To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2015 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

(a) Short title.—This Act may be cited as the “Carl Levin National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015”.

(1) Senator Carl Levin of Michigan was elected a member of the United States Senate on November 7, 1978, for a full term beginning January 3, 1979. He has served continuously in the Senate since that date, and was appointed as a member of the Committee on Armed Services in January 1979. He has served on the Committee on Armed Services since that date, a period of nearly 36 years.

(2) A graduate of Detroit Central High School, Senator Levin went on to Swarthmore College, and graduated from Harvard Law School in 1959, gaining admittance to the Michigan bar. He served his State as assistant attorney general and general counsel of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission from 1964–1967, and later served his hometown of Detroit as a member of the Detroit City Council from 1969–1973, and as the council’s president from 1974–1977.

(3) Senator Levin first served as chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the United States Senate for a period of the 107th Congress, and has remained chairman since the 110th Congress began in 2007. He has exercised extraordinary leadership as either the chairman or ranking minority member of the committee since the start of the 105th Congress in 1997.

(4) Each year, for the past 52 years, the Committee on Armed Services has reliably passed an annual defense authorization act, and this will be the 36th that Senator Levin has had a role in. In his capacity as member, ranking member, and chairman, he has been an advocate for a strong national defense, and has made lasting contributions to the security of our Nation.

(5) It is altogether fitting and proper that this Act, the last annual authorization act for the national defense that Senator Levin manages in and for the United States Senate as chairman of the Committee on Armed Services, be named in his honor, as provided in subsection (a).

(3) Division C–Department of Energy National Security Authorizations and Other Authorizations.

(a) In general.—The Secretary of the Navy shall take whatever steps the Secretary deems appropriate and are available to the Navy to ensure that the Navy retains the option of buying more EA–18G aircraft if further analysis of airborne electronic attack (AEA) force structure indicates the Navy should buy more EA–18G aircraft.

(b) Funding.—To the extent provided in appropriations Acts, the Secretary of the Navy may transfer from fiscal year 2014 Aircraft Procurement, Navy funds, $75,000,000 to support Navy efforts to ensure that the Navy is not prevented from deciding to buy more EA–18G aircraft by the closure of the EA–18G production line if Navy analysis indicates that buying more EA–18G aircraft is required to meet airborne electronic warfare requirements.

(c) Covered funds.—For purposes of this section, the term “fiscal year 2014 Aircraft Procurement, Navy funds” means amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 by section 101 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 690) and available for Aircraft Procurement, Navy as specified in the funding table in section 4101 of that Act (127 Stat. 1093).

(d) Effect on authorization amounts.—A transfer made from one account to another under the authority of this section shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for the account to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal to the amount transferred.

(e) Construction of authority.—The transfer authority in this section is in addition to any other transfer authority provided in this Act.

(f) Briefing.—Not later than September 1, 2014, the Secretary of the Navy shall provide briefings to the congressional defense committees on—

(1) the options available to the Navy for ensuring that the Navy will not be precluded from buying more EA–18G aircraft if that is what the Navy analysis concludes should be done; and

(2) an update on the Navy’s progress in conducting its analysis of emerging requirements for airborne electronic attack.

SEC. 122. Report on test evaluation master plan for Littoral Combat Ship seaframes and mission modules.

(a) In general.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the test evaluation master plan for the seaframes and mission modules for the Littoral Combat Ship program.

(b) Elements.—The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following elements:

(1) A description of the Navy's progress with respect to the test evaluation master plan.

(2) An assessment of whether or not completion of the test evaluation master plan will demonstrate operational effectiveness and operational suitability for both seaframes and each mission module.

SEC. 123. Authority to transfer certain funds for refueling of aircraft carrier and construction of amphibious ship.

(a) In general.—To the extent provided in appropriations Acts, upon a determination described in subsection (b), the Secretary of the Navy is authorized to transfer funds available in Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy or any other Navy procurement account for either or both of the following purposes:

(1) Up to $650,000,000 to conduct a refueling and complex overhaul of the U.S.S. George Washington (CVN–73).

(2) Up to $650,000,000 for the ship construction of a San Antonio class amphibious ship.

(b) Determination.—A determination described in this subsection is a determination by the Secretary of the Navy that—

(1) unobligated balances are available in the program or programs from which funds will be transferred pursuant to subsection (a) due to slower than expected program execution; and

(2) the transfer of funds will fill a high priority military need and is in the best interest of the Department of the Navy.

(c) Contingent authorization.—The Secretary of the Navy is authorized to enter into a contract for the procurement of one San Antonio class amphibious ship beginning in fiscal year 2015, and to use incremental funding for the procurement of that ship, if additional funds are made available for such purpose in fiscal year 2015 and the Secretary determines that such procurement will fill a high priority military need and is in the best interests of the Department of the Navy.

(e) Construction of authority.—The transfer authority under this section is in addition to any other transfer authority provided in this Act.

SEC. 132. Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of Air Force aircraft.

(a) Limitation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage any aircraft of the Air Force, except for such aircraft the Secretary of the Air Force planned to retire as of April 9, 2013, until 60 days after submittal of the report as described in subsection (b) of the report required by that subsection.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the appropriate contributions of the regular Air Force, the Air National Guard, and the Air Force Reserve to the total force structure of the Air Force.

(A) A separate presentation of mix of forces for each mission and aircraft platform of the Air Force.

(B) An analysis and recommendations for not less than 80 percent of the missions and aircraft platforms described in subparagraph (A).

SEC. 133. Temporary limitation on availability of funds for transfer of Air Force C–130H and C–130J aircraft.

(a) Limitation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to transfer from one Department of Defense facility to another any C–130H or C–130J aircraft until 60 days after the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees an assessment of the costs and benefits of the proposed transfer.

(b) Report.—The assessment referred to in subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following elements:

(1) A recommended basing alignment of C–130H2, C–130H3, and C–130J aircraft.

(2) An identification of how that plan deviates from the basing plan approved by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239).

(3) An explanation of why that plan deviates, if in any detail, from the plan approved by that Act.

(4) An assessment of the national security benefits and any other expected benefits of the proposed transfers, including benefits for the facility or facilities expected to receive the transferred aircraft.

(5) An assessment of the costs of the proposed transfers, including the impact of the proposed transfers on the facility or facilities from which the aircraft will be transferred.

(6) An analysis of the recommended basing alignment that demonstrates that the recommendation is the most effective and efficient alternative for such basing alignment.

(7) For units equipped with special capabilities, such the modular airborne firefighting system capability, an analysis of the impact of the proposed transfers on the ability to satisfy missions that utilize those capabilities.

(c) Comptroller General report.—Not later than 45 days after the Secretary of the Air Force submits the report required under subsection (a), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a sufficiency review of that report, including any findings and recommendations relating to such review.

SEC. 134. Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of A–10 aircraft.

(a) Limitation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to make significant changes to manning levels with respect to any A–10 aircraft squadrons, or to retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage any A–10 aircraft, except for such aircraft the Secretary of the Air Force, as of April 9, 2013, planned to retire.

(b) Rule of construction.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or otherwise affect the requirement to maintain the operational capability of the A–10 aircraft.

SEC. 136. Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) aircraft.

(a) Limitation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to make significant changes to manning levels with respect to any Airborne Warning and Control Systems (AWACS) aircraft, or to retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage any AWACS aircraft.

(b) Rule of construction.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or otherwise affect the requirement to maintain the operational capability of the E–3 AWACS.

(1) The capability provided by the nuclear-capable, air launched cruise missile (ALCM) is critical to maintaining a credible and effective air-delivery leg of the triad, preserving the ability to respond to geopolitical and technical surprise, and reassuring United States allies through credible extended deterrence.

(2) In its fiscal year 2015 budget request, the Air Force delayed development of the Long Range Standoff Weapon (LRSO), the follow-on for the ALCM, by three years.

(3) The Air Force plans to sustain the current ALCM, known as the AGM–86, until approximately 2030, with multiple service life extension programs required to preserve but not enhance existing ALCM capabilities.

(4) The AGM–86 was initially developed in the 1970s and deployed in the 1980s.

(6) The operating environment, particularly the sophistication of integrated air defenses, has evolved substantially since the ALCM’s inception.

(7) The AGM–86 is no longer in production and the inventory of spare bodies for required annual testing continues to diminish, posing serious challenges for long-term sustainment.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force, in coordination with the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the status of the current air-launched cruise missile and the development of the follow-on system, the long-range standoff weapon.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:

(A) An assessment of the current system’s effectiveness and survivability through 2030, including the impact of any degradation on the ability of the United States Strategic Command to meet deterrence requirements, such as the number of targets held at risk by the air-launched cruise missile or the burdens placed on other legs of the triad.

(B) A description of age-related failure trends, and assessment of potential age-related fleet-wide reliability and supportability problems, as well as the estimated costs for sustaining the existing system.

(C) A detailed plan, including initial cost estimates, for the development and deployment of the follow-on system that will achieve initial operational capability before 2030.

(D) An assessment of the feasibility and advisability of alternative development strategies, including initial cost estimates, that would achieve full operational capability before 2030.

(E) An assessment of current testing requirements and the availability of test bodies to sustain the current system over the long term.

(F) A description of the extent to which the airframe and other related components can be completed independent of the payload, as determined by the Nuclear Weapons Council.

(G) A statement of the risks assumed by not fielding an operational replacement for the existing air-launched cruise missile by 2030.

(3) FORM.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in classified form, but may include an unclassified summary.

(a) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report including a complete analysis and fielding plan for C–130 aircraft.

(b) Content.—The fielding plan submitted under subsection (a) shall also include specific details of the Air Force’s plan to maintain intra-theater airlift capacity and capability within both the active and reserve components, including its modernization and recapitalization plan for C–130H and C–130J aircraft.

(a) In general.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on options for the modernization or replacement of the T–1A aircraft capability.

(b) Elements.—The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following elements:

(D) replacing organic aircraft with leased aircraft or services while the Air Force executes a new procurement or service life extension program.

(2) An evaluation of the ability of each alternative to meet future training requirements.

(4) A description of potential cost savings from merging a T–1A capability replacement program with other Air Force programs, such as the Companion Trainer Program.

SEC. 211. Modification of authority for prizes for advanced technology achievements.

(a) Modification of limit on amount of awards.—Subsection (c)(1) of section 2374a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “The total amount” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting the following: “No prize competition may result in the award of a cash prize of more than $10,000,000.”.

(1) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections (f) and (g), respectively; and

“(f) Acceptance of funds.—In addition to such sums as may be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Secretary to award prizes under this section, the Secretary may accept funds from other Federal departments and agencies, and from State and local governments, to award prizes under this section.”.

(2) in paragraph (2), in the matter before subparagraph (A), by striking “a fiscal year” and inserting “a period of two fiscal years”; and

(3) in the subsection heading by striking “annual” and inserting“ biennial”.

(a) Modification of Joint Defense Manufacturing Technology Panel reporting requirement.—Subsection (e)(5) of section 2521 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering” and inserting “one or more individuals designated by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics for purposes of this paragraph”.

(b) Decreased frequency of update of five-year strategic plan.—Subsection (f)(3) of such section is amended by striking “on a biennial basis” and inserting “not less frequently than once every four years”.

SEC. 213. Limitation on retirement of Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar Systems aircraft.

(a) Limitation.—The Secretary of the Air Force may not make any significant changes to manning levels with respect to any operational Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar Systems (JSTARS) aircraft or take any action to retire or to prepare to retire such aircraft until the date that is 60 days after the date on which the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees the report required by subsection (b).

(b) Report.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the following:

(1) An update on the results of the analysis of alternatives for recapitalizing the current Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar Systems capability.

(2) An analysis of life cycle supports costs of maintaining the current fleet of Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar Systems aircraft and the costs of replacing such fleet with a new aircraft and radar system employing mature technology.

(3) An assessment of the cost and schedule of developing and fielding a new aircraft and radar system employing mature technology to replace the current Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar Systems aircraft.

SEC. 214. Limitation on significant modifications of Army test and evaluation capabilities.

(a) In general.—The Secretary of the Army may not undertake actions which will result in a significant modification of the test and evaluation capabilities of the Army Test and Evaluation Command within the Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB) until 30 days after the date on which the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the following:

(2) An estimate of the savings to be achieved or costs to be incurred through the proposed consolidation.

(3) The written assessment of the Director of the Test Resource Management Center (TRMC) of the Department of Defense of the proposed consolidation.

SEC. 221. Study and reports on the technological superiority of the United States military.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall, using the Defense Science Board or such other independent entity as the Secretary selects for purposes of this subsection, provide for a study of the technological superiority of the United States military and efforts to address challenges to the maintenance of such technological superiority.

(2) SCOPE OF STUDY.—The study required pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include the following:

(A) An assessment of current and anticipated foreign technological capabilities that will be deployed and will represent a significant challenge to deployed forces and systems of the United States military within 10 years of the date of the enactment of this Act.

(B) An assessment of current threats facing deployed forces and systems of the United States military that cannot be adequately addressed by systems currently being acquired or by current requirements in current acquisition programs.

(C) An assessment of the adequacy of current developmental programs and resources to address the threats described in subparagraph (B).

(D) An identification of authorities, policies, and procedures that could be adopted or adapted to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the Department of Defense in addressing challenges to the technological superiority of the United States military that are identified in the study.

(E) Such other matters relating to the technological superiority of the United States military, and current and anticipated challenges to the maintenance of such technology superiority, as the Secretary shall specify for purposes of the study.

(3) ACCESS TO INFORMATION.—The Secretary shall ensure that entity conducting the study required by paragraph (1) has appropriate access to all data, information, personnel, and records (whether classified or unclassified) necessary to conduct the study.

(4) REPORT ON STUDY.—The entity conducting the study required by paragraph (1) shall submit to the Secretary, and to Congress, a report on the study by not later than February 1, 2016.

(b) Secretary of Defense report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report setting forth the following:

(1) A list and description of current funded programs of the Department of Defense intended to achieve the deployment of capabilities to address challenges to the technological superiority of deployed forces and systems of the United States during the 10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, including the funding currently programmed for such programs.

(2) A description of the processes being used by the Department to identify challenges to the technological superiority of forces and systems described in paragraph (1), including challenges not being addressed by current requirements in current acquisition programs.

(3) A description of any authorities, policies, or procedures currently under development to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the Department in addressing challenges to the technological superiority of the United States military.

(c) Form of reports.—The reports submitted to Congress under subsections (a)(4) and (b) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

SEC. 222. Reduction in frequency of reporting by Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering.

(a) In general.—Section 139b(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(2) in paragraph (1), in the second sentence of the matter before subparagraph (A), by striking “Each report” and inserting the following:

(3) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following new paragraphs (1) and (2):

“(1) ANNUAL REPORT BY DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR DEVELOPMENTAL TEST AND EVALUATION.—Not later than March 31 of each year, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Developmental Test and Evaluation shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the activities undertaken pursuant to subsections (a) during the preceding year.

“(2) BIENNIAL REPORT BY DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING.—Not later than March 31 of every other year, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the activities undertaken pursuant to subsection (b) during the preceding two-year period.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The heading for such section is amended by striking “annual report” and inserting “annual and biennial reports”.

(c) Effective date.—The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and the first report submitted under paragraph (2) of section 139b(d) of such title, as added by subsection (a)(3), shall be submitted not later than March 31, 2015.

SEC. 231. Pilot program on assignment to Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency of private sector personnel with critical research and development expertise.

(a) Pilot program authorized.—In accordance with the provisions of this section, the Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency may carry out a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of temporarily assigning covered individuals with significant technical expertise in research and development areas of critical importance to defense missions to the Agency to lead research or development projects of the Agency.

(b) Covered individuals.—For purposes of the pilot program, a covered individual is any individual who is employed by a covered entity.

(c) Covered entities.—For purposes of the pilot program, a covered entity is any non-Federal, nongovernmental entity that—

(1) NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS ASSIGNED.—Under the pilot program, the Director may assign covered individuals to the Agency as described in subsection (a), but may not have more than five covered individuals so assigned at any given time.

(2) PERIOD OF ASSIGNMENT.— (A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the Director may, under the pilot program, assign a covered individual described in subsection (a) to lead research and development projects of the Agency for a period of not more than two years.

(B) The Director may extend the assignment of a covered individual for an additional two years as the Director considers appropriate.

(3) APPLICATION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF TITLE 5.—Except as otherwise provided in this section, the Director shall carry out the pilot program in accordance with the provisions of subchapter VI of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code, except that, for purposes of the pilot program, the term “other organization”, as used in such subchapter, shall be deemed to include a covered entity.

(4) PAY AND SUPERVISION.—A covered individual employed by a covered entity who is assigned to the Agency under the pilot program—

(A) may continue to receive pay and benefits from such covered entity with or without reimbursement by the Agency;

(1) PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES REQUIRED.—The Director shall develop practices and procedures to manage conflicts of interest and the appearance of conflicts of interest that could arise through assignments under the pilot program.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The practices and procedures required by paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, the requirement that each covered individual assigned to the Agency under the pilot program shall sign an agreement that provides for the following:

(A) The non-disclosure of any trade secrets or other nonpublic or proprietary information which is of commercial value to the covered entity from which such covered individual is assigned.

(B) The assignment of rights to intellectual property developed in the course of any research or development project under the pilot program—

(i) to the Agency and its contracting partners in accordance with applicable provisions of law regarding intellectual property rights; and

(ii) not to the covered individual or the covered entity from which such covered individual is assigned.

(C) Such additional measures as the Director considers necessary to prevent the covered individual or the employer of the covered individual from gaining unfair advantage over competitors as result of the assignment.

(f) Prohibition on charges by covered entities.—A covered entity may not charge the Federal Government, as direct or indirect costs under a Federal contract, the costs of pay or benefits paid by the covered entity to a covered individual assigned to the Agency under the pilot program.

(g) Annual report.—Not later than the first October 31 after the first fiscal year in which the Director carries out the pilot program and each October 31 thereafter that immediately follows a fiscal year in which the Director carries out the pilot program, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the activities carried out under the pilot program during the most recently completed fiscal year.

(h) Termination of authority.—The authority provided in this section shall expire on September 30, 2020, except that any covered individual assigned to the Agency under the pilot program shall continue in such assignment until the terms of such assignment have been satisfied.

(i) Nontraditional defense contractor defined.—In this section, the term “nontraditional defense contractor” has the meaning given the term in section 2302 of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 232. Pilot program on enhancement of preparation of dependents of members of Armed Forces for careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.

(a) Pilot program.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of—

(1) enhancing the preparation of covered students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics; and

(2) providing assistance to the teachers of such students to enhance preparation described in paragraph (1).

(b) Covered students.—For purposes of the pilot program, covered students are dependents of members of the Armed Forces who are enrolled in an elementary or secondary school at which the Secretary determines a significant number of such dependents are enrolled.

(4) The heads of such other Federal, State, and local government and private sector organizations as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate.

(1) Establishment of targeted internships and cooperative research opportunities at defense laboratories and other technical centers for covered students and their teachers.

(2) Efforts and activities that improve the quality of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics educational and training opportunities for covered students and their teachers.

(3) Development of travel opportunities, demonstrations, mentoring programs, and informal science education for covered students and their teachers.

(e) Metrics.—The Secretary shall establish outcome-based metrics and internal and external assessments to evaluate the merits and benefits of activities conducted under the pilot program with respect to the needs of the Department of Defense.

(f) Authorities.—In carrying out the pilot program, the Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practicable, make use of the authorities under chapter 111 and sections 2601, 2605, and 2374a of title 10, United States Code, section 219 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note), and such other authorities as the Secretary considers appropriate.

(g) Report.—Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on activities carried out under the pilot program.

(h) Termination.—The pilot program required by subsection (a) shall terminate on September 30, 2020.

SEC. 233. Modification to requirement for contractor cost-sharing in pilot program to include technology protection features during research and development of certain defense systems.

(2) by inserting “, or such other portion of such cost as the Secretary considers appropriate upon showing of good cause” after “such activities”.

(a) Method of payments under cooperative agreements.—Subsection (b) of section 103a of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670c–1) is amended—

“(2) In the case of a cooperative agreement under subsection (a)(2), such funds—

“(A) may be paid in a lump sum and include an amount intended to cover the future costs of the natural resource maintenance and improvement activities provided for under the agreement; and

“(B) may be placed by the recipient in an interest-bearing or other investment account, and any interest or income shall be applied for the same purposes as the principal.

“(3) If any funds are placed by a recipient in an interest-bearing or other investment account under paragraph (2)(B), the Secretary of Defense shall report biennially to the congressional defense committees on the disposition of such funds.”.

(b) Availability of funds; agreement under other laws.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended to read as follows:

“(c) Availability of funds; agreement under other laws.— (1) Cooperative agreements and interagency agreements entered into under this section shall be subject to the availability of funds.

“(2) Notwithstanding chapter 63 of title 31, United States Code, a cooperative agreement under this section may be used to acquire property or services for the direct benefit or use of the United States Government.”.

SEC. 312. Environmental restoration at former Naval Air Station Chincoteague, Virginia.

(a) Environmental restoration project.—Notwithstanding the administrative jurisdiction of the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration over the Wallops Flight Facility, Virginia, the Secretary of Defense may undertake an environmental restoration project in a manner consistent with chapter 160 of title 10, United States Code, at the property constituting that facility in order to provide necessary response actions for contamination from a release of a hazardous substance or a pollutant or contaminant that is attributable to the activities of the Department of Defense at the time the property was under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy or used by the Navy pursuant to a permit or license issued by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration in the area formerly known as the Naval Air Station Chincoteague, Virginia (including Naval Aviation Ordnance Test Station, Virginia). Any such project may be undertaken jointly or in conjunction with an environmental restoration project of the Administrator.

(b) Interagency agreement.—The Secretary and the Administrator may enter into an agreement or agreements to provide for the effective and efficient performance of environmental restoration projects for purposes of subsection (a). Notwithstanding section 2215 of title 10, United States Code, any such agreement may provide for environmental restoration projects conducted jointly or by one agency on behalf of the other or both agencies and for reimbursement of the agency conducting the project by the other agency for that portion of the project for which the reimbursing agency has authority to respond.

(c) Source of Department of Defense funds.—Pursuant to section 2703(c) of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary may use funds available in the Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites, account of the Department of Defense for environmental restoration projects conducted for or by the Secretary under subsection (a) and for reimbursable agreements entered into under subsection (b).

(d) No effect on compliance with environmental laws.—Nothing in this section affects or limits the application of or obligation to comply with any environmental law, including the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et. seq) and the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.).

(a) Limitation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to make a bulk purchase of a drop-in fuel for operational purposes unless the cost of that drop-in fuel is cost-competitive with the cost of a traditional fuel available for the same purpose.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the requirements of paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation under subsection (a) with respect to a purchase.

(2) NOTICE REQUIRED.—Not later than 30 days after issuing a waiver under this subsection, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees notice of the waiver. Any such notice shall include each of the following:

(B) A certification that the waiver is in the national security interest of the United States.

(1) DROP-IN FUEL.—The term “drop-in fuel” means a neat or blended liquid hydrocarbon fuel designed as a direct replacement for a traditional fuel with comparable performance characteristics and compatible with existing infrastructure and equipment.

(2) TRADITIONAL FUEL.—The term “traditional fuel” means a liquid hydrocarbon fuel derived or refined from petroleum.

(3) OPERATIONAL PURPOSES.—The term “operational purposes” means for the purposes of conducting military operations, including training, exercises, large scale demonstrations, and moving and sustaining military forces and military platforms. The term does not include research, development, testing, evaluation, fuel certification, or other demonstrations.

SEC. 314. Study on implementation of requirements for consideration of fuel logistics support requirements in planning, requirements development, and acquisition processes.

(a) Report required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report regarding the implementation of section 332 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4420; 10 U.S.C. 2911 note) (in this section referred to as “section 332”). The report shall describe the implementation to date of the requirements for consideration of fuel logistics support requirements in the planning, requirements development, and acquisition processes, including the following elements:

(1) A list of acquisition solicitations that incorporate analysis established and developed pursuant to section 332.

(2) An analysis of the extent to which Department of Defense planning, requirements development, and acquisition processes incorporate or rely on the fully burdened cost of energy and energy key performance parameter in relation to other metrics.

(3) An estimate of the total fuel costs avoided as a result of inclusion of the fully burdened cost of energy and energy key performance parameter in acquisitions, including an estimate of monetary savings and fuel volume savings.

(4) An analysis of the extent to which the energy security requirements of the Department of Defense are enhanced by incorporation of section 332 requirements in the acquisition process, and recommendations for further improving section 332 requirements to further enhance energy security and mission capability requirements.

(b) Energy security defined.—In this section, the term “energy security” has the meaning given the term in section 2924(3) of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 315. Comptroller General study of Department of Defense research and development projects and investments to increase energy security and meet energy goals requirements.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a review of Department of Defense projects, strategy, resourcing, and research, development, and investment in pursuit of increasing energy security, decreasing energy consumption and logistical burdens, reducing tactical and strategic vulnerabilities, and meeting the renewable energy goals set forth in section 2911(e) of title 10, United States Code, including by Executive Order and through related legislative mandates.

(A) specific programs, costs, and estimated and expected savings of the programs, and the methodology and accuracy of cost savings projections, including the cost of construction, maintenance, and modernization of facilities, infrastructure, and equipment relative to the costs of using traditional energy sources; and

(B) any benefits related to increased energy security, the availability of on-site renewable and hybrid energy systems when using a micro-grid, reduced energy consumption and logistical burdens, reduced tactical and strategic vulnerabilities, and assured access for the Department to reliable supplies of energy required to meet all the needs and combatant capabilities of the Armed Forces.

(b) Report.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review conducted under subsection (a), including the following elements:

(1) A description of all current Department of Defense energy research, development, and investment initiatives throughout the Department of Defense, by military service, including—

(A) the use of any renewable energy source as specified in section 2911(e)(2) of title 10, United States Code;

(B) the total dollars spent to date compared to the total dollars spent to date on the lifecycle costs of conventional energy sources;

(D) any potential benefits related to meeting Department of Defense technology development goals, increasing energy security, the availability of on-site renewable and hybrid energy systems when using a micro-grid, reduced energy consumption and logistical burdens, reduced tactical and strategic vulnerabilities, and assured access for the Department to reliable supplies of energy required to meet all the needs and combatant capabilities of the Armed Forces.

(A) the estimated and expected savings or cost increases of each of the projects;

(B) the methodology and accuracy of cost savings projections, including the cost of construction, maintenance, modernization of facilities, infrastructure, and equipment relative to the costs of using traditional energy sources;

(C) any potential benefits related to meeting Department of Defense technology development goals, increasing energy security, the availability of on-site renewable and hybrid energy systems when using a micro-grid, reduced energy consumption and logistical burdens, reduced tactical and strategic vulnerabilities, and assured access for the Department to reliable supplies of energy required to meet all the needs and combatant capabilities of the Armed Forces as described in paragraph (1), including a comparison of the lifecycle costs and benefits of renewable power to the lifecycle costs and benefits of conventional energy sources projected over future periods of 10, 20, and 30 years with reasonable consideration given to utility rate structures, costs associated with ancillary services, and anticipated transmission or other construction costs incurred or avoided by a particular type of energy project.

(A) the adequacy of the coordination by the Department of Defense among the service branches and the Department of Defense as a whole, and whether or not the Department of Defense has an effective, combat capabilities-based, and coordinated energy research, development, and investment strategy for energy projects with consideration for savings realized for dollars invested and the capitalization costs of such investments; and

(B) any potential benefits related to meeting Department of Defense technology development goals, increasing energy security, the availability of on-site renewable and hybrid energy systems when using a micro-grid, reduced energy consumption, reduced logistical burdens, reduced tactical and strategic vulnerabilities, and assured access for the Department to reliable supplies of energy required to meet all the needs and combatant capabilities of the Armed Forces.

(4) An assessment of any challenges and gaps faced by the Department of Defense between its goals and its current research, development, and investment in energy initiatives.

(5) Recommendations whether a need exists for a new energy strategy for the Department of Defense that provides the Department with assured access to reliable supplies of energy required to meet all the needs and combat capabilities of the Armed Forces.

SEC. 316. Decontamination of a portion of former bombardment area on island of Culebra, Puerto Rico.

(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that certain limited portions of the former bombardment area on the Island of Culebra should be available for safe public recreational use while the remainder of the area is most advantageously reserved as habitat for endangered and threatened species.

(b) Modification of restriction on decontamination limitation.—The first sentence of section 204(c) of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1974 (Public Law 93–166; 87 Stat. 668) shall not apply to the beaches, the campgrounds, and the Carlos Rosario Trail.

(c) Modification of deed restrictions.—Notwithstanding paragraph 9 of the quitclaim deed, the Secretary of the Army may expend funds available in the Environmental Restoration Account, Formerly Used Defense Sites, established pursuant to section 2703(a)(5) of title 10, United States Code, to decontaminate the beaches, the campgrounds, and the Carlos Rosario Trail of unexploded ordnance.

(d) Precise boundaries.—The Secretary of the Army shall determine the exact boundaries of the beaches, the campgrounds, and the Carlos Rosario Trail for purposes of this section.

(1) The term “beaches” means the portions of Carlos Rosario Beach, Flamenco Beach, and Tamarindo Beach identified in green in Figure 4 as Beach and located inside of the former bombardment area.

(2) The term “campgrounds” means the areas identified in blue in Figure 4 as Campgrounds in the former bombardment area.

(3) The term “Carlos Rosario Trail” means the trail identified in yellow in Figure 4 as the Carlos Rosario Trail and traversing the southern portion of the former bombardment area from the campground to the Carlos Rosario Beach.

(5) The term “former bombardment area” means that area on the Island of Culebra, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, consisting of approximately 408 acres, conveyed to the Commonwealth by the quitclaim deed, and subject to the first sentence of section 204(c) of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1974 (Public Law 93–166; 87 Stat. 668).

(6) The term “quitclaim deed” means the quitclaim deed from the United States of America to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico conveying the former bombardment area, signed by the Governor of Puerto Rico on December 20, 1982.

(7) The term “study” means the “Study Relating to the Presence of Unexploded Ordnance in a Portion of the Former Naval Bombardment Area of Culebra Island, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico”, dated April 20, 2012, prepared by the United States Army for the Department of Defense pursuant to section 2815 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4464).

(8) The term “unexploded ordnance” has the meaning given the term in section 101(e)(5) of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 321. Modification of annual reporting requirement related to prepositioning of materiel and equipment.

“(2) PROGRESS REPORTS.—Not later than one year after submitting the report required under paragraph (1), and annually thereafter for two years, the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report assessing the progress of the Department of Defense in implementing its strategic policy and plan for its prepositioned stocks and including any additional information related to the Department's management of its prepositioned stocks that the Comptroller General determines appropriate.”.

(B) by striking “subsections (b), (d), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j), and (k)” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting “subsections (b), (d), (e), (f), and (g).”;

(3) by redesignating subsections (g), (h), (i), (j), and (l) as subsections (d), (e), (f), (g), and (h), respectively;

(4) in subsection (d)(1), as redesignated by paragraph (3), by striking “National Response Plan” and inserting “National Response Framework (NRF)”;

(5) in subsection (e), as so redesignated, by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(3) The assessment included in the report under paragraph (1) by the Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall include a separate assessment prepared by the Commander of United States Cyber Command relating to the United States Cyber Command.”; and

(B) by redesignating subparagraphs (H) and (I) as subparagraphs (G) and (H), respectively.

“(b) It shall be the objective to the Secretary of the Army, in managing the workload of the arsenals, to maintain the critical capabilities identified in the Army Organic Industrial Base Strategy Report, and ensure cost efficiency and technical competence in peacetime, while preserving the ability to provide an effective and timely response to mobilizations, national defense contingency situations, and other emergent requirements.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 433 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 4532 and inserting the following new item:

SEC. 331. Repeal of annual report on Department of Defense operation and financial support for military museums.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 23 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 489.

SEC. 341. Limitation on MC–12 aircraft transfer to United States Special Operations Command.

(a) Limitation.—Except as provided under subsection (c), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide, may be obligated or expended for the transfer of MC–12 aircraft from the Air Force to the United States Special Operations Command until 60 days after the delivery of the report required under subsection (b).

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1, 2015, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict, in coordination with the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report with an analysis and justification for the transfer of MC–12 aircraft from the Air Force to the United States Special Operations Command.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall outline, at a minimum—

(A) the current platform requirements for manned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft to support United States Special Operations Forces;

(B) an analysis of alternatives comparing various manned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft, including U–28 aircraft, in meeting the platform requirements for manned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft to support United States Special Operations Forces;

(C) an analysis of the remaining service life of the U–28 aircraft to be divested by the United States Special Operations Command and the MC–12 aircraft to be transferred from the Air Force;

(D) the future manned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance platform requirements of the United States Special Operations Command for areas outside of Afghanistan, including range, payload, endurance, and other requirements, as defined by the Command's “Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Road Map”;

(E) an analysis of the cost to convert MC–12 aircraft to provide intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities equal to or better than those provided by the U–28 aircraft;

(F) a description of the engineering and integration needed to convert MC–12 aircraft to provide intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities equal to or better than those provided by the U–28 aircraft; and

(G) the expected annual cost to operate 16 U–28 aircraft as a government-owned, contractor operated program.

(c) Exception.—Subsection (a) does not apply to aircraft transferred from the Air Force to the United States Special Operations Command to support Aviation Foreign Internal Defense requirements.

SEC. 342. Limitation on establishment of regional Special Operations Forces Coordination Centers.

SEC. 351. Repeal of authority relating to use of military installations by Civil Reserve Air Fleet contractors.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 931 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 9513.

(1) in paragraph (4), by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting “; or”;

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 631 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“(a) In general.—The Secretary of the Navy shall establish areas, to be known as ‘Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas’, for national defense purposes. Such areas shall include each of the following:

“(1) The area that includes Naval Base Ventura County, San Nicolas Island, and Begg Rock and the adjacent and surrounding waters within the following coordinates:

“(2) The area that includes Naval Base Coronado, San Clemente Island and the adjacent and surrounding waters running parallel to shore to 3 nautical miles from the high tide line designated by part 165 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, on May 20, 2010, as the San Clemente Island 3NM Safety Zone.

“(1) INCIDENTAL TAKINGS UNDER ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF 1973.—Sections 4 and 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533, 1538) shall not apply with respect to the incidental taking of any southern sea otter in the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas in the course of conducting a military readiness activity.

“(2) INCIDENTAL TAKINGS UNDER MARINE MAMMAL PROTECTION ACT OF 1972.—Sections 101 and 102 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1371, 1372) shall not apply with respect to the incidental taking of any southern sea otter in the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas in the course of conducting a military readiness activity.

“(3) TREATMENT AS SPECIES PROPOSED TO BE LISTED.—For purposes of conducting a military readiness activity, any southern sea otter while within the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas shall be treated for the purposes of section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1536) as a member of a species that is proposed to be listed as an endangered species or a threatened species under section 4 of that Act (16 U.S.C. 1533).

“(c) Removal.—Nothing in this section or any other Federal law shall be construed to require that any southern sea otter located within the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas be removed from the Areas.

“(d) Revision or termination of exceptions.—The Secretary of the Interior may revise or terminate the application of subsection (b) if the Secretary of the Interior determines, in consultation with the Secretary of the Navy and the Marine Mammal Commission, that military activities occurring in the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas are impeding the southern sea otter conservation or the return of southern sea otters to optimum sustainable population levels.

“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Navy shall conduct monitoring and research within the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas to determine the effects of military readiness activities on the growth or decline of the southern sea otter population and on the near-shore ecosystem. Monitoring and research parameters and methods shall be determined in consultation with the Service and the Marine Mammal Commission.

“(2) REPORTS.—Not later than 24 months after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 and every three years thereafter, the Secretary of the Navy shall report to Congress and the public on monitoring undertaken pursuant to paragraph (1).

“(1) SOUTHERN SEA OTTER.—The term ‘southern sea otter’ means any member of the subspecies Enhydra lutris nereis.

“(A) when used in reference to activities subject to regulation by the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), shall have the meaning given such term in that Act; and

“(B) when used in reference to activities subject to regulation by the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) shall have the meaning given such term in that Act.

“(3) INCIDENTAL TAKING.—The term ‘incidental taking’ means any take of a southern sea otter that is incidental to, and not the purpose of, the carrying out of an otherwise lawful activity.

“(4) MILITARY READINESS ACTIVITY.—The term ‘military readiness activity’ has the meaning given that term in section 315(f) of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (16 U.S.C. 703 note) and includes all training and operations of the armed forces that relate to combat and the adequate and realistic testing of military equipment, vehicles, weapons, and sensors for proper operation and suitability for combat use.

“(5) OPTIMUM SUSTAINABLE POPULATION.—The term ‘optimum sustainable population’ means, with respect to any population stock, the number of animals that will result in the maximum productivity of the population or the species, keeping in mind the carrying capacity of the habitat and the health of the ecosystem of which they form a constituent element.”.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 631 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

(b) Conforming amendment.—Section 1 of Public Law 99–625 (16 U.S.C. 1536 note) is repealed.

(a) In general.—The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as of September 30, 2015, as follows:

(b) End strength reductions.—The end strengths prescribed by subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve component shall be proportionately reduced by—

(1) the total authorized strength of units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component which are on active duty (other than for training) at the end of the fiscal year; and

(2) the total number of individual members not in units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component who are on active duty (other than for training or for unsatisfactory participation in training) without their consent at the end of the fiscal year.

(c) End strength increases.—Whenever units or individual members of the Selected Reserve of any reserve component are released from active duty during any fiscal year, the end strength prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected Reserve of such reserve component shall be increased proportionately by the total authorized strengths of such units and by the total number of such individual members.

(1) NATIONAL GUARD.—Within the limitation provided in section 10217(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, the number of non-dual status technicians employed by the National Guard as of September 30, 2015, may not exceed the following:

(2) ARMY RESERVE.—The number of non-dual status technicians employed by the Army Reserve as of September 30, 2015, may not exceed 595.

(3) AIR FORCE RESERVE.—The number of non-dual status technicians employed by the Air Force Reserve as of September 30, 2015, may not exceed 90.

(b) Non-dual status technicians defined.—In this section, the term “non-dual status technician” has the meaning given that term in section 10217(a) of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for operational support.

(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4401.

(b) Construction of authorization.—The authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) supersedes any other authorization of appropriations (definite or indefinite) for such purpose for fiscal year 2015.

SEC. 501. Authority for three-month deferral of retirement for officers selected for selective early retirement.

(a) Warrant officers.—Section 581(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(2) by inserting after the first sentence the following new sentence: “An officer recommended for early retirement under this section, if approved for deferral, shall be retired on the date requested by the officer, and approved by the Secretary concerned, which date shall be not later than the first day of the tenth calendar month beginning after the month in which the Secretary concerned approves the report of the board which recommended the officer for early retirement.”.

(b) Officers on the active-duty list.—Section 638(b) of such title is amended—

(1) in paragraph (1), by inserting before the period at the end of subparagraph (B) the following: “, with such retirement under that section to be not later than the first day of the month beginning after the month in which the officer becomes qualified for retirement under that section, or on the first day of the seventh calendar month beginning after the month in which the Secretary concerned approves the report of the board which recommended the officer for early retirement, whichever is later”; and

(B) by inserting after the first sentence the following new sentences: “An officer recommended for early retirement under paragraph (1)(A) or section 638a of this title, if approved for deferral, shall be retired on the date requested by the officer, and approved by the Secretary concerned, which date shall be not later than the first day of the tenth calendar month beginning after the month in which the Secretary concerned approves the report of the board which recommended the officer for early retirement. The Secretary concerned may defer the retirement of an officer otherwise approved for early retirement under paragraph (1)(B), but in no case later than the first day of the tenth calendar month beginning after the month in which the Secretary concerned approves the report of the board which recommended the officer for early retirement. An officer recommended for early retirement under paragraph (2), if approved for deferral, shall be retired on the date requested by the officer, and approved by the Secretary concerned, which date shall be not later than the first day of the thirteenth calendar month beginning after the month in which the Secretary concerned approves the report of the board which recommended the officer for early retirement.”.

SEC. 502. Repeal of limits on percentage of officers who may be recommended for discharge during a fiscal year under enhanced selective discharge authority.

(2) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively.

SEC. 503. Elimination of requirement that a qualified aviator or naval flight officer be in command of an inactivated nuclear-powered aircraft carrier before decommissioning.

“(2) Paragraph (1) does not apply to command of a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier that has been inactivated for the purpose of permanent decommissioning and disposal.”.

SEC. 504. Authority to limit consideration for early retirement by selective retirement boards to particular warrant officer year groups and specialties.

(A) by striking “the list shall include each” and inserting “the list shall include—

“(B) with respect to a group of warrant officers designated under subparagraph (A) who are in a particular grade and competitive category, only those warrant officers in that grade and competitive category who are also in a particular year group or specialty, or any combination thereof determined by the Secretary concerned.”.

SEC. 505. Repeal of requirement for submittal to Congress of annual reports on joint officer management and promotion policy objectives for joint officers.

(1) JOINT OFFICER MANAGEMENT.—Section 667 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.

(2) PROMOTION POLICY OBJECTIVES FOR JOINT OFFICERS.—Section 662 of such title is amended —

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 38 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 667.

SEC. 511. Retention on reserve active-status list following nonselection for promotion of certain health professions officers and first lieutenants and lieutenants (junior grade) pursuing baccalaureate degrees.

(a) Retention of first lieutenants and lieutenants (junior grade) following nonselection for promotion.—Subsection (a)(1) of section 14701 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(A) by striking “A reserve officer of” and inserting “A reserve officer of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps described in subparagraph (B) who is required to be removed from the reserve active-status list under section 14504 of this title, or a reserve officer of”; and

“(B) A reserve officer described in this subparagraph is a reserve officer of the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps who holds the grade of first lieutenant, or a reserve officer of the Navy who holds the grade of lieutenant (junior grade), who—

“(ii) is actively pursuing an undergraduate program of education leading to a baccalaureate degree.”.

(b) Retention of health professions officers.—Such section is further amended—

“(b) Continuation of health professions officers.— (1) Notwithstanding subsection (a)(6), a health professions officer obligated to a period of service incurred under section 16201 of this title who is required to be removed from the reserve active-status list under section 14504, 14505, 14506, or 14507 of this title and who has not completed a service obligation incurred under section 16201 shall be retained on the reserve active-status list until the completion of such service obligation and then discharged, unless sooner retired or discharged under another provision of law.

“(2) The Secretary concerned may waive the applicability of paragraph (1) to any officer if the Secretary determines that completion of the service obligation of that officer is not in the best interest of the service.

“(3) A health professions officer who is continued on the reserve active-status list under this subsection who is subsequently promoted or whose name is on a list of officers recommended for promotion to the next higher grade is not required to be discharged or retired upon completion of the officer’s service obligation. Such officer may continue on the reserve active-status list as other officers of the same grade unless separated under another provision of law.”.

(a) Centralized database required.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, establish and maintain a centralized database of information on the military technician positions of the Department of Defense. The database shall contain and set forth current information on all military technician positions of the Armed Forces.

(1) An identification of each military technician position, whether dual-status or non-dual status.

SEC. 513. Improved consistency in suicide prevention and resilience program for the reserve components of the Armed Forces.

(a) Policy for standard suicide data collection, reporting and assessment.—To improve consistency in and oversight of the suicide prevention and resilience program for the National Guard and Reserves established pursuant to section 10219 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe a policy for the development of a standard method for collecting, reporting, and assessing suicide data and suicide-attempt data involving members of the National Guard and Reserves.

(b) Consultation.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop the policy required by subsection (a) in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments and the Chief of the National Guard Bureau.

(c) Submittal of policy.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit the policy developed under subsection (a) to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives.

(d) Implementation.—The Secretaries of the military departments shall implement the policy developed under subsection (a) by not later than 180 days after the date of the submittal of the policy pursuant to subsection (c).

SEC. 521. Enhancement of participation of mental health professionals in boards for correction of military records and boards for review of discharge or dismissal of members of the Armed Forces.

(a) Boards for correction of military records.—Section 1552 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

“(g) Any medical advisory opinion issued to a board established under subsection (a)(1) with respect to a member or former member of the armed forces who was diagnosed while serving in the armed forces as experiencing a mental health disorder shall include the opinion of a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist if the request for correction of records concerned relates to a mental health disorder.”.

