests;
(10) the United States should support the achievement of a
bilateral security agreement between NATO and the Government
of Afghanistan because such a bilateral security agreement
also will contribute to the long term stability and security
of Afghanistan;
(11) the United States should conduct the required
oversight and audits of United States stability programs to
ensure that the activities are in line with the intended
purpose of these programs;
(12) the United States should assist the Government of
Afghanistan to provide security for the Afghan elections
scheduled for 2014 and provide such assistance as requested
by Afghan Government entities overseeing the elections and
judged necessary by the United States to help guarantee a
credible and legitimate election; and
(13) significant uncertainty exists within Afghanistan
regarding the level of future United States military support
following the end of the NATO mission on December 31, 2014,
and therefore in order to reduce such uncertainty and promote
further stability and security in Afghanistan following the
end of the NATO mission, the President should--
(A) publicly support a residual United States military
presence in Afghanistan consistent with United States
national security interests;
(B) as part of the announcement of residual force levels,
publicly define the mission sets and the support that the
United States will provide to the Afghan National Security
Forces; and
(C) publicly support sufficient funding for the Afghan
National Security Forces until the Government of Afghanistan
is able to independently sustain the security of Afghanistan
consistent with United States national security interests.

SEC. 1223. DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE PLAN.

(a) Plan Required.--Not later than 180 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of
Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of
the Senate a Department of Defense plan regarding covered
defense intelligence assets in relation to the drawdown of
the United States Armed Forces in Afghanistan. Such plan
shall include--
(1) a description of the covered defense intelligence
assets;
(2) a description of any such assets to remain in
Afghanistan after December 31, 2014, to continue to support
military operations;
(3) a description of any such assets that will be or have
been reallocated to other locations outside of the United
States in support of the Department of Defense;
(4) the defense intelligence priorities that will be or
have been addressed with the reallocation of such assets from
Afghanistan;
(5) the necessary logistics, operations, and maintenance
plans to operate in the locations where such assets will be
or have been reallocated, including personnel, basing, and
any host country agreements; and
(6) a description of any such assets that will be or have
been returned to the United States.
(b) Covered Defense Intelligence Assets Defined.--In this
section, the term ``covered defense intelligence assets''
means Department of Defense intelligence assets and personnel
supporting military operations in Afghanistan at any time
during the one-year period ending on the date of the
enactment of this Act.

SEC. 1224. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR CERTAIN
AUTHORITIES FOR AFGHANISTAN.

(a) Reintegration Activities and Infrastructure Projects in
Afghanistan.--
(1) In general.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act may be obligated or expended to
carry out the provisions of

[[Page H3437]]

law described in paragraph (2) until 15 days after the date
on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the specified
congressional committees the certification described in
subsection (d).
(2) Provisions of law.--The provisions of law referred to
in paragraph (1) are the following:
(A) Section 1216 of the Ike Skelton National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383;
124 Stat. 4392; relating to authority to use funds for
reintegration activities in Afghanistan).
(B) Section 1217 of the Ike Skelton National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383;
124 Stat. 4393; relating to authority for program to develop
and carry out infrastructure projects in Afghanistan).
(b) Commanders' Emergency Response Program in
Afghanistan.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by
this Act to carry out section 1201 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81;
125 Stat. 1619; relating to the Commanders' Emergency
Response Program in Afghanistan), $45,000,000 may not be
obligated or expended until 15 days after the date on which
the Secretary of Defense submits to the specified
congressional committees the certification described in
subsection (d).
(c) Afghanistan Security Forces Fund.--Of the funds
authorized to be appropriated by this Act for the Afghanistan
Security Forces Fund, $2,615,000,000 may not be obligated or
expended until 15 days after the date on which the Secretary
of Defense submits to the specified congressional committees
the certification described in subsection (d).
(d) Certification Described.--The certification referred to
in subsections (a), (b), and (c) is a certification of the
Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of
State, that the United States and Afghanistan have signed a
bilateral security agreement that--
(1) protects the Department of Defense, its military and
civilian personnel, and contractors from liability to pay any
tax, or similar charge, associated with efforts to carry out
missions in the territory of Afghanistan that have been
agreed to by both the Government of the United States and the
Government of Afghanistan;
(2) ensures exclusive jurisdiction for the United States
over United States Armed Forces located in Afghanistan;
(3) ensures that there is no infringement on the right of
self-defense of the United States military mission or United
States military personnel in Afghanistan;
(4) ensures that the United States military in Afghanistan
is permitted to take the efforts deemed necessary to protect
other United States Government offices and personnel in
Afghanistan as may be required;
(5) ensures that the United States military mission in
Afghanistan has sufficient access to bases and basing rights
as may be necessary to carry out the activities in
Afghanistan that the President has assigned to the military;
and
(6) ensures that the United States has the freedom of
movement to carry out those military missions as may be
required to continue the effort to defeat al Qaeda and its
associated forces.
(e) Specified Congressional Committees.--In this section,
the term ``specified congressional committees'' means--
(1) the congressional defense committees; and
(2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives.

Subtitle D--Matters Relating to Iran

SEC. 1231. REPORT ON UNITED STATES MILITARY PARTNERSHIP WITH
GULF COOPERATION COUNCIL COUNTRIES.

(a) In General.--Not later than 90 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report on
the United States military partnership with Gulf Cooperation
Council countries.
(b) Matters to Be Included.--The report required by
subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An explanation of the steps that the Department of
Defense is taking to improve the interoperability of United
States-Gulf Cooperation Council countries missile defense
systems.
(2) An outline of the defense agreements with Gulf
Cooperation Council countries, including caveats and
restrictions on United States operations.
(3) An outline of United States efforts in Gulf Cooperation
Council countries that are funded by overseas contingency
operations funding, an explanation of overseas contingency
operations funding for such efforts, and a plan to transition
overseas contingency operations funding for such efforts to
long-term, sustainable funding sources.
(c) Form.--The report required by subsection (a) shall be
submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified
annex, if necessary.

SEC. 1232. ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS IN ANNUAL REPORT ON MILITARY
POWER OF IRAN.

(a) In General.--Section 1245(b)(3) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84;
123 Stat. 2542) is amended--
(1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``and'' at the end;
(2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at the end
and inserting a semicolon; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
``(E) a description of the strategy and structure of the
global Iranian Threat Network and an assessment of the
capability of such Network and how such Network operates to
reinforce Iran's grand strategy; and
``(F) a description of the gaps in intelligence of the
Department of Defense with respect to Iran and a
prioritization of those gaps in intelligence by operational
need.''.
(b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section
shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act
and shall apply with respect to reports required to be
submitted under section 1245 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010, as so amended, on or
after that date.

SEC. 1233. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE DEFENSE OF THE ARABIAN
GULF.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) In response to U.S. Central Command requirements, the
United States Navy has maintained, on average, more than one
aircraft carrier in the Arabian Gulf for more than five
years.
(2) In February 2013, the senior leadership of the
Department of Defense elected to reduce the number of
aircraft carriers deployed to the Arabian Gulf in light of
budget constraints and limitation of the overall carrier
force structure to support the two aircraft carrier
requirement.
(3) In reference to the decision to indefinitely delay the
deployment of the USS Harry Truman, CVN 75, and the USS
Gettysburg, its cruiser escort, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs,
General Martin Dempsey stated, ``We're trying to stretch our
readiness out by keeping this particular carrier in homeport
in our global response force, so if something happens
elsewhere in the world, we can respond to it. Had we deployed
it and `consumed' that readiness, we could have created a
situation where downstream we wouldn't have a carrier present
in certain parts of the world at all.''.
(4) Highlighting the risks of having only one aircraft
carrier in the region and relying on land-based aircraft,
General Dempsey stated, ``When you have carrier-based
aircraft, you have complete autonomy and control over when
you use them. When you use land-based aircraft, you often
have to have host-nation permission to use them.''.
(5) Addressing the perception of the United States
commitment to the region, General James Mattis, Commander of
U.S. Central Command, testified in March 2013, ``Perhaps the
greatest risk to U.S. interests in the region is a perceived
lack of an enduring U.S. commitment to collective interests
and the security of our regional partners.''. He went on to
testify that, ``The drawdown of our forces can be
misinterpreted as a lack of attention, a lack of commitment
to the region.''.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) maintaining only one aircraft carrier battle group in
the Arabian Gulf constrains United States' options and could
put at risk the ability to have diversified platforms from
which to defend the Arabian Gulf and, if necessary, to
conduct military operations to prevent Iran from threatening
the United States, United States allies, or Iran's neighbors
with nuclear weapons;
(2) it is in the interests of the United States to maintain
both land-based and sea-based capabilities in the region to
project force;
(3) land-based locations in the region could restrict
United States military options and critically impact the
operational capability if required to conduct a defense of
the Arabian Gulf because the United States has not finalized
bilateral security agreements with key Gulf Cooperation
Council countries;
(4) as a result of these and other critical limitations
associated with maintaining one aircraft carrier battle group
in the Arabian Gulf, United States military commanders have
expressed concerns about the operational constraints, the
increasing uncertainty among United States allies, and the
emboldening of potential adversaries such as Iran;
(5) regarding the ability of the United States Navy to
maintain a two aircraft carrier presence in the Arabian Gulf,
the Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Jonathan Greenert,
stated, ``We need 11 carriers to do the job. That's been
pretty clearly written, and that's underwritten in our
defense strategic guidance.''.
(6) the United States should construct and sufficiently
sustain a fleet of at least eleven aircraft carriers and
associated battle force ships in order to meet current and
future requirements and to support at least a two aircraft
carrier battle group presence in the Arabian Gulf, in
addition to meeting other operational requirements; and
(7) the United States should finalize bilateral agreements
with key Gulf Cooperation Council countries that support the
Defense of the Arabian Gulf requirements, at the earliest
possible date.

Subtitle E--Reports and Other Matters

SEC. 1241. REPORT ON POSTURE AND READINESS OF UNITED STATES
ARMED FORCES TO RESPOND TO FUTURE TERRORIST
ATTACKS IN AFRICA AND THE MIDDLE EAST.

(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya on September
11, 2012, may have never occurred or could have been
prevented had there been an international stabilizing force
following NATO-led operations in order to help stabilize the
country, build capacity within the security forces, and
pursue terrorist groups that threaten the local government as
well as United States interests;
(2) the attack also highlighted the limitations of the
United States military to alert, deploy, and decisively
counter a no-notice terrorist attack such as the one in
Benghazi, or another security contingency, due to the
limitations stemming from United States military posture in
Africa and the Middle East and when there is a lack of a
layered defense at United States diplomatic facilities;
(3) the United States military is more effectively able to
respond to terrorist attacks on United States facilities
outside of the United States if the responding United States
military assets are forward deployed;

[[Page H3438]]

(4) when an intelligence threat assessment determines that
a United States facility overseas is vulnerable to attack,
such facility should have robust force protection measures
sufficient to safeguard personnel and assets until a United
States military response can arrive;
(5) the continually evolving terrorist threat to United
States interests on the Continent of Africa and the Middle
East necessitates that the United States military maintains a
forward deployed posture in Europe, Middle East, and Africa
in order to be able to respond to terrorist events, or other
security contingencies, and to effectively evacuate and
recover United States personnel;
(6) the United States military, in conjunction with the
Department of State and the intelligence community, should
continue to evaluate the assumptions underpinning the
terrorist threat in order to ensure that it is effectively
able to respond globally to future terrorist attacks;
(7) the United States military should regularly re-evaluate
the posture and alert status requirements of its crisis
response elements in order to be more responsive to the
evolving and global nature of the terrorist threat, and all
United States military crisis response elements should be
fully equipped with the required supporting capabilities to
conduct their missions;
(8) on April 16, 2013, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff, General Martin Dempsey, testified before the House
Appropriations Committee that the military is, ``. .
.adapting our force posture to a new normal of combustible
violence in North Africa and in the Middle East'';
(9) The President stated in a press conference on May 16,
2013, ``I have directed the Defense Department to ensure that
our military can respond lightening quick in times of
crisis.'';
(10) the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs should continue to
evaluate the posture of United States forces to respond to
the global terrorist threat, including an evaluation of
whether United States Africa Command should have forces and
necessary equipment permanently assigned to the command to
respond more promptly to this ``new normal''; and
(11) although the Department of State-initiated
Accountability Review Board found that the Marine Security
Guard program should be expanded and that there should be
greater coordination between the Department of Defense and
the Department of State to identify additional resources for
security at high risk posts, the United States military may
be challenged to provide additional security to Department of
State facilities due to budget shortfalls, on-going force
structure constraints, and increasing operational
requirements for the Department of Defense.
(b) Report Required.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in
consultation with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a
report on the posture and readiness of United States Armed
Forces to respond to future terrorist attacks in Africa and
the Middle East.
(2) Matters to be included.--The plan required under
paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(A) An assessment of terrorist groups and other non-state
groups that threaten United States interests and facilities
in Africa, including a description of the key assumptions
underpinning such assessment.
(B) A description of the readiness, posture, and alert
status of relevant United States Armed Forces in Europe, the
Middle East, Africa, and the United States and any changes
implemented or planned to be implemented since the terrorist
attack in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012, to respond
to the ``new normal'' and President Obama's directive for the
military to respond ``lightening quick'' in times of crisis.
(C) In consultation with the Secretary of State, a
description of new or modified requirements of the Department
of State, if any, for--
(i) United States Marine Security Guard Detachments;
(ii) any other Department of Defense assets to provide
enhanced security at Department of State facilities;
(iii) an explanation of how any new requirements for Marine
Security Detachments or other Department of Defense assets
affect the capacity of the Armed Forces, including
specifically the capacity of the Marine Corps, to fulfill
Department of Defense operational requirements; and
(iv) an explanation of how any unfulfilled requirements for
Marine Security Detachments would adversely impact security
at Department of State facilities.
(3) Definition.--In this subsection, the term ``appropriate
congressional committees'' means--
(A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on
Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on
Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 1242. ROLE OF THE GOVERNMENT OF EGYPT TO UNITED STATES
NATIONAL SECURITY.

(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) Egypt is undergoing a significant political transition
and the ultimate outcome of this political process and its
implications for United States national security interests
remain uncertain;
(2) the United States continues to have considerable
concerns about the intentions and actions of the Egyptian
Muslim Brotherhood and whether the government of President
Morsi is committed to a pluralistic, democratic Egypt;
(3) the United States has a stake in Egypt becoming a
mature, pluralistic democracy in which the rights of Egyptian
citizens, including women and minorities, are protected;
(4) the United States should continue to closely monitor
President Morsi's support for the peace treaty with the
Government of Israel, which has been a stabilizing force in
the region for over 30 years;
(5) the United States military relationship with the
Egyptian military is long-standing and should remain a key
pillar to, and component of, United States engagement with
Egypt;
(6) the close military-to-military relationship between the
United States and Egypt has been a critical component in
enabling counterterrorism cooperation between the two
governments to ensure the United States military has freedom
of movement throughout the region in order to deter
aggression and respond to threats to United States national
security interests, particularly in light of the security
situation in Libya and the Sinai;
(7) the Egyptian military has exercised restraint and
professionalism during the unrest in Egypt over the last two
years and hopefully will remain a key mechanism through which
the United States can support the people of Egypt in
achieving their goals for a representative and democratic
political system, while promoting peace and security in the
region; and
(8) therefore, with appropriate vetting, United States
military assistance and support to the Egyptian military
should continue, even as civilian aid to Egypt receives
greater scrutiny as a result of the uncertainty associated
with Egypt's current political leadership and economic
policies.
(b) Plan Required.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in
consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the
appropriate congressional committees a report that contains a
comprehensive plan for United States military assistance and
cooperation with Egypt.
(2) Matters to be included.--The plan required under
paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, a detailed
description of the following:
(A) How United States security assistance and cooperation
enables--
(i) freedom of movement for the United States military
throughout the region; and
(ii) the Government of Egypt to disrupt, dismantle, and
defeat al Qaeda, affiliated groups, and other terrorist
organizations, whether based in and operating from Egyptian
territory or the region.
(B) The capacity of the Government of Egypt to prevent the
illicit movement of terrorists, criminals, weapons, and other
dangerous material across Egypt's borders or administrative
boundaries, including through tunnels and other illicit
points of entry into Gaza.
(C) The extent to which the Egyptian military is--
(i) supporting the protection of the political, economic,
and religious freedoms and human rights of all citizens and
residents in Egypt;
(ii) supporting credible and legitimate elections in Egypt;
(iii) supporting the Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty;
(iv) taking effective steps to eliminate smuggling networks
and to detect and destroy tunnels between Egypt and Gaza; and
(v) supporting action to combat terrorism in the Sinai.
(3) Appropriate congressional committees defined.--In this
subsection, the term ``appropriate congressional committees''
means--
(A) the congressional defense committees; and
(B) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives.

SEC. 1243. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE MILITARY DEVELOPMENTS ON
THE KOREAN PENINSULA.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) The Democratic People's Republic of Korea (``North
Korea'') has escalated regional tensions with hostile
rhetoric and provocative actions.
(2) North Korea threatened a nuclear attack on the United
States and a resumption of open war against the Republic of
Korea (``South Korea'').
(3) North Korea's nuclear weapons and ballistic missile
programs constitute a threat to the national security of the
United States and to regional stability.
(4) On April 14, 2009, North Korea halted negotiations
regarding its nuclear weapons program when it abandoned the
Six-Party Talks with the People's Republic of China
(``China''), Japan, the Russian Federation (``Russia''),
South Korea, and the United States.
(5) On May 25, 2009, North Korea detonated a nuclear device
in an underground explosive test.
(6) On March 26, 2010, North Korea sank a South Korean
naval vessel, the Cheonan, killing 46 South Korean sailors.
(7) On November 23, 2010, North Korea shelled the border
island of Yeonpyeong-do, killing four people. This was the
first direct artillery attack on South Korean territory since
the signing of the 1953 armistice.
(8) On April 13, 2012, North Korea conducted a rocket
launch that failed to send a satellite into orbit. This
launch violated United Nations Security Council (UNSC)
Resolutions 1718 and 1874.
(9) On December 12, 2012, North Korea used banned long-
range missile technology to launch an earth observation
satellite into orbit. In response, the UNSC unanimously
adopted Resolution 2087, condemning the launch.
(10) On February 12, 2013, North Korea conducted a third
underground nuclear test in violation of UNSC Resolution
1718, 1874, and 2087. The test also contravened North Korea's
commitments under the September 2005 Joint Statement of the
Six-Party Talks.
(11) On March 7, 2013, the UNSC unanimously adopted
Resolution 2094, condemning North Korea's third nuclear test
and imposed additional sanctions against the regime.

[[Page H3439]]

(12) On March 28, 2013, North Korea unilaterally nullified
the armistice agreement with the United States that suspended
military conflict on the Korean peninsula.
(13) On March 30, 2013, North Korea declared a state of war
with South Korea.
(14) On April 4, 2013, North Korea placed two intermediate-
range Musudan missiles on mobile launchers and temporarily
relocated them to the eastern coast of the Korean peninsula
before removing them a month later from the launch sites.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the United States and its allies, South Korea and
Japan, share the goal of a stable and peaceful Korean
Peninsula, free of nuclear weapons;
(2) the United States remains committed to defending its
allies in the Asia-Pacific region and stability in Northeast
Asia requires restraint by all parties from activities that
would complicate international relations or escalate
international tensions, and international disputes should be
mitigated in a constructive manner consistent with
established principles of international law;
(3) Congress supports--
(A) the verifiable denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula
in a peaceful manner,
(B) North Korea's abandonment of its nuclear programs and
return to the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear
Weapons and to International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards;
and
(C) North Korea's full acceptance of and compliance with
the terms of the 1953 Armistice Agreement;
(4) the United States has national interests in security
and stability in the Asia-Pacific region, the implementation
of the United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement, nuclear non-
proliferation efforts, the promotion of respect for the
fundamental human rights of the North Korean people,
international cyber-security cooperation, and full
implementation of United States and multilateral sanctions
against illicit activities;
(5) the United States encourages China and Russia to fully
implement and enforce United States and United Nations
Security Council sanctions against North Korea; and
(6) the President, the Secretary of State, and the
Secretary of Defense should keep Congress fully informed on
security developments on the Korean Peninsula.

SEC. 1244. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON DEFENSE COOPERATION WITH
GEORGIA.

It is the sense of Congress that the United States should
enhance its defense cooperation efforts with Georgia and
support the efforts of the Government of Georgia to provide
for the defense of its government, people, and sovereign
territory.

SEC. 1245. LIMITATION ON ESTABLISHMENT OF REGIONAL SPECIAL
OPERATIONS FORCES COORDINATION CENTERS.

(a) Limitation.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for
fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be
obligated or expended to plan, prepare, establish, or
implement any ``Regional Special Operations Forces
Coordination Center'' (RSCC) or similar regional coordination
entities.
(b) Exclusion.--The limitation contained in subsection (a)
shall not apply with respect to any RSCC or similar regional
coordination entity authorized by statute, including the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization Special Operations
Headquarters authorized under section 1244 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law
111-84; 123 Stat. 2541).
(c) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in
coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the
congressional committees specified in subsection (d) a report
on the following:
(1) A detailed description of the intent and purpose of the
RSCC concept.
(2) Defined and validated requirements justifying the
establishment of RSCCs or similar entities within each
geographic combatant command, to include how such centers
have been coordinated and de-conflicted with existing
regional and multilateral frameworks or approaches.
(3) An explanation of why existing regional centers and
multilateral frameworks cannot satisfy the requirements and
needs of the Department of Defense and geographic combatant
commands.
(4) Cost estimates across the Future Years Defense Program
for such centers, to include estimates of contributions of
nations participating in such centers.
(5) Any other matters that the Secretary of Defense or
Secretary of State determines appropriate.
(d) Specified Congressional Committees.--The congressional
committees referred to in subsection (c) are--
(1) the congressional defense committees; and
(2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives.

SEC. 1246. ADDITIONAL REPORTS ON MILITARY AND SECURITY
DEVELOPMENTS INVOLVING THE DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S
REPUBLIC OF KOREA.

(a) Report.--Subsection (a) of section 1236 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law
112-81; 125 Stat. 1641), as amended by section 1292 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2042), is further amended by
striking ``November 1, 2012, and November 1, 2013,'' and
inserting ``November 1, 2013, November 1, 2015, and November
1, 2017,''.
(b) Update.--Section 1236 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 is amended--
(1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new
subsection:
``(c) Update.--The Secretary of Defense shall revise or
supplement the most recent report submitted pursuant to
subsection (a) if, in the Secretary's estimation, interim
events or developments occurring in a period between reports
required under subsection (a) warrant revision or
supplement.''.

SEC. 1247. AMENDMENTS TO ANNUAL REPORT UNDER ARMS CONTROL AND
DISARMAMENT ACT.

(a) Appropriate Congressional Committees.--Section 403 of
the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2593a) is
amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ``the Speaker of the
House of Representatives and to the chairman of the Committee
on Foreign Relations of the Senate'' and inserting ``the
appropriate congressional committees''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(e) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In
this section, the term `appropriate congressional committees'
means--
``(1) the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on
Armed Services, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of
the Senate; and
``(2) the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on
Armed Services, and the Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence of the House of Representatives.''.
(b) Congressional Briefing.--Section 403 of the Arms
Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2593a), as amended by
subsection (a) of this section, is further amended--
(1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new
subsection:
``(e) Congressional Briefing.--Not later than May 15 of
each year, the President shall provide to such committees a
briefing on such report.''.

SEC. 1248. LIMITATION ON FUNDS TO PROVIDE THE RUSSIAN
FEDERATION WITH ACCESS TO CERTAIN MISSILE
DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY.

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or
otherwise made available for each of the fiscal years 2014
through 2018 for the Department of Defense may be used to
provide the Russian Federation with access to information
regarding--
(1) missile defense technology of the United States
relating to hit-to-kill technology; or
(2) telemetry data with respect to missile defense
interceptors or target vehicles.

SEC. 1249. REPORTS ON ACTIONS TO REDUCE SUPPORT OF BALLISTIC
MISSILE PROGRAMS OF CHINA, SYRIA, IRAN, AND
NORTH KOREA.

(a) Disclosure of and Report on Russian Support of
Ballistic Missile Programs of China, Syria, Iran, and North
Korea.--
(1) In general.--The President shall seek to encourage the
Government of the Russian Federation to disclose any support
by the Russian Federation or Russian entities for the
ballistic missile programs of the People's Republic of China,
Syria, Iran, or North Korea.
(2) Report required.--The President shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a semi-annual report on any
disclosure by the Government of the Russian Federation of any
such support during the preceding six-month period.
(3) Initial report.--The initial report required by
paragraph (2) shall be submitted not later than 180 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act and in addition
to addressing any such support during the preceding six-month
period shall also address any such support during the 10-year
period ending on the date of the enactment of this Act.
(b) Cooperation of Russia and China to Reduce Technology
and Expertise That Supports the Ballistic Missile Programs of
Syria, Iran, North Korea, and Other Countries.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of State, in coordination
with the Secretary of Defense, shall develop a plan to seek
and secure the cooperation of the Russian Federation and the
People's Republic of China to verifiably reduce the spread of
technology and expertise that supports the ballistic missile
programs of the Syria, Iran, North Korea, or any other
country that the Secretary of State determines has a
ballistic missile program.
(2) Report and briefings required.--The Secretary of State,
in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and the
Director of National Intelligence, shall submit to the
appropriate congressional committees not later than 180 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act a report
describing the plan required in paragraph (1) and provide
briefings to such committees annually thereafter until 2018
on the progress and results of these efforts.
(3) Definition.--In this subsection, the term ``appropriate
congressional committees'' means--
(A) the congressional defense committees;
(B) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the
House of Representatives and the Select Committee on
Intelligence of the Senate; and
(C) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the
Senate.
(c) Form.--Each report required by this section shall be
submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified
annex, if necessary.

SEC. 1250. CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATIONS RELATING TO STATUS OF
FORCES AGREEMENTS.

(a) In General.--With respect to an agreement on the status
of forces between the United States and a foreign country,
the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary
of State, shall notify the appropriate congressional

[[Page H3440]]

committees not later than 15 days after the date on which the
agreement is signed, renewed, amended or otherwise revised,
or terminated.
(b) Briefings Required.--Not later than February 1 of each
calendar year, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with
the Secretary of State, shall provide a briefing to the
appropriate congressional committees on the following:
(1) Status of forces agreements that the United States will
seek to enter into in such calendar year.
(2) Status of forces agreements that have expired and which
the United States will seek to renew in such calendar year.
(3) Amendments to status of forces agreements that the
Secretary of Defense determines to be substantial and are
likely to be negotiated in such calendar year.
(c) Appropriate Congressional Committees.--In this section,
the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means--
(1) the congressional defense committees; and
(2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives.
(d) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect on the
date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply with
respect to an agreement described in subsection (a) that is
signed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 1251. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE CONFLICT IN SYRIA.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) The conflict in Syria began in March 2011.
(2) As of February 2013, the United Nations High
Commissioner for Human Rights estimated that approximately
70,000 Syrians have been killed during the conflict.
(3) According to the United Nations High Commissioner for
Refugees, over 1,200,000 Syrians are registered refugees or
persons of concern including, over 66,000 in Egypt, over
145,000 in Iraq, over 461,000 in Jordan, over 462,000 in
Lebanon, and over 329,000 in Turkey.
(4) Jabhat al-Nusra, a group located in Syria and
categorized as an affiliate of al-Qaeda by the intelligence
community, presents a direct threat to the interests of the
United States and could present a direct threat to the United
States.
(5) On August 19, 2011, President Obama stated: ``The
future of Syria must be determined by its people, but
President Bashar al-Assad is standing in their way. We have
consistently said that President Assad must lead a democratic
transition or get out of the way. He has not led. For the
sake of the Syrian people, the time has come for President
Assad to step aside.''.
(6) The United States is deploying 200 military personnel
from the headquarters of the 1st Armored Division to Jordan
in order to ``improve readiness and prepare for a number of
scenarios''.
(7) In a letter from Miguel Rodriguez, the Assistant to the
President for Legislative Affairs, to Senators McCain and
Levin, dated April 25, 2013, it stated that ``our
intelligence community does assess with varying degrees of
confidence that the Syrian regime has used chemical weapons
on a small scale in Syria, specifically, the chemical agent
sarin. . .We do believe that any use of chemical weapons in
Syria would very likely have originated with the Assad
regime. . .the President has made it clear that the use of
chemical weapons--or the transfer of chemical weapons to
terrorist groups--is a red line for the United States of
America''.
(8) In a press conference with Israel Prime Minister,
Benjamin Netanyahu, President Obama stated: ``I have made
clear that the use of chemical weapons is a game-changer''.
(9) In August 2012, during a White House press conference,
President Obama stated: ``We have been very clear to the
Assad regime, but also to other players on the ground, that a
redline for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical
weapons moving around or being utilized.''.
(10) It is a threat to the vital national security interest
of the United States if terrorist groups, such as al-Qaeda,
obtain chemical or biological material or weapons in Syria.
(11) At a Pentagon press conference on May 2, 2013,
Secretary Hagel confirmed that the Obama Administration is
re-thinking its opposition to arming the rebels.
(12) On April 11, 2013, responding to a question about the
need for a supplemental funding request for any potential
United States military effort in Syria, Secretary Hagel
stated: ``Yes, I think it is pretty clear that a supplemental
would be required.''.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) President Obama should have a comprehensive policy and
should ensure robust contingency planning to secure United
States' interests in Syria;
(2) President Obama should fully consider all courses of
action to remove President Bashar al-Assad from power;
(3) the conflict in Syria threatens the vital national
security interests of Israel, which should be sufficiently
weighed by the President when considering policy approaches
towards the conflict in Syria;
(4) the President should fully consider all courses of
action to reinforce his stated ``redline'' regarding the use
of weapons of mass destruction by the Assad regime in Syria,
which could threaten the credibility of the United States
with its allies in the region and embolden the Assad regime;
(5) the United States should continue to conduct rigorous
planning and operational preparation to support any efforts
to secure the chemical and biological stockpiles and
associated weapons;
(6) the United States should have a policy that supports
the stability of countries on Syria's border, including
Jordan, Turkey, Iraq, Lebanon, and Israel;
(7) the United States should continue to support Syrian
opposition forces with non-lethal aid;
(8) the President, the Department of Defense, the
Department of State, and the intelligence community, in
cooperation with European and regional allies, should ensure
that the risks of all courses of action or inaction regarding
Syria are fully explored and understood and that Congress is
kept fully informed of such risks;
(9) the President should fully consider, and the Department
of Defense should conduct prudent planning for, the provision
of lethal aid and relevant operational training to vetted
Syrian opposition forces, including an analysis of the risks
of the provision of such aid and training; and
(10) should the President decide to employ any military
assets in Syria, the President should provide a supplemental
budget request to Congress.

SEC. 1252. REVISION OF STATUTORY REFERENCES TO FORMER NATO
SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS AND RELATED NATO
AGREEMENTS.

(a) Title 10, United States Code.--Section 2350d of title
10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by striking ``NATO Maintenance and Supply
Organization'' each place it appears and inserting ``NATO
Support Organization and its executive agencies'';
(2) in subsection (a)(1)--
(A) by striking ``Weapon System Partnership Agreements''
and inserting ``Support Partnership Agreements''; and
(B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``a specific weapon
system'' and inserting ``activities''; and
(3) in subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e), by striking
``Weapon System Partnership Agreement'' each place it appears
and inserting ``Support Partnership Agreement''.
(b) Arms Export Control Act.--Section 21(e)(3) of the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2761(e)(3)) is amended--
(1) in subparagraphs (A) and (C)(i), by striking
``Maintenance and Supply Agency of the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization'' and inserting ``North Atlantic Treaty
Organization (NATO) Support Organization and its executive
agencies'';
(2) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking ``weapon system
partnership agreement'' and inserting ``support partnership
agreement''; and
(3) in subparagraph (C)(i)(II), by striking ``a specific
weapon system'' and inserting ``activities''.

SEC. 1253. LIMITATION ON FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT EXECUTIVE
AGREEMENTS RELATING TO UNITED STATES MISSILE
DEFENSE CAPABILITIES.

(a) Statement of Policy.--Congress reaffirms, with respect
to executive agreements relating to the missile defense
capabilities of the United States, including basing,
locations, capabilities and numbers of missiles with respect
to such missile defense capabilities, that section 303(b) of
the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2573(b))
provides the following: ``No action shall be taken pursuant
to this or any other Act that would obligate the United
States to reduce or limit the Armed Forces or armaments of
the United States in a militarily significant manner, except
pursuant to the treaty-making power of the President set
forth in Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution
or unless authorized by the enactment of further affirmative
legislation by the Congress of the United States.''.
(b) Limitation on Funds.--None of the funds authorized to
be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year
2014 or any fiscal year thereafter for the Department of
Defense may be used--
(1) to implement any executive agreement relating to the
missile defense capabilities of the United States, including
basing, locations, capabilities, and numbers of missiles with
respect to such missile defense capabilities; or
(2) to implement rules of engagement or Guidance for
Employment of Force relating to such executive agreement.
(c) Rule of Construction.--Subsection (b) shall not apply
with respect to the use of funds to negotiate or implement
any executive agreement with a country with respect to which
the United States has entered into a treaty of alliance or
has a security guarantee.
(d) Executive Agreement Defined.--In this section, the term
``executive agreement'' means an international agreement
other than--
(1) an agreement that is in the form of a treaty under
article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution of the
United States; or
(2) an agreement that requires implementing legislation to
be enacted into law for the agreement to enter into force
with respect to the United States.

SEC. 1254. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR THREAT
REDUCTION ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES AND UNITED
STATES CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE
NUCLEAR-TEST-BAN TREATY ORGANIZATION.

(a) In General.--None of the funds made available for
fiscal year 2014 for Threat Reduction Engagement activities
may be obligated or expended for such purposes until the
President certifies to Congress that no state party to the
Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty has undertaken nuclear
weapons test activities in fiscal year 2013 that are
inconsistent with United States interpretations regarding
obligations under such Treaty.
(b) Lobbying or Advocacy Activities.--None of the funds
made available for fiscal year 2014 for contributions of the
United States to the CTBTO entities may be used for lobbying
or advocacy in the United States relating to the
Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty.
(c) CTBTO Entities.--In subsection (b), the term ``CTBTO
entities'' means--
(1) the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization
International Monitoring System; and

[[Page H3441]]

(2) the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization
Preparatory Commission-Special Contributions.

SEC. 1255. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON MILITARY-TO-MILITARY
COOPERATION BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND
BURMA.

It is the sense of the Congress that--
(1) as the United States policy rebalances towards Asia, it
is critical that the United States military comprehensively
evaluate its engagement with Burma;
(2) the future of the military-to-military relationship
between the United States and Burma should take into account
the current ethnic conflict in Burma and persecution of
ethnic and religious minorities;
(3) while the United States has national security interests
in Burma's peace and stability, the peaceful settlement of
armed conflicts with the ethnic minority groups requires the
Burmese military to respect ceasefire agreements, laws of
war, and human rights provisions; and
(4) the Department of Defense should fully consider and
assess the Burmese military's efforts to implement reforms,
end impunity for human rights abuses, and increase
transparency and accountability before expanding military-to-
military cooperation beyond initial dialogue and isolated
engagements.

SEC. 1256. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE STATIONING OF UNITED
STATES FORCES IN EUROPE.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) During the past several years, over 700 kinetic terror
incidents have occurred in the U.S. European Command (EUCOM)
area of operations. Rising tensions in the region due to
unemployment, fiscal insolvency, ethnic strife, hegemonic
desires, and terrorism, pose risks to the security and
stability of Europe.
(2) Arab Spring uprisings in Middle Eastern and North
African countries, including the Republic of Mali, the Arab
Republic of Egypt, Libya, and the Syrian Arab Republic
(Syria), have presented emerging strategic challenges that
present significant implications for regional stability, the
security of the State of Israel (Israel), and the national
security interests of the United States and many European
allies.
(3) U.S. Africa Command does not have formally assigned
Army or Marine Corps units assigned to it and it continues to
share Air Force and Navy component commands with EUCOM.
Consequently, United States forces stationed in Europe have
been deployed to support contingencies associated with the
Arab Spring in North Africa.
(4) The Commander of U.S. European Command is responsible
for developing operational plans for the defense of Israel.
Moreover, forces stationed in Europe would be deployed to
defend Israel in the event of such a contingency.
(5) Regimes, including the Islamic Republic of Iran and
Syria, continue efforts to procure, develop, and proliferate
advanced ballistic missile technologies that pose a serious
threat to United States forces and installations in the
theater, as well as to the territory, populations, and forces
of Israel and European allies. United States missile defense
capabilities in Europe seek to mitigate these threats.
(6) Violent extremist organizations, including Kongra-Gel,
al Qaida, Lebanese Hizballah, and Iranian Qods Force, may
utilize Europe as an important venue for recruitment,
logistical support, financing, and the targeting of the
United States and Western interests.
(7) Congress has lacked sufficient data to compare the
strategic benefits and the costs associated with permanently
stationing forces in Europe. The Government Accountability
Office (GAO) has found that the combatant commands do not
completely and consistently report cost data in their theater
posture plans. In particular, GAO reported in February 2011
that EUCOM lacks comprehensive cost data in its theater
posture plans and therefore decision makers lack critical
information that could be used to make fully informed posture
decisions. Additionally, in June 2012, GAO found that the
Department of Defense has taken steps to align posture
initiatives with strategy and cost, but continues to lack
comprehensive and consistent cost estimates of initiatives.
(8) The Department of Defense has reported that the cost of
permanently stationing forces in the United States rather
than overseas is often offset by such factors as increased
rotational costs.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) an enduring United States presence and engagement
across Europe and Eurasia provides the critical access and
infrastructure necessary to accomplish United States
strategic priorities, expand United States global reach to
Europe, Eurasia, the Middle East, Africa, as well as the
Mediterranean and Atlantic Oceans, and facilitates a rapid
United States response for complex contingencies;
(2) the United States continues to have an interest in
supporting the stability and security of Europe, especially
in a dynamic and challenging global security environment;
(3) forward-stationed active duty service members, forward-
deployed rotational units, and reserve forces assigned to
U.S. European Command remain essential for United States
planning, logistics, and operations in support of U.S.
Central Command, U.S. Africa Command, U.S. Transportation
Command, U.S. Special Operations Command, and U.S. Strategic
Command, as well as fulfilling commitments under Article V of
the North Atlantic Charter;
(4) in light of the benefits associated with defense of the
homeland forward and strategic access, as well as the
potential for rotational deployments to increase cost to the
Department of Defense, the Department of Defense should
implement the recommendations of the Government
Accountability Office with regard to improved cost estimation
to enable informed force posture decisions prior to making
any further significant changes to the United States force
posture in Europe that could increase risk for the United
States; and
(5) the Secretary of Defense should keep Congress fully and
currently informed regarding the requirements of the United
States force posture in Europe and the costs associated with
maintaining such force.

SEC. 1257. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON MILITARY CAPABILITIES OF THE
PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA.

Congress--
(1) notes the People's Republic of China (PRC) continues to
rapidly modernize and expand its military capabilities across
the land, sea, air, space, and cyberspace domains;
(2) is concerned by the rate and scope of PRC military
developments, including its military-focused cyber espionage,
which indicate a desire to constrain or prevent the peaceful
activities of the United States and its allies in the Western
Pacific;
(3) concurs with Admiral Samuel Locklear, commander of U.S.
Pacific Command, that ``China's rapid development of advanced
military capabilities, combined with its unclear intentions,
certainly raises strategic and security concerns for the U.S
and the region'';
(4) notes the United States remains committed to a robust
forward military-presence in the Asia-Pacific and will
continue to vigorously support mutual defense arrangements
with treaty allies while also building deeper relationships
with other strategic partners in the region; and
(5) urges the Government of the PRC to work peacefully to
resolve existing territorial disputes and to adopt a maritime
code of conduct with relevant parties to guide all forms of
maritime interaction and communications in the Asia-Pacific.

SEC. 1258. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

Nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the
use of force against Syria.

TITLE XIII--COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION

SEC. 1301. SPECIFICATION OF COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION
PROGRAMS AND FUNDS.

(a) Specification of Cooperative Threat Reduction
Programs.--For purposes of section 301 and other provisions
of this Act, Cooperative Threat Reduction programs are the
programs specified in section 1501 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (50 U.S.C. 2362 note).
(b) Fiscal Year 2014 Cooperative Threat Reduction Funds
Defined.--As used in this title, the term ``fiscal year 2014
Cooperative Threat Reduction funds'' means the funds
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations
in section 301 and made available by the funding table in
section 4301 for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs.
(c) Availability of Funds.--Funds appropriated pursuant to
the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made
available by the funding table in section 4301 for
Cooperative Threat Reduction programs shall be available for
obligation for fiscal years 2014, 2015, and 2016.

SEC. 1302. FUNDING ALLOCATIONS.

(a) Funding for Specific Purposes.--Of the $528,455,000
authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense
for fiscal year 2014 in section 301 and made available by the
funding table in section 4301 for Cooperative Threat
Reduction programs, the following amounts may be obligated
for the purposes specified:
(1) For strategic offensive arms elimination, $5,655,000.
(2) For chemical weapons destruction, $13,000,000.
(3) For global nuclear security, $32,793,000.
(4) For cooperative biological engagement, $293,142,110.
(5) For proliferation prevention, $149,314,890.
(6) For threat reduction engagement, $6,375,000.
(7) For activities designated as Other Assessments/
Administrative Costs, $28,175,000.
(b) Report on Obligation or Expenditure of Funds for Other
Purposes.--No fiscal year 2014 Cooperative Threat Reduction
funds may be obligated or expended for a purpose other than a
purpose listed in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection
(a) until 15 days after the date that the Secretary of
Defense submits to Congress a report on the purpose for which
the funds will be obligated or expended and the amount of
funds to be obligated or expended. Nothing in the preceding
sentence shall be construed as authorizing the obligation or
expenditure of fiscal year 2014 Cooperative Threat Reduction
funds for a purpose for which the obligation or expenditure
of such funds is specifically prohibited under this title or
any other provision of law.
(c) Limited Authority to Vary Individual Amounts.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), in any case in
which the Secretary of Defense determines that it is
necessary to do so in the national interest, the Secretary
may obligate amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for a
purpose listed in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection
(a) in excess of the specific amount authorized for that
purpose.
(2) Notice-and-wait required.--An obligation of funds for a
purpose stated in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection
(a) in excess of the specific amount authorized for such
purpose may be made using the authority provided in paragraph
(1) only after--
(A) the Secretary submits to Congress notification of the
intent to do so together with a complete discussion of the
justification for doing so; and
(B) 15 days have elapsed following the date of the
notification.

[[Page H3442]]

SEC. 1303. EXTENSION FOR USE OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE
COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION PROGRAM.

Section 1303(g) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note)
is amended by striking ``2015'' and inserting ``2018''.

TITLE XIV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

Subtitle A--Military Programs

SEC. 1401. WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other
activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for
providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as
specified in the funding table in section 4501.

SEC. 1402. NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the
fiscal year 2014 for the National Defense Sealift Fund, as
specified in the funding table in section 4501.

SEC. 1403. CHEMICAL AGENTS AND MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION,
DEFENSE.

(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby
authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense
for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise provided
for, for Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense,
as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
(b) Use.--Amounts authorized to be appropriated under
subsection (a) are authorized for--
(1) the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions
in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense
Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521); and
(2) the destruction of chemical warfare materiel of the
United States that is not covered by section 1412 of such
Act.

SEC. 1404. DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES,
DEFENSE-WIDE.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the
Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not
otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-
Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding
table in section 4501.

SEC. 1405. DEFENSE INSPECTOR GENERAL.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the
Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not
otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector
General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the
funding table in section 4501.

SEC. 1406. DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2014 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the
funding table in section 4501, for use of the Armed Forces
and other activities and agencies of the Department of
Defense in providing for the health of eligible
beneficiaries.

Subtitle B--National Defense Stockpile

SEC. 1411. USE OF NATIONAL DEFENSE STOCKPILE FOR THE
CONSERVATION OF A STRATEGIC AND CRITICAL
MATERIALS SUPPLY.

(a) Presidential Responsibility for Conservation of
Stockpile Materials.--Section 98e(a) of title 50, United
States Code, is amended--
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (5) and (6) as paragraphs
(6) and (7), respectively; and
(2) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new
paragraph (5):
``(5) provide for the recovery of any strategic and
critical material from excess materials made available for
recovery purposes by other Federal agencies;''.
(b) Uses of National Defense Stockpile Transaction Fund.--
Section 98h(b)(2) of title 50, United States Code, is
amended--
(1) by redesignating subparagraphs (D) through (L) as
subparagraphs (E) through (M), respectively; and
(2) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the following new
subparagraph (D):
``(D) Encouraging the conservation of strategic and
critical materials.''.
(c) Development of Domestic Sources.--Section 98h-6(a) of
title 50, United States Code, is amended, in the matter
preceding paragraph (1), by inserting ``and conservation''
after ``development''.

SEC. 1412. AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE ADDITIONAL MATERIALS FOR THE
NATIONAL DEFENSE STOCKPILE.

(a) Acquisition Authority.--Using funds available in the
National Defense Stockpile Transaction Fund, the National
Defense Stockpile Manager may acquire the following materials
determined to be strategic and critical materials required to
meet the defense, industrial, and essential civilian needs of
the United States:
(1) Ferroniobium.
(2) Dysprosium Metal.
(3) Yttrium Oxide.
(4) Cadmium Zinc Tellurium Substrate Materials.
(5) Lithium Ion Precursors.
(6) Triamino-Trinitrobenzene and Insensitive High Explosive
Molding Powders.
(b) Amount of Authority.--The National Defense Stockpile
Manager may use up to $41,000,000 of the National Stockpile
Transaction Fund for acquisition of the materials specified
in subsection (a).
(c) Fiscal Year Limitation.--The authority under this
section is available for purchases during fiscal year 2014
through fiscal year 2019.

Subtitle C--Other Matters

SEC. 1421. AUTHORITY FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO JOINT
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE-DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS MEDICAL FACILITY DEMONSTRATION FUND FOR
CAPTAIN JAMES A. LOVELL HEALTH CARE CENTER,
ILLINOIS.

(a) Authority for Transfer of Funds.--Of the funds
authorized to be appropriated for section 507 and available
for the Defense Health Program for operation and maintenance,
$143,087,000 may be transferred by the Secretary of Defense
to the Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans
Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund established by
subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84;
123 Stat. 2571). For purposes of subsection (a)(2) of such
section 1704, any funds so transferred shall be treated as
amounts authorized and appropriated specifically for the
purpose of such a transfer.
(b) Use of Transferred Funds.--For the purposes of
subsection (b) of such section 1704, facility operations for
which funds transferred under subsection (a) may be used are
operations of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care
Center, consisting of the North Chicago Veterans Affairs
Medical Center, the Navy Ambulatory Care Center, and
supporting facilities designated as a combined Federal
medical facility under an operational agreement covered by
section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417;
122 Stat. 4500).

SEC. 1422. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR ARMED FORCES
RETIREMENT HOME.

There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2014 from the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund
the sum of $67,800,000 for the operation of the Armed Forces
Retirement Home.

SEC. 1423. CEMETERIAL EXPENSES.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the
Department of the Army for fiscal year 2014 for cemeterial
expenses, not otherwise provided for, in the amount of
$45,800,000.

TITLE XV--AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR OVERSEAS
CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS

Subtitle A--Authorization of Additional Appropriations

SEC. 1501. PURPOSE.

The purpose of this subtitle is to authorize appropriations
for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 to provide
additional funds for overseas contingency operations being
carried out by the Armed Forces.

SEC. 1502. PROCUREMENT.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2014 for procurement accounts for the Army, the Navy and
the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities,
as specified in the funding table in section 4102.

SEC. 1503. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2014 for the use of the Department of Defense for
research, development, test, and evaluation, as specified in
the funding table in section 4202.

SEC. 1504. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.

SEC. 1505. MILITARY PERSONNEL.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other
activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for
expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel,
as specified in the funding table in section 4402.

SEC. 1506. WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS.

SEC. 1507. DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES,
DEFENSE-WIDE.

SEC. 1508. DEFENSE INSPECTOR GENERAL.

SEC. 1509. DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the
Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not
otherwise provided for, for the Defense Health Program, as
specified in the funding table in section 4502.

Subtitle B--Financial Matters

SEC. 1521. TREATMENT AS ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATIONS.

The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are
in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be
appropriated by this Act.

SEC. 1522. SPECIAL TRANSFER AUTHORITY.

(a) Authority To Transfer Authorizations.--
(1) Authority.--Upon determination by the Secretary of
Defense that such action is necessary in the national
interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of
authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in
this title for fiscal year 2014 between any such
authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions
thereof). Amounts of authorizations so

[[Page H3443]]

transferred shall be merged with and be available for the
same purposes as the authorization to which transferred.
(2) Limitation.--The total amount of authorizations that
the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this
subsection may not exceed $3,000,000,000.
(b) Terms and Conditions.--Transfers under this section
shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as
transfers under section 1001.
(c) Additional Authority.--The transfer authority provided
by this section is in addition to the transfer authority
provided under section 1001.

Subtitle C--Limitations and Other Matters

SEC. 1531. AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND.

(a) Continuation of Existing Limitations on Use of Funds in
Fund.--Funds available to the Department of Defense for the
Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2014 shall
be subject to the conditions contained in subsections (b)
through (g) of section 1513 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181;
122 Stat. 428), as amended by section 1531(b) of the Ike
Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2011 (Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4424).
(b) Revision of Plan for Use of Afghanistan Security Forces
Fund.--
(1) Revision and purpose.--The Secretary of Defense shall
revise the plan required by section 1531(e) of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law
112-239; 126 Stat. 2056) regarding use of the Afghanistan
Security Forces Fund through September 30, 2017, to ensure
that an office or official of the Department of Defense is
identified as responsible for each program or activity
supported using funds available to the Department of Defense
through the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund.
(2) Submission.--Not later than 90 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the congressional committees the plan as revised
pursuant to paragraph (1).
(c) Promotion of Recruitment and Retention of Women.--Of
the funds available to the Department of Defense for the
Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2014, no
less than $47,300,000 shall be used for the recruitment and
retention of women in the Afghanistan National Security
Forces. This requirement does not modify the distribution of
funds for programs and activities supported using the
Afghanistan Security Forces Fund, but will ensure attention
to recruitment and retention of women within each program and
activity.

SEC. 1532. FUTURE ROLE OF JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE
DEFEAT ORGANIZATION.

(a) Report Required.--Not later than 60 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report on
the future plans of the Department of Defense for the Joint
Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization (JIEDDO).
(b) Required Elements.--The report required by subsection
(a) shall include the following elements:
(1) An analysis of alternatives considered in determining
the future plans for JIEDDO.
(2) If the Secretary of Defense plans to discontinue
JIEDDO--
(A) a description of how JIEDDO's major programs and
capabilities will be integrated into other components within
the Department of Defense or discontinued; and
(B) a statement of the estimated costs to other components
of the Department for any JIEDDO programs and capabilities
that are reassigned to such components.
(3) If the Secretary of Defense plans to continue JIEDDO--
(A) a statement of the expected mission of JIEDDO;
(B) a description of the expected organizational structure
for JIEDDO, including the reporting structure and lines of
authority within the Department and personnel strength,
including contractors; and
(C) a statement of the estimated costs and budgetary
impacts related to implementing any changes to the mission of
JIEDDO and its organizational structure.
(4) A timeline for implementation of the selected
alternative described in paragraph (2) or (3).
(5) A description on how the Department will identify and
incorporate lessons learned from establishing and managing
JIEDDO and its programs.

SEC. 1533. LIMITATION ON INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE, AND
RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT FOR OPERATION OBSERVANT
COMPASS.

None of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for
operation and maintenance by section 1504, as specified in
the funding table in section 4302, may be obligated or
expended for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance
support for Operation Observant Compass until the Secretary
of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a
report on Operation Observant Compass, including the specific
goals of the campaign to counter the Lord Resistance Army,
the precise metrics used to measure progress in such
campaign, and the required steps that will be taken to
transition such campaign if it is determined that it is no
longer necessary for the United States to support the mission
of such campaign.

SEC. 1534. REPORT ON UNITED STATES FORCE LEVELS AND COSTS OF
MILITARY OPERATIONS IN AFGHANISTAN.

Not later than January 15, 2014, the Secretary of Defense
shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House
of Representatives and Senate a report on the following:
(1) The estimated United States force levels in Afghanistan
for each of years 2015 through 2020.
(2) The estimated costs of United States military
operations in Afghanistan for each of fiscal years 2015
through 2020.

TITLE XVI--INDUSTRIAL BASE MATTERS

SEC. 1601. PERIODIC AUDITS OF CONTRACTING COMPLIANCE BY
INSPECTOR GENERAL OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

(a) Requirement for Periodic Audits of Contracting
Compliance.--The Inspector General of the Department of
Defense shall conduct periodic audits of contracting
practices and policies related to procurement under section
2533a of title 10, United States Code. Such an audit shall be
conducted at least once every three years.
(b) Requirement for Additional Information in Semiannual
Reports.--The Inspector General of the Department of Defense
shall ensure that findings and other information resulting
from audits conducted pursuant to subsection (a) are included
in the semiannual report transmitted to congressional
committees under section 8(f)(1) of the Inspector General Act
of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App).

SEC. 1602. EXPANSION OF THE PROCUREMENT TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
PROGRAM TO ADVANCE SMALL BUSINESS GROWTH.

(a) Advancing Small Business Growth.--
(1) In general.--Chapter 142 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended--
(A) by redesignating section 2419 as section 2420; and
(B) by inserting after section 2418 the following new
section 2419:

``Sec. 2419. Advancing small business growth

``(a) Identification of Recommended Business Capabilities
and Characteristics.--(1) The Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall publish in the
Federal Register and on the website of the Office of Small
Business Programs of the Department of Defense a list of
capabilities and characteristics recommended for the
successful transition of a qualified small business concern
to become competitive as an other-than-small business for
contracts awarded by the Department of Defense. The
capabilities and characteristics on the list shall be set
forth by North American Industry Classification System
sector.
``(2) The list shall be reviewed and updated appropriately
on an annual basis.
``(b) Contract Clause Required.--(1) The Under Secretary
shall require the clause described in paragraph (2) to be
included in each covered contract awarded by the Department
of Defense.
``(2) The clause described in this paragraph is a clause
that--
``(A) requires the contractor to acknowledge that
acceptance of the contract may cause the business to exceed
the applicable small business size standards (established
pursuant to section 3(a) of the Small Business Act) for the
industry concerned and that the contractor may no longer
qualify as a small business concern for that industry; and
``(B) encourages the contractor to develop capabilities and
characteristics identified in the list required by subsection
(a) if the contractor intends to remain competitive as an
other-than-small business in that industry.
``(c) Assistance for Advancing Certain Small Businesses.--
Eligible small businesses may be provided specific assistance
with developing the capabilities and characteristics
identified in the list required by subsection (a), as part of
any procurement technical assistance furnished pursuant to
this chapter.
``(d) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) The term `covered contract' means a contract--
``(A) awarded to a qualified small business concern as
defined pursuant to section 3(a) of the Small Business Act;
and
``(B) with an estimated annual value--
``(i) that will exceed the applicable receipt-based small
business size standard; or
``(ii) if the contract is in an industry with an employee-
based size standard, that will exceed $70,000,000.
``(2) The term `eligible small business' means a qualified
small business concern as defined pursuant to section 3(a) of
the Small Business Act that has entered into a contract with
the Department of Defense that includes a contract clause
described in subsection (b)(2).''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections as the
beginning of such chapter is amended by striking the item
relating to section 2419 and inserting the following:

``2419. Advancing small business growth.
``2420. Regulations.''.

(b) Exception to Limitation on Funding.--Section 2414 of
such title is amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ``The value'' and
inserting ``Except as provided in subsection (c), the
value''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection (c):
``(c) Exception.--The value of the assistance provided in
accordance with section 2419(c) of this title is not subject
to the limitations in subsection (a).''.
(c) Revisions to Cooperative Agreements.--
(1) Full funding allowed for certain assistance.--Section
2413(b) of such title is amended--
(A) by striking ``except that in the case'' and inserting:
``except that--
``(1) in the case'';
(B) by striking the period at the end and inserting ``;
and''; and
(C) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(2) in the case of a program sponsored by such an entity
that provides specific assistance

[[Page H3444]]

for eligible small businesses pursuant to section 2419(c) of
this title, the Secretary may agree to furnish the full cost
of such assistance.''.
(2) Additional considerations.--Section 2413 of such title
is further amended by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
``(e) In determining the level of funding to provide under
an agreement under subsection (b), the Secretary shall
consider the forecast by the eligible entity of demand for
procurement technical assistance, and, in the case of an
established program under this chapter, the outlays and
receipts of such program during prior years of operation.''.
(3) Conforming amendment.--Section 2413(d) of such title is
amended by striking ``and in determining the level of funding
to provide under an agreement under subsection (b),''.
(d) Report Required.--Not later than March 15 of 2015,
2016, and 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on the
implementation of the amendments made by this section, along
with any recommendations for improving the Procurement
Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program.

SEC. 1603. AMENDMENTS RELATING TO PROCUREMENT TECHNICAL
ASSISTANCE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT PROGRAM.

(a) Increase in Government Share.--Section 2413(b) of title
10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by striking ``one-half'' both places it appears and
inserting ``65 percent''; and
(2) by striking ``three-fourths'' and inserting ``75
percent''.
(b) Increase in Limitations on Value of Assistance.--
Section 2414(a) of such title is amended--
(1) in paragraphs (1) and (4), by striking ``$600,000'' and
inserting ``$750,000'';
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``$300,000'' and
inserting ``$450,000''; and
(3) in paragraph (3), by striking ``$150,000'' and
inserting ``$300,000''.

SEC. 1604. STRATEGIC PLAN FOR REQUIREMENTS FOR WAR RESERVE
STOCKS OF MEALS READY-TO-EAT.

(a) Limitation; Strategic Plan.--The Administrator of the
Defense Logistics Agency may not make any reductions in the
requirements for war reserve stocks of meals ready-to-eat
until the Administrator and the heads of the military
services, in consultation with manufacturers of meals ready-
to-eat, develop a comprehensive strategic plan to address--
(1) the aggregate meals ready-to-eat requirements for each
of the military departments;
(2) industrial base sustainment and war-time surge capacity
requirements for meals ready-to-eat; and
(3) timely rotation of the war reserves of meals-ready-to-
eat.
(b) Briefing Required.--The Administrator shall brief the
congressional defense committees on the strategic plan
developed under subsection (a) before making any reductions
in the requirements for war reserve stocks of meals ready-to-
eat.

SEC. 1605. FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SATELLITE SERVICES.

(a) In General.--Chapter 135 of title 10, United States
Code, as amended by section 911(b) of this Act, is further
amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``Sec. 2279. Foreign commercial satellite services

``(a) Prohibition.--The Secretary of Defense may not enter
into a contract for satellite services with a foreign entity
if--
``(1) the foreign entity is an entity in which the
government of a covered foreign country has an ownership
interest; or
``(2) the foreign entity plans to or is expected to provide
launch or other satellite services under the contract from a
covered foreign country.
``(b) Waiver.--The Secretary of Defense may waive
subsection (a) for a particular contract if the Secretary, in
consultation with the Director of National Intelligence,
submits to the congressional defense committees a national
security assessment for such contract that includes the
following:
``(1) The projected period of performance (including any
period covered by options to extend the contract), the
financial terms, and a description of the services to be
provided under the contract.
``(2) To the extent practicable, a description of the
ownership interest that a covered foreign country has in the
foreign entity providing satellite services to the Department
of Defense under the contract and the launch or other
satellite services that will be provided in a covered foreign
country under the contract.
``(3) A justification for entering into a contract with
such foreign entity and a description of the actions
necessary to eliminate the need to enter into such a contract
with such foreign entity in the future.
``(4) A risk assessment of entering into a contract with
such foreign entity, including an assessment of mission
assurance and security of information and a description of
any measures necessary to mitigate risks found by such risk
assessment.
``(c) Delegation of Waiver Authority.--The Secretary of
Defense may only delegate the authority under subsection (b)
to waive subsection (a) to the Deputy Secretary of Defense,
the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, or the Under
Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and
Logistics and such authority may not be further delegated.
``(d) Form of Waiver Assessments.--Each assessment under
subsection (b) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but
may include a classified annex.
``(e) Covered Foreign Country Defined.--In this section,
the term `covered foreign country' means a country described
in section 1261(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat.
2019).''.
(b) Table of Sections Amendment.--The table of sections at
the beginning of such chapter, as amended by section 911(c)
of this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the
following item:

``2279. Foreign commercial satellite services.''.

SEC. 1606. PROOF OF CONCEPT COMMERCIALIZATION PILOT PROGRAM.

(a) Pilot Program.--The Secretary of Defense, acting
through the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and
Engineering, shall establish and implement a pilot program,
to be known as the ``Proof of Concept Commercialization Pilot
Program'', in accordance with this section.
(b) Purpose.--The purpose of the pilot program is to
accelerate the commercialization of basic research
innovations from qualifying institutions.
(c) Awards.--
(1) In general.--Under the pilot program, the Secretary
shall make financial awards to qualifying institutions in
accordance with this subsection.
(2) Competitive, merit-based process.--An award under the
pilot program shall be made using a competitive, merit-based
process.
(3) Eligibility.--A qualifying institution shall be
eligible for an award under the pilot program if the
institution agrees to--
(A) use funds from the award for the uses specified in
paragraph (5); and
(B) oversee the use of the funds through--
(i) a rigorous, diverse review board comprised of experts
in translational and proof of concept research, including
industry, start-up, venture capital, technical, financial,
and business experts and university technology transfer
officials;
(ii) technology validation milestones focused on market
feasibility;
(iii) simple reporting on program progress; and
(iv) a process to reallocate funding from poor performing
projects to those with more potential.
(4) Criteria.--An award may be made under the pilot program
to a qualifying institution in accordance with the following
criteria:
(A) The extent to which a qualifying institution--
(i) has an established and proven technology transfer or
commercialization office and has a plan for engaging that
office in the program's implementation or has outlined an
innovative approach to technology transfer that has the
potential to increase or accelerate technology transfer
outcomes and can be adopted by other qualifying institutions;
(ii) can assemble a project management board comprised of
industry, start-up, venture capital, technical, financial,
and business experts;
(iii) has an intellectual property rights strategy or
office; and
(iv) demonstrates a plan for sustainability beyond the
duration of the funding from the award.
(B) Such other criteria as the Secretary determines
necessary.
(5) Use of award.--
(A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), the funds
from an award may be used to evaluate the commercial
potential of existing discoveries, including activities that
contribute to determining a project's commercialization path,
including technical validations, market research, clarifying
intellectual property rights, and investigating commercial
and business opportunities.
(B) Limitations.--
(i) The amount of an award may not exceed $500,000 a year.
(ii) Funds from an award may not be used for basic
research, or to fund the acquisition of research equipment or
supplies unrelated to commercialization activities.
(d) Report.--Not later than one year after the
establishment of the pilot program, the Secretary shall
submit to the congressional defense committees and to the
Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation of the Senate a report evaluating the
effectiveness of the activities of the pilot program. The
report shall include--
(1) a detailed description of the pilot program, including
incentives and activities undertaken by review board experts;
(2) an accounting of the funds used in the pilot program;
(3) a detailed description of the institutional selection
process;
(4) a detailed compilation of results achieved by the pilot
program; and
(5) an analysis of the program's effectiveness, with data
supporting the analysis.
(e) Qualifying Institution Defined.--In this section, the
term ``qualifying institution'' means a nonprofit
institution, as defined in section 4(3) of the Stevenson-
Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3703(3)),
or a Federal laboratory, as defined in section 4(4) of the
Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C.
3703(4)).
(f) Termination.--The pilot program conducted under this
section shall terminate on September 30, 2018.

DIVISION B--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS

SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE.

This division may be cited as the ``Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014''.

SEC. 2002. EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AND AMOUNTS REQUIRED
TO BE SPECIFIED BY LAW.

(a) Expiration of Authorizations After Three Years.--Except
as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained
in titles XXI through XXVII and title XXIX of this division

[[Page H3445]]

for military construction projects, land acquisition, family
housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment
Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall
expire on the later of--
(1) October 1, 2016; or
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds
for military construction for fiscal year 2017.
(b) Exception.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to
authorizations for military construction projects, land
acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and
contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
Security Investment Program (and authorizations of
appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have
been obligated before the later of--
(1) October 1, 2016; or
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds
for fiscal year 2017 for military construction projects, land
acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, or
contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
Security Investment Program.

SEC. 2003. EFFECTIVE DATE.

Titles XXI through XXVII and title XXIX shall take effect
on the later of--
(1) October 1, 2013; or
(2) the date of the enactment of this Act.

TITLE XXI--ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION
PROJECTS.

(a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2103 and available for military construction projects inside
the United States as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real
property and carry out military construction projects for the
installations or locations inside the United States, and in
the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Army: Inside the United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Installation or
State Location Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska........................ Fort Wainwright....... $103,000,000
Colorado...................... Fort Carson, Colorado. $242,200,000
Florida....................... Eglin AFB............. $4,700,000
Georgia....................... Fort Gordon........... $61,000,000
Hawaii........................ Fort Shafter.......... $65,000,000
Kansas........................ Fort Leavenworth...... $17,000,000
Kentucky...................... Fort Campbell, $4,800,000
Kentucky.............
Maryland...................... Aberdeen Proving $21,000,000
Ground...............
Fort Detrick.......... $7,100,000
Missouri...................... Fort Leonard Wood..... $90,700,000
North Carolina................ Fort Bragg............ $5,900,000
Texas......................... Fort Bliss............ $46,800,000
Virginia...................... Joint Base Langley- $50,000,000
Eustis...............
Washington.................... Joint Base Lewis- $144,000,000
Mcchord..............
Yakima................ $9,100,00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2103 and available for military construction projects outside
the United States as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real
property and carry out the military construction project for
the installation or location outside the United States, and
in the amount, set forth in the following table:

Army: Outside the United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Country Installation or Location Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marshall Islands............. Kwajalein Atoll......... $63,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(c) Unspecified Worldwide.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2103 and available for military construction projects at
unspecified worldwide locations as specified in the funding
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire
real property and carry out military construction projects
for unspecified installations or locations in the amounts set
forth in the following table:

Army: Unspecified
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Location or Installation Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Worldwide Unspecified.......................... Unspecified Worldwide Locations.................. $33,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING.

(a) Construction and Acquisition.--Using amounts
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations
in section 2103 and available for military family housing
functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601,
the Secretary of the Army may construct or acquire family
housing units (including land acquisition and supporting
facilities) at the installations or locations, in the number
of units, and in the amounts set forth in the following
table:

Army: Family Housing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Country Installation Units Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Germany................................. South Camp Vilseck........ 29........................ $16,600,000
Wisconsin............................... Fort McCoy................ 56........................ $23,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(a) Planning and Design.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2103 and available for military family housing functions as
specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary
of the Army may carry out architectural and engineering
services and construction design activities with respect to
the construction or improvement of family housing units in an
amount not to exceed $4,408,000.

SEC. 2103. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military
construction, land acquisition, and military family housing
functions of the Department of the Army as specified in the
funding table in section 4601.

SEC. 2104. ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL
YEAR 2004 PROJECT.

(a) Project Authorization.--In connection with the
authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2004 (division B

[[Page H3446]]

of Public Law 108-136; 117 Stat. 1697) for Picatinny Arsenal,
New Jersey, for construction of a Research and Development
Loading Facility, the Secretary of the Army may carry out a
military construction project in the amount of $4,500,000 to
complete work on the facility within the initial scope of the
project.
(b) Use of Unobligated Prior-year Army Military
Construction Funds.--For the project described in subsection
(a), the Secretary of the Army shall use unobligated Army
military construction funds that were appropriated for a
fiscal year before fiscal year 2014 and are available because
of savings resulting from favorable bids.
(c) Congressional Notification.--The Secretary of the Army
shall provide information in accordance with section 2851(c)
of title 10, United States Code, regarding the project
described in subsection (a). If it becomes necessary to
exceed the estimated project cost, the Secretary shall
utilize the authority provided by section 2853 of such title
regarding authorized cost and scope of work variations.

SEC. 2105. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN
FISCAL YEAR 2010 PROJECT.

In the case of the authorization contained in the table in
section 2101(b) of the Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111-84;
123 Stat. 2629) for Camp Arifjan, Kuwait, for construction of
APS Warehouses, the Secretary of the Army may construct up to
74,976 square meters of hardstand parking, 22,741 square
meters of access roads, a 6 megawatt power plant, and 50,724
square meters of humidity-controlled warehouses.

SEC. 2106. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN
FISCAL YEAR 2011 PROJECT.

In the case of the authorization contained in the table in
section 2101(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat.
4437) for Joint Base Lewis-McCord, Washington, for
construction of a Regional Logistics Support Complex, the
Secretary of the Army may construct up to 98,381 square yards
of Organizational Vehicle Parking.

SEC. 2107. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR
2010 PROJECTS.

(a) Extensions.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010
(division B of Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2627), the
authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as
provided in section 2101 of that Act (126 Stat. 2628) and
extended by section 2106 of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public
Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2121), shall remain in effect until
October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act
authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year
2015, whichever is later:
(b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as
follows:

Army: Extension of 2010 Project Authorizations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Installation or Location Project Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virginia............................. Fort Belvoir............ Road and Access Control $9,500,000
Point......................
Washington........................... Fort Lewis.............. Fort Lewis-McChord AFB Joint $9,000,000
Access.....................
Kuwait............................... Camp Arifjian........... APS Warehouses.............. $82,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2108. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR
2011 PROJECTS.

(a) Extensions.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
(division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4436), the
authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as
provided in section 2101 of that Act (124 Stat. 4437), shall
remain in effect until October 1, 2014, or the date of the
enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military
construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later:
(b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as
follows:

Army: Extension of 2011 Project Authorizations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Installation or Location Project Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California............................ Presidio of Monterey....... Advanced Individual Training $63,000,000
Barracks....................
Georgia............................... Fort Benning............... Land Acquisition............. $12,200,000
New Mexico............................ White Sands Missile Range.. Barracks..................... $29,000,000
Germany............................... Wiesbaden Air Base......... Access Control Point......... $5,100,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TITLE XXII--NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION
PROJECTS.

(a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2204 and available for military construction projects inside
the United States as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real
property and carry out military construction projects for the
installations or locations inside the United States, and in
the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Navy: Inside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Installation or Location Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California.................................... Barstow........................................ $14,998,000
Camp Pendleton, California..................... $13,124,000
Coronado....................................... $8,910,000
Point Mugu..................................... $24,667,000
Port Hueneme................................... $33,600,000
San Diego...................................... $34,331,000
Twentynine Palms, California................... $33,437,000
Florida....................................... Jacksonville................................... $20,752,000
Key West....................................... $14,001,000
Mayport........................................ $16,093,000
Georgia....................................... Albany......................................... $16,610,000
Savannah....................................... $61,717,000
Guam.......................................... Joint Region Marianas.......................... $318,377,000
Hawaii........................................ Kaneohe Bay.................................... $236,982,000
Pearl City..................................... $30,100,000
Pearl Harbor................................... $57,998,000
Illinois...................................... Great Lakes.................................... $35,851,000
Maryland...................................... Fort Meade..................................... $83,988,000
Maine......................................... Bangor......................................... $13,800,000

[[Page H3447]]

Kittery........................................ $11,522,000
North Carolina................................ Camp Lejeune, North Carolina................... $77,999,000
New River...................................... $45,863,000
Nevada........................................ Fallon......................................... $11,334,000
Oklahoma...................................... Tinker Air Force Base.......................... $14,144,000
Rhode Island.................................. Newport........................................ $12,422,000
South Carolina................................ Charleston..................................... $73,932,000
Virginia...................................... Dam Neck....................................... $10,587,000
Norfolk........................................ $3,380,000
Quantico....................................... $38,374,000
Yorktown....................................... $18,700,000
Washington.................................... Bremerton...................................... $18,189,000
Whidbey Island................................. $117,649,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2204 and available for military construction projects outside
the United States as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real
property and carry out military construction projects for the
installation or location outside the United States, and in
the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Navy: Outside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Country Installation or Location Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Djibouti...................................... Camp Lemonier................................... $29,000,000
Japan......................................... Camp Butler..................................... $5,820,000
Japan......................................... Yokosuka........................................ $7,568,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING.

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization
of appropriations in section 2204 and available for military
family housing functions as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may carry out
architectural and engineering services and construction
design activities with respect to the construction or
improvement of family housing units in an amount not to
exceed $4,438,000.

SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS.

Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code,
and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization
of appropriations in section 2204 and available for military
family housing functions as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may improve existing
military family housing units in an amount not to exceed
$68,969,000.

SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military
construction, land acquisition, and military family housing
functions of the Department of the Navy, as specified in the
funding table in section 4601.

SEC. 2205. LIMITATION ON PROJECT AUTHORIZATION TO CARRY OUT
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2014 PROJECT.

The Secretary of the Navy may not obligate or expend any
funds authorized in this title for land acquisition related
to the Townsend Bombing Range near Savannah, Georgia, until
the Secretary certifies in writing to the congressional
defense committees that the Secretary has entered into
mutually-acceptable agreements with the governments of Long
and McIntosh Counties, Georgia, that--
(1) include specific arrangements to mitigate any economic
hardships to be incurred by the counties as a result of
revenue loss caused by the acquisition; or
(2) affirm that no compensation is required from the
Secretary before the acquisition proceeds.

SEC. 2206. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN
FISCAL YEAR 2011 PROJECT.

In the case of the authorization contained in the table in
section 2201(b) of the Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111-383;
124 Stat. 4441) for Southwest Asia, Bahrain, for construction
of Navy Central Command Ammunition Magazines, the Secretary
of the Navy may construct additional Type C earth covered
magazines (to provide a project total of eighteen), ten new
modular storage magazines, an inert storage facility, a
maintenance and ground support equipment facility, concrete
pads for portable ready service lockers, and associated
supporting facilities using appropriations available for the
project.

SEC. 2207. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN
FISCAL YEAR 2012 PROJECT.

In the case of the authorization contained in the table in
section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112-81;
125 Stat. 1666) for Kitsap, Washington, for construction of
Explosives Handling Wharf No. 2, the Secretary of the Navy
may construct new hardened facilities in lieu of hardening
existing structures and a new facility to replace the
existing Coast Guard Maritime Force Protection Unit and the
Naval Undersea Warfare Command unhardened facilities using
appropriations available for the project.

SEC. 2208. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR
2011 PROJECTS.

(a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
(division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4436), the
authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as
provided in section 2201 of that Act (124 Stat. 4441), shall
remain in effect until October 1, 2014, or the date of the
enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military
construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later.
(b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as
follows:

Navy: Extension of 2011 Project Authorizations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State/Country Installation or Location Project Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bahrain................................. Southwest Asia............ Navy Central Command $89,280,000
Ammunition Magazines.....
Guam.................................... Naval Activities.......... Defense Access Roads $66,730,000
Improvements.............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page H3448]]

TITLE XXIII--AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND
ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

(a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2304 and available for military construction projects inside
the United States as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real
property and carry out military construction projects for the
installations or locations inside the United States, and in
the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Air Force: Inside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Installation or Location Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona......................................... Luke Air Force Base........................ $26,900,000
California...................................... Beale Air Force Base....................... $62,000,000
Florida......................................... Tyndall Air Force Base..................... $9,100,000
Guam............................................ Joint Region Marianas...................... $176,230,000
Hawaii.......................................... Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam............. $4,800,000
Kansas.......................................... McConnell Air Force Base................... $219,120,000
Kentucky........................................ Fort Campbell, Kentucky.................... $8,000,000
Mariana Islands................................. Saipan..................................... $29,300,000
Maryland........................................ Fort Meade................................. $358,000,000
Joint Base Andrews......................... $30,000,000
Missouri........................................ Whiteman Air Force Base.................... $5,900,000
North Dakota.................................... Minot Air Force Base....................... $23,830,000
New Mexico...................................... Cannon Air Force Base...................... $34,100,000
Holloman Air Force Base.................... $2,250,000
Kirtland Air Force Base.................... $30,500,000
Nevada.......................................... Nellis Air Force Base...................... $78,500,000
Oklahoma........................................ Altus Air Force Base....................... $30,850,000
Tinker Air Force Base...................... $8,600,000
Texas........................................... Fort Bliss................................. $3,350,000
Utah............................................ Hill Air Force Base........................ $32,000,000
Virginia........................................ Joint Base Langley-Eustis.................. $4,800,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2304 and available for military construction projects outside
the United States as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real
property and carry out military construction projects for the
installations or locations outside the United States, and in
the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Air Force: Outside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Country Installation Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greenland...................................... Thule AB....................................... $43,904,000
United Kingdom................................. RAF Lakenheath................................. $22,047,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2302. FAMILY HOUSING.

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization
of appropriations in section 2304 and available for military
family housing functions as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out
architectural and engineering services and construction
design activities with respect to the construction or
improvement of family housing units in an amount not to
exceed $4,267,000.

SEC. 2303. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS.

Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code,
and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization
of appropriations in section 2304 and available for military
family housing functions as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may improve
existing military family housing units in an amount not to
exceed $72,093,000.

SEC. 2304. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR FORCE.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military
construction, land acquisition, and military family housing
functions of the Department of the Air Force, as specified in
the funding table in section 4601.

SEC. 2305. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN
FISCAL YEAR 2013 PROJECT.

The table in section 2301(b) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public
Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2126) is amended in the item relating
to Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, for construction of a
hangar by striking ``$58,000,000'' in the amount column and
inserting ``$128,000,000''.

SEC. 2306. LIMITATION ON PROJECT AUTHORIZATION TO CARRY OUT
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2014 PROJECT.

The Secretary of the Air Force may not obligate or expend
any funds authorized in this title for the construction of a
maintenance facility, a hazardous cargo pad, or an airport
storage facility at Saipan, Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, until the Secretary certifies to Congress
that the Secretary will purchase an interest in the real
estate associated with these military construction projects.

SEC. 2307. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR
2011 PROJECT.

(a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
(division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4436), the
authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as
provided in section 2301 of that Act (124 Stat. 4444), shall
remain in effect until October 1, 2014, or the date of the
enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military
construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later.
(b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as
follows:

Air Force: Extension of 2011 Project Authorization
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Installation or Location Project Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bahrain............................... Southwest Asia........... North Apron Expansion....... $45,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page H3449]]

TITLE XXIV--DEFENSE AGENCIES MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Subtitle A--Defense Agency Authorizations

SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUCTION AND LAND
ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

(a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2403 and available for military construction projects inside
the United States as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real
property and carry out military construction projects for the
installations or locations inside the United States, and in
the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Defense Agencies: Inside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Installation or Location Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska.......................................... Clear Air Force Base....................... $17,204,000
Fort Greely................................ $82,000,000
California...................................... Brawley.................................... $23,095,000
Defense Distribution Depot-Tracy........... $37,554,000
Miramar.................................... $6,000,000
Colorado........................................ Fort Carson, Colorado...................... $22,282,000
Florida......................................... Hurlburt Field............................. $7,900,000
Jacksonville............................... $7,500,000
Panama City................................ $2,600,000
Tyndall Air Force Base..................... $9,500,000
Georgia......................................... Fort Benning............................... $43,335,000
Fort Stewart, Georgia...................... $44,504,000
Hunter Army Airfield....................... $13,500,000
Moody Air Force Base....................... $3,800,000
Hawaii.......................................... Ford Island................................ $2,615,000
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam............. $2,800,000
Kentucky........................................ Fort Campbell, Kentucky.................... $124,211,000
Fort Knox.................................. $303,023,000
Massachusetts................................... Hanscom Air Force Base..................... $36,213,000
Maryland........................................ Aberdeen Proving Ground.................... $210,000,000
Bethesda Naval Hospital.................... $66,800,000
North Carolina.................................. Camp Lejeune............................... $28,977,000
Fort Bragg................................. $172,065,000
North Dakota.................................... Minot Air Force Base....................... $6,400,000
New Jersey...................................... Joint Base Mcguire-Dix-Lakehurst........... $10,000,000
New Mexico...................................... Holloman Air Force Base.................... $81,400,000
Oklahoma........................................ Altus Air Force Base....................... $2,100,000
Tinker Air Force Base...................... $36,000,000
Pennsylvania.................................... Defense Distribution Depot New Cumberland.. $9,000,000
South Carolina.................................. Beaufort................................... $41,324,000
Tennessee....................................... Arnold Air Force Base...................... $2,200,000
Texas........................................... Joint Base San Antonio..................... $12,600,000
Virginia........................................ Defense Distribution Depot Richmond........ $87,000,000
Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek - $30,404,000
Story.....................................
Pentagon................................... $59,450,000
Quantico................................... $40,586,000
Washington...................................... Whidbey Island............................. $10,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2403 and available for military construction projects outside
the United States as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real
property and carry out military construction projects for the
installations or locations outside the United States, and in
the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Defense Agencies: Outside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Country Installation or Location Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bahrain Island.................................. Southwest Asia............................. $45,400,000
Belgium......................................... Brussels................................... $67,613,000
Germany......................................... Kaiserlautern Air Base..................... $49,907,000
Ramstein Air Base.......................... $98,762,000
Weisbaden.................................. $109,655,000
Japan........................................... Atsugi..................................... $4,100,000
Iwakuni.................................... $34,000,000
Kadena Air Base............................ $38,792,000
Torri Commo Station........................ $63,621,000
Yokosuka................................... $10,600,000
Korea, Republic Of.............................. Camp Walker................................ $52,164,000
United Kingdom.................................. Raf Mildenhall............................. $84,629,000

[[Page H3450]]

Royal Air Force Lakenheath................. $69,638,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(c) Unspecified Classified.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2403 and available for military construction projects at
unspecified worldwide locations as specified in the funding
table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire
real property and carry out military construction projects
for unspecified installations or locations in the amounts set
forth in the following table:

Defense Agencies: Classified
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Location or Installation Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Worldwide Classified........................... Classified Worldwide Locations................... $15,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2402. AUTHORIZED ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS.

(a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2403 and available for energy conservation projects inside
the United States as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy
conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United
States Code, for the installations or locations inside the
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following
table:

Energy Conservation Projects: Inside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Installation or Location Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama........................................ Anniston Army Depot......................... $2,700,000
California..................................... MCAS Miramar................................ $17,968,000
Parks DRTA.................................. $4,150,000
Florida........................................ NAS Jacksonville............................ $2,840,000
Hawaii......................................... Camp Smith.................................. $7,966,000
Hickam...................................... $3,100,000
Hickam...................................... $3,000,000
Indiana........................................ Mt. Home.................................... $2,630,000
Kansas......................................... Tokepka Readiness Center.................... $2,050,000
Massachusetts.................................. Devens...................................... $2,600,000
New York....................................... US Military Academy......................... $3,200,000
South Carolina................................. Shaw........................................ $2,500,000
Texas.......................................... NAS Corpus Christi.......................... $2,340,000
Sheppard.................................... $3,779,000
Laughlin.................................... $2,800,000
Utah........................................... Dugway Proving Ground....................... $9,966,000
Tooele Army Depot........................... $5,900,000
Tooele Army Depot........................... $5,500,000
Tooele Army Depot........................... $4,300,000
Virginia....................................... NSA Hampton Roads........................... $4,060,000
Pentagon.................................... $2,120,000
Various Locations.............................. Various Locations........................... $20,476,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2403 and available for energy conservation projects outside
the United States as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy
conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United
States Code, for the installations or locations outside the
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following
table:

Energy Conservation Projects: Outside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Country Installation or Location Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Italy.......................................... NAS Sigonella............................... $3,300,000
Japan.......................................... CFA Sasebo.................................. $14,766,000
Japan.......................................... Yokota...................................... $5,674,000
Germany........................................ Ramstein.................................... $2,140,000
Greenland...................................... Thule....................................... $5,175,000
Various Locations.............................. Various Locations........................... $3,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2403. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DEFENSE AGENCIES.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military
construction, land acquisition, and military family housing
functions of the Department of Defense (other than the
military departments), as specified in the funding table in
section 4601.

Subtitle B--Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations

SEC. 2411. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, CHEMICAL
DEMILITARIZATION CONSTRUCTION, DEFENSE-WIDE.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military
construction and land acquisition for chemical
demilitarization, as specified in the funding table in
section 4601.

TITLE XXV--NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY INVESTMENT
PROGRAM

SEC. 2501. AUTHORIZED NATO CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION
PROJECTS.

The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment
Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, United
States Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum of the amount
authorized to be appropriated for this purpose in section
2502 and the amount collected from the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization as a result of construction previously financed
by the United States.

SEC. 2502. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATO.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
years beginning after September 30, 2013, for contributions
by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10,
United States Code, for the share of the United States of the
cost of projects for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
Security Investment Program authorized by section 2501 as
specified in the funding table in section 4601.

[[Page H3451]]

TITLE XXVI--GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES

Subtitle A--Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations

SEC. 2601. AUTHORIZED ARMY NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUCTION AND
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of
appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National
Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real
property and carry out military construction projects for the
Army National Guard locations inside the United States, and
in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Army National Guard: Inside the United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Location Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama........................ Decatur............... $4,000,000
Arkansas....................... Fort Chaffee.......... $21,000,000
Florida........................ Pinellas Park......... $5,700,000
Illinois....................... Kankakee.............. $42,000,000
Massachusetts.................. Camp Edwards.......... $19,000,000
Michigan....................... Camp Grayling......... $17,000,000
Minnesota...................... Stillwater............ $17,000,000
Missouri....................... Macon................. $9,100,000
Whiteman AFB.......... $5,000,000
Mississippi.................... Camp Shelby........... $3,000,000
Pascagoula............ $4,500,000
New York....................... New York.............. $31,000,000
Ohio........................... Ravenna Army $5,200,000
Ammunition Plant.
Pennsylvania................... Fort Indiantown Gap... $40,000,000
Puerto Rico.................... Camp Santiago......... $5,600,000
South Carolina................. Greenville............ $26,000,000
Texas.......................... Fort Worth............ $14,270,000
Wyoming........................ Afton................. $10,200,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2602. AUTHORIZED ARMY RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND
ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of
appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National
Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real
property and carry out military construction projects for the
Army Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the
amounts, set forth in the following table:

Army Reserve
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Location Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
California..................... Camp Parks............ $17,500,000
Fort Hunter Liggett... $16,500,000
Maryland....................... Bowie................. $25,500,000
North Carolina................. Fort Bragg............ $24,500,000
New Jersey..................... Joint Base Mcguire-Dix- $36,200,000
Lakehurst.
New York....................... Bullville............. $14,500,000
Wisconsin...................... Fort Mccoy............ $23,400,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2603. AUTHORIZED NAVY RESERVE AND MARINE CORPS RESERVE
CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of
appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National
Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real
property and carry out military construction projects for the
Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve locations inside the
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following
table:

Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Location Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
California................... March Air Force Base.... $11,086,000
Missouri..................... Kansas City............. $15,020,000
Tennessee.................... Memphis................. $4,330,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2604. AUTHORIZED AIR NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUCTION AND
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization
of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the
National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table
in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire
real property and carry out military construction projects
for the Air National Guard locations inside the United
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

[[Page H3452]]

Air National Guard
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Location Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama........................................ Birmingham International Airport.............. $8,500,000
Indiana........................................ Hulman Regional Airport....................... $7,300,000
Montana........................................ Great Falls International Airport............. $22,000,000
New York....................................... Fort Drum, New York........................... $4,700,000
Ohio........................................... Springfield Beckley-Map....................... $7,200,000
Pennsylvania................................... Fort Indiantown Gap........................... $7,700,000
Rhode Island................................... Quonset State Airport......................... $6,000,000
Tennessee...................................... Mcghee-Tyson Airport.......................... $18,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2605. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND
ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization
of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the
National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table
in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire
real property and carry out military construction projects
for the Air Force Reserve locations inside the United States,
and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Air Force Reserve
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Location Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
California................... March Air Force Base.... $19,900,000
Florida...................... Homestead Air Reserve $9,800,000
Base.
Oklahoma..................... Tinker Air Force Base... $12,200,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2606. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATIONAL GUARD
AND RESERVE.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
years beginning after September 30, 2013, for the costs of
acquisition, architectural and engineering services, and
construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve Forces,
and for contributions therefor, under chapter 1803 of title
10, United States Code (including the cost of acquisition of
land for those facilities), as specified in the funding table
in section 4601.

Subtitle B--Other Matters

SEC. 2611. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN
FISCAL YEAR 2013 PROJECT.

In the case of the authorization contained in the table in
section 2603 of the Military Construction Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112-239; 126
Stat. 2135) for Fort Des Moines, Iowa, for construction of a
Joint Reserve Center at that location, the Secretary of the
Navy may, instead of constructing a new facility at Camp
Dodge, acquire up to approximately 20 acres to construct a
Joint Reserve Center and associated supporting facilities in
the greater Des Moines, Iowa, area using amounts appropriated
for the project pursuant to the authorization of
appropriations in section 2606 of such Act (126 Stat. 2136).

SEC. 2612. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR
2011 PROJECTS.

(a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
(division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4436), the
authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as
provided in sections 2601, 2602, and 2604 of that Act (124
Stat. 4452, 4453, 4454), shall remain in effect until October
1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing
funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015,
whichever is later.
(b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as
follows:

Extension of 2011 National Guard and Reserve Project Authorizations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Installation or Location Project Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Puerto Rice............................. Camp Santiago.............. Multi Purpose Machine Gun $9,200,000
Range.....................
Tennessee............................... Nashville International Intelligence Group and $5,500,000
Airport................... Remotely Piloted Aircraft
Remote Split Operations
Group.....................
Virginia................................ Fort Story................. Army Reserve Center........ $11,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TITLE XXVII--BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES

Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

SEC. 2701. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR BASE
REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES FUNDED
THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE
ACCOUNT.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
years beginning after September 30, 2013, for base
realignment and closure activities, including real property
acquisition and military construction projects, as authorized
by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part
A of title XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note)
and funded through the Department of Defense Base Closure
Account established by section 2906 of such Act (as amended
by section 2711 of the Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112-239;
126 Stat. 2140)), as specified in the funding table in
section 4601.

Subtitle B--Other Matters

SEC. 2711. PROHIBITION ON CONDUCTING ADDITIONAL BASE
REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE (BRAC) ROUND.

Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize an
additional Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round, and
none of the funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization
of appropriations contained in this Act may be used to
propose, plan for, or execute an additional BRAC round.

SEC. 2712. ELIMINATION OF QUARTERLY CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENT
REGARDING AVAILABILITY OF MILITARY HEALTH CARE
IN NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION.

Section 1674(c) of the Wounded Warrior Act (title XVI of
Public Law 110-181; 122 Stat. 483) is amended by striking
``on a quarterly basis''.

TITLE XXVIII--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS

Subtitle A--Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing
Changes

SEC. 2801. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT UNSPECIFIED
MINOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION.

(a) Increased Threshold for Application of Secretory
Approval and Congressional Notification Requirements.--
Subsection (b)(1) of section 2805 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by striking ``$750,000'' and inserting
``$1,000,000''.
(b) Increase in Maximum Amount of Operation and Maintenance
Funds Authorized to Be Used for Certain Projects.--Subsection
(c)(1)(B) of such section is amended by striking ``$750,000''
and inserting ``$1,000,000''.
(c) Annual Location Adjustment of Dollar Limitations.--Such
section is further amended by adding at the end the following
new subsection:

[[Page H3453]]

``(f) Adjustment of Dollar Limitations for Location.--Each
fiscal year, the Secretary concerned shall adjust the dollar
limitations specified in this section applicable to an
unspecified minor military construction project to reflect
the area construction cost index for military construction
projects published by the Department of Defense during the
prior fiscal year for the location of the project.''.

SEC. 2802. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENTS FOR LOCAL COMPARABILITY OF
ROOM PATTERNS AND FLOOR AREAS FOR MILITARY
FAMILY HOUSING AND SUBMISSION OF NET FLOOR AREA
INFORMATION.

(a) Repeal.--Section 2826 of title 10, United States Code,
is repealed.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of subchapter II of chapter 169 of such title is
amended by striking the item relating to section 2826.

SEC. 2803. REPEAL OF SEPARATE AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO LIMITED
PARTNERSHIPS WITH PRIVATE DEVELOPERS OF
HOUSING.

(a) Repeal.--
(1) In general.--Section 2837 of title 10, United States
Code, is repealed.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of subchapter II of chapter 169 of such title is
amended by striking the item relating to section 2837.
(b) Effect on Existing Contracts.--The repeal of section
2837 of title 10, United States Code, shall not affect the
validity or terms of any contract in connection with a
limited partnership under subsection (a) or a collateral
incentive agreement under subsection (b) of such section
entered into before the date of the enactment of this Act.
(c) Effect on Defense Housing Investment Account.--Any
unobligated amounts remaining in the Defense Housing
Investment Account on the date of the enactment of this Act
shall be transferred to the Department of Defense Family
Housing Improvement Fund. Amounts transferred shall be merged
with amounts in such fund and shall be available for the same
purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations,
as amounts in such fund.

SEC. 2804. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS TO REDUCE
VULNERABILITY OF STRUCTURES TO TERRORIST
ATTACK.

Section 2859(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by striking ``develop construction standards
designed'' and inserting ``develop construction standards
that, taking into consideration the probability of a
terrorist attack, are designed''.

SEC. 2805. TREATMENT OF PAYMENTS RECEIVED FOR PROVIDING
UTILITIES AND SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH USE
OF ALTERNATIVE AUTHORITY FOR ACQUISITION AND
IMPROVEMENT OF MILITARY HOUSING.

(a) Crediting of Payments.--Section 2872a(c)(2) of title
10, United States Code, is amended by striking ``from which
the cost of furnishing the utilities or services concerned
was paid'' and inserting ``available to the Secretary
concerned to furnish utilities or services under subsection
(a)''.
(b) Application of Amendment.--The amendment made by
subsection (a) shall apply only with respect to cash payments
received under subsection (c)(1) of section 2872a of title
10, United States Code, as reimbursement for utilities or
services furnished, after the date of the enactment of this
Act, under subsection (a) of such section.

SEC. 2806. REPEAL OF ADVANCE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR USE
OF MILITARY HOUSING INVESTMENT AUTHORITY.

Section 2875 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by
striking subsection (e).

SEC. 2807. ADDITIONAL ELEMENT FOR ANNUAL REPORT ON MILITARY
HOUSING PRIVATIZATION PROJECTS.

Section 2884(c)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by inserting before the period at the end the
following: ``, to specifically include any variances
associated with litigation costs''.

SEC. 2808. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY, LIMITED AUTHORITY TO USE
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FUNDS FOR
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN CERTAIN AREAS OUTSIDE
THE UNITED STATES.

Section 2808(h) of the Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108-136;
117 Stat. 1723), as most recently amended by section 2804 of
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2013 (division B of Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2149), is
further amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``September 30, 2013''
and inserting ``September 30, 2014''; and
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``fiscal year 2014'' and
inserting ``fiscal year 2015''.

Subtitle B--Real Property and Facilities Administration

SEC. 2811. CODIFICATION OF POLICIES AND REQUIREMENTS
REGARDING CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT OF UNITED
STATES MILITARY INSTALLATIONS IN FOREIGN
COUNTRIES.

(a) Redesignation of Existing Reporting Requirement.--
Section 2687a of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection
(a) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively;
(2) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of
subsection (b) as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C),
respectively, and in subparagraph (A), as redesignated, by
striking ``subsection (a)(2)'' and inserting ``paragraph
(1)(B)'';
(3) by striking ``(b) Report Elements.--A report under
subsection (a)'' and inserting ``(2) A report under paragraph
(1)''; and
(4) by striking ``(a) Annual Status Report.--''and
inserting ``(b) Annual Report on Status of Overseas Closures
and Realignments and Master Plans.--(1)''.
(b) Transfer of Provisions.--
(1) Sense of congress.--Subsection (a) of section 2921 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991
(Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note)--
(A) is transferred to section 2687a of title 10, United
States Code; and
(B) is inserted after the heading of such section as
subsection (a).
(2) Other provisions.--Subsections (c), (d), (f), and (g)
of such section 2921--
(A) are transferred to section 2687a of title 10, United
States Code;
(B) are inserted at the end of such section in that order;
and
(C) are redesignated as subsections (c), (d), (e), and (f)
of such section; respectively.
(3) Definitions.--Section 2687a of title 10, United States
Code, is further amended by adding after subsection (f), as
added and redesignated by paragraph (2), the following new
subsection:
``(g) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) The term `fair market value of the improvements'
means the value of improvements determined by the Secretary
of Defense on the basis of their highest use.
``(2) The term `improvements' includes new construction of
facilities and all additions, improvements, modifications, or
renovations made to existing facilities or to real property,
without regard to whether they were carried out with
appropriated or nonappropriated funds.''.
(c) Conforming Amendments.--Section 2687a of title 10,
United States Code, is further amended--
(1) in subsection (c), as transferred and redesignated by
subsection (b)(2)--
(A) in paragraph (1)--
(i) by striking ``Establishment of'';
(ii) by striking the first sentence; and
(iii) in the second sentence, by striking ``such account''
and inserting ``the Department of Defense Overseas Military
Facility Investment Recovery Account''; and
(B) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking ``Armed Forces'' and
inserting ``armed forces'';
(2) in subsection (d), as transferred and redesignated by
subsection (b)(2)--
(A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``(Public Law 100-526;
10 U.S.C. 2687 note)'' after ``Realignment Act''; and
(B) in paragraph (2)--
(i) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking ``section 2685 of
title 10, United States Code'' and inserting ``section 2685
of this title''; and
(ii) in paragraph (2), by striking ``Armed Forces'' both
places it appears and inserting ``armed forces''; and
(3) in subsection (f), as transferred and redesignated by
subsection (b)(2), by striking ``section 480 of title 10,
United States Code'' in paragraph (3) and inserting ``section
480 of this title 10''.
(d) Repeal of Superseded Provisions.--
(1) Repeal.--Section 2921 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101-510;
10 U.S.C. 2687 note) is repealed.
(2) Treatment of special account.--The repeal of such
section shall not affect the Department of Defense Overseas
Military Facility Investment Recovery Account established by
subsection (c)(1) of such section, amounts in such account,
or the continued use of such account as provided in section
2687a of title 10, United States Code, as amended by this
section.

Subtitle C--Energy Security

SEC. 2821. CONTINUATION OF LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR
LEADERSHIP IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN
(LEED) GOLD OR PLATINUM CERTIFICATION.

Section 2830(b)(1) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public
Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1695), as amended by section 2823(b) of
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2013 (division B of Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2153), is
amended by striking ``or 2013'' and inserting ``, 2013, or
2014''.

Subtitle D--Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military Realignment

SEC. 2831. CHANGE FROM PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR TO PREVIOUS
FISCAL YEAR FOR PERIOD COVERED BY ANNUAL REPORT
OF INTERAGENCY COORDINATION GROUP OF INSPECTORS
GENERAL FOR GUAM REALIGNMENT.

Section 2835(e)(1) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 10
U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended in the first sentence by
striking ``calendar year'' and inserting ``fiscal year''.

SEC. 2832. REPEAL OF CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS ON REALIGNMENT OF
MARINE CORPS FORCES IN ASIA-PACIFIC REGION.

Section 2832 of the Military Construction Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112-239; 126
Stat. 2155) is repealed.

Subtitle E--Land Conveyances

SEC. 2841. REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION, NAVAL BASE VENTURA
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

(a) Authority.--The Secretary of the Navy may acquire all
right, title, and interest in and to real property, including
improvements thereon, located at Naval Base Ventura County,
California, that was initially constructed under the former
section 2828(g) of title 10, United States Code (commonly
known as the ``Build to Lease program''), as added by section
801 of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1984
(Public Law 98-115; 97 Stat 782).

[[Page H3454]]

(b) Use.--Upon acquiring the real property under subsection
(a), the Secretary of the Navy may use the improvements as
provided in sections 2835 and 2835a of title 10, United
States Code.

SEC. 2842. LAND CONVEYANCE, FORMER OXNARD AIR FORCE BASE,
VENTURA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

(a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of the Navy may
convey, without consideration, to Ventura County, California
(in this section referred to as the ``County''), all right,
title, and interest of the United States in and to the real
property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of
former Oxnard Air Force Base for the purpose of permitting
the County to use the property for public purposes.
(b) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
(1) Payment required.--The Secretary of the Navy shall
require the County to cover costs (except costs for
environmental remediation of the property) to be incurred by
the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs
incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under
subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for
environmental documentation, and any other administrative
costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected
from the County in advance of the Secretary incurring the
actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs
actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the
conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to
the County.
(2) Treatment of amounts received.--Amounts received as
reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the
fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred
by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so
credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or
account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and
subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in
such fund or account.
(c) Description of Property.--The exact acreage and legal
description of the property to be conveyed under subsection
(a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the
Secretary of the Navy.
(d) Additional Terms.--The Secretary of the Navy may
require such additional terms and conditions in connection
with the conveyance as the Secretary considers appropriate to
protect the interests of the United States.

SEC. 2843. LAND CONVEYANCE, PHILADELPHIA NAVAL SHIPYARD,
PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA.

(a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of the Navy may
convey to the Philadelphia Regional Port Authority (in this
section referred to as the ``Port Authority'') all right,
title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel
of real property, including any improvements thereon,
consisting of approximately .595 acres located at the
Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The
Secretary may void any land use restrictions associated with
the property to be conveyed under this subsection.
(b) Consideration.--
(1) Amount and determination.--As consideration for the
conveyance under subsection (a), the Port Authority shall pay
to the Secretary of the Navy an amount that is not less than
the fair market value of the property conveyed, as determined
by the Secretary. The Secretary's determination of fair
market value shall be final. In lieu of all or a portion of
cash payment of consideration, the Secretary may accept in-
kind consideration.
(2) Treatment of cash consideration.--The Secretary shall
deposit any cash payment received under paragraph (1) in the
special account in the Treasury established for that
Secretary under subsection (e) of section 2667 of title 10,
United States Code. The entire amount deposited shall be
available for use in accordance with paragraph (1)(D) of such
subsection.
(c) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
(1) Payment required.--The Secretary of the Navy shall
require the Port Authority to reimburse the Secretary to
cover costs (except costs for environmental remediation of
the property) to be incurred by the Secretary, or to
reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary,
to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including
survey costs, costs related to environmental documentation,
and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance.
If amounts are collected in advance of the Secretary
incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds
the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the
conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to
the Port Authority.
(2) Treatment of amounts received.--Amounts received as
reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the
fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred
by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so
credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account
and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to
the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund
or account.
(d) Compliance With Environmental Laws.--Nothing in this
section shall be construed to affect or limit the application
of, or any obligation to comply with, any environmental law,
including the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et
seq.) and the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 6901 et
seq.).
(e) Description of Property.--The exact acreage and legal
description of the parcel of real property to be conveyed
under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey
satisfactory to the Secretary of the Navy.
(f) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary of the
Navy may require such additional terms and conditions in
connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the
Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of
the United States.

SEC. 2844. LAND CONVEYANCE, CAMP WILLIAMS, UTAH.

(a) Conveyance Required.--Not later than 120 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the
Interior, acting through the Bureau of Land Management, shall
convey, without consideration, to the State of Utah all
right, title, and interest of the United States in and to
certain lands comprising approximately 420 acres, as
generally depicted on a map entitled ``Proposed Camp Williams
Land Transfer'' and dated June 14, 2011, which are located
within the boundaries of the public lands currently withdrawn
for military use by the Utah National Guard and known as Camp
Williams, Utah, for the purpose of permitting the Utah
National Guard to use the conveyed land as provided in
subsection (c).
(b) Supersedence of Executive Order.--Executive Order No.
1922 of April 24, 1914, as amended by section 907 of the Camp
W.G. Williams Land Exchange Act of 1989 (title IX of Public
Law 101-628; 104 Stat. 4501), is hereby superseded, only
insofar as it affects the lands identified for conveyance to
the State of Utah under subsection (a).
(c) Reversionary Interest.--The lands conveyed to the State
of Utah under subsection (a) shall revert to the United
States if the Secretary of Defense determines that the land,
or any portion thereof, is sold or attempted to be sold, or
that the land, or any portion thereof, is used for non-
National Guard or non-national defense purposes.
(d) Hazardous Materials.--With respect to any portion of
the land conveyed under subsection (a) that the Secretary of
Defense determines is subject to reversion under subsection
(c), if the Secretary of Defense also determines that the
portion of the conveyed land contains hazardous materials,
the State of Utah shall pay the United States an amount equal
to the fair market value of that portion of the land, and the
reversionary interest shall not apply to that portion of the
land.

SEC. 2845. CONVEYANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD RADAR SITE, FRANCIS
PEAK, WASATCH MOUNTAINS, UTAH.

(a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of the Air Force
may convey, without consideration, to the State of Utah (in
this section referred to as the ``State''), all right, title,
and interest of the United States in and to the structures,
including equipment and any other personal property related
thereto, comprising the Air National Guard radar site located
on Francis Peak, Utah, for the purpose of permitting the
State to use the structures to support emergency public
safety communications, including 911 emergency response
service for Northern Utah.
(b) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
(1) Payment required.--The Secretary of the Air Force may
require the State to cover costs to be incurred by the
Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred
by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under
subsection (a), including survey costs, costs related to
environmental documentation, and other administrative costs
related to the conveyance. If amounts paid to the Secretary
in advance exceed the costs actually incurred by the
Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall
refund the excess amount to the State.
(2) Treatment of amounts received.--Amounts received as
reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the
fund or account that was used to cover the costs incurred by
the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so
credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or
account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and
subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in
such fund or account.
(c) Description of Property.--The exact inventory of
equipment and other personal property to be conveyed under
subsection (a) shall be determined by the Secretary of the
Air Force.
(d) Time of Conveyance.--The conveyance under this section
shall occur as soon as practicable after the date of the
enactment of this Act. Until such time as the conveyance
occurs, the Secretary of the Air Force shall take no action
with regard to the structures described in subsection (a)
that will result in the likely disruption of emergency
communications by the State and local authorities.
(e) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary of the
Air Force may require such additional terms and conditions in
connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the
Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of
the United States.
(f) Continuation of Land Use Permit.--The conveyance of the
structures under subsection (a) shall not affect the validity
and continued applicability of the land use permit, in effect
on the date of the enactment of this Act, that was issued by
the Forest Service for placement and use of the structures.
(g) Duration of Authority.--The authority to make a
conveyance under this section shall expire on the later of--
(1) September 30, 2014; or
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds
for military construction for fiscal year 2015.

SEC. 2846. LAND CONVEYANCE, FORMER FORT MONROE, HAMPTON,
VIRGINIA.

(a) Sense of Congress Regarding Need for Conveyance.--It is
the sense of Congress that--
(1) the historic features of former Fort Monroe in Hampton,
Virginia, are being degraded because of the lack of
Department of the Army facility sustainment associated with
the former Fort Monroe; and
(2) it is in the best interest of the Secretary of the Army
and the Commonwealth of Virginia (in this section referred to
as the ``Commonwealth'') to expeditiously convey, consistent
with the Fort Monroe Reuse Plan and the Programmatic

[[Page H3455]]

Agreement dated April 27, 2009, certain portions of former
Fort Monroe to the Commonwealth.
(b) Conveyance Authorized.--Pursuant to 2905(b)(4) of the
Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of
title XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note), the
Secretary of the Army shall convey to the Commonwealth all
right, title, and interest of the United States in and to
approximately 70.431 acres of real property at former Fort
Monroe depicted as areas 4-1 and 4-2 on the map titled ``Plat
Showing 8 Parcels of Land Totaling +/-564.519 Acres Situated
on Fort Monroe, Virginia, Boundary Survey'', prepared by the
Norfolk District, Army Corps of Engineers, and dated August
17, 2009 (in this section referred to as the ``Map'').
(c) Timing of Conveyance.--The Secretary of the Army shall
exercise the authority provided by subsection (b) only
concurrent, as near in time as possible, with the reversion
to the Commonwealth of approximately 371.77 acres of property
depicted as areas 3 and 5 on the Map.
(d) Conditions of Conveyance.--As a condition of the
conveyance of real property under subsection (b)--
(1) the Commonwealth shall enter into an agreement with the
Secretary of the Army to share equally with the United
States, after conveyance of property areas 4-1 and 4-2, the
net proceeds derived from any subsequent conveyance of these
parcels to third-party buyers or from any lease of areas 4-1
or 4-2, payable over a period of seven years following the
conveyance by the Secretary;
(2) the parties shall agree to transfer authority over the
utility systems at Fort Monroe to the Commonwealth in return
for receiving service on the same relative terms and
conditions that the Department of the Army provided service
during its ownership of the utilities; and
(3) the Secretary will resolve all issues with Dominion
Virginia Power and will be responsible for maintaining
electrical service in its name until such resolution has been
obtained.
(e) Savings Provision.--Nothing in this section shall be
construed to affect or limit the application of, or any
obligation to comply with, any environmental law, including
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.) and the Solid
Waste Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.).
(f) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The parties may agree
to such additional terms and conditions in connection with
the conveyance under this section as the parties consider
appropriate to protect their respective interests.

SEC. 2847. LAND CONVEYANCE, MIFFLIN COUNTY UNITED STATES ARMY
RESERVE CENTER, LEWISTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA.

(a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of the Army may
convey, without consideration, to Derry Township,
Pennsylvania (in this section referred to as the
``Township''), all right, title, and interest of the United
States in and to a parcel of real property, including any
improvements thereon and improvements related thereto,
consisting of approximately 4.52 acres and containing the
Mifflin County Army Reserve Center located at 73 Reserve
Lane, Lewistown, Pennsylvania (parcel number 16,01-0113J),
for the purpose of permitting the Township to use the parcel
for a regional police headquarters or other public purposes.
(b) Interim Lease.--Until such time as the real property
described in subsection (a) is conveyed to the Township, the
Secretary may lease the property to the Township.
(c) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
(1) Payment required.--The Secretary shall require the
Township to cover costs (except costs for environmental
remediation of the property) to be incurred by the Secretary,
or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the
Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a),
including survey costs, costs for environmental
documentation, and any other administrative costs related to
the conveyance. If amounts are collected from the Township in
advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the
amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the
Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall
refund the excess amount to the Township.
(2) Treatment of amounts received.--Amounts received as
reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the
fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred
by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so
credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or
account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and
subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in
such fund or account.
(d) Conditions of Conveyance.--The conveyance of the real
property under subsection (a) shall be subject to the
condition that the Township not use any Federal funds to
cover--
(1) any portion of the conveyance costs required by
subsection (c) to be paid by the Township; or
(2) to cover the costs for the design or construction of
any facility on the property.
(e) Description of Property.--The exact acreage and legal
description of the property to be conveyed under subsection
(a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the
Secretary.
(f) Additional Terms.--The Secretary may require such
additional terms and conditions in connection with the
conveyance under this section as the Secretary considers
appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.

Subtitle F--Other Matters

SEC. 2861. REPEAL OF ANNUAL ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT COMMITTEE
REPORTING REQUIREMENT.

Subsection (d) of section 4004 of the Defense Economic
Adjustment, Diversification, Conversion, and Stabilization
Act of 1990 (division D of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2391
note), as amended by section 4212(b) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 102-484;
106 Stat. 2664), is further amended--
(1) by inserting ``and'' at the end of paragraph (1);
(2) by striking ``; and'' at the end of paragraph (2) and
inserting a period; and
(3) by striking paragraph (3).

SEC. 2862. REDESIGNATION OF THE ASIA-PACIFIC CENTER FOR
SECURITY STUDIES AS THE DANIEL K. INOUYE ASIA-
PACIFIC CENTER FOR SECURITY STUDIES.

(a) Redesignation.--The Department of Defense regional
center for security studies known as the Asia-Pacific Center
for Security Studies is hereby renamed the ``Daniel K. Inouye
Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies''.
(b) Conforming Amendments.--
(1) Reference to regional centers for strategic studies.--
Section 184(b)(2)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by striking ``Asia-Pacific Center for Security
Studies'' and inserting ``Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific
Center for Security Studies''.
(2) Acceptance of gifts and donations.--Section
2611(a)(2)(B) of such title is amended by striking ``Asia-
Pacific Center for Security Studies'' and inserting ``Daniel
K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies''.
(c) References.--Any reference to the Department of Defense
Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies in any law,
regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the
United States shall be deemed to be a reference to the Daniel
K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies.

SEC. 2863. REDESIGNATION OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NURSING AT
THE UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH
SCIENCES AS THE DANIEL K. INOUYE GRADUATE
SCHOOL OF NURSING.

(a) Redesignation.--The Graduate School of Nursing at the
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences is
hereby renamed the ``Daniel K. Inouye Graduate School of
Nursing''.
(b) References.--Any reference to the Graduate School of
Nursing at the Uniformed Services University of the Health
Sciences in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or
other paper of the United States shall be deemed to be a
reference to the Daniel K. Inouye Graduate School of Nursing.

SEC. 2864. RENAMING SITE OF THE DAYTON AVIATION HERITAGE
NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK, OHIO.

Section 101(b)(5) of the Dayton Aviation Heritage
Preservation Act of 1992 (16 U.S.C. 410ww(b)(5)) is amended
by striking ``Aviation Center'' and inserting ``National
Museum''.