(1) REVIEW FOR CERTAIN FORMER MEMBERS WITH PTSD OR TBI.—Subsection (d)(1) of section 1553 of such title is amended by striking “physician, clinical psychologist, or psychiatrist” the second place it appears and inserting “clinical psychologist or psychiatrist, or a physician with additional training and experience specified by the Secretary concerned to provide advice on specialized medical or psychological matters relating to post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injuries”.

(2) REVIEW FOR CERTAIN FORMER MEMBERS WITH MENTAL HEALTH DIAGNOSES.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(e) In the case of a former member of the armed forces (other than a former member covered by subsection (d)) who was diagnosed while serving in the armed forces as experiencing a mental health disorder, a board established under this section to review the former member's discharge or dismissal shall include a member who is a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist, or a physician with additional training and experience specified by the Secretary concerned to provide advice on specialized medical or psychological matters relating to mental health disorders.”.

SEC. 522. Extension of authority to conduct programs on career flexibility to enhance retention of members of the Armed Forces.

(a) Extension of program authority.—Subsection (l) of section 533 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 701 prec. note) is amended—

(2) in paragraph (1), as designated by paragraph (1) of this subsection, by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2018”; and

“(2) A member may not be reactivated to active duty in the Armed Forces under a pilot program conducted under this section after December 31, 2021.”.

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking “and 2017” and inserting “2017, and 2019”;

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking “March 1, 2019” and inserting “March 1, 2022”; and

“(4) ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS FOR FINAL REPORTS.—Each final report under this subsection shall, in addition to the elements required by paragraph (3), include the following:

“(A) A description of the costs to the military department concerned of each pilot program conducted by such military department under this section

“(B) A description of the reasons why members choose to participate in the pilot programs conducted by the military department concerned.

“(C) A description of the members who did not return to the active duty in the Armed Forces at the conclusion of their inactivation from active duty under the pilot programs conducted by the military department concerned, and a statement of the reasons why.

“(D) A statement whether the military department concerned required members to perform inactive duty training as part of participation in any pilot program conducted by such military department, and if so, a description of the members so required, a statement of the reasons why, and a description of how often.”.

SEC. 523. Sense of Senate on validated gender-neutral occupational standards for all military occupations.

(1) eliminate all unnecessary gender-based barriers to service and integrate women into occupational fields and units currently closed to them to the maximum extent possible;

(2) by not later than September 1, 2015, validate gender-neutral occupational standards for every military occupation, with such standards for each military occupation to be based solely on the necessary and required specific tasks associated with the qualifications and duties performed while serving in or assigned to such military occupation;

(3) ensure that such gender-neutral occupational standards enable the operational capability and combat effectiveness required for the military to meet national defense objectives;

(4) ensure that such validated gender-neutral occupational standards are considered in determining whether positions and occupations currently closed to service by women are opened;

(5) ensure that the surgeon general of the Armed Force concerned has evaluated the medical requirements and has determined that resources to meet such requirements will be adequate for female members for the military occupations or units to which they will be assigned;

(6) ensure that the Chief of Service of the Armed Force concerned has evaluated the table of equipment for the unit or position for the military occupations or units to which they will be assigned and has determined that all required equipment for female members meets required standards for wear and survivability; and

(7) by not later than January 1, 2016, open all military occupations to service by women who can meet such validated gender-neutral occupational standards for the military occupations to which they will be assigned, if determined to be in the best interests of the national defense of the United States, and ensure that all members of the Armed Forces, regardless of gender, are assigned to units on the basis of their ability to meet the occupational standards required by such assignment.

SEC. 524. Comptroller General of the United States report on impact of certain mental and physical trauma on discharges from military service for misconduct.

(a) Report required.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report on the impact of mental and physical trauma relating to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), behavioral health matters not related to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, and other neurological combat traumas (in this section referred to as “covered traumas”) on the discharge of members of the Armed Forces from the Armed Forces for misconduct.

(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:

(1) An assessment of the extent to which the Armed Forces have in place processes for the consideration of the impact of mental and physical trauma relating to covered traumas on members of the Armed Forces who are being considered for discharge from the Armed Forces for misconduct, including the compliance of the Armed Forces with such processes and mechanisms in the Department of Defense for ensuring the compliance of the Armed Forces with such processes.

(2) An assessment of the extent to which the Armed Forces provide members of the Armed Forces, including commanding officers, junior officers, and noncommissioned officers, training on the symptoms of covered traumas and the identification of the presence of such conditions in members of the Armed Forces.

(3) An assessment of the extent to which members of the Armed Forces who receive treatment for a covered trauma before discharge from the Armed Forces are later discharged from the Armed Forces for misconduct.

(4) An identification of the number of members of the Armed Forces discharged as described in paragraph (3) who are ineligible for benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs based on characterization of discharge.

(5) An assessment of the extent to which members of the Armed Forces who accept a discharge from the Armed Forces for misconduct in lieu of trial by court-martial are counseled on the potential for ineligibility for benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs as a result of such discharge before acceptance of such discharge.

SEC. 525. Sense of Senate on upgrade of characterization of discharge of certain Vietnam era members of the Armed Forces.

(a) Sense of Senate.—It is the sense of the Senate that, when considering a request for correction of a less-than-honorable discharge issued to a member of the Armed Forces during the Vietnam era, the Boards for Correction of Military Records—

(B) following such service, was diagnosed with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder as a result of such service after Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder was included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders of the American Psychiatric Association; and

(2) if the veteran meets the criteria specified in paragraph (1), should give all due consideration to an upgrade of characterization of discharge.

(b) Vietnam era defined.—In this section, the term “Vietnam era” has the meaning given that term in section 101(29) of title 38, United States Code.

SEC. 531. Enhancement of authority for members of the Armed Forces to obtain professional credentials.

(a) In general.—Section 2015 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“§ 2015. Professional credentials: program to assist members in obtaining credentials

“(a) Program required.— (1) Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security, with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy, shall carry out a program to enable members of the armed forces to obtain, while serving in the armed forces, professional credentials that relate to training and skills that are acquired during their service in the armed forces and translate into civilian occupations.

“(2) The program shall provide for the payment of expenses of members for professional accreditation, Federal occupational licenses, State-imposed and professional licenses, professional certification, and related expenses.

“(b) Limitation.—The authority under subsection (a) may not be used to pay the expenses of a member to obtain professional credentials that are a prerequisite for appointment in the armed forces.

“(c) Regulations.— (1) The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section.

“(2) The regulations shall apply uniformly to the armed forces to the extent practicable.

“(A) Requirements for eligibility for participation in the program under this section.

“(B) A description of the professional credentials and occupations covered by the program.

“(C) Mechanisms for oversight of the payment of expenses and the provision of other benefits under the program.

“(D) Such other matters in connection with the payment of expenses and the provision of other benefits under the program as the Secretaries consider appropriate.

“(d) Expenses defined.—In this section, the term ‘expenses’ means expenses for class room instruction, hands-on training (and associated materials), manuals, study guides and materials, text books, processing fees, and test fees and related fees.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 101 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 2015 and inserting the following new item:

(a) In general.—Chapter 108 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2163 the following new section:

“§ 2163a. Degree granting authority for Joint Special Operations University

“(a) Authority.—Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the President of the Joint Special Operations University may, upon the recommendation of the faculty of the Joint Special Operations University, confer appropriate degrees upon graduates who meet the degree requirements.

“(1) the Secretary of Education has recommended approval of the degree in accordance with the Federal Policy Governing Granting of Academic Degrees by Federal Agencies; and

“(2) the Joint Special Operations University is accredited by the appropriate civilian academic accrediting agency or organization to award the degree, as determined by the Secretary of Education.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 108 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2163 the following new item:

SEC. 533. Enhancement of information provided to members of the Armed Forces and veterans regarding use of Post-9/11 Educational Assistance and Federal financial aid through Transition Assistance Program.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall enhance the higher education component of the Transition Assistance Program (TAP) of the Department of Defense by providing additional information that is more complete and accurate than the information provided as of the day before the date of the enactment of this Act to individuals who apply for educational assistance under chapter 30 or 33 of title 38, United States Code, to pursue of a program of education at an institution of higher learning.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The additional information required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:

(i) to the extent practicable, differences between types of institutions of higher learning in such matters as tuition and fees, admission requirements, accreditation, transferability of credits, credit for qualifying military training, time required to complete a degree, and retention and job placement rates; and

(ii) how Federal educational assistance provided under title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070 et seq.) should be used in conjunction with educational assistance provided under chapters 30 and 33 of title 38, United States Code, for pursuit of a program of education at an institution of higher learning before using private student loans whenever possible.

(B) Information from the Federal Trade Commission that addresses important questions that veterans should consider when choosing an institution of higher learning at which to pursue a program of education.

(C) Information about the Postsecondary Education Complaint System of the Department of Defense, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Department of Education, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

(D) Information about the GI Bill Comparison Tool of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

(E) Information about each of the Principles of Excellence established by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and the Secretary of Education pursuant to Executive Order 13607 of April 27, 2012 (77 Fed. Reg. 25861), including how to recognize whether an educational institution may be violating any of such principles.

(3) ACCESSIBILITY.— (A) In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary of Defense shall consult with individuals who are experts on the presentation of complex information in formats and manners that are engaging to members of the Armed Forces and veterans.

(B) In carrying out this subsection and presenting information to members of the Armed Forces or veterans, the Secretary of Defense shall avoid using abstract terms and shall focus on the practical effects of relevant factors relating to attending educational institutions.

(4) CONSULTATION.—In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary of Defense shall consult with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

(b) Availability of higher education component online.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the higher education component of the Transition Assistance Program is available to members of the Armed Forces on an Internet website of the Department of Defense so that members have an option to complete such component electronically and remotely.

(c) Notice of availability of higher education component upon request for certificate of entitlement to Tuition Assistance.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Whenever a member of the Armed Forces requests a certificate from the Secretary of Defense to prove entitlement to educational assistance under section 2007 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary shall notify the member of the availability of the higher education component of the Transition Assistance Program online pursuant to subsection (b)(1).

(2) GUIDANCE.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out this subsection with such guidance as the Secretary considers appropriate.

(1) The term “institution of higher learning” has the meaning given such term in section 3452 of title 38, United States Code.

(2) The term “type of institution of higher learning” means the following types of institutions of higher learning:

(A) An educational institution described in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a)).

(B) An educational institution described in subsection (b) of section 102 of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1002).

SEC. 534. Duration of foreign and cultural exchange activities at military service academies.

(a) Military Academy.—Section 4345a(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “two weeks” and inserting “four weeks”.

(b) Naval Academy.—Section 6957b(a) of such title is amended by striking “two weeks” and inserting “four weeks”.

“(a) (1) At any time after charges have been signed as provided in section 830 of this title (article 30), oral or written depositions may be ordered as follows:

“(A) Before referral of such charges for trial, by the convening authority who has such charges for disposition.

“(B) After referral of such charges for trial, by the convening authority or the military judge hearing the case.

“(2) An authority authorized to order a deposition under paragraph (1) may order the deposition at the request of any party, but only if the party demonstrates that, due to exceptional circumstances, it is in the interest of justice that the testimony of the prospective witness be taken and preserved for use at a preliminary hearing under section 832 of this title (article 32) or a court-martial.

“(3) If a deposition is to be taken before charges are referred for trial, the authority under paragraph (1)(A) may designate commissioned officers as counsel for the Government and counsel for the accused, and may authorize those officers to take the deposition of any witness.”.

SEC. 542. Modification of Rule 513 of the Military Rules of Evidence, relating to the privilege against disclosure of communications between psychotherapists and patients.

(1) To include within the communications covered by the privilege communications with other licensed mental health professionals.

(2) To clarify or eliminate the current exception to the privilege when the admission or disclosure of a communication is constitutionally required.

(3) To require that a party seeking production or admission of records or communications protected by the privilege—

(A) show a specific factual basis demonstrating a reasonable likelihood that the records or communications would yield evidence admissible under an exception to the privilege;

(B) demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the requested information meets one of the enumerated exceptions to the privilege;

(D) show that the party made reasonable efforts to obtain the same or substantially similar information through non-privileged sources.

(4) To authorize the military judge to conduct a review in camera of records or communications only when—

(A) the moving party has met its burden as established pursuant to paragraph (3); and

(B) an examination of the information is necessary to rule on the production or admissibility of protected records or communications.

(5) To require that any production or disclosure permitted by the military judge be narrowly tailored to only the specific records or communications, or portions of such records or communications, that meet the requirements for one of the enumerated exceptions to the privilege and are included in the stated purpose for which the such records or communications are sought.

SEC. 543. Enhancement of victims' rights to be heard through counsel in connection with prosecution of certain sex-related offenses.

(a) Representation by Special Victims' Counsels.—Section 1044e(b)(6) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Accompanying the victim” and inserting “Representing the victim”.

(b) Manual for Courts-Martial.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Manual for Courts-Martial shall be modified to provide that when a victim of an alleged sex-related offense has a right to be heard in connection with the prosecution of such offense, the victim may exercise that right through counsel, including through a Special Victims' Counsel under section 1044e of title 10, United States Code (as amended by subsection (a)).

(c) Notice to counsel on scheduling of proceedings.—Each Secretary concerned shall establish policies and procedures designed to ensure that any counsel of the victim of an alleged sex-related offense, including a Special Victims' Counsel under section 1044e of title 10, United States Code (as so amended), is provided prompt and adequate notice of the scheduling of any hearing, trial, or other proceeding in connection with the prosecution of such offense in order to permit such counsel the opportunity to prepare for such proceeding.

(1) The term “alleged sex-related offense” has the meaning given that term in section 1044e(g) of title 10, United States Code.

(2) The term “Secretary concerned” has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 544. Eligibility of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces for assistance of Special Victims' Counsel.

“(3) A member of a reserve component who is the victim of an alleged sex-related offense and who is not otherwise eligible for military legal assistance under section 1044 of this title shall be deemed to be eligible for the assistance of a Special Victims’ Counsel under this section.”.

SEC. 545. Additional enhancements of military department actions on sexual assault prevention and response.

(a) Additional duty of Special Victims' Counsels.—In addition to any duties authorized by section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, a Special Victims’ Counsel designated under subsection (a) of such section shall provide advice to victims of sexual assault on the advantages and disadvantages of prosecution of the offense concerned by court-martial or by a civilian court with jurisdiction over the offense before such victims express their preference as to the prosecution of the offense under subsection (b).

(b) Consultation with victims regarding preference in prosecution of certain sexual offenses.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretaries of the military departments shall each establish a process to ensure consultation with the victim of a covered sexual offense that occurs in the United States with respect to the victim's preference as to whether the offense should be prosecuted by court-martial or by a civilian court with jurisdiction over the offense.

(2) CONSIDERATION OF PREFERENCE.—The preference expressed by a victim under paragraph (1) with respect to the prosecution of an offense, while not binding, should be considered in the determination whether to prosecute the offense by court-martial or by a civilian court.

(3) NOTICE TO VICTIM OF LACK OF CIVILIAN CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AFTER PREFERENCE FOR SUCH PROSECUTION.—In the event a victim expresses a preference under paragraph (1) in favor of prosecution of an offense by civilian court and the civilian authorities determine to decline prosecution, or defer to prosecution by court-martial, the victim shall be promptly notified of that determination.

(1) APPRAISALS OF ALL MEMBERS ON COMPLIANCE WITH SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PROGRAMS.—The Secretaries of the military departments shall each ensure that the written performance appraisals of members of the Armed Forces (whether officers or enlisted members) under the jurisdiction of such Secretary include an assessment of the extent to which each such member supports the sexual assault prevention and response program of the Armed Force concerned.

(2) PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS OF COMMANDING OFFICERS.—The Secretaries of the military departments shall each ensure that the performance appraisals of commanding officers under the jurisdiction of such Secretary indicate the extent to which each such commanding officer has or has not established a command climate in which—

(A) allegations of sexual assault would be properly managed and fairly evaluated; and

(B) a victim can report criminal activity, including sexual assault, without fear of retaliation, including ostracism and group pressure from other members of the command.

(d) Review of command climate assessments following incidents of certain sexual offenses.—Section 1743(c)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 979; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended by inserting at the end the following new subparagraph:

“(F) A review of the most recent climate assessment conducted pursuant to section 572(a)(3) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1754) for the command or unit of the suspect and the command or unit of the victim, and an assessment of whether another such climate assessment should be conducted.”.

(e) Confidential review of characterization of terms of discharge of victims of sexual offenses.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretaries of the military departments shall each establish a confidential process, through boards for the correction of military records of the military department concerned, by which an individual who was the victim of a covered sexual offense during service in the Armed Forces may challenge, on the basis of being the victim of such an offense, the terms or characterization of the individual's discharge or separation from the Armed Forces.

(2) CONSIDERATION OF INDIVIDUAL EXPERIENCES IN CONNECTION WITH OFFENSES.—In deciding whether to modify the terms or characterization of an individual's discharge or separation pursuant to the process required by paragraph (1), the Secretary of the military department concerned shall instruct boards to give due consideration to the psychological and physical aspects of the individual’s experience in connection with the offense concerned, and to determine what bearing such experience may have had on the circumstances surrounding the individual's discharge or separation from the Armed Forces.

(3) PRESERVATION OF CONFIDENTIALITY.—Documents considered and decisions rendered pursuant to the process required by paragraph (1) shall not be made available to the public, except with the consent of the individual concerned.

(f) Covered sexual offense defined.—In subsections (a) through (e), the term “covered sexual offense” means any of the following:

(1) Rape or sexual assault under subsection (a) or (b) of section 920 of title 10, United States Code (article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

(2) Forcible sodomy under section 925 of such title (article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

(3) An attempt to commit an offense specified in paragraph (1) or (2) as punishable under section 880 of such title (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

(g) Modification of military rules of evidence relating to admissibility of general military character toward probability of innocence.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, Rule 404(a) of the Military Rules of Evidence shall be amended to provide that the general military character of an accused is not admissible for the purpose of showing the probability of innocence of the accused for an offense specified in paragraph (2).

(2) OFFENSES.—An offense specified in this paragraph is an offense as follows:

(A) An offense under sections 920 through 923a of title 10, United States Code (articles 120 through 123a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

(B) An offense under sections 925 through 927 of such title (articles 125 through 127 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

(C) An offense under sections 929 through 932 of such title (articles 129 through 132 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

(D) Any other offense under chapter 47 of such title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) in which evidence of the general military character of the accused is not relevant to an element of an offense for which the accused has been charged.

(E) An attempt to commit an offense specified in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (D) as punishable under section 880 of such title (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

(F) A conspiracy to commit an offense specified in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (D) as punishable under section 881 of such title (article 81 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

SEC. 546. Review of decisions not to refer charges of certain sex-related offenses for trial by court-martial if requested by chief prosecutor.

(1) by striking “(c)” and all that follows through “In any case where” and inserting the following:

“(1) CASES NOT REFERRED FOLLOWING STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE RECOMMENDATION FOR REFERRAL FOR TRIAL.—In any case where”; and

“(2) CASES NOT REFERRED BY CONVENING AUTHORITY UPON REQUEST FOR REVIEW BY CHIEF PROSECUTOR.—

“(A) IN GENERAL.—In any case where a convening authority decides not to refer a charge of a sex-related offense to trial by court-martial and the chief prosecutor of the Armed Force concerned requests review of the decision, the Secretary of the military department concerned shall review the decision as a superior authority authorized to exercise general court-martial convening authority.

“(B) CHIEF PROSECUTOR DEFINED.—In this paragraph, the term ‘chief prosecutor’ means the chief prosecutor or equivalent position of an Armed Force, or, if an Armed Force does not have a chief prosecutor or equivalent position, such other trial counsel as shall be designated by the Judge Advocate General of that Armed Force, or in the case of the Marine Corps, the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps.”.

SEC. 547. Modification of Department of Defense policy on retention of evidence in a sexual assault case to permit return of personal property upon completion of related proceedings.

“(f) Return of personal property upon completion of related proceedings.—Notwithstanding subsection (c)(4)(A), personal property retained as evidence in connection with an incident of sexual assault involving a member of the Armed Forces may be returned to the rightful owner of such property after the conclusion of all legal, adverse action, and administrative proceedings related to such incident.”.

SEC. 548. Inclusion of information on assaults in the Defense Sexual Assault Incident Database.

(a) Inclusion of information.—The Secretary of Defense shall issue policies and procedures for the inclusion of information about assaults in the Defense Sexual Assault Incident Database, or an alternate database selected by the Secretary, as identified in restricted reports and unrestricted reports of sexual assault by members of the Armed Forces.

(b) Information.—The information required by subsection (a) to be included in the database described in that subsection shall include the following:

(5) Information on the means or method used by the alleged assailant to commit the assault.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The policies and procedures issued under subsection (a) shall specify the categories of individuals who shall have access to information including pursuant to that subsection in the database described in that subsection.

(2) INFORMATION DERIVED FROM RESTRICTED REPORTS.—With respect to information so included is derived from restricted reports, the policies and procedures shall—

SEC. 549. Technical revisions and clarifications of certain provisions in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 relating to the military justice system.

(a) Revisions of article 32 and article 60, Uniform Code of Military Justice.—

(1) EXPLICIT AUTHORITY FOR CONVENING AUTHORITY TO TAKE ACTION ON FINDINGS OF A COURT-MARTIAL WITH RESPECT TO A QUALIFYING OFFENSE.—Paragraph (3) of subsection (c) of section 860 of title 10, United States Code (article 60 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 1702(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 955), is amended—

(A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting “and may be taken only with respect to a qualifying offense” after “is not required”; and

(ii) by striking “, other than a charge or specification for a qualifying offense,” and inserting “for a qualifying offense” in clauses (i) and (ii).

(2) CLARIFICATION OF APPLICABILITY OF REQUIREMENT FOR EXPLANATION IN WRITING FOR MODIFICATION TO FINDINGS OF A COURT-MARTIAL.—Subparagraph (C) of such paragraph is amended by striking “(other than a qualifying offense)”.

(3) VICTIM SUBMISSION OF MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION BY CONVENING AUTHORITY DURING CLEMENCY PHASE OF COURTS-MARTIAL PROCESS.—

(A) CLARIFICATION OF DEADLINE.—Paragraph (2)(A) of subsection (d) of such section (article), as added by section 1706(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 960), is amended—

(i) in clause (i), by inserting “, if applicable” after “(article 54(e))”; and

(B) CONFORMING DEFINITION OF VICTIM WITH OTHER DEFINITIONS OF VICTIM IN NDAA FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014.—Paragraph (5) of such subsection, as added by section 1706(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2014, is amended by striking “loss” and inserting “harm”.

(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 832(a)(1) of such title (article 32(a)(1) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 1702(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 954), is amended by inserting “, unless such hearing is waived by the accused” after “preliminary hearing”.

(B) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 834(a)(2) of such title (article 34(a)(2) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 1702(c)(3)(B) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 957), is amended by inserting “(if there is such a report)” after “a preliminary hearing under section 832 of this title (article 32)”.

(5) NON-APPLICABILITY OF PROHIBITION ON PRE-TRIAL AGREEMENTS FOR CERTAIN OFFENSES WITH MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCES.—Section 860(c)(4)(C)(ii) of such title (article 60(c)(4)(C)(ii) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 1702(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 955), is amended by inserting “pursuant to section 856(b) of this title (article 56(b))” after “applies”.

(A) ARTICLE 32 AMENDMENTS AND RELATED AMENDMENTS.—The amendments made paragraph (4) shall take effect on the later of—

(ii) December 26, 2014, in which case the amendment made by paragraph (4)(A) shall be made immediately after the amendment made by section 1702(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 954).

(i) IMMEDIATE EFFECT.—The amendments made by paragraph (3) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.

(ii) DELAYED EFFECT.—The amendments made by paragraphs (1), (2), and (5) shall take effect on the later of—

(II) June 26, 2014, in which case such amendments shall be made immediately after the amendment made by section 1702(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 955).

(1) REQUESTS TO INTERVIEW VICTIM THROUGH COUNSEL.—Paragraph (1) of section 846(b) of title 10, United States Code (article 46(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 1704 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 958), is amended by striking “through trial counsel” and inserting “through the Special Victims’ Counsel or other counsel for the victim, if applicable”.

(2) CORRECTION OF REFERENCES TO TRIAL COUNSEL.—Such section is further amended by striking “trial counsel” each place it appears and inserting “counsel for the Government”.

(3) CORRECTION OF REFERENCES TO DEFENSE COUNSEL.—Such section is further amended—

(A) in the heading, by striking “Defense counsel” and inserting “Counsel for accused”; and

(B) by striking “defense counsel” each place it appears and inserting “counsel for the accused”.

(1) CLARIFICATION OF LEGAL ASSISTANCE AUTHORIZED WITH REGARD TO POTENTIAL CIVIL LITIGATION AGAINST THE UNITED STATES.—Subsection (b)(4) of section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 1716(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (127 Stat. 966), is amended by striking “the Department of Defense” and inserting “the United States”.

(2) ADDITION OF OMITTED REFERENCE TO STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE TO THE COMMANDANT OF THE MARINE CORPS.—Subsection (d)(2) of such section is amended by inserting “, and within the Marine Corps, by the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps” after “employed”.

(3) CORRECTION OF INCORRECT REFERENCE TO SECRETARY OF DEFENSE.—Subsection (e)(1) of such section is amended by inserting “concerned” after “jurisdiction of the Secretary”.

(d) Repeal of offense of consensual sodomy under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.—

(1) CLARIFICATION OF DEFINITION OF FORCIBLE SODOMY.—Section 925(a) of title 10, United States Code (article 125(a) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 1707 of the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 961), is amended by striking “force” and inserting “unlawful force”.

(A) Section 843(b)(2)(B) of such title (article 43(b)(2)(B) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended—

(i) in clause (iii), by striking “Sodomy” and inserting “Forcible sodomy”; and

(ii) in clause (v), by striking “sodomy” and inserting “forcible sodomy”.

(B) Section 918(4) of such title (article 118(4) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by striking “sodomy” and inserting “forcible sodomy”.

(e) Clarification of scope of prospective members of the Armed Forces for purposes of inappropriate and prohibited relationships.—Section 1741(e)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 977; 10 U.S.C. prec. 501 note) is amended by inserting “who is pursing or has recently pursued becoming a member of the Armed Forces and” after “a person”.

(f) Extension of crime victims’ rights to victims of offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.—

(1) CLARIFICATION OF LIMITATION ON DEFINITION OF VICTIM TO NATURAL PERSONS.—Subsection (b) of section 806b of title 10, United States Code (article 6b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by section 1701 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 952), is amended by striking “a person” and inserting “an individual”.

(2) CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO APPOINT INDIVIDUALS TO ASSUME RIGHTS OF CERTAIN VICTIMS.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended—

(A) in the heading, by striking “legal guardian” and inserting “appointment of individuals to assume rights”;

(B) by inserting “(who is not a member of the armed forces)” after “under 18 years of age”;

(D) by striking “other suitable person” and inserting “another suitable individual”; and

SEC. 550. Applicability of sexual assault prevention and response and related military justice enhancements to military service academies.

(a) Military service academies.—The Secretary of the military department concerned shall ensure that the provisions of title XVII of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 950), as amended by the provisions of this subtitle, and the provisions and amendments of this subtitle, apply to the United States Military Academy, the Naval Academy, and the Air Force Academy, as applicable.

(b) Coast Guard Academy.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall ensure that the provisions of title XVII of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, as amended by the provisions of this subtitle, and the provisions and amendments of this subtitle, apply to the Coast Guard Academy.

SEC. 551. Analysis and assessment of disposition of most serious offenses identified in unrestricted reports on sexual assaults in annual reports on sexual assaults in the Armed Forces.

(a) Submittal to Secretary of Defense of information on each Armed Force.—Subsection (b) of section 1631 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(11) An analysis of the disposition of the most serious offenses occurring during sexual assaults committed by members of the Armed Force during the year covered by the report, as identified in unrestricted reports of sexual assault by any members of the Armed Forces, including the numbers of reports identifying offenses that were disposed of by each of the following:

“(A) Conviction by court-martial, including a separate statement of the most serious charge preferred and the most serious charge for which convicted.

“(C) Non-judicial punishment under section 815 of title 10, United States Code (article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

“(D) Administrative action, including by each type of administrative action imposed.

“(E) Dismissal of all charges, including by reason for dismissal and by stage of proceedings in which dismissal occurred.”.

(b) Secretary of Defense assessment of information in reports to Congress.—Subsection (d) of such section is amended—

“(2) an assessment of the information submitted to the Secretary pursuant to subsection (b)(11); and”; and

(4) in paragraph (3), as redesignated by paragraph (2) of this subsection, by inserting “other” before “assessments”.

(c) Application of amendments.—The amendments made by this section shall apply beginning with the report regarding sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces required to be submitted by March 1, 2015, under section 1631 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011.

SEC. 552. Defense Advisory Committee on Investigation, Prosecution, and Defense of Sexual Assault in the Armed Forces.

(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish and maintain within the Department of Defense an advisory committee to be known as the “Defense Advisory Committee on Investigation, Prosecution, and Defense of Sexual Assault in the Armed Forces” (in this section referred to as the “Advisory Committee”).

(b) Membership.—The Advisory Committee shall consist of not more than 20 members, appointed by the President from among individuals (other than members of the Armed Forces) who have experience with the investigation, prosecution, and defense of allegations of sexual assault offenses (such as Federal and State prosecutors, judges, law professors, and private attorneys).

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Advisory Committee shall advise the Secretary of Defense on the investigation, prosecution, and defense of allegations of rape, forcible sodomy, sexual assault, and other sexual misconduct in the Armed Forces.

(2) BASIS FOR PROVISION OF ADVICE.—For purposes of providing advice to the Secretary pursuant to this subsection, the Advisory Committee shall, on an ongoing basis—

(A) select a representative sample of cases involving allegations of rape, forcible sodomy, sexual assault, and other sexual misconduct in the Armed Forces; and

(i) The criminal investigation reports (including reports of investigations that did not substantiate the alleged offense).

(ii) The report on the preliminary hearing conducted pursuant to section 832 of title 10, United States Code (article 32 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

(iii) Any recommendations of Staff Judge Advocates and the initial disposition authority on the disposition of such case.

(iv) The findings and sentences of the court-martial, if any, or any non-judicial punishment imposed pursuant to section 815 of title 10, United States Code (article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

(v) Any legal reviews that recommended that such case not be referred for prosecution.

(d) Annual reports.—Not later than January 31 each year, the Advisory Committee shall submit to the Secretary of Defense, and to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, a report on the results of the activities of the Advisory Committee pursuant to this section during the preceding year.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Advisory Committee shall terminate on the date that is five years after the date of the establishment of the Advisory Committee pursuant to subsection (a).

(2) CONTINUATION.—The Secretary of Defense may continue the Advisory Committee after the date otherwise provided for the termination of the Advisory Committee under paragraph (1) if the Secretary determines that continuation of the Advisory Committee after that date is advisable and appropriate. If the Secretary determines to continue the Advisory Committee, the Secretary shall submit to the President, and to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, a report on that determination, together with the date through which the Secretary will continue the Advisory Committee.

SEC. 553. Collaboration between the Department of Defense and the Department of Justice in efforts to prevent and respond to sexual assault.

(a) Strategic framework on collaboration required.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General shall jointly develop a strategic framework for ongoing collaboration between the Department of Defense and the Department of Justice in their efforts to prevent and respond to sexual assault. The framework shall be based on and include the following:

(1) An assessment of the role of the Department of Justice in investigations and prosecutions of sexual assault cases in which the Department of Defense and the Department of Justice have concurrent jurisdiction, with the assessment to include a review of and list of recommended revisions to relevant Memoranda of Understanding and related documents between the Department of Justice and the Department of Defense.

(2) An assessment of the need for, and if a need exists the feasibility of, establishing the position of advisor on military sexual assaults within the Department of Justice (using existing Department resources and personnel) to assist in the activities required under paragraph (1) and provide to the Department of Defense investigative and other assistance in sexual assault cases occurring on domestic and overseas military installations over which the Department of Defense has primary jurisdiction, with the assessment to address the necessity and feasibility of maintaining representatives or designees of the advisor at military installations for the purpose of reviewing cases of sexual assault and providing assistance with the investigation and prosecution of sexual assaults.

(3) An assessment of the number of sexual assault cases that have occurred on military installations in which no perpetrator has been identified, and a plan, with appropriate benchmarks, to review those cases using currently available civilian and military law enforcement resources, such as new technology and forensics information.

(4) A strategy to leverage efforts by the Department of Defense and the Department of Justice—

(A) to improve the quality of investigations, prosecutions, specialized training, services to victims, awareness, and prevention regarding sexual assault; and

(5) Mechanisms to promote sharing of information and best practices between the Department of Defense and the Department of Justice on prevention and response to sexual assault, including victim assistance through the Violence against Women Act and Office for Victims of Crime programs of the Department of Justice.

(b) Report.—The Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General shall jointly submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the framework required by subsection (a). The report shall—

(1) describe the manner in which the Department of Defense and Department of Justice will collaborate on an ongoing basis under the framework;

(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate; and

(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 554. Modification of term of judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.

(a) Modification of terms.—Section 942(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended–

(A) by striking “September 30” each place it appears and inserting “July 31”; and

(b) Saving provision.—No person who is serving as a judge of the court on the date of the enactment of this Act, and no survivor of any such person, shall be deprived of any annuity provided by section 945 of title 10, United States Code, by the operation of the amendments made by subsection (a).

SEC. 555. Report on review of Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity role in sexual harassment cases.

“(d) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the Carl Levin National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth the results of the review conducted under subsection (a).”.

SEC. 556. Repeal of obsolete requirement to develop comprehensive management plan to address deficiencies in data captured in the Defense Incident-Based Reporting System.

(2) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (4) as paragraphs (1) through (3), respectively.

SEC. 561. Medals for members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees of the Department of Defense who were killed or wounded in an attack by a foreign terrorist organization.

(A) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1129 the following new section:

“§ 1129a. Purple Heart: members killed or wounded in attacks by foreign terrorist organizations

“(a) In general.—For purposes of the award of the Purple Heart, the Secretary concerned shall treat a member of the armed forces described in subsection (b) in the same manner as a member who is killed or wounded as a result of an international terrorist attack against the United States.

“(b) Covered members.— (1) A member described in this subsection is a member on active duty who was killed or wounded in an attack by a foreign terrorist organization in circumstances where the death or wound is the result of an attack targeted on the member due to such member's status as a member of the armed forces, unless the death or wound is the result of willful misconduct of the member.

“(2) For purposes of this section, an attack by an individual or entity shall be considered to be an attack by a foreign terrorist organization if—

“(A) the individual or entity was in communication with the foreign terrorist organization before the attack; and

“(B) the attack was inspired or motivated by the foreign terrorist organization.

“(c) Foreign terrorist organization defined.—In this section, the term ‘foreign terrorist organization’ means an entity designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the Secretary of State pursuant to section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189).”.

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 57 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1129 the following new item:

(A) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by paragraph (1) shall take effect as of September 11, 2001.

(B) REVIEW OF CERTAIN PREVIOUS INCIDENTS.—The Secretaries concerned shall undertake a review of each death or wounding of a member of the Armed Forces that occurred between September 11, 2001, and the date of the enactment of this Act under circumstances that could qualify as being the result of an attack described in section 1129a of title 10, United States Code (as added by paragraph (1)), to determine whether the death or wounding qualifies as a death or wounding resulting from an attack by a foreign terrorist organization for purposes of the award of the Purple Heart pursuant to such section (as so added).

(C) ACTIONS FOLLOWING REVIEW.—If the death or wounding of a member of the Armed Forces reviewed under subparagraph (B) is determined to qualify as a death or wounding resulting from an attack by a foreign terrorist organization as described in section 1129a of title 10, United States Code (as so added), the Secretary concerned shall take appropriate action under such section to award the Purple Heart to the member.

(D) SECRETARY CONCERNED DEFINED.—In this paragraph, the term “Secretary concerned” has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United States Code.

(1) REVIEW OF THE NOVEMBER 5, 2009, ATTACK AT FORT HOOD, TEXAS.—If the Secretary concerned determines, after a review under subsection (a)(2)(B) regarding the attack that occurred at Fort Hood, Texas, on November 5, 2009, that the death or wounding of any member of the Armed Forces in that attack qualified as a death or wounding resulting from an attack by a foreign terrorist organization as described in section 1129a of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)), the Secretary of Defense shall make a determination as to whether the death or wounding of any civilian employee of the Department of Defense or civilian contractor in the same attack meets the eligibility criteria for the award of the Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of Freedom.

(2) AWARD.—If the Secretary of Defense determines under paragraph (1) that the death or wounding of any civilian employee of the Department of Defense or civilian contractor in the attack that occurred at Fort Hood, Texas, on November 5, 2009, meets the eligibility criteria for the award of the Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of Freedom, the Secretary shall take appropriate action to award the Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of Freedom to the employee or contractor.

SEC. 571. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees.

(a) Assistance to schools with significant numbers of military dependent students.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301, $25,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of providing assistance to local educational agencies under subsection (a) of section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 20 U.S.C. 7703b).

(b) Local educational agency defined.—In this section, the term “local educational agency” has the meaning given that term in section 8013(9) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7713(9)).

SEC. 574. Authority to employ non-United States citizens as teachers in Department of Defense Overseas Dependents’ School system.

SEC. 575. Inclusion of domestic dependent elementary and secondary schools among functions of Advisory Council on Dependents' Education.

(a) In general.—Subsection (c) of section 1411 of the Defense Dependents’ Education Act of 1978 (20 U.S.C. 929) is amended—

(1) in paragraph (1), by inserting “, and of the domestic dependent elementary and secondary school system established under section 2164 of title 10, United States Code,” after “of the defense dependents’ education system”; and

(2) in paragraph (2), by inserting “and in the domestic dependent elementary and secondary school system” before the comma at the end.

(1) by inserting “and the domestic dependent elementary and secondary schools established under section 2164 of title 10, United States Code” after “the defense dependents’ education system”; and

SEC. 576. Department of Defense suicide prevention programs for military dependents.

(a) Programs required.—As soon as practicable after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall direct the Secretary of each military department to develop and implement a program to track, retain, and analyze information on deaths that are reported as suicides involving dependents of members of the regular and reserve components of the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of such Secretary.

(b) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the programs developed and implemented by the Secretaries of the military departments pursuant to subsection (a). The report shall include a description of each such program and the assessment of the Secretary of the Defense of such program.

(c) Dependent defined.—In this section, the term “dependent” means a person described in section 1072(2) of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 581. Enhancement of authority to accept support for Air Force Academy athletic programs.

“(1) SUPPORT RECEIVED FROM THE CORPORATION.—Notwithstanding section 1342 of title 31, the Secretary of the Air Force may accept from the corporation funds, supplies, equipment, and services for the support of the athletic programs of the Academy.

“(2) FUNDS RECEIVED FROM OTHER SOURCES.—The Secretary may charge fees for the support of the athletic programs of the Academy. The Secretary may accept and retain fees for services and other benefits provided incident to the operation of its athletic programs, including fees from the National Collegiate Athletic Association, fees from athletic conferences, game guarantees from other educational institutions, fees for ticketing or licensing, and other consideration provided incidental to the execution of the athletic programs of the Academy.

“(3) LIMITATIONS.—The Secretary shall ensure that contributions accepted under this subsection do not—

“(A) reflect unfavorably on the ability of the Department of the Air Force, any of its employees, or any member of the armed forces to carry out any responsibility or duty in a fair and objective manner; or

“(B) compromise the integrity or appearance of integrity of any program of the Department of the Air Force, or any individual involved in such a program.

“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Air Force may, in accordance with section 2667 of this title, enter into leases or licenses with the corporation for the purpose of supporting the athletic programs of the Academy. Consideration provided under such a lease or license may be provided in the form of funds, supplies, equipment, and services for the support of the athletic programs of the Academy.

“(2) SUPPORT SERVICES.—The Secretary may provide support services to the corporation without charge while the corporation conducts its support activities at the Academy. In this paragraph, the term ‘support services’ includes utilities, office furnishings and equipment, communications services, records staging and archiving, audio and video support, and security systems in conjunction with the leasing or licensing of property. Any such support services may only be provided without any liability of the United States to the corporation.

“(g) Contracts and cooperative agreements.—The Secretary of the Air Force may enter into contracts and cooperative agreements with the corporation for the purpose of supporting the athletic programs of the Academy. Notwithstanding section 2304(k) of this title, the Secretary may enter such contracts or cooperative agreements on a sole source basis pursuant to section 2304(c)(5) of this title. Notwithstanding chapter 63 of title 31, a cooperative agreement under this section may be used to acquire property, services, or travel for the direct benefit or use of the athletic programs of the Academy.

“(1) LICENSING, MARKETING, AND SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENTS.—An agreement under subsection (g) may, consistent with section 2260 (other than subsection (d)) of this title, authorize the corporation to enter into licensing, marketing, and sponsorship agreements relating to trademarks and service marks identifying the Academy, subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Air Force.

“(2) LIMITATIONS.—No licensing, marketing, or sponsorship agreement may be entered into under paragraph (1) if—

“(A) such agreement would reflect unfavorably on the ability of the Department of the Air Force, any of its employees, or any member of the armed forces to carry out any responsibility or duty in a fair and objective manner; or

“(B) the Secretary determines that the use of the trademark or service mark would compromise the integrity or appearance of integrity of any program of the Department of the Air Force, or any individual involved in such a program.

“(i) Retention and use of funds.—Any funds received under this section may be retained for use in support of the athletic programs of the Academy and shall remain available until expended.”.

(a) Waiver of section 1009 adjustment.—The adjustment to become effective during fiscal year 2015 required by section 1009 of title 37, United States Code, in the rates of monthly basic pay authorized members of the uniformed services shall not be made.

(b) Increase in basic pay.—Effective on January 1, 2015, the rates of monthly basic pay for members of the uniformed services are increased by 1 percent for enlisted member pay grades, warrant officer pay grades, and commissioned officer pay grades below pay grade O–7.

(c) Application of Executive Schedule Level II ceiling on payable rates for general and flag officers.—Section 203(a)(2) of title 37, United States Code, shall be applied for rates of basic pay payable for commissioned officers in pay grades O–7 through O–10 during calendar year 2015 by using the rate of pay for level II of the Executive Schedule in effect during 2014.

SEC. 602. Inclusion of Chief of the National Guard Bureau and Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chief of the National Guard Bureau among senior members of the Armed Forces for purposes of pay and allowances.

(a) Basic pay rate equal treatment of Chief of the National Guard Bureau and Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chief of the National Guard Bureau.—

(1) CHIEF OF THE NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU.—The rate of basic pay for an officer while serving as the Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall be the same as the rate of basic pay for the officers specified in Footnote 2 of the table entitled “commissioned officers” in section 601(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136; 37 U.S.C. 1009 note), regardless of cumulative years of service computed under section 205 of title 37, United States Code.

(A) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a)(1) of section 685 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (37 U.S.C. 205 note) is amended by inserting “or as Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chief of the National Guard Bureau” after “Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff”.

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The heading of such section is amended by inserting “and for the Chief of the National Guard Bureau” after “Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff”.

(b) Pay during terminal leave and while hospitalized.—Section 210 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—

(1) in subsection (a), by inserting “or the senior enlisted advisor to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff or the Chief of the National Guard Bureau” after “that armed force” the first place it appears; and

(1) in subsection (a)(5), by striking “or Commandant of the Coast Guard” and inserting “Commandant of the Coast Guard, or Chief of the National Guard Bureau”; and

(2) in subsection (c), by striking “or the Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff” and inserting “the Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, or the Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chief of the National Guard Bureau”.

(d) Retired base pay.—Section 1406(i) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1) in the subsection heading, by inserting “Chief of the National Guard Bureau,” after “Chiefs of Service,”;

(A) by inserting “as Chief of the National Guard Bureau,” after “Chief of Service,”; and

(B) by inserting “or the senior enlisted advisor to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff or the Chief of the National Guard Bureau” after “of an armed force”; and

(e) Effective date.—This section and the amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to months of service that begin on or after that date.

SEC. 603. Modification of computation of basic allowance for housing inside the United States.