SEC. 2865. DESIGNATION OF DISTINGUISHED FLYING CROSS NATIONAL
MEMORIAL IN RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) The most reliable statistics regarding the number of
members of the Armed Forces who have been awarded the
Distinguished Flying Cross indicate that 126,318 members of
the Armed Forces received the medal during World War II,
approximately 21,000 members received the medal during the
Korean conflict, and 21,647 members received the medal during
the Vietnam War. Since the end of the Vietnam War, more than
203 Armed Forces members have received the medal in times of
conflict.
(2) The National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis,
Missouri, burned down in 1973, and thus many more recipients
of the Distinguished Flying Cross may be undocumented.
Currently, the Department of Defense continues to locate and
identify members of the Armed Forces who have received the
medal and are undocumented.
(3) The United States currently lacks a national memorial
dedicated to the bravery and sacrifice of those members of
the Armed Forces who have distinguished themselves by heroic
deeds performed in aerial flight.
(4) An appropriate memorial to current and former members
of the Armed Forces is under construction at March Field Air
Museum in Riverside, California.
(5) This memorial will honor all those members of the Armed
Forces who have distinguished themselves in aerial flight,
whether documentation of such members who earned the
Distinguished Flying Cross exists or not.
(b) Designation.--The memorial to members of the Armed
Forces who have been awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross,
located at March Field Air Museum in Riverside, California,
is hereby designated as the Distinguished Flying Cross
National Memorial.
(c) Effect of Designation.--The national memorial
designated by this section is not a unit of the National Park
System, and the designation of the national memorial shall
not be construed to require or permit Federal funds to be
expended for any purpose related to the national memorial.

TITLE XXIX--OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

SEC. 2901. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION
PROJECT.

(a) Outside the United States.--The Secretary of the Army
may acquire real property and carry out the military
construction project for the installation outside the United
States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table:

[[Page H3456]]

Army: Outside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Country Installation Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cuba........................................... Guantanamo Bay................................. $247,400,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Use of Unobligated Prior-year Military Construction
Funds.--To carry out the military construction project set
forth in the table in subsection (a), the Secretary of
Defense may make available to the Secretary of the Army
available, unobligated military construction funds
appropriated for a fiscal year before fiscal year 2014.
(c) Congressional Notification.--The Secretary of the Army
shall provide information in accordance with section 2851(c)
of title 10, United States Code, regarding the military
construction project set forth in the table in subsection
(a). If it becomes necessary to exceed the estimated project
cost, the Secretary shall utilize the authority provided by
section 2853 of such title regarding authorized cost and
scope of work variations.
(d) Briefing on Infrastructure to Support Joint Task Force,
Guantanamo.--
(1) Briefing required.--The Secretary of Defense shall
brief the congressional defense committees on each of the
following:
(A) A description of each of the following costs, broken
down by fiscal year, for each of fiscal years 2002 through
2013:
(i) The costs of constructing the permanent and temporary
infrastructure to support the detention operations at such
Naval Station.
(ii) The costs of facility repair, sustainment,
maintenance, and operation of all infrastructure supporting
the detention operations at such Naval Station.
(iii) The costs of military personnel, civilian personnel,
and contractors associated with the detention operations at
such Naval Station.
(iv) The costs of operation and maintenance, shown for each
military department and account, associated with carrying out
military commissions for individuals detained at such Naval
Station.
(v) The costs associated with the Office of the Deputy
Assistant Secretary of Defense (Rule of Law and Detainee
Policy), the Periodic Review Services, and studies and task
forces funded by the Department of Defense that relate to the
detention operations at such Naval Station.
(vi) Any other costs associated with supporting the
detention operations at such Naval Station.
(B) A master plan for the continuation of detention
operations by Joint Task Force Guantanamo, at United States
Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, during the time period
beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending
on the date of the 66th birthday of the youngest individual
who is detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo
Bay, Cuba, on the date of the enactment of this Act,
including--
(i) a description of any infrastructure projects that the
Secretary determines are required for the continuation of
such detention operations, including new requirements and
replacement of existing infrastructure;
(ii) an estimate of the total military personnel, civilian
personnel, and contractor costs associated with the
continuation of such detention operations;
(iii) an estimate of the total operation and maintenance
costs associated with the continuation of such detention
operations;
(iv) an estimate of the total costs associated with
carrying out military commissions for individuals detained at
such Naval Station; and
(v) an estimate of any other costs associated with the
continuation of such detention operations.
(C) A cost estimate, itemized by construction project, of
the infrastructure investments identified in the master plan
described in subparagraph (B).
(D) A detailed estimate of the annual costs projected to
repair, sustain, and maintain the facilities that are in use
by Joint Task Force, Guantanamo, as of the date of the
enactment of this Act, or are identified in the master plan
described in subparagraph (B).
(2) Presidential plan.--Not later than 120 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit
to the congressional defense committees a plan describing
each of the following:
(A) The locations to which the President seeks to transfer
individuals detained at Guantanamo who have been identified
for continued detention or prosecution.
(B) The individuals detained at Guantanamo who the
President seeks to transfer to overseas locations, the
overseas locations to which the President seeks to transfer
such individuals, and the conditions under which the
President would transfer such individuals to such locations.
(C) The proposal of the President for the detention and
treatment of individuals captured overseas in the future who
are suspected of being terrorists.
(D) The proposal of the President regarding the disposition
of the individuals detained at the detention facility at
Parwan, Afghanistan, who have been identified as enduring
security threats to the United States.
(E) For any location in the United States to which the
President seeks to transfer such an individual, estimates of
each of the following costs:
(i) The costs of constructing infrastructure to support
detention operations or prosecution at such location.
(ii) The costs of facility repair, sustainment,
maintenance, and operation of all infrastructure supporting
detention operations or prosecution at such location.
(iii) The costs of military personnel, civilian personnel,
and contractors associated with the detention operations or
prosecution at such location, including any costs likely to
be incurred by other Federal departments or agencies or State
or local governments.
(iv) Any other costs associated with supporting the
detention operations or prosecution at such location.

TITLE XXX--MILITARY LAND TRANSFERS AND WITHDRAWALS TO SUPPORT READINESS
AND SECURITY

Subtitle A--Limestone Hills Training Area, Montana

SEC. 3001. WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION OF PUBLIC LANDS FOR
LIMESTONE HILLS TRAINING AREA, MONTANA.

(a) Withdrawal.--Subject to valid existing rights and
except as provided in this subtitle, the public lands and
interests in lands described in subsection (c), and all other
areas within the boundaries of such lands as depicted on the
map provided for by subsection (d) that may become subject to
the operation of the public land laws, are hereby withdrawn
from all forms of appropriation under the public land laws,
including the mining laws and the mineral leasing and
geothermal leasing laws.
(b) Reservation; Purpose.--Subject to the limitations and
restrictions contained in section 3003, the public lands
withdrawn by subsection (a) are reserved for use by the
Secretary of the Army for the following purposes:
(1) The conduct of training for active and reserve
components of the Armed Forces.
(2) The construction, operation, and maintenance of
organizational support and maintenance facilities for
component units conducting training.
(3) The conduct of training by the Montana Department of
Military Affairs, except that any such use may not interfere
with purposes specified in paragraphs (1) and (2).
(4) The conduct of training by State and local law
enforcement agencies, civil defense organizations, and public
education institutions, except that any such use may not
interfere with military training activities.
(5) Other defense-related purposes consistent with the
purposes specified in the preceding paragraphs.
(c) Land Description.--The public lands and interests in
lands withdrawn and reserved by this section comprise
approximately 18,644 acres in Broadwater County, Montana, as
generally depicted as ``Proposed Land Withdrawal'' on the map
titled ``Limestone Hills Training Area Land Withdrawal'',
dated April 10, 2013.
(d) Legal Description and Map.--
(1) In general.--As soon as practicable after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior
shall publish in the Federal Register a legal description of
the public land withdrawn under subsection (a) and a copy of
a map depicting the legal description of the withdrawn land.
(2) Force of law.--The legal description and map published
under paragraph (1) shall have the same force and effect as
if included in this Act, except that the Secretary of the
Interior may correct errors in the legal description.
(3) Reimbursement of costs.--The Secretary of the Army
shall reimburse the Secretary of the Interior for any costs
incurred by the Secretary of the Interior in implementing
this subsection.
(e) Indian Tribes.--Nothing in this subtitle shall be
construed as altering any rights reserved for an Indian tribe
for tribal use of lands within the military land withdrawal
by treaty or Federal law. The Secretary of the Army shall
consult with any Indian tribes in the vicinity of the
military land withdrawal before taking action within the
military land withdrawal affecting tribal rights or cultural
resources protected by treaty or Federal law.

SEC. 3002. MANAGEMENT OF WITHDRAWN AND RESERVED LANDS.

During the period of the withdrawal and reservation
specified in section 3005, the Secretary of the Army shall
manage the public lands withdrawn by section 3001 for the
purposes specified in subsection (b) of such section, subject
to the limitations and restrictions contained in section
3003.

SEC. 3003. SPECIAL RULES GOVERNING MINERALS MANAGEMENT.

(a) Indian Creek Mine.--
(1) In general.--Of the lands withdrawn by section 3001,
locatable mineral activities in the approved Indian Creek
Mine plan of operations, MTM-78300, shall be regulated
pursuant to subparts 3715 and 3809 of title 43, Code of
Federal Regulations. Of the lands withdrawn by section 3001,
the land area subject to the approved plan of operations
shall permanently remain open to the amendment or relocation
of mining claims (or both) under the Act of May 10, 1872
(commonly known as the General Mining Act of 1872; 30 U.S.C.
22 et seq.) to the extent necessary to preserve the mining
operations described in the approved plan of operations.
(2) Restrictions on secretary of the army.--The Secretary
of the Army shall make no determination that the disposition
of or exploration for minerals as provided for in the
approved plan of operations is inconsistent with the defense-
related uses of the lands covered by the military land
withdrawal. The coordination of such disposition of and
exploration for minerals with defense-related uses of such
lands

[[Page H3457]]

shall be determined pursuant to procedures in an agreement
provided for under subsection (c).
(b) Removal of Unexploded Ordnance on Lands To Be Mined.--
(1) Removal activities.--Subject to the availability of
funds appropriated for such purpose, the Secretary of the
Army shall remove unexploded ordnance on lands withdrawn by
section 3001 that are subject to mining under subsection (a),
consistent with applicable Federal and State law. The
Secretary of the Army may engage in such removal of
unexploded ordnance in phases to accommodate the development
of the Indian Creek Mine pursuant to subsection (a).
(2) Report on removal activities.--The Secretary of the
Army shall annually submit to the Secretary of the Interior a
report regarding the unexploded ordnance removal activities
for the previous fiscal year performed pursuant to this
subsection. The report shall include--
(A) the amounts of funding expended for unexploded ordnance
removal on the lands withdrawn by section 3001; and
(B) the identification of the lands cleared of unexploded
ordnance and approved for mining activities by the Secretary
of the Interior.
(c) Implementation Agreement for Mining Activities.--The
Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Army shall
enter into an agreement to implement this section with regard
to coordination of defense-related uses and mining and the
ongoing removal of unexploded ordnance. The duration of the
agreement shall be the same as the period of the withdrawal
under section 3001, but may be amended from time to time. The
agreement shall provide the following:
(1) That Graymont Western US, Inc., or any successor or
assign of the approved Indian Creek Mine mining plan of
operations, MTM-78300, is invited to be a party to the
agreement.
(2) Provisions regarding the day-to-day joint-use of the
Limestone Hills Training Area.
(3) Provisions addressing when military and other
authorized uses of the withdrawn lands will occur.
(4) Provisions regarding when and where military use or
training with explosive material will occur.
(5) Provisions regarding the scheduling of training
activities conducted within the withdrawn area that restrict
mining activities and procedures for deconfliction with
mining operations, including parameters for notification and
sanction of anticipated changes to the schedule.
(6) Provisions regarding liability and compensation for
damages or injury caused by mining or military training
activities.
(7) Provisions for periodic review of the agreement for its
adequacy, effectiveness, and need for revision.
(8) Procedures for access through mining operations covered
by this section to training areas within the boundaries of
the Limestone Hills Training Area.
(9) Procedures for scheduling of the removal of unexploded
ordnance.
(d) Existing Memorandum of Agreement.--Until such time as
the agreement required under subsection (c) becomes
effective, the compatible joint use of the lands withdrawn
and reserved by section 3001 shall be governed, to the extent
compatible, by the terms of the 2005 Memorandum of Agreement
among the Montana Army National Guard, Graymont Western US
Inc. and the Bureau of Land Management.

SEC. 3004. GRAZING.

(a) Issuance and Administration of Permits and Leases.--The
issuance and administration of grazing permits and leases,
including their renewal, on the public lands withdrawn by
section 3001 shall be managed by the Secretary of the
Interior consistent with all applicable laws, regulations,
and policies of the Secretary of the Interior relating to
such permits and leases.
(b) Safety Requirements.--With respect to any grazing
permit or lease issued after the date of the enactment of
this Act for lands withdrawn by section 3001, the Secretary
of the Interior and the Secretary of the Army shall jointly
establish procedures that are consistent with Department of
the Army explosive and range safety standards and that
provide for the safe use of any such lands.
(c) Assignment.--The Secretary of the Interior may, with
the agreement of the Secretary of the Army, assign the
authority to issue and to administer grazing permits and
leases to the Secretary of the Army, except that such an
assignment may not include the authority to discontinue
grazing on the lands withdrawn by section 3001.

SEC. 3005. DURATION OF WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION.

The military land withdrawal made by section 3001 shall
terminate on March 31, 2039.

SEC. 3006. PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES.

The lands withdrawn by section 3001 shall remain eligible
as entitlement land under section 6901 of title 31, United
States Code.

SEC. 3007. HUNTING, FISHING AND TRAPPING.

All hunting, fishing and trapping on the lands withdrawn by
section 3001 shall be conducted in accordance with section
2671 of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 3008. WATER RIGHTS.

(a) Water Rights.--Nothing in this subtitle shall be
construed--
(1) to establish a reservation in favor of the United
States with respect to any water or water right on lands
withdrawn by section 3001; or
(2) to authorize the appropriation of water on lands
withdrawn by section 3001, except in accordance with
applicable State law.
(b) Effect on Previously Acquired or Reserved Water
Rights.--This section shall not be construed to affect any
water rights acquired or reserved by the United States before
the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 3009. BRUSH AND RANGE FIRE PREVENTION AND SUPPRESSION.

(a) Required Activities.--The Secretary of the Army shall,
consistent with any applicable land management plan, take
necessary precautions to prevent, and actions to suppress,
brush and range fires occurring as a result of military
activities on the lands withdrawn and reserved by section
3001, including fires outside those lands that spread from
the withdrawn land and which occurred as a result of such
activities.
(b) Cooperation of Secretary of the Interior.--At the
request of the Secretary of the Army, the Secretary of the
Interior shall provide assistance in the suppression of such
fires and shall be reimbursed for such assistance by the
Secretary of the Army. Notwithstanding section 2215 of title
10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Army may
transfer to the Secretary of the Interior, in advance, funds
to reimburse the costs of the Department of the Interior in
providing such assistance.

SEC. 3010. ON-GOING DECONTAMINATION.

During the withdrawal and reservation authorized by section
3001, the Secretary of the Army shall maintain, to the extent
funds are available for such purpose, a program of
decontamination of contamination caused by defense-related
uses on such lands consistent with applicable Federal and
State law. The Secretary of Defense shall include a
description of such decontamination activities in the annual
report required by section 2711 of title 10, United States
Code.

SEC. 3011. APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF A WITHDRAWAL AND
RESERVATION.

(a) Notice.--To the extent practicable, no later than five
years before the termination of the withdrawal and
reservation made by section 3001, the Secretary of the Army
shall notify the Secretary of the Interior whether the
Secretary of the Army will have a continuing defense-related
need for any of the lands withdrawn and reserved by section
3001 after the termination date of such withdrawal and
reservation. The Secretary of the Army shall provide a copy
of the notice to the Committee on Armed Services and the
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Natural
Resources of the House of Representatives.
(b) Filing for Extension.--If the Secretary of the Army
concludes that there will be a continuing defense-related
need for any of the withdrawn and reserved lands after the
termination date, the Secretary of the Army shall file an
application for extension of the withdrawal and reservation
of such needed lands in accordance with the regulations and
procedures of the Department of the Interior applicable to
the extension of withdrawals and reservations.

SEC. 3012. LIMITATION ON SUBSEQUENT AVAILABILITY OF LANDS FOR
APPROPRIATION.

At the time of termination of a withdrawal and reservation
made by section 3001, the previously withdrawn lands shall
not be open to any form of appropriation under the public
land laws, including the mining laws and the mineral leasing
and geothermal leasing laws, until the Secretary of the
Interior publishes in the Federal Register an appropriate
order specifying the date upon which such lands shall be
restored to the public domain and opened for such purposes.

SEC. 3013. RELINQUISHMENT.

(a) Notice of Intention to Relinquish.--If, during the
period of withdrawal and reservation under section 3001, the
Secretary of the Army decides to relinquish any or all of the
lands withdrawn and reserved, the Secretary of the Army shall
file a notice of intention to relinquish with the Secretary
of the Interior.
(b) Determination of Contamination.--As a part of the
notice under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Army shall
include a written determination concerning whether and to
what extent the lands that are to be relinquished are
contaminated with explosive materials or toxic or hazardous
substances.
(c) Public Notice.--The Secretary of the Interior shall
publish in the Federal Register the notice of intention to
relinquish, including the determination concerning the
contaminated state of the lands.
(d) Decontamination of Lands to Be Relinquished.--
(1) Conditions requiring decontamination.--If land subject
of a notice of intention to relinquish pursuant to subsection
(a) is contaminated, and the Secretary of the Interior, in
consultation with the Secretary of the Army, determines that
decontamination is practicable and economically feasible
(taking into consideration the potential future use and value
of the land) and that, upon decontamination, the land could
be opened to operation of some or all of the public land
laws, including the mining laws and the mineral leasing and
geothermal leasing laws, the Secretary of the Army shall
decontaminate the land to the extent that funds are
appropriated for such purpose.
(2) Discretion if conditions not met.--If the Secretary of
the Interior, after consultation with the Secretary of the
Army, concludes that decontamination of land subject of a
notice of intention to relinquish pursuant to subsection (a)
is not practicable or economically feasible, or that the land
cannot be decontaminated sufficiently to be opened to
operation of some or all of the public land laws, or if
Congress does not appropriate sufficient funds for the
decontamination of such land, the Secretary of the Interior
shall not be required to accept the land proposed for
relinquishment.
(3) Response.--If the Secretary of the Interior declines to
accept the lands that have been proposed for relinquishment
because of their contaminated state, or if at the expiration
of the

[[Page H3458]]

withdrawal and reservation made by section 3001 the Secretary
of the Interior determines that some of the lands withdrawn
and reserved are contaminated to an extent which prevents
opening such contaminated lands to operation of the public
land laws--
(A) the Secretary of the Army shall take appropriate steps
to warn the public of the contaminated state of such lands
and any risks associated with entry onto such lands;
(B) after the expiration of the withdrawal and reservation,
the Secretary of the Army shall undertake no activities on
such lands except in connection with decontamination of such
lands; and
(C) the Secretary of the Army shall report to the Secretary
of the Interior and to the Congress concerning the status of
such lands and all actions taken in furtherance of this
paragraph.
(e) Revocation Authority.--Upon deciding that it is in the
public interest to accept the lands proposed for
relinquishment pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary of
the Interior may order the revocation of the withdrawal and
reservation made by section 3001 as it applies to such lands.
The Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal
Register the revocation order, which shall--
(1) terminate the withdrawal and reservation;
(2) constitute official acceptance of the lands by the
Secretary of the Interior; and
(3) state the date upon which the lands will be opened to
the operation of some or all of the public land laws,
including the mining laws.
(f) Acceptance by Secretary of the Interior.--Nothing in
this section shall be construed to require the Secretary of
the Interior to accept the lands proposed for relinquishment
if the Secretary determines that such lands are not suitable
for return to the public domain. If the Secretary makes such
a determination, the Secretary shall provide notice of the
determination to Congress.

Subtitle B--White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico

SEC. 3021. TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION, WHITE
SANDS MISSILE RANGE, NEW MEXICO.

(a) Transfer Required.--Not later than September 30, 2014,
the Secretary of the Interior shall transfer to the
administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Army
certain public land administered by the Bureau of Land
Management in Dona Ana County, New Mexico, consisting of
approximately 5,100 acres depicted as ``Parcel 1'' on the map
titled ``White Sands Missile Range Land Reservation'' and
dated January 4, 2013.
(b) Use of Transferred Land.--Upon the receipt of the land
under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Army shall include
the land as part of White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico,
and authorize use of the land for military purposes.
(c) Legal Description and Map.--
(1) Preparation and publication.--The Secretary of the
Interior shall publish in the Federal Register a legal
description and map of the public land to be transferred
under subsection (a).
(2) Force of law.--The legal description and map filed
under paragraph (1) shall have the same force and effect as
if included in this Act, except that the Secretary of the
Interior may correct errors in the legal description.
(d) Reimbursement of Costs.--The transfer required by
subsection (a) shall be made without reimbursement, except
that the Secretary of the Army shall reimburse the Secretary
of the Interior for any costs incurred by the Secretary of
the Interior to prepare the legal description and map under
subsection (c).
(e) Treatment of Grazing Leases.--If a grazing permit or
lease exists on the date of the enactment of this Act for any
portion of the public land to be transferred under subsection
(a), the Secretary of the Interior shall transfer or relocate
the grazing allotments associated with the permit or lease to
other public land, acceptable to the permit or lease holder,
so that the grazing continues to have the same value to the
holder.

SEC. 3022. WATER RIGHTS.

(a) Water Rights.--Nothing in this subtitle shall be
construed--
(1) to establish a reservation in favor of the United
States with respect to any water or water right on lands
transferred by this subtitle; or
(2) to authorize the appropriation of water on lands
transferred by this subtitle except in accordance with
applicable State law.
(b) Effect on Previously Acquired or Reserved Water
Rights.--This section shall not be construed to affect any
water rights acquired or reserved by the United States before
the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 3023. WITHDRAWAL.

Subject to valid existing rights, the public land to be
transferred under section 3021 is withdrawn from all forms of
appropriation under the public land laws, including the
mining laws and geothermal leasing laws, so long as the lands
remain under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary
of the Army.

Subtitle C--Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California

SEC. 3031. TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION, NAVAL AIR
WEAPONS STATION CHINA LAKE, CALIFORNIA.

(a) Transfer Required.--Not later than September 30, 2014,
the Secretary of the Interior shall transfer to the
administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy
certain public land administered by the Bureau of Land
Management in Inyo, Kern, and San Bernardino Counties,
California, consisting of approximately 1,045,000 acres in
Inyo, Kern, and San Bernardino Counties, California, as
generally depicted on the map titled ``Naval Air Weapons
Station China Lake Withdrawal - Renewal'' and dated 2012.
(b) Use of Transferred Land.--Upon the receipt of the land
under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy shall include
the land as part of the Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake,
California, and authorize use of the land for military
purposes.
(c) Legal Description and Map.--
(1) Preparation and publication.--The Secretary of the
Interior shall publish in the Federal Register a legal
description and map of the public land to be transferred
under subsection (a).
(2) Force of law.--The legal description and map filed
under paragraph (1) shall have the same force and effect as
if included in this Act, except that the Secretary of the
Interior may correct errors in the legal description and map.
(d) Reimbursement of Costs.--The transfer required by
subsection (a) shall be made without reimbursement, except
that the Secretary of the Navy shall reimburse the Secretary
of the Interior for any costs incurred by the Secretary of
the Interior to prepare the legal description and map under
subsection (c).

SEC. 3032. WATER RIGHTS.

SEC. 3033. WITHDRAWAL.

Subject to valid existing rights, the public land to be
transferred under section 3031 is withdrawn from all forms of
appropriation under the public land laws, including the
mining laws and geothermal leasing laws, so long as the lands
remain under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary
of the Navy.

Subtitle D--Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, California

SEC. 3041. TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION, CHOCOLATE
MOUNTAIN AERIAL GUNNERY RANGE, CALIFORNIA.

(a) Transfer Required.--The Secretary of the Interior shall
transfer to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary
of the Navy certain public land administered by the Bureau of
Land Management in Imperial and Riverside Counties,
California, consisting of approximately 226,711 acres, as
generally depicted on the map titled ``Chocolate Mountain
Aerial Gunnery Range Proposed-Withdrawal'' dated 1987
(revised July 1993), and identified as WESTDIV Drawing No. C-
102370, which was prepared by the Naval Facilities
Engineering Command of the Department of the Navy and is on
file with the California State Office of the Bureau of Land
Management.
(b) Valid Existing Rights.--The transfer of administrative
jurisdiction under subsection (a) shall be subject to any
valid existing rights, including any property, easements, or
improvements held by the Bureau of Reclamation and
appurtenant to the Coachella Canal. The Secretary of the Navy
shall provide for reasonable access by the Bureau of
Reclamation for inspection and maintenance purposes not
inconsistent with military training.
(c) Time for Conveyance.--The transfer of administrative
jurisdiction under subsection (a) shall occur pursuant to a
schedule agreed to by the Secretary of the Interior and the
Secretary of the Navy, but in no case later than the date of
the completion of the boundary realignment required by
section 3043.
(d) Map and Legal Description.--
(1) Preparation and publication.--The Secretary of the
Interior shall publish in the Federal Register a legal
description of the public land to be transferred under
subsection (a).
(2) Submission to congress.--The Secretary of the Interior
shall file with the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources
of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the
House of Representatives--
(A) a copy of the legal description prepared under
paragraph (1); and
(B) a map depicting the legal description of the
transferred public land.
(3) Availability for public inspection.--Copies of the
legal description and map filed under paragraph (2) shall be
available for public inspection in the appropriate offices
of--
(A) the Bureau of Land Management;
(B) the Office of the Commanding Officer, Marine Corps Air
Station Yuma, Arizona;
(C) the Office of the Commander, Navy Region Southwest; and
(D) the Office of the Secretary of the Navy.
(4) Force of law.--The legal description and map filed
under paragraph (2) shall have the same force and effect as
if included in this Act, except that the Secretary of the
Interior may correct clerical and typographical errors in the
legal description or map.
(5) Reimbursement of costs.--The transfer required by
subsection (a) shall be made without reimbursement, except
that the Secretary of the Navy shall reimburse the Secretary
of the Interior for any costs incurred by the Secretary of
the Interior to prepare the legal description and map under
this subsection.

SEC. 3042. MANAGEMENT AND USE OF TRANSFERRED LAND.

(a) Use of Transferred Land.--Upon the receipt of the land
under section 3041, the Secretary of the Navy shall
administer the land as the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery
Range, California, and continue to authorize use of the land
for military purposes.

[[Page H3459]]

(b) Protection of Desert Tortoise.--Nothing in the transfer
required by section 3041 shall affect the prior designation
of certain lands within the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery
Range as critical habitat for the desert tortoise (Gopherus
Agassizii).
(c) Withdrawal of Mineral Estate.--Subject to valid
existing rights, the mineral estate of the land to be
transferred under section 3041 are withdrawn from all forms
of appropriation under the public land laws, including the
mining laws and the mineral and geothermal leasing laws, for
as long as the land is under the administrative jurisdiction
of the Secretary of the Navy.
(d) Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan.--Not
later than one year after the transfer of the land under
section 3041, the Secretary of the Navy, in cooperation with
the Secretary of the Interior, shall prepare an integrated
natural resources management plan pursuant to the Sikes Act
(16 U.S.C. 670a et seq.) for the transferred land and for
land that, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, is
under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy
underlying the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range.

SEC. 3043. REALIGNMENT OF RANGE BOUNDARY AND RELATED TRANSFER
OF TITLE.

(a) Realignment; Purpose.--The Secretary of the Interior
and the Secretary of the Navy shall realign the boundary of
the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, as in effect on
the date of the enactment of this Act, to improve public
safety and management of the Range, consistent with the
following:
(1) The northwestern boundary of the Chocolate Mountain
Aerial Gunnery Range shall be realigned to the edge of the
Bradshaw Trail so that the Trail is entirely on public land
under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Interior.
(2) The centerline of the Bradshaw Trail shall be
delineated by the Secretary of the Interior in consultation
with the Secretary of the Navy, beginning at its western
terminus at Township 8 South, Range 12 East, Section 6
eastward to Township 8 South, Range 17 East, Section 32 where
it leaves the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range.
(b) Transfers Related to Realignment.--The Secretary of the
Interior and the Secretary of the Navy shall make such
transfers of administrative jurisdiction as may be necessary
to reflect the results of the boundary realignment carried
out pursuant to subsection (a).
(c) Applicability of National Environmental Policy Act of
1969.--The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) shall not apply to any transfer of land
made under subsection (b) or any decontamination actions
undertaken in connection with such a transfer.
(d) Decontamination.--The Secretary of the Navy shall
maintain, to the extent funds are available for such purpose
and consistent with applicable Federal and State law, a
program of decontamination of any contamination caused by
defense-related uses on land transferred under subsection
(b). The Secretary of Defense shall include a description of
such decontamination activities in the annual report required
by section 2711 of title 10, United States Code.
(e) Timeline.--The delineation of the Bradshaw Trail under
subsection (a) and any transfer of land under subsection (b)
shall occur pursuant to a schedule agreed to by the Secretary
of the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy, but in no case
later than two years after the date of the enactment of this
Act.

SEC. 3044. EFFECT OF TERMINATION OF MILITARY USE.

(a) Notice and Effect.--Upon a determination by the
Secretary of the Navy that there is no longer a military need
for all or portions of the land transferred under section
3041, the Secretary of the Navy shall notify the Secretary of
the Interior of such determination. Subject to subsections
(b), (c), and (d), the Secretary of the Navy shall transfer
the land subject to such a notice back to the administrative
jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior.
(b) Contamination.--Before transmitting a notice under
subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy shall prepare a
written determination concerning whether and to what extent
the land to be transferred are contaminated with explosive,
toxic, or other hazardous materials. A copy of the
determination shall be transmitted with the notice. Copies of
the notice and the determination shall be published in the
Federal Register.
(c) Decontamination.--The Secretary of the Navy shall
decontaminate any contaminated land that is the subject of a
notice under subsection (a) if--
(1) the Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the
Secretary of the Navy, determines that--
(A) decontamination is practicable and economically
feasible (taking into consideration the potential future use
and value of the land); and
(B) upon decontamination, the land could be opened to
operation of some or all of the public land laws, including
the mining laws; and
(2) funds are appropriated for such decontamination.
(d) Alternative.--The Secretary of the Interior is not
required to accept land proposed for transfer under
subsection (a) if the Secretary of the Interior is unable to
make the determinations under subsection (c)(1) or if
Congress does not appropriate a sufficient amount of funds
for the decontamination of the land.

SEC. 3045. TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF EXISTING WITHDRAWAL PERIOD.

Notwithstanding subsection (a) of section 806 of the
California Military Lands Withdrawal and Overflights Act of
1994 (title VIII of Public Law 103-433; 108 Stat. 4505), the
withdrawal and reservation of the land transferred under
section 3041 shall not terminate until the date on which the
land transfer required by section 3041 is executed.

SEC. 3046. WATER RIGHTS.

Subtitle E--Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms,
California

SEC. 3051. DESIGNATION OF JOHNSON VALLEY NATIONAL OFF-HIGHWAY
VEHICLE RECREATION AREA.

(a) Designation.--The approximately 188,000 acres of public
land and interests in land administered by the Secretary of
the Interior through the Bureau of Land Management in San
Bernardino County, California, as generally depicted as the
``Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area'' on the
map titled ``Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle
Recreation Area and Transfer of the Southern Study Area'' and
dated April 11, 2013, are hereby designated as the ``Johnson
Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area''.
(b) Recreational and Conservation Use.--The Johnson Valley
National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area is designated
for the following purposes:
(1) Public recreation (including off-highway vehicle use,
camping, and hiking) when the lands are not used for military
training as authorized by section 3052.
(2) Natural resources conservation.
(c) Withdrawal.--The public land and interests in land
included in the Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle
Recreation Area are hereby withdrawn from all forms of
appropriation under the public land laws, including the
mining laws and the mineral leasing and geothermal leasing
laws.
(d) Treatment of Existing Rights.--The designation of the
Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area
and the withdrawal of the public land and interests in land
included in the Recreation Area are subject to valid existing
rights.

SEC. 3052. LIMITED BIANNUAL MARINE CORPS AIR GROUND COMBAT
CENTER TWENTYNINE PALMS USE OF JOHNSON VALLEY
NATIONAL OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE RECREATION AREA.

(a) Use for Military Purposes Authorized.--Subject to
subsection (b), the Secretary of the Interior shall authorize
the Secretary of the Navy to utilize portions of Johnson
Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area twice in
each calendar year for up to a total of 60 days per year for
the following purposes:
(1) Sustained, combined arms, live-fire, and maneuver field
training for large-scale Marine air-ground task forces.
(2) Individual and unit live-fire training ranges.
(3) Equipment and tactics development.
(4) Other defense-related purposes consistent with the
purposes specified in the preceding paragraphs.
(b) Conditions on Military Use.--
(1) Consultation and public participation requirements.--
Before the Secretary of the Navy requests the two time
periods for military use of the Johnson Valley National Off-
Highway Vehicle Recreation Area in a calendar year, the
Secretary of the Navy shall--
(A) consult with the Secretary of the Interior regarding
the best times for military use to reduce interference with
or interruption of nonmilitary activities authorized by
section 3051(b); and
(B) provide for public awareness of and participation in
the selection process.
(2) Public notice.--The Secretary of the Navy shall provide
advance, wide-spread notice before any closure of public
lands for military use under this section.
(3) Public safety.--Military use of the Johnson Valley
National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area during the
biannual periods authorized by subsection (a) shall be
conducted in the presence of sufficient range safety officers
to ensure the safety of military personnel and civilians.
(4) Certain types of ordnance prohibited.--The Secretary of
the Navy shall prohibit the use of dud-producing ordnance in
any military training conducted under subsection (a).
(c) Implementing Agreement.--
(1) Agreement required; required terms.--The Secretary of
the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy shall enter into a
written agreement to implement this section. The agreement
shall include a provision for periodic review of the
agreement for its adequacy, effectiveness, and need for
revision.
(2) Additional terms.--The agreement may provide for--
(A) the integration of the management plans of the
Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy;
(B) delegation to civilian law enforcement personnel of the
Department of the Navy of the authority of the Secretary of
the Interior to enforce the laws relating to protection of
natural and cultural resources and of fish and wildlife; and
(C) the sharing of resources in order to most efficiently
and effectively manage the lands.
(d) Duration.--Any agreement for the military use of the
Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area
shall terminate not later than March 31, 2039.

[[Page H3460]]

SEC. 3053. TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION, SOUTHERN
STUDY AREA, MARINE CORPS AIR GROUND COMBAT
CENTER TWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA.

(a) Transfer Required.--Not later than September 30, 2014,
the Secretary of the Interior shall transfer, without
reimbursement, to the administrative jurisdiction of the
Secretary of the Navy certain public land administered by the
Bureau of Land Management consisting of approximately 20,000
acres in San Bernardino County, California, as generally
depicted as the ``Southern Study Area'' on the map referred
to in section 3051.
(b) Use of Transferred Land.--Upon the receipt of the land
under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy shall include
the land as part of the Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center
Twentynine Palms, California, and authorize use of the land
for military purposes.
(c) Legal Description and Map.--
(1) Preparation and publication.--The Secretary of the
Interior shall publish in the Federal Register a legal
description and map of the public land to be transferred
under subsection (a).
(2) Force of law.--The legal description and map filed
under paragraph (1) shall have the same force and effect as
if included in this Act, except that the Secretary of the
Interior may correct clerical and typographical errors in the
legal description and map.
(d) Reimbursement of Costs.--The Secretary of the Navy
shall reimburse the Secretary of the Interior for any costs
incurred by the Secretary of the Interior to carry out this
section.

SEC. 3054. WATER RIGHTS.

Subtitle F--Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada

SEC. 3061. TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION, NAVAL AIR
STATION FALLON, NEVADA.

(a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall
transfer to the Secretary of the Navy, without consideration,
the Federal land described in subsection (b).
(b) Description of Federal Land.--The Federal land referred
to in subsection (a) is the parcel of approximately 400 acres
of land under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the
Interior that--
(1) is adjacent to Naval Air Station Fallon in Churchill
County, Nevada; and
(2) was withdrawn under Public Land Order 6834 (NV-943-
4214-10; N-37875).
(c) Management.--On transfer of the Federal land described
under subsection (b) to the Secretary of the Navy, the
Secretary of the Navy shall have full jurisdiction, custody,
and control of the Federal land.

SEC. 3062. WATER RIGHTS.

SEC. 3063. WITHDRAWAL.

Subject to valid existing rights, the Federal land to be
transferred under section 3061 is withdrawn from all forms of
appropriation under the public land laws, including the
mining laws and geothermal leasing laws, so long as the land
remains under the administrative jurisdiction of the
Secretary of the Navy.

DIVISION C--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND
OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

TITLE XXXI--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS

Subtitle A--National Security Programs Authorizations

SEC. 3101. NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.

(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby
authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for
fiscal year 2014 for the activities of the National Nuclear
Security Administration in carrying out programs as specified
in the funding table in section 4701.
(b) Authorization of New Plant Projects.--From funds
referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying
out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out new
plant projects for the National Nuclear Security
Administration as follows:
Project 14-D-710, Device Assembly Facility Argus
Installation Project, Nevada National Security Site, Las
Vegas, Nevada, $14,000,000
Project 14-D-901, Spent Fueling Handling Recapitalization
Project, Naval Reactors Facility, Idaho, $45,400,000.
Project 14-D-902, KL Materials Characterization Laboratory,
Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, Schenectady, New York,
$1,000,000.

SEC. 3102. DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the
Department of Energy for fiscal year 2014 for defense
environmental cleanup activities in carrying out programs as
specified in the funding table in section 4701.

SEC. 3103. OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the
Department of Energy for fiscal year 2014 for other defense
activities in carrying out programs as specified in the
funding table in section 4701.

SEC. 3104. ENERGY SECURITY AND ASSURANCE.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the
Department of Energy for fiscal year 2014 for energy security
and assurance programs necessary for national security as
specified in the funding table in section 4701.

Subtitle B--Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations

SEC. 3111. CLARIFICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF NATIONAL NUCLEAR
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.

Subsection (c) of section 3211 of the National Nuclear
Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2401) is amended to
read as follows:
``(c) Operations and Activities to Be Carried Out
Consistent With Certain Principles.--In carrying out the
mission of the Administration, the Administrator shall ensure
that all operations and activities of the Administration are
consistent with the principles of--
``(1) protecting the environment;
``(2) safeguarding the safety and health of the public and
of the workforce of the Administration; and
``(3) ensuring the security of the nuclear weapons, nuclear
material, and classified information in the custody of the
Administration.''.

SEC. 3112. TERMINATION OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EMPLOYEES TO
PROTECT NATIONAL SECURITY.

(a) In General.--Subtitle C of the National Nuclear
Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2441 et seq.) is
amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 3245. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYEES TO PROTECT NATIONAL
SECURITY.

``(a) Termination Authority.--Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, the Secretary of Energy may terminate an
employee of the Administration or any element of the
Department of Energy that involves nuclear security if the
Secretary--
``(1) determines that the employee acted in a manner that
endangers the security of special nuclear material or
classified information;
``(2) considers the termination to be in the interests of
the United States; and
``(3) determines that the procedures prescribed in other
provisions of law that authorize the termination of the
employment of such employee cannot be invoked in a manner
that the Secretary considers consistent with national
security.
``(b) Statements and Affidavits.--(1) To the extent that
the Secretary determines that the interests of national
security permit, the Secretary shall notify an employee whose
employment is terminated under this section of the reasons
for the termination.
``(2) During the 30-day period beginning on the date on
which a terminated employee is notified under paragraph (1),
the employee may submit to the Secretary statements or
affidavits to show why the employee should be restored to
duty.
``(3) If a terminated employee submits statements and
affidavits under paragraph (2), the Secretary--
``(A) shall provide a written response to the employee; and
``(B) may restore the employment of the employee.
``(c) Finality.--A decision by the Secretary to terminate
the employment of an employee under this section is final and
may not be appealed or reviewed outside the Department.
``(d) Notification to Congressional Committees.--Whenever
the Secretary terminates the employment of an employee under
the authority of this section, the Secretary shall promptly
notify the congressional defense committees of such
termination.
``(e) Preservation of Right to Seek Other Employment.--Any
termination of employment under this section does not affect
the right of the employee involved to seek or accept
employment with any other department or agency of the United
States if that employee is declared eligible for such
employment by the Director of the Office of Personnel
Management.
``(f) Prohibition on Delegation.--The authority of the
Secretary under this section may not be delegated.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents at the
beginning of such Act is amended by inserting after the item
relating to section 3244 the following new item:

``Sec. 3245. Termination of employees to protect national security.''.

SEC. 3113. MODIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATES ON LIFE
EXTENSION PROGRAMS AND NEW NUCLEAR FACILITIES.

(a) In General.--Section 4217 of the Atomic Energy Defense
Act (50 U.S.C. 2537) is amended--
(1) in subsection (b)(2), by adding after the period at the
end the following: ``Such cost estimates shall be conducted
by the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of
Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation. The Director may
delegate carrying out such a cost estimate to another element
of the Department of Defense.''; and
(2) by amending subsection (c) to read as follows:
``(c) Authority for Further Assessments.--(1) In
consultation with the Administrator, the Secretary of
Defense, acting through the Director of Cost Assessment and
Program Evaluation,

[[Page H3461]]

may conduct an independent cost assessment of any initiative
or program of the Administration that is estimated to cost
more than $500,000,000. The Director may delegate carrying
out such a cost estimate to another element of the Department
of Defense.
``(2) The Secretary, acting through the Administrator,
shall request an appropriate official or entity to conduct an
independent review of each--
``(A) guidance for the analysis of alternatives for each
covered system or facility before such analysis is conducted;
and
``(B) results of such analysis.
``(3) The Secretary, acting through the Administrator,
shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the
Nuclear Weapons Council each independent review conducted
under paragraph (2).
``(4) In this subsection:
``(A) The term `appropriate official or entity' means the
following:
``(i) The Director of Cost Assessment and Program
Evaluation.
``(ii) An organization selected by the Director of Cost
Assessment and Program Evaluation.
``(iii) The JASON Defense Advisory Panel.
``(B) The term `covered system or facility' means the
following:
``(i) Each nuclear weapon system undergoing life extension
at the completion of phase 6.2A, relating to design
definition and cost study.
``(ii) Each new nuclear facility within the nuclear
security enterprise (as defined in section 4002(5) of the
Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501(5)) that is
estimated to cost more than $500,000,000 before such facility
achieves critical decision 2 in the acquisition process.''.
(b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection
(a)(2) shall expire on the date that is three years after the
date of the enactment of this Act. Effective on the day after
such expiration date, subsection (c) of section 4217 of the
Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2537), as in effect on
the day before the date of the enactment of this Act, is
hereby revived.
(c) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that
Congress encourages the Administrator for Nuclear Security
and the Nuclear Weapons Council to follow the results of the
analysis of alternatives of a life extension program or a
defense nuclear facility construction project when selecting
a final option.

SEC. 3114. PLAN FOR RETRIEVAL, TREATMENT, AND DISPOSITION OF
TANK FARM WASTE AT HANFORD NUCLEAR RESERVATION.

(a) In General.--Subtitle D of title XLIV of the Atomic
Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2621 et seq.) is amended by
adding at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 4445. PLAN FOR RETRIEVAL, TREATMENT, AND DISPOSITION
OF TANK FARM WASTE AT HANFORD NUCLEAR
RESERVATION.

``(a) Plan.--Not later than March 1, 2014, the Secretary of
Energy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a
comprehensive plan through 2025 for the safe and effective
retrieval, treatment, and disposition of nuclear waste
contained in the tank farms of Hanford Nuclear Reservation,
Richland, Washington.
``(b) Matters Included.--The plan under subsection (a)
shall include the following:
``(1) A list of all requirements, assumptions, and criteria
needed to design, construct, and operate the Waste Treatment
and Immobilization Plant and any required infrastructure
facilities at the Hanford Tank Farms.
``(2) A schedule of activities, construction, and
operations at the Hanford Tank Farms and Waste Treatment and
Immobilization Plant required before 2025 to carry out the
safe and effective retrieval, treatment, and disposition of
waste in the Hanford Tank Farms.
``(3) Actions required to accelerate, to the extent
possible, the retrieval and treatment of lower-risk, low-
activity waste while continuing efforts to accelerate the
resolution of technical challenges associated with higher-
risk, high-activity waste.
``(4) A description of how the Secretary will--
``(A) provide adequate protection to workers and the public
under the plan; and
``(B) incorporate into the plan any new science and
technical information that was not available before the
development of the plan, including new science and technical
information not available as of March 2014.
``(c) Determinations.--(1) For each requirement,
assumption, or criterion identified by the Secretary under
subsection (b)(1), the Secretary shall include in the plan
under subsection (a) a determination regarding whether such
requirement, assumption or criterion is finalized and will be
used to inform planning, design, construction, and operations
of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant project.
``(2) For each requirement, assumption, or criterion that
the Secretary cannot make a finalized determination for under
paragraph (1) by the date the plan under subsection (a) is
submitted to the congressional defense committees, the
Secretary shall--
``(A) include in the plan--
``(i) a description of the requirement, assumption, or
criterion;
``(ii) a list of activities required for the Secretary to
make such determination; and
``(iii) the date on which the Secretary anticipates making
such determination; and
``(B) once the Secretary makes the finalized determination
with respect to the requirement, assumption, or criterion,
submit to such committees notification that the requirement,
assumption, or criterion is finalized and will be used to
inform the planning, design, construction, and operations of
the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant project.
``(3)(A) Subject to subparagraph (B), the Secretary may
authorize a change to a requirement, assumption, or criterion
that the Secretary determines as finalized under paragraph
(1) or (2)(B).
``(B) The Secretary shall make changes to a requirement,
assumption, or criterion under subparagraph (A) if the
Secretary cannot provide adequate protection without making
such changes.
``(C) If the Secretary authorizes a change to a
requirement, assumption, or criterion under subparagraph (A)
or (B) that will have a material effect on any aspect of the
schedule or cost of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization
Plant project, the Secretary shall promptly notify the
congressional defense committees of such change.
``(D) The authority of the Secretary under this paragraph
may be delegated only to the Deputy Secretary of Energy.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents at the
beginning of the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by
inserting after the item relating to section 4444 the
following new item:

``Sec. 4445. Plan for retrieval, treatment, and disposition of tank
farm waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation.''.

SEC. 3115. ENHANCED PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY TO MANAGE SUPPLY
CHAIN RISK.

(a) In General.--Subtitle A of title XLVIII of the Atomic
Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2781 et seq.) is amended by
adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 4806. ENHANCED PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY TO MANAGE SUPPLY
CHAIN RISK.

``(a) Authority.--Subject to subsection (b), a covered
official may--
``(1) carry out a covered procurement action; and
``(2) notwithstanding any other provision of law, limit, in
whole or in part, the disclosure of information relating to
the basis for carrying out a covered procurement action.
``(b) Determination and Notification.--Before exercising
the authority under subsection (a), a covered official
shall--
``(1) obtain a joint recommendation by the Deputy Secretary
of Energy and the Chief Information Officer of the Department
of Energy, on the basis of a risk assessment conducted by the
Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence of the
Department of Energy, that there is a significant supply
chain risk to a covered system;
``(2) make a determination in writing, with the concurrence
of the Deputy Secretary of Energy, that--
``(A) carrying out a covered procurement action under
subsection (a)(1) is necessary to protect national security
by reducing supply chain risk;
``(B) less intrusive measures are not reasonably available
to reduce such supply chain risk; and
``(C) if the covered official plans to limit disclosure of
information under subsection (a)(2), the risk to national
security that may result from the disclosure of such
information is greater than such risk that may result from
not disclosing such information; and
``(3) submit to the congressional defense committees, the
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate, and
the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of
Representatives written notification of--
``(A) the joint recommendation under paragraph (1),
including a summary of the risk assessment by the Office of
Intelligence and Counterintelligence that serves as the basis
for such joint recommendation;
``(B) the determination under paragraph (2), including--
``(i) a summary of the basis for such determination; and
``(ii) a discussion of the less intrusive measures that
were considered under subparagraph (B) of such paragraph and
the reason that the official determined such measures to not
be reasonably available; and
``(C) the information required by section 2304(f)(3) of
title 10, United States Code.
``(c) Limitation on Disclosure.--If a covered official
exercises the authority under subsection (a), the covered
official shall--
``(1) notify appropriate parties of the covered procurement
action and the basis for such action only to the extent
necessary to carry out the covered procurement action;
``(2) notify other elements of the Department of Energy or
other departments or agencies of the United States that are
responsible for procurement that may be subject to the same
or similar supply chain risk of the covered procurement
action, consistent with the requirements of national
security; and
``(3) ensure the confidentiality of any notification made
under paragraph (1) or (2).
``(d) Delegation.--A covered official may not delegate the
authority provided under this section to an official of the
Department of Energy below the level of the Deputy Assistant
Secretary of Energy.
``(e) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) The term `covered item of supply' means an item that
is purchased for inclusion in a covered system, and the loss
of integrity of which could result in a supply chain risk for
a covered system.
``(2) The term `covered official' means any of the
following:
``(A) The Under Secretary of Energy.
``(B) The Under Secretary of Energy for Science.
``(C) The Administrator for Nuclear Security.
``(D) The Administrator of the Energy Information
Administration.
``(E) The Administrator of the Bonneville Power
Administration.
``(F) The Administrator of the Southeastern Power
Administration.
``(G) The Administrator of the Southwestern Power
Administration.
``(H) The Administrator of the Western Area Power
Administration.

[[Page H3462]]

``(I) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of
Energy.
``(3) The term `covered procurement' means--
``(A) a source selection for a covered system or a covered
item of supply involving either a performance specification,
as described in paragraph (1)(C)(ii) of section 2305(a) of
title 10, United States Code, or an evaluation factor, as
described in paragraph (2)(A) of such section, relating to
supply chain risk;
``(B) the consideration of proposals for and issuance of a
task or delivery order for a covered system or a covered item
of supply if the task or delivery order contract concerned
includes a contract clause establishing a requirement
relating to supply chain risk; or
``(C) any contract action involving a contract for a
covered system or a covered item of supply if such contract
includes a clause establishing requirements relating to
supply chain risk.
``(4) The term `covered procurement action' means, with
respect to an action that occurs in the course of conducting
a covered procurement, any of the following:
``(A) The exclusion of a source that fails to meet
qualification standards established in accordance with the
requirements of section 2319 of title 10, United States Code,
for the purpose of reducing supply chain risk in the
acquisition of covered systems.
``(B) The exclusion of a source that fails to achieve an
acceptable rating with respect to an evaluation factor
providing for the consideration of supply chain risk in the
evaluation of proposals for the award of a contract or the
issuance of a task or delivery order.
``(C) The withholding of consent for a contractor to
subcontract with a particular source or the direction to a
contractor for a covered system to exclude a particular
source from consideration for a subcontract under the
contract.
``(5) The term `covered system' means--
``(A) nuclear weapons;
``(B) components of nuclear weapons;
``(C) items associated with the design, development,
production, and maintenance of nuclear weapons or components
of nuclear weapons; and
``(D) items associated with the surveillance of the nuclear
weapon stockpile; and
``(E) any national security system (as defined in section
3542(b)(2) of title 44, United States Code).
``(6) The term `supply chain risk' means the risk that an
adversary may sabotage, maliciously introduce an unwanted
function, or otherwise subvert the design, integrity,
manufacturing, production, distribution, installation,
operation, or maintenance of a covered system so as to
surveil, deny, disrupt, or otherwise degrade the function,
use, or operation of such system.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents at the
beginning of such Act is amended by inserting after the item
relating to section 4805 the following new item:

``Sec. 4806. Enhanced procurement authority to manage supply chain
risk.''.

(c) Effective Date.--Section 4806 of the Atomic Energy
Defense Act, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with
respect to--
(1) contracts that are awarded on or after the date that is
180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act; and
(2) task and delivery orders that are issued on or after
the date that is 180 days after such date of enactment under
contracts awarded before, on, or after such date of
enactment.

SEC. 3116. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR NATIONAL
NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.

(a) Limitation.--Except as provided by subsection (c), of
the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or
otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the
National Nuclear Security Administration, $139,500,000 may
not be obligated or expended until the date on which the
Administrator for Nuclear Security submits to the
congressional defense committees--
(1) a detailed plan to realize the planned efficiencies;
and
(2) written certification that the planned efficiencies
will be achieved during fiscal year 2014.
(b) Unrealized Efficiencies.--If the Administrator does not
submit to the congressional defense committees the matters
described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a) by the
date that is 60 days after the date of the enactment of this
Act, the Administrator shall submit to the congressional
defense committees a report on--
(1) the amount of planned efficiencies that will not be
realized during fiscal year 2014; and
(2) any effects caused by such unrealized planned
efficiencies to the programs funded under the directed
stockpile work and nuclear programs accounts.
(c) Exception.--The limitation in subsection (a) shall
not--
(1) apply to funds authorized to be appropriated for
directed stockpile work, nuclear programs, or Naval Reactors;
or
(2) affect the authority of the Secretary under sections
4702, 4705, and 4711 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50
U.S.C. 2742, 2745, and 2751).
(d) Planned Efficiencies Defined.--In this section, the
term ``planned efficiencies'' means the $106,800,000, with
respect to directed stockpile work, and $32,700,000, with
respect to nuclear programs, that the Administrator plans to
save during fiscal year 2014 through management efficiency
and workforce restructuring reductions, as described in the
budget request for fiscal year 2014 that the President
submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31,
United States Code.

SEC. 3117. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR OFFICE OF
THE ADMINISTRATOR.

Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or
otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Office
of the Administrator, not more than 75 percent may be
obligated or expended until--
(1) the President transmits to Congress the matters
required to be transmitted during 2013 and 2014 under section
4205(f)(2) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C.
2525(f)(2));
(2) the President transmits to the congressional defense
committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate,
and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives the matters required to be transmitted during
2013 and 2014 under section 1043 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81;
125 Stat. 1576) with respect to such matters for which the
Secretary of Energy is responsible;
(3) the Administrator for Nuclear Security submits to the
congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign
Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs
of the House of Representatives the reports required to be
submitted during 2013 and 2014 under section 3122(b)(1) of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1710); and
(4) the Administrator submits to the congressional defense
committees--
(A) the detailed report on the stockpile stewardship,
management, and infrastructure plan required to be submitted
during 2013 under paragraph (2) of section 4203(b) of the
Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2523(b)(2)); and
(B) the summary of the plan required to be submitted during
2014 under paragraph (1) of such section.

SEC. 3118. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR GLOBAL
THREAT REDUCTION INITIATIVE.

(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that,
particularly in the current constrained budget environment,
the National Nuclear Security Administration should--
(1) prioritize its primary mission of sustaining and
modernizing the nuclear weapons stockpile; and
(2) shift funding from secondary missions if required to
ensure critical nuclear weapons modernization programs stay
on schedule and deliver nuclear warheads needed to support
the military requirements of the United States.
(b) Limitation.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated
by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014
for the Global Threat Reduction Initiative of the National
Nuclear Security Administration, not more than 80 percent may
be obligated or expended unless, by not later than 60 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the
Administrator for Nuclear Security certifies to the
congressional defense committees that the B61 life extension
program will deliver a first production unit in fiscal year
2019.
(c) Exception.--The limitation in subsection (b) shall not
affect the authority of the Secretary under Section 4702 of
the AEDA (50 U.S.C. 2742).

SEC. 3119. ESTABLISHMENT OF CENTER FOR SECURITY TECHNOLOGY,
ANALYSIS, TESTING, AND RESPONSE.

(a) Establishment.--The Administrator for Nuclear Security
shall establish within the nuclear security enterprise (as
defined in section 4002(5) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act
(50 U.S.C. 2501(5)) a Center for Security Technology,
Analysis, Testing, and Response.
(b) Duties.--The center established under subsection (a)
shall carry out the following:
(1) Provide to the Administrator, the Chief of Defense
Nuclear Security, and the management and operating
contractors of the nuclear security enterprise a wide range
of objective expertise on security technologies, systems,
analysis, testing, and response forces.
(2) Assist the Administrator in developing standards,
requirements, analysis methods, and testing criteria with
respect to security.
(3) Collect, analyze, and distribute lessons learned with
respect to security.
(4) Support inspections and oversight activities with
respect to security.
(5) Promote professional development and training for
security professionals.
(6) Provide for advance and bulk procurement for security-
related acquisitions that affect multiple facilities of the
nuclear security enterprise.
(7) Advocate for continual improvement and security
excellence throughout the nuclear security enterprise.

SEC. 3120. COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES FOR COMPETITION OF
MANAGEMENT AND OPERATING CONTRACTS.

(a) Bid Protest.--Subsection (a) of section 3121 of the
National Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law
112-239; 126 Stat. 2175) is amended by inserting ``or the
date on which a protest with respect to such a contract is
resolved'' before the period at the end.
(b) Expected Cost Savings.--Subsection (b)(1) of such
section is amended by inserting ``, including a description
of the assumptions used and analysis conducted to determine
such expected cost savings'' before the semicolon.
(c) Naval Reactors.--Subsection (d) of such section is
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(3) Naval reactors.--The requirement for reports under
subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to a management
and operations contract for a Naval Reactor facility.''.

SEC. 3121. W88-1 WARHEAD AND W78-1 WARHEAD LIFE EXTENSION
OPTIONS.

In carrying out Phase 6.2 and Phase 6.2A of the Joint W78/
88-1 Warhead Life Extension Program, the Secretary of Defense
and the Secretary of Energy, acting through the Nuclear
Weapons Council established by section 179 of title 10,
United States Code, shall include during such phases a full
analysis of feasibility, design definition, and cost
estimation for each of the following life extension options:

[[Page H3463]]

(1) A separate life extension option to produce a W78-1
warhead.
(2) A separate life extension option to produce a W88-1
warhead.
(3) An interoperable W78/88-1 life extension option.
(4) Any other option that the Nuclear Weapons Council
considers appropriate.

SEC. 3122. EXTENSION OF PRINCIPLES OF PILOT PROGRAM TO
ADDITIONAL FACILITIES OF THE NUCLEAR SECURITY
ENTERPRISE.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) In April 2006, the Administrator for Nuclear Security
initiated a pilot program to improve and streamline oversight
of the Kansas City Plant of the National Nuclear Security
Administration.
(2) In a memorandum initiating the pilot, the Administrator
cited slow progress in implementing previous efforts to
streamline such oversight, saying that such slow progress
``is a reflection of excessive risk aversion''.
(3) The pilot program shifted away from reliance on
directives of the Department of Energy and toward third-party
certification and industrial standards whenever possible--but
the pilot program specifically exempted certain high-hazard
operations from its scope.
(4) An independent assessment conducted one year after
initiation of the pilot found approximately $14,000,000 had
been saved in fiscal year 2007 because of the pilot program.
(5) The independent assessment found that ``the replacement
of Department of Energy prescriptive requirements with site
specific standards and operating systems was observed to be a
significant cost reduction driver. . .in several business
areas, this reduction was accomplished by moving toward the
use of metrics and benchmarks rather than transactional
oversight.''.
(6) The independent assessment further found that ``no
immediate or negative impacts were observed as a result'' of
the pilot program and that ``the lessons learned at [the
Kansas City Plant] can and should be applied at other NNSA
and DOE sites'', while acknowledging that application of such
lessons would be limited by the presence of high-risk, high-
hazard activities at such locations.
(7) The independent assessment concluded, ``it is our
opinion that these elements can be encouraged and developed
over time at each NNSA facility, subject to the limitations
made necessary by the nature of the site.''.
(b) Extension of Policies.--
(1) In general.--Except as provided by paragraph (2), the
Administrator for Nuclear Security shall--
(A) ensure that the principles of the pilot program are
permanently implemented at the Kansas City Plant of the
National Nuclear Security Administration; and
(B) in accordance with paragraph (3), extend such
principles of the pilot program, with modifications as the
Administrator determines appropriate, to not less than two
additional facilities of the nuclear security enterprise (as
defined in section 4002(5) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act
(50 U.S.C. 2501(5)), with such principles commencing at each
facility not later than one year after the date of the
enactment of this Act.
(2) Exemption.--In carrying out the extension of the
principles of the pilot program pursuant to subparagraph (A)
and (B) of paragraph (1), the Administrator--
(A) may exempt high-hazard or high-risk activities from
such extension;
(B) shall exempt nuclear operations from such extension;
and
(C) shall focus the initial extension of such principles on
low-risk, high-reward initiatives.
(3) Implementation.--
(A) In extending the principles of the pilot program to not
less than two facilities under paragraph (1)(B), the
Administrator shall certify to the appropriate congressional
committees that--
(i) the management and operating contractor for such a
facility has sufficiently mature processes, as well as high
performance, to enable the extension without undue risk; and
(ii) Federal oversight mechanisms are in place and
sufficiently mature to enable the extension without undue
risk.
(B) If the Administrator cannot make a certification under
subparagraph (A) with respect to a facility--
(i) the Administrator shall delay the extension of the
principles of the pilot program to such facility until the
date on which the Administrator makes such certification; and
(ii) not later than one year after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the
appropriate congressional committees a report regarding--

(I) the improvements to processes, procedures, and
performance that are required to make such certification;
(II) a plan with respect to the activities that the
Administrator will carry out to make such improvements; and
(III) the date by which the Administrator expects to make
such certification and extend the principles of the pilot
program.

(4) Definitions.--In this subsection:
(A) The term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means
the following:
(i) The congressional defense committees.
(ii) The Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the
Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House
of Representatives.
(B) The term ``principles of the pilot program'' means the
principles regarding the use of third-party certification,
industrial standards, best business practices, and
verification of internal procedures and performance to
improve and streamline oversight, as demonstrated in the
pilot program at the Kansas City Plant of the Administration
described in subsection (a)(1).

Subtitle C--Reports

SEC. 3131. ANNUAL REPORT AND CERTIFICATION ON STATUS OF THE
SECURITY OF THE NUCLEAR SECURITY ENTERPRISE.

(a) In General.--Section 4506 of the Atomic Energy Defense
Act (50 U.S.C. 2657) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 4506. ANNUAL REPORT AND CERTIFICATION ON STATUS OF THE
SECURITY OF THE NUCLEAR SECURITY ENTERPRISE.

``Not later than September 30 of each year, the
Administrator shall submit to the Secretary of Energy and to
the congressional defense committees--
``(1) a report detailing the status of the security of the
nuclear security enterprise, including the status of the
security of special nuclear material, nuclear weapons, and
classified information at each nuclear weapons production
facility and national security laboratory; and
``(2) written certification that the special nuclear
material, nuclear weapons, and classified information in the
custody of the Administration are secure.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents at the
beginning of such Act is amended by striking the item
relating to section 4506 and inserting the following new
item:

``Sec. 4506. Annual report and certification on status of the security
of the nuclear security enterprise.''.

SEC. 3132. MODIFICATIONS TO ANNUAL REPORTS REGARDING THE
CONDITION OF THE NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE.

(a) Report on Assessments.--Subsection (e) of section 4205
of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2525) is
amended--
(1) in paragraph (3)--
(A) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``; and'' and
inserting a semicolon;
(B) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at the end
and inserting ``; and''; and
(C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
``(E) a concise summary of any significant finding
investigations initiated or active during the previous year
for which the head of the national security laboratory has
full or partial responsibility.''; and
(2) by amending paragraph (4) to read as follows:
``(4) In the case of a report submitted by the Commander of
the United States Strategic Command--
``(A) a discussion of the relative merits of other nuclear
weapon types (if any), or compensatory measures (if any) that
could be taken, that could enable accomplishment of the
missions of the nuclear weapon types to which the assessments
relate, should such assessments identify any deficiency with
respect to such nuclear weapon types; and
``(B) a summary of all major assembly releases in place as
of the date of the report for the active and inactive nuclear
weapon stockpiles.''.
(b) Reports Submitted to the President and Congress.--
Subsection (f) of such section is amended by adding at the
end the following new paragraph:
``(3) If the President does not forward to Congress the
matters required under paragraph (2) by the date required
under such paragraph, each official specified in subsection
(b) shall submit to the congressional defense committees the
report, without change, that the official submitted to the
Secretary concerned under subsection (e).''.

SEC. 3133. REPEAL OF CERTAIN REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.

(a) Report on Counterintelligence and Security Practices at
National Laboratories.--
(1) In general.--Section 4507 of the Atomic Energy Defense
Act (50 U.S.C. 2658) is repealed.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of contents at the
beginning of the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by
striking the item relating to section 4507.
(b) Reports on Advanced Supercomputer Sales to Certain
Foreign Nations.--Section 3157 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105-85; 50
U.S.C. App. 2404 note) is repealed.

Subtitle D--Other Matters

SEC. 3141. CONGRESSIONAL ADVISORY PANEL ON THE GOVERNANCE OF
THE NUCLEAR SECURITY ENTERPRISE.

Section 3166 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2208) is
amended--
(1) in subsection (d)--
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``180 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``October 1,
2013''; and
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``February 1, 2014'' and
inserting ``March 1, 2014''; and
(2) by amending subsection (f) to read as follows:
``(f) Termination.--
``(1) In general.--The advisory panel shall terminate not
later than September 30, 2014.
``(2) Final report.--Before terminating, the advisory panel
may submit to the officials and committees specified in
subsection (d)(1) a final report that includes a summary of
the activities and recommendations of the advisory panel and
such other matters as the advisory panel considers
appropriate.''.

SEC. 3142. STUDY OF POTENTIAL REUSE OF NUCLEAR WEAPON
SECONDARIES.

(a) Study.--Not later than 60 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security
shall conduct a study of the potential reuse of nuclear
weapon secondaries that includes an assessment of the
potential for reusing secondaries in future life extension
programs, including--
(1) a description of which secondaries could be reused;

[[Page H3464]]

(2) the number of such secondaries available in the
stockpile as of the date of the study; and
(3) the number of such secondaries that are planned to be
available after such date as a result of the dismantlement of
nuclear weapons.
(b) Matters Included.--The study under subsection (a) shall
include the following:
(1) The feasibility and practicability of potential full or
partial reuse options with respect to nuclear weapon
secondaries.
(2) The benefits and risks of reusing such secondaries.
(3) A list of technical challenges that must be resolved to
certify aged materials under dynamic loading conditions and
the full stockpile-to-target sequence of weapons, including a
program plan and timeline for resolving such technical
challenges and an assessment of the importance of resolving
outstanding materials issues on certifying aged secondaries.
(4) The potential costs and cost savings of such reuse.
(5) The effects of such reuse on the requirements for
secondaries manufacturing.
(6) An assessment of how such reuse affects plans to build
a responsive nuclear weapons infrastructure.
(c) Submission.--Not later than March 1, 2014, the
Administrator shall submit to the congressional defense
committees the study under subsection (a).

SEC. 3143. CLARIFICATION OF ROLE OF SECRETARY OF ENERGY.

The amendment made by section 3113 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239;
126 Stat. 2169) to section 4102 of the Atomic Energy Defense
Act (50 U.S.C. 2512) may not be construed as affecting the
authority of the Secretary of Energy, in carrying out
national security programs, with respect to the management,
planning, and oversight of the National Nuclear Security
Administration or as affecting the delegation by the
Secretary of Energy of authority to carry out such
activities, as set forth under subsection (a) of such section
4102 as it existed before the amendment made by such section
3113.

SEC. 3144. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT TO ATOMIC ENERGY ACT OF 1954.

Chapter 10 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2131
et seq.), as amended by section 3176 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239;
126 Stat. 2215), is amended in the matter following section
111 by inserting before ``a. The Commission'' the following:
``SEC. 112. DOMESTIC MEDICAL ISOTOPE PRODUCTION.--''.

TITLE XXXII--DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

SEC. 3201. AUTHORIZATION.

There is authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014
$29,915,000 for the operation of the Defense Nuclear
Facilities Safety Board under chapter 21 of the Atomic Energy
Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286 et seq.).

SEC. 3202. IMPROVEMENTS TO THE DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES
SAFETY BOARD.

(a) Cost-benefit Analysis.--Subsection (a) of section 315
of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286d(a)) is
amended--
(1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and
(2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new
paragraph (3):
``(3) The Secretary may request an analysis from the Board
regarding the costs and benefits of any draft or final
recommendation. If the Secretary requests such an analysis,
the Board shall transmit to the Secretary such analysis by
not later than 30 days after the date of the request. The
Board shall make such analysis available to the public when
the associated recommendation is made available to the public
under subsection (b) or promptly thereafter. Additionally, if
the Secretary requests such an analysis, the Secretary shall
conduct an analysis of the costs and benefits of the
recommendation and make such analysis available to the public
together with the response of the Secretary to the Board
under subsection (c).''.
(b) Recommendations.--Paragraph (5) of section 312(b) of
such Act (42. U.S.C. 2286a(b)(5)) is amended to read as
follows:
``(5) Recommendations.--The Board shall make such
recommendations to the Secretary of Energy with respect to
Department of Energy defense nuclear facilities, including
operations of such facilities, standards, and research needs,
as the Board determines are necessary to ensure adequate
protection of public health and safety. In making its
recommendations, the Board shall--
``(A) use rigorous, quantitative analysis;
``(B) specifically assess risk (whenever sufficient data
exists);
``(C) specifically assess the use of various
administrative, passive, and engineered controls for
implementing the recommended measures; and
``(D) specifically assess the technical and economic
feasibility of implementing the recommended measures.''.

TITLE XXXIV--NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES

SEC. 3401. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

(a) Amount.--There are hereby authorized to be appropriated
to the Secretary of Energy $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2014
for the purpose of carrying out activities under chapter 641
of title 10, United States Code, relating to the naval
petroleum reserves.
(b) Period of Availability.--Funds appropriated pursuant to
the authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) shall
remain available until expended.

TITLE XXXV--MARITIME ADMINISTRATION

SEC. 3501. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR NATIONAL
SECURITY ASPECTS OF THE MERCHANT MARINE FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2014.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2014, to be available without fiscal year limitation if
so provided in appropriations Acts, for the use of the
Department of Transportation for Maritime Administration
programs associated with maintaining national security
aspects of the merchant marine, as follows:
(1) For expenses necessary for operations of the United
States Merchant Marine Academy, $81,268,000, of which--
(A) $67,268,000 shall remain available until expended for
Academy operations; and
(B) $14,000,000 shall remain available until expended for
capital asset management at the Academy.
(2) For expenses necessary to support the State maritime
academies, $17,100,000, of which--
(A) $2,400,000 shall remain available until expended for
student incentive payments;
(B) $3,600,000 shall remain available until expended for
direct payments to such academies; and
(C) $11,100,000 shall remain available until expended for
maintenance and repair of State maritime academy training
vessels.
(3) For expenses necessary to dispose of vessels in the
National Defense Reserve Fleet, $2,000,000, to remain
available until expended.
(4) For expenses to maintain and preserve a United States-
flag merchant marine to serve the national security needs of
the United States under chapter 531 of title 46, United
States Code, $183,000,000.
(5) For the cost (as defined in section 502(5) of the
Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661a(5)) of loan
guarantees under the program authorized by chapter 537 of
title 46, United States Code, $72,655,000, of which
$2,655,000 shall remain available until expended for
administrative expenses of the program.

SEC. 3502. 5-YEAR REAUTHORIZATION OF VESSEL WAR RISK
INSURANCE PROGRAM.

Section 53912 of title 46, United States Code, is amended
by striking ``December 31, 2015'' and inserting ``December
31, 2020''.

SEC. 3503. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) It is in the interest of United States national
security that the United States merchant marine, both ships
and mariners, serve as a naval auxiliary in times of war or
national emergency.
(2) The readiness of the United States merchant fleet
should be augmented by a Government-owned reserve fleet
comprised of ships with national defense features that may
not be available immediately in sufficient numbers or types
in the active United States-owned, United States-flagged, and
United States-crewed commercial industry.
(3) The Ready Reserve Force of the Maritime Administration,
a component of the National Defense Reserve Fleet, plays an
important role in United States national security by
providing necessary readiness and efficiency in the form of a
Government-owned sealift fleet.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) maintaining a United States shipbuilding base is
critical to meeting United States national security
requirements;
(2) it is of vital importance that the Ready Reserve Force
of the Maritime Administration remains capable, modern, and
efficient in order to best serve the national security needs
of the United States in times of war or national emergency;
(3) Federal agencies must consider investment options for
replacing aging vessels within the Ready Reserve Force to
meet future operational commitments;
(4) investment in recapitalizing the Ready Reserve Force
may include--
(A) construction of dual-use vessels, based on need, for
use in the America's Marine Highway Program of the Department
of Transportation, as a recent study performed under a
cooperative agreement between the Maritime Administration and
the Navy demonstrated that dual-use vessels transporting
domestic freight between United States ports could be called
upon to supplement sealift capacity;
(B) construction of tanker vessels to meet military
transport needs; and
(C) construction of vessels for use in transporting
potential new energy exports; and
(5) the Department of Transportation, in consultation with
the Navy, should pursue the most cost-effective means of
recapitalizing the Ready Reserve Force, including by
promoting the building of new vessels that are militarily
useful and commercially viable.

DIVISION D--FUNDING TABLES

SEC. 4001. AUTHORIZATION OF AMOUNTS IN FUNDING TABLES.

(a) In General.--Whenever a funding table in this division
specifies a dollar amount authorized for a project, program,
or activity, the obligation and expenditure of the specified
dollar amount for the project, program, or activity is hereby
authorized, subject to the availability of appropriations.
(b) Merit-based Decisions.--A decision to commit, obligate,
or expend funds with or to a specific entity on the basis of
a dollar amount authorized pursuant to subsection (a) shall--
(1) be based on merit-based selection procedures in
accordance with the requirements of sections 2304(k) and 2374
of title 10, United States Code, or on competitive
procedures; and
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of law.
(c) Relationship to Transfer and Programming Authority.--An
amount specified in the funding tables in this division may
be transferred or reprogrammed under a transfer or
reprogramming authority provided by another

[[Page H3465]]

provision of this Act or by other law. The transfer or
reprogramming of an amount specified in such funding tables
shall not count against a ceiling on such transfers or
reprogrammings under section 1001 or section 1522 of this Act
or any other provision of law, unless such transfer or
reprogramming would move funds between appropriation
accounts.
(d) Applicability to Classified Annex.--This section
applies to any classified annex that accompanies this Act.
(e) Oral and Written Communications.--No oral or written
communication concerning any amount specified in the funding
tables in this division shall supersede the requirements of
this section.

TITLE XLI--PROCUREMENT

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT (In Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 House
Line Item Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,
ARMY
FIXED WING
001 UTILITY F/W AIRCRAFT. 19,730 19,730
002 AERIAL COMMON SENSOR 142,050 142,050
(ACS) (MIP).
003 MQ-1 UAV............. 518,460 518,460
004 RQ-11 (RAVEN)........ 10,772 10,772
ROTARY
005 HELICOPTER, LIGHT 96,227 231,327
UTILITY (LUH).
Program increase [115,100]
for additional
aircraft.
Program increase [20,000]
for fielding.
006 AH-64 APACHE BLOCK 608,469 608,469
IIIA REMAN.
007 ADVANCE 150,931 150,931
PROCUREMENT (CY).
011 UH-60 BLACKHAWK M 1,046,976 1,046,976
MODEL (MYP).
012 ADVANCE 116,001 116,001
PROCUREMENT (CY).
013 CH-47 HELICOPTER..... 801,650 801,650
014 ADVANCE 98,376 98,376
PROCUREMENT (CY).
MODIFICATION OF
AIRCRAFT
015 MQ-1 PAYLOAD--UAS.... 97,781 97,781
016 GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP). 10,262 10,262
017 MULTI SENSOR ABN 12,467 12,467
RECON (MIP).
018 AH-64 MODS........... 53,559 53,559
019 CH-47 CARGO 149,764 149,764
HELICOPTER MODS
(MYP).
020 UTILITY/CARGO 17,500 17,500
AIRPLANE MODS.
021 UTILITY HELICOPTER 74,095 74,095
MODS.
022 KIOWA MODS WARRIOR... 184,044 184,044
023 NETWORK AND MISSION 152,569 152,569
PLAN.
024 COMMS, NAV 92,779 92,779
SURVEILLANCE.
025 GATM ROLLUP.......... 65,613 65,613
026 RQ-7 UAV MODS........ 121,902 121,902
GROUND SUPPORT
AVIONICS
027 AIRCRAFT 47,610 47,610
SURVIVABILITY
EQUIPMENT.
028 SURVIVABILITY CM..... 5,700 5,700
029 CMWS................. 126,869 126,869
OTHER SUPPORT
030 AVIONICS SUPPORT 6,809 6,809
EQUIPMENT.
031 COMMON GROUND 65,397 65,397
EQUIPMENT.
032 AIRCREW INTEGRATED 45,841 45,841
SYSTEMS.
033 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL.. 79,692 79,692
034 INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 1,615 1,615
035 LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET 2,877 2,877
TOTAL AIRCRAFT 5,024,387 5,159,487
PROCUREMENT,
ARMY.

MISSILE PROCUREMENT,
ARMY
SURFACE-TO-AIR
MISSILE SYSTEM
002 MSE MISSILE.......... 540,401 540,401
AIR-TO-SURFACE
MISSILE SYSTEM
003 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY. 4,464 4,464
ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT
MISSILE SYS
004 JAVELIN (AAWS-M) 110,510 110,510
SYSTEM SUMMARY.
005 TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY. 49,354 49,354
006 ADVANCE 19,965 19,965
PROCUREMENT (CY).
007 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET 237,216 237,216
(GMLRS).
008 MLRS REDUCED RANGE 19,022 19,022
PRACTICE ROCKETS
(RRPR).
MODIFICATIONS
010 PATRIOT MODS......... 256,438 256,438
011 STINGER MODS......... 37,252 37,252
012 ITAS/TOW MODS........ 20,000 20,000
013 MLRS MODS............ 11,571 11,571
014 HIMARS MODIFICATIONS. 6,105 6,105
SPARES AND REPAIR
PARTS
015 SPARES AND REPAIR 11,222 11,222
PARTS.
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
FACILITIES
016 AIR DEFENSE TARGETS.. 3,530 3,530
017 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M 1,748 1,748
(MISSILES).
018 PRODUCTION BASE 5,285 5,285
SUPPORT.
TOTAL MISSILE 1,334,083 1,334,083
PROCUREMENT,
ARMY.

PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV,
ARMY
TRACKED COMBAT
VEHICLES
001 STRYKER VEHICLE...... 374,100 374,100
MODIFICATION OF
TRACKED COMBAT
VEHICLES
002 STRYKER (MOD)........ 20,522 20,522
003 FIST VEHICLE (MOD)... 29,965 29,965
004 BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD) 158,000 158,000

[[Page H3466]]

005 HOWITZER, MED SP FT 4,769 4,769
155MM M109A6 (MOD).
006 PALADIN INTEGRATED 260,177 260,177
MANAGEMENT (PIM).
007 IMPROVED RECOVERY 111,031 186,031
VEHICLE (M88A2
HERCULES).
Program increase. [75,000]
008 ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD). 2,500 2,500
009 ASSAULT BREACHER 62,951 93,951
VEHICLE.
Program increase. [31,000]
010 M88 FOV MODS......... 28,469 28,469
011 JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE. 2,002 2,002
012 M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD). 178,100 178,100
013 ABRAMS UPGRADE 168,000
PROGRAM.
Program increase. [168,000]
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
FACILITIES
014 PRODUCTION BASE 1,544 1,544
SUPPORT (TCV-WTCV).
WEAPONS & OTHER
COMBAT VEHICLES
015 INTEGRATED AIR BURST 69,147 8,147
WEAPON SYSTEM FAMILY.
Funding ahead of [-50,000]
need.
Transfer to PE [-11,000]
64601A per Army's
request.
018 MORTAR SYSTEMS....... 5,310 5,310
019 XM320 GRENADE 24,049 24,049
LAUNCHER MODULE
(GLM).
021 CARBINE.............. 70,846 48,846
Funding ahead of [-22,000]
need.
023 COMMON REMOTELY 56,580 56,580
OPERATED WEAPONS
STATION.
024 HANDGUN.............. 300 300
MOD OF WEAPONS AND
OTHER COMBAT VEH
026 M777 MODS............ 39,300 39,300
027 M4 CARBINE MODS...... 10,300 10,300
028 M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN 33,691 33,691
MODS.
029 M249 SAW MACHINE GUN 7,608 7,608
MODS.
030 M240 MEDIUM MACHINE 2,719 2,719
GUN MODS.
031 SNIPER RIFLES 7,017 7,017
MODIFICATIONS.
032 M119 MODIFICATIONS... 18,707 18,707
033 M16 RIFLE MODS....... 2,136 2,136
034 MODIFICATIONS LESS 1,569 1,569
THAN $5.0M (WOCV-
WTCV).
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
FACILITIES
035 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M 2,024 2,024
(WOCV-WTCV).
036 PRODUCTION BASE 10,108 10,108
SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV).
037 INDUSTRIAL 459 459
PREPAREDNESS.
038 SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT 1,267 1,267
(SOLDIER ENH PROG).
TOTAL 1,597,267 1,788,267
PROCUREMENT OF
W&TCV, ARMY.

PROCUREMENT OF
AMMUNITION, ARMY
SMALL/MEDIUM CAL
AMMUNITION
002 CTG, 5.56MM, ALL 112,167 87,167
TYPES.
Unit cost [-25,000]
efficiencies--Arm
y requested
reduction.
003 CTG, 7.62MM, ALL 58,571 53,571
TYPES.
Unit cost [-5,000]
efficiencies--Arm
y requested
reduction.
004 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL 9,858 9,858
TYPES.
005 CTG, .50 CAL, ALL 80,037 55,037
TYPES.
Unit cost [-25,000]
efficiencies--Arm
y requested
reduction.
007 CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES. 16,496 16,496
008 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES. 69,533 50,033
Unit cost [-19,500]
efficiencies--Arm
y requested
reduction.
009 CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES. 55,781 55,781
MORTAR AMMUNITION
010 60MM MORTAR, ALL 38,029 38,029
TYPES.
011 81MM MORTAR, ALL 24,656 24,656
TYPES.
012 120MM MORTAR, ALL 60,781 60,781
TYPES.
TANK AMMUNITION
013 CARTRIDGES, TANK, 121,551 121,551
105MM AND 120MM, ALL
TYPES.
ARTILLERY AMMUNITION
014 ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 39,825 39,825
75MM & 105MM, ALL
TYPES.
015 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 37,902 37,902
155MM, ALL TYPES.
016 PROJ 155MM EXTENDED 67,896 67,896
RANGE M982.
017 ARTILLERY 71,205 71,205
PROPELLANTS, FUZES
AND PRIMERS, ALL.
ROCKETS
020 SHOULDER LAUNCHED 1,012 1,012
MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES.
021 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL 108,476 108,476
TYPES.
OTHER AMMUNITION
022 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, 24,074 24,074
ALL TYPES.
023 GRENADES, ALL TYPES.. 33,242 33,242
024 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES... 7,609 7,609
025 SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES 5,228 5,228
MISCELLANEOUS
026 AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL 16,700 16,700
TYPES.
027 NON-LETHAL 7,366 7,366
AMMUNITION, ALL
TYPES.
028 CAD/PAD ALL TYPES.... 3,614 3,614
029 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 12,423 12,423
MILLION (AMMO).
030 AMMUNITION PECULIAR 16,604 16,604
EQUIPMENT.
031 FIRST DESTINATION 14,328 14,328
TRANSPORTATION
(AMMO).
032 CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES. 108 108
PRODUCTION BASE
SUPPORT

[[Page H3467]]

033 PROVISION OF 242,324 242,324
INDUSTRIAL
FACILITIES.
034 CONVENTIONAL 179,605 179,605
MUNITIONS
DEMILITARIZATION.
035 ARMS INITIATIVE...... 3,436 3,436
TOTAL 1,540,437 1,465,937
PROCUREMENT OF
AMMUNITION, ARMY.

OTHER PROCUREMENT,
ARMY
TACTICAL VEHICLES
001 TACTICAL TRAILERS/ 4,000 4,000
DOLLY SETS.
002 SEMITRAILERS, 6,841 6,841
FLATBED:.
003 FAMILY OF MEDIUM 223,910 223,910
TACTICAL VEH (FMTV).
004 FIRETRUCKS & 11,880 11,880
ASSOCIATED
FIREFIGHTING EQUIP.
005 FAMILY OF HEAVY 14,731 14,731
TACTICAL VEHICLES
(FHTV).
006 PLS ESP.............. 44,252 44,252
009 HVY EXPANDED MOBILE 39,525 39,525
TACTICAL TRUCK EXT
SERV.
011 TACTICAL WHEELED 51,258 25,958
VEHICLE PROTECTION
KITS.
Funding ahead of [-25,300]
need.
012 MODIFICATION OF IN 49,904 49,904
SVC EQUIP.
013 MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH- 2,200 2,200
PROTECTED (MRAP)
MODS.
NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES
014 HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN.. 400 400
015 PASSENGER CARRYING 716 716
VEHICLES.
016 NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, 5,619 5,619
OTHER.
COMM--JOINT
COMMUNICATIONS
018 WIN-T--GROUND FORCES 973,477 973,477
TACTICAL NETWORK.
019 SIGNAL MODERNIZATION 14,120 14,120
PROGRAM.
020 JOINT INCIDENT SITE 7,869 7,869
COMMUNICATIONS
CAPABILITY.
021 JCSE EQUIPMENT 5,296 5,296
(USREDCOM).
COMM--SATELLITE
COMMUNICATIONS
022 DEFENSE ENTERPRISE 147,212 147,212
WIDEBAND SATCOM
SYSTEMS.
023 TRANSPORTABLE 7,998 7,998
TACTICAL COMMAND
COMMUNICATIONS.
024 SHF TERM............. 7,232 7,232
025 NAVSTAR GLOBAL 3,308 3,308
POSITIONING SYSTEM
(SPACE).
026 SMART-T (SPACE)...... 13,992 13,992
028 GLOBAL BRDCST SVC-- 28,206 28,206
GBS.
029 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP 2,778 2,778
(TAC SAT).
COMM--C3 SYSTEM
031 ARMY GLOBAL CMD & 17,590 17,590
CONTROL SYS (AGCCS).
COMM--COMBAT
COMMUNICATIONS
032 ARMY DATA 786 786
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
(DATA RADIO).
033 JOINT TACTICAL RADIO 382,930 382,930
SYSTEM.
034 MID-TIER NETWORKING 19,200 19,200
VEHICULAR RADIO
(MNVR).
035 RADIO TERMINAL SET, 1,438 1,438
MIDS LVT(2).
036 SINCGARS FAMILY...... 9,856 9,856
037 AMC CRITICAL ITEMS-- 14,184 14,184
OPA2.
038 TRACTOR DESK......... 6,271 6,271
040 SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT 1,030 1,030
PROGRAM COMM/
ELECTRONICS.
041 TACTICAL 31,868 31,868
COMMUNICATIONS AND
PROTECTIVE SYSTEM.
042 UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE 18,000 18,000
044 RADIO, IMPROVED HF 1,166 1,166
(COTS) FAMILY.
045 FAMILY OF MED COMM 22,867 22,867
FOR COMBAT CASUALTY
CARE.
COMM--INTELLIGENCE
COMM
048 CI AUTOMATION 1,512 1,512
ARCHITECTURE.
049 ARMY CA/MISO GPF 61,096 61,096
EQUIPMENT.
INFORMATION SECURITY
050 TSEC--ARMY KEY MGT 13,890 13,890
SYS (AKMS).
051 INFORMATION SYSTEM 23,245 23,245
SECURITY PROGRAM-
ISSP.
052 BIOMETRICS ENTERPRISE 3,800 3,800
053 COMMUNICATIONS 24,711 24,711
SECURITY (COMSEC).
COMM--LONG HAUL
COMMUNICATIONS
055 BASE SUPPORT 43,395 43,395
COMMUNICATIONS.
COMM--BASE
COMMUNICATIONS
057 INFORMATION SYSTEMS.. 104,577 104,577
058 DEFENSE MESSAGE 612 612
SYSTEM (DMS).
059 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 39,000 39,000
MODERNIZATION
PROGRAM.
060 INSTALLATION INFO 248,477 248,477
INFRASTRUCTURE MOD
PROGRAM.
ELECT EQUIP--TACT INT
REL ACT (TIARA)
064 JTT/CIBS-M........... 824 824
065 PROPHET GROUND....... 59,198 59,198
067 DCGS-A (MIP)......... 267,214 267,214
068 JOINT TACTICAL GROUND 9,899 9,899
STATION (JTAGS).
069 TROJAN (MIP)......... 24,598 24,598
070 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP 1,927 1,927
(INTEL SPT) (MIP).
071 CI HUMINT AUTO 6,169 6,169
REPRTING AND
COLL(CHARCS).
072 MACHINE FOREIGN 2,924 2,924
LANGUAGE TRANSLATION
SYSTEM-M.
ELECT EQUIP--
ELECTRONIC WARFARE
(EW)
074 LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER 40,735 40,735
MORTAR RADAR.
075 EW PLANNING & 13 13
MANAGEMENT TOOLS
(EWPMT).
076 ENEMY UAS............ 2,800 2,800
079 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/ 1,237 1,237
SECURITY
COUNTERMEASURES.
080 CI MODERNIZATION..... 1,399 1,399
ELECT EQUIP--TACTICAL
SURV. (TAC SURV)
082 SENTINEL MODS........ 47,983 47,983

[[Page H3468]]

083 SENSE THROUGH THE 142 142
WALL (STTW).
084 NIGHT VISION DEVICES. 202,428 202,428
085 LONG RANGE ADVANCED 5,183 5,183
SCOUT SURVEILLANCE
SYSTEM.
086 NIGHT VISION, THERMAL 14,074 14,074
WPN SIGHT.
087 SMALL TACTICAL 22,300 22,300
OPTICAL RIFLE
MOUNTED MLRF.
089 GREEN LASER 1,016 1,016
INTERDICTION SYSTEM
(GLIS).
090 INDIRECT FIRE 55,354 55,354
PROTECTION FAMILY OF
SYSTEMS.
091 ARTILLERY ACCURACY 800 800
EQUIP.
092 PROFILER............. 3,027 3,027
093 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP 1,185 1,185
(FIREFINDER RADARS).
094 JOINT BATTLE COMMAND-- 103,214 103,214
PLATFORM (JBC-P).
096 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP 26,037 26,037
(LLDR).
097 MORTAR FIRE CONTROL 23,100 23,100
SYSTEM.
098 COUNTERFIRE RADARS... 312,727 312,727
ELECT EQUIP--TACTICAL
C2 SYSTEMS
101 FIRE SUPPORT C2 43,228 43,228
FAMILY.
102 BATTLE COMMAND 14,446 14,446
SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT
SYSTEM.
103 FAAD C2.............. 4,607 4,607
104 AIR & MSL DEFENSE 33,090 33,090
PLANNING & CONTROL
SYS.
105 IAMD BATTLE COMMAND 21,200 21,200
SYSTEM.
107 LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE 1,795 1,795
SUPPORT (LCSS).
109 NETWORK MANAGEMENT 54,327 54,327
INITIALIZATION AND
SERVICE.
110 MANEUVER CONTROL 59,171 59,171
SYSTEM (MCS).
111 GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT 83,936 83,936
SYSTEM-ARMY (GCSS-A).
113 LOGISTICS AUTOMATION. 25,476 25,476
114 RECONNAISSANCE AND 19,341 19,341
SURVEYING INSTRUMENT
SET.
ELECT EQUIP--
AUTOMATION
115 ARMY TRAINING 11,865 11,865
MODERNIZATION.
116 AUTOMATED DATA 219,431 219,431
PROCESSING EQUIP.
117 GENERAL FUND 6,414 6,414
ENTERPRISE BUSINESS
SYSTEMS FAM.
118 HIGH PERF COMPUTING 62,683 62,683
MOD PGM (HPCMP).
120 RESERVE COMPONENT 34,951 34,951
AUTOMATION SYS
(RCAS).
ELECT EQUIP--AUDIO
VISUAL SYS (A/V)
121 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M 7,440 7,440
(A/V).
122 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M 1,615 1,615
(SURVEYING
EQUIPMENT).
ELECT EQUIP--SUPPORT
123 PRODUCTION BASE 554 554
SUPPORT (C-E).
124 BCT EMERGING 20,000 20,000
TECHNOLOGIES.
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
124A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.. 3,558 3,558
CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE
EQUIPMENT
126 FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL 762 762
EQUIPMENT (FNLE).
127 BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS 20,630 20,630
(BDS).
128 CBRN DEFENSE......... 22,151 22,151
BRIDGING EQUIPMENT
130 TACTICAL BRIDGING.... 14,188 14,188
131 TACTICAL BRIDGE, 23,101 23,101
FLOAT-RIBBON.
132 COMMON BRIDGE 15,416 15,416
TRANSPORTER (CBT)
RECAP.
ENGINEER (NON-
CONSTRUCTION)
EQUIPMENT
134 GRND STANDOFF MINE 50,465 50,465
DETECTN SYSM
(GSTAMIDS).
135 ROBOTIC COMBAT 6,490 6,490
SUPPORT SYSTEM
(RCSS).
136 EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS 1,563 1,563
RECAPITALIZATION.
137 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE 20,921 20,921
DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD
EQPMT).
138 REMOTE DEMOLITION 100 100
SYSTEMS.
139 < $5M, COUNTERMINE 2,271 2,271
EQUIPMENT.
COMBAT SERVICE
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
140 HEATERS AND ECU'S.... 7,269 7,269
141 LAUNDRIES, SHOWERS 200 200
AND LATRINES.
142 SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT.. 1,468 1,468
143 PERSONNEL RECOVERY 26,526 26,526
SUPPORT SYSTEM
(PRSS).
144 GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM 81,680 71,680
Unjustified unit [-10,000]
cost growth.
147 FIELD FEEDING 28,096 28,096
EQUIPMENT.
148 CARGO AERIAL DEL & 56,150 56,150
PERSONNEL PARACHUTE
SYSTEM.
149 MORTUARY AFFAIRS 3,242 3,242
SYSTEMS.
150 FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT 38,141 38,141
AND CONSTRUCTION
SETS.
151 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M 5,859 5,859
(ENG SPT).
PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT
152 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, 60,612 60,612
PETROLEUM & WATER.
MEDICAL EQUIPMENT
153 COMBAT SUPPORT 22,042 22,042
MEDICAL.
154 MEDEVAC MISSON 35,318 35,318
EQUIPMENT PACKAGE
(MEP).
MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT
155 MOBILE MAINTENANCE 19,427 19,427
EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS.
156 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M 3,860 3,860
(MAINT EQ).
CONSTRUCTION
EQUIPMENT
157 GRADER, ROAD MTZD, 2,000 2,000
HVY, 6X4 (CCE).
159 SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING 36,078 36,078
160 MISSION MODULES-- 9,721 9,721
ENGINEERING.
162 HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR.. 50,122 50,122
163 TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED 28,828 28,828
164 ALL TERRAIN CRANES... 19,863 19,863

[[Page H3469]]

166 HIGH MOBILITY 23,465 23,465
ENGINEER EXCAVATOR
(HMEE).
168 ENHANCED RAPID 13,590 13,590
AIRFIELD
CONSTRUCTION CAPAP.
169 CONST EQUIP ESP...... 16,088 16,088
170 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M 6,850 6,850
(CONST EQUIP).
RAIL FLOAT
CONTAINERIZATION
EQUIPMENT
171 ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP.. 38,007 19,007
Funding ahead of [-19,000]
need.
172 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M 10,605 10,605
(FLOAT/RAIL).
GENERATORS
173 GENERATORS AND 129,437 129,437
ASSOCIATED EQUIP.
MATERIAL HANDLING
EQUIPMENT
174 ROUGH TERRAIN 1,250 1,250
CONTAINER HANDLER
(RTCH).
175 FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS.. 8,260 8,260
TRAINING EQUIPMENT
176 COMBAT TRAINING 121,710 121,710
CENTERS SUPPORT.
177 TRAINING DEVICES, 225,200 225,200
NONSYSTEM.
178 CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL 30,063 30,063
TRAINER.
179 AVIATION COMBINED 34,913 34,913
ARMS TACTICAL
TRAINER.
180 GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN 9,955 9,955
SUPPORT OF ARMY
TRAINING.
TEST MEASURE AND DIG
EQUIPMENT (TMD)
181 CALIBRATION SETS 8,241 8,241
EQUIPMENT.
182 INTEGRATED FAMILY OF 67,506 67,506
TEST EQUIPMENT
(IFTE).
183 TEST EQUIPMENT 18,755 18,755
MODERNIZATION
(TEMOD).
OTHER SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
184 M25 STABILIZED 5,110 5,110
BINOCULAR.
185 RAPID EQUIPPING 5,110 5,110
SOLDIER SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT.
186 PHYSICAL SECURITY 62,904 62,904
SYSTEMS (OPA3).
187 BASE LEVEL COMMON 1,427 1,427
EQUIPMENT.
188 MODIFICATION OF IN- 96,661 96,661
SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA-
3).
189 PRODUCTION BASE 2,450 2,450
SUPPORT (OTH).
190 SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR 11,593 11,593
USER TESTING.
191 AMC CRITICAL ITEMS 8,948 8,948
OPA3.
192 TRACTOR YARD......... 8,000 8,000
OPA2
195 INITIAL SPARES--C&E.. 59,700 59,700
TOTAL OTHER 6,465,218 6,410,918
PROCUREMENT,
ARMY.

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,
NAVY
COMBAT AIRCRAFT
001 EA-18G............... 2,001,787 1,956,787
Program [-45,000]
adjustment.
003 F/A-18E/F (FIGHTER) 206,551 206,551
HORNET.
004 ADVANCE 75,000
PROCUREMENT (CY).
Program increase. [75,000]
005 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER 1,135,444 1,135,444
CV.
006 ADVANCE 94,766 94,766
PROCUREMENT (CY).
007 JSF STOVL............ 1,267,260 1,267,260
008 ADVANCE 103,195 103,195
PROCUREMENT (CY).
009 V-22 (MEDIUM LIFT)... 1,432,573 1,432,573
010 ADVANCE 55,196 55,196
PROCUREMENT (CY).
011 H-1 UPGRADES (UH-1Y/ 749,962 749,962
AH-1Z).
012 ADVANCE 71,000 71,000
PROCUREMENT (CY).
013 MH-60S (MYP)......... 383,831 383,831
014 ADVANCE 37,278 37,278
PROCUREMENT (CY).
015 MH-60R (MYP)......... 599,237 599,237
016 ADVANCE 231,834 231,834
PROCUREMENT (CY).
017 P-8A POSEIDON........ 3,189,989 3,189,989
018 ADVANCE 313,160 313,160
PROCUREMENT (CY).
019 E-2D ADV HAWKEYE..... 997,107 962,107
Unjustified CRI [-35,000]
Funding.
020 ADVANCE 266,542 266,542
PROCUREMENT (CY).
TRAINER AIRCRAFT
021 JPATS................ 249,080 249,080
OTHER AIRCRAFT
022 KC-130J.............. 134,358 134,358
023 ADVANCE 32,288 32,288
PROCUREMENT (CY).
025 ADVANCE 52,002 52,002
PROCUREMENT (CY).
026 MQ-8 UAV............. 60,980 60,980
028 OTHER SUPPORT 14,958 14,958
AIRCRAFT.
MODIFICATION OF
AIRCRAFT
029 EA-6 SERIES.......... 18,577 18,577
030 AEA SYSTEMS.......... 48,502 48,502
031 AV-8 SERIES.......... 41,575 41,575
032 ADVERSARY............ 2,992 2,992
033 F-18 SERIES.......... 875,371 875,371
034 H-46 SERIES.......... 2,127 2,127
036 H-53 SERIES.......... 67,675 67,675
037 SH-60 SERIES......... 135,054 135,054
038 H-1 SERIES........... 41,706 41,706
039 EP-3 SERIES.......... 55,903 77,903
12th Aircraft [8,000]
Spiral 3 Upgrade.
Multi-INT Sensor [14,000]
Kits &
Installation.

[[Page H3470]]

040 P-3 SERIES........... 37,436 37,436
041 E-2 SERIES........... 31,044 31,044
042 TRAINER A/C SERIES... 43,720 43,720
043 C-2A................. 902 902
044 C-130 SERIES......... 47,587 47,587
045 FEWSG................ 665 665
046 CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C 14,587 14,587
SERIES.
047 E-6 SERIES........... 189,312 189,312
048 EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS 85,537 85,537
SERIES.
049 SPECIAL PROJECT 3,684 16,684
AIRCRAFT.
Engineering and [8,000]
Technical
Services Support.
Multi-INT Sensor [5,000]
Kits &
Installation.
050 T-45 SERIES.......... 98,128 98,128
051 POWER PLANT CHANGES.. 22,999 22,999
052 JPATS SERIES......... 1,576 1,576
053 AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT 6,267 6,267
MODS.
054 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT. 141,685 141,685
055 COMMON AVIONICS 120,660 120,660
CHANGES.
056 COMMON DEFENSIVE 3,554 3,554
WEAPON SYSTEM.
057 ID SYSTEMS........... 41,800 41,800
058 P-8 SERIES........... 9,485 9,485
059 MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION 14,431 14,431
060 MQ-8 SERIES.......... 1,001 1,001
061 RQ-7 SERIES.......... 26,433 26,433
062 V-22 (TILT/ROTOR 160,834 160,834
ACFT) OSPREY.
063 F-35 STOVL SERIES.... 147,130 147,130
064 F-35 CV SERIES....... 31,100 31,100
AIRCRAFT SPARES AND
REPAIR PARTS
065 SPARES AND REPAIR 1,142,461 1,142,461
PARTS.
AIRCRAFT SUPPORT
EQUIP & FACILITIES
066 COMMON GROUND 410,044 410,044
EQUIPMENT.
067 AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL 27,450 27,450
FACILITIES.
068 WAR CONSUMABLES...... 28,930 28,930
069 OTHER PRODUCTION 5,268 5,268
CHARGES.
070 SPECIAL SUPPORT 60,306 60,306
EQUIPMENT.
071 FIRST DESTINATION 1,775 1,775
TRANSPORTATION.
TOTAL AIRCRAFT 17,927,651 17,957,651
PROCUREMENT,
NAVY.

WEAPONS PROCUREMENT,
NAVY
MODIFICATION OF
MISSILES
001 TRIDENT II MODS...... 1,140,865 1,126,765
Equipment related [-14,100]
to New START
treaty
implementation.
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
FACILITIES
002 MISSILE INDUSTRIAL 7,617 7,617
FACILITIES.
STRATEGIC MISSILES
003 TOMAHAWK............. 312,456 312,456
TACTICAL MISSILES
004 AMRAAM............... 95,413 95,413
005 SIDEWINDER........... 117,208 117,208
006 JSOW................. 136,794 136,794
007 STANDARD MISSILE..... 367,985 367,985
008 RAM.................. 67,596 67,596
009 HELLFIRE............. 33,916 33,916
010 STAND OFF PRECISION 6,278 6,278
GUIDED MUNITIONS
(SOPGM).
011 AERIAL TARGETS....... 41,799 41,799
012 OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT 3,538 3,538
MODIFICATION OF
MISSILES
013 ESSM................. 76,749 76,749
014 HARM MODS............ 111,902 111,902
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
FACILITIES
015 WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL 1,138 1,138
FACILITIES.
016 FLEET SATELLITE COMM 23,014 23,014
FOLLOW-ON.
ORDNANCE SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
017 ORDNANCE SUPPORT 84,318 84,318
EQUIPMENT.
TORPEDOES AND RELATED
EQUIP
018 SSTD................. 3,978 3,978
019 ASW TARGETS.......... 8,031 8,031
MOD OF TORPEDOES AND
RELATED EQUIP
020 MK-54 TORPEDO MODS... 125,898 125,898
021 MK-48 TORPEDO ADCAP 53,203 53,203
MODS.
022 QUICKSTRIKE MINE..... 7,800 7,800
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
023 TORPEDO SUPPORT 59,730 59,730
EQUIPMENT.
024 ASW RANGE SUPPORT.... 4,222 4,222
DESTINATION
TRANSPORTATION
025 FIRST DESTINATION 3,963 3,963
TRANSPORTATION.
GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS
026 SMALL ARMS AND 12,513 12,513
WEAPONS.
MODIFICATION OF GUNS
AND GUN MOUNTS
027 CIWS MODS............ 56,308 56,308
028 COAST GUARD WEAPONS.. 10,727 10,727
029 GUN MOUNT MODS....... 72,901 72,901

[[Page H3471]]

030 CRUISER MODERNIZATION 1,943 1,943
WEAPONS.
031 AIRBORNE MINE 19,758 19,758
NEUTRALIZATION
SYSTEMS.
SPARES AND REPAIR
PARTS
033 SPARES AND REPAIR 52,632 52,632
PARTS.
TOTAL WEAPONS 3,122,193 3,108,093
PROCUREMENT,
NAVY.

PROCUREMENT OF AMMO,
NAVY & MC
NAVY AMMUNITION
001 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS 37,703 37,703
002 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL 65,411 65,411
TYPES.
003 MACHINE GUN 20,284 20,284
AMMUNITION.
004 PRACTICE BOMBS....... 37,870 37,870
005 CARTRIDGES & CART 53,764 53,764
ACTUATED DEVICES.
006 AIR EXPENDABLE 67,194 67,194
COUNTERMEASURES.
007 JATOS................ 2,749 2,749
008 LRLAP 6" LONG RANGE 3,906 3,906
ATTACK PROJECTILE.
009 5 INCH/54 GUN 24,151 24,151
AMMUNITION.
010 INTERMEDIATE CALIBER 33,080 33,080
GUN AMMUNITION.
011 OTHER SHIP GUN 40,398 40,398
AMMUNITION.
012 SMALL ARMS & LANDING 61,219 61,219
PARTY AMMO.
013 PYROTECHNIC AND 10,637 10,637
DEMOLITION.
014 AMMUNITION LESS THAN 4,578 4,578
$5 MILLION.
MARINE CORPS
AMMUNITION
015 SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION 26,297 26,297
016 LINEAR CHARGES, ALL 6,088 6,088
TYPES.
017 40 MM, ALL TYPES..... 7,644 7,644
018 60MM, ALL TYPES...... 3,349 3,349
020 120MM, ALL TYPES..... 13,361 13,361
022 GRENADES, ALL TYPES.. 2,149 2,149
023 ROCKETS, ALL TYPES... 27,465 27,465
026 FUZE, ALL TYPES...... 26,366 26,366
028 AMMO MODERNIZATION... 8,403 8,403
029 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 5,201 5,201
MILLION.
TOTAL 589,267 589,267
PROCUREMENT OF
AMMO, NAVY & MC.

SHIPBUILDING &
CONVERSION, NAVY
OTHER WARSHIPS
001 CARRIER REPLACEMENT 944,866 944,866
PROGRAM.
003 VIRGINIA CLASS 2,930,704 3,422,704
SUBMARINE.
Increase to [492,000]
Virginia class.
004 ADVANCE 2,354,612 2,354,612
PROCUREMENT (CY).
005 CVN REFUELING 1,705,424 1,705,424
OVERHAULS.
006 ADVANCE 245,793 245,793
PROCUREMENT (CY).
007 DDG 1000............. 231,694 310,994
Increase to DDG [79,300]
1000.
008 DDG-51............... 1,615,564 1,615,564
009 ADVANCE 388,551 388,551
PROCUREMENT (CY).
010 LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP. 1,793,014 1,793,014
AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS
012 AFLOAT FORWARD 524,000 524,000
STAGING BASE.
014 JOINT HIGH SPEED 2,732 2,732
VESSEL.
AUXILIARIES, CRAFT
AND PRIOR YR PROGRAM
COST
016 ADVANCE 183,900 183,900
PROCUREMENT (CY).
017 OUTFITTING........... 450,163 450,163
019 LCAC SLEP............ 80,987 80,987
020 COMPLETION OF PY 625,800 988,800
SHIPBUILDING
PROGRAMS.
DDG-51........... [332,000]
Joint High Speed [7,600]
Vessel.
MTS.............. [23,400]
TOTAL 14,077,804 15,012,104
SHIPBUILDING &
CONVERSION, NAVY.

OTHER PROCUREMENT,
NAVY
SHIP PROPULSION
EQUIPMENT
001 LM-2500 GAS TURBINE.. 10,180 10,180
002 ALLISON 501K GAS 5,536 5,536
TURBINE.
003 HYBRID ELECTRIC DRIVE 16,956 16,956
(HED).
GENERATORS
004 SURFACE COMBATANT 19,782 19,782
HM&E.
NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT
005 OTHER NAVIGATION 39,509 39,509
EQUIPMENT.
PERISCOPES
006 SUB PERISCOPES & 52,515 52,515
IMAGING EQUIP.
OTHER SHIPBOARD
EQUIPMENT
007 DDG MOD.............. 285,994 285,994
008 FIREFIGHTING 14,389 14,389
EQUIPMENT.
009 COMMAND AND CONTROL 2,436 2,436
SWITCHBOARD.
010 LHA/LHD MIDLIFE...... 12,700 12,700
011 LCC 19/20 EXTENDED 40,329 40,329
SERVICE LIFE PROGRAM.
012 POLLUTION CONTROL 19,603 19,603
EQUIPMENT.
013 SUBMARINE SUPPORT 8,678 8,678
EQUIPMENT.
014 VIRGINIA CLASS 74,209 74,209
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.
015 LCS CLASS SUPPORT 47,078 47,078
EQUIPMENT.

[[Page H3472]]

016 SUBMARINE BATTERIES.. 37,000 37,000
017 LPD CLASS SUPPORT 25,053 25,053
EQUIPMENT.
018 STRATEGIC PLATFORM 12,986 12,986
SUPPORT EQUIP.
019 DSSP EQUIPMENT....... 2,455 2,455
020 CG MODERNIZATION..... 10,539 10,539
021 LCAC................. 14,431 14,431
022 UNDERWATER EOD 36,700 36,700
PROGRAMS.
023 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 119,902 119,902
MILLION.
024 CHEMICAL WARFARE 3,678 3,678
DETECTORS.
025 SUBMARINE LIFE 8,292 8,292
SUPPORT SYSTEM.
REACTOR PLANT
EQUIPMENT
027 REACTOR COMPONENTS... 286,744 286,744
OCEAN ENGINEERING
028 DIVING AND SALVAGE 8,780 8,780
EQUIPMENT.
SMALL BOATS
029 STANDARD BOATS....... 36,452 36,452
TRAINING EQUIPMENT
030 OTHER SHIPS TRAINING 36,145 36,145
EQUIPMENT.
PRODUCTION FACILITIES
EQUIPMENT
031 OPERATING FORCES IPE. 69,368 69,368
OTHER SHIP SUPPORT
032 NUCLEAR ALTERATIONS.. 106,328 106,328
033 LCS COMMON MISSION 45,966 45,966
MODULES EQUIPMENT.
034 LCS MCM MISSION 59,885 59,885
MODULES.
035 LCS SUW MISSION 37,168 37,168
MODULES.
LOGISTIC SUPPORT
036 LSD MIDLIFE.......... 77,974 77,974
SHIP SONARS
038 SPQ-9B RADAR......... 27,934 27,934
039 AN/SQQ-89 SURF ASW 83,231 83,231
COMBAT SYSTEM.
040 SSN ACOUSTICS........ 199,438 199,438
041 UNDERSEA WARFARE 9,394 9,394
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.
042 SONAR SWITCHES AND 12,953 12,953
TRANSDUCERS.
043 ELECTRONIC WARFARE 8,958 8,958
MILDEC.
ASW ELECTRONIC
EQUIPMENT
044 SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC 24,077 24,077
WARFARE SYSTEM.
045 SSTD................. 11,925 11,925
046 FIXED SURVEILLANCE 94,338 94,338
SYSTEM.
047 SURTASS.............. 9,680 9,680
048 MARITIME PATROL AND 18,130 18,130
RECONNSAISANCE FORCE.
ELECTRONIC WARFARE
EQUIPMENT
049 AN/SLQ-32............ 203,375 203,375
RECONNAISSANCE
EQUIPMENT
050 SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT. 123,656 123,656
051 AUTOMATED 896 896
IDENTIFICATION
SYSTEM (AIS).
SUBMARINE
SURVEILLANCE
EQUIPMENT
052 SUBMARINE SUPPORT 49,475 49,475
EQUIPMENT PROG.
OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC
EQUIPMENT
053 COOPERATIVE 34,692 34,692
ENGAGEMENT
CAPABILITY.
054 TRUSTED INFORMATION 396 396
SYSTEM (TIS).
055 NAVAL TACTICAL 15,703 15,703
COMMAND SUPPORT
SYSTEM (NTCSS).
056 ATDLS................ 3,836 3,836
057 NAVY COMMAND AND 7,201 7,201
CONTROL SYSTEM
(NCCS).
058 MINESWEEPING SYSTEM 54,400 54,400
REPLACEMENT.
059 SHALLOW WATER MCM.... 8,548 8,548
060 NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS 11,765 11,765
(SPACE).
061 AMERICAN FORCES RADIO 6,483 6,483
AND TV SERVICE.
062 STRATEGIC PLATFORM 7,631 7,631
SUPPORT EQUIP.
TRAINING EQUIPMENT
063 OTHER TRAINING 53,644 53,644
EQUIPMENT.
AVIATION ELECTRONIC
EQUIPMENT
064 MATCALS.............. 7,461 7,461
065 SHIPBOARD AIR TRAFFIC 9,140 9,140
CONTROL.
066 AUTOMATIC CARRIER 20,798 20,798
LANDING SYSTEM.
067 NATIONAL AIR SPACE 19,754 19,754
SYSTEM.
068 FLEET AIR TRAFFIC 8,909 8,909
CONTROL SYSTEMS.
069 LANDING SYSTEMS...... 13,554 13,554
070 ID SYSTEMS........... 38,934 38,934
071 NAVAL MISSION 14,131 14,131
PLANNING SYSTEMS.
OTHER SHORE
ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
072 DEPLOYABLE JOINT 3,249 3,249
COMMAND & CONTROL.
073 MARITIME INTEGRATED 11,646 11,646
BROADCAST SYSTEM.
074 TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I 18,189 18,189
SYSTEMS.
075 DCGS-N............... 17,350 17,350
076 CANES................ 340,567 340,567
077 RADIAC............... 9,835 9,835
078 CANES-INTELL......... 59,652 59,652
079 GPETE................ 6,253 6,253
080 INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM 4,963 4,963
TEST FACILITY.
081 EMI CONTROL 4,664 4,664
INSTRUMENTATION.
082 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 66,889 66,889
MILLION.
SHIPBOARD
COMMUNICATIONS

[[Page H3473]]

084 SHIP COMMUNICATIONS 23,877 23,877
AUTOMATION.
086 COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS 28,001 28,001
UNDER $5M.
SUBMARINE
COMMUNICATIONS
087 SUBMARINE BROADCAST 7,856 7,856
SUPPORT.
088 SUBMARINE 74,376 74,376
COMMUNICATION
EQUIPMENT.
SATELLITE
COMMUNICATIONS
089 SATELLITE 27,381 27,381
COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS.
090 NAVY MULTIBAND 215,952 215,952
TERMINAL (NMT).
SHORE COMMUNICATIONS
091 JCS COMMUNICATIONS 4,463 4,463
EQUIPMENT.
092 ELECTRICAL POWER 778 778
SYSTEMS.
CRYPTOGRAPHIC
EQUIPMENT
094 INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY 133,530 133,530
PROGRAM (ISSP).
095 MIO INTEL 1,000 1,000
EXPLOITATION TEAM.
CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT
096 CRYPTOLOGIC 12,251 12,251
COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP.
OTHER ELECTRONIC
SUPPORT
097 COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT 2,893 2,893
SONOBUOYS
099 SONOBUOYS--ALL TYPES. 179,927 179,927
AIRCRAFT SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
100 WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT 55,279 55,279
EQUIPMENT.
101 EXPEDITIONARY 8,792 8,792
AIRFIELDS.
102 AIRCRAFT REARMING 11,364 11,364
EQUIPMENT.
103 AIRCRAFT LAUNCH & 59,502 59,502
RECOVERY EQUIPMENT.
104 METEOROLOGICAL 19,118 19,118
EQUIPMENT.
105 DCRS/DPL............. 1,425 1,425
106 AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT 29,670 29,670
107 AIRBORNE MINE 101,554 101,554
COUNTERMEASURES.
108 LAMPS MK III 18,293 18,293
SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT.
109 PORTABLE ELECTRONIC 7,969 7,969
MAINTENANCE AIDS.
110 OTHER AVIATION 5,215 5,215
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.
111 AUTONOMIC LOGISTICS 4,827 4,827
INFORMATION SYSTEM
(ALIS).
SHIP GUN SYSTEM
EQUIPMENT
112 NAVAL FIRES CONTROL 1,188 1,188
SYSTEM.
113 GUN FIRE CONTROL 4,447 4,447
EQUIPMENT.
SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS
EQUIPMENT
114 NATO SEASPARROW...... 58,368 58,368
115 RAM GMLS............. 491 491
116 SHIP SELF DEFENSE 51,858 51,858
SYSTEM.
117 AEGIS SUPPORT 59,757 59,757
EQUIPMENT.
118 TOMAHAWK SUPPORT 71,559 71,559
EQUIPMENT.
119 VERTICAL LAUNCH 626 626
SYSTEMS.
120 MARITIME INTEGRATED 2,779 2,779
PLANNING SYSTEM-MIPS.
FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
121 STRATEGIC MISSILE 224,484 198,565
SYSTEMS EQUIP.
New START treaty [-25,919]
implementation.
ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
122 SSN COMBAT CONTROL 85,678 85,678
SYSTEMS.
123 SUBMARINE ASW SUPPORT 3,913 3,913
EQUIPMENT.
124 SURFACE ASW SUPPORT 3,909 3,909
EQUIPMENT.
125 ASW RANGE SUPPORT 28,694 28,694
EQUIPMENT.
OTHER ORDNANCE
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
126 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE 46,586 46,586
DISPOSAL EQUIP.
127 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 11,933 11,933
MILLION.
OTHER EXPENDABLE
ORDNANCE
128 ANTI-SHIP MISSILE 62,361 62,361
DECOY SYSTEM.
129 SURFACE TRAINING 41,813 41,813
DEVICE MODS.
130 SUBMARINE TRAINING 26,672 26,672
DEVICE MODS.
CIVIL ENGINEERING
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
131 PASSENGER CARRYING 5,600 5,600
VEHICLES.
132 GENERAL PURPOSE 3,717 3,717
TRUCKS.
133 CONSTRUCTION & 10,881 10,881
MAINTENANCE EQUIP.
134 FIRE FIGHTING 14,748 14,748
EQUIPMENT.
135 TACTICAL VEHICLES.... 5,540 5,540
136 AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT. 5,741 5,741
137 POLLUTION CONTROL 3,852 3,852
EQUIPMENT.
138 ITEMS UNDER $5 25,757 25,757
MILLION.
139 PHYSICAL SECURITY 1,182 1,182
VEHICLES.
SUPPLY SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
140 MATERIALS HANDLING 14,250 14,250
EQUIPMENT.
141 OTHER SUPPLY SUPPORT 6,401 6,401
EQUIPMENT.
142 FIRST DESTINATION 5,718 5,718
TRANSPORTATION.
143 SPECIAL PURPOSE 22,597 22,597
SUPPLY SYSTEMS.
TRAINING DEVICES
144 TRAINING SUPPORT 22,527 22,527
EQUIPMENT.
COMMAND SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
145 COMMAND SUPPORT 50,428 50,428
EQUIPMENT.
146 EDUCATION SUPPORT 2,292 2,292
EQUIPMENT.
147 MEDICAL SUPPORT 4,925 4,925
EQUIPMENT.
149 NAVAL MIP SUPPORT 3,202 3,202
EQUIPMENT.
151 OPERATING FORCES 24,294 24,294
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.

[[Page H3474]]

152 C4ISR EQUIPMENT...... 4,287 4,287
153 ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT 18,276 18,276
EQUIPMENT.
154 PHYSICAL SECURITY 134,495 134,495
EQUIPMENT.
155 ENTERPRISE 324,327 324,327
INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY.
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
156A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.. 12,140 12,140
SPARES AND REPAIR
PARTS
157 SPARES AND REPAIR 317,234 316,959
PARTS.
New START treaty [-275]
implementation.
TOTAL OTHER 6,310,257 6,284,063
PROCUREMENT,
NAVY.

PROCUREMENT, MARINE
CORPS
TRACKED COMBAT
VEHICLES
001 AAV7A1 PIP........... 32,360 32,360
002 LAV PIP.............. 6,003 6,003
ARTILLERY AND OTHER
WEAPONS
003 EXPEDITIONARY FIRE 589 589
SUPPORT SYSTEM.
004 155MM LIGHTWEIGHT 3,655 3,655
TOWED HOWITZER.
005 HIGH MOBILITY 5,467 5,467
ARTILLERY ROCKET
SYSTEM.
006 WEAPONS AND COMBAT 20,354 20,354
VEHICLES UNDER $5
MILLION.
OTHER SUPPORT
007 MODIFICATION KITS.... 38,446 38,446
008 WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT 4,734 4,734
PROGRAM.
GUIDED MISSILES
009 GROUND BASED AIR 15,713 15,713
DEFENSE.
010 JAVELIN.............. 36,175 36,175
012 ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS 1,136 1,136
SYSTEM-HEAVY (AAWS-
H).
OTHER SUPPORT
013 MODIFICATION KITS.... 33,976 33,976
COMMAND AND CONTROL
SYSTEMS
014 UNIT OPERATIONS 16,273 16,273
CENTER.
REPAIR AND TEST
EQUIPMENT
015 REPAIR AND TEST 41,063 41,063
EQUIPMENT.
OTHER SUPPORT (TEL)
016 COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM 2,930 2,930
COMMAND AND CONTROL
SYSTEM (NON-TEL)
018 ITEMS UNDER $5 1,637 1,637
MILLION (COMM &
ELEC).
019 AIR OPERATIONS C2 18,394 18,394
SYSTEMS.
RADAR + EQUIPMENT
(NON-TEL)
020 RADAR SYSTEMS........ 114,051 114,051
021 RQ-21 UAS............ 66,612 66,612
INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT
(NON-TEL)
022 FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM.. 3,749 3,749
023 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT 75,979 75,979
EQUIPMENT.
026 RQ-11 UAV............ 1,653 1,653
027 DCGS-MC.............. 9,494 9,494
OTHER COMM/ELEC
EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
028 NIGHT VISION 6,171 6,171
EQUIPMENT.
OTHER SUPPORT (NON-
TEL)
029 COMMON COMPUTER 121,955 121,955
RESOURCES.
030 COMMAND POST SYSTEMS. 83,294 83,294
031 RADIO SYSTEMS........ 74,718 74,718
032 COMM SWITCHING & 47,613 47,613
CONTROL SYSTEMS.
033 COMM & ELEC 19,573 19,573
INFRASTRUCTURE
SUPPORT.
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
033A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.. 5,659 5,659
ADMINISTRATIVE
VEHICLES
034 COMMERCIAL PASSENGER 1,039 1,039
VEHICLES.
035 COMMERCIAL CARGO 31,050 31,050
VEHICLES.
TACTICAL VEHICLES
036 5/4T TRUCK HMMWV 36,333 36,333
(MYP).
037 MOTOR TRANSPORT 3,137 3,137
MODIFICATIONS.
040 FAMILY OF TACTICAL 27,385 27,385
TRAILERS.
OTHER SUPPORT
041 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 7,016 7,016
MILLION.
ENGINEER AND OTHER
EQUIPMENT
042 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL 14,377 14,377
EQUIP ASSORT.
043 BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT 24,864 24,864
044 TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS 21,592 21,592
045 POWER EQUIPMENT 61,353 61,353
ASSORTED.
046 AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT 4,827 4,827
EQUIPMENT.
047 EOD SYSTEMS.......... 40,011 40,011
MATERIALS HANDLING
EQUIPMENT
048 PHYSICAL SECURITY 16,809 16,809
EQUIPMENT.
049 GARRISON MOBILE 3,408 3,408
ENGINEER EQUIPMENT
(GMEE).
050 MATERIAL HANDLING 48,549 48,549
EQUIP.
051 FIRST DESTINATION 190 190
TRANSPORTATION.
GENERAL PROPERTY
052 FIELD MEDICAL 23,129 23,129
EQUIPMENT.
053 TRAINING DEVICES..... 8,346 8,346
054 CONTAINER FAMILY..... 1,857 1,857
055 FAMILY OF 36,198 36,198
CONSTRUCTION
EQUIPMENT.

[[Page H3475]]

056 RAPID DEPLOYABLE 2,390 2,390
KITCHEN.
OTHER SUPPORT
057 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 6,525 6,525
MILLION.
SPARES AND REPAIR
PARTS
058 SPARES AND REPAIR 13,700 13,700
PARTS.
TOTAL 1,343,511 1,343,511
PROCUREMENT,
MARINE CORPS.

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,
AIR FORCE
TACTICAL FORCES
001 F-35................. 3,060,770 3,060,770
002 ADVANCE 363,783 363,783
PROCUREMENT (CY).
OTHER AIRLIFT
005 C-130J............... 537,517 537,517
006 ADVANCE 162,000 162,000
PROCUREMENT (CY).
007 HC-130J.............. 132,121 132,121
008 ADVANCE 88,000 88,000
PROCUREMENT (CY).
009 MC-130J.............. 389,434 389,434
010 ADVANCE 104,000 104,000
PROCUREMENT (CY).
HELICOPTERS
015 CV-22 (MYP).......... 230,798 230,798
MISSION SUPPORT
AIRCRAFT
017 CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C. 2,541 2,541
OTHER AIRCRAFT
020 TARGET DRONES........ 138,669 138,669
022 AC-130J.............. 470,019 470,019
024 RQ-4................. 27,000 27,000
027 MQ-9................. 272,217 352,217
Program increase. [80,000]
028 RQ-4 BLOCK 40 PROC... 1,747 1,747
STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT
029 B-2A................. 20,019 20,019
030 B-1B................. 132,222 132,222
031 B-52................. 111,002 110,502
B-52 conversions [-500]
related to New
START treaty
implementation.
032 LARGE AIRCRAFT 27,197 27,197
INFRARED
COUNTERMEASURES.
TACTICAL AIRCRAFT
033 A-10................. 47,598 47,598
034 F-15................. 354,624 354,624
035 F-16................. 11,794 11,794
036 F-22A................ 285,830 285,830
037 F-35 MODIFICATIONS... 157,777 157,777
AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT
038 C-5.................. 2,456 2,456
039 C-5M................. 1,021,967 1,021,967
042 C-17A................ 143,197 143,197
043 C-21................. 103 103
044 C-32A................ 9,780 9,780
045 C-37A................ 452 452
046 C-130 AMP............ 47,300
LRIP Kit [47,300]
Procurement.
TRAINER AIRCRAFT
047 GLIDER MODS.......... 128 128
048 T-6.................. 6,427 6,427
049 T-1.................. 277 277
050 T-38................. 28,686 28,686
OTHER AIRCRAFT
052 U-2 MODS............. 45,591 45,591
053 KC-10A (ATCA)........ 70,918 70,918
054 C-12................. 1,876 1,876
055 MC-12W............... 5,000 5,000
056 C-20 MODS............ 192 192
057 VC-25A MOD........... 263 263
058 C-40................. 6,119 6,119
059 C-130................ 58,577 74,277
C-130H Propulsion [15,700]
System Engine
Upgrades.
061 C-130J MODS.......... 10,475 10,475
062 C-135................ 46,556 46,556
063 COMPASS CALL MODS.... 34,494 34,494
064 RC-135............... 171,813 171,813
065 E-3.................. 197,087 197,087
066 E-4.................. 14,304 14,304
067 E-8.................. 57,472 57,472
068 H-1.................. 6,627 6,627
069 H-60................. 27,654 27,654
070 RQ-4 MODS............ 9,313 9,313
071 HC/MC-130 16,300 16,300
MODIFICATIONS.
072 OTHER AIRCRAFT....... 6,948 6,948
073 MQ-1 MODS............ 9,734 9,734
074 MQ-9 MODS............ 102,970 102,970
076 RQ-4 GSRA/CSRA MODS.. 30,000 30,000
077 CV-22 MODS........... 23,310 23,310
AIRCRAFT SPARES AND
REPAIR PARTS

[[Page H3476]]

078 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR 463,285 639,285
PARTS.
F100-229 spare [165,000]
engine shortfall.
MQ-9 spares...... [11,000]
COMMON SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
079 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT 49,140 49,140
SUPPORT EQUIP.
POST PRODUCTION
SUPPORT
081 B-1.................. 3,683 3,683
083 B-2A................. 43,786 43,786
084 B-52................. 7,000 7,000
087 C-17A................ 81,952 81,952
089 C-135................ 8,597 8,597
090 F-15................. 2,403 2,403
091 F-16................. 3,455 3,455
092 F-22A................ 5,911 5,911
INDUSTRIAL
PREPAREDNESS
094 INDUSTRIAL 21,148 21,148
RESPONSIVENESS.
WAR CONSUMABLES
095 WAR CONSUMABLES...... 94,947 94,947
OTHER PRODUCTION
CHARGES
096 OTHER PRODUCTION 1,242,004 1,242,004
CHARGES.
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
101A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.. 75,845 67,545
Program Decrease. [-8,300]
TOTAL AIRCRAFT 11,398,901 11,709,101
PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE.

MISSILE PROCUREMENT,
AIR FORCE
MISSILE REPLACEMENT
EQUIPMENT--BALLISTIC
001 MISSILE REPLACEMENT 39,104 39,104
EQ-BALLISTIC.
TACTICAL
002 JASSM................ 291,151 291,151
003 SIDEWINDER (AIM-9X).. 119,904 119,904
004 AMRAAM............... 340,015 340,015
005 PREDATOR HELLFIRE 48,548 48,548
MISSILE.
006 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB.. 42,347 42,347
INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES
007 INDUSTR'L PREPAREDNS/ 752 752
POL PREVENTION.
CLASS IV
009 MM III MODIFICATIONS. 21,635 21,635
010 AGM-65D MAVERICK..... 276 276
011 AGM-88A HARM......... 580 580
012 AIR LAUNCH CRUISE 6,888 6,888
MISSILE (ALCM).
013 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB.. 5,000 5,000
MISSILE SPARES AND
REPAIR PARTS
014 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR 72,080 71,377
PARTS.
Spares and repair [-703]
parts related to
New START treaty
implementation.
SPACE PROGRAMS
015 ADVANCED EHF......... 379,586 379,586
016 WIDEBAND GAPFILLER 38,398 38,398
SATELLITES(SPACE).
017 GPS III SPACE SEGMENT 403,431 403,431
018 ADVANCE 74,167 74,167
PROCUREMENT (CY).
019 SPACEBORNE EQUIP 5,244 5,244
(COMSEC).
020 GLOBAL POSITIONING 55,997 55,997
(SPACE).
021 DEF METEOROLOGICAL 95,673 95,673
SAT PROG(SPACE).
022 EVOLVED EXPENDABLE 1,852,900 1,852,900
LAUNCH VEH(SPACE).
023 SBIR HIGH (SPACE).... 583,192 583,192
SPECIAL PROGRAMS
029 SPECIAL UPDATE 36,716 36,716
PROGRAMS.
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
029A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.. 829,702 829,702
TOTAL MISSILE 5,343,286 5,342,583
PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE.

PROCUREMENT OF
AMMUNITION, AIR
FORCE
ROCKETS
001 ROCKETS.............. 15,735 15,735
CARTRIDGES
002 CARTRIDGES........... 129,921 129,921
BOMBS
003 PRACTICE BOMBS....... 30,840 30,840
004 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS 187,397 187,397
005 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK 188,510 188,510
MUNITION.
OTHER ITEMS
006 CAD/PAD.............. 35,837 35,837
007 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE 7,531 7,531
DISPOSAL (EOD).
008 SPARES AND REPAIR 499 499
PARTS.
009 MODIFICATIONS........ 480 480
010 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 9,765 9,765
MILLION.
FLARES
011 FLARES............... 55,864 55,864
FUZES
013 FUZES................ 76,037 76,037
SMALL ARMS
014 SMALL ARMS........... 21,026 21,026

[[Page H3477]]

TOTAL 759,442 759,442
PROCUREMENT OF
AMMUNITION, AIR
FORCE.

OTHER PROCUREMENT,
AIR FORCE
PASSENGER CARRYING
VEHICLES
001 PASSENGER CARRYING 2,048 2,048
VEHICLES.
CARGO AND UTILITY
VEHICLES
002 MEDIUM TACTICAL 8,019 8,019
VEHICLE.
003 CAP VEHICLES......... 946 946
004 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 7,138 7,138
MILLION.
SPECIAL PURPOSE
VEHICLES
005 SECURITY AND TACTICAL 13,093 13,093
VEHICLES.
006 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 13,983 13,983
MILLION.
FIRE FIGHTING
EQUIPMENT
007 FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH 23,794 23,794
RESCUE VEHICLES.
MATERIALS HANDLING
EQUIPMENT
008 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 8,669 8,669
MILLION.
BASE MAINTENANCE
SUPPORT
009 RUNWAY SNOW REMOV & 6,144 6,144
CLEANING EQUIP.
010 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 1,580 1,580
MILLION.
COMM SECURITY
EQUIPMENT(COMSEC)
012 COMSEC EQUIPMENT..... 149,661 149,661
013 MODIFICATIONS 726 726
(COMSEC).
INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS
014 INTELLIGENCE TRAINING 2,789 2,789
EQUIPMENT.
015 INTELLIGENCE COMM 31,875 31,875
EQUIPMENT.
016 ADVANCE TECH SENSORS. 452 452
017 MISSION PLANNING 14,203 14,203
SYSTEMS.
ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS
018 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & 46,232 46,232
LANDING SYS.
019 NATIONAL AIRSPACE 11,685 11,685
SYSTEM.
020 BATTLE CONTROL 19,248 19,248
SYSTEM--FIXED.
021 THEATER AIR CONTROL 19,292 19,292
SYS IMPROVEMENTS.
022 WEATHER OBSERVATION 17,166 17,166
FORECAST.
023 STRATEGIC COMMAND AND 22,723 22,723
CONTROL.
024 CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN 27,930 27,930
COMPLEX.
025 TAC SIGNIT SPT....... 217 217
SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS
PROJECTS
027 GENERAL INFORMATION 49,627 49,627
TECHNOLOGY.
028 AF GLOBAL COMMAND & 13,559 13,559
CONTROL SYS.
029 MOBILITY COMMAND AND 11,186 11,186
CONTROL.
030 AIR FORCE PHYSICAL 43,238 43,238
SECURITY SYSTEM.
031 COMBAT TRAINING 10,431 10,431
RANGES.
032 C3 COUNTERMEASURES... 13,769 13,769
033 GCSS-AF FOS.......... 19,138 19,138
034 THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 8,809 8,809
SYSTEM.
035 AIR & SPACE 26,935 26,935
OPERATIONS CTR-WPN
SYS.
AIR FORCE
COMMUNICATIONS
036 INFORMATION TRANSPORT 80,558 80,558
SYSTEMS.
038 AFNET................ 97,588 97,588
039 VOICE SYSTEMS........ 8,419 8,419
040 USCENTCOM............ 34,276 34,276
SPACE PROGRAMS
041 SPACE BASED IR SENSOR 28,235 28,235
PGM SPACE.
042 NAVSTAR GPS SPACE.... 2,061 2,061
043 NUDET DETECTION SYS 4,415 4,415
SPACE.
044 AF SATELLITE CONTROL 30,237 30,237
NETWORK SPACE.
045 SPACELIFT RANGE 98,062 98,062
SYSTEM SPACE.
046 MILSATCOM SPACE...... 105,935 105,935
047 SPACE MODS SPACE..... 37,861 37,861
048 COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM.. 7,171 7,171
ORGANIZATION AND BASE
049 TACTICAL C-E 83,537 83,537
EQUIPMENT.
050 COMBAT SURVIVOR 11,884 11,884
EVADER LOCATER.
051 RADIO EQUIPMENT...... 14,711 14,711
052 CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL 10,275 10,275
EQUIPMENT.
053 BASE COMM 50,907 50,907
INFRASTRUCTURE.
MODIFICATIONS
054 COMM ELECT MODS...... 55,701 55,701
PERSONAL SAFETY &
RESCUE EQUIP
055 NIGHT VISION GOGGLES. 14,524 14,524
056 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 28,655 28,655
MILLION.
DEPOT PLANT+MTRLS
HANDLING EQ
057 MECHANIZED MATERIAL 9,332 9,332
HANDLING EQUIP.
BASE SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
058 BASE PROCURED 16,762 16,762
EQUIPMENT.
059 CONTINGENCY 33,768 33,768
OPERATIONS.
060 PRODUCTIVITY CAPITAL 2,495 2,495
INVESTMENT.
061 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT... 12,859 12,859
062 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 1,954 1,954
MILLION.
SPECIAL SUPPORT
PROJECTS
064 DARP RC135........... 24,528 24,528
065 DCGS-AF.............. 137,819 137,819

[[Page H3478]]

067 SPECIAL UPDATE 479,586 479,586
PROGRAM.
068 DEFENSE SPACE 45,159 45,159
RECONNAISSANCE PROG..
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
068A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.. 14,519,256 14,519,256
SPARES AND REPAIR
PARTS
069 SPARES AND REPAIR 25,746 25,746
PARTS.
TOTAL OTHER 16,760,581 16,760,581
PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE.

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-
WIDE
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD
038 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD. 37,345 37,345
039 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, 16,678 16,678
INTELLIGENCE.
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA
037 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 14,363 14,363
SECURITY PROGRAM
(ISSP).
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS
041 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS. 35,259 35,259
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA
008 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 16,189 16,189
SECURITY.
011 TELEPORT PROGRAM..... 66,075 66,075
012 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 83,881 83,881
MILLION.
013 NET CENTRIC 2,572 2,572
ENTERPRISE SERVICES
(NCES).
014 DEFENSE INFORMATION 125,557 125,557
SYSTEM NETWORK.
016 CYBER SECURITY 16,941 16,941
INITIATIVE.
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA
017 MAJOR EQUIPMENT...... 13,137 13,137
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DSS
021 MAJOR EQUIPMENT...... 5,020 5,020
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCAA
001 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 1,291 1,291
MILLION.
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS
040 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS. 14,792 14,792
MAJOR EQUIPMENT,
MISSILE DEFENSE
AGENCY
025 THAAD................ 581,005 581,005
026 AEGIS BMD............ 580,814 580,814
027 BMDS AN/TPY-2 RADARS. 62,000 62,000
028 AEGIS ASHORE PHASE 131,400 131,400
III.
030 IRON DOME............ 220,309 220,309
032 ADVANCE 107,000
PROCUREMENT (CY).
Advanced [107,000]
Procurement of 14
GBIs, beginning
with booster
motor sets.
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA
003 PERSONNEL 47,201 47,201
ADMINISTRATION.
MAJOR EQUIPMENT,
DEFENSE THREAT
REDUCTION AGENCY
022 VEHICLES............. 100 100
023 OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT 13,395 13,395
MAJOR EQUIPMENT,
DEFENSE SECURITY
COOPERATION AGENCY
020 EQUIPMENT............ 978 978
MAJOR EQUIPMENT,
DODEA
019 AUTOMATION/ 1,454 1,454
EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT
& LOGISTICS.
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA
002 MAJOR EQUIPMENT...... 5,711 5,711
MAJOR EQUIPMENT,
DMACT
018 MAJOR EQUIPMENT...... 15,414 15,414
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
041A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.. 544,272 544,272
AVIATION PROGRAMS
043 ROTARY WING UPGRADES 112,456 112,456
AND SUSTAINMENT.
044 MH-60 MODERNIZATION 81,457 81,457
PROGRAM.
045 NON-STANDARD AVIATION 2,650 2,650
046 U-28................. 56,208 56,208
047 MH-47 CHINOOK........ 19,766 19,766
048 RQ-11 UNMANNED AERIAL 850 850
VEHICLE.
049 CV-22 MODIFICATION... 98,927 98,927
050 MQ-1 UNMANNED AERIAL 20,576 20,576
VEHICLE.
051 MQ-9 UNMANNED AERIAL 1,893 1,893
VEHICLE.
053 STUASL0.............. 13,166 13,166
054 PRECISION STRIKE 107,687 107,687
PACKAGE.
055 AC/MC-130J........... 51,870 51,870
057 C-130 MODIFICATIONS.. 71,940 71,940
SHIPBUILDING
059 UNDERWATER SYSTEMS... 37,439 37,439
AMMUNITION PROGRAMS
061 ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M.. 159,029 159,029
OTHER PROCUREMENT
PROGRAMS
064 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS. 79,819 79,819
066 DISTRIBUTED COMMON 14,906 14,906
GROUND/SURFACE
SYSTEMS.
068 OTHER ITEMS <$5M..... 81,711 81,711
069 COMBATANT CRAFT 35,053 35,053
SYSTEMS.
072 SPECIAL PROGRAMS..... 41,526 41,526
073 TACTICAL VEHICLES.... 43,353 43,353
074 WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M. 210,540 210,540
076 COMBAT MISSION 20,000 20,000
REQUIREMENTS.
080 GLOBAL VIDEO 6,645 6,645
SURVEILLANCE
ACTIVITIES.

[[Page H3479]]

081 OPERATIONAL 25,581 25,581
ENHANCEMENTS
INTELLIGENCE.
087 OPERATIONAL 191,061 191,061
ENHANCEMENTS.
CBDP
089 INSTALLATION FORCE 14,271 14,271
PROTECTION.
090 INDIVIDUAL PROTECTION 101,667 101,667
092 JOINT BIO DEFENSE 13,447 13,447
PROGRAM (MEDICAL).
093 COLLECTIVE PROTECTION 20,896 20,896
094 CONTAMINATION 144,540 144,540
AVOIDANCE.
TOTAL 4,534,083 4,641,083
PROCUREMENT,
DEFENSE-WIDE.

JOINT URGENT
OPERATIONAL NEEDS
FUND
JOINT URGENT
OPERATIONAL NEEDS
FUND
001 JOINT URGENT 98,800 0
OPERATIONAL NEEDS
FUND.
Program reduction [-98,800]
TOTAL JOINT 98,800 0
URGENT
OPERATIONAL
NEEDS FUND.

TOTAL 98,227,168 99,666,171
PROCUREMENT.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (In Thousands
of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 House
Line Item Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,
ARMY
FIXED WING
001A SATURN ARCH (MIP).... 48,000 48,000
003 MQ-1 UAV............. 31,988 31,988
ROTARY
008 AH-64 APACHE BLOCK 142,000 142,000
IIIB NEW BUILD.
010 KIOWA WARRIOR WRA.... 163,800 163,800
013 CH-47 HELICOPTER..... 386,000 386,000
TOTAL AIRCRAFT 771,788 771,788
PROCUREMENT,
ARMY.

MISSILE PROCUREMENT,
ARMY
SURFACE-TO-AIR
MISSILE SYSTEM
002 MSE MISSILE.......... 25,887
Restoral of funds [25,887]
based on offsets
used for April
2013
reprogramming.
AIR-TO-SURFACE
MISSILE SYSTEM
003 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY. 54,000 54,000
ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT
MISSILE SYS
007 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET 39,045 39,045
(GMLRS).
009A ARMY TACTICAL MSL SYS 35,600 35,600
(ATACMS)--SYS SUM.
TOTAL MISSILE 128,645 154,532
PROCUREMENT,
ARMY.

PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV,
ARMY
MOD OF WEAPONS AND
OTHER COMBAT VEH
033 M16 RIFLE MODS....... 15,422
Restoral of funds [15,422]
based on offsets
used for April
2013
reprogramming.
TOTAL 15,422
PROCUREMENT OF
W&TCV, ARMY.

PROCUREMENT OF
AMMUNITION, ARMY
SMALL/MEDIUM CAL
AMMUNITION
002 CTG, 5.56MM, ALL 4,400 4,400
TYPES.
004 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL 1,500 1,500
TYPES.
005 CTG, .50 CAL, ALL 5,000 10,000
TYPES.
Restoral of funds [5,000]
based on offsets
used for April
2013
reprogramming.
008 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES. 60,000 60,000
MORTAR AMMUNITION
010 60MM MORTAR, ALL 5,000 5,000
TYPES.
ARTILLERY AMMUNITION
014 ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 10,000 30,000
75MM & 105MM, ALL
TYPES.
Restoral of funds [20,000]
based on offsets
used for April
2013
reprogramming.
015 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 10,000 10,000
155MM, ALL TYPES.
016 PROJ 155MM EXTENDED 11,000 11,000
RANGE M982.
MINES
018 MINES & CLEARING 9,482
CHARGES, ALL TYPES.
Restoral of funds [9,482]
based on offsets
used for April
2013
reprogramming.
ROCKETS
021 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL 57,000 57,000
TYPES.
OTHER AMMUNITION
022 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, 4,000 4,000
ALL TYPES.
023 GRENADES, ALL TYPES.. 3,000 3,000
024 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES... 8,000 8,000
MISCELLANEOUS
028 CAD/PAD ALL TYPES.... 2,000 2,000
TOTAL 180,900 215,382
PROCUREMENT OF
AMMUNITION, ARMY.

OTHER PROCUREMENT,
ARMY

[[Page H3480]]

TACTICAL VEHICLES
003 FAMILY OF MEDIUM 2,500
TACTICAL VEH (FMTV).
Restoral of funds [2,500]
based on offsets
used for April
2013
reprogramming.
005 FAMILY OF HEAVY 2,050
TACTICAL VEHICLES
(FHTV).
Restoral of funds [2,050]
based on offsets
used for April
2013
reprogramming.
013 MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH- 321,040 562,596
PROTECTED (MRAP)
MODS.
Restoral of funds [241,556]
based on offsets
used for April
2013
reprogramming.
COMM--BASE
COMMUNICATIONS
060 INSTALLATION INFO 25,000 25,000
INFRASTRUCTURE MOD
PROGRAM.
ELECT EQUIP--TACT INT
REL ACT (TIARA)
067 DCGS-A (MIP)......... 7,200 7,200
071 CI HUMINT AUTO 5,980 5,980
REPRTING AND
COLL(CHARCS).
ELECT EQUIP--
ELECTRONIC WARFARE
(EW)
074 LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER 57,800 83,255
MORTAR RADAR.
Restoral of funds [25,455]
based on offsets
used for April
2013
reprogramming.
078 FAMILY OF PERSISTENT 15,300 15,300
SURVEILLANCE
CAPABILITIE.
079 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/ 4,221 4,221
SECURITY
COUNTERMEASURES.
ELECT EQUIP--TACTICAL
SURV. (TAC SURV)
091 ARTILLERY ACCURACY 1,834 1,834
EQUIP.
093 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP 8,400
(FIREFINDER RADARS).
Restoral of funds [8,400]
based on offsets
used for April
2013
reprogramming.
096 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP 21,000 21,000
(LLDR).
098 COUNTERFIRE RADARS... 85,830 85,830
ELECT EQUIP--TACTICAL
C2 SYSTEMS
110 MANEUVER CONTROL 3,200
SYSTEM (MCS).
Restoral of funds [3,200]
based on offsets
used for April
2013
reprogramming.
112 SINGLE ARMY LOGISTICS 5,160
ENTERPRISE (SALE).
Restoral of funds [5,160]
based on offsets
used for April
2013
reprogramming.
CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE
EQUIPMENT
126 FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL 15,000
EQUIPMENT (FNLE).
Restoral of funds [15,000]
based on offsets
used for April
2013
reprogramming.
127 BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS 24,932
(BDS).
Restoral of funds [24,932]
based on offsets
used for April
2013
reprogramming.
ENGINEER (NON-
CONSTRUCTION)
EQUIPMENT
137 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE 3,565
DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD
EQPMT).
Restoral of funds [3,565]
based on offsets
used for April
2013
reprogramming.
COMBAT SERVICE
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
146 FORCE PROVIDER....... 51,654 51,654
147 FIELD FEEDING 6,264 6,264
EQUIPMENT.
PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT
152 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, 2,119
PETROLEUM & WATER.
Restoral of funds [2,119]
based on offsets
used for April
2013
reprogramming.
TRAINING EQUIPMENT
176 COMBAT TRAINING 7,000
CENTERS SUPPORT.
Restoral of funds [7,000]
based on offsets
used for April
2013
reprogramming.
TOTAL OTHER 603,123 944,060
PROCUREMENT,
ARMY.

JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE
DEV DEFEAT FUND
NETWORK ATTACK
001 ATTACK THE NETWORK... 417,700 417,700
JIEDDO DEVICE DEFEAT
002 DEFEAT THE DEVICE.... 248,886 248,886
FORCE TRAINING
003 TRAIN THE FORCE...... 106,000 106,000
STAFF AND
INFRASTRUCTURE
004 OPERATIONS........... 227,414 227,414
TOTAL JOINT IMPR 1,000,000 1,000,000
EXPLOSIVE DEV
DEFEAT FUND.

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,
NAVY
COMBAT AIRCRAFT
011 H-1 UPGRADES (UH-1Y/ 29,520 29,520
AH-1Z).
OTHER AIRCRAFT
026 MQ-8 UAV............. 13,100 13,100
MODIFICATION OF
AIRCRAFT
031 AV-8 SERIES.......... 57,652 57,652
033 F-18 SERIES.......... 35,500 35,500
039 EP-3 SERIES.......... 2,700 2,700
049 SPECIAL PROJECT 3,375 3,375
AIRCRAFT.
054 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT. 49,183 49,183
055 COMMON AVIONICS 4,190 4,190
CHANGES.
059 MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION 20,700 20,700
AIRCRAFT SPARES AND
REPAIR PARTS
065 SPARES AND REPAIR 24,776 24,776
PARTS.
TOTAL AIRCRAFT 240,696 240,696
PROCUREMENT,
NAVY.

WEAPONS PROCUREMENT,
NAVY
TACTICAL MISSILES
009 HELLFIRE............. 27,000 27,000
009A LASER MAVERICK....... 58,000 58,000
010 STAND OFF PRECISION 1,500 1,500
GUIDED MUNITIONS
(SOPGM).
TOTAL WEAPONS 86,500 86,500
PROCUREMENT,
NAVY.

[[Page H3481]]

PROCUREMENT OF AMMO,
NAVY & MC
NAVY AMMUNITION
001 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS 11,424 11,424
002 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL 30,332 30,332
TYPES.
003 MACHINE GUN 8,282 8,282
AMMUNITION.
006 AIR EXPENDABLE 31,884 31,884
COUNTERMEASURES.
011 OTHER SHIP GUN 409 409
AMMUNITION.
012 SMALL ARMS & LANDING 11,976 11,976
PARTY AMMO.
013 PYROTECHNIC AND 2,447 2,447
DEMOLITION.
014 AMMUNITION LESS THAN 7,692 7,692
$5 MILLION.
MARINE CORPS
AMMUNITION
015 SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION 13,461 13,461
016 LINEAR CHARGES, ALL 3,310 3,310
TYPES.
017 40 MM, ALL TYPES..... 6,244 6,244
018 60MM, ALL TYPES...... 3,368 3,368
019 81MM, ALL TYPES...... 9,162 9,162
020 120MM, ALL TYPES..... 10,266 10,266
021 CTG 25MM, ALL TYPES.. 1,887 1,887
022 GRENADES, ALL TYPES.. 1,611 1,611
023 ROCKETS, ALL TYPES... 37,459 37,459
024 ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES. 970 970
025 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, 418 418
ALL TYPES.
026 FUZE, ALL TYPES...... 14,219 14,219
TOTAL 206,821 206,821
PROCUREMENT OF
AMMO, NAVY & MC.

OTHER PROCUREMENT,
NAVY
CIVIL ENGINEERING
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
135 TACTICAL VEHICLES.... 17,968 17,968
TOTAL OTHER 17,968 17,968
PROCUREMENT,
NAVY.

PROCUREMENT, MARINE
CORPS
GUIDED MISSILES
010 JAVELIN.............. 29,334 29,334
011 FOLLOW ON TO SMAW.... 105 105
OTHER SUPPORT
013 MODIFICATION KITS.... 16,081 16,081
REPAIR AND TEST
EQUIPMENT
015 REPAIR AND TEST 16,081 16,081
EQUIPMENT.
OTHER SUPPORT (TEL)
017 MODIFICATION KITS.... 2,831 2,831
COMMAND AND CONTROL
SYSTEM (NON-TEL)
018 ITEMS UNDER $5 8,170 8,170
MILLION (COMM &
ELEC).
INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT
(NON-TEL)
023 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT 2,700 2,700
EQUIPMENT.
026 RQ-11 UAV............ 2,830 2,830
OTHER SUPPORT (NON-
TEL)
029 COMMON COMPUTER 4,866 4,866
RESOURCES.
030 COMMAND POST SYSTEMS. 265 265
ENGINEER AND OTHER
EQUIPMENT
042 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL 114 114
EQUIP ASSORT.
043 BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT 523 523
044 TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS 365 365
045 POWER EQUIPMENT 2,004 2,004
ASSORTED.
047 EOD SYSTEMS.......... 42,930 42,930
GENERAL PROPERTY
055 FAMILY OF 385 385
CONSTRUCTION
EQUIPMENT.
TOTAL 129,584 129,584
PROCUREMENT,
MARINE CORPS.

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,
AIR FORCE
STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT
032 LARGE AIRCRAFT 94,050 94,050
INFRARED
COUNTERMEASURES.
OTHER AIRCRAFT
052 U-2 MODS............. 11,300 11,300
059 C-130................ 1,618 1,618
064 RC-135............... 2,700 2,700
COMMON SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
079 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT 6,000 6,000
SUPPORT EQUIP.
TOTAL AIRCRAFT 115,668 115,668
PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE.

MISSILE PROCUREMENT,
AIR FORCE
TACTICAL
005 PREDATOR HELLFIRE 24,200 24,200
MISSILE.
TOTAL MISSILE 24,200 24,200
PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE.

PROCUREMENT OF
AMMUNITION, AIR
FORCE
ROCKETS
001 ROCKETS.............. 326 326
CARTRIDGES
002 CARTRIDGES........... 17,634 17,634
BOMBS
004 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS 37,514 37,514
005 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK 84,459 84,459
MUNITION.

[[Page H3482]]

FLARES
011 FLARES............... 14,973 14,973
012 FUZES................ 3,859 3,859
SMALL ARMS
014 SMALL ARMS........... 1,200 1,200
TOTAL 159,965 159,965
PROCUREMENT OF
AMMUNITION, AIR
FORCE.

OTHER PROCUREMENT,
AIR FORCE
ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS
022 WEATHER OBSERVATION 1,800 1,800
FORECAST.
SPACE PROGRAMS
046 MILSATCOM SPACE...... 5,695 5,695
BASE SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
059 CONTINGENCY 60,600 60,600
OPERATIONS.
061 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT... 68,000 68,000
SPECIAL SUPPORT
PROJECTS
068 DEFENSE SPACE 58,250 58,250
RECONNAISSANCE PROG..
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
068A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.. 2,380,501 2,380,501
TOTAL OTHER 2,574,846 2,574,846
PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE.

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-
WIDE
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA
011 TELEPORT PROGRAM..... 4,760 4,760
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
041A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.. 78,986 78,986
AMMUNITION PROGRAMS
060 ORDNANCE 2,841 2,841
REPLENISHMENT.
OTHER PROCUREMENT
PROGRAMS
064 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS. 13,300 13,300
082 SOLDIER PROTECTION 8,034 8,034
AND SURVIVAL SYSTEMS.
087 OPERATIONAL 3,354 3,354
ENHANCEMENTS.
TOTAL 111,275 111,275
PROCUREMENT,
DEFENSE-WIDE.

JOINT URGENT
OPERATIONAL NEEDS
FUND
JOINT URGENT
OPERATIONAL NEEDS
FUND
001 JOINT URGENT 15,000 0
OPERATIONAL NEEDS
FUND.
Program reduction [-15,000]
TOTAL JOINT 15,000 -15,000
URGENT
OPERATIONAL
NEEDS FUND.

NATIONAL GUARD &
RESERVE EQUIPMENT
UNDISTRIBUTED
999 MISCELLANEOUS 400,000
EQUIPMENT.
Program increase. [400,000]
TOTAL NATIONAL 400,000
GUARD & RESERVE
EQUIPMENT.

TOTAL 6,366,979 7,168,707
PROCUREMENT.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

TITLE XLII--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION (In Thousands of
Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program FY 2014 House
Line Element Item Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
.............. RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT,
TEST & EVAL,
ARMY
.............. BASIC RESEARCH
001 0601101A IN-HOUSE 21,803 21,803
LABORATORY
INDEPENDENT
RESEARCH.
002 0601102A DEFENSE 221,901 221,901
RESEARCH
SCIENCES.
003 0601103A UNIVERSITY 79,359 79,359
RESEARCH
INITIATIVES.
004 0601104A UNIVERSITY AND 113,662 113,662
INDUSTRY
RESEARCH
CENTERS.
.............. SUBTOTAL 436,725 436,725
BASIC
RESEARCH.
..............
.............. APPLIED
RESEARCH
005 0602105A MATERIALS 26,585 26,585
TECHNOLOGY.
006 0602120A SENSORS AND 43,170 43,170
ELECTRONIC
SURVIVABILITY.
007 0602122A TRACTOR HIP.... 36,293 36,293
008 0602211A AVIATION 55,615 55,615
TECHNOLOGY.
009 0602270A ELECTRONIC 17,585 17,585
WARFARE
TECHNOLOGY.
010 0602303A MISSILE 51,528 51,528
TECHNOLOGY.
011 0602307A ADVANCED 26,162 26,162
WEAPONS
TECHNOLOGY.
012 0602308A ADVANCED 24,063 24,063
CONCEPTS AND
SIMULATION.
013 0602601A COMBAT VEHICLE 64,589 64,589
AND AUTOMOTIVE
TECHNOLOGY.
014 0602618A BALLISTICS 68,300 68,300
TECHNOLOGY.
015 0602622A CHEMICAL, SMOKE 4,490 4,490
AND EQUIPMENT
DEFEATING
TECHNOLOGY.
016 0602623A JOINT SERVICE 7,818 7,818
SMALL ARMS
PROGRAM.
017 0602624A WEAPONS AND 37,798 37,798
MUNITIONS
TECHNOLOGY.

[[Page H3483]]

018 0602705A ELECTRONICS AND 59,021 59,021
ELECTRONIC
DEVICES.
019 0602709A NIGHT VISION 43,426 43,426
TECHNOLOGY.
020 0602712A COUNTERMINE 20,574 20,574
SYSTEMS.
021 0602716A HUMAN FACTORS 21,339 21,339
ENGINEERING
TECHNOLOGY.
022 0602720A ENVIRONMENTAL 20,316 20,316
QUALITY
TECHNOLOGY.
023 0602782A COMMAND, 34,209 34,209
CONTROL,
COMMUNICATIONS
TECHNOLOGY.
024 0602783A COMPUTER AND 10,439 10,439
SOFTWARE
TECHNOLOGY.
025 0602784A MILITARY 70,064 70,064
ENGINEERING
TECHNOLOGY.
026 0602785A MANPOWER/ 17,654 17,654
PERSONNEL/
TRAINING
TECHNOLOGY.
027 0602786A WARFIGHTER 31,546 31,546
TECHNOLOGY.
028 0602787A MEDICAL 93,340 93,340
TECHNOLOGY.
.............. SUBTOTAL 885,924 885,924
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
..............
.............. ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT
029 0603001A WARFIGHTER 56,056 56,056
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
030 0603002A MEDICAL 62,032 62,032
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
031 0603003A AVIATION 81,080 81,080
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
032 0603004A WEAPONS AND 63,919 63,919
MUNITIONS
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
033 0603005A COMBAT VEHICLE 97,043 97,043
AND AUTOMOTIVE
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
034 0603006A SPACE 5,866 5,866
APPLICATION
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
035 0603007A MANPOWER, 7,800 7,800
PERSONNEL AND
TRAINING
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
036 0603008A ELECTRONIC 40,416 40,416
WARFARE
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
037 0603009A TRACTOR HIKE... 9,166 9,166
038 0603015A NEXT GENERATION 13,627 13,627
TRAINING &
SIMULATION
SYSTEMS.
039 0603020A TRACTOR ROSE... 10,667 10,667
040 0603105A MILITARY HIV
RESEARCH.
041 0603125A COMBATING 15,054 15,054
TERRORISM--TEC
HNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
042 0603130A TRACTOR NAIL... 3,194 3,194
043 0603131A TRACTOR EGGS... 2,367 2,367
044 0603270A ELECTRONIC 25,348 25,348
WARFARE
TECHNOLOGY.
045 0603313A MISSILE AND 64,009 64,009
ROCKET
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
046 0603322A TRACTOR CAGE... 11,083 11,083
047 0603461A HIGH 180,662 180,662
PERFORMANCE
COMPUTING
MODERNIZATION
PROGRAM.
048 0603606A LANDMINE 22,806 22,806
WARFARE AND
BARRIER
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
049 0603607A JOINT SERVICE 5,030 5,030
SMALL ARMS
PROGRAM.
050 0603710A NIGHT VISION 36,407 36,407
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
051 0603728A ENVIRONMENTAL 11,745 11,745
QUALITY
TECHNOLOGY
DEMONSTRATIONS.
052 0603734A MILITARY 23,717 23,717
ENGINEERING
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
053 0603772A ADVANCED 33,012 33,012
TACTICAL
COMPUTER
SCIENCE AND
SENSOR
TECHNOLOGY.
.............. SUBTOTAL 882,106 882,106
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
..............
.............. ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT &
PROTOTYPES
054 0603305A ARMY MISSLE 15,301 15,301
DEFENSE
SYSTEMS
INTEGRATION.
055 0603308A ARMY SPACE 13,592 13,592
SYSTEMS
INTEGRATION.
056 0603619A LANDMINE 10,625 10,625
WARFARE AND
BARRIER--ADV
DEV.
057 0603627A SMOKE,
OBSCURANT AND
TARGET
DEFEATING SYS-
ADV DEV.
058 0603639A TANK AND MEDIUM 30,612 30,612
CALIBER
AMMUNITION.
059 0603653A ADVANCED TANK 49,989 49,989
ARMAMENT
SYSTEM (ATAS).
060 0603747A SOLDIER SUPPORT 6,703 6,703
AND
SURVIVABILITY.
061 0603766A TACTICAL 6,894 6,894
ELECTRONIC
SURVEILLANCE
SYSTEM--ADV
DEV.
062 0603774A NIGHT VISION 9,066 9,066
SYSTEMS
ADVANCED
DEVELOPMENT.
063 0603779A ENVIRONMENTAL 2,633 2,633
QUALITY
TECHNOLOGY--DE
M/VAL.
064 0603782A WARFIGHTER 272,384 272,384
INFORMATION
NETWORK-
TACTICAL--DEM/
VAL.
065 0603790A NATO RESEARCH 3,874 3,874
AND
DEVELOPMENT.
066 0603801A AVIATION--ADV 5,018 5,018
DEV.
067 0603804A LOGISTICS AND 11,556 11,556
ENGINEER
EQUIPMENT--ADV
DEV.
068 0603805A COMBAT SERVICE
SUPPORT
CONTROL SYSTEM
EVALUATION AND
ANALYSIS.
069 0603807A MEDICAL 15,603 15,603
SYSTEMS--ADV
DEV.
070 0603827A SOLDIER 14,159 14,159
SYSTEMS--ADVAN
CED
DEVELOPMENT.
071 0603850A INTEGRATED 79 79
BROADCAST
SERVICE.
072 0604115A TECHNOLOGY 55,605 55,605
MATURATION
INITIATIVES.
073 0604131A TRACTOR JUTE...
074 0604319A INDIRECT FIRE 79,232 79,232
PROTECTION
CAPABILITY
INCREMENT 2-
INTERCEPT
(IFPC2).
075 0604785A INTEGRATED BASE 4,476 4,476
DEFENSE
(BUDGET
ACTIVITY 4).
076 0305205A ENDURANCE UAVS. 28,991 991
.............. LEMV [-28,000]
program
reduction.
.............. SUBTOTAL 636,392 608,392
ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT
& PROTOTYPES.
..............
.............. SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT &
DEMONSTRATION
077 0604201A AIRCRAFT 76,588 76,588
AVIONICS.
078 0604220A ARMED, 73,309 73,309
DEPLOYABLE
HELOS.
079 0604270A ELECTRONIC 154,621 154,621
WARFARE
DEVELOPMENT.
080 0604280A JOINT TACTICAL 31,826 31,826
RADIO.
081 0604290A MID-TIER 23,341 23,341
NETWORKING
VEHICULAR
RADIO (MNVR).
082 0604321A ALL SOURCE 4,839 4,839
ANALYSIS
SYSTEM.
083 0604328A TRACTOR CAGE... 23,841 23,841
084 0604601A INFANTRY 79,855 90,855
SUPPORT
WEAPONS.
.............. Transfer [11,000]
from WTCV
line 15--
XM25
development.
085 0604604A MEDIUM TACTICAL 2,140 2,140
VEHICLES.
086 0604611A JAVELIN........ 5,002 5,002
087 0604622A FAMILY OF HEAVY 21,321 21,321
TACTICAL
VEHICLES.
088 0604633A AIR TRAFFIC 514 514
CONTROL.

[[Page H3484]]

089 0604641A TACTICAL
UNMANNED
GROUND VEHICLE
(TUGV).
090 0604642A LIGHT TACTICAL
WHEELED
VEHICLES.
091 0604661A FCS SYSTEMS OF
SYSTEMS ENGR &
PROGRAM MGMT.
092 0604663A FCS UNMANNED
GROUND
VEHICLES.
093 0604710A NIGHT VISION 43,405 43,405
SYSTEMS--ENG
DEV.
094 0604713A COMBAT FEEDING, 1,939 1,939
CLOTHING, AND
EQUIPMENT.
095 0604715A NON-SYSTEM 18,980 18,980
TRAINING
DEVICES--ENG
DEV.
096 0604716A TERRAIN
INFORMATION--E
NG DEV.
097 0604741A AIR DEFENSE 18,294 18,294
COMMAND,
CONTROL AND
INTELLIGENCE--
ENG DEV.
098 0604742A CONSTRUCTIVE 17,013 17,013
SIMULATION
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
099 0604746A AUTOMATIC TEST 6,701 6,701
EQUIPMENT
DEVELOPMENT.
100 0604760A DISTRIBUTIVE 14,575 14,575
INTERACTIVE
SIMULATIONS
(DIS)--ENG DEV.
101 0604780A COMBINED ARMS 27,634 27,634
TACTICAL
TRAINER (CATT)
CORE.
102 0604798A BRIGADE 193,748 193,748
ANALYSIS,
INTEGRATION
AND EVALUATION.
103 0604802A WEAPONS AND 15,721 15,721
MUNITIONS--ENG
DEV.
104 0604804A LOGISTICS AND 41,703 41,703
ENGINEER
EQUIPMENT--ENG
DEV.
105 0604805A COMMAND, 7,379 7,379
CONTROL,
COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS--ENG
DEV.
106 0604807A MEDICAL 39,468 39,468
MATERIEL/
MEDICAL
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
EQUIPMENT--ENG
DEV.
107 0604808A LANDMINE 92,285 92,285
WARFARE/
BARRIER--ENG
DEV.
108 0604814A ARTILLERY 8,209 8,209
MUNITIONS--EMD.
109 0604818A ARMY TACTICAL 22,958 22,958
COMMAND &
CONTROL
HARDWARE &
SOFTWARE.
110 0604820A RADAR 1,549 1,549
DEVELOPMENT.
111 0604822A GENERAL FUND 17,342 17,342
ENTERPRISE
BUSINESS
SYSTEM (GFEBS).
112 0604823A FIREFINDER..... 47,221 47,221
113 0604827A SOLDIER 48,477 48,477
SYSTEMS--WARRI
OR DEM/VAL.
114 0604854A ARTILLERY 80,613 80,613
SYSTEMS--EMD.
115 0604869A PATRIOT/MEADS
COMBINED
AGGREGATE
PROGRAM (CAP).
116 0604870A NUCLEAR ARMS
CONTROL
MONITORING
SENSOR NETWORK.
117 0605013A INFORMATION 68,814 68,814
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
118 0605018A INTEGRATED 137,290 137,290
PERSONNEL AND
PAY SYSTEM-
ARMY (IPPS-A).
119 0605028A ARMORED MULTI- 116,298 116,298
PURPOSE
VEHICLE (AMPV).
120 0605030A JOINT TACTICAL 68,148 68,148
NETWORK CENTER
(JTNC).
121 0605380A AMF JOINT 33,219 33,219
TACTICAL RADIO
SYSTEM (JTRS).
122 0605450A JOINT AIR-TO- 15,127 15,127
GROUND MISSILE
(JAGM).
123 0605455A SLAMRAAM.......
124 0605456A PAC-3/MSE 68,843 68,843
MISSILE.
125 0605457A ARMY INTEGRATED 364,649 364,649
AIR AND
MISSILE
DEFENSE
(AIAMD).
126 0605625A MANNED GROUND 592,201 592,201
VEHICLE.
127 0605626A AERIAL COMMON 10,382 10,382
SENSOR.
128 0605766A NATIONAL 21,143 21,143
CAPABILITIES
INTEGRATION
(MIP).
129 0605812A JOINT LIGHT 84,230 84,230
TACTICAL
VEHICLE (JLTV)
ENGINEERING
AND
MANUFACTURING
DEVELOPMENT PH.
130 0303032A TROJAN--RH12... 3,465 3,465
131 0304270A ELECTRONIC 10,806 10,806
WARFARE
DEVELOPMENT.
.............. SUBTOTAL 2,857,026 2,868,026
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT
&
DEMONSTRATIO
N.
..............
.............. RDT&E
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT
132 0604256A THREAT 16,934 16,934
SIMULATOR
DEVELOPMENT.
133 0604258A TARGET SYSTEMS 13,488 13,488
DEVELOPMENT.
134 0604759A MAJOR T&E 46,672 46,672
INVESTMENT.
135 0605103A RAND ARROYO 11,919 11,919
CENTER.
136 0605301A ARMY KWAJALEIN 193,658 193,658
ATOLL.
137 0605326A CONCEPTS 37,158 37,158
EXPERIMENTATIO
N PROGRAM.
138 0605502A SMALL BUSINESS
INNOVATIVE
RESEARCH.
139 0605601A ARMY TEST 340,659 340,659
RANGES AND
FACILITIES.
140 0605602A ARMY TECHNICAL 66,061 66,061
TEST
INSTRUMENTATIO
N AND TARGETS.
141 0605604A SURVIVABILITY/ 43,280 43,280
LETHALITY
ANALYSIS.
142 0605605A DOD HIGH ENERGY
LASER TEST
FACILITY.
143 0605606A AIRCRAFT 6,025 6,025
CERTIFICATION.
144 0605702A METEOROLOGICAL 7,349 7,349
SUPPORT TO
RDT&E
ACTIVITIES.
145 0605706A MATERIEL 19,809 19,809
SYSTEMS
ANALYSIS.
146 0605709A EXPLOITATION OF 5,941 5,941
FOREIGN ITEMS.
147 0605712A SUPPORT OF 55,504 55,504
OPERATIONAL
TESTING.
148 0605716A ARMY EVALUATION 65,274 65,274
CENTER.
149 0605718A ARMY MODELING & 1,283 1,283
SIM X-CMD
COLLABORATION
& INTEG.
150 0605801A PROGRAMWIDE 82,035 82,035
ACTIVITIES.
151 0605803A TECHNICAL 33,853 33,853
INFORMATION
ACTIVITIES.
152 0605805A MUNITIONS 53,340 53,340
STANDARDIZATIO
N,
EFFECTIVENESS
AND SAFETY.
153 0605857A ENVIRONMENTAL 5,193 5,193
QUALITY
TECHNOLOGY
MGMT SUPPORT.
154 0605898A MANAGEMENT HQ-- 54,175 54,175
R&D.
155 0909999A FINANCING FOR
CANCELLED
ACCOUNT
ADJUSTMENTS.
.............. SUBTOTAL 1,159,610 1,159,610
RDT&E
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT.
..............
.............. OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT
156 0603778A MLRS PRODUCT 110,576 110,576
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM.
157 0607141A LOGISTICS 3,717 3,717
AUTOMATION.
158 0607665A FAMILY OF
BIOMETRICS.
159 0607865A PATRIOT PRODUCT 70,053 70,053
IMPROVEMENT.
160 0102419A AEROSTAT JOINT 98,450 68,450
PROJECT OFFICE.
.............. JLENS [-30,000]
program
reduction.
161 0203726A ADV FIELD 30,940 30,940
ARTILLERY
TACTICAL DATA
SYSTEM.
162 0203735A COMBAT VEHICLE 177,532 177,532
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAMS.

[[Page H3485]]

163 0203740A MANEUVER 36,495 36,495
CONTROL SYSTEM.
164 0203744A AIRCRAFT 257,187 257,187
MODIFICATIONS/
PRODUCT
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAMS.
165 0203752A AIRCRAFT ENGINE 315 315
COMPONENT
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM.
166 0203758A DIGITIZATION... 6,186 6,186
167 0203801A MISSILE/AIR 1,578 1,578
DEFENSE
PRODUCT
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM.
168 0203802A OTHER MISSILE 62,100 62,100
PRODUCT
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAMS.
169 0203808A TRACTOR CARD... 18,778 18,778
170 0208053A JOINT TACTICAL 7,108 7,108
GROUND SYSTEM.
171 0208058A JOINT HIGH
SPEED VESSEL
(JHSV).
173 0303028A SECURITY AND 7,600 7,600
INTELLIGENCE
ACTIVITIES.
174 0303140A INFORMATION 9,357 9,357
SYSTEMS
SECURITY
PROGRAM.
175 0303141A GLOBAL COMBAT 41,225 41,225
SUPPORT SYSTEM.
176 0303142A SATCOM GROUND 18,197 18,197
ENVIRONMENT
(SPACE).
177 0303150A WWMCCS/GLOBAL 14,215 14,215
COMMAND AND
CONTROL SYSTEM.
179 0305204A TACTICAL 33,533 33,533
UNMANNED
AERIAL
VEHICLES.
180 0305208A DISTRIBUTED 27,622 27,622
COMMON GROUND/
SURFACE
SYSTEMS.
181 0305219A MQ-1C GRAY 10,901 10,901
EAGLE UAS.
182 0305232A RQ-11 UAV...... 2,321 2,321
183 0305233A RQ-7 UAV....... 12,031 12,031
184 0305235A VERTICAL UAS...
185 0307665A BIOMETRICS 12,449 12,449
ENABLED
INTELLIGENCE.
186 0708045A END ITEM 56,136 56,136
INDUSTRIAL
PREPAREDNESS
ACTIVITIES.
186A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 4,717 4,717
PROGRAMS.
.............. SUBTOTAL 1,131,319 1,101,319
OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
..............
.............. TOTAL 7,989,102 7,942,102
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMEN
T, TEST &
EVAL, ARMY.
..............
.............. RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT,
TEST & EVAL,
NAVY
.............. BASIC RESEARCH
001 0601103N UNIVERSITY 112,617 122,617
RESEARCH
INITIATIVES.
.............. Program [10,000]
increase.
002 0601152N IN-HOUSE 18,230 18,230
LABORATORY
INDEPENDENT
RESEARCH.
003 0601153N DEFENSE 484,459 484,459
RESEARCH
SCIENCES.
.............. SUBTOTAL 615,306 625,306
BASIC
RESEARCH.
..............
.............. APPLIED
RESEARCH
004 0602114N POWER 104,513 104,513
PROJECTION
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
005 0602123N FORCE 145,307 145,307
PROTECTION
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
006 0602131M MARINE CORPS 47,334 47,334
LANDING FORCE
TECHNOLOGY.
007 0602235N COMMON PICTURE 34,163 34,163
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
008 0602236N WARFIGHTER 49,689 49,689
SUSTAINMENT
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
009 0602271N ELECTROMAGNETIC 97,701 97,701
SYSTEMS
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
010 0602435N OCEAN 45,685 63,685
WARFIGHTING
ENVIRONMENT
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
.............. AGOR mid [18,000]
life refit.
011 0602651M JOINT NON- 6,060 6,060
LETHAL WEAPONS
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
012 0602747N UNDERSEA 103,050 103,050
WARFARE
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
013 0602750N FUTURE NAVAL 169,710 169,710
CAPABILITIES
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
014 0602782N MINE AND 31,326 31,326
EXPEDITIONARY
WARFARE
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
.............. SUBTOTAL 834,538 852,538
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
..............
.............. ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT
015 0603114N POWER 48,201 48,201
PROJECTION
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
016 0603123N FORCE 28,328 28,328
PROTECTION
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
017 0603235N COMMON PICTURE
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
018 0603236N WARFIGHTER
SUSTAINMENT
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
019 0603271N ELECTROMAGNETIC 56,179 56,179
SYSTEMS
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
020 0603640M USMC ADVANCED 132,400 132,400
TECHNOLOGY
DEMONSTRATION
(ATD).
021 0603651M JOINT NON- 11,854 11,854
LETHAL WEAPONS
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
022 0603673N FUTURE NAVAL 247,931 247,931
CAPABILITIES
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
023 0603729N WARFIGHTER 4,760 4,760
PROTECTION
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
024 0603747N UNDERSEA
WARFARE
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
025 0603758N NAVY 51,463 51,463
WARFIGHTING
EXPERIMENTS
AND
DEMONSTRATIONS.
026 0603782N MINE AND 2,000 2,000
EXPEDITIONARY
WARFARE
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
.............. SUBTOTAL 583,116 583,116
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
..............
.............. ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT &
PROTOTYPES
027 0603207N AIR/OCEAN 42,246 42,246
TACTICAL
APPLICATIONS.
028 0603216N AVIATION 5,591 5,591
SURVIVABILITY.
029 0603237N DEPLOYABLE 3,262 3,262
JOINT COMMAND
AND CONTROL.
030 0603251N AIRCRAFT 74 74
SYSTEMS.
031 0603254N ASW SYSTEMS 7,964 7,964
DEVELOPMENT.
032 0603261N TACTICAL 5,257 5,257
AIRBORNE
RECONNAISSANCE.
033 0603382N ADVANCED COMBAT 1,570 1,570
SYSTEMS
TECHNOLOGY.
034 0603502N SURFACE AND 168,040 168,040
SHALLOW WATER
MINE
COUNTERMEASURE
S.
035 0603506N SURFACE SHIP 88,649 88,649
TORPEDO
DEFENSE.
036 0603512N CARRIER SYSTEMS 83,902 83,902
DEVELOPMENT.
037 0603525N PILOT FISH..... 108,713 108,713
038 0603527N RETRACT LARCH.. 9,316 9,316
039 0603536N RETRACT JUNIPER 77,108 77,108
040 0603542N RADIOLOGICAL 762 762
CONTROL.
041 0603553N SURFACE ASW.... 2,349 2,349
042 0603561N ADVANCED 852,977 874,977
SUBMARINE
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT.

[[Page H3486]]

.............. Unmanned [22,000]
Underwater
Vehicle
Development.
043 0603562N SUBMARINE 8,764 8,764
TACTICAL
WARFARE
SYSTEMS.
044 0603563N SHIP CONCEPT 20,501 20,501
ADVANCED
DESIGN.
045 0603564N SHIP 27,052 27,052
PRELIMINARY
DESIGN &
FEASIBILITY
STUDIES.
046 0603570N ADVANCED 428,933 428,933
NUCLEAR POWER
SYSTEMS.
047 0603573N ADVANCED 27,154 27,154
SURFACE
MACHINERY
SYSTEMS.
048 0603576N CHALK EAGLE.... 519,140 519,140
049 0603581N LITTORAL COMBAT 406,389 406,389
SHIP (LCS).
050 0603582N COMBAT SYSTEM 36,570 36,570
INTEGRATION.
051 0603609N CONVENTIONAL 8,404 8,404
MUNITIONS.
052 0603611M MARINE CORPS 136,967 136,967
ASSAULT
VEHICLES.
053 0603635M MARINE CORPS 1,489 1,489
GROUND COMBAT/
SUPPORT SYSTEM.
054 0603654N JOINT SERVICE 38,422 38,422
EXPLOSIVE
ORDNANCE
DEVELOPMENT.
055 0603658N COOPERATIVE 69,312 69,312
ENGAGEMENT.
056 0603713N OCEAN 9,196 9,196
ENGINEERING
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
057 0603721N ENVIRONMENTAL 18,850 18,850
PROTECTION.
058 0603724N NAVY ENERGY 45,618 45,618
PROGRAM.
059 0603725N FACILITIES 3,019 3,019
IMPROVEMENT.
060 0603734N CHALK CORAL.... 144,951 144,951
061 0603739N NAVY LOGISTIC 5,797 5,797
PRODUCTIVITY.
062 0603746N RETRACT MAPLE.. 308,131 308,131
063 0603748N LINK PLUMERIA.. 195,189 195,189
064 0603751N RETRACT ELM.... 56,358 56,358
065 0603764N LINK EVERGREEN. 55,378 55,378
066 0603787N SPECIAL 48,842 48,842
PROCESSES.
067 0603790N NATO RESEARCH 7,509 7,509
AND
DEVELOPMENT.
068 0603795N LAND ATTACK 5,075 5,075
TECHNOLOGY.
069 0603851M JOINT NON- 51,178 51,178
LETHAL WEAPONS
TESTING.
070 0603860N JOINT PRECISION 205,615 205,615
APPROACH AND
LANDING
SYSTEMS--DEM/
VAL.
071 0603889N COUNTERDRUG
RDT&E PROJECTS.
072 0604272N TACTICAL AIR 37,227 37,227
DIRECTIONAL
INFRARED
COUNTERMEASURE
S (TADIRCM).
073 0604279N ASE SELF- 169 169
PROTECTION
OPTIMIZATION.
074 0604653N JOINT COUNTER 20,874 10,874
RADIO
CONTROLLED IED
ELECTRONIC
WARFARE
(JCREW).
.............. Schedule [-10,000]
delay.
075 0604659N PRECISION 2,257 2,257
STRIKE WEAPONS
DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM.
076 0604707N SPACE AND 38,327 38,327
ELECTRONIC
WARFARE (SEW)
ARCHITECTURE/
ENGINEERING
SUPPORT.
077 0604786N OFFENSIVE ANTI- 135,985 135,985
SURFACE
WARFARE WEAPON
DEVELOPMENT.
078 0605812M JOINT LIGHT 50,362 50,362
TACTICAL
VEHICLE (JLTV)
ENGINEERING
AND
MANUFACTURING
DEVELOPMENT PH.
079 0303354N ASW SYSTEMS 8,448 8,448
DEVELOPMENT--M
IP.
080 0304270N ELECTRONIC 153 153
WARFARE
DEVELOPMENT--M
IP.
.............. SUBTOTAL 4,641,385 4,653,385
ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT
& PROTOTYPES.
..............
.............. SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT &
DEMONSTRATION
081 0604212N OTHER HELO 40,558 40,558
DEVELOPMENT.
082 0604214N AV-8B AIRCRAFT-- 35,825 35,825
ENG DEV.
083 0604215N STANDARDS 99,891 99,891
DEVELOPMENT.
084 0604216N MULTI-MISSION 17,565 17,565
HELICOPTER
UPGRADE
DEVELOPMENT.
085 0604218N AIR/OCEAN 4,026 4,026
EQUIPMENT
ENGINEERING.
086 0604221N P-3 1,791 1,791
MODERNIZATION
PROGRAM.
087 0604230N WARFARE SUPPORT 11,725 11,725
SYSTEM.
088 0604231N TACTICAL 68,463 68,463
COMMAND SYSTEM.
089 0604234N ADVANCED 152,041 152,041
HAWKEYE.
090 0604245N H-1 UPGRADES... 47,123 47,123
091 0604261N ACOUSTIC SEARCH 30,208 30,208
SENSORS.
092 0604262N V-22A.......... 43,084 43,084
093 0604264N AIR CREW 11,401 11,401
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
094 0604269N EA-18.......... 11,138 11,138
095 0604270N ELECTRONIC 34,964 34,964
WARFARE
DEVELOPMENT.
096 0604273N VH-71A 94,238 94,238
EXECUTIVE HELO
DEVELOPMENT.
097 0604274N NEXT GENERATION 257,796 257,796
JAMMER (NGJ).
098 0604280N JOINT TACTICAL 3,302 3,302
RADIO SYSTEM--
NAVY (JTRS-
NAVY).
099 0604307N SURFACE 240,298 240,298
COMBATANT
COMBAT SYSTEM
ENGINEERING.
100 0604311N LPD-17 CLASS 1,214 1,214
SYSTEMS
INTEGRATION.
101 0604329N SMALL DIAMETER 46,007 46,007
BOMB (SDB).
102 0604366N STANDARD 75,592 75,592
MISSILE
IMPROVEMENTS.
103 0604373N AIRBORNE MCM... 117,854 117,854
104 0604376M MARINE AIR 10,080 10,080
GROUND TASK
FORCE (MAGTF)
ELECTRONIC
WARFARE (EW)
FOR AVIATION.
105 0604378N NAVAL 21,413 21,413
INTEGRATED
FIRE CONTROL--
COUNTER AIR
SYSTEMS
ENGINEERING.
106 0604404N UNMANNED 146,683 146,683
CARRIER
LAUNCHED
AIRBORNE
SURVEILLANCE
AND STRIKE
(UCLASS)
SYSTEM.
107 0604501N ADVANCED ABOVE 275,871 275,871
WATER SENSORS.
108 0604503N SSN-688 AND 89,672 89,672
TRIDENT
MODERNIZATION.
109 0604504N AIR CONTROL.... 13,754 13,754
110 0604512N SHIPBOARD 69,615 69,615
AVIATION
SYSTEMS.
111 0604518N COMBAT
INFORMATION
CENTER
CONVERSION.
112 0604558N NEW DESIGN SSN. 121,566 121,566
113 0604562N SUBMARINE 49,143 49,143
TACTICAL
WARFARE SYSTEM.
114 0604567N SHIP CONTRACT 155,254 155,254
DESIGN/ LIVE
FIRE T&E.
115 0604574N NAVY TACTICAL 3,689 3,689
COMPUTER
RESOURCES.
116 0604601N MINE 5,041 5,041
DEVELOPMENT.
117 0604610N LIGHTWEIGHT 26,444 26,444
TORPEDO
DEVELOPMENT.

[[Page H3487]]

118 0604654N JOINT SERVICE 8,897 8,897
EXPLOSIVE
ORDNANCE
DEVELOPMENT.
119 0604703N PERSONNEL, 6,233 6,233
TRAINING,
SIMULATION,
AND HUMAN
FACTORS.
120 0604727N JOINT STANDOFF 442 442
WEAPON SYSTEMS.
121 0604755N SHIP SELF 130,360 130,360
DEFENSE
(DETECT &
CONTROL).
122 0604756N SHIP SELF 50,209 50,209
DEFENSE
(ENGAGE: HARD
KILL).
123 0604757N SHIP SELF 164,799 164,799
DEFENSE
(ENGAGE: SOFT
KILL/EW).
124 0604761N INTELLIGENCE 1,984 1,984
ENGINEERING.
125 0604771N MEDICAL 9,458 9,458
DEVELOPMENT.
126 0604777N NAVIGATION/ID 51,430 51,430
SYSTEM.
127 0604800M JOINT STRIKE 512,631 512,631
FIGHTER (JSF)--
EMD.
128 0604800N JOINT STRIKE 534,187 534,187
FIGHTER (JSF)--
EMD.
129 0605013M INFORMATION 5,564 5,564
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
130 0605013N INFORMATION 69,659 69,659
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
131 0605018N NAVY INTEGRATED
MILITARY HUMAN
RESOURCES
SYSTEM (N-
IMHRS).
132 0605212N CH-53K RDTE.... 503,180 503,180
133 0605450N JOINT AIR-TO- 5,500 5,500
GROUND MISSILE
(JAGM).
134 0605500N MULTI-MISSION 317,358 317,358
MARITIME
AIRCRAFT (MMA).
135 0204202N DDG-1000....... 187,910 187,910
136 0304231N TACTICAL 2,140 2,140
COMMAND
SYSTEM--MIP.
137 0304785N TACTICAL 9,406 9,406
CRYPTOLOGIC
SYSTEMS.
138 0305124N SPECIAL 22,800 22,800
APPLICATIONS
PROGRAM.
.............. SUBTOTAL 5,028,476 5,028,476
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT
&
DEMONSTRATIO
N.
..............
.............. MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT
139 0604256N THREAT 43,261 43,261
SIMULATOR
DEVELOPMENT.
140 0604258N TARGET SYSTEMS 71,872 71,872
DEVELOPMENT.
141 0604759N MAJOR T&E 38,033 38,033
INVESTMENT.
142 0605126N JOINT THEATER 1,352 1,352
AIR AND
MISSILE
DEFENSE
ORGANIZATION.
143 0605152N STUDIES AND 5,566 5,566
ANALYSIS
SUPPORT--NAVY.
144 0605154N CENTER FOR 48,345 48,345
NAVAL ANALYSES.
145 0605502N SMALL BUSINESS
INNOVATIVE
RESEARCH.
146 0605804N TECHNICAL 637 637
INFORMATION
SERVICES.
147 0605853N MANAGEMENT, 76,585 76,585
TECHNICAL &
INTERNATIONAL
SUPPORT.
148 0605856N STRATEGIC 3,221 3,221
TECHNICAL
SUPPORT.
149 0605861N RDT&E SCIENCE 72,725 72,725
AND TECHNOLOGY
MANAGEMENT.
150 0605863N RDT&E SHIP AND 141,778 141,778
AIRCRAFT
SUPPORT.
151 0605864N TEST AND 331,219 331,219
EVALUATION
SUPPORT.
152 0605865N OPERATIONAL 16,565 16,565
TEST AND
EVALUATION
CAPABILITY.
153 0605866N NAVY SPACE AND 3,265 3,265
ELECTRONIC
WARFARE (SEW)
SUPPORT.
154 0605867N SEW 7,134 7,134
SURVEILLANCE/
RECONNAISSANCE
SUPPORT.
155 0605873M MARINE CORPS 24,082 24,082
PROGRAM WIDE
SUPPORT.
156 0305885N TACTICAL 497 497
CRYPTOLOGIC
ACTIVITIES.
157 0909999N FINANCING FOR
CANCELLED
ACCOUNT
ADJUSTMENTS.
.............. SUBTOTAL 886,137 886,137
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT.
..............
.............. OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT
159 0604227N HARPOON 699 699
MODIFICATIONS.
160 0604402N UNMANNED COMBAT 20,961 40,961
AIR VEHICLE
(UCAV)
ADVANCED
COMPONENT AND
PROTOTYPE
DEVELOPMENT.
.............. X-47B [20,000]
Aerial
Refueling
Test &
Evaluation.
161 0604717M MARINE CORPS
COMBAT
SERVICES
SUPPORT.
162 0604766M MARINE CORPS 35 35
DATA SYSTEMS.
163 0605525N CARRIER ONBOARD 2,460 2,460
DELIVERY (COD)
FOLLOW ON.
164 0605555N STRIKE WEAPONS 9,757 9,757
DEVELOPMENT.
165 0101221N STRATEGIC SUB & 98,057 121,957
WEAPONS SYSTEM
SUPPORT.
.............. Reentry [23,900]
System
Application
s and
Strategic
Guidance
Application
s.
166 0101224N SSBN SECURITY 31,768 31,768
TECHNOLOGY
PROGRAM.
167 0101226N SUBMARINE 1,464 1,464
ACOUSTIC
WARFARE
DEVELOPMENT.
168 0101402N NAVY STRATEGIC 21,729 21,729
COMMUNICATIONS.
169 0203761N RAPID 13,561 13,561
TECHNOLOGY
TRANSITION
(RTT).
170 0204136N F/A-18 131,118 131,118
SQUADRONS.
171 0204152N E-2 SQUADRONS.. 1,971 1,971
172 0204163N FLEET 46,155 46,155
TELECOMMUNICAT
IONS
(TACTICAL).
173 0204228N SURFACE SUPPORT 2,374 2,374
174 0204229N TOMAHAWK AND 12,407 12,407
TOMAHAWK
MISSION
PLANNING
CENTER (TMPC).
175 0204311N INTEGRATED 41,609 41,609
SURVEILLANCE
SYSTEM.
176 0204413N AMPHIBIOUS 7,240 7,240
TACTICAL
SUPPORT UNITS
(DISPLACEMENT
CRAFT).
177 0204460M GROUND/AIR TASK 78,208 78,208
ORIENTED RADAR
(G/ATOR).
178 0204571N CONSOLIDATED 45,124 45,124
TRAINING
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
179 0204574N CRYPTOLOGIC 2,703 2,703
DIRECT SUPPORT.
180 0204575N ELECTRONIC 19,563 19,563
WARFARE (EW)
READINESS
SUPPORT.
181 0205601N HARM 13,586 13,586
IMPROVEMENT.
182 0205604N TACTICAL DATA 197,538 197,538
LINKS.
183 0205620N SURFACE ASW 31,863 31,863
COMBAT SYSTEM
INTEGRATION.
184 0205632N MK-48 ADCAP.... 12,806 12,806
185 0205633N AVIATION 88,607 88,607
IMPROVEMENTS.
186 0205658N NAVY SCIENCE
ASSISTANCE
PROGRAM.
187 0205675N OPERATIONAL 116,928 116,928
NUCLEAR POWER
SYSTEMS.
188 0206313M MARINE CORPS 178,753 178,753
COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS.
189 0206623M MARINE CORPS 139,594 113,794
GROUND COMBAT/
SUPPORTING
ARMS SYSTEMS.
.............. Marine [-20,800]
personnel
carrier--fu
nding ahead
of need.
.............. Precision [-5,000]
extended
range
munition
program
reduction.

[[Page H3488]]

190 0206624M MARINE CORPS 42,647 42,647
COMBAT
SERVICES
SUPPORT.
191 0206625M USMC 34,394 34,394
INTELLIGENCE/
ELECTRONIC
WARFARE
SYSTEMS (MIP).
192 0207161N TACTICAL AIM 39,159 39,159
MISSILES.
193 0207163N ADVANCED MEDIUM 2,613 2,613
RANGE AIR-TO-
AIR MISSILE
(AMRAAM).
194 0208058N JOINT HIGH 986 986
SPEED VESSEL
(JHSV).
199 0303109N SATELLITE 66,231 66,231
COMMUNICATIONS
(SPACE).
200 0303138N CONSOLIDATED 24,476 24,476
AFLOAT NETWORK
ENTERPRISE
SERVICES
(CANES).
201 0303140N INFORMATION 23,531 23,531
SYSTEMS
SECURITY
PROGRAM.
202 0303150M WWMCCS/GLOBAL
COMMAND AND
CONTROL SYSTEM.
203 0303238N CONSOLIDATED
AFLOAT NETWORK
ENTERPRISE
SERVICES
(CANES)--MIP.
205 0305149N COBRA JUDY.....
206 0305160N NAVY 742 742
METEOROLOGICAL
AND OCEAN
SENSORS-SPACE
(METOC).
207 0305192N MILITARY 4,804 4,804
INTELLIGENCE
PROGRAM (MIP)
ACTIVITIES.
208 0305204N TACTICAL 8,381 8,381
UNMANNED
AERIAL
VEHICLES.
209 0305206N AIRBORNE
RECONNAISSANCE
SYSTEMS.
210 0305207N MANNED
RECONNAISSANCE
SYSTEMS.
211 0305208M DISTRIBUTED 5,535 5,535
COMMON GROUND/
SURFACE
SYSTEMS.
212 0305208N DISTRIBUTED 19,718 19,718
COMMON GROUND/
SURFACE
SYSTEMS.
213 0305220N RQ-4 UAV....... 375,235 375,235
214 0305231N MQ-8 UAV....... 48,713 48,713
215 0305232M RQ-11 UAV...... 102 102
216 0305233N RQ-7 UAV....... 710 710
217 0305234N SMALL (LEVEL 0) 5,013 5,013
TACTICAL UAS
(STUASL0).
218 0305237N MEDIUM RANGE
MARITIME UAS.
219 0305239M RQ-21A......... 11,122 11,122
220 0305241N MULTI- 28,851 28,851
INTELLIGENCE
SENSOR
DEVELOPMENT.
221 0308601N MODELING AND 5,116 5,116
SIMULATION
SUPPORT.
222 0702207N DEPOT 28,042 28,042
MAINTENANCE
(NON-IF).
223 0708011N INDUSTRIAL 50,933 50,933
PREPAREDNESS.
224 0708730N MARITIME 4,998 4,998
TECHNOLOGY
(MARITECH).
224A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 1,185,132 1,185,132
PROGRAMS.
.............. SUBTOTAL 3,385,822 3,403,922
OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
..............
.............. TOTAL 15,974,780 16,032,880
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMEN
T, TEST &
EVAL, NAVY.
..............
.............. RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT,
TEST & EVAL,
AF
.............. BASIC RESEARCH
001 0601102F DEFENSE 373,151 373,151
RESEARCH
SCIENCES.
002 0601103F UNIVERSITY 138,333 138,333
RESEARCH
INITIATIVES.
003 0601108F HIGH ENERGY 13,286 13,286
LASER RESEARCH
INITIATIVES.
.............. SUBTOTAL 524,770 524,770
BASIC
RESEARCH.
..............
.............. APPLIED
RESEARCH
004 0602102F MATERIALS...... 116,846 116,846
005 0602201F AEROSPACE 119,672 119,672
VEHICLE
TECHNOLOGIES.
006 0602202F HUMAN 89,483 89,483
EFFECTIVENESS
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
007 0602203F AEROSPACE 197,546 197,546
PROPULSION.
008 0602204F AEROSPACE 127,539 127,539
SENSORS.
009 0602601F SPACE 104,063 104,063
TECHNOLOGY.
010 0602602F CONVENTIONAL 81,521 81,521
MUNITIONS.
011 0602605F DIRECTED ENERGY 112,845 112,845
TECHNOLOGY.
012 0602788F DOMINANT 138,161 138,161
INFORMATION
SCIENCES AND
METHODS.
013 0602890F HIGH ENERGY 40,217 40,217
LASER RESEARCH.
.............. SUBTOTAL 1,127,893 1,127,893
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
..............
.............. ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT
014 0603112F ADVANCED 39,572 49,572
MATERIALS FOR
WEAPON SYSTEMS.
.............. Program [10,000]
increase.
015 0603199F SUSTAINMENT 12,800 12,800
SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY
(S&T).
016 0603203F ADVANCED 30,579 30,579
AEROSPACE
SENSORS.
017 0603211F AEROSPACE 77,347 77,347
TECHNOLOGY DEV/
DEMO.
018 0603216F AEROSPACE 149,321 149,321
PROPULSION AND
POWER
TECHNOLOGY.
019 0603270F ELECTRONIC 49,128 49,128
COMBAT
TECHNOLOGY.
020 0603401F ADVANCED 68,071 68,071
SPACECRAFT
TECHNOLOGY.
021 0603444F MAUI SPACE 26,299 26,299
SURVEILLANCE
SYSTEM (MSSS).
022 0603456F HUMAN 20,967 20,967
EFFECTIVENESS
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
023 0603601F CONVENTIONAL 33,996 33,996
WEAPONS
TECHNOLOGY.
024 0603605F ADVANCED 19,000 19,000
WEAPONS
TECHNOLOGY.
025 0603680F MANUFACTURING 41,353 41,353
TECHNOLOGY
PROGRAM.
026 0603788F BATTLESPACE 49,093 49,093
KNOWLEDGE
DEVELOPMENT
AND
DEMONSTRATION.
027 0603924F HIGH ENERGY
LASER ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
PROGRAM.
.............. SUBTOTAL 617,526 627,526
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
..............
.............. ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT &
PROTOTYPES
028 0603260F INTELLIGENCE 3,983 3,983
ADVANCED
DEVELOPMENT.
029 0603287F PHYSICAL 3,874 3,874
SECURITY
EQUIPMENT.
030 0603430F ADVANCED EHF
MILSATCOM
(SPACE).
031 0603432F POLAR MILSATCOM
(SPACE).
032 0603438F SPACE CONTROL 27,024 27,024
TECHNOLOGY.
033 0603742F COMBAT 15,899 15,899
IDENTIFICATION
TECHNOLOGY.
034 0603790F NATO RESEARCH 4,568 4,568
AND
DEVELOPMENT.
035 0603791F INTERNATIONAL 379 379
SPACE
COOPERATIVE
R&D.

[[Page H3489]]

036 0603830F SPACE 28,764 28,764
PROTECTION
PROGRAM (SPP).
037 0603850F INTEGRATED
BROADCAST
SERVICE--DEM/
VAL.
038 0603851F INTERCONTINENTA 86,737 86,737
L BALLISTIC
MISSILE--DEM/
VAL.
039 0603854F WIDEBAND GLOBAL
SATCOM RDT&E
(SPACE).
040 0603859F POLLUTION 953 953
PREVENTION--DE
M/VAL.
041 0603860F JOINT PRECISION
APPROACH AND
LANDING
SYSTEMS--DEM/
VAL.
042 0604015F LONG RANGE 379,437 379,437
STRIKE.
043 0604283F BATTLE MGMT COM
& CTRL SENSOR
DEVELOPMENT.
044 0604317F TECHNOLOGY 2,606 2,606
TRANSFER.
045 0604327F HARD AND DEEPLY 103 103
BURIED TARGET
DEFEAT SYSTEM
(HDBTDS)
PROGRAM.
046 0604330F JOINT DUAL ROLE
AIR DOMINANCE
MISSILE.
047 0604337F REQUIREMENTS 16,018 16,018
ANALYSIS AND
MATURATION.
048 0604422F WEATHER SYSTEM
FOLLOW-ON.
049 0604458F AIR & SPACE OPS 58,861 58,861
CENTER.
050 0604618F JOINT DIRECT 2,500 2,500
ATTACK
MUNITION.
051 0604635F GROUND ATTACK 21,175 21,175
WEAPONS FUZE
DEVELOPMENT.
052 0604857F OPERATIONALLY
RESPONSIVE
SPACE.
053 0604858F TECH TRANSITION 13,636 13,636
PROGRAM.
054 0105921F SERVICE SUPPORT 2,799 2,799
TO STRATCOM--
SPACE
ACTIVITIES.
055 0207455F THREE 70,160 70,160
DIMENSIONAL
LONG-RANGE
RADAR (3DELRR).
056 0305164F NAVSTAR GLOBAL 137,233 137,233
POSITIONING
SYSTEM (USER
EQUIPMENT)
(SPACE).
057 0305178F NATIONAL POLAR-
ORBITING
OPERATIONAL
ENVIRONMENTAL
SATELLITE
SYSTEM
(NPOESS).
.............. SUBTOTAL 876,709 876,709
ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT
& PROTOTYPES.
..............
.............. SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT &
DEMONSTRATION
058 0603260F INTELLIGENCE 977 977
ADVANCED
DEVELOPMENT.
059 0603840F GLOBAL
BROADCAST
SERVICE (GBS).
060 0604222F NUCLEAR WEAPONS
SUPPORT.
061 0604233F SPECIALIZED 3,601 3,601
UNDERGRADUATE
FLIGHT
TRAINING.
062 0604270F ELECTRONIC 1,971 1,971
WARFARE
DEVELOPMENT.
063 0604280F JOINT TACTICAL
RADIO.
064 0604281F TACTICAL DATA 51,456 51,456
NETWORKS
ENTERPRISE.
065 0604287F PHYSICAL 50 50
SECURITY
EQUIPMENT.
066 0604329F SMALL DIAMETER 115,000 115,000
BOMB (SDB)--
EMD.
067 0604421F COUNTERSPACE 23,930 23,930
SYSTEMS.
068 0604425F SPACE SITUATION 400,258 400,258
AWARENESS
SYSTEMS.
069 0604429F AIRBORNE 4,575 4,575
ELECTRONIC
ATTACK.
070 0604441F SPACE BASED 352,532 372,532
INFRARED
SYSTEM (SBIRS)
HIGH EMD.
.............. Space Based [20,000]
Infrared
Systems
(SBIRS)
Data
Exploitatio
n.
071 0604602F ARMAMENT/ 16,284 16,284
ORDNANCE
DEVELOPMENT.
072 0604604F SUBMUNITIONS... 2,564 2,564
073 0604617F AGILE COMBAT 17,036 17,036
SUPPORT.
074 0604706F LIFE SUPPORT 7,273 7,273
SYSTEMS.
075 0604735F COMBAT TRAINING 33,200 33,200
RANGES.
076 0604740F INTEGRATED
COMMAND &
CONTROL
APPLICATIONS
(IC2A).
077 0604750F INTELLIGENCE
EQUIPMENT.
078 0604800F F-35--EMD...... 816,335 816,335
079 0604851F INTERCONTINENTA 145,442 145,442
L BALLISTIC
MISSILE--EMD.
080 0604853F EVOLVED 27,963 27,963
EXPENDABLE
LAUNCH VEHICLE
PROGRAM
(SPACE)--EMD.
081 0604932F LONG RANGE 5,000 5,000
STANDOFF
WEAPON.
082 0604933F ICBM FUZE 129,411 129,411
MODERNIZATION.
083 0605213F F-22 131,100 131,100
MODERNIZATION
INCREMENT 3.2B.
084 0605221F KC-46.......... 1,558,590 1,558,590
085 0605229F CSAR HH-60 393,558 393,558
RECAPITALIZATI
ON.
086 0605278F HC/MC-130 RECAP 6,242 6,242
RDT&E.
087 0605431F ADVANCED EHF 272,872 272,872
MILSATCOM
(SPACE).
088 0605432F POLAR MILSATCOM 124,805 124,805
(SPACE).
089 0605433F WIDEBAND GLOBAL 13,948 13,948
SATCOM (SPACE).
090 0605931F B-2 DEFENSIVE 303,500 303,500
MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM.
091 0101125F NUCLEAR WEAPONS 67,874 67,874
MODERNIZATION.
092 0207100F LIGHT ATTACK
ARMED
RECONNAISSANCE
(LAAR)
SQUADRONS.
093 0207604F READINESS
TRAINING
RANGES,
OPERATIONS AND
MAINTENANCE.
094 0207701F FULL COMBAT 4,663 4,663
MISSION
TRAINING.
095 0305230F MC-12..........
096 0401138F C-27J AIRLIFT
SQUADRONS.
097 0401318F CV-22.......... 46,705 46,705
098 0401845F AIRBORNE SENIOR
LEADER C3
(SLC3S).
.............. SUBTOTAL 5,078,715 5,098,715
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT
&
DEMONSTRATIO
N.
..............
.............. MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT
099 0604256F THREAT 17,690 17,690
SIMULATOR
DEVELOPMENT.
100 0604759F MAJOR T&E 34,841 34,841
INVESTMENT.
101 0605101F RAND PROJECT 32,956 32,956
AIR FORCE.
102 0605502F SMALL BUSINESS
INNOVATION
RESEARCH.
103 0605712F INITIAL 13,610 13,610
OPERATIONAL
TEST &
EVALUATION.
104 0605807F TEST AND 742,658 742,658
EVALUATION
SUPPORT.
105 0605860F ROCKET SYSTEMS 14,203 14,203
LAUNCH PROGRAM
(SPACE).
106 0605864F SPACE TEST 13,000 13,000
PROGRAM (STP).
107 0605976F FACILITIES 44,160 44,160
RESTORATION
AND
MODERNIZATION-
-TEST AND
EVALUATION
SUPPORT.
108 0605978F FACILITIES 27,643 27,643
SUSTAINMENT--T
EST AND
EVALUATION
SUPPORT.
109 0606323F MULTI-SERVICE 13,935 13,935
SYSTEMS
ENGINEERING
INITIATIVE.

[[Page H3490]]

110 0606392F SPACE AND 192,348 192,348
MISSILE CENTER
(SMC) CIVILIAN
WORKFORCE.
111 0702806F ACQUISITION AND 28,647 28,647
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT.
112 0804731F GENERAL SKILL 315 315
TRAINING.
113 0909999F FINANCING FOR
CANCELLED
ACCOUNT
ADJUSTMENTS.
114 1001004F INTERNATIONAL 3,785 3,785
ACTIVITIES.
.............. SUBTOTAL 1,179,791 1,179,791
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT.
..............
.............. OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT
115 0603423F GLOBAL 383,500 383,500
POSITIONING
SYSTEM III--
OPERATIONAL
CONTROL
SEGMENT.
116 0604263F COMMON VERTICAL
LIFT SUPPORT
PLATFORM.
117 0604445F WIDE AREA 5,000 5,000
SURVEILLANCE.
118 0605018F AF INTEGRATED 90,097 90,097
PERSONNEL AND
PAY SYSTEM (AF-
IPPS).
119 0605024F ANTI-TAMPER 32,086 32,086
TECHNOLOGY
EXECUTIVE
AGENCY.
121 0101113F B-52 SQUADRONS. 24,007 24,007
122 0101122F AIR-LAUNCHED 450 450
CRUISE MISSILE
(ALCM).
123 0101126F B-1B SQUADRONS. 19,589 19,589
124 0101127F B-2 SQUADRONS.. 100,194 100,194
125 0101313F STRAT WAR 37,448 37,448
PLANNING
SYSTEM--USSTRA
TCOM.
126 0101314F NIGHT FIST--
USSTRATCOM.
128 0102326F REGION/SECTOR 1,700 1,700
OPERATION
CONTROL CENTER
MODERNIZATION
PROGRAM.
129 0102823F STRATEGIC
AEROSPACE
INTELLIGENCE
SYSTEM
ACTIVITIES.
130 0203761F WARFIGHTER 3,844 3,844
RAPID
ACQUISITION
PROCESS (WRAP)
RAPID
TRANSITION
FUND.
131 0205219F MQ-9 UAV....... 128,328 128,328
132 0207040F MULTI-PLATFORM
ELECTRONIC
WARFARE
EQUIPMENT.
133 0207131F A-10 SQUADRONS. 9,614 9,614
134 0207133F F-16 SQUADRONS. 177,298 177,298
135 0207134F F-15E SQUADRONS 244,289 244,289
136 0207136F MANNED 13,138 13,138
DESTRUCTIVE
SUPPRESSION.
137 0207138F F-22A SQUADRONS 328,542 328,542
138 0207142F F-35 SQUADRONS. 33,000 33,000
139 0207161F TACTICAL AIM 15,460 15,460
MISSILES.
140 0207163F ADVANCED MEDIUM 84,172 84,172
RANGE AIR-TO-
AIR MISSILE
(AMRAAM).
141 0207170F JOINT HELMET
MOUNTED CUEING
SYSTEM (JHMCS).
142 0207224F COMBAT RESCUE 2,582 2,582
AND RECOVERY.
143 0207227F COMBAT RESCUE-- 542 542
PARARESCUE.
144 0207247F AF TENCAP...... 89,816 89,816
145 0207249F PRECISION 1,075 1,075
ATTACK SYSTEMS
PROCUREMENT.
146 0207253F COMPASS CALL... 10,782 10,782
147 0207268F AIRCRAFT ENGINE 139,369 139,369
COMPONENT
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM.
148 0207277F ISR INNOVATIONS
149 0207325F JOINT AIR-TO- 6,373 6,373
SURFACE
STANDOFF
MISSILE
(JASSM).
150 0207410F AIR & SPACE 22,820 22,820
OPERATIONS
CENTER (AOC).
151 0207412F CONTROL AND 7,029 7,029
REPORTING
CENTER (CRC).
152 0207417F AIRBORNE 186,256 186,256
WARNING AND
CONTROL SYSTEM
(AWACS).
153 0207418F TACTICAL 743 743
AIRBORNE
CONTROL
SYSTEMS.
154 0207423F ADVANCED
COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS.
156 0207431F COMBAT AIR 4,471 4,471
INTELLIGENCE
SYSTEM
ACTIVITIES.
157 0207438F THEATER BATTLE
MANAGEMENT
(TBM) C4I.
158 0207444F TACTICAL AIR 10,250 10,250
CONTROL PARTY-
MOD.
159 0207448F C2ISR TACTICAL 1,431 1,431
DATA LINK.
160 0207449F COMMAND AND 7,329 7,329
CONTROL (C2)
CONSTELLATION.
161 0207452F DCAPES......... 15,081 15,081
162 0207581F JOINT 13,248 13,248
SURVEILLANCE/
TARGET ATTACK
RADAR SYSTEM
(JSTARS).
163 0207590F SEEK EAGLE..... 24,342 24,342
164 0207601F USAF MODELING 10,448 10,448
AND SIMULATION.
165 0207605F WARGAMING AND 5,512 5,512
SIMULATION
CENTERS.
166 0207697F DISTRIBUTED 3,301 3,301
TRAINING AND
EXERCISES.
167 0208006F MISSION 62,605 62,605
PLANNING
SYSTEMS.
168 0208021F INFORMATION
WARFARE
SUPPORT.
169 0208059F CYBER COMMAND 68,099 68,099
ACTIVITIES.
170 0208087F AF OFFENSIVE 14,047 14,047
CYBERSPACE
OPERATIONS.
171 0208088F AF DEFENSIVE 5,853 5,853
CYBERSPACE
OPERATIONS.
179 0301400F SPACE 12,197 12,197
SUPERIORITY
INTELLIGENCE.
180 0302015F E-4B NATIONAL 18,267 18,267
AIRBORNE
OPERATIONS
CENTER (NAOC).
181 0303131F MINIMUM 36,288 36,288
ESSENTIAL
EMERGENCY
COMMUNICATIONS
NETWORK
(MEECN).
182 0303140F INFORMATION 90,231 90,231
SYSTEMS
SECURITY
PROGRAM.
183 0303141F GLOBAL COMBAT 725 725
SUPPORT SYSTEM.
184 0303150F GLOBAL COMMAND
AND CONTROL
SYSTEM.
185 0303601F MILSATCOM 140,170 140,170
TERMINALS.
187 0304260F AIRBORNE SIGINT 117,110 117,110
ENTERPRISE.
190 0305099F GLOBAL AIR 4,430 4,430
TRAFFIC
MANAGEMENT
(GATM).
191 0305103F CYBER SECURITY 2,048 2,048
INITIATIVE.
192 0305105F DOD CYBER CRIME 288 288
CENTER.
193 0305110F SATELLITE 35,698 35,698
CONTROL
NETWORK
(SPACE).
194 0305111F WEATHER SERVICE 24,667 24,667
195 0305114F AIR TRAFFIC 35,674 35,674
CONTROL,
APPROACH, AND
LANDING SYSTEM
(ATCALS).
196 0305116F AERIAL TARGETS. 21,186 21,186
199 0305128F SECURITY AND 195 195
INVESTIGATIVE
ACTIVITIES.
200 0305145F ARMS CONTROL 1,430 1,430
IMPLEMENTATION.
201 0305146F DEFENSE JOINT 330 330
COUNTERINTELLI
GENCE
ACTIVITIES.
203 0305164F NAVSTAR GLOBAL
POSITIONING
SYSTEM (USER
EQUIPMENT)
(SPACE).
204 0305165F NAVSTAR GLOBAL
POSITIONING
SYSTEM (SPACE
AND CONTROL
SEGMENTS).

[[Page H3491]]

206 0305173F SPACE AND 3,696 3,696
MISSILE TEST
AND EVALUATION
CENTER.
207 0305174F SPACE 2,469 2,469
INNOVATION,
INTEGRATION
AND RAPID
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
208 0305179F INTEGRATED 8,289 8,289
BROADCAST
SERVICE (IBS).
209 0305182F SPACELIFT RANGE 13,345 13,345
SYSTEM (SPACE).
210 0305193F CYBER
INTELLIGENCE.
211 0305202F DRAGON U-2..... 18,700 18,700
212 0305205F ENDURANCE 3,000 3,000
UNMANNED
AERIAL
VEHICLES.
213 0305206F AIRBORNE 37,828 37,828
RECONNAISSANCE
SYSTEMS.
214 0305207F MANNED 13,491 13,491
RECONNAISSANCE
SYSTEMS.
215 0305208F DISTRIBUTED 7,498 7,498
COMMON GROUND/
SURFACE
SYSTEMS.
216 0305219F MQ-1 PREDATOR A 3,326 3,326
UAV.
217 0305220F RQ-4 UAV....... 134,406 134,406
218 0305221F NETWORK-CENTRIC 7,413 7,413
COLLABORATIVE
TARGETING.
219 0305236F COMMON DATA 40,503 40,503
LINK (CDL).
220 0305238F NATO AGS....... 264,134 264,134
221 0305240F SUPPORT TO DCGS 23,016 23,016
ENTERPRISE.
222 0305265F GPS III SPACE 221,276 221,276
SEGMENT.
223 0305614F JSPOC MISSION 58,523 58,523
SYSTEM.
224 0305881F RAPID CYBER 2,218 2,218
ACQUISITION.
225 0305887F INTELLIGENCE
SUPPORT TO
INFORMATION
WARFARE.
226 0305913F NUDET DETECTION 50,547 50,547
SYSTEM (SPACE).
227 0305940F SPACE SITUATION 18,807 18,807
AWARENESS
OPERATIONS.
228 0307141F INFORMATION
OPERATIONS
TECHNOLOGY
INTEGRATION &
TOOL
DEVELOPMENT.
229 0308699F SHARED EARLY 1,079 1,079
WARNING (SEW).
230 0401115F C-130 AIRLIFT 400 26,400
SQUADRON.
.............. C-130H [26,000]
Propulsion
System
Propeller
Upgrades.
231 0401119F C-5 AIRLIFT 61,492 61,492
SQUADRONS (IF).
232 0401130F C-17 AIRCRAFT 109,134 109,134
(IF).
233 0401132F C-130J PROGRAM. 22,443 22,443
234 0401134F LARGE AIRCRAFT 4,116 4,116
IR
COUNTERMEASURE
S (LAIRCM).
235 0401139F LIGHT MOBILITY
AIRCRAFT
(LIMA).
236 0401218F KC-135S........
237 0401219F KC-10S.........
238 0401314F OPERATIONAL 44,553 44,553
SUPPORT
AIRLIFT.
239 0408011F SPECIAL TACTICS 6,213 6,213
/ COMBAT
CONTROL.
240 0702207F DEPOT 1,605 1,605
MAINTENANCE
(NON-IF).
241 0708012F LOGISTICS
SUPPORT
ACTIVITIES.
242 0708610F LOGISTICS 95,238 95,238
INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY
(LOGIT).
243 0708611F SUPPORT SYSTEMS 10,925 10,925
DEVELOPMENT.
244 0804743F OTHER FLIGHT 1,347 1,347
TRAINING.
245 0808716F OTHER PERSONNEL 65 65
ACTIVITIES.
246 0901202F JOINT PERSONNEL 1,083 1,083
RECOVERY
AGENCY.
247 0901218F CIVILIAN 1,577 1,577
COMPENSATION
PROGRAM.
248 0901220F PERSONNEL 5,990 5,990
ADMINISTRATION.
249 0901226F AIR FORCE 786 786
STUDIES AND
ANALYSIS
AGENCY.
250 0901279F FACILITIES 654 654
OPERATION--ADM
INISTRATIVE.
251 0901538F FINANCIAL 135,735 135,735
MANAGEMENT
INFORMATION
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
252 0902998F MANAGEMENT HQ--
ADP SUPPORT
(AF).
252A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 11,874,528 11,894,528
PROGRAMS.
.............. Program [20,000]
Increase.
.............. SUBTOTAL 16,297,542 16,343,542
OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
..............
.............. TOTAL 25,702,946 25,778,946
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMEN
T, TEST &
EVAL, AF.
..............
.............. RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT,
TEST & EVAL,
DW
.............. BASIC RESEARCH
001 0601000BR DTRA BASIC 45,837 45,837
RESEARCH
INITIATIVE.
002 0601101E DEFENSE 315,033 315,033
RESEARCH
SCIENCES.
003 0601110D8Z BASIC RESEARCH 11,171 11,171
INITIATIVES.
004 0601117E BASIC 49,500 49,500
OPERATIONAL
MEDICAL
RESEARCH
SCIENCE.
005 0601120D8Z NATIONAL 84,271 89,271
DEFENSE
EDUCATION
PROGRAM.
.............. Restore PK- [5,000]
12 funding.
006 0601228D8Z HISTORICALLY 30,895 35,895
BLACK COLLEGES
AND
UNIVERSITIES/
MINORITY
INSTITUTIONS.
.............. Program [5,000]
increase.
007 0601384BP CHEMICAL AND 51,426 51,426
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
PROGRAM.
.............. SUBTOTAL 588,133 598,133
BASIC
RESEARCH.
..............
.............. APPLIED
RESEARCH
008 0602000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS 20,065 13,565
TECHNOLOGY.
.............. Decrease to [-6,500]
insensitive
munitions
program.
009 0602115E BIOMEDICAL 114,790 114,790
TECHNOLOGY.
010 0602228D8Z HISTORICALLY
BLACK COLLEGES
AND
UNIVERSITIES
(HBCU) SCIENCE.
011 0602234D8Z LINCOLN 46,875 46,875
LABORATORY
RESEARCH
PROGRAM.
012 0602250D8Z SYSTEMS 2020
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
013 0602251D8Z APPLIED 45,000 45,000
RESEARCH FOR
THE
ADVANCEMENT OF
S&T PRIORITIES.
014 0602303E INFORMATION & 413,260 413,260
COMMUNICATIONS
TECHNOLOGY.
015 0602304E COGNITIVE 16,330 16,330
COMPUTING
SYSTEMS.
016 0602305E MACHINE
INTELLIGENCE.
017 0602383E BIOLOGICAL 24,537 24,537
WARFARE
DEFENSE.
018 0602384BP CHEMICAL AND 227,065 217,065
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
PROGRAM.
.............. Program [-10,000]
decrease.
019 0602663D8Z DATA TO
DECISIONS
APPLIED
RESEARCH.

[[Page H3492]]

020 0602668D8Z CYBER SECURITY 18,908 18,908
RESEARCH.
021 0602670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL
AND CULTURE
BEHAVIOR
MODELING
(HSCB) APPLIED
RESEARCH.
022 0602702E TACTICAL 225,977 225,977
TECHNOLOGY.
023 0602715E MATERIALS AND 166,654 166,654
BIOLOGICAL
TECHNOLOGY.
024 0602716E ELECTRONICS 243,469 243,469
TECHNOLOGY.
025 0602718BR WEAPONS OF MASS 175,282 175,282
DESTRUCTION
DEFEAT
TECHNOLOGIES.
026 0602751D8Z SOFTWARE 11,107 11,107
ENGINEERING
INSTITUTE
(SEI) APPLIED
RESEARCH.
027 1160401BB SPECIAL 29,246 29,246
OPERATIONS
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
.............. SUBTOTAL 1,778,565 1,762,065
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
..............
.............. ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT
028 0603000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS 26,646 26,646
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
029 0603121D8Z SO/LIC ADVANCED 19,420 19,920
DEVELOPMENT.
.............. Program [500]
increase
for future
information
operations
strategy.
030 0603122D8Z COMBATING 77,792 77,792
TERRORISM
TECHNOLOGY
SUPPORT.
031 0603160BR COUNTERPROLIFER 274,033 274,033
ATION
INITIATIVES--P
ROLIFERATION
PREVENTION AND
DEFEAT.
032 0603175C BALLISTIC 309,203 239,203
MISSILE
DEFENSE
TECHNOLOGY.
.............. Decrease in [-70,000]
funding of
Common Kill
Vehicle
Technology
Program.
033 0603200D8Z JOINT ADVANCED
CONCEPTS.
034 0603225D8Z JOINT DOD-DOE 19,305 19,305
MUNITIONS
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
035 0603264S AGILE 7,565 7,565
TRANSPORTATION
FOR THE 21ST
CENTURY
(AT21)--THEATE
R CAPABILITY.
036 0603274C SPECIAL 40,426 40,426
PROGRAM--MDA
TECHNOLOGY.
037 0603286E ADVANCED 149,804 149,804
AEROSPACE
SYSTEMS.
038 0603287E SPACE PROGRAMS 172,546 172,546
AND TECHNOLOGY.
039 0603384BP CHEMICAL AND 170,847 170,847
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
PROGRAM--ADVAN
CED
DEVELOPMENT.
040 0603618D8Z JOINT 9,009 9,009
ELECTRONIC
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
041 0603648D8Z JOINT 174,428 167,428
CAPABILITY
TECHNOLOGY
DEMONSTRATIONS.
.............. Decrease to [-7,000]
Strategic
Capabilitie
s Office
efforts.
042 0603662D8Z NETWORKED 20,000 20,000
COMMUNICATIONS
CAPABILITIES.
043 0603663D8Z DATA TO
DECISIONS
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
044 0603665D8Z BIOMETRICS
SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY.
045 0603668D8Z CYBER SECURITY 19,668 19,668
ADVANCED
RESEARCH.
046 0603670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL
AND CULTURE
BEHAVIOR
MODELING
(HSCB)
ADVANCED
DEVELOPMENT.
047 0603680D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE 34,041 34,041
MANUFACTURING
SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY
PROGRAM.
048 0603699D8Z EMERGING 61,971 53,971
CAPABILITIES
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
.............. Decrease to [-8,000]
Strategic
Capabilitie
s Office
efforts.
049 0603711D8Z JOINT ROBOTICS
PROGRAM/
AUTONOMOUS
SYSTEMS.
050 0603712S GENERIC 20,000 20,000
LOGISTICS R&D
TECHNOLOGY
DEMONSTRATIONS.
051 0603713S DEPLOYMENT AND 30,256 30,256
DISTRIBUTION
ENTERPRISE
TECHNOLOGY.
052 0603716D8Z STRATEGIC 72,324 72,324
ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH
PROGRAM.
053 0603720S MICROELECTRONIC 82,700 82,700
S TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT
AND SUPPORT.
054 0603727D8Z JOINT 8,431 8,431
WARFIGHTING
PROGRAM.
055 0603739E ADVANCED 117,080 117,080
ELECTRONICS
TECHNOLOGIES.
056 0603755D8Z HIGH
PERFORMANCE
COMPUTING
MODERNIZATION
PROGRAM.
057 0603760E COMMAND, 239,078 239,078
CONTROL AND
COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS.
058 0603765E CLASSIFIED
DARPA PROGRAMS.
059 0603766E NETWORK-CENTRIC 259,006 259,006
WARFARE
TECHNOLOGY.
060 0603767E SENSOR 286,364 286,364
TECHNOLOGY.
061 0603769SE DISTRIBUTED 12,116 12,116
LEARNING
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
062 0603781D8Z SOFTWARE 19,008 19,008
ENGINEERING
INSTITUTE.
063 0603826D8Z QUICK REACTION 78,532 78,532
SPECIAL
PROJECTS.
064 0603828D8Z JOINT
EXPERIMENTATIO
N.
065 0603828J JOINT 12,667 12,667
EXPERIMENTATIO
N.
066 0603832D8Z DOD MODELING 41,370 41,370
AND SIMULATION
MANAGEMENT
OFFICE.
067 0603901C DIRECTED ENERGY
RESEARCH.
068 0603902C NEXT GENERATION
AEGIS MISSILE.
069 0603941D8Z TEST & 92,508 92,508
EVALUATION
SCIENCE &
TECHNOLOGY.
070 0604055D8Z OPERATIONAL 52,001 60,001
ENERGY
CAPABILITY
IMPROVEMENT.
.............. Operational [8,000]
Energy
Capability
Improvement
Fund.
071 0303310D8Z CWMD SYSTEMS... 52,053 52,053
072 1160402BB SPECIAL 46,809 46,809
OPERATIONS
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
073 1160422BB AVIATION
ENGINEERING
ANALYSIS.
074 1160472BB SOF INFORMATION
AND BROADCAST
SYSTEMS
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
.............. SUBTOTAL 3,109,007 3,032,507
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
..............
.............. ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT
AND PROTOTYPES
075 0603161D8Z NUCLEAR AND 63,641 63,641
CONVENTIONAL
PHYSICAL
SECURITY
EQUIPMENT
RDT&E ADC&P.
076 0603527D8Z RETRACT LARCH.. 19,152 19,152
077 0603600D8Z WALKOFF........ 70,763 70,763
078 0603709D8Z JOINT ROBOTICS
PROGRAM.
079 0603714D8Z ADVANCED 17,230 17,230
SENSORS
APPLICATION
PROGRAM.
080 0603851D8Z ENVIRONMENTAL 71,453 71,453
SECURITY
TECHNICAL
CERTIFICATION
PROGRAM.
081 0603881C BALLISTIC 268,990 268,990
MISSILE
DEFENSE
TERMINAL
DEFENSE
SEGMENT.
082 0603882C BALLISTIC 1,033,903 1,174,303
MISSILE
DEFENSE
MIDCOURSE
DEFENSE
SEGMENT.
.............. Planning [50,000]
and Design
(35% to
100%
design).
.............. RDT&E [70,000]
Ground
Systems
Development.
.............. RDT&E Site [20,400]
Activities,
including
EIS.
082A 0603XXXC COMMON KILL 70,000
VEHICLE
TECHNOLOGY AND
CAPABILITY
DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM.
.............. Common Kill [70,000]
Vehicle
Technology
Program.
083 0603884BP CHEMICAL AND 196,237 196,237
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
PROGRAM--DEM/
VAL.
084 0603884C BALLISTIC 315,183 315,183
MISSILE
DEFENSE
SENSORS.
085 0603888C BALLISTIC
MISSILE
DEFENSE TEST &
TARGETS.