“(3) (A) The monthly amount of the basic allowance for housing for an area of the United States for a member of a uniformed service shall be the amount equal to the difference between—

“(i) the amount of the monthly cost of adequate housing in that area, as determined by the Secretary of Defense, for members of the uniformed services serving in the same pay grade and with the same dependency status as the member; and

“(ii) the amount equal to a specified percentage (determined under subparagraph (B)) of the national average monthly cost of adequate housing in the United States, as determined by the Secretary, for members of the uniformed services serving in the same pay grade and with the same dependency status as the member.

“(B) The percentage to be used for purposes of subparagraph (A)(ii) shall be determined by the Secretary of Defense and may not exceed 5 percent.”.

SEC. 604. Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates of basic allowance for housing under certain circumstances.

SEC. 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for reserve forces.

(2) Section 308c(i), relating to Selected Reserve affiliation or enlistment bonus.

(3) Section 308d(c), relating to special pay for enlisted members assigned to certain high-priority units.

(4) Section 308g(f)(2), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment bonus for persons without prior service.

(5) Section 308h(e), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service.

(6) Section 308i(f), relating to Selected Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service.

(7) Section 336(g), relating to contracting bonus for cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps.

(8) Section 478a(e), relating to reimbursement of travel expenses for inactive-duty training outside of normal commuting distance.

(9) Section 910(g), relating to income replacement payments for reserve component members experiencing extended and frequent mobilization for active duty service.

SEC. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for health care professionals.

(a) Title 10 authorities.—The following sections of title 10, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2014” and inserting “December 31, 2015”:

(2) Section 16302(d), relating to repayment of education loans for certain health professionals who serve in the Selected Reserve.

(b) Title 37 authorities.—The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2014” and inserting “December 31, 2015”:

(1) Section 302c-1(f), relating to accession and retention bonuses for psychologists.

(3) Section 302e(a)(1), relating to incentive special pay for nurse anesthetists.

(4) Section 302g(e), relating to special pay for Selected Reserve health professionals in critically short wartime specialties.

(7) Section 302k(f), relating to accession bonus for medical officers in critically short wartime specialties.

(8) Section 302l(g), relating to accession bonus for dental specialist officers in critically short wartime specialties.

SEC. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear officers.

(1) Section 312(f), relating to special pay for nuclear-qualified officers extending period of active service.

SEC. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities.

(3) Section 333(i), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for nuclear officers.

(4) Section 334(i), relating to special aviation incentive pay and bonus authorities for officers.

(5) Section 335(k), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for officers in health professions.

(9) Section 355(h), relating to retention incentives for members qualified in critical military skills or assigned to high priority units.

SEC. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 37 bonuses and special pays.

(6) Section 324(g), relating to accession bonus for new officers in critical skills.

(7) Section 326(g), relating to incentive bonus for conversion to military occupational specialty to ease personnel shortage.

(8) Section 327(h), relating to incentive bonus for transfer between Armed Forces.

SEC. 621. Inapplicability of reduced annual adjustment of retired pay for members of the Armed Forces under the age of 62 under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 who first become members prior to January 1, 2016.

SEC. 622. Modification of determination of retired pay base for officers retired in general and flag officer grades.

(A) by striking “In a case” and inserting “Except as otherwise provided in this section, in a case”; and

(B) by inserting “during the period described in subsection (b)” after “for any period”;

“(b) Period covered by determination using rates of basic pay.—The period described in this subsection is the period beginning on October 1, 2006, and ending on the last day of the first month beginning on or after the date of the enactment of the Carl Levin National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015.

“(c) Retired pay base for officers retiring after December 31, 2014, who first became members before September 8, 1980.—In the case of a covered general or flag officer who first became a member of the armed forces before September 8, 1980, and retires from the armed forces after December 31, 2014, the retired pay base shall be whichever is greater of the following:

“(1) The retired pay base determined by applicable law at the time of the member's retirement (including the inapplicability of subsection (a) to the determination of the retired pay base by reason of subsection (b)).

“(A) the monthly basic pay of the member was the rate of monthly basic provided by law for the member's permanent grade as of December 31, 2014 (without reduction under section 203(a)(2) of title 37); and

“(B) the member's retired grade was the member's permanent grade as of December 31, 2014.”.

SEC. 623. Modification of per-fiscal year calculation of days of certain active duty or active service to reduce eligibility age for retirement for non-regular service.

SEC. 624. Earlier determination of dependent status with respect to transitional compensation for dependents of certain members separated for dependent abuse.

SEC. 625. Survivor Benefit Plan annuities for special needs trusts established for the benefit of dependent children incapable of self-support.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 1450 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

“(4) SPECIAL NEEDS TRUSTS FOR SOLE BENEFIT OF CERTAIN DEPENDENT CHILDREN.—Notwithstanding subsection (i), a supplemental or special needs trust established under subparagraph (A) or (C) of section 1917(d)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396p(d)(4)) for the sole benefit of a dependent child considered disabled under section 1614(a)(3) of that Act (42 U.S.C. 1382c(a)(3)) who is incapable of self-support because of mental or physical incapacity.”.

(A) Subsection (i) of such section is amended by inserting “(a)(4) or” after “subsection”.

(I) in subparagraph (A), by striking “section 1450(a)(2)” and inserting “subsection (a)(2) or (a)(4) of section 1450”; and

(II) in subparagraph (B), by striking “section 1450(a)(3)” and inserting “subsection (a)(3) or (a)(4) of section 1450”; and

(ii) in subsection (f)(2), by inserting “, or to special needs trust pursuant to section 1450(a)(4) of this title,” after “dependent child”.

(1) in the subsection caption, by striking “and fiduciaries” and inserting “, fiduciaries, and special needs trusts”;

(B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and

“(C) a dependent child incapable of self-support because of mental or physical incapacity for whom a supplemental or special needs trust has been established under subparagraph (A) or (C) of section 1917(d)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396p(d)(4)).”;

(A) by redesignating subparagraphs (C) through (H) as subparagraphs (D) through (I), respectively;

“(C) In the case of an annuitant referred to in paragraph (1)(C), payment of the annuity to the supplemental or special needs trust established for the annuitant.”;

(C) in subparagraph (D), as redesignated by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, by striking “subparagraphs (D) and (E)” and inserting “subparagraphs (E) and (F)”; and

(i) by inserting “or (1)(C)” after “paragraph (1)(B)” in the matter preceding clause (i);

(iii) in clause (ii), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and

“(iii) procedures for determining when annuity payments to a supplemental or special needs trust shall end based on the death or marriage of the dependent child for which the trust was established.”; and

(4) in paragraph (3), by striking “or fiduciary” in the paragraph caption and inserting “, fiduciary, or trust”.

SEC. 631. Procurement of brand-name and other commercial items for resale by commissary stores.

(3) by striking “regarding the procurement” and all that follows and inserting “for the procurement of any commercial item (including brand-name and generic items) for resale in, at, or by commissary stores.”.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1074m the following new section:

“§ 1074n. Annual mental health assessments for members of the armed forces

“(a) Mental health assessments.—Subject to subsection (d), not less frequently than once each calendar year, the Secretary of Defense shall provide a person-to-person mental health assessment for—

“(b) Purpose.—The purpose of a mental health assessment provided pursuant to this section shall be to identify mental health conditions among members of the armed forces in order to determine which such members are in need of additional care, treatment, or other services for such health conditions.

“(c) Elements.—The mental health assessments provided pursuant to this section shall—

“(1) be conducted in accordance with the requirements of subsection (c)(1) of section 1074m of this title with respect to a mental health assessment provided pursuant to such section; and

“(2) include a review of the health records of the member that are related to each previous health assessment or other relevant activities of the member while serving in the armed forces, as determined by the Secretary.

“(d) Sufficiency of other mental health assessments.— (1) The Secretary is not required to provide a mental health assessment pursuant to this section to an individual in a calendar year in which the individual has received a mental health assessment pursuant to section 1074m of this title.

“(2) The Secretary may treat periodic health assessments and other person-to-person assessments that are provided to members of the armed forces, including examinations under section 1074f of this title, as meeting the requirements for mental health assessments required under this section if the Secretary determines that such assessments and person-to-person assessments meet the requirements for mental health assessments established by this section.

“(e) Reports.— (1) Not less frequently than once each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report on the annual mental health assessments of members of the armed forces conducted pursuant to this section.

“(2) Each report required by paragraph (1) shall include, with respect to assessments conducted pursuant to this section during the one-year period preceding the date of the submittal of such report, the following:

“(A) A description of the tools and processes used to provide such assessments, including—

“(ii) the process by which such tools and processes have been approved for use in providing mental health assessments.

“(B) Such recommendations for improving the tools and processes used to conduct such assessments, including tools that may address the underreporting of mental health conditions, as the Secretary considers appropriate.

“(C) Such recommendations as the Secretary considers appropriate for improving the monitoring and reporting of the number of members of the armed forces—

“(3) No personally identifiable information may be included in any report under paragraph (1).

“(f) Privacy matters.—Any medical or other personal information obtained under this section shall be protected from disclosure or misuse in accordance with the laws on privacy applicable to such information.

“(g) Regulations.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the other administering Secretaries, prescribe regulations for the administration of this section.”.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 55 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1074m the following new item:

(3) IMPLEMENTATION.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the issuance of the regulations prescribed under section 1074n(g) of title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1) of this subsection, the Secretary of Defense shall implement such regulations.

(b) Conforming amendment.—Section 1074m(e)(1) of such title is amended by inserting “and section 1074n of this title” after “pursuant to this section”.

SEC. 702. Modifications of cost-sharing and other requirements for the TRICARE Pharmacy Benefits Program.

(a) Availability of pharmaceutical agents through national mail-order pharmacy program.—Paragraph (5) of section 1074g(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1) by striking “at least one of the means described in paragraph (2)(E)” and inserting “the national mail-order pharmacy program”; and

(2) by striking “may include” and all that follows through the end of the paragraph and inserting “shall include cost-sharing by the eligible covered beneficiary as specified in paragraph (6).”.

(b) Cost-sharing amounts.—Paragraph (6) of such section is amended to read as follows:

“(6) (A) In the case of any of the years 2015 through 2024, the cost-sharing amounts under this subsection shall be determined in accordance with the following table:

“(B) There shall be no cost-sharing amounts under this subsection for prescription medications filled by military treatment facility pharmacies.

“(C) For any year after 2024, the cost-sharing amounts under this subsection shall be equal to the cost-sharing amounts for the previous year adjusted by an amount, if any, determined by the Secretary to reflect changes in the costs of pharmaceutical agents and prescription dispensing, rounded to the nearest dollar.

“(D) Notwithstanding subparagraphs (A) and (C), the cost-sharing amounts under this subsection for any year for a dependent of a member of the uniformed services who dies while on active duty, a member retired under chapter 61 of this title, or a dependent of such a member shall be equal to the cost-sharing amounts, if any, for 2014.”.

“For:	The cost-sharing amount for 30-day supply of a retail generic is:	The cost-sharing amount for 30-day supply of a retail formulary is:	The cost-sharing amount for a 90-day supply of a mail order generic is:	The cost-sharing amount for a 90-day supply of a mail order formulary is:	The cost-sharing amount for a 90-day supply of a mail order non-formulary is:
2015	$5	$26	$0	$26	$51
2016	$6	$28	$0	$28	$54
2017	$7	$30	$0	$30	$58
2018	$8	$32	$0	$32	$62
2019	$9	$34	$9	$34	$66
2020	$10	$36	$10	$36	$70
2021	$11	$38	$11	$38	$75
2022	$12	$40	$12	$40	$80
2023	$13	$43	$13	$43	$85
2024	$14	$45	$14	$45	$90

(c) Refills of prescription maintenance medications through military treatment facility pharmacies or national mail order pharmacy program.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(9) (A) The pharmacy benefits program shall require eligible covered beneficiaries generally to refill non-generic prescription maintenance medications through military treatment facility pharmacies or the national mail-order pharmacy program.

“(B) The Secretary shall determine the maintenance medications subject to the requirement under subparagraph (A). The Secretary shall ensure that—

“(i) such medications are generally available to eligible covered beneficiaries through retail pharmacies only for an initial filling of a 30-day or less supply; and

“(ii) any refills of such medications are obtained through a military treatment facility pharmacy or the national mail-order pharmacy program.

“(C) The Secretary may exempt the following prescription maintenance medications from the requirement of subparagraph (A):

SEC. 703. Parity in provision of inpatient mental health services with other inpatient medical services.

(a) Termination of inpatient day limits in provision of mental health services.—Section 1079 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(b) Waiver of nonavailability statement for mental health services.—Section 721(a) of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is amended by striking “(other than mental health services)”.

SEC. 704. Availability of breastfeeding support, supplies, and counseling under the TRICARE program.

“(18) Breastfeeding support, supplies (including breast pumps and associated equipment), and counseling shall be provided as appropriate during pregnancy and the postpartum period.”.

SEC. 705. Authority for provisional TRICARE coverage for emerging health care products and services.

“(c) Provisional coverage for emerging products and services.— (1) The Secretary of Defense is authorized to provide provisional coverage or authorization of coverage under this chapter for health care products and services that have not been demonstrated to be safe and effective under this chapter as medically or psychologically necessary to prevent, diagnose, or treat a mental or physical illness, injury, or bodily malfunction but have been demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Secretary to be likely safe and effective health care products or services.

“(2) In making a determination authorized by paragraph (1), the Secretary may consider—

“(3) In making a determination under paragraph (1), the Secretary may arrange for an evaluation from the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies of Sciences or such other independent entity as the Secretary shall select.

“(4) (A) Provisional coverage under paragraph (1) for a product or service may be in effect not longer than five years, but may be terminated at any time before that time.

“(B) Prior to the expiration of provisional coverage or authorization of coverage of a product or service pursuant to subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall determine the coverage or authorization of coverage, if any, that will follow coverage or authorization of coverage of such product or service, and take appropriate action to implement such determination. If implementation of such determinations requires legislative action, the Secretary shall make a timely recommendation to Congress regarding such legislative action.

“(5) Prompt public notice shall be provided for each product or service that receives an affirmative provisional coverage or authorization of coverage determination under paragraph (1) along with all terms and conditions associated with the determination. The public notice shall be through the website of the TRICARE program accessible by the public.

“(6) All determinations under this subsection to provide, decline to provide, terminate, establish or disestablish terms and conditions, or take any other action shall be approved by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs based on professional medical judgment. Such determinations and actions are committed to agency discretion and are conclusive.”.

(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:

(1) A description of the implementation of the transition for eligible beneficiaries under the TRICARE program (other than eligible beneficiaries on active duty in the Armed Forces) who no longer have access to TRICARE Prime under TRICARE managed care contracts as of the date of the report, including the following:

(A) The number of eligible beneficiaries who have transitioned from TRICARE Prime to the TRICARE Standard option of the TRICARE program since October 1, 2013.

(B) The number of eligible beneficiaries who transferred their TRICARE Prime enrollment to a more distant available Prime service area to remain in TRICARE Prime, by State.

(C) The number of eligible beneficiaries who were eligible to transfer to a more distant available Prime service area, but chose to use TRICARE Standard.

(D) The number of eligible beneficiaries who elected to return to TRICARE Prime.

(2) An estimate of the increased annual costs per eligible beneficiary described in paragraph (1) incurred by such beneficiary for healthcare under the TRICARE program.

(3) A description of the plans of the Department to assess the impact on access to healthcare and beneficiary satisfaction for eligible beneficiaries described in paragraph (1).

SEC. 707. Repeal of requirement for ongoing Comptroller General of the United States reviews of viability of TRICARE Standard and TRICARE Extra.

SEC. 721. Department of Defense Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Care Fund matters.

(a) Reenactment and modification of superseded authorities and requirements on payments into Fund.—Section 1116 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(a) The Secretary of Defense shall pay into the Fund at the end of each month as the Department of Defense contribution to the Fund for that month the amount that, subject to subsections (b) and (c), is the sum of the following:

“(A) the monthly dollar amount determined using all the methods and assumptions approved for the most recent (as of the first day of the current fiscal year) actuarial valuation under section 1115(c)(1)(A) of this title (except that any statutory change in the uniformed services retiree health care programs for medicare-eligible beneficiaries that is effective after the date of that valuation and on or before the first day of the current fiscal year shall be used in such determination); and

“(B) the total end strength for that month for members of the uniformed services under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense on active duty (other than active duty for training) and full-time National Guard duty (other than full-time National Guard duty for training only).

“(A) the level monthly dollar amount determined using all the methods and assumptions approved for the most recent (as of the first day of the current fiscal year) actuarial valuation under section 1115(c)(1)(B) of this title (except that any statutory change in the uniformed services retiree health care programs for medicare-eligible beneficiaries that is effective after the date of that valuation and on or before the first day of the current fiscal year shall be used in such determination); and

“(B) the total end strength for that month for members of the Selected Reserve of the uniformed services under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense other than members on full-time National Guard duty (other than for training) who are not otherwise described in paragraph (1)(B).

“(b) (1) If during a month a statute is enacted that will have a significant effect on the amounts calculated for purposes of subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may recalculate the amount payable under subsection (a) for months in the fiscal year of such enactment that begin after such enactment taking into account the effect of such change on the calculation of amounts so payable. Any such recalculation in a fiscal year shall apply to amounts payable under subsection (a) for months in such fiscal year beginning after the change triggering the recalculation.

“(2) The Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on any recalculation carried out by the Secretary under this subsection, including the effect of such recalculation on amounts payable under subsection (a) for months in the fiscal year concerned beginning after such recalculation.

“(c) If an actuarial valuation referred to in paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (a) has been calculated as a separate single level dollar amount for a participating uniformed service under section 1115(c)(1) of this title, the administering Secretary for the department in which such uniformed service is operating shall calculate the amount under such paragraph separately for such uniformed service. If the administering Secretary is not the Secretary of Defense, the administering Secretary shall notify the Secretary of Defense of the amount so calculated. To determine a single amount for the purpose of paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (a), as the case may be, the Secretary of Defense shall aggregate the amount calculated under this subsection for a uniformed service for the purpose of such paragraph with the amount or amounts calculated (whether separately or otherwise) for the other uniformed services for the purpose of such paragraph.

“(d) (1) At the beginning of each fiscal year the Secretary of the Treasury shall promptly pay into the Fund from the General Fund of the Treasury the amount certified to the Secretary by the Secretary of Defense under paragraph (3). Such payment shall be the contribution to the Fund for that fiscal year required by sections 1115(a) and 1115(c) of this title.

“(2) At the beginning of each fiscal year the Secretary of Defense shall determine the sum of the following:

“(A) The amount of the payment for that year under the amortization schedule determined by the Board of Actuaries under section 1115(a) of this title for the amortization of the original unfunded liability of the Fund.

“(B) The amount (including any negative amount) for that year under the most recent amortization schedule determined by the Secretary of Defense under section 1115(c)(2) of this title for the amortization of any cumulative unfunded liability (or any gain) to the Fund resulting from changes in benefits.

“(C) The amount (including any negative amount) for that year under the most recent amortization schedule determined by the Secretary of Defense under section 1115(c)(3) of this title for the amortization of any cumulative actuarial gain or loss to the Fund resulting from actuarial assumption changes.

“(D) The amount (including any negative amount) for that year under the most recent amortization schedule determined by the Secretary of Defense under section 1115(c)(4) of this title for the amortization of any cumulative actuarial gain or loss to the Fund resulting from actuarial experience.

“(3) The Secretary of Defense shall promptly certify the amount determined under paragraph (2) each year to the Secretary of the Treasury.

“(e) Amounts paid into the Fund under subsection (a) shall be paid from funds available for the pay of members of the participating uniformed services under the jurisdiction of the respective administering Secretaries.”.

(1) In section 1111(c), by striking “under section 1115(b)” and all that follows and inserting “under section 1116 of this title, and such administering Secretary may make such contributions.”.

(2) In section 1113(f), by inserting “of this title” after “section 1111(c)”.

(A) in subsection (a), by striking “section 1116 of this title” and inserting “section 1116(d) of this title”;

“(b) (1) The Secretary of Defense shall determine each year, in sufficient time for inclusion in budget requests for the following fiscal year, the total amount of Department of Defense contributions to be made to the Fund during that fiscal year under section 1116(a) of this title. That amount shall be the sum of the following:

“(i) the current estimate of the value of the single level dollar amount to be determined under subsection (c)(1)(A) at the time of the next actuarial valuation under subsection (c); and

“(ii) the expected average force strength during that fiscal year for members of the uniformed services under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense on active duty and full-time National Guard duty, but excluding any member who would be excluded for active-duty end strength purposes by section 115(i) of this title.

“(i) the current estimate of the value of the single level dollar amount to be determined under subsection (c)(1)(B) at the time of the next actuarial valuation under subsection (c); and

“(ii) the expected average force strength during that fiscal year for members of the Selected Reserve of the uniformed services under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense who are not otherwise described in subparagraph (A)(ii).

“(2) The amount determined under paragraph (1) for any fiscal year is the amount needed to be appropriated to the Department of Defense (or to the other executive department having jurisdiction over the participating uniformed service) for that fiscal year for payments to be made to the Fund during that year under section 1116(a) of this title. The President shall include not less than the full amount so determined in the budget transmitted to Congress for that fiscal year under section 1105 of title 31. The President may comment and make recommendations concerning any such amount.”; and

(i) in the flush matter following paragraph (1), by inserting “and section 1116(a) of this title” after “subsection (b)”; and

(ii) in paragraph (5), by striking “section 1116” and inserting “section 1116(d)”.

(c) Effective date and applicability.—The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to payments made into the Department of Defense Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Care Fund under chapter 56 of title 10, United States Code (as so amended), for fiscal years beginning after fiscal year 2015.

SEC. 722. Extension of authority for Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund.

SEC. 723. Department of Defense-wide strategy for contracting for health care professionals for the Department of Defense.

(a) Strategy required.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop a Department of Defense-wide strategy for contracting for health care professionals for the Department of Defense.

(b) Elements.—The strategy required by subsection (a) shall include the following:

(1) A statement of the responsibilities of each military department and the Defense Health Agency under the strategy.

(2) Mechanisms to consolidate requirements in order to create efficiencies and reduce costs.

(3) Metrics to evaluate the success of the strategy in achieving its objectives, including metrics to assess the effects of the strategy on the timeliness of beneficiary access to professional health care services in military medical treatment facilities.

(c) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the strategy developed under subsection (a). The report shall set forth the strategy and include such other matters with respect to the strategy as the Secretary considers appropriate.

(a) Program required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall commence carrying out a program of comprehensive, uniform medication management in military medical treatment facilities.

(b) Elements.—The program required by subsection (a) shall include the following:

(1) An identification of the risks associated with administration and management of medications (including prescription opioid medications), including accidental and intentional overdoses, under-medication and over-medication, and adverse interactions among multiple medications.

(2) Evidence-based best practices for medication management in military medical treatment facilities, including integration of comprehensive medication management best practices in patient-centered medical homes.

(3) Evidence-based best practices to mitigate medication management risks and to ensure patient compliance with medication regimens.

(4) Evidence-based best practices for medication reconciliation to reduce medication errors.

(5) Various mechanisms for safe and effective collection and disposal of unwanted and unnecessary prescription medications.

(c) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth a description of the program commenced under subsection (a).

SEC. 731. Report on military family planning programs of the Department of Defense.

(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth the results of a comprehensive study of access to methods of contraception approved by the Food and Drug Administration, contraception counseling, and related education for all members of the Armed Forces and military dependents provided healthcare through the Department of Defense.

(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:

(1) A description and assessment of the extent to which all approved methods of contraception are available to members of the Armed Forces and military dependents provided healthcare through the Department of Defense.

(2) A list of current Department programs, including programs of the Armed Forces, that provide comprehensive contraception counseling and education to members of the Armed Forces and military dependents, including for each such program, the following:

(3) A description and assessment of current Department programs, including programs of the Armed Forces, that provide contraception counseling and education to members of the Armed Forces and military dependents, including an assessment of the following:

(A) The extent to which contraception counseling and education is available for members of the Armed Forces and military dependents under such programs during annual healthcare exams, before deployment, during deployment, and on return from deployment.

(B) The extent to which confidential contraception counseling and education is available for members of the Armed Forces and military dependents under such programs, including the locations at which such counseling and education is offered, the healthcare professionals responsible for providing such counseling and education, and the frequency with which members and dependents may access such counseling and education.

(C) The extent to which contraception counseling and education for members of the Armed Forces and military dependents under such programs includes discussions of the unique physical environment in which a member of the Armed Forces serves and the impact of such environment on decisions related to contraception.

(D) The extent to which healthcare providers (including general practitioners) who provide healthcare for female members of the Armed Forces and military dependents through the Department provide the most current evidence-based standards of care with respect to methods of contraception.

(4) A description and assessment of the manner and extent to which the Department disseminates to healthcare providers who provide healthcare for female members of the Armed Forces and military dependents through the Department clinical decision support tools that reflect the most current evidence-based standards of care with respect to methods of contraception and counseling on methods of contraception, as established by health agencies and professional organizations such as the following:

(A) The United States Preventive Services Task Force within the Department of Health and Human Services.

(B) The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality of the Department of Health and Human Services.

(5) Such recommendations for legislative or administrative action as the Secretary considers appropriate to improve the availability of, access to, and quality of methods of contraception, contraception counseling, and related education for all members of the Armed Forces and military dependents provided healthcare through the Department of Defense.

(c) Consultation.—In preparing the report required by subsection (a), the Secretary may consult with experts on women’s health and family planning from both within and outside the Armed Forces, including the following:

(1) The Health Resources and Services Administration of the Department of Health and Human Services.

SEC. 732. Interagency working group on the provision of mental health services to members of the National Guard and the Reserves.

(a) Establishment.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, convene an interagency working group to review and recommend collaborative approaches to improving the provision of mental health services to members of the National Guard and the Reserves.

(b) Duties.—The duties of the interagency working group convened pursuant to subsection (a) are as follows:

(1) To review existing programs that can be used to improve the provision of accessible, timely, and high-quality mental health services to members of the National Guard and the Reserves.

(2) To recommend new interagency programs and partnerships to improve the provision of such mental health services to such members.

(3) To recommend best practices for partnerships among the Armed Forces, the National Guard, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Department of Health and Human Services, States, and private and academic entities to improve the provision of mental health care to members of the members of the National Guard and the Reserves.

(c) Consultation.—In carrying out the duties under subsection (b), the interagency working group may consult with representatives of academia, industry, and such other relevant agencies, organizations, and institutions as the interagency working group considers appropriate.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report that includes the findings and recommendations of the interagency working group.

(2) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS.—In this subsection, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—

(B) the Committee on Veterans' Affairs and the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate; and

(1) IN GENERAL.—Any medical or other personal information obtained pursuant to any provision of this section shall be protected from disclosure or misuse in accordance with the laws on privacy applicable to such information.

(2) EXCLUSION OF PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION FROM REPORTS.—No personally identifiable information may be included in any report required by subsection (d).

SEC. 733. Report on improvements in the identification and treatment of mental health conditions and traumatic brain injury among members of the Armed Forces.

(a) In general.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth an evaluation of specific tools, processes, and best practices to improve the identification of and treatment by the Armed Forces of mental health conditions and traumatic brain injury among members of the Armed Forces.

(1) An evaluation of existing peer-to-peer identification and intervention programs in each of the Armed Forces.

(2) An evaluation of the Star Behavioral Health Providers program and similar programs that provide training and certification to health care providers that treat mental health conditions and traumatic brain injury in members of the Armed Forces.

(3) An evaluation of programs and services provided by the Armed Forces that provide training and certification to providers of cognitive rehabilitation and other rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury to members of the Armed Forces.

(4) An evaluation of programs and services provided by the Armed Forces that assist members of the Armed Forces and family members affected by suicides among members of the Armed Forces.

(5) An evaluation of tools and processes used by the Armed Forces to identify traumatic brain injury in members of the Armed Forces and to distinguish mental health conditions likely caused by traumatic brain injury from mental health conditions caused by other factors.

(6) An evaluation of the unified effort of the Armed Forces to promote mental health and prevent suicide through the integration of clinical and non-clinical programs of the Armed Forces.

(7) Recommendations with respect to improving, consolidating, expanding, and standardizing the programs, services, tools, processes, and efforts described in paragraphs (1) through (6).

(8) A description of existing efforts to reduce the time from development and testing of new mental health and traumatic brain injury tools and treatments for members of the Armed Forces to widespread dissemination of such tools and treatments among the Armed Forces.

(9) Recommendations as to the feasibility and advisability of establishing preliminary mental health assessments and pre-discharge mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces, including the utility of using tools and processes in such mental health assessments that conform to those used in other mental health assessments provided to members of the Armed Forces.

(10) Recommendations on how to track changes in the mental health assessment of a member of the Armed Forces relating to traumatic brain injury, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety, and other conditions.

(11) A description of the methodology used by the Secretary in preparing the report required by this section, including a description of the input provided by the entity and individuals consulted pursuant to subsection (c).

(B) mental health and other health providers who serve members of the regular and reserve components of each Armed Force.

(9) The Administrator of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

(2) EXCLUSION OF PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION FROM REPORTS.—No personally identifiable information may be included in any report required by subsection (a).

(1) PRELIMINARY MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT.—The term “preliminary mental health assessment” means a mental health assessment conducted with respect to an individual before the individual enlists in the Armed Forces or is commissioned as an officer in the Armed Forces.

(2) PRE-DISCHARGE MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT.—The term “pre-discharge mental health assessment” means a mental health assessment conducted with respect to an individual during the 90-day period preceding the date of discharge or release of the individual from the Armed Forces.

SEC. 734. Report on implementation of recommendations of Institute of Medicine on improvements to certain resilience and prevention programs of the Department of Defense.

(a) Report required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth an assessment of the feasibility and advisability of implementing the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) regarding improvements to programs of the Department of Defense intended to strengthen mental, emotional, and behavioral abilities associated with managing adversity, adapting to change, recovering, and learning in connection with service in the Armed Forces.

(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:

(1) The Department’s assessment of the report’s findings and recommendations.

(2) The Department’s actions taken to implement recommendations in the report.

(3) For any recommendations not implemented, the rationale for not implementing those recommendations in the report.

SEC. 735. Report on Department of Defense support of members of the Armed Forces who experience traumatic injury as a result of vaccinations required by the Department.

(a) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth the results of a comprehensive review (conducted for purposes of the report) of the adequacy and effectiveness of the policies, procedures, and systems of the Department of Defense in providing support to members of the Armed Forces who experience traumatic injury as a result of a vaccination required by the Department.

(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:

(1) The number and nature of traumatic injuries incurred by members of the Armed Forces as a result of a vaccination required by the Department of Defense each year since January 1, 2001, set forth by aggregate in each year and by military department in each year.

(2) Such recommendations as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate for improvements to the policies, procedures, and systems (including tracking systems) of the Department to identify members of the Armed Forces who experience traumatic injury as a result of a vaccination required by the Department.

(3) Such recommendations as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate for improvements to the policies, procedures, and systems of the Department to support members of the Armed Forces who experience traumatic injury as a result of the administration of a vaccination required by the Department.

SEC. 736. Comptroller General of the United States report on Military Health System Modernization Study of the Department of Defense.

(a) Report required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the Military Health System Modernization Study of the Department of Defense.

(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following with respect to the Military Health System Modernization Study:

(1) An assessment of the methodology used by the Secretary of Defense to conduct the study.

(2) An assessment of the analysis made by the Secretary to inform decisions regarding the modernization of the military health system in the study.

(3) An assessment of the extent to which the Secretary evaluated in the study the impact on the access of eligible beneficiaries to quality health care, and satisfaction with such care, of the following changes in the study in military medical treatment facilities:

(4) An assessment of the extent to which the Secretary evaluated in the study how any reduced inpatient, ambulatory surgery, or specialty care capacity and capabilities at military medical facilities covered by the study would impact timely access to care for eligible beneficiaries at local civilian community hospitals within reasonable driving distances of the catchment areas of such facilities.

(5) An assessment of the extent to which the Secretary consulted in conducting the study with community hospitals in locations covered by the study to determine their capacities for additional inpatient and ambulatory surgery patients and their capabilities to meet additional demands for specialty care services.

(6) An assessment of the extent to which the Secretary considered in the study the impact the change in the structure or alignment of military medical treatment facilities covered by the study would have on timely access by local civilian populations to inpatient, ambulatory surgery, or specialty care services if additional eligible beneficiaries also sought access to such services from the same providers.

(7) An assessment of the impact of the elimination of health care services at military medical treatment facilities covered by the study on civilians employed at such facilities.

(c) Eligible beneficiaries defined.—In this section, the term “eligible beneficiaries” means individuals who are eligible for health care and services through the military health care system.

SEC. 801. Open systems approach to acquisition of systems containing information technology.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3), each Major Defense Acquisition Program and Major Automated Information System, and each other acquisition program the primary purpose of which is the acquisition of an information technology system, that enters concept development after January 1, 2016, shall use an open systems approach in development to achieve agility, rapid capability enhancement, interoperability, increased competition, and lower costs over the life cycle of the program.

(2) CASE-BY-CASE EXCEPTION BASED ON COSTS AND PRACTICALITY.—The requirement under paragraph (1) shall not apply to an acquisition program if a business case analysis conducted at a point in development where there is sufficient design information to conduct an independent life-cycle cost estimate demonstrates that an open systems approach is more expensive or is not practically achievable.

(A) COMMERCIAL OFF-THE-SHELF ITEMS AND SYSTEMS.—The requirement under paragraph (1) does not apply to acquisition programs that consist primarily of commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) end items and systems or modified COTS systems.

(B) URGENT OR EMERGENT OPERATIONAL NEED STATEMENTS.—Systems acquired pursuant to urgent or emergent operational need statements shall not be subject to the requirement in paragraph (1) unless a decision is made to transition the program to a program of record. In the event of such a transition, a business case analysis shall be conducted to consider the life-cycle costs of the program and determine whether to migrate the system to an open systems architecture.

(b) Actions required.—Not later than January 1, 2016, the Secretary of Defense shall take the following actions:

(1) Identify computing environments within the Department of Defense that are sufficiently distinct to justify the development of specific Technical Reference Architectures and associated standards necessary to support an open systems approach to the development of systems utilizing those computing environments.

(2) Identify each mission and functional domain within the Department of Defense that is sufficiently distinct to justify the development of domain-specific services and associated standards necessary to support an open systems approach to the development of systems that will operate in that mission or functional domain.

(3) Pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–113; 110 Stat. 783; 15 U.S.C. 272 note) and Office of Management and Budget Circular Number A–119, form or use voluntary, consensus-based standards bodies to establish the standards required for each of the Technical Reference Architectures and each set of domain-specific services to support open systems approaches.

(4) Ensure, in carrying out the actions set forth in paragraphs (1) through (3), that there are not duplicative or competing Technical Reference Architectures, domain-specific services, or standards or standards bodies related to such architectures and services across the Department of Defense.

(c) Guidelines for business case analyses.—Not later than July 1, 2015, the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation shall issue guidelines for business case analyses as they apply to decisions regarding the adoption of an open systems approach, including requirements for comparative life-cycle costs and opportunities for competition and capability upgrades.

(d) Treatment of ongoing and legacy programs.—Not later than November 1, 2015, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report—

(1) identifying all closed systems that are in development, production, or deployed status as of January 1, 2016, that are or were Major Defense Acquisition Programs or Major Automated Information Systems;

(2) outlining a process for establishing the priority of migrating each such system and program to an open system; and

(3) including a schedule to review the top half of the prioritized list, conduct a business case analysis on each program, and develop plans where appropriate to migrate such programs to an open system within 10 years.

(1) DOMAIN-SPECIFIC SERVICES.—The term “domain-specific services” means the decomposition of functions and operations in specific mission domains into common services that systems operating in those domains would utilize.

(2) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY.—The term “information technology” has the meaning given the term in section 11101(6) of title 40, United States Code.

(3) OPEN SYSTEMS APPROACH.—The term “open systems approach” means an integrated business and technical strategy that—

(A) employs a modular design, and uses widely supported and consensus-based standards for its key interfaces;

(B) is subjected to successful validation and verification tests to ensure the openness of its key interfaces; and

(C) uses an open system architecture allowing components to be added, modified, replaced, removed, or supported by different vendors throughout a program's life-cycle in order to afford opportunities for enhanced competition and innovation while yielding significant cost and schedule savings and increased interoperability.

(4) TECHNICAL REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE.—The term “Technical Reference Architecture” means a system architecture template for a particular computing environment that provides a common vocabulary for implementations to promote consistency and commonality of interfaces and interactions between architectural layers.

SEC. 802. Recharacterization of changes to Major Automated Information System programs.

(a) Addition to covered determination of a significant change.—Subsection (c)(2) of section 2445c of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; or”; and

“(D) the automated information system or information technology investment failed to achieve a full deployment decision within five years after the Milestone A decision for the program or, if there was no Milestone A decision, the date when the preferred alternative is selected for the program (excluding any time during which program activity is delayed as a result of a bid protest).”.

(b) Removal of covered determination of a critical change.—Subsection (d)(3) of such section is amended—

(2) by redesignating subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D) as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), respectively.

SEC. 803. Process map requirement for milestone approval of defense business system programs.

(1) ASSIGNMENT OF COORDINATOR.— (A) The Secretary of Defense shall assign a senior military or civilian official to serve as the assistant to the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense and Coordinator of the Joint Information Environment of the Department (in this section referred to as the “Coordinator”).

(B) In assigning an individual to serve as the assistant to the Chief Information Officer and as the Coordinator, the Secretary shall select from among individuals who have significant expertise in the following:

(iii) The United States Cyber Command’s concept of operations for operating and defending information systems and networks.

(i) Balancing priorities and risks between efficient network acquisition and operation, effective execution of military missions through a network, and effective network defense.

(ii) Defining the elements and aspects of the current information architecture in the Department of Defense that are critical for the transition to the desired Joint Information Environment end state.

(iii) Developing the desired architecture for the Joint Information Environment to an appropriate level of detail.

(iv) Developing and updating an integrated master schedule for migrating to the Joint Information Environment, with milestones and critical dependencies.

(v) In conjunction with the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, developing and updating cost estimates and performance measures for the Joint Information Environment.

(vi) Tracking compliance with, and deviations from, objectives, schedule, and costs of the Joint Information Environment.

(vii) Identifying gaps in plans and budgets of components of the Department of Defense that relate to the Joint Information Environment and identifying requirements for development and procurement to address those gaps.

(viii) Developing and verifying achievement of open systems architectures for major warfighting missions of the Department similar to the Defense Intelligence Information Environment architecture developed under the auspices of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence for the intelligence mission of the Department.

(2) ESTABLISHMENT OF TEAM OF EXPERTS.— (A) The Coordinator shall establish a team of experts to provide advice and assistance to the Coordinator in carrying out the responsibilities of the Coordinator.

(B) The Chief Information Officer, the commanders of the combatant commands, and the heads of the cyber components of the military departments shall assist the Coordinator by making available to the Coordinator experts who have operational experience in or with the following:

(i) The office of the Chief Information Officer of the Department or an office of a chief information officer of a military department.

(iii) The United States Cyber Command or a cyber component of a military department.

(iv) Technical aspects of information technology acquisition and cloud computing.

(3) EXPANSION OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE.— (A) The Executive Committee of the Joint Information Environment shall include the Director for Operations (commonly referred to as the “J3”) of the Joint Staff and the Director for Operations of the United States Cyber Command.

(B) The Executive Committee of the Joint Information Environment shall ensure that working groups within the Executive Committee include representatives from the operational communities responsible for executing military missions.

(4) SUPPORT BY MILITARY DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES.—The head of each military department and defense agency shall assign an official to support the Coordinator and to align component plans and budgets with the objectives and schedules of the Joint Information Environment.

(b) Selection of standard language for representing and communicating cyber event and threat data.—Not later than June 1, 2015, the Chief Information Officer shall select a standard language for representing and communicating cyber event and threat data that is machine-readable for the Joint Information Environment from among open source candidates.

(c) Assessment of applications used by Department of Defense and estimate of time-phased cloud computing workload of Department of Defense.—

(1) ASSESSMENT OF APPLICATIONS.—As part of the Department's cloud computing migration strategy under the Joint Information Environment, the Chief Information Officer of the Department shall identify and prioritize the applications in use in the Department that should be considered for migration to a cloud computing environment and determine the following:

(A) Whether each of the applications used by the Department can be readily ported to a cloud computing environment.

(B) If an application used by the Department cannot be readily ported to a cloud computing environment, the cost and time required to enable, either by modification or replacement, the operation of the application in a cloud computing environment.

(C) Whether it would be cost-effective to enable, either by modification or replacement, the operation of an application described in subparagraph (B) in a cloud computing environment.

(D) A list of applications used by the Department that should be enabled, either by modification or replacement, to operate in a cloud computing environment, listed in the order of priority by which they should be enabled, and a schedule for such modification or replacement.

(2) ESTIMATE.—The Chief Information Officer shall use the assessment conducted under paragraph (1) to develop an estimate of the time-phased cloud computing workload of the Department for the purpose of—

(A) informing the Department’s cloud computing strategy under the Joint Information Environment initiative; and

(B) to assist commercial cloud computing providers to develop business proposals for the Department.

SEC. 805. Report on implementation of acquisition process for information technology systems.

(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the implementation of the acquisition process for information technology systems required by section 804 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2402; 10 U.S.C. 2225 note).

(b) Elements.—The report required under subsection (a) shall, at a minimum, include the following elements:

(1) The applicable regulations, instructions, or policies implementing the acquisition process.

(5) Identification of any categories of information technology acquisitions to which this acquisition process will not apply.

(6) Recommendations for any legislation that may be required to implement the remaining criteria of this acquisition process.

SEC. 806. Revision of requirement for acquisition programs to maintain defense research facility records.

(A) in paragraph (3), by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting “; and”;

(i) by striking “prepared by Defense research facilities are readily available to all combatant commands” and inserting “prepared by Defense research facilities, including technology issue papers and technological assessments relating to major weapon systems, are readily available to Department of Defense components”; and

(A) by striking “this section:” and all that follows through “(1) The term” and inserting “this section, the term”;

(B) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively, and moving such paragraphs, as so redesignated, 2 ems to the left; and

SEC. 807. Rapid acquisition and deployment procedures for United States Special Operations Command.

(a) Requirement to establish procedures.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe procedures for the rapid acquisition and deployment of items for the United States Special Operations Command that are currently under development by the Department of Defense or available from the commercial sector and are—

(1) urgently needed to react to an enemy threat or to respond to significant and urgent safety situations;

(3) needed to avoid collateral damage risk where the absence of collateral damage is a requirement for mission success.

(b) Issues to be addressed.—The procedures prescribed under subsection (a) shall include the following:

(1) A process for streamlined communication between the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command, and the acquisition and research and development communities, including—

(A) a process for the Commander to communicate needs to the acquisition community and the research and development community; and

(B) a process for the acquisition community and the research and development community to propose items that meet the needs communicated by the Commander.

(2) Procedures for demonstrating, rapidly acquiring, and deploying items proposed pursuant to paragraph (1)(B), including—

(A) a process for demonstrating performance and evaluation for current operational purposes the existing capability of an item;

(B) a process for developing an acquisition and funding strategy for the deployment of an item; and

(1) IN GENERAL.—The process for demonstrating performance and evaluating for current operational purposes the existing capability of an item prescribed under subsection (b)(2)(A) shall include—

(A) an operational assessment in accordance with expedited procedures prescribed by the Director of Operational Testing and Evaluation; and

(B) a requirement to provide information to the deployment decision-making authority about any deficiency of the item in meeting the original requirements for the item (as stated in an operational requirements document or similar document).

(2) DEFICIENCY NOT A DETERMINING FACTOR.—The process may not include a requirement for any deficiency of an item to be the determining factor in deciding whether to deploy the item.

(d) Limitation.—The quantity of items of a system procured using the procedures prescribed pursuant to this section may not exceed the number established for low-rate initial production for the system. Any such items shall be counted for purposes of the number of items of the system that may be procured through low-rate initial production.

(e) Annual funding limitation.—Of the funds available to the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command in any given fiscal year, not more than $50,000,000 may be used to procure items under this section.

SEC. 821. Restatement and revision of requirements applicable to multiyear defense acquisitions to be specifically authorized by law.

(a) In general.—Subsection (i) of section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(i) Defense acquisitions specifically authorized by law.— (1) In the case of the Department of Defense, a multiyear contract in amount equal to or greater than $500,000,000 may not be entered into under this section unless the contract is specifically authorized by law in an Act other than an appropriations Act.

“(2) In submitting a request for a specific authorization by law to carry out a defense acquisition program using multiyear contract authority under this section, the Secretary shall include in the request a report containing preliminary findings of the agency head required in paragraphs (1) through (6) of subsection (a) together with the basis for such findings.

“(3) A multiyear contract may not be entered into under this section for a defense acquisition program that has been specifically authorized by law to be carried out using multiyear contract authority unless the Secretary of Defense certifies in writing, not later than 30 days before entry into the contract, that each of the following conditions is satisfied:

“(A) The Secretary has determined that each of the requirements in paragraphs (1) through (6) of subsection (a) will be met by such contract and has provided the basis for such determination to the congressional defense committees.

“(B) The Secretary's determination under subparagraph (A) was made after the completion of a cost analysis performed by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Analysis and such analysis supports the findings.

“(C) The system being acquired pursuant to such contract has not been determined to have experienced cost growth in excess of the critical cost growth threshold pursuant to section 2433(d) of this title within 5 years prior to the date the Secretary anticipates such contract (or a contract for advance procurement entered into consistent with the authorization for such contract) will be awarded.

“(D) A sufficient number of end items of the system being acquired under such contract have been delivered at or within the most current estimates of the program acquisition unit cost or procurement unit cost for such system to determine that current estimates of such unit costs are realistic.

“(E) During the fiscal year in which such contract is to be awarded, sufficient funds will be available to perform the contract in such fiscal year, and the future-years defense program for such fiscal year will include the funding required to execute the program without cancellation.

“(G) The proposed multiyear contract provides for production at not less than minimum economic rates given the existing tooling and facilities.

“(4) If for any fiscal year a multiyear contract to be entered into under this section is authorized by law for a particular procurement program and that authorization is subject to certain conditions established by law (including a condition as to cost savings to be achieved under the multiyear contract in comparison to specified other contracts) and if it appears (after negotiations with contractors) that such savings cannot be achieved, but that substantial savings could nevertheless be achieved through the use of a multiyear contract rather than specified other contracts, the President may submit to Congress a request for relief from the specified cost savings that must be achieved through multiyear contracting for that program. Any such request by the President shall include details about the request for a multiyear contract, including details about the negotiated contract terms and conditions.

“(5) (A) The Secretary may obligate funds for procurement of an end item under a multiyear contract for the purchase of property only for procurement of a complete and usable end item.

“(B) The Secretary may obligate funds appropriated for any fiscal year for advance procurement under a contract for the purchase of property only for the procurement of those long-lead items necessary in order to meet a planned delivery schedule for complete major end items that are programmed under the contract to be acquired with funds appropriated for a subsequent fiscal year (including an economic order quantity of such long-lead items when authorized by law).

“(6) The Secretary may make the certification under paragraph (3) notwithstanding the fact that one or more of the conditions of such certification are not met, if the Secretary determines that, due to exceptional circumstances, proceeding with a multiyear contract under this section is in the best interest of the Department of Defense and the Secretary provides the basis for such determination with the certification.

“(7) The Secretary may not delegate the authority to make the certification under paragraph (3) or the determination under paragraph (6) to an official below the level of Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics.”.

(b) Conforming amendment.—Subsection (a)(7) of such section is amended by striking “subparagraphs (C) through (F) of paragraph (1) of subsection (i)” and inserting “subparagraphs (C) through (F) of subsection (i)(3)”.

(c) Effective date.—The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to requests for specific authorization by law to carry out defense acquisition programs using multiyear contract authority that are made on or after that date.

SEC. 822. Extension and modification of contract authority for advanced component development and prototype units and modification of authority.

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking “advanced component development or prototype of technology” and inserting “advanced component development, prototype, or initial production of technology”; and

(B) in paragraph (2), by striking “delivery of initial or additional prototype items” and inserting “delivery of initial or additional items”; and

(2) in subsection (b)(4), by striking “September 30, 2014” and inserting “September 30, 2019”.

SEC. 823. Conditional temporary extension of comprehensive subcontracting plans.

(1) the Department of Defense will not be able to transition all participants in the test program to individual small business subcontracting plans that meet all relevant requirements contained in the Federal Acquisition Regulation before December 31, 2014; or

(2) participants transitioned to individual small business subcontracting plans do not enhance subcontracting opportunities for small business concerns.

SEC. 824. Sourcing requirements related to avoiding counterfeit electronic parts.

(i) by striking “trusted suppliers” and inserting “suppliers identified as trusted suppliers in accordance with regulations issued pursuant to subparagraphs (C) and (D)”; and

(C) in clause (ii), by striking “trusted suppliers;” and inserting “suppliers identified as trusted suppliers in accordance with the regulations issued pursuant to subparagraphs (C) and (D); and”; and

“(iii) obtain electronic parts from alternate suppliers when such parts are not available from original manufacturers, their authorized dealers, or trusted suppliers;”;

(B) by striking “subparagraph (A)” and inserting “clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph (A), when obtaining the electronic parts in accordance with such clauses is not possible”;

(3) in subparagraph (C), by striking “identify trusted suppliers that have appropriate policies” and inserting “identify as trusted suppliers those that have appropriate policies”; and

(4) in subparagraph (D), by striking “additional trusted suppliers” and inserting “their own identified trusted suppliers”.

SEC. 825. Authority for Defense Contract Audit Agency to interview contractor employees in connection with examination of contractor records.

(a) Authority.—Section 2313(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “, interview employees,” after “is authorized to inspect the plant”.

(b) Applicability.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to contracts entered into after the date of the enactment of this Act.

(c) Regulations.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall revise the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to implement the amendment made by subsection (a).

SEC. 827. Prohibition on reimbursement of contractors for congressional investigations and inquiries.

“(Q) Costs incurred by a contractor in connection with a congressional investigation or inquiry into an issue that is the subject matter of a proceeding resulting in a disposition as described in subsection (k)(2).”.

SEC. 828. Enhanced authority to acquire certain products and services produced in Africa.

(a) Authority.—In the case of a product or service to be acquired in support of Department of Defense activities in a covered African country for which the Secretary of Defense makes a determination described in subsection (b), the Secretary may conduct a procurement in which—

(1) competition is limited to products or services that are from that country; or

(2) a preference is provided for products or services that are from that country.

(b) Determination.— (1) A determination described in this subsection is a determination by the Secretary of either of the following:

(A) That the product or service concerned is to be used only in support of activities described in subsection (a).

(B) That it is in the national security interest of the United States to limit competition or provide a preference as described in subsection (a) because such limitation or preference is necessary—

(ii) to promote regional security, stability, and economic prosperity in Africa.

(2) A determination under paragraph (1)(B) shall not be effective for purposes of a limitation or preference under subsection (a) unless the Secretary also determines that the limitation or preference will not adversely affect—

(A) United States military operations or stability operations in the United States Africa Command area of responsibility; or

(c) Limitation on cost preferences.—Preferences provided under subsection (a)(2) shall, to the maximum extent practicable, be other than cost evaluation factors. No cost preference provided under such subsection may be more than 15 percent.

(d) Products and services from a covered African country.—For the purpose of this section:

(1) A product is from a covered African country if it is mined, produced, or manufactured in that country.

(2) A service is from a covered African country if it is performed in that country by citizens or residents of that country.

(e) Covered African country defined.—In this section, the term “covered African country” means a country in Africa that has signed a long-term agreement with the United States related to basing or operational needs of the United States Armed Forces, as determined by the Secretary of Defense.

SEC. 829. Requirement to provide photovoltaic devices from United States sources.

(a) Contract requirement.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each covered contract includes a provision requiring that any photovoltaic devices installed under the contract be manufactured in the United States substantially all from articles, materials, or supplies mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States, unless the head of the department or independent establishment concerned determines, on a case-by-case basis, that the inclusion of such requirement is inconsistent with the public interest or involves unreasonable costs, subject to exceptions provided in the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C. 2501 et seq.) or otherwise provided by law.

(1) COVERED CONTRACT.—The term “covered contract” means a contract awarded by the Department of Defense that provides for a photovoltaic device to be—

(A) installed inside the United States on Department of Defense property or in a facility owned by the Department of Defense; or

(B) reserved for the exclusive use of the Department of Defense in the United States for the full economic life of the device.

(2) PHOTOVOLTAIC DEVICES.—The term “photovoltaic device” means devices that convert light directly into electricity through a solid-stats, semiconductor process.

(a) Strategy.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop a comprehensive strategy for enhancing the role of Department of Defense program managers in developing and carrying out defense acquisition programs.

(b) Matters to be addressed.—The strategy required by this section shall address, at a minimum—

(2) increased emphasis on the mentoring of current and future program managers by experienced senior executives and program managers within the Department;

(4) additional incentives for the recruitment and retention of highly qualified individuals to serve as program managers;

(5) improved resources and support (including systems engineering expertise, cost estimating expertise, and software development expertise) for program managers;

(6) improved means of collecting and disseminating best practices and lessons learned to enhance program management across the Department;

(7) common templates and tools to support improved data gathering and analysis for program management and oversight purposes;

(8) increased accountability of program managers for the results of defense acquisition programs; and

(9) enhanced monetary and nonmonetary awards for successful accomplishment of program objectives by program managers.

(c) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the strategy developed under subsection (a).

SEC. 842. Tenure and accountability of program managers for program development periods.

(a) Revised guidance required.—Not later than 180 days after date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall revise Department of Defense guidance for defense acquisition programs to address the tenure and accountability of program managers for the program development period of defense acquisition programs.

(b) Program development period.—For the purpose of this section, the term “program development period” refers to the period before a decision on Milestone B approval (or Key Decision Point B approval in the case of a space program).

(c) Responsibilities.—The revised guidance required by subsection (a) shall provide that the program manager for the program development period of a defense acquisition program is responsible for—

(1) bringing to maturity the technologies and manufacturing processes that will be needed to carry out the program;

(2) ensuring continuing focus during program development on meeting stated mission requirements and other requirements of the Department of Defense;

(3) making trade-offs between program cost, schedule, and performance for the life-cycle of the program;

(5) ensuring that appropriate information is available to the milestone decision authority to make a decision on Milestone B approval (or Key Decision Point B approval in the case of a space program), including information necessary to make the certification required by section 2366a of title 10, United States Code.

(d) Qualifications, resources, and tenure.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each program manager for the program development period of a defense acquisition program—

(1) has the appropriate management, engineering, technical, and financial expertise needed to meet the responsibilities assigned pursuant to subsection (c);

(2) is provided the resources and support (including systems engineering expertise, cost estimating expertise, and software development expertise) needed to meet such responsibilities; and

(3) is assigned to the program manager position for such program until such time as such program is ready for a decision on Milestone B approval (or Key Decision Point B approval in the case of a space program).

SEC. 843. Tenure and accountability of program managers for program execution periods.

(a) Revised guidance required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall revise Department of Defense guidance for defense acquisition programs to address the tenure and accountability of program managers for the program execution period of defense acquisition programs.

(b) Program execution period.—For purposes of this section, the term “program execution period” refers to the period after Milestone B approval (or Key Decision Point B approval in the case of a space program).

(1) require the program manager for the program execution period of a defense acquisition program to enter into a performance agreement with the milestone decision authority for such program within six months of assignment, that—

(A) establishes expected parameters for the cost, schedule, and performance of the program consistent with the business case for the program;

(B) provides the commitment of the milestone decision authority to provide the level of funding and resources required to meet such parameters; and

(C) provides the assurance of the program manager that such parameters are achievable and that the program manager will be accountable for meeting such parameters; and

(A) veto the addition of new program requirements that would be inconsistent with the parameters established in the performance agreement entered into pursuant to paragraph (1), subject to the authority of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics to override the veto based on critical national security reasons;

(B) make trade-offs between cost, schedule, and performance, provided that such trade-offs are consistent with the parameters established in the performance agreement entered into pursuant to paragraph (1);

(C) redirect funding within such program, to the extent necessary to achieve the parameters established in the performance agreement entered into pursuant to paragraph (1);

(D) develop such interim goals and milestones as may be required to achieve the parameters established in the performance agreement entered into pursuant to paragraph (1); and

(E) use program funds to recruit and hire such technical experts as may be required to carry out the program, if necessary expertise is not otherwise provided by the Department of Defense.

(d) Qualifications, resources, and tenure.—The Secretary shall ensure that each program manager for the program execution period of a defense acquisition program—

(1) has the appropriate management, engineering, technical, and financial expertise needed to meet the responsibilities assigned pursuant to subsection (c);

(2) is provided the resources and support (including systems engineering expertise, cost estimating expertise, and software development expertise) needed to meet such responsibilities; and

(3) is assigned to the program manager position for such program at the time of Milestone B approval (or Key Decision Point B approval in the case of a space program) and continues in such position until the delivery of the first production units of the program.

(e) Limited waiver authority.—The Secretary may waive the requirement in paragraph (3) of subsection (d) that a program manager for the program execution period of a defense acquisition program serve in that position until the delivery of the first production units of such program upon submitting to the congressional defense committees a written determination that—

(1) the program is so complex, and the delivery of the first production units will take so long, that it would not be feasible for a single individual to serve as program manager for the entire period covered by such paragraph; and

(2) the complexity of the program, and length of time that will be required to deliver the first production units, are not the result of a failure to meet the certification requirements under section 2366a of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 844. Removal of requirements related to waiver of preliminary design review and post-preliminary design review before Milestone B.

SEC. 845. Comptroller General of the United States report on operational testing programs for major defense acquisition programs.

(a) Report required.—Not later than March 31, 2015, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on disputes between the Office of the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation and the acquisition community over testing requirements for major weapon systems.

(b) Contents.—The report required by subsection (a) shall address, at a minimum, the following matters:

(1) The extent, if any, to which the disputes described in subsection (a) have been the result of efforts that require that major weapon systems conduct operational testing in excess of levels necessary to demonstrate—

(A) compliance with program requirements validated by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council; and

(B) effectiveness and suitability for combat, as required by section 2399 of title 10, United States Code.

(2) The extent, if any, to which such disputes have been the result of efforts to reduce potential testing for major weapon systems below levels necessary to demonstrate—

(A) compliance with program requirements validated by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council; and

(B) effectiveness and suitability for combat, as required by section 2399 of title 10, United States Code.

(3) The extent, if any, to which testing requirements or standards established for major weapons systems as described in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) that were incompatible or inconsistent with testing requirements or standards as described in subparagraph (B) of such paragraph, and the impact of any such incompatibility or inconsistency.

(1) The term “major defense acquisition program” has the meaning given that term in section 2430 of title 10, United States Code.

(2) The term “major weapon system” means a major system within the meaning of section 2302d(a) of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 861. Extension to United States Transportation Command of authorities relating to prohibition on contracting with the enemy.

(1) by striking “means United States Central Command” and inserting the following: “means—

(2) by striking “Pacific Command.” and inserting the following: “Pacific Command; and

SEC. 862. Reimbursement of Department of Defense for assistance provided to nongovernmental entertainment-oriented media producers.

(a) In general.—Subchapter II of chapter 134 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2263 the following new section:

“§ 2264. Reimbursement for assistance provided to nongovernmental entertainment-oriented media producers

“(a) In general.—There shall be credited to the applicable appropriations account or fund from which the expenses described in subsection (b) were charged any amounts received by the Department of Defense as reimbursement for such expenses.

“(b) Description of expenses.—The expenses referred to in subsection (a) are any expenses—

“(1) incurred by the Department of Defense as a result of providing assistance to a nongovernmental entertainment-oriented media producer;

“(2) for which the Department of Defense requires reimbursement under section 9701 of title 31 or any other provision of law; and

“(3) for which the Department of Defense received reimbursement after the date of the enactment of the Carl Levin National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by adding after the item relating to section 2263 the following new item:

SEC. 863. Three-year extension of authority for Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund.

SEC. 901. Reorganization of the Office of the Secretary of Defense and related matters.

(a) Conversion of position of Deputy Chief Management Officer to position of Chief Management Officer.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 4 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 133 the following new section:

“(a) Appointment.—There is a Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, appointed from civilian life by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

“(b) Responsibility for discharge of certain statutory position requirements.—In addition to the responsibilities specified in subsection (c), the Chief Management Officer is also the following:

“(c) General responsibilities.—The Chief Management Officer is responsible, subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense in the role of the Deputy Secretary as Chief Operating Officer of the Department of Defense, for the following:

“(1) Assisting the Deputy Secretary of Defense in the Deputy Secretary’s role as the Chief Operating Officer of the Department of Defense under section 132(c) of this title.

“(2) Supervising the management of the business operations of the Department of Defense and adjudicating issues and conflicts in functional domain business policies.

“(3) Establishing business strategic planning and performance management policies and measures and developing the Department of Defense Strategic Management Plan.

“(4) Establishing business information technology portfolio policies and overseeing investment management of that portfolio for the Department of Defense.

“(5) Establishing end-to-end business process and policies for establishing, eliminating, and implementing business standards, and the Business Enterprise Architecture.

“(6) Exercising authority, direction, and control over the Information Assurance Directorate of the National Security Agency.

“(7) Discharging the responsibilities provided for in chapter 35 of title 44 and section 11315 of title 40 for chief information officers of executive agencies.

“(8) In addition to discharging the responsibilities specified in paragraph (7)—

“(A) reviewing and providing recommendations to the Secretary of Defense on Department of Defense budget requests for information technology and national security systems;

“(B) ensuring the interoperability of information technology and national security systems throughout the Department of Defense;

“(C) ensuring that information technology and national security systems standards that will apply throughout the Department of Defense are prescribed;

“(D) providing for the elimination of duplicate information technology and national security systems within and between the military departments and the Defense Agencies; and

“(E) maintaining a consolidated inventory of Department of Defense mission critical and mission essential information systems, identifying interfaces between such information systems and other information systems, and developing and maintaining contingency plans for responding to a disruption in the operation of any of such information systems.

“(d) Precedence.—The Chief Management Officer takes precedence in the Department of Defense after the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and the Secretaries of the military departments.”.

(2) CONFORMING REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED AUTHORITY.—Section 132a of such title is repealed.

(A) by striking paragraphs (2) and (3) and inserting the following new paragraph (2):

“(2) (A) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics.

(B) by redesignated paragraphs (4) through (8) as paragraphs (3) through (7), respectively.

(4) CONTINUATION OF INCUMBENT IN POSITION.—The individual appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to serve as the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense as of the date of enactment of this Act shall serve as the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense under section 133a of title 10, United States Code (as amended by paragraph (1)), after that date.

(b) Designation of Deputy Secretary of Defense as Chief Operating Officer of Department of Defense.—Subsection (c) of section 132 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(c) (1) The Deputy Secretary serves as the Chief Operating Officer of the Department of Defense.

“(2) In the Deputy Secretary's role as Chief Operating Officer of the Department of Defense, the Deputy Secretary shall exercise authority, direction, and control of the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense under section 133a of this title.”.

(1) INCREASE IN NUMBER OF PDUS.—Paragraph (1) of subsection (a) of section 137a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “five” and inserting “seven”.

(2) CODIFICATION OF RESTRICTION ON USE OF DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE TITLE.—

(A) CODIFICATION.—Subsection (a) of such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(3) The officials authorized under this section shall be the only Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense.”.

(B) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Section 906(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (10 U.S.C. 137a note) is repealed.

(3) CONFORMING AMENDMENT FOR THE VACANCY REFORM ACT OF 1998.—Subsection (b) of section 137a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “is absent or disabled” and inserting “dies, resigns, or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of the office”.

(4) AMENDMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH CONVERSION TO POSITION OF CHIEF MANAGEMENT OFFICER.—

(A) Subsection (b) of such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “For purposes of the preceding sentence and paragraphs (6) and (7) of subsection (c), the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense shall be treated as an Under Secretary of Defense.”

(B) ADDITIONAL PDUS.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:

“(6) One of the Principal Deputy Under Secretaries is the Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Management.

“(7) One of the Principal Deputy Under Secretaries is the Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Information.”.

(d) Redesignation of Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational Energy Plans and Programs to reflect merger with Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for installations and environment.—Paragraph (9) of section 138(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(9) (A) One of the Assistant Secretaries is the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment. The Assistant Secretary—

“(i) is the principal advisor to the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics on matters relating to energy, installations, and environment; and

“(ii) is the principal advisor to the Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense regarding operational energy plans and programs.

“(B) In the capacity specified in subparagraph (A)(ii), the Assistant Secretary may communicate views on matters related to operational energy plans and programs and the operational energy strategy directly to the Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense without obtaining the approval or concurrence of any other official within the Department of Defense.”.

(e) Elimination and integration of separate statutory sections for certain prescribed Assistant Secretary of Defense positions.—Chapter 4 of title 10, United States Code, is further amended as follows:

(1) ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR LOGISTICS AND MATERIEL READINESS.—Paragraph (7) of section 138(b) is amended—

(A) in the first sentence, by inserting after “Readiness” the following: “, who shall be appointed from among persons with an extensive background in the sustainment of major weapons systems and combat support equipment”;

(C) by transferring to the end of that paragraph (as amended by subparagraph (B)) the text of subsection (b) of section 138a;

(D) by transferring to the end of that paragraph (as amended by subparagraph (C)) the text of subsection (c) of section 138a; and

(E) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (3) in the text transferred by subparagraph (C) of this paragraph as subparagraphs (A) through (C), respectively.

(2) ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING.—Paragraph (8) of such section is amended—

(A) by striking the second sentence and inserting the text of subsection (a) of section 138b;

(B) by inserting after the text added by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph the following: “The Assistant Secretary, in consultation with the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Developmental Test and Evaluation, shall—”;

(C) by transferring paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (b) of section 138b to the end of that paragraph (as amended by subparagraphs (A) and (B)), indenting those paragraphs 2 ems from the left margin, and redesignating those paragraphs as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively;

(i) by striking “The Assistant Secretary” and all that follows through “Test and Evaluation, shall”; and

(E) in subparagraph (B) (as so transferred and redesignated), by striking “The Assistant Secretary” and all that follows through “Test and Evaluation, shall”.

(3) ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR NUCLEAR, CHEMICAL, AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAMS.—Paragraph (10) of such section is amended—

(A) by striking the second sentence and inserting the text of subsection (b) of section 138d; and

(B) by inserting after the text added by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph the text of subsection (a) of such section and in that text as so inserted—

(i) by striking “of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs”; and

(ii) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (3) as subparagraphs (A) through (C), respectively.

(1) Section 134(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “after” and all that follows and inserting “the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense”.

(2) Section 137a(d) of such title is amended by striking “the Under Secretaries of Defense, and the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense” and inserting “the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, and the other Under Secretaries of Defense”.

(3) Section 138(d) of such title is amended by striking “the Under Secretaries of Defense, the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense” and inserting “the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, the other Under Secretaries of Defense”.

(g) Clarification of policy and responsibilities of Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment.—

(1) TRANSFER OF POLICY PROVISIONS.—Chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(B) by transferring paragraph (3) of section 138c(c) of such title to section 2926, as added by subparagraph (A), inserting such paragraph after the section heading, and redesignated such paragraph as subsection (a);

(i) by inserting “Alternative fuel activities.—” before “The Assistant Secretary”;

(ii) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) through (E) as paragraphs (1) through (5), respectively; and

(iii) in paragraph (5) (as so redesignated), by striking “subsection (e)(4)” and inserting “subsection (c)(4)”;

(D) by transferring subsections (d), (e), and (f) of section 138c of such title to section 2926, as added by subparagraph (A), inserting those subsections after subsection (a) (as transferred and redesignated by subparagraph (B)), and redesignating those subsections as subsections (b), (c), and (d), respectively;

(E) in subsections (a), (b), (c), and (d) of section 2926 (as transferred and redesignated by subparagraphs (B) and (D)), by inserting “of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment” after “Assistant Secretary” the first place it appears in each such subsection; and

(F) in paragraph (4) of subsection (b) of section 2926 (as transferred and redesignated by subparagraph (D)), by striking “provide guidance to, and consult with, the Secretary of Defense, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the Secretaries of the military departments,” and inserting “make recommendations to the Secretary of Defense and Deputy Secretary of Defense and provide guidance to the Secretaries of the military departments”.

(h) Technical and conforming amendments.—Title 10, United States Code, is further amended as follows:

(1) In paragraph (6) of section 131(b) (as redesignated by subsection (a)(3))—

(A) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) through (H) as subparagraphs (B) through (I), respectively; and

(B) by inserting before subparagraph (B), as redesignated by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, the following new subparagraph (A):

“(A) The two Deputy Directors within the Office of the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation under section 139a(c) of this title.”.

(2) Section 132(b) is amended by striking “is disabled or there is no Secretary of Defense” and inserting “dies, resigns, or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of the office”.

(A) in subsection (a), by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following new paragraph (2):

(B) in subsection (b), by striking “the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense” and inserting “the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense”.

(4) In section 2222, by striking “the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense” each place it appears in subsections (c)(2)(E), (d)(3), (f)(1)(D), (f)(1)(E), and (f)(2)(E) and inserting “the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense”.

(5) In section 2925(b), by striking “Operational Energy Plans and Programs” and inserting “Energy, Installations, and Environment”.

(1) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 4 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(A) by striking the items relating to sections 132a, 138a, 138b, 138c, and 138d; and

(2) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter III of chapter 173 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

(1) EXECUTIVE SCHEDULE LEVEL III.—Section 5314 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to the Deputy Chief Management Office of the Department of Defense and inserting the following new item:

(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT TO PRIOR REDUCTION IN NUMBER OF ASSISTANT SECRETARIES OF DEFENSE.—Section 5315 of such title is amended by striking “Assistant Secretaries of Defense (16)” and inserting “Assistant Secretaries of Defense (14)”.

(1) DCMO.—Any reference to the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense in any provision of law or in any rule, regulation, or other record, document, or paper of the United States shall be deemed to refer to the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense.

(2) CIO.—Any reference to the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense in any provision of law or in any rule, regulation, or other record, document, or paper of the United States shall be deemed to refer to the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense.

(3) ASDEIE.—Any reference to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational Energy Plans and Programs or to the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment in any provision of law or in any rule, regulation, or other paper of the United State shall be deemed to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment.

(1) REDESIGNATION OF POSITION.—The position of Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs is hereby redesignated as the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs. The individual serving in that position on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act may continue in office after that date without further appointment.

(2) STATUTORY DUTIES.—Paragraph (2) of section 138(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(2) One of the Assistant Secretaries is the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs. In addition to any duties and powers prescribed under paragraph (1), the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs shall have as the principal duty of such Assistant Secretary the overall supervision of manpower and reserve affairs of the Department of Defense.”.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1007 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 10201.

SEC. 911. Modifications to requirements for accounting for members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees listed as missing.

(a) Designation of officer.—Section 1501(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1) in the subsection heading, by striking “Personnel” and inserting “Persons”;

(4) by striking the first sentence of paragraph (1) and inserting the following:

“(1) (A) The Secretary of Defense shall designate a single organization within the Department of Defense to have responsibility for Department matters relating to missing persons, including accounting for missing persons and persons whose remains have not been recovered from the conflict in which they were lost.

“(B) The organization designated under this paragraph shall be a Defense Agency or other entity of the Department of Defense outside the military departments and is referred to in this chapter as the ‘designated Defense Agency’.

“(C) The head of the organization designated under this paragraph is referred to in this chapter as the ‘designated Agency Director’.”.

(b) Responsibilities.—Paragraph (2) of such section, as designated by subsection (a)(3), is amended—

(1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “the official designated under this paragraph shall include—” and inserting “the designated Agency Director shall include the following:”

(2) by capitalizing the first letter of the first word of each of subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D);

(3) by striking the semicolon at the end of subparagraph (A) and inserting a period;

“(E) The establishment of a means for communication between officials of the designated Defense Agency and family members of missing persons, veterans service organizations, concerned citizens, and the public on the Department’s efforts to account for missing persons, including a readily available means for communication of their views and recommendations to the designated Agency Director.”.

(1) in paragraph (3), by striking “the official designated under paragraphs (1) and (2)” and inserting “the designated Agency Director”; and

(2) in paragraphs (4) and (5), by striking “The designated official” and inserting “The designated Agency Director”.

(e) Public-private partnerships and other forms of support.—Chapter 76 of such title is amended by inserting after section 1501 the following new section:

“(a) Public-private partnerships.—The Secretary of Defense may enter into arrangements known as public-private partnerships with appropriate entities outside the Government for the purposes of facilitating the activities of the designated Defense Agency. The Secretary may only partner with foreign governments or foreign entities with the concurrence of the Secretary of State. Any such arrangement shall be entered into in accordance with authorities provided under this section or any other authority otherwise available to the Secretary. Regulations prescribed under subsection (f)(1) shall include provisions for the establishment and implementation of such partnerships.

“(b) Acceptance of voluntary personal services.—The Secretary of Defense may accept voluntary services to facilitate accounting for missing persons in the same manner as the Secretary of a military department may accept such services under section 1588(a)(9) of this title.

“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may enter into a cooperative agreement with, or make a grant to, a private entity for purposes related to support of the activities of the designated Defense Agency.

“(2) INAPPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS.—Notwithstanding section 2304(k) of this title, the Secretary may enter such cooperative agreements or grants on a sole source basis pursuant to section 2304(c)(5) of this title.

“(d) Use of department of defense personal property.—The Secretary may allow a private entity to use, at no cost, personal property of the Department of Defense to assist the entity in supporting the activities of the designated Defense Agency.

“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations to implement this section.

“(2) LIMITATION.—Such regulations shall provide that acceptance of a gift (including a gift of services) or use of a gift under this section may not occur if the nature or circumstances of the acceptance or use would compromise the integrity, or the appearance of integrity, of any program of the Department of Defense or any individual involved in such program.

“(1) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT.—The term ‘cooperative agreement’ means an authorized cooperative agreement as described in section 6305 of title 31.

“(2) GRANT.—The term ‘grant’ means an authorized grant as described in section 6304 of title 31.”.

(f) Section 1505 conforming amendments.—Section 1505(c) of such title is amended—

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking “the office established under section 1501 of this title” and inserting “the designated Agency Director”; and

(2) in paragraphs (2) and (3), by striking “head of the office established under section 1501 of this title” and inserting “designated Agency Director”.

(B) in paragraph (1), by striking “POW/MIA accounting community” and inserting “through the designated Agency Director”;

“(2) (A) The Secretary shall assign or detail to the designated Defense Agency on a full-time basis a senior medical examiner from the personnel of the Armed Forces Medical Examiner System. The primary duties of the medical examiner so assigned or detailed shall include the identification of remains in support of the function of the designated Agency Director to account for unaccounted for persons covered by subsection (a).

“(B) In carrying out functions under this chapter, the medical examiner so assigned or detailed shall report to the designated Agency Director.

“(ii) establish identification and laboratory policy consistent with the Armed Forces Medical Examiner System; and

“(D) Nothing in this chapter shall be interpreted as affecting the authority of the Armed Forces Medical Examiner under section 1471 of this title.”.

(A) in the subsection heading, by inserting “; Centralized database” after “Files”; and

“(4) The Secretary of Defense shall establish and maintain a single centralized database and case management system containing information on all missing persons for whom a file has been established under this subsection. The database and case management system shall be accessible to all elements of the Department of Defense involved in the search, recovery, identification, and communications phases of the program established by this section.”; and

(ii) by striking “Secretary of Defense shall coordinate” and inserting “designated Agency Director shall ensure coordination”;

“(3) In carrying out the program, the designated Agency Director shall coordinate all external communications and events associated with the program.”.

(1) CROSS-REFERENCE CORRECTION.—Section 1513(1) of such title is amended in the last sentence by striking “subsection (b)” and inserting “subsection (c)”.

(2) HEADING AMENDMENT.—The heading of section 1509 of such title is amended to read as follows:

(3) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 76 of such title is amended—

(A) by inserting after the item relating to section 1501 the following new item:

(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this division for fiscal year 2015 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred.

(2) LIMITATION.—Except as provided in paragraph (3), the total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this section may not exceed $5,000,000,000.

(3) EXCEPTION FOR TRANSFERS BETWEEN MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS.—A transfer of funds between military personnel authorizations under title IV shall not be counted toward the dollar limitation in paragraph (2).

(b) Limitations.—The authority provided by subsection (a) to transfer authorizations—

(1) may only be used to provide authority for items that have a higher priority than the items from which authority is transferred; and

(2) may not be used to provide authority for an item that has been denied authorization by Congress.

(c) Effect on authorization amounts.—A transfer made from one account to another under the authority of this section shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for the account to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal to the amount transferred.

(d) Notice to Congress.—The Secretary shall promptly notify Congress of each transfer made under subsection (a).

(a) Establishment of Fund.—Chapter 131 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2218 the following new section:

“(a) Establishment.—There is established in the Treasury of the United States a fund to be known as the ‘National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund’.

“(b) Administration of fund.—The Secretary of Defense shall administer the Fund consistent with the provisions of this section.

“(c) Fund purposes.—Funds in the Fund shall be available for obligation and expenditure only for construction (including design of vessels), purchase, alteration, and conversion of national sea-based deterrence vessels.

“(d) Deposits.—There shall be deposited in the Fund all funds appropriated to the Department of Defense for construction (including design of vessels), purchase, alteration, and conversion of national sea-based deterrence vessels.

“(e) Limitation.—The construction, purchase, alteration, or conversion of national sea-based deterrence vessels with funds in the Fund pursuant to subsection (c) shall be conducted in United States shipyards.

“(f) Expiration of funds after 5 years.—No part of an appropriation that is deposited in the Fund pursuant to subsection (d) shall remain available for obligation more than five years after the end of fiscal year for which appropriated except to the extent specifically provided by law.

“(g) Budget requests.—Budget requests submitted to Congress for the Fund shall separately identify the amount requested for programs, projects, and activities for construction (including design of vessels), purchase, alteration, and conversion of national sea-based deterrence vessels.

“(1) The term ‘Fund’ means the National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund established by subsection (a).

“(2) The term ‘national sea-based deterrence vessel’ means any vessel owned, operated, or controlled by the Department of Defense that carries operational intercontinental ballistic missiles.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 131 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2218 the following new item:

(1) The budget of the President for fiscal year 2015, as submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, provides for significant reductions to the military force structure and in military compensation over the course of the future-years defense program, including proposals to restrict pay raises for members of the Armed Forces below the rate of inflation, freeze pay for general and flag officers, reduce the growth of housing allowances by requiring members of the Armed Forces to pay 5 percent out-of-pocket for housing costs, reduce appropriated fund subsidies to the defense commissaries, make significant changes to benefits under the TRICARE program, reduce the end strength of the Army by more than 60,000, retire the A–10 and U–2 aircraft of the Air Force, inactivate half of the cruiser fleet of the Navy, and reduce the size of the helicopter fleet of the Army by 25 percent and terminate the Ground Combat Vehicle program of the Army.

(2) These proposed reductions are the result of the budget caps enacted by Congress in the Budget Control Act of 2011 and reaffirmed (with some relief for fiscal years 2014 and 2015) in the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2014, which cut more than $900,000,000,000 from the planned Department of Defense budget over a period of ten years. Under these budget caps, the Department of Defense budget is unchanged from the funding level in fiscal years 2013 and 2014, and remains more than $30,000,000,000 below the funding provided to the Department in fiscal years 2010, 2011, and 2012. In inflation-adjusted terms, the drop is even greater, with a reduction of $75,000,000,000 since fiscal year 2010 and virtually no projected growth in inflation-adjusted dollars through the balance of the future-years defense program.

(3) If the budget caps remain unchanged for fiscal year 2016 and beyond, the Department of Defense will be required to make even deeper cuts, including an additional reduction of 60,000 in the end strength of the Army, the retirement of the entire KC–10 tanker aircraft fleet and the Global Hawk Block 40 fleet, reduced purchases of Joint Strike Fighters and unmanned aerial vehicles, the inactivation of additional naval vessels, reduced purchases of destroyers, and the elimination of an aircraft carrier and a carrier air wing. Senior civilian and military leaders of the Department of Defense have testified that if these additional reductions are carried out, the United States Armed Forces will not be able to carry out the National Defense Strategy.

(4) The budget of the President for fiscal year 2015 proposes to add $115,000,000,000 to the budget caps of the Department of Defense for the four fiscal years starting in fiscal year 2016 in order to avoid the need to make the additional cuts described in paragraph (3). The budget proposes to add an equal amount to the budget caps for the non-defense agencies of the Federal Government in order to ensure that such agencies can continue to meet their obligation to protect and promote public safety, health, education, justice, transportation, the environment, and other domestic needs.

(1) leaving the budget caps described in subsection (a)(2) for fiscal year 2016 and beyond unchanged would require cuts that would seriously undermine the ability of the Department of Defense to carry out its national security mission and reduce the ability of other Federal Government agencies to adequately address non-defense priorities; and

(2) Congress should avoid these adverse impacts to the national interests of the United States by enacting deficit-neutral legislation to increase the budget caps, offset by a bipartisan comprehensive package.

SEC. 1011. Extension of authority to support unified counter-drug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia.

(a) Extension.—Section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2042), as most recently amended by section 1011(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 126 Stat. 843), is further amended—

(b) Notice to Congress on assistance.—Not later than 15 days before providing assistance under section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (as amended by subsection (a)) using funds available for fiscal year 2015, 2016, or 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a notice setting forth the assistance to be provided, including the types of such assistance, the budget for such assistance, and the anticipated completion date and duration of the provision of such assistance.

SEC. 1012. Extension and modification of authority for joint task forces supporting law enforcement agencies conducting activities to counter transnational organized crime to support law enforcement agencies conducting counter-terrorism activities.

(a) In general.—Subsection (a) of section 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (10 U.S.C. 371 note) is amended by inserting “or activities to counter transnational organized crime” after “counter-drug activities”.

(2) by inserting “for drug interdiction and counter-drug activities that are” after “funds”; and

(3) by inserting “or activities to counter transnational organized crime” after “counter-drug activities”.

(B) by striking “Congress” and inserting “the congressional defense committees”;

(A) by inserting “, counter-transnational organized crime,” after “counter-drug” the first place it appears; and

(B) by inserting “or funds to counter transnational organized crime” after “counter-drug funds”;

(3) in paragraph (2), by inserting before the period the following: “, and a description of the objectives of such support”; and

(4) in paragraph (3), by inserting before the period the following: “or operations to counter transnational organized crime”.

(A) by inserting “or funds to counter transnational organized crime” after “counter-drug funds”; and

(B) by inserting “or activities to counter transnational organized crime, as applicable,” after “counter-drug activities”;

(B) by striking “Congress” and inserting “the congressional defense committees”; and

(C) by inserting before the period at the end of the second sentence the following: “, together with a description of the national security interests associated with the support covered by such waiver”; and

(e) Counter-illicit trafficking activities.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(1) IN GENERAL.—In addition to any support authorized by subsection (a), a joint task force of the Department described in that subsection may also provide, subject to all applicable laws and regulations, support to law enforcement agencies conducting counter-illicit trafficking activities.

“(2) ILLICIT TRAFFICKING DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term ‘illicit trafficking’ means the trafficking of money, goods, or value gained from illegal activities, including human trafficking, illegal trade in natural resources and wildlife, trade in illegal drugs and weapons, illicit financial flows, and other forms of illicit activities determined by the Secretary of Defense to directly benefit organizations that have been determined to be a security threat to the United States.”.

SEC. 1013. Extension of authority to provide additional support for counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments.

(a) Extension.—Subsection (a)(2) of section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 111 Stat. 1881), as most recently amended by section 1013(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 844), is further amended by striking “September 30, 2016” and inserting “September 30, 2020”.

(b) Availability of funds.—Subsection (e) of such section 1033 (111 Stat. 1882), as most recently amended by section 1013(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 844), is further amended to read as follows:

“(e) Availability of funds.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 in which the authority under this section is in effect for drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, an amount not to exceed $125,000,000 shall be available in such fiscal year for the provision of support under this section.”.

SEC. 1014. Extension and modification of authority of Department of Defense to provide additional support for counterdrug activities of other governmental agencies.

(a) Extension.—Subsection (a) of section 1004 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (10 U.S.C. 374 note) is amended by striking “2014” and inserting “2020”.

(b) Expansion of authority To include activities To counter transnational organized crime.—Such section is further amended—

(1) by inserting “or activities to counter transnational organized crime” after “counter-drug activities” each place it appears;

(2) in subsection (a)(3), by inserting “or responsibilities for countering transnational organized crime” after “counter-drug responsibilities”; and

(3) in subsection (b)(5), by inserting “or counter-transnational organized crime” after “Counter-drug”.

(c) Notice to Congress on facilities projects.—Subsection (h)(2) of such section is amended by striking “$500,000” and inserting “$250,000”.

(d) Clerical amendment.—The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:

“SEC. 1004. Additional support for counter-drug activities and activities to counter transnational organized crime”.

SEC. 1021. Limitation on use of funds for inactivation of U.S.S. George Washington.

SEC. 1022. Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation of Ticonderoga class cruisers or dock landing ships.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided in this section, none of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense by this Act or the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66) may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, inactivate, or place in storage a cruiser or dock landing ship.

(2) USE OF SMOSF FUNDS.—Funds in the Ship, Modernization, Operations, and Sustainment Fund (SMOSF) may be used only for 11 Ticonderoga-class cruisers (CG 63 through CG 73) and 3 dock landing ships (LSD 41, LSD 42, and LSD 46). The Secretary of the Navy may use such funds only to man, operate, equip, sustain, and modernize such vessels.

(b) Phased modernization of Ticonderoga class cruisers and dock landing ships.—The Secretary of the Navy shall retain 22 Ticonderoga-class cruisers (CGs) and 12 Whidbey Island/Harpers Ferry-class dock landing ships (LSDs) until the end of their expected service lives, as follows:

(1) OPERATIONAL FORCES.—The naval combat forces of the Navy shall include not less than 11 operational cruisers (CG 52 through CG 62) and 11 operational dock landing ships (all members of the LSD 41 class, except LSD 41, LSD, 42 and LSD 46). For purposes of this paragraph, a cruiser or dock landing ship is operational if such vessel is available for worldwide deployment other than during routine or scheduled maintenance or repair.

(2) PHASED MODERNIZATION.—The Secretary may conduct phased modernization of the cruisers and dock landing ships for which funds in the Ship, Modernization, Operations, and Sustainment Fund are authorized to be available pursuant to subsection (a)(2). During a phased modernization period, the Secretary may reduce manning on such vessels to the minimal level necessary to ensure the safety and security of such vessels and to retain critical skills.

(3) END OF SERVICE AND TRANSITION FROM PHASED MODERNIZATION TO OPERATIONAL FORCES.—Cruisers covered by paragraph (1) may only be decommissioned when replaced by one of the cruisers for which the Navy has conducted a phased modernization using funds in the Ship, Modernization, Operations, and Sustainment Fund as described in paragraph (2). After being reintroduced into the operational fleet, the cruisers modernized as described in paragraph (2) may be decommissioned individually upon reaching the end of their expected service life, excluding time spent in a phased modernization status under paragraph (2). After being reintroduced into the operational fleet, the dock landing ships modernized as described in paragraph (2) may be decommissioned upon reaching the end of their expected service life, excluded time spent in a phased modernization status under paragraph (2).

(1) REQUIREMENTS.—During the period of phased modernization under subsection (b)(2) of the vessels specified in subsection (a)(2), the Secretary of the Navy shall—

(A) continue to maintain the vessels in a manner that will ensure the ability of the vessels to reenter the operational fleet;

(B) conduct planning activities to ensure scheduled and deferred maintenance and modernization work items are identified and included in maintenance availability work packages;

(C) conduct hull, mechanical, and electrical (HM&E) and combat system modernization necessary to achieve a service life of 40 years;

(D) in the case of the cruisers, schedule completion of maintenance and modernization, including required testing and crew training, to replace on a one-for-one basis, active cruisers that will be decommissioned upon reaching the end of their expected service life;

(E) ensure adequate funds are available to execute phased modernization activities for all the vessels.

(2) LIMITATIONS.—During the period of phased modernization under subsection (b)(2) of the vessels specified in subsection (a)(2), the Secretary may not—

(A) permit removal or cannibalization of equipment or systems to support operational vessels, other than—

(ii) equipment or systems necessary to support urgent operational requirements (but only with the approval of the Secretary of Defense); or

(B) make any irreversible modifications that will prohibit the vessel from reentering the operational fleet.