[[Page H3493]]

086 0603890C BMD ENABLING 377,605 377,605
PROGRAMS.
087 0603891C SPECIAL 286,613 286,613
PROGRAMS--MDA.
088 0603892C AEGIS BMD...... 937,056 937,056
089 0603893C SPACE TRACKING 44,947 44,947
& SURVEILLANCE
SYSTEM.
090 0603895C BALLISTIC 6,515 6,515
MISSILE
DEFENSE SYSTEM
SPACE PROGRAMS.
091 0603896C BALLISTIC 418,355 418,355
MISSILE
DEFENSE
COMMAND AND
CONTROL,
BATTLE
MANAGEMENT AND
COMMUNICATI.
092 0603898C BALLISTIC 47,419 47,419
MISSILE
DEFENSE JOINT
WARFIGHTER
SUPPORT.
093 0603904C MISSILE DEFENSE 52,131 52,131
INTEGRATION &
OPERATIONS
CENTER (MDIOC).
094 0603906C REGARDING 13,864 13,864
TRENCH.
095 0603907C SEA BASED X- 44,478 44,478
BAND RADAR
(SBX).
096 0603913C ISRAELI 95,782 283,782
COOPERATIVE
PROGRAMS.
.............. Development [15,000]
of
increased
capabilitie
s for Iron
Dome.
.............. Increase [173,000]
Israeli
Cooperative
Programs.
097 0603914C BALLISTIC 375,866 375,866
MISSILE
DEFENSE TEST.
098 0603915C BALLISTIC 495,257 495,257
MISSILE
DEFENSE
TARGETS.
099 0603920D8Z HUMANITARIAN 11,704 11,704
DEMINING.
100 0603923D8Z COALITION 9,842 9,842
WARFARE.
101 0604016D8Z DEPARTMENT OF 3,312 13,312
DEFENSE
CORROSION
PROGRAM.
.............. Corrosion [10,000]
Prevention,
Control,
and
Mitigation.
102 0604250D8Z ADVANCED 130,000 25,000
INNOVATIVE
TECHNOLOGIES.
.............. Decrease to [-105,000]
SCO efforts.
103 0604400D8Z DEPARTMENT OF 8,300 8,300
DEFENSE (DOD)
UNMANNED
AIRCRAFT
SYSTEM (UAS)
COMMON
DEVELOPMENT.
104 0604445J WIDE AREA 30,000 30,000
SURVEILLANCE.
105 0604670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL
AND CULTURE
BEHAVIOR
MODELING
(HSCB)
RESEARCH AND
ENGINEERING.
106 0604775D8Z DEFENSE RAPID 250,000
INNOVATION
PROGRAM.
.............. Rapid [250,000]
Innovation
Program.
107 0604787D8Z JOINT SYSTEMS
INTEGRATION
COMMAND (JSIC).
108 0604787J JOINT SYSTEMS 7,402 7,402
INTEGRATION.
109 0604828D8Z JOINT FIRES
INTEGRATION
AND
INTEROPERABILI
TY TEAM.
110 0604828J JOINT FIRES 7,506 7,506
INTEGRATION
AND
INTEROPERABILI
TY TEAM.
111 0604880C LAND-BASED SM-3 129,374 129,374
(LBSM3).
112 0604881C AEGIS SM-3 308,522 308,522
BLOCK IIA CO-
DEVELOPMENT.
113 0604883C PRECISION
TRACKING SPACE
SYSTEM.
114 0604886C ADVANCED REMOTE
SENSOR
TECHNOLOGY
(ARST).
115 0303191D8Z JOINT 3,169 3,169
ELECTROMAGNETI
C TECHNOLOGY
(JET) PROGRAM.
116 0305103C CYBER SECURITY 946 946
INITIATIVE.
.............. SUBTOTAL 5,902,517 6,455,917
ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT
AND
PROTOTYPES.
..............
.............. SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT
AND
DEMONSTRATION
117 0604051D8Z DEFENSE
ACQUISITION
CHALLENGE
PROGRAM (DACP).
118 0604161D8Z NUCLEAR AND 8,155 8,155
CONVENTIONAL
PHYSICAL
SECURITY
EQUIPMENT
RDT&E SDD.
119 0604165D8Z PROMPT GLOBAL 65,440 65,440
STRIKE
CAPABILITY
DEVELOPMENT.
120 0604384BP CHEMICAL AND 451,306 451,306
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
PROGRAM--EMD.
121 0604709D8Z JOINT ROBOTICS
PROGRAM--EMD.
122 0604764K ADVANCED IT 29,138 29,138
SERVICES JOINT
PROGRAM OFFICE
(AITS-JPO).
123 0604771D8Z JOINT TACTICAL 19,475 19,475
INFORMATION
DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM (JTIDS).
124 0605000BR WEAPONS OF MASS 12,901 12,901
DESTRUCTION
DEFEAT
CAPABILITIES.
125 0605013BL INFORMATION 13,812 13,812
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
126 0605021SE HOMELAND 386 386
PERSONNEL
SECURITY
INITIATIVE.
127 0605022D8Z DEFENSE 3,763 3,763
EXPORTABILITY
PROGRAM.
128 0605027D8Z OUSD(C) IT 6,788 6,788
DEVELOPMENT
INITIATIVES.
129 0605070S DOD ENTERPRISE 27,917 27,917
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT
AND
DEMONSTRATION.
130 0605075D8Z DCMO POLICY AND 22,297 22,297
INTEGRATION.
131 0605080S DEFENSE AGENCY 51,689 51,689
INTIATIVES
(DAI)--FINANCI
AL SYSTEM.
132 0605210D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE 6,184 6,184
ELECTRONIC
PROCUREMENT
CAPABILITIES.
133 0303141K GLOBAL COMBAT 12,083 12,083
SUPPORT SYSTEM.
134 0305304D8Z DOD ENTERPRISE 3,302 3,302
ENERGY
INFORMATION
MANAGEMENT
(EEIM).
.............. SUBTOTAL 734,636 734,636
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT
AND
DEMONSTRATIO
N.
..............
.............. MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT
135 0604774D8Z DEFENSE 6,393 6,393
READINESS
REPORTING
SYSTEM (DRRS).
136 0604875D8Z JOINT SYSTEMS 2,479 2,479
ARCHITECTURE
DEVELOPMENT.
137 0604940D8Z CENTRAL TEST 240,213 240,213
AND EVALUATION
INVESTMENT
DEVELOPMENT
(CTEIP).
138 0604942D8Z ASSESSMENTS AND 2,127 2,127
EVALUATIONS.
139 0604943D8Z THERMAL VICAR.. 8,287 8,287
140 0605100D8Z JOINT MISSION 31,000 31,000
ENVIRONMENT
TEST
CAPABILITY
(JMETC).
141 0605104D8Z TECHNICAL 24,379 24,379
STUDIES,
SUPPORT AND
ANALYSIS.
142 0605110D8Z USD(A&T)--
CRITICAL
TECHNOLOGY
SUPPORT.
143 0605117D8Z FOREIGN 54,311 54,311
MATERIEL
ACQUISITION
AND
EXPLOITATION.
144 0605126J JOINT 47,462 47,462
INTEGRATED AIR
AND MISSILE
DEFENSE
ORGANIZATION
(JIAMDO).
145 0605128D8Z CLASSIFIED
PROGRAM USD(P).
146 0605130D8Z FOREIGN 12,134 12,134
COMPARATIVE
TESTING.
147 0605142D8Z SYSTEMS 44,237 44,237
ENGINEERING.
148 0605151D8Z STUDIES AND 5,871 5,871
ANALYSIS
SUPPORT--OSD.
149 0605161D8Z NUCLEAR MATTERS- 5,028 5,028
PHYSICAL
SECURITY.
150 0605170D8Z SUPPORT TO 6,301 6,301
NETWORKS AND
INFORMATION
INTEGRATION.
151 0605200D8Z GENERAL SUPPORT 6,504 6,504
TO USD
(INTELLIGENCE).
152 0605384BP CHEMICAL AND 92,046 92,046
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
PROGRAM.
153 0605502BR SMALL BUSINESS
INNOVATION
RESEARCH.

[[Page H3494]]

154 0605502C SMALL BUSINESS
INNOVATION
RESEARCH--MDA.
155 0605502D8Z SMALL BUSINESS
INNOVATIVE
RESEARCH.
156 0605502E SMALL BUSINESS
INNOVATIVE
RESEARCH.
157 0605502S SMALL BUSINESS
INNOVATIVE
RESEARCH.
158 0605790D8Z SMALL BUSINESS 1,868 1,868
INNOVATION
RESEARCH
(SBIR)/ SMALL
BUSINESS
TECHNOLOGY
TRANSFER (S.
159 0605798D8Z DEFENSE 8,362 8,362
TECHNOLOGY
ANALYSIS.
160 0605801KA DEFENSE 56,024 56,024
TECHNICAL
INFORMATION
CENTER (DTIC).
161 0605803SE R&D IN SUPPORT 6,908 6,908
OF DOD
ENLISTMENT,
TESTING AND
EVALUATION.
162 0605804D8Z DEVELOPMENT 15,451 19,451
TEST AND
EVALUATION.
.............. Program [4,000]
increase.
163 0605897E DARPA AGENCY
RELOCATION.
164 0605898E MANAGEMENT HQ-- 71,659 71,659
R&D.
165 0606100D8Z BUDGET AND 4,083 4,083
PROGRAM
ASSESSMENTS.
166 0606301D8Z AVIATION SAFETY
TECHNOLOGIES.
167 0203345D8Z DEFENSE 5,306 5,306
OPERATIONS
SECURITY
INITIATIVE
(DOSI).
168 0204571J JOINT STAFF 2,097 2,097
ANALYTICAL
SUPPORT.
171 0303166D8Z SUPPORT TO
INFORMATION
OPERATIONS
(IO)
CAPABILITIES.
172 0303166J SUPPORT TO 8,394 8,394
INFORMATION
OPERATIONS
(IO)
CAPABILITIES.
173 0303169D8Z INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY
RAPID
ACQUISITION.
174 0305103E CYBER SECURITY
INITIATIVE.
175 0305193D8Z CYBER 7,624 7,624
INTELLIGENCE.
177 0305400D8Z WARFIGHTING AND
INTELLIGENCE-
RELATED
SUPPORT.
178 0804767D8Z COCOM EXERCISE 43,247 43,247
ENGAGEMENT AND
TRAINING
TRANSFORMATION
(CE2T2).
179 0901598C MANAGEMENT HQ-- 37,712 37,712
MDA.
180 0901598D8W MANAGEMENT 607 607
HEADQUARTERS
WHS.
181 0909999D8Z FINANCING FOR
CANCELLED
ACCOUNT
ADJUSTMENTS.
181A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 54,914 54,914
PROGRAMS.
.............. SUBTOTAL 913,028 917,028
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT.
..............
.............. OPERATIONAL
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT
182 0604130V ENTERPRISE 7,552 7,552
SECURITY
SYSTEM (ESS).
183 0605127T REGIONAL 3,270 3,270
INTERNATIONAL
OUTREACH (RIO)
AND
PARTNERSHIP
FOR PEACE
INFORMATION
MANA.
184 0605147T OVERSEAS 287 287
HUMANITARIAN
ASSISTANCE
SHARED
INFORMATION
SYSTEM
(OHASIS).
185 0607210D8Z INDUSTRIAL BASE 14,000 14,000
ANALYSIS AND
SUSTAINMENT
SUPPORT.
186 0607310D8Z OPERATIONAL 1,955 1,955
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
187 0607327T GLOBAL THEATER 13,250 13,250
SECURITY
COOPERATION
MANAGEMENT
INFORMATION
SYSTEMS (G-
TSCMIS).
188 0607384BP CHEMICAL AND 13,026 13,026
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
(OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT).
189 0607828D8Z JOINT
INTEGRATION
AND
INTEROPERABILI
TY.
190 0607828J JOINT 12,652 12,652
INTEGRATION
AND
INTEROPERABILI
TY.
191 0208043J PLANNING AND 3,061 3,061
DECISION AID
SYSTEM (PDAS).
192 0208045K C4I 72,726 72,726
INTEROPERABILI
TY.
194 0301144K JOINT/ALLIED 6,524 6,524
COALITION
INFORMATION
SHARING.
201 0302016K NATIONAL 512 512
MILITARY
COMMAND SYSTEM-
WIDE SUPPORT.
202 0302019K DEFENSE INFO 12,867 12,867
INFRASTRUCTURE
ENGINEERING
AND
INTEGRATION.
203 0303126K LONG-HAUL 36,565 36,565
COMMUNICATIONS
-DCS.
204 0303131K MINIMUM 13,144 13,144
ESSENTIAL
EMERGENCY
COMMUNICATIONS
NETWORK
(MEECN).
205 0303135G PUBLIC KEY 1,060 1,060
INFRASTRUCTURE
(PKI).
206 0303136G KEY MANAGEMENT 33,279 33,279
INFRASTRUCTURE
(KMI).
207 0303140D8Z INFORMATION 10,673 10,673
SYSTEMS
SECURITY
PROGRAM.
208 0303140G INFORMATION 181,567 179,291
SYSTEMS
SECURITY
PROGRAM.
.............. Excess to [-2,276]
need.
209 0303140K INFORMATION
SYSTEMS
SECURITY
PROGRAM.
210 0303150K GLOBAL COMMAND 34,288 34,288
AND CONTROL
SYSTEM.
211 0303153K DEFENSE 7,741 7,741
SPECTRUM
ORGANIZATION.
212 0303170K NET-CENTRIC 3,325 3,325
ENTERPRISE
SERVICES
(NCES).
213 0303260D8Z DEFENSE 1,246 1,246
MILITARY
DECEPTION
PROGRAM OFFICE
(DMDPO).
214 0303610K TELEPORT 5,147 5,147
PROGRAM.
216 0304210BB SPECIAL 17,352 17,352
APPLICATIONS
FOR
CONTINGENCIES.
220 0305103K CYBER SECURITY 3,658 3,658
INITIATIVE.
221 0305125D8Z CRITICAL 9,752 9,752
INFRASTRUCTURE
PROTECTION
(CIP).
225 0305186D8Z POLICY R&D 3,210 3,210
PROGRAMS.
227 0305199D8Z NET CENTRICITY. 21,602 21,602
230 0305208BB DISTRIBUTED 5,195 5,195
COMMON GROUND/
SURFACE
SYSTEMS.
233 0305208K DISTRIBUTED 3,348 3,348
COMMON GROUND/
SURFACE
SYSTEMS.
235 0305219BB MQ-1 PREDATOR A 641 641
UAV.
237 0305231BB MQ-8 UAV.......
238 0305387D8Z HOMELAND 2,338 2,338
DEFENSE
TECHNOLOGY
TRANSFER
PROGRAM.
239 0305600D8Z INTERNATIONAL 4,372 4,372
INTELLIGENCE
TECHNOLOGY AND
ARCHITECTURES.
244 0305889G COUNTERDRUG
INTELLIGENCE
SUPPORT.
247 0708011S INDUSTRIAL 24,691 24,691
PREPAREDNESS.
248 0708012S LOGISTICS 4,659 4,659
SUPPORT
ACTIVITIES.
249 0902298J MANAGEMENT HQ-- 3,533 3,533
OJCS.
250 1105219BB MQ-9 UAV....... 1,314 1,314
251 1105232BB RQ-11 UAV......
252 1105233BB RQ-7 UAV.......
253 1160279BB SMALL BUSINESS
INNOVATIVE
RESEARCH/SMALL
BUS TECH
TRANSFER PILOT
PROG.
254 1160403BB AVIATION 156,561 156,561
SYSTEMS.
255 1160404BB SPECIAL
OPERATIONS
TACTICAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
256 1160405BB SPECIAL 7,705 7,705
OPERATIONS
INTELLIGENCE
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.

[[Page H3495]]

257 1160408BB SOF OPERATIONAL 42,620 42,620
ENHANCEMENTS.
258 1160421BB SPECIAL
OPERATIONS CV-
22 DEVELOPMENT.
259 1160427BB MISSION
TRAINING AND
PREPARATION
SYSTEMS (MTPS).
260 1160429BB AC/MC-130J.....
261 1160431BB WARRIOR SYSTEMS 17,970 17,970
262 1160432BB SPECIAL 7,424 7,424
PROGRAMS.
263 1160474BB SOF
COMMUNICATIONS
EQUIPMENT AND
ELECTRONICS
SYSTEMS.
264 1160476BB SOF TACTICAL
RADIO SYSTEMS.
265 1160477BB SOF WEAPONS
SYSTEMS.
266 1160478BB SOF SOLDIER
PROTECTION AND
SURVIVAL
SYSTEMS.
267 1160479BB SOF VISUAL
AUGMENTATION,
LASERS AND
SENSOR SYSTEMS.
268 1160480BB SOF TACTICAL 2,206 2,206
VEHICLES.
269 1160481BB SOF MUNITIONS..
270 1160482BB SOF ROTARY WING
AVIATION.
271 1160483BB MARITIME 18,325 18,325
SYSTEMS.
272 1160484BB SOF SURFACE
CRAFT.
273 1160488BB SOF MILITARY
INFORMATION
SUPPORT
OPERATIONS.
274 1160489BB SOF GLOBAL 3,304 3,304
VIDEO
SURVEILLANCE
ACTIVITIES.
275 1160490BB SOF OPERATIONAL 16,021 16,021
ENHANCEMENTS
INTELLIGENCE.
275A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 3,773,704 3,773,704
PROGRAMS.
.............. SUBTOTAL 4,641,222 4,638,946
OPERATIONAL
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT.
..............
.............. TOTAL 17,667,108 18,139,232
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMEN
T, TEST &
EVAL, DW.
..............
.............. OPERATIONAL
TEST & EVAL,
DEFENSE
.............. MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT
001 0605118OTE OPERATIONAL 75,720 75,720
TEST AND
EVALUATION.
002 0605131OTE LIVE FIRE TEST 48,423 48,423
AND EVALUATION.
003 0605814OTE OPERATIONAL 62,157 62,157
TEST
ACTIVITIES AND
ANALYSES.
.............. SUBTOTAL 186,300 186,300
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT.
..............
.............. TOTAL 186,300 186,300
OPERATIONA
L TEST &
EVAL,
DEFENSE.
..............
.............. TOTAL 67,520,236 68,079,460
RDT&E.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR
OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS
CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (In Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 House
Line Program Element Item Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
................ SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT &
DEMONSTRATION
087 0604622A FAMILY OF HEAVY 7,000 7,000
TACTICAL
VEHICLES.
................ SUBTOTAL 7,000 7,000
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT &
DEMONSTRATION.
................
................ TOTAL 7,000 7,000
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT
, TEST &
EVAL, ARMY.
................
................ OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT
224A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 34,426 34,426
PROGRAMS.
................ SUBTOTAL 34,426 34,426
OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
................
................ TOTAL 34,426 34,426
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT
, TEST &
EVAL, NAVY.
................
................ OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT
252A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 9,000 9,000
PROGRAMS.
................ SUBTOTAL 9,000 9,000
OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
................
................ TOTAL 9,000 9,000
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT
, TEST &
EVAL, AF.
................
................ OPERATIONAL
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT
275A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 66,208 66,208
PROGRAMS.
................ SUBTOTAL 66,208 66,208
OPERATIONAL
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT.
................
................ TOTAL 66,208 66,208
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT
, TEST &
EVAL, DW.
................
................ TOTAL RDT&E 116,634 116,634
------------------------------------------------------------------------

TITLE XLIII--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.

[[Page H3496]]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (In Thousands of Dollars)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 House
Line Item Request Authorized
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY
OPERATING FORCES
010 MANEUVER UNITS..................................................... 888,114 1,096,714
Missile Defense Deployment to Guam............................. [13,100]
Restore Army OPTEMPO to 90%.................................... [195,500]
020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES........................................... 72,624 72,624
030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE............................................. 617,402 617,402
040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS............................................... 602,262 602,262
050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT..................................... 1,032,484 1,032,484
060 AVIATION ASSETS.................................................... 1,287,462 1,303,262
Restore Army Flying Hour Program to 90%........................ [15,800]
070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT................................. 3,559,656 3,559,656
080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS...................................... 454,477 454,477
090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE...................................... 1,481,156 1,481,156
100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT............................................ 7,278,154 7,278,154
110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION................ 2,754,712 3,011,712
Realignment of Arlington National Cemetary operations.......... [-25,000]
Sustainment to 90%............................................. [282,000]
120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ'S.................................... 425,271 425,271
130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS............................... 185,064 185,064
170 COMBATANT COMMANDERS ANCILLARY MISSIONS............................ 463,270 456,594
Realignment of SOUTHCOM Information Operations................. [3,100]
Unjustified EUCOM Growth....................................... [-9,776]
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES...................................... 21,102,108 21,576,832

MOBILIZATION
180 STRATEGIC MOBILITY................................................. 360,240 360,240
190 ARMY PREPOSITIONING STOCKS......................................... 192,105 192,105
200 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS............................................ 7,101 7,101
SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION.......................................... 559,446 559,446

TRAINING AND RECRUITING
210 OFFICER ACQUISITION................................................ 115,992 115,992
220 RECRUIT TRAINING................................................... 52,323 52,323
230 ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING.......................................... 43,589 43,589
240 SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS............................. 453,745 453,745
250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING......................................... 1,034,495 1,034,495
260 FLIGHT TRAINING.................................................... 1,016,876 1,016,876
270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION................................. 186,565 186,565
280 TRAINING SUPPORT................................................... 652,514 652,514
290 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING......................................... 485,500 485,500
300 EXAMINING.......................................................... 170,912 170,912
310 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION................................... 251,523 251,523
320 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING.................................... 184,422 184,422
330 JUNIOR ROTC........................................................ 181,105 181,105
SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING............................... 4,829,561 4,829,561

ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
350 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION......................................... 690,089 690,089
360 CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES.......................................... 774,120 779,120
Corrosion Prevention, Control, and Mitigation.................. [5,000]
370 LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES........................................ 651,765 651,765
380 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT.............................................. 453,051 453,051
390 ADMINISTRATION..................................................... 487,737 487,737
400 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS......................................... 1,563,115 1,563,115
410 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT................................................ 326,853 326,853
420 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT............................................ 234,364 234,364
430 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT.............................................. 1,212,091 1,212,091
440 ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES............................................. 243,540 243,540
450 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT............................................. 241,101 241,101
460 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT............................................ 226,291 226,291
470 SUPPORT OF NATO OPERATIONS......................................... 426,651 457,851
Realignment of NATO Special Operations Headquarters from O&M [31,200]
Defense-wide...................................................
480 MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS..................................... 27,248 24,148
Realignment of SOUTHCOM Information Operations................. [-3,100]
525 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS................................................ 1,023,946 1,023,946
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES............................ 8,581,962 8,615,062

UNDISTRIBUTED
530 UNDISTRIBUTED...................................................... -740,300
Average civilian end strength above projection................. [-284,300]
Unobligated balances........................................... [-456,000]
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED......................................... -740,300

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY........................... 35,073,077 34,840,601

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES
OPERATING FORCES
010 MANEUVER UNITS..................................................... 1,621 1,621
020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES........................................... 24,429 24,429
030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE............................................. 657,099 657,099
040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS............................................... 122,485 122,485

[[Page H3497]]

050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT..................................... 584,058 584,058
060 AVIATION ASSETS.................................................... 79,380 79,380
070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT................................. 471,616 471,616
080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS...................................... 74,243 74,243
090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE...................................... 70,894 70,894
100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT............................................ 569,801 569,801
110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION................ 294,145 323,245
Sustainment to 90%............................................. [29,100]
120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ'S.................................... 51,853 51,853
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES...................................... 3,001,624 3,030,724

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
130 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION......................................... 10,735 10,735
140 ADMINISTRATION..................................................... 24,197 24,197
150 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS......................................... 10,304 10,304
160 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT................................................ 10,319 10,319
170 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING......................................... 37,857 37,857
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES.............................. 93,412 93,412

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES....................... 3,095,036 3,124,136

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG
OPERATING FORCES
010 MANEUVER UNITS..................................................... 800,880 800,880
020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES........................................... 178,650 178,650
030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE............................................. 771,503 771,503
040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS............................................... 98,699 98,699
050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT..................................... 38,779 38,779
060 AVIATION ASSETS.................................................... 922,503 922,503
070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT................................. 761,056 761,056
080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS...................................... 62,971 62,971
090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE...................................... 233,105 233,105
100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT............................................ 1,019,059 1,019,059
110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION................ 712,139 786,339
Sustainment to 90%............................................. [74,200]
120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ'S.................................... 1,013,715 1,013,715
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES...................................... 6,613,059 6,687,259

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
130 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION......................................... 10,812 10,812
140 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT............................................. 1,551 1,551
150 ADMINISTRATION..................................................... 78,284 78,284
160 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS......................................... 46,995 46,995
170 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT................................................ 6,390 6,390
180 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING......................................... 297,105 297,105
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES.............................. 441,137 441,137

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG........................... 7,054,196 7,128,396

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY
OPERATING FORCES
010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS................................ 4,952,522 4,952,522
020 FLEET AIR TRAINING................................................. 1,826,404 1,826,404
030 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES..................... 38,639 38,639
040 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT.................................. 90,030 90,030
050 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT................................................ 362,700 362,700
060 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE......................................... 915,881 915,881
070 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT.................................. 35,838 35,838
080 AVIATION LOGISTICS................................................. 379,914 448,414
CLS for AVN Logistics.......................................... [68,500]
090 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS.................................. 3,884,836 3,884,836
100 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING................................. 734,852 734,852
110 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE............................................. 5,191,511 5,191,511
120 SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT...................................... 1,351,274 1,351,274
130 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS.............................................. 701,316 691,722
New START treaty implementation, excluding verification and [-9,594]
inspection activities..........................................
140 ELECTRONIC WARFARE................................................. 97,710 97,710
150 SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE..................................... 172,330 172,330
160 WARFARE TACTICS.................................................... 454,682 454,682
170 OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY........................... 328,406 328,406
180 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES.............................................. 946,429 946,429
190 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE.............................................. 142,249 148,249
Corrosion Prevention, Control, and Mitigation.................. [6,000]
200 DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT........................................... 2,603 2,603
210 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS............................... 102,970 102,970
220 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT........................ 199,128 199,128
230 CRUISE MISSILE..................................................... 92,671 92,671
240 FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE............................................ 1,193,188 1,193,188
250 IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT................................. 105,985 105,985
260 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE................................................ 532,627 532,627
270 OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT....................................... 304,160 304,160
280 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION............................................. 1,011,528 1,011,528

[[Page H3498]]

290 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION......................... 1,996,821 2,182,021
Sustainment to 90%............................................. [185,200]
300 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT............................................. 4,460,918 4,460,918
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES...................................... 32,610,122 32,860,228

MOBILIZATION
310 SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE...................................... 331,576 331,576
320 AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS................................. 6,638 6,638
330 SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS..................................... 222,752 222,752
340 EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS.............................. 73,310 73,310
350 INDUSTRIAL READINESS............................................... 2,675 2,675
360 COAST GUARD SUPPORT................................................ 23,794 23,794
SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION.......................................... 660,745 660,745

TRAINING AND RECRUITING
370 OFFICER ACQUISITION................................................ 148,516 148,516
380 RECRUIT TRAINING................................................... 9,384 9,384
390 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS.................................... 139,876 139,876
400 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING......................................... 630,069 630,069
410 FLIGHT TRAINING.................................................... 9,294 9,294
420 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION................................. 169,082 169,082
430 TRAINING SUPPORT................................................... 164,368 164,368
440 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING......................................... 241,733 242,833
Naval Sea Cadets............................................... [1,100]
450 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION................................... 139,815 139,815
460 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING.................................... 94,632 94,632
470 JUNIOR ROTC........................................................ 51,373 51,373
SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING............................... 1,798,142 1,799,242

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
480 ADMINISTRATION..................................................... 886,088 886,088
490 EXTERNAL RELATIONS................................................. 13,131 13,131
500 CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT......................... 115,742 115,742
510 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT......................... 382,150 382,150
520 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT............................................ 268,403 268,403
530 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS......................................... 317,293 317,293
550 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION......................................... 207,128 207,128
570 PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN................................... 295,855 295,855
580 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT................................. 1,140,484 1,140,484
590 HULL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SUPPORT............................ 52,873 52,873
600 COMBAT/WEAPONS SYSTEMS............................................. 27,587 27,587
610 SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS............................... 75,728 75,728
620 NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE........................................ 543,026 543,026
680 INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS AND AGENCIES............................ 4,965 4,965
705 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS................................................ 545,775 545,775
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES.............................. 4,876,228 4,876,228

UNDISTRIBUTED
710 UNDISTRIBUTED...................................................... -278,200
Average civilian end strength above projection................. [-38,500]
Unobligated balances........................................... [-239,700]
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED......................................... -278,200

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY........................... 39,945,237 39,918,243

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS
OPERATING FORCES
010 OPERATIONAL FORCES................................................. 837,012 902,012
Crisis Response Force.......................................... [30,000]
Marine Security Guard.......................................... [35,000]
020 FIELD LOGISTICS.................................................... 894,555 898,555
Corrosion Prevention, Control, and Mitigation.................. [4,000]
030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................................................. 223,337 221,337
Unjustified Growth HUMVEE Modifications........................ [-2,000]
040 MARITIME PREPOSITIONING............................................ 97,878 97,878
050 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION........................... 774,619 781,719
Sustainment to 90%............................................. [7,100]
060 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT............................................. 2,166,661 2,166,661
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES...................................... 4,994,062 5,068,162

TRAINING AND RECRUITING
070 RECRUIT TRAINING................................................... 17,693 17,693
080 OFFICER ACQUISITION................................................ 896 896
090 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING......................................... 100,806 100,806
100 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION................................. 46,928 46,928
110 TRAINING SUPPORT................................................... 356,426 356,426
120 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING......................................... 179,747 179,747
130 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION................................... 52,255 52,255
140 JUNIOR ROTC........................................................ 23,138 23,138
SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING............................... 777,889 777,889

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES

[[Page H3499]]

150 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION......................................... 43,816 43,816
160 ADMINISTRATION..................................................... 305,107 305,107
180 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT................................. 87,500 87,500
185 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS................................................ 46,276 46,276
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES.............................. 482,699 482,699

UNDISTRIBUTED
190 UNDISTRIBUTED...................................................... -50,000
Unobligated balances........................................... [-50,000]
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED......................................... -50,000

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS................... 6,254,650 6,278,750

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES
OPERATING FORCES
010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS................................ 586,620 586,620
020 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE........................................... 7,008 7,008
040 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE......................................... 100,657 100,657
050 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT.................................. 305 305
060 AVIATION LOGISTICS................................................. 3,927 3,927
070 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS.................................. 75,933 75,933
080 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING................................. 601 601
090 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE............................................. 44,364 44,364
100 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS.............................................. 15,477 15,477
110 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES.............................................. 115,608 115,608
120 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE................................................ 1,967 1,967
130 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION............................................. 43,726 43,726
140 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION......................... 69,011 74,011
Sustainment to 90%............................................. [5,000]
150 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT............................................. 109,604 109,604
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES...................................... 1,174,808 1,179,808

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
160 ADMINISTRATION..................................................... 2,905 2,905
170 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT......................... 14,425 14,425
180 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS......................................... 2,485 2,485
190 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT................................. 3,129 3,129
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES.............................. 22,944 22,944

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES....................... 1,197,752 1,202,752

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE
OPERATING FORCES
010 OPERATING FORCES................................................... 96,244 96,244
020 DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................................................. 17,581 19,081
Restore Critical Depot Maintenance............................. [1,500]
030 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION......................... 32,438 32,738
Sustainment to 90%............................................. [300]
040 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT............................................. 95,259 95,259
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES...................................... 241,522 243,322

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
050 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION......................................... 894 894
060 ADMINISTRATION..................................................... 11,743 11,743
070 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING......................................... 9,158 9,158
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES.............................. 21,795 21,795

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE..................... 263,317 265,117

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE
OPERATING FORCES
010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES.............................................. 3,295,814 3,295,814
020 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES.......................................... 1,875,095 1,875,095
030 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS)..................... 1,559,109 1,559,109
040 DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................................................. 5,956,304 5,961,304
Corrosion Prevention, Control, and Mitigation.................. [5,000]
050 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION................ 1,834,424 2,224,454
Restoration, Modernization, and Demolition project shortfalls.. [170,530]
Sustainment to 90%............................................. [219,500]
060 BASE SUPPORT....................................................... 2,779,811 2,779,811
070 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING....................................... 913,841 913,841
080 OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS...................................... 916,837 916,837
100 TACTICAL INTEL AND OTHER SPECIAL ACTIVITIES........................ 720,349 720,349
110 LAUNCH FACILITIES.................................................. 305,275 305,275
120 SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS.............................................. 433,658 433,658
130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT........................ 1,146,016 1,147,116
NORTHCOM VOICE program......................................... [1,100]
140 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS............................... 231,830 231,830
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES...................................... 21,968,363 22,364,493

MOBILIZATION
150 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS................................................. 2,015,902 2,015,902

[[Page H3500]]

160 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS.......................................... 147,216 147,216
170 DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................................................. 1,556,232 1,556,232
180 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION................ 167,402 167,402
190 BASE SUPPORT....................................................... 707,040 707,040
SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION.......................................... 4,593,792 4,593,792

TRAINING AND RECRUITING
200 OFFICER ACQUISITION................................................ 102,334 102,334
210 RECRUIT TRAINING................................................... 17,733 17,733
220 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC)............................. 94,600 94,600
230 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION................ 217,011 217,011
240 BASE SUPPORT....................................................... 800,327 800,327
250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING......................................... 399,364 399,364
260 FLIGHT TRAINING.................................................... 792,275 792,275
270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION................................. 248,958 248,958
280 TRAINING SUPPORT................................................... 106,741 106,741
290 DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................................................. 319,331 319,331
300 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING......................................... 122,736 122,736
310 EXAMINING.......................................................... 3,679 3,679
320 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION................................... 137,255 137,255
330 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING.................................... 176,153 176,153
340 JUNIOR ROTC........................................................ 67,018 67,018
SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING............................... 3,605,515 3,605,515

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
350 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS............................................... 1,103,684 1,103,684
360 TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES....................................... 919,923 919,923
370 DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................................................. 56,601 52,601
Heavy bomber eliminations related to New START treaty [-400]
implementation.................................................
ICBM reductions related to New START implementation............ [-3,600]
380 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION................ 281,061 281,061
390 BASE SUPPORT....................................................... 1,203,305 1,203,305
400 ADMINISTRATION..................................................... 593,865 593,865
410 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS......................................... 574,609 574,609
420 OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES....................................... 1,028,600 1,013,200
De-MIRVing ICBMs related to New START treaty implementation.... [-700]
ICBM eliminations and Environmental Impact Study related to New [-14,700]
START treaty implementation....................................
430 CIVIL AIR PATROL................................................... 24,720 24,720
460 INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT.............................................. 89,008 89,008
465 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS................................................ 1,227,796 1,222,996
Classified Adjustment.......................................... [-4,800]
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES.............................. 7,103,172 7,078,972

UNDISTRIBUTED
470 UNDISTRIBUTED...................................................... -205,100
Average civilian end strength above projection................. [-18,700]
Unobligated balances........................................... [-186,400]
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED......................................... -205,100

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE...................... 37,270,842 37,437,672

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE
OPERATING FORCES
010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES.............................................. 1,857,951 1,857,951
020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS......................................... 224,462 224,462
030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................................................. 521,182 521,182
040 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION................ 89,704 98,804
Sustainment to 90%............................................. [9,100]
050 BASE SUPPORT....................................................... 360,836 360,836
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES...................................... 3,054,135 3,063,235

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
060 ADMINISTRATION..................................................... 64,362 64,362
070 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING......................................... 15,056 15,056
080 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERS MGMT (ARPC)............................. 23,617 23,617
090 OTHER PERS SUPPORT (DISABILITY COMP)............................... 6,618 6,618
100 AUDIOVISUAL........................................................ 819 819
SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES............. 110,472 110,472

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE..................... 3,164,607 3,173,707

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG
OPERATING FORCES
010 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS................................................ 3,371,871 3,371,871
020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS......................................... 720,305 720,305
030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................................................. 1,514,870 1,514,870
040 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION................ 296,953 323,853
Sustainment to 90%............................................. [26,900]
050 BASE SUPPORT....................................................... 597,303 597,303
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES...................................... 6,501,302 6,528,202

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES

[[Page H3501]]

060 ADMINISTRATION..................................................... 32,117 32,117
070 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING......................................... 32,585 32,585
SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES............ 64,702 64,702

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG............................ 6,566,004 6,592,904

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE
OPERATING FORCES
010 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF.............................................. 472,239 472,239
020 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND......................................... 5,261,463 5,230,711
AFSOC Flying Hour Program...................................... [70,100]
International SOF Information Sharing System................... [-7,017]
Ongoing baseline contingency operations........................ [-35,519]
Pilot program for SOF family members........................... [5,000]
Preserve the force and families--human performance program..... [-16,605]
Preserve the force and families--resiliency.................... [-8,786]
Realignment of NATO Special Operations Headquarters to O&M, [-31,200]
Army...........................................................
Regional SOF Coordination Centers.............................. [-14,725]
SOCOM National Capitol Region.................................. [-10,000]
USASOC Flying Hour Program..................................... [18,000]
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES...................................... 5,733,702 5,702,950

TRAINING AND RECRUITING
040 DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY..................................... 157,397 157,397
050 NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY........................................ 84,899 84,899
SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING............................... 242,296 242,296

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
060 CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS............................................ 144,443 165,443
STARBASE....................................................... [21,000]
080 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY...................................... 612,207 612,207
090 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY................................. 1,378,606 1,378,606
110 DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY................................... 763,091 763,091
120 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY................................. 1,326,243 1,326,243
140 DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY...................................... 29,933 29,933
150 DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY........................................... 462,545 462,545
160 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY............................................. 222,979 222,979
170 DEFENSE POW/MIA OFFICE............................................. 21,594 21,594
180 DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY................................ 788,389 788,389
190 DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE........................................... 546,603 546,603
210 DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY ADMINISTRATION......................... 35,151 35,151
220 DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY.................................... 438,033 438,033
240 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY........................... 2,713,756 2,713,756
250 MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY............................................. 256,201 256,201
270 OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT...................................... 371,615 217,715
Program reduction.............................................. [-153,900]
280 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE................................. 2,010,176 1,992,676
BRAC 2015 Initiative........................................... [-8,000]
Combatant Commanders Exercise Engagement Training [90,500]
Transformation.................................................
Procurement Technical Assistance Program--Enhanced Business [10,000]
Support........................................................
Realignment to Building Partnership Capacity authories......... [-35,000]
Reduction to Building Partnership Capacity authories........... [-75,000]
290 WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES................................... 616,572 616,572
295 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS................................................ 14,283,558 14,287,648
Classified adjustment.......................................... [4,090]
SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES............. 27,021,695 26,875,385

UNDISTRIBUTED
305 UNDISTRIBUTED...................................................... -320,000
Section 514. Study of Reserve Component General and Flag [3,000]
Officers.......................................................
Section 551. Department of Defense Recognition of Spouses of [5,000]
Members of Armed Forces who Serve in Combat Zones..............
Section 571 .DOD Supplementary Impact Aid...................... [25,000]
Section 621. Expand the victims transitional compensation [10,000]
benefit........................................................
Unobligated balances........................................... [-363,000]
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED......................................... -320,000

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE................... 32,997,693 32,500,631

MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS
MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS
050 OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND CIVIC AID...................... 109,500 109,500
060 COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION....................................... 528,455 528,455
080 ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD............................................... 256,031 256,031
090 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY.................................... 298,815 298,815
160 OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS TRANSFER FUND...................... 5,000 0
Program reduction.............................................. [-5,000]
SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS.......................... 1,197,801 1,192,801

MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS
100 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY.................................... 316,103 316,103
SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS.......................... 316,103 316,103

[[Page H3502]]

MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS
110 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE............................... 439,820 439,820
SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS.......................... 439,820 439,820

MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS
040 US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEFENSE.................. 13,606 12,626
Unjustified Growth............................................. [-980]
120 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE................................. 10,757 10,757
SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS.......................... 24,363 23,383

MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS
130 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES...................... 237,443 237,443
SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS.......................... 237,443 237,443

TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS............................ 2,215,530 2,209,550

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE................................. 175,097,941 174,672,459
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY
OPERATIONS.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS
(In Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
House
Line Item FY 2014 Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE,
ARMY
OPERATING FORCES
010 MANEUVER UNITS.......... 217,571 247,571
Missile Defense [15,000]
Deployment--Other...
Missile Defense [15,000]
Deployment to Turkey
020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES 8,266 8,266
030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE.. 56,626 56,626
040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS.... 4,209,942 4,209,942
050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS 950,567 950,567
SUPPORT................
060 AVIATION ASSETS......... 474,288 474,288
070 FORCE READINESS 1,349,152 1,349,152
OPERATIONS SUPPORT.....
080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS 655,000 655,000
READINESS..............
090 LAND FORCES DEPOT 301,563 796,563
MAINTENANCE............
Restore High [495,000]
Priority Depot
Maintenance.........
100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT. 706,214 706,214
140 ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES... 11,519,498 11,519,498
150 COMMANDERS EMERGENCY 60,000 60,000
RESPONSE PROGRAM.......
160 RESET................... 2,240,358 3,740,358
Restore Critical [1,500,000]
Army Reset..........
SUBTOTAL OPERATING 22,749,045 24,774,045
FORCES..............

ADMIN & SRVWIDE
ACTIVITIES
350 SERVICEWIDE 4,601,356 4,601,356
TRANSPORTATION.........
380 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT... 17,418 17,418
400 SERVICEWIDE 110,000 110,000
COMMUNICATIONS.........
420 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT. 94,820 94,820
430 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT... 54,000 54,000
450 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT.. 250,000 250,000
525 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..... 1,402,994 1,402,994
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & 6,530,588 6,530,588
SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES..

UNDISTRIBUTED
530 UNDISTRIBUTED........... 91,100
Increase to support [91,100]
higher fuel rates...
SUBTOTAL 91,100
UNDISTRIBUTED.......

TOTAL OPERATION & 29,279,633 31,395,733
MAINTENANCE, ARMY..

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE,
ARMY RES
OPERATING FORCES
030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE.. 6,995 6,995
050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS 2,332 2,332
SUPPORT................
070 FORCE READINESS 608 608
OPERATIONS SUPPORT.....
090 LAND FORCES DEPOT 75,800
MAINTENANCE............
Restore High [75,800]
Priority Depot
Maintenance.........
100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT. 33,000 33,000
SUBTOTAL OPERATING 42,935 118,735
FORCES..............

TOTAL OPERATION & 42,935 118,735
MAINTENANCE, ARMY
RES................

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE,
ARNG
OPERATING FORCES

[[Page H3503]]

010 MANEUVER UNITS.......... 29,314 29,314
020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES 1,494 1,494
030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE.. 15,343 15,343
040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS.... 1,549 1,549
060 AVIATION ASSETS......... 64,504 64,504
070 FORCE READINESS 31,512 31,512
OPERATIONS SUPPORT.....
100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT. 42,179 42,179
120 MANAGEMENT AND 11,996 11,996
OPERATIONAL HQ'S.......
SUBTOTAL OPERATING 197,891 197,891
FORCES..............

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
160 SERVICEWIDE 1,480 1,480
COMMUNICATIONS.........
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & 1,480 1,480
SRVWD ACTIVITIES....

TOTAL OPERATION & 199,371 199,371
MAINTENANCE, ARNG..

AFGHANISTAN SECURITY
FORCES FUND
MINISTRY OF DEFENSE
010 SUSTAINMENT............. 2,735,603 2,735,603
020 INFRASTRUCTURE.......... 278,650 278,650
030 EQUIPMENT AND 2,180,382 2,180,382
TRANSPORTATION.........
040 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS. 626,550 626,550
SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF 5,821,185 5,821,185
DEFENSE.............

MINISTRY OF INTERIOR
060 SUSTAINMENT............. 1,214,995 1,214,995
080 EQUIPMENT AND 54,696 54,696
TRANSPORTATION.........
090 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS. 626,119 626,119
SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF 1,895,810 1,895,810
INTERIOR............

DETAINEE OPS
110 SUSTAINMENT............. 7,225 7,225
140 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS. 2,500 2,500
SUBTOTAL DETAINEE 9,725 9,725
OPS.................

TOTAL AFGHANISTAN 7,726,720 7,726,720
SECURITY FORCES
FUND...............

AFGHANISTAN
INFRASTRUCTURE FUND
AFGHANISTAN
INFRASTRUCTURE FUND
010 POWER................... 279,000 279,000
SUBTOTAL AFGHANISTAN 279,000 279,000
INFRASTRUCTURE FUND.

TOTAL AFGHANISTAN 279,000 279,000
INFRASTRUCTURE FUND

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE,
NAVY
OPERATING FORCES
010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT 845,169 845,169
OPERATIONS.............
030 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA 600 600
& ENGINEERING SERVICES.
040 AIR OPERATIONS AND 17,489 17,489
SAFETY SUPPORT.........
050 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT..... 78,491 78,491
060 AIRCRAFT DEPOT 162,420 202,420
MAINTENANCE............
Restore critical [40,000]
depot maintenance...
070 AIRCRAFT DEPOT 2,700 2,700
OPERATIONS SUPPORT.....
080 AVIATION LOGISTICS...... 50,130 50,130
090 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP 949,539 960,939
OPERATIONS.............
Spares.............. [11,400]
100 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT 20,226 20,226
& TRAINING.............
110 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE.. 1,679,660 1,843,660
Program increase.... [164,000]
120 SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS 126,000
SUPPORT................
Program increase.... [126,000]
130 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS... 37,760 37,760
160 WARFARE TACTICS......... 25,351 25,351
170 OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY 20,045 20,045
AND OCEANOGRAPHY.......
180 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES... 1,212,296 1,665,296
Combat forces [148,000]
equipment...........
Combat forces [305,000]
shortfall...........
190 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE... 10,203 10,203
250 IN-SERVICE WEAPONS 127,972 127,972
SYSTEMS SUPPORT........
260 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE..... 221,427 221,427
290 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION 13,386 13,386
AND MODERNIZATION......
300 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT.. 110,940 110,940
SUBTOTAL OPERATING 5,585,804 6,380,204
FORCES..............

MOBILIZATION
340 EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH 18,460 18,460
SERVICES SYSTEMS.......
360 COAST GUARD SUPPORT..... 227,033 227,033
SUBTOTAL 245,493 245,493
MOBILIZATION........

TRAINING AND RECRUITING
400 SPECIALIZED SKILL 50,269 50,269
TRAINING...............

[[Page H3504]]

430 TRAINING SUPPORT........ 5,400 5,400
SUBTOTAL TRAINING 55,669 55,669
AND RECRUITING......

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
480 ADMINISTRATION.......... 2,418 2,418
490 EXTERNAL RELATIONS...... 516 516
510 MILITARY MANPOWER AND 5,107 5,107
PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT...
520 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT. 1,411 1,411
530 SERVICEWIDE 2,545 2,545
COMMUNICATIONS.........
550 SERVICEWIDE 153,427 153,427
TRANSPORTATION.........
580 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM 8,570 8,570
MANAGEMENT.............
620 NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE 1,425 1,425
SERVICE................
705 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..... 5,608 5,608
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & 181,027 181,027
SRVWD ACTIVITIES....

UNDISTRIBUTED
710 UNDISTRIBUTED........... 155,400
Increase to support [155,400]
higher fuel rates...
SUBTOTAL 155,400
UNDISTRIBUTED.......

TOTAL OPERATION & 6,067,993 7,017,793
MAINTENANCE, NAVY..

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE,
MARINE CORPS
OPERATING FORCES
010 OPERATIONAL FORCES...... 992,190 992,190
020 FIELD LOGISTICS......... 559,574 559,574
030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE....... 570,000 626,000
Restore High [56,000]
Priority Depot
Maintenance.........
060 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT.. 69,726 69,726
SUBTOTAL OPERATING 2,191,490 2,247,490
FORCES..............

TRAINING AND RECRUITING
110 TRAINING SUPPORT........ 108,270 108,270
SUBTOTAL TRAINING 108,270 108,270
AND RECRUITING......

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
150 SERVICEWIDE 365,555 365,555
TRANSPORTATION.........
160 ADMINISTRATION.......... 3,675 3,675
185 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..... 825 825
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & 370,055 370,055
SRVWD ACTIVITIES....

UNDISTRIBUTED
190 UNDISTRIBUTED........... 5,400
Increase to support [5,400]
higher fuel rates...
SUBTOTAL 5,400
UNDISTRIBUTED.......

TOTAL OPERATION & 2,669,815 2,731,215
MAINTENANCE, MARINE
CORPS..............

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE,
NAVY RES
OPERATING FORCES
010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT 17,196 17,196
OPERATIONS.............
020 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE 200 200
040 AIRCRAFT DEPOT 6,000 6,000
MAINTENANCE............
070 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP 12,304 12,304
OPERATIONS.............
090 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE.. 6,790 6,790
110 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES... 13,210 13,210
SUBTOTAL OPERATING 55,700 55,700
FORCES..............

TOTAL OPERATION & 55,700 55,700
MAINTENANCE, NAVY
RES................

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE,
MC RESERVE
OPERATING FORCES
010 OPERATING FORCES........ 11,124 11,124
040 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT.. 1,410 1,410
SUBTOTAL OPERATING 12,534 12,534
FORCES..............

TOTAL OPERATION & 12,534 12,534
MAINTENANCE, MC
RESERVE............

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE,
AIR FORCE
OPERATING FORCES
010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES... 1,712,393 1,782,393
Restore Critical [70,000]
Depot Maintenance...
020 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT 836,104 836,104
FORCES.................
030 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING 14,118 14,118
(OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS).
040 DEPOT MAINTENANCE....... 1,373,480 1,473,480
Program increase.... [100,000]
050 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, 122,712 122,712
RESTORATION &
MODERNIZATION..........
060 BASE SUPPORT............ 1,520,333 1,520,333
070 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY 31,582 31,582
WARNING................
080 OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT 147,524 147,524
PROGRAMS...............
110 LAUNCH FACILITIES....... 857 857

[[Page H3505]]

120 SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS... 8,353 8,353
130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS 50,495 50,495
DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT.
SUBTOTAL OPERATING 5,817,951 5,987,951
FORCES..............

MOBILIZATION
150 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS...... 3,091,133 3,141,133
Restore Critical [50,000]
Depot Maintenance...
160 MOBILIZATION 47,897 47,897
PREPAREDNESS...........
170 DEPOT MAINTENANCE....... 387,179 887,179
Program increase.... [500,000]
180 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, 7,043 7,043
RESTORATION &
MODERNIZATION..........
190 BASE SUPPORT............ 68,382 68,382
SUBTOTAL 3,601,634 4,151,634
MOBILIZATION........

TRAINING AND RECRUITING
200 OFFICER ACQUISITION..... 100 100
210 RECRUIT TRAINING........ 478 478
240 BASE SUPPORT............ 19,256 19,256
250 SPECIALIZED SKILL 12,845 12,845
TRAINING...............
260 FLIGHT TRAINING......... 731 731
270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 607 607
EDUCATION..............
280 TRAINING SUPPORT........ 720 720
320 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY 152 152
EDUCATION..............
SUBTOTAL TRAINING 34,889 34,889
AND RECRUITING......

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
350 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS.... 86,273 86,273
360 TECHNICAL SUPPORT 2,511 2,511
ACTIVITIES.............
390 BASE SUPPORT............ 19,887 19,887
400 ADMINISTRATION.......... 3,493 3,493
410 SERVICEWIDE 152,086 152,086
COMMUNICATIONS.........
420 OTHER SERVICEWIDE 269,825 269,825
ACTIVITIES.............
460 INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT... 117 117
465 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..... 16,558 16,558
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & 550,750 550,750
SRVWD ACTIVITIES....

UNDISTRIBUTED
470 UNDISTRIBUTED........... 284,000
Increase to support [284,000]
higher fuel rates...
SUBTOTAL 284,000
UNDISTRIBUTED.......

TOTAL OPERATION & 10,005,224 11,009,224
MAINTENANCE, AIR
FORCE..............

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE,
AF RESERVE
OPERATING FORCES
030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE....... 26,599 26,599
050 BASE SUPPORT............ 6,250 6,250
SUBTOTAL OPERATING 32,849 32,849
FORCES..............

TOTAL OPERATION & 32,849 32,849
MAINTENANCE, AF
RESERVE............

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE,
ANG
OPERATING FORCES
020 MISSION SUPPORT 22,200 22,200
OPERATIONS.............
SUBTOTAL OPERATING 22,200 22,200
FORCES..............

TOTAL OPERATION & 22,200 22,200
MAINTENANCE, ANG...

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE,
DEFENSE-WIDE
OPERATING FORCES
020 SPECIAL OPERATIONS 2,222,868 2,222,868
COMMAND................
SUBTOTAL OPERATING 2,222,868 2,222,868
FORCES..............

ADMINISTRATION AND
SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
080 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT 27,781 27,781
AGENCY.................
090 DEFENSE CONTRACT 45,746 45,746
MANAGEMENT AGENCY......
120 DEFENSE INFORMATION 76,348 76,348
SYSTEMS AGENCY.........
140 DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES 99,538 99,538
AGENCY.................
160 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY.. 9,620 9,620
180 DEFENSE SECURITY 1,950,000 1,950,000
COOPERATION AGENCY.....
240 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 100,100 100,100
EDUCATION ACTIVITY.....
280 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 38,227 73,227
OF DEFENSE.............
Realignment to [35,000]
Building Partnership
Capacity authories..
290 WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS 2,784 2,784
SERVICES...............
295 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..... 1,862,066 1,862,066
SUBTOTAL 4,212,210 4,247,210
ADMINISTRATION AND
SERVICEWIDE
ACTIVITIES..........

TOTAL OPERATION & 6,435,078 6,470,078
MAINTENANCE,
DEFENSE-WIDE.......

TOTAL OPERATION & 62,829,052 67,071,152
MAINTENANCE........
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page H3506]]

TITLE XLIV--MILITARY PERSONNEL

SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL (In Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 House
Item Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Military Personnel Appropriations..... 130,399,881 130,219,281
Flight Paramedic Training Pay and [4,500]
Allowances--Army Guard...........
Flight Paramedic Training Pay and [900]
Allowances--Army Reserve.........
Military Personnel unobligated [-186,000]
balances.........................
Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund 6,676,750 6,676,750
Contributions........................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY
OPERATIONS.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (In
Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 House
Item Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Military Personnel Appropriations....... 9,689,307 9,689,307
Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund 164,033 164,033
Contributions..........................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

TITLE XLV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS (In Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 House
Item Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY
PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS........ 25,158 25,158
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY..... 25,158 25,158

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE
SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS (MEDICAL/DENTAL). 61,731 61,731
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE 61,731 61,731

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA).......... 46,428 46,428
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE- 46,428 46,428
WIDE.................................

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA.............. 1,412,510 1,412,510
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA..... 1,412,510 1,412,510

NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND
MPF MLP................................. 134,917 134,917
POST DELIVERY AND OUTFITTING............ 43,404 43,404
LG MED SPD RO/RO MAINTENANCE............ 116,784 116,784
DOD MOBILIZATION ALTERATIONS............ 60,703 60,703
TAH MAINTENANCE......................... 19,809 19,809
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT................ 56,058 56,058
READY RESERVE FORCE..................... 299,025 299,025
TOTAL NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND.. 730,700 730,700

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM
IN-HOUSE CARE........................... 8,880,738 8,880,738
PRIVATE SECTOR CARE..................... 15,842,732 15,842,732
CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT............. 2,505,640 2,505,640
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT.................. 1,450,619 1,450,619
MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES................... 368,248 368,248
EDUCATION AND TRAINING.................. 733,097 733,097
BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS.......... 1,872,660 1,872,660
R&D RESEARCH............................ 9,162 9,162
R&D EXPLORATRY DEVELOPMENT.............. 47,977 47,977
R&D ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT................ 291,156 291,156
R&D DEMONSTRATION/VALIDATION............ 132,430 132,430
R&D ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT............. 161,674 161,674
R&D MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT.............. 72,568 72,568
R&D CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT............ 14,646 14,646
PROC INITIAL OUTFITTING................. 89,404 89,404
PROC REPLACEMENT & MODERNIZATION........ 377,577 377,577
PROC IEHR............................... 204,200 204,200
UNDISTRIBUTED........................... -276,800
DHP Unobligated.................... [-440,800]
Section 711. Future Availability of [164,000]
TRICARE Prime for Certain
Beneficiaries Enrolled in TRICARE
Prime..............................
TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM......... 33,054,528 32,777,728

CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE................. 451,572 451,572

[[Page H3507]]

RDT&E................................... 604,183 604,183
PROCUREMENT............................. 1,368 1,368
TOTAL CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS 1,057,123 1,057,123
DESTRUCTION..........................

DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES,
DEF
OPERATING FORCES........................ 815,965 815,965
DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM........... 122,580 122,580
TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG 938,545 938,545
ACTIVITIES, DEF......................

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE............... 311,131 311,131
PROCUREMENT............................. 1,000 1,000
TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 312,131 312,131

TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS........... 37,638,854 37,362,054
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY
OPERATIONS.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (In
Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 House
Item Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY
PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS............ 44,732 44,732
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY......... 44,732 44,732

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE
C-17 CLS ENGINE REPAIR...................... 78,500 78,500
TRANSPORTATION FALLEN HEROES................ 10,000 10,000
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE.... 88,500 88,500

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA).............. 131,678 131,678
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE. 131,678 131,678

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
IN-HOUSE CARE............................... 375,958 375,958
PRIVATE SECTOR CARE......................... 382,560 382,560
CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT................. 132,749 132,749
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT...................... 2,238 2,238
MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES....................... 460 460
EDUCATION AND TRAINING...................... 10,236 10,236
TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM............. 904,201 904,201

DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF
OPERATING FORCES............................ 376,305 376,305
TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG 376,305 376,305
ACTIVITIES, DEF..........................

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE................... 10,766 10,766
TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL.... 10,766 10,766

TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS............... 1,556,182 1,556,182
------------------------------------------------------------------------

TITLE XLVI--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION (In Thousands of Dollars)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State/Country and Budget House
Account Installation Project Title Request Agreement
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska
Army Fort Wainwright Aviation Battalion Complex. 45,000 45,000
Army Fort Wainwright Aviation Storage Hangar.... 58,000 58,000
Colorado
Army Fort Carson Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 66,000 66,000
Army Fort Carson Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 73,000 73,000
Army Fort Carson Central Energy Plant....... 34,000 34,000
Army Fort Carson Fire Station............... 12,000 12,000
Army Fort Carson Headquarters Building...... 33,000 33,000
Army Fort Carson Runway..................... 12,000 12,000
Army Fort Carson Simulator Building......... 12,200 12,200
Florida
Army Eglin AFB Automated Sniper Field Fire 4,700 4,700
Range.

[[Page H3508]]

Georgia
Army Fort Gordon Adv Individual Training 61,000 61,000
Barracks Cplx, Ph2.
Hawaii
Army Fort Shafter Command and Control 75,000 65,000
Facility--Admin.
Kansas
Army Fort Leavenworth Simulations Center......... 17,000 17,000
Kentucky
Army Fort Campbell Battlefield Weather Support 4,800 4,800
Facility.
Maryland
Army Aberdeen Proving Operations and Maintenance 21,000 21,000
Ground Facilities.
Army Fort Detrick Entry Control Point........ 2,500 2,500
Army Fort Detrick Hazardous Material Storage 4,600 4,600
Building.
Missouri
Army Fort Leonard Wood Adv Individual Training 86,000 86,000
Barracks Cplx, Ph1.
Army Fort Leonard Wood Simulator Building......... 4,700 4,700
New York
Army U.S. Military Academy Cadet Barracks, Incr 2..... 42,000 42,000
North Carolina
Army Fort Bragg Command and Control 5,900 5,900
Facility.
Texas
Army Fort Bliss Control Tower.............. 10,800 10,800
Army Fort Bliss Unmanned Aerial Vehicle 36,000 36,000
Complex.
Virginia
Army Joint Base Langley- Adv Individual Training 50,000 50,000
Eustis Barracks Cplx, Ph3.
Washington
Army Joint Base Lewis- Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 79,000 79,000
Mcchord
Army Joint Base Lewis- Airfield Operations Complex 37,000 37,000
Mcchord
Army Joint Base Lewis- Aviation Battalion Complex. 28,000 28,000
Mcchord
Army Yakima Automated Multipurpose 9,100 9,100
Machine Gun Range.
Worldwide Classified
Army Classified Location Company Operations Complex. 33,000 33,000
Kwajalein
Army Kwajalein Atoll Pier....................... 63,000 63,000
Worldwide Unspecified
Army Unspecified Worldwide Host Nation Support Fy14... 33,000 23,000
Locations
Army Unspecified Worldwide Minor Construction Fy14.... 25,000 25,000
Locations
Army Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design Fy14... 41,575 41,575
Locations
........................
Total Military Construction, Army 1,119,875 1,099,875
......................
California
Navy Barstow Engine Dynamometer Facility 14,998 14,998
Navy Camp Pendleton Ammunition Supply Point 13,124 13,124
Upgrade.
Navy Coronado H-60 Trainer Facility...... 8,910 8,910
Navy Point Mugu Aircraft Engine Test Pads.. 7,198 7,198
Navy Point Mugu Bams Consolidated 17,469 17,469
Maintenance Hangar.
Navy Port Hueneme Unaccompanied Housing 33,600 33,600
Conversion.
Navy San Diego Steam Plant 34,331 34,331
Decentralization.
Navy Twentynine Palms Camp Wilson Infrastructure 33,437 33,437
Upgrades.
Florida
Navy Jacksonville P-8a Training & Parking 20,752 20,752
Apron Expansion.
Navy Key West Aircraft Crash/Rescue & 14,001 14,001
Fire Headquarters.
Navy Mayport Lcs Logistics Support 16,093 16,093
Facility.
Georgia
Navy Albany Cers Dispatch Facility..... 1,010 1,010
Navy Albany Weapons Storage and 15,600 15,600
Inspection Facility.
Navy Savannah Townsend Bombing Range Land 61,717 61,717
Acq--Phase 1.
Guam
Navy Joint Region Marianas Aircraft Maintenance 85,673 85,673
Hangar--North Ramp.
Navy Joint Region Marianas Bams Forward Operational & 61,702 61,702
Maintenance Hangar.
Navy Joint Region Marianas Dehumidified Supply Storage 17,170 17,170
Facility.
Navy Joint Region Marianas Emergent Repair Facility 35,860 35,860
Expansion.
Navy Joint Region Marianas Modular Storage Magazines.. 63,382 63,382
Navy Joint Region Marianas Sierra Wharf Improvements.. 1,170 1,170
Navy Joint Region Marianas X-Ray Wharf Improvements... 53,420 53,420
Hawaii
Navy Kaneohe Bay 3rd Radio Bn Maintenance/ 25,336 25,336
Operations Complex.
Navy Kaneohe Bay Aircraft Maintenance 16,968 16,968
Expansion.
Navy Kaneohe Bay Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 31,820 31,820
Upgrades.
Navy Kaneohe Bay Armory Addition and 12,952 12,952
Renovation.
Navy Kaneohe Bay Aviation Simulator 17,724 17,724
Modernization/Addition.
Navy Kaneohe Bay Mv-22 Hangar............... 57,517 57,517
Navy Kaneohe Bay Mv-22 Parking Apron and 74,665 74,665
Infrastructure.
Navy Pearl City Water Transmission Line.... 30,100 30,100
Navy Pearl Harbor Drydock Waterfront Facility 22,721 22,721
Navy Pearl Harbor Submarine Production 35,277 35,277
Support Facility.
Illinois
Navy Great Lakes Unaccompanied Housing...... 35,851 35,851
Maine

[[Page H3509]]

Navy Bangor Nctams Vlf Commercial Power 13,800 13,800
Connection.
Navy Kittery Structural Shops 11,522 11,522
Consolidation.
Maryland
Navy Fort Meade Marforcybercom HQ-Ops 83,988 83,988
Building.
Nevada
Navy Fallon Wastewater Treatment Plant. 11,334 11,334
North Carolina
Navy Camp Lejeune Landfill--Phase 4.......... 20,795 20,795
Navy Camp Lejeune Operations Training Complex 22,515 22,515
Navy Camp Lejeune Steam Decentralization--BEQ 18,679 18,679
Nodes.
Navy Camp Lejeune Steam Decentralization-- 2,620 2,620
Camp Johnson.
Navy Camp Lejeune Steam Decentralization-- 13,390 13,390
Hadnot Point.
Navy New River Ch-53k Maintenance Training 13,218 13,218
Facility.
Navy New River Corrosion Control Hangar... 12,547 12,547
Navy New River Regional Communication 20,098 20,098
Station.
Oklahoma
Navy Tinker AFB Tacamo E-6B Hangar......... 14,144 14,144
Rhode Island
Navy Newport Hewitt Hall Research Center 12,422 12,422
South Carolina
Navy Charleston Nuclear Power Operational 73,932 73,932
Training Facility.
Virginia
Navy Dam Neck Aerial Target Operation 10,587 10,587
Consolidation.
Navy Norfolk Pier 11 Power Upgrades for 3,380 3,380
Cvn-78.
Navy Quantico Academic Instruction 25,731 25,731
Facility Tecom Schools.
Navy Quantico Atc Transmitter/Receiver 3,630 3,630
Relocation.
Navy Quantico Fuller Road Improvements... 9,013 9,013
Navy Yorktown Small Arms Ranges.......... 18,700 18,700
Washington
Navy Bremerton Integrated Water Treatment 18,189 18,189
Sys Dry Docks 3&4.
Navy Kitsap Explosives Handling Wharf 24,880 24,880
#2 (Inc).
Navy Whidbey Island Ea-18g Facility 32,482 32,482
Improvements.
Navy Whidbey Island P-8a Hangar and Training 85,167 85,167
Facilities.
Djibouti
Navy Camp Lemonier Armory..................... 6,420 6,420
Navy Camp Lemonier Unaccompanied Housing...... 22,580 22,580
Japan
Navy Camp Butler Airfield Security Upgrades. 5,820 5,820
Navy Yokosuka Communication System 7,568 7,568
Upgrade.
Worldwide Unspecified
Navy Unspecified Worldwide Mcon Design Funds.......... 89,830 89,830
Locations
Navy Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 19,740 19,740
Locations Construction.
........................
Total Military Construction, Navy 1,700,269 1,700,269
......................
Arizona
AF Luke AFB F-35 Field Training 5,500 5,500
Detachment.
AF Luke AFB F-35 Sq Ops/Aircraft 21,400 21,400
Maintenance Unit #3.
California
AF Beale AFB Distributed Common Ground 62,000 62,000
Station Ops Bldg.
Florida
AF Tyndall AFB F-22 Munitions Storage 9,100 9,100
Complex.
Guam
AF Joint Region Marianas Par--Fuel Sys Hardened 20,000 20,000
Bldgs.
AF Joint Region Marianas Par--Strike Tactical 10,530 10,530
Missile Mxs Facility.
AF Joint Region Marianas Par--Tanker Gp Mx Hangar/ 132,600 132,600
AMU/Sqd Ops.
AF Joint Region Marianas Prtc Red Horse Airfield 8,500 8,500
Operations Facility.
AF Joint Region Marianas Prtc Sf Fire Rescue & 4,600 4,600
Emergency Mgt.
Kansas
AF Mcconnell AFB KC-46a 2-Bay Corrosion 0 82,000
Control/Fuel Cell Hangar.
AF Mcconnell AFB KC-46a 3-Bay General 0 80,000
Purpose Maintenance Hangar.
AF Mcconnell AFB KC-46a Aircraft Parking 0 2,200
Apron Alteration.
AF Mcconnell AFB KC-46a Aprons Fuels 0 12,800
Distribution System.
AF Mcconnell AFB KC-46a Flight Simulator 0 2,150
Facility Phase 1.
AF Mcconnell AFB KC-46a General Maintenance 0 32,000
Hangar.
AF Mcconnell AFB KC-46a Miscellaneous 0 970
Facilities Alteration.
AF Mcconnell AFB KC-46a Pipeline Student 0 7,000
Dormatory.
Hawaii
AF Joint Base Pearl C-17 Modernize Hgr 35, 4,800 4,800
Harbor-Hickam Docks 1&2.
Kentucky
AF Fort Campbell 19th Air Support Operations 8,000 8,000
Sqdrn Expansion.
Maryland
AF Fort Meade Cybercom Joint Operations 85,000 85,000
Center, Increment 1.
AF Joint Base Andrews Helicopter Operations 30,000 30,000
Facility.
Missouri
AF Whiteman AFB Wsa Mop Igloos and Assembly 5,900 5,900
Facility.
Nebraska
AF Offutt AFB Usstratcom Replacement 136,000 136,000
Facility, Incr 3.
Nevada
AF Nellis AFB Add Rpa Weapons School 20,000 20,000
Facility.

[[Page H3510]]

AF Nellis AFB Dormitory (240 Rm)......... 35,000 35,000
AF Nellis AFB F-35 Alt Mission Equip 5,000 5,000
(Ame) Storage.
AF Nellis AFB F-35 Fuel Cell Hangar...... 9,400 9,400
AF Nellis AFB F-35 Parts Store........... 9,100 9,100
New Mexico
AF Cannon AFB Airmen and Family Readiness 5,500 5,500
Center.
AF Cannon AFB Dormitory (144 Rm)......... 22,000 22,000
AF Cannon AFB Satellite Dining Facility.. 6,600 6,600
AF Holloman AFB F-16 Aircraft Covered 2,250 2,250
Washrack and Pad.
AF Kirtland AFB Nuclear Systems Wing & 30,500 30,500
Sustainment Center (Ph.
North Dakota
AF Minot AFB B-52 Adal Aircraft 15,530 15,530
Maintenance Unit.
AF Minot AFB B-52 Munitions Storage 8,300 8,300
Igloos.
Oklahoma
AF Altus AFB KC-46a Ftu Adal Fuel 0 3,350
Systems Maintenance Dock.
AF Altus AFB KC-46a Ftu Adal Squad Ops/ 0 7,400
AMU.
AF Altus AFB KC-46a Ftu Flight Training 0 12,600
Center Simulators Facility
Phase 1.
AF Altus AFB KC-46a Ftu Fuselage Trainer 0 6,300
Phase 1.
AF Altus AFB KC-46a Ftu Renovate 0 1,200
Facility.
AF Tinker AFB KC-46a Land Acquisition.... 8,600 8,600
Texas
AF Fort Bliss F-16 Bak 12/14 Aircraft 3,350 3,350
Arresting System.
Utah
AF Hill AFB F-35 Aircraft Mx Unit 13,500 13,500
Hangar 45e Ops #1.
AF Hill AFB Fire Crash Rescue Station.. 18,500 18,500
Virginia
AF Joint Base Langley- 4-Bay Conventional 4,800 4,800
Eustis Munitions Inspection Bldg.
Greenland
AF Thule Ab Thule Consolidation, Phase 43,904 43,904
2.
Mariana Islands
AF Saipan Par--Airport Pol/Bulk 18,500 18,500
Storage Ast.
AF Saipan Par--Hazardous Cargo Pad... 8,000 8,000
AF Saipan Par--Maintenance Facility.. 2,800 2,800
United Kingdom
AF Croughton Raf Main Gate Complex.......... 12,000 0
AF Royal Air Force Guardian Angel Operations 22,047 22,047
Lakenheath Facility.
Worldwide Unspecified
AF Unspecified Worldwide KC-46a Ftu Facility 63,000 0
Locations Projects.
AF Unspecified Worldwide KC-46a Mob #1 Facility 192,700 0
Locations Projects.
AF Unspecified Worldwide Planning & Design.......... 11,314 11,314
Locations
AF Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 20,448 20,448
Locations Construction.
........................
Total Military Construction, Air Force 1,156,573 1,138,843
......................
Alaska
Def-Wide Clear AFS Bmds Upgrade Early Warning 17,204 17,204
Radar.
Def-Wide Fort Greely Mechanical-Electrical Bldg 82,000 82,000
Missile Field #1.
California
Def-Wide Brawley SOF Desert Warfare Training 23,095 23,095
Center.
Def-Wide Defense Distribution General Purpose Warehouse.. 37,554 37,554
Depot-Tracy
Def-Wide Miramar Replace Fuel Pipeline...... 6,000 6,000
Colorado
Def-Wide Fort Carson SOF Group Support Battalion 22,282 22,282
Florida
Def-Wide Hurlburt Field SOF Add/Alter Operations 7,900 7,900
Facility.
Def-Wide Jacksonville Replace Fuel Pipeline...... 7,500 7,500
Def-Wide Key West SOF Boat Docks............. 3,600 0
Def-Wide Panama City Replace Ground Vehicle 2,600 2,600
Fueling Facility.
Def-Wide Tyndall AFB Replace Fuel Pipeline...... 9,500 9,500
Georgia
Def-Wide Fort Benning Faith Middle School 6,031 6,031
Addition.
Def-Wide Fort Benning White Elemtary School 37,304 37,304
Replacement.
Def-Wide Fort Stewart Diamond Elementary School 44,504 44,504
Replacement.
Def-Wide Hunter Army Airfield Replace Fuel Island........ 13,500 13,500
Def-Wide Moody AFB Replace Ground Vehicle 3,800 3,800
Fueling Facility.
Hawaii
Def-Wide Ford Island DISA Pacific Facility 2,615 2,615
Upgrades.
Def-Wide Joint Base Pearl Alter Warehouse Space...... 2,800 2,800
Harbor-Hickam
Kentucky
Def-Wide Fort Campbell Fort Campbell High School 59,278 59,278
Replacement.
Def-Wide Fort Campbell Marshall Elementary School 38,591 38,591
Replacement.
Def-Wide Fort Campbell SOF Group Special Troops 26,342 26,342
Battalion.
Def-Wide Fort Knox Ambulatory Health Center... 265,000 265,000
Def-Wide Fort Knox Consolidate/Replace Van 38,023 38,023
Voorhis-Mudge Es.
Maryland
Def-Wide Aberdeen Proving Public Health Command Lab 210,000 110,000
Ground Replacement.
Def-Wide Bethesda Naval Mech & Electrical 46,800 46,800
Hospital Improvements.

[[Page H3511]]

Def-Wide Bethesda Naval Parking Garage............. 20,000 20,000
Hospital
Def-Wide Fort Detrick USAMRIID Replacement Stage 13,000 0
1, Incr 8.
Def-Wide Fort Meade High Performance Computing 431,000 431,000
Capacity Inc 3.
Def-Wide Fort Meade NSAW Recapitalize Building 58,000 58,000
#1/Site M Inc 2.
Def-Wide Joint Base Andrews Ambulatory Care Center Inc 76,200 63,800
2.
Massachusetts
Def-Wide Hanscom AFB Hanscom Primary School 36,213 36,213
Replacement.
New Jersey
Def-Wide Joint Base Mcguire-Dix- Replace Fuel Distribution 10,000 10,000
Lakehurst Components.
New Mexico
Def-Wide Holloman AFB Medical Clinic Replacement. 60,000 60,000
Def-Wide Holloman AFB Replace Hydrant Fuel System 21,400 21,400
North Carolina
Def-Wide Camp Lejeune SOF Performance Resiliency 14,400 0
Center.
Def-Wide Camp Lejeune SOF Sustainment Training 28,977 28,977
Complex.
Def-Wide Fort Bragg Consolidate/Replace Pope 37,032 37,032
Holbrook Elementary.
Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Civil Affairs Battalion 37,689 37,689
Annex.
Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Combat Medic Skills 7,600 7,600
Sustain. Course Bldg.
Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Engineer Training 10,419 10,419
Facility.
Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Language and Cultural 64,606 64,606
Center.
Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Upgrade Training 14,719 14,719
Facility.
North Dakota
Def-Wide Minot AFB Replace Fuel Pipeline...... 6,400 6,400
Oklahoma
Def-Wide Altus AFB Replace Refueler Parking... 2,100 2,100
Def-Wide Tinker AFB Replace Fuel Distribution 36,000 36,000
Facilities.
Pennsylvania
Def-Wide Def Distribution Depot Upgrade Hazardous Material 3,100 3,100
New Cumberland Warehouse.
Def-Wide Def Distribution Depot Upgrade Public Safety 5,900 5,900
New Cumberland Facility.
South Carolina
Def-Wide Beaufort Bolden Elementary/Middle 41,324 41,324
School Replacement.
Tennessee
Def-Wide Arnold Air Force Base Replace Ground Vehicle 2,200 2,200
Fueling Facility.
Texas
Def-Wide Fort Bliss Hospital Replacement Incr 5 252,100 152,100
Def-Wide Joint Base San Antonio Sammc Hyperbaric Facility 12,600 12,600
Addition.
Virginia
Def-Wide Dam Neck SOF Human Performance 11,147 0
Center.
Def-Wide Def Distribution Depot Operations Center Phase 1.. 87,000 87,000
Richmond
Def-Wide Joint Expeditionary SOF Logsu Two Operations 30,404 30,404
Base Little Creek-- Facility.
Story
Def-Wide Pentagon Boundary Channel Access 6,700 6,700
Control Point.
Def-Wide Pentagon Pentagon South Pedestrian 1,850 1,850
Safety Project.
Def-Wide Pentagon Pfpa Support Operations 14,800 14,800
Center.
Def-Wide Pentagon Raven Rock Administrative 32,000 32,000
Facility Upgrade.
Def-Wide Pentagon Raven Rock Exterior Cooling 4,100 4,100
Tower.
Def-Wide Quantico Quantico Middle/High School 40,586 40,586
Replacement.
Washington
Def-Wide Whidbey Island Replace Fuel Pier 10,000 10,000
Breakwater.
Worldwide Classified
Def-Wide Classified Location an/Tpy-2 Radar Site........ 15,000 15,000
Bahrain Island
Def-Wide Sw Asia Medical/Dental Clinic 45,400 45,400
Replacement.
Belgium
Def-Wide Brussels NATO Headquarters Facility. 38,513 38,513
Def-Wide Brussels NATO Headquarters Fit-Out.. 29,100 29,100
Germany
Def-Wide Kaiserlautern Ab Kaiserslautern Elementary 49,907 49,907
School Replacement.
Def-Wide Ramstein Ab Ramstein High School 98,762 98,762
Replacement.
Def-Wide Rhine Ordnance Medical Center Replacement, 151,545 151,545
Barracks Incr 3.
Def-Wide Weisbaden Hainerberg Elementary 58,899 58,899
School Replacement.
Def-Wide Weisbaden Wiesbaden Middle School 50,756 50,756
Replacement.
Japan
Def-Wide Atsugi Replace Ground Vehicle 4,100 4,100
Fueling Facility.
Def-Wide Iwakuni Construct Hydrant Fuel 34,000 34,000
System.
Def-Wide Kadena Ab Kadena Middle School 38,792 38,792
Addition/Renovation.
Def-Wide Torri Commo Station SOF Facility Augmentation.. 71,451 64,071
Def-Wide Yokosuka Upgrade Fuel Pumps......... 10,600 10,600
Korea
Def-Wide Camp Walker Daegu Middle/High School 52,164 52,164
Replacement.
Romania
Def-Wide Deveselu Aegis Ashore Missile Def 85,000 80,000
Sys Cmplx, Increm. 2.
United Kingdom
Def-Wide Raf Mildenhall Replace Fuel Storage....... 17,732 17,732
Def-Wide Raf Mildenhall SOF Airfield Pavements and 0 48,448
Hangar/AMU.
Def-Wide Raf Mildenhall SOF Airfiled Pavements..... 24,077 0
Def-Wide Raf Mildenhall SOF Hangar/AMU............. 24,371 0
Def-Wide Raf Mildenhall SOF Mrsp and Parts Storage. 6,797 6,797

[[Page H3512]]

Def-Wide Raf Mildenhall SOF Squadron Operations 11,652 11,652
Facility.
Def-Wide Royal Air Force Lakenheath High School 69,638 69,638
Lakenheath Replacement.
Worldwide Unspecified
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Contingency Construction... 10,000 0
Locations
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Energy Conservation 150,000 150,000
Locations Investment Program.
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Exercise Related Minor 9,730 9,730
Locations Construction.
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Planning & Design.......... 10,891 10,891
Locations
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design........ 75,905 75,905
Locations
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design........ 36,866 36,866
Locations
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design........ 6,931 6,931
Locations
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design........ 50,192 50,192
Locations
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design........ 57,053 57,053
Locations
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 2,000 2,000
Locations Construction.
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 7,430 7,430
Locations Construction.
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 5,170 5,170
Locations Construction.
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 5,409 5,409
Locations Construction.
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 1,500 1,500
Locations Construction.
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 9,578 9,578
Locations Construction.
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 3,000 3,000
Locations Construction.
........................
Total Military Construction, Defense-Wide 3,985,300 3,708,373
......................
Kentucky
Chem Demil Blue Grass Army Depot Ammunition Demilitarization 122,536 122,536
Facility, Ph Xiv.
........................
Total Chemical Demilitarization Construction, Defense 122,536 122,536
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
NATO NATO Security NATO Security Investment 239,700 199,700
Investment Program Program.
........................
Total NATO Security Investment Program 239,700 199,700
......................
Alabama
Army NG Decatur National Guard Readiness 4,000 4,000
Center Add/Alt.
Arkansas
Army NG Fort Chaffee Scout/Recce Gunnery Complex 21,000 21,000
Florida
Army NG Pinellas Park Ready Building............. 5,700 5,700
Illinois
Army NG Kankakee Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 28,000 28,000
Army NG Kankakee Readiness Center........... 14,000 14,000
Massachusetts
Army NG Camp Edwards Enlisted Barracks, 19,000 19,000
Transient Training Add.
Michigan
Army NG Camp Grayling Enlisted Barracks, 17,000 17,000
Transient Training.
Minnesota
Army NG Stillwater Readiness Center........... 17,000 17,000
Mississippi
Army NG Camp Shelby Water Supply/Treatment 3,000 3,000
Building, Potable.
Army NG Pascagoula Readiness Center........... 4,500 4,500
Missouri
Army NG Macon Vehicle Maintenance Shop... 9,100 9,100
Army NG Whiteman AFB Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 5,000 5,000
New York
Army NG New York Readiness Center Add/Alt... 31,000 31,000
Ohio
Army NG Ravenna Army Sanitary Sewer............. 5,200 5,200
Ammunition Plant
Pennsylvania
Army NG Fort Indiantown Gap Aircraft Maintenance 40,000 40,000
Instructional Building.
Puerto Rico
Army NG Camp Santiago Maneuver Area Training & 5,600 5,600
Equipment Site Addit.
South Carolina
Army NG Greenville Readiness Center........... 13,000 13,000
Army NG Greenville Vehicle Maintenance Shop... 13,000 13,000

[[Page H3513]]

Texas
Army NG Fort Worth Armed Forces Reserve Center 14,270 14,270
Add.
Wyoming
Army NG Afton National Guard Readiness 10,200 10,200
Center.
Worldwide Unspecified
Army NG Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design........ 29,005 24,005
Locations
Army NG Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 12,240 12,240
Locations Construction.
........................
Total Military Construction, Army National Guard 320,815 315,815
......................
California
Army Res Camp Parks Army Reserve Center........ 17,500 17,500
Army Res Fort Hunter Liggett Tass Training Center (Ttc). 16,500 16,500
Maryland
Army Res Bowie Army Reserve Center........ 25,500 25,500
New Jersey
Army Res Joint Base Mcguire-Dix- Automated Multipurpose 9,500 9,500
Lakehurst Machine Gun (Mpmg).
Army Res Joint Base Mcguire-Dix- Central Issue Facility..... 7,900 7,900
Lakehurst
Army Res Joint Base Mcguire-Dix- Consolidated Dining 13,400 13,400
Lakehurst Facility.
Army Res Joint Base Mcguire-Dix- Modified Record Fire Range. 5,400 5,400
Lakehurst
New York
Army Res Bullville Army Reserve Center........ 14,500 14,500
North Carolina
Army Res Fort Bragg Army Reserve Center........ 24,500 24,500
Wisconsin
Army Res Fort Mccoy Access Control Point/Mail/ 17,500 17,500
Freight Center.
Army Res Fort Mccoy Nco Academy Dining Facility 5,900 5,900
Worldwide Unspecified
Army Res Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design........ 14,212 14,212
Locations
Army Res Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 1,748 1,748
Locations Construction.
........................
Total Military Construction, Army Reserve 174,060 174,060
......................
California
N/MC Res March AFB NOSC Moreno Valley Reserve 11,086 11,086
Training Center.
Missouri
N/MC Res Kansas City Reserve Training Center-- 15,020 15,020
Belton, Missouri.
Tennessee
N/MC Res Memphis Reserve Boat Maintenance 4,330 4,330
and Storage Facility.
Worldwide Unspecified
N/MC Res Unspecified Worldwide Mcnr Planning & Design..... 1,500 1,500
Locations
N/MC Res Unspecified Worldwide Usmcr Planning and Design.. 1,040 1,040
Locations
........................
Total Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps Reserve 32,976 32,976
......................
Alabama
Air NG Birmingham IAP Add to and Alter 8,500 8,500
Distributed Ground Station
F.
Indiana
Air NG Hulman Regional Add/Alter Bldg 37 for Dist 7,300 7,300
Airport Common Ground Sta.
Maryland
Air NG Fort Meade 175th Network Warfare 4,000 0
Squadron Facility.
Air NG Martin State Airport Cyber/ISR Facility......... 8,000 0
Montana
Air NG Great Falls IAP Intra-Theater Airlift 22,000 22,000
Conversion.
New York
Air NG Fort Drum Mq-9 Flight Training Unit 4,700 4,700
Hangar.
Ohio
Air NG Springfield Beckley- Alter Intelligence 7,200 7,200
Map Operations Facility.
Pennsylvania
Air NG Fort Indiantown Gap Communications Operations 7,700 7,700
and Training Facili.
Rhode Island
Air NG Quonset State Airport C-130J Flight Simulator 6,000 6,000
Training Facility.
Tennessee
Air NG Mcghee-Tyson Airport Tec Expansion- Dormitory & 18,000 18,000
Classroom Facility.
Worldwide Unspecified
Air NG Various Worldwide Planning and Design........ 13,400 13,400
Locations
Air NG Various Worldwide Unspecified Minor 13,000 13,000
Locations Construction.
........................
Total Military Construction, Air National Guard 119,800 107,800
......................
California
AF Res March AFB Joint Regional Deployment 19,900 19,900
Processing Center,.

[[Page H3514]]

Florida
AF Res Homestead AFS Entry Control Complex...... 9,800 9,800
Oklahoma
AF Res Tinker AFB Air Control Group Squadron 12,200 12,200
Operations.
Worldwide Unspecified
AF Res Various Worldwide Planning and Design........ 2,229 2,229
Locations
AF Res Various Worldwide Unspecified Minor 1,530 1,530
Locations Construction.
........................
Total Military Construction, Air Force Reserve 45,659 45,659
......................
Wisconsin
FH Con Army Fort Mccoy Family Housing New 23,000 23,000
Construction (56 Units).
Germany
FH Con Army South Camp Vilseck Family Housing New 16,600 16,600
Construction (29 Units).
Worldwide Unspecified
FH Con Army Unspecified Worldwide Family Housing P & D....... 4,408 4,408
Locations
........................
Total Family Housing Construction, Army 44,008 44,008
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Furnishings................ 33,125 33,125
Locations
FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Leased Housing............. 180,924 180,924
Locations
FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Maintenance of Real 107,639 107,639
Locations Property Facilities.
FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Management Account......... 54,433 54,433
Locations
FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Military Housing 25,661 25,661
Locations Privitization Initiative.
FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Miscellaneous.............. 646 646
Locations
FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Services................... 13,536 13,536
Locations
FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Utilities.................. 96,907 96,907
Locations
........................
Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Army 512,871 512,871
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
FH Con AF Unspecified Worldwide Improvements............... 72,093 72,093
Locations
FH Con AF Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design........ 4,267 4,267
Locations
........................
Total Family Housing Construction, Air Force 76,360 76,360
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Furnishings Account........ 39,470 39,470
Locations
FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Housing Privatization...... 41,436 41,436
Locations
FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Leasing.................... 54,514 54,514
Locations
FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Maintenance (Rpma Rpmc).... 110,786 110,786
Locations
FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Management Account......... 53,044 53,044
Locations
FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Miscellaneous Account...... 1,954 1,954
Locations
FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Services Account........... 16,862 16,862
Locations
FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Utilities Account.......... 70,532 70,532
Locations
........................
Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Air Force 388,598 388,598
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
FH Con Navy Unspecified Worldwide Design..................... 4,438 4,438
Locations
FH Con Navy Unspecified Worldwide Improvements............... 68,969 68,969
Locations
........................
Total Family Housing Construction, Navy and Marine Corps 73,407 73,407
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Furnishings Account........ 21,073 21,073
Locations

[[Page H3515]]

FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Leasing.................... 74,962 74,962
Locations
FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Maintenance of Real 90,122 90,122
Locations Property.
FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Management Account......... 60,782 60,782
Locations
FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Miscellaneous Account...... 362 362
Locations
FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Privatization Support Costs 27,634 27,634
Locations
FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Services Account........... 20,596 20,596
Locations
FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Utilities Account.......... 94,313 94,313
Locations
........................
Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Navy and Marine Corps 389,844 389,844
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Furnishings Account........ 67 67
Locations
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Furnishings Account........ 20 20
Locations
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Furnishings Account........ 3,196 3,196
Locations
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Leasing.................... 10,994 10,994
Locations
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Leasing.................... 40,433 40,433
Locations
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Maintenance of Real 311 311
Locations Property.
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Maintenance of Real 74 74
Locations Property.
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Management Account......... 418 418
Locations
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Services Account........... 32 32
Locations
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Utilities Account.......... 288 288
Locations
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Utilities Account.......... 12 12
Locations
........................
Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide 55,845 55,845
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
FHIF Unspecified Worldwide Family Housing Improvement 1,780 1,780
Locations Fund.
........................
Total DOD Family Housing Improvement Fund 1,780 1,780
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
BRAC Base Realignment & Base Realignment and 180,401 180,401
Closure, Army Closure.
BRAC Base Realignment & Base Realignment & Closure. 108,300 108,300
Closure, Navy
BRAC Unspecified Worldwide Dod BRAC Activities--Air 126,376 126,376
Locations Force.
BRAC Unspecified Worldwide Don-100: Planing, Design 7,277 7,277
Locations and Management.
BRAC Unspecified Worldwide Don-101: Various Locations. 20,988 20,988
Locations
BRAC Unspecified Worldwide Don-138: NAS Brunswick, ME. 993 993
Locations
BRAC Unspecified Worldwide Don-157: Mcsa Kansas City, 40 40
Locations MO.
BRAC Unspecified Worldwide Don-172: NWS Seal Beach, 5,766 5,766
Locations Concord, CA.
BRAC Unspecified Worldwide Don-84: JRB Willow Grove & 1,216 1,216
Locations Cambria Reg Ap.
........................
Total Base Realignment and Closure--Army 451,357 451,357
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
PYS Unspecified Worldwide Prior Year Savings--ANG 0 -45,623
Locations Unspecified Minor
Construction.
PYS Unspecified Worldwide Prior Year Savings--Army 0 -14,000
Locations Bid Savings.
PYS Unspecified Worldwide Prior Year Savings--Army 0 -50,000
Locations Planning and Design Fy12.
PYS Unspecified Worldwide Prior Year Savings--Defense 0 -358,400
Locations Wide Bid Savings.
PYS Unspecified Worldwide Prior Year Savings--Defense 0 -16,470
Locations Wide Unspecified Minor
Construction.

[[Page H3516]]

PYS Unspecified Worldwide Prior Year Savings--Navy 0 -49,920
Locations Bid Savings.
PYS Unspecified Worldwide Prior Year Savings--Section 0 -50,000
Locations 1013 of the Demonstration
Cities and Metropolitan
Development Act of 1966,
As Amended.
........................
Total Prior Year Savings 0 -584,413
......................
Total Military Construction 11,011,633 10,055,563
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TITLE XLVII--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS (In Thousands
of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 House
Program Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discretionary Summary By Appropriation
Energy And Water Development, And Related
Agencies
Appropriation Summary:
Energy Programs
Electricity delivery and energy 16,000 0
reliability..........................
Nuclear Energy........................ 94,000 94,000

Atomic Energy Defense Activities
National nuclear security
administration:
Weapons activities.................. 7,868,409 8,088,409
Defense nuclear nonproliferation.... 2,140,142 2,140,142
Naval reactors...................... 1,246,134 1,246,134
Office of the administrator......... 397,784 389,784
Total, National nuclear security 11,652,469 11,864,469
administration...........................

Environmental and other defense
activities:
Defense environmental cleanup....... 5,316,909 4,958,909
Other defense activities............ 749,080 749,080
Total, Environmental & other defense 6,065,989 5,707,989
activities...............................
Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities... 17,718,458 17,572,458
Total, Discretionary Funding.............. 17,828,458 17,666,458

Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability
Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability
Infrastructure security & energy 16,000 0
restoration (HS).......................

Nuclear Energy
Idaho sitewide safeguards and security.... 94,000 94,000

Weapons Activities
Life extension programs and major
alterations
B61 Life extension program............ 537,044 581,044
W76 Life extension program............ 235,382 245,082
W78/88-1 Life extension program....... 72,691 78,291
W88 ALT 370........................... 169,487 169,487
Total, Stockpile assessment and design.... 1,014,604 1,073,904

Stockpile systems
B61 Stockpile systems................. 83,536 83,536
W76 Stockpile systems................. 47,187 47,187
W78 Stockpile systems................. 54,381 54,381
W80 Stockpile systems................. 50,330 50,330
B83 Stockpile systems................. 54,948 60,948
W87 Stockpile systems................. 101,506 101,506
W88 Stockpile systems................. 62,600 62,600
Total, Stockpile systems.................. 454,488 460,488

Weapons dismantlement and disposition
Operations and maintenance............ 49,264 49,264

Stockpile services
Production support.................... 321,416 351,016
Research and development support...... 26,349 29,549
R&D certification and safety.......... 191,259 209,559
Management, technology, and production 214,187 214,187
Plutonium sustainment................. 156,949 166,449
Total, Stockpile services................. 910,160 970,760
Total, Directed stockpile work............ 2,428,516 2,554,416

Campaigns:
Science campaign

[[Page H3517]]

Advanced certification................ 54,730 54,730
Primary assessment technologies....... 109,231 109,231
Dynamic materials properties.......... 116,965 116,965
Advanced radiography.................. 30,509 30,509
Secondary assessment technologies..... 86,467 86,467
Total, Science campaign................... 397,902 397,902

Engineering campaign
Enhanced surety....................... 51,771 54,271
Weapon systems engineering assessment 23,727 23,727
technology...........................
Nuclear survivability................. 19,504 19,504
Enhanced surveillance................. 54,909 58,909
Total, Engineering campaign............... 149,911 156,411

Inertial confinement fusion ignition and
high yield campaign
Ignition.............................. 80,245 80,245
Support of other stockpile programs... 15,001 15,001
Diagnostics, cryogenics and 59,897 59,897
experimental support.................
Pulsed power inertial confinement 5,024 5,024
fusion...............................
Joint program in high energy density 8,198 8,198
laboratory plasmas...................
Facility operations and target 232,678 232,678
production...........................
Total, Inertial confinement fusion and 401,043 401,043
high yield campaign......................

Advanced simulation and computing 564,329 564,329
campaign...............................

Readiness Campaign
Component manufacturing development... 106,085 106,085
Tritium readiness..................... 91,695 91,695
Total, Readiness campaign................. 197,780 197,780
Total, Campaigns.......................... 1,710,965 1,717,465

Nuclear programs
Nuclear operations capability........... 265,937 265,937
Capabilities based investments.......... 39,558 39,558
Construction:
12-D-301 TRU waste facilities, LANL... 26,722 26,722
11-D-801 TA-55 Reinvestment project 30,679 30,679
Phase 2, LANL........................
07-D-220 Radioactive liquid waste 55,719 55,719
treatment facility upgrade project,
LANL.................................
06-D-141 PED/Construction, Uranium 325,835 325,835
Capabilities Replacement Project Y-12
Total, Construction....................... 438,955 438,955
Total, Nuclear programs................... 744,450 744,450

Secure transportation asset
Operations and equipment................ 122,072 122,072
Program direction....................... 97,118 97,118
Total, Secure transportation asset........ 219,190 219,190

Site stewardship
Nuclear materials integration........... 17,679 17,679
Corporate project management............ 13,017 13,017

Minority serving institution 14,531 14,531
partnerships program...................

Enterprise infrastructure
Site Operations....................... 1,112,455 1,112,455
Site Support.......................... 109,561 109,561
Sustainment........................... 433,764 498,864
Facilities disposition................ 5,000 5,000
Subtotal, Enterprise infrastructure....... 1,660,780 1,725,880
Total, Site stewardship................... 1,706,007 1,771,107

Defense nuclear security
Operations and maintenance.............. 664,981 664,981
Construction:
14-D-710 DAF Argus, NNSS.............. 14,000 14,000
Total, Defense nuclear security........... 678,981 678,981

NNSA CIO activities....................... 148,441 170,941

Legacy contractor pensions................ 279,597 279,597
Subtotal, Weapons activities.............. 7,916,147 8,136,147

Adjustments
Use of prior year balances.............. -47,738 -47,738
Total, Adjustments........................ -47,738 -47,738
Total, Weapons Activities................. 7,868,409 8,088,409

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs

[[Page H3518]]

Global threat reduction initiative...... 424,487 447,487

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D
Operations and maintenance............ 388,838 388,838

Nonproliferation and international 141,675 141,675
security...............................

International material protection and 369,625 346,625
cooperation............................

Fissile materials disposition
U.S. surplus fissile materials
disposition
Operations and maintenance
U.S. plutonium disposition........ 157,557 157,557
U.S. uranium disposition.......... 25,000 25,000
Total, Operations and maintenance......... 182,557 182,557
Construction:
99-D-143 Mixed oxide fuel 320,000 320,000
fabrication facility, Savannah
River, SC........................
Total, Construction....................... 320,000 320,000
Total, U.S. surplus fissile materials 502,557 502,557
disposition..............................
Total, Fissile materials disposition...... 502,557 502,557

Legacy contractor pensions.............. 93,703 93,703
Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation 1,920,885 1,920,885
Programs.................................

Nuclear counterterrorism incident response 181,293 181,293
program..................................

Counterterrorism and counterproliferation 74,666 74,666
programs.................................
Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation 2,176,844 2,176,844

Adjustments
Use of prior year balances.............. -36,702 -36,702
Total, Adjustments........................ -36,702 -36,702
Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation... 2,140,142 2,140,142

Naval Reactors
Naval reactors operations and 455,740 453,740
infrastructure...........................
Naval reactors development................ 419,400 419,400
Ohio replacement reactor systems 126,400 126,400
development..............................
S8G Prototype refueling................... 144,400 144,400
Program direction......................... 44,404 44,404
Construction:
14-D-902 KL Materials characterization 1,000 1,000
laboratory expansion, KAPL.............
14-D-901 Spent fuel handling 45,400 45,400
recapitalization project, NRF..........
13-D-905 Remote-handled low-level waste 21,073 21,073
facility, INL..........................
13-D-904 KS Radiological work and 600 2,600
storage building, KSO..................
Naval Reactor Facility, ID.............. 1,700 1,700
Total, Construction....................... 69,773 71,773
Subtotal, Naval Reactors.................. 1,260,117 1,260,117

Adjustments:
Use of prior year balances (Naval -13,983 -13,983
reactors)..............................
Total, Naval Reactors..................... 1,246,134 1,246,134

Office Of The Administrator
Office of the administrator............... 397,784 389,784
Total, Office Of The Administrator........ 397,784 389,784

Defense Environmental Cleanup
Closure sites:
Closure sites administration............ 4,702 4,702

Hanford site:
River corridor and other cleanup 393,634 393,634
operations.............................
Central plateau remediation............. 513,450 513,450
Richland community and regulatory 14,701 14,701
support................................
Total, Hanford site....................... 921,785 921,785

Idaho National Laboratory:
Idaho cleanup and waste disposition..... 362,100 362,100
Idaho community and regulatory support.. 2,910 2,910
Total, Idaho National Laboratory.......... 365,010 365,010

NNSA sites
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.. 1,476 1,476
Nuclear facility D & D Separations 23,700 23,700
Process Research Unit..................
Nevada.................................. 61,897 61,897
Sandia National Laboratories............ 2,814 2,814
Los Alamos National Laboratory.......... 219,789 219,789

[[Page H3519]]

Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites.... 309,676 309,676

Oak Ridge Reservation:
OR Nuclear facility D & D............... 73,716 73,716
OR cleanup and disposition.............. 115,855 115,855
OR reservation community and regulatory 4,365 4,365
support................................
Total, Oak Ridge Reservation.............. 193,936 193,936

Office of River Protection:
Waste treatment and immobilization plant
01-D-416 A-E/ORP-0060 / Major 690,000 690,000
construction.........................

Tank farm activities
Rad liquid tank waste stabilization 520,216 520,216
and disposition......................
Total, Office of River protection......... 1,210,216 1,210,216

Savannah River sites:
Savannah River risk management 432,491 432,491
operations.............................
SR community and regulatory support..... 11,210 11,210

Radioactive liquid tank waste:
Radioactive liquid tank waste 552,560 647,560
stabilization and disposition........
Construction:
05-D-405 Salt waste processing 92,000 92,000
facility, Savannah River...........
Total, Construction....................... 92,000 92,000
Total, Radioactive liquid tank waste...... 644,560 739,560
Total, Savannah River site................ 1,088,261 1,183,261

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
Waste isolation pilot plant............. 203,390 203,390
Total, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant........ 203,390 203,390

Program direction......................... 280,784 280,784
Program support........................... 17,979 17,979

Safeguards and Security:
Oak Ridge Reservation................... 18,800 18,800
Paducah................................. 9,435 9,435
Portsmouth.............................. 8,578 8,578
Richland/Hanford Site................... 69,078 69,078
Savannah River Site..................... 121,196 121,196
Waste Isolation Pilot Project........... 4,977 4,977
West Valley............................. 2,015 2,015
Technology development.................... 24,091 34,091
Subtotal, Defense environmental cleanup... 4,853,909 4,958,909

Uranium enrichment D&D fund contribution.. 463,000 0

Total, Defense Environmental Cleanup...... 5,316,909 4,958,909

Other Defense Activities
Health, safety and security
Health, safety and security............. 143,616 143,616
Program direction....................... 108,301 108,301
Total, Health, safety and security........ 251,917 251,917

Specialized security activities........... 196,322 196,322

Office of Legacy Management
Legacy management....................... 163,271 163,271
Program direction....................... 13,712 13,712
Total, Office of Legacy Management........ 176,983 176,983

Defense-related activities
Defense related administrative support
Chief financial officer................. 38,979 38,979
Chief information officer............... 79,857 79,857
Total, Defense related administrative 118,836 118,836
support..................................

Office of hearings and appeals............ 5,022 5,022
Subtotal, Other defense activities........ 749,080 749,080
Total, Other Defense Activities........... 749,080 749,080
------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Acting CHAIR. No amendment to that amendment in the nature of a
substitute shall be in order except those printed in part B of House
Report 113-108 and amendments en bloc described in section 3 of House
Resolution 260.
Except as provided by the order of the House of today, each amendment
printed in part B of House Report 113-108 shall be considered only by
the order printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member
designated in the report, shall be considered as read,

[[Page H3520]]

shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided
and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject
to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the
question.
It shall be in order at any time for the chair of the Committee on
Armed Services or his designee to offer amendments en bloc consisting
of amendments printed in part B of House Report 113-108 not earlier
disposed of. Amendments en bloc shall be considered as read, shall be
debatable for 20 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chair
and ranking minority member of the Committee on Armed Services or their
designees, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject
to a demand for division of the question. The original proponent of an
amendment included in such amendments en bloc may insert a statement in
the Congressional Record immediately before the disposition of the
amendments en bloc.

{time} 1440

Amendment No. 1 Offered by Mr. McKeon

The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 1
printed in Part B of House Report 113-108.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of the manager's
amendment.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:

Page 400, line 15, after ``committees'' insert the
following: ``the Committee on Foreign Relations of the
Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives''.
Page 405, line 9, after the period insert the following:
``The Secretary of Defense shall submit any such classified
annex to the congressional defense committees.''.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman
from California (Mr. McKeon) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from California.
Mr. McKEON. This is the manager's amendment, and it has been worked
on and agreed to by the minority. It contains technical and conforming
changes, and it's noncontroversial.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, although I'm not in
opposition, I rise to claim the time in opposition.
The Acting CHAIR. Without objection, the gentleman is recognized for
5 minutes.
There was no objection.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. I yield myself the balance of my time just
to say I agree with the chairman. These are technical corrections that
we have agreed to, and I urge support.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I ask our colleagues to support this
amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentleman from California (Mr. McKeon).
The amendment was agreed to.

Amendment No. 2 Offered by Mr. Blumenauer

The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 2
printed in Part B of House Report 113-108.
Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:

At the end of subtitle C of title I, insert the following
new section:

SEC. 123. MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENT FOR CERTAIN NUMBER OF
AIRCRAFT CARRIERS OF THE NAVY.

(a) In General.--Section 5062(b) of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by striking ``11'' and inserting ``10''.
(b) Conforming Repeal.--Section 1023 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law
111-84; 123 Stat. 2447) is repealed.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman
from Oregon (Mr. Blumenauer) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Oregon.
Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself 2 minutes.
I appreciate the hard work that the committee has undertaken. We have
before you a bipartisan amendment also offered by my colleagues Mr.
Mulvaney and Mr. Bentivolio. The purpose of the amendment is simple: it
will help make the naval fleet stronger and more sustainable by
allowing the Navy to decide the level of aircraft carriers in the
future; stay at the current level of 10 at some point in the future
instead of going back to a congressionally mandated level. It does not
eliminate any aircraft carriers.
The entire Department of Defense is in the midst of a major reality
check as budgets shrink, priorities change, and new technologies
emerge. I don't pretend to be a naval expert, but our Navy is being
pushed into shallow waters as a result of sequestration. And now more
than ever, we should allow them to make the decisions.
I have been a little concerned that some people in opposition say
that this amendment would make a 10-carrier fleet permanent. Nothing
could be further from the truth. It simply will allow the Navy to
decide if it wants 10 aircraft carriers at some point in the next three
decades. Now, if they're afraid that this will happen, then it means
they think that the Navy 5 years, 10 years, 20 years from now will
decide that they have higher strategic needs.
The history of the 12-carrier requirement was imposed for the first
time in two centuries by Congress in 2006. That number, being
unsustainable, was reduced to 11 in 2007. That cap still being too
high, the Navy had to seek a waiver from the Congress to temporarily
drop it to 10.
If the amendment passes, the Navy will still go back to 11 carriers
in 2016 when the Ford is commissioned. But at that point, we should
allow the Navy to decide, not people in Congress.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I rise to claim the 5 minutes in
opposition.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California is recognized for 5
minutes.
Mr. McKEON. I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from North Carolina
(Mr. McIntyre).
Mr. McINTYRE. I rise to oppose this amendment. The Navy is already
down to 11 aircraft carriers from a high of 15 during the Cold War. We
clearly need these 11 aircraft carriers to maintain a continuous
presence in the Middle East, the western Pacific, and wherever else we
may be called upon to go. Protecting our national security interests
with our allies, such as Israel and Japan, and keeping trade lanes
open, require the fleet of carriers that we have today.
Also, these carriers allow the U.S. to maintain influence without
having a base in a foreign country. Talk about saving money; carriers
are, in reality, mobile bases. This is a critical military capability
for the United States, and it must be maintained. Keeping aircraft
carrier production on track is also a major jobs issue. We know that
tens of thousands of skilled workers support building and maintaining
our aircraft carriers, and without them, we would soon lose our ability
to build large ships of any kind.
Mr. BLUMENAUER. I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from
Virginia (Mr. Wittman), a subcommittee chairman on the Armed Services
Committee.
Mr. WITTMAN. Simply put, this amendment seriously jeopardizes
national security and also our ability to project power and maintain a
forward presence in an ever-growing dangerous world. The backbone of
our Navy is our carrier strike force. In order to have seven carriers,
we need to have 11. There are carriers that are in port to be refueled,
sailors that have to rest. Eleven equals seven.
Today we see in the Central Command, they request two aircraft
carriers. They're only provided one in the most dangerous area of the
world, the Middle East. If we can't meet the requirements that our
commanders are asking for, then why would we want to be reducing the
number of carriers? That just doesn't make sense.
There's a misconception, too, that because we're moving out of
Afghanistan, that somehow there won't be a need for a presence of an
aircraft carrier there in the Arabian Gulf. That is absolutely wrong.
We need that presence there. The way we maintain that presence is to
make sure that we have a minimum of 11 aircraft carriers.
Our forward presence is needed today, and we want to make sure that
this is done, especially with the reposturing to the Asian Pacific.

[[Page H3521]]

With that, Mr. Chairman, I urge my colleagues to vote against this
amendment.
Mr. BLUMENAUER. I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from South
Carolina (Mr. Mulvaney).
Mr. MULVANEY. Mr. Chairman, you can imagine my surprise when I found
out that for the last 7 years, Congress has been dictating the number
of carriers that are in the Navy. For 230 years we were satisfied to
let the Navy make that decision. I was just stunned to find that this
was actually happening. I wish I had known. I could have offered an
amendment to simply get rid of the requirement entirely, but I applaud
my friend from Oregon for at least offering this small improvement.
I would respectfully disagree with my friend from Virginia--this
amendment has no impact at all on national security or national
defense. Again, there's no impact on national security or national
defense.
If the amendment passes, the Navy could have 20 carriers next year if
the Navy decided that that's what it wanted to do. All we're doing is
taking the congressional mandate down from 11 to 10.
I go back to the words of former Secretary Gates in 2010 to the Navy
League. I thought it was interesting what he said. He said:

Our current plan is to have 11 carrier strike groups
through 2040 to be sure the need to project power across the
seas will never go away, but consider the massive overmatch
the U.S. already enjoys. Consider, too, the growing anti-ship
capabilities of adversaries. Do we really need 11 carrier
strike groups for another 30 years when no other country has
more than one? Any future plans must address these realities.

That's all we are doing, Mr. Chairman, is simply giving the Navy more
control over how many carriers the Navy has.
With all due respect to all of my colleagues here, I am perfectly
willing to trust the Navy with the operations of our naval warfare,
more so than I am Congress. With that, I ask my friends to support this
amendment, which has no impact on national defense but gives more
control to the Navy, to the experts in the field.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to my friend and
colleague, the gentleman from Connecticut (Mr. Courtney).
Mr. COURTNEY. Mr. Chairman, as long as we are on the subject of the
Navy, the Navy actually did report to Congress in February 2013 with
their force structure assessment, which called for 11 carriers to be in
the force, which followed the strategic review which President Obama
and Secretary Gates conducted in 2011, reported in early 2012, which
talked about the repositioning to the Asian Pacific, which my friend,
Mr. Wittman, talked about. And, in fact, articulated the fact that we
are going to need more naval projection with that shift in strategy and
focus for our country's future national security needs.
Strategy should drive decisions here in Congress, both in terms of
the defense bill and our budgets. The Navy has spoken, in fact, as
recently as February of this year, with a report which I would be happy
to share with any of my colleagues, which clearly articulated an 11-
carrier force is what we need today and fits within the strategic
review, which we have just exhaustively conducted under the leadership
of Secretary Gates and President Obama. I urge a ``no'' vote on the
amendment.