(d) Authority To enter into economic order quantity contracts.—The Secretary of the Navy may enter into a so-called “economic order quantity” contracts with private shipyards for ship maintenance and modernization, and with private industry for equipment procurement for the phased modernization under subsection (b)(2) of the vessels specified in subsection (a)(2).

(1) IN GENERAL.—At the same time as the submittal to Congress of the budget of the President under section 1105 of title 31, United States, for each fiscal year in which activities under the phased modernization of vessels will be carried out under this section, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a written report on the status of the phased modernization of vessels under this section.

(A) The status of phased modernization efforts, including availability schedules, equipment procurement schedules, and by-fiscal year funding requirements.

(B) The readiness, and operational and manning status of each vessel to be undergoing phased modernization under this section during the fiscal year covered by such report.

(D) A list of rotatable pool equipment that is identified across the whole class of cruisers to support operations on a continuing basis.

(E) A list of equipment, other than rotatable pool equipment and components incidental to performing maintenance, removed from each such vessel, including a justification for the removal, the disposition of the equipment, and plan for restoration of the equipment.

(F) A detailed plan for obligations and expenditures by vessel for the fiscal year beginning in the year of such report, and projections of obligations by vessel by fiscal year for the remaining time a vessel is in the phased modernization program.

(G) A statement of the funding required during the fiscal year beginning in the year of such report to ensure the Ship, Modernization, Operations, and Sustainment Fund account has adequate resources to execute the plan under subparagraph (F) in the execution fiscal year and the following fiscal year.

(3) NOTICE ON VARIANCE FROM PLAN.—Not later than 30 days before executing any material deviation from a plan under paragraph (2)(F) for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees in writing of such deviation from the plan.

(f) Repeal of superseded limitation.—Section 1023 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 846) is repealed.

SEC. 1023. Operational readiness of Littoral Combat Ships on extended deployments.

(a) Authority.—Subsection (a) of section 7310 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1) in the subsection heading, by inserting “under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy” after “vessels”;

(2) by striking “A naval vessel” and inserting “(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), a naval vessel”; and

“(2) (A) Subject to subparagraph (B), in the case of a naval vessel that is classified as a Littoral Combat Ship and is operating on deployment, corrective and preventive maintenance or repair (whether intermediate or depot level) and facilities maintenance may be performed on the vessel—

“(B) (i) Corrective and preventive maintenance or repair may be performed on a vessel as described in subparagraph (A) only if the work is performed by United States Government personnel or United States contractor personnel.

“(ii) Facilities maintenance may be performed by a foreign contractor on a vessel as described in subparagraph (A) only as approved by the Secretary of the Navy.”.

(b) Definitions.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(A) maintenance or repair actions performed as a result of a failure in order to return or restore equipment to acceptable performance levels; and

“(B) scheduled maintenance or repair actions intended to prevent or discover functional failures, including scheduled periodic maintenance requirements and integrated class maintenance plan tasks that are time-directed maintenance actions.

“(A) preservation or corrosion control efforts, encompassing surface preparation and preservation of the structural facility to minimize effects of corrosion; and

“(ii) deep cleaning of bilges to remove dirt, oily waste, and other foreign matter.”.

(1) SECTION HEADING.—The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:

“§ 7310. Overhaul, repair, and maintenance of vessels in foreign shipyards and facilities: restrictions; exceptions”.

(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 633 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 7310 and inserting the following:

SEC. 1024. Authority for limited coastwise trade for certain vessels providing transportation services under a shipbuilding or ship repair contract with the Secretary of the Navy.

(a) In general.—Chapter 645 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“(a) Contractor-owned vessel defined.—In this section, the term ‘contractor-owned vessel’ means a dry dock, a tugboat, or a towing vessel that—

“(A) is under contract with the Navy to construct, maintain, or repair a vessel of the Navy; and

“(B) in conjunction with such contract, is operating under a special security agreement with the Secretary of Defense;

“(3) is used, pursuant to such contract, to construct, maintain, or repair a vessel of the Navy; and

“(b) In general.—A contractor-owned vessel may, at the direction of the Secretary of the Navy, engage in coastwise trade for the exclusive purpose of performing a contract with the Navy to construct, maintain, or repair a vessel of the Navy, and any law pertaining to coastwise trade shall not apply to such vessel, the owner or operator of such vessel, or the operation of such vessel.

“(c) Notice.—The Secretary of the Navy shall provide notice to the Secretary of Homeland Security if a contractor-owned vessel is authorized, pursuant to this section, to engage in coastwise trade.

“(d) Limitation.—An authorization to engage in coastwise trade pursuant to this section shall be non-transferrable and shall expire on the earlier of—

“(2) the date of that the contract with the Navy to construct, maintain, or repair a vessel of the Navy expires or that the Secretary of the Navy terminates such contract; or

“(3) the date that the Secretary of Defense terminates the special security agreement with the contractor that owns the vessel.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 645 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

SEC. 1031. Limitation on the transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

(a) In general.—Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2015 may be used to transfer, release, or assist in the transfer or release to or within the United States, its territories, or possessions of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or any other detainee who—

(1) is not a United States citizen or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and

(2) is or was held on or after January 20, 2009, at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by the Department of Defense.

(b) Transfer for detention and trial.—The Secretary of Defense may transfer a detainee described in subsection (a) to the United States for detention pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40), trial, and incarceration if the Secretary—

(1) determines that the transfer is in the national security interest of the United States;

(2) determines that appropriate actions have been taken, or will be taken, to address any risk to public safety that could arise in connection with detention and trial in the United States; and

(3) notifies the appropriate committees of Congress not later than 30 days before the date of the proposed transfer.

(1) A statement of the basis for the determination that the transfer is in the national security interest of the United States.

(2) A description of the action the Secretary determines have been taken, or will be taken, to address any risk to the public safety that could arise in connection with the detention and trial in the United States.

(d) Status while in the United States.—A detainee who is transferred to the United States under this section—

(1) shall not be permitted to apply for asylum under section 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1158) or be eligible to apply for admission into the United States;

(2) shall be considered to be paroled into the United States temporarily pursuant to section 212(d)(5)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(5)(A)); and

(3) shall not, as a result of such transfer, have a change in designation as an unprivileged enemy belligerent eligible for detention pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force, as determined in accordance with applicable law and regulations.

(e) Limitation on transfer or release or detainees transferred to the United States.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an individual who is transferred to the United States under this section shall not be released within the United States or its territories, and may only be transferred or released in accordance with the procedures under section 1035 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 128 Stat. 851).

(1) LIMITATIONS.—Except as provided for in paragraph (2), no court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider any action against the United States or its agents relating to any aspect of the detention, transfer, treatment, or conditions of confinement of a detainee described in subsection (a) who is held by the Armed Forces of the United States.

(2) EXCEPTION.—A detainee who is transferred to the United States under this section shall not be deprived of the right to challenge his designation as an unprivileged enemy belligerent by filing a writ of habeas corpus as provided by the Supreme Court in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (548 U.S. 557 (2006)) and Boumediene v. Bush (553 U.S. 723 (2008)).

(3) NO CAUSE OF ACTION IN DECISION NOT TO TRANSFER.—A decision not to transfer a detainee to the United States under this section shall not give rise to a judicial cause of action.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subsections (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) shall take effect on the date, following the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the appropriate committees of Congress a detailed plan to close the detention facility at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, that Congress fails to enact a joint resolution disapproving such report pursuant to subsection (i).

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall contain the following:

(A) A case-by-case determination made for each individual detained at Guantanamo of whether such individual is intended to be transferred to a foreign country, transferred to the United States for the purpose of civilian or military trial, or transferred to the United States or another country for continued detention under the law of armed conflict.

(B) The specific facility or facilities that are intended to be used, or modified to be used, to hold individuals inside the United States for the purpose of trial, for detention in the aftermath of conviction, or for continued detention under the law of armed conflict.

(D) A description of the legal implications associated with the detention inside the United States of an individual detained at Guantanamo, including but not limited to the right to challenge such detention as unlawful.

(E) A detailed description and assessment, made in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, of the actions that would be taken prior to the transfer to a foreign country of an individual detained at Guantanamo that would substantially mitigate the risk of such individual engaging or reengaging in any terrorist or other hostile activity that threatens the United States or United States person or interests.

(F) What additional authorities, if any, may be necessary to detain an individual detained at Guantanamo inside the United States as an unprivileged enemy belligerent pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force, pending the end of hostilities or a future determination by the Secretary of Defense that such individual no longer poses a threat to the United States or United States persons or interests.

(3) FORM.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

(h) Interim prohibition.—The prohibition in section 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1911) shall apply to funds appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense from the date of the enactment of this Act until the effective date specified in subsection (g).

(1) TERMS OF THE RESOLUTION.—For purposes of this section the term “joint resolution” means only a joint resolution which is introduced within the 10-day period beginning on the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to Congress a report under subsection (g) and—

(B) the matter after the resolving clause of which is as follows: “That Congress disapproves the report of the Secretary of Defense under section 1031(g) of the Carl Levin National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 as submitted by the Secretary of Defense to Congress on ______”, the blank space being filled in with the appropriate date; and

(C) the title of which is as follows: “Joint resolution disapproving the Guantanamo Detention Facility Closure report of the Secretary of Defense.”.

(2) REFERRAL.—A resolution described in paragraph (1) that is introduced in the House of Representatives shall be referred to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. A resolution described in paragraph (1) introduced in the Senate shall be referred to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate.

(3) DISCHARGE.—If the committee to which a resolution described in paragraph (1) is referred has not reported such resolution (or an identical resolution) by the end of the 20-day period beginning on the date on which the Secretary submits to Congress a report under subsection (g), such committee shall be, at the end of such period, discharged from further consideration of such resolution, and such resolution shall be placed on the appropriate calendar of the House involved.

(4) CONSIDERATION.— (A) On or after the third day after the date on which the committee to which such a resolution is referred has reported, or has been discharged (under paragraph (3)) from further consideration of, such a resolution, it is in order (even though a previous motion to the same effect has been disagreed to) for any Member of the respective House to move to proceed to the consideration of the resolution. A Member may make the motion only on the day after the calendar day on which the Member announces to the House concerned the Member’s intention to make the motion, except that, in the case of the House of Representatives, the motion may be made without such prior announcement if the motion is made by direction of the committee to which the resolution was referred. All points of order against the resolution (and against consideration of the resolution) are waived. The motion is highly privileged in the House of Representatives and is privileged in the Senate and is not debatable. The motion is not subject to amendment, or to a motion to postpone, or to a motion to proceed to the consideration of other business. A motion to reconsider the vote by which the motion is agreed to or disagreed to shall not be in order. If a motion to proceed to the consideration of the resolution is agreed to, the respective House shall immediately proceed to consideration of the joint resolution without intervening motion, order, or other business, and the resolution shall remain the unfinished business of the respective House until disposed of.

(B) Debate on the resolution, and on all debatable motions and appeals in connection therewith, shall be limited to not more than 2 hours, which shall be divided equally between those favoring and those opposing the resolution. An amendment to the resolution is not in order. A motion further to limit debate is in order and not debatable. A motion to postpone, or a motion to proceed to the consideration of other business, or a motion to recommit the resolution is not in order. A motion to reconsider the vote by which the resolution is agreed to or disagreed to is not in order.

(C) Immediately following the conclusion of the debate on a resolution described in paragraph (1) and a single quorum call at the conclusion of the debate if requested in accordance with the rules of the appropriate House, the vote on final passage of the resolution shall occur.

(D) Appeals from the decisions of the Chair relating to the application of the rules of the Senate or the House of Representatives, as the case may be, to the procedure relating to a resolution described in paragraph (1) shall be decided without debate.

(5) CONSIDERATION BY OTHER HOUSE.— (A) If, before the passage by one House of a resolution of that House described in paragraph (1), that House receives from the other House a resolution described in paragraph (1), then the following procedures shall apply:

(i) The resolution of the other House shall not be referred to a committee and may not be considered in the House receiving it except in the case of final passage as provided in clause (ii)(II).

(ii) With respect to a resolution described in paragraph (1) of the House receiving the resolution—

(I) the procedure in that House shall be the same as if no resolution had been received from the other House; but

(B) Upon disposition of the resolution received from the other House, it shall no longer be in order to consider the resolution that originated in the receiving House.

(6) RULES OF THE SENATE AND THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.—This subsection is enacted by Congress—

(A) as an exercise of the rulemaking power of the Senate and House of Representatives, respectively, and as such it is deemed a part of the rules of each House, respectively, but applicable only with respect to the procedure to be followed in that House in the case of a resolution described in paragraph (1), and it supersedes other rules only to the extent that it is inconsistent with such rules; and

(B) with full recognition of the constitutional right of either House to change the rules (so far as relating to the procedure of that House) at any time, in the same manner, and to the same extent as in the case of any other rule of that House.

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

(2) The term “individual detained at Guantanamo” means any individual located at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of October 1, 2009, who—

(A) is not a citizen of the United States or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and

(ii) otherwise under detention at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

SEC. 1032. Report on facilitation of transfer overseas of certain individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

(a) Report.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall jointly submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the actions that have been taken and are planned to be taken to facilitate the transfer overseas of individuals detained at Guantanamo who have been approved for transfer.

(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:

(1) For each individual detained at Guantanamo in detention as of December 26, 2013, who has been approved for transfer overseas and has not been so transferred, a description of factors impeding the transfer.

(2) A description of the actions that have been taken by the Department of Defense and other Federal agencies to address the factors described in paragraph (1) impeding the transfer overseas of individuals described in that paragraph.

(3) A description of additional actions that are planned to be taken to address the factors described in paragraph (1) impeding the transfer overseas of such individuals.

(4) Such recommendations for legislative action as the Secretaries jointly consider appropriate to facilitate the transfer overseas of such individuals.

(c) Treatment as approved for transfer.—For purposes of this section, an individual shall be considered to have been approved for transfer if—

(1) the individual was approved for transfer under the review conducted by the Guantanamo Detainee Review Task Force established pursuant to Executive Order 13492;

(2) the Secretary of Defense determines, following a review conducted in accordance with the requirements of section 1023 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 801 note) and Executive Order 13567, that the individual is no longer a threat to the national security of the United States; or

(3) the individual has been approved for transfer consistent with the provisions of section 1035 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 851; 10 U.S.C. 801 note).

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

(2) The term “individual detained at Guantanamo” has the meaning given that term in section 1031(i)(2).

SEC. 1033. Authority to temporarily transfer individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United States for emergency or critical medical treatment.

(a) Transfer for emergency or critical medical treatment authorized.—Notwithstanding section 1031(a), or any other provision of law enacted after September 30, 2013, but subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense may temporarily transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to a Department of Defense medical facility in the United States for the sole purpose of providing the individual medical treatment if the Secretary determines that—

(1) the Senior Medical Officer, Joint Task Force–Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, has determined that the medical treatment is necessary to prevent death or imminent significant injury or harm to the health of the individual;

(2) based on the recommendation of the Senior Medical Officer, Joint Task Force–Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the medical treatment is not available to be provided at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, without incurring excessive and unreasonable costs; and

(3) the Department of Defense has provided for appropriate security measures for the custody and control of the individual during any period in which the individual is temporarily in the United States under this subsection.

(1) IN GENERAL.—In addition to the requirements in subsection (a), an individual may not be temporarily transferred under the authority in that subsection unless the Secretary of Defense submits to the appropriate committees of Congress the notice described in paragraph (2)—

(B) if notice cannot be provided in accordance with subparagraph (A) because of an especially immediate need for the provision of medical treatment to prevent death or imminent significant injury or harm to the health of the individual, as soon as is practicable, but not later than 5 days after the date of transfer.

(2) NOTICE ELEMENTS.—The notice on the transfer of an individual under this subsection shall include the following:

(A) A statement of the basis for the determination that the transfer is necessary to prevent death or imminent significant injury or harm to the health of the individual.

(B) The specific Department of Defense medical facility that will provide medical treatment to the individual.

(C) A description of the actions the Secretary determines have been taken, or will be taken, to address any risk to the public safety that could arise in connection with the provision of medical treatment to the individual in the United States.

(c) Limitation on exercise of authority.—The authority of the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a) may be exercised only by the Secretary of Defense or by another official of the Department of Defense at the level of Under Secretary of Defense or higher.

(d) Conditions of transfer.—An individual who is temporarily transferred under the authority in subsection (a) shall—

(1) while in the United States, remain in the custody and control of the Secretary of Defense at all times; and

(2) be returned to United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as soon as feasible after a Department of Defense physician determines that—

(B) in consultation with the Commander, Joint Task Force–Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, any necessary follow-up medical care may reasonably be provided the individual at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

(e) Status while in United States.—An individual who is temporarily transferred under the authority in subsection (a), while in the United States—

(1) shall be deemed at all times and in all respects to be in the uninterrupted custody of the Secretary of Defense, as though the individual remained physically at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba;

(2) shall not at any time be subject to, and may not apply for or obtain, or be deemed to enjoy, any right, privilege, status, benefit, or eligibility for any benefit under any provision of the immigration laws (as defined in section 101(a)(17) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(17)), or any other law or regulation;

(3) shall not be permitted to avail himself of any right, privilege, or benefit of any law of the United States beyond those available to individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; and

(4) shall not, as a result of such transfer, have a change in any designation that may have attached to that detainee while detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40), as determined in accordance with applicable law and regulations..

(1) NO CREATION OF ENFORCEABLE RIGHTS.—Nothing in this section is intended to create any enforceable right or benefit, or any claim or cause of action, by any party against the United States, or any other person or entity.

(2) LIMITATION ON JUDICIAL REVIEW.—Except as provided in paragraph (3), no court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider any claim or action against the United States or its agents relating to any aspect of the detention, transfer, treatment, or conditions of confinement of an individual transferred under this section.

(A) JURISDICTION.—The United States District Court for the District of Columbia shall have exclusive jurisdiction to consider an application for writ of habeas corpus challenging the fact or duration of detention and seeking release from custody filed by or on behalf of an individual who is in the United States pursuant to a temporary transfer under subsection (a). Such jurisdiction shall be limited to that required by the Constitution with respect to the fact or duration of detention.

(B) SCOPE OF AUTHORITY.—A court order in a proceeding covered by paragraph (3) may not—

(i) review, halt, or stay the return of the individual who is the object of the application to United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, including pursuant to subsection (d); or

(1) The term “appropriate committees of Congress” has the meaning given that term in section 1031(i)(1).

(2) The term “individual detained at Guantanamo” has the meaning given that term in section 1031(i)(2).

SEC. 1034. Prohibition on transfer or release to Yemen of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

SEC. 1041. Reduction in Department of Defense civilian personnel and review of certain headquarters spending.

(a) Report on certain civilian positions in Department of Defense.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the following:

(1) The total number of civilian positions created in the Department of Defense between September 11, 2001, and December 31, 2013, as a result of conversions of support functions from performance by military personnel to performance by civilian personnel, set forth separated by the number of each of administrative, technical, and medical positions.

(2) The total number of civilian positions created as described in paragraph (1) that were created as temporary provisions and are now being converted back to military positions.

(3) The total number of civilian positions created as described in paragraph (1) that have been or are being eliminated.

(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that the number of civilian positions in the Department of Defense created as described in subsection (a)(1) should be reduced simultaneously with reductions in the end strengths of the Armed Forces, and by the same percentages as the reductions in such end strengths which such reductions in civilian positions accompany.

(c) Review of spending on headquarters in lower echelon commands.—The Secretary shall conduct a review of spending on headquarters in commands at command echelons below the level of major command with the objective of—

(1) identifying opportunities to consolidate or eliminate commands that are geographically close or have similar missions;

(2) seeking further opportunities to centralize administrative and command support services, functions, or programs; and

(3) identifying means of achieving a reduction in spending for headquarters at such commands by an amount that is not less than the amount equal to 10 percent of the spending for headquarters of such commands in fiscal year 2014.

(d) Revision of Department of Defense instruction 5100.73, major DOD headquarters activities.—The Secretary shall require the Director of Administration and Management, in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, to revise Department of Defense Instruction 5100.73, Major DOD Headquarters Activities, to—

(1) include all major Department of Defense headquarter activity organizations within the purview of the instruction;

(2) specify how contractors performing major Department of Defense headquarters activity functions will be identified and included in headquarters reporting;

(3) clarify how components are to compile the major Department of Defense headquarters activities information needed to respond to the reporting requirements in section 1111 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 143 note) and section 115a(f) of title 10, United States Code, as a result of the amendments made by section 1109 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2492); and

(4) establish time frames for implementing the actions required pursuant to paragraphs (1) through (3) in order improve tracking and reporting of headquarters resources for major Department of Defense headquarters.

(e) Guidance for combatant commands.—In order to ensure that the combatant commands are properly sized to meet their assigned missions and to improve the transparency of the authorized manpower, assigned personnel, and mission and headquarters-support costs of the combatant commands, the Secretary shall require—

(1) the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to revise Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction 1001.01A to require—

(A) a comprehensive, periodic evaluation of whether the size and structure of the combatant commands are proper to ensure that the combatant commands meet assigned mission; and

(i) identify, manage, and track all personnel, including temporary personnel such as civilian overhires and Reserves on active duty, in the electronic Joint Manpower and Personnel System (e-JMAPS) of the Joint Staff; and

(ii) identify specific guidelines and timeframes for the combatant commands to consistently input personnel information and review assigned personnel in the electronic Joint Manpower and Personnel System (e-JMAPS) of the Joint Staff;

(2) the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in coordination with the Secretaries of the military departments and the commanders of the combatant commands, to develop and implement a formal process to gather information on authorized manpower and assigned personnel of the component commands of the Armed Forces; and

(3) the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) to revise Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation 7000.14R to require the military departments, in their annual budget documents for operation and maintenance, to identify the authorized military position and civilian and contractor full-time equivalents at each combatant command and provide detailed information on funding required by each combatant command for mission and headquarters support, such as civilian pay, contract services, travel and supplies.

(a) Secretary of Defense authority.—Chapter 159 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2671 the following new section:

“(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall protect the buildings, grounds, and property that are under the jurisdiction, custody, or control of the Department of Defense and the persons on that property.

“(b) Officers and agents.— (1) (A) The Secretary may designate military or civilian personnel of the Department of Defense as officers and agents to perform the functions of the Secretary under subsection (a), including, with regard to civilian officers and agents, duty in areas outside the property specified in that subsection to the extent necessary to protect that property and persons on that property.

“(B) A designation under subparagraph (A) may be made by individual, by position, by installation, or by such other category of personnel as the Secretary considers appropriate.

“(C) In making a designation under subparagraph (A) with respect to any category of personnel, the Secretary shall specify each of the following:

“(ii) Which authorities provided for in paragraph (2) may be exercised by personnel in that category.

“(I) which authorities provided for in paragraph (2), if any, are authorized to be exercised outside the property specified in subsection (a); and

“(II) with respect to the exercise of any such authorities outside the property specified in subsection (a), the circumstances under which coordination with law enforcement officials outside of the Department of Defense should be sought in advance.

“(D) The Secretary may make a designation under subparagraph (A) only if the Secretary determines, with respect to the category of personnel to be covered by that designation, that—

“(i) the exercise of each specific authority provided for in paragraph (2) to be delegated to that category of personnel is necessary for the performance of the duties of the personnel in that category and such duties cannot be performed as effectively without such authorities; and

“(ii) the necessary and proper training for the authorities to be exercised is available to the personnel in that category.

“(2) Subject to subsection (h) and to the extent specifically authorized by the Secretary, while engaged in the performance of official duties pursuant to this section, an officer or agent designated under this subsection may—

“(A) enforce Federal laws and regulations for the protection of persons and property;

“(i) without a warrant for any offense against the United States committed in the presence of the officer or agent; or

“(ii) for any felony cognizable under the laws of the United States if the officer or agent has reasonable grounds to believe that the person to be arrested has committed or is committing a felony;

“(D) serve warrants and subpoenas issued under the authority of the United States; and

“(E) conduct investigations, on and off the property in question, of offenses that may have been committed against property under the jurisdiction, custody, or control of the Department of Defense or persons on such property.

“(c) Regulations.— (1) The Secretary may prescribe regulations, including traffic regulations, necessary for the protection and administration of property under the jurisdiction, custody, or control of the Department of Defense and persons on that property. The regulations may include reasonable penalties, within the limits prescribed in paragraph (2), for violations of the regulations. The regulations shall be posted and remain posted in a conspicuous place on the property to which they apply.

“(2) A person violating a regulation prescribed under this subsection shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned for not more than 30 days, or both.

“(d) Limitation on delegation of authority.—The authority of the Secretary of Defense under subsections (b) and (c) may be exercised only by the Secretary or the Deputy Secretary of Defense.

“(e) Disposition of persons arrested.—A person who is arrested pursuant to authority exercised under subsection (b) may not be held in a military confinement facility, other than in the case of a person who is subject to chapter 47 of this title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

“(f) Facilities and services of other agencies.— (1) In implementing this section, when the Secretary determines it to be economical and in the public interest, the Secretary may use the facilities and services of Federal, State, Indian tribal, and local law enforcement agencies, with the consent of those agencies, and may reimburse those agencies for the use of their facilities and services.

“(2) Services of State, Indian tribal, and local law enforcement, including application of their powers of law enforcement, may be provided under paragraph (1) notwithstanding that the property is subject to the legislative jurisdiction of the United States.

“(g) Authority outside Federal property.—For the protection of property under the jurisdiction, custody, or control of the Department of Defense and persons on that property, the Secretary may enter into agreements with Federal agencies and with State, Indian tribal, and local governments to obtain authority for civilian officers and agents designated under this section to enforce Federal laws and State, Indian tribal, and local laws concurrently with other Federal law enforcement officers and with State, Indian tribal, and local law enforcement officers.

“(h) Attorney General approval.—The powers granted pursuant to subsection (b)(2) to officers and agents designated under subsection (b)(1) shall be exercised in accordance with guidelines approved by the Attorney General.

“(i) Limitation with regard to other Federal agencies.—Nothing in this section shall be construed as affecting the authority of the Secretary of Homeland Security to provide for the protection of facilities under the jurisdiction, custody, or control, in whole or in part, of Federal agencies, including the buildings, grounds, and properties of the General Services Administration, other than the Department of Defense and located off of a military installation.

“(j) Cooperation with local law enforcement agencies.—With regard to civilian officers and agents performing duty in areas outside the property specified in subsection (a), the Secretary shall enter into agreements with local law enforcement agencies exercising jurisdiction over such areas for the purposes of avoiding conflicts of jurisdiction, promoting notification of planned law enforcement actions, and facilitating productive working relationships.

“(k) Limitation on statutory construction.—Nothing in this section shall be construed—

“(1) to preclude or limit the authority of any Federal law enforcement agency;

“(2) to restrict the authority of the Secretary of Homeland Security under the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.) or the authority of the Administrator of General Services, including the authority to promulgate regulations affecting property under the custody and control of that Secretary or the Administrator, respectively;

“(3) to expand or limit section 21 of the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 797);

“(4) to affect chapter 47 of this title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice);

“(5) to restrict any other authority of the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department; or

“(6) to restrict the authority of the Director of the National Security Agency under section 11 of the National Security Agency Act of 1959 (50 U.S.C. 3609).”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 159 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2671 the following new item:

“(10) Voluntary legal support services provided by law students through internship and externship programs approved by the Secretary concerned.”.

SEC. 1044. Inclusion of Chief of the National Guard Bureau among leadership of the Department of Defense provided physical protection and personal security.

(a) Inclusion.—Subsection (a) of section 1074 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 330) is amended—

(b) Conforming amendment.—Subsection (b)(1) of such section is amended by striking “paragraphs (1) through (7)” and inserting “paragraphs (1) through (8)”.

SEC. 1045. Inclusion of regional organizations in authority for assignment of civilian employees of the Department of Defense as advisors to foreign ministries of defense.

(a) Inclusion of regional organizations in authority.—Section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (10 U.S.C. 168 note) is amended—

(A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting “or regional organizations” after “foreign countries”; and

(B) by inserting “or organization” after “ministry” each place it appears in paragraphs (1) and (2); and

(2) in subsection (c), by inserting “and regional organizations” after “defense ministries” each place it appears in paragraphs (1) and (5).

(b) Update of policy guidance on authority.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy shall issue an update of the policy of the Department of Defense for assignment of civilian employees of the Department as advisors to foreign ministries of defense and regional organizations under the authority in section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, as amended by this section.

“SEC. 1081. Authority for assignment of civilian employees of the Department of Defense as advisors to foreign ministries of defense and regional organizations”.

SEC. 1046. Extension of authority to waive reimbursement of costs of activities for nongovernmental personnel at Department of Defense regional centers for security studies.

SEC. 1061. Reports on recommendations of the National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force.

(a) Reports.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the submittal to Congress pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, of the budget of the President for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2019, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the response of the Air Force to the 42 specific recommendations of the National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force in the report of the Commission pursuant to section 363(b) of the National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force Act of 2012 (subtitle G of title III of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1704).

(b) Elements of initial report.—The initial report of the Secretary under subsection (a) shall set forth the following:

(1) Specific milestones for review by the Air Force of the recommendations of the Commission described in subsection (a).

(2) A preliminary implementation plan for each of such recommendations that do not require further review by the Air Force as of the date of such report for implementation.

(c) Elements of subsequent reports.—Each report of the Secretary under subsection (a) after the initial report shall set forth the following:

(1) An implementation plan for each of the recommendations of the Commission described in subsection (a), and not previously covered by a report under this section, that do not require further review by the Air Force as of the date of such report for implementation.

(2) A description of the accomplishments of the Air Force in implementing the recommendations of the Commission previously identified as not requiring further review by the Air Force for implementation in an earlier report under this section, including a description of any such recommendation that is fully implemented as of the date of such report.

(d) Deviation from Commission recommendations.—If any implementation plan under this section includes a proposal to deviate in a material manner from a recommendation of the Commission described in subsection (a), the report setting forth such implementation plan shall—

(e) Allocation of savings.—Each report of the Secretary under subsection (a) shall—

(1) identify any savings achieved by the Air Force as of the date of such report in implementing the recommendations of the Commission described in subsection (a) when compared with spending anticipated by the budget of the President for fiscal year 2015; and

(2) indicate the manner in which such savings affected the budget request of the President for the fiscal year beginning in the year in which such report is submitted.

(a) Review required.—By not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall review the logs of each ship under the authority of the Secretary of the Navy that is known to have operated in the waters near Vietnam during the period beginning on January 9, 1962, and ending on May 7, 1975, to determine—

(1) whether each such ship operated in the territorial waters of the Republic of Vietnam during such period; and

(B) the distance from the shore of the location where the ship operated that was the closest proximity to shore.

(b) Provision of information to Secretary of Veterans Affairs.—Upon a determination that any such ship so operated, the Secretary of Defense shall provide such determination, together with the information described in subsection (a)(2) about the ship, to the Secretary of Veteran Affairs.

SEC. 1063. Assessment of the operations research tools, processes, and capabilities in support of requirements analysis for major defense acquisition programs and allocation of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance assets.

(a) Assessment.—The Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, shall conduct an assessment of the following:

(1) The potential benefits to systems acquisition of increased application of rigorous operations research tools, processes, and capabilities to the analysis of requirements for major defense acquisition programs and the programs of Major Automated Information Systems (commonly referred to as “MAIS”) to achieve balance between cost, performance, schedule, and risk requirements at the beginning of such programs and at subsequent milestone reviews.

(2) The potential benefits to the prioritization and allocation of existing intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance assets to the combatant commands of increased application of rigorous evidence-based operations research tools, processes, and capabilities to the analysis of the requirements submitted by the commanders of the combatant commands.

(3) The standardization and quality of the data related to requirements submitted by the commanders of the combatant commands for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance support that are collected and available to assess those requirements.

(4) The contribution of operations research to the decision making process within the Joint Requirements Oversight Council (commonly referred to as “JROC”) and the senior leadership in the Joint Staff for fixing requirements for systems acquisitions and validating and prioritizing intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance assets.

(5) The operations research resources, both government employee and contractor operations research professionals, available in the Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation office (commonly referred to as “CAPE”), the Warfighting Analysis Division of the Force Structure, Resources, and Assessment directorate of the Joint Staff (commonly referred to as the “J8”), other elements of such directorate, the Joint Functional Component Command for Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (commonly referred to as “JFCC ISR”), and such other elements of the Department of Defense or the intelligence community (as defined in section 4 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003)) as the Vice Chairman considers appropriate for purposes of this subsection.

(6) The extent to which the resources described in paragraph (5) are utilized, and the degree to which they could and should be utilized, to support the analysis, validation, and prioritization of requirements for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance among the commanders of the geographic combatant commands and for new system acquisitions.

(7) Whether additional operations research capability is needed to effectively support the requirements analysis responsibilities of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

(8) Whether the current policies and processes relating to the analysis, validation, and prioritization of requirements for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance assets under the Global Force Management process need to be modified, including consideration of the following:

(A) Making the personnel and other resources for processing, exploitation, and dissemination part of the Global Force Management process, and creating means to re-allocate resources for processing, exploitation, and dissemination, including across combatant commands, when missions or sorties cannot be executed as planned.

(B) Integrating the assessment division of the Joint Functional Component Command for Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance more closely with the Force Structure, Resources, and Assessment directorate of the Joint Staff to support analysis and validation of requirements of the combatant commands.

(D) Standardizing the qualifications and training of personnel of the geographic combatant commands that are responsible for generating requirements.

(E) Factoring national intelligence collection operations into the Global Force Management process for analyzing and validating requirements of the geographic combatant commands.

(F) Creating larger number of discriminating standard metrics for support of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance in addition to combat air patrol orbits, sorties per month, or hours of collection.

(b) Briefing of Congress on findings.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, shall brief the congressional defense committees on the findings of the Vice Chairman with respect to the assessment conducted under subsection (a).

(c) Submittal to Congress of operations research analysis of requirements for ISR asset allocation in GFMAP for FY2015.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the congressional intelligence committees (as defined in section 4 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003)) the data collected and the operations research analysis of that data used to validate the requirements submitted by the commanders of the combatant commands for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance asset prioritization and allocation under the Global Force Management Allocation Plan for fiscal year 2015.

SEC. 1064. Review of United States military strategy and the force posture of allies and partners in the United States Pacific Command area of responsibility.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall commission an independent review of the United States Asia-Pacific re-balance, with a focus on policy issues that will be critical during the 10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, including the national security interests and military strategy of the United States in the Asia-Pacific region.

(2) CONDUCT OF REVIEW.—The review conducted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be conducted by an independent organization that has—

(A) recognized credentials and expertise in maritime strategy and military affairs; and

(B) access to policy experts throughout the United States and from the Asia-Pacific region.

(3) ELEMENTS.—The review conducted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:

(A) An assessment of the current and planned United States force posture adjustments and the impact of such adjustments on the strategy to re-balance to the Asia-Pacific region.

(B) An assessment of the risks to United States national security interests in the United States Pacific Command area of responsibility during the 10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act posed by potential adversaries or emerging technologies.

(C) An analysis of the willingness and capacity of allies, partners, and regional organizations to contribute to the security and stability of the Asia-Pacific region, including potential required adjustments to United States military strategy based on that analysis.

(D) An evaluation of current and projected wide-area, long-range, persistent intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities and capability gaps of the United States and its partners.

(E) An analysis of regional ballistic missile capabilities and adequacy of regional and United States missile defense plans and capabilities for the Asia-Pacific region.

(F) An appraisal of the Arctic ambitions of actors in the Asia-Pacific region in the context of current and projected capabilities, including an analysis of the adequacy and relevance of the Arctic Roadmap prepared by the Navy.

(G) An evaluation of partner capacity building efforts of the United States Pacific Command in the context of current and projected threats with a focus on maritime domain awareness, maritime security, and border security capabilities, including—

(i) an examination of the capabilities and naval force posture of allies and partners of the United States, with specific focus on current and projected submarine capabilities of United States and regional actors and the implications for maritime security strategy;

(ii) an assessment of the advantages or disadvantages of the formation of an East Asian maritime security partnership; and

(iii) a description of the role of multilateral organizations, such as the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, in reducing tensions and negotiating resolution of maritime disputes.

(H) The views of noted policy leaders and regional experts, including military commanders, in the Asia-Pacific region.

(1) SUBMISSION TO THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the independent organization that conducted the review pursuant to subsection (a)(1) shall submit to the Secretary of Defense an unclassified report, along with a classified annex, containing the findings of the review.

(2) SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 90 days after the date of receipt of the report required by paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees the report, together with any comments on the report that the Secretary considers appropriate.

SEC. 1065. Department of Defense policies on community involvement in Department community outreach events.

(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth such recommendations as the Secretary considers appropriate for modifications of the policies of the Department of Defense on the involvement of non-Federal entities in Department community outreach events (including, but not limited to, air shows, parades, and open houses) that feature any unit, aircraft, vessel, equipment, or members of the Armed Forces in order to increase the involvement of non-Federal entities in such events.

(b) Consultation.—The Secretary shall prepare the report required by subsection (a) in consultation with the Director of the Office of Government Ethics.

(1) A description of current Department of Defense policies and regulations on the acceptance and use of voluntary gifts, donations, sponsorships, and other forms of support from non-Federal entities and persons for Department community outreach events described in subsection (a).

(2) Recommendations for modifications of such policies and regulations in order to permit additional voluntary support and funding from non-Federal entities for such events, including recommendations on matters such as increased recognition of donors, authority for military units to endorse the fundraising efforts of certain donors, and authority for the Armed Forces to charge fees or solicit and accept donations for parking and admission to such events.

SEC. 1066. Comptroller General of the United States briefing and report on management of the conventional ammunition demilitarization stockpile of the Department of Defense.

(a) Finding.—Congress finds that the Comptroller General of the United States recently reported that there is risk that the Armed Forces may budget funds to procure new supplies of conventional ammunition to meet requirements when such ammunition is currently available in the inventories of the Department of Defense, but categorized for demilitarization or disposal.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General shall provide a briefing and submit a report to the congressional defense committees on the management of the conventional ammunition demilitarization stockpile of the Department of Defense

(2) ELEMENTS.—The briefing and report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:

(A) An assessment of the adequacy of Department policies and procedures governing the demilitarization of excess, obsolete, and unserviceable conventional ammunition.

(B) An assessment of the adequacy of the maintenance by the Department of information on the quantity, value, condition, and location of excess, obsolete, and unserviceable conventional ammunition for each of the Armed Forces.

(C) An assessment whether the Department has conducted an analysis comparing the costs of storing and maintaining items in the conventional ammunition demilitarization stockpile with the costs of the disposal of items in the stockpile.

(i) identified challenges in managing the current and anticipated conventional ammunition demilitarization stockpile; and

(E) Such other matters relating to the management of the conventional ammunition demilitarization stockpile as the Comptroller General considers appropriate.

(3) DEADLINES.—The briefing required by paragraph (1) shall be provided not later than April 30, 2015. The report required by that paragraph shall be submitted not later than June 1, 2015.

(a) Title 10, United States Code.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:

(2) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 55 is amended by striking the item relating to section 1073b.

(1) FISCAL YEAR 2012.—Subsection (b) of section 1043 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1576) is amended to read as follows:

“(b) Form of reports.—Any report under subsection (a) may be submitted in classified form.”.

(2) FISCAL YEAR 2008.—Section 330(e)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 68), as most recently amended by section 332 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1697), is further amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “However, a report is not required under this paragraph for any fiscal year during which the Secretary concerned did not use the authority in subsection (a).”.

(3) FISCAL YEAR 2004.—Subsection (d) of section 2808 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1723), as most recently amended by section 2806(d) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4725), is further amended—

(c) Inclusion of extremity trauma and amputation center of excellence annual report in Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense joint annual report on health care coordination and sharing activities.—

(1) Section 723 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4508) is amended by striking subsection (d).

(2) Section 8111(f) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(6) The two Secretaries shall include in the annual report under this subsection a report on the activities of the Center of Excellence in the Mitigation, Treatment, and Rehabilitation of Traumatic Extremity Injuries and Amputations (established pursuant to section 723 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417)) during the one-year period ending on the date of such report. Such report shall include a description of the activities of the center and an assessment of the role of such activities in improving and enhancing the efforts of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs for the mitigation, treatment, and rehabilitation of traumatic extremity injuries and amputations.”.

SEC. 1068. Repeal of requirement for Comptroller General of the United States annual reviews and report on pilot program on commercial fee-for-service air refueling support for the Air Force.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 80 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1566a the following new section:

“(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out the following activities:

“(A) affirmatively offer, on an annual basis, each member of the armed forces on active duty (other than active duty for training) the opportunity, through the online system developed under paragraph (2), to—

“(B) provide services to such members for the purpose of carrying out the activities in clauses (i), (ii), and (iii) of subparagraph (A).

“(2) Implement an online system that, to the extent practicable, is integrated with the existing systems of each of the military departments and that—

“(A) provides an electronic means for carrying out the requirements of paragraph (1);

“(B) in the case of an individual registering to vote in a State that accepts electronic voter registration and operates its own electronic voter registration system using a form that meets the requirements for mail voter registration forms under section 9(b) of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 1973gg–7(b)), directs such individual to that system; and

“(C) in the case of an individual using the official post card form prescribed under section 101(b)(2) of the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (42 U.S.C. 1973ff(b)(2)) to register to vote and request an absentee ballot—

“(i) pre-populates such official post card form with the personal information of such individual, and

“(ii) (I) produces the pre-populated form and a pre-addressed envelope for use in transmitting such official post card form; or

“(II) transmits the completed official post card form electronically to the appropriate State or local election officials.

“(3) Implement a system (either independently or in conjunction with the online system under paragraph (2)) by which any change of address by a member of the armed forces on active duty who is undergoing a permanent change of station, deploying overseas for at least six months, or returning from an overseas deployment of at least six months automatically triggers a notification via electronic means to such member that—

“(A) indicates that such member's voter registration or absentee mailing address should be updated with the appropriate State or local election officials; and

“(B) includes instructions on how to update such voter registration using the online system developed under paragraph (2).

“(b) Data collection.—The online system developed under subsection (a)(2) shall collect and store all data required to meet the reporting requirements of section 1071(b) of the Carl Levin National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 and section 105A(b)(2) of the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (42 U.S.C. 1973ff–4a(b)(2)) in a manner that complies with section 552a of title 5 (commonly known as the Privacy Act of 1974), and imposes no new record management burden on any military unit or military installation.

“(c) Regulations.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations implementing the requirements of subsection (a). Such regulations shall include procedures to inform those members of the armed forces on active duty (other than active duty for training) experiencing a change of address about the benefits of this section and the timeframe for requesting an absentee ballot to ensure sufficient time for State delivery of the ballot.”.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 80 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1566a the following new item:

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the relevant committees of Congress a report on the status of the implementation of the requirements of section 1566b of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)(1).

(A) a detailed description of any specific steps already taken towards the implementation of the requirements of such section 1566b;

(B) a detailed plan for the implementation of such requirements, including milestones and deadlines for the completion of such implementation;

(D) a description of how the annual voting assistance and system under subsection (a)(3) of such section will be integrated with Department of Defense personnel databases that track military servicemembers' address changes;

(E) an estimate of how long it will take an average member to complete the voter assistance process required under subsection (a)(1) of such section;

(F) an explanation of how the Secretary of Defense will collect reliable data on the utilization of the online system under subsection (a)(2) of such section; and

(G) a summary of any objections, concerns, or comments made by State or local election officials regarding the implementation of such section.

(3) RELEVANT COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term “relevant committees of Congress” means—

(A) the Committees on Appropriations, Armed Services, and Rules and Administration of the Senate; and

(B) the Committees on Appropriations, Armed Services, and House Administration of the House of Representatives.

(A) by striking “Not later than” and all that follows through “subsection (f), the Secretaries” and inserting “The Secretaries”; and

(2) in subsection (c), by striking “shall ensure” and all that follows through “necessity,” and inserting “may ensure”;

(4) in subsection (e), by striking the second sentence and inserting the following: “Any office so designated may provide voting assistance described in this section.”; and

SEC. 1081. Biennial surveys of Department of Defense civilian employees on workplace and gender relations matters.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 23 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 481 the following new section:

“§ 481a. Workplace and gender relations issues: surveys of Department of Defense civilian employees

“(a) In general.— (1) The Secretary of Defense shall carry out every other fiscal year a survey of civilian employees of the Department of Defense to solicit information on gender issues, including issues relating to gender-based assault, harassment, and discrimination, and the climate in the Department for forming professional relationships between male and female civilian employees of the Department.

“(2) Each survey under this section shall be known as a ‘Department of Defense Civilian Employee Workplace and Gender Relations Survey’.

“(b) Elements.—Each survey conducted under this section shall be conducted so as to solicit information on the following:

“(1) Indicators of positive and negative trends for professional and personal relationships between male and female civilian employees of the Department of Defense.

“(2) The specific types of assault on civilian employees of the Department by other personnel of the Department (including contractor personnel) that have occurred, and the number of times each respondent has been so assaulted during the preceding fiscal year.

“(3) The effectiveness of Department policies designed to improve professional relationships between male and female civilian employees of the Department.

“(4) The effectiveness of current processes for complaints on and investigations into gender-based assault, harassment, and discrimination involving civilian employees of the Department.

“(5) Any other issues relating to assault, harassment, or discrimination involving civilian employees of the Department that the Secretary considers appropriate.

“(c) Report to Congress.—Upon the completion of a survey under this section, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report containing the results of the survey.”.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 23 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 481 the following new item:

(3) INITIAL SURVEY.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out the first survey required by section 481a of title 10, United States Code (as added by this subsection), during fiscal year 2016.

(b) Report on feasibility of similar surveys of military dependents and Department of Defense contractors.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth an assessment by the Secretary of the feasibility of conducing recurring surveys of each population specified in paragraph (2) on issues relating to gender-based assault, harassment, and discrimination.

(2) COVERED POPULATIONS.—The populations specified in this paragraph are the following:

SEC. 1082. Transfer of administration of Ocean Research Advisory Panel from Department of the Navy to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

(a) Authority for ocean research advisory panel.—Subsection (a) of section 7903 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(A) by inserting “, through the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” after “The Council”;

(B) by striking “Panel consisting” and inserting “Panel. The Panel shall consist”; and

(C) by striking “chairman,” and inserting “Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, on behalf of the Council,”;

(2) in paragraph (1), by striking “National Academy of Science.” and inserting “National Academies.”; and

(3) by striking paragraphs (2) and (3) and redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively.

(1) by inserting “, through the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” after “The Council”;

(2) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as paragraphs (4) and (5), respectively; and

(3) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following new paragraphs (2) and (3):

“(2) To advise the Council on the determination of scientific priorities and needs.

“(3) To provide the Council strategic advice regarding execution and collaboration related to the National Oceanographic Partnership Program.”.

(c) Funding to support activities of panel.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended by striking “Secretary of the Navy” and inserting “Secretary of Commerce”.

SEC. 1083. Authority to require employees of the Department of Defense and members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps to occupy quarters on a rental basis while performing official travel.

(a) Authority.—Subsection (e) of section 5911 of title 5, United States Code, is amended—

(1) by striking “The head” and inserting “(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the head”; and

“(2) The Secretary of Defense may require an employee of the Department of Defense or a member of the uniformed services under the jurisdiction of the Secretary who is performing duty on official travel to occupy adequate quarters on a rental basis when available.”.

(b) Definition of quarters.—Subsection (a)(5) of such section is amended by inserting “or commercial lodging arranged through a Government lodging program” after “leased by the Government”.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the exercise of the authority provided by paragraph (2) of section 5911(e) of title 5, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)). The report shall include the following:

(C) An estimate of the savings achieved by the Department of Defense through the exercise of the authority, and an estimate of the additional savings to be achieved by the Department over the course of the future-years defense program current as of the date of such report.

(D) An assessment whether the quality of lodging has improved for civilian employees of the Department of Defense and members of the Armed Forces as a result of the exercise of the authority.

(E) Such other matters relating to the exercise of the authority as the Secretary considers appropriate.

(2) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 1084. Expansion of authority for Secretary of Defense to use the Department of Defense reimbursement rate for transportation services provided to certain non-Department of Defense entities.

(a) Eligible categories of transportation.—Subsection (a) of section 2642 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “The Secretary” and inserting “Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary”;

(A) by striking “During the period beginning on October 28, 2009, and ending on October 28, 2019, for” and inserting “For”; and

(B) by striking “of Defense” the first place it appears and all that follows through “military sales” and inserting “of Defense”; and

“(4) For military transportation services provided in support of foreign military sales.

“(5) For military transportation services provided to a State, local, or tribal agency (including any organization composed of State, local, or tribal agencies).

“(6) For military transportation services provided to a Department of Defense contractor when transporting supplies that are for, or destined for, a Department of Defense entity.”.

(b) Termination of authority for certain categories of transportation.—Such section is further amended—

“(b) Termination of authority for certain categories of transportation.—The provisions of paragraphs (3), (4), (5), and (6) of subsection (a) shall apply only to military transportation services provided before October 1, 2019.”.

(1) SECTION HEADING.—The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:

“§ 2642. Transportation services provided to certain non-Department of Defense agencies and entities: use of Department of Defense reimbursement rate”.

(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The item relating to such section in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 157 of such title is amended to read as follows:

SEC. 1085. Pilot program to rehabilitate and modify homes of disabled and low-income veterans.

(1) DISABLED.—The term “disabled” means an individual with a disability, as defined by section 12102 of title 42, United States Code.

(2) ELIGIBLE VETERAN.—The term “eligible veteran” means a disabled or low-income veteran.

(3) ENERGY EFFICIENT FEATURES OR EQUIPMENT.—The term “energy efficient features or equipment” means features of, or equipment in, a primary residence that help reduce the amount of electricity used to heat, cool, or ventilate such residence, including insulation, weatherstripping, air sealing, heating system repairs, duct sealing, or other measures.

(4) LOW-INCOME VETERAN.—The term “low-income veteran” means a veteran whose income does not exceed 80 percent of the median income for an area, as determined by the Secretary.

(5) NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION.—The term “nonprofit organization” means an organization that is—

(A) described in section 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and

(A) IN GENERAL.—The term “primary residence” means a single family house, a duplex, or a unit within a multiple-dwelling structure that is the principal dwelling of an eligible veteran and is owned by such veteran or a family member of such veteran.

(B) FAMILY MEMBER DEFINED.—For purposes of this paragraph, the term “family member” includes—

(iii) any individual related by blood or affinity whose close association with a veteran is the equivalent of a family relationship.

(7) QUALIFIED ORGANIZATION.—The term “qualified organization” means a nonprofit organization that provides nationwide or statewide programs that primarily serve veterans or low-income individuals.

(8) SECRETARY.—The term “Secretary” means the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.

(9) VETERAN.—The term “veteran” has the meaning given the term in section 101 of title 38, United States Code.

(10) VETERANS SERVICE ORGANIZATION.—The term “veterans service organization” means any organization recognized by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for the representation of veterans under section 5902 of title 38, United States Code.

(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall establish a pilot program to award grants to qualified organizations to rehabilitate and modify the primary residence of eligible veterans.

(B) COORDINATION.—The Secretary shall work in conjunction with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish and oversee the pilot program and to ensure that such program meets the needs of eligible veterans.

(C) MAXIMUM GRANT.—A grant award under the pilot program to any one qualified organization shall not exceed $1,000,000 in any one fiscal year, and such an award shall remain available until expended by such organization.

(A) IN GENERAL.—Each qualified organization that desires a grant under the pilot program shall submit an application to the Secretary at such time, in such manner, and, in addition to the information required under subparagraph (B), accompanied by such information as the Secretary may reasonably require.

(B) CONTENTS.—Each application submitted under subparagraph (A) shall include—

(ii) the approximate number of veterans the qualified organization intends to serve using grant funds;

(iii) a description of the type of work that will be conducted, such as interior home modifications, energy efficiency improvements, and other similar categories of work; and

(iv) a plan for working with the Department of Veterans Affairs and veterans service organizations to identify veterans who are not eligible for programs under chapter 21 of title 38, United States Code, and meet their needs.

(C) PREFERENCES.—In awarding grants under the pilot program, the Secretary shall give preference to a qualified organization—

(i) with experience in providing housing rehabilitation and modification services for disabled veterans; or

(ii) that proposes to provide housing rehabilitation and modification services for eligible veterans who live in rural, including tribal, areas (the Secretary, through regulations, shall define the term “rural areas”).

(3) CRITERIA.—In order to receive a grant award under the pilot program, a qualified organization shall meet the following criteria:

(A) Demonstrate expertise in providing housing rehabilitation and modification services for disabled or low-income individuals for the purpose of making the homes of such individuals accessible, functional, and safe for such individuals.

(i) would engage eligible veterans and veterans service organizations in projects utilizing grant funds under the pilot program;

(ii) ensure veterans who are disabled receive preference in selection for assistance under this program; and

(iii) identify eligible veterans and their families and enlist veterans involved in skilled trades, such as carpentry, roofing, plumbing, or HVAC work.

(ii) able to provide housing rehabilitation and modification services for eligible veterans.

(D) Have experience in successfully carrying out the accountability and reporting requirements involved in the proper administration of grant funds, including funds provided by private entities or Federal, State, or local government entities.

(A) to modify and rehabilitate the primary residence of an eligible veteran, and may include—

(i) installing wheelchair ramps, widening exterior and interior doors, reconfigurating and re-equipping bathrooms (which includes installing new fixtures and grab bars), removing doorway thresholds, installing special lighting, adding additional electrical outlets and electrical service, and installing appropriate floor coverings to—

(I) accommodate the functional limitations that result from having a disability; or

(II) if such residence does not have modifications necessary to reduce the chances that an elderly, but not disabled person, will fall in their home, reduce the risks of such an elderly person from falling;

(ii) rehabilitating such residence that is in a state of interior or exterior disrepair; and

(I) an eligible veteran’s monthly utility costs for such residence is more than 5 percent of such veteran’s monthly income; and

(II) an energy audit of such residence indicates that the installation of energy efficient features or equipment will reduce such costs by 10 percent or more; and

(B) in connection with modification and rehabilitation services provided under the pilot program, to provide technical, administrative, and training support to an affiliate of a qualified organization receiving a grant under such pilot program.

(5) OVERSIGHT.—The Secretary shall direct the oversight of the grant funds for the pilot program so that such funds are used efficiently until expended to fulfill the purpose of addressing the adaptive housing needs of eligible veterans.

(A) IN GENERAL.—A qualified organization receiving a grant under the pilot program shall contribute towards the housing modification and rehabilitation services provided to eligible veterans an amount equal to not less than 50 percent of the grant award received by such organization.

(B) IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS.—In order to meet the requirement under subparagraph (A), such organization may arrange for in-kind contributions.

(7) LIMITATION COST TO THE VETERANS.—A qualified organization receiving a grant under the pilot program shall modify or rehabilitate the primary residence of an eligible veteran at no cost to such veteran (including application fees) or at a cost such that such veteran pays no more than 30 percent of his or her income in housing costs during any month.

(A) ANNUAL REPORT.—The Secretary shall submit to Congress, on an annual basis, a report that provides, with respect to the year for which such report is written—

(i) the number of eligible veterans provided assistance under the pilot program;

(ii) the socioeconomic characteristics of such veterans, including their gender, age, race, and ethnicity;

(iii) the total number, types, and locations of entities contracted under such program to administer the grant funding;

(iv) the amount of matching funds and in-kind contributions raised with each grant;

(v) a description of the housing rehabilitation and modification services provided, costs saved, and actions taken under such program;

(vi) a description of the outreach initiatives implemented by the Secretary to educate the general public and eligible entities about such program;

(vii) a description of the outreach initiatives instituted by grant recipients to engage eligible veterans and veteran service organizations in projects utilizing grant funds under such program;

(viii) a description of the outreach initiatives instituted by grant recipients to identify eligible veterans and their families; and

(ix) any other information that the Secretary considers relevant in assessing such program.

(B) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than 6 months after the completion of the pilot program, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report that provides such information that the Secretary considers relevant in assessing the pilot program.

(C) INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT.—Not later than March 31, 2019, the Inspector General of the Department of Housing and Urban Development shall submit to the Chairmen and Ranking Members of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives a report containing a review of—

(i) the use of appropriated funds by the Secretary and by grantees under the pilot program; and

(9) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There are authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Housing and Urban Development for carrying out this section $4,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2015 through 2019.

(a) Amendment to National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013.—Effective as of January 2, 2013, and as if included therein as enacted, section 604(b)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1774) is amended by striking “the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013” and inserting “this Act”.

(b) Amendments to title 10, United States Code, to reflect enactment of title 41, United States Code.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:

(1) Section 2013(a)(1) is amended by striking “section 6101(b)-(d) of title 41” and inserting “section 6101 of title 41”.

(A) in paragraph (7), by striking “section 4 of such Act” and inserting “such section”; and

(i) by striking “section 26 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 422)” and inserting “chapter 15 of title 41”; and

(3) Section 2306a(b)(3)(B) is amended by striking “section 4(12)(C)(i) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12)(C)(i))” and inserting “section 103(3)(A) of title 41”.

(4) Section 2314 is amended by striking “Sections 6101(b)-(d)” and inserting “Sections 6101”.

(5) Section 2321(f)(2) is amended by striking “section 35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c))” and inserting “section 104 of title 41”.

(6) Section 2359b(k)(4)(A) is amended by striking “section 4 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403)” and inserting “section 110 of title 41”.

(A) in subsections (a)(1)(A), (b)(2)(A), and (c)(1)(B)(i), by striking “section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12))” and inserting “section 103 of title 41”; and

(B) in subsections (b) and (c)(1), by striking “section 35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c))” and inserting “section 104 of title 41”.

(A) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking “section 7 of such Act” and inserting “section 7104(a) of such title”; and

(B) in subparagraph (B)(ii), by striking “section 7 of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978” and inserting “section 7104(a) of title 41”.

(9) Section 2533(a) is amended by striking “such Act” in the matter preceding paragraph (1) and inserting “chapter 83 of such tittle”.

(i) in paragraph (1), by striking “sections 34 and 35 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 430 and 431)” and inserting “sections 1906 and 1907 of title 41”; and

(ii) in paragraph (2), by striking “section 35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c))” and inserting “section 104 of title 41”; and

(i) in paragraph (2), by striking “section 4 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403)” and inserting “section 105 of title 41”;

(ii) in paragraph (3), by striking “section 4 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403)” and inserting “section 131 of title 41”; and

(iii) in paragraph (5), by striking “section 35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c))” and inserting “section 104 of title 41”.

(11) Section 2545(1) is amended by striking “section 4(16) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(16))” and inserting “section 131 of title 41”.

(12) Section 7312(f) is amended by striking “Section 3709 of the Revised Statutes (41 U.S.C. 5)” and inserting “Section 6101 of title 41”.

(1) The Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383) is amended as follows:

(i) by striking “the Buy American Act (41 U.S.C. 10a et seq.)” and inserting “chapter 83 of title 41, United States Code”; and

(i) in subsection (b)(4)(A), by striking “section 26 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 422)” and inserting “chapter 15 of title 41, United States Code”; and

(ii) in subsection (e)(2)(A), by striking “section 4(13) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(13))” and inserting “section 110 of title 41, United States Code”.

(C) Section 893(f)(2) (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking “section 26 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 422)” and inserting “chapter 15 of title 41, United States Code”.

(2) The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) is amended as follows:

(i) in subparagraph (A), by striking “section 4(12)(E) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12)(E))” and inserting “section 103(5) of title 41, United States Code”; and

(ii) in subparagraph (C)(i), by striking “section 4(12)(F) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12)(F))” and inserting “section 103(6) of title 41, United States Code”.

(B) Section 821(b)(2) (10 U.S.C. 2304 note) is amended by striking “section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12))” and inserting “section 103 of title 41, United States Code”.

(i) in subsection (a)(5), by striking “section 27(e) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 423(e))” and inserting “section 2105 of title 41, United States Code,”;

(ii) in subsection (c)(1), by striking “section 4(16) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act” and inserting “section 131 of title 41, United States Code,”; and

(iii) in subsection (d)(1), by striking “section 27 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 423)” and inserting “chapter 21 of title 41, United States Code”.

(i) in subsection (b)(1), by striking “section 25 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 421)” and inserting “section 1303 of title 41, United States Code,”; and

(ii) in subsection (d)(1), by striking “section 6(j) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 405(j))” and inserting “section 1126 of title 41, United States Code”.

(3) The John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364) is amended as follows:

(A) Section 832(d)(3) (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking “section 8(b) of the Service Contract Act of 1965 (41 U.S.C. 357(b))” and inserting “section 6701(3) of title 41, United States Code”.

(B) Section 852(b)(2)(A)(ii) (10 U.S.C. 2324 note) is amended by striking “section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12))” and inserting “section 103 of title 41, United States Code”.

(4) Section 8118 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108–287; 10 U.S.C. 2533a note) is amended by striking “section 34 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 430)” and inserting “section 1906 of title 41, United States Code”.

(5) The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136) is amended as follows:

(A) Section 812(b)(2) (10 U.S.C. 2501 note) is amended by striking “section 6(d)(4)(A) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 405(d)(4)(A))” and inserting “section 1122(a)(4)(A) of title 41, United States Code,”.

(i) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking “section 32A of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act, as added by section 1443 of this Act” and inserting “section 1903 of title 41, United States Code”; and

(ii) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking “Subsections (a) and (b) of section 7 of the Anti-Kickback Act of 1986 (41 U.S.C. 57(a) and (b))” and inserting “Section 8703(a) of title 41, United States Code”.

(6) Section 8025(c) of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2004 (Public Law 108–87; 10 U.S.C. 2410d note) is amended by striking “the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46–48)” and inserting “chapter 85 of title 41, United States Code”.

(7) Section 817(e)(1)(B) of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 10 U.S.C. 2306a note) is amended by striking “section 26(f)(5)(B) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 422(f)(5)(B))” and inserting “section 1502(b)(3)(B) of title 41, United States Code”.

(8) Section 801(f)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107–107; 10 U.S.C. 2330 note) is amended by striking “section 16(3) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(3))” and inserting “section 1702(c)(1) of title 41, United States Code”.

(9) Section 803(d) of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261; 10 U.S.C. 2306a note) is amended by striking “subsection (b)(1)(B) of section 304A of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 254b)” and inserting “section 3503(a)(2) of title 41, United States Code”.

(10) Section 848(e)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note) is amended by striking “section 32 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 428)” and inserting “section 1902 of title 41, United States Code”.

(11) Section 722(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (Public Law 104–201; 10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is amended by striking “section 25(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 421(c))” and inserting “section 1303(a) of title 41, United States Code.”.

(12) Section 3412(k) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 (Public Law 104–106; 10 U.S.C. 7420 note) is amended by striking “section 303(c) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 253(c))” and inserting “section 3304(a) of title 41, United States Code”.

(13) Section 845 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103–160; 10 U.S.C. 2371 note) is amended—

(A) in subsection (a)(2)(A), by striking “section 16(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(c))” and inserting “section 1702(c) of title 41, United States Code,”;

(B) in subsection (d)(1)(B)(ii), by striking “section 16(3) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(3))” and inserting “paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 1702(c) of title 41, United States Code”;

(C) in subsection (e)(2)(A), by striking “section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12))” and inserting “section 103 of title 41, United States Code”; and

(D) in subsection (h), by striking “section 27 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 423)” and inserting “chapter 21 of title 41, United States Code”.

(14) Section 326(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 102–484; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking “section 25(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 421(c))” and inserting “section 1303(a) of title 41, United States Code”.

(15) Section 806 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993 (Public Law 102–190; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—

(A) in subsection (b), by striking “section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act” and inserting “section 103 of title 41, United States Code”; and

(i) by striking “section 25(a) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act” and inserting “section 1302(a) of title 41, United States Code”; and

(ii) by striking “section 25(c)(1) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 421(c)(1))” and inserting “section 1303(a)(1) of such title 41”.

(16) Section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—

(A) by designating the subsection after subsection (k), relating to definitions, as subsection (l); and

(B) in paragraph (8) of that subsection, by striking “the first section of the Act of June 25, 1938 (41 U.S.C. 46; popularly known as the ‘Wagner-O'Day Act’)” and inserting “section 8502 of title 41, United States Code”.

(d) Amendments to title 10, United States Code, to reflect reclassification of provisions of law proposed for codification in title 50, United States Code.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:

(1) Sections 113(b), 125(a), and 155(d) are amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. 401)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3002)”.

(2) Sections 113(e)(2), 117(a)(1), 118(b)(1), 118a(b)(1), 153(b)(1)(C)(i), 231(b)(1), and 231a(c)(1) are amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. 404a)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3043)”.

(10) Sections 491(c)(3), 494(d)(1), and 496(a)(1) are amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. 401a(4))” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3003(4))”.

(11) Section 1599a(a) is amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. 402 note)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3614)”.

(e) Amendments to other defense-related statutes to reflect reclassification of provisions of law proposed for codification in title 50, United States Code.—

(A) Section 911(3) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 2271 note).

(2) Section 901(d) of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 10 U.S.C. 137 note) is amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. 401 et seq.)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.)”.

(1) TITLE 10, UNITED STATES CODE.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:

(A) Section 2430(c)(2) is amended by striking “section 2366a(a)(4)” and inserting “section 2366a(a)(6)”.

(B) Section 7292(d)(2) is amended by striking “section 1024(a)” and inserting “section 1018(a)”.

(2) TITLE 40, UNITED STATES CODE.—Section 591(b)(2)(A) of title 40, United States Code, is amended by striking “section 2394 of title 10” and inserting “section 2922a of title 10”.

(g) Date of enactment references.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:

(1) Section 1218(d)(3) is amended by striking “on the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010” and inserting “on October 28, 2014”.

(2) Section 1566a(a) is amended by striking “Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 and under” and inserting “Under”.

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking “before the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013” and inserting “before January 2, 2013”; and

(B) in paragraph (2), by striking “on or after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013” and inserting “on or after January 2, 2013”.

(4) Section 2601a(e) is amended by striking “after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012” and inserting “after December 31, 2011,”.

(5) Section 6328(c) is amended by striking “on or after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010” and inserting “after October 27, 2009,”.

(h) Other amendments to title 10, United States Code.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:

(2) Section 407(a)(3)(A) is amended by striking the comma after “as applicable”.

(A) in subsection (a), by striking “Section” in the second sentence and inserting “section”; and

(4) Section 1074m(a)(2) is amended by striking “subparagraph” in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) and inserting “subparagraphs”.

(5) Section 1154(a)(2)(A)(ii) is amended by striking “U.S.C.1411” and inserting “U.S.C. 1411”.

(i) by inserting before “Each of” the following paragraph heading: “Other terms.—”;

(A) in subsection (a)(1), by striking “issue” and inserting “prescribe”; and

(10) Section 2853(c)(1)(A) is amended by striking “can be still be” and inserting “can still be”.

(11) Section 2866(a)(4)(A) is amended by striking “repayed” and inserting “repaid”.

(12) Section 2884(c) is amended by striking “on evaluation” in the matter preceding paragraph (1) and inserting “an evaluation”.

(1) TRANSFER AND REDESIGNATION.—Section 2814 of title 10, United States Code, is transferred to chapter 631 of such title, inserted after section 7205, and redesignated as section 7206.

(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Such section, as so transferred and redesignated, is amended—

(A) in paragraphs (2) and (3)(B) of subsection (i), by striking “this chapter” and inserting “chapter 169 of this title”; and

“(1) The term ‘appropriate committees of Congress’ has the meaning given such term in section 2801 of this title.

“(A) Any utility service or other service listed in section 2686(a) of this title.

“(B) Any other service determined by the Secretary to be a service that supports the operation and maintenance of real property, personal property, or facilities.”.

(A) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 169 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 2814.

(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 631 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 7205 the following new item:

(j) Coordination with other amendments made by this Act.—For purposes of applying amendments made by provisions of this Act other than this section, the amendments made by subsections (b) through (h) of this section shall be treated as having been enacted immediately before any such amendments by other provisions of this Act.

SEC. 1101. Extension and modification of experimental program for scientific and technical personnel.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b)(1) of section 1101 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (5 U.S.C. 3104 note) is amended—

(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking “60 scientific and engineering positions” and inserting “100 scientific and engineering positions”;

(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (c)(2) of such section is amended by striking “the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency” and inserting “the Department of Defense”.

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking “12-month period” and inserting “calendar year”; and

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking “fiscal year” and inserting “calendar year”.

(c) Extension.—Subsection (e)(1) of such section is amended by striking “September 30, 2016” and inserting “September 30, 2019”.

SEC. 1102. Modifications of biennial strategic workforce plan relating to senior management, functional, and technical workforces of the Department of Defense.

(a) Senior management workforce.—Subsection (c) of section 115b of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

“(A) specifically address the shaping and improvement of the senior management workforce of the Department of Defense; and

“(B) include an assessment of the senior functional and technical workforce of the Department of Defense within the appropriate functional community.”; and

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking “such senior management, functional, and technical workforce” and inserting “such senior management workforce and such senior functional and technical workforce”.

(1) in subsection (b)(2), by striking “subsection (f)(1)” in subparagraphs (D) and (E) and inserting “subsection (h)(1) or (h)(2)”;

(2) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections (g) and (h), respectively; and

“(f) Highly qualified experts.— (1) Each strategic workforce plan under subsection (a) shall include an assessment of the workforce of the Department of Defense comprised of highly qualified experts appointed pursuant to section 9903 of title 5 (in this subsection referred to as the ‘HQE workforce’).

“(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), each plan shall include, with respect to the HQE workforce—

“(A) an assessment of the critical skills and competencies of the existing HQE workforce and projected trends in that workforce based on expected losses due to retirement and other attrition;

“(B) specific strategies for attracting, compensating, and motivating the HQE workforce of the Department, including the program objectives of the Department to be achieved through such strategies and the funding needed to implement such strategies;

“(D) any changes that may be necessary in resources or in the rates or methods of pay needed to ensure the Department has full access to appropriately qualified personnel; and

“(E) any legislative actions that may be necessary to achieve HQE workforce goals.”.

“(1) The term ‘senior management workforce of the Department of Defense’ includes the following categories of Department of Defense civilian personnel:

“(A) Appointees in the Senior Executive Service under section 3131 of title 5.

“(B) Persons serving in the Defense Intelligence Senior Executive Service under section 1606 of this title.

“(2) The term ‘senior functional and technical workforce of the Department of Defense’ includes the following categories of Department of Defense civilian personnel:

“(B) Scientists and engineers appointed pursuant to section 342(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 103–337; 108 Stat. 2721), as amended by section 1114 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398 (114 Stat. 1654A–315)).

“(C) Scientists and engineers appointed pursuant to section 1101 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (5 U.S.C. 3104 note).

“(D) Persons serving in Intelligence Senior Level positions under section 1607 of this title.

“(3) The term ‘acquisition workforce’ includes individuals designated under section 1721 of this title as filling acquisition positions.”.

(d) Conforming amendment.—The heading of subsection (c) of such section is amended to read as follows: “Senior management workforce; senior functional and technical workforce.—”.

(e) Formatting of annual report.—Subsections (d)(1) and (e)(1) of such section are each amended by striking “include a separate chapter to”.

SEC. 1103. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees working overseas.

SEC. 1104. Personnel authorities for civilian personnel for the United States Cyber Command.

(1) the Secretary of Defense needs enhanced authorities for employing, compensating, and promoting civilian personnel with technical and operational cyber expertise in order to enable the United States Cyber Command to recruit and retain a civilian workforce able to support its demanding cyber missions; and

(2) sections 1601 through 1607 of title 10, United States Code, provide an example of authorities which might suit that purpose.

(b) Recommendations on personnel authorities.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Principal Cyber Advisor to the Secretary of Defense shall—

(1) identify improvements to be made to the support provided by the Air Force, in its capacity as executive agent for the United States Cyber Command, to meet the needs of the Command for obtaining and retaining civilian personnel with the skills and experience required to support the missions and responsibilities of the Command;

(2) identify the additional employment, compensation, and promotion authorities necessary for the Air Force, in that capacity, to ensure that the United States Cyber Command has a civilian workforce able to support the missions and responsibilities of the Command; and

(3) submit to the Secretary recommendations for administrative and legislative actions, including actions in connection with authorities identified pursuant to paragraph (2), to ensure that the United States Cyber Command has a civilian workforce able to support the missions and responsibilities of the Command.

SEC. 1201. Modification of Department of Defense authority for humanitarian stockpiled conventional munitions assistance programs.

(1) by striking “and includes” and inserting “small arms, and light weapons, including man-portable air-defense systems. Such term includes”; and

(2) by inserting before the period at the end the following: “, small arms, and light weapons, including man-portable air-defense systems”.

SEC. 1202. Codification of recurring limitations on the use of funds for assistance for units of foreign security forces that have committed a gross violation of human rights.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter I of chapter 134 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2245a the following new section:

“§ 2246. Limitation on use of funds for assistance for units of foreign security forces that have committed gross violations of human rights

“(a) In general.—Funds authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense may not be used for training, equipment, or other assistance for the members of a unit of a foreign security force if the Secretary of Defense has credible information that such unit has committed a gross violation of human rights.

“(b) Exceptions.—The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply if the Secretary determines that—

“(1) the government of the country of the foreign security force unit concerned has undertaken all necessary corrective steps; or

“(A) to assist in disaster relief operations or other humanitarian or national security emergencies; or

“(c) Waiver.—The Secretary may waive the prohibition in subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that the waiver is required by extraordinary circumstances.

“(d) Information on violations of human rights.— (1) The Secretary shall ensure that, before a decision to provide training, equipment, or other assistance to a unit of a foreign security force, full consideration is given to any credible information available to the Department of State relating to human rights violations by such unit.

“(2) The Secretary shall establish, and periodically update, procedures to ensure that any information in the possession of the Department of Defense about gross violations of human rights by units of foreign security forces is shared on a timely basis with the Department of State.

“(e) Consultation.—The Secretary of Defense shall consult with the Secretary of State in the discharge of subsections (b), (c), and (d).

“(f) Notification.—Not later than 15 days after the application of any exception under subsection (b) or the exercise of any waiver under subsection (c), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the following:

“(1) In the case a report on an exception under subsection (b), notice of the use of the exception and a description of the grounds for the exception.

“(2) In the case of a report on a waiver under subsection (c), a description of—

“(B) the information relating to the gross violation of human rights by such unit;

“(D) the cost, purpose, and duration of the training, equipment, or other assistance covered by such waiver.

“(g) Other assistance defined.—In this section, the term ‘other assistance’ means assistance whose primary purpose is to build the capacity of a foreign security force.”.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter I of chapter 134 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2245a the following new item:

(b) Effective date.—The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on October 1, 2014, and shall apply with respect to funds available to the Department of Defense for fiscal years beginning on or after that date.

SEC. 1203. Codification and enhancement of authority to build the capacity of foreign security forces.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 136 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“(a) Authority.—The Secretary of Defense is authorized to conduct or support a program or programs as follows:

“(1) To build the capacity of a foreign country's national military forces in order for that country to—

“(B) participate in or support allied or coalition military or stability operations that benefit the national security interests of the United States.

“(2) To build the capacity of a foreign country's national maritime or border security forces to conduct counterterrorism operations.

“(3) To build the capacity of a foreign country's other security forces that have a counterterrorism mission in order for such forces to conduct counterterrorism operations.

“(b) Concurrence of Secretary of State.—The Secretary of Defense shall obtain the concurrence of the Secretary of State before conducting or supporting a program under subsection (a).

“(1) AUTHORIZED ELEMENTS.—A program under subsection (a) may include the provision of equipment, supplies, training, defense services, and small-scale military construction.

“(2) REQUIRED ELEMENTS.—A program under subsection (a) shall include elements that promote the following:

“(1) ANNUAL FUNDING LIMITATION.—The Secretary of Defense may use up to $350,000,000 of funds available for operation and maintenance for any fiscal year to conduct or support activities under subsection (a) in that fiscal year.

“(2) ADDITIONAL FUNDING.—In addition to the amount available as specified in paragraph (1), up to $150,000,000 of funds available for operation and maintenance for any fiscal year may be used to conduct or support activities under subsection (a) in that fiscal year if transferred for such purposes in accordance with established procedures for reprogramming of funds under section 1001 of the Carl Levin National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, and successor provisions of law.

“(3) ASSISTANCE OTHERWISE PROHIBITED BY LAW.—The Secretary of Defense may not use the authority in subsection (a) to provide any type of assistance described in subsection (b) that is otherwise prohibited by any provision of law.

“(4) LIMITATION ON ELIGIBLE COUNTRIES.—The Secretary of Defense may not use the authority in subsection (a) to provide assistance described in subsection (b) to any foreign country that is otherwise prohibited from receiving such type of assistance under any other provision of law.

“(A) IN GENERAL.—Amounts available under this subsection for the authority in subsection (a) for a fiscal year may be used for programs under that authority that begin in such fiscal year but end in the next fiscal year.

“(B) ACHIEVEMENT OF FULL OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY.—If, in accordance with subparagraph (A), equipment is delivered under a program under the authority in subsection (a) in the fiscal year after the fiscal year in which the program begins, amounts for supplies, training, defense services, and small-scale military construction associated with such equipment and necessary to ensure that the recipient unit achieves full operational capability for such equipment may be used in the fiscal year in which the foreign country takes receipt of such equipment and in the next fiscal year.

“(6) LIMITATION ON AMOUNT FOR BUILDING CAPACITY TO PARTICIPATE IN ALLIED OR COALITION MILITARY OR STABILITY OPERATIONS.—Of the amounts available under this subsection for the authority in subsection (a) for a fiscal year, not more than $150,000,000 may be used in such fiscal year for purposes described in subsection (a)(1)(B).

“(7) LIMITATIONS ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR SMALL-SCALE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION.—

“(A) ACTIVITIES UNDER PARTICULAR PROGRAMS.—The amount that may be obligated or expended for small-scale military construction activities under any particular program authorized under subsection (a) may not exceed $750,000.

“(B) ACTIVITIES UNDER ALL PROGRAMS.—The amount that may be obligated or expended for small-scale military construction activities during a fiscal year for all programs authorized under subsection (a) during that fiscal year may not exceed $25,000,000.

“(e) Formulation and execution of program.—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall jointly formulate any program under subsection (a). The Secretary of Defense shall coordinate with the Secretary of State in the implementation of any program under subsection (a).

“(1) IN GENERAL.—Not less than 15 days before initiating activities under a program under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a notice of the following:

“(A) The country whose capacity to engage in activities in subsection (a) will be built under the program.

“(B) The budget, implementation timeline with milestones, anticipated delivery schedule for assistance, military department responsible for management and associated program executive office, and completion date for the program.

“(D) A description of the arrangements, if any, for the sustainment of the program and the source of funds to support sustainment of the capabilities and performance outcomes achieved under the program beyond its completion date, if applicable.

“(E) A description of the program objectives and assessment framework to be used to develop capability and performance metrics associated with operational outcomes for the recipient unit.

“(F) Information, including the amount, type, and purpose, on the assistance provided the country during the three preceding fiscal years under each of the following programs, accounts, or activities:

“(ii) The Foreign Military Financing program under the Arms Export Control Act.

“(iv) The International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement (INCLE) program under section 481 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2291).

“(vi) Counterdrug activities authorized by section 1004 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (10 U.S.C. 374 note) and section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998.

“(vii) Any other significant program, account, or activity for the provision of security assistance that the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State consider appropriate.

“(2) COORDINATION WITH SECRETARY OF STATE.—Any notice under paragraph (1) shall be prepared in coordination with the Secretary of State.

“(g) Assessments of programs.—Amounts available to conduct or support programs under subsection (a) shall be available to the Secretary of Defense to conduct assessments and determine the effectiveness of such programs in building the operational capacity and performance of the recipient units concerned.

“(h) Appropriate committees of Congress defined.—In this section, the term ‘appropriate committees of Congress’ means—

“(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and

“(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.”.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 136 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

(1) Section 943(g)(1) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4578), as most recently amended by section 1205(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1624), is further amended by striking “sections 1206 and 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3456 and 3458)” and inserting “section 2282 of title 10, United States Code, and section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3458)”.

(2) Section 1209(b)(1)(A) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 368), as most recently amended by section 1203(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2512), is further amended by striking “section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3456)” and inserting “section 2282 of title 10, United States Code”.

(c) Repeal of superseded authority.—Section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163) is repealed.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the end of each of fiscal years 2015 through 2025, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report summarizing the findings of the assessments of programs carried out under subsection (g) of section 2282 of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)), during such fiscal year.

(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report under paragraph (1) shall include, for each program assessed under such subsection (g) during the fiscal year covered by such report, the following:

(A) A description of the nature and the extent of the potential or actual terrorist threat, if any, that the program is intended to address.

(B) A description of the program, including the objectives of the program, the types of recipient country units receiving assistance under the program, and the baseline operational capability and performance of the units receiving assistance under the program before the commencement of receipt of assistance under the program.

(C) A description of the extent to which the program is implemented by United States Government personnel or contractors.

(D) A description of the assessment framework to be used to develop capability and performance metrics associated with operational outcomes for units receiving assistance under the program.

(E) An assessment of the program using the assessment framework described in subparagraph (D).

(F) An assessment of the effectiveness of the program in achieving its intended purpose.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 31 of each of 2015 through 2025, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress an audit of such program or programs conducted or supported pursuant to section 2282 of title 10, United States Code (as so added), during the preceding fiscal year as the Comptroller General shall, in consultation with the appropriate committees of Congress, select for purposes of such report.

(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report shall include, for the program or programs covered by such report and the fiscal year covered by such report, the following:

(iii) the delivery and completion schedules for assistance under the program or programs; and

(iv) the baseline operational capability and performance of the units receiving assistance under the program or programs before the commencement of receipt of assistance under the program or programs.

(B) An assessment of the capacity of each recipient country to absorb assistance under the program or programs.

(C) An assessment of the arrangements, if any, for the sustainment of the program or programs, including any source of funds to support sustainment of the capabilities and performance outcomes achieved under the program or program beyond completion date, if applicable.

(D) A description of the extent to which the program or programs are implemented by United States Government personnel or contractors.

(E) A description of the assessment framework to be used to develop capability and performance metrics associated with operational outcomes for units receiving assistance under the program or programs.

(F) A description of the assessment of the program or programs using the assessment framework described in subparagraph (E).

(G) An assessment of the effectiveness of the program or programs in achieving their intended purpose.

(f) Appropriate committees of Congress defined.—In subsections (d) and (e), the term “appropriate committees of Congress” has the meaning given that term in subsection (h) of section 2282 of title 10, United States Code (as so added).

SEC. 1204. Training of security forces and associated ministries of foreign countries to promote respect for the rule of law and human rights.

(a) In general.—Chapter 136 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 1203 of this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“§ 2283. Training of security forces and associated ministries of foreign countries to promote respect for the rule of law and human rights

“(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense is authorized to conduct human rights training of security forces and associated ministries of foreign countries.

“(b) Construction with limitation on use of funds.—Human rights training authorized by this section may be conducted for security forces otherwise prohibited from receiving such training under section 2242 of this title in accordance with the exception in subsection (b)(2)(B) of that section.

“(c) Secretary of State concurrence required.—Training activities may be conducted under this section only with the concurrence of the Secretary of State.

“(d) Authorized activities.—Human rights training authorized by this section may include associated activities and expenses necessary for the conduct of training and assessments designed to further the purposes of this section.

“(e) Human rights training defined.—In this section, the term ‘human rights training’ includes training conducted for one or more of the following purposes:

“(3) To promote compliance with the law of armed conflict or the establishment of a military justice system.

“(5) To otherwise address and alleviate the factors contributing to a gross violation of human rights by the security forces of a foreign country.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 136 of such title, as so amended, is further amended by adding at the end the following new item:

SEC. 1205. Modification and extension of Global Security Contingency Fund authority.

(a) Types of assistance.—Subsection (c)(1) of section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (22 U.S.C. 2151 note) is amended by striking “the provision of equipment, supplies, and training.” and inserting “the provision of the following:

(b) Transfer authority.—Subsection (f)(1) of such section is amended by striking “for Defense-wide activities” in the first sentence.

(c) Two-year extension of availability of funds.—Subsection (i) of such section is amended by striking “September 30, 2015” and inserting “September 30, 2017”.

(d) Extension of expiration date.—Subsection (p) of such section is amended—

(1) by striking “September 30, 2015” and inserting “September 30, 2017”; and

(2) by striking “funds available for fiscal years 2012 through 2015” and inserting “funds available for a fiscal year beginning before that date”.

SEC. 1206. Use of acquisition and cross-servicing agreements to lend certain military equipment to certain foreign forces for personnel protection and survivability.

(a) One-year extension.—Section 1202(e) of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2413), as most recently amended by section 1217(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 909), is further amended by striking “December 31, 2014” and inserting “December 31, 2015”.

(1) AUTHORITY TO WAIVE.—In the case of equipment loaned to the military forces of another nation under the authority of section 1202 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007, as amended by subsection (a), that is damaged or destroyed as a result of combat operations during coalition operations while held by the forces to which loaned, the Secretary of Defense may, with respect to such equipment and without regard to the date of loan of such equipment under such authority, waive any applicable requirement under subchapter I of chapter 138 of title 10, United States Code, for—

(2) CONDITION OF WAIVER.—Any waiver under this subsection may be made only if the Secretary determines that the waiver is in the national security interest of the United States.

(3) CASE-BY-CASE BASIS.—Any waiver under this subsection may be made only on a case-by-case basis.

SEC. 1207. Cross servicing agreements for loan of personnel protection and personnel survivability equipment in coalition operations.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter I of chapter 138 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2342 the following new section:

“§ 2342a. Cross-servicing agreements: use for loan of personnel protection and personnel survivability equipment in coalition operations

“(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense may, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, enter into an arrangement, under an agreement concluded pursuant to section 2342 of this title, under which the United States agrees to loan personnel protection and personnel survivability equipment for the use of such equipment by military forces of a nation participating with the United States in a coalition operation as part of a contingency operation or a peacekeeping operation under the Charter of the United Nations or another international agreement.

“(b) Limitations.— (1) Equipment may be loaned to the military forces of a nation under the authority of this section only upon a determination by the Secretary of Defense that the United States forces in the coalition operation concerned have no unfulfilled requirements for such equipment.

“(2) Equipment loaned to the military forces of a nation under the authority of this section may be used by those forces only for personnel protection or to aid in the personnel survivability of those forces and only in a coalition operation with the United States described in subsection (a).

“(3) Equipment loaned to the military forces of a nation under the authority of this section may be used by the military forces of that nation for the duration of that country’s participation in the coalition operation concerned.

“(c) Waiver of reimbursement in case of loss of equipment in combat.— (1) In the case of equipment loaned under the authority of this section that is damaged or destroyed as a result of combat operations during coalition operations while held by forces to which loaned under this section, the Secretary of Defense may, with respect to such equipment, waive any other applicable requirement under this subchapter for—

“(2) Any waiver under this subsection may be made only if the Secretary determines that the waiver is in the national security interest of the United States.

“(3) Any waiver under this subsection may be made only on a case-by-case basis.

“(d) Reports to Congress.—If the authority provided under this section is exercised during a fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall, in coordination with the Secretary of State, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the exercise of such authority by not later than October 30 of the year in which such fiscal year ends. Each report on the exercise of such authority shall specify the recipient country of the equipment loaned, the type of equipment loaned, and the duration of the loan of such equipment.”.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter I of chapter 138 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2342 the following new item:

(b) Definitions.—Section 2350 of such title is amended by adding at end the following new paragraphs:

“(5) The term ‘personnel protection and personnel survivability equipment’ means items designated as significant military equipment in categories I, II, III, VII, XI, XIII of the United States Munitions List under section 38(a)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778(a)(1) that the Secretary of Defense designates as available for loan under section 2342a of this title.

“(A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and

“(B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.”.

SEC. 1208. Extension and modification of authority for support of special operations to combat terrorism.

(a) Amount available for support.—Subsection (a) of section 1208 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2086), as most recently amended by section 1203(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1621), is further amended by striking “$50,000,000” and inserting “$60,000,000”.

(b) Extension.—Subsection (h) of such section 1208, as most recently amended by section 1203(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2012, is further amended by striking “2015” and inserting “2016”.

SEC. 1209. Assistance to foster a negotiated settlement to the conflict in Syria.