{time} 1450

Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself 30 seconds just to say
the Navy is going to have 11 carriers when the one under construction
goes into operation. Nothing in this amendment denies them that.
What it says is that, subsequently, going out 20 or 30 years, the
decision about the minimum level will be left to the Navy, not
Congress.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, who has the right to close?
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California has the right to
close and has 2 minutes remaining.
Mr. McKEON. I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself the remainder of the
time.
The notion here that somehow, unless we impose a permanent mandate on
the Navy, they are not going to do what my friends from Connecticut and
Virginia say they're going to do, I think, is ludicrous.
This is a symbol of Congress micromanaging, substituting its judgment
for that of the command structure. It is, I think, important for us to,
in a small way, express confidence in them. They will have their 11
aircraft carriers, as the Gerald Ford is commissioned. They'll be back
at 11.
The question is, are we going to have a mandate in perpetuity to
substitute our judgment for the realities of the Navy in 5 years, 10
years, 30 years, regardless of force structure, threats or technology?
This is a small symbol of what's wrong with the process here and why
we can't get control over many of the budget issues.
I'd respectfully suggest support for this bipartisan amendment.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield the balance of our time to the
gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Forbes), subcommittee chairman on the
Armed Services Committee.
Mr. FORBES. I thank the chairman.
Mr. Chairman, one of the things that unites Republicans and Democrats
in opposition to this amendment, that's why you've heard them take this
floor, is that the Constitution of the United States mandates Congress
to build strong navies. It doesn't mandate the Pentagon, it doesn't
mandate the White House, it doesn't mandate anybody. It mandates us,
and we will not walk away from that mandate.
And if you look at every independent analysis, every QDR since 2001
says we need 11 carriers. If you really believe the Navy's going to
come in here and say they don't need them, that's not the truth. What's
going to happen is somebody's going to give them a budget figure and
say the budget needs to drive the strategy, and that's why you need to
cut it down. And we're not going to put them in that position.
Three things: they talk about costs. The reality is it could cost
more to have fewer carriers because they don't take into consideration
the deployment times we're going to put on the backs of our sailors, or
the turnaround time we're going to have, or the increased maintenance
cost.
The second thing they don't look at is the fact that, in 2007, we
were able to meet 90 percent of our combatant commanders' needs through
the Navy. This year we'll only meet 51 percent because of cuts we've
placed on their backs.
But the final thing, Mr. Chairman--and this is the essence of all of
it--they will come in here, and the people who advocate that will say
this is acceptable risk.
Do you know what acceptable risk means to them?
It means how many ships we can lose, how many men and women we can
lose, how much equipment we can lose in a conflict and still have the
potential of winning if every other assumption we've made holds true.
Mr. Chairman, we're committed to changing the definition of
acceptable risk, and saying this: when one of our men and women go into
battle, we're going to make sure we've done everything we can
reasonably do to make sure they have the highest probability possible
of returning to the country they're fighting for and the families that
they love. And you can't do it with fewer than 11 carriers.
That's why we're standing with this, and that's why I hope we will
reject soundly this amendment.
I yield back the balance of my time.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentleman from Oregon (Mr. Blumenauer).
The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes
appeared to have it.
Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Chair, I demand a recorded vote.
The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Oregon will
be postponed.

Amendment No. 3 Offered by Mrs. Lummis

The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 3
printed in Part B of House Report 113-108.
Mrs. LUMMIS. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:

[[Page H3522]]

Page 79, after line 23, insert the following:

SEC. 241. READINESS OF INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE
FORCE.

The Secretary of Defense shall preserve each
intercontinental ballistic missile silo that contains a
deployed missile as of the date of the enactment of this Act
in, at minimum, a warm status that enables such silo to--
(1) remain a fully functioning element of the
interconnected and redundant command and control system of
the missile field; and
(2) be made fully operational with a deployed missile.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentlewoman
from Wyoming (Mrs. Lummis) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from Wyoming.
Mrs. LUMMIS. Mr. Chairman, my amendment is cosponsored by Mr. Daines
of Montana and Mr. Cramer of North Dakota. It would require DOT to
maintain all current 450 intercontinental ballistic missile silos in
warm status.
This amendment would maintain our nuclear triad, where ICBMs, along
with submarines and bombers, work together to complicate and deter any
attempts at a successful first strike on our country and our allies.
China's nuclear arsenal is expanding. Russia and other nuclear states
like Pakistan are modernizing. With inexperienced leaders like Kim Jung
Un in North Korea, now is the time not to reduce our most reliable and
transparent deterrence.
President Obama continues to suggest further reductions in U.S.
nuclear forces beyond the New START Treaty levels and is now bypassing
Congress to negotiate directly with President Putin on additional
unilateral reductions.
It's important for Congress to legislatively require that any final
force structure decisions occur in FY15, as currently planned, and not
be prematurely executed.
The ICBM force is in the final stages of more than a decade-long
effort to replace and modernize critical-mission components. This makes
it extremely cost effective to maintain the Minuteman III fleet over
the next two decades.
This amendment is budget-neutral. It simply keeps silos in warm
status, so as not to take steps backward that would be costly to
reverse at a later date, especially if we encountered unforeseen
geopolitical changes.
Congress needs to weigh in on the importance of maintaining our land-
based forces so the decision is not made without us.
Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from North Dakota
(Mr. Cramer).
Mr. CRAMER. Mr. Chairman, George Washington said:

To be prepared for war is one of the most effective means
of preserving peace.

Besides the United States and the United Kingdom, the rest of the
world has never seriously considered entertaining the idea of
eliminating their nuclear weapons. China, France, India, Iran, North
Korea, Pakistan, and Russia are all engaged in maintaining, expanding,
or modernizing their weapons programs.
We should not continue down the path of reduction and degradation of
our nuclear programs, including this important ICBM force. The cost of
maintaining this force is minor compared to the price tag associated
with rebuilding it should we judge incorrectly.
Now, some will argue that the U.S. taxpayer is funding the
maintenance of weapons never used. I submit, Mr. Chairman, that the
U.S. taxpayer is funding the maintenance of weapons being used every
day, successfully deterring our enemies from launching their own
nuclear weapons.
Mr. Chairman, this amendment will save money and may very well save
our country.
Mrs. LUMMIS. Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the amendment.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Tennessee is recognized for 5
minutes.
Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Chairman, I have the highest regard for the gentlelady from
Wyoming. She is an outstanding Member of this body. She is doing a
superb job of representing her constituents in Wyoming.
I haven't had the pleasure of really getting to know the other
gentlemen, but it is no secret that these three, the sponsors of the
amendment, each represent an ICBM missile silo field. And these are
wonderful bases in our fine country, but these are also bases that we
should not give a blank check to and allow to flourish in perpetuity.
The Cold War is over. Our men and women in uniform, led by our
generals and admirals, are making some very important decisions about
the best way to structure our triad, not to, in any way, give up on the
triad, but to accommodate such things as, for example, the New START
Treaty, which was overwhelmingly ratified by the other body just a few
years ago.

{time} 1500

There are lots of technical factors having to do with the silo fields
and with the capability of Minuteman III missiles. There are lots of
technical factors having to do with the other elements of our triad.
But I would urge my colleagues to oppose this amendment despite the
fine qualities of the sponsors of this amendment because what's good
for a missile base in Wyoming is not necessarily good for American
defense policy. And while I have the highest admiration for the
gentlelady from Wyoming, we really need to put this in perspective.
This should be seriously considered by our colleagues; and I would
urge them, at this point, to reject the amendment overwhelmingly.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mrs. LUMMIS. Mr. Chairman, I yield 90 seconds to the gentleman from
Montana (Mr. Daines).
Mr. DAINES. Mr. Chairman, I want to thank Representative Lummis for
her leadership on this critically important issue and show my strong
support for this amendment which I have joined her and our friend from
North Dakota in introducing today.
Our Nation's intercontinental ballistic missiles are a vital
component of our nuclear deterrence strategy to keep the American
people safe from mankind's most dangerous threat. And for several
decades, this ``peace through strength'' policy has worked.
Malmstrom Air Force Base in Great Falls, Montana, is home to 150 of
our Nation's ICBMs. I recently visited Malmstrom and met with the
leaders of the 341st Missile Wing to discuss the importance of our ICBM
mission to our national security. In fact, at the conclusion of the
visit, Colonel Robert Stanley, the commander at Malmstrom, gave me this
commander's coin. The motto embossed on it summarizes why our defense
strategy is effective. And let me read it. It says this:

Scaring the hell out of America's enemies since 1962.

I am grateful for their role in keeping America secure and their
enormous contributions to Montana. I believe it will be deeply unwise
to rewrite our effective policy for peace. Our potential adversaries in
the 21st century may differ from those during the Cold War, but a
comprehensive nuclear deterrence capability will remain crucial to our
national security.
Our amendment requires the Pentagon to keep our ICBM silos in warm
status even as adjustments pursuant to the New START Treaty are made.
It will keep potential adversaries at bay and ensure that our crucial
nuclear force remains flexible and responsive.
I urge all my colleagues to vote for it.
Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the ranking member of
the Armed Services Committee, Mr. Smith of Washington.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, there are two very compelling
reasons to oppose this amendment.
First of all, this is, again, not recognizing the reality of
sequestration and the defense budget. The way Congress seems to have
reacted to the reality of the fact that the defense budget has already
been cut substantially and that because of sequestration--which nobody
seems to want to put forward a plan to get rid of or certainly won't
pass the House and the Senate--the defense budget is going to be cut.
So the way Congress reacts is, okay, fine, but I have to protect mine.
Don't close my base, don't shut down a ship, don't shut down a plane,
and don't move anything out of the National Guard.

[[Page H3523]]

All of this is an effort to preserve, in these three States, their
military presence, which means money. And I get that. But the Pentagon
is going to have to reduce their budget. Every time we pass one of
these things that says you can't do this and you can't save money here
and you can't save money there, we are creating a hollow force. The
Pentagon will not have the funds necessary to train our troops to be
ready to perform the missions that we need to if they can't save money
anywhere because Congress has stepped in and said you can't because
it's mine and I don't want to give it up.
The second reason is we have well over 5,000 nuclear weapons. We will
be amply able to scare the living crap out of everybody in the world
for a very long time even if we reduce that somewhat and sensibly.
This amendment just cramps the ability of the Pentagon to make those
types of sensible decisions. It will not eliminate our nuclear
deterrence. Our nuclear deterrence is overwhelming. There is money to
be saved in the nuclear programs. The Pentagon can sensibly do that.
But here comes Congress, again, to say, I have to protect my own, and I
don't care what it does to the budget.
Fiscal conservatives should not support this amendment. We've got to
get our budget in order. We've got to do it logically, and logically is
not ``protect mine and I don't care about the big picture.'' That's not
the way to approach this budget if we're going to have an adequate
national security.
Mrs. LUMMIS. Mr. Speaker, I yield 30 seconds to the gentleman from
Alabama (Mr. Rogers).
Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. I thank the gentlelady.
As chairman of the Strategic Forces Subcommittee, I rise in support
of this amendment, and I don't have any silos in Alabama, although I
would like to have some.
One of the things I want people to be cognizant of is we need to
maintain our resiliency as we go through these negotiations. The New
START Treaty does not require these silos be demolished. The fact is,
as we just learned with our ground-based interceptors which President
Obama decided 4 years ago to reduce from 44 to 30, he reversed course
when the world got a little bit more dangerous, and now we're going
back to put those additional 14 GBIs in Fort Greeley.
We never know when the world's landscape is going to change. It is
much more expensive and cumbersome to try to put new silos in than it
is to keep these warm. I urge my colleagues to vote ``yes'' on this
amendment.
Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, how much time do I have remaining?
The Acting CHAIR (Mr. Hultgren). The gentleman from Tennessee has
1\1/2\ minutes remaining. The gentlewoman from Wyoming's time has
expired.
Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, let me close.
Again, I have the highest regard for the gentlelady from Wyoming, but
this is an issue of national importance. We should not allow parochial
concerns to dominate here. She is doing an extraordinary job of
representing her constituents, particularly those of that base. But I
would urge, particularly my colleague from North Dakota, to be aware
that to the extent he preserves these ICBM missile fields, he may be
hurting, unintentionally, his nuclear-capable bomber force. So watch
out. If you're going to be parochial, let's go all the way and be
thoroughly parochial and don't leave part out.
So this is a very important thing. We realize, as Members, we should
put the national interests first. Let's listen to the Air Force, let's
listen to STRATCOM, and let's not make pork-barrel decisions back home
that may benefit us politically but are not in the national interest.
We're all for a strong national defense, and I think there is
overwhelming and bipartisan opposition to this amendment.
So I urge my colleagues to strongly and forcefully oppose it.
Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentlewoman from Wyoming (Mrs. Lummis).
The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the ayes
appeared to have it.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from Wyoming
will be postponed.

Amendment No. 4 Offered by Mr. Pearce

The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 4
printed in Part B of House Report 113-108.
Mr. PEARCE. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:

Page 93, after line 7, insert the following:

SEC. 267. APPROVAL OF CERTAIN NEW USES OF RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION LAND.

(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of
law, the Secretary of Defense, or the head of any other
department or agency of the Federal Government, may not
finalize any decision regarding new land use activity on
covered land unless the Secretary concerned approves such
activity in writing.
(b) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``covered land'' means ranges, test areas, or
other land in the contiguous United States used by the
Secretary of Defense for activities related to research,
development, test, and evaluation that the Secretary
determines, for purposes of this section, to be critical to
national security.
(2) The term ``new land use activity'' means an activity
regarding the use of covered land that--
(A) as of the date of the enactment of this Act, is not
carried out on covered land; and
(B) is carried out by, or in cooperation with, a department
or agency of the Federal Government other than the Department
of Defense.
(3) The term ``Secretary concerned'' has the meaning given
that term in section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United States
Code.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman
from New Mexico (Mr. Pearce) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from New Mexico.
Mr. PEARCE. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself 1\1/2\ minutes.
Right now, emerging technologies critical to our readiness and the
safety of our soldiers has developed 23 major range and test facilities
within DOD. Recently, a problem has come to our attention, and that
problem plays out in the White Sands Missile Range that's in my
district.
Basically, this center piece of the range is controlled by DOD, the
land and the air above it. These pieces here, the north and the south,
the air is controlled by the Department of Defense, the Secretary of
the Army, but the land is controlled by the BLM. And the BLM recently
has approved an encroachment across this land which threatens 33
percent of the missions in White Sands.
There's a launch facility that is up in this very northern corner,
and we use the entire 140-mile length. It's the largest overland test
base, and we use that to test these new emerging technologies. With the
encroachment, then it endangers fully one-third of the missions of the
base.
So our amendment simply says that no Secretary of any agency should
be able to come in here and put at risk these tests of the 23 different
sites located with DOD and with a split jurisdiction like we have here.
It's a very simple amendment. It simply says that you've got to go
through the process and ask the people here.
With that, I reserve the balance of my time.

{time} 1510

Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the
amendment.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. I yield myself such time as I may consume.
While I understand the importance of the Department of Defense's role
in all this, there are other agencies that also have an important role.
The National Resources Committee minority has expressed concerns
about this because the Bureau of Land Management has their interests,
as well as a bunch of other Federal agencies. So this basically gives
the Department of Defense a veto power over land use. I want to make
sure that the Department of Defense's interests are looked after, but
they're not the only interests that exists in our country. So a proper
balance of those interests I think would be a proper approach.

[[Page H3524]]

This amendment just says Department of Defense basically gets the
ultimate veto, and I think that gives it too much power. So I'd prefer
to see a more balanced approach and oppose the amendment.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. PEARCE. I yield the gentlewoman from Tennessee (Mrs. Black) 1\1/
2\ minutes.
Mrs. BLACK. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
Mr. Chairman, as a cochairman of the Congressional Range and Testing
Center Caucus, I rise in support of Congressman Pearce's amendment to
the National Defense Authorization Act.
The Major Range and Test Facility Base is made up of 23 installations
across the country, including the Arnold Air Force Base based in
Tullahoma, Tennessee. The critical testing and evaluation capabilities
of the installations are truly a national asset vital to our security.
The testing and evaluation performed at these facilities, though often
done behind the scenes, helps to ensure that our men and women in
uniform have the equipment and the technologies they need to defend our
country.
It is vital that we protect these facilities against the various
forms of encroachment that can undermine the effectiveness of their
operation. My colleague's amendment would ensure that any new use of
lands already owned by the Federal Government around these
installations be approved by the Department of Defense.
I urge my colleagues to join me in support of this commonsense
amendment that strengthens our national security.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. PEARCE. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Utah
(Mr. Bishop).
Mr. BISHOP of Utah. I appreciate the invitation from Mr. Pearce.
This problem illustrates a couple of overwhelming problems we have.
One is that agencies don't talk one with another. When the FAA closed
towers down, they put three military bases in a difficult situation
because they didn't talk. When NASA changed its policy on manned space
flight, it increased the cost of our missile defense system because the
agencies flat out didn't talk.
Here is another situation of agencies that simply are not working
together, which illustrates a second reason why, in this bill, when we
try to talk about land, we're not talking about withdrawing land so
that two different agencies have the same land. We're trying to do
transfers of land so one agency can make the decision--in this case, it
should be the military.
Now, as subcommittee chairman for the Public Lands Subcommittee in
the Resources, I want to say I support this amendment, and I would ask
that people would pass this amendment. There may be some areas of
trying to change some of the language to limit the scope of what we are
doing here, which could easily be done in conference if this amendment
is placed on the table in the first place. We already have language in
there that deals with White Sands, but this amendment would have to be
in addition to that.
So I would urge my colleagues to actually vote in favor of this. If
there are some areas that we need to scope down again, we can easily
accomplish that if we have the opportunity of doing so in a conference.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. I continue to reserve the balance of my
time.
Mr. PEARCE. Mr. Chairman, again, the situation is quite simple and
quite transparent. We're just trying to resolve who can make the
decisions on land that is owned by one agency and aerospace owned by
the other.
Nowhere else in the U.S., nowhere else in the world do we have this
long, uninterrupted range in which we can test weapons. The recovery of
the bodies of those weapons gives us great insight into the failures or
the successes. So if we're going to preserve this national asset, this
ability to test new and different weapons, then let's get a clear line
of understanding.
I would urge passage of the amendment and yield back the balance of
my time.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself the balance of
my time and just say I think the gentleman from Utah makes a very
reasonable point. Certainly, one agency shouldn't be shutting something
down that has a negative impact on another without consulting them.
Perhaps if we work on this amendment to figure out some way where
consultation is required, there is some sort of balance. It's just the
way this amendment is written, it gives the Department of Defense the
ability to do what the gentleman from Utah just said the other agency
did, which is just whack it and not talk to anybody else.
So we're happy to continue to work on this going forward. In its
present form, I am still opposed to it.
I yield back the balance of my time.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentleman from New Mexico (Mr. Pearce).
The amendment was agreed to.

Amendment No. 5 Offered by Mr. Coffman

The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 5
printed in Part B of House Report 113-108.
Mr. COFFMAN. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:

In section 301, strike ``Funds are hereby authorized'' and
insert the following:
(a) In General.--Funds are hereby authorized
In section 301, add at the end the following:
(b) Funding.--
(1) Increase.--Notwithstanding the amounts specified in the
funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be
appropriated in section 301 for operation and maintenance, as
specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4301,
is hereby increased by a total of $250,000,000, to alleviate
training and readiness shortfalls, to be derived as follows:
(A) Operation and Maintenance, Army, for Maneuver Units,
Line 010, $85,000,000.
(B) Operation and Maintenance, Army, for Aviation Assets,
Line 060, $35,000,000.
(C) Operation and Maintenance, Navy, for Mission and Other
Flight Operations, Line 010, $32,500,000.
(D) Operation and Maintenance, Navy, for Fleet Air
Training, Line 020, $7,500,000.
(E) Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps, for
Operational Forces, Line 010, $25,000,000.
(F) Operation and Maintenance, Air Force, for Primary
Combat Forces, Line 010, $65,000,000.
(2) Offset.--Notwithstanding the amounts specified in the
funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be
appropriated in section 201 for Research, Development, Test,
and Evaluation, Defensewide, as specified in the
corresponding funding table in section 4201 for the Defense
Rapid Innovation Program, is hereby reduced by $250,000,000.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman
from Colorado (Mr. Coffman) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Colorado.
Mr. COFFMAN. Mr. Chairman, my amendment, No. 208, cuts $250 million
from the Defense Rapid Innovation Program--or commonly called DRIP--and
moves the money to alleviate training and readiness shortfalls.
The DRIP program is a relatively new program started by Congress in
the wake of the earmark ban in 2010. The funding was not requested by
the Department of Defense, and Congress uses the program through DOD to
provide grants to small businesses. The funding can be better applied.
Yesterday, Deputy Defense Secretary Ash Carter said the sequester
hits particularly hard in the operations and maintenance accounts. As a
result, training is hurt and our Nation's military readiness plummets.
This is unacceptable.
But we can't just bemoan this fact; we have to address it. It is our
duty to our men and women in uniform and our Nation's security to
ensure that we spend our defense dollars in the most efficient and
critical way possible. A quarter billion dollars for the DRIP program
is not the wisest use of our tax dollars.
As a former small business owner, I am naturally very protective of
our Nation's small businesses. I understand the pressures they operate
under.
But I am also aware of the effect sequestration is having on our
military's operations and maintenance accounts. We are seeing across-
the-board cuts to vital operational funding. The Air Force grounded 13
squadrons for the year. The Navy has canceled ship deployments and
deferred maintenance. The Army has canceled major training exercises
for the year.

[[Page H3525]]

While I am sure that there have been good results from some of the
spending in the DRIP program, I am sure that this program is
duplicative of many other efforts in the Department of Defense.
There is already $76 million for quick reaction special projects, $62
million for emerging capabilities technology development, $174 million
for joint capability technology demonstrations, and $34 million for the
Defense-Wide Manufacturing Science & Technology program.
There is over $1 billion for Department of Defense Small Business
Innovation Research funding, and so on, DARPA, joint programs, and
technical support programs. Transferring this money will not leave
small businesses or technology development without funding. What it
will do is signal to the American people that we are willing to make
the hard choices necessary to prioritize our men and women in uniform
by supporting the operations and maintenance accounts they rely on,
which are a higher priority than the potential DRIP results.
I repeat, the DRIP program was set up in 2010 as a way to get around
the ban on earmarks. In today's restrictive fiscal climate, we have
higher defense spending priorities that we should fund instead. I ask
for your support for this amendment.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. I rise in opposition to the amendment.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, if this amendment passes, we
will strip away one of the main tools that we have in the defense
budget to ensure that small businesses continue to be part of the
defense industrial base.

{time} 1520

The Rapid Innovation Fund was created a couple of years ago in order
to ensure that small businesses that had technology, that had resources
to help the war fighter could get funding to develop that technology to
develop those resources and get service to the warfighter sooner rather
than later.
In 2011 alone, over 3,500 white papers were submitted and evaluated--
proposals for the Rapid Innovation Fund--3,500. Two hundred final
proposals were invited. Out of that total 3,500, 177 awards were made,
95 percent of which went to small businesses, 80 percent to current or
prior SBIR participants; and the average product value of $2.2 million,
awards to companies in 32 States and in the District of Columbia.
This is an important program to help small businesses continue to be
part of the defense industrial base. We should not strip RIF funding
out of the bill. If we are going to deal with operations and
maintenance, let's do what everybody on the committee wants to do:
let's stop the sequester, replace the sequester with something more
balanced to ensure that the O&M accounts, as well as great programs
like RIF, are funded.
With that, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. COFFMAN. Mr. Chairman, every dollar wasted in the defense budget
is a dollar not spent on defending this country. This is not a program
that was ever requested by the Department of Defense. This is a jobs
program. I think, given the fact that the Defense Department is under
incredible stress, that we've got to fund the priorities that our men
and women on the front lines need. And that is putting this $250
million to operations and maintenance--$250 million to the spending
program that is already duplicated in other parts of the Department of
Defense budget.
Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I would like to request how
much time I have remaining.
The ACTING CHAIR. The gentleman from Washington has 3\1/2\ minutes.
The gentleman from Colorado has 1\1/2\ minutes.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I would like to yield 1
minute to the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Shuster).
Mr. SHUSTER. Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentleman for yielding.
I just want to echo what the gentleman from Washington said. This is
an extremely important program to small business that operates in the
defense industrial base. We are making it more and more difficult for
them to operate. This fund, the Rapid Innovation Fund, is just the
solution to keeping them involved in the innovation and coming out with
new products, faster products. So in the long run, this is going to
save money. It is going to have new products the warfighters need. This
fund has been very important to them.
Mr. Larsen and I chaired a panel on this, a panel on business
challenges in the defense industry. We traveled the country listening
to small businesses. This was what they asked for. It was so important
to the development of their products. In fact, when we started this, we
had Secretary Rumsfeld come before the committee and say, when I asked
him, What would you recommend to businesses doing business with the
Department of Defense? And he said, I recommend they don't do business.
It's so difficult. In fact, he said, It's like sleeping with a
hippopotamus. Eventually, it's going to roll over and crush you, and it
will never know that it did it.
This is extremely important to the small business community to keep
them engaged. The big defense contractors need the small folks there
developing and innovating.
I urge a ``no'' vote on the Coffman amendment.
Mr. COFFMAN. Mr. Chairman, the question before us, in an environment
of limited resources, is whether we fund an economic development
program for small business. And as a former small business owner, I
certainly would think under normal circumstances that would be
important. But we're doing it out of the Department of Defense budget,
and we're doing it at the expense of priorities within the Department
of Defense.
The Department of Defense is not asking for this program. What the
Department of Defense is saying is that there are shortages in funding
operations and maintenance. So I believe that it's critically important
to take this $250 million that the Department of Defense is now
requesting and put it into an area where they are requesting.
Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the
gentlelady from California (Ms. Sanchez).
Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition
to this amendment. I understand my colleague's concern with the
shortfall in the Department's operations and maintenance accounts, but
that's really a product of sequestration.
What we are really talking about is innovation here. Innovation
generally doesn't happen in the big companies. It happens in the small
companies, the companies that are able to move quickly so that we get
what we need. That's what the RIF program is about. This is not an
earmark. In fact, just yesterday, the pre-notification for the fiscal
year '13 process was released. It said: ``Any and all companies can put
forward proposals.'' That's not an earmark.
The RIF process contributes to cost savings to the services' training
activities. In fact, the Navy added ``cost reduction'' as a critical
focus area in the fiscal year '12 Rapid Innovation Fund broad agency
announcement. Several of these selected RIF projects actually seek to
reduce operations and maintenance costs to include the cost of
training.
I urge a ``no'' vote on this amendment.
Mr. COFFMAN. Mr. Chairman, how much time do I have remaining?
The ACTING CHAIR. The gentleman from Colorado has 30 seconds
remaining.
Mr. COFFMAN. Mr. Chairman, in this bill, there's already $76 million
for Quick Reaction Special Projects, $62 million for emerging
capabilities technology development, $174 million for joint capability
technology demonstrations, and $34 million for the Defense-Wide
Manufacturing Science and Technology program. The Department of Defense
Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology
Transfer programs spend about $1 billion per year in research and
development funding for our Nation's small technology companies. The
issues that they're talking about are already addressed in multiple
ways; and this is,

[[Page H3526]]

unfortunately, wasteful Pentagon spending that should be cut.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, could I request how much time
I have remaining.
The ACTING CHAIR. The gentleman from Washington has 1\1/2\ minutes
remaining.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Thank you. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute
to the gentleman from Rhode Island (Mr. Langevin).
(Mr. LANGEVIN asked and was given permission to revise and extend his
remarks.)
Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentleman for yielding.
While I fully understand and appreciate the gentleman from Colorado's
intention, I must strongly disagree with his amendment, specifically
its choice of offset. Cutting our future to pay for the present is the
very definition of penny-wise and pound-foolish. This amendment would
have a severe negative impact on small businesses in the defense
industry.
The Rapid Innovation Fund was created by the Armed Services
Committee. It is a fully competitive program to facilitate the rapid
insertion of innovative small business technologies and processes into
military systems or programs that meet critical national security needs
of the warfighter. Projects are under way now, and just yesterday the
pre-notification for the FY 13 process was released.
The Rapid Innovation Fund process contributes to the cost savings of
the services' training activities. In fact, the Navy added cost
reduction as a critical focus area in its FY 12 Rapid Innovation Fund
broad agency announcement. Several of the selected RIF projects
actually seek to reduce O&M costs, to include the cost of training.
According to the Department:

RIF has a high return on investment while providing a venue
for the timely, innovative solutions from small businesses to
our near-term challenges.

The ACTING CHAIR. The gentleman from Washington is recognized for 30
seconds.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
In conclusion, I would ask my colleagues to vote ``no'' on this
amendment. I think we have made a good case. I think folks have heard
the argument.
Just a final note. The defense business panel that Mr. Shuster of
Pennsylvania spoke of, we did travel around the country, talking to
small businesses all around the country in many States; and everywhere
we heard that this is the program, the Rapid Innovation Fund is the
program that they see as most valuable. They want us to keep this in
place.
I would ask my colleagues to vote ``no'' on this amendment, and with
that I yield back the balance of my time.

{time} 1530

The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Coffman).
The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes
appeared to have it.
Mr. COFFMAN. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Colorado
will be postponed.

Amendments En Bloc No. 1 Offered by Mr. McKeon

Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, pursuant to H. Res. 260, I offer amendments
en bloc.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendments en bloc.
Amendments en bloc No. 1 consisting of amendment Nos. 7, 8, 16, 17,
24, 26, 30, 34, 35, 40, 41, 42, 48, 62, 94, 111, 113, 130, 154, and
159, printed in House Report No. 113-108, offered by Mr. McKeon of
California:

amendment no. 7 offered by ms. frankel of florida

At the end of section 549, add the following new
subsections:
(c) Additional Duty for Response Systems Panel Regarding
Instances of Members' Abusing Chain of Command Position to
Gain Access to or Coerce Another Person for a Sex-related
Offense.--
(1) In general.--The independent panel established by the
Secretary of Defense under subsection (a)(1) of section 576
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1758) shall conduct an
assessment of instances in the Armed Forces in which a member
of the Armed Forces has committing a sexual act upon another
person by abusing one's position in the chain of command of
the other person to gain access to or coerce the other
person.
(2) Submission of results.--The panel shall include the
results of the assessment and its recommendations and
comments in the report required by subsection (c)(1) of such
section 576, as amended by subsection (b) of this section.
(d) Additional Duty for Judicial Proceedings Panel
Regarding Additional Revision of Definition of Article 120
Sex-related Offenses.--The independent panel established by
the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a)(2) of section
576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1758) shall assess the
likely consequences of amending of definition of rape and
sexual assault under article 120 of the Uniform Code of
Military Justice to expressly cover a situation in which a
person subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice
commits a sexual act upon another person by abusing one's
position in the chain of command of the other person to gain
access to or coerce the other person. The panel shall include
the results of the assessment in one of the reports required
by subsection (c)(2)(B) of such section 576.

amendment no. 8 offered by mr. pierluisi of puerto rico

Page 110, after line 15, insert the following new section:

SEC. 334. ORDNANCE RELATED RECORDS REVIEW AND REPORTING
REQUIREMENT FOR VIEQUES AND CULEBRA ISLANDS,
PUERTO RICO.

(a) Identification of Military Munitions and Navy
Operational History.--
(1) Records review.--The Secretary of Defense shall conduct
a review of all existing Department of Defense records to
determine and describe the historical use of military
munitions and military training on the islands of Vieques and
Culebra, Puerto Rico, and in the nearby cays and waters. The
review shall, to the extent practicable and based on
historical documents available, identify the type of
munitions, the quantity of munitions, and the location where
such munitions may have potentially been used or may be
remaining on the islands of Vieques and Culebra, Puerto Rico,
and in the nearby cays or waters. The historical review shall
also determine the type of various military training
exercises that occurred on each island and in the nearby cays
and waters.
(2) Cooperation and consultation.--The Secretary of Defense
may request the assistance of other Federal agencies and may
consult the Governor of Puerto Rico as may be deemed
appropriate in conducting the review required by this
subsection and in preparing the report required by subsection
(b).
(b) Report.--Not later than 450 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit
to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of
Representatives and the Senate, and shall make publicly
available, a report detailing the findings and determinations
of the review required by subsection (a). The report shall be
organized to include the information detailed in subsection
(a) in addition to site history, site description, real
estate ownership information, and any other information about
known military munitions and military training that occurred
historically on the islands of Vieques and Culebra, Puerto
Rico, and in the nearby cays and waters. The report shall
include any information and recommendations that the
Secretary deems appropriate about the potential hazards to
the public associated with unexploded ordnance on the islands
of Vieques and Culebra, Puerto Rico, and in the nearby cays
and waters.
(c) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``military munitions'' has the meaning given
that term in section 101(e)(4) of title 10, United States
Code.
(2) The term ``unexploded ordnance'' has the meaning given
that term in section 101(e)(5) of title 10, United States
Code.

amendment no. 16 offered by mr. huelskamp of kansas

At the end of subtitle C of title V, add the following:

SEC. 5__. MEETINGS WITH RESPECT TO RELIGIOUS LIBERTY.

(a) Notice.--
(1) In general.--The Department of Defense shall provide to
the Committee on Armed Services of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services of the
Senate advance written notice of any meeting to be held
between Department employees and civilians for the purpose of
writing, revising, issuing, implementing, enforcing, or
seeking advice, input, or counsel regarding military policy
related to religious liberty.
(2) Contents of notice.--Notice provided under paragraph
(1) shall include information on the time, date, location,
and anticipated attendees of the meeting and information on
who initiated the meeting.
(3) Verbal notice.--If a meeting to which this subsection
applies is scheduled less than 24 hours in advance of the
meeting, the notice requirement under paragraph (1) may be
satisfied by a phone call if Committee staff provide verbal
confirmation of receipt of the notice.
(b) Reports.--Not later than 72 hours after the conclusion
of a meeting to which subsection (a) applies, the Secretary
of Defense

[[Page H3527]]

shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the House
of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services of the
Senate a report on the meeting, which shall include
information on the time, date, location, duration, and
attendees of the meeting and information on who initiated the
meeting.

amendment no. 17 offered by mr. fitzpatrick of pennsylvania

Page 243, after line 8, insert the following:

SEC. 568. REQUIREMENT TO CONTINUE PROVISION OF TUITION
ASSISTANCE FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

The Secretary of each military department shall carry out
tuition assistance programs for members of an Armed Force
under the jurisdiction of that Secretary during fiscal year
2014 using an amount not less than the sum of any amounts
appropriated or otherwise made available for tuition
assistance for members of that Armed Force for fiscal year
2014.

amendment no. 24 offered by mr. grayson of florida

Beginning on page 270, strike line 23 and all that follows
through page 271, line 2.
Page 270, line 22, after ``State'' insert ``, the District
of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands,
Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and
American Samoa.''

amendment no. 26 offered by mr. bilirakis of florida

At the end of title VI, add the following new section:

SEC. 6__. TRANSPORTATION ON MILITARY AIRCRAFT ON A SPACE-
AVAILABLE BASIS FOR DISABLED VETERANS WITH A
SERVICE-CONNECTED, PERMANENT DISABILITY RATED
AS TOTAL.

(a) Availability of Transportation.--Section 2641b of title
10, United States Code, as amended by section 622 of National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, is further
amended--
(1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new
subsection (f):
``(f) Special Priority for Certain Disabled Veterans.--(1)
The Secretary of Defense shall provide, at no additional cost
to the Department of Defense and with no aircraft
modification, transportation on scheduled and unscheduled
military flights within the continental United States and on
scheduled overseas flights operated by the Air Mobility
Command on a space-available basis for any veteran with a
service-connected, permanent disability rated as total.
``(2) Notwithstanding subsection (d)(1), in establishing
space-available transportation priorities under the travel
program, the Secretary shall provide transportation under
paragraph (1) on the same basis as such transportation is
provided to members of the armed forces entitled to retired
or retainer pay.
``(3) The requirement to provide transportation on
Department of Defense aircraft on a space-available basis on
the priority basis described in paragraph (2) to veterans
covered by this subsection applies whether or not the travel
program is established under this section.
``(4) In this subsection, the terms `veteran' and `service-
connected' have the meanings given those terms in section 101
of title 38.''.
(b) Effective Date.--Subsection (f) of section 2641b of
title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a),
shall take effect at the end of the 90-day period beginning
on the date of the enactment of this Act.

amendment no. 30 offered by mr. grayson of florida

At the end of title VIII, add the following new section:

SEC. 833. REPORT ON PROCUREMENT SUPPLY CHAIN VULNERABILITIES.

(a) Report Required.--Not later than 180 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense
shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the
Senate and the House of Representatives a report on how sole
source suppliers of components to the Department of Defense
procurement supply chain create vulnerabilities to military
attack, terrorism, natural disaster, industrial shock,
financial crisis, or geopolitical crisis, such as an embargo
of key raw materials or industrial inputs.
(b) Matters Covered.--The report required by subsection (a)
shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(1) A list of the components in the Department of Defense
procurement supply chain for which there is a supplier that
controls over 50 percent of the global market.
(2) A list of parts of the supply chain where there is
inadequate information to ascertain whether there is a single
source supplier of components.
(3) The Secretary's recommendations on which single source
suppliers create vulnerabilities, as well recommendations on
how to reduce those vulnerabilities.
(c) Form of Report.--The report required by subsection (a)
may be classified.

amendment no. 34 offered by mr. cuellar of texas

At the end of subtitle G of title X, add the following new
section:

SEC. __. UNMANNED AIRCRAFT JOINT TRAINING AND USAGE PLAN.

(a) Methods.--The Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of
Homeland Security, and the Administrator of the Federal
Aviation Administration jointly shall develop and implement
plans and procedures to review the potential of joint testing
and evaluation of unmanned aircraft equipment and systems
with other appropriate departments and agencies of the
Federal Government that may serve the dual purpose of
providing capabilities to the Department of Defense to meet
the future requirements of combatant commanders and
domestically to strengthen international border security.
(b) Report.--Not later than 270 days after date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, the
Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Administrator of the
Federal Aviation Administration shall jointly submit to
Congress a report on the status of the development of the
plans and procedures required under subsection (a), including
a cost benefit analysis of the shared expenses between the
Department of Defense and other appropriate departments and
agencies of the Federal Government to support such plans.

amendment no. 35 offered by mr. mccaul of texas

At the end of subtitle I of title X, add the following:

SEC. 1090. TRANSFER OR LOAN OF EQUIPMENT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF
HOMELAND SECURITY RELATING TO BORDER SECURITY.

The Secretary of Defense may coordinate with the Secretary
of Homeland Security to identify and provide for the transfer
or long-term loan to the Department of Homeland Security of
equipment the Secretary of Defense determines to be excess
and the Secretary of Homeland Security determines to be
appropriate in order to increase situational awareness and
achieve operational control of the international borders of
the United States.

amendment no. 40 offered by ms. duckworth of illinois

Page 582, insert after line 25 the following (and conform
the table of contents accordingly):

SEC. 1607. REPORTING ON GOALS FOR PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS
AWARDED TO SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS.

Subsection (h) of section 15 of the Small Business Act (15
U.S.C. 644) is amended to read as follows:
``(h) Reporting on Goals for Procurement Contracts Awarded
to Small Business Concerns.--
``(1) Agency reports.--At the conclusion of each fiscal
year, the head of each Federal agency shall submit to the
Administrator a report describing--
``(A) the extent of the participation by small business
concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by
veterans (including service-disabled veterans), qualified
HUBZone small business concerns, small business concerns
owned and controlled by socially and economically
disadvantaged individuals, and small business concerns owned
and controlled by women in the procurement contracts of such
agency during such fiscal year;
``(B) whether the agency achieved the goals established for
the agency under subsection (g)(2) with respect to such
fiscal year;
``(C) any justifications for a failure to achieve such
goals; and
``(D) a remediation plan with proposed new practices to
better meet such goals, including analysis of factors leading
to any failure to acheive such goals.
``(2) Reports by administrator.--Not later than 60 days
after receiving a report from each Federal agency under
paragraph (1) with respect to a fiscal year, the
Administrator shall submit to the President and Congress, and
to make available on a public Web site, an annual report that
includes--
``(A) a copy of each report submitted to the Administrator
under paragraph (1);
``(B) a determination of whether each goal established by
the President under subsection (g)(1) for such fiscal year
was achieved;
``(C) a determination of whether each goal established by
the head of a Federal agency under subsection (g)(2) for such
fiscal year was achieved;
``(D) the reasons for any failure to achieve a goal
established under paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (g) for
such fiscal year and a description of actions planned by the
applicable agency to address such failure, including the
Administrator's comments and recommendations on the proposed
remediation plan; and
``(E) for the Federal Government and each Federal agency,
an analysis of the number and dollar amount of prime
contracts awarded during such fiscal year to--
``(i) small business concerns--

``(I) in the aggregate;
``(II) through sole source contracts;
``(III) through competitions restricted to small business
concerns; and
``(IV) through unrestricted competition;

``(ii) small business concerns owned and controlled by
service-disabled veterans--

``(iii) qualified HUBZone small business concerns--

``(I) in the aggregate;
``(II) through sole source contracts;

[[Page H3528]]

``(III) through competitions restricted to small business
concerns;
``(IV) through competitions restricted to qualified HUBZone
small business concerns;
``(V) through unrestricted competition where a price
evaluation preference was used; and
``(VI) through unrestricted competition where a price
evaluation preference was not used;

``(iv) small business concerns owned and controlled by
socially and economically disadvantaged individuals--

``(I) in the aggregate;
``(II) through sole source contracts;
``(III) through competitions restricted to small business
concerns;
``(IV) through competitions restricted to small business
concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically
disadvantaged individuals;
``(V) through unrestricted competition; and
``(VI) by reason of that concern's certification as a small
business owned and controlled by socially and economically
disadvantaged individuals;

``(v) small business concerns owned by an Indian tribe (as
such term is defined in section 8(a)(13)) other than an
Alaska Native Corporation--

``(vi) small business concerns owned by a Native Hawaiian
Organization--

``(vii) small business concerns owned by an Alaska Native
Corporation--

``(viii) small business concerns owned and controlled by
women--

``(I) in the aggregate;
``(II) through competitions restricted to small business
concerns;
``(III) through competitions restricted using the authority
under section 8(m)(2);
``(IV) through competitions restricted using the authority
under section 8(m)(2) and in which the waiver authority under
section 8(m)(3) was used; and
``(V) through unrestricted competition; and

``(F) for the Federal Government, the number, dollar
amount, and distribution with respect to the North American
Industry Classification System of subcontracts awarded during
such fiscal year to small business concerns, small business
concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans,
qualified HUBZone small business concerns, small business
concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically
disadvantaged individuals, and small business concerns owned
and controlled by women, provided that such information is
publicly available through data systems developed pursuant to
the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of
2006 (Public Law 109-282), or otherwise available as provided
in paragraph (3).
``(3) Access to data.--
``(A) Federal procurement data system.--To assist in the
implementation of this section, the Administration shall have
access to information collected through the Federal
Procurement Data System, Federal Subcontracting Reporting
System, or any new or successor system.
``(B) Agency procurement data sources.--To assist in the
implementation of this section, the head of each contracting
agency shall provide, upon request of the Administration,
procurement information collected through agency data
collection sources in existence at the time of the request.
Contracting agencies shall not be required to establish new
data collection systems to provide such data."''.

amendment no. 41 offered by mr. murphy of florida

At the end of subtitle B of title XXVIII, add the following
new section:

SEC. 28__. REPORT ON UTILIZATION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
REAL PROPERTY.

(a) Report Required.--Not later than 180 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense
shall submit to Congress a report on the utilization of real
property across the Department of Defense.
(b) Elements of Report.--The report required by subsection
(a) shall describe the following:
(1) The strategy of the Department of Defense for
maximizing utilization of existing facilities, progress
implementing this strategy, and obstacles to implementing
this strategy.
(2) The efforts of the Department of Defense to
systematically collect, process, and analyze data on real
property utilization to aid in the planning and
implementation of the strategy referred to in paragraph (1).
(3) The number of underutilized Department facilities, to
be defined as facilities rated less than 66 percent
utilization, and unutilized Department facilities, to be
defined as facilities rated at zero percent utilization, in
the Real Property Inventory Database of the Department of
Defense.
(4) The annual cost of maintaining and improving such
underutilized and unutilized Department facilities.
(5) The efforts of the Department of Defense to dispose of
underutilized and unutilized facilities.
(c) Classified Annex.--The report required by subsection
(a) may include a classified annex if necessary to fully
describe the matters required by subsection (b).

amendment no. 42 offered by mr. mccaul of texas

At the end of subtitle I of title X, add the following:

SEC. 1090. TRANSFER TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY OF
THE TETHERED AEROSTAT RADAR SYSTEM.

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not later than
September 30, 2013, the Secretary of Defense is authorized to
transfer to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the
Secretary of Homeland Security is authorized to accept from
the Secretary of Defense, full contract ownership and
management responsibilities for the existing Tethered
Aerostat Radar System (TARS) program and contracts. Neither
the Department of Defense nor the Department of Homeland
Security shall be required to reimburse the other agency for
any services under the TARS program.

amendment no. 48 offered by ms. brownley of california

At the end of subtitle B of title III, add the following
new section:

SEC. 3__. MILITARY READINESS AND SOUTHERN SEA OTTER
CONSERVATION.

(a) Establishment of the Southern Sea Otter Military
Readiness Areas.--Chapter 631 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new
section:

``Sec. 7235. Establishment of the Southern Sea Otter Military
Readiness Areas

``(a) Establishment.--The Secretary of Defense shall
establish areas to be known as `Southern Sea Otter Military
Readiness Areas' for national defense purposes. Such areas
shall include each of the following:
``(1) The area that includes Naval Base Ventura County, San
Nicolas Island, and Begg Rock and the adjacent and
surrounding waters within the following coordinates:
``N. Latitude/W. Longitude
``3327.8'/11934.3'
``3320.5'/11915.5'
``3313.5'/11911.8'
``3306.5'/11915.3'
``3302.8'/11926.8'
``3308.8'/11946.3'
``3317.2'/11956.9'
``3330.9'/11954.2';
``(2) That area that includes Naval Base Coronado, San
Clemente Island and the adjacent and surrounding waters
running parallel to shore to 3 nautical miles from the high
tide line designated by 33 C.F.R. part 165 on May 20, 2010,
as the San Clemente Island 3NM Safety Zone.
``(b) Activities Within the Southern Sea Otter Military
Readiness Areas.--
``(1) Incidental takings under endangered species act of
1973.--Sections 4 and 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973
(16 U.S.C. 1533, 1538) shall not apply with respect to the
incidental taking of any southern sea otter in the Southern
Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas in the course of
conducting a military readiness activity.
``(2) Incidental takings under marine mammal protection act
of 1972.--Sections 101 and 102 of the Marine Mammal
Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1371, 1372) shall not apply
with respect to the incidental taking of any southern sea
otter in the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas in
the course of conducting military readiness activities.
``(3) Treatment as species proposed to be listed.--For
purposes of any military readiness activity, any southern sea
otter while within the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness
Areas shall be treated for the purposes of section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1536) as a member
of a species that is proposed to be listed as an endangered
species or a threatened species under section 4 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533).
``(c) Removal.--Nothing in this section or any other
Federal law shall be construed to require that any southern
sea otter located within the Southern Sea Otter Military
Readiness Areas as of the effective date of this section or
thereafter be removed from the Areas.
``(d) Revision or Termination of Exceptions.--The Secretary
of the Interior may revise or terminate the application of
subsection (b) if the Secretary, in consultation with the
Secretary of the Navy, determines that military activities
authorized under subsection (b) are impeding southern sea
otter conservation or the return of southern sea otters to
optimum sustainable population levels.
``(e) Monitoring.--
``(1) In general.--The Secretary of the Navy shall conduct
monitoring and research

[[Page H3529]]

within the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas to
determine the effects of military readiness activities on the
growth or decline of the sea otter population and on the
near-shore eco-system. Monitoring and research parameters and
methods shall be determined in consultation with the service.
``(2) Reports.--Within 24 months after the effective date
of this section and every three years thereafter, the
Secretary of the Navy shall report to Congress and the public
on monitoring undertaken pursuant to paragraph (1).
``(f) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) Incidental taking.--The term `incidental taking'
means any take of a southern sea otter that is incidental to,
and not the purpose of, the carrying out of an otherwise
lawful activity.
``(2) Optimum sustainable population.--The term `optimum
sustainable population' means, with respect to any population
stock, the number of animals that will result in the maximum
productivity of the population or the species, keeping in
mind the carrying capacity of the habitat and the health of
the ecosystem of which they form a constituent element.
``(3) Southern sea otter.--The term `southern sea otter'
means any member of the subspecies Enhydra lutris nereis.
``(4) Take.--The term `take'--
``(A) when used in reference to activities subject to
regulation by the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C.
1531-1544) shall have the meaning given such term in that
statute; and
``(B) when used in reference to activities subject to
regulation by the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16
U.S.C. 1361-1423h), shall have the meaning given such term in
that statute.
``(5) Military readiness activity.--The term `military
readiness activity' has the meaning given that term in
section 315(f) of the Bob Stump National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107-314;
116 Stat. 2509; 16 U.S.C. 703 note), and includes all
training and operations of the Armed Forces that relate to
combat, and the adequate and realistic testing of military
equipment, vehicles, weapons, and sensors for proper
operation and suitability for combat use.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the
following:
``7235. Establishment of the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness
Areas.''.
(c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1 of Public Law 99-625
(16 U.S.C. 1536 note) is repealed.

amendment no. 62 offered by ms. brownley of california

Page 232, after line 18, insert the following:

SEC. 555. TRANSITION OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND THEIR
FAMILIES FROM MILITARY TO CIVILIAN LIFE.

(a) Findings.--The Congress finds the following:
(1) Members of the Armed Forces and their families make
great sacrifices on behalf of the United States, and, when
their active duty service is successfully concluded, members
deserve the opportunity to also make a successful transition
to the civilian labor force.
(2) When transitioning from active duty in the Armed Forces
to civilian employment, members often face barriers that make
it difficult to fully utilize the skills and training they
gained during their military service.
(3) Members and veterans are too often required to repeat
education or training in order to receive industry
certifications and State occupational licenses, even though
their military training and experience often overlaps with
the certification or licensing requirements.
(4) When members are transferred from military assignment
to military assignment, their spouses often face barriers to
transferring their credentials and to securing employment in
their new location.
(5) More than one million members will make the transition
to civilian life in the coming years.
(6) The Department of Defense established the Military
Credentialing and Licensing Task Force in 2012.
(7) The Joining Forces program, a national initiative to
mobilize all sectors of society to give members of the Armed
Forces and their families the opportunities and support they
have earned, will make it easier for members and their
families to transfer skills learned while the member was
serving in the Armed Forces to civilian employment.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the Federal Government and State governments should
make the transition of a member of the Armed Forces and the
member's spouse from military to civilian life as seamless as
possible by creating opportunities for the member and spouse
to earn, while the member is in the Armed Forces, civilian
occupational credentials and licenses, with an emphasis on
well-paying industries and occupations that have a high
demand for skilled workers, including: manufacturing,
information technology, transportation and logistics, health
care, and emergency medical services;
(2) the Federal Government should assist State governments
in translating military training and experience into credit
towards professional licensure; and
(3) State governments should streamline approaches for
assessing the equivalency of military training and
experience, and accelerate occupational licensing processes
for members, veterans, and their spouses.

amendment no. 94 offered by mr. fitzpatrick of pennsylvania

Page 335, after line 12, insert the following:

SEC. 833. STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF CONTRACTING WITH VETERAN-
OWNED SMALL BUSINESSES.

(a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in
coordination with the Administrator of the Small Business
Administration and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall
issue a report that includes--
(1) a description of the impacts of Department of Defense
contracting with small business concerns owned and controlled
by veterans and small business concerns owned and controlled
by service-disabled veterans on veteran entrepreneurship and
veteran unemployment;
(2) a description of the effect that increased economic
opportunity for veterans has on issues such as veteran
suicide and veteran homelessness; and
(3) an analysis of the feasibility and expected impacts of
the implementation within the Department of Defense of a
contracting program modeled on the program authorized under
section 8127 of title 38, United States Code.
(b) Definitions.--In this section--
(1) the term ``veteran'' has the meaning given the term
under section 101(2) of title 38, United States Code; and
(2) the terms ``small business concern owned and controlled
by veterans'' and ``small business concern owned and
controlled by service-disabled veterans'' have the meanings
given such terms under section 3 of the Small Business Act
(15 U.S.C. 632).

amendment no. 111 offered by mr. mccaul of texas

At the end of subtitle I of title X, add the following:

SEC. 1090. SALE OR DONATION OF EXCESS PERSONAL PROPERTY FOR
BORDER SECURITY ACTIVITIES.

Section 2576a of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)--
(A) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting ``border security
activities and'' before ``law enforcement activities''; and
(B) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``, the Secretary of
Homeland Security,'' after ``Attorney General''; and
(2) in subsection (d), by inserting ``border security
activities or'' before ``counter-drug''.

amendment no. 113 offered by mr. turner of ohio

Page 463, after line 6, insert the following:

SEC. 10__. UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS AND NATIONAL AIRSPACE.

(a) Memoranda of Understanding.--Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, the Secretary of Defense may enter into a
memorandum of understanding with a non-Department of Defense
entity that is engaged in the test range program authorized
under section 332(c) of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act
of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 40101 note) to allow such entity to access
nonregulatory special use airspace if such access--
(1) is used by the entity as part of such test range
program; and
(2) does not interfere with the activities of the Secretary
or otherwise interrupt or delay missions or training of the
Department of Defense.
(b) Established Procedures.--The Secretary shall carry out
subsection (a) using the established procedures of the
Department of Defense with respect to entering into a
memorandum of understanding.
(c) Construction.--A memorandum of understanding entered
into under subsection (a) between the Secretary and a non-
Department of Defense entity shall not be construed as
establishing the Secretary as a partner, proponent, or team
member of such entity in the test range program specified in
such subsection.

amendment no. 130 offered by mr. turner of ohio

Amend section 1244 to read as follows:

SEC. 1244. STATEMENT OF CONGRESS ON DEFENSE COOPERATION WITH
GEORGIA.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) The Republic of Georgia is a highly valued ally of the
United States and has repeatedly demonstrated its commitment
to advancing the mutual interests of both countries,
including the deployment of Georgian forces as part of the
NATO-led International Security Assistance Force in
Afghanistan and the Multi-National Force in Iraq.
(2) The peaceful transfer of power as the result of the
free and fair parliamentary elections in Georgia in October
2012 represents a major accomplishment toward the Georgian
people's creation of a free society and full democracy.
(3) However, since the October 2012 parliamentary elections
the new Georgian Government has taken a series of measures
against former officials and members of the current political
opposition that appear to be motivated by political
considerations.
(4) Over 100 former Georgian Government officials have been
charged with criminal violations since the October 2012
parliamentary elections.

[[Page H3530]]

(5) Similar charges have been filed against members of the
political opposition, including Vano Merabishvili, the
Secretary General of the United National Movement.
(6) The arrest of the leader of an opposition party is
especially troubling, particularly its chilling effect on
political freedom prior to the presidential election
scheduled for October 2013.
(7) The Georgian Government has taken insufficient action
to prevent further violence against members of the United
National Movement and to punish offenders.
(8) These actions call into question the Georgian
Government's continued progress toward the creation of a free
and democratic society in which basic freedoms, including
freedom for political opposition, are guaranteed.
(b) Statement of Congress.--Congress declares that--
(1) the United States remains committed to assisting the
people of Georgia in establishing a free and democratic
society in their country;
(2) the measures taken by the Georgian Government against
former officials and political opponents, apparently in part
motivated by political considerations, may have a significant
negative impact on cooperation between the United States and
Georgia, including efforts to build a stronger relationship
in political, economic, and security matters, as well as
progress on integrating Georgia into international
organizations;
(3) the United States must be unambiguous when democratic
backsliding occurs in a key ally after a peaceful and
democratic transfer of power between political parties; and
(4) the people of the United States and the Members of
Congress express their deepest condolences to the Georgian
people on the tragic loss of seven soldiers of Georgia in a
suicide bombing on June 6, 2013, and the deaths of three
soldiers killed in another suicide bombing on May 13, 2013,
while they were supporting United States and NATO forces in
Afghanistan.

amendment no. 154 offered by mr. turner of ohio

At the end of section 2801, add the following new
subsection:
(d) Modification and Extension of Authority for Laboratory
Revitalization Projects.--
(1) In general.--Subsection (d) of section 2805 of title
10, United States Code, is amended--
(A) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ``not more than
$2,000,000'' and inserting ``not more than $4,000,000,
notwithstanding subsection (c)'';
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking the first sentence and
inserting the following: ``For purposes of this subsection,
an unspecified minor military construction project is a
military construction project that (notwithstanding
subsection (a)) has an approved cost equal to or less than
$4,000,000.''
(C) in paragraph (5), by striking ``2016'' and inserting
``2020''.
(2) Application to current projects.--The amendments made
by paragraph (1) do not apply to any laboratory
revitalization project for which the design phase has been
completed as of the date of the enactment of this Act.

amendment no. 159 offered by mr. bilirakis of florida

At the end of title XXVIII, add the following new section:

SEC. 28__. ESTABLISHMENT OF MILITARY DIVERS MEMORIAL AT
WASHINGTON NAVY YARD.

(a) Memorial Authorized.--Consistent with the sense of the
Congress expressed in section 2855 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, the Secretary of the
Navy may permit a third party to establish and maintain, at a
suitable location at the former Navy Dive School at the
Washington Navy Yard in the District of Columbia, a memorial
to honor the members of the United States Armed Forces who
have served as divers and whose service in defense of the
United States has been carried out beneath the waters of the
world.
(b) Location and Design of Monument.--The actual location
at the Washington Navy Yard for the memorial authorized by
subsection (a) and the final design of the memorial shall be
subject to the approval of the Secretary. In selecting the
site to serve as the location for the memorial, the Secretary
shall seek to maximize visitor access to the memorial.
(c) Military Support.--The Secretary shall provide military
ceremonial support at the dedication of the memorial
authorized by subsection (a).
(d) Use of Federal Funds Prohibited.--Federal funds may not
be used to design, procure, prepare, install, or maintain the
memorial authorized by subsection (a), but the Secretary may
accept and expend contributions of non-Federal funds and
resources for such purposes.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman
from California (Mr. McKeon) and the gentleman from Washington (Mr.
Smith) each will control 10 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from California.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I urge the committee to adopt the
amendments en bloc, all of which have been examined by both the
majority and the minority.
At this time, I yield 1 minute to my friend and colleague, the
gentleman from Florida (Mr. Bilirakis).
Mr. BILIRAKIS. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
I rise today in support of my amendment, which would allow disabled
veterans with a service-connected permanent disability rated as
``total'' to travel on military aircraft on a space-available basis.
My amendment would allow disabled veterans, who have bravely served
our country and who have made enormous personal sacrifices that follow
them in their daily lives, to travel through the Space-A program at no
additional cost to the Department of Defense. The space-available
program is a DOD program which allows Active Duty servicemembers, their
families, retirees, and certain others to fill empty seats on DOD
flights. While Active Duty members and their families will remain the
primary beneficiaries of this program in order to assist them with the
rigors of military life, my amendment allows these veterans the same
benefit.
I would like to thank Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith and
their staffs for their assistance in the amendment process.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the
gentlelady from Illinois (Ms. Duckworth).
Ms. DUCKWORTH. Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of my amendment, which
will strengthen small business participation in government contracts.
In my district and across the country, small businesses are the
backbone of our economy. Small businesses innovate, know how to operate
on a tight budget and know how to create good-paying jobs. I want small
businesses in places like Elgin, Illinois, to be able to win government
contracts from the Department of Defense because I know they will do
more with taxpayer dollars and provide superior products and services
for our men and women in uniform.
However, the government is lagging behind on awarding contracts to
small businesses. We are not meeting our goal of 23 percent of
contracts going to small businesses, and 23 percent is a pretty low bar
that we should be raising even higher, not be struggling to meet. It is
even more unfortunate that we are also failing to award enough
contracts to women- and veteran-owned small businesses.
My amendment seeks to remedy this problem by asking the Small
Business Administration and Federal agencies to include remediation
plans in their annual reports on small business contracting goals. The
government should explain why it is not meeting its small business
goals. It should identify faulty past practices and propose new
practices to increase small business participation. We need an action
plan to support our small businesses, and my amendment will do just
that.
I thank Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith and the committee
staffs for their help on this amendment, and I urge my colleagues to
support this amendment and our small businesses.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to my friend and
colleague, the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Fitzpatrick).
Mr. FITZPATRICK. I thank the chairman for the opportunity to address
two amendments which are part of this package.
The first is my amendment to protect military tuition assistance, an
important tool for members of the armed services to obtain the
necessary professional development education and to prepare themselves
for the civilian job market upon leaving the service. Last year,
approximately 300,000 servicemembers used tuition assistance to pursue
their educational goals. Unfortunately, last March, the administration
chose to end this program, and it took congressional action to overturn
that decision.
This amendment would prevent even the specter of ending this benefit
from ever happening again. Our soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines
deserve better.
Second, included in this package is an amendment requiring the
Secretary of Defense to conduct a study on veteran-owned small business
contracting and to examine the feasibility of putting a priority on
meeting veteran-owned small business contracting goals first, similar
to a successful program in

[[Page H3531]]

the VA. They will be examining how fair contracting practices for
veteran-owned small businesses could positively affect veteran
unemployment, homelessness and even suicide.
Mr. Chairman, the fact is there are 250,000 servicemembers
transitioning each year from military life to civilian life. One in
seven is self-employed or is a small business owner, and about a
quarter of our veterans say they are interested in starting or in
buying their own small businesses.
They play an important role in our economy. This Congress needs to
help them in the transition and in getting America back to work. So I
would like to thank the chairman and ranking member on the bill, and I
urge support of these amendments.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. I yield 2 minutes to the gentlelady from
Florida (Ms. Frankel).
Ms. FRANKEL of Florida. I am the mother of a United States marine war
veteran, and I remember well the pride my son felt when he put on his
uniform. My constituent, Elisha Morrow, felt the same pride when at age
22 she joined the United States Coast Guard. She started boot camp full
of hope for her future.
That hope quickly turned into humiliation and sorrow as her company
commander became her enemy. First, he ordered her to clean his office,
and he later harassed her with sexual innuendoes and advances night
after night. Feeling hopeless and fearing retribution, Elisha stayed
silent until the commander became more emboldened. He again ordered
another female recruit to his office at night. This time, he ordered
her to remove her clothes and engage in unwanted sex.
Thankfully, the victimized servicewoman was brave enough to pursue
charges, but because it was determined that she was not under physical
threat and that she did not fear for her life, her assailant got away
with the lesser offenses of cruelty and maltreatment and adultery,
instead of being charged with rape.
This is not full justice. When our daughters and our sons put on the
uniform to protect us, the United States, they must be protected to the
utmost extent from such an abuse of power. Mr. Chair, the intention of
this amendment is to do just that.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to my friend and
colleague, the gentleman from Kansas (Mr. Huelskamp).
Mr. HUELSKAMP. I want to thank the chairman for yielding to me. I
appreciate, especially, his efforts on the NDAA last year in which we
were able to add language that would require the Department of Defense
to adopt new regulations to protect the religious liberties of our
military personnel, especially of our brave chaplains.
However, since March and since the adoption of that law, we have sent
three letters to the Department of Defense, asking for progress
updates. The Department has only responded with an acknowledgment that
it has received our letters, but, to date, we are unaware of any
progress. Instead, it seems that secretive meetings continue with
individuals actually opposed to religious liberties.
In light of this delay, my amendment is very simple. It would require
the Department to provide Congress with a report of meetings between
employees and civilians with respect to the development of military
policy related to religious liberty. I encourage my colleagues to
support this amendment.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Texas
(Mr. Cuellar).
Mr. CUELLAR. Mr. Chairman, I rise today to encourage my colleagues to
support my amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act. This
amendment will bring the Department of Defense and other Federal, State
and local agencies together to map out the futures of UAVs.
I first want to thank Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith and
their staffs for their assistance on this important issue. I also want
to thank those who have cosponsored this amendment--Representative Gene
Green, Representative Ted Poe and Chairman Michael McCaul.

{time} 1540

This amendment calls for the Secretary of Defense, in consultation
with the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Aviation
Administration, to develop and implement plans to review the potential
of joint testing training that might serve the dual purpose of
providing capabilities to the Department of Defense to protect us
abroad and on the international border. This amendment will go a long
way to make sure we utilize all available resources and not waste
taxpayers' money.
I urge all my colleagues to vote ``yes'' on this amendment.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to my friend and
colleague, the gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. Bridenstine).
Mr. BRIDENSTINE. Mr. Chairman, I'd like to thank my friend from
Kansas (Mr. Huelskamp) for offering amendment No. 236. He is a champion
for religious freedom.
As a Navy pilot with Iraq and Afghanistan combat tours, I am
concerned that senior Air Force officials have taken advice from an
anti-Christian zealot when drafting guidance on culture and standards.
The president of the badly misnamed Military Religious Freedom
Foundation, Mr. Mikey Weinstein, has described Christians as human
monsters and monstrously savage, responsible for racism, bigotry, and
prejudice. He even called the presence of committed Christians in the
military a national security threat comparable to al Qaeda.
Mr. Chairman, we're not asking to approve the military's calendar
appointments, but given this situation, Congress needs to know when the
military meets with anti-Christian fanatics on issues regarding
religious liberty.
With that, I urge my colleagues to support this amendment.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, we have no further speakers.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. As I have no further speakers either, I
yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. McKEON. I encourage our colleagues to support the en bloc
amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. MURPHY of Florida. Mr. Chair, I rise today to offer an amendment
to the National Defense Authorization Act that would address wasteful
government spending on unused and underutilized facilities. The
Department of Defense has hundreds, possibly thousands, of buildings
and structures that it has rated at zero percent utilization. This is
an incredible number of useless facilities that taxpayers are paying to
maintain.
The extent of this wasteful spending, however, is not currently
known, even by the Department itself. My amendment would fix that,
requiring the Department of Defense to disclose just how many of its
facilities are unused or underutilized and how much it is costing
American taxpayers to maintain these facilities. The Department of
Defense would be required to report back to Congress in six months,
explaining what they are doing either to dispose of these wasteful
facilities or increase their utilization.
By forcing the Department of Defense to take a serious look at its
facilities, gather data on how these facilities are managed, and
develop a coherent plan for reducing costs and improving efficiency, my
amendment seeks to eliminate this wasteful government spending.
Unfortunately, the Department of Defense is not the only federal
agency that is currently wasting taxpayer money on maintaining unused
or underutilized facilities. As a whole, the federal government must do
a better job at managing its facilities. At times of record debt,
taxpayers should not continue paying for unused and underused
buildings. That is not good government, and that is not smart spending.
That is why I recently introduced the SAVE Act to root out up to $200
billion in wasteful and duplicative government spending over the next
10 years. This amendment is an extension of one of the 11 common-sense
solutions included in the bipartisan SAVE Act, holding the Department
of Defense accountable for spending taxpayer money on facilities the
Department itself has found to be unused or underutilized.
We all agree that we need to reduce government spending. We should
also all agree that the best place to start is by rooting out waste.
This is a common-sense solution to do just that and I urge my
colleagues on both sides of the aisle to support this amendment.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendments en bloc offered
by the gentleman from California (Mr. McKeon).
The en bloc amendments were agreed to.

[[Page H3532]]

Amendment No. 6 Offered by Mr. Turner

The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 6
printed in Part B of House Report 113-108.
Mr. TURNER. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:

At the end of subtitle D of title V, add the following new
section:

SEC. 5__. DISCHARGE OR DISMISSAL, AND CONFINEMENT REQUIRED
FOR CERTAIN SEX-RELATED OFFENSES COMMITTED BY
MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

(a) Mandatory Punishments.--
(1) Imposition.--Section 856 of title 10, United States
Code (article 56 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is
amended--
(A) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``The punishment''; and
(B) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(b)(1) While a person subject to this chapter who is
found guilty of an offense specified in paragraph (2) shall
be punished as a general court-martial may direct, such
punishment must include, at a minimum--
``(A) dismissal or dishonorable discharge; and
``(B) confinement for two years.
``(2) Paragraph (1) applies to the following offenses:
``(A) An offense in violation of subsection (a) or (b) of
section 920 (article 120(a) or (b)).
``(B) Forcible sodomy under section 925 of this title
(article 125).
``(C) An attempt to commit an offense specified in
subparagraph (A) or (B) that is punishable under section 880
of this title (article 80).''.
(2) Clerical amendments.--
(A) Section heading.--The heading of such section is
amended to read as follows:

``Sec. 856. Art. 56. Maximum and minimum limits''.

``856. Art 56. Maximum and minimum limits.''.

(b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section
shall take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, and apply to offenses specified in section
856(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code (article 56(b)(2)
of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by
subsection (a)(1), committed after that date.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman
from Ohio (Mr. Turner) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Ohio.
Mr. TURNER. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
I want to thank Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Adam Smith for
their efforts. They had given to Representative Tsongas and myself the
task of doing a bipartisan package to address the issue of sexual
assault in the military.
We all know and people have spoken on this House floor eloquently of
the tragedy of the issue of sexual assault in the military. We have to
do something both to change the culture and to change the legislative
regime that affects the prosecution and the prevention of sexual
assault and the protection of victims.
Many times victims report they are revictimized by the system. It is
our effort in changing the system so that the perpetrator fears the
system, not the victim.
There is one other thing that we need to address. Mr. Chairman, many
people have taken this House floor and say we need to go further. The
Turner amendment is what we need to do to go further.
We have put in this bill currently a mandatory minimum, meaning if
you commit a sexual assault, you are subject to a statutory minimum.
That minimum in this bill, unfortunately, is only that you're out of
the military. We want to increase that to include 2 years of
confinement.
Mr. Chairman, 22 States have mandatory minimums that include
confinement, incarceration. Of those 22 States, we took the minimum of
those so that we're not going higher than any State.
But here is the issue, Mr. Chairman, that we need to remedy:
unfortunately, under current law, if you commit a sexual assault on a
base that's in a State that has a mandatory minimum, you might actually
avoid a mandatory minimum. That has happened.
In the case of Marine Corps Gunnery Sergeant Nicholas Howard, he
committed a rape on a 23-year-old woman. He was a recruiter in Alaska.
He was convicted of sexual assault due to DNA testing, and he was found
guilty of first degree sexual assault. He was given a dishonorable
discharge but no jail time. In Alaska, he would have been subject to
incarceration.
Mr. Chairman, we should not have people who are in uniform or on base
committing sexual assaults actually avoid jail time because they're in
the military. We shouldn't have a lower standard.
With that, Mr. Chairman, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to Mrs. Walorski.
Mrs. WALORSKI. Mr. Chairman, I'd like to thank Representative Turner
for giving me this opportunity to speak in favor of his amendment. He's
been a leader on this issue, and I applaud his efforts and commitment
to this cause.
Currently, there's no minimum punishment required when someone is
convicted of military sexual assault. This means a servicemember can be
convicted of a serious crime and receive no punishment. The amendment
will impose a mandatory minimum sentence of 2 years confinement and a
dishonorable discharge for conviction of rape and sexual assault.
Right now, 22 States have mandatory minimum sentences for those
convicted of rape and sexual assault. My State, Indiana, is one of
those States. In Indiana, there's a mandatory sentence of not less than
6 years for rape.
It's inexcusable that servicemembers guilty of the most heinous crime
should be allowed to remain in the military, allowing them to coexist
with victims and potentially commit repeated offenses. Criminals must
receive the full weight of justice for their wrongdoings.
America's sons and daughters deserve protection while serving in the
military and should never feel vulnerable or revictimized after
suffering from any form of sexual assault or misconduct. This amendment
is a much-needed reform that ensures victims receive the justice they
deserve.
Mrs. DAVIS of California. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentlewoman is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mrs. DAVIS of California. Mr. Chairman, I really respect the
gentleman and what he's bringing forward, but the reality is that
mandatory minimums have been shown to actually reduce the incidence of
reporting.
Judges and juries need the ability to decide with discretion and not
strictly by its appearance. Sometimes--and we've seen this many times--
mandatory minimums can have the opposite effect: encouraging jurors to
make a decision based on the potential sentence as opposed to the
facts.
That's why I'm standing in opposition, because we also know that
organizations who have worked very hard to look at this issue worry
that this could go in the wrong direction. Protect our Defenders, which
has been a very strong advocacy group for victims, worries that when a
jury knows that a perpetrator will automatically be dishonorably
discharged, that the jury will be less likely to assign confinement
charges in addition. They need to see the full picture.
So we must take caution to judge every case individually.
As we have additional speakers, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. TURNER. I reserve the balance of my time.
Mrs. DAVIS of California. I'm pleased to yield 3 minutes to the
gentlewoman from Massachusetts (Ms. Tsongas).
Ms. TSONGAS. Mr. Chairman, I value my partnership with Congressman
Turner as cochairs of the Military Sexual Assault Prevention Caucus and
with the legislation we have crafted on combating the horrific crime of
sexual assault in the military.
This year, our work together on the Better Enforcement for Sexual
Assault Free Environments Act, otherwise known as BE SAFE, led to its
incorporation into the NDAA before us today. However, I must take
exception to the amendment before us.
I do agree that we must make sure that all individuals who are
convicted of sexual assault in the military are punished with
confinement--absolutely--but there are many different ideas about the
best way to do that. Some argue that a better approach would be a
system similar to Federal sentencing guidelines, and that's why Mr.
Turner and I wrote a provision in the defense authorization before us

[[Page H3533]]

that requires the Secretary of Defense to provide Congress with a
report on sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimum sentencing
provisions under the UCMJ.
Before we make additional changes to the UCMJ, we need to see this
report. Since we've introduced the BE SAFE Act, we have heard from many
groups. One letter from the National Alliance to End Sexual Violence
says:

Long mandatory minimum sentences can have a chilling effect
on reporting and prosecuting sexual assault in the civilian
system, and the National Alliance to End Sexual Violence does
not recommend them.

We have to listen to these various voices. We cannot afford to take
this risk in the military. Reporting of sexual assault in the military
already happens at abysmal rates. We need more reporting, not less.
Less reporting equals fewer prosecutions, which ultimately will fail to
deter the perpetrators from carrying out this heinous crime.
I urge a ``no'' vote on this amendment.

{time} 1550

Mr. TURNER. Mr. Chairman, how much time do I have remaining?
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Ohio has 2 minutes remaining.
Mr. TURNER. Do I have the right to close, Mr. Chairman?
The Acting CHAIR. The gentlewoman from California has the right to
close.
Mr. TURNER. Mr. Chairman, I appreciate the concern that I have heard
from the other side of the aisle. The issue, I think, comes down to
being in a military uniform should not be a get-out-of-jail-free card.
Basically the state of the law is that if you're in a State that has a
mandatory minimum and you commit a sexual assault or a rape, you're
going to jail. But yet under our law, you could be a member of the
military and commit a sexual assault or rape and be free from
incarceration even if you commit the assault or rape off base.
When we talk about wanting to make certain that we uphold the victims
and make certain that the perpetrator is the person who feels insecure
and threatened by the system, you can't have a system that threatens
the perpetrator when the perpetrator knows that being a man or woman in
uniform or by being on base and a member of the military that you're
subject to a lower standard in conviction and sentencing.
The case we have in Alaska where a member of our military, a member
of the Marine Corps, committed a rape and then received no jail time
whatsoever--no jail time whatsoever--and if he had been off base or if
he been a civilian in Alaska, he would have been subject to a
significant mandatory minimum of incarceration.
When people ask what's different in the military, this is different.
We need a mandatory minimum that says if you commit a sexual assault
and you're convicted, you are out of the military, you are dishonorably
discharged, and you are going to jail. And that mandatory minimum will
be at least 2 years of incarceration.
I was just at a facility where I asked the commanders what had
occurred on their facility with sexual assault, and they reported there
had been a sexual assault and there was currently someone in jail, in
the brig for 7 months. They didn't get a dishonorable discharge. That's
all they got, 7 months. They were going to be out walking among their
fellow men and women, and they will have committed a sexual assault.
That has a chilling effect both on reporting, and it also creates an
environment where people who are perpetrators feel they could be safe.
Our law, this amendment, would make it: you're out, mandatory,
dishonorable discharge, 2 years in prison, and that's it. We urge
support for the Turner amendment.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Mrs. DAVIS of California. I yield 1 minute to the gentlelady from
California (Ms. Loretta Sanchez).
Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California. Mr. Chairman, I thank the ranking
member.
I rise in opposition to this amendment. Congress is of course
outraged over the ongoing cases of sexual assault and sexual harassment
occurring in our military. There's no one in this Chamber who doesn't
believe that criminals should pay for such violent and atrocious crime,
and so I understand why my good colleague on the other side would offer
such an amendment.
I'll say several things. First, I'm pretty much opposed to mandatory
minimum sentences in general. But this base bill, the base bill that
we're considering today, the committee requires the Department of
Defense to provide a report on mandatory minimums and sentencing
guidelines in order to make sure that such sentencing reforms will not
discourage the victims from reporting.
And in addition to that, in the base bill, if you are convicted of
these crimes, you will be dishonorably discharged. So in order to avoid
imposing laws that may harm victims, I urge my colleagues to vote
against this amendment.
Mrs. DAVIS of California. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself the balance of
my time.
This is a complex issue. We know that. I think what we feel is this
further complicates it. I think my colleague has introduced with
Congresswoman Tsongas a bill that does much of what we're talking about
here, but there is an exception in terms of the way that the jury is
able to move forward here. We think that this actually makes sense so
that the decisions that are made are absolutely based on an individual
case and what we can offer in terms of making certain that the
perpetrator is held accountable.
I yield back the balance of my time.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Turner).
The amendment was agreed to.

Amendment No. 9 Offered by Mr. Rigell

The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 9
printed in Part B of House Report 113-108.
Mr. RIGELL. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:

At the end of title III, insert the following:

SEC. 352. MODIFICATION OF TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF PUBLIC-
PRIVATE COMPETITIONS FOR CONVERSION OF
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FUNCTIONS TO CONTRACTOR
PERFORMANCE.

(a) Modification.--Section 325 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84;
123 Stat. 2253) is amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ``Secretary of Defense
submits to the congressional defense committees the
certification required under subsection (d)'' and inserting
``Comptroller General submits to the congressional defense
committees the assessment required under subsection (c)'';
and
(2) by striking subsection (d).
(b) Exemption of Public-private Partnerships.--The
Secretary of Defense may exempt from study or competition
pursuant to Office of Management and Budget Circular A-76
those functions or workloads which are the subject of an
existing public-private partnership.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman
from Virginia (Mr. Rigell) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Virginia.
Mr. RIGELL. Mr. Chairman, these are very, very challenging fiscal
times. Our deficit continues to grow, and that is putting pressure on
every single line of our Federal budget, including defense. And yet the
world has not become a safer place. So what's clear is we have a duty,
an absolute duty, to invest each and every dollar of our defense
dollars wisely, and that's exactly what my amendment does. It does that
by eliminating a regulation that's holding back competition; and in
doing so, it's hurting the American taxpayer.
When it comes to understanding the value of introducing competition
into things, the American people get it. From groceries to computers,
we know when competition is introduced, good things happen. The prices
go down and the quality goes up.
The same is true, or it should be true, when it comes to the
Department of Defense and the ability of the private sector and the
public sector to compete. President Obama put it this way. He said:

Taxpayers may receive more value for their dollars if not
inherently governmental activities that can be provided
commercially are subject to the forces of competition.

In my service to my district, I'm always looking for commonsense
ideas

[[Page H3534]]

and common ground. On this particular issue, I see both in the
President's statement.
My amendment moves competition forward by eliminating a full
moratorium that Congress has put in place. The Department of Defense
said in 2011 that it wanted that particular moratorium removed so it
could meet its statutory obligation. What is that statutory obligation?
It's this, and this comes right out of their own report and
recommendations:

The Secretary of Defense shall use the least costly form of
personnel consistent with military requirements and other
needs of the Department.

Well, we know that some activities are inherently governmental. For
example, criminal investigations. My amendment has nothing to do with
those types of activities. They should be performed by the Federal
Government. But other activities, Mr. Chairman, for example, janitorial
services, that's not inherently governmental and should be subject to
competition. That's what this amendment opens up. It really isn't
effecting what's known as the 50/50 rule and those core services that
are provided by depots. I believe that the amendment represents both
common sense and common ground. I urge my colleagues to vote for it.
I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Coffman).
Mr. COFFMAN. Mr. Chairman, over the past few years, the prevailing
trend within the Department of Defense has been an overreliance on
Federal employees to perform commercial services. Given our Nation's
need for fiscal austerity, a problem made more acute by mandated
sequester cuts, it is important that Congress provide the Pentagon with
the necessary tools to drive efficiencies and cost savings. Public-
private competitions are one such tool.
Public-private competitions are an effective way of injecting
performance and accountability into government operations. The private
sector constantly competes for new business opportunities. When the
Federal Government performs commercial functions, they, too, should be
required to compete. Unfortunately, Congress has placed a moratorium on
public-private cost competitions, effectively granting monopoly power
to the Federal Government when it comes to providing commercially
available goods and services. We all know that without competition,
both innovation and quality suffer.
The amendment does not mandate the use of public-private
competitions. It simply unlocks an essential tool that the Defense
Department can use to drive cost effectiveness and efficiencies, and
save valuable taxpayer dollars.
Mr. RIGELL. I reserve the balance of my time.
Ms. HANABUSA. Mr. Chairman, I rise to claim the time in opposition to
the Rigell amendment.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentlewoman from Hawaii is recognized for 5
minutes.

{time} 1600

Ms. HANABUSA. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself 1 minute.
Mr. Chairman, the Rigell amendment would lift the current moratorium
on the public-private competition to the A-76 process. Unfortunately,
it is based on very faulty assumptions.
Lifting the moratorium will eliminate the incentives the Department
needs to fix the A-76 process, as well as finish the service contracts
inventory. It's based on the following assumption, which has been
proven to be faulty, that the private contractors, for some reason,
save money; and we know from the program reports that that is not true.
As DOD evaluates the correct balance between civilian and contractor
personnel, it is critical to make sure that our Federal employees, the
strength of our country, the backbone of defense, are protected.
Efficient government requires focused attention on supporting and
strengthening our dedicated Federal workforce and making sure that they
have the tools they need to complete our mission.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. RIGELL. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
I just would respond to the gentlelady. I appreciate her comments.
And I, too, am a strong supporter of our Federal workforce. I just
believe that they can compete and should compete.
This is good for America, good for our ability to defend our great
country, and good for the American taxpayer.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Ms. HANABUSA. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from
Pennsylvania (Mr. Cartwright).
Mr. CARTWRIGHT. Thank you, Representative Hanabusa.
Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to this amendment and in support
of the over 5,000 men and women who work at the Tobyhanna Army Depot
who support our warfighters.
The OMB circular A-76 process, which this amendment seeks to
reinstate, has been prohibited because it's unfair to Federal employees
and wasteful of taxpayer dollars.
The OMB and the Pentagon, who have historically been the biggest
boosters of this process, both acknowledge that A-76 is flawed and they
oppose its revival.
The DOD acknowledges it's still improving its statutorily required
improvements, and it would be rash for us to jump past their internal
procedures for improvement.
Lifting the moratorium would eliminate the incentives the Department
needs to fix the A-76 process, and we would not be doing our jobs if we
rushed to allow a flawed procedure to lay off our dedicated civilian
workforce and, in many cases, hurt the taxpayers in the process.
Mr. RIGELL. Mr. Chairman, I just refuse to agree with the gentleman's
proposition there about laying Federal employees off. This does not
state that, has nothing to do with that, in fact. It just simply says
that this is a tool for the Department of Defense to use. It does not
require public-private competitions to go forward.
I just believe in the Federal worker. I believe in the free market as
well, that competition is a good thing, and it needs to be introduced,
because this is how we will make our defense dollars go as far as they
can possibly go.
I see this as a duty to the American people to advance this
amendment. I ask my colleagues to support it.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Ms. HANABUSA. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from
Utah (Mr. Bishop).
Mr. BISHOP of Utah. Mr. Chairman, even though I appreciate the
efforts and the goals of the gentlemen who are introducing this
amendment, the experience at most of our air logistics centers simply
means that A-76 has brought along delays; and those delays, even if
they're in the form of a study, have caused the work to delay, meaning
the product given to the warfighter is delayed, and the fixed cost
overhead that our depots obviously have faced have to be paid from some
source, which is, indeed, the taxpayer.
A-76 is about low cost and not necessarily best value, which means if
you're dealing with a market system where something goes out there, you
see if it sells or not, that's okay. But you're dealing with military
equipment which must be performed and must be prepared on a timely
basis and in a specific way. And that is why the Department of Defense
and the Office of Management and Budget are both opposing this
amendment, as well as why they halted the process in the first place,
because they found there are structural flaws inherent in this process.
It is better to go about finding a better solution to this, and that
is public-private partnerships, which we are already doing at the air
logistics centers. By taking the creativity of the private sector with
the stability of the public workforce, we actually get the best of both
worlds. That would be far better than tearing this open for a food
fight that would affect the quality of military equipment which is at
stake.
Ms. HANABUSA. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from
North Carolina (Mr. Jones).
Mr. JONES. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to this amendment. We
fought this issue of the A-76 several years ago in a bipartisan way and
we were able to put it on the shelf for a period of time, and I think
trying to activate it and bring it back is absolutely the wrong thing
to do.
I have Cherry Point Marine Air Station in my district. I have a depot
there with over 4,000 workers. They pick up and go overseas and fight
these wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, leave

[[Page H3535]]

their families back home, and stand right there with the warfighter.
We need to kill this amendment because it is opposed by the OMB, by
the DOD, and there is no reason to reactivate the A-76. It should be
dead and buried.
Ms. HANABUSA. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from
Utah (Mr. Stewart).
Mr. STEWART. Mr. Chairman, I had the honor of serving as a B-1 pilot
in the United States Air Force for 14 years. My last assignment was
working as a liaison between the Air Force and a multitude of private
contractors. And because of this, I saw firsthand the struggles that
the military had in successfully implementing A-76 contract
requirements. I saw it lead to a slowdown in work that was being
performed and, in some cases, actual complete work stoppage.
As a conservative, and I want to be clear on this, I have always
supported free markets and open competition. But markets can only be
free when there's a level playing field, and that is not possible under
the current rules regarding A-76 contracting.
Neither the military nor the private contractors are well-served by a
flawed process that leads to a flawed result, which is the reason why
the Department of Defense has spoken out so strongly against this
amendment.
The Department appreciates the value of A-76 public-private
competition as a tool to help the Department's workforce, and I do as
well. However, the Department has also identified a number of
improvements in policy changes that could lead to implementation before
the moratorium is removed. The Department is working hard to put these
processes in place. Let's give them a little more time to do that.
Ms. HANABUSA. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself the balance of my time.
Mr. Chairman, it is faulty to assume, when the Department of Defense
has not resolved longstanding problems in the A-76 process that have
been identified by the GAO and the DOD, that this is the way to
proceed. We must keep that moratorium on until we are certain that, in
fact, this is in the best interest of the people of our great Nation.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. LOEBSACK. Mr. Chair, I rise today in strong opposition to this
amendment.
The current moratorium on the use of A-76 competitions was put in
place under President Bush after the Department of Defense Inspector
General and the non-partisan GAO found significant flaws with the A-76
process, including that the costs of A-76 competitions often exceeded
the estimated savings. Those flaws have not been fixed.
Put simply--lifting the moratorium on A-76 would not save taxpayer
dollars, would not be in the best interest of our military readiness,
and is not supported by the Department of Defense.
In fact, the Department of Defense opposes lifting this moratorium
until the significant problems with these competitions are addressed.
Moreover, as co-chair of the Depot Caucus, I appreciate that this
amendment would exempt public-private partnerships but I'm deeply
concerned that lifting the A-76 moratorium and putting back into place
a severely flawed system would do significant damage to our organic
industrial base, including our arsenals and depots, at a time when it
is critical that we maintain these facilities' capabilities to equip
our troops.
I proudly represent Rock Island Arsenal, where thousands of highly
skilled people work every day to equip our troops. Our organic
industrial base has time and again shown their critical importance to
our men and women in uniform. When our troops on the ground needed
improved armor on their vehicles, it was Rock Island Arsenal that was
able to rapidly produce and field that life-saving armor to protect our
troops. As a military parent, I am thankful that the workforce at Rock
Island Arsenal and in organic industrial base facilities across our
country is there to equip our men and women in uniform.
In addition, I strongly support public-private partnerships between
our organic industrial base and the private sector because they
leverage the skills and capabilities from both sectors to equip our
troops and improve our national security readiness while benefiting the
taxpayer and supporting the highly skilled workforce at our arsenals
and depots.
Conversely, A-76 competitions do not produce best value for the
Department of Defense and our service men and women.
The deeply flawed A-76 process should not be reinstated and I
strongly oppose lifting the moratorium.
For these reasons, I oppose this amendment and urge my colleagues to
join me in voting against it.
The Acting CHAIR (Mr. Simpson). The question is on the amendment
offered by the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Rigell).
The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes
appeared to have it.
Mr. RIGELL. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Virginia
will be postponed.

Amendment No. 10 Offered by Mr. McGovern

The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 10
printed in part B of House Report 113-108.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:

Strike section 1222 and insert the following:

SEC. 1222. COMPLETION OF ACCELERATED TRANSITION OF UNITED
STATES COMBAT AND MILITARY AND SECURITY
OPERATIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT OF AFGHANISTAN.

(a) In General.--It is the policy of the United States
that, in coordination with the Government of Afghanistan,
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) member countries,
and other allies in Afghanistan, the President shall--
(1) complete the accelerated transition of United States
combat operations to the Government of Afghanistan by not
later than December 31, 2013;
(2) complete the accelerated transition of United States
military and security operations to the Government of
Afghanistan and redeploy United States Armed Forces from
Afghanistan (including operations involving military and
security-related contractors) by not later than December 31,
2014; and
(3) pursue robust negotiations leading to a political
settlement and reconciliation of the internal conflict in
Afghanistan, to include the Government of Afghanistan, all
interested parties within Afghanistan and with the observance
and support of representatives of donor nations active in
Afghanistan and regional governments and partners in order to
secure a secure and independent Afghanistan and regional
security and stability.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that
should the President determine the necessity to maintain
United States troops in Afghanistan to carry out missions
after December 31, 2014, and such presence and missions
should be authorized by a separate vote of Congress not later
than June 1, 2014.
(c) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be
construed so as to limit or prohibit any authority of the
President to--
(1) modify the military strategy, tactics, and operations
of United States Armed Forces as such Armed Forces redeploy
from Afghanistan;
(2) attack Al Qaeda forces wherever such forces are
located;
(3) provide financial support and equipment to the
Government of Afghanistan for the training and supply of
Afghanistan military and security forces; or
(4) gather, provide, and share intelligence with United
States allies operating in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman
from Massachusetts (Mr. McGovern) and a Member opposed each will
control 5 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Massachusetts.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself 1 minute.
Mr. Chairman, the war in Afghanistan has gone on for more than 12
years, the longest war in American history. 2,235 U.S. military
personnel have been killed, over 17,000 have been wounded, and more
will fall before our troops finally come home. The human and financial
costs are staggering; $778 billion on Operation Enduring Freedom,
nearly all of that in Afghanistan, $7.2 billion each and every month.
The President has announced and is implementing a timetable to wind
down U.S. military operations in Afghanistan. He's carrying it out.
This amendment requires the President to stick to his timetable,
accelerate it if he can. And depending on your point of view, this
amendment puts the wind at the President's back, or holds his feet to
the fire, to fulfill the promises he made to our brave troops, their
families, and the American people.
More importantly, it expresses that should U.S. troops be asked to
remain in Afghanistan beyond 2014, then Congress needs to take its
constitutional

[[Page H3536]]

responsibility seriously and hold a specific vote to authorize that
mission and troop presence.
The future and fate of tens of thousands of uniformed men and women
deserve a vote. I ask all my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to
vote ``yes'' on the McGovern-Jones-Smith-Lee-Garamendi amendment.
I reserve the balance of my time.

{time} 1610

Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I rise to claim the time in opposition,
although I will not oppose the amendment in its current form.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California is recognized for 5
minutes.
Mr. McKEON. I yield myself such time as I may consume.
This amendment is a reflection of the President's current policy in
Afghanistan. My concerns about the President's Afghanistan policy are
well documented. I do not believe we should have given our enemies the
comfort of a date certain for our withdrawal. I believe the commander
in chief should only commit our troops to combat if he is committed to
getting the job done right.
Notwithstanding my underlying concerns, I must acknowledge the
amendment articulates a policy that reflects the President's current
policy.
I look forward to working with the sponsors of this amendment to
further perfect the language going forward. In particular, I note that
the amendment expresses the sense of Congress that a post-2014 troop
presence should be authorized by a vote in Congress. This Congressman
does not agree with that assertion. The Congress does not vote on
Status of Forces Agreements with other countries. They are not defense
treaties. It would be bad policy and a bad precedent to treat
Afghanistan any differently. Moreover, the underlying bill takes
meaningful steps to ensure any Bilateral Security Agreement with
Afghanistan protects U.S. interests and our troops' ability to defend
themselves.
This is not a trivial issue. Our vital national security interests
are at stake during this delicate time period in Afghanistan. My
position is unchanged. The transition of the mission should be based
upon the conditions on the ground and the input of our commanders. I,
for one, hope that the President's decisionmaking process is not based
on a non-binding restatement of his current policies. Rather, I hope
his decisionmaking is commensurate with the national security interests
at stake.
I look forward to working with the gentleman further and reserve the
balance of my time.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Chairman, at this time, it's my pleasure to yield
1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Jones), a
cosponsor.
Mr. JONES. Mr. Chairman, it's been said before, we have been in
Afghanistan for 12 years. We in Congress should have the opportunity to
vote ``yes'' or ``no'' on any commitment of troops after 2014.
As a former Commandant of the United States Marine Corps who agrees
with my opinion that we should withdraw our troops from Afghanistan
said to me, and I quote the Commandant:

What do we say to the mother and father--to the wife--of
the last marine or soldier killed to support a corrupt
government and a corrupt leader in a war that cannot be won?

Mr. Chairman, Congress has neglected this war for far too long. We
should not allow another American to die in Afghanistan unless we vote
on the policy.
The American people want our troops out. The American people know
that Afghanistan is a failed policy. The American people do not want
any more blood or any more treasure to be spent in Afghanistan.
I join my friend from Massachusetts and my other friends: please vote
for this amendment offered by Mr. McGovern, myself, and others. It is
the right thing to do for our military, it's the right thing to do for
our Nation, and it is our constitutional responsibility.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Chairman, I'm privileged to now yield 1\1/2\
minutes to the ranking member of the Armed Services Committee, Mr.
Smith.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. I thank the gentleman from Massachusetts for
his leadership on this issue.
My opinion is that we have done what we can do in Afghanistan. A
substantial portion of the mission, which was very clear, was to try to
contain the Taliban and contain al Qaeda so they could never again use
it as a base to attack our country. And it is not easy work. As Mr.
Jones pointed out, and others, there are many, many problems and
challenges in Afghanistan, not the least of which is the corruption
within the government.
Our goal has always been clear: whatever the minimum is to get a
government that can stand and deny a safe haven to those who threaten
America. That was a fight worth doing. But we have done what we can do.
We have trained hundreds of thousands of Afghan national security
forces, and it is time to turn that responsibility over to Afghanistan.
It will always be a challenging part of the world. In both
Afghanistan and Pakistan, violent extremists are abundant, and we'll
have to keep an eye on it. But we do not need to have the troop levels
that we have now. We need to draw down in a very responsible way, and I
think the gentleman's amendment lays out a plan to do that.
Therefore, I support it, and, again, I support him for his efforts to
get us out of Afghanistan as soon as we responsibly can.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Chairman, how much time remains?
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Massachusetts has 1\3/4\ minutes
remaining.
Mr. McGOVERN. I yield 30 seconds to the gentleman from California
(Mr. Rohrabacher).
Mr. ROHRABACHER. Keeping our troops in Afghanistan any longer than
they have to absolutely be there is a disservice to those people who
are protecting our country. They are now doing what we said they would
do once we have announced that we were leaving: they're picking our
people off. How do we explain to those parents who are losing their
children in the next few months?
Let's not send any more over there, and if we do, let's make sure
that it's a decision made by the House of the people rather than just
by a clique someplace in the Pentagon or elsewhere. We need to make
sure that we're watching out for our troops, and I think that this is
the best amendment that would do just that.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Chairman, I will close. I yield myself the
remaining time.
Mr. Chairman, hundreds of billions of dollars and tens of thousands
of U.S.-NATO allies and Afghan lives have been lost. It is time to end
the war in Afghanistan, bring our troops home, and take seriously our
duty as a Congress to specifically authorize any mission and troop
presence beyond 2014.
We are not bystanders in this war. We are responsible for sending
thousands and thousands of men and women over into Afghanistan. The
least we can do is take seriously our duty as a Congress and authorize
any mission and troop presence beyond 2014.
Members of Congress ought to go on record as to where they stand on
this. We owe it to our troops, and we owe it to their families and the
American people. I urge my colleagues to support the McGovern-Jones-
Smith amendment on Afghanistan and send a signal to the administration
and to others that we take our responsibility in this matter very
seriously. We will have a vote if this war goes beyond what the
President has stated.
With that, Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, at this time, I yield the balance of my
time to the gentleman from Texas, the vice chairman of the committee,
Mr. Thornberry.
Mr. THORNBERRY. I thank the chairman for yielding.
Mr. Chairman, I would simply want to point out that Members have a
variety of opinions about Afghanistan, and a number of Members have
come to the floor to voice their opinion that we ought to leave
Afghanistan. I understand that. That's not what this amendment says.
This amendment basically restates the President's policy with regard to
Afghanistan, and then, as the gentleman from Massachusetts said, it
says Congress ought to exercise its responsibilities under the
Constitution.
Now, we can do that in a variety of ways. We can have oversight
hearings,

[[Page H3537]]

and we can have amendments dealing with funding. And we've had those
sorts of things before. But the point is that some of the rhetoric
doesn't match the amendment. As the chairman pointed out, the
underlying bill tries to encourage a Bilateral Security Agreement so
that looking ahead beyond 2014, it is very important to many of us that
any American troops who are remaining in Afghanistan have the
protections that they should have under such an agreement. So the
underlying bill has a fence on some of the funding going to Afghanistan
until there is that sort of Bilateral Security Agreement.
So the point is, moving ahead beyond 2014, there are lots of unknowns
at this stage. We're trying to help shape it in a way that is
beneficial for our security but also protects our troops. But the
underlying amendment, to get back to what's before us, basically
restates the President's position and says that Congress ought to
exercise its responsibilities. I think that's true. Meanwhile, Members
can have their own opinions about Afghanistan and what should happen
between now and then.
I yield back the balance of my time.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. McGovern).
The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the ayes
appeared to have it.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from
Massachusetts will be postponed.

Amendment No. 11 Offered by Mr. Goodlatte

The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 11
printed in part B of House Report 113-108.
Mr. GOODLATTE. Mr. Chairman, I offer amendment No. 11.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:

At the end of subtitle D of title X, add the following:

SEC. 10__. PROCEDURES GOVERNING UNITED STATES CITIZENS
APPREHENDED INSIDE THE UNITED STATES PURSUANT
TO THE AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE.

(a) Availability of Writ of Habeas Corpus.--Nothing in the
Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40;
50 U.S.C. 1541 note), or any other law, shall be construed to
deny the availability of the writ of habeas corpus to any
United States citizen apprehended inside the United States
pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force
(Public Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note).
(b) Procedures.--In any habeas proceeding brought by a
United States citizen apprehended inside the United States
pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force
(Public Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note), the government
shall have the burden of proving by clear and convincing
evidence that such citizen is an unprivileged enemy
belligerent and there shall be no presumption that any
evidence presented by the government as justification for the
apprehension and subsequent detention is accurate and
authentic.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman
from Virginia (Mr. Goodlatte) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Virginia.

{time} 1620

Mr. GOODLATTE. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
On September 18, 2001, Congress enacted the Authorization for the Use
of Military Force, which empowered the President to ``use all necessary
and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons
he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist
attacks,'' in order to prevent ``any future acts of international
terrorism against the United States.''
Section 1021 of the fiscal year 2012 National Defense Authorization
Act reaffirms the President's authority to detain so-called ``enemy
combatants'' by ``affirming that the authority of the President to use
all necessary and appropriate force pursuant to the Authorization for
Use of Military Force includes the authority for the Armed Forces of
the United States to detain covered persons pending disposition under
the law of war.''
A number of Members from both sides of the aisle have expressed
extreme discomfort and even outrage at the notion that a United States
citizen apprehended on United States soil can potentially be held
indefinitely under this act. To that end, I supported an amendment to
the fiscal year 2013 National Defense Authorization Act that reaffirmed
the availability of the writ of habeas corpus for any person detained
in the United States pursuant to the 2001 AUMF or the fiscal year 2012
NDAA.
While this provision was a step in the right direction, many would
view the current habeas proceedings as unfair to the petitioner. For
instance, the government enjoys a rebuttable presumption that its
evidence is accurate and authentic, and it must only prove its case by
a preponderance of the evidence. To most Americans, this would not seem
to be a fair fight. For United States citizens, the burden should be on
the government to prove that the detainee is an enemy belligerent. U.S.
citizens should not be put in a position to prove that they are not a
terrorist.
Today, with this amendment, I want to make clear that nothing in the
AUMF or the fiscal year 2012 NDAA--or any other law for that matter--
can be construed to deny the great writ of habeas corpus.
Further, this amendment requires that in habeas proceedings for
United States citizens apprehended in the United States pursuant to the
AUMF, the government must prove by clear and convincing evidence that
the citizen is an unprivileged enemy combatant, and there is no
presumption that the government's evidence is accurate and authentic.
This is an important amendment that should alleviate any of the well-
founded concerns of the American people concerning the possibility of
indefinite detention of United States citizens. The presumption of
innocence until proven guilty will be preserved by adopting this
amendment.
I want to thank the chairman of the Armed Services Committee for
supporting this amendment. I appreciate his commitment to ensuring that
this language stays in the bill as it moves through the legislative
process.
I urge my colleagues to support this amendment, and I reserve the
balance of my time.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. I rise to claim the time in opposition.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. I yield myself 2 minutes.
Mr. Chairman, make no mistake about it, even with this amendment, the
President of the United States and the Department of Justice will still
have the ability to indefinitely detain people captured in the U.S.--be
they U.S. citizens or not--without the normal due process of law.
Habeas will be available, but even with this increased standard, it is
a very minimum standard; and it does not afford the normal article III
court rights that are in the Constitution for everybody else. The
President will still have the ability to indefinitely detain people
here in the U.S.
This amendment is insufficient, first of all, to deal with the
concerns that I think people legitimately have about excessive
executive power over people in the U.S. The Executive will continue to
maintain, under the Authorization for the Use of Military Force, the
ability to indefinitely detain anyone who is deemed to be a covered
person, an enemy combatant; and, yes, it is a slightly higher standard,
but it is not the beyond-a-reasonable standard that is normally
required to incarcerate somebody.
The President doesn't need this power. President Obama has never
exercised it. President Bush only briefly exercised it in three
instances. He doesn't need the power. But to keep it on the books is a
threat to liberty and a threat to freedom here in the U.S.
The specific problem with this amendment is it carves out U.S.
citizens, whereas the constitutional protections--and deliberately--
were for any person. If you read the Constitution and the Bill of
Rights, it doesn't say any U.S. citizen. It says any person.
Now, on habeas, you will have two different standards. You will have
the standard to hold a noncitizen--which will be, I gather, still the
preponderance of the evidence. The government

[[Page H3538]]

will still have the presumption that what they're saying is true, but
for a U.S. citizen you will have a different standard. That really
messes with the Constitution.
There's a very simple way to do this. I will have an amendment in a
couple of amendments that gets rid of the ability to indefinitely
detain anyone captured in the U.S.--straight forward, no question, no
weasel words, no back and forth between U.S. citizens and not. It gets
rid of indefinite detention.
I would urge support for that amendment and opposition to this one,
and I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. GOODLATTE. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself 1 minute. I want to
respond to the gentleman.
First of all, the contention that there is no distinction drawn
between United States citizens and noncitizens in the context of the
Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, the Supreme Court
has held that the Fourth Amendment does not operate to protect all
citizens regardless of their connections to American society. So the 9/
11 hijackers are not in the same status as individuals in this country
who are citizens of the United States. Rather, the Fourth Amendment
operates only to protect the class of persons who are part of a
national community or who have otherwise developed sufficient
connection with this country to be considered part of that community.
The farther that an individual is removed from such community, then the
weaker the claim he has to constitutional protection.
I agree with the gentleman that rewriting the Authorization for Use
of Military Force and extending this protection, particularly as it
pertains to the United States citizens, greater should be done; but
what the gentleman wants to do does not have the kind of strong
bipartisan support that's necessary to pass the House. This amendment
does, and I urge my colleagues to support it.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the
gentleman from New York (Mr. Nadler).
Mr. NADLER. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to this amendment. Mr.
Goodlatte and Chairman Smith and I are in agreement, I think, on the
goal, though I think the three of us mutually disagree on elements of
this amendment.
The amendment, while intended to enhance protections for U.S.
citizens, in fact does the opposite. Right now, Americans on U.S. soil
cannot be detained indefinitely without charge or trial. Rather than
affirming this fundamental principle, the amendment implicitly
authorizes the military to detain Americans on U.S. soil indefinitely
by premising its protection on the mistaken assertion that the AUMF,
the Authorization for Military Force, allows such detention--which I
disagree with Chairman Smith, it does not. No such authority exists.
The AUMF does not grant this authority, and we should do nothing to
suggest otherwise. In fact, we should be taking clear and immediate
steps to ban indefinite military detention altogether. The Smith-Gibson
amendment, which I support, takes a good first step in doing this by
prohibiting the detention without charge of any person arrested or
detained in the United States.
We should also pass my No Detention Without Charge Act, which would
cure the problem altogether by preventing indefinite detention without
charge or trial for all persons in U.S. custody, at home or overseas.
Secondly, this amendment would create greater uncertainty in habeas
corpus cases and raises significant constitutional concerns. The
amendment seeks to raise the burden on the U.S. Government to prove
that a U.S. citizen is an unprivileged enemy belligerent. But that is
not the same as requiring proof that the person is being lawfully
detained, which is what habeas corpus is designed to do.
The creation of a two-tiered habeas system with one set of standards
for U.S. citizens and different, lesser standards for noncitizens
raises very troubling constitutional concerns. Our Constitution simply
does not permit us to permit greater basic due process rights based
solely on citizenship.
Although the chairman, Mr. Goodlatte, is right in citing the case
that he cited, he talked about connection with the United States.
Someone who is in the United States--physically in the United States--
and is arrested there has the same constitutional Fourth Amendment
protections as an American citizen.
Any changes to habeas protections should be studied carefully through
regular order, not through rushed attachments to the defense
authorization act. Passing this amendment would be a serious and
dangerous mistake. I urge my colleagues to vote against it.
Mr. GOODLATTE. Mr. Chairman, may I ask how much time each side has
remaining.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Virginia has 1 minute remaining.
The gentleman from Washington has 1 minute remaining.
Mr. GOODLATTE. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself the balance of my time to
say to the gentleman from New York, you cause the Members of the
Congress to have a Hobson's choice of having to choose to give the
protection to every single person in the United States--including the
9/11 hijackers and others--or you have the opportunity to choose to
give it clearly to United States citizens who clearly are entitled to
have it.
You do not have the ability, with your amendment, to draw that line
between those who are lawfully present in the United States and would
be entitled, and those who do not. As a result of that, I would urge my
colleagues to oppose the amendment that the gentleman describes and
support this amendment, which will advance the cause of giving United
States citizens greater protections, reversing the burden of proof,
putting that burden on the government--which is, after all, the
American way. It is, after all, what the Bill of Rights provides.
You have to show that in order to convict a United States citizen in
our courts--or certainly in an article III court--and it should be in
these military tribunals--the burden of proof on government to do that
and do it by a higher standard than they have to under the law that
exists right now in the AUMF, which is only reasonable proof, not clear
and convincing as this amendment requires.
I urge my colleagues to support this amendment as the best way to
move forward in protecting the rights of American citizens.
I yield back the balance of my time.

{time} 1630

Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield the balance of my time
to the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Andrews).
(Mr. ANDREWS asked and was given permission to revise and extend his
remarks.)
Mr. ANDREWS. Mr. Chairman, I share with the author of this amendment
the goal of clarifying and strengthening the time-honored writ of
habeas corpus for all American citizens. But my concern is that
sometimes by omission we limit people's rights.
This amendment is very carefully, but narrowly, drawn in such a way
it begs questions about the exclusion of those outside the ambit of
this amendment and their rights. The gentleman, I know in good faith,
is trying to promulgate an amendment that broadens the right of the
writ of habeas corpus. But I think when compared with the Smith-Gibson
language that this modifies, that it raises by omission an intention of
the Congress to narrow the right of habeas corpus. So although it is
not the gentleman's intent, I believe it is the effect of this
amendment.
Those who believe that the right of habeas should be strengthened and
broadened, I believe should oppose this amendment and support the
underlying language as I, in fact, do.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Goodlatte).
The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the ayes
appeared to have it.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Washington
will be postponed.

Amendment No. 12 Offered by Mr. Radel

The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 12
printed in part B of House Report 113-108.
Mr. RADEL. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.

[[Page H3539]]

The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:

Page 442, after line 9, insert the following:

SEC. 1080. REPORT ON UNITED STATES CITIZENS SUBJECT TO
MILITARY DETENTION.

(a) Report Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall submit
to Congress an annual report on United States citizens
subject to military detention. Such report shall include, for
the period covered by the report, each of the following:
(1) The name of each United States citizen subject to
military detention during such period.
(2) The legal justification for such detention of such
citizen.
(3) The steps taken to provide judicial process for or to
release each such citizen.
(b) Form of Report.--The report required by subsection (a)
shall be in unclassified form but may contain a classified
annex.
(c) Availability of Report.--The report submitted under
subsection (a) shall be made available to all members of
Congress.
(d) Savings Clause.--Nothing in this section shall be
construed to authorize or express approval for subjecting
United States citizens to military detention.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman
from Florida (Mr. Radel) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Florida.
Mr. RADEL. Mr. Chairman, for too long, and at the hands of both
parties, the White House has been operating with secret memos and
behind closed doors hidden from you. This is why we are offering this
amendment requiring the Department of Defense to submit an annual
report to Congress which basically goes over who, why, and what.
Who? The names of any U.S. citizens subject to military detention.
Why? The legal justification for their detention.
What? The steps the executive branch is taking to either provide them
some sort of judicial process or the path of possible release.
Now, this amendment requires that an unclassified version of the
report be made available to every Member of Congress. This amendment
shines light where there has been darkness in this country, ensuring
freedom, liberty, and justice for all.
While there is a legitimate need that we recognize that the
government protects us from terrorism, we almost always must ensure--we
must ensure--that Americans' rights to their due process and their day
in court are always, always protected. You need to be guaranteed that
your government is looking out for your rights.
Upon our founding, every American was guaranteed fundamental God-
given rights that cannot be taken away by the government. These
amendments ensure that these rights are safeguarded.
I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from Arizona
(Mr. Salmon).
Mr. SALMON. Mr. Chairman, this little document here, the Constitution
of the United States, is something that we all cherish, something when
we were all sworn in we raised our right arm to the square and we said
that we would uphold this document. It is the framework this Nation is
built upon. There are certain unalienable rights that are created in
that document that we just can't waive away.
Some concerns about these rights are embedded in this bill. I have
real concerns about American citizens being detained for an unspecified
amount of time. I believe that this amendment goes a long way toward
shedding the light, the light of transparency, on how these American
citizens are handled. I think that's the very least that we can do as a
body to make sure that our people's fundamental rights of freedom are
protected.
One of the great leaders and Founding Fathers of this Nation,
Benjamin Franklin, once said:

Those who are willing to trade their freedom for security
deserve neither and shall probably lose both.

Mr. RADEL. Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.

Parliamentary Inquiry

Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I have a parliamentary
inquiry.
The ACTING CHAIR. The gentleman will state it.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. This has happened a couple of times.
Isn't it the normal order that one person speaks, then they reserve,
and then the opposition speaks? A couple of times they just moved on to
their next speaker and have gone through. As I understand it
parliamentarily, that is not the way it is supposed to happen.
The ACTING CHAIR. That is the normal pattern of alternation, but
recognition is within the discretion of the Chair.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. At the discretion of the Chair. That's fine.
Mr. Chairman, I rise to claim the time in opposition, even though I
am not in opposition to the amendment.
The ACTING CHAIR. Without objection, the gentleman is recognized for
5 minutes.
There was no objection.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I appreciate the opportunity
to speak. I think it is very straightforward. Certainly we should
acknowledge and have this bit of information made available to us, and
I don't oppose that.
I just want to take the time to raise the issue of the next
amendment--the Smith-Gibson amendment--that's coming up on this whole
broader issue. This is a very simple, straightforward debate, that is,
the militarization of U.S. law enforcement.
That's really what we're concerned about with indefinite detention.
There are some who believe that any terrorist act committed within the
U.S., that the U.S. military should basically take over. You should
have indefinite detention; you should basically get rid of the normal
due process contained in the Constitution.
I think that is dangerous, wrong, and wholly unnecessary. I think the
U.S. Constitution and the Department of Justice have proven themselves
more than capable of investigating, capturing, prosecuting, trying,
convicting, and incarcerating all the terrorists in the U.S.; and I
think it is a dangerous step towards executive and military power to
allow things like indefinite detention under military control within
the U.S.
That's the heart and the essence of this issue. We are dancing around
the U.S. citizen question. I take Mr. Goodlatte at his word. I believe
that the Constitution doesn't apply to everybody, but it doesn't just
apply to U.S. citizens either, as he acknowledged. It applies to U.S.
persons, broadly speaking, people who have a connection to this
country. We shouldn't just protect U.S. citizens; we should protect
U.S. persons under that constitutional definition.
In a very straightforward way, do you believe the President of the
United States should have the power to indefinitely detain people
captured within the U.S. without the normal due process of law? I
don't, and honestly I don't think most Americans do, and I don't think
most Members of Congress do. We have gotten bogged down in different
little subpieces of the debate and U.S. citizens and who counts and who
doesn't count.
But the fundamental question is, Do you believe that the President
should have the power to indefinitely detain people captured in the
U.S. without normal due process of law? If you don't, if you are
concerned about that executive power, then the only way to take that
out of our law is to vote for Smith-Gibson. The rest of this just sort
of moves it around on the edges, but very clearly leaves that power
with the President, a power I don't think that he should have.
With that, I yield back the balance of my time.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentleman from Florida (Mr. Radel).
The amendment was agreed to.

Amendment No. 13 Offered by Mr. Smith of Washington

The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 13
printed in part B of House Report 113-108.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I offer an amendment.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:
Page 405, after line 9, insert the following:

SEC. 1040B. DISPOSITION OF COVERED PERSONS DETAINED IN THE
UNITED STATES PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORIZATION FOR
USE OF MILITARY FORCE.