(a) Authority To provide assistance.—The Secretary of Defense is authorized to provide equipment, supplies, training, and defense services to assist vetted elements of the Syrian opposition for the purposes as follows:

(2) Protecting the United States, its friends and allies, and the Syrian people from the threats posed by terrorists in Syria.

(3) Promoting the conditions for a negotiated settlement to end the conflict in Syria.

(b) Vetted elements of the Syrian opposition.—For the purposes of this section, vetted elements of the Syrian opposition are units of the Free Syrian Army and the Supreme Military Council, and other Syrian forces, groups, or individuals opposed to the Syrian regime, who, after a review of information available to the United States Government are—

(1) determined by the Secretary of Defense not to be organizations or persons that have been designated as a foreign terrorist organization pursuant to section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189) or a Specifically Designated Global Terrorist pursuant to Executive Order 13224 (66 Fed. Reg. 49079); and

(2) assessed by the Secretary of Defense to be suitable recipients of United States support after conducting a review of available information that they are—

(A) committed to rejecting terrorism, and cooperating with international counterterrorism and nonproliferation efforts;

(C) committed to establishing a peaceful, pluralistic, and democratic Syria that respects the human rights and fundamental freedoms of all its citizens; and

(D) committed to civilian rule, including subordinating the military to civilian authority, and the rule of law for Syria.

(c) Assistance to third countries in provision of training and equipment.—The Secretary may provide assistance to third countries for purposes of the provision of training and equipment under subsection (a).

(d) Concurrence of Secretary of State.—The Secretary of Defense shall obtain the concurrence of the Secretary of State before providing assistance pursuant to this section.

(e) Authority To accept contributions.—The Secretary of Defense may accept contributions from foreign governments to provide assistance under this section. Any funds so accepted by the Secretary may be credited to the account from which funds are made available for the provision of such assistance, and may be used for such purpose until expended.

(f) Notice to Congress on assistance.—The Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a detailed notice on the following:

(g) Expiration.—The authority to provide assistance under this section shall terminate on December 31, 2018.

(h) Appropriate committees of Congress defined.—In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—

(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and

(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), no amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense by this Act may be available for security assistance to the Government of Burma unless the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, certifies to the appropriate committees of Congress that—

(B) the Government of Burma is taking steps toward establishing a transparent and inclusive process to amend the constitution of Burma, including the full participation of the political opposition and all ethnic minority groups in that process; and

(ii) increased transparency and accountability through activities such as establishing or updating a code of conduct, a uniform code of military justice, an inspector general, an ombudsman, or guidelines for relations between the military and civilians.

(2) EXCEPTIONS.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the use of funds with respect to human rights and disaster relief training as follows:

(A) Consultation, education, and training on human rights, the law of armed conflict, civilian control of the military, rule of law, and other legal training.

(C) Courses or workshops on regional norms of security cooperation, defense institution reform, and transnational issues such as human trafficking and international crime.

(D) Observation of bilateral or multilateral military exercises on humanitarian assistance or disaster relief.

(E) Training on humanitarian assistance and disaster relief for the Burma military.

(F) Aid or support for the Government of Burma in the event of a humanitarian crisis or natural disaster.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the strategy and plans for military-to-military engagement between the United States Armed Forces and the Burma military.

(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following:

(A) A description and assessment of the current strategy of the Government of Burma for reform of the security sector of Burma.

(B) A description of the current United States strategy for the military-to-military relationship between the United States and Burma, and how military-to-military engagement supports the United States national security strategy for Burma.

(C) A description and assessment of the record of the Burma military with respect to the implementation of human rights reforms, including—

(i) cooperation with civilian authorities to investigate and resolve cases of human rights violations; and

(ii) actions to demonstrate respect for law of war and human rights, including with respect to child soldiers.

(D) A description of the elements of the current military-to-military engagement between the United States and Burma that promote the implementation of human rights reforms described in subparagraph (C).

(E) A current list of ongoing military-to-military activities conducted between the United States and Burma, including a description of each such activity and an update of any such activities in prior years that are ongoing as of the date of such report.

(F) A list of military-to-military activities between the United States and Burma that are planned to occur during the one-year period beginning on the date of such report, including a description of each such activity.

(G) An assessment of current progress on the peaceful settlement of armed conflicts between the Government of Burma and ethnic minority groups in Burma.

(3) FORM.—Each report under this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and

(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 1211. Biennial report on programs carried out by the Department of Defense to provide training, equipment, or other assistance or reimbursement to foreign security forces.

(a) Biennial report required.—Not later than February 1 of each of 2016, 2018, and 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall, in coordination with the Secretary of State, submit to the congressional defense committees a report that sets forth, on a country-by-country basis, a description of each program carried out by the Department of Defense to provide training, equipment, or other security assistance or reimbursement during the two fiscal years ending in the year before the year in which such report is submitted under the authorities specified in subsection (c).

(b) Elements of report.—Each report required under subsection (a) shall provide for each program covered by such report, and for the reporting period covered by such report, the following:

(1) A description of the purpose and type of the training, equipment, or assistance or reimbursement provided.

(2) The cost of such training, equipment, or assistance or reimbursement, including by type of support provided under such program.

(1) Section 127d of title 10, United States Code, relating to authority to provide logistic support, supplies, and services to allied forces participating in a combined operation with the Armed Forces.

(2) Section 166a(b)(6) of title 10, United States Code, relating to humanitarian and civic assistance by the commanders of the combatant commands.

(A) to provide assistance to nations of the former Soviet Union as part of the Warsaw Initiative Fund;

(C) to conduct a program to increase defense institutional legal capacity through the Defense Institute of International Legal Studies.

(4) Section 2010 of title 10, United States Code, relating to authority to reimburse foreign troops for participation in combined exercises.

(5) Section 2011 of title 10, United States Code, relating to authority to reimburse foreign troops for participation in Joint Combined Exercise Training.

(6) Section 2249c of title 10, United States Code, relating to authority to use appropriated funds for costs associated with education and training of foreign officials under the Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Fellowship Program.

(7) Section 2282 of title 10, United States Code (as added by section 1203 of this Act), relating to authority to build the capacity of foreign military forces, or the predecessor authority to such section in section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3456).

(8) Section 2561 of title 10, United States Code, relating to authority to provide humanitarian assistance.

(10) Section 1205 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (32 U.S.C. 107 note), relating to authority for National Guard State Partnership program.

(11) Section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 168 note), relating to the Ministry of Defense Advisors program.

(12) Section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (22 U.S.C. 2151 note), relating to the Global Security Contingency Fund.

(13) Section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 393), relating to authority to reimburse certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations.

(14) Section 1234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 394), relating to authorization for logistical support for coalition forces supporting certain United States military operations.

(15) Section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 111 Stat. 1881), relating to authority to provide additional support for counter-drug activities of Peru and Colombia.

(16) Section 1004 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (10 U.S.C. 374 note), relating to additional support for counter-drug activities.

(17) Any other authority on assistance or reimbursement that the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate and consistent with subsection (a).

(d) Nonduplication of effort.—If any information required under subsection (a) has been included in another report or notification previously submitted to Congress by law, the Secretary of Defense may provide a compilation of such reports and notifications at the time of submitting the report required by subsection (a) in lieu of including such information in the report required by subsection (a).

(e) Form.—Each report required under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex.

(f) Repeal of superseded requirement.—Section 1209 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 368) is repealed.

SEC. 1212. Sense of the Senate on multilateral humanitarian assistance and disaster relief exercises.

(1) humanitarian assistance and disaster relief multilateral exercises provide nations in the Asia-Pacific region with the training, capacity building, and coordination expertise necessary to respond to natural disasters that often cause serious damage and loss of human life, as seen recently with the devastation caused by the Haiyan typhoon in the Philippines; and

(2) both the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan should be afforded the opportunity to participate in the humanitarian assistance and disaster relief portions of future multilateral exercises, such as Pacific Partnership, Pacific Angel, or the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC), to increase their capacity to effectively respond to these types of disasters.

(a) One-year extension.—Section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1619), as most recently amended by section 1211 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 904), is further amended by striking “fiscal year 2014” each place it appears and inserting “fiscal year 2015”.

(b) Semi-annual reports.—Subsection (b) of such section, as so amended, is further amended—

(1) in the subsection heading, by striking “Quarterly” and inserting “Semi-annual”; and

(A) in the paragraph heading, by striking “Quarterly” and inserting “Semi-annual”;

(B) by striking “fiscal year quarter” and inserting “half fiscal year”; and

(c) Funds available during fiscal year 2015.—Subsection (a) of such section, as so amended, is further amended by striking “$60,000,000” and inserting “$20,000,000”.

(d) Restriction on amount of payments.—Subsection (e) of such section is amended by striking “$20,000,000” and inserting “$2,000,000”.

(e) Notification on certain projects.—Subsection (g) of such section is amended—

(1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “$5,000,000” and inserting “$500,000”;

(2) in paragraph (1), by striking “to advance the military campaign plan for Afghanistan” and inserting “to directly benefit the security or stability of the people of Afghanistan”; and

(3) in paragraph (3), by striking “any agreement with either the Government of Afghanistan,” and inserting “any written agreement with either the Government of Afghanistan, an entity owned or controlled by the Government of Afghanistan,”.

(f) Submittal of revised guidance.—Not later than 15 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a copy of the guidance issued by the Secretary to the Armed Forces concerning the Commanders' Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan as revised to take into account the amendments made by this section.

SEC. 1222. Extension of authority to transfer defense articles and provide defense services to the military and security forces of Afghanistan.

(a) Extension.—Subsection (h) of section 1222 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1992) is amended by striking “December 31, 2014” and inserting “December 31, 2015”.

(b) Quarterly reports.—Subsection (f)(1) of such section is amended by striking “March 31, 2015” and inserting “March 31, 2016”.

(c) Excess defense articles.—Subsection (i)(2) of such section is amended by striking “and 2014” each place it appears and inserting “, 2014, and 2015”.

SEC. 1223. One-year extension of authority to use funds for reintegration activities in Afghanistan.

(B) by striking “for fiscal year 2014” and inserting “for fiscal year 2015”; and

(2) in subsection (e), by striking “December 31, 2014” and inserting “December 31, 2015”.

SEC. 1224. Extension and modification of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations.

(a) Extension.—Subsection (a) of section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 1213 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 905), is further amended by striking “fiscal year 2014” and inserting “fiscal year 2015”.

(1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking “in Operation Enduring Freedom” and inserting “in Afghanistan”;

(2) in subsection (b), by striking “in Operation Enduring Freedom” in the matter preceding paragraph (1).

(1) in the second sentence, by striking “during fiscal year 2014 may not exceed $1,500,000,000” and inserting “during fiscal year 2015 may not exceed $1,200,000,000”; and

(2) in the third sentence, by striking “during fiscal year 2013 may not exceed $1,200,000,000” and inserting “during fiscal year 2015 may not exceed $900,000,000”.

(d) Extension of notice requirement relating to reimbursement of Pakistan for support provided by Pakistan.—Section 1332(b)(6) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 1213(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 906), is further amended by striking “September 30, 2014” and inserting “September 30, 2015”.

(e) Extension of limitation on reimbursement of Pakistan pending certification on Pakistan.—Section 1227(d)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2001), as amended by section 1213(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 906), is further amended by striking “fiscal year 2014” and inserting “fiscal year 2015”.

(f) Additional limitation on reimbursement of Pakistan pending certification on Pakistan.—Of the total amount of reimbursements and support authorized for Pakistan during fiscal year 2015 pursuant to the third sentence of section 1233(d)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (as amended by subsection (c)(2)), $300,000,000 shall not be eligible for the waiver under section 1227(d)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (126 Stat. 2001) unless the Secretary of Defense certifies that Pakistan has undertaken military operations in North Waziristan that have significantly disrupted the safe haven and freedom of movement of the Haqqani network in Pakistan.

SEC. 1225. One-year extension of logistical support for coalition forces supporting certain United States military operations.

(1) in subsection (a), by striking “fiscal year 2014” and inserting “fiscal year 2015”;

(2) in subsection (d), by striking “December 31, 2014” and inserting “December 31, 2015”; and

(3) in subsection (e)(1), by striking “December 31, 2014” and inserting “December 31, 2015”.

SEC. 1226. Prohibition on use of funds for certain programs and projects of the Department of Defense in Afghanistan that cannot be safely accessed by United States Government personnel.

(a) Prohibition.—Amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act for the Department of Defense may not be obligated or expended for a reconstruction or other infrastructure projects of the Department in Afghanistan if military or civilian personnel of the United States Government with authority to conduct oversight of such program or project cannot safely access such program or project.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The prohibition in subsection (a) may be waived with respect to a program or project otherwise covered by that subsection if a determination described in paragraph (2) is made as follows:

(A) In the case of a program or project with an estimated lifecycle cost of less than $1,000,000, by the contracting officer assigned to oversee the program or project.

(B) In the case of a program or project with an estimated lifecycle cost of $1,000,000 or more, but less than $40,000,000, by the Commander of United States Forces-Afghanistan.

(C) In the case of a program or project with an estimated lifecycle cost of $40,000,000 or more, by the Secretary of Defense.

(2) DETERMINATION.—A determination described in this paragraph with respect to a program or project is a determination of each of the following:

(A) That the program or project clearly contributes to United States national interests or strategic objectives.

(B) That the Government of Afghanistan has requested or expressed a need for the program or project.

(C) That the program or project has been coordinated with the Government of Afghanistan, and with any other implementing agencies or international donors.

(D) That security conditions permit effective implementation and oversight of the program or project.

(E) That the program or project includes safeguards to detect, deter, and mitigate corruption and waste, fraud, and abuse of funds.

(F) That adequate arrangements have been made for the sustainment of the program or project following its completion, including arrangements with respect to funding and technical capacity for sustainment.

(G) That meaningful metrics have been established to measure the progress and effectiveness of the program or project in meeting its objectives

(3) NOTICE ON CERTAIN WAIVERS.—In the event a waiver is issued under paragraph (1) for a program or project described in subparagraph (C) of that paragraph, the Secretary of Defense shall notify Congress of the waiver not later than 15 days after the issuance of the waiver.

SEC. 1227. Semiannual report on enhancing the strategic partnership between the United States and Afghanistan.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress on a semiannual basis a report on building and sustaining the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF).

(2) SUBMITTAL.—A report under paragraph (1) shall be submitted not later than April 30 each year, for the 6-month period ending on the preceding March 31, and not later than October 31 each year, for the 6-month period ending on the preceding September 30. No report is required to be submitted under paragraph (1) after the report required to be submitted on October 31, 2017.

(3) FORM.—Each report required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

(b) Matters To be included.—Each report required under subsection (a) shall include the following:

(1) OBJECTIVES OF UNITED STATES AND NATO MISSIONS IN AFGHANISTAN AFTER 2014.—A statement of the objectives of any United States mission, and of any mission agreed by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, to train, advise, and assist the Afghan National Security Forces after 2014.

(2) THREAT ASSESSMENT.—An assessment of the current security conditions in Afghanistan and the security conditions anticipated in Afghanistan during the 24-month period beginning on the date of the submittal of such report.

(A) the size and force structure of the Afghan National Security Forces, including the Afghanistan National Army (ANA), the Afghanistan National Police (ANP), the Afghan Border Police, the Afghan Local Police, and such other major force components of the Afghan National Security Forces as the Secretary considers appropriate;

(B) the rationale for any changes in the overall end strength or the mix of force structure for the Afghan National Security Forces during the period covered by such report; and

(C) levels of recruitment, retention, and attrition within the Afghan National Security Forces, in the aggregate and by force component; and

(D) personnel levels within the Afghanistan Ministry of Defense and the Afghanistan Ministry of Security.

(4) ASSESSMENT OF SIZE, STRUCTURE, AND CAPABILITIES OF ANSF.—An assessment whether the size, structure, and capabilities of the Afghan National Security Forces are sufficient to provide security with an acceptable level of risk in light of the current security conditions in Afghanistan and the security conditions anticipated in Afghanistan during the 24-month period beginning on the date of the submittal of such report.

(A) A description of programs to achieve key mission enabling capabilities within the Afghan National Security Forces, including any major milestones and timelines, and the end states intended to be achieved by such programs, including for the following:

(B) Metrics for monitoring and evaluating the performance of such programs in achieving the intended outcomes of such programs.

(A) any plan agreed by the United States, the international community, and the Government of Afghanistan to fund and sustain the Afghan National Security Forces that serves as current guidance on such matters during the period covered by such report, including a description of whether such plan differs from—

(i) in the case of the first report submitted under subsection (a), commitments undertaken at the 2012 NATO Summit in Chicago and the Tokyo Mutual Accountability Framework; or

(ii) in the case of any other report submitted under subsection (a), such plan as set forth in the previous report submitted under subsection (a);

(C) contributions by the international community to sustaining the Afghan National Security Forces during the period covered by such report;

(D) contributions by the Government of Afghanistan to sustaining the Afghan National Security Forces during the period covered by such report; and

(E) efforts to ensure that the Government of Afghanistan can assume an increasing financial responsibility for sustaining the Afghan National Security Forces consistent with its commitments at the Chicago Summit and the Tokyo Mutual Accountability Framework.

(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and

(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

(d) Repeal of superseded authority.—Section 1230 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) is repealed.

(a) Report required.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and every six months thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the nature and extent of bilateral security cooperation between the United States and Pakistan.

(b) Elements.—The report required under subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following:

(1) A description of any strategic security objectives that the United States and Pakistan have agreed to pursue in cooperation.

(2) A description of programs or activities that the United States and Pakistan have jointly undertaken to pursue mutually agreed security cooperation objectives.

(3) A description and assessment of the effectiveness of efforts by Pakistan, unilaterally or jointly with the United States, to disrupt operations and eliminate safe havens of al Qaeda, Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, and other militant extremist groups such as the Haqqani Network and the Quetta Shura Taliban located in Pakistan.

(4) A description and assessment of efforts by Pakistan, unilaterally or jointly with the United States, to counter the threat of improvised explosive devices and the networks involved in the acquisition, production, and delivery of such devices and their precursors and components.

(5) An assessment of the effectiveness of any United States security assistance to Pakistan to achieve the strategic security objectives described in paragraph (1).

(6) A description of any metrics used to assess the effectiveness of programs and activities described in paragraph (2).

(7) An assessment of the cooperation of the Government of Pakistan in the search for Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl, who was captured on June 30, 2009, in Paktika Province in eastern Afghanistan, including an assessment of the degree to which the Government of Pakistan has provided the Department of Defense all requested information and intelligence relating to Sergeant Bergdahl, his captors, and his whereabouts that could assist in his recovery. The assessment should include a description of any unmet or partially met requests for information and intelligence to the extent practicable.

(c) Form.—The report required under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

(d) Sunset.—The requirements in this section shall terminate on December 31, 2017.

(e) Appropriate committees of Congress defined.—In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—

(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and

(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

(f) Repeal of obsolete and superseded requirements.—Section 1232 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) is amended by striking subsections (a) and (c).

SEC. 1229. Surface clearance of unexploded ordnance on former United States training ranges in Afghanistan.

(a) Authority To conduct surface clearance.—Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense may, using funds specified in subsection (c), conduct surface clearance of unexploded ordnance at closed training ranges used by the Armed Forces of the United States in Afghanistan.

(1) LIMITATION TO RANGES NOT TRANSFERRED TO AFGHANISTAN.—The surface clearance of unexploded ordnance authorized under subsection (a) may only take place on training ranges managed and operated by the Armed Forces of the United States that have not been transferred to the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan for use by its armed forces.

(2) LIMITATION ON AMOUNTS AVAILABLE.—Funds expended for clearance pursuant to the authority in subsection (a) may not exceed $125,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2015 and 2016.

(c) Funds.—The surface clearance of unexploded ordnance authorized by subsection (a) shall be paid for using amounts as follows:

(1) For fiscal year 2015, amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 1502 and available for operation and maintenance for overseas contingency operations.

(2) For fiscal year 2016, amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for the Department of Defense as additional authorizations of appropriations for overseas contingency operations and available for operation and maintenance for overseas contingency operations.

(d) Unexploded ordnance defined.—In this section, the term “unexploded ordnance” has the meaning given that term in section 101(e)(5) of title 10, United States Code.

(a) Short title.—This section may be cited as the “Afghan Allies Protection Extension Act”.

(b) Extension and expansion.—Section 602(b) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended—

“(ii) was or is employed in Afghanistan on or after October 7, 2001, for not less than 1 year—

“(II) by, or on behalf of, an organization or entity closely associated with the United States mission in Afghanistan that has received United States Government funding through an official and documented contract, award, grant, or cooperative agreement, including the International Security Assistance Force;”;

(B) in clause (iii), by striking “the United States Government” and inserting “an entity or organization described in clause (ii)”; and

“(D) ADDITIONAL FISCAL YEARS.—For each of the fiscal years 2014 and 2015, the total number of principal aliens who may be provided special immigrant status under this section may not exceed 4,000 per year, except that—

“(i) notwithstanding subparagraph (C), any unused balance of the total number of principal aliens who may be provided special immigrant status in fiscal years 2014 and 2015 may be carried forward and provided through December 31, 2016;

“(ii) the 1-year period during which an alien must have been employed in accordance with paragraph (2)(A)(ii) shall be the period from October 7, 2001, through December 31, 2014; and

“(iii) the principal alien seeking special immigrant status under this subparagraph shall apply to the Chief of Mission in accordance with paragraph (2)(D) not later than December 31, 2015.”.

SEC. 1231. Extension and modification of authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq.

(a) Extension.—Subsection (f)(1) of section 1215 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by striking “fiscal year 2014” and inserting “fiscal year 2015”.

(1) in subsection (c), by striking “fiscal year 2014 may not exceed $209,000,000” and inserting “fiscal year 2015 may not exceed $30,000,000”; and

(2) in subsection (d), by striking “fiscal year 2014” and inserting “fiscal year 2015”.

SEC. 1241. Report on impact of end of major combat operations in Afghanistan on authority to use military force.

(a) Report required.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth an assessment of the impact, if any, of the end of major combat operations in Afghanistan on the authority of the Armed Forces of the United States to use military force, including the authority to detain, with regard to al Qaeda, the Taliban and associated forces pursuant to—

(b) Form.—The report under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate; and

(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 1242. United States strategy for enhancing security and stability in Europe.

(1) REPORT ON STRATEGY REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on a strategy for enhancing security and stability in Europe.

(2) SENSE OF CONGRESS ON STRATEGY.—It is the sense of Congress that the United States strategy for enhancing security and stability in Europe should be guided by the following:

(A) The United States reaffirms its commitment to the goal of a Europe that is whole, free, and secure.

(B) The United States is unwavering in its commitment to its obligations under the North Atlantic Treaty, including the collective defense of allies under Article V.

(C) Respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the countries of Europe within internationally-recognized borders is fundamental to the security and stability of the region and the national security interests of the United States.

(D) Overcoming the threat to security and stability produced by the actions of the Russian Federation in seizing and annexing territory of neighboring countries and ongoing violations of the sovereignty of those countries is critical to United States interests in regional stability.

(1) REVIEW.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of the force posture, readiness, and responsiveness of United States forces and the forces of other members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in the area of responsibility of the United States European Command, and of contingency plans for such United States forces, with the objective of ensuring that the posture, readiness, and responsiveness of such forces are appropriate to meet the obligations of collective self-defense under Article V of the North Atlantic Treaty.

(2) REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth the following:

(B) A description of any initiatives or recommendations of the Secretary for enhancing the force posture, readiness, and responsiveness of United States forces in the area of responsibility of the United States European Command and contingency plans as a result of that review.

(C) A description of any initiatives of other members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization for enhancing the force posture, readiness, and responsiveness of their forces within the area of responsibility of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

(1) REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on a plan for reassuring Central European and Eastern European members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization regarding the commitment of the United States and other members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to their obligations under the North Atlantic Treaty, including collective defense under Article V.

(A) A description of measures to be undertaken by the United States to reassure members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization regarding the commitment of the United States to its obligations under the North Atlantic Treaty.

(B) A description of measures undertaken or to be undertaken by other members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to provide assurances of their commitment to meet their obligations under the North Atlantic Treaty.

(C) A description of any planned measures to increase the presence of the Armed Forces of the United States and the forces of other members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, including on a rotational basis, on the territories of the Central European and Eastern European members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

(D) A description of the measures undertaken by the United States and other members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to enhance the capability of members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to respond to tactics like those used by the Russian Federation in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine or to assist members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in responding to such tactics.

(d) Plan for enhancing United States security cooperation with NATO partners.—

(1) REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall jointly submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a plan for enhancing bilateral and multilateral security cooperation with appropriate countries participating in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Partnership for Peace program.

(2) AUTHORITIES FOR ENHANCING SECURITY COOPERATION.—For purposes of this subsection, the authorities for enhancing security cooperation with countries specified in paragraph (1) may include, but are not limited to, the following:

(A) Section 168 of title 10, United States Code, relating to the Warsaw Initiative Fund.

(B) Section 2282 of title 10, United States Code (as added by section 1203 of this Act), relating to authority to build the capacity of foreign military forces.

(C) Section 2283 of title 10, United States Code (as added by section 1204 of this Act), relating to training of security forces and associated ministries of foreign countries to promote respect for the rule of law and human rights.

(D) Section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 168 note), relating to the Ministry of Defense Advisors program.

(E) Section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (22 U.S.C. 2151 note), relating to the Global Security Contingency Fund.

(F) Any other authority available to the Secretary of Defense or Secretary of State appropriate for such purpose.

(1) PROHIBITION OF USE OF FUNDS FOR BILATERAL SECURITY COOPERATION ACTIVITIES.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be used to conduct bilateral security cooperation activities between the military forces of the United States and the Russian Federation until the Secretary of Defense certifies to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives that the armed forces of Russia have drawn down from areas adjacent to the border of Ukraine and ceased aggressive activities that threaten the security and territorial integrity of Ukraine and members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

(2) NONAPPLICABILITY.—The prohibition in paragraph (1) shall not apply to any activities necessary to ensure the compliance of the United States with its obligations under any bilateral or multilateral arms control or nonproliferation agreement or any other treaty obligation of the United States.

(3) WAIVER.—The Secretary of Defense may waive the applicability of the prohibition in paragraph (1) to the extent the Secretary determines that such waiver is necessary—

(A) to provide logistical or other support to the conduct of United States or North Atlantic Treaty Organization military operations in Afghanistan or the withdrawal from Afghanistan;

(B) to provide for the orderly and complete elimination of the Syrian chemical weapons program;

(C) to provide support to international negotiations on the nuclear program of Iran, including implementation of the Joint Plan of Action and negotiation of a long-term comprehensive agreement; or

(f) Appropriate committees of Congress defined.—In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—

(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and

(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 1243. Report on military and security developments involving the Russian Federation.

(a) Report.—Not later than June 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the specified congressional committees a report on the security and military strategy of the Russian Federation.

(b) Elements.—The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following elements:

(1) The elements set forth in paragraphs (1) through (7) of section 1254(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 927).

(2) A description of Russian military spending and investment priorities and their alignment with security priorities and objectives described in paragraph (1) of such section, including the capabilities under development and acquisition timelines for Russia’s 5th generation fighter program.

(3) A description of Russia's modernization program for its command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance and its applications for Russia's precision guided weapons.

(4) A description of Russia’s current missile defense strategy and capabilities, including efforts to develop missile defense capabilities.

(5) An assessment of the tactics, techniques, and procedures used by Russia in operations in Ukraine.

(6) A description of Russia's asymmetric strategy and capabilities, including efforts to develop and deploy electronic warfare, space and counterspace, and cyberwarfare capabilities, including details on the number of malicious cyber incidents and associated activities against Department of Defense networks that are known or suspected to have been conducted or directed by the Government of the Russian Federation.

(7) A description of Russia's nuclear strategy and associated doctrines, and nuclear capabilities, including the size and state of Russia's nuclear weapons stockpile, its nuclear weapons production capacities, and plans for developing its nuclear capabilities.

(8) A description of changes to United States policy on military-to-military contacts with Russia resulting from Russia’s annexation of Crimea.

(c) Nonduplication of efforts.—If any information required under subsection (b) has been included in another report or notification previously submitted to Congress as required by law, the Secretary of Defense may provide a compilation of such reports and notifications at the time of submitting the report required by subsection (a) in lieu of including such information.

(d) Specified congressional committees defined.—In this section, the term “specified congressional committees” means—

(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and

(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 1244. Modification of matters for discussion in annual reports of United States-China Economic and Security Review Commission.

(a) Matters for discussion.—Section 1238(c)(2) of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 22 U.S.C. 7002(c)(2)) is amended by striking subparagraphs (A) through (J) and inserting the following new subparagraphs:

“(A) The role of the People’s Republic of China in the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and other weapons (including dual use technologies), including actions the United States might take to encourage the People’s Republic of China to cease such practices.

“(B) The qualitative and quantitative nature of the transfer of United States production activities to the People’s Republic of China, including the relocation of manufacturing, high technology and intellectual property, and research and development facilities, the impact of such transfers on the national security of the United States (including the dependence of the national security industrial base of the United States on imports from China), the economic security of the United States, and employment in the United States, and the adequacy of United States export control laws in relation to the People's Republic of China.

“(C) The effects of the need for energy and natural resources in the People’s Republic of China on the foreign and military policies of the People's Republic of China, the impact of the large and growing economy of the People’s Republic of China on world energy and natural resource supplies, prices, and the environment, and the role the United States can play (including through joint research and development efforts and technological assistance) in influencing the energy and natural resource policies of the People’s Republic of China.

“(D) Foreign investment by the United States in the People’s Republic of China and by the People’s Republic of China in the United States, including an assessment of its economic and security implications, the challenges to market access confronting potential United States investment in the People’s Republic of China, and foreign activities by financial institutions in the People's Republic of China.

“(E) The military plans, strategy and doctrine of the People’s Republic of China, the structure and organization of the People's Republic of China military, the decision-making process of the People's Republic of China military, the interaction between the civilian and military leadership in the People's Republic of China, the development and promotion process for leaders in the People's Republic of China military, deployments of the People's Republic of China military, resources available to the People's Republic of China military (including the development and execution of budgets and the allocation of funds), force modernization objectives and trends for the People's Republic of China military, and the implications of such objectives and trends for the national security of the United States.

“(F) The strategic economic and security implications of the cyber operations of the People’s Republic of China.

“(G) The national budget, fiscal policy, monetary policy, capital controls, and currency management practices of the People's Republic of China, their impact on internal stability in the People’s Republic of China, and their implications for the United States.

“(H) The drivers, nature, and implications of the growing economic, technological, political, cultural, people-to-people, and security relations of the People’s Republic of China’s with other countries, regions, and international and regional entities (including multilateral organizations), including the triangular relationship among the United States, Taiwan, and the People’s Republic of China.

“(I) The compliance of the People’s Republic of China with its commitments to the World Trade Organization, other multilateral commitments, bilateral agreements signed with the United States, commitments made to bilateral science and technology programs, and any other commitments and agreements strategic to the United States (including agreements on intellectual property rights and prison labor imports), and United States enforcement policies with respect to such agreements.

“(J) The implications of restrictions on speech and access to information in the People’s Republic of China for its relations with the United States in economic and security policy, as well as any potential impact of media control by the People's Republic of China on United States economic interests.

“(K) The safety of food, drug, and other products imported from China, the measures used by the People's Republic of China Government and the United States Government to monitor and enforce product safety, and the role the United States can play (including through technical assistance) to improve product safety in the People’s Republic of China.”.

(b) Effective date.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to annual reports submitted under section 1238(c) of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 after that date.

SEC. 1245. Report on maritime security strategy and annual briefing on military to military engagement with the People’s Republic of China.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that outlines the strategy of the Department of Defense with regard to maritime security in the South China Sea and the East China Sea that seeks to balance the interests of the United States, the People's Republic of China, and other countries in the region.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall outline the strategy described in that paragraph and include the following:

(A) A description of any current or planned bilateral or regional maritime capacity building initiatives in the South China Sea and the East China Sea region.

(B) An assessment of anti-access and area denial capabilities of the People's Republic of China in the region, including weapons and technologies, and their impact on United States maritime strategy in the region.

(C) An assessment of how the actions of the People’s Republic of China in the South China Sea and the East China Sea have changed the status quo with regard to competing territorial and maritime claims in those seas.

(D) A detailed analysis and assessment of the manner in which military to military engagements between the United States and the People's Republic of China facilitates a reduction in potential miscalculation and tension in the South China Sea and the East China Sea, including a specific description of the effect of such engagements on particular incidents or interactions involving the People's Republic of China in those seas.

(E) A description of the naval modernization efforts of the People's Republic of China, including both defense and law enforcement capabilities and the implications of such efforts for United States maritime strategy in the region.

(3) FORM.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

(b) Briefings.—Not later than May 15 each year, the Secretary of Defense shall provide the congressional defense committees a briefing (in classified form, if appropriate) on the following:

(1) An outline in detail of all of the planned and potential military to military engagements between the United States and the People's Republic of China during the fiscal year beginning in the year of such briefing, including the objectives of such engagements.

(2) An assessment of the military to military engagements between the United States and the People's Republic of China during the fiscal year ending in the year preceding such briefing, and during the first fiscal half year of the fiscal year of such briefing, including an assessment of the success of such engagements in meeting the objectives of the Commander of the United States Pacific Command for such engagements.

(a) Report required.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct an assessment and submit a report to the congressional defense committees related to military assistance to Ukraine.

(b) Elements.—At a minimum, the report required under subsection (a) should provide a detailed explanation of the following matters:

(1) Military equipment, supplies, and defense services, including type, quantity, and prioritization of such items, requested by the Government of Ukraine.

(2) Military equipment, supplies, and defense services, including type, quantity, and actual or estimated delivery date, that the United States Government has provided, is currently providing, and plans to provide to the Government of Ukraine.

(3) An assessment of what United States military assistance to the Government of Ukraine, including type and quantity, would most effectively improve the military readiness and capabilities of the Ukrainian military.

(4) An assessment of the need for, appropriateness of, and force protection concerns of any United States military advisors that may be made available to the armed forces of Ukraine.

(6) Military training the United States Government has conducted with Ukraine in the previous six months.

(7) Military training the United States Government plans to conduct with the Government of Ukraine in the next year.

SEC. 1261. Treatment of Kurdistan Democratic Party and Patriotic Union of Kurdistan under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

(a) Exclusion of Kurdistan Democratic Party and Patriotic Union of Kurdistan from treatment as terrorist organizations.—The Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, or the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State, may exclude the Kurdistan Democratic Party and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan from the definition of terrorist organization in section 212(a)(3)(B)(vi)(III) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(3)(B)(vi)(III)).

(b) Relief for certain members of Kurdistan Democratic Party and Patriotic Union of Kurdistan regarding admissibility.—If the Secretary of State or the Secretary of Homeland Security uses the authority provided in subsection (a), such Secretary shall not apply paragraph (3)(B) of section 212(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.1182(a)) to an alien with respect to activities undertaken in association with the Kurdistan Democratic Party or the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan in opposition to the regime of the Arab Socialist Ba’ath Party and the autocratic dictatorship of Saddam Hussein in Iraq.

(c) Prohibition on judicial review.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law (whether statutory or nonstatutory), section 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S. C. 1252), sections 1361 and 1651 of title 28, United States Code, section 2241 of such title, and any other habeas corpus provision of law, no court shall have jurisdiction to review any determination made pursuant to subsection (a) or (b).

(a) Notice to President.—If the Secretary of Defense has substantial reason to believe that there is a potentially significant case of foreign noncompliance with an arms control treaty to which the United States is a party, the Secretary shall notify the President of such belief.

(b) Notice to Congress.—Not later than 30 days after notifying the President of a belief under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a notice of the action taken to notify the President pursuant to that subsection.

SEC. 1263. Enhanced authority for provision of support to foreign military liaison officers of foreign countries while assigned to the Department of Defense.

(a) Eligibility.—Subsection (a) of section 1051a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(A) by striking “involved in a military operation with the United States”; and

(B) by striking “in connection with the planning for, or conduct of, a military operation”; and

(3) in paragraph (2), by striking “To the headquarters of” and all that follows and inserting “To the Joint Staff.”.

(b) Travel, subsistence, and medical care expenses.—Subsection (b) of such section is amended—

(B) by inserting “or by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as appropriate” before the period at the end; and

(2) in paragraph (3), by striking “if such travel” and all that follows and inserting “if such travel meets each of the following conditions:

“(B) The commander of the combatant command concerned or the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as applicable, directs round-trip travel from the assigned location to one or more travel locations.”.

(1) by striking “To the extent that the Secretary determines appropriate, the” and inserting “The”; and

(2) by adding at the end the following new sentence: “The terms of reimbursement shall be specified in the appropriate international agreement used to assign the liaison officer to a combatant command or to the Joint Staff.”.

(d) Definition.—Subsection (d) of such section is amended by inserting “training programs conducted to familiarize, orient, or certify liaison personnel regarding unique aspects of the assignments of the liaison personnel,” after “police protection,”.

SEC. 1264. One-year extension of authorization for non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities.

(a) Extension.—Subsection (h) of section 943 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4578), as most recently amended by section 1241 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 920), is further amended by striking “2015” and inserting “2016”.

(b) Cross-reference amendment.—Subsection (f) of such section is amended by striking “413b(e)” and inserting “3093(e)”.

(a) Operation.—The Secretary of the Air Force may operate the Air Force education and training facility known as the Inter-European Air Forces Academy (in this section referred to as the “Academy”).

(b) Purpose.—The purpose of the Academy shall be to provide military education and training to military personnel of countries that are members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization or signatories to the Partnership for Peace Framework Documents.

(1) CONCURRENCE OF SECRETARY OF STATE.—Military personnel of a country may be provided education and training under this section only with the concurrence of the Secretary of State.

(2) ASSISTANCE OTHERWISE PROHIBITED BY LAW.—Education and training may not be provided under this section to the military personnel of any country that is otherwise prohibited from receiving such type of assistance under any other provision of law.

(d) Supplies and clothing.—The Secretary of the Air Force may, under such conditions as the Secretary may prescribe, provide to a person receiving education and training under this section the following:

(3) Billeting, food, and health services in connection with the receipt of such education and training.

(e) Living allowance.—The Secretary of the Air Force may pay to a person receiving education and training under this section a living allowance at a rate to be prescribed by the Secretary, taking into account the rates of living allowances authorized for a member of the Armed Forces under similar circumstances.

(f) Funding.—Amounts for the operations and maintenance of the Academy, and for the provision of education and training through the Academy, may be paid from funds available for the Air Force for operation and maintenance.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the end of each fiscal year in which the Secretary of the Air Force operates the Academy pursuant to this section, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the operations of the Academy during such fiscal year.

(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report under this subsection shall set forth, for the fiscal year covered by such report, the following:

(B) A summary of the number of individuals receiving education and training through the Academy, set forth by country of origin and education or training provided.

(D) The amounts paid by the Secretary under subsections (d) and (e) in connection with the provision of education and training through the Academy.

(h) Expiration.—The authority in subsection (a) shall expire on September 30, 2017.

SEC. 1266. Extension of limitations on providing certain missile defense information to the Russian Federation.

SEC. 1267. Prohibition on direct or indirect use of funds to enter into contracts or agreements with Rosoboronexport.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Department of Defense may not enter into a contract, memorandum of understanding, or cooperative agreement with, or make a grant to, or provide a loan or loan agreement to Rosoboronexport or any subsidiary or affiliate of Rosoboronexport.

(2) TERMINATION OF EXISTING CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS.—The Secretary of Defense shall immediately terminate any contract, memorandum of understanding, cooperative agreement, loan, or loan agreement described in paragraph (1).

(b) National security waiver authority.—The President may waive the applicability of subsection (a) if the President, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, certifies in writing to the congressional defense committees that, to the best of the President's knowledge—

(1) Rosoboronexport has ceased the transfer of lethal military equipment to, and the maintenance of existing lethal military equipment for, the Government of the Syrian Arab Republic;

(2) the armed forces of the Russian Federation have withdrawn from Crimea (other than military forces present on military bases subject to agreements in force between the Government of the Russian Federation and the Government of Ukraine); and

(3) agents of the Russian Federation are not taking active measures to destabilize the control of the Government of Ukraine over eastern Ukraine (including through active support of efforts to unlawfully occupy facilities of the Government of Ukraine).

(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the following:

(A) A list of the known transfers of lethal military equipment by Rosoboronexport to the Government of the Syrian Arab Republic since March 15, 2011.

(B) A list of the known contracts, if any, that Rosoboronexport has signed with the Government of the Syrian Arab Republic since March 15, 2011.

(C) A detailed list of all existing contracts, subcontracts, memorandums of understanding, cooperative agreements, grants, loans, and loan guarantees between the Department of Defense and Rosoboronexport, including a description of the transaction, signing dates, values, and quantities.

(2) FORM.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

(a) Fiscal year 2015 cooperative threat reduction funds defined.—As used in this subtitle, the term “fiscal year 2015 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds” means the funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program established under section 1321.

(b) Availability of funds.—Funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program shall be available for obligation for fiscal years 2015, 2016, and 2017.

(a) Funding for specific purposes.—Of the $365,088,000 authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program established under section 1321, the following amounts may be obligated for the purposes specified:

(7) For activities designated as Other Assessments/Administrative Costs, $27,844,000.

(b) Report on obligation or expenditure of funds for other purposes.—No fiscal year 2015 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds may be obligated or expended for a purpose other than a purpose listed in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) until 15 days after the date that the Secretary of Defense submits to Congress a report on the purpose for which the funds will be obligated or expended and the amount of funds to be obligated or expended. Nothing in the preceding sentence shall be construed as authorizing the obligation or expenditure of fiscal year 2015 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for a purpose for which the obligation or expenditure of such funds is specifically prohibited under this title or any other provision of law.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), in any case in which the Secretary of Defense determines that it is necessary to do so in the national interest, the Secretary may obligate amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for a purpose listed in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) in excess of the specific amount authorized for that purpose.

(2) NOTICE-AND-WAIT REQUIRED.—An obligation of funds for a purpose stated in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) in excess of the specific amount authorized for such purpose may be made using the authority provided in paragraph (1) only after—

(A) the Secretary submits to Congress notification of the intent to do so together with a complete discussion of the justification for doing so; and

SEC. 1321. Authority to carry out the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.

(a) Authority.—The Secretary of Defense may carry out a program, referred to as the “Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program”, with respect to foreign states to do the following:

(1) Facilitate the elimination and the safe and secure transportation and storage of chemical, biological, or other weapons, weapons components, weapons-related materials, and their delivery vehicles.

(A) the safe and secure transportation and storage of nuclear weapons, nuclear weapons-usable or high-threat radiological materials, nuclear weapons components, and their delivery vehicles; and

(B) the elimination of nuclear weapons components and nuclear weapons delivery vehicles.

(3) Prevent the proliferation of nuclear and chemical weapons, weapons components, and weapons-related materials, technology, and expertise.

(4) Prevent the proliferation of biological weapons, weapons components, and weapons-related materials, technology, and expertise, which may include activities that facilitate detection and reporting of highly pathogenic diseases or other diseases that are associated with or that could be utilized as an early warning mechanism for disease outbreaks that could impact the Armed Forces of the United States or allies of the United States.

(5) Prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction-related materials, including all materials, equipment, and technology that could be used for the design, development, production, or use of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and their means of delivery.

(6) Carry out military-to-military and defense contacts for advancing the mission of the Program, subject to subsection (f).

(b) Concurrence of Secretary of State.—The authority under subsection (a) to carry out the Program is subject to any concurrence of the Secretary of State or other appropriate agency head required under section 1322 or 1323 (unless such concurrence is otherwise exempted by section 1352).

(c) Scope of authority.—The authority to carry out the Program in subsection (a) includes authority to provide equipment, goods, and services, but does not include authority to provide cash directly to a project or activity carried out under the Program.

(d) Type of program.—The Program carried out under subsection (a) may involve assistance in planning and in resolving technical problems associated with weapons destruction and proliferation. The Program may also involve the funding of critical short-term requirements related to weapons destruction.

(e) Reimbursement of other agencies.—The Secretary of Defense may reimburse other United States Government departments and agencies under this section for costs of participation in the Program carried out under subsection (a).

(f) Military-to-military and defense contacts.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the military-to-military and defense contacts carried out under subsection (a)(6)—

(1) are focused and expanded to support specific relationship-building opportunities, which could lead to Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program development in new geographic areas and achieve other Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program benefits;

(2) are directly administered as part of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program; and

(1) ANNUAL REQUIREMENT.—Not less than 15 days before any obligation of any funds appropriated for any fiscal year for the Program, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on that proposed obligation for that fiscal year.

(A) the activities and forms of assistance for which the Secretary of Defense plans to obligate funds;

(C) the projected involvement (if any) of any department or agency of the United States (in addition to the Department of Defense) and of the private sector of the United States in the activities and forms of assistance for which the Secretary of Defense plans to obligate such funds.

SEC. 1322. Use of Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for certain emergent threats or opportunities.

(a) Authority.—For purposes of the Program specified in section 1321, the Secretary of Defense may obligate and expend Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for a fiscal year, and any Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for a fiscal year before such fiscal year that remain available for obligation, for a proliferation threat reduction project or activity if the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, determines each of the following:

(A) assist the United States in the resolution of a critical emerging proliferation threat; or

(B) permit the United States to take advantage of opportunities to achieve long-standing nonproliferation goals.

(3) That the Department of Defense is the entity of the Federal Government that is most capable of carrying out such project or activity.

(b) Congressional notification.—Not later than 10 days after obligating funds under the authority in subsection (a) for a project or activity, the Secretary of Defense shall notify the congressional defense committees and the Secretary of State shall notify the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate in writing of the determinations made under subsection (a) with respect to such project or activity, together with—

(c) Non-defense agency partner-nation contacts.—For military-to-military and defense contacts carried out under subsection (a)(6) of section 1321, as further described in subsection (f) of such section, concurrence of the Secretary of State is required only for participation by personnel from non-defense agencies.

SEC. 1323. Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program authority for urgent threat reduction activities.

(a) In general.—Subject to the requirements under subsection (b) or (c), as applicable, not more than 15 percent of the total amounts appropriated or otherwise made available for any fiscal year for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program may be expended, notwithstanding any other provision of law, for activities described under subsections (b)(1)(B) and (c)(1)(B).

(1) DETERMINATION.—Subject to paragraph (2), amounts may be expended by the Secretary of Defense as described in subsection (a) if the Secretary makes a written determination that—

(A) a threat arising from the proliferation of chemical, nuclear, or biological weapons or weapons-related materials, technologies, or expertise must be addressed urgently;

(B) certain provisions of law would unnecessarily impede the Secretary's ability to carry out activities of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program to address that threat; and

(2) CONCURRENCE REQUIRED.—A determination by the Secretary of Defense under paragraph (1) may only be made with the concurrence of the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Energy.

(3) NOTICE REQUIRED.—Not later than 15 days after obligating or expending funds under the authority provided in subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall, after consultation with the Secretary of State, notify the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate of the determination made under paragraph (1). The notice shall include the following:

(B) The activities to be undertaken by the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.

(1) DETERMINATION.—Amounts may be made available under subsection (a) if the President makes a written determination that—

(A) a threat arising from the proliferation of chemical, nuclear, or biological weapons or weapons-related materials, technologies, or expertise must be addressed urgently in an ungoverned area or an area that is not controlled by an effective governmental authority, as determined by the Secretary of State; and

(B) it is necessary to make available amounts as described in subsection (a) to carry out activities of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program to address that threat.

(2) NOTICE REQUIRED.—Not less than 15 days before obligating or expending funds under the authority provided in subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall, after consultation with the Secretary of State, notify the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate of the determination made under paragraph (1). The notice shall include the following:

(B) The activities to be undertaken through the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.

(1) REPORT.—For any fiscal year for which amounts are specifically authorized in an Act other than an appropriations Act for specific purposes (specified by law) within the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, amounts appropriated or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program for that fiscal year may be obligated or expended for a Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction purpose other than one of the purposes so specified if—

(A) the Secretary of Defense determines that it is necessary to do so in the national interest; and

(2) CONSTRUCTION WITH OTHER LAWS.—Nothing in paragraph (1) shall be construed as authorizing the obligation or expenditure of Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program funds for a purpose for which the obligation or expenditure of such funds is specifically prohibited under any provision of law.

(b) Limited authority to vary individual amounts provided for any fiscal year for specified purposes.—For any fiscal year for which amounts are specifically authorized in an Act other than an appropriations Act for specific purposes (specified by law) within the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, the Secretary of Defense may obligate funds appropriated or otherwise made available for any such purpose for that fiscal year in excess of the specific amount so authorized for that purpose if—

(1) the Secretary of Defense determines that it is necessary to do so in the national interest; and

(1) the Secretary of Defense submit to the congressional defense committees notification of the intent to obligate funds as described in subsection (a) or (b), together with a complete discussion of the justification for doing so and, in the case of a report for purposes of subsection (a), a statement of the purpose for which the funds will be used and the amount of funds to be used; and

SEC. 1325. Use of contributions to the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.

(1) AUTHORITY.—Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense may enter into one or more agreements with any person (including a foreign government, international organization, multinational entity, or any other entity) that the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate under which the person contributes funds for activities conducted under the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.

(2) REQUIREMENT FOR SECRETARY OF STATE CONCURRENCE.—The Secretary of Defense may enter into an agreement under this subsection only with the concurrence of the Secretary of State.

(b) Retention and use of amounts.—Notwithstanding section 3302 of title 31, United States Code, and subject to subsections (c) and (d), the Secretary of Defense may retain and obligate or expend amounts contributed pursuant to subsection (a) for purposes of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program. Amounts so contributed shall be retained in a separate fund established in the Treasury for such purposes and shall be available to be obligated or expended without further appropriation.

(c) Return of amounts not obligated or expended within three years.—If the Secretary of Defense does not obligate or expend an amount contributed pursuant to subsection (a) by the date that is three years after the date on which the contribution was made, the Secretary shall return the amount to the person who made the contribution.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after receiving an amount contributed pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a notice—

(A) specifying the value of the contribution and the purpose for which the contribution was made; and

(2) LIMITATION ON USE OF AMOUNTS.—The Secretary of Defense may not obligate an amount contributed pursuant to subsection (a) until the date that is 15 days after the date on which the Secretary submits the notice required by paragraph (1).

(e) Annual report.—Not later than the first Monday in February of each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on amounts contributed pursuant to subsection (a) during the preceding fiscal year. Each such report shall include, for the fiscal year covered by the report, the following:

(1) A statement of any amounts contributed pursuant to subsection (a), including, for each such amount, the value of the contribution and the identity of the person who made the contribution.

(2) A statement of any amounts so contributed that were obligated or expended by the Secretary of Defense, including, for each such amount, the purposes for which the amount was obligated or expended.

(3) A statement of any amounts so contributed that were retained but not obligated or expended, including, for each such amount, the purposes (if known) for which the Secretary of Defense intends to obligate or expend the amount.

(f) Implementation plan.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees an implementation plan for the authority provided under this section prior to obligating or expending any amounts contributed pursuant to subsection (a). The Secretary of Defense shall submit updates to such plan as needed.

(a) In general.—Funds appropriated for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program may not be obligated or expended for any of the following purposes:

(1) Conducting any peacekeeping exercise or other peacekeeping-related activity.

(b) Limitation with respect to conventional weapons.—Funds appropriated for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program may not be obligated or expended for elimination of—

(2) conventional weapons delivery vehicles, unless such delivery vehicles could reasonably be used or adapted to be used for the delivery of chemical, nuclear, or biological weapons.

(a) On-site manager requirement.—Before obligating any Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program funds for a project described in subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall appoint one on-site manager for that project. The manager shall be appointed from among employees of the Federal Government.

(2) which involves dismantlement, destruction, or storage facilities, or construction of a facility; and

(3) with respect to which the total contribution by the Department of Defense is expected to exceed $50,000,000.

(1) develop, in cooperation with representatives from governments of states participating in the project, a list of those steps or activities critical to achieving the project's disarmament or nonproliferation goals;

(3) meet with all participants to seek assurances that those steps or activities are being completed on schedule; and

(4) suspend United States participation in a project when a non-United States participant fails to complete a scheduled step or activity on time, unless directed by the Secretary of Defense to resume United States participation.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), an employee of the Federal Government may serve as on-site manager for more than one project, including projects at different locations.

(2) LIMITATION.—If such an employee serves as on-site manager for more than one project in a fiscal year, the total cost of the projects for that fiscal year may not exceed $150,000,000.

(e) Steps or activities.—Steps or activities referred to in subsection (c)(1) are those activities that, if not completed, will prevent a project from achieving its disarmament or nonproliferation goals, including, at a minimum, the following:

(2) Verification that the items, substances, or capabilities to be dismantled, secured, or otherwise modified are available for dismantlement, securing, or modification.

(3) Timely provision of financial, personnel, management, transportation, and other resources.

(f) Notification to congress.—In any case in which the Secretary of Defense directs an on-site manager to resume United States participation in a project under subsection (c)(4), the Secretary shall concurrently notify the congressional defense committees of such direction.

(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall seek to obtain all the permits required to complete each phase of construction of a project under the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program in a state of the former Soviet Union before obligating significant amounts of funding for that phase of the project.

(b) Use of funds for new construction projects.—Except as provided in subsection (c), with respect to a new construction project to be carried out by the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, not more than 40 percent of the total costs of the project may be obligated from Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program funds for any fiscal year until the Secretary of Defense—

(1) determines the number and type of permits that may be required for the lifetime of the project in the proposed location or locations of the project; and

(2) obtains from the state in which the project is to be located any permits that may be required to begin construction.

(c) Exception to limitations on use of funds.—The limitation in subsection (b) on the obligation of funds for a construction project otherwise covered by such subsection shall not apply with respect to the obligation of funds for a particular project if the Secretary of Defense—

(1) determines that it is necessary in the national interest to obligate funds for such project; and

(2) submits to the congressional defense committees a notification of the intent to obligate funds for such project, together with a complete discussion of the justification for doing so.

(d) Definitions.—In this section, with respect to a project under the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program:

(1) NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECT.—The term “new construction project” means a construction project for which no funds have been obligated or expended as of November 24, 2003.

(2) PERMIT.—The term “permit” means any local or national permit for development, general construction, environmental, land use, or other purposes that is required for purposes of major construction.

SEC. 1341. Annual certifications on use of facilities being constructed for Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction projects or activities.

(1) Whether or not such facility will be used for its intended purpose by the government of the state of the former Soviet Union in which the facility is constructed.

(2) Whether or not the government of such state remains committed to the use of such facility for its intended purpose.

(3) Whether those actions needed to ensure security at the facility, including secure transportation of any materials, substances, or weapons to, from, or within the facility, have been taken.

SEC. 1342. Requirement to submit summary of amounts requested by project category.

(a) Summary required.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees in the materials and manner specified in subsection (c)—

(1) a descriptive summary, with respect to the appropriations requested for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program for the fiscal year after the fiscal year in which the summary is submitted, of the amounts requested for each project category under each Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program element; and

(2) a descriptive summary, with respect to appropriations for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program for the fiscal year in which the list is submitted and the previous fiscal year, of the amounts obligated or expended, or planned to be obligated or expended, for each project category under each Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program element.

(b) Description of purpose and intent.—The descriptive summary required under subsection (a) shall include a narrative description of each program and project category under each Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program element that explains the purpose and intent of the funds requested.

(c) Inclusion in certain materials submitted to congress.—The summary required to be submitted in a fiscal year under subsection (a) shall be set forth by project category, and by amounts specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) of that subsection in connection with such project category, in each of the following:

(1) The annual report on activities and assistance under the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program required in such fiscal year under section 1343.

(2) The budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the Department of Defense budget for the fiscal year succeeding such fiscal year (as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code).

SEC. 1343. Reports on activities and assistance under the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.

(a) Annual report.—In any year in which the budget of the President under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, for the fiscal year beginning in such year requests funds for the Department of Defense for assistance or activities under the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, the Secretary of Defense shall, after consultation with the Secretary of State, submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on activities and assistance during the preceding fiscal year under the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program setting forth the matters in subsection (c).

(b) Deadline for report.—The report under subsection (a) shall be submitted not later than the first Monday in February of a year.

(1) An estimate of the total amount that will be required to be expended by the United States in order to achieve the objectives of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.

(2) A five-year plan setting forth the amount of funds and other resources proposed to be provided by the United States for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program over the term of the plan, including the purpose for which such funds and resources will be used, and to provide guidance for the preparation of annual budget submissions with respect to the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.

(3) A description of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction activities carried out during the fiscal year ending in the year preceding the year of the report, including—

(A) the amounts notified, obligated, and expended for such activities and the purposes for which such amounts were notified, obligated, and expended for such fiscal year and cumulatively for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program;

(B) a description of the participation, if any, of each department and agency of the United States Government in such activities;

(D) a description of the United States private sector participation in the portion of such activities that were supported by the obligation and expenditure of funds for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program; and

(E) such other information as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate to inform Congress fully of the operation of Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction programs and activities, including, with respect to proposed demilitarization or conversion projects, information on the progress toward demilitarization of facilities and the conversion of the demilitarized facilities to civilian activities.

(4) A description of the means (including program management, audits, examinations, and other means) used by the United States during the fiscal year ending in the year preceding the year of the report to ensure that assistance provided under the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program is fully accounted for, that such assistance is being used for its intended purpose, and that such assistance is being used efficiently and effectively, including—

(A) if such assistance consisted of equipment, a description of the current location of such equipment and the current condition of such equipment;

(B) if such assistance consisted of contracts or other services, a description of the status of such contracts or services and the methods used to ensure that such contracts and services are being used for their intended purpose;

(C) a determination whether the assistance described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) has been used for its intended purpose and an assessment of whether the assistance being provided is being used effectively and efficiently; and

(D) a description of the efforts planned to be carried out during the fiscal year beginning in the year of the report to ensure that Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction assistance provided during such fiscal year is fully accounted for and is used for its intended purpose.

(5) A description of the defense and military activities carried out under section 1321(a)(6) during the fiscal year ending in the year preceding the year of the report, including—

(B) the strategy, goals, and objectives for which such amounts were obligated and expended;

(C) a description of the activities carried out, including the forms of assistance provided, and the justification for each form of assistance provided;

(D) the success of each activity, including the goals and objectives achieved for each;

(E) a description of participation by private sector entities in the United States in carrying out such activities, and the participation of any other Federal department or agency in such activities; and

(F) any other information that the Secretary considers relevant to provide a complete description of the operation and success of activities carried out under the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.

SEC. 1344. Metrics for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.

(1) Sections 212, 221, 222, and 231 of the Soviet Nuclear Threat Reduction Act of 1991 (title II of Public Law 102–228; 22 U.S.C. 2551 note).

(2) Sections 1412 and 1431 of the Former Soviet Union Demilitarization Act of 1992 (22 U.S.C. 5902 and 5921).

(3) Sections 1203, 1204, 1206, and 1208 of the Cooperative Threat Reduction Act of 1993 (22 U.S.C. 5952, 5953, 5955, and 5957).

(5) Section 1501 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (Public Law 104–201; 50 U.S.C. 2362 note).

(6) Section 1307 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note).

(7) Section 1303 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–65; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note).

(8) (A) Sections 1303 and 1304 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note).

(B) Section 1306 of such Act (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 114 Stat. 1654A–340).

(9) Section 1304 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107–107; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note).

(10) Sections 1305 and 1306 of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2673; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note).

(11) Sections 1303, 1305, 1307, and 1308 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (22 U.S.C. 5960, 5961, 5962, and 5963).

(a) Determinations relating to certain proliferation threat reduction projects and activities.—Any determination made before the date of the enactment of this Act under section 1308(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (22 U.S.C. 5963(a)) shall be treated as a determination under section 1322(a).

(b) Determinations relating to urgent threat reduction activities.—Any determination made before the date of the enactment of this Act under section 1305(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (22 U.S.C. 5965(b)) shall be treated as a determination under section 1323(b).

(c) Exception to requirement for certain determinations.—The requirement for a determination under section 1322(a) shall not apply to a state that was part of the former Soviet Union, but regular coordination practices shall apply.

(d) Funds available for Cooperative Threat Reduction program.—Funds made available for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs pursuant to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1632) or the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 672) that remain available for obligation as of the date of the enactment of this Act shall be available for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.

(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.

(b) Use.—Amounts authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a) are authorized for—

(1) the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521); and

(2) the destruction of chemical warfare materiel of the United States that is not covered by section 1412 of such Act.

(a) In general.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the supply of rare earth materials extracted, processed, and refined from secure sources of supply to develop and produce advanced technologies in support of requirements of the Department of Defense.

(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:

(1) A description of the current capacity for extracting, processing, and refining rare earth materials from secure sources of supply in support of requirements of the Department of Defense.

(2) An evaluation of the current global supply and demand for rare earth materials, prices for such materials, and trends and projections relating to such materials.

(3) A description of any challenges relating to developing the capacity from secure sources of supply to extract, process, and refine rare earth materials in support of requirements of the Department of Defense, including challenges relating to ownership of intellectual property.

(4) A description of any constraints faced by suppliers of rare earth materials for the Department of Defense in trying to meet the demand for such materials using foreign suppliers of such materials.

(5) An assessment of the current role of the Department of Defense in the development of a secure supply chain for rare earth materials.

(6) An assessment of the future plans and quantities for rare earth materials related to the National Defense Stockpile, including the potential role of the Federal Government in the development of secure sources of supply.

SEC. 1421. Authority for transfer of funds to joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, Illinois.

(a) Authority for transfer of funds.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated for section 1405 and available for the Defense Health Program for operation and maintenance, $146,857,000 may be transferred by the Secretary of Defense to the Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund established by subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2571). For purposes of subsection (a)(2) of such section 1704, any funds so transferred shall be treated as amounts authorized and appropriated specifically for the purpose of such a transfer.

(b) Use of transferred funds.—For the purposes of subsection (b) of such section 1704, facility operations for which funds transferred under subsection (a) may be used are operations of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, consisting of the North Chicago Veterans Affairs Medical Center, the Navy Ambulatory Care Center, and supporting facilities designated as a combined Federal medical facility under an operational agreement covered by section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4500).

SEC. 1422. Comptroller General of the United States report on Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, North Chicago, Illinois.

(a) Report required.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the submittal to Congress by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs of the evaluation report on the joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility demonstration project known as the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, North Chicago, Illinois, that is required to be submitted in March 2016, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on that demonstration project.

(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include an assessment by the Comptroller General of the following:

(1) The evaluation measures, standards, and criteria used by the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs to measure the overall effectiveness and success of the medical facility referred to in subsection (a).

(2) The measurable effect, if any, on the missions of the Department of the Navy and the Department of Veterans Affairs of the provision of care in a joint facility such as the medical facility.

(3) Such other matters with respect to the medical facility demonstration project described in subsection (a) as the Comptroller General considers appropriate.

(c) Availability of certain documents.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the receipt from the contractor for the medical facility demonstration project described in subsection (a) of any documents created by the contractor for the evaluation of the demonstration project (including any evaluation plans, task summaries, in-process reviews, interim reports, and draft final report), the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall make such documents available to the Comptroller General for purposes of the report required by subsection (a).

(d) Appropriate committees of Congress defined.—In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—

(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate; and

(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 1424. Designation and responsibilities of Senior Medical Advisor for the Armed Forces Retirement Home.

(a) Designation of Senior Medical Advisor.—Subsection (a) of section 1513A of the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 (24 U.S.C. 413a) is amended—

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking “Deputy Director of the TRICARE Management Activity” and inserting “Deputy Director of the Defense Health Agency”; and

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking “Deputy Director of the TRICARE Management Activity” both places it appears and inserting “Deputy Director of the Defense Health Agency”.

(b) Clarification of responsibilities and duties of senior medical advisor.—Subsection (c)(2) of such section is amended by striking “health care standards of the Department of Veterans Affairs” and inserting “nationally-recognized health care standards and requirements”.

(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this title for fiscal year 2015 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred.

(2) LIMITATION.—The total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this subsection may not exceed $4,000,000,000.

(b) Terms and conditions.—Transfers under this section shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as transfers under section 1001.

(c) Additional authority.—The transfer authority provided by this section is in addition to the transfer authority provided under section 1001.

SEC. 1521. Plan for transition of funding of United States Special Operations Command from supplemental funding for overseas contingency operations to recurring funding for future-years defense programs.

(a) Use and transfer of funds.—Subsections (b) and (c) of section 1514 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2439), as in effect before the amendments made by section 1503 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4649) but as amended by subsection (b) of this section, shall apply to the funds made available to the Department of Defense for the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund for fiscal year 2015.

(b) Scope of activities.—Subsection (b) of section 1514 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 is amended by inserting “in connection with Operation Enduring Freedom and any successor operation to that operation” before the period at the end.

(c) Termination of availability.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, amounts in the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund may not be obligated or transferred under any authority in law after September 30, 2015.

(1) PLAN REQUIRED.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan to eliminate (as appropriate) any non-enduring functions, associated capabilities, and funding, and to consolidate into an appropriate existing organization or organizations any enduring functions, associated capabilities, and funding, of the following organizations:

(F) Any other Department of Defense-wide or military department specific organizations, and associated capabilities and funding, carrying out comparable joint urgent operational needs (JUONs) or joint emergent operational needs (JEONs) efforts.

(2) CONSULTATION.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall prepare the plan required by paragraph (1) in coordination with the Secretaries of the military departments, the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command, and the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation of the Department of Defense.

(e) Extension of interdiction of improvised explosive device precursor chemicals authority.—Section 1532(c)(4) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2057), as amended by section 1532(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act For Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 939), is further amended by striking “December 31, 2014” and inserting “December 31, 2015”.

(a) Continuation of prior authorities and notice and reporting requirements.—Funds available to the Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2015 shall be subject to the conditions contained in subsections (b) through (g) of section 1513 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 428), as amended by section 1531(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4424).

(b) Extension of authority on promotion of recruitment and retention of women.—Subsection (c)(1) of section 1531 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 938) is amended by striking “fiscal year 2014” and inserting “fiscal year 2015”.

(c) Extension of authority To accept certain equipment.—Subsection (d)(1) of such section 1531 (127 Stat. 938; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking “prior Acts” and inserting “Acts enacted before the date of the enactment of the Carl Levin National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015”.

(1) counter-improvised explosive device tactics, techniques, and procedures used in Iraq and Afghanistan have produced important lessons learned and enduring technology critical to mitigating the devastating effects of improvised explosive devices, which have been the leading cause of combat casualties;

(2) without the preservation of knowledge about counter-improvised explosive devices, the United States Government could fail to take advantage of the lessons and investments of counter-improvised explosive device operations to enhance warfighter readiness; and

(3) the Department of Defense should to the extent appropriate retain in the military departments a knowledge base relating to counter-improvised explosive device operations.

SEC. 1601. Procurement authority for certain parts of intercontinental ballistic missile fuzes.

(a) In general.—The Secretary of the Air Force may enter into contracts for the life-of-type procurement of covered parts of the intercontinental ballistic missile fuze.

(b) Availability of funds.—Notwithstanding section 1502(a) of title 31, United States Code, of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by section 101 and available for Missile Procurement, Air Force as specified in the funding table in section 4101, $4,700,000 shall be available for the procurement of covered parts pursuant to contracts entered into under subsection (a).

(c) Covered parts defined.—In this section, the term “covered parts” means commercially available off-the-shelf items as defined in section 104 of title 41, United States Code.

SEC. 1602. Form of and cost estimates relating to annual reports on plan for the nuclear weapons stockpile, nuclear weapons complex, nuclear weapons delivery systems, and nuclear weapons command and control system.

“(b) Estimate of costs by Congressional Budget Office.—In the case of a report required to be transmitted under subsection (a)(1) not later than 30 days after the submission to Congress of the budget of the President for an odd-numbered fiscal year, the Director of the Congressional Budget Office shall, not later than 120 days after the transmission of that report, submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the following:

“(1) An estimate of the costs over the 10-year period beginning on the date of the report associated with fielding and maintaining the current nuclear weapons and nuclear weapon delivery systems of the United States.

“(2) An estimate of the costs over the 10-year period beginning on the date of the report of any life extension, modernization, or replacement of any current nuclear weapons or nuclear weapon delivery systems of the United States that is anticipated as of the date of the report.”.

SEC. 1603. Reports on installation of nuclear command, control, and communications systems at the United States Strategic Command headquarters.

(a) In general.—Not later than 30 days after the date on which the budget of the President for a fiscal year is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the installation and operation of nuclear command, control, and communications systems associated with the construction of the United States Strategic Command headquarters.

(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall address, with respect to the installation and operation of nuclear command, control, and communications systems associated with the construction of the United States Strategic Command headquarters, the following:

(1) Milestones and costs associated with installation of communications systems.

(2) Milestones and costs associated with integrating targeting and analysis planning tools.

(3) An assessment of progress on the upgrade of systems that existed before the date of the enactment of this Act, such as the Strategic Automated Command and Control System and the MILSTAR satellite communications system, for compatibility with such nuclear command, control, and communications systems.

(4) Such other information as the Commander of the United States Strategic Command considers necessary to assess adherence to overall cost, scope, and schedule milestones.

(c) Termination.—The Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall not be required to submit a report under subsection (a) with the budget of the President for any fiscal year after the date on which the Commander certifies to the congressional defense committees that all milestones relating to the installation of nuclear command, control, and communications systems associated with the construction of the United States Strategic Command headquarters have been completed and such systems are fully operational.

(a) Report by Nuclear Weapons Council.—Not later than 7 days before any decision to reduce the number of final production units for the B61 life extension program below the total number of such units planned in the stockpile stewardship and management plan required by section 4203 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2523) for fiscal year 2015, the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council established under section 179 of title 10, United States Code, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the following:

(b) Report by Commander of United States Strategic Command.—Not later than 30 days after any decision described in subsection (a) with respect to the B61 life extension program, the Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the following:

(1) An assessment the changes, or proposed changes, to the life extension program.

(3) An assessment of the impact of the decision on the ability of the United States Strategic Command to meet deterrence requirements.

(c) Form of reports.—Each report required by this section shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

SEC. 1605. Sense of Congress on deterrence and defense posture of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

(1) “The greatest responsibility of the Alliance is to protect and defend our territory and our populations against attack, as set out in Article 5 of the Washington Treaty. The Alliance does not consider any country to be its adversary. However, no one should doubt NATO’s resolve if the security of any of its members were to be threatened. NATO will ensure that it maintains the full range of capabilities necessary to deter and defend against any threat to the safety and security of our populations, wherever it should arise. Allies’ goal is to bolster deterrence as a core element of our collective defense and contribute to the indivisible security of the Alliance.”.

(2) “Nuclear weapons are a core component of NATO’s overall capabilities for deterrence and defense alongside conventional and missile defense forces. The review has shown that the Alliance’s nuclear force posture currently meets the criteria for an effective deterrence and defense posture.”.

(3) “The circumstances in which any use of nuclear weapons might have to be contemplated are extremely remote. As long as nuclear weapons exist, NATO will remain a nuclear alliance. The supreme guarantee of the security of the Allies is provided by the strategic nuclear forces of the Alliance, particularly those of the United States; the independent strategic forces of the United Kingdom and France, which have a deterrent role of their own, contribute to the overall deterrence and security of the Allies.”.

(4) “NATO must have the full range of capabilities necessary to deter and defend against threats to the safety of its populations and the security of its territory, which is the Alliance’s greatest responsibility.”.

(5) “NATO is committed to maintaining an appropriate mix of nuclear, conventional, and missile defense capabilities for deterrence and defense to fulfill its commitments as set out in the Strategic Concept. These capabilities, underpinned by NATO’s Integrated Command Structure, offer the strongest guarantee of the Alliance’s security and will ensure that it is able to respond to a variety of challenges and unpredictable contingencies in a highly complex and evolving international security environment.”.

(1) The United States has deployed the Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) system, with 30 Ground-Based Interceptors (GBIs) currently in Alaska and California, for defense of the United States homeland against the threat of limited ballistic missile attack from nations such as North Korea and Iran.

(2) The system has experienced several flight test failures since 2010 involving the deployed Capability Enhancement-I and Capability Enhancement-II Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicles (EKVs), and the Missile Defense Agency plans to conduct an intercept flight test in the summer of 2014 to demonstrate corrections to the kill vehicles.

(3) The Department of Defense is taking, and planning to take, numerous actions to improve United States homeland ballistic missile defense capabilities over the next decade to keep pace with evolving ballistic missile threats, including the following key actions:

(A) Deployment of 14 additional Ground-Based Interceptors in Alaska by the end of 2017.

(B) Improvement of the sensor network that supports homeland ballistic missile defense, including deployment of a new Long-Range Discriminating Radar in Alaska.

(C) Investment in improvements to the discrimination capabilities needed to improve the operational effectiveness and efficiency of the homeland ballistic missile defense system.

(D) Re-design of the Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle to increase significantly its performance, reliability, cost-effectiveness, and affordability.

(E) Design and development of a Next Generation Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle that will incorporate new technologies and the potential for defeating multiple threat objects with individual interceptors.

(1) it is a national priority to defend the United States homeland against the threat of limited ballistic missile attack from North Korea and Iran;

(2) although the currently deployed Ground-based Midcourse Defense system provides protection of the entire United States homeland, including the East Coast, against the threat of limited ballistic missile attack from North Korea and Iran, this capability needs to be improved to meet evolving ballistic missile threats;

(3) the initial step in this process of improvement is to correct the problems that caused the flight test failures with the current kill vehicles, and to improve the reliability of the deployed Ground-Based Interceptor fleet;

(4) as indicated by senior Department of Defense officials, investments to enhance homeland defense sensor and discrimination capabilities are essential to improve the operational effectiveness and shot doctrine of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system;

(5) given limitations with the currently deployed Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicles, it is important to re-design the Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle using a rigorous acquisition approach, including realistic testing, that can achieve a demonstrated capability as soon as practicable using sound acquisition principles and practices; and

(6) in order to stay ahead of evolving ballistic missile threats, the Department should design the Next Generation Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle to take full advantage of improvements in sensors, discrimination, kill assessment, battle management, and command and control, including the potential to engage multiple objects.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the status of current and planned efforts to improve the homeland ballistic missile defense capability of the United States.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following:

(A) A description of the status of efforts to correct the problems that caused the flight test failures of the Capability Enhancement-I and Capability Enhancement-II Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicles.

(B) A description of the status of efforts to field the additional 14 Ground-Based Interceptors planned for deployment at Fort Greely, Alaska, including the status of the refurbishment of Missile Field 1 at Fort Greely, and the operational impact of the additional interceptors.

(C) A description of the plans and progress toward improving the capability, reliability, and availability of fielded Ground-Based Interceptors, including progress toward improving the capabilities of Ground-Based Interceptors deployed with upgraded Capability Enhancement-I and Capability Enhancement-II Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicles.

(D) A description of the planned improvements to homeland ballistic missile defense sensor and discrimination capabilities, including an assessment of the expected operational benefits of such improvements to homeland ballistic missile defense.

(E) A description of the plans and efforts to redesign, develop, test, and field the Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle for the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system, and an explanation of its expected improvements in capability, cost-effectiveness, reliability, maintainability, and producibility.

(F) A description of the plans for developing, testing, and fielding the Next Generation Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle, and an explanation of how the anticipated capabilities are intended to help keep pace with evolving ballistic missile threats.

(3) FORM.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

(1) the regional ballistic missile capabilities of countries such as Iran and North Korea pose a serious and growing threat to United States forward deployed forces, allies, and partner countries;

(2) given this growing threat, it is a high priority for the United States to develop, test, and deploy effective regional missile defense capabilities to provide the commanders of the geographic combatant commands with capabilities to meet their operational requirements, and for United States allies and partners to improve their regional missile defense capabilities;

(3) the United States and its North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) partners should continue the development, testing, and implementation of Phases 2 and 3 of the European Phased Adaptive Approach, to defend United States forward deployed forces, allies, and partners in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in Europe against the growing regional missile capability of Iran;

(4) the United States should continue efforts to improve regional missile defense capabilities in the Middle East, including its close cooperation with Israel and its efforts with countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council, in order to improve regional security against the growing regional missile capabilities of Iran; and

(5) the United States should continue to work closely with its allies in Asia, particularly Japan, South Korea, and Australia, to improve regional missile defense capabilities against the growing threat of North Korean ballistic missiles.

(b) Report required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the status and progress of efforts to improve United States regional missile defense capabilities in Europe, the Middle East, and in the Asia-Pacific region, including efforts and cooperation by allies and partner countries.

(1) A description of the status of implementation of the European Phased Adaptive Approach, including the status of efforts to develop, test, and deploy the capabilities planned for Phases 2 and 3 of the European Phased Adaptive Approach.

(2) A description of the status of efforts to improve the regional missile defense capabilities of the United States and the Gulf Cooperation Council countries in the Middle East against regional missile threats from Iran, including progress toward, and benefits of, multilateral cooperation and data sharing among the Gulf Cooperation Council countries for multilateral integrated air and missile defense against threats from Iran.

(3) A description of the progress of the United States and its allies in the Asia-Pacific region, particularly Japan, South Korea, and Australia, to improve regional missile defense capabilities against missile threats from North Korea.

(4) A description of the degree of coordination among the commanders of the geographic combatant commands for integrated missile defense planning and operations, including obstacles and opportunities to improving such coordination and integrated capabilities.

(5) A description of the phased and adaptive elements of United States regional missile defense approaches tailored to the specific regional requirements in the areas of responsibility of the United States Central Command and the United States Pacific Command, including the role of missile defense capabilities of United States allies and partners in each region.

(6) A summary of the regional missile defense risk assessment and priorities of the commanders of the geographic combatant commands.

(d) Form.—The report required by subsection (b) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

(a) In general.—Except as otherwise provided in this section, of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by section 201 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Defense-wide, and available for the Missile Defense Agency, $350,900,000 may be provided to the Government of Israel to procure the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system as specified in the funding table in section 4201, including for co-production of Iron Dome parts and components in the United States by United States industry.

(b) Availability of amounts for higher priority missile defense programs.—If the Government of Israel determines that it is a higher priority for its national security, of the amount authorized under subsection (a), up to $175,000,000 may be used for the following cooperative missile defense programs:

(1) IRON DOME.—Amounts authorized in subsection (a) to produce the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program shall be available subject to the terms, conditions, and co-production targets specified for fiscal year 2015 in the “Agreement Between the Department of Defense of the United States of America and the Ministry of Defense of the State of Israel Concerning Iron Dome Defense System Procurement,” signed on March 5, 2014.

(2) OTHER MISSILE DEFENSE PROGRAMS.—If the Government of Israel decides to use amounts authorized in subsection (a) for the cooperative missile defense programs identified in subsection (b), amounts for such cooperative missile defense programs shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the joint United States-Israel Project Agreements governing the management and execution of these cooperative programs.

(1) the existing models of the Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system are prototype designs that were developed and deployed without robust and rigorous acquisition practices;

(2) consequently, the deployed models of the Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle have experienced flight test failures since 2010, and have not demonstrated the degree of reliability, robustness, cost-effectiveness, or performance that are desirable;

(3) the Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle for the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system needs to be re-designed to improve substantially its performance and reliability; and

(4) in order to avoid repeating the problems with the designs of the Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle, the Department of Defense should follow a robust and rigorous acquisition plan for the design, development, and testing of the re-designed Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle.

(b) Acquisition plan required.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop a robust acquisition plan for the re-design of the Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system that includes rigorous elements for system engineering, design, integration, development, testing, and evaluation.

(c) Objectives.—The objectives of the acquisition plan required by subsection (b) shall be to ensure that the re-designed Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle is operationally effective, reliable, producible, cost-effective, maintainable, and testable.

(d) Approval of acquisition plan required.—The acquisition plan required by subsection (b) shall be subject to approval by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics.

(e) Testing required.—Prior to operational deployment of the re-designed Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle, the Secretary shall ensure that it has demonstrated, through successful, operationally realistic flight testing, a high probability of working in an operationally effective manner and that it has the ability to accomplish its intended mission.

(f) Report required.—Not later than 60 days after the date on which the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics approves of the acquisition plan under subsection (d), the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the acquisition plan and the manner in which it will meet the objectives described in subsection (c).

SEC. 1615. Testing and assessment of missile defense systems prior to production and deployment.

(1) The initial acquisition approach to the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system did not follow standard acquisition practices, including the “fly before you buy” approach of adequately testing and demonstrating the performance of major defense systems before final production and deployment.

(2) Consequently, the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system was deployed in 2004 without any intercept flight tests of the production interceptor and kill vehicle, and was fielded with a prototype experimental design kill vehicle that had not been fully engineered, developed, or tested.

(3) In July 2013, the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system had a flight test failure with the initially-deployed Capability Enhancement-I Kill Vehicle because the kill vehicle failed to separate from the booster.

(4) The upgraded Capability Enhancement-II Kill Vehicle was deployed starting in 2008, prior to any successful intercept flight tests, and it has not had any successful intercept flights test as of May 2014.

(5) As a result of this highly concurrent acquisition approach, the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system has had a variety of kill vehicle problems that have caused several flight test failures since 2010, which have required more than $1,300,000,000 and four years of effort to correct.

(1) it is a high priority that United States ballistic missile defense systems should work in an operationally effective and cost-effective manner;

(2) prior to making final production decisions for and prior to operational deployment of such systems, the United States should conduct operationally realistic intercept flight testing, which should create sufficiently challenging operational conditions to establish confidence that such systems will work in an operationally effective and cost-effective manner when needed; and

(3) in order to achieve these objectives, and to avoid post-production and post-deployment problems like those encountered with the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system, it is essential for the Department of Defense to follow a “fly before you buy” approach to adequately test and assess the elements of the Ballistic Missile Defense System before final production decisions or operational deployment.

(c) Successful testing required prior to final production or operational deployment.—Prior to making a final production decision for, and prior to the operational deployment of, a new or substantially upgraded interceptor or weapon system of the Ballistic Missile Defense System, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that—

(1) sufficient and operationally realistic testing of the system is conducted to assess the performance of the system in order to inform a final production decision or an operational deployment decision; and

(2) the results of such testing have demonstrated a high probability that the interceptor or weapon system will work in an operationally effective manner and has the ability to accomplish its intended mission.

(d) Director of Operational Test and Evaluation assessment.—Prior to any final production decision or operational deployment described in subsection (c), the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation shall—

(1) provide to the Secretary the assessment of the Director, based on the available test data, of the sufficiency, adequacy, and results of the testing of such system, including an assessment of whether the system will be sufficiently effective, suitable, and survivable when needed; and

(2) provide to the congressional defense committees a written summary of that assessment.

SEC. 1621. Update of National Security Space Strategy to include space control and space superiority strategy.

(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, update the National Security Space Strategy developed pursuant to the Space Posture Review conducted under section 913 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4572) to include a strategy relating to space control and space superiority for the protection of national security space assets.

(b) Elements.—The strategy relating to space control and space superiority required by subsection (a) shall address the following:

(6) Projected resources required over the period covered by the current future-years defense program under section 221 of title 10, United States Code.

(c) Consistency with Space Protection Strategy.—The Secretary shall, in consultation with the Director, ensure that the strategy relating to space control and space superiority required by subsection (a) is consistent with the Space Protection Strategy developed under section 911 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 2271 note).

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 31, 2015, the Secretary shall, in consultation with the Director, submit a report on the strategy relating to space control and space superiority required by subsection (a) to—

(A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and

(B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

(2) FORM OF REPORT.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in classified form with an unclassified summary.

SEC. 1622. Allocation of funds for the Space Security and Defense Program; report on space control.

(a) Allocation of funds.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or any other Act and made available for the Space Security and Defense Program (PE# 0603830F), a preponderance of such funds shall be allocated to the development of offensive space control and active defensive strategies.

(b) Statement with respect to allocation.—The Secretary of Defense shall include, in the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the budget of the Department of Defense for a fiscal year (as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code), a statement with respect to whether the budget of the Department allocates funds for the Space Security and Defense Program as required by subsection (a).

(c) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report that contains the following:

(2) A concept of operations for the defense of critical national security space assets in all orbital regimes.

SEC. 1623. Prohibition on contracting with Russian suppliers of critical space launch supplies for the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program.

(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense may not enter into or renew a contract, on or after the date of the enactment of this Act, for the procurement of property or services for space launch activities under the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program from any person if that person purchases supplies critical for space launch activities covered by the contract from a Russian entity.

(b) Waiver.—The Secretary may waive the prohibition under subsection (a) with respect to a contract for the procurement of property or services for space launch activities if the Secretary determines, and certifies to the congressional defense committees not later than 30 days before the waiver takes effect, that—

(1) the waiver is necessary for the national security interests of the United States; and

(2) the space launch services and capabilities covered by the contract could not be obtained at a fair and reasonable price without the purchase of supplies critical for space launch activities from a Russian entity.

(c) Russian entity defined.—In this section, the term “Russian entity” means an entity organized under the laws of the Russian Federation or otherwise subject to the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation.

SEC. 1625. Report on reliance of Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program on foreign manufacturers.

(1) An assessment of the degree to which the Air Force, through its contractors and subcontractors, relies on foreign manufacturers for supplies necessary for any qualified or certified provider of the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle.

(2) An assessment of the extent to which such reliance subjects the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program to—

(3) Recommendations for measures the Air Force could take to mitigate the risks to the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program of reliance on foreign manufacturers and a cost-benefit analysis for each such recommendation.

SEC. 1626. Availability of additional rocket cores pursuant to competitive procedures.

(a) In general.—Relative to the number of rocket cores for which space launch providers may submit bids or competitive proposals under competitive procedures pursuant to the fiscal year 2015 National Security Space Launch Procurement Forecast, the Secretary of Defense shall—

(1) in fiscal year 2015, increase by one the number of such cores for which such providers may submit bids or competitive proposals; and

(2) for fiscal years 2015 through 2017, increase by one (in addition to the core referred to in paragraph (1)) the number of such cores for which such providers may submit bids or competitive proposals, unless the Secretary—

(A) determines that there is no practicable way to increase the number of such cores for which such providers may submit bids or competitive proposals and remain in compliance with the requirements of the firm fixed price contract for 36 rocket engine cores over the 5 fiscal years beginning with fiscal year 2013; and

(B) not later than 45 days after making that determination, submits to the congressional defense committees—

(i) a certification that there is no practicable way to increase the number of such cores for which such providers may submit bids or competitive proposals and remain in compliance with the requirements of the firm fixed price contract for 36 rocket engine cores over the 5 fiscal years beginning with fiscal year 2013; and

(b) Competitive procedures defined.—In this section, the term “competitive procedures” means procedures as described in section 2304 of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 1627. Competitive procedures required to launch payload for mission number five of the Operationally Responsive Space Program.

(a) In general.—Before entering into a contract for the launch of the payload for mission number five of the Operationally Responsive Space Program, the Secretary of the Air Force shall follow competitive procedures described in section 2304 of title 10, United States Code, and the policies of the Department of Defense concerning competitive space launch opportunities.

(b) Waiver.—The Secretary may waive the requirement under subsection (a) if the Secretary—

(1) determines that the waiver is necessary for the national security interests of the United States; and

(2) not less than 15 days before waiving the requirement, submits a report to the congressional defense committees on the waiver.

SEC. 1628. Limitation on funding for storage of Defense Meteorological Satellite Program satellites.

(2) sufficient funding is reflected in the current future-years defense program under section 221 of title 10, United States Code, to launch the satellite; and

(3) storing the satellite until a launch in 2020 is the most cost-effective approach to meeting the requirements of the Department.

SEC. 1629. Plan for development of liquid rocket engine for medium or heavy lift launch vehicle; transfer of certain funds.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan for the production of a liquid rocket engine, by 2019, capable of supporting the requirements of the Department of Defense for a medium or heavy lift launch vehicle to support national security launch missions.

(2) COMPETITION.—The plan required by paragraph (1) shall provide for the use of competitive procedures in accordance with section 2304 of title 10, United States Code.

(3) SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS.—Not later than September 30, 2014, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees the plan required by paragraph (1).

(1) IN GENERAL.—To the extent provided in appropriations Acts, the Secretary of the Air Force may transfer from the funds described in paragraph (2), not more than $20,000,000 to other, higher priority programs of the Air Force if the Secretary determines there is an urgent need to do so.

(2) FUNDS DESCRIBED.—The funds described in this paragraph are amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 by section 201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 703) and available for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for the dual launch capability (PE# 0604853F) as specified in the funding