(a) Short Title.--This section may be cited as the ``Due
Process and Military Detention Amendments Act''.
(b) Disposition.--Section 1021 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal

[[Page H3540]]

Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1562; 10 U.S.C. 801
note) is amended--
(1) in subsection (c), by striking ``The disposition'' and
inserting ``Except as provided in subsection (g), the
disposition''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsections:
``(g) Disposition of Persons Detained in the United
States.--
``(1) Persons detained pursuant to the authorization for
use of military force or the fiscal year 2012 national
defense authorization act.--In the case of a covered person
who is detained in the United States, or a territory or
possession of the United States, pursuant to the
Authorization for Use of Military Force or this Act,
disposition under the law of war shall occur immediately upon
the person coming into custody of the Federal Government and
shall only mean the immediate transfer of the person for
trial and proceedings by a court established under Article
III of the Constitution of the United States or by an
appropriate State court. Such trial and proceedings shall
have all the due process as provided for under the
Constitution of the United States.
``(2) Prohibition on transfer to military custody.--No
person detained, captured, or arrested in the United States,
or a territory or possession of the United States, may be
transferred to the custody of the Armed Forces for detention
under the Authorization for Use of Military Force or this
Act.
``(h) Rule of Construction.--This section shall not be
construed to authorize the detention of a person within the
United States, or a territory or possession of the United
States, under the Authorization for Use of Military Force or
this Act.''.
(c) Repeal of Requirement for Military Custody.--
(1) Repeal.--Section 1022 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 is hereby repealed.
(2) Conforming amendment.--Section 1029(b) of such Act is
amended by striking ``applies to'' and all that follows
through ``any other person'' and inserting ``applies to any
person''.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman
from Washington (Mr. Smith) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Washington.

{time} 1640

Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the
gentleman from New York (Mr. Nadler).
Mr. NADLER. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
I rise in strong support of the Smith-Gibson amendment.
When we considered the fiscal year 2012 version of this bill, I
argued in opposition to sections 1021 and 1022. I argued then--and I
still believe now--that these provisions go far beyond the AUMF to
suggest that the President has the authority to detain even U.S.
citizens without charge indefinitely. The AUMF gives the President no
such authority.
Clearly, we must roll back these provisions. The Smith-Gibson
amendment prohibits the detention without charge of any person arrested
or detained in the United States, and it is the first step towards
restoring the due process of law. It is a good first step, but the
scope is limited to U.S. soil and to the present AUMF. We should do
more.
That's why I've introduced the No Detention Without Charge Act, which
would apply to all persons in U.S. custody--at home and overseas--and
to all Authorizations to Use Military Force--present and future. It not
only prohibits detention without charge of people arrested in the
United States, but it also prohibits the detention of any person
anywhere, except to the extent permitted by the Constitution and the
law of war, and it restores a meaningful right of action for detainees
to challenge the legality of the detentions.
The notion that the United States ought to conduct itself according
to the Constitution and the law of war should not be controversial.
Smith-Gibson takes the first step, and I have proposed the next, which
is towards affirming our values and securing our liberty. This
clarifies that the AUMF does not give any President the authority to
detain people without the due process of law and to detain them
indefinitely.
I urge my colleagues to support this amendment and to sign on as
cosponsors of my bill but to, right now, support the Smith-Gibson
amendment.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I rise to claim the time in opposition.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California is recognized for 5
minutes.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to my friend and
colleague, the chairman of the Homeland Security Committee, the
gentleman from Texas (Mr. McCaul).
Mr. McCAUL. I thank the gentleman from California, my fellow
chairman.
I rise in opposition to this amendment. As the terrorist attacks in
Benghazi and Boston demonstrate, our fight against those who mean us
harm and those they inspire is far from over.
This amendment is of questionable constitutional standing as it seeks
to deprive any President of lawful options that he needs to protect
America; it hinders our ability to gather information; and it actually
provides an incentive for terrorists to come here to attack us. It
prohibits the President from ever detaining anyone in the United
States, including a foreign terrorist, under the authority of the 2001
Authorization for Use of Military Force.
This amendment requires that foreign terrorists could only be
prosecuted in civilian courts. But what if they could not be
successfully prosecuted? Currently, there are detainees in Guantanamo
who are too dangerous to release but who are not prosecutable. Under
this amendment, if similarly situated terrorists were captured here at
home, they would have to be released. Our experience in trying to
deport illegal aliens whose native lands refuse to accept their return
demonstrates the untenable position this amendment would leave us in.
If we can't use the AUMF to hold detainees and if we can't
successfully prosecute them in a civilian court, then what can we do?
The amendment ignores the reality of the threats that we face every
day.
Consistent with the laws of war, we have long recognized the
authority to detain enemy combatants for the duration of hostilities.
In the 2004 Hamdi decision, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the authority
to detain a U.S. citizen captured fighting with the Taliban and who was
later detained in the United States, and that such detainees have the
right to challenge their detentions. Then the 2012 NDAA reaffirmed the
detention authority provided by the 2001 AUMF as well as the right to
habeas corpus determinations.
The amendment overturns established legal precedent as well as
undermines the statutory support for the AUMF. It does not make us
safer, and it increases our peril. I urge my colleagues to vote against
it.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the
gentleman from New York (Mr. Gibson).
Mr. GIBSON. I thank the gentleman from Washington. I am honored to be
offering this amendment with him.
From our Bill of Rights, the Fifth Amendment: no person shall be
deprived of life, liberty or property without due process. From our
Sixth Amendment: the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and
public trial.
That is the supreme law of the land.
Evidently, we have some ambiguity based out of the 2001 AUMF. So,
clearly, we need to offer this amendment here today, and I rise in
strong support of it.
We think about the founding in that period, shortly after the
Revolution, and remember the fact that we had Americans who at the time
did not support the Revolution. There were a lot of hard feelings in
the immediate aftermath of the war, but the one thing that united
everyone was the way that we arrayed our institutions--to check
absolute power--and, further, to check the power between the Federal
and the State governments. Of course, underpinning all of that was the
Bill of Rights, the Bill of Rights that unites all of us--united us
then, unites us now.
That's why I think it is very important that we bring clarity to this
matter, that we pass Smith-Gibson and that we ensure that we bring
clarity to the situation, which is that our Bill of Rights is the
supreme law of the land.

Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to my friend and
colleague, the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Cotton).
Mr. COTTON. Thank you.
When I was a child, I played a game called hide-and-seek, as I
suspect many of you might have played. There was a phrase in that game
called ``ollie ollie oxen free,'' which meant you could come out, that
you were safe, that you no longer had to hide.

[[Page H3541]]

This amendment is the ``ollie ollie oxen free'' amendment of the war
on terrorism. It invites al Qaeda and associated forces to send
terrorists to the United States and to recruit terrorists on U.S. soil.
Think about what happens if you're detained in the U.S. for
committing an act of terrorism: you will not be detained while you are
interrogated; you cannot be used to stop future attacks. Think about
what will happen: you will get your Miranda warnings; you will get an
attorney at taxpayer expense; and you will, if acquitted and not
accepted by your home country, be released into the streets of the
United States. We are encouraging al Qaeda to send terrorists here if
we adopt this amendment.
Consider also about an illegal alien crossing our border. If he does
so to get a job, Customs and Border Patrol can detain him and summarily
deport him. If he is detained by intelligence or military
professionals, what happens? He goes into the court system, and he gets
all the rights due to a common burglar.
The concerns that we have about due process are misplaced. The law
plainly lets every person--a citizen or foreigner--file a petition for
the writ of habeas corpus to challenge his detention. I strongly oppose
this amendment.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the
gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Amash).
Mr. AMASH. In 2011, Congress enacted a provision of the NDAA that
authorizes the indefinite detention of Americans caught on U.S. soil.
That provision, which is permanent law and continues to apply to this
day, authorizes the President to detain persons who ``substantially
supported'' forces ``associated'' with terrorists.
It is important to note that ``substantial support'' and being
``associated'' with terrorists were not defined in 2011 and still have
not been defined by Congress. There is a good argument that this
provision is unconstitutionally vague. In fact, a Federal court has
already ruled that the provision is unconstitutional because it chills
First Amendment association and free speech.
Our Constitution does not permit the Federal Government to detain
anyone in the United States indefinitely without charge or trial. I
strongly believe in protecting the country's security and in equipping
our Armed Forces with the tools they need to defeat our enemies, but
the American people cannot support measures that, in the name of
security, violate our constitutionally protected rights.
The Constitution entitles all people to be charged with a crime and
to be given a trial when the government detains them in the United
States. Join me in affirming this right by voting for Smith-Gibson,
which is the only amendment that protects the rights of those of you
watching at home.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to my friend and
colleague, the gentleman from New York (Mr. King).
Mr. KING of New York. I thank my good friend, the chairman, for
yielding, and I rise in opposition to the Smith-Gibson amendment.
Let me express my deepest respect for the ranking member, Mr. Smith,
and for my colleague from New York, Mr. Gibson, who has served his
Nation long and well and who certainly acts with the very best of
intentions. I certainly admire his patriotism and dedication.
Having said that, I strongly identify with the remarks of Chairman
McCaul and of Congressman Cotton. I think the ultimate fact here is
that we would be giving terrorists more rights if they come to the
United States than if they'd been captured overseas. To say that
everyone captured in the United States is entitled to the full rights
of a citizen or of a person lawfully in this country takes away from
the fact that if a Nazi soldier had attacked the United States during
World War II, would he have been entitled to all the rights of a
citizen?

{time} 1650

In fact, the Supreme Court ruled on that. We had Nazi saboteurs land
in New York during World War II. They were arrested, tried before a
military commission, and executed with the approval of the United
States Supreme Court.
In the Hamdi decision several years ago, the plurality of the Court
said:

There is no bar to this Nation's holding one of its own
citizens as an enemy combatant. A citizen, no less than an
alien, can be part of supporting forces hostile to the United
States or coalition partners and engage in an armed conflict
against the United States.

The fact is we should not be saying there's an incentive for a
terrorist to come from Afghanistan and come to the United States to
fight because if he's captured here, he gets more rights than if he was
captured in Afghanistan. This goes against, to me, common sense, and it
in no way is what is happening under the AUMF and in any way a
violation of the Constitution.
With that, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. I yield myself the balance of my time.
There is no incentive for U.S. terrorists to come here. They are
trying to attack us. But we capture them successfully, try them, and
prosecute them.
Abdulmutallab came here. He was captured. Yes, he was Mirandized.
Even after he was Mirandized, he gave out an enormous amount of
information that was very helpful. We convicted him.
What this is essentially saying is that we don't trust the Department
of Justice to do their job, so therefore we have to give the President
the power to detain someone whether they have any evidence of a crime
or not. If they come here, the Department of Justice does its job.
We have tried and convicted over 400 terrorists in this country
successfully. The only incentive to come here is if they're not going
to commit a crime. All of the inmates down at Guantanamo were not
captured in the U.S. No one who has been captured in the U.S. as a
terrorist have we failed to convict.
Let's trust the Constitution. The Constitution doesn't threaten us.
The Constitution protects us. Let us use it, and use it to bring these
terrorists to justice, as every single time we have successfully done.
I urge support for the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my
time.
Ms. JACKSON LEE. Mr. Chair, I rise in support of amendment No. 13 to
H.R. 1960, ``National Defense Authorization Act for FY2014,'' offered
by Ranking Member Smith and Congressman Gibson of New York.
The amendment strikes Section 1022 of the FY2012 National Defense
Authorization Act and amends Section 1021 of same law to eliminate
indefinite military detention of any person detained under AUMF
authority in the United States and its territories and possessions by
providing immediate transfer to trial and proceedings by a court
established under Article III of the Constitution of the United States
or by an appropriate State court.
This amendment would bar any President or any other government
official from ordering the military to put anyone in the United States,
or its territories or possessions, into indefinite detention without
charge or trial, or to put anyone in the United States on trial before
a military commission.
Federal criminal courts are open, operating, experienced, and
secure--and are the appropriate venue for any proceedings here in the
United States itself.
The Bill of Rights applies to all persons within the United States
and its territories, this amendment is consistent with 233 years of
constitutional precedent as it does not pick and choose between which
persons on located on U.S. soil will receive constitutional
protections.
Further, the amendment bars the transfer of anyone in the United
States to the military for indefinite detention without charge or
trial. This provision is consistent with the Posse Comitatus Act, and
would provide an additional protection against any misuse of civilian
law enforcement as a way to put suspects into military detention
without charge or trial.
It is fully consistent with the Constitution, with the Posse
Comitatus Act of 1878, and with the Non-Detention Act of 1971. It will
reinforce the protections that most Americans assume apply--and do
apply--within the United States.
Since 2001, this executive power has only been utilized 3 times which
makes it clear that it is not necessary to protect our national
security; however, creates a gap in our civil liberties.
This amendment would repeal section 1022 of the FY2012 NDAA. Section
1022 requires the military to put some civilian suspects into military
detention.
The current Administration has waived application of section 1022 to
many groups of potential suspects, but it has not foreclosed the

[[Page H3542]]

possibility of section 1022 being applied to all categories of
civilians, including even within the United States itself. To ensure
this provision will not be used against those living in the United
States, we must repeal section 1022.
Our military is designed to fight and win our battles overseas and to
protect our borders; it is not designed to enforce domestic laws.
The military has not been required to enforce domestic laws since the
Civil War. We have a Department of Justice, State and Federal
Prosecutors, and local law enforcement that have been successful for
hundreds of years.
The amendment reaffirms the importance and availability of due
process protections for all persons within the United States. It
prohibits the NDAA detention provisions from providing any authority
for the military to detain persons under any claim of authority under
the NDAA or the Authorization for Use of Military Force of 2001.
I urge my colleagues to join me in supporting civil liberties and
upholding the constitution by supporting this amendment.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentleman from Washington (Mr. Smith).
The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes
appeared to have it.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Washington
will be postponed.

Amendments En Bloc No. 2 Offered by Mr. McKeon

Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, pursuant to H. Res. 260, I offer amendments
en bloc.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendments en bloc.
Amendments en bloc No. 2 consisting of amendment Nos. 27, 31, 38, 43,
44, 45, 46, 47, 49, 54, 81, 84, 85, 95, 96, 97, 114, 143, 164, and 165,
printed in House Report No. 113-108, offered by Mr. McKeon of
California:

Amendment No. 27 Offered by Mr. Larson of Connecticut

Page 299, after the matter following line 23, insert the
following:

SEC. 703. BEHAVIORAL HEALTH TREATMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL
DISABILITIES UNDER TRICARE.

(a) In General.--Section 1077 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
``(g)(1) Subject to paragraph (3)(A), in providing health
care under subsection (a), the treatment of developmental
disabilities (as defined by section 102(8) of the
Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act
of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 15002(8))), including autism spectrum
disorder, shall include behavioral health treatment,
including applied behavior analysis, when prescribed by a
physician.
``(2) In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary shall
ensure that--
``(A) except as provided by subparagraph (B), a person who
is authorized to provide behavioral health treatment is
licensed or certified by a State or accredited national
certification board; and
``(B) applied behavior analysis or other behavioral health
treatment may be provided by an employee, contractor, or
trainee of a person described in subparagraph (A) if the
employee, contractor, or trainee meets minimum
qualifications, training, and supervision requirements as set
forth by the Secretary.
``(3)(A) This subsection shall not apply to--
``(i) a medicare eligible beneficiary (as defined in
section 1111(b) of this title); or
``(ii) a covered beneficiary who is a beneficiary by reason
of being a retired member of the Coast Guard, the
Commissioned Corp of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, or the Commissioned Corp of the Public Health
Service, or by being a dependent of such a retired member.
``(B) Except as provided in subparagraph (A), nothing in
this subsection shall be construed as limiting or otherwise
affecting the benefits otherwise provided to a covered
beneficiary under--
``(i) this chapter;
``(ii) title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1395 et seq.); or
``(iii) any other law.''.
(b) Funding.--
(1) Increase.--Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the
funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be
appropriated in section 1406 for the Defense Health Program,
as specified in the corresponding funding table in section
4501, for Private Sector Care is hereby increased by
$60,000,000.
(2) Offset.--Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the
funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be
appropriated in section 4301 for operation and maintenance,
as specified in the corresponding funding table in section
4301, for the Office of the Secretary of Defense (Line 280)
is hereby reduced by $60,000,000.

Amendment No. 31 Offered by Mr. Young of Alaska

At the end of title VIII, add the following new section:

SEC. 833. REVISIONS TO REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO JUSTIFICATION
AND APPROVAL OF SOLE-SOURCE DEFENSE CONTRACTS.

Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall modify the
provisions of the Department of Defense Supplement to the
Federal Acquisition Regulation that implement section 811 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010
(Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2401) to clarify that the
authority of the head of an agency (as defined in section
811(c)(2)(A) of such section) to make an award pursuant to
such section is delegable.

Amendment No. 38 Offered by Mr. Bentivolio of Michigan

At the end of subtitle E of title XII, add the following:

SEC. 1259. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING RELATIONS WITH TAIWAN.

It is the sense of Congress that the United States should--
(1) allow all high-level officials of Taiwan to enter into
the United States or its embassies and consulates under
conditions which demonstrate appropriate respect for the
dignity of such leaders;
(2) allow meetings between all high-level Taiwan and United
States officials in United States executive departments;
(3) allow the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative
Office and all other instrumentalities established in the
United States by Taiwan to conduct business activities,
including activities which involve participation by Members
of Congress and other representatives of Federal, State, and
local governments, and all high-level Taiwan officials,
without obstruction from the United States Government or any
foreign power; and
(4) adopt a policy of allowing high-ranking Taiwan leaders
to make official visits with high-ranking officials of the
United States, including official visits by Taiwan's
democratically elected president, and allowing for visits
between these officials in Washington, D.C.

Amendment No. 43 Offered by Mr. Lamborn of Colorado

Page 59, after line 12, insert the following:

SEC. 225. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR SPACE-BASED
INFRARED SYSTEMS SPACE PROGRAM.

Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or
otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the
Department of Defense, not more than 50 percent may be
obligated or expended for the space-based infrared systems
space modernization initiative wide-field-of-view testbed
until the Executive Agent for Space of the Department of
Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees
that the Secretary of Defense is carrying out the
Operationally Responsive Space Program Office in accordance
with section 2273a of title 10, United States Code.

Amendment No. 44 Offered by Mr. Holt of New Jersey

At the end of subtitle D of title II, insert the following:

SEC. 255. REPORT ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND
MATHEMATICS SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM.

Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this
Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report that assesses
whether the Science, Mathematics and Research for
Transformation (SMART) scholarship program, or related
scholarship or fellowship programs within the Department of
Defense, are providing the necessary number of undergraduate
and graduate students in the fields of science, technology,
engineer, and mathematics to meet the recommendations
contained in the report of the Commission on Research and
Development in the United States Intelligence Community, as
well as recommendation for how SMART and similar program
might be improved to better satisfy those recommendations.

Amendment No. 45 Offered by Mr. Hudson of North Carolina

At the end of subtitle E of title II, add the following:

SEC. 2__. CANINES AS STAND-OFF DETECTION OF EXPLOSIVES AND
EXPLOSIVE PRECURSORS.

Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this
Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology, and Logistics shall provide to the Committee on
Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the
Committee on Armed Services of the Senate a report that--
(1) describes how the Department of Defense intends to
maintain the capability and infrastructure required to
support canines as stand-off detection of explosives and
explosive precursors;
(2) specifies the appropriate office to oversee the
acquisition process, research and development, technology
advancement, testing and evaluation, and production and
procurement with respect to canines as stand-off detection of
explosives and explosive precursors;
(3) specifies the plan to sustain and enhance the
partnerships and relationships of the Department of Defense
with service laboratories, private sector companies, and
academic institutions to ensure that the latest data and
information regarding canine capabilities are distributed
throughout the Department and other Federal agencies that
could benefit from such information; and

[[Page H3543]]

(4) specifies any technologies capable of replacing the
canine as a stand-off detection capability during the next 2
years.

Amendment No. 46 Offered by Mrs. Bachmann of Minnesota

Page 93, after line 18, insert the following:

SEC. 302. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR MARINE SECURITY
GUARD.

(a) Increase.--Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the
funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be
appropriated in section 301 for Operation and Maintenance, as
specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4301,
for Marine Security Guard is hereby increased by $13,400,000.
(b) Offset.--Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the
funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be
appropriated in section 301 for Operation and Maintenance,
Army, as specified in the corresponding funding table in
section 4301, is hereby reduced by $13,400,000, to be derived
from the Maneuver Units.

Amendment No. 47 Offered by Mrs. Bachmann of Minnesota

Page 93, after line 18, insert the following:

SEC. 302. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR CRISIS RESPONSE
FORCE.

(a) Increase.--Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the
funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be
appropriated in section 301 for Operation and Maintenance, as
specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4301,
for the Crisis Response Force is hereby increased by
$10,600,000.
(b) Offset.--Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the
funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be
appropriated in section 301 for Operation and Maintenance,
Army, as specified in the corresponding funding table in
section 4301, is hereby reduced by $10,600,000, to be derived
from the Maneuver Units.

Amendment No. 49 Offered by Ms. Jackson Lee of Texas

Page 106, after line 8, insert the following:

SEC. 324. ASSESSMENT OF OUTREACH FOR SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS
OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY WOMEN AND MINORITIES
REQUIRED BEFORE CONVERSION OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS
TO CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE.

No Department of Defense function that is performed by
Department of Defense civilian employees and is tied to a
certain military base may be converted to performance by a
contractor until the Secretary of Defense conducts an
assessment to determine if the Department of Defense has
carried out sufficient outreach programs to assist small
business concerns owned and controlled by women (as such term
is defined in section 8(d)(3)(D) of the Small Business Act)
and small business concerns owned and controlled by socially
and economically disadvantaged individuals (as such term is
defined in section 8(d)(3)(C) of the Small Business Act) that
are located in the geographic area near the military base.

Amendment No. 54 Offered by Ms. Jackson Lee of Texas

Page 223, after line 23, insert the following new section:

SEC. 550A. ENHANCEMENT TO REQUIREMENTS FOR AVAILABILITY OF
INFORMATION ON SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND
RESPONSE RESOURCES.

(a) Required Posting of Information on Sexual Assault
Prevention and Response Resources.--
(1) Posting.--The Secretary of Defense shall require that
there be prominently posted, in accordance with paragraph
(2), notice of the following information relating to sexual
assault prevention and response, in a form designed to ensure
visibility and understanding:
(A) Resource information for members of the Armed Forces,
military dependents, and civilian personnel of the Department
of Defense with respect to prevention of sexual assault and
reporting of incidents of sexual assault.
(B) Contact information for personnel who are designated as
Sexual Assault Response Coordinators and Sexual Assault
Victim Advocates.
(C) The Department of Defense ``hotline'' telephone number,
referred to as the Safe Helpline, for reporting incidents of
sexual assault, or any successor operation.
(2) Posting placement.--Posting under subsection (a) shall
be at the following locations, to the extent practicable:
(A) Any Department of Defense duty facility.
(B) Any Department of Defense dining facility.
(C) Any Department of Defense multi-unit residential
facility.
(D) Any Department of Defense health care facility.
(E) Any Department of Defense commissary or exchange.
(F) Any Department of Defense Community Service Agency.
(G) Any Department of Defense website.
(b) Notice to Victims of Available Assistance.--The
Secretary of Defense shall require that procedures in the
Department of Defense for responding to a complaint or
allegation of sexual assault submitted by or against a member
of the Armed Forces include prompt notice to the person
making the complaint or allegation of the forms of assistance
available to that person from the Department of Defense and,
to the extent known to the Secretary, through other
departments and agencies, including State and local agencies,
and other sources.

Amendment No. 81 Offered by Mr. Holt of New Jersey

At the end of subtitle C of title VII, insert the
following:

SEC. 726. DATA SHARING WITH STATE ADJUTANT GENERALS TO
FACILITATE SUICIDE PREVENTION EFFORTS.

Upon the request of any adjutant general of a State, the
Secretary of Defense shall share the contact information of
members of the Individual Ready Reserve and individual
mobilization augmentees who reside in the State of such
adjutant general for the purpose of conducting suicide
prevention outreach efforts.

Amendment No. 84 Offered by Ms. Jackson Lee of Texas

Page 308, after line 21, add the following new section:

SEC. 726. INCREASED COLLABORATION WITH NIH TO COMBAT TRIPLE
NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER.

The Office of Health of the Department of Defense shall
work in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health
to--
(1) identify specific genetic and molecular targets and
biomarkers for triple negative breast cancer; and
(2) provide information useful in biomarker selection, drug
discovery, and clinical trials design that will enable both--
(A) triple negative breast cancer patients to be identified
earlier in the progression of their disease; and
(B) the development of multiple targeted therapies for the
disease.

Amendment No. 85 Offered by Ms. Jackson Lee of Texas

Page 308, after line 21, insert the following:

SEC. 726. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON MENTAL HEALTH COUNSELORS FOR
MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND THEIR FAMILIES.

It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the Secretary of Defense should develop a plan to
ensure a sustainable flow of qualified counselors to meet the
long-term needs of members of the Armed Forces and their
families for counselors; and
(2) the plan should include the participation of accredited
schools and universities, health care providers, professional
counselors, family service or support centers, chaplains, and
other appropriate resources of the Department of Defense.

Amendment No. 95 Offered by Ms. Jackson Lee of Texas

Page 335, after line 12, insert the following:

SEC. 833. IMPROVED MANAGEMENT OF DEFENSE EQUIPMENT AND
SUPPLIES THROUGH AUTOMATED INFORMATION AND DATA
CAPTURE TECHNOLOGIES.

The Secretary of Defense shall improve the management of
defense equipment and supplies throughout their life cycles
by adopting and implementing Item Unique Identification
(IUID), Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), biometrics,
and other automated information and data capture (AIDC)
technologies for the tracking, management, and accountability
for assets deployed across the Department of Defense.

Amendment No. 96 Offered by Mr. Young of Alaska

At the end of subtitle A of title IX, add the following new
section:

SEC. 9__. REPORT ON STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE OF UNITED STATES
MILITARY INSTALLATION OF THE U.S. PACIFIC
COMMAND.

(a) Report Required.--Not later than 180 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense,
in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security,
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report
on the strategic value of each major installation that
supports operations in the United States Pacific Command.
(b) Content of Report.--The report required by subsection
(a) shall include, at a minimum, an assessment of the
following with respect to each major installation covered by
the report:
(1) The strategic value of the operations of the
installation in the Pacific Command Area of Responsibility,
including the strategic value of the installation for the
global deployment of airpower, military personnel, and
logistical support.
(2) The usefulness of the installation for potential future
missions, including military, search and rescue, and
humanitarian missions in a changing Pacific and Arctic
region.
(3) The suitability of the installation for basing of F-35
aircraft and other future weapons systems in the Pacific
Command Area of Responsibility.
(4) The suitability of the installation for mission growth,
including relocation of combat-coded aircraft, Army units,
naval vessels, and Marine Corps units from overseas bases.
(5) How critical the installation is in maintaining and
expanding the North and Southern Pacific air refueling
bridge.
(6) The availability of the installation for basing
remotely piloted aircraft.
(7) The proximity of the installation to scoreable,
instrumented training ranges, with an emphasis on joint-
training.
(8) The impact of urban encroachment on the installation
and its training ranges.
(c) Classified Annex.--The report required by subsection
(a) may include a classified

[[Page H3544]]

annex if necessary to fully describe the matters required by
subsection (b).

Amendment No. 97 Offered by Mr. Young of Alaska

At the end of subtitle A of title IX, add the following new
section:

SEC. 9__. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON POTENTIAL RELOCATION
OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TENANTS ON ASIA-PACIFIC
AND ARCTIC-ORIENTED UNITED STATES MILITARY
INSTALLATIONS.

(a) Report Required.--Not later than March 1, 2014, the
Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the
appropriate committees of Congress a report containing the
results of a review of the potential for--
(1) effectively consolidating underused facilities on
military installations; or
(2) vacating costly leased space by relocating Federal
Government agency tenants, activities, missions, and
personnel onto such installations.
(b) Specific Consideration of Asia-Pacific and Arctic-
oriented Installations.--As a result of the Federal
Government's decision to emphasize Asia-Pacific security
issues and changes in the Arctic environment, the Comptroller
General shall specifically evaluate potential consolidation
of Federal tenants on Asia-Pacific and Arctic-oriented
installations, focusing on Federal entities with homeland
security, defense, international trade, commerce, and other
national security-related functions that are compatible with
the missions of the military installations.

Amendment No. 114 Offered by Mrs. Bachmann of Minnesota

Page 463, after line 6, insert the following new section:

SEC. 1090. DAYS ON WHICH THE POW/MIA FLAG IS DISPLAYED ON
CERTAIN FEDERAL PROPERTY.

Section 902 of title 36, United States Code, is amended by
striking subsection (c) and inserting the following new
subsection:
``(c) Days for Flag Display.--For the purposes of this
section, POW/MIA flag display days are all days on which the
flag of the United States is displayed.''.

Amendment No. 143 Offered by Mr. Lamborn of Colorado

At the end of subtitle E of title XII of division A, add
the following new section:

SEC. 12_. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE THREAT POSED BY HEZBOLLAH.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) Hezbollah has been designated a foreign terrorist
organization by the Department of State since October 8,
1997.
(2) Hezbollah has been responsible for numerous terrorist
attacks and attempted terrorist attacks around the world,
including attacks against United States citizens.
(3) Hezbollah is active in Europe and has been linked to a
July 18, 2012, suicide bombing in Bulgaria which killed five
people.
(4) Hezbollah operatives have been captured around the
world attacking or attempting to attack Western and Israeli
targets.
(5) The United States is working with its European allies
to combat terrorism through a variety of means, including
through NATO's Partnership Action Plan against Terrorism and
the Defence Against Terrorism Programme of Work.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the United States should continue to use all necessary
means to fight against terrorism, including Hezbollah;
(2) President Obama should strongly encourage his European
counterparts to publicly condemn Hezbollah;
(3) European allies should seek to officially recognize
Hezbollah as a terrorist organization;
(4) any attempt to distinguish between military and
civilian wings in Hezbollah is meaningless; and
(5) all countries should work together to fight radical
terrorist organizations like Hezbollah.

Amendment No. 164 Offered by Mr. Young of Alaska

At the end of title XXXV, add the following new section:

SEC. 35__. TREATMENT OF FUNDS FOR INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION
MARITIME FACILITY, PORT OF ANCHORAGE, ALASKA.

Section 10205 of Public Law 109-59 (119 Stat. 1934) is
amended by striking ``shall'' and inserting ``may''.

Amendment No. 165 Offered by Mr. Young of Alaska

At the end of title XXXV (page 730, after line 19) add the
following:

SEC. 350_. STRATEGIC SEAPORTS.

(a) Priority.--
(1) In general.--Under the port infrastructure development
program established under section 50302(c) of title 46,
United States Code, the Maritime Administrator, in
consultation with the Secretary of Defense, may give priority
to providing funding to strategic seaports in support of
national security requirements.
(2) Strategic seaport defined.--In this subsection the term
``strategic seaport'' means a military port or and commercial
port that is subject to a port planning order or Basic
Ordering Agreement (or both) that is projected to be used for
the deployment of forces and shipment of ammunition or
sustainment supplies in support of military operations.
(b) Financial Assistance.--Section 50302(c)(2)(D) of title
46, United States Code, is amended by inserting ``and
financial assistance, including grants,'' after ``technical
assistance''.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman
from California (Mr. McKeon) and the gentleman from Washington (Mr.
Smith) each will control 10 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from California.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to my friend and
colleague, the gentlelady from Minnesota (Mrs. Bachmann).
Mrs. BACHMANN. Mr. Chairman, I rise today in support of this
amendment package which includes three amendments which I've offered to
protect and honor America's brave men and women in uniform.
The first and the second amendments would both properly train and
equip and staff the Marine Embassy Security Group and the Crisis
Response Task Force. In the wake of Benghazi and the tragedy there,
protecting our Nation's Embassy personnel and classified materials has
never been more important.
The third amendment requires certain Federal buildings that are
already required to fly the POW-MIA flags on Federal holidays to fly
those flags every day. We owe it to the memory of those who serve, to
honor their commitment and give them the funding and the support that
they need.
I urge my colleagues to support this package, and I want to thank Mr.
McKeon.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 4 minutes to the
gentlelady from Texas (Ms. Jackson Lee).
Ms. JACKSON LEE. Let me thank the gentleman from Washington for his
leadership and the gentleman from California for their work and their
work with my office and staff.
One of the efforts that we have been working on--when I say that,
Congress and individual Members--is to approach and to continue to work
on the issue of breast cancer that impacts women throughout this
country, and certainly women and men in the United States military.
I'm very pleased in this en bloc to have an amendment by Jackson Lee
that really cements the collaboration between the Department of Defense
Office of Health to collaborate with the National Institutes of Health
to provide resources, to identify specific genetic and molecular
targets and biomarkers for triple negative breast cancer, often not
heard of.
I will tell you, in the course of my involvement, I've had daughters
of those who lost their lives--triple negative breast cancer is a
particularly negative but deadly form of breast cancer where the victim
does not last very long. I've lost dear friends. And this highlighting
the biomarker will bring down the cost of treatment, but more
importantly will help to stem the tide of those who quickly die because
there is no treatment because it accelerates so quickly and lives are
lost.
I also am grateful that we are beginning to make some steps. Though I
indicated my support for the Speier and Gabbard amendment, I am pleased
to be able to have in this language, a board, a place where sexual
assault prevention information and resources bring it out in the open
and let people know, men and women, how they can access resources.
Let's put it forward so that people are safe, so that we can stop it
and get in the gap. I think honoring our men and women in the United
States military is particularly important.
Over the years, I have supported increased funding for PTSD and
recognized the crises that many of our soldiers are facing in the need
for mental health services. We can see some of the impact of those in
terms of family situations and violence, domestic violence. So I have
in this en bloc an amendment that will provide more mental health
counselors, or focus on more mental health counselors, to ensure that
the 200,000 veterans of military service and Active Duty soldiers will
have the ability to be able to get that kind of service.
It is also important to be fiscally responsible, and I have an
amendment that improves the management of defense equipment and
supplies through automated information data-captured technology. This
will support the work of the DOD to adopt a proven private sector
method for more efficiently

[[Page H3545]]

managing inventory, and that's inventory going from what we have in
Afghanistan to left over in Iraq and to many other places. We want to
save money.
I also am very grateful that there is a manager's amendment in this
en bloc, something very close and near and dear to my heart, and that
is the outreach by the Department of Defense to small businesses,
minority-owned businesses and women-owned businesses. I can tell you
that they are the backbone of America. Even though we are downsizing on
some of the contractual relationships, I can tell you that obviously
they bring about $537 billion as obligated by Federal agencies. These
small businesses can benefit. They create jobs. And the outreach is
going to be vital beyond where the bases are, beyond where the areas
where you would likely think.
Let me also say this. I want to thank the committee for working with
me on an amendment that I thought was very important, and that is the
study of the procurement practices of our intelligence assets and to be
able to improve how we deal with intelligence. I know that we will work
together on that going forward, and I believe that it is important that
we do work together.
These are amendments that I believe will improve the conditions of
our very important military personnel. And again, to all of them, Happy
Father's Day.
Mr. McKEON. At this time, Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the
gentleman from Alaska (Mr. Young) for the purpose of a colloquy.
Mr. YOUNG of Alaska. I thank the gentleman for yielding. I rise to
thank my good friend and chairman of the House Armed Services Committee
for including my amendment on section 811 of the fiscal year 2010
National Defense Authorization Act in one of today's en bloc packages
and to ask if he is concerned, as I am, that implementation by Federal
agencies of section 811 of the FY10 National Defense Authorization Act
has been inconsistent and contrary to the congressional intent.
Mr. McKEON. Will the gentleman yield?
Mr. YOUNG of Alaska. I yield to the gentleman from California.

{time} 1700

Mr. McKEON. I thank the gentleman from Alaska for raising concern
over inconsistency in implementation of section 811 and bringing it to
our attention.
Mr. YOUNG of Alaska. I thank the gentleman and ask the distinguished
chairman of the Armed Services Committee if he agrees with me that
section 811 was not intended to be a cap or bar on sole-source awards
above $20 million, and to also ask if he is concerned about the growing
number of reports that agencies are treating the threshold requiring
sole-source justification as a prohibition on such awards.
Mr. McKEON. Will the gentleman yield?
Mr. YOUNG of Alaska. I yield to the gentleman.
Mr. McKEON. I agree that section 811 was intended to provide
increased oversight of sole-source contract awards but was not intended
to be a prohibition on such contracts.
Mr. YOUNG of Alaska. Mr. Chairman, I ask you to join me and my
colleague from Hawaii (Ms. Hanabusa) in continued oversight of Federal
agency implementation of section 811 and in requesting the Comptroller
General provide us a full report with respect to any inconsistencies in
the ways agencies are implementing section 811, the negative impacts
such section is having on Native American contractors, and provide
recommendations on how the provision should be better implemented. Such
a report will aid Congress in ensuring that section 811 is implemented
so as to make clear that the provision does not impose a cap or limit
on awards covered by the provision, so long as the justifications and
approval are obtained pursuant to provision, and that the provision is
intended to provide a level of oversight and approval, not act as a
prohibition or limit on awards.
Mr. McKEON. I will be happy to work with the gentleman and with our
colleague from Hawaii to send a joint letter to the Comptroller General
in the manner he suggests and to continue oversight on this issue.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from
California (Ms. Hahn).
Ms. HAHN. Mr. Chairman, I rise to speak in support of amendment 246,
which is a bipartisan amendment that I cosponsored with my good friend
and colleague, Congressman Don Young.
Despite the vital role they play to our economic strength and
national security, our ports, unlike nearly every other mode of
transportation, still do not have a dedicated source of Federal funding
for infrastructure projects.
Ensuring ports have the infrastructure funding they need is not only
critical to strengthening our economy, but also to making sure that our
ports can handle the sudden needs of rapid deployment in the outbreak
of war or during a national emergency.
This amendment would allow the Maritime Administration to provide
infrastructure grants to our Nation's ports and prioritize funding for
our strategic seaports.
By finally giving MARAD the tools that they need to successfully
mitigate congestion and increase the flow of goods at U.S. ports, we
will ensure our ports will be fully prepared to serve our national
defense and continue to be the strong economic engine that drives our
Nation's prosperity.
I want to thank Congressman Young for working with me on this
amendment, as well as my colleague from California, Chairman McKeon,
and Ranking Member Smith for accepting this amendment en bloc.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from
Alaska (Mr. Young).
Mr. YOUNG of Alaska. I thank the chairman for including my amendment
in this package.
My amendment is very simple. It asks the Department of Defense to
report on what actually makes an installation in the Pacific
strategically important. In my many meetings with military leaders, I'm
always told about the strategic importance of various installations in
Alaska and all across this country; however, ``strategic'' is never
fully defined. My amendment merely asks the Department of Defense to
qualify and quantify exactly what makes an installation strategic.
As every Alaskan knows, Alaska has numerous strategic installations
that proudly protect this country from harm. Among those bases is
Eielson Air Force Base in Fairbanks, which is the home to the 18th
Aggressor Squadron. This squadron provides our Nation's pilots with
real-life training they need to be the best in the world. Throughout
the year, but especially during Red Flag-Alaska, the F-16 Aggressors
fight realistic mock battles in the largest training range in the
United States, and it's one of the most terrain diverse training areas
in the world.
Eielson Air Force Base is also home to the strategically important
168th Air Guard Refueling Wing. These KC-135s provide legs for our
Nation's northern air bridge, which allows us to project power into the
Arctic and the Northern Pacific. I have confidence that my amendment
and the following DOD report will show what General Billy Mitchell
recognized in 1935, namely, that Alaska is the most strategic place in
the world.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from
Hawaii (Ms. Hanabusa).
Ms. HANABUSA. Mr. Chairman, I rise to speak in support of en bloc
amendment 244, the Young-Hanabusa amendment.
Section 811 of the fiscal year 2010 NDAA required that any 8(a)
Native American sole-source contract in excess of $20 million go
through a heightened justification and approval.
The justification and approval is often interpreted to be approved by
a ``head of agency.'' This requirement is shown by a recent GAO report
to cause a 60 percent decline in revenue from these contracts. It has
resulted in a loss of jobs, reduced benefits to Native Americans, and
has led to a large amount of unintended discrimination against Native
community-owned firms. What the amendment does is it makes it a
delegable authority.
In my home State of Hawaii, there are numerous 8(a) enterprises known
as Native Hawaiian Organizations. These

[[Page H3546]]

entities are conducting critical research for our defense industry and
other sectors of government while also supporting critical programs
within the community. It makes no sense to place onerous requirements
on these successful organizations that significantly decrease the
ability to conduct business.
Further, I support a letter to the GAO requesting a full and detailed
report with respect to any inconsistencies in the way the agencies are
implementing section 811, the negative impacts such section is having
on Native American contractors, along with recommendations of how the
provisions should be implemented.
Mr. Chairman, I would also like to thank the chairman, the ranking
member, and my colleague Mr. Young from Alaska for this amendment and
for placing it in the en bloc package.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from
Colorado (Mr. Lamborn).
Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chairman, I rise today to highlight my amendment No.
143, which expresses the sense of Congress highlighting the threat
posed by Hezbollah.
Hezbollah is one of the world's most dangerous terrorist
organizations. After al Qaeda, it is responsible for the most deaths of
American citizens. Hezbollah is behind a series of terrorist attacks
around the world, including the foiled plot to assassinate the Saudi
Ambassador here in Washington.
Hezbollah is backed by the Iranian regime and has now joined the
fight to protect another Iranian proxy, the Assad regime in Syria.
Hezbollah was behind an attack last summer in Bulgaria that killed
five people. Unfortunately, the European Union has not yet listed
Hezbollah as a terrorist organization.
My amendment calls on the EU to recognize that Hezbollah is a
terrorist organization. Please vote ``yes'' on this amendment to stand
against terrorism.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my
time.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, we have no further speakers. I urge
adoption of the en bloc amendment, and I yield back the balance of my
time.
Ms. JACKSON LEE. Mr. Chair, I thank Chairman McKeon and Ranking
Member Smith and the Rules Committee for making in order and including
in En Bloc Amendment #1 Amendment Number 35 and Amendment Number 111 to
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.
These amendments are offered by the House Committee on Homeland
Security's Chairman McCaul, Ranking Member Bennie Thompson, as well as
the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security's Chairwoman Miller
and Ranking Member Jackson Lee.
In addition to the Jackson Lee amendments offered to this bill, I
joined my Colleagues on the Committee on Homeland Security in
supporting an amendment to promote collaboration and cooperation
between the Department of Defense and Department of Homeland Security
regarding the identification of equipment, either declared excess, or
made available to DHS on a long-term loan basis that will help increase
security along the border.
I also request that my colleagues support another amendment that I
joined in sponsoring along with the leadership of the House Committee
on Homeland Security, which would allow the transfer of technology from
DOD to state and local law enforcement. Before the creation of DHS a
program was created to facilitate this type of equipment transfer and
this amendment adds the Secretary of Homeland Security in a
consultative role in the equipment transfer process. This amendment
also gives applicants seeking DOD equipment for use in border security
preference in this statute. This will facilitate expedited transfer of
equipment that Federal, state and local first responders can use to
strengthen our border security efforts.
I thank Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith for including these
amendments in the En Bloc Amendment #1 and I urge all members to vote
in favor of this amendment.
Ms. JACKSON LEE. Mr. Chair, I thank Chairman McKeon and Ranking
Member Smith and the Rules Committee for making in order and including
in En Bloc Amendment #2 three amendments that I offered to the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.
The Jackson Lee Amendments are simple and if adopted would improve
the final bill.
The Jackson Lee Amendment designated as #81 calls for the
collaboration between the Department of Defense and the National
Institutes of Health to combat Triple Negative Breast Cancer. The
Amendment directs the Department of Defense Office of Health to
collaborate with the National Institutes of Health to provide resources
to identify specific genetic and molecular targets and biomarkers for
TNBC.

Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a term used to describe
breast cancers whose cells do not have estrogen receptors and
progesterone receptors, and do not have an excess of the ``HER2''
protein on their cell membrane of tumor cells.
Between 10-17% of female breast cancer patients have the triple
negative subtype.
Three times more likely to cause death than the most common form of
breast cancer, 70% of women with metastatic triple negative breast
cancer do not live more than five years after being diagnosed.
There is no targeted treatment available for TNBC. The American
Cancer Society calls this particular strain of breast cancer ``an
aggressive subtype associated with lower survival rates.''
Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) cells are usually of a higher
grade and size; onset at a younger age; more aggressive; and more
likely to metastasize.
TNBC is in fact a heterogeneous group of cancers with varying
differences in prognosis and survival rate between various subtypes.
This has led to a lot of confusion amongst both physicians and
patients.
Apart from surgery, cytotoxic chemotherapy is the only available
treatment; targeted molecular treatments, while being investigated, are
not accepted treatment.

Populations Affected by TNBC

TNBC disproportionately impacts younger women, African American
women, Hispanic/Latina women, and women with a ``BRCA1'' genetic
mutation, which is prevalent in Jewish women.
TNBC usually affects women under 50 years of age.
More than 30% of all breast cancer diagnoses in African American are
of the triple negative variety. Black women are far more susceptible to
this dangerous subtype than white or Hispanic women.
Women with TNBC are more likely to have distant metastases in the
brain and lung than more common subtypes of breast cancer.
Breast cancers with specific, targeted treatment methods, such as
hormone and gene based strains, have higher survival rates than the
triple negative subtype, highlighting the need for a targeted
treatment.
The Jackson Lee Amendment designated as #88 directs the Department of
Defense to post information on sexual assault prevention and response
resources online for ease of access by men and women in the armed
services.
There is no greater crime that an individual can commit than the
crime of sexual molestation and sexual assault. The perpetrators of
these crimes rob victims of their dignity and sense of wellbeing.
Victimization is not easily relieved by treating the immediate physical
injuries that may result, but can last for years. Moreover, victims of
sexual assault are profoundly affected for the rest of their lives,
often with PTSD or other medical conditions. As elected officials, we
have an obligation to condemn this violence, work for stronger
enforcement of laws and provide adequate funding for programs to assist
individuals who may have experienced such abuse.
When the victim is a member of the armed forces, the crime is much
more traumatic because the assailant may be a superior officer or the
location of the crime far from our shores. Further, the mechanisms in
place to support civilians who are victims of sexual violence are often
not available to men and women in the military.
In 2012, the Department of Defense estimates that 26,000 men and
women in the armed forces are victims of some type of unwanted sexual
contact. This reflects a 40 percent increase over a two year period.
The report provided by the Defense Department suggests that the
majority of the crimes involved rape, aggravated sexual assault or
nonconsensual sodomy.
We know that victims of sexual violence or abuse among civilians are
routinely underreported. The Defense Department report states that of
the 26,000 estimated victims only 3,374 crimes were reported and just
302 of the 2,558 incidents pursued by victims were prosecuted.
This crime is not limited to women who are victims of men, but
include men who are victims of other men. The Defense Department report
states that 81 percent of sexual violence against men goes unreported
and just 5 percent of attacks are reported to civilian law enforcement.
The stigma is great for any victim of sexual violence, but it may be
more so for men because civilian society has accepted the reality of
sexual violence against women and children but is just becoming aware
of crimes against men.

[[Page H3547]]

In 2011, the Journal of Trauma and Dissociation reports that men in
the military face barriers to reporting sexual crimes that include
avoidance/blocking the incident, fear of retribution, fear of facing
charges under the Uniform Code of Military Justice for associated
behavior like drinking, fear that reporting will damage their military
career and fear of not being believed.
Sexual assault can be verbal, visual, or anything that forces a
person to join in unwanted sexual contact or attention. Examples of
this are voyeurism (when someone watches private sexual acts),
exhibitionism (when someone exposes him/herself in public), incest
(sexual contact between family members), and sexual harassment. It can
happen in different situations, by a stranger in an isolated place, on
a date, or in the place where a person sleeps by someone they know.
The negative impacts of sexual assault go beyond the physical trauma
of the attack itself. The victims suffer psychological trauma,
emotional scarring, shame, anger, the stigma of being victimized.
Victims often suffer in silence for years before they can gain the
courage to seek help.
Unfortunately, sexual assault is an issue that has plagued the Nation
and we are learning that men and women in the armed forces cannot
escape its effects. In my home state of Texas, nearly 2 million adult
Texans, or 12.6% of the population, have been sexually assaulted, and
more than half of all sexual assaults are committed against children
under age 18.
An estimated 82% of rapes go unreported. The vast majority of rape
victims--nearly 80%--know the person who rapes them.

Purpose of my Amendment

The goal of the amendment is to make sure that information is
available and easily accessible to military personnel for the purpose
of raising awareness, promoting education and the long term goal of
influencing organizational culture around the issue of sexual violence.
Many in the military are just learning that there is a huge
difference between sex and sexual violence. My amendment would educate
both victims, potential victims, witnesses or victimizers that these
are acts of violence and should be treated as such. It may also help
influence thinking among military leaders on the nature of these crimes
and promote changes in policy to aggressively provide support to
victims and judicial remedies to prosecute and punish criminal
behavior.
It will take more than just stronger prevention and enforcement of
the law to prevent sexual molestation and other forms of sexual
assault. It is also raising awareness, which is what my amendment does.
In order to end this serious epidemic that plagues the American Armed
forces, all segments of the military from the most junior to the most
senior officers should be aware of what a sexual crime is and how to
reduce the incidents or them. Victims are not at fault--victimizers are
criminals who intend to subjugate, humiliate, dominate and hurt their
victims. They are predators among those who honorably serve in defense
of our nation. They should not be tolerated, condoned, protected, given
refuge or enabled in any way.
The Jackson Lee Amendment designated as #82 expresses the sense of
the Congress that the Secretary of Defense should develop a plan to
ensure a sustainable flow of qualified mental health counselors to meet
the long-term needs of members of the Armed Forces, veterans, and their
families.
I have always been a supporter of the men and women in the military,
visiting every combat zone, including Bosnia, Kosovo, Albania, with
numerous visits to Afghanistan and Iraq.
Houston is home to one of the largest populations of military service
members and their families in the nation. There are over 200,000
veterans of military service who live and work in Houston; more than
13,000 are veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan. For the brave men and
women who have been wounded in combat, help is on the way.
Although some of a soldier's wounds are invisible to the naked eye
they are still wounds that should be properly treated. One of the best
ways to increase access to treatment is to increase the number of
medical facilities and mental health professionals who are available to
serve the needs of men and women currently serving and those who have
become veterans.
The current conflict in Afghanistan is the most continuous combat
operations since Vietnam.
One study published in the American Journal of Medicine indicated
that 94% of soldiers returning from Iraq reported receiving small-arms
fire.
In addition, 86% of soldiers in Iraq reported knowing someone who was
seriously injured or killed, 68% reported seeing dead or seriously
injured Americans, and 51% reported handling or uncovering human
remains.
The majority, 77%, of soldiers deployed to Iraq reported shooting or
directing fire at the enemy, 48% reported being responsible for the
death of an enemy combatant, and 28% reported being responsible for the
death of a noncombatant. (Hoge et al., 2004).
In addition to these Jackson Lee Amendments, I joined my Colleagues
on the Committee on Homeland Security in supporting an amendment to
promote collaboration between the Department of Defense and Department
of Homeland security regarding the identification of equipment, either
declared excess, or made available to DHS on a long-term loan basis
that will help increase security along the border.
This is a common-sense way to leverage equipment the taxpayer has
already paid for and is coming back from overseas and no longer needed
for military purposes is a wise use of these resources.
I also request that my colleagues support another amendment that I
joined in sponsoring along with the leadership of the House Committee
on Homeland Sec, which would allow the transfer of technology from DOD
to state and local law enforcement. Before the creation of DHS, a
program was created to facilitate this type of equipment transfer, and
this amendment adds the Secretary of Homeland Security in a
consultative role in the equipment transfer process. This amendment
also gives applicants seek DOD equipment for use in border security
preference in this statute. This will facilitate expedited transfer of
equipment that Federal, state and local first responders can use to
strengthen our border security efforts.
I thank Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith for including these
amendments in the En Bloc Amendment #2 and I urge all members to vote
in favor of this amendment.
Ms. JACKSON LEE. Mr. Chair, the Rules Committee made several
amendments I offered to the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2014 in order.
The Jackson Lee Amendments are simple and if adopted would improve
the final bill.
The Jackson Lee Amendment designated as #95 provides for the improved
management of defense equipment and supplies through automated
information and data capture technologies. The private sector has
leaped forward in using inventory tracking technology to monitor large
and small products from the time they leave manufacturing facilities
until they are sold at retail or wholesale stores.
Adoption and implementation of DOD's Item Unique Identification
(IUID) policy for serialized asset control will make several asset
management and supply chain management improvements. Once fully
implemented, if an item is in the inventory of any DOD facility
anywhere in the world, it would be easy to locate and deliver where and
when it is needed. This happens every day in retail settings and it
should be the standard way DOD inventory is managed. My amendment would
support the work of the DOD to adopt a proven private sector method for
more efficiently managing inventory.
The most advanced warehouse inventory management systems are fully
automated and biometrically controlled to track items and create
records of people who make request to transport items from storage to
use. These systems make sure that persons' seeking to move items have
the authority to do so and that the requests create records that can be
tracked as well as track the items moved. These fully automated
warehouses have no staff, but rely upon technology that is designed to
store and retrieve items in the most cost effective and efficient
manner possible.
The automated warehouse systems are in use in the private sector and
are one of the many innovations that may assist the DOD in improving
efficiency of equipment management while saving potentially millions of
dollars in labor and acquisition costs.
The Jackson Lee Amendment designated as #49 requires outreach by the
DOD to small business concerns owned and controlled by women and
minorities before conversion of certain functions to contractor
performance. Federal contracting can be an important revenue source for
businesses of any size. In fiscal year 2011, federal agencies obligated
a total of around $537 billion in government contracts to businesses.
However, federal agencies goal for contracting with women and minority
owned businesses is five percent.
The Department of Defense is a major consumer of products and
services that range from office products to military specific
equipment. The wide ranges of business opportunities provide ample
reasons to engage women and minority owned businesses as contractors or
subcontractors.
This Amendment requires outreach by the DOD to small business
concerns owned and controlled by women and minorities before conversion
of certain functions to contractor performance. Federal contracting can
be an important revenue source for businesses of any size. In fiscal
year 2011, federal agencies obligated a total of around $537 billion in
government contracts to businesses. However, federal agencies goal for
contracting with women and minority owned businesses is five percent.

[[Page H3548]]

The Jackson Lee Amendment designated as #95 provides an improved
management of defense equipment and supplies through automated
information and data capture technologies. The private sector has
leaped forward in using inventory tracking technology to monitor large
and small products from the time they leave manufacturing facilities
until they are sold at retail or wholesale stores.
Adoption and implementation of DOD's Item Unique Identification
(IUID) policy for serialized asset control will make several asset
management and supply chain management improvements. Once fully
implemented, if an item is in the inventory of any DOD facility
anywhere in the world, it would be easy to locate and deliver where and
when it is needed. This happens every day in retail settings and it
should be the standard way DOD inventory is managed. My amendment would
support the work of the DOD to adopt a proven private sector method for
more efficiently managing inventory.
The most advanced warehouse inventory management systems are fully
automated and biometrically controlled to track items and create
records of people who make request to transport items from storage to
use. These systems make sure that persons seeking to move items have
the authority to do so and that the requests create records that can be
tracked as well as track the items moved. These fully automated
warehouses have no staff, but rely upon technology that is designed to
store and retrieve items in the most cost effective and efficient
manner possible.
Fully automated warehouse systems, such as the ones operated by
Genco, are in use in the private sector and are one of the many
innovations that may assist the DOD in improving efficiency of
equipment management while saving potentially millions of dollars in
labor and acquisition costs.
I urge all members to support these amendments.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendments en bloc offered
by the gentleman from California (Mr. McKeon).
The en bloc amendments were agreed to.

Announcement by the Acting Chair

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, proceedings
will now resume on those amendments printed in part B of House Report
113-108 on which further proceedings were postponed, in the following
order:
Amendment No. 2 by Mr. Blumenauer of Oregon.
Amendment No. 3 by Mrs. Lummis of Wyoming.
Amendment No. 5 by Mr. Coffman of Colorado.
Amendment No. 9 by Mr. Rigell of Virginia.
Amendment No. 10 by Mr. McGovern of Massachusetts.
Amendment No. 11 by Mr. Goodlatte of Virginia.
Amendment No. 12 by Mr. Smith of Washington.
The Chair will reduce to 2 minutes the minimum time for any
electronic vote after the first vote in this series.

Amendment No. 2 Offered by Mr. Blumenauer

The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a
recorded vote on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Oregon
(Mr. Blumenauer) on which further proceedings were postponed and on
which the noes prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.

Recorded Vote

The Acting CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 106,
noes 318, not voting 10, as follows:

[Roll No. 222]

AYES--106

Amash
Bass
Becerra
Benishek
Bentivolio
Blumenauer
Bonamici
Braley (IA)
Capps
Capuano
Carson (IN)
Castor (FL)
Clarke
Clay
Cleaver
Cohen
Conyers
Cooper
Davis, Danny
DeFazio
DeGette
Doggett
Doyle
Duckworth
Duncan (TN)
Edwards
Ellison
Eshoo
Farr
Foster
Garamendi
Griffith (VA)
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Hahn
Hastings (FL)
Higgins
Himes
Holt
Honda
Horsford
Huffman
Jeffries
Johnson (GA)
Kennedy
Kildee
Kind
Labrador
Lee (CA)
Lipinski
Loebsack
Lofgren
Lowenthal
Maloney, Carolyn
Massie
Matsui
McClintock
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
McNerney
Meeks
Meng
Miller, George
Moore
Mulvaney
Nadler
Napolitano
Negrete McLeod
Nolan
O'Rourke
Pallone
Peterson
Petri
Polis
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rangel
Rohrabacher
Roybal-Allard
Rush
Sanford
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schrader
Sensenbrenner
Serrano
Sherman
Sires
Slaughter
Speier
Stutzman
Swalwell (CA)
Thompson (CA)
Tierney
Titus
Van Hollen
Velazquez
Walz
Waters
Watt
Waxman
Welch
Wilson (FL)
Yarmuth
Yoho

NOES--318

Aderholt
Alexander
Amodei
Andrews
Bachmann
Bachus
Barber
Barletta
Barr
Barrow (GA)
Barton
Beatty
Bera (CA)
Bilirakis
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Bishop (UT)
Black
Blackburn
Bonner
Boustany
Brady (PA)
Brady (TX)
Bridenstine
Brooks (AL)
Brooks (IN)
Broun (GA)
Brown (FL)
Brownley (CA)
Buchanan
Bucshon
Burgess
Bustos
Butterfield
Calvert
Camp
Cantor
Capito
Cardenas
Carney
Carter
Cartwright
Cassidy
Castro (TX)
Chabot
Chaffetz
Cicilline
Clyburn
Coble
Coffman
Cole
Collins (GA)
Collins (NY)
Conaway
Connolly
Cook
Costa
Cotton
Courtney
Cramer
Crawford
Crenshaw
Crowley
Cuellar
Culberson
Cummings
Daines
Davis (CA)
Davis, Rodney
Delaney
DeLauro
DelBene
Denham
Dent
DeSantis
DesJarlais
Deutch
Diaz-Balart
Dingell
Duffy
Duncan (SC)
Ellmers
Engel
Enyart
Esty
Farenthold
Fincher
Fitzpatrick
Fleischmann
Fleming
Flores
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foxx
Frankel (FL)
Franks (AZ)
Frelinghuysen
Fudge
Gabbard
Gallego
Garcia
Gardner
Garrett
Gerlach
Gibbs
Gibson
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Gosar
Gowdy
Granger
Graves (GA)
Graves (MO)
Grayson
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Griffin (AR)
Grimm
Guthrie
Hall
Hanabusa
Hanna
Harper
Harris
Hartzler
Hastings (WA)
Heck (NV)
Heck (WA)
Hensarling
Herrera Beutler
Hinojosa
Holding
Hoyer
Hudson
Huelskamp
Huizenga (MI)
Hultgren
Hunter
Hurt
Israel
Issa
Jackson Lee
Jenkins
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, E. B.
Johnson, Sam
Jones
Jordan
Joyce
Keating
Kelly (IL)
Kelly (PA)
Kilmer
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kinzinger (IL)
Kirkpatrick
Kline
Kuster
LaMalfa
Lamborn
Lance
Langevin
Lankford
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Latham
Latta
Levin
LoBiondo
Long
Lowey
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lujan Grisham (NM)
Lujan, Ben Ray (NM)
Lummis
Lynch
Maffei
Maloney, Sean
Marchant
Marino
Matheson
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul
McHenry
McIntyre
McKeon
McKinley
McMorris Rodgers
Meadows
Meehan
Messer
Mica
Michaud
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Moran
Mullin
Murphy (FL)
Murphy (PA)
Neugebauer
Noem
Nugent
Nunes
Nunnelee
Olson
Owens
Palazzo
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Paulsen
Pearce
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Perry
Peters (CA)
Peters (MI)
Pingree (ME)
Pittenger
Pitts
Pocan
Poe (TX)
Pompeo
Posey
Price (GA)
Radel
Rahall
Reed
Reichert
Renacci
Ribble
Rice (SC)
Richmond
Rigell
Roby
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rokita
Rooney
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Ross
Rothfus
Royce
Ruiz
Runyan
Ruppersberger
Ryan (OH)
Ryan (WI)
Salmon
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Scalise
Schiff
Schneider
Schock
Schwartz
Schweikert
Scott (VA)
Scott, Austin
Scott, David
Sessions
Sewell (AL)
Shimkus
Shuster
Simpson
Sinema
Smith (MO)
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Smith (WA)
Southerland
Stewart
Stivers
Stockman
Takano
Terry
Thompson (MS)
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tiberi
Tipton
Tonko
Tsongas
Turner
Upton
Valadao
Vargas
Veasey
Vela
Visclosky
Wagner
Walberg
Walden
Walorski
Wasserman Schultz
Weber (TX)
Webster (FL)
Wenstrup
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Williams
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Wolf
Womack
Woodall
Yoder
Young (AK)
Young (FL)
Young (IN)

NOT VOTING--10

Campbell
Chu
Fattah
Kaptur
Lewis
Markey
McCarthy (NY)
Neal
Payne
Shea-Porter

{time} 1734

Messrs. FRANKS of Arizona, HARPER, GENE GREEN of Texas, LUETKEMEYER,
BARROW of Georgia, MEADOWS, BISHOP of Utah, CICILLINE, GARCIA, DELANEY,
UPTON, LARSON of Connecticut, CLYBURN, THOMPSON of Mississippi, Ms.
EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, and Mrs.
KIRKPATRICK changed their vote from ``aye'' to ``no.''
Messrs. STUTZMAN, DOYLE, MEEKS, and Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD changed their
vote from ``no'' to ``aye.''
So the amendment was rejected.

[[Page H3549]]

The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.

Amendment No. 3 Offered by Mrs. Lummis

The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a
recorded vote on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from Wyoming
(Mrs. Lummis) on which further proceedings were postponed and on which
the ayes prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.

Recorded Vote

The Acting CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The Acting CHAIR. This will be a 2-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 235,
noes 189, not voting 10, as follows:

[Roll No. 223]

AYES--235

Aderholt
Alexander
Amodei
Bachmann
Bachus
Barletta
Barr
Barton
Benishek
Bentivolio
Bilirakis
Bishop (UT)
Black
Blackburn
Bonner
Boustany
Brady (TX)
Bridenstine
Brooks (AL)
Brooks (IN)
Broun (GA)
Buchanan
Bucshon
Burgess
Calvert
Camp
Cantor
Capito
Carter
Cassidy
Chabot
Chaffetz
Coble
Coffman
Cole
Collins (GA)
Collins (NY)
Conaway
Cook
Cotton
Cramer
Crawford
Crenshaw
Culberson
Daines
Davis, Rodney
Denham
Dent
DeSantis
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Duffy
Duncan (SC)
Duncan (TN)
Ellmers
Farenthold
Fincher
Fitzpatrick
Fleischmann
Fleming
Flores
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Frelinghuysen
Gardner
Garrett
Gerlach
Gibbs
Gibson
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Gosar
Gowdy
Granger
Graves (GA)
Graves (MO)
Green, Gene
Griffin (AR)
Griffith (VA)
Grimm
Guthrie
Hall
Hanna
Harper
Harris
Hartzler
Hastings (WA)
Heck (NV)
Hensarling
Herrera Beutler
Holding
Hudson
Huelskamp
Huizenga (MI)
Hultgren
Hunter
Hurt
Issa
Jenkins
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, Sam
Jones
Jordan
Joyce
Kelly (PA)
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kinzinger (IL)
Kline
Labrador
LaMalfa
Lamborn
Lance
Lankford
Latham
Latta
LoBiondo
Long
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lummis
Marchant
Marino
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul
McClintock
McHenry
McIntyre
McKeon
McKinley
McMorris Rodgers
Meadows
Meehan
Messer
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Mullin
Murphy (PA)
Neugebauer
Noem
Nugent
Nunes
Nunnelee
Olson
Palazzo
Paulsen
Pearce
Perry
Peterson
Petri
Pittenger
Pitts
Poe (TX)
Pompeo
Posey
Price (GA)
Radel
Reed
Reichert
Renacci
Ribble
Rice (SC)
Rigell
Roby
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rokita
Rooney
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Ross
Rothfus
Royce
Ruiz
Runyan
Ryan (OH)
Ryan (WI)
Salmon
Sanford
Scalise
Schock
Schweikert
Scott, Austin
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Sewell (AL)
Sherman
Shimkus
Shuster
Simpson
Smith (MO)
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Southerland
Stewart
Stivers
Stockman
Stutzman
Terry
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tiberi
Tipton
Turner
Upton
Valadao
Wagner
Walberg
Walden
Walorski
Weber (TX)
Webster (FL)
Wenstrup
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Williams
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Wolf
Womack
Woodall
Yoder
Yoho
Young (AK)
Young (FL)
Young (IN)

NOES--189

Amash
Andrews
Barber
Barrow (GA)
Bass
Beatty
Becerra
Bera (CA)
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer
Bonamici
Brady (PA)
Braley (IA)
Brown (FL)
Brownley (CA)
Bustos
Butterfield
Capps
Capuano
Cardenas
Carney
Carson (IN)
Cartwright
Castor (FL)
Castro (TX)
Cicilline
Clarke
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly
Conyers
Cooper
Costa
Courtney
Crowley
Cuellar
Cummings
Davis (CA)
Davis, Danny
DeFazio
DeGette
Delaney
DeLauro
DelBene
Deutch
Dingell
Doggett
Doyle
Duckworth
Edwards
Ellison
Engel
Enyart
Eshoo
Esty
Farr
Foster
Frankel (FL)
Fudge
Gabbard
Gallego
Garamendi
Garcia
Grayson
Green, Al
Grijalva
Hahn
Hanabusa
Hastings (FL)
Heck (WA)
Higgins
Himes
Hinojosa
Holt
Honda
Horsford
Hoyer
Huffman
Israel
Jackson Lee
Jeffries
Johnson (GA)
Johnson, E. B.
Kaptur
Keating
Kelly (IL)
Kennedy
Kildee
Kilmer
Kind
Kirkpatrick
Kuster
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Levin
Lipinski
Loebsack
Lowenthal
Lowey
Lujan Grisham (NM)
Lujan, Ben Ray (NM)
Lynch
Maffei
Maloney, Carolyn
Maloney, Sean
Massie
Matheson
Matsui
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
McNerney
Meeks
Meng
Michaud
Miller, George
Moore
Moran
Mulvaney
Murphy (FL)
Nadler
Napolitano
Negrete McLeod
Nolan
O'Rourke
Owens
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Payne
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Peters (CA)
Peters (MI)
Pingree (ME)
Pocan
Polis
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rahall
Rangel
Richmond
Rohrabacher
Roybal-Allard
Ruppersberger
Rush
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schneider
Schrader
Schwartz
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Serrano
Sinema
Sires
Slaughter
Smith (WA)
Speier
Swalwell (CA)
Takano
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tierney
Titus
Tonko
Tsongas
Van Hollen
Vargas
Veasey
Vela
Velazquez
Visclosky
Walz
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watt
Waxman
Welch
Wilson (FL)
Yarmuth

NOT VOTING--10

Campbell
Chu
Fattah
Gutierrez
Lewis
Lofgren
Markey
McCarthy (NY)
Neal
Shea-Porter

Announcement by the Acting Chair

The Acting CHAIR (during the vote). There is 1 minute remaining.

{time} 1739

Ms. SINEMA changed her vote from ``aye'' to ``no.''
So the amendment was agreed to.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.

Amendment No. 5 Offered by Mr. Coffman

The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a
recorded vote on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Colorado
(Mr. Coffman) on which further proceedings were postponed and on which
the noes prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.

Recorded Vote

[Roll No. 224]

AYES--206

Alexander
Amash
Amodei
Bachmann
Bachus
Barletta
Barr
Barton
Bentivolio
Bilirakis
Bishop (UT)
Black
Blackburn
Bonner
Boustany
Brady (TX)
Bridenstine
Brooks (IN)
Broun (GA)
Buchanan
Bucshon
Burgess
Calvert
Cantor
Capito
Carter
Cartwright
Cassidy
Chabot
Chaffetz
Coble
Coffman
Cole
Collins (GA)
Collins (NY)
Conaway
Cook
Cooper
Costa
Cotton
Cramer
Crawford
Culberson
Daines
Davis, Rodney
Denham
Dent
DeSantis
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Duffy
Duncan (SC)
Duncan (TN)
Ellmers
Farenthold
Fincher
Fleischmann
Fleming
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foxx
Frankel (FL)
Franks (AZ)
Gardner
Garrett
Gerlach
Gibbs
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Gosar
Gowdy
Granger
Graves (GA)
Griffin (AR)
Griffith (VA)
Grimm
Guthrie
Hall
Hanna
Hartzler
Hastings (WA)
Heck (NV)
Hensarling
Himes
Holding
Hudson
Huelskamp
Huizenga (MI)
Hultgren
Hurt
Issa
Jenkins
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, Sam
Jones
Jordan
Kelly (PA)
King (IA)
Kingston
Kinzinger (IL)
Kline
Labrador
Lamborn
Lance
Lankford
Latham
Latta
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lummis
Marchant
Massie
Matheson
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul
McClintock
McHenry
McKeon
McKinley
McMorris Rodgers
Meadows
Messer
Mica
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Mullin
Mulvaney
Murphy (PA)
Neugebauer
Noem
Nugent
Nunes
Nunnelee
Olson
Owens
Palazzo
Paulsen
Pearce
Perlmutter
Petri
Pittenger
Pitts
Poe (TX)
Pompeo
Posey
Price (GA)
Radel
Reichert
Ribble
Rice (SC)
Rigell
Roby
Roe (TN)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Rokita
Rooney
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Ross
Rothfus
Royce
Runyan
Ryan (WI)
Salmon
Sanford
Scalise
Schock
Schweikert
Scott, Austin
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Smith (MO)
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Southerland
Speier
Stewart
Stockman
Stutzman
Terry
Thompson (PA)
Tipton
Upton
Valadao
Wagner
Walberg
Walden
Walorski
Walz
Weber (TX)
Webster (FL)
Wenstrup
Williams
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Wolf
Womack
Woodall
Yoder
Yoho
Young (AK)
Young (IN)

[[Page H3550]]

NOES--220

Aderholt
Andrews
Barber
Barrow (GA)
Bass
Beatty
Becerra
Benishek
Bera (CA)
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer
Bonamici
Brady (PA)
Braley (IA)
Brooks (AL)
Brown (FL)
Brownley (CA)
Bustos
Butterfield
Camp
Capps
Capuano
Cardenas
Carney
Carson (IN)
Castor (FL)
Castro (TX)
Cicilline
Clarke
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly
Conyers
Courtney
Crenshaw
Crowley
Cuellar
Cummings
Davis (CA)
Davis, Danny
DeFazio
DeGette
Delaney
DeLauro
DelBene
Deutch
Dingell
Doggett
Doyle
Duckworth
Edwards
Ellison
Engel
Enyart
Eshoo
Esty
Farr
Fitzpatrick
Flores
Foster
Frelinghuysen
Fudge
Gabbard
Gallego
Garamendi
Garcia
Gibson
Graves (MO)
Grayson
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Hahn
Hanabusa
Harper
Harris
Hastings (FL)
Heck (WA)
Herrera Beutler
Higgins
Hinojosa
Holt
Honda
Horsford
Hoyer
Huffman
Hunter
Israel
Jackson Lee
Jeffries
Johnson (GA)
Johnson, E. B.
Joyce
Kaptur
Keating
Kelly (IL)
Kennedy
Kildee
Kilmer
Kind
King (NY)
Kirkpatrick
Kuster
LaMalfa
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Levin
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Loebsack
Lofgren
Long
Lowenthal
Lowey
Lujan Grisham (NM)
Lujan, Ben Ray (NM)
Lynch
Maffei
Maloney, Carolyn
Maloney, Sean
Marino
Matsui
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
McIntyre
McNerney
Meehan
Meeks
Meng
Michaud
Miller (FL)
Miller, George
Moore
Moran
Murphy (FL)
Nadler
Napolitano
Negrete McLeod
Nolan
O'Rourke
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Payne
Pelosi
Perry
Peters (CA)
Peters (MI)
Peterson
Pingree (ME)
Pocan
Polis
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rahall
Rangel
Reed
Renacci
Richmond
Rogers (AL)
Roybal-Allard
Ruiz
Ruppersberger
Rush
Ryan (OH)
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schneider
Schrader
Schwartz
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Serrano
Sewell (AL)
Sherman
Shimkus
Shuster
Simpson
Sinema
Sires
Slaughter
Smith (WA)
Stivers
Swalwell (CA)
Takano
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Thornberry
Tiberi
Tierney
Titus
Tonko
Tsongas
Turner
Van Hollen
Vargas
Veasey
Vela
Velazquez
Visclosky
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watt
Waxman
Welch
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Wilson (FL)
Yarmuth
Young (FL)

NOT VOTING--8

Campbell
Chu
Fattah
Lewis
Markey
McCarthy (NY)
Neal
Shea-Porter

{time} 1747

Mr. DeFAZIO changed his vote from ``aye'' to ``no.''
Mr. COLLINS of New York changed his vote from ``no'' to ``aye.''
So the amendment was rejected.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.

Amendment No. 9 Offered by Mr. Rigell

The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a
recorded vote on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Virginia
(Mr. Rigell) on which further proceedings were postponed and on which
the noes prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.

Recorded Vote

[Roll No. 225]

AYES--178

Aderholt
Alexander
Amash
Amodei
Bachmann
Bachus
Barr
Benishek
Bentivolio
Bilirakis
Black
Blackburn
Bonner
Boustany
Brady (TX)
Brooks (AL)
Brooks (IN)
Broun (GA)
Buchanan
Bucshon
Calvert
Camp
Cantor
Carter
Cassidy
Chabot
Coble
Coffman
Collins (NY)
Conaway
Connolly
Cotton
Cramer
Crawford
Culberson
Daines
Denham
DeSantis
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Duffy
Duncan (SC)
Duncan (TN)
Ellmers
Fincher
Fleischmann
Fleming
Flores
Fortenberry
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Frelinghuysen
Gardner
Garrett
Gibbs
Goodlatte
Gosar
Gowdy
Granger
Graves (MO)
Griffin (AR)
Griffith (VA)
Guthrie
Hanna
Harper
Harris
Hartzler
Hastings (WA)
Heck (NV)
Hensarling
Herrera Beutler
Holding
Hudson
Huelskamp
Huizenga (MI)
Hultgren
Hunter
Hurt
Jenkins
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, Sam
Jordan
Kelly (PA)
King (IA)
Kinzinger (IL)
Kline
Labrador
LaMalfa
Lamborn
Lance
Latham
Latta
Long
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lummis
Marchant
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul
McClintock
McHenry
McKeon
McMorris Rodgers
Meadows
Messer
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Mulvaney
Neugebauer
Noem
Nugent
Nunes
Nunnelee
Olson
Palazzo
Paulsen
Perry
Petri
Pittenger
Pitts
Poe (TX)
Pompeo
Posey
Radel
Reed
Renacci
Ribble
Rigell
Roby
Roe (TN)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Rokita
Rooney
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Ross
Rothfus
Royce
Ryan (WI)
Salmon
Sanford
Scalise
Schock
Schweikert
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Smith (MO)
Smith (NE)
Smith (TX)
Southerland
Stivers
Stockman
Stutzman
Terry
Thornberry
Upton
Valadao
Wagner
Walberg
Walden
Walorski
Weber (TX)
Webster (FL)
Wenstrup
Whitfield
Williams
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Womack
Woodall
Yoder
Yoho
Young (FL)
Young (IN)

NOES--248

Andrews
Barber
Barletta
Barrow (GA)
Barton
Bass
Beatty
Becerra
Bera (CA)
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Bishop (UT)
Blumenauer
Bonamici
Brady (PA)
Braley (IA)
Bridenstine
Brown (FL)
Brownley (CA)
Burgess
Bustos
Butterfield
Capito
Capps
Capuano
Cardenas
Carney
Carson (IN)
Cartwright
Castor (FL)
Castro (TX)
Chaffetz
Cicilline
Clarke
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Cole
Collins (GA)
Conyers
Cook
Cooper
Costa
Courtney
Crenshaw
Crowley
Cuellar
Cummings
Davis (CA)
Davis, Danny
Davis, Rodney
DeFazio
DeGette
Delaney
DeLauro
DelBene
Dent
Deutch
Dingell
Doggett
Doyle
Duckworth
Edwards
Ellison
Engel
Enyart
Eshoo
Esty
Farenthold
Farr
Fitzpatrick
Forbes
Foster
Frankel (FL)
Fudge
Gabbard
Gallego
Garamendi
Garcia
Gerlach
Gibson
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Graves (GA)
Grayson
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Grijalva
Grimm
Gutierrez
Hahn
Hall
Hanabusa
Hastings (FL)
Heck (WA)
Higgins
Himes
Hinojosa
Holt
Honda
Horsford
Hoyer
Huffman
Israel
Issa
Jackson Lee
Jeffries
Johnson (GA)
Johnson, E. B.
Jones
Joyce
Kaptur
Keating
Kelly (IL)
Kennedy
Kildee
Kilmer
Kind
King (NY)
Kingston
Kirkpatrick
Kuster
Langevin
Lankford
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Levin
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Loebsack
Lofgren
Lowenthal
Lowey
Lujan Grisham (NM)
Lujan, Ben Ray (NM)
Lynch
Maffei
Maloney, Carolyn
Maloney, Sean
Marino
Massie
Matheson
Matsui
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
McIntyre
McKinley
McNerney
Meehan
Meeks
Meng
Michaud
Miller, George
Moore
Moran
Mullin
Murphy (FL)
Murphy (PA)
Nadler
Napolitano
Negrete McLeod
Nolan
O'Rourke
Owens
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Payne
Pearce
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Peters (CA)
Peters (MI)
Peterson
Pingree (ME)
Pocan
Polis
Price (GA)
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rahall
Rangel
Reichert
Rice (SC)
Richmond
Rogers (AL)
Roybal-Allard
Ruiz
Runyan
Ruppersberger
Rush
Ryan (OH)
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schneider
Schrader
Schwartz
Scott (VA)
Scott, Austin
Scott, David
Serrano
Sewell (AL)
Sherman
Shimkus
Shuster
Simpson
Sinema
Sires
Slaughter
Smith (NJ)
Smith (WA)
Speier
Stewart
Swalwell (CA)
Takano
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Thompson (PA)
Tiberi
Tierney
Tipton
Titus
Tonko
Tsongas
Turner
Van Hollen
Vargas
Veasey
Vela
Velazquez
Visclosky
Walz
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watt
Waxman
Welch
Westmoreland
Wilson (FL)
Wolf
Yarmuth
Young (AK)

NOT VOTING--8

Campbell
Chu
Fattah
Lewis
Markey
McCarthy (NY)
Neal
Shea-Porter

{time} 1750

So the amendment was rejected.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.

Amendment No. 10 Offered by Mr. McGovern

The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a
recorded vote on the amendment offered by the gentleman from
Massachusetts (Mr. McGovern) on which further proceedings were
postponed and on which the ayes prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.

[[Page H3551]]

Recorded Vote

[Roll No. 226]

AYES--305

Alexander
Amash
Amodei
Andrews
Bachus
Barber
Barton
Bass
Beatty
Becerra
Benishek
Bentivolio
Bera (CA)
Bilirakis
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer
Bonamici
Bonner
Brady (PA)
Braley (IA)
Bridenstine
Brooks (AL)
Broun (GA)
Brownley (CA)
Buchanan
Burgess
Bustos
Butterfield
Calvert
Camp
Capito
Capps
Capuano
Cardenas
Carney
Carson (IN)
Cartwright
Cassidy
Castor (FL)
Castro (TX)
Chaffetz
Cicilline
Clarke
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Coble
Coffman
Cohen
Cole
Connolly
Conyers
Cook
Cooper
Costa
Courtney
Crawford
Crowley
Cummings
Daines
Davis (CA)
Davis, Danny
Davis, Rodney
DeFazio
DeGette
Delaney
DeLauro
DelBene
Deutch
Dingell
Doggett
Doyle
Duckworth
Duffy
Duncan (TN)
Edwards
Ellison
Engel
Eshoo
Esty
Farr
Fitzpatrick
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foster
Frankel (FL)
Fudge
Gabbard
Garamendi
Garcia
Garrett
Gibson
Graves (GA)
Grayson
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Griffin (AR)
Griffith (VA)
Grijalva
Guthrie
Gutierrez
Hahn
Hanabusa
Hanna
Harper
Hartzler
Hastings (FL)
Hastings (WA)
Heck (NV)
Heck (WA)
Herrera Beutler
Higgins
Himes
Hinojosa
Holt
Honda
Horsford
Hoyer
Huelskamp
Huffman
Hultgren
Hurt
Israel
Jackson Lee
Jeffries
Johnson (GA)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, E. B.
Johnson, Sam
Jones
Jordan
Joyce
Kaptur
Keating
Kelly (IL)
Kennedy
Kildee
Kilmer
Kind
King (IA)
Kingston
Kirkpatrick
Kline
Kuster
Lamborn
Lance
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Latham
Lee (CA)
Levin
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Loebsack
Lofgren
Lowenthal
Lowey
Lujan Grisham (NM)
Lujan, Ben Ray (NM)
Lummis
Lynch
Maffei
Maloney, Carolyn
Maloney, Sean
Massie
Matsui
McClintock
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
McIntyre
McKeon
McKinley
McMorris Rodgers
McNerney
Meadows
Meeks
Meng
Mica
Michaud
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Miller, George
Moore
Moran
Mulvaney
Murphy (FL)
Nadler
Napolitano
Negrete McLeod
Neugebauer
Nolan
Nugent
Nunnelee
O'Rourke
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Paulsen
Payne
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Peters (CA)
Peters (MI)
Peterson
Petri
Pingree (ME)
Pittenger
Pitts
Pocan
Poe (TX)
Polis
Posey
Price (GA)
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rahall
Rangel
Reed
Reichert
Ribble
Richmond
Rigell
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rohrabacher
Rooney
Roybal-Allard
Royce
Ruiz
Runyan
Rush
Ryan (OH)
Ryan (WI)
Salmon
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sanford
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schneider
Schrader
Schwartz
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Sensenbrenner
Serrano
Sherman
Shimkus
Shuster
Simpson
Sinema
Sires
Slaughter
Smith (NJ)
Smith (WA)
Southerland
Speier
Stivers
Swalwell (CA)
Takano
Terry
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Thornberry
Tiberi
Tierney
Tipton
Titus
Tonko
Tsongas
Turner
Upton
Valadao
Van Hollen
Vargas
Veasey
Vela
Velazquez
Visclosky
Walden
Walorski
Walz
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watt
Waxman
Webster (FL)
Welch
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Wilson (FL)
Wittman
Wolf
Womack
Woodall
Yarmuth
Yoho
Young (AK)
Young (FL)

NOES--121

Aderholt
Bachmann
Barletta
Barr
Barrow (GA)
Bishop (UT)
Black
Blackburn
Boustany
Brady (TX)
Brooks (IN)
Brown (FL)
Bucshon
Cantor
Carter
Chabot
Collins (GA)
Collins (NY)
Conaway
Cotton
Cramer
Crenshaw
Cuellar
Culberson
Denham
Dent
DeSantis
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Duncan (SC)
Ellmers
Enyart
Farenthold
Fincher
Fleischmann
Fleming
Flores
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Frelinghuysen
Gallego
Gardner
Gerlach
Gibbs
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Gosar
Gowdy
Granger
Graves (MO)
Grimm
Hall
Harris
Hensarling
Holding
Hudson
Huizenga (MI)
Hunter
Issa
Jenkins
Kelly (PA)
King (NY)
Kinzinger (IL)
Labrador
LaMalfa
Lankford
Latta
Long
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Marchant
Marino
Matheson
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul
McHenry
Meehan
Messer
Mullin
Murphy (PA)
Noem
Nunes
Olson
Owens
Palazzo
Pearce
Perry
Pompeo
Radel
Renacci
Rice (SC)
Roby
Rogers (MI)
Rokita
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Ross
Rothfus
Ruppersberger
Scalise
Schock
Schweikert
Scott, Austin
Sessions
Sewell (AL)
Smith (MO)
Smith (NE)
Smith (TX)
Stewart
Stockman
Stutzman
Thompson (PA)
Wagner
Walberg
Weber (TX)
Wenstrup
Williams
Wilson (SC)
Yoder
Young (IN)

NOT VOTING--8

Campbell
Chu
Fattah
Lewis
Markey
McCarthy (NY)
Neal
Shea-Porter

{time} 1754

So the amendment was agreed to.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.

Amendment No. 11 Offered by Mr. Goodlatte

The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a
recorded vote on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Virginia
(Mr. Goodlatte) on which further proceedings were postponed and on
which the ayes prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.

Recorded Vote

[Roll No. 227]

AYES--214

Aderholt
Alexander
Amodei
Bachmann
Bachus
Barletta
Barr
Barrow (GA)
Barton
Benishek
Bentivolio
Bilirakis
Bishop (UT)
Black
Blackburn
Bonner
Boustany
Brady (TX)
Bridenstine
Brooks (AL)
Brooks (IN)
Broun (GA)
Buchanan
Bucshon
Burgess
Calvert
Camp
Cantor
Capito
Carter
Cassidy
Chabot
Coble
Coffman
Cole
Collins (GA)
Collins (NY)
Conaway
Cook
Cramer
Crawford
Crenshaw
Culberson
Daines
Davis, Rodney
Denham
Dent
DeSantis
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Duffy
Duncan (SC)
Duncan (TN)
Ellmers
Fincher
Fitzpatrick
Fleischmann
Fleming
Flores
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Frelinghuysen
Gardner
Garrett
Gerlach
Gibbs
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Gowdy
Granger
Graves (GA)
Graves (MO)
Griffin (AR)
Grimm
Guthrie
Hall
Hanna
Harper
Harris
Hartzler
Hastings (WA)
Heck (NV)
Hensarling
Herrera Beutler
Holding
Hudson
Huizenga (MI)
Hultgren
Hunter
Hurt
Issa
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, Sam
Jordan
Joyce
Kelly (PA)
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kinzinger (IL)
Kline
LaMalfa
Lamborn
Lance
Lankford
Latham
Latta
LoBiondo
Long
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lummis
Marchant
Marino
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul
McHenry
McKeon
McKinley
McMorris Rodgers
Meadows
Meehan
Messer
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Mullin
Mulvaney
Murphy (PA)
Neugebauer
Noem
Nugent
Nunes
Nunnelee
Olson
Owens
Palazzo
Paulsen
Pearce
Perry
Petri
Pittenger
Pitts
Poe (TX)
Posey
Price (GA)
Rahall
Reed
Reichert
Renacci
Ribble
Rice (SC)
Rigell
Roby
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rokita
Rooney
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Ross
Rothfus
Royce
Runyan
Ryan (WI)
Scalise
Schock
Scott, Austin
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shimkus
Shuster
Simpson
Smith (MO)
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Southerland
Stewart
Stivers
Stutzman
Terry
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tiberi
Tipton
Turner
Upton
Valadao
Wagner
Walberg
Walden
Walorski
Weber (TX)
Webster (FL)
Wenstrup
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Williams
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Wolf
Womack
Woodall
Yoder
Young (AK)
Young (FL)
Young (IN)

NOES--211

Amash
Andrews
Barber
Bass
Beatty
Becerra
Bera (CA)
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer
Bonamici
Brady (PA)
Braley (IA)
Brown (FL)
Brownley (CA)
Bustos
Butterfield
Capps
Capuano
Cardenas
Carney
Carson (IN)
Cartwright
Castor (FL)
Castro (TX)
Chaffetz
Cicilline
Clarke
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly
Conyers
Cooper
Costa
Cotton
Courtney
Crowley
Cuellar
Cummings
Davis (CA)
Davis, Danny
DeFazio
DeGette
Delaney
DeLauro
DelBene
Deutch
Dingell
Doggett
Doyle
Duckworth
Edwards

[[Page H3552]]

Ellison
Engel
Enyart
Eshoo
Esty
Farenthold
Farr
Foster
Frankel (FL)
Fudge
Gabbard
Gallego
Garamendi
Garcia
Gibson
Gosar
Grayson
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Griffith (VA)
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Hahn
Hanabusa
Hastings (FL)
Heck (WA)
Higgins
Himes
Hinojosa
Holt
Honda
Horsford
Hoyer
Huelskamp
Huffman
Israel
Jackson Lee
Jeffries
Jenkins
Johnson (GA)
Johnson, E. B.
Jones
Kaptur
Keating
Kelly (IL)
Kennedy
Kildee
Kilmer
Kind
Kirkpatrick
Kuster
Labrador
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Levin
Lipinski
Loebsack
Lofgren
Lowenthal
Lowey
Lujan Grisham (NM)
Lujan, Ben Ray (NM)
Lynch
Maffei
Maloney, Carolyn
Maloney, Sean
Massie
Matheson
Matsui
McClintock
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
McIntyre
McNerney
Meeks
Meng
Michaud
Miller, George
Moore
Moran
Murphy (FL)
Nadler
Napolitano
Negrete McLeod
Nolan
O'Rourke
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Payne
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Peters (CA)
Peters (MI)
Peterson
Pingree (ME)
Pocan
Polis
Pompeo
Price (NC)
Quigley
Radel
Rangel
Richmond
Rohrabacher
Roybal-Allard
Ruiz
Ruppersberger
Rush
Ryan (OH)
Salmon
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sanford
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schneider
Schrader
Schwartz
Schweikert
Scott (VA)
Serrano
Sewell (AL)
Sherman
Sinema
Sires
Slaughter
Smith (WA)
Speier
Stockman
Swalwell (CA)
Takano
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tierney
Titus
Tonko
Tsongas
Van Hollen
Vargas
Veasey
Vela
Velazquez
Visclosky
Walz
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watt
Waxman
Welch
Wilson (FL)
Yarmuth
Yoho

NOT VOTING--9

Campbell
Chu
Fattah
Lewis
Markey
McCarthy (NY)
Neal
Scott, David
Shea-Porter

{time} 1758

So the amendment was agreed to.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.

Amendment No. 13 Offered by Mr. Smith of Washington

The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a
recorded vote on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Washington
(Mr. Smith) on which further proceedings were postponed and on which
the noes prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.

Recorded Vote

[Roll No. 228]

AYES--200

Amash
Andrews
Barber
Bass
Beatty
Becerra
Bentivolio
Bera (CA)
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer
Bonamici
Brady (PA)
Braley (IA)
Broun (GA)
Brown (FL)
Brownley (CA)
Bustos
Butterfield
Capps
Capuano
Cardenas
Carney
Carson (IN)
Cartwright
Castor (FL)
Castro (TX)
Cicilline
Clarke
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly
Conyers
Cooper
Courtney
Crowley
Cummings
Davis (CA)
Davis, Danny
DeFazio
DeGette
Delaney
DeLauro
DelBene
Deutch
Dingell
Doggett
Doyle
Duckworth
Duncan (TN)
Edwards
Ellison
Engel
Enyart
Eshoo
Esty
Farr
Foster
Frankel (FL)
Fudge
Gabbard
Garamendi
Garcia
Gibson
Gosar
Grayson
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Griffith (VA)
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Hahn
Hanabusa
Hastings (FL)
Heck (WA)
Higgins
Himes
Hinojosa
Holt
Honda
Horsford
Hoyer
Huelskamp
Huffman
Israel
Jackson Lee
Jeffries
Johnson (GA)
Johnson, E. B.
Jones
Kaptur
Keating
Kelly (IL)
Kennedy
Kildee
Kilmer
Kind
Kirkpatrick
Kuster
Labrador
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Loebsack
Lofgren
Lowenthal
Lowey
Lujan Grisham (NM)
Lujan, Ben Ray (NM)
Lynch
Maffei
Maloney, Carolyn
Massie
Matsui
McClintock
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
McNerney
Meeks
Meng
Michaud
Miller, George
Moore
Moran
Murphy (FL)
Nadler
Napolitano
Negrete McLeod
Nolan
O'Rourke
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Payne
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Peters (CA)
Peters (MI)
Peterson
Petri
Pingree (ME)
Pocan
Polis
Posey
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rahall
Rangel
Ribble
Richmond
Roybal-Allard
Ruiz
Rush
Ryan (OH)
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanford
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schneider
Schrader
Schwartz
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Serrano
Sewell (AL)
Sherman
Shimkus
Sinema
Sires
Slaughter
Smith (WA)
Speier
Swalwell (CA)
Takano
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tierney
Tipton
Titus
Tonko
Tsongas
Van Hollen
Vargas
Veasey
Velazquez
Visclosky
Walz
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watt
Waxman
Welch
Wilson (FL)
Yarmuth
Yoho

NOES--226

Aderholt
Alexander
Amodei
Bachmann
Bachus
Barletta
Barr
Barrow (GA)
Barton
Benishek
Bilirakis
Bishop (UT)
Black
Blackburn
Bonner
Boustany
Brady (TX)
Bridenstine
Brooks (AL)
Brooks (IN)
Buchanan
Bucshon
Burgess
Calvert
Camp
Cantor
Capito
Carter
Cassidy
Chabot
Chaffetz
Coble
Coffman
Cole
Collins (GA)
Collins (NY)
Conaway
Cook
Costa
Cotton
Cramer
Crawford
Crenshaw
Cuellar
Culberson
Daines
Davis, Rodney
Denham
Dent
DeSantis
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Duffy
Duncan (SC)
Ellmers
Farenthold
Fincher
Fitzpatrick
Fleischmann
Fleming
Flores
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Frelinghuysen
Gallego
Gardner
Garrett
Gerlach
Gibbs
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Gowdy
Granger
Graves (GA)
Graves (MO)
Griffin (AR)
Grimm
Guthrie
Hall
Hanna
Harper
Harris
Hartzler
Hastings (WA)
Heck (NV)
Hensarling
Herrera Beutler
Holding
Hudson
Huizenga (MI)
Hultgren
Hunter
Hurt
Issa
Jenkins
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, Sam
Jordan
Joyce
Kelly (PA)
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kinzinger (IL)
Kline
LaMalfa
Lamborn
Lance
Lankford
Latham
Latta
Levin
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Long
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lummis
Maloney, Sean
Marchant
Marino
Matheson
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul
McHenry
McIntyre
McKeon
McKinley
McMorris Rodgers
Meadows
Meehan
Messer
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Mullin
Mulvaney
Murphy (PA)
Neugebauer
Noem
Nugent
Nunes
Nunnelee
Olson
Owens
Palazzo
Paulsen
Pearce
Perry
Pittenger
Pitts
Poe (TX)
Pompeo
Price (GA)
Radel
Reed
Reichert
Renacci
Rice (SC)
Rigell
Roby
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Rokita
Rooney
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Ross
Rothfus
Royce
Runyan
Ruppersberger
Ryan (WI)
Salmon
Sanchez, Loretta
Scalise
Schock
Schweikert
Scott, Austin
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shuster
Simpson
Smith (MO)
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Southerland
Stewart
Stivers
Stockman
Stutzman
Terry
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tiberi
Turner
Upton
Valadao
Vela
Wagner
Walberg
Walden
Walorski
Weber (TX)
Webster (FL)
Wenstrup
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Williams
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Wolf
Womack
Woodall
Yoder
Young (AK)
Young (FL)
Young (IN)

NOT VOTING--8

Campbell
Chu
Fattah
Lewis
Markey
McCarthy (NY)
Neal
Shea-Porter

{time} 1803

Ms. WATERS and Mr. CUMMINGS changed their vote from ``no'' to
``aye.''
So the amendment was rejected.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I move that the Committee do now rise.
The motion was agreed to.
Accordingly, the Committee rose; and the Speaker pro tempore (Mr. Poe
of Texas) having assumed the chair, Mr. Simpson, Acting Chair of the
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union, reported that
that Committee, having had under consideration the bill (H.R. 1960) to
authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for military activities
of the Department of Defense and for military construction, to
prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for
other purposes, had come to no resolution thereon.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that, during further
consideration of H.R. 1960 pursuant to House Resolution 260, amendments
14 and 23 printed in part B of House Report 113-108 may be considered
out of sequence.
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Simpson). Is there objection to the
request of the gentleman from California?
There was no objection.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to House Resolution 260 and rule

[[Page H3553]]

XVIII, the Chair declares the House in the Committee of the Whole House
on the state of the Union for the further consideration of the bill,
H.R. 1960.
Will the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Poe) kindly assume the chair.

{time} 1809

In the Committee of the Whole

{time} 1810

Amendment No. 15 Offered by Mr. Denham

The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 15
printed in part B of House Report 113-108.
Mr. DENHAM. I rise to offer my amendment.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:

At the end of subtitle C of title V, add the following new
section:

SECTION 530E. AUTHORITY TO ENLIST IN THE ARMED FORCES CERTAIN
ALIENS WHO ARE UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED
STATES AND LEGAL STATUS OF SUCH ENLISTEES BY
REASON OF HONORABLE SERVICE IN THE ARMED
FORCES.

(a) Certain Aliens Authorized for Enlistment.--Subsection
(b)(1) of section 504 of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
``(D) An alien who was unlawfully present in the United
States on December 31, 2011, who has been unlawfully and
continuously present in the United States since that date,
who was younger than 15 years of age on the date the alien
intially entered the United States, and who, disregarding
such unlawful status, is otherwise eligible for original
enlistment in a regular component of the Army, Navy, Air
Force, Marine Corps, or Coast Guard under section 505(a) of
this title and regulations issued to implement such
section.''.
(b) Conditional Admission to Permanent Residence of Alien
Enlistees.--Such section is further amended by adding at the
end the following new subsection:
``(c) Conditional Admission to Permanent Residence of Alien
Enlistees.--(1) The Secretary of Homeland Security shall
adjust the status of an alien described in subsection
(b)(1)(D) who enlists in a regular component of the Army,
Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Coast Guard to the status
of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence under
the provisions of section 249 of the Immigration and
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1259), except that the alien does
not have to--
``(A) establish that he or she entered the United States
prior to January 1, 1972; or
``(B) comply with section 212(e) of such Act (8 U.S.C.
1182(e)).
``(2) The lawful permanent resident status of an alien
described in subsection (b)(1)(D) who enlisted in a regular
component of the armed forces and whose status was adjusted
under paragraph (1) is automatically rescinded, by operation
of law, if the alien is separated from the armed forces under
other than honorable conditions before the alien serves the
term of enlistment of such alien. Such grounds for rescission
are in addition to any other grounds for rescission provided
by law. Proof of separation from the armed forces under other
than honorable conditions shall be established by a duly
authenticated certification from the armed force in which the
alien last served.
``(3) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to
alter--
``(A) the process prescribed by sections 328, 329, and 329A
of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1439, 1440,
1440-1) by which a person may naturalize through service in
the armed forces; or
``(B) the qualifications for original enlistment in the
armed forces described in section 505(a) of this title and
regulations issued to implement such section.''.
(c) Offset and Delayed Effective Date.--
(1) Budgetary effects.--Not later than 30 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit
to Congress an analysis of the budgetary effects of enactment
of this section and a determination regarding whether such
enactment would result in an increase in the deficit in the
current year, the budget year, or the subsequent nine fiscal
years.
(2) Delayed effective date.--With the exception of
paragraph (1), this section and the amendments made by this
section shall become effective only upon enactment of an Act
referencing this section and the title of which is as
follows: ``An Act to provide budgetary treatment of changes
to enlistment policies of the Armed Forces.''.
(d) Clerical Amendments.--
(1) Section heading.--The heading of such section is
amended to read as follows:

``Sec. 504. Persons not qualified; citizenship or residency
requirements; exceptions''.

(2) Table of sections.--The table of sections at the
beginning of chapter 31 of such title is amended by striking
the item relating to section 504 and inserting the following
new item:

``504. Persons not qualified; citizenship or residency requirements;
exceptions.''.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman
from California (Mr. Denham) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from California.
Mr. DENHAM. Mr. Chairman, thank you for giving me an opportunity to
speak on behalf of my amendment to authorize the enlistment in the
Armed Forces of undocumented immigrants who entered the U.S. under 15
years of age, who entered the country on or before December 31, 2011,
and who are otherwise qualified for enlistment.
This amendment will also provide a way for this group of undocumented
immigrants to be lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent
residence by reason of their honorable service and sacrifice in the
United States military.
As a Nation, we have never made citizenship a requirement for service
in our Armed Forces. Half of the U.S. military enlistees in the 1840s
were immigrants, and more than 660,000 military veterans sought
naturalization between 1862 and 2000.
Mr. Chairman, I have worn the uniform. I have served with many
immigrants in Desert Storm and Somalia. My uncle and godfather served
with immigrants during Vietnam. My grandfather and grandmother served
in Korea, where Europeans were encouraged to sign up for the United
States military. Filipinos from 1947 to 2000 were encouraged to sign up
and serve in the military.
This is one opportunity for those that have gone to school here, that
have graduated from high school, that are in our communities, to show
their ultimate support for this great Nation and are willing to
sacrifice in support of our country.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the
amendment.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. I yield to the gentleman from California
(Mr. Becerra).
Mr. BECERRA. Mr. Chairman, I would like to engage the gentleman from
California in a colloquy, if I may.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Washington controls the time.
Mr. BECERRA. I would like to engage in a colloquy with the gentleman
from California (Mr. Denham), and what I'd like to ask is, in
conversations that have taken place between Members on this particular
amendment, there is obviously quite a bit of support on this side of
the House for legislation that would honor the service of any American,
including those Americans who have come to this country through no
fault of their own without documentation, have essentially become
Americans through their time as youngsters in this country, and then
wanted to fulfill service to this Nation by applying to serve in our
Armed Forces.
This amendment, however, has some flaws in it that make it very
difficult for the very people that the gentleman is trying to help to
actually receive the opportunity to serve our country and then be able
to adjust their status to lawful permanent residents, and ultimately,
we hope, to become United States citizens.
There is also a further flaw in the bill that would prevent any part
of this from ever taking effect unless the gentleman were able to find
the resources to implement this. As he and I discussed before this
amendment was put on the floor, that would be very difficult unless we
were prepared to make some substantial changes to the current funding
of some very important

[[Page H3554]]

mandatory programs, including retirement pay for our soldiers; TRICARE,
which is health care services for our military servicemembers; mortgage
refinancing for our servicemembers.
So I would ask the gentleman if the gentleman was intent on pursuing
this amendment today, or if he was prepared to withdraw and have
further conversation to see if these flaws could be corrected.
I would also note that for many of us who have been working for over
20 years to try to reform a broken immigration system, this is
certainly one aspect of a broken immigration system that must be fixed.
There are any number of hardworking individuals in this country who we
believe, through a comprehensive fix of our broken immigration system,
would have an opportunity to show all Americans citizens that they have
tried to work very hard to earn a chance to become tax-paying American
citizens.
So while many of us prefer to be able to deal with all aspects of a
broken immigration system, this is certainly one that truly needs to be
dealt with and deserves attention. But this amendment has two very
substantial flaws, and I would ask the gentleman what his intentions
are with regard to pursuing this amendment on the floor this evening?
With the permission of our ranking member, I would ask that Mr.
Denham be yielded time to respond.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. I yield to the gentleman from California
(Mr. Denham).

Mr. DENHAM. In addressing his concern about the cost of this bill, it
is yet to be defined. It's something that we will need the
administration to define the cost of, as we would with any bill that
goes through the appropriations process. We look forward to working not
only with the gentleman from California on the amendment, but certainly
working with the administration to define an unknown cost that we are
realizing today.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, how much time do I have
remaining?
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman has 2\1/2\ minutes remaining.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. DENHAM. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from
Virginia (Mr. Goodlatte).
Mr. GOODLATTE. I thank the gentleman very much for yielding. I also
want to tell him how much I appreciate him raising this very important
issue.
There is no doubt that individuals brought to the United States as
young children by their illegal immigrant parents are the most
sympathetic group of people not lawfully present in the United States
today, and that is particularly true of those who desire to serve in
the Armed Forces of the United States. We should embrace these
individuals whose goal it is to integrate into American society and
live and work by the rules of our Nation.
This is an issue that we plan to look at in the Judiciary Committee,
and so I want to thank the gentleman from California (Mr. Becerra) also
for raising the issue in the context of our overall efforts to deal
with immigration reform, and if the gentleman from California would
withdraw his amendment, I would commit to him to work with him in
addressing the situation and immigration status of these individuals.
This should and can be done in the broad spectrum of the entire
immigration debate, which as you know we are fully engaged in in the
House Judiciary Committee.
Mr. DENHAM. I look forward to working with the gentleman, but at this
time I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. I continue to reserve the balance of my
time.
Mr. DENHAM. I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Diaz-
Balart).
Mr. DIAZ-BALART. Mr. Chairman, actually I rise to thank you, Mr.
Denham, for bringing up this very important issue. The gentleman
mentioned historically the great contributions that the folks that he
mentioned today, people just like that, have made throughout our
history. Let me tell you, Mr. Denham, you are bringing up an issue
which I am glad finally someone has brought up, and I know you're going
to continue to, as you have, show the leadership on this issue that
you've had from day one.
I just want to tell you that I'm willing to do whatever I can to be
of help because I think the issue that you have brought up today is
essential not only for a group of individuals, but more importantly,
for the national security interests of the United States. So again,
thank you, sir, for bringing this up.

{time} 1820

Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, do I understand that we have
the right to close?
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is correct.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from
California (Mr. Becerra).
Mr. BECERRA. I thank the gentleman for yielding. And I appreciate the
gentleman from California being willing to withdraw the amendment, and
certainly appreciate the work of the chairman of the Judiciary
Committee, Mr. Goodlatte, in proposing that we try to resolve this in
this Chamber.
I think we want to make it very clear. As I think every one of my
colleagues who has spoken on this amendment has said, this is an
important issue because we have a lot of young Americans who are
trapped in a situation where they have to live in the shadows. And
especially for those who wish to provide service to our country in
uniform, I think all of us believe, if you're willing to give that
highest calling of service, that we want to be there to be not only
appreciative of your service, but recognizing the valor involved.
And so I want to make sure we're very clear. We all support the
notion of trying to help these young Americans, who are Americans in
everything but legal title, the opportunity to serve this country. This
amendment, unfortunately, would not accomplish that if it were to go
forward, and that's why I think it's so important, as Mr. Goodlatte,
our chairman of the Judiciary Committee pointed out, that we withdraw
the amendment and try to make corrections so we can get to the point of
dealing with immigration reform.
Mr. DENHAM. Mr. Chairman, how much time do I have remaining?
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California has 1\1/2\ minutes
remaining.
Mr. DENHAM. I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Colorado (Mr.
Coffman).
Mr. COFFMAN. Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentleman from California for
yielding and for bringing up this critical issue.
My father was a veteran of both World War II and Korea, and he taught
me, growing up, that there's no greater demonstration of American
citizenship than serving one's country in the military. And in my
congressional district, there are a lot of young people who came to
this country by their parents illegally, who grew up in the United
States, who went to school here, and who want to serve this country in
the military. It is the only country that they've known, and so they
ought to be afforded the right to do that and to demonstrate what is
the greatest, I think, form of citizenship, and that is service in the
United States military.
So I think that this is something that we've got to accomplish as a
part of comprehensive immigration reform and something, certainly, that
will make our country a better place.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chair, I continue to reserve the
balance of my time.
Mr. DENHAM. Mr. Chairman, let me just finish by saying the precedence
is here. Legal permanent residents are already serving in our military
from American Samoa, from Micronesia, from Palau. We have a long
history of over 660,000 immigrants serving in our military from other
countries.
This seems like something that should be a bipartisan, commonsense
way to address this problem, allowing people to not only be able to
serve in the military, that great opportunity that they have, but,
ultimately, the ultimate sacrifice, giving your life for a great
country like this.
With that, Mr. Chairman, I ask unanimous consent to withdraw my
amendment.
The Acting CHAIR. Without objection, the amendment is withdrawn.
There was no objection.

[[Page H3555]]

Amendment No. 21 Offered by Mr. Turner

The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 21
printed in part B of House Report 113-108.
Mr. TURNER. Mr Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:

Page 79, after line 23, insert the following:

SEC. 241. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON NEGOTIATIONS AFFECTING THE
MISSILE DEFENSES OF THE UNITED STATES.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) On April 15, 2013, the National Security Advisor to the
President, Tom Donilon, conveyed a personal letter from
President Obama to the President of the Russian Federation,
Vladimir Putin.
(2) Press reports indicate that in this letter the
President proposed, ``developing a legally-binding agreement
on transparency, which would include exchange of information
to confirm that our programs do not pose a threat to each
other's deterrence forces,'' through ``a so-called executive
agreement, for which [the President] does not need to seek
the consent of Congress.''.
(3) The Deputy Foreign Minister of Russia, Sergei Ryabkov,
stated in response to the letter that, ``the proposals of the
U.S. side on the issue are quite concrete and are related in
a certain way to the discussions our countries had at various
levels in the past years. And it cannot be said from this
point of view that the offers are decorative and not serious.
No, I want to emphasize that we are committing to the
seriousness of these proposals but we note their
insufficiency.''.
(4) Press reports indicate that the Secretary of the
Russian Security Council, Nikolai Patrushev, conveyed a
response to the letter from President Putin.
(5) President Obama's proposed deal with Russian President
Putin has been kept secret from Congress and the American
people.
(6) The Administration has systematically denied Congress
information about past offers of U.S. missile defense
concessions to Russia, including written requests from
Members of the House of Representatives.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the President should promptly convey to Congress the
details of any proposed deals with the Russian Federation
concerning the missile defenses or nuclear arms of the United
States; and
(2) the missile defenses of the United States are central
to the defense of the homeland from ballistic missile
threats, particularly if nuclear deterrence fails, thus such
defenses are not something that the President should continue
to trade away for the prospects of nuclear arms reductions
with Russia, the People's Republic of China, or any other
foreign country.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman
from Ohio (Mr. Turner) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Ohio.
Mr. TURNER. Mr. Chairman, last year I stood here on the House floor
and I asked the President of the United States to make available to us,
to Congress and the American public, the details of what I believe is,
and many have seen is, a secret deal that the President has with the
Russians concerning the United States missile defense.
Everyone is very much aware that the President had an open mic
incident where he didn't expect the American public to hear what he was
saying when he was meeting in Seoul, South Korea, with then-President
Medvedev of Russia, and he said to him that he needed some space from
the Russians.
He said to him, as we all are familiar with now, ``This is my last
election,'' Obama told Medvedev during the two-day nuclear summit. He
said, ``After my election, I will have more flexibility.''
You don't have to take my word for it. You can see this on YouTube,
where the President offers the issue of missile defense as one that's
negotiable with the Russians after he's no longer answering to the
American public through the election.
What's troubling is that, as we stood on the House floor and demanded
the President make public the terms of this secret deal that he was
talking about with Medvedev, the President didn't make any of those
details available. But, instead, after the election, with the stroke of
his pen, abandoned phase IV of his own phased adaptive approach missile
defense plan that would have provided missile defense protection for
the United States homeland. It was a portion of the missile defense
shield that was objected to by the Russians.
So here we have the President sitting with Medvedev saying wait till
after the election, I'll have more flexibility, and then subsequent to
the election, abandoning a portion of the missile defense shield that
was intended to protect the homeland.
But what's more troubling is Russian press reports indicate that
President Putin says that they have received from the United States
indications of a further deal and further negotiations, further offers
from this administration to what I believe weaken and diminish our
missile defense shield.
The President needs to make these public. We are asking for a sense
of Congress demanding that the President of the United States make
public the details of the terms of what he is offering President Putin.
The President has said he's going to be the most open, most
transparent administration; and yet this is an area where not only did
the administration deny negotiations are ongoing, which we know to be
the case, but he even denies the American public and us the terms of
those negotiations.
Our sense of Congress says, Mr. President, make these public.
As we know, South Korea is incredibly vulnerable to North Korea. Now
the United States is vulnerable, as North Korea has taken missiles and
put them on a launch pad. We have Iran that's emerging. We have real
concerns and threats to the United States. This President should not be
negotiating away our missile defense shield, especially not in a manner
that's not open and transparent to the Members of Congress.
With that, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. I claim time in opposition.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chair, I'd encourage our colleagues to
vote ``no'' on this amendment. The amendment implies that the President
is negotiating some secret deal with Russia that would weaken U.S.
security for the ideological pursuit of nuclear weapons reductions.
Now, we know the President has the constitutional power to conduct
formulations, and Congress has the authority to provide advice and
consent to ratification and to deny funding for any implementation of
any treaty. The administration has provided regular briefings and has
supplied senior State and Defense officials over here to our committee
and to the House Foreign Affairs Committee and informed us on talks on
Russia.
This amendment also is not necessary. The bill already contains
numerous provisions asking for information on U.S.-Russian missile
defense cooperation and blocking nuclear weapons reductions. So I'd ask
my colleagues to oppose this amendment.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. TURNER. Mr. Chairman, how much time do I have remaining?
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Ohio has 2 minutes remaining.
Mr. TURNER. I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr.
Bridenstine).
Mr. BRIDENSTINE. Mr. Chairman, I rise today to support the Turner
amendment.
The President, as everybody remembers, told then-Russian President
Medvedev that we would have more flexibility to cut a secret deal--of
course, he didn't use the word ``secret,'' but I think we all
understand that's what it was--on missile defense after the 2012
elections.
We also know that the National Security Adviser, Tom Donilon,
conveyed a letter from the President to Russian President Putin that
reportedly proposed a missile defense agreement that would avoid
congressional review and consent. Given this administration's lack of
transparency, I have no confidence in the President's abilities to
negotiate on missile defense or on nuclear weapons.
Mr. Chairman, missile defenses protect our Nation. They protect our
deployed forces and our allies from attack. Our nuclear deterrent is a
stabilizing force that promotes restraint and assures our allies of
security.

{time} 1830

Given our economic and military superiority currently, we have
military dominance when compared to Russia. I personally don't trust
this President to negotiate it away. And I think it's important that
we, as Members of Congress, should have oversight here.

[[Page H3556]]

Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chair, I yield 2 minutes to the
gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Andrews).
(Mr. ANDREWS asked and was given permission to revise and extend his
remarks.)
Mr. ANDREWS. Mr. Chairman, I think virtually everyone on our side of
the aisle in this Chamber would agree that if the President wants to
submit a treaty, he has to follow the Constitution to get it approved.
I think all of us should agree that if the President wants to implement
a so-called executive agreement not subject to treaty confirmation that
we should vigorously exercise our power of the purse and our oversight
authority to make sure that that's in the best interest of the American
people, and if it's not, we shouldn't fund it, as the Constitution
gives us the prerogative.
The problem with this amendment is, if it's said that we call on the
President to give us complete information about what's going on between
us and Russia, I would vote for it; but I can't vote for an amendment
that has findings that are hearsay at best and inaccurate at worst.
But the word ``finding'' in the operation of this institution implies
that there's been a sober, thorough, and factual inquiry as to what's
gone on. These findings are pure hearsay. They say that certain Members
have read newspaper articles. Well, that's interesting, but that's not
a finding. It then characterizes--characterizes--the President as
trading away for the prospect of nuclear arms reductions certain
weapons system or defense systems. And I would really ask anyone on the
other side if they could cite to us any instance where the President
has, in fact, made an agreement where he has traded away any defense
system to the Russians or anyone else. I don't think they can.
The right vote on this is ``no.'' We should exercise oversight. We
should not engage in science fiction.
Mr. TURNER. I yield the balance of my time to the chairman of the
Strategic Forces Subcommittee, the gentleman from Alabama, Mike Rogers.
Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of the Turner
amendment.
This administration must be transparent with the Congress on
negotiating proposals with foreign states, especially on something as
important to U.S. security as missile defense. Numerous members of the
HASC, including Chairman McKeon, have written asking questions of DOD
and the President as to the content of proposals that the
administration is and may be making with the Russians.
We see over and over again Russian officials, after visits by U.S.
officials, referencing proposals that have been made on U.S. missile
defenses. We know from these press reports that the President is
proposing ``executive agreements'' and drafting executive orders to
provide ``legally binding'' constraints on our missile defenses. When
we, as Members of Congress, ask about these proposals, we're told next
to nothing.
It's unacceptable for this administration to stiff-arm the Congress
when negotiating over U.S. missile defenses. I urge my colleagues to
vote ``yes'' on this amendment.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, again, I would ask my
colleagues to vote ``no'' on this amendment.
We have heard from this side not just the content of this amendment
being sort of out of whack with reality, but also when we consider
whether or not it's necessary to commit a case, this is not a necessary
amendment given the provisions that are already in H.R. 1960.
So I ask my colleagues to vote ``no'' on this amendment and yield
back the balance of my time.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Turner).
The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the ayes
appeared to have it.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Ohio will be
postponed.

Amendments En Bloc No. 3 Offered by Mr. McKeon

Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, pursuant to H. Res. 260, I offer amendments
en bloc.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendments en bloc.
Amendments en bloc No. 3 consisting of amendment Nos. 29, 50, 51, 52,
55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 63, 65, 66, 68, 71, 75, 80, and 160,
printed in House Report No. 113-108, offered by Mr. McKeon of
California:

Amendment No. 29 Offered by Mr. Rigell of Virginia

Page 317, line 20, strike ``and'' at the end.
Page 317, line 23, strike the period at the end and insert
a semicolon.
Page 317, insert after line 23 the following new
paragraphs:
(3) by striking subsection (c);
(4) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (c); and
(5) by striking paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (c)
(as so redesignated) and redesignating paragraph (4) as
paragraph (2).

Amendment No. 50 Offered by Mr. McKeon of California

Page 136, after line 24, insert the following:

SEC. 1065. DESIGNATION OF STATE STUDENT CADET CORPS AS
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE YOUTH ORGANIZATIONS.

Section 508(d) of title 32, United States Code, is
amended--
(1) by redesignating paragraph (14) as paragraph (15); and
(2) by inserting after paragraph (13) the following new
paragraph (14):
``(14) Any State student cadet corps authorized under State
law.''.

Amendment No. 51 Offered by Mr. Heck of Washington

Page 170, after line 4, insert the following:

SEC. 530F. PROOF OF PERIOD OF MILITARY SERVICE FOR PURPOSES
OF INTEREST RATE LIMITATION UNDER THE
SERVICEMEMBERS CIVIL RELIEF ACT.

Section 207(b)(1) of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act
(50 U.S.C. App 527(b)(1)) is amended by inserting after
``calling the servicemember to military service'' the
following: ``, or other appropriate indicator of military
service, including a certified letter from a commanding
officer or information from the Defense Manpower Database
Center,''.

Amendment No. 52 Offered by Mr. Kline of Minnesota

At the end of subtitle C of title V, add the following new
section:

SEC. 5__. POLICY ON MILITARY RECRUITMENT AND ENLISTMENT OF
GRADUATES OF SECONDARY SCHOOLS.

(a) Conditions on Use of Test, Assessment, or Screening
Tools.--In the case of any test, assessment, or screening
tool utilized under the policy on recruitment and enlistment
required by subsection (b) of section 532 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law
112-81; 125 Stat. 1403; 10 U.S.C. 503 note) for the purpose
of identifying persons for recruitment and enlistment in the
Armed Forces, the Secretary of Defense shall--
(1) implement a means for ensuring that graduates of a
secondary school (as defined in section 9101(38) of the
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C.
7801(38)), including all persons described in subsection
(a)(2) of section 532 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2012, are required to meet the same
standard on the test, assessment, or screening tool; and
(2) use uniform testing requirements and grading standards.
(b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in section 532(b) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 or
this section shall be construed to permit the Secretary of
Defense or the Secretary of a military department to create
or use a different grading standard on any test, assessment,
or screening tool utilized for the purpose of identifying
graduates of a secondary school (as defined in section
9101(38) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of
1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801(38)), including all persons described in
subsection (a)(2) of section 532 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, for recruitment and
enlistment in the Armed Forces.

Amendment No. 55 Offered by Ms. Velazquez of New York

At the end of subtitle D of title V, add the following new
section:

SEC. 5__. MILITARY HAZING PREVENTION OVERSIGHT PANEL.

(a) Establishment.--There is established a panel to be
known as the Military Hazing Prevention Oversight Panel (in
this section referred to as the ``Panel'').
(b) Membership.--The Panel shall be composed of the
following members:
(1) The Secretary of the Army or the Secretary's designee.
(2) The Secretary of the Navy or the Secretary's designee.
(3) The Secretary of the Air Force or the Secretary's
designee.
(4) The Secretary of Homeland Security (with respect to the
Coast Guard) or the Secretary's designee.
(5) Members appointed by the Secretary of Defense from
among individuals who are not officers or employees of any
government and who have expertise in advocating for--
(A) women;
(B) racial or ethnic minorities;

[[Page H3557]]

(C) religious minorities; or
(D) gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender individuals.
(c) Duties.--The Panel shall--
(1) make recommendations to the Secretary concerned (as
defined in section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United States Code)
on the development of the policies, programs, and procedures
to prevent and respond to hazing in the Armed Forces; and
(2) monitor any policies, programs, and procedures in place
to prevent and respond to hazing in the Armed Forces and make
recommendations to the Secretary concerned on ways to improve
such policies, programs, and procedures.
(d) Initial Meeting.--Not later than 180 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Panel shall hold its
initial meeting.
(e) Meetings.--The Panel shall meet not less than annually.

Amendment No. 56 Offered by Mrs. Lowey of New York

At the end of subtitle D of title V, add the following:

SEC. 550A. PREVENTION OF SEXUAL ASSAULT AT MILITARY SERVICE
ACADEMIES.

The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each of the
military service academies adds a section in the ethics
curricula of such academies that outlines honor, respect, and
character development as such pertain to the issue of
preventing sexual assault in the Armed Forces. Such curricula
shall include a brief history of the problem of sexual
assault in the Armed Forces, a definition of sexual assault,
information relating to reporting a sexual assault, victims'
rights, and dismissal and dishonorable discharge for
offenders. Such ethics training shall be provided within 60
days after the initial arrival of a new cadet or midshipman
at a military services academy and repeated in annual ethics
training requirements.

Amendment No. 57 Offered by Ms. Pingree of Maine

At the end of subtitle D of title V of the bill, add the
following:

SEC. 550A. ENSURING AWARENESS OF POLICY TO INSTRUCT VICTIMS
OF SEXUAL ASSAULT SEEKING SECURITY CLEARANCE TO
ANSWER ``NO'' TO QUESTION 21.

(a) Ensuring Awareness of Policy.--The Secretary of Defense
shall inform members of the United States Armed Forces of the
policy described in subsection (b)--
(1) at the earliest time possible, such as upon enlistment
and commissioning; and
(2) during sexual assault awareness training and service
member interactions with sexual assault response
coordinators.
(b) Policy Described.--The policy described in this
subsection is the policy of instructing an individual to
answer ``no'' to question 21 of Standard Form 86 of the
Questionnaire for National Security Positions with respect to
consultation with a health care professional if--
(1) the individual is a victim of a sexual assault; and
(2) the consultation occurred with respect to an emotional
or mental health condition strictly in relation to the sexual
assault.

Amendment No. 58 Offered by Ms. Lee of California

At the end of subtitle D of title V, add the following new
section:

SEC. 550A. REPORT ON POLICIES AND REGULATIONS REGARDING
SERVICE MEMBERS LIVING WITH OR AT RISK OF
CONTRACTING HIV.

(a) Report to Congress.--Not later than 180 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense
shall submit to Congress and make publicly available a report
on the use of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the
Manual for Courts-Martial, and related policies, punitive
articles, and regulations with regard to service members
living with or at risk of contracting HIV.
(b) Contents.--The report shall include the following:
(1) An assessment of whether the Uniform Code of Military
Justice, the Manual for Courts-Martial, and related policies,
punitive articles, and regulations are exercised in a way
that demonstrates an evidence-based, medically accurate
understanding of--
(A) the multiple factors that lead to HIV transmission;
(B) the relative risk of HIV transmission routes;
(C) the associated benefits of treatment and support
services for people living with HIV; and
(D) the impact of HIV-specific policies and regulations on
public health and on people living with or at risk of
contracting HIV.
(2) A review of court-martial decisions in recent years
preceding the date of enactment of this Act.
(3) Recommendations for adjustments to the Uniform Code of
Military Justice, the Manual for Courts-Martial, and related
policies, punitive articles, and regulations, as may be
necessary, in order to ensure that policies and regulations
regarding service members living with or at risk of
contracting HIV are in accordance with a contemporary
understanding of HIV transmission routes and associated
benefits of treatment.
(c) Definition of HIV.--In this section, the term ``HIV''
means infection with the human immunodeficiency virus.

Amendment No. 59 Offered by Ms. DeLauro of Connecticut.

At the end subtitle D of title V, add the following new
section:

SEC. 5__. ADDITIONAL MODIFICATION OF ANNUAL DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING SEXUAL
ASSAULTS AND PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PROGRAM.

(a) Additional Elements of Each Report.--Section 1631(b) of
the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4433; 10 U.S.C. 1561
note) is amended by adding at the end the following new
paragraphs:
``(11) A description of the implementation of the
comprehensive policy on the retention of and access to
evidence and records relating to sexual assaults involving
members of the Armed Forces required to comply with section
586 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1434; 10 U.S.C. 1561
note).
``(12) The policies, procedures, and processes implemented
by the Secretary concerned to ensure detailed evidence and
records are transmitted to the Department of Veterans
Affairs, including medical records of sexual assault victims
that accurately and completely describe the physical and
emotional injuries resulting from a sexual trauma that
occurred during active duty service.''.
(b) Application of Amendments.--The amendment made by this
section shall apply beginning with the report regarding
sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces
required to be submitted by March 1, 2014, under section 1631
of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2011.

Amendment No. 60 Offered by Mr. Cummings of Maryland

Page 232, after line 18, insert the following:

SEC. 555. MORTGAGE PROTECTION FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED
FORCES, SURVIVING SPOUSES, AND CERTAIN VETERANS
AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SERVICEMEMBERS
CIVIL RELIEF ACT.

(a) Members of the Armed Forces, Surviving Spouses, and
Certain Disabled Veterans.--
(1) In general.--Title III of the Servicemembers Civil
Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 501 et seq.) is amended by
inserting after section 303A, as added by section 553, the
following new section:

``SEC. 303B. MORTGAGES AND TRUST DEEDS OF CERTAIN
SERVICEMEMBERS, SURVIVING SPOUSES, AND DISABLED
VETERANS.

``(a) Mortgage as Security.--This section applies only to
an obligation on real or personal property owned by a covered
individual that--
``(1) originated at any time and for which the covered
individual is still obligated; and
``(2) is secured by a mortgage, trust deed, or other
security in the nature of a mortgage.
``(b) Stay of Proceedings.--
``(1) In general.--In accordance with subsection (d)(1), in
a judicial action pending or in a nonjudicial action
commenced during a covered time period to enforce an
obligation described in subsection (a), a court--
``(A) may, after a hearing and on its own motion, stay the
proceedings until the end of the covered time period; and
``(B) shall, upon application by a covered individual, stay
the proceedings until the end of the covered time period.
``(2) Obligation to stop proceedings.--Upon receipt of
notice provided under subsection (d)(1), a mortgagee,
trustee, or other creditor seeking to foreclose on real
property secured by an obligation covered by this section
using any judicial or nonjudicial proceedings shall
immediately stop any such proceeding until the end of the
covered time period.
``(c) Sale or Foreclosure.--A sale, judicial or nonjudicial
foreclosure, or seizure of property for a breach of an
obligation described in subsection (a) that is not stayed
under subsection (b) shall not be valid during a covered time
period except--
``(1) upon a court order granted before such sale, judicial
or nonjudicial foreclosure, or seizure with a return made and
approved by the court; or
``(2) if made pursuant to an agreement as provided in
section 107.
``(d) Notice Required.--
``(1) In general.--To be covered under this section, a
covered individual shall provide to the mortgagee, trustee,
or other creditor written notice that such individual is so
covered.
``(2) Manner.--Written notice under paragraph (1) may be
provided electronically.
``(3) Time.--Notice provided under paragraph (1) shall be
provided during the covered time period.
``(4) Contents.--With respect to a servicemember described
in subsection (g)(1)(A), notice shall include--
``(A) a copy of the servicemember's official military
orders, or any notification, certification, or verification
from a servicemember's commanding officer that provides
evidence of servicemember's eligibility for special pay as
described in subsection (g)(1)(A); or
``(B) an official notice using a form designed under
paragraph (5).
``(5) Official forms.--
``(A) In general.--The Secretary of Defense shall design
and distribute an official Department of Defense form that
can be used by an individual to give notice under paragraph
(1).

[[Page H3558]]

``(B) Use of official form not required.--Failure by any
individual to use a form designed or distributed under
subparagraph (A) to provide notice shall not make such
provision of notice invalid.
``(e) Aggregate Duration.--The aggregate duration for which
a covered individual (except a servicemember described in
subsection (g)(1)(A)) may be covered under this section is
one year.
``(f) Misdemeanor.--A person who knowingly makes or causes
to be made a sale, foreclosure, or seizure of property that
is prohibited by subsection (c), or who knowingly attempts to
do so, shall be fined as provided in title 18, United States
Code, or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
``(g) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) Covered individual.--The term `covered individual'
means the following individuals:
``(A) A servicemember who is or was eligible for hostile
fire or imminent danger special pay under section 310 of
title 37, United States Code, during a period of military
service.
``(B) A servicemember placed on convalescent status,
including a servicemember transferred to the temporary
disability retired list under section 1202 or 1205 of title
10, United States Code.
``(C) A veteran who was medically discharged and retired
under chapter 61 of title 10, United States Code, except for
a veteran described in section 1207 of such title.
``(D) A surviving spouse (as defined in section 101(3) of
title 38, United States Code, and in accordance with section
103 of such title) of a servicemember who died while in
military service if such spouse is the successor in interest
to property covered under subsection (a).
``(2) Covered time period.--The term `covered time period'
means the following time periods:
``(A) With respect to a servicemember who is or was
eligible for hostile fire or imminent danger special pay
under section 310 of title 37, United States Code, during a
period of military service, during the period beginning on
the first day on which the servicemember is or was eligible
for such special pay during such period of military service
and ending on the date that is one year after the last day of
such period of military service.
``(B) With respect to a servicemember described in
paragraph (1)(B), during the one-year period beginning on the
date on which the servicemember is placed on convalescent
status or transferred to the temporary disability retired
list under section 1202 or 1205 of title 10, United States
Code.
``(C) With respect to a veteran described in paragraph
(1)(C), during the one-year period beginning on the date of
the retirement of such veteran.
``(D) With respect to a surviving spouse of a servicemember
as described in paragraph (1)(D), during the one-year period
beginning on the date on which the spouse receives notice of
the death of the servicemember.''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of contents in section
1(b) of such Act is amended by inserting after the item
relating to section 303 the following new item:

``Sec. 303B. Mortgages and trust deeds of certain servicemembers,
surviving spouses, and disabled veterans.''.

(3) Conforming amendment.--Section 107 of the
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 517) is
amended by adding at the end the following:
``(e) Other Individuals.--For purposes of this section, the
term `servicemember' includes any covered individual under
section 303B.''.
(b) Increased Civil Penalties for Mortgage Violations.--
Paragraph (3) of section 801(b) of the Servicemembers Civil
Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 597(b)(3)) is amended to read as
follows:
``(3) to vindicate the public interest, assess a civil
penalty--
``(A) with respect to a violation of section 207, 303, or
303B regarding real property--
``(i) in an amount not exceeding $110,000 for a first
violation; and
``(ii) in an amount not exceeding $220,000 for any
subsequent violation; and
``(B) with respect to any other violation of this Act--
``(i) in an amount not exceeding $55,000 for a first
violation; and
``(ii) in an amount not exceeding $110,000 for any
subsequent violation.''.
(c) Credit Discrimination.--Section 108 of such Act (50
U.S.C. App. 518) is amended--
(1) by striking ``Application by'' and inserting ``(a)
Application or Receipt.--Application by''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(b) Eligibility.--In addition to the protections under
subsection (a), an individual who is entitled to any right or
protection provided under this Act may not be denied or
refused credit or be subject to any other action described
under paragraphs (1) through (6) of subsection (a) solely by
reason of such entitlement.''.
(d) Requirements for Lending Institutions That Are
Creditors for Obligations and Liabilities Covered by the
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act.--Section 207 of the
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 527) is
amended--
(1) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as subsections
(e) and (f), respectively; and
(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new
subsection (d):
``(d) Lending Institution Requirements.--
``(1) Compliance officers.--Each lending institution
subject to the requirements of this section shall designate
an employee of the institution as a compliance officer who is
responsible for ensuring the institution's compliance with
this section and for distributing information to
servicemembers whose obligations and liabilities are covered
by this section.
``(2) Toll-free telephone number.--During any fiscal year,
a lending institution subject to the requirements of this
section that had annual assets for the preceding fiscal year
of $10,000,000,000 or more shall maintain a toll-free
telephone number and shall make such telephone number
available on the primary Internet website of the
institution.''.
(e) Pension for Certain Veterans Covered by Medicaid Plans
for Services Furnished by Nursing Facilities.--Section
5503(d)(7) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by
striking ``November 30, 2016'' and inserting ``March 1,
2017''.
(f) Effective Date.--Section 303B of the Servicemembers
Civil Relief Act, as added by subsection (a), and the
amendments made by this section (other than the amendment
made by subsection (e)), shall take effect on the date that
is one year after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Amendment No. 61 Offered by Ms. Michele Lujan Grisham of New Mexico

Page 232, after line 18, insert the following:

SEC. 555. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE RECOGNITION OF DEPENDENTS OF
MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES WHO SERVE IN COMBAT
ZONES.

(a) Establishment and Presentation of Lapel Buttons.--
Chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by
inserting after section 1126 the following new section:

``Sec. 1126b. Dependent-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button:
eligibility and presentation

``(a) Design and Eligibility.--A lapel button, to be known
as the dependent-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button, shall be
designed, as approved by the Secretary of Defense, to
identify and recognize the dependent of a member of the armed
forces who is serving or has served in a combat zone for a
period of more than 30 days.
``(b) Presentation.--The Secretary concerned may authorize
the use of appropriated funds to procure dependent-of-a-
combat-veteran lapel buttons and to provide for their
presentation to eligible dependents of members.
``(c) Exception to Time-period Requirement.--The 30-day
period specified in subsection (a) does not apply if the
member is killed or wounded in the combat zone before the
expiration the period.
``(d) License to Manufacture and Sell Lapel Buttons.--
Section 901(c) of title 36 shall apply with respect to the
dependent-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button authorized by this
section.
``(e) Combat Zone Defined.--In this section, the term
`combat zone' has the meaning given that term in section
112(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
``(f) Regulations.--The Secretary of Defense shall issue
such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this
section. The Secretary shall ensure that the regulations are
uniform for each armed force to the extent practicable.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the
item relating to section 1126 the following new item:

``1126b. Dependent-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button:
eligibility and presentation.''.

Amendment No. 63 Offered by Mr. Gene Green of Texas

Page 243, after line 8, insert the following:

SEC. 568. INTERNET ACCESS FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMY, NAVY, AIR
FORCE, AND MARINE CORPS SERVING IN COMBAT
ZONES.

(a) Provision of Internet Access Requirement.--The
Secretaries of the military departments shall ensure that
members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps who
are deployed in an area for which imminent danger pay or
hazardous duty pay is authorized under section 310 or 351 of
title 37, United States Code, have reasonable access to the
Internet in order to permit the members--
(1) to engage in video-conferencing and other communication
with their families and friends; and
(2) to enjoy the educational and recreational capabilities
of the Internet via websites approved by the Secretary
concerned.
(b) Waiver Authority.--The Secretary of a military
department may waive the requirement imposed by subsection
(a) for an area, or for certain time periods in an area, if
the Secretary determines that the security environment of the
area does not reasonably allow for recreational Internet use.
(c) No Charge for Access and Use.--Internet access and use
shall be provided to members under this section without
charge.
(d) Effective Date.--The requirement imposed by subsection
(a) shall take effect on January 1, 2014.

Amendment No. 65 Offered by Mrs. Blackburn of Tennessee

At the end of subtitle F of title V, insert the following:

SEC. 568. REPORT ON THE TROOPS TO TEACHERS PROGRAM.

Not later than March 1, 2014, the Secretary of Defense
shall submit to the Committees

[[Page H3559]]

on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives
a report on the Troops to Teachers program that includes each
of the following:
(1) An evaluation of whether there is a need to broaden
eligibility to allow service members and veterans without a
bachelor's degree admission into the program and whether the
program can be strengthened.
(2) An evaluation of whether a pilot program should be
established to demonstrate the potential benefit of an
institutional based award for troops to teachers, as long as
any such pilot maximizes benefits to soldiers and minimizes
administrative and other overhead costs at the participating
academic institutions.

Amendment No. 66 Offered by Mr. Culberson of Texas

Page 255, after line 9, insert the following new section:

SEC. 589. REQUIRED GOLD CONTENT FOR MEDAL OF HONOR.

(a) Army.--
(1) Gold content.--Section 3741 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended--
(A) by striking ``The President'' and inserting ``(a)
Award.--The President''; and
(B) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(b) Gold Content.--The metal content of the Medal of
Honor shall be 90 percent gold and 10 percent alloy.''.
(2) Exception for duplicate medal.--Section 3754 of such
title is amended by adding at the end the following new
sentence: ``Section 3741(b) of this title shall not apply to
the issuance of a duplicate Medal of Honor under this
section.''.
(b) Navy.--
(1) Gold content.--Section 6241 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended--
(A) by striking ``The President'' and inserting ``(a)
Award.--The President''; and
(B) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(b) Gold Content.--The metal content of the Medal of
Honor shall be 90 percent gold and 10 percent alloy.''.
(2) Exception for duplicate medal.--Section 6256 of such
title is amended by adding at the end the following new
sentence: ``Section 6241(b) of this title shall not apply to
the issuance of a duplicate Medal of Honor under this
section.''.
(c) Air Force.--
(1) Gold content.--Section 8741 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended--
(A) by striking ``The President'' and inserting ``(a)
Award.--The President''; and
(B) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(b) Gold Content.--The metal content of the Medal of
Honor shall be 90 percent gold and 10 percent alloy.''.
(2) Exception for duplicate medal.--Section 8754 of such
title is amended by adding at the end the following new
sentence: ``Section 8741(b) of this title shall not apply to
the issuance of a duplicate Medal of Honor under this
section.''.
(d) Coast Guard.--
(1) Gold content.--Section 491 of title 14, United States
Code, is amended--
(A) by striking ``The President'' and inserting ``(a)
Award.--The President''; and
(B) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(b) Gold Content.--The metal content of the Medal of
Honor shall be 90 percent gold and 10 percent alloy.''.
(2) Exception for duplicate medal.--Section 504 of such
title is amended by adding at the end the following new
sentence: ``Section 491(b) of this title shall not apply to
the issuance of a duplicate Medal of Honor under this
section.''.
(e) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section
shall apply with respect to Medals of Honor awarded after the
date of the enactment of this Act.

Amendment No. 68 Offered by Mr. Hunter of California

At the end of subtitle H of title V, add the following new
section:

SEC. 589. CONSIDERATION OF SILVER STAR AWARD NOMINATIONS.

The Secretary of the Army shall consider the nominations
for the Silver Star Award, as previously submitted, for
retired Master Sergeants Michael McElhiney, Ronnie Raikes,
Gilbert Magallanes, and Staff Sergeant Wesley McGirr.

Amendment No. 71 Offered by Mr. McKinley of West Virginia

Page 273, after line 10, insert the following:

SEC. 595. ELECTRONIC TRACKING OF CERTAIN RESERVE DUTY.

The Secretary of Defense shall establish an electronic
means by which members of the Ready Reserve of the Armed
Forces can track their operational active-duty service
performed after January 28, 2008, under section 12301(a),
12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10, United
States Code. The tour calculator shall specify early
retirement credit authorized for each qualifying tour of
active duty, as well as cumulative early reserve retirement
credit authorized to date under section 12731(f) of such
title.

Amendment No. 75 Offered by Mr. Terry of Nebraska

At the end of title V, add the following new section:

SEC. 5__. MILITARY SALUTE DURING RECITATION OF PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE BY MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES NOT
IN UNIFORM AND BY VETERANS.

Section 4 of title 4, United States Code, is amended by
adding at the end the following new sentence: ``Members of
the Armed Forces not in uniform and veterans may render the
military salute in the manner provided for persons in
uniform.''.

Amendment No. 80 Offered by Mr. Terry of Nebraska

Page 306, after line 10, insert the following new
subsection:
(f) Additional Report.--Not later than 180 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report
on the methods, as of the date of the report, employed by the
military departments to collect charges from third-party
payers incurred at military medical treatment facilities,
including specific data with respect to the dollar amount of
third-party collections that resulted from each method
currently being used throughout the military departments. The
Secretary shall take into account the results of such report
in evaluating the results of the pilot program under
subsection (a)(1).

Amendment No. 160 Offered by Mr. Ben Ray Lujan of New Mexico

At the end of subtitle B of title XXXI, insert the
following new section:

SEC. 3123. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF ENERGY TO
ENTER INTO TRANSACTIONS TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN
RESEARCH PROJECTS.

Section 646(g)(10) of the Department of Energy Organization
Act (42 U.S.C. 7256(g)(10)) is amended by striking
``September 30, 2015'' and inserting ``September 30, 2020''.

Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I ask unanimous consent that amendment No.
29 be modified in the form I have placed at the desk.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will report the modification.
Modification to amendment No. 29 offered by Mr. McKeon of California:

Page 317, strike lines 15 to 23 and insert the following:
Section 808 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1489) is
amended--
(1) in subsections (a) and (b), by striking ``fiscal year
2012 or 2013'' and inserting ``fiscal year 2012, 2013, 2014
or 2015'';
(2) in subsection (c)--
(A) by striking ``during fiscal years 2012 and 2013'' in
the matter preceding paragraph (1);
(B) by striking paragraphs (1) and (2) and redesignating
paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3),
respectively; and
(C) in paragraph (3), as so redesignated, by striking
``fiscal years 2012 and 2013'' and inserting ``fiscal years
2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015'';
(3) in subsection (d)(4), by striking ``fiscal year 2012 or
2013'' and inserting ``fiscal year 2012, 2013, 2014 or
2015''; and
(4) by adding at the end the following new subsections:
``(e) Carryover of Reductions Required.--If the reductions
required by subsection (c)(2) for fiscal years 2012 and 2013
are not implemented, the amounts remaining for those
reductions in fiscal years 2012 and 2013 shall be implemented
in fiscal years 2014 and 2015.
``(f) Anti-Deficiency Act Violation.--Failure to comply
with subsections (a) and (e) shall be considered violations
of section 1341 of title 31, United States Code (popularly
referred to as the Anti-Deficiency Act).''.

Mr. McKEON (during the reading). Mr. Chairman, I ask unanimous
consent that the reading of the modification be dispensed with.
The Acting CHAIR. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman
from California?
There was no objection.
The Acting CHAIR. Without objection, the amendment is modified.
There was no objection.
The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman
from California (Mr. McKeon) and the gentleman from Washington (Mr.
Smith) each will control 10 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from California.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I urge the committee to adopt the
amendments en bloc, all of which have been examined by both the
majority and the minority.
At this time, I yield 1 minute to my friend and colleague, the
gentleman from Texas (Mr. Culberson).
Mr. CULBERSON. Mr. Chairman, my amendment No. 66 in the bill is very
straightforward.
The Medal of Honor is our Nation's highest award, given only to those
soldiers who have performed personal acts of valor above and beyond the
call of duty. The medal has been made of brass. My amendment today
would ensure that from this day forward, the Medal of Honor be made of
gold. It's the least we can do for our bravest soldiers who have earned
America's highest award, and I would move passage.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the
gentleman from California (Mr. Cardenas).

[[Page H3560]]

Mr. CARDENAS. Mr. Chairman, I'd also like to thank Chairman McKeon
and Ranking Member Smith for their leadership in bringing this bill to
the floor. I also want to thank them for allowing me to speak on my
amendments, even though they will be considered later on today.
The three amendments that I have offered will strengthen our Nation's
cybersecurity so we can effectively defend our Nation, economy, and
innovation.
We all know that cyber-based terrorism, espionage, computer
intrusions, and fraud are not going away any time soon. These attacks
occur far more frequently and far more rapidly and are more
sophisticated than most people would care to know. Anonymity makes it
difficult to trace the origin of these attacks and prosecute criminals.
These attacks are not only intended to steal defense secrets and
technology, but are also targeted at some of our most critical
industries. According to a Mandiant study, those industries include
construction and manufacturing; media, advertisement, and
entertainment; financial services; health care; food and agriculture;
and education. This is not only a national security issue but also an
economic issue as well.
My first amendment strengthens our preparedness and ability to fend
off attacks by expanding our understanding of the economic impact of
cyber intrusions on the U.S. defense industry. It also requires the
Department of Defense to identify ways to protect our intellectual
property when attacks occur.
My second amendment directs the Secretary of Defense to establish an
outreach and education program to educate small businesses on cyber
threats and assist them in developing plans to protect intellectual
property and their networks.
My third amendment ensures that the comprehensive mission analysis of
cyber operations mandated in this bill also includes an assessment of
the retention, recruitment, and management of the cyber workforce.
The Department of Defense must provide appropriate incentives,
opportunities, and professional development paths that will encourage
civilians and servicemembers to enter and hone their technical skills
that they need to be part of this cyber field.
These amendments will strengthen our national security, and I urge
their passage.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, at this time, I yield 2 minutes to the
gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Young) for the purpose of a colloquy.
Mr. YOUNG of Indiana. I thank the distinguished gentleman for
yielding.
Mr. Chairman, I rise to commend the Armed Services Committee on their
excellent work here, and I want to take this opportunity to highlight
an issue addressed in last year's NDAA which required the Secretary of
Defense to produce a report this fall that examines an issue of great
importance.
During my prior service on the Armed Services Committee, I learned of
a discrepancy in the law where military facilities closed outside of
the BRAC process are not given the same indemnification against
liabilities that are a result of hazardous substances left over from
any previous DOD activities.
Several Army ammunition plants were closed outside of the BRAC
process, and because DOD is not required to maintain responsibility for
potential problems related to military use, we are hindering
redevelopment of these properties.

{time} 1840

Last year, I wrote a bill called the Base Redevelopment and
Indemnification Correction Act, or the BRIC Act, that would extend the
same BRAC protections to non-BRAC closed facilities. It was included in
the House-passed NDAA but was removed during conference. However,
language was adopted that requires a DOD assessment of the status of
these former defense facilities as well as recommendations to
facilitate their redevelopment. Local redevelopers should not be held
responsible for any lingering issues that were a result of DOD
operations.
I anticipate the Secretary's report on this matter will provide a
path forward for these former military installations that remain
disadvantaged without these important indemnification protections. I
thank the chairman for his continued support to address this ongoing
issue and look forward to working with the committee after the report
is released to address this glaring anomaly.
I yield to the gentleman from California.
Mr. McKEON. I thank the gentleman.
Reuse of former military installations is essential for the local
communities and in many circumstances represents a real opportunity to
amortize the initial costs of a new development.
I also look forward to receiving a copy of the Secretary's report and
I hope it will inform Congress so that we may address this important
issue in a deliberate and thoughtful manner. I specifically look
forward to hearing the Secretary's recommendations in dealing with this
important matter.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the
gentleman from California (Mr. Takano).
Mr. TAKANO. I thank the gentleman from Washington for yielding.
Mr. Chairman, I rise today to express my strong support for the
amendments submitted by the gentleman from Maryland (Mr. Cummings),
known previously as H.R. 1842, the Military Family Home Protection Act.
As a member of the Veterans Affairs Committee and the ranking member
of the Economic Opportunity Subcommittee, taking care of our
servicemembers and their families is one of my top priorities. This
legislation does just that: it takes care of our heroes.
By staying foreclosures when servicemembers are receiving hostile
fire or when they are medically discharged, by doubling the civil
penalties for mortgage-related violations, and by prohibiting banks
from discriminating against servicemembers, veterans or surviving
spouses, the Military Family Home Protection Act no longer allows our
heroes and their families to be taken advantage of.
Since the economic downturn, more than 700 servicemembers have been
wrongfully foreclosed on, and more than 1,500 servicemembers have been
subjected to illegal practices by mortgage providers. The men and women
who fight bravely for our Nation deserve better.
The Acting CHAIR (Mr. Holding). The time of the gentleman has
expired.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. I yield an additional 15 seconds to the
gentleman.
Mr. TAKANO. We owe it to them not to allow their families to be
thrown out of their houses when they are putting their lives on the
line in the name of freedom.
I urge my colleagues to support our military families.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield to the chairman of the Foreign
Affairs Committee for the purpose of a colloquy.
Mr. ROYCE. Mr. Chairman, I have a colloquy on an amendment I intend
to withdraw.
Mr. Chairman, we are facing a serious and growing national security
threat in central Africa. Rebel groups, long active in the region, have
taken on a new form of illicit activity to fill their coffers, and that
form is poaching. On the black market, ivory from elephant tusks runs
over $1,000 per kilo. Rhino horns are worth more than their weight in
gold--$30,000 per pound.
The black market for wildlife is now in the league of drug smuggling.
The low risk and high reward of poaching makes it ideal for criminal
groups, but also for extremist groups. Indeed, groups like the Lord's
Resistance Army, which the U.S. military is helping Africans to track
down, and the al Qaeda-linked al-Shabaab are reaping the benefits by
brutally slaughtering these majestic, defenseless animals.
These aren't your poor man's poachers either. Many poachers today are
outfitted with night-vision goggles and sophisticated GPS equipment.
They fly helicopters, slaughtering these endangered species from above.
A recent U.N. report cites an increase in advanced weapons used in
poaching, which can be traced back to the fall of Qadhafi in Libya.
Earlier this year, testifying on worldwide threats, the head of our
intelligence community noted that the multibillion-dollar industry of
illicit wildlife trade ``threats to disrupt the rule of law in
important countries

[[Page H3561]]

around the world,'' and that this trade involves ``disparate actors--
from government and military personnel to members of insurgent groups
and transnational organized crime organizations.''
Unfortunately, African nations trying to fight off transnational
poachers lack the capacity to address the problem. With relatively few
security resources dedicated to combating them, poachers operate
freely.
This amendment would have provided authority for the Defense
Department to advise and assist Africans to suppress this illicit
wildlife trade. AFRICOM is rightly involved in many of these regions,
focusing on counterterrorism and on counternarcotics. Since these
illicit activities are interwoven, this is an ideal area to further our
cooperation with African partners, helping their stability, our
security, and the chances that magnificent species aren't extinguished.
The Acting CHAIR. The time of the gentleman has expired.
Mr. McKEON. I yield the gentleman 1 additional minute.
The Acting CHAIR. The chairman's time has expired.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the
gentlewoman from New York (Mrs. Lowey).
Mrs. LOWEY. Mr. Chairman, the sexual assault epidemic plaguing our
military has taken hold at the academies, which reported 80 cases of
sexual assault last year--a 23 percent increase--and these are just the
cases that were reported. My amendment would require the service
academies to incorporate sexual assault prevention into their ethics
curricula.
Cadets and midshipmen enter academies at an impressionable age. Using
ethics as an avenue to teach sexual assault prevention can strengthen
the core messages of honor and respect in character development. It
would also put discussion of this essential policy at the center of the
service's culture, which must be changed to stop sexual assault in the
military.
I thank the chair and the ranking member for including my amendment
in the en bloc.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, may I inquire how much time is remaining?
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California (Mr. McKeon) has 5
minutes remaining on the en bloc amendments.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume,
and I yield to the gentleman from California to finish when we were so
rudely interrupted.
Mr. ROYCE. I thank the gentleman.
Chairman McKeon, I know you share my concern with this growing
transnational threat of poaching. And I am hopeful that, looking ahead,
we can work together to address any concerns that may exist and support
a more aggressive U.S. commitment to this problem.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I hope you appreciate my weak attempt at
humor.
The Acting CHAIR. Indeed.
Mr. McKEON. I would like to start off first by acknowledging the
longstanding work that Chairman Royce has done on this issue.
The gentleman from California spelled out the growing links between
poaching and terrorist groups in Africa. I share his concern. He is
also correct that AFRICOM is continuing to engage with our African
partners in a variety of ways.
Under Chairman Royce's leadership, I understand that the Foreign
Affairs Committee will be continuing to look into illegal wildlife
trafficking in Africa and the national security consequences. I fully
support that effort. I believe that we should seek a greater
understanding of the linkages between these illicit activities and find
an interagency approach to counter this threat.
The U.S. military has a role to play in countering terrorist groups
and their networks that would target our national interests in this
region. So I look forward to our two committees continuing to work
together.
Mr. ROYCE. I appreciate the Chairman's comments.
Mr. McKEON. I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the
gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Holt).
Mr. HOLT. I thank the gentleman.
I just wanted to describe two amendments that I have that the
chairman and the leadership were kind enough to include en bloc.
I am a member of the United States commission on research and
development in the intelligence community. I won't go through the whole
report--in fact, it's being declassified in part now--but we talk about
the great looming threat to our technological advantage in the
intelligence arena--the shortage of scientists, engineers, and
mathematicians.

{time} 1850

I have an amendment directing the Secretary of Defense to report to
Congress within 60 days from this bill on whether the science,
mathematics, and research transformation of the SMART scholarship
program is providing adequate help to undergraduate and graduate
students to meet our scientific and technical needs.
Mr. Chairman, I appreciate the Rules Committee making this amendment
in order, My amendment's purpose is to ensure that the United States
defense and intelligence communities have the necessary scientific and
technical talent in the years ahead so that our nation maintains its
ability to avoid strategic surprise and preserve our technological edge
against known or potential opponents.
For the last 18 months, I have served as a member of the United
States Commission on Research and Development in the Intelligence
Community. Although the Commission was created in law as part of the
annual Intelligence Authorization Act passed a decade ago, it was not
funded and no Commissioners were appointed until the Fiscal Year 2012
budget was passed. Indeed, funding for the Commission was blocked for
several years by the then chairman of HPSCI. The Commission did not
formally start meeting until early 2012. My colleague from Texas, Rep.
Conaway, is also a member of the Commission, as are Senators Mark
Warner of Virginia and Dan Coats of Indiana. The balance of the
commission is made up of former government officials with S&T
expertise, a former NSC official, a Silicon Valley venture capitalist,
a Wall Street banker, and a university president with a deep scientific
background, among others.
Our mandate was to examine the current state of the IC's R&D efforts
& make recommendations for changes where necessary. Classified and
unclassified versions of our report were delivered to the House
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence just before Memorial Day,
and the unclassified version will be released soon, most likely before
the July 4th holiday. I encourage all Members to take the time to
review the full classified report at their earliest convenience.
Because the unclassified version remains under an embargo for the
moment, I cannot discuss directly our key findings. However, I can and
will give you this Commissioner's view on the single greatest looming
threat to our technological advantage in the intelligence arena: a
potential shortage of scientists, engineers, and mathematicians.
My amendment seeks to address that potential shortage by directing
the Secretary of Defense to report to Congress within 60 days of the
enactment of this bill on whether the Science, Mathematics and Research
for Transformation or SMART scholarship program is providing the
necessary number of undergraduate students to meet our scientific and
technical needs, specifically in the defense and intelligence
communities. If the Secretary assess that the existing SMART program
will not be sufficient, he is to make recommendations to Congress on
what measures would be necessary to ensure our scientific and technical
talent pipeline is sufficient to meet our projected needs.
I offer this amendment because I have already seen evidence that such
an assessment is overdue and urgently needed.
At a recent cyber briefing on the Hill, CYBERCOM officials told my
staff that NSA is seeing a marked increase in employees asking to have
resumes undergo clearance reviews so they can look for other jobs.
During my own visit to some other NSA facilities in the DC metro area
last year, I heard from NSA officials that some universities are now
telling NSA--in writing--that their pay scales are not sufficiently
competitive. These are warning signs of a potential skilled personnel
shortage in the S&T components of the IC, and the Commission found
others as you will see in our report. If adopted, this amendment will
allow us to take a much needed step towards assessing our defense and
intelligence personnel needs in the areas of science, technology,
mathematics and engineering. Accordingly, I urge adoption of my
amendment.
I have another amendment that grew out of a suicide tragedy in my
district.

[[Page H3562]]

This amendment would allow any State adjutant general to request
information for any Individual Ready Reserve or any individual
mobilization augmentee living in the State so that the adjutant general
can provide suicide prevention and outrage services for such
Reservists.
Mr. Chairman, I thank the Rules Committee for making this amendment
in order. The purpose of this amendment is to ensure that suicide
outreach and prevention programs reach specific at-risk populations of
Reservists.
Sergeant Coleman Bean of East Brunswick, New Jersey did two combat
tours in Iraq. In between and after those tours, he sought treatment
for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Because Sgt. Bean was a
member of the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR)--a pool of Reserve
soldiers not assigned to any unit but available for mobilization if
needed--he could not get treatment for his condition because the
Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs refused to take ownership
of Sgt. Bean and the thousands like him. Since his death in the fall of
2008, I have worked in a bipartisan way to secure additional funding
for suicide prevention and outreach services for our active duty, Guard
and Reserve members, and for our veterans. One component of that
outreach effort must involve our state National Guard Adjutant
Generals.
My amendment would allow any state AG to request contact information
for any IRR or Individual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA) living in their
state so that the AG can provide suicide prevention and outreach
services to such Reservists.
Within my own state, our extremely successful Vet2Vet and the
national Vets4Warriors program have been providing peer-to-peer
counseling services for years. Its success was so great--no
servicemember who used the program took his or her life--that the 2010
DoD Task Force on the Prevention of Suicide by Members of the Armed
Forces recommended that Vet2Vet should be examined as a potential
national model. In December 2011, the National Guard Bureau decided to
support a parallel, national program to Vet2Vet, named Vets4Warriors to
denote its national character, and designated it as the program of
record for Guard personnel nationwide who were seeking counseling
services.
The key reason these programs work so well is that every person who
takes a call from a servicemember or veteran is also a former
servicemember. This peer-to-peer connection is vital in building the
trust necessary to get a soldier or veteran with a problem to open up
about their experiences, fears, needs and hopes. Both Vet2Vet and
Vets4Warriors work in direct partnership with the New Jersey Department
of Military and Veterans Affairs, and thus passing this amendment would
allow all Adjutant Generals, including New Jersey's, to conduct
targeted suicide prevention and outreach to IRR and IMA members in
their states.
Mr. Chairman, the suicide epidemic sweeping our armed forces can only
eliminated if we utilize every tool at our disposal to reach every
servicemember or veteran who may be at risk. Passing this amendment
would give us one more such tool, I urge my colleagues to support this
amendment.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I continue to reserve the balance of my
time.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, we have no more speakers on
the en bloc, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, how much time do I have remaining?
The ACTING CHAIR. The gentleman from California has 3\3/4\ minutes.
Mr. McKEON. Thank you very much. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself the
balance of that time.
Just an hour ago, the President confirmed chemical weapons, including
sarin gas, have been used by the Assad regime against Syrian civilians.
The President has stated that a red line has been crossed. But I would
observe that red lines are meaningless unless they are backed by
action.
The underlying bill reflects a sense of Congress that any red line
should be backed with substantive measures. The White House stated this
evening that President Obama agrees with this sentiment.
Tonight, representatives of the National Security Council stated:

The President has made the decision to support Syrian
opposition. That includes military support.

I expect to see more details in the coming days from the White House
and the Department of Defense.
I am, however, deeply concerned about our ability to honor and uphold
red lines. Our military readiness and our ability to respond is
degraded today. Seventeen combat coded Air Force squadrons are grounded
due to budget cuts. A carrier battle group should be in the Middle
East, but instead is in port. We just pulled the last A-10 ground
attack squadron out of Germany because some felt that a forward-
operating presence was unnecessary for a so-called Cold War mission.
Yet we have an amendment here this evening that would cut $5 billion
that, in addition to funding the troops in Afghanistan, provides
support to help alleviate deep readiness problems that are porting our
ships and grounding our fighter jets.
Another amendment this evening would strike the very sense of
Congress that all courses of action, not just military, should be
considered in Syria and that our red lines must have meaning.
Reality has overwhelmed both of these proposals.
To my friends who think there is no risk to ever-deeper cuts, I ask
you to tell that to the airman and the sailor who may well face down
Syrian missiles in the coming weeks. To my friends who are
contemplating further cuts when they vote tomorrow, consider that you
may be denying that warfighter the hour of training or the piece of
hardware that means the difference between life and death. None of us
is comfortable in putting them into harm's way at this time, or in that
place; but that does not mean that they may not have to go. And that
does not mean we shouldn't give them all they need.
Here Congress and the White House agree in principle. Boundaries are
useless unless they are enforced and resourced.
I yield back the balance of my time.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendments en bloc offered
by the gentleman from California (Mr. McKeon).
The en bloc amendments were agreed to.

Amendment No. 22 Offered by Mr. Holt

The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 22
printed in part B of House Report 113-108.
Mr. HOLT. I have an amendment at the desk, Mr. Chairman.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:

Strike page 59, line 15, and all that follows through page
72, line 12.
Strike page 72, line 23, and all that follows through page
79, line 23.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman
from New Jersey (Mr. Holt) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from New Jersey.
Mr. HOLT. I thank the Chair, and I thank the Rules Committee and the
leadership of the Armed Services Committee for making this amendment in
order.
Mr. Chairman, the amendment's purpose is simple: to eliminate the
missile defense-related portions of the bill with the exception of the
relatively successful Iron Dome program.
As some of you may know, I have been involved with arms control
issues for decades, since I was a part of the U.S. Geneva delegation
sent to investigate the then-Soviet phased array radar in Krasnoyarsk
in the early 1980s. My training as a physicist, as well as the decades
I've spent dealing with these issues, long ago led me to conclude a
couple of things: effective strategic ballistic missile defense systems
have not been and are not likely to be technically feasible; and,
second, attempting to build them only fuels the international arms
race.
If you don't believe the latter point, let me quote from a Russian
Television story on June 8 of this year:

Russia's Strategic Missile Forces have reported a
successful launch of a next-generation ICBM that can
supposedly pierce any antiballistic missile system. The test
came after the U.S. announced it would resume its ABM program
in Europe.

That is a description of the arms race that should have ended years
ago.
The article goes on to quote Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry
Rogozin who says that the new Russian ICBM was a ``missile defense
killer. Neither current nor future American missile defense systems
will be able to prevent that missile from hitting the target dead on.''
Yes, arms race.

[[Page H3563]]

Just as it has for over 30 years, our continued pursuit of a
strategic ballistic missile defense system is perpetuating the arms
race, in this case between the United States and Russia, and would
perpetuate arms races between the United States and China or others. It
is also an expense we cannot afford.
The Missile Defense Agency itself estimates that since fiscal year
1985, Congress has appropriated $149.5 billion for strategic ballistic
missile defense programs, and the system has still never been tested
successfully against any of the kind of real-world threats offered by
missiles equipped with decoys, jammers, and so on.
This bill proposes to continue throwing good money after bad, with
one exception: the tactical Iron Dome missile defense system. Our
Israeli allies, with funding approved by this Congress and that I have
supported, and many here have supported, have developed what is
arguably the best, and certainly most well-tested, tactical missile
defense system in the world. It is not perfect, and the missile defense
experts, both here and in Israel, continue to debate the exact kill
rate, which Israeli officials claim is 84 percent. What is clear is
that this system is more practical and more immediately useful for the
defense of Israel than our strategic defense system is for us.
What my amendment would do is stop the United States from throwing
more money at a failed, politically destabilizing strategic missile
defense system and instead would allow continuing funding for further
development of efforts for Iron Dome and tactical systems like that--
the kind of systems that may help save lives in Israel and save lives
of deployed American troops should they face opponents like North Korea
or Iran.
Accordingly, I urge my colleagues to support this, and I reserve the
balance of my time.

{time} 1900

Mr. McKEON. I rise to claim time in opposition to the amendment.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California is recognized for 5
minutes.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, at this time, I yield 3 minutes to my
friend and colleague, the chairman of the Strategic Forces
Subcommittee, the gentleman from Alabama (Mr. Rogers).
Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. I thank the chairman.
I rise in vigorous opposition to Mr. Holt's amendment. At a time when
the technical and strategic case for missile defense has never been
stronger, the gentleman's amendment would strike bipartisan provisions
that will improve our missile defenses.
For example, the amendment would strike a provision the committee
adopted that would improve the kill assessment capability of the
Ground-Based Midcourse Defense system. Why would the gentleman want a
national missile defense system with a less robust kill assessment
capability than is technically possible?
The amendment would strike a provision dealing with an Analysis of
Alternatives on the future space sensor architecture for our missile
defense system. Does the gentleman not want an informed judgment and
study on a persistent overhead space sensor system? The gentleman may
be laboring under misimpressions of missile defense.
I know there are so-called ``experts'' in the disarmament community
who labor to create doubts about our missile defense system, but I ask,
How many of these ``experts'' have been briefed on what the system
does, on the incredibly technically demanding tests that the
warfighters create? I would say none.
I urge the gentleman to withdraw his amendment, to come get some
classified briefings; and let's see if we can't add him to the
overwhelming bipartisan group of policymakers that supports a strong
and robust national and regional missile defense system.
With that, Mr. Chairman, I ask the Members to vote ``no.''
Mr. HOLT. Mr. Chairman, may I ask the time remaining.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from New Jersey has 45 seconds
remaining.
Mr. HOLT. I thank the Chair.
I will just quickly say then, in closing, that the desire for a
strategic missile defense system may be as strong as it ever has been;
but the demonstrations, the accomplishments of the work towards such a
system are no further along than they have been for decades.
We can repeal legislation--we could repeal, perhaps, ObamaCare if the
other side had its way--but we cannot repeal the laws of physics, and
long experience with this tells me this is a wasteful program. The Iron
Dome tactical system and systems like that, on the other hand, are
worth pursuing, and I propose keeping that funding intact.
I yield back the balance of my time.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California has 3\1/2\ minutes
remaining.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield the balance of my time to my friend
and colleague, the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Lamborn).
Mr. LAMBORN. I thank the chairman of the full committee. I also
appreciate what the chairman of the subcommittee, the gentleman from
Alabama (Mr. Rogers), has said. I totally agree with what he has
already put forward.
Against this amendment, I would have to add that one of the other
things it does which is harmful to our national defense is to stop the
progress we are making on creating a third site on the eastern coast of
the United States for missile defense.
The gentleman quoted some Russian television commentator. That has no
relevance to what Ground-Based Midcourse Defense is all about. Ground-
Based Midcourse Defense is against a rogue missile fired from a North
Korea or an Iran or from some country like that or is an accidental
single launch from another country. It is not to fight against the
Russians or the Chinese. That's not it at all. We have some
interceptors already in place in Alaska and in California. The eastern
site would add that same capability of defense against a rogue missile
on the east coast.
I happen to believe that we should be protecting the east coast
better than we are today. I think the people of New Jersey, let's say,
deserve just as much protection as the people of California, and we
have that capability.
You said it hasn't defeated jammers and decoys. The North Koreans
don't have jammers and decoys. The Iranians aren't even that far along.
They're not as far along as the North Koreans.
We don't have to have the perfect. In this case, the perfect would be
the enemy of the good. We have had missiles in tests like a bullet
shooting down a bullet. We have had many successful tests, and we could
stop a North Korean or an Iranian missile. We have that on the west
coast. We should have that on the east coast. This Congress in last
year's NDAA put in language calling for an environmental assessment and
study of the east coast site. That should go forward. Unfortunately,
this amendment, should it pass, would stop this progress in its tracks.
So for that reason and for the reasons already stated by
Representative Rogers, I would urge a strong ``no.'' This would be
destructive of missile defense. This would be destructive of our
national defense. Please vote ``no.''
Mr. THORNBERRY. I yield back the balance of my time.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Holt).
The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes
appeared to have it.
Mr. HOLT. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from New Jersey
will be postponed.

Amendment No. 25 Offered by Ms. McCollum

The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 25
printed in part B of House Report 113-108.
Ms. McCOLLUM. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:

At the end of title V, add the following new section:

SEC. 5__. PROHIBITION ON ARMY NATIONAL GUARD SPONSORSHIPS OF
PROFESSIONAL WRESTLING ENTERTAINMENT OR MOTOR
SPORTS.

Section 503(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

[[Page H3564]]

``(3) Recruiting and advertising campaigns authorized by
paragraphs (1) and (2) or by any other provision of law,
including section 561(b) of the Floyd D. Spence National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted
into law by Public Law 106-398; 114 Stat. 1654A-129; 10
U.S.C. 503 note), for the purposes of branding or marketing
of, or promoting enlistment in, the Army National Guard may
not include payments for professional wrestling entertainment
sponsorships or motor sports sponsorships. Nothing in this
paragraph shall be construed to prohibit recruiters from
making direct, personal contact with secondary school
students and other prospective recruits.''.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentlewoman
from Minnesota (Ms. McCollum) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from Minnesota.
Ms. McCOLLUM. The Army National Guard is spending over $53 million in
taxpayer funds this year to sponsor World Wrestling Entertainment and
motor sports racing.
That's right. At a time of enormous Federal budget deficits, endless
borrowing from China, sequestration's harming military readiness, and
deep cuts to services for vulnerable children, seniors and people with
disabilities, the Army National Guard is spending over $53 million to
have its logo highlighted at World Wrestling Entertainment events and
to sponsor NASCAR racing and IndyCar racing. After years of
congressional debate, the Army National Guard still cannot provide any
data--zero statistics--to demonstrate anyone has signed a recruiting
contract as a result of this program.
This amendment can bring both liberals and Tea Party conservatives
together. The fact that $53 million in taxpayer funds is going to
sponsor some of the most violent and sexist entertainment on television
and NASCAR racing teams that result in zero recruits is a waste of
money, and it should be stopped.
As a member of the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, over and over
these past 3 months, our subcommittee has heard from military leaders
that sequestration is causing a crisis: military readiness is
diminished; hundreds of thousands of critical civilian Pentagon
employees are being furloughed; and vital services, like access to
mental health care, are being cut. In fact, the National Guard
testified that, because of sequestration, 115,000 traditional National
Guard forces will not receive their annual medical or dental
examinations.
The Guard says: ``This reduction in examinations will bring total
force medical readiness down by 39 percent.''
Yet the National Guard can afford to pay one NASCAR race car driver
$29 million and to pay another driver $14 million for IndyCar racing?
Clearly, this is a case of misplaced priorities. Congress has to make
tough choices and smart cuts. Terminating this wasteful, ineffective
program is an easy choice unless you want to protect government
handouts to millionaire race car drivers and owners.
In the past, some of my conservative friends have made the claim that
cutting this wasteful spending was micromanaging the Pentagon.

{time} 1910

My job is not to protect race car track owners and millionaire race
car drivers. Cutting government waste and protecting taxpayer dollars
is not micromanaging. It is our job.
In recent years, the Army, Navy, and the Marine Corps have all
terminated NASCAR sponsorships because these sponsorships failed to
meet their recruiting goals. They're making other more effective
investments in recruiting dollars.
The Army is sponsoring high school football, the All-American Bowl.
That's fantastic. They're also sponsoring robotic competitions to
engage with and help our young people develop the skills to best
service our Nation and to serve in the Armed Forces.
The very best marketing and branding the Army National Guard gets is
not from a logo on a race car or a violent wrestling performance. It is
from the lifesaving work that our National Guardsmen and -women perform
during times of crisis in our communities during the floods, during the
forest fires, and during national disasters.
I am so proud of the service and sacrifice of the Minnesota National
Guardsmen and -women who have served our Nation in Kosova, Iraq,
Afghanistan, and at home in Minnesota over the past decade. They are
heroes.
The opponents of my amendment believe that a $29 million taxpayer-
funded logo on a race car results in National Guard recruits and
reenlistments. Based on what? The National Guard has failed to prove
any data, no program measures, that this program has resulted in any
recruits--zero data, zero recruits.
This Republican Congress is cutting children off of school lunch
programs and kicking them off of Head Start to save money. This
Congress is willing to inflict sequestration on our military, and it
undermines our readiness. This amendment gives Members an opportunity
to cut real waste.
Mr. Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I claim time in opposition.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Texas is recognized for 5
minutes.
Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the distinguished
gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Hudson).
Mr. HUDSON. Mr. Chairman, I rise amongst a broad bipartisan coalition
to oppose this misguided amendment offered by my colleague from
Minnesota.
Mr. Chairman, facts are a stubborn thing. The National Guard has
reiterated time and time again the immense value of their recruiting
and retention programs in professional motor sports. The facts of this
program show a successful return on investment for the taxpayers.
To demonstrate the success of this program, I would like to cite
three crystal clear numbers which support strong opposition to this
amendment:
First, 90 percent. In the June 4 letter to House Appropriations, the
National Guard Association of the United States and their counterpart,
the Enlisted Association of the National Guard, stated that a recent
independent study found that 90 percent of the Army National Guard
soldiers who enlisted or reenlisted were exposed to the Guard from
recruiting or retention materials featuring NASCAR drivers and their
cars. That's a real return on your investment, a return on the invest
of the American people;
Second, 85 percent. Of those who enlisted or reenlisted during that
time period, 85 percent agree that professional sports are beneficial
to attracting and retaining good soldiers. That's, again, a good return
on your investment;
And the last number is 400,000. Since embarking on a more robust use
of professional sport sponsorships in fiscal year 2007, the Army
National Guard has added more than 400,000 new soldiers. That, Mr.
Chairman, is a return on your investment.
Mr. Chairman, these facts come from sound research and independent
study which the National Guard has shared with us, and I will enter
into the Record my remarks here today.
I submit these facts to my colleagues and encourage them to consider
the tremendous return on investment we would be stealing from our
Nation's military and hardworking taxpayers if this amendment were to
pass. I urge my colleagues to vote ``no.''
National Guard Association of the United States, Enlisted
Association of the National Guard of the United States,
June 4, 2013.
Hon. Bill Young,
Chairman, House Appropriations Committee, Defense
Subcommittee, Washington, DC.
Hon. Pete Visclosky,
Ranking Member, House Appropriations Committee, Defense
Subcommittee, Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman and Ranking Member of the House
Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense: As you may be aware,
there have been proposals in Congress to restrict the
Department of Defense's ability to utilize sports
sponsorships as part of recruitment and retention campaigns.
We would urge you to oppose any effort to restrict DoD
leadership's ability to utilize creative and innovative
tactics to ensure that the National Guard is able to promote
their career opportunities.
Recruiting for the all-volunteer force isn't what it used
to be. Only one in every four young people today is even
eligible to join. Today, you have to know how smart, fit
young people think, where they live and play, and go to them.
Innovative techniques such as sports sponsorships help the
National Guard do just that.
The enhanced use of sponsorships was a direct response to
specific recruiting challenges faced during the height of the
wars in

[[Page H3565]]

Iraq and Afghanistan in 2006 and 2007, when traditional and
more expensive recruiting efforts were failing to attract
enough quality applicants. It was during this time period
that recruiting goals were reached, partly, by lowering
minimum entrance requirements and accepting enlistees who
lacked high school diplomas, had low scores on the military's
aptitude test, or received waivers for criminal and medical
problems. However, since embarking on a more robust use of
professional sports sponsorships in fiscal year 2007, the
Army National Guard has added more than 400,000 new soldiers.
A recent study has found that 90 percent of Army National
Guard soldiers who enlisted or re-enlisted since 2007 were
exposed to the Guard through recruiting or retention
materials featuring NASCAR cars and/or drivers. Of those who
enlisted or re-enlisted during that time period, 85 percent
agree that professional sports are beneficial to attracting
and retaining good soldiers. The survey also found that
racing fans are an especially receptive group for National
Guard recruiting. NASCAR enthusiasts aged 18-34, the National
Guard's target age demographic, are twice as likely to
consider a military career than non-fans.
For the National Guard, marketing through sports is a
direct appeal to our target audience and their influencers,
providing the opportunity to reach individuals who are like-
minded. Any limitations or bans on this may look good on the
surface in a tight fiscal environment, but, in reality, it
would provide no savings and hinder the National Guard's
effort to reach the most qualified potential recruits.
Sponsorships provide the Guard a national platform to build
relationships, promote our image and aid in recruiting
efforts. The recruiting and retention dollars spent through
sports sponsorships increase the National Guard's prestige
and visibility, as well as help generate recruiting leads at
events.
But these sport sponsorships go beyond a race or match.
They extend into the community, creating partnerships to
develop a national effort to address issues affecting
military personnel and their spouses, including providing
education assistance, combating unemployment, fostering
technology sharing and innovation, and sharing the story of
the National Guard.
Pro sports sponsorships are not just a matter of money.
They are an effective and important marketing platform for
awareness and development to target future potential
recruits, while also working to improve the lives of our
Guardsmen and women.
I ask that you please support the National Guard's
continued efforts to partner with professional sports
programs and create lasting community partnerships that
positively impact our National Guard.
Thank you for your consideration on this matter.
Gus Hargett,
Major General, USA, (Ret.), President, NGAUS.
John Helbert,
CSM, ARNG, President, EANGUS.

New Research: Sports Sponsorships Valuable to Military Recruitment

New research paints a clear picture of the value
sponsorships and marketing around professional sports provide
the U.S. military and its efforts to recruit and retain
soldiers. Conducted by respected independent firm Alan Newman
Research, the empirical study was deployed through a joint
initiative by the Enlisted Association of the National Guard
of the United States (EANGUS) and the National Guard
Association of the United States (NGAUS). The effort surveyed
thousands of Americans, including general population, sports
fans and, for the first time, more than 1,300 currently
serving and retired National Guard soldiers and airmen.

NASCAR Drives Recruiting

The Army National Guard has added more than 400,000 new
soldiers since fiscal year 2007 when the Department of
Defense embarked on a more robust use of professional sports
sponsorships for recruiting purposes. During this time, the
National Guard has leveraged NASCAR as a key platform to
promote its career opportunities, reporting a three-to-one
return on the current sponsorship program while routinely
meeting and exceeding recruiting targets. Most recently, the
Army National Guard exceeded fiscal-year-to-date 2013
accession goal by more than 1,000 recruits (or 104 percent).
Ninety percent of Army National Guard soldiers who enlisted
or re-enlisted from 2007-2013 said they have been exposed to
the Guard through recruiting or retention materials that
incorporated NASCAR. Of those who enlisted or re-enlisted
since 2007, 85 percent agree that professional sports are
beneficial to the National Guard's overall efforts to attract
and retain soldiers. More than six of ten of all National
Guard respondents have seen NASCAR leveraged at a recruiting
center or event.

Fans Advocate for Military Careers

Research confirms the NASCAR audience is tailor-made for
programs promoting career opportunities in the U.S. military.
Young fans (age 18-34) of NASCAR are twice as likely as non-
fans in the same age group to consider the military as a
career option. In addition, NASCAR fans are more passionate
advocates for military careers. They are 20 percent more
likely than non-fans to be ``very likely'' to support a
friend or family members choice to pursue military service.

The Power of Patriotism

National Guard members consider NASCAR, which hosts
swearing-in ceremonies for hundreds of new recruits each
year, the most patriotic of all major professional sports. In
a powerful statement for recruiting and retention programs
that utilize NASCAR, a nearly unanimous 92 percent of
National Guard respondents say they are more likely to engage
with an organization that they perceive as pathetic over
competitors.

Americans Support Military Recruitment

Americans clearly support the ability of the U.S. military
to recruit where it sees fit. An overwhelming 83 percent
believe military branches should be able to promote career
opportunities where the branches feel a receptive audience
will be found. Just 12 percent of Americans do net feel that
fans of professional sports represent a reasonable target
audience for recruiting programs.

Opportunities Across Pro Sports

Nearly all members of the National Guard are avid fans of
at least one major professional sport, notably the National
Football League, Major League Baseball and NASCAR. Guard
soldiers are similarly interested in pro sports in their home
areas--such as minor league baseball and hockey, arena
football and local short-track racing--indicating
opportunities for recruiting and retention programs at the
grassroots level in hundreds of communities around the
country. A majority of Americans--64 percent--are more likely
to engage with organizations that, like the National Guard,
are affiliated with a favorite sport, team or athlete.

Conclusion: Sponsorships Work for the Military

For the same reasons they are a preferred venue for
corporate advertising, NASCAR and other professional sports
are a prime place for recruitment advertising due to wide and
devoted fan bases and demographics ideal for messaging
regarding military careers. For the National Guard,
participation in NASCAR allows the opportunity to leverage
the largest American spectator sport with a massive and loyal
fan base of 75 million. Sports marketing is a widely accepted
and important piece of the marketing mix for the most
successful brands and organizations in the world, and it
should remain so for the U.S. military.

Ms. McCOLLUM. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
The Army decided to end its 10-year NASCAR sponsorship, calling it
``not a good investment'' because 5 percent of NASCAR viewers weren't
even the age for recruitment.
Let's end this wasteful program. Let's put the money to work to
recruit and keep a strong military. I ask for the Members to support my
amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name Contract Number Prime 2013 Cost End Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army National Guard

NASCAR....................... W9133L08D0100... LM&O under $29,962,425 30-Nov-13
marketing IDIQ.
Indy Race League............. W9133L08D0100... LM&O under $14,496,424 28-Sep-13
marketing IDIQ.
American Motorcycle W9133L09D0002... MPSC............ $3,960,100 17-Oct-13
Association.
World Wrestling Entertainment W9133L11C0057... WWE, INC........ $5,150,000 25-Sep-13

Total.................... ................ ................ $53,568,949

Air National Guard

MOTOCROSS.................... W9133L-08-D-0100- Lucas Oil....... $380,000 30-Sep-13
0092.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the distinguished
gentlelady from North Carolina (Ms. Foxx).
Ms. FOXX. Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentleman for yielding and for
his leadership on this issue.
NASCAR is a vital part of the National Guard's outreach to young
Americans. NASCAR fans between the age of 18 and 34 are twice as likely
as their peers to consider the military. Their fellow fans are more
likely to support their friends and family members choosing the
military as a career option.

[[Page H3566]]

Advertising through NASCAR gives the military a cost-effective way to
reach 75 million patriotic fans. That's why it is has reported a 3-to-1
return on the program's investment.
NASCAR support of the military goes beyond mere sponsorship
opportunities. NASCAR holds swearing in ceremonies for hundreds of new
recruits each year, giving the fans a real-life example of the
patriotism they support. NASCAR is a real part of hundreds of American
communities.
The National Guard has chosen to use its limited recruiting budget
through the means it feels are most effective. We should not force it
to turn its back on a proven means of leveraging that budget and
introducing millions of potential heros to their opportunity to serve.
I urge my fellow Americans to oppose this amendment and thank the
chairman for the opportunity to speak.
Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the distinguished
gentleman from New York (Mr. Collins).
Mr. COLLINS of New York. Mr. Chairman, this amendment wrongly targets
one of our best recruiting practices of the National Guard.
Motor sports sponsorship programs have helped the Guard add 400,000
new citizen soldiers since it was begun in 2007, many of whom were
sworn in right at the track. Why would we want to cut something that's
working?
Every season, the National Guard emblem is seen by millions on the
hood of Dale Earnhardt, Jr.'s car, one of the most popular drivers
during the last 10 years.
Since the National Guard is prohibited from advertising on broadcast
television, motor sports sponsorships are one of the few ways the Guard
can market to a national audience while still interacting with local
communities.
This amendment takes a strong program proven valuable to our military
readiness and arbitrarily cuts it for the sake of political posturing.
This amendment does not save any money. It does not address any
government excess or impropriety. It unnecessarily attacks our National
Guard, and it shackles their best opportunity to recruit and retain the
very best for national security.
As in the previous two defense authorization acts, I urge Members to
hold strong and continue to oppose this amendment.
Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the distinguished
subcommittee chairman of the Strategic Forces Subcommittee, Mr. Rogers
of Alabama.
Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. I thank the chairman.
I rise in strong opposition to the McCollum amendment. The McCollum
amendment would prohibit the Army National Guard from sponsoring and
advertising in professional motor sports. This amendment would have a
negative impact on the recruiting of soldiers to enlist or reenlist in
the National Guard.
Recent studies have shown that around 90 percent of the Army National
Guard soldiers who enlisted or reenlisted since 2007 were exposed to
this form of advertising. Additionally, these creative advertising
techniques reach a sport with over 75 million loyal viewers, many of
whom are between the age of 18 and 34 years old, the target audience to
recruit quality soldiers for the Army National Guard.
I fully recognize the need for Congress to cut unnecessary spending,
and I have voted many times to rein in government spending; however, I
see no need to prohibit this successful form of advertising which works
to recruit quality men and women to help protect and defend our Nation.
I urge a ``no'' vote on McCollum amendment No. 25.
Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentlewoman from Minnesota (Ms. McCollum).
The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes
appeared to have it.
Ms. McCOLLUM. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from Minnesota
will be postponed.
The Chair understands that amendment No. 28 will not be offered.

Amendment No. 32 Offered by Mr. Nolan

The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 32
printed in part B of House Report 113-108.
Mr. NOLAN. Mr. Chairman, I offer the amendment.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:

At the end of subtitle A of title X, add the following new
section:

SEC. 10_. ACROSS-THE-BOARD FUNDING REDUCTION.

Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables
in division D, the total amount authorized to be appropriated
in this Act is hereby reduced by 9.4 percent.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman
from Minnesota (Mr. Nolan) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Minnesota.

{time} 1920

Mr. NOLAN. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Chairman, I rise today on a matter of the highest priority
critical to the future of our great Nation and our people. It is time
to put an end to the wars of choice and nation-building abroad, and to
start rebuilding America. Daily we are reminded of our Nation's fiscal
crises, massive deficits, and unemployment, and shortage of revenue for
the things that we know we need to do. The simple truth is, the
trillions of dollars spent on the wars of choice and nation-building
abroad are the primary cause of our current financial crises, not
Social Security and Medicare as some would have us believe.
The sad fact is our own bridges are falling down. Our infrastructure
is crumbling, and our education system is struggling, while millions
more middle class men and women are unemployed or underemployed.
Mr. Chairman, I strongly support a strong national defense, but I
also agree completely with my Republican colleague, Congressman Mo
Brooks of Alabama, who recently said:

I don't believe America can financially afford to be the
police cop on every street corner in the world. We no longer
have the financial resources to do that.

In fact, the $652 billion we spent on the military last year amounts
to 57 percent of our discretionary budget. Mind you, education is at 6
percent; agriculture at 1 percent; transportation at 2 percent.
Moreover, that $652 billion spent last year accounts for more than
the next 10-largest military budgets in the world combined--China,
Russia, U.K., Japan, France, Saudi, India, Germany, Italy, Brazil--we
spent more than all of them combined. This $60 billion cut that is
proposed in this amendment, or a 9.4 percent cut that I propose, is not
an unreasonable amount. In fact, it is exactly the same amount the
Commission on Wartime Contracting estimates to have been wasted through
fraud and abuse in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Understand that my amendment is not an across-the-board cut from
every line item as in sequestration, which makes no sense at all. My
proposed cut is a cut from the bottom line that would give the
Appropriations Committee the authority to decide where the cuts can
most prudently be made. And to me, those categories are crystal clear.
We want to cut our excessive network of military bases in every nook
and cranny of the world. We need to cut the failed infrastructure and
investments in nation-building abroad. We need to cut assistance to the
armed combatants in every sectional and civil war in the world. We need
to cut discretionary funds to initiate new programs not authorized by
the Congress. We need to cut funds for the extravagant compensation of
CEOs for giant defense contractors. We need to cut military weapons
systems that were not requested by our military. We need to cut funds
maintaining unnecessary facilities in Guantanamo, and we need to cut
funding maintaining out-of-date weapons systems and naval vessels.
Now, let me be clear where we must not cut. We must not cut veterans
benefits. We must not cut the National Guard. It's our most efficient
bang for the dollar that we get in our national defense. We must not
cut compensation

[[Page H3567]]

to soldiers and their families. We must not cut assistance to Israel
and our other strategic allies. We should not cut funds to the teams
and other elite units that can respond to crises abroad. And we cannot
cut efforts to fund reform of military justice and reduce sexual
assaults in the military.
Moreover, it is my recommendation that the savings achieved here can
be used for deficit reduction and used for investment in our own
infrastructure--our roads, our bridges, our ports, our education, and
the unmet human development needs in this country. We can use this
money to improve the quality of American lives, to stimulate our
economy, to strengthen our power as a Nation, and to help restore
America's confidence in the future.
Finally, Mr. Chairman, my amendment is entirely consistent with the
spirit of the bipartisan Budget Control Act of 2011, which recommended
$1 trillion in defense cuts over the next decade, and consistent as
well with the significant cuts recommended across the spectrum by
liberal policy groups such as the Center for American Progress, as well
as conservative and libertarian groups.
Mr. Chairman, we all support a strong national defense. We support
our troops, and we are committed to our veterans. This amendment is not
politics, it is commonsense economics.
Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I claim the time in opposition.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Texas is recognized for 5
minutes.
Mr. THORNBERRY. I yield myself 2 minutes.
Mr. Chairman, in some ways I admire the gentleman from Minnesota
because he states clearly what he believes. In my opinion, his
argument, however, is dangerous, and it will mean a very much more
dangerous world for the United States and many of the people around the
world who depend upon us.

If we're going to talk numbers, we ought to just remind everybody
that in 1960 the defense budget was about half of the total budget of
the United States Government. Today, it's 17 percent of the budget for
the United States budget. Now it's true it's most of the discretionary
spending, but that completely leaves out the entitlements or the
mandatory spending programs which are a vast majority of the
government.
In more recent history, let's think about that defense already took a
reduction of $487 billion over a 10-year period. In the current fiscal
year, it was cut another $55 billion. And now this amendment would take
another $60 billion on top of that.
Mr. Chairman, I think defense has been cut enough. If anyone has been
listening to some of the debates we've been having today, you'd hear
about readiness being down, about training not occurring, and about
more expensive procurements because we can't buy at the most efficient
rate. And this amendment would take another $60 billion on top of the
other things, and would include the personnel accounts which were
exempt under sequestration.
But the ironic thing, Mr. Chairman, is that after you take this $60
billion out of defense, it would get hit again once sequestration kicks
in. So in effect this doubles the cuts that come on defense from
sequestration. It is mistaken. It is tragically mistaken, and I think
it should be rejected.
Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the distinguished gentleman from
Alabama (Mr. Rogers).
Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. Mr. Chairman, I never ceased to be amazed in
this Chamber. The only time I see my colleagues on the other side of
the aisle concerned about fiscal restraint and cutting spending is when
it comes to national defense. You know, one of the most knuckle-headed
things this Congress has done is the sequestration framework that I,
unfortunately, was a part of setting into place. But as you just heard
my colleague from Texas state, we had already cut $480 billion out of
defense before sequestration comes into play. Now we have sequestration
coming into play.
The thought that we could be in a war, defend against potential areas
of war that are emerging around the world with further cuts is mindless
and irresponsible. We owe it to the men and women in this country who
serve in uniform and their families to make sure they have everything
they need to be safe and successful when we send them into a theater of
war.
This amendment is dangerous, and I urge my colleagues to reject it.
Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself the balance of my time.
I appreciate my colleague from Alabama and I would just conclude with
two points. One, is that it is in the Constitution where it clearly
provides that a primary, and I believe the primary responsibility of
the Federal Government, is to defend the country. You can't do that on
the cheap. Obviously, you have to be efficient. You shouldn't waste
money, but the first job of the Federal Government is to defend the
country.

{time} 1930

The second point I'd want to make is this: there are some people who
seem to want to stick their head in the sand and believe that all the
threats have gone away.
As a matter of fact, the President seemed to say a few weeks ago in
his speech that the war on terrorism was over. And then today, the
President acknowledges that there is evidence that is clear, at least
in his mind, that chemical weapons have been used in Syria.
So, whether you think about al Qaeda and its affiliates spreading out
all over the world or whether you think about the very real dangers of
chemical weapons in Syria, not just being used against Syrians, but
potentially getting in the hands of terrorists and being used against
us, or whether you think about the new domain of warfare, which is
cybersecurity, or warfare in space, whether you think about the
potential military rise of China and what that means for the United
States and its interests, as you just wrap your mind around the
headlines and the news of the world, my point is, the threats have not
gone away. This is a dangerous world.
Only the United States is a super power to maintain stability and to
protect the lives and freedoms of Americans. That takes some resources.
We've already cut defense. We've already cut defense enough, and
certainly, we should not cut defense again.
This amendment, as I say, Mr. Chairman, is dangerous. It should be
rejected.
I yield back the balance of my time.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Nolan).
The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes
appeared to have it.
Mr. NOLAN. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Minnesota
will be postponed.

Amendments En Bloc No. 4 Offered by Mr. Thornberry

Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, as a designee of the chairman, and
pursuant to H. Res. 260, I offer amendments en bloc.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendments en bloc.
Amendments en bloc No. 4 consisting of amendment Nos. 64, 67, 69, 70,
72, 74, 77, 78, 79, 82, 83, 102, 107, and 126, printed in House Report
No. 113-108, offered by Mr. Thornberry of Texas:

Amendment No. 64 Offered by Mr. Andrews of New Jersey

At the end of subtitle F of title V, add the following new
section:

SEC. 5__. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE REPORT ON FEASIBILITY OF
REQUIRING AUTOMATIC OPERATION OF CURRENT
PROHIBITION ON ACCRUAL OF INTEREST ON DIRECT
STUDENT LOANS OF CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE ARMED
FORCES.

Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of Defense, after consultation with
relevant Federal agencies, shall submit to Congress a report
addressing the following:
(1) Whether application of the benefits provided under
section 455(o) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C.
1087e(o)) could occur automatically for members of the Armed
Forces eligible for the benefits.
(2) How the Department of Defense would implement the
automatic operation of the current prohibition on the accrual
of interest on direct student loans of certain members,
including the Federal agencies with which the Department of
Defense would coordinate.
(3) If the Secretary determines that automatic operation is
not feasible, an explanation of the reasons for that
determination.

[[Page H3568]]

Amendment No. 67 Offered by Mrs. Bustos of Illinois

At the end of subtitle H of title V (page 255, after line
9), insert the following new section:

SEC. 589. REPORT ON ARMY REVIEW, FINDINGS, AND ACTIONS
PERTAINING TO MEDAL OF HONOR NOMINATION OF
CAPTAIN WILLIAM L. ALBRACHT.

Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the
Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a
report describing the Army's review, findings, and actions
pertaining to the Medal of Honor nomination of Captain
William L. Albracht. The report shall account for all
evidence submitted with regard to the case.

Amendment No. 69 Offered by Ms. Esty of Connecticut

At the end of subtitle H of title V, add the following new
section:

SEC. 5__. REPLACEMENT OF MILITARY DECORATIONS.

(a) Prompt Replacement Required; Annual Report.--Section
1135 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (d); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new
subsections:
``(b) Prompt Replacement Required.--When a request for the
replacement of a military decoration is received under this
section or section 3747, 3751, 6253, 8747, or 8751 of this
title, the Secretary concerned shall ensure that--
``(1) all actions to be taken with respect to the request,
including verification of the service record of the recipient
of the military decoration, are completed within one year;
and
``(2) the replacement military decoration is mailed to the
person requesting the replacement military decoration within
60 days after verification of the service record.
``(c) Annual Report.--The Secretary of Defense shall submit
to the congressional defense committees an annual report
regarding compliance by the military departments with the
performance standards imposed by subsection (b). Each report
shall include--
``(1) for the one-year period covered by the report--
``(A) the average number of days it took to verify the
service record and entitlement of members and former members
of the armed forces for replacement military decorations;
``(B) the average number of days between receipt of a
request and the date on which the replacement military
decoration was mailed; and
``(C) the average number of days between verification of a
service record and the date on which the replacement military
decoration was mailed; and
``(2) an estimate of the funds necessary for the next
fiscal year to meet or exceed such performance standards.''.
(b) Plan Required.--Not later than 180 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the congressional defense committees (as defined in
section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code) a plan to
implement the amendments made by subsection (a), including an
estimate of the funds necessary for fiscal year 2015 to meet
or exceed the performance standards imposed by such
amendments.

Amendment No. 70 Offered by Mr. Kind of Wisconsin

At the end of subtitle H of title V, add the following new
section:

SEC. 589. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL OF HONOR TO
FIRST LIEUTENANT ALONZO H. CUSHING FOR ACTS OF
VALOR DURING THE CIVIL WAR.

(a) Authorization.--Subject to subsection (c),
notwithstanding the time limitations specified in section
3744 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time
limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to
persons who served in the Armed Forces, the President is
authorized and requested to award the Medal of Honor under
section 3741 of such title to then First Lieutenant Alonzo H.
Cushing for conspicuous acts of gallantry and intrepidity at
the risk of life and beyond the call of duty in the Civil
War, as described in subsection (b).
(b) Acts of Valor Described.--The acts of valor referred to
in subsection (a) are the actions of then First Lieutenant
Alonzo H. Cushing while in command of Battery A, 4th United
States Artillery, Army of the Potomac, at Gettysburg,
Pennsylvania, on July 3, 1863, during the American Civil War.
(c) Report Submission.--Subsection (a) shall take effect
upon receipt by the Committees on Armed Services of the
Senate and House of Representatives of the report, as
required in House Report 112-705, providing information on
the process and materials used by review boards for the
consideration of Medal of Honor recommendations for acts of
heroism that occurred during the Civil War.

Amendment No. 72 Offered by Mrs. Kirkpatrick of Arizona

Page 273, after line 10, insert the following:

SEC. 595. PROVISION OF SERVICE RECORDS.

(a) In General.--In accordance with subsection (b), the
Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs, shall make the covered records of each
member of the Armed Forces available to the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs in an electronic format.
(b) Timeline.--The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that
the covered records of members are made available to the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs as follows:
(1) With respect to a member of the Armed Forces who was
discharged or released from the Armed Forces during the
period beginning on September 11, 2001, and ending on the day
before the date of the enactment of this Act, not later than
120 days after the date of such discharge or release.
(2) With respect to a member of the Armed Forces who is
discharged or released from the Armed Forces on or after the
date of the enactment of this Act, not later than 90 days
after the date of such discharge or release.
(c) Certification.--For each member of the Armed Forces
whose covered records are made available under subsection
(a), the Secretary of Defense shall transmit to the Secretary
of Veterans Affairs a letter certifying that--
(1) the Secretary of Defense thoroughly reviewed the
records of the member;
(2) the information provided in the covered records of such
member is complete as of the date of the letter;
(3) no other information that should be included in such
covered records exist as of such date; and
(4) if other information is later discovered--
(A) such other information will be added to such covered
records; and
(B) the Secretary of Defense will notify the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs of such addition.
(d) Sharing of Protected Health Information.--For purposes
of the regulations promulgated under section 264(c) of the
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
(42 U.S.C. 1320d-2 note), making medical records available to
the Secretary of Veterans Affairs under subsection (a) shall
be treated as a permitted disclosure.
(e) Currently Available Records.--The Secretary of Veterans
Affairs, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall
ensure that the covered records of members of the Armed
Forces that are available to the Secretary as of the date of
the enactment of this Act are made electronically accessible
and available in real-time to the Veterans Benefits
Administration.
(f) Covered Records Defined.--In this section, the term
``covered records'' means, with respect to a member of the
Armed Forces--
(1) service treatment records;
(2) accompanying personal records;
(3) relevant unit records; and
(4) medical records created by reason of treatment or
services received pursuant to chapter 55 of title 10, United
States Code.

Amendment No. 74 Offered by Mr. Bishop of New York

At the end of title V, add the following new section:

SEC. 5__. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING THE RECOVERY OF THE
REMAINS OF CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES
KILLED IN THURSTON ISLAND, ANTARCTICA.

(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
(1) Commencing August 26, 1946, though late February 1947
the United States Navy Antarctic Developments Program Task
Force 68, codenamed ``Operation Highjump'' initiated and
undertook the largest ever-to-this-date exploration of the
Antarctic continent.
(2) The primary mission of the Task Force 68 organized by
Rear Admiral Richard E. Byrd Jr. USN, (Ret) and led by Rear
Admiral Richard H. Cruzen, USN, was to do the following:
(A) Establish the Antarctic research base Little America
IV.
(B) In the defense of the United States of America from
possible hostile aggression from abroad - to train personnel
test equipment, develop techniques for establishing,
maintaining and utilizing air bases on ice, with
applicability comparable to interior Greenland, where
conditions are similar to those of the Antarctic.
(C) Map and photograph a full two-thirds of the Antarctic
Continent during the classified, hazardous duty/volunteer-
only operation involving 4700 sailors, 23 aircraft and 13
ships including the first submarine the U.S.S. Sennet, and
the aircraft carrier the U.S.S. Philippine Sea, brought to
the edge of the ice pack to launch (6) Navy ski-equipped,
rocket-assisted R4Ds.
(D) Consolidate and extend United States sovereignty over
the largest practicable area of the Antarctic continent.
(E) Determine the feasibility of establishing, maintaining
and utilizing bases in the Antarctic and investigating
possible base sites.
(3) While on a hazardous duty/all volunteer mission vital
to the interests of National Security and while over the
eastern Antarctica coastline known as the Phantom Coast, the
PBM-5 Martin Mariner ``Flying Boat'' ``George 1'' entered a
whiteout over Thurston Island. As the pilot attempted to
climb, the aircraft grazed the glacier's ridgeline and
exploded within 5 seconds instantly killing Ensign Maxwell
Lopez, Navigator and Wendell ``Bud'' Hendersin, Aviation
Machinists Mate 1st Class while Frederick Williams, Aviation
Radioman 1st Class died several hours later. Six other
crewmen survived including the Captain of the ``George 1's''
seaplane tender U.S.S. Pine Island.

[[Page H3569]]

(4) The bodies of the dead were protected from the
desecration of Antarctic scavenging birds (Skuas) by the
surviving crew wrapping the bodies and temporarily burying
the men under the starboard wing engine nacelle.
(5) Rescue requirements of the ``George-1'' survivors
forced the abandonment of their crewmates' bodies.
(6) Conditions prior to the departure of Task Force 68
precluded a return to the area to the recover the bodies.
(7) For nearly 60 years Navy promised the families that
they would recover the men: ``If the safety, logistical, and
operational prerequisites allow a mission in the future,
every effort will be made to bring our sailors home.''.
(8) The Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command twice offered to
recover the bodies of this crew for Navy.
(9) A 2004 NASA ground penetrating radar overflight
commissioned by Navy relocated the crash site three miles
from its crash position.
(10) The Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command offered to
underwrite the cost of an aerial ground penetrating radar
(GPR) survey of the crash site area by NASA.
(11) The Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command studied the
recovery with the recognized recovery authorities and
national scientists and determined that the recovery is only
``medium risk''.
(12) National Science Foundation and scientists from the
University of Texas, Austin, regularly visit the island.
(13) The crash site is classified as a ``perishable site'',
meaning a glacier that will calve into the Bellingshausen
Sea.
(14) The National Science Foundation maintains a presence
in area - of the Pine Island Glacier.
(15) The National Science Foundation Director of Polar
Operations will assist and provide assets for the recovery
upon the request of Congress.
(16) The United States Coast Guard is presently pursuing
the recovery of 3 WWII air crewmen from similar circumstances
in Greenland.
(17) On Memorial Day, May 25, 2009, President Barak Obama
declared: ``. . .the support of our veterans is a sacred
trust. . .we need to serve them as they have served us. .
.that means bringing home all our POWs and MIAs. . .''.
(18) The policies and laws of the United States of America
require that our armed service personnel be repatriated.
(19) The fullest possible accounting of United States
fallen military personnel means repatriating living American
POWs and MIAs, accounting for, identifying, and recovering
the remains of military personnel who were killed in the line
of duty, or providing convincing evidence as to why such a
repatriation, accounting, identification, or recovery is not
possible.
(20) It is the responsibility of the Federal Government to
return to the United States for proper burial and respect all
members of the Armed Forces killed in the line of duty who
lie in lost graves.
(b) Sense of Congress.--In light of the findings under
subsection (a), Congress--
(1) reaffirms its support for the recovery and return to
the United States, the remains and bodies of all members of
the Armed Forces killed in the line of duty, and for the
efforts by the Joint POW-MIA Accounting Command to recover
the remains of members of the Armed Forces from all wars,
conflicts and missions;
(2) recognizes the courage and sacrifice of all members of
the Armed Forces who participated in Operation Highjump and
all missions vital to the national security of the United
States of America;
(3) acknowledges the dedicated research and efforts by the
US Geological Survey, the National Science Foundation, the
Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command, the Fallen American
Veterans Foundation and all persons and organizations to
identify, locate, and advocate for, from their temporary
Antarctic grave, the recovery of the well-preserved frozen
bodies of Ensign Maxwell Lopez, Naval Aviator, Frederick
Williams, Aviation Machinist's Mate 1ST Class, Wendell
Hendersin, Aviation Radioman 1ST Class of the ``George 1''
explosion and crash; and
(4) encourages the Department of Defense to review the
facts, research and to pursue new efforts to undertake all
feasible efforts to recover, identify, and return the well-
preserved frozen bodies of the ``George 1'' crew from
Antarctica's Thurston Island.

Amendment No. 77 Offered by Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania

Page 299, after the matter following line 23, insert the
following:

SEC. 703. EXTENSION OF TRANSITIONAL ASSISTANCE MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM.

(a) Telemedicine.--In carrying out the Transitional
Assistance Management Program, the Secretary of Defense shall
extend the coverage of such program to individuals by an
additional 180 days for treatment provided through
telemedicine.
(b) Mental Health Care and Behavioral Services.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary shall extend the coverage of
the Transitional Assistance Management Program for covered
treatment to covered individuals for a period determined
necessary by a health care professional treating the covered
individual.
(2) Definitions.--In this subsection:
(A) The term ``covered individual'' means an individual
who--
(i) during the initial 180-day period of being enrolled in
the Transitional Assistance Management Program, received any
mental health care treatment or covered treatment; or
(ii) during the one-year period preceding separation or
discharge from the Armed Forces, received any mental health
care treatment.
(B) The term ``covered treatment'' means behavioral
services provided through telemedicine.
(3) Sunset .--The authority of the Secretary to carry out
paragraph (1) shall terminate on December 31, 2018, if the
Secretary determines that by that date the suicide rates for
both members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty and
for members of a reserve component are 50 percent less than
such rates as of December 31, 2012.
(c) Telemedicine Defined.--In this section, the term
``telemedicine'' means the use by a health care provider of
telecommunications to assist in the diagnosis or treatment of
a patient's medical condition, including for behavioral
services.

Amendment No. 78 Offered by Mr. Guthrie of Kentucky

Page 299, after the matter following line 23, insert the
following:

SEC. 703. COMPREHENSIVE POLICY ON IMPROVEMENTS TO CARE AND
TRANSITION OF SERVICE MEMBERS WITH UROTRAUMA.

(a) Comprehensive Policy Required.--
(1) In general.--Not later than January 1, 2014, the
Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs
shall jointly develop and implement a comprehensive policy on
improvements to the care, management, and transition of
recovering service members with urotrauma.
(2) Scope of policy.--The policy shall cover each of the
following:
(A) The care and management of the specific needs of
service members who are urotrauma patients, including
eligibility for the Recovery Care Coordinator Program
pursuant to the Wounded Warrior Act (10 U.S.C. 1071 note).
(B) The return of service members who have recovered to
active duty when appropriate.
(C) The transition of recovering service members from
receipt of care and services through the Department of
Defense to receipt of care and services through the
Department of Veterans Affairs.
(3) Consultation.--The Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall develop the policy in
consultation with the heads of other appropriate departments
and agencies of the Federal Government, with representatives
of military service organizations representing the interests
of service members who are urotrauma patients and with
appropriate nongovernmental organizations having an expertise
in matters relating to the policy.
(b) Report.--The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs shall jointly submit to Congress a report
that includes a review identifying and options for responding
to gaps in the care of service members who are urotrauma
patients.

Amendment No. 79 Offered by Mr. Gallego of Texas

Page 308, line 7, strike ``and'' after the semicolon.
Page 308, line 11, strike the period and insert ``; and''.
Page 308, after line 11, insert the following:
(3) determine the effectiveness of the efforts of the
Department of Defense in reducing suicide rates of members of
the Armed Forces.

Amendment No. 82 Offered by Ms. Kuster of New Hampshire

At the end of subtitle C of title VII, insert the
following:

SEC. 726. REPORT ON ROLE OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS IN
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE.

Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit to
the Committees on Armed Services and Veterans' Affairs of the
House of Representatives and the Committees on Armed Services
and Veterans' Affairs of the Senate a report on the centers
of excellence established under sections 1621, 1622, and 1623
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2008 (Public Law 110-181; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note). Such report
shall include each of the following:
(1) The amount of resources that have been obligated by
Department of Veterans Affairs in support of each of the
centers since the dates on which they were established,
including the amount of personnel, time, money, and function
provided in support of the centers.
(2) An estimate of the amount of resources the Secretary
expects the Department to dedicate to each of the centers
during each of fiscal years 2014 through 2018.
(3) A description of the role of the Department within each
of the centers.

Amendment No. 83 Offered by Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania

Page 308, after line 21, insert the following:

SEC. 726. PRELIMINARY MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENTS.

Before any individual enlists in the Armed Forces or is
commissioned as an officer in the Armed Forces, the Secretary
of Defense shall provide the individual with a mental health
assessment. The Secretary shall use such results as a
baseline for any subsequent mental health examinations,
including such examinations provided under sections 1074f

[[Page H3570]]

and 1074m of title 10, United States Code, and section 1074n
of such title, as added by section 702.

Amendment No. 102 Offered by Mr. DeSantis of Florida

At the end of subtitle D of title IX, add the following new
section:

SEC. __. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR
COLLABORATIVE CYBERSECURITY ACTIVITIES WITH
CHINA.

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act
may be used for collaborative cybersecurity activities with
the People's Republic of China or any entity owned or
controlled by China, including cybersecurity war games,
cybersecurity working groups, the exchange of classified
cybersecurity technologies or methods, and the exchange of
procedures for investigating cyber intrusions.

Amendment No. 107 Offered by Mr. Broun of Georgia

At the end of subtitle H of title X, add the following new
section:

SEC. 1080. REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF
THE PALOMARES NUCLEAR WEAPONS ACCIDENT REVISED
DOSE EVALUATION REPORT.

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a report on the implementation of the
recommendations of the Palomares Nuclear Weapons Accident
Revised Dose Evaluation Report released in April by the Air
Force in 2001.

Amendment No. 126 Offered by Mr. Conaway of Texas

At the end of subtitle D of title XII of division A, add
the following new section:

SEC. 12_. INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE PROGRAMS AT
TRAINING LOCATIONS IN SOUTHWEST ASIA.

Section 544(c)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22
U.S.C. 2347c(c)(1)) is amended--
(1) in the first sentence, by inserting after ``programs''
the following: ``and integrated air and missile defense
programs''; and
(2) in the second sentence, by striking ``post-
undergraduate flying and tactical leadership'' and inserting
``such''.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman
from Texas (Mr. Thornberry) and the gentleman from Washington (Mr.
Larsen) each will control 10 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Texas.
Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I urge the committee to adopt the
amendments en bloc, all of which have been examined by both the
majority and the minority.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of the en
bloc amendment and encourage our colleagues to support it.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from
Florida (Mr. Posey).
Mr. POSEY. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
I am pleased that my bipartisan bill, the Deployed Troops Support
Act, is part of an en bloc amendment later this evening.
My amendment simply allows the Department of Defense to transport, on
a space-available basis, goods supplied by nonprofit organizations to
members of the armed services who are deployed overseas.
We ensure that the Secretary has the authority to determine that
there is a legitimate need for the goods being shipped, and that the
supplies are suitable for distribution, and that adequate arrangements
have been made for the distribution when the shipment arrives.
This legislative idea was brought to me by veterans in my
congressional district, specifically, AVET Project. If enacted into
law, it would give our troops the same consideration on a space
available as currently granted to foreigners under the Denton Program.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the
gentlewoman from Connecticut (Ms. Esty).
Ms. ESTY. Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of this en bloc amendment,
which includes my amendment to add the Proper Replacement of Medals and
Performance Tracking, the PROMPT Act, to the underlying legislation.
I want to first thank Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith for
their leadership and cooperation. And I'd also like to thank my
colleague, Dr. Joe Heck, for making the PROMPT Act a bipartisan effort
aimed at improving our service to veterans, servicemembers, and their
families.
I drafted this legislation after working with several veterans in my
district to replace medals and decorations that they've been waiting
months, and sometimes years, to receive.
One constituent, a Korean War veteran, has grandchildren that want to
see his medals and document his service as part of the family history.
He should not have to wait indefinitely for the medals he earned in
service to this country.
Nor should Paul Sypek, the Vietnam veteran in my district seeking to
replace his Army Commendation Medal. He first had to correct a clerical
error that omitted the decoration from his separation papers. More than
2 years later, he's still waiting for the replacement medal he
requested.
The PROMPT Act creates performance standards to ensure that requests
are fulfilled in a timely and organized fashion. We can and we must do
better for those who served our country with distinction. Adding the
PROMPT Act to H.R. 1960 ensures that we will. I urge support for the en
bloc amendment.
Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from
New York (Mr. Collins).
Mr. COLLINS of New York. I rise tonight to speak on behalf of an
amendment to be offered later. This amendment provides a sense of
Congress to the Secretary of Defense and urges my colleagues to support
this amendment, which will help maintain a strong National Guard and
Reserve.
We've seen, time and again, whether it's Superstorm Sandy or other
national catastrophes, the National Guard and the Reserve that have
come to the Nation and helped support us in a time of need. September
11 it was the members of the Air National Guard that flew jets over New
York City and this Nation's Capitol.
Many members of both the Guard and Reserve have fought and died for
this country in Iraq and Afghanistan. Time and again we have called on
them to support us, and this proposed amendment just urges the
Secretary of Defense to make sure that we send the message that he
should make every effort to ensure our military Reserve and National
Guard forces are fully manned and fully funded to help the United
States fulfill its longstanding commitment to the unyielding defense of
this country.
Mr. Chairman, the brave men and women who fill the ranks of both the
National Guard and Reserve deserve nothing else.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the
gentleman from Texas (Mr. Gallego).
Mr. GALLEGO. Mr. Chairman, I too would like to thank the chairman and
the ranking member as I rise today in support of the en bloc
amendments. These amendments include two amendments which I have
authored to support the men and women who serve in our armed services,
and to support their families.
The first amendment ensures that the Department of Defense can
continue to fast-track and to expedite the hiring of critical health
care workers who treat our wounded warriors and provide care to
military families. Members of our armed services make incredible
sacrifices, and taking care of them, and taking care of their loved
ones, is one of the most sacred promises that our country can make.
This amendment helps folks who receive medical attention at places
like Brooke Army Medical Center and Fort Bliss William Beaumont Army
Medical Center.
The amendment would designate critical health care workers as part of
a special ``shortage category'' and thus make them eligible for
salaries that are competitive with the higher salaries that are offered
by the VA for similar positions.
We need to ensure the highest standard of treatment for the men and
the women who have given so much to our country.
There is no increase in costs associated. The Department of Defense
has already budgeted for this proposal.
The second amendment helps ensure that the Secretary of Defense can
take measures, as he sees fit, to determine the effectiveness of our
efforts to reduce suicide by members of our armed services.
The military suicide rate hit a record high last year with 349 people
who took their own lives across the four branches. That averages out to
1 every 25 hours.

[[Page H3571]]

{time} 1940

We must take any and all measures to help reduce the suicide rates
among those who serve our country. As a member of the Armed Services
Committee, again, I thank the chairman and the ranking member and all
of the members of the committee for their hard work on a very vital
piece of legislation, including these provisions to treat wounded
warriors and to reduce suicide rates.
Mr. Chairman, I encourage passage of the en bloc amendments.
Mr. TURNER. We have no further speakers, and I yield back the balance
of my time.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of
my time.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendments en bloc offered
by the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Thornberry).
The en bloc amendments were agreed to.

Amendment No. 33 Offered by Mr. Larsen of Washington

The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 33
printed in part B of House Report 113-108.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I rise to offer amendment 33
as the designee of Mr. Cooper.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:

Page 425, after line 23, insert the following:

SEC. 1060. NEW START TREATY FUNDING.

(a) Reduction.--Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in
the funding tables in division D--
(1) the amount authorized to be appropriated in section
201, as specified in the corresponding funding table in
section 4201, for research, development, test, and
evaluation, defense-wide, Space Programs and Technology, is
decreased by $50,000,000; and
(2) the amount authorized to be appropriated in section
301, as specified in the corresponding funding table in
section 4301, for operation and maintenance, defense-wide,
Office of the Secretary of Defense is decreased by
$20,491,000.
(b) Increases.--Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in
the funding tables in division D:
(1) The amount authorized to be appropriated in section
101, as specified in the corresponding funding table in
section 4101, for procurement is increased as follows:
(A) Weapons Procurement, Navy, Trident II Modifications by
$14,100,000.
(B) Other Procurement, Navy, Strategic Missiles System
Equipment by $25,919,000.
(C) Other Procurement, Navy, Spares and repair Parts by
$275,000.
(D) Aircraft Procurement, Air Force, B52 by $500,000.
(2) The amount authorized to be appropriated in section
201, as specified in the corresponding funding table in
section 4201, for Missile Procurement, Air Force, Initial
Spares/Repair Parts is increased by $703,000.
(3) The amount authorized to be appropriated in section
301, as specified in the corresponding funding table in
section 4301, for operation and maintenance is increased as
follows:
(A) Combat Communications by $9,594,000.
(B) Depot Maintenance by $4,000,000.
(C) Other Service-wide Activities by $15,400,000.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman
from Washington (Mr. Larsen) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Washington.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, this amendment would restore
funding for commonsense nuclear weapons reductions that have already
been approved with the advice and consent of the Senate and that the
Navy and the Air Force have planned for fiscal year 2014.
The $70 million cut in the bill keeps nuclear weapons at Cold War
levels, and denying fiscal year '14 funding risks the United States
missing the deadline for treaty compliance as there will be
insufficient lead time for procurement and installation to support
conversion efforts to implement the reductions required by 2018, the
date of entry into force.
This amendment is funded by an offset of $50 million from DARPA's
space technology program due to the recently terminated System F6,
which was aimed to distribute functions of big satellites into several
small ones orbiting in tight formation--so this funding is available--
and $20 million from the $2.1 billion in the Office of the Secretary of
Defense O&M funds which pays OSD staff. This is a 1 percent cut with
minimal impact, as the Secretary of Defense has indicated that he
intends to make cuts to overhead.
So I urge my colleagues to support this amendment.
With that, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I claim time in opposition.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Texas is recognized for 5
minutes.
Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the distinguished
gentleman from Alabama, the chairman of the Strategic Forces
Subcommittee.
Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. I thank the chairman.
Today I rise in opposition to the amendment offered by my good friend
and colleague from Tennessee (Mr. Cooper) as well as my good friend
from Washington State.
The committee zeroed out these funds because the administration
appears to be expecting a blank check from the Congress to implement
this treaty. The House, through the appropriation power, must have a
chance to evaluate whether the implementation of a treaty and the
manner in which an administration intends to implement a treaty is in
the U.S. national security interest. That's the reason the 1042 report
was required in the FY12 NDAA in the first place.
I remind the House, this report is mandated by law. Are we really
comfortable in this House with letting the President ignore the law of
the land as he sees fit?
Additionally, while the gentleman from Tennessee withdrew the
amendment at the full committee level because the offset he selected
was of concern, the offset he has now is also a problem. It takes a
program in DARPA that has been eliminated recently, and the funds for
that program are planned to support transition activities to two other
DARPA programs. Diverting $50 million from this effort now would
significantly slow down the schedule for these two programs.
Additionally, we expect President Obama to announce, likely next week
in Berlin, that he will seek to reduce our deployed nuclear forces by
one-third--beyond the New START treaty reductions we have yet to put in
place. We need to put the brakes on this rush to zero. This President
is proposing dangerous and irreversible changes to our nuclear forces.
I urge my colleagues to reject the amendment.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, how much time remains?
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Washington has 3\3/4\ minutes
remaining.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I ask unanimous consent to
yield the balance of the time to the gentleman from Tennessee (Mr.
Cooper).
The Acting CHAIR. Without objection, the gentleman from Tennessee
will control the remainder of the time.
There was no objection.
Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, it's a shame that President Ronald Reagan
would have a hard time getting nominated in today's Republican Party.
If you look back at what President Reagan said, he called for the
abolition of ``all nuclear weapons.'' Furthermore, he went on to say
that these weapons are ``totally irrational, totally inhumane, good for
nothing but killing, possibly destructive of life on Earth and
civilization.''
Now, no one on this side of the aisle is calling for abolition, but
we are calling for the United States of America to live up to its
legitimate treaty commitments as passed by an overwhelming majority of
the United States Senate. Now, I know there is very little love lost
for the other body, but it was an overwhelming vote, and it was just 2
or 3 years ago.
The treaty is supposed to be implemented in 2018. Why the other side
of the aisle is not more interested in reducing Russian nuclear
weapons, I do not know, but this just simply allows us to live up to
our legitimate and legal treaty commitments.
The other side is welcome to have suspicions of all sorts of things,
but we should obey the treaties that we have ratified. So this calls
for $70 million to do that.
We can always question offsets. I've worked very hard with the other
side to try to find appropriate offsets. But the key is let's restore
the $70 million that our own military wants so that we

[[Page H3572]]

can implement this treaty which could reduce nuclear risk in this world
as President Reagan called for.
This is an opportunity. This is a necessity if we're going to live up
to our legal obligations. I have the utmost respect for my friend from
Alabama, the chairman of the subcommittee. This is a fixable problem.
This is a needless political fight. In the full committee, as the
gentleman knows, we try to work very closely with folks on the other
side of the aisle. This is just $70 million to live up to our existing
treaty commitments.
I would urge my colleagues of good faith on both sides of the aisle,
we can do this. We must do this. Let's follow what President Reagan
would have wanted and let's support this treaty commitment.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the distinguished
chairman of the Tactical Air and Land Forces Subcommittee, the
gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Turner).
Mr. TURNER. Mr. Chairman, let's be clear. It has been misstated that
if this amendment doesn't pass that we would leave nuclear weapons at
the Cold War level. Our nuclear weapons have already been reduced by 90
percent since the peak of the Cold War and 75 percent since the end of
the Cold War.
Ronald Reagan never said that the United States should disarm itself
at its disadvantage. He saw a world where no one would have nuclear
weapons, not that we would place ourselves at a disadvantage. I
certainly believe that, as Ronald Reagan would look around the world
today, he would have never foreseen a nuclear-capable North Korea, and
he certainly wouldn't have seen the world watch as Iran marches to
become a nuclear state.
This amendment actually would take money from programs that are
important, but it would put money toward something that is just not
ready. We know we're not ready for New START treaty implementation, and
we also know that we are certainly not going to be in breach.

This is not an issue of our walking away from a treaty obligation.
This is not at all an issue of saying that Russia should not reduce
their nuclear weapons. In fact, we believe that Russia ought to further
reduce especially their tactical nuclear weapons, the overwhelming
thousands that they have pointed at Europe that are in greater numbers
than Europe or the United States would ever imagine.
We believe that we should stand up to the treaty obligations. But to
fulfill those, we have to look to what the President promised, which,
as the President said, in order for us to go to the New START treaty
levels, that America has work to do. That work needs to be done.
While the President walks away from his commitments to nuclear
modernization of our infrastructure and our weapons and fails to turn
in the 1042 report that would give us the understanding of what our
overall strategy is, the President wants to continue down this path of
dismantling nuclear weapons when we're just not ready. New START can
wait until we satisfy the convictions that even the President had put
forward.

{time} 1950

But even further, we have to look at what the President currently is
doing. The President has signaled that he wants to reduce nuclear
weapons further even before we've gone to New START. The problem is
that obviously North Korea has just recently marched a weapon to the
launch pad that could threaten the United States. This is not the time
to do this.
Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, may I inquire as to how much time I have
remaining.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Tennessee has 1\3/4\ minutes
remaining.
Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, let me speak very briefly, and then I will
yield the balance of my time to my friend from California.
My colleagues on the other side of the aisle, no one can know for
sure what President Reagan would have done today. But read what Henry
Kissinger is writing today, George Shultz--keepers, I think, of the
Reagan legacy. They are working with Sam Nunn and others to do what we
can to have enforceable, reliable treaties with the former Soviet
Union, with Russia. And I would urge my colleagues to do what our own
military is requesting, to give them the means to implement this
treaty.
I yield the balance of my time to the gentleman from California (Mr.
Garamendi).
Mr. GARAMENDI. Trust and verify. Wow. In the New START treaty, it's
trust and verify. But to get to the trust and verify, we're going to
have to begin the process--$70 million requested by the military to
begin the process.
I know the gentleman on the other side of this question has spent
days and days working through this budget. The military plans years
ahead; And in order to carry out the New START treaty and see the
reductions that we need to make on our side, as obligated by that
treaty, we need to begin that planning process now.
It's not a matter of throwing the weapons out or disposing of these
weapons today. It's how we go about getting to that point, and the $70
million is essential for that.
We'll delay by one whole year the process of carrying out our treaty
obligations. Russia is in the process of carrying out their treaty
obligations, and we should too.
It's very simple, guys. It's about carrying out an obligation that we
have. It's about giving the military the money that they need today to
begin the planning, to do the early parts of that process.
Trust and verify. The Russians want us--they trust us, maybe, but
they want verification. We want verification from them also. This is
all about carrying out a treaty obligation, getting it going.
Mr. COOPER. I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. FORTENBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself the balance of my time.
Mr. Chairman, none of us of course could know what President Reagan
would have done. I would suggest, however, that if we had a Reagan
approach to defense, we would not still be arguing about missile
defense, and we certainly wouldn't be debating $60 billion cuts to
defense.
The other point I would make is ratification of the New START treaty
was conditioned in the Senate upon certain investments to our nuclear
deterrent infrastructure. Unfortunately, those investments have not
been forthcoming.
Let me talk about the offset for just a second. The most cutting-edge
done for our military is done at DARPA. DARPA funding is flat, and
there are a number of us who are concerned about that. But what they do
at DARPA is they evaluate the projects they have; and if one seems less
promising than others, they move that money around. So what this
amendment does is punish them for doing that, because as they are
moving money from one project to another that seems more promising, it
takes that money away. When you're looking at funding research, it
seems to me we want to encourage that sort of flexibility towards the
most promising avenues of the research, and yet this amendment takes
exactly the opposite approach.
For a variety of reasons, Mr. Chairman, I think this amendment is not
a good idea, and I would recommend Members vote against it.
I yield back the balance of my time.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentleman from Washington (Mr. Larsen).
The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes
appeared to have it.
Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Washington
will be postponed.

Amendment No. 36 Offered by Mr. Gibson

The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 36
printed in part B of House Report 113-108.
Mr. GIBSON. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:

Strike section 1251.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman
from New York (Mr. Gibson) and a

[[Page H3573]]

Member opposed each will control 5 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from New York.
Mr. GIBSON. Mr. Chairman, this amendment is very simple. It strikes
the language in section 1251, which pertains to Syria--a very serious
subject that's been talked about here this evening. In my view, we
should be debating this in regular order, and there should be a stand-
alone resolution that deals with Syria.
You know, this language that we have in the underlying bill, the
intent of it I understand, it was supposed to deal with the weapons of
mass destruction in Syria, the control of them. That would be one
thing. But I just want every Member to understand what's in the
underlying language.
Subsection b, subsection 1:

President Obama should fully consider all courses of action
to remove President Assad from power.

That sounds a lot like unilateral action for regime change to me.
Subsection 5:

The United States should continue to support Syrian
opposition forces with nonlethal aid.

I don't remember authorizing any aid to begin with, much less
continuing.
Subsection 8:

Should the President decide to employ any military assets
in Syria, the President should provide a supplemental budget
request to Congress.

Well, yes on the supplemental budget request if it ever comes to it.
But should the President decide to employ any military assets, that's
for us to decide, not for the President.
So, Mr. Chairman, I have concerns. I certainly understand the initial
intent. It is my strongest recommendation that we strike this language,
that we work together on language that is more suitable for an NDAA,
and then, if desired, to have broader discussion with a separate
resolution if somebody wants to move forward with regard to action in
Syria.
I would say that I oppose military action in Syria, but I certainly
think there should be voices. We should have Representatives speaking
for their people.
And I hope that we learn. You know, in 2011, I came here very
concerned about Libya. I spoke out against military action. We ended up
taking military action. I was concerned that we would empower forces
hostile to us. And I regret to say on September 11 of last year, we
ended up with a situation in Benghazi that we all are very saddened by.
I want to see us learn from this, and I certainly want to see us strike
this language.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. McKEON. I rise to claim the time in opposition to the amendment.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California is recognized for 5
minutes.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, at this time I yield 2\1/2\ minutes to my
friend and colleague, the gentlelady from Indiana (Mrs. Walorski).
Mrs. WALORSKI. Mr. Chairman, while I greatly respect the author of
this amendment, I must rise in opposition.
This amendment does, in fact, strike section 1251 of the underlying
bill that expresses a sense of Congress in regard to Syria. Section
1251 says the President should have a plan in place to secure U.S.
interests in Syria; that the U.S. should support the stability of our
allies like Israel--our strongest ally in the region; and that the U.S.
should continue to conduct rigorous planning to secure any chemical and
biological stockpiles. It does not say that the U.S. should intervene
in Syria. And it requires the President to provide a supplemental
budget should military action be necessary.
Although much delayed, the confirmation from the Obama administration
just a few hours ago that the Assad regime has used chemical weapons
against rebel forces demonstrates why section 1251 is needed. It's time
to get serious about addressing Syria and develop a plan to protect
American interests in the region.
According to the President, Assad has crossed a red line. By turning
a blind eye to this civil war that has already claimed more than 90,000
lives, we lose credibility within the region and embolden bad actors
like Iran and Hezbollah.
I would ask my colleagues to vote against this amendment.
Mr. GIBSON. Mr. Chairman, I'll yield myself about 20 seconds, and
then I'm going to yield to my good friend from California.
I just want to say in response that, with regard to planning,
absolutely. I know our military forces are always in the process of
planning.
Standing with Israel, absolutely. But I just would remind my
colleagues to read the language in here. This is inappropriate for an
NDAA. It is not in our interest to be affirming this language.
At this point, I'd like to yield to my good friend from California
(Mr. Garamendi).

{time} 2000

Mr. GARAMENDI. May I inquire as to the time available?
The ACTING CHAIR. The gentleman has 2\1/4\ minutes remaining.
Mr. GARAMENDI. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
A lot of analogies come to mind: slippery slopes, camel's nose under
the tent.
Syria is an extremely serious matter, and the role of the United
States in the serious issue of Syria needs to be fully vetted by the
Congress and the Senate. We are debating; 435 of us are given 10
minutes, 10 minutes of time to this issue, plus perhaps another 5
minutes in the committee hearing, to this matter of what is the role of
the United States in the serious Syrian issue.
Slippery slope, red lines, military aid, nonlethal aid. What does it
all mean? Where is the House Foreign Affairs Committee on this matter?
And by the way, how did this slip by the requirement of dual
referencing? It did. We're here.
Ten minutes, 10 minutes on a matter that could very easily suck the
United States into another war in the Middle East. We need time. We
need to debate this. We need to understand all the ramifications of
this. The language in this particular section is really serious
language. It's far more than has been stated on the floor. Put it
aside, step back, take our time, understand what all the ramifications
are.
Mr. GIBSON. I would like to yield my remaining time to my colleague
from Minnesota.
Mr. NOLAN. Madam Chairman, I rise in support of the Gibson-Garamendi
amendment. I'm using this time to express my regret that a resolution
that I presented to the Rules Committee requiring the Congress to
decide on whether or not we should send arms and troops to the rebels
was denied an opportunity to be heard today.
The fact is, this is a centuries old conflict between the Sunnis and
the Shiites. We have no friends in this fight. Believe me, I've lived
in the Middle East, I've done business in the Middle East, I've studied
the language, I've studied the culture. We have no friends in this
conflict. The rebels--make no mistake about it--are the al Mazraa
affiliated with al Qaeda.
The Acting CHAIR (Ms. Ros-Lehtinen). The time of the gentleman has
expired.
Mr. McKEON. Madam Chair, at this time, I yield the balance of my time
to the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Lamborn).
Mr. LAMBORN. Madam Chairman, I thank the chairman of the full
committee for yielding me time.
I have total respect for my colleague and friend from New York who
authored this amendment, but I believe on this one this amendment is
misguided and we should defeat it. This does not call for a declaration
of war or any kinds of the, I think exaggerated responses I've heard in
favor of this amendment. This says that the President should have a
course of action.
The President earlier stated that there are red lines concerning
weapons of mass destruction. I believe, if the news today is correct,
then belatedly maybe there is a step toward recognizing that and taking
some action for red lines just in the last few hours.
But we've been working on this amendment, we debated it in committee,
because up until now, and even going forward--I'm not sure how much--
there hasn't been very much planning. There hasn't been a stated plan
or a course of action by the administration. We need to have that in
place.
We can and should and will debate this further. But the
administration, I believe, has been lacking in leadership--too much
leading from behind, as

[[Page H3574]]

we've seen in other places. There needs to be leadership.
This is a volatile area of the world--there's no question about that.
That doesn't mean, though, that we can be disengaged. We can't just
throw our hands up and withdraw and put our heads in the sand.
We have allies in the region, especially Israel. Israel needs to be
supported and defended. We are the most powerful country in the world.
We need to take a role of at least planning for what's happening.
That's what this sense of Congress language does. Section 1251, the
amendment offered by my friend and colleague from New York, would
strike the language.
I would urge a ``no'' vote on this amendment. Let's have some
planning for once by this administration on this important issue.
Mr. McKEON. I yield back the balance of my time.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentleman from New York (Mr. Gibson).
The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes
appeared to have it.
Mr. GIBSON. Madam Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from New York
will be postponed.

Amendment No. 37 Offered by Mr. Coffman

The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 37
printed in part B of House Report 113-108.
Mr. COFFMAN. Madam Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:

After section 1256, insert the following new section (and
redesignate subsequent sections accordingly):

SEC. 1257. REMOVAL OF BRIGADE COMBAT TEAMS FROM EUROPE.

(a) Finding.--Congress finds that, because defense spending
among European NATO countries fell 12% since 2008, from $314
billion to $275 billion, so that currently only 4 out of the
28 NATO allies of the United States are spending the widely
agreed-to standard of 2% of their GDP on defense, the United
States must look to more wisely allocate scarce resources to
provide for the national defense.
(b) Removal Required.--The President shall end the
permanent basing of the 2nd Cavalry Regiment (2CR) in
Vilseck, Germany and return that Brigade Combat Team
currently stationed in Europe to the United States, without
permanent replacement, leaving one Brigade Combat Team and
one Combat Aviation Brigade.
(c) Use of Rotational Forces to Satisfy Security Needs.--It
is the policy of the United States that the deployment of
units of the United States Armed Forces on a rotational basis
at military installations in European member nations of the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization pursuant to the Army Force
Generation (ARFORGEN) process is a force-structure
arrangement sufficient to permit the United States--
(1) to satisfy the commitments undertaken by United States
pursuant to Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, signed at
Washington, District of Columbia, on April 4, 1949, and
entered into force on August 24, 1949 (63 Stat. 2241; TIAS
1964);
(2) to address the current security environment in Europe;
and
(3) to contribute to peace and stability in Europe.
(d) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be
construed so as to require the removal of Landstuhl Regional
Medical Center or to prohibit the utilization of the 82nd
Airborne's Division Readiness Brigade, Marine Corps Fleet
Anti-Terrorism Security Teams, Marine Corps Special-Purpose
Marine Air-Ground Task Forces, Marine Corps expeditionary
units, Special Operations Command forces, or other quick-
response forces to respond to threats in Europe and in the
vicinity of the U.S. European Command (EUCOM) area.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman
from Colorado (Mr. Coffman) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Colorado.
Mr. COFFMAN. Madam Chairman, I am proud to be joined by
Representatives Polis, Griffith, and Blumenauer in offering an
amendment to move away from our Cold War posture to meet the challenges
of the future. This bipartisan amendment will end the permanent basing
of the 2nd Cavalry Regiment in Germany and return that brigade combat
team to the United States, without permanent replacement. There is no
longer a strategic reason to maintain our current troop numbers in
Europe.
This action will still leave one brigade combat team and one combat
aviation brigade in Europe. Nothing in this amendment demands the
removal of our European medical facilities or rapid response forces.
Should a crisis occur, it is not the BCTs that will be called to
respond. In fact, just last month, the U.S. moved marines from a
crisis-response force to Italy in anticipation that it could be needed
to respond to growing unrest in Libya. In an emergency, expeditionary
forces, such as the Marine Corp Special MAG Task Force and FAST teams,
or even the Army's 82nd Airborne, would be called to action, not the
BCTs in Germany.
Only 4 out of 28 NATO allies spend even the required 2 percent of
their GDP on defense. The U.S. spends 4.7 percent. Our allies keep
defense spending low because they take for granted that we will
guarantee their security. This is an unfair burden to U.S. taxpayers.
We should reprioritize our commitments while meeting our security
obligations to our NATO allies by utilizing rotational forces.
I ask my colleagues to join in supporting this amendment to better
deal with the strategic challenges of the future.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia. Madam Chairman, I rise to claim time in
opposition.
The ACTING CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia. Madam Chairman, I yield myself 2 minutes.
First of all, this is, a very dangerous, dangerous amendment. I am a
member of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly. I am also the vice chairman
of the Science and Technology Committee of NATO. I have been a member
of NATO for 11 years. That means I get to travel across the world two
or three times each year into this region. I can tell you firsthand
that this is a dangerous amendment, it is very dangerous at this time.
Now, you have mentioned about some of our NATO colleagues. And yes,
we are having a challenge. Each nation is going through economic
challenges. But let me tell you, they are increasing their input and
their financial resources each year.

{time} 2010

One thing is for certain: the wrong message that we should send to
them now and to encourage them to contribute more is for us to cut and
run and contribute less, and that's exactly what this amendment that
you are offering will do.
The other point as to why it is dangerous is that we would sit here
in Congress and force the hand of President Obama--or, for that matter,
of any President or future President--to publicly state that he is
going to remove a contingent of a brigade like the 2nd Cavalry Regiment
in Vilseck, Germany, and then return that brigade to the United States
and not put anything in its place. Europe and the Mediterranean and the
Middle East--there is no more volatile, unpredictable place on this
planet. At the same time, there is no place on this planet that we have
the strength of alliances as we have here.
With that, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. COFFMAN. I think we both have experience in NATO. You serve on
this parliamentary committee, and I served in the United States Army in
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, in the very type of unit that
we are talking about today.
That unit was designed to defend the border between what was West
Germany and Czechoslovakia against Warsaw Pact forces that were on the
other side. That border no longer exists. The Warsaw Pact no longer
exists. Yet we still maintain a regiment there, which is not an
expeditionary unit, to do the very things that you're talking about. We
also have the capability to move our forces when needed over there.
When I was in Europe during the height of the Cold War, protecting
the very border in the same units that we are talking about today, we
did the Reforger exercise on an annual basis in which U.S. forces would
come over to Europe, in about the middle of western Germany, to
reinforce our positions

[[Page H3575]]

and to push those Warsaw Pact forces back.
Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia. Will the gentleman yield 10 seconds?
Mr. COFFMAN. I yield to the gentleman.
Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia. Even today, yes, you are absolutely
right; but what did they do in Europe when we asked them to stand with
us in Afghanistan? They stood with us. What did they do when we asked
in Iraq? All I am simply saying is that we have an obligation today and
in the future.
Mr. COFFMAN. I reclaim my time.
There is nothing in the NATO charter that says we have to maintain
permanent bases in Europe. I certainly support rotational forces. I
support our involvement and our obligations to the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization, but it doesn't say we need to have a unit that is
not an expeditionary force in the middle of Europe protecting a border
that no longer exists.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia. I yield 2 minutes to my dear friend, the
gentleman from Ohio, Mr. Mike Turner.
Mr. TURNER. This amendment is unlike anything that you're going to
see in the National Defense Authorization Act. That's because this is
not a function of Congress.
This amendment says the President shall end the permanent basing of
the 2nd Cavalry Regiment in Germany and return them to the United
States.
We don't move troops. There is a reason we don't move troops. There
is nowhere in this bill you're going to find any provision that we move
troops. That's because, in 10 minutes, we shouldn't have a debate about
where troops would be.
The gentleman is absolutely, dangerously incorrect. These troops are
not like the troops with whom he served in the early seventies. These
troops are active in defending the United States and our allies. They
are absolutely necessary for forward deployment. We need the 3 to 5
days it would take for these troops to make it to the important areas
of Afghanistan, Israel, the Middle East, and it would take 20 days from
the United States.
Mr. COFFMAN. Will the gentleman yield?
Mr. TURNER. No, I will not yield to the gentleman.
Here is the most important thing:
The gentleman says that these troops need to be reduced. We've
reduced troops. Mind you, the gentleman served in the early seventies.
Here is 1989. We had 213,000 troops. We've already drastically reduced
them. They're already down to one-sixth of what they were. We are
headed towards 30,000 troops in 2013.
You have to think about what it is that these troops do--they do
regional security; they do international cooperation; they do partner
nation training; they're part of our ISAF support in Afghanistan;
they're part of NATO cooperation. These troops are active. If you go
and meet with any of our troops who are currently in Europe, they are
actively working--our men and women in uniform--on our operations now.
No one since the seventies has been staring down the bad Soviet
Union. They are there protecting the United States and the United
States' interests. They are our active men and women in uniform, and we
have them forward-based because they help the United States in its
functions of being able to deliver forces and our men and women to the
important areas of where there are conflicts.
General Breedlove of the European Command says that this is as far as
we can go. He vehemently opposes this. Even those people who might be
for reducing troops should not be for this. Congress should not be
specifically telling the Commander in Chief where troops should be and
how to move them. This is dangerously wrong. If the gentleman wants to
move troops, he should apply for a job at the DOD if he is qualified.
The Acting CHAIR. The time of the gentleman has expired.
The gentleman from Colorado has 1 minute remaining.
Mr. COFFMAN. In closing, I did apply and work for the DOD. In fact, I
served in both the Army and the Marine Corps, and in the 1980s, I
served in NATO as well as in the 1970s.
The mission has changed. Times have changed. We need to change. In
doing so, we've got a unit there that really has no tactical purpose at
this time. It is not an expeditionary force that can be readily moved.
It would have to be moved to a railhead and then to a port facility and
then be brought by ship in the most cost-effective manner.
We are at a time when we have excess capacity in the United States in
terms of the United States Army. The last report was in 2004 of 20
percent excess capacity for the United States, and the administration
wants to do another Base Realignment and Closure Commission. We ought
to bring that unit home to the United States. It can deploy as needed,
where needed, and not be in a country that's spending less than 2
percent of its GDP on defense when we're at 4.7 percent.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia. Madam Chair, how much time do I have
remaining?
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Georgia has 1 minute remaining.
Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia. I would like to say this very quickly.
How things have changed. Messages that go out from this floor go out
around the world. As we speak, just at our most recent NATO meeting, we
were able to get 27 nations out of the 28 nations of NATO to pass a
resolution supporting the United States' and Israel's position against
Iran's acquiring a nuclear bomb. That's how relevant we are today.
With that, Madam Chairman, I yield the balance of my time to the
gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. Bridenstine).
Mr. BRIDENSTINE. I would just like to make a couple of points.
Number one, these troops are not for NATO. These troops are for the
European Command. These troops are for the United States of America.
I'm a Navy pilot myself. I've been a part of units that deploy, that
rotate. What I can say is that, when units rotate, the training that we
get with our allies is less robust and is just not as good as if you
have a permanent presence where you can integrate with our NATO allies.
It's true that we are integrated with our NATO allies, but it is also
true that these troops are for European Command.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Coffman).
The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes
appeared to have it.
Mr. COFFMAN. Madam Chair, I demand a recorded vote.
The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Colorado
will be postponed.

{time} 2020

Amendments En Bloc No. 5 Offered by Mr. McKeon

Mr. McKEON. Madam Chairman, pursuant to H. Res. 260, I offer
amendments en bloc.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendments en bloc.
Amendments en bloc No. 5 consisting of amendment Nos. 86, 87, 88, 89,
90, 91, 98, 99, 100, 101, 103, 104, 105, 109, 112, 115, 119, 121, and
142, printed in House Report No. 113-108, offered by Mr. McKeon of
California:

AMENDMENT NO. 86 OFFERED BY MR. PASCRELL OF NEW JERSEY

Page 308, after line 21, insert the following new section:

SEC. 726. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY
PLAN.

It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) section 739(b) of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1822)
requires the Secretary of Defense to submit a plan to
Congress to improve the coordination and integration of the
programs of the Department of Defense that address traumatic
brain injury and the psychological health of members of the
Armed Forces not later than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of such Act;
(2) the requirement to submit the plan is still in effect
and the contents of the plan are still important; and
(3) the Secretary of Defense should deliver the report
within the required time frame.

AMENDMENT NO. 87 OFFERED BY MR. PASCRELL OF NEW JERSEY

Page 308, after line 21, insert the following:

SEC. 726. REPORT ON MEMORANDUM REGARDING TRAUMATIC BRAIN
INJURIES.

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on how the
Secretary will identify, refer, and treat traumatic brain
injuries with respect to members

[[Page H3576]]

of the Armed Forces who served in Operation Enduring Freedom
or Operation Iraqi Freedom before the date in June 2010 on
which the memorandum regarding using a 50-meter distance from
an explosion as a criterion to properly identify, refer, and
treat members for potential traumatic brain injury took
effect.

AMENDMENT NO. 88 OFFERED BY MR. SESSION OF TEXAS

Page 308, after line 21, insert the following:

SEC. 726. PILOT PROGRAM FOR INVESTIGATIONAL TREATMENT OF
MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES FOR TRAUMATIC BRAIN
INJURY AND POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER.

(a) Process.--The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a
five-year pilot program under which the Secretary shall
establish a process through which the Secretary shall provide
payment for investigational treatments (including diagnostic
testing) of traumatic brain injury or post-traumatic stress
disorder received by members of the Armed Forces in health
care facilities other than military treatment facilities.
Such process shall provide that payment be made directly to
the health care facility furnishing the treatment.
(b) Conditions for Approval.--The approval by the Secretary
for payment for a treatment pursuant to subsection (a) shall
be subject to the following conditions:
(1) Any drug or device used in the treatment must be
approved or cleared by the Food and Drug Administration for
any purpose and its use must comply with rules of the Food
and Drug Administration applicable to investigational new
drugs or investigational devices.
(2) The treatment must be approved by the Secretary
following approval by an institutional review board operating
in accordance with regulations issued by the Secretary of
Health and Human Services.
(3) The patient receiving the treatment must demonstrate an
improvement under criteria approved by the Secretary, as a
result of the treatment on one or more of the following:
(A) Standardized independent pre-treatment and post-
treatment neuropsychological testing.
(B) Accepted survey instruments including, such instruments
that look at quality of life.
(C) Neurological imaging.
(D) Clinical examination.
(4) The patient receiving the treatment must be receiving
the treatment voluntarily and based on informed consent.
(5) The patient receiving the treatment may not be a
retired member of the Armed Forces who is entitled to
benefits under part A, or eligible to enroll under part B, of
title XVIII of the Social Security Act.
(c) Additional Restrictions Authorized.--The Secretary may
establish additional restrictions or conditions for
reimbursement as the Secretary determines appropriate to
ensure the protection of human research subjects, appropriate
fiscal management, and the validity of the research results.
(d) Authority.--The Secretary shall make payments under
this section for treatments received by members of the Armed
Forces using the authority in subsection (c)(1) of section
1074 of title 10, United States Code.
(e) Amount.--A payment under this section shall be made at
the equivalent Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
reimbursement rate in effect for appropriate treatment codes
for the State or territory in which the treatment is
received. If no such rate is in effect, payment shall be made
on a cost-reimbursement basis, as determined by the
Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Health and
Human Services.
(f) Data Collection and Availability.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary shall develop and maintain a
database containing data from each patient case involving the
use of a treatment under this section. The Secretary shall
ensure that the database preserves confidentiality and that
any use of the database or disclosures of such data are
limited to such use and disclosures permitted by law and
applicable regulations.
(2) Publication of qualified institutional review board
studies.--The Secretary shall ensure that an Internet website
of the Department of Defense includes a list of all civilian
institutional review board studies that have received a
payment under this section.
(g) Assistance for Members to Obtain Treatment.--
(1) Assignment to temporary duty.--The Secretary of a
military department may assign a member of the Armed Forces
under the jurisdiction of the Secretary to temporary duty or
allow the member a permissive temporary duty in order to
permit the member to receive treatment for traumatic brain
injury or post-traumatic stress disorder, for which payments
shall be made under subsection (a), at a location beyond
reasonable commuting distance of the permanent duty station
of the member.
(2) Per diem.--A member who is away from the permanent
station of the member may be paid a per diem in lieu of
subsistence in an amount not more than the amount to which
the member would be entitled if the member were performing
travel in connection with a temporary duty assignment.
(3) Gift rule waiver.--The Secretary of Defense may waive
any rule of the Department of Defense regarding ethics or the
receipt of gifts with respect to any assistance provided to a
member of the Armed Forces for travel or per diem expenses
incidental to receiving treatment under this section.
(h) Memoranda of Understanding.--The Secretary shall enter
into memoranda of understandings with civilian institutions
for the purpose of providing members of the Armed Forces with
treatment carried out by civilian health care practitioners
under treatment--
(1) approved by and under the oversight of civilian
institutional review boards; and
(2) that would qualify for payment under this section.
(i) Outreach.--The Secretary of Defense shall establish a
process to notify members of the Armed Forces of the
opportunity to receive treatment pursuant to this section.
(j) Report to Congress.--Not later than 30 days after the
last day of each fiscal year during which the Secretary is
authorized to make payments under this section, the Secretary
shall submit to Congress an annual report on the
implementation of this section and any available results on
investigational treatment studies authorized under this
section.
(k) Termination.--The authority to make a payment under
this section shall terminate on the date that is five years
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(l) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized
to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for
each fiscal year during which the Secretary is authorized to
make payments under this section.
(m) Funding Increase and Offsetting Reduction.--
(1) In general.--Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in
the funding tables in division D, to carry out this section
during fiscal year 2014--
(A) the amount authorized to be appropriated in section
1406 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the
corresponding funding table in division D, is hereby
increased by $10,000,000, with the amount of the increase
allocated to the Defense Health Program, as set forth in the
table under section 4501, to carry out this section; and
(B) the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 301
for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide, as specified in
the corresponding funding table in division D, is hereby
reduced by $10,000,000, with the amount of the reduction to
be derived from Line 280, Office of the Secretary of Defense
as set forth in the table under section 4301.
(2) Merit-based or competitive decisions.--A decision to
commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to in paragraph
(1)(A) with or to a specific entity shall--
(A) be based on merit-based selection procedures in
accordance with the requirements of sections 2304(k), 2361,
and 2374 of title 10, United States Code, or on competitive
procedures; and
(B) comply with other applicable provisions of law.

AMENDMENT NO. 89 OFFERED BY MR. McKEON OF CALIFORNIA

Page 308, after line 21, insert the following:

SEC. 726. INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD OF THE
DEPARTMENTS OF DEFENSE AND VETERANS AFFAIRS.

(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) despite repeated attempts at cooperation over the past
20 years, the Department of Defense and the Department of
Veterans Affairs have failed to implement a solution that
allows for seamless electronic sharing of medical health care
data;
(2) the recent decision by the Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs to abandon their earlier
agreement and pursue separate paths to integration
jeopardizes the stated goal of providing ``a patient-centered
health care system that delivers excellent quality, access,
satisfaction, and value, consistently across the
Departments'';
(3) despite the repeated concerns and objections of the
congressional committees of jurisdiction, the Department of
Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs seem to be on
a continued path to fail in achieving the goal of creating a
seamless health record that integrates data across the
Departments; and
(4) the President should make the necessary leadership
changes to assure timely completion of this requirement.
(b) Implementation.--The Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall--
(1) implement an integrated electronic health record to be
used by each of the Secretaries; and
(2) deploy such record by not later than October 1, 2016.
(c) Design Principles.--The integrated electronic health
record established under subsection (b) shall adhere to the
following principles:
(1) To the extent practicable, efforts to establish such
record shall be based on objectives, activities, and
milestones established by the Joint Executive Committee Joint
Strategic Plan Fiscal Years 2013-2015, including any
requirements, definition, documents, or analyses previously
developed to satisfy said Joint Strategic Plan.
(2) Principles with respect to open architecture standards,
including--
(A) modular designs based on standards with loose coupling
and high cohesion that allow for independent acquisition of
system components;
(B) if existing national standards do not exist as of the
date on which the record is being established, the
Secretaries shall agree upon and adopt a standard for
purposes of

[[Page H3577]]

the record until such time as national standards are
established;
(C) enterprise investment strategies that maximize reuse of
proven system designs;
(D) implementation of aggressive life-cycle sustainment
planning that uses proven technology insertion strategies and
product upgrade techniques;
(E) enforcement of system design transparency, continuous
design disclosure and improvement, and peer reviews that
include government, academia, and industry; and
(F) strategies for data-use rights to ensure a level
competitive playing field and access to alternative solutions
and sources across the life-cycle of the program.
(3) By the point of full deployment decision, such record
must be at a generation 3 level or better for a health
information technology system.
(d) Program Plan.--Not later than January 31, 2014, the
Secretaries shall jointly develop and submit to the
appropriate congressional committees a program plan for the
oversight and execution of the integrated electronic health
record program established under this section. This plan
shall include--
(1) program objectives;
(2) organization;
(3) responsibilities of the Departments;
(4) technical system requirements;
(5) milestones, including a schedule for industry
competitions for capabilities needed to satisfy the technical
system requirements;
(6) technical system standards being adopted by the
program;
(7) outcome-based metrics proposed to measure the
performance and effectiveness of the program; and
(8) level of funding for fiscal years 2014 through 2017.
(e) Assessment.--
(1) In general.--The Secretaries shall jointly commission
an independent assessment of the program plan under
subsection (d).
(2) Submission.--Not later than 60 days after the date on
which the program plan under subsection (d) is submitted to
the appropriate congressional committees, the Secretaries
shall jointly submit to such committees the independent
assessment conducted under paragraph (1).
(f) Limitation of Funds.--Not more than 25 percent of the
amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or
otherwise made available for development , modernization, or
enhancement of the integrated electronic health record within
the Department of Veterans Affairs or for operation and
maintenance for the Defense Health Agency of the Department
of Defense may be obligated or expended until the date on
which the program plan under subsection (d) is submitted to
the appropriate congressional committees.
(g) Monthly Reporting.--On a monthly basis, the Secretary
of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans affairs shall each
submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report
on the expenditures incurred by the Secretary in the
development of an integrated electronic health record under
this section. Such reports shall include obligations by major
categories of spending and by support of milestones
identified in the program plan required under subsection (d).
(h) Requirements.--
(1) In general.--Not later than October 1, 2014, all health
care information contained in the Department of Defense AHLTA
and the Department of Veterans Affairs VistA systems shall be
available and actionable in real-time to health care
providers in each Department through shared technology.
(2) Certification.--At such time as the operational
capability described in paragraph (1) is achieved, the
Secretaries shall jointly certify to the appropriate
congressional committees that the Secretaries have
implemented such operational capability.
(3) Limitation of funds.--Neither the Secretary of Defense
or the Secretary of Veterans Affairs may obligate or expend
more than 10 percent of the amounts authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the
research, development, test, and evaluation, or procurement
for the Virtual Lifetime Electronic Record until the date on
which the certification is made under paragraph (2).
(4) Responsible official.--The Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall each identify a senior
official to be responsible for the electronic health record
established under this section, including the operational
capability described in paragraph (1). Such official shall
have included within their performance evaluation performance
metrics related to the execution of the responsibilities
under this paragraph. Not later than 30 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, each Secretary shall submit to
the appropriate congressional committees the name of the
senior official selected under this paragraph.
(5) Accountability review.--If the Secretary of Defense and
the Secretary of Veterans Affairs fail to meet the
requirements under paragraph (1), the Secretaries shall
jointly conduct an accountability review to identify the
following:
(A) The root cause of the failure and if the failure is a
result of technology or human performance.
(B) The work sections responsible for the failure.
(C) The milestones and resource investment required to
achieve such requirements.
(D) The recommendations for corrective actions, to include
personnel actions, to achieve such requirements.
(6) Submission of accountability review.--If the
Secretaries conduct a review under paragraph (5), the
Secretaries shall jointly submit to the appropriate
congressional committees a report of the results of the
review by not later than November 30, 2014.
(i) Advisory Panel.--
(1) Establishment.--Not later than 60 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretaries shall jointly
establish an advisory panel to support the development and
validation of requirements, programmatic assessment, and
other actions, as needed by the Secretaries, with respect to
the integrated electronic health record established under
subsection (b). The panel shall certify to the appropriate
congressional committees that such record meets the
definition of ``integrated'' as specified in subsection
(j)(4).
(2) Membership.--The panel established under paragraph (1)
shall consist of not more than 14 members, appointed by the
Secretaries as follows:
(A) Two co-chairs, one appointed by each of the
Secretaries.
(B) The chief information officer of the Department of
Defense and the chief information officer of the Department
of Veterans Affairs.
(C) One member from the acquisition community of the
Department of Defense and one member from such community of
the Department of Veterans Affairs.
(D) Two members from the academic community appointed by
the Secretary of Defense.
(E) Two members from the academic community appointed by
the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
(F) Two members from industry appointed by the Secretary of
Defense.
(G) Two members from industry appointed by the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs.
(3) Reporting.--The Advisory panel established under
paragraph (1) shall submit to the appropriate congressional
committees a quarterly report on the activities of the panel.
The panel shall submit the first report by not later than
December 31, 2013.
(j) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``actionable'' means information that is
directly useful to customers for immediate use in clinical
decision making.
(2) The term ``appropriate congressional committees''
means--
(A) the congressional defense committees; and
(B) the Committees on Veterans' Affairs of the Senate and
the House of Representatives.
(3) The term ``generation 3'' means, with respect to an
electronic health systems, a system that has the technical
capability to bring evidence-based medicine to the point of
care and provide functionality for multiple care venues.
(4) The term ``integrated'' means one single core
technology or an inherent cross-platform capability without
the need for additional patch development to accomplish this
capability.

AMENDMENT NO. 90 OFFERED BY MR. WILSON OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Page 308, after line 21, insert the following:

SEC. 726. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON RECOVERY AUDIT
PROGRAM FOR TRICARE.

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report that
evaluates the similarities and differences in the approaches
to identifying and recovering improper payments across
Medicare and TRICARE. The report shall contain an evaluation
of the following:
(1) Medicare and TRICARE claims processing efforts to
prevent improper payments by denying claims prior to payment.
(2) Medicare and TRICARE claims processing efforts to
correct improper payments post-payment.
(3) The effectiveness of Medicare and TRICARE post-payment
audit programs in place to identify and correct improper
payments that are returned to the government plans.

AMENDMENT NO. 91 OFFERED BY MR. SARBANES OF MARYLAND

At the end of title VIII, add the following new section:

SEC. 833. REVISION OF DEFENSE SUPPLEMENT TO THE FEDERAL
ACQUISITION REGULATION TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT
SOURCING LAWS.

Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal
Acquisition Regulation shall be revised to implement the
requirements imposed by sections 129, 129a, 2330a, 2461, and
2463 of title 10, United States Code.

AMENDMENT NO. 98 OFFERED BY MR. CARDENAS OF CALIFORNIA

Page 360, after line 8, insert the following new paragraph:
(3) An assessment of the mechanisms for improving
recruitment, retention, and management of cyber operations
forces, including through focused recruiting; educational,
training, or certification scholarships; bonuses; or the use
of short-term or virtual deployments without the need for
permanent relocation.

AMENDMENT NO. 99 OFFERED BY MR. CARDENAS OF CALIFORNIA

Page 363, line 10, insert after ``investigation'' the
following: ``, an estimate of the

[[Page H3578]]

economic losses from the intrusion, and any additional
actions needed to improve the protection of intellectual
property''.
Page 363, line 24, insert after ``compromised,'' the
following: ``an estimate of the economic losses from the
intrusion,''.

AMENDMENT NO. 100 OFFERED BY MR. RUIZ OF CALIFORNIA

Page 365, after line 22, insert the following:

SEC. 936. SMALL BUSINESS CYBERSECURITY SOLUTIONS OFFICE.

(a) Establishment.--The Secretary of Defense shall submit a
report to the Congress on the feasibility of establishing a
small business cyber technology office to assist small
business concerns in providing cybersecurity solutions to the
Federal Government.
(b) Definitions.--In this section, the terms ``small
business concern'' has the meaning given such term in section
3 of the Small Business Act.

AMENDMENT NO. 101 OFFERED BY MR. CARDENAS OF CALIFORNIA

Page 365, after line 22, insert the following new section:

SEC. 936. SMALL BUSINESS CYBER EDUCATION.

The Secretary of Defense shall establish an outreach and
education program to assist small businesses (as defined in
section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632))
contracted by the Department of Defense to assist such
businesses to--
(1) understand the gravity and scope of cyber threats;
(2) develop a plan to protect intellectual property; and
(3) develop a plan to protect the networks of such
businesses.

AMENDMENT NO. 103 OFFERED BY MR. LANGEVIN OF RHODE ISLAND

Page 385, after line 2, insert the following:

SEC. 1035. REPORT COMPARING COSTS OF DDG 1000 AND DDG 51
FLIGHT III SHIPS.

Not later than March 15, 2014, the Secretary of the Navy
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report
providing an updated comparison of the costs and risks of
acquiring DDG 1000 and DDG 51 Flight III vessels equipped for
enhanced ballistic missile defense capability. The report
shall include each of the following:
(1) An updated estimate of the total cost to develop,
procure, operate, and support ballistic missile defense
capable DDG 1000 destroyers equipped with the air and missile
defense radar that would be procured in addition to the three
prior-year-funded DDG 1000 class ships, and in lieu of Flight
III DDG-51 destroyers.
(2) The estimate of the Secretary of the total cost of the
current plan to develop, procure, operate, and support Flight
III DDG 51 destroyers.
(3) Details on the assumed ballistic missile defense
requirements and construction schedules for both the DDG 1000
and DDG 51 Flight III destroyers referred to in paragraphs
(1) and (2), respectively.
(4) An updated comparison of the program risks and the
resulting ship capabilities in all dimensions (not just
ballistic missile defense) of the options referred to in
paragraphs (1) and (2).
(5) Any other information the Secretary determines
appropriate.

AMENDMENT NO. 104 OFFERED BY MR. CONYERS OF MICHIGAN

Page 401, line 23, add at the end before the period the
following: ``for purposes of interpreting the scope of
section 2 of the Authorization for Use of Military Force
(Public Law 107-40; 115 Stat. 224; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note)''.

AMENDMENT NO. 105 OFFERED BY MR. ROSS OF FLORIDA

Page 405, after line 9, insert the following:

SEC. 1040B. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF FUNDS FOR RECREATIONAL
FACILITIES FOR INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT
GUANTANAMO.

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or
otherwise available to the Department of Defense may be used
to provide additional or upgraded recreational facilities for
individuals detained at United States Naval Station,
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

AMENDMENT NO. 109 OFFERED BY MR. POSEY OF FLORIDA

Page 452, after line 6, insert the following new section:

SEC. 1082A. TRANSPORTATION OF SUPPLIES TO MEMBERS OF THE
ARMED FORCES FROM NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) In General.--Chapter 20 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by inserting after section 402 the following
new section:

``Sec. 403. Transportation of supplies from nonprofit
organizations

``(a) Authorization of Transportation.--Notwithstanding any
other provision of law, and subject to subsection (b), the
Secretary of Defense may transport to any country, without
charge, supplies that have been furnished by a nonprofit
organization and that are intended for distribution to
members of the armed forces. Such supplies may be transported
only on a space available basis.
``(b) Limitations.--(1) The Secretary may not transport
supplies under subsection (a) unless the Secretary determines
that--
``(A) the transportation of the supplies is consistent with
the policies of the United States;
``(B) the supplies are suitable for distribution to members
of the armed forces and are in usable condition;
``(C) there is a legitimate need for the supplies by the
members of the armed forces for whom they are intended; and
``(D) adequate arrangements have been made for the
distribution and use of the supplies.
``(2) Procedures.--The Secretary shall establish procedures
for making the determinations required under paragraph (1).
Such procedures shall include inspection of supplies before
acceptance for transport.
``(3) Preparation.--It shall be the responsibility of the
nonprofit organization requesting the transport of supplies
under this section to ensure that the supplies are suitable
for transport.
``(c) Distribution.--Supplies transported under this
section may be distributed by the United States Government or
a nonprofit organization.
``(d) Definition of Nonprofit Organization.--In this
section, the term `nonprofit organization' means an
organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from tax under section 501(a)
of such Code.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of chapter 20 of such title is amended by inserting
after the item relating to section 402 the following new
item:

``403. Transportation of supplies from nonprofit organizations.''.

AMENDMENT NO. 112 OFFERED BY MR. HANNA OF NEW YORK

Page 463, after line 6, insert the following new section:

SEC. 1090. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICES.

It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the use of improvised explosive devices (in this
section referred to as ``IEDs'') against members of the Armed
Forces or people of the United States should be condemned;
(2) unwavering support for members of the Armed Forces,
first responders, and explosive ordnance disposal personnel
of the United States who face the threat of IEDs and put
their lives on the line to defeat them should be expressed;
(3) all relevant agencies of the Government should be
called on to coordinate with international partners and other
responsible entities to reduce the use of IEDs and curb their
proliferation; and
(4) the exchange of blast trauma research data should be
facilitated between all relevant agencies of the Government.

AMENDMENT NO. 115 OFFERED BY MR. COLLINS OF NEW YORK

Page 463, after line 6, insert the following:

SEC. 1090. SENSE OF CONGRESS TO MAINTAIN A STRONG NATIONAL
GUARD AND MILITARY RESERVE FORCE.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) The first volunteer militia unit in America was formed
in 1636 in Massachusetts Bay, followed by other units in the
colonies of Virginia and Connecticut. the American founding
fathers wrote article I, section 8, of the United States
Constitution to keep the militia model, authorizing a
standing military force that could organize, train, and equip
militia volunteers when needed.
(2) In World War I, nearly all National Guardsmen were
mobilized into Federal service, and while they represented
only 15 percent of the total United States Army, they
comprised 40 percent of the American divisions sent to France
and sustained 43 percent of the casualties in combat. In
World War II, the National Guard comprised 19 Army divisions
and 29 observation squadrons with aircraft assigned to the
United States Army Air Forces.
(3) On September 11, 2001, the first fighter jets over New
York City and Washington, DC, were Air National Guard F-15
and F-16 aircraft from Massachusetts and North Dakota, with
over 400 more Air National Guard fighter aircraft on alert by
that afternoon. Over 600,000 Air and Army National Guard
soldiers and airmen have deployed in the many campaigns since
9/11.
(4) Air and Army National Guard soldiers and airmen have
been involved in countless domestic response missions,
including missions in response to hurricanes, tornadoes,
floods, and forest fires including the more recent events of
Superstorm Sandy and the tornados in Oklahoma.
(5) The volunteer National Guard and Reserve have time and
again demonstrated their readiness to meet operational
requirements through cost-effective means.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the Secretary of Defense should make every effort to
ensure the Military Reserve and National Guard forces are
sustained by a fully manned and fully funded force and that
the United States fulfill its longstanding commitment to
unyielding readiness in terms of defense;
(2) the Secretary of Defense should act with the knowledge
that the National Guard and Reserve are critical components
to the Armed Forces, particularly as means of preserving
combat power during a time of budget austerity; and
(3) Congress repudiates proposals to diminish the National
Guard or Reserve and affirms the growth of these components
as circumstances warrant.

AMENDMENT NO. 119 OFFERED BY MR. LANGEVIN OF RHODE ISLAND

At the end of titel XI, add the following new section:

SEC. 1108. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW REGARDING AVAILABILITY OF
FUNDING FOR CIVILIAN PERSONNEL.

(a) Regulations.--No later than 45 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act,

[[Page H3579]]

the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations
implementing the authority in subsection (a) of section 1111
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2010 (Public Law 111-84; 10 U.S.C. 1580 note prec.).
(b) Coordination.--The Under Secretary of Defense
(Comptroller), in consultation with the Under Secretary of
Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall be responsible for
coordinating the preparation of the regulations required
under subsection (a).
(c) Limitations.--The regulations required under subsection
(a) shall not be restricted by any civilian full-time
equivalent or end-strength limitation, nor shall such
regulations require offsetting civilian pay funding, civilian
full-time equivalents, or end-strength.

AMENDMENT NO. 121 OFFERED BY MR. ROHRABACHER OF CALIFORNIA

Page 490, after line 6, add the following new subparagraph:
(C) That Pakistan is not using its military or any funds or
equipment provided by the United States to persecute minority
groups for their legitimate and nonviolent political and
religious beliefs, including the Balochi, Sindhi, and Hazara
ethnic groups and minority religious groups, including
Christian, Hindu, and Ahmadiyya Muslim.

AMENDMENT NO. 142 OFFERED BY MS. ROS-LEHTINEN OF FLORIDA

At the end of subtitle E of title XII (page 551, after line
12), add the following new section:

SEC. 1259. COMBATING CRIME THROUGH INTELLIGENCE CAPABILITIES.

The Secretary of Defense is authorized to deploy assets,
personnel, and resources to the Joint Interagency Task Force
South, in coordination with SOUTHCOM, to combat the following
by supplying sufficient intelligence capabilities:
(1) Transnational criminal organizations.
(2) Drug trafficking.
(3) Bulk shipments of narcotics or currency.
(4) Narco-terrorism.
(5) Human trafficking.
(6) The Iranian presence in the Western Hemisphere.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman
from California (Mr. McKeon) and the gentleman from Washington (Mr.
Larsen) each will control 10 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from California.
Mr. McKEON. Madam Chair, I urge the committee to adopt the amendments
en bloc, all of which have been examined by the majority and the
minority.
At this time I yield 2 minutes to my friend and colleague, the
gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Kelly).
Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania. I rise today with an amendment that will
be considered later tonight that creates a 1-year ban on the use of
funds by the Department of Defense to implement the U.N. Arms Trade
Treaty, unless the ATT fulfills all constitutional and legal
requirements needed to take domestic legal effect, including the
passage of implementing legislation.
Over the last year, I have been joined by over 140 bipartisan Members
of this body to express deep concerns with the United Nations Arms
Trade Treaty and to urge its rejection.
First, the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty undermines our Second
Amendment rights by omitting the fundamental, individual right to keep
and bear arms and imposing a national responsibility to prevent
firearms diversion, thus opening the door to new gun control measures.
Secondly, the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty undermines our
sovereignty by imposing vague, readily politicized requirements on the
United States and inviting United Nations-led investigations into what
U.S. policymakers knew or should have known regarding arms transfers
that allegedly violate the United Nations arms trade treaty.
Ultimately, the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty will stop the good
from doing good without stopping the bad from doing bad. As then-
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton once said, the U.S. maintains the
``gold standard'' of arms export controls.
My amendment upholds our current policies, as well as our enduring
values.
I would like to thank the chairman and the ranking member for
including this amendment in the en bloc amendments.
With that, I urge adoption of this amendment.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Madam Chair, I too, encourage my colleagues
to support this en bloc, and I now yield 3 minutes to Mr. Ellison from
Minnesota.
Mr. ELLISON. Madam Chairman, allow me to thank the ranking member and
the chair of the committee.
This graphic I have in front of me, Madam Chairman, was taken in
Tahrir Square a few years ago now when the people were peacefully
demonstrating to overcome the Mubarak regime which had oppressed them
for so many years. They're holding up tear gas, and it says ``Made in
America'' on it.
When our government transferred those riot and anti-riot materials to
that government, I believe we didn't have any reason to know that it
would be misused by a tyrannical regime to oppress and down press
peaceful demonstrators. I propose, though, that when our government has
reason to know that there is a tyrannical regime using repressive
techniques to put down their peaceful demonstrators, that our
government should withhold exports of that nature.
The fact is that the tyranny that people lived under under Hosni
Mubarak was not made in America. It was made by Hosni Mubarak. But we
should not be implicated in the kind of oppression if we know about it,
and therefore I think we should have the authority in our government to
withhold those kinds of transfers when they come to our attention.
So the young man holding up this tear gas canister that police fired
at the pro-democracy demonstrators is labeled ``Made in the USA.'' This
is a misrepresentation because it was Mubarak who oppressed his own
people, but we should not be implicated in this, particularly if we
have reason to know.
Madam Chairman, this is not the message we should be sending. Whether
it's being sent deliberately or not, it's not the message we should
send to the people who are seeking nothing more than what we want in
the United States, which is to democratically control their own
country. It's not in our interest, and we should have the authority to
stop it.
The United States should not supply tear gas to governments that use
it to repress democracy, and my amendment helps us to move to that
goal.
Mr. McKEON. Madam Chair, at this time, we have no further speakers.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Madam Chair, we yield back the balance of
our time.
Mr. McKEON. Madam Chair, I ask that all of our colleagues support
this group of en bloc amendments, and I yield back the balance of my
time.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendments en bloc offered
by the gentleman from California (Mr. McKeon).
The en bloc amendments were agreed to.

Amendments En Bloc No. 6 Offered by Mr. McKeon

Mr. McKEON. Madam Chairman, pursuant to H. Res. 260, I offer
amendments en bloc.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendments en bloc.
Amendments en bloc No. 6 consisting of amendment Nos. 106, 108, 110,
116, 117, 118, 120, 127, 128, 129, 132, 133, 134, 136, 138, 139, 140
and 145, printed in House Report No. 113-108, offered by Mr. McKeon of
California:

Amendment No. 106 Offered by Mr. Braley of Iowa

At the end of subtitle H of title X, insert the following:

SEC. 1080. REPORT ON LONG-TERM COSTS OF OPERATION IRAQI
FREEDOM AND OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM.

(a) Report Requirement.--Not later than 90 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the President, with
contributions from the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of
State, and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall submit to
Congress a report containing an estimate of previous costs of
Operation New Dawn (the successor contingency operation to
Operation Iraqi Freedom) and the long-term costs of Operation
Enduring Freedom for a scenario, determined by the President
and based on current contingency operation and withdrawal
plans, that takes into account expected force levels and the
expected length of time that members of the Armed Forces will
be deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.
(b) Estimates to Be Used in Preparation of Report.--In
preparing the report required by subsection (a), the
President shall make estimates and projections through at
least fiscal year 2023, adjust any dollar amounts
appropriately for inflation, and take into account and
specify each of the following:
(1) The total number of members of the Armed Forces
expected to be deployed in support of Operation Enduring
Freedom, including--
(A) the number of members of the Armed Forces actually
deployed in Southwest Asia in support of Operation Enduring
Freedom;
(B) the number of members of reserve components of the
Armed Forces called or ordered to active duty in the United
States for

[[Page H3580]]

the purpose of training for eventual deployment in Southwest
Asia, backfilling for deployed troops, or supporting other
Department of Defense missions directly or indirectly related
to Operation Enduring Freedom; and
(C) the break-down of deployments of members of the regular
and reserve components and activation of members of the
reserve components.
(2) The number of members of the Armed Forces, including
members of the reserve components, who have previously served
in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or
Operation Enduring Freedom and who are expected to serve
multiple deployments.
(3) The number of contractors and private military security
firms that have been used and are expected to be used during
the course of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn,
and Operation Enduring Freedom.
(4) The number of veterans currently suffering and expected
to suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic
brain injury, or other mental injuries.
(5) The number of veterans currently in need of and
expected to be in need of prosthetic care and treatment
because of amputations incurred during service in support of
Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or Operation
Enduring Freedom.
(6) The current number of pending Department of Veterans
Affairs claims from veterans of military service in Iraq and
Afghanistan, and the total number of such veterans expected
to seek disability compensation from the Department of
Veterans Affairs.
(7) The total number of members of the Armed Forces who
have been killed or wounded in Iraq or Afghanistan, including
noncombat casualties, the total number of members expected to
suffer injuries in Afghanistan, and the total number of
members expected to be killed in Afghanistan, including
noncombat casualties.
(8) The amount of funds previously appropriated for the
Department of Defense, the Department of State, and the
Department of Veterans Affairs for costs related to Operation
Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, and Operation Enduring
Freedom, including an account of the amount of funding from
regular Department of Defense, Department of State, and
Department of Veterans Affairs budgets that has gone and will
go to costs associated with such operations.
(9) Previous, current, and future operational expenditures
associated with Operation Enduring Freedom and, when
applicable, Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation New Dawn,
including--
(A) funding for combat operations;
(B) deploying, transporting, feeding, and housing members
of the Armed Forces (including fuel costs);
(C) activation and deployment of members of the reserve
components of the Armed Forces;
(D) equipping and training of Iraqi and Afghan forces;
(E) purchasing, upgrading, and repairing weapons,
munitions, and other equipment consumed or used in Operation
Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or Operation Enduring
Freedom; and
(F) payments to other countries for logistical assistance
in support of such operations.
(10) Past, current, and future costs of entering into
contracts with private military security firms and other
contractors for the provision of goods and services
associated with Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn,
and Operation Enduring Freedom.
(11) Average annual cost for each member of the Armed
Forces deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom,
including room and board, equipment and body armor,
transportation of troops and equipment (including fuel
costs), and operational costs.
(12) Current and future cost of combat-related special pays
and benefits, including reenlistment bonuses.
(13) Current and future cost of calling or ordering members
of the reserve components to active duty in support of
Operation Enduring Freedom.
(14) Current and future cost for reconstruction, embassy
operations and construction, and foreign aid programs for
Iraq and Afghanistan.
(15) Current and future cost of bases and other
infrastructure to support members of the Armed Forces serving
in Afghanistan.
(16) Current and future cost of providing health care for
veterans who served in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom,
Operation New Dawn, or Operation Enduring Freedom,
including--
(A) the cost of mental health treatment for veterans
suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic
brain injury, and other mental problems as a result of such
service; and
(B) the cost of lifetime prosthetics care and treatment for
veterans suffering from amputations as a result of such
service.
(17) Current and future cost of providing Department of
Veterans Affairs disability benefits for the lifetime of
veterans who incur disabilities while serving in support of
Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or Operation
Enduring Freedom.
(18) Current and future cost of providing survivors'
benefits to survivors of members of the Armed Forces killed
while serving in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom,
Operation New Dawn, or Operation Enduring Freedom.
(19) Cost of bringing members of the Armed Forces and
equipment back to the United States upon the conclusion of
Operation Enduring Freedom, including the cost of
demobilization, transportation costs (including fuel costs),
providing transition services for members of the Armed Forces
transitioning from active duty to veteran status,
transporting equipment, weapons, and munitions (including
fuel costs), and an estimate of the value of equipment that
will be left behind.
(20) Cost to restore the military and military equipment,
including the equipment of the reserve components, to full
strength after the conclusion of Operation Enduring Freedom.
(21) Amount of money borrowed to pay for Operation Iraqi
Freedom, Operation New Dawn, and Operation Enduring Freedom,
and the sources of that money.
(22) Interest on money borrowed, including interest for
money already borrowed and anticipated interest payments on
future borrowing, for Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New
Dawn, and Operation Enduring Freedom.

Amendment No. 108 Offered by Mr. Andrews of New Jersey

Page 447, line 20, strike ``is capable and available'' and
insert ``are available and capable''.
Page 449, line 5, insert ``or subcontract'' after
``contract''.

Amendment No. 110 Offered by Ms. Speier of California

Add at the end of subtitle I of title X the following new
section:

SEC. 1090. ACCESS OF EMPLOYEES OF CONGRESSIONAL SUPPORT
OFFICES TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FACILITIES.

(a) Finding.--Congress finds that Congressional support
offices perform a critical role in enabling Congress to carry
out its Constitutionally mandated task of performing
oversight of the executive branch.
(b) Access in Same Manner as Employees of Defense
Committees.--The Secretary of Defense shall provide employees
of any Congressional support office who work on issues
related to national security with access to facilities of the
Department of Defense in the same manner, and subject to the
same terms and conditions, as employees of the Committees on
Armed Services of the House of Representatives and Senate.
(c) Congressional Support Offices Defined.--In this
section, the term ``Congressional support office'' means any
of the following:
(1) The Congressional Budget Office.
(2) The Congressional Research Service of the Library of
Congress.
(3) The Government Accountability Office.

Amendment No. 116 Offered by Mr. Lewis of Georgia

At the end of title X, add the following new section:

SEC. 10__. COST OF WARS.

The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the
Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service and the Director
of the Bureau of Economic Analysis, shall post on the public
Web site of the Department of Defense the costs, including
the relevant legacy costs, to each American taxpayer of each
of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Amendment No. 117 Offered by Mr. Farr of California

At the end of title X, insert the following:

SEC. 1090. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING CONSIDERATION OF
FOREIGN LANGUAGES AND CULTURES IN THE BUILDING
OF PARTNER CAPACITY.

It is the sense of Congress that the head of each element
of the Department of Defense should take into consideration
foreign languages and cultures during the development by such
element of the Department of training, tools, and
methodologies to engage in military-to-military activities
and in the building of partner capacity.

Amendment No. 118 Offered by Mr. Gallego of Texas

At the end of title XI, add the following new section:

SEC. 11__. EXTENSION OF ENHANCED APPOINTMENT AND COMPENSATION
AUTHORITY FOR CIVILIAN PERSONNEL FOR CARE AND
TREATMENT OF WOUNDED AND INJURED MEMBERS OF THE
ARMED FORCES.

(a) Extension.--Subsection (c) of section 1599c of title
10, United States Code, is amended by striking ``December 31,
2015'' both places it appears and inserting ``December 31,
2020''.
(b) Repeal of Fulfilled Requirement.--Such section is
further amended--
(1) by striking subsection (b); and
(2) by redesignating subsection (c), as amended by
subsection (a), as subsection (b).
(c) Repeal of References to Certain Title 5 Authorities.--
Subsection (a)(2)(A) of such section is amended--
(1) by striking ``sections 3304, 5333, and 5753 of title
5'' and inserting ``section 3304 of title 5''; and
(2) in clause (ii), by striking ``the authorities in such
sections'' and inserting ``the authority in such section''.

Amendment No. 120 Offered by Mr. Connolly of Virginia

At the end of subtitle A of title XII of division A, add
the following new section:

SEC. 12_. MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN,
DISASTER, AND CIVIC AID PROGRAMS OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

(a) In General.--Of the amounts authorized to be
appropriated by this Act to carry

[[Page H3581]]

out sections 401, 402, 404, 407, 2557, and 2561 of title 10,
United States Code, up to 5 percent of such amounts may be
made available to conduct monitoring and evaluation of
programs conducted pursuant to such authorities during fiscal
year 2014.
(b) Briefing.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide
a briefing to the appropriate congressional committees on
mechanisms to evaluate the programs conducted pursuant to the
authorities listed in subsection (a). The briefing shall
include the following:
(1) A description of how the Department of Defense
evaluates program and project outcomes and impact, including
cost effectiveness and extent to which programs meet
designated goals.
(2) An analysis of steps taken to implement the
recommendations from the following reports:
(A) The Government Accountability Office's Report entitled
``Project Evaluations and Better Information Sharing Needed
to Manage the Military's Efforts''.
(B) The Department of Defense Inspector General Report
numbered ``DODIG-2012-119''.
(C) The RAND Corporation's Report prepared for the Office
of the Secretary of Defense entitled ``Developing a Prototype
Handbook for Monitoring and Evaluating Department of Defense
Humanitarian Assistance Projects''.
(c) Definition.--In this section, the term ``appropriate
congressional committees'' means the following:
(1) The congressional defense committees.
(2) The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the
Senate.

Amendment No. 127 Offered by Mr. Grimm of New York

At the end of subtitle D of title XII of division A, add
the following new section:

SEC. 12_. STATEMENT OF POLICY ON CONDEMNING THE GOVERNMENT OF
IRAN FOR ITS STATE-SPONSORED PERSECUTION OF ITS
BAHA'I MINORITY.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) In 1982, 1984, 1988, 1990, 1992, 1994, 1996, 2000,
2006, 2008, 2009, 2012, and 2013, Congress declared that it
deplored the religious persecution by the Government of Iran
of the Baha'i community and would hold the Government of Iran
responsible for upholding the rights of all Iranian
nationals, including members of the Baha'i faith.
(2) The United States Commission on International Religious
Freedom 2012 Report stated, ``The Baha'i community has long
been subject to particularly severe religious freedom
violations in Iran. Baha'is, who number at least 300,000, are
viewed as `heretics' by Iranian authorities and may face
repression on the grounds of apostasy.''.
(3) The United States Commission on International Religious
Freedom 2012 Report stated, ``Since 1979, Iranian government
authorities have killed more than 200 Baha'i leaders in Iran
and dismissed more than 10,000 from government and university
jobs.''.
(4) The United States Commission on International Religious
Freedom 2012 Report stated, ``Baha'is may not establish
places of worship, schools, or any independent religious
associations in Iran.''.
(5) The United States Commission on International Religious
Freedom 2012 Report stated, ``Baha'is are barred from the
military and denied government jobs and pensions as well as
the right to inherit property. Their marriages and divorces
also are not recognized, and they have difficulty obtaining
death certificates. Baha'i cemeteries, holy places, and
community properties are often seized or desecrated, and many
important religious sites have been destroyed.''.
(6) The United States Commission on International Religious
Freedom 2012 Report stated, ``The Baha'i community faces
severe economic pressure, including denials of jobs in both
the public and private sectors and of business licenses.
Iranian authorities often pressure employers of Baha'is to
dismiss them from employment in the private sector.''.
(7) The Department of State 2011 International Religious
Freedom Report stated, ``The government prohibits Baha'is
from teaching and practicing their faith and subjects them to
many forms of discrimination that followers of other
religions do not face.''.
(8) The Department of State 2011 International Religious
Freedom Report stated, ``According to law, Baha'i blood is
considered `mobah', meaning it can be spilled with
impunity.''.
(9) The Department of State 2011 International Religious
Freedom Report stated that ``members of religious minorities,
with the exception of Baha'is, can serve in lower ranks of
government employment'', and ``Baha'is are barred from all
leadership positions in the government and military''.
(10) The Department of State 2011 International Religious
Freedom Report stated, ``Baha'is suffered frequent government
harassment and persecution, and their property rights
generally were disregarded. The government raided Baha'i
homes and businesses and confiscated large amounts of private
and commercial property, as well as religious materials
belonging to Baha'is.''.
(11) The Department of State 2011 International Religious
Freedom Report stated, ``Baha'is also are required to
register with the police''.
(12) The Department of State 2011 International Religious
Freedom Report stated that ``[p]ublic and private
universities continued to deny admittance to and expelled
Baha'i students'' and ``[d]uring the year, at least 30
Baha'is were barred or expelled from universities on
political or religious grounds''.
(13) The Department of State 2011 International Religious
Freedom Report stated, ``Baha'is are regularly denied
compensation for injury or criminal victimization.''.
(14) On March 6, 2012, the United Nations Special
Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic
Republic of Iran issued a report (A/HRC/19/66), which stated
that ``the Special Rapporteur continues to be alarmed by
communications that demonstrate the systemic and systematic
persecution of members of unrecognized religious communities,
particularly the Baha'i community, in violation of
international conventions'' and expressed concern regarding
``an intensive defamation campaign meant to incite
discrimination and hate against Baha'is''.
(15) On May 23, 2012, the United Nations Secretary-General
issued a report, which stated that ``the Special Rapporteur
on freedom of religion or belief . . . pointed out that the
Islamic Republic of Iran had a policy of systematic
persecution of persons belonging to the Baha'i faith,
excluding them from the application of freedom of religion or
belief by simply denying that their faith had the status of a
religion''.
(16) On August 22, 2012, the United Nations Secretary-
General issued a report, which stated, ``The international
community continues to express concerns about the very
serious discrimination against ethnic and religious
minorities in law and in practice, in particular the Baha'i
community. The Special Rapporteur on the situation of human
rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran expressed alarm about
the systemic and systematic persecution of members of the
Baha'i community, including severe socioeconomic pressure and
arrests and detention. He also deplored the Government's
tolerance of an intensive defamation campaign aimed at
inciting discrimination and hate against Baha'is.''.
(17) On September 13, 2012, the United Nations Special
Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic
Republic of Iran issued a report (A/67/369), which stated,
``Reports and interviews submitted to the Special Rapporteur
also continue to portray a disturbing trend with regard to
religious freedom in the country. Members of both recognized
and unrecognized religions have reported various levels of
intimidation, arrest, detention and interrogation that focus
on their religious beliefs.'', and stated, ``At the time of
drafting the report, 105 members of the Baha'i community were
reported to be in detention.''.
(18) On November 27, 2012, the Third Committee of the
United Nations General Assembly adopted a draft resolution
(A/C.3/67/L.51), which noted, ``[I]ncreased persecution and
human rights violations against persons belonging to
unrecognized religious minorities, particularly members of
the Baha'i faith and their defenders, including escalating
attacks, an increase in the number of arrests and detentions,
the restriction of access to higher education on the basis of
religion, the sentencing of twelve Baha'is associated with
Baha'i educational institutions to lengthy prison terms, the
continued denial of access to employment in the public
sector, additional restrictions on participation in the
private sector, and the de facto criminalization of
membership in the Baha'i faith.''.
(19) On December 20, 2012, the United Nations General
Assembly adopted a resolution (A/RES/67/182), which called
upon the government of Iran ``[t]o eliminate discrimination
against, and exclusion of . . . members of the Baha'i Faith,
regarding access to higher education, and to eliminate the
criminalization of efforts to provide higher education to
Baha'i youth denied access to Iranian universities,'' and
``to accord all Baha'is, including those imprisoned because
of their beliefs, the due process of law and the rights that
they are constitutionally guaranteed''.
(20) On February 28, 2013, the United Nations Special
Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic
Republic of Iran issued a report (A/HRC/22/56), which stated,
``110 Bahai's are currently detained in Iran for exercising
their faith, including two women, Mrs. Zohreh Nikayin and
Mrs. Taraneh Torabi, who are reportedly nursing infants in
prison''.
(21) In March and May of 2008, intelligence officials of
the Government of Iran in Mashhad and Tehran arrested and
imprisoned Mrs. Fariba Kamalabadi, Mr. Jamaloddin Khanjani,
Mr. Afif Naeimi, Mr. Saeid Rezaie, Mr. Behrouz Tavakkoli,
Mrs. Mahvash Sabet, and Mr. Vahid Tizfahm, the seven members
of the ad hoc leadership group for the Baha'i community in
Iran.
(22) In August 2010, the Revolutionary Court in Tehran
sentenced the seven Baha'i leaders to 20-year prison terms on
charges of ``spying for Israel, insulting religious
sanctities, propaganda against the regime and spreading
corruption on earth''.
(23) The lawyer for these seven leaders, Mrs. Shirin Ebadi,
the Nobel Laureate, was denied meaningful or timely access to
the prisoners and their files, and her successors as defense
counsel were provided extremely limited access.
(24) These seven Baha'i leaders were targeted solely on the
basis of their religion.

[[Page H3582]]

(25) Beginning in May 2011, Government of Iran officials in
four cities conducted sweeping raids on the homes of dozens
of individuals associated with the Baha'i Institute for
Higher Education (BIHE) and arrested and detained several
educators associated with BIHE.
(26) In October 2011, the Revolutionary Court in Tehran
sentenced seven of these BIHE instructors and administrators,
Mr. Vahid Mahmoudi, Mr. Kamran Mortezaie, Mr. Mahmoud
Badavam, Ms. Nooshin Khadem, Mr. Farhad Sedghi, Mr. Riaz
Sobhani, and Mr. Ramin Zibaie, to prison terms for the crime
of ``membership of the deviant sect of Baha'ism, with the
goal of taking action against the security of the country, in
order to further the aims of the deviant sect and those of
organizations outside the country''.
(27) Six of these educators remain imprisoned, with Mr.
Mortezaie serving a 5-year prison term and Mr. Badavam, Ms.
Khadem, Mr. Sedghi, Mr. Sobhani, and Mr. Zibaie serving 4-
year prison terms.
(28) Since October 2011, four other BIHE educators, Ms.
Faran Hessami, Mr. Kamran Rahimian, Mr. Kayvan Rahimian, and
Mr. Shahin Negari have been sentenced to 4-year prison terms,
which they are now serving.
(29) The efforts of the Government of Iran to collect
information on individual Baha'is have recently intensified
as evidenced by a letter, dated November 5, 2011, from the
Director of the Department of Education in the county of
Shahriar in the province of Tehran, instructing the directors
of schools in his jurisdiction to ``subtly and in a
confidential manner'' collect information on Baha'i students.
(30) The Baha'i community continues to undergo intense
economic and social pressure, including an ongoing campaign
in the town of Semnan, where the Government of Iran has
harassed and detained Baha'is, closed 17 Baha'i owned
businesses in the last three years, and imprisoned several
members of the community, including three mothers along with
their infants.
(31) Ordinary Iranian citizens who belong to the Baha'i
faith are disproportionately targeted, interrogated, and
detained under the pretext of national security.
(32) The Government of Iran is party to the International
Covenants on Human Rights and is in violation of its
obligations under the Covenants.
(b) Statement of Policy.--Congress--
(1) condemns the Government of Iran for its state-sponsored
persecution of its Baha'i minority and its continued
violation of the International Covenants on Human Rights;
(2) calls on the Government of Iran to immediately release
the seven imprisoned leaders, the ten imprisoned educators,
and all other prisoners held solely on account of their
religion; and
(3) calls on the President and Secretary of State, in
cooperation with responsible nations, to immediately condemn
the Government of Iran's continued violation of human rights
and demand the immediate release of prisoners held solely on
account of their religion.

Amendment No. 128 Offered by Mr. Connolly of Virginia

Page 522, line 8, insert before the semicolon the
following: ``, including those involved in Egyptian civil
society and democratic promotion efforts through
nongovernmental organizations''.

Amendment No. 129 Offered by Ms. Ros-Lehtinen of Florida

Page 522, after line 18, insert the following:
(D) A description of the strategic objectives of the United
States regarding the provision of United States security
assistance to the Government of Egypt.
(E) A description of biennial outlays of United States
security assistance to the Government of Egypt for the
purposes of strategic planning, training, provision of
equipment, and construction of facilities, including funding
streams.
(F) A description of vetting and end-user monitoring
systems in place by both Egypt and the United States for
defense articles and training provided by the United States,
including human rights vetting.
(G) A description of actions that the Government of Egypt
is taking to--
(i) repudiate, combat, and stop incitement to violence
against the United States and United States citizens and
prohibit the transmission within its domains of satellite
television or radio channels that broadcast such incitement;
and
(ii) adopt and implement legal reforms that protect the
religious and democratic freedoms of all citizens and
residents of Egypt.
(H) Recommendations, including with respect to required
resources and actions, to maximize the effectiveness of
United States security assistance provided to Egypt.

Page 523, after line 3, insert the following:

(c) GAO Report.--Not later than 120 days after the date of
the submission of the report required under subsection (b),
the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to
the appropriate congressional committees a report that--
(1) reviews and comments on the report required under
subsection (b); and
(2) provides recommendations regarding additional actions
with respect to the provision of United States security
assistance to Egypt, if necessary.

Amendment No. 132 Offered by Mr. Lamborn of Colorado

Page 539, after line 7, insert the following new paragraph:

(4) the sale or transfer of advanced anti-aircraft weapons
systems to Syria poses a grave risk to Israel and the United
States supports Israel's right to respond to this grave
threat as needed;

Page 539, line 8, through page 540, line 12, redesignate
paragraphs (4) through (10) as paragraphs (5) through (11),
respectively.

Amendment No. 133 Offered by Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania

At the end of subtitle E of title XII of division A, add
the following new section:

SEC. 12_. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT
THE ARMS TRADE TREATY.

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act
or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 or any
fiscal year thereafter for the Department of Defense may be
obligated or expended to implement the Arms Trade Treaty, or
to make any change to existing programs, projects, or
activities as approved by Congress in furtherance of,
pursuant to, or otherwise to implement the Arms Trade Treaty,
unless the Arms Trade Treaty has been signed by the
President, received the advice and consent of the Senate, and
has been the subject of implementing legislation by the
Congress.

Amendment No. 134 Offered by Mr. Rigell of Virginia

At the end of subtitle E of title XII of division A, add
the following new section:

SEC. 12_. WAR POWERS OF CONGRESS.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) In 1793, George Washington said, ``The constitution
vests the power of declaring war in Congress; therefore no
offensive expedition of importance can be undertaken until
after they shall have deliberated upon the subject and
authorized such a measure.''.
(2) In a letter to Thomas Jefferson in 1798, James Madison
wrote: ``The constitution supposes, what the History of all
Governments demonstrates, that the Executive is the branch of
power most interested in war, and most prone to it. It has
accordingly with studied care vested the question of war to
the Legislature.''
(3) In 1973, Congress passed the War Powers Resolution
which states in section 2: ``The constitutional powers of the
President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States
Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where
imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by
the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a
declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or
(3) national emergency created by attack upon the United
States, its territories or possessions, or its armed
forces.''.
(4) In its April 1, 2011, Memorandum to President Obama,
the Office of Legal Counsel concluded: ``President Obama
could rely on his constitutional power to safeguard the
national interest by directing the anticipated military
operations in Libya--which were limited in their nature,
scope, and duration--without prior congressional
authorization.''.
(5) On June 15, 2011, in a letter to the Speaker of the
House of Representatives from the Department of Defense and
Department of State, the Departments informed Congress that
``The President is of the view that the current U.S. military
operations in Libya are consistent with the War Powers
Resolution and do not under that law require further
congressional authorization, because U.S. military operations
are distinct from the kind of `hostilities contemplated by
the Resolution's 60 day termination provision'.''.
(6) The precedence set by the Executive Branch in its
assertion that Congress plays no role in military actions
like those taken in Libya is contrary to the intent of the
Framers and of the Constitution which vests sole authority to
declare war in the Legislative Branch.
(b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act shall be
construed to authorize any use of military force.

Amendment No. 136 Offered by Mr. Broun of Georgia

At the end of subtitle E of title XII of division A, add
the following new section:

SEC. 12_. PROHIBITION ON USE OF DRONES TO KILL UNITED STATES
CITIZENS.

(a) Prohibition.--The Department of Defense may not use a
drone to kill a citizen of the United States.
(b) Exception.--The prohibition under subsection (a) shall
not apply to an individual who is actively engaged in combat
against the United States.
(c) Definition.--In this section, the term ``drone'' means
an unmanned aircraft (as defined in section 331 of the FAA
Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 40101 note)).

[[Page H3583]]

Amendment No. 138 Offered by Mr. Connolly of Virginia

At the end of subtitle E of title XII of division A, add
the following new section:

SEC. 12_. SALE OF F-16 AIRCRAFT TO TAIWAN.

The President shall carry out the sale of no fewer than 66
F-16C/D multirole fighter aircraft to Taiwan.

Amendment No. 139 Offered by Mr. Roskam of Illinois

At the end of subtitle E of title XII of division A, add
the following new section:

SEC. 12_. STATEMENT OF POLICY AND REPORT ON THE INHERENT
RIGHT OF ISRAEL TO SELF-DEFENSE.

(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation
Act of 2012 (22 U.S.C. 8601 et seq.) established the policy
of the United States to support the inherent right of Israel
to self-defense.
(2) The United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation
Act of 2012 (22 U.S.C. 8601 et seq.) expressed the sense of
Congress that the Government of the United States should
transfer to the Government of Israel defense articles and
defense services such as air refueling tankers, missile
defense capabilities, and specialized munitions.
(3) The inherent right of Israel to self-defense
necessarily includes the possession and maintenance by Israel
of an independent capability to remove existential threats to
its security and defend its vital national interests.
(b) Policy of the United States.--It is the policy of the
United States to take all necessary steps to ensure that
Israel possesses and maintains an independent capability to
remove existential threats to its security and defend its
vital national interests.
(c) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that
air refueling tankers and advanced bunker-buster munitions
should immediately be transferred to Israel to ensure our
democratic ally has an independent capability to remove any
existential threat posed by the Iranian nuclear program and
defend its vital national interests.
(d) Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter, the
President shall submit to the House and Senate Armed Services
committees, the House Foreign Affairs Committee, the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee, and the House and Senate
Appropriations committees a report that--
(1) identifies all aerial refueling platforms, bunker-
buster munitions, and other capabilities and platforms that
would contribute significantly to the maintenance by Israel
of a robust independent capability to remove existential
security threats, including nuclear and ballistic missile
facilities in Iran, and defend its vital national interests;
(2) assesses the availability for sale or transfer of items
necessary to acquire the capabilities and platforms described
in paragraph (1) as well as the legal authorities available
for making such transfers; and
(3) describes the steps the President is taking to
immediately transfer the items described in paragraph (1)
pursuant to the policy described in subsection (b).

Amendment No. 140 Offered by Mr. Bridenstine of Oklahoma

Add at the end of subtitle E of title XII the following:

SEC. 1259. REPORT ON COLLECTIVE AND NATIONAL SECURITY
IMPLICATIONS OF CENTRAL ASIAN AND SOUTH
CAUCASUS ENERGY DEVELOPMENT.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) Assured access to stable energy supplies is an enduring
concern of both the United States and the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization (NATO).
(2) Adopted in Lisbon in November 2010, the new NATO
Strategic Concept declares that ``[s]ome NATO countries will
become more dependent on foreign energy suppliers and in some
cases, on foreign energy supply and distribution networks for
their energy needs''.
(3) The report required by section 1233 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law
112-81) reaffirmed the Strategic Concept's assessment of
growing energy dependence of some members of the NATO
alliance and also noted there is value in the assured access,
protection, and delivery of energy.
(4) Development of energy resources and transit routes in
the areas surrounding the Caspian Sea can diversify sources
of supply for members of the NATO alliance, particularly
those in Eastern Europe.
(b) Report.--
(1) Report.--Not later than 270 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in
consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of
Energy, submit to the appropriate congressional committees a
detailed report on the implications of new energy resource
development and distribution networks, both planned and under
construction, in the areas surrounding the Caspian Sea for
energy security strategies of the United States and NATO.
(2) Elements.--The report required by paragraph (1) shall
include the following:
(A) An assessment of the dependence of NATO members on a
single oil or natural gas supplier or distribution network.
(B) An assessment of the potential of energy resources of
the areas surrounding the Caspian Sea to mitigate such
dependence on a single supplier or distribution network.
(C) Recommendations, if any, for ways in which the United
States can help support increased energy security for NATO
members.
(3) Submission of classified information.--The report under
this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form, but
may contain a classified annex.
(c) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this
section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees''
means--
(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on
Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and
(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on
Foreign Relations of the Senate.

Amendment No. 145 Offered by Mr. Bridenstine of Oklahoma

Page 551, after line 12, insert the following:

SEC. 1259. REPORT ON MILITARY AND SECURITY DEVELOPMENTS
INVOLVING THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

(a) Report.--Not later than June 1, 2014, and June 1 of
each year thereafter through 2017, the Secretary of Defense
shall submit to the specified congressional committees a
report, in both classified and unclassified form, on the
current and future military power of the Russian Federation
(in this section referred to as ``Russia''). The report shall
address the current and probable future course of military-
technological development of the Russian military, the tenets
and probable development of Russian security strategy and
military strategy, and military organizations and operational
concepts, for the 20-year period following submission of such
report.
(b) Matters to Be Included.--A report required under
subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An assessment of the security situation in regions
neighboring Russia.
(2) The goals and factors shaping Russian security strategy
and military strategy.
(3) Trends in Russian security and military behavior that
would be designed to achieve, or that are consistent with,
the goals described in paragraph (2).
(4) An assessment of Russia's global and regional security
objectives, including objectives that would affect the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization, the Middle East, and the
People's Republic of China.
(5) A detailed assessment of the sizes, locations, and
capabilities of Russian nuclear, special operations, land,
sea, and air forces.
(6) Developments in Russian military doctrine and training.
(7) An assessment of the proliferation activities of Russia
and Russian entities, as a supplier of materials,
technologies, or expertise relating to nuclear weapons or
other weapons of mass destruction or missile systems.
(8) Developments in Russia's asymmetric capabilities,
including its strategy and efforts to develop and deploy
cyberwarfare and electronic warfare capabilities, details on
the number of malicious cyber incidents originating from
Russia against Department of Defense infrastructure, and
associated activities originating or suspected of originating
from Russia.
(9) The strategy and capabilities of Russian space and
counterspace programs, including trends, global and regional
activities, the involvement of military and civilian
organizations, including state-owned enterprises, academic
institutions, and commercial entities, and efforts to
develop, acquire, or gain access to advanced technologies
that would enhance Russian military capabilities.
(10) Developments in Russia's nuclear program, including
the size and state of Russia's stockpile, its nuclear
strategy and associated doctrines, its civil and military
production capacities, and projections of its future
arsenals.
(11) A description of Russia's anti-access and area denial
capabilities.
(12) A description of Russia's command, control,
communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and
reconnaissance modernization program and its applications for
Russia's precision guided weapons.
(13) In consultation with the Secretary of Energy and the
Secretary of State, developments regarding United States-
Russian engagement and cooperation on security matters.
(14) The current state of United States military-to-
military contacts with the Russian Federation Armed Forces,
which shall include the following:
(A) A comprehensive and coordinated strategy for such
military-to-military contacts and updates to the strategy.
(B) A summary of all such military-to-military contacts
during the one-year period preceding the report, including a
summary of topics discussed and questions asked by the
Russian participants in those contacts.
(C) A description of such military-to-military contacts
scheduled for the 12-month period following such report and
the plan for future contacts.
(D) The Secretary's assessment of the benefits the Russians
expect to gain from such military-to-military contacts.
(E) The Secretary's assessment of the benefits the
Department of Defense expects to gain from such military-to-
military contacts, and any concerns regarding such contacts.
(F) The Secretary's assessment of how such military-to-
military contacts fit into the larger security relationship
between the United States and the Russian Federation.
(15) A description of Russian military-to-military
relationships with other countries,

[[Page H3584]]

including the size and activity of military attache offices
around the world and military education programs conducted in
Russia for other countries or in other countries for the
Russians.
(16) Other military and security developments involving
Russia that the Secretary of Defense considers relevant to
United States national security.
(c) Definition.--In this section the term ``specified
congressional committees'' means--
(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on
Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and
(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on
Foreign Relations of the Senate.

{time} 2030

Russian military modernization concerns us and our allies and our
friends, particularly those in Eastern Europe and the Caucasus. It is
imperative that Congress understand the implications of Russia's
military buildup for our bilateral relationship and regional stability.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Madam Chair, I continue to reserve the
balance of my time.
Mr. McKEON. How much time do we have left?
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California has 7 minutes
remaining.
Mr. McKEON. Madam Chair, I yield 2 minutes to my friend and
colleague, the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Broun).
Mr. BROUN of Georgia. I thank the chairman for yielding.
I am pleased to support this en bloc amendment which includes
important language to put a stop to the practice of using drones to
kill Americans and prevent any administration in the future from doing
so as well. The only exception would be if a citizen is actively
engaged in combat against the United States. Not plotting, not
suspected, but currently engaging in combat.
Attorney General Eric Holder made it perfectly clear in a recent
white paper that the administration believes that they have the right
to be judge, jury and executioner of any and all American citizens.
My amendment would correct this dangerous overreach and defend
Americans' God-given constitutionally protected rights.
However, while this will curtail the threat of drones, I'm
disappointed that another of my amendments was not made in order to
address another overarching issue.
Along with my colleague from California, Congresswoman Lee, I
sponsored an amendment to sunset the Authorization for Use of Military
Force in Afghanistan, a provision that has outrageously expanded the
powers of the Federal Government. This law has allowed our government
to engage in indefinite detention, extrajudicial targeted killing,
warrantless surveillance and wiretapping activities, and the open-ended
expansion of military operations abroad.
It's time for this provision to go. And if we need additional war
authorizations, they should be narrow and clear, as our Founders
intended. It's time to end this abuse of power by our Federal
Government. I will continue working with my colleagues on both sides of
the aisle to meet that goal and to restore liberty in America.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Madam Chair, I continue to reserve the
balance of my time.
Mr. McKEON. Madam Chair, I yield 1 minute to my good friend from
Georgia, Dr. Phil Gingrey.
Mr. GINGREY of Georgia. Madam Chair, I rise today to urge my
colleagues to support my commonsense amendment that was included in one
of the en bloc amendments to be considered tomorrow that would express
the sense of Congress that Active Duty military personnel who live in
or are stationed in Washington, D.C., should be exempt from existing
District of Columbia firearms restrictions.
It is no secret that the District of Columbia has historically had
some of the most restrictive firearm regulations in the Nation, even
after the victory for Second Amendment rights in the 2008 ruling by the
Supreme Court in the District of Columbia v. Heller. With approximately
40,000 servicemen and -women across all branches of the Armed Forces
either living in or actually stationed on Active Duty within the
Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, these individuals are subject to
the very laws of the District of Columbia that make the lawful
possession of firearms nearly impossible.
My amendment would recognize that the D.C. handgun law, especially in
regard to trained servicemen and -women, punishes individuals.
The Acting CHAIR. The time of the gentleman has expired.
Mr. McKEON. I yield an additional 1 minute to the gentleman.
Mr. GINGREY of Georgia. I thank the gentleman.
Madam Chairman, my amendment would recognize that the D.C. handgun
law, especially in regard to trained servicemen and -women, punishes
individuals well-equipped to protect themselves and others while
emboldening perpetrators of violent crime.
I urge my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to support this
amendment.
Mr. McKEON. We have no further speakers.
Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Madam Chair, I yield back the balance of my
time.
Mr. McKEON. I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. CONNOLLY. Madam Chair, I am pleased to offer a simple bipartisan
amendment with Representatives Wolf and Schneider to expand an existing
report required by Section 1242 of the bill. The amendment clarifies
that the report ought to include information on how the Egyptian
military is supporting the rights of individuals involved in civil
society and democratic promotion efforts through non-governmental
organizations or NGOs.

[[Page H3585]]

This a timely issue, given the guilty verdict rendered by an Egyptian
court June 4th against 43 NGO workers--including 17 Americans--because
of their involvement with pro-democracy groups. The guilty verdict
renews concerns about Egypt's commitment to democratic principles. In
fact, I am circulating a bipartisan letter with my Virginia colleague,
Representative Wolf, urging Egyptian President Morsi to immediately
reconsider this action and permit the NGOs to continue their important
work. So far, more than 50 Members of Congress have signed our
bipartisan letter, including Representative Schneider, who also
cosponsored this amendment.
The United States supports the aspirations of the Egyptian people to
become a free and fair society, in which all NGOs--regardless of their
nation of origin-- are allowed to operate freely. I hope that Egyptian
officials will come to this same realization and return property
confiscated from the NGOs 18 months ago, remove their staff from the
no-fly list, and permit them to continue their work supporting a fair
and open election process and helping to improve the lives of all
Egyptians.
If the U.S. government and the American people are to have any
confidence that the Egyptian government is undertaking a genuine
transition to a democratic state, under civilian control, where the
freedoms of assembly, association, religion, and expression are
guaranteed and the rule of law is upheld, then we must see a swift and
satisfactory resolution to this case.
As my colleagues will recall, this ordeal began a year and a half
ago, when Egyptian forces raided both American and non-American NGO
offices. During the raids, Egyptian forces seized records, computers,
other electronic equipment, and hard currency. At every turn Egyptian
authorities assured the NGOs and U.S. authorities that the situation
would be appropriately resolved, only to renege on their word. For
example, three days after the raids, U.S. NGOs were waiting for the
return of their confiscated property as promised by Field Marshal
Tantawi while simultaneously, another Egyptian official--Fayza Abou
Naga, the government minister in charge of coordinating foreign aid--
was holding a press conference saying the property would not be
returned. Abou Naga also accused the NGOs of illicitly funneling money
to the April 6th Youth Movement.
When I traveled to Egypt in March of last year, my colleagues and I
raised the issue of the NGOs with General Tantawi. During that trip, we
also met with the Egyptian staffers who were facing charges. They were
in a precarious position, and their situation has only worsened with
the June 4th verdict.
We cannot in good conscience ignore the results of the recent trial,
which comes on the heels of a draft law that further restricts NGOs,
fails to meet Egypt's international commitments with respect to freedom
of association, and lends credence to the opinion that there is an
ongoing war against civil society in Egypt.
U.S. law with regard to this issue is clear in the restrictions
placed on the $1.3 billion in military aid for Egypt: Prior to the
obligation of funds appropriated by this Act under the heading `Foreign
Military Financing Program,' the Secretary of State shall certify to
the Committees on Appropriations that the Government of Egypt is
supporting the transition to civilian government including holding free
and fair elections; implementing policies to protect freedom of
expression, association, and religion, and due process of law.
With the current state of affairs in Egypt, any such certification
that Egypt is, in fact, implementing policies to guarantee the pillars
of a free society would be met with skepticism. That is why news
reports of Secretary Kerry's recent action to waive the restrictions on
that military aid are of particular concern. It is not too late to
include these important NGO issues in a larger discussion about
releasing (or withholding) other tranches of money to Egypt.
Our amendment would further support the transition to democracy by
requiring the Pentagon report on how Egyptian military activities
contribute to an atmosphere where pro-democracy NGOs can operate
freely. I encourage my colleagues to support the Connolly/Wolf/
Schneider amendment and to sign the related letter to President Morsi
of Egypt.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendments en bloc offered
by the gentleman from California (Mr. McKeon).
The en bloc amendments were agreed to.

Amendments En Bloc No. 7 Offered by Mr. McKeon

Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, pursuant to H. Res. 260, I offer amendments
en bloc.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendments en bloc.
Amendments en bloc No. 7 consisting of amendment Nos. 76, 92, 93,
122, 124, 125, 131, 135, 141, 144, 147, 148, 151, 155, 162, 167, 168,
and 169, printed in House Report No. 113-108, offered by Mr. McKeon of
California:

Amendment No. 76 Offered by Ms. Schakowsky of Illinois

At the end of subtitle D of title VI, add the following new
section:

SEC. 6__. EXCHANGE STORE SYSTEM PARTICIPATION IN THE ACCORD
ON FIRE AND BUILDING SAFETY IN BANGLADESH.

(a) Special Procurement Guidance for Garments Manufactured
in Bangladesh.--The senior official of the Department of
Defense designated pursuant to section 2481(c) to oversee the
defense commissary system and the exchange store system shall
require, consistent with applicable international agreements,
that the exchange store system--
(1) for the purchase of garments manufactured in Bangladesh
for the private label brands of the exchange store system,
becomes a signatory of or otherwise complies with applicable
requirements set forth in the Accord on Fire and Building
Safety in Bangladesh;
(2) for the purchase of licensed apparel manufactured in
Bangladesh, gives a preference to licensees that are
signatories to the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in
Bangladesh; and
(3) for the purchase of garments manufactured in Bangladesh
from retail suppliers, gives a preference to retail suppliers
that are signatories to the Accord on Fire and Building
Safety in Bangladesh.
(b) Notice of Exceptions.--If any garments manufactured in
Bangladesh are purchased from suppliers that are not
signatories to the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in
Bangladesh, the Department of Defense official referred to in
subsection (a) shall notify Congress of the purchase and the
reasons therefor.
(c) Effective Date.--The requirements imposed by this
section shall take effect 90 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act or as soon after that date as the
Secretary of Defense determines to be practicable so as to
avoid disruption in garment supplies for the exchange store
system.

Amendment No. 92 Offered by Mr. Rigell of Virginia

At the end of title VIII, add the following new section:

SEC. 833. PROHIBITION ON PURCHASE OF MILITARY COINS NOT MADE
IN UNITED STATES.

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act
may be used to purchase military coins that are not produced
in the United States.

Amendment No. 93 Offered by Ms. Tsongas of Massachusetts

At the end of title VIII, insert the following new section:

SEC. 833. COMPLIANCE WITH DOMESTIC SOURCE REQUIREMENTS FOR
FOOTWEAR FURNISHED TO ENLISTED MEMBERS OF THE
ARMED FORCES UPON THEIR INITIAL ENTRY INTO THE
ARMED FORCES.

(a) Requirement.--Section 418 of title 37, United States
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
``(d)(1) In the case of athletic footwear needed by members
of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps upon their
initial entry into the armed forces, the Secretary of Defense
shall furnish such footwear directly to the members instead
of providing a cash allowance to the members for the purchase
of such footwear.
``(2) In procuring athletic footwear to comply with
paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall comply with the
requirements of section 2533a of title 10, without regard to
the applicability of any simplified acquisition threshold
under chapter 137 of title 10 (or any other provision of
law).--
``(3) This subsection does not prohibit the provision of a
cash allowance to a member described in paragraph (1) for the
purchase of athletic footwear if such footwear--
``(A) is medically required to meet unique physiological
needs of the member; and
``(B) cannot be met with athletic footwear that complies
with the requirements of this subsection.''.
(b) Certification.--The amendment made by subsection (a)
shall not take effect until the Secretary of Defense
certifies that there are at least two sources that can
provide athletic footwear to the Department of Defense that
is 100 percent compliant with section 2533a of title 10,
United States Code.

Amendment No. 122 Offered by Mr. Lynch of Massachusetts

Page 497, line 13, strike ``(g), (h), and (i)'' and insert
``(h), (i), and (j)''.
Page 497, line 15, strike ``subsection'' and insert
``subsections''.
Page 498, line 11, before the closing quotation marks
insert the following:
``(g) Matters to Be Included: Assessment of Capability of
ANSF to Provide Operations and Maintenance Functions.--The
report required under subsection (a) shall include a detailed
assessment of the capability of the Afghan National Security
Forces (ANSF) to provide operations and maintenance functions
for infrastructure projects constructed for the ANSF after
January 1, 2015, including--
``(1) a description of training provided to the ANSF by the
United States and the International Security Assistance
Force;
``(2) a comprehensive evaluation of operations and
maintenance capabilities and skills; and

[[Page H3586]]

``(3) the Government of Afghanistan's financial wherewithal
to perform or contract out such functions.

Amendment No. 124 Offered by Mr. Johnson of Georgia

At the end of subtitle C of title XII, add the following
new section:

SEC. 12_. LIMITATION ON FUNDS TO ESTABLISH PERMANENT MILITARY
INSTALLATIONS OR BASES IN AFGHANISTAN.

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act
may be obligated or expended by the United States Government
to establish any military installation or base for the
purpose of providing for the permanent stationing of United
States Armed Forces in Afghanistan.

Amendment No. 125 Offered by Mr. Schneider of Illinois

Page 509, line 7, strike ``and'' at the end.
Page 509, line 11, strike the first period, the closing
quotation marks, and the second period and insert ``; and''.
Page 509, after line 11, add the following new
subparagraph:
``(G) an analysis of how sanctions on Iran are effecting
its military capability and its ability to export terrorism
to proxy groups within its Threat Network.''.

Amendment No. 131 Offered by Mr. Schneider of Illinois

Page 539, strike lines 4 through 7 and insert the
following:
(3) the conflict in Syria threatens the vital national
security interests of Israel and the stability of Jordan,
Lebanon, and Turkey, the implications of which should be
sufficiently weighed by the President when considering policy
approaches towards the conflict in Syria;
Page 540, line 11, strike ``and'' at the end.
Page 540, line 14, strike the period at the end and insert
``; and''.
Page 540, after line 14, insert the following new
paragraph:
(11) the President should use all diplomatic means to
disrupt the flow of arms into Syria, including efforts to
dissuade Russia from further arms sales with Syria, the
influx of weapons and fighters from Hezbollah, and the
infiltration of weapons and fighters from Iran.

Amendment No. 135 Offered by Mr. Ellison of Minnesota

At the end of subtitle E of title XII of division A of the
bill, add the following:

SEC. 12XX. LIMITATION ON ASSISTANCE TO PROVIDE TEAR GAS OR
OTHER RIOT CONTROL ITEMS.

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act
may be used to provide tear gas or other riot control items
to the government of a country undergoing a transition to
democracy in the Middle East or North Africa unless the
Secretary of Defense certifies to the Committee on Armed
Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of
the House of Representatives that the security forces of such
government are not using excessive force to repress peaceful,
lawful, and organized dissent.

Amendment No. 141 Offered by Mr. Welch of Vermont

At the end of subtitle E of title XII, add the following:

SEC. 1259. REPORT ON CERTAIN FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO AFGHAN
MILITARY.

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a
report on measures to monitor and ensure that United States
financial assistance to the Afghan National Security Forces
to purchase fuel is not used to purchase fuel from Iran in
violation of United States sanctions.

Amendment No. 144 Offered by Mr. Gosar of Arizona

At the end of subtitle E of title XII of division A, add
the following new section:

SEC. 12_. ISRAEL'S RIGHT TO SELF-DEFENSE.

Congress fully supports Israel's lawful exercise of self-
defense, including actions to halt regional aggression.

Amendment No. 147 Offered by Mr. Walorski of Indiana

At the appropriate place in title XII insert the following
new section:

SEC. 12_. SENSE OF CONGRESS STRONGLY SUPPORTING THE FULL
IMPLEMENTATION OF UNITED STATES AND
INTERNATIONAL SANCTIONS ON IRAN AND URGING THE
PRESIDENT TO CONTINUE TO STRENGTHEN ENFORCEMENT
OF SANCTIONS LEGISLATION.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) On May 14, 1948, the people of Israel proclaimed the
establishment of the sovereign and independent State of
Israel.
(2) On March 28, 1949, the United States Government
recognized the establishment of the new State of Israel and
established full diplomatic relations.
(3) Since its establishment nearly 65 years ago, the modern
State of Israel has rebuilt a nation, forged a new and
dynamic democratic society, and created a thriving economic,
political, cultural, and intellectual life despite the heavy
costs of war, terrorism, and unjustified diplomatic and
economic boycotts against the people of Israel.
(4) The people of Israel have established a vibrant,
pluralistic, democratic political system, including freedom
of speech, association, and religion; a vigorously free
press; free, fair, and open elections; the rule of law; a
fully independent judiciary; and other democratic principles
and practices.
(5) Since the 1979 revolution in Iran, the leaders of the
Islamic Republic of Iran have repeatedly made threats against
the existence of the State of Israel and sponsored acts of
terrorism and violence against its citizens.
(6) On October 27, 2005, President of Iran Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad called for a world without America and Zionism.
(7) In February 2012, Supreme Leader of Iran Ali Khamenei
said of Israel, ``The Zionist regime is a true cancer tumor
on this region that should be cut off. And it definitely will
be cut off.''.
(8) In August 2012, Supreme Leader Khamenei said of Israel,
``This bogus and fake Zionist outgrowth will disappear off
the landscape of geography.''.
(9) In August 2012, President Ahmadinejad said that ``in
the new Middle East . . . there will be no trace of the
American presence and the Zionists'';
(10) The Department of State has designated the Islamic
Republic of Iran as a state sponsor of terrorism since 1984
and has characterized the Islamic Republic of Iran as the
``most active state sponsor of terrorism'' in the world.
(11) The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran has
provided weapons, training, funding, and direction to
terrorist groups, including Hamas, Hizballah, and Shiite
militias in Iraq that are responsible for the murder of
hundreds of United States service members and innocent
civilians.
(12) The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran has
provided weapons, training, and funding to the regime of
Bashar al Assad that has been used to suppress and murder its
own people.
(13) Since at least the late 1980s, the Government of the
Islamic Republic of Iran has engaged in a sustained and well-
documented pattern of illicit and deceptive activities to
acquire a nuclear weapons capability.
(14) Since September 2005, the Board of Governors of the
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has found the
Islamic Republic of Iran to be in non-compliance with its
safeguards agreement with the IAEA, which Iran is obligated
to undertake as a non-nuclear-weapon State Party to the
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, done at
Washington, London, and Moscow July 1, 1968, and entered into
force March 5, 1970 (NPT).
(15) The United Nations Security Council has adopted
multiple resolutions since 2006 demanding of the Government
of the Islamic Republic of Iran its full and sustained
suspension of all uranium enrichment-related and reprocessing
activities and its full cooperation with the IAEA on all
outstanding issues related to its nuclear activities,
particularly those concerning the possible military
dimensions of its nuclear program.
(16) The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran has
refused to comply with United Nations Security Council
resolutions or to fully cooperate with the IAEA.
(17) In November 2011, the IAEA Director General issued a
report that documented ``serious concerns regarding possible
military dimensions to Iran's nuclear programme'', and
affirmed that information available to the IAEA indicates
that ``Iran has carried out activities relevant to the
development of a nuclear explosive device'' and that some
activities may be ongoing.
(18) The Government of Iran stands in violation of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights for denying its
citizens basic freedoms, including the freedoms of
expression, religion, peaceful assembly and movement, and for
flagrantly abusing the rights of minorities and women.
(19) In his State of the Union Address on January 24, 2012,
President Barack Obama stated, ``Let there be no doubt:
America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear
weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve
that goal.''.
(20) Congress has passed and the President has signed into
law legislation imposing significant economic and diplomatic
sanctions on Iran to encourage the Government of Iran to
abandon its pursuit of nuclear weapons and end its support
for terrorism.
(21) These sanctions, while having significant effect, have
yet to persuade Iran to abandon its illicit pursuits and
comply with United Nations Security Council resolutions.
(22) More stringent enforcement of sanctions legislation,
including elements targeting oil exports and access to
foreign exchange, could still lead the Government of Iran to
change course.
(23) In his State of the Union Address on February 12,
2013, President Obama reiterated, ``The leaders of Iran must
recognize that now is the time for a diplomatic solution,
because a coalition stands united in demanding that they meet
their obligations. And we will do what is necessary to
prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon.''.
(24) On March 4, 2012, President Obama stated, ``Iran's
leaders should understand that I do not have a policy of
containment; I have a policy to prevent Iran from obtaining a
nuclear weapon.''.
(25) On October 22, 2012, President Obama said of Iran,
``The clock is ticking . . . And we're going to make sure
that if they do not meet the demands of the international
community, then we are going to take all options necessary to
make sure they don't have a nuclear weapon.''.
(26) On May 19, 2011, President Obama stated, ``Every state
has the right to self-defense, and Israel must be able to
defend itself, by itself, against any threat.''.

[[Page H3587]]

(27) On September 21, 2011, President Obama stated,
``America's commitment to Israel's security is unshakeable.
Our friendship with Israel is deep and enduring.''.
(28) On March 4, 2012, President Obama stated, ``And
whenever an effort is made to delegitimize the state of
Israel, my administration has opposed them. So there should
not be a shred of doubt by now: when the chips are down, I
have Israel's back.''.
(29) On October 22, 2012, President Obama stated, ``Israel
is a true friend. And if Israel is attacked, America will
stand with Israel. I've made that clear throughout my
presidency . . . I will stand with Israel if they are
attacked.''.
(30) In December 2012, 74 United States Senators wrote to
President Obama ``As you begin your second term as President,
we ask you to reiterate your readiness to take military
action against Iran if it continues its efforts to acquire a
nuclear weapon. In addition, we urge you to work with our
European and Middle Eastern allies to demonstrate to the
Iranians that a credible and capable multilateral coalition
exists that would support a military strike if, in the end,
this is unfortunately necessary.''.
(31) The United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation
Act of 2012 (Public Law 112-150) stated that it is United
States policy to support Israel's inherent right to self-
defense.
(b) Sense of Congress.--Congress--
(1) reaffirms the special bonds of friendship and
cooperation that have existed between the United States and
the State of Israel for more than sixty years and that enjoy
overwhelming bipartisan support in Congress and among the
people of the United States;
(2) strongly supports the close military, intelligence, and
security cooperation that President Obama has pursued with
Israel and urges this cooperation to continue and deepen;
(3) deplores and condemns, in the strongest possible terms,
the reprehensible statements and policies of the leaders of
the Islamic Republic of Iran threatening the security and
existence of Israel;
(4) recognizes the tremendous threat posed to the United
States, the West, and Israel by the Government of Iran's
continuing pursuit of a nuclear weapons capability;
(5) reiterates that the policy of the United States is to
prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon capability and
to take such action as may be necessary to implement this
policy;
(6) reaffirms its strong support for the full
implementation of United States and international sanctions
on Iran and urges the President to continue and strengthen
enforcement of sanctions legislation;
(7) declares that the United States has a vital national
interest in, and unbreakable commitment to, ensuring the
existence, survival, and security of the State of Israel, and
reaffirms United States support for Israel's right to self-
defense; and
(8) urges that, if the Government of Israel is compelled to
take military action in legitimate self-defense against
Iran's nuclear weapons program, the United States Government
should stand with Israel and provide, in accordance with
United States law and the constitutional responsibility of
Congress to authorize the use of military force, diplomatic,
military, and economic support to the Government of Israel in
its defense of its territory, people, and existence.
(c) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be
construed as an authorization for the use of force or a
declaration of war.

Amendment No. 148 Offered by Mr. Fortenberry of Nebraska

At the end of title XIII, add the following new section:

SEC. 13_. STRATEGY TO MODERNIZE COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION
AND PREVENT THE PROLIFERATION OF WEAPONS OF
MASS DESTRUCTION AND RELATED MATERIALS IN THE
MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA REGION.

(a) Strategy Required.--The Secretary of Defense, in
consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of
Energy, shall establish a comprehensive and broad
nonproliferation strategy to modernize cooperative threat
reduction and advance cooperative efforts with international
partners to reduce the threat from the proliferation of
weapons of mass destruction and related materials in the
Middle East and North Africa region.
(b) Elements.--The strategy required by subsection (a)
shall--
(1) build upon the current activities of the Departments of
Defense, State, and Energy's nonproliferation programs that
aim to mitigate the range of threats in the Middle East and
North Africa region posed by weapons of mass destruction;
(2) review issues relating to the threat from the
proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related
materials in the Middle East and North Africa region on a
regional basis as well as on a country-by-country basis;
(3) review the activities and achievements in the Middle
East and North Africa region of the Department of Defense
Cooperative Threat Reduction Program and the nonproliferation
programs at the Department of State and Department of Energy
and other United States Government agencies and departments
designed to address nuclear, radiological, chemical, and
biological safety and security issues;
(4) ensure the continued coordination of cooperative
nonproliferation efforts within the United States Government
and further mobilize and leverage additional resources from
partner nations, nongovernmental and multilateral
organizations, and international institutions;
(5) include an assessment of what countries are
financially, materially, or technologically supporting
proliferation in this region and how the strategy will
prevent, stop or interdict the support;
(6) include an estimate of associated costs required to
plan and execute the proposed cooperative threat reduction
activities in order to execute the comprehensive strategy to
prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and
related materials; and
(7) include a discussion of the metrics to measure the
strategy's and activities' success in reducing the regional
threat of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
(c) Integration and Coordination.--The strategy required by
subsection (a) shall include an assessment of gaps in current
cooperative nonproliferation efforts, an articulation of
agencies' threat reduction priorities in the Middle East and
North Africa region, the establishment of appropriate metrics
for determining success in the region, and steps to ensure
that the strategy fits in broader United States efforts to
reduce the threat from weapons of mass destruction.
(d) Consultation.--In establishing the strategy required by
subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may consult with
both governmental and nongovernmental experts from a diverse
set of views.
(e) Strategy and Implementation Plan.--Not later than March
31, 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
specified congressional committees the cooperative threat
reduction modernization strategy required by subsection (a),
as well as a plan for the implementation of the strategy
required by subsection (a).
(f) Form.--The strategy required by subsection (a) shall be
submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified
annex.
(g) Specified Congressional Committees.--In this section,
the term ``specific congressional committees'' means--
(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on
Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the
House of Representatives; and
(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on
Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the
Senate.

Amendment No. 151 Offered by Mr. Schrader of Oregon

At the end of title XVI, insert the following new section:

SEC. 1607. PROGRAM TO PROVIDE FEDERAL CONTRACTS TO EARLY
STAGE SMALL BUSINESSES.

(a) In General.--The Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et
seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 48. PROGRAM TO PROVIDE FEDERAL CONTRACTS TO EARLY
STAGE SMALL BUSINESSES.

``(a) Establishment.--The Administrator shall establish and
carry out a program in accordance with the requirements of
this section to provide improved access to Federal contract
opportunities for early stage small business concerns.
``(b) Procurement Contracts.--
``(1) In general.--In carrying out subsection (a), the
Administrator, in consultation with other Federal agencies,
shall identify procurement contracts of Federal agencies for
award under the program.
``(2) Contract awards.--Under the program established
pursuant to this section, the award of a procurement contract
of a Federal agency identified by the Administrator pursuant
to paragraph (1) shall be made by the agency to an eligible
program participant selected, and determined to be
responsible, by the agency.
``(3) Competition.--
``(A) Sole source.--A contracting officer may award a sole
source contract under this program if such concern is
determined to be a responsible contractor with respect to
performance of such contract opportunity and the contracting
officer does not have a reasonable expectation that 2 or more
early stage small business concerns will submit offers for
the contracting opportunity and in the estimation of the
contracting officer, the contract award can be made at a fair
and reasonable price.
``(B) Restricted competition.--A contracting officer may
award contracts on the basis of competition restricted to
early stage small business concerns if the contracting
officer has a reasonable expectation that not less than 2
early stage small business concerns will submit offers and
that the award can be made at a fair market price.
``(4) Contract value.--Contracts shall be awarded under
this program if its value is greater than $3,000 and less
than half the upper threshold of section 15(j)(1) of the
Small Business Act.
``(c) Eligibility.--Only an early stage small business
concern shall be eligible to compete for a contract to be
awarded under the program. The Administrator shall certify
that a small business concern is an early stage small
business concern, or the Administrator shall approve a
Federal agency, a State government, or a national certifying
entity to certify that the business meets the eligibility
criteria of an early stage small business concern.

[[Page H3588]]

``(d) Technical Assistance.--The Administrator shall
provide early stage small business concerns with technical
assistance and counseling with regard to--
``(1) applying for and competing for Federal contracts; and
``(2) fulfilling the administrative responsibilities
associated with the performance of a Federal contract.
``(e) Attainment of Contract Goals.--All contract awards
made under the program shall be counted toward the attainment
of the goals specified in section 15(g) of the Small Business
Act.
``(f) Regulations.--The Administrator shall--
``(1) issue proposed regulations to carry out this section
not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this
Act; and
``(2) issue final regulations to carry out this section not
later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
``(g) Report to Congress.--Not later than April 30, 2015,
the Administrator shall transmit to the Congress a report on
the performance of the program.
``(h) Definitions.--For purposes of this section, the
following definitions shall apply:
``(1) Program.--The term `program' means a program
established pursuant to subsection (a).
``(2) Early stage small business concern.--The term `early
stage small business concern' means a small business concern
that--
``(A) has not more than 15 employees; and
``(B) has average annual receipts that total not more than
$1,000,000, except if the concern is in an industry with an
average annual revenue standard that is less than $1,000,000,
as defined by the North American Industry Classification
System.''.
(b) Repeal of Similar Program.--Section 304 of the Small
Business Administration Reauthorization and Amendments Act of
1994 (15 U.S.C. 644 note) is repealed.

Amendment No. 155 Offered by Mr. Garcia of Florida

Page 617, after line 7, insert the following:

SEC. 2807A. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REPORT ON MILITARY HOUSING
PRIVATIZATION INITIATIVE.

Not later than 90 days after enactment of this Act, the
Secretary of Defense shall issue a report to Congress on the
Military Housing Privatization Initiative under subchapter IV
of chapter 169 of title 10, United States Code. The report
shall include the details of any project where the project
owner has outstanding local, county, city, town or State tax
obligations dating back over 12 months, as determined by a
final judgment by a tax authority.

Amendment No. 162 Offered by Mr. Pearce of New Mexico

Page 723, after line 23, insert the following:

SEC. 3145. GOVERNMENT WASTE ISOLATION PILOT PLANT EXTENSION.

(a) Extension of Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Mission.--The
Secretary of Energy shall manage WIPP in such a way as to
include, in addition to the disposal of wastes authorized by
section 213 of the Department of Energy National Security and
Military Applications of Nuclear Energy Authorization Act of
1980 (Public Law 96-164; 93 Stat. 1259, 1265), the
transportation and disposal of any non-defense Federal
Government-owned transuranic waste that can be shown to meet
the applicable criteria described in the document entitled
``Transuranic Waste Acceptance Criteria For The Waste
Isolation Pilot Plant'', published by the Department of
Energy on April 21, 2011, or any successor document.
(b) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Disposal; transuranic waste.--The terms ``disposal''
and ``transuranic waste'' have the meanings given those terms
in section 2 of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Land
Withdrawal Act (Public Law 102-579; 106 Stat. 4777).
(2) WIPP.--The term ``WIPP'' means the Waste Isolation
Pilot Plant project authorized under section 213 of the
Department of Energy National Security and Military
Applications of Nuclear Energy Authorization Act of 1980
(Public Law 96-164; 93 Stat. 1259, 1265).

Amendment No. 167 Offered by Mr. Whitfield of Kentucky

Add at the end of subtitle C of title X the following:

SEC. 1090. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ADVISORY
BOARD ON TOXIC SUBSTANCES AND WORKER HEALTH.

It is the sense of Congress that the President should
establish an Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker
Health, as described in the report of the Comptroller General
of the United States titled ``Energy Employees Compensation:
Additional Independent Oversight and Transparency Would
Improve Program's Credibility'', numbered GAO-10-302, to--
(1) advise the President concerning the review and approval
of the Department of Labor site exposure matrix;
(2) conduct periodic peer reviews of, and approve, medical
guidance for part E claims examiners with respect to the
weighing of a claimant's medical evidence;
(3) obtain periodic expert review of evidentiary
requirements for part B claims related to lung disease
regardless of approval;
(4) provide oversight over industrial hygienists,
Department of Labor staff physicians, and Department of
Labor's consulting physicians and their reports to ensure
quality, objectivity, and consistency; and
(5) coordinate exchanges of data and findings with the
Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health to the extent
necessary (under section 3624 the Energy Employees
Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (42
U.S.C. 7384o).

Amendment No. 168 Offered by Mr. Franks of Arizona

At the end of subtitle E of title XII of division A of the
bill, add the following new section:

SEC. 12_. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE ILLEGAL NUCLEAR WEAPONS
PROGRAMS OF IRAN AND NORTH KOREA.

It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the paramount security concern of the United States is
the ongoing and illegal nuclear weapons programs of the
Islamic Republic of Iran and the Democratic People's Republic
of Korea;
(2) it should be the primary objective of the President of
the United States to ensure that North Korea's nuclear
program is completely and verifiably eliminated and that
Iran, and its terrorist proxies, are not allowed to develop
nuclear weapons capability and the means to deliver them;
(3) the continuing failure to compel Iran and North Korea
to comply with their respective obligations under
international law risks greater nuclear proliferation
throughout already unstable regions by states that have
chosen, but not irreversibly so, to refrain from developing
or acquiring their own nuclear weapons capability;
(4) nuclear arms reductions by the United States and the
Russian Federation have not persuaded or otherwise
incentivized Iran and North Korea to halt or reverse their
destabilizing and dangerous nuclear weapons programs, nor
have they resulted in increased cooperation by other states
to deal with these threats; and
(5) the President should use all international fora
available to the President to pursue the complete and
verifiable elimination of the nuclear weapons programs of
Iran and North Korea as the President's paramount obligation
to the security of the American people.

Amendment No. 169 Offered by Mr. Franks of Arizona

Page 456, line 12, strike ``Secretary of the Defense'' and
insert ``Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the
Secretary of Homeland Security and the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission,''.
Page 456, line 15, after `` `TCAs')'' insert the following:
``that receive power supply from commercial or other non-
military sources''.
Page 456, line 21, strike ``Secretary of the Defense'' and
insert ``Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the
Secretary of Homeland Security and the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission,''.
Page 457, lines 3 through 4, after ``Department of
Defense'' insert the following: ``, in consultation with the
Secretary of Homeland Security and the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission,''.
Page 457, line 8, after ``Department'' insert the
following: ``, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland
Security and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,''.
Page 457, line 12, after ``Department'' insert the
following: ``, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland
Security and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,''.
Page 457, line 18, after ``Secretary of Defense'' insert
the following: ``, in consultation with the Secretary of
Homeland Security and the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission,''.

[[Page H3589]]

This would be good for our troops and good for our economy. This
amendment makes Congress' intent of the Berry Amendment explicit and
will ensure that all components of our troops' PT uniforms are made in
the U.S.A.
Madam Chair, this amendment will guarantee our troops fight and train
in American-made uniforms from head to toe.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendments en bloc offered
by the gentleman from California (Mr. McKeon).
The en bloc amendments were agreed to.
Mr. McKEON. Madam Chair, I move that the Committee do now rise.
The motion was agreed to.
Accordingly, the Committee rose; and the Speaker pro tempore (Mr.
Thornberry) having assumed the chair, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Acting Chair of
the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union, reported
that that Committee, having had under consideration the bill (H.R.
1960) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for military
activities of the Department of Defense and for military construction,
to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for
other purposes, had come to no resolution thereon.

____________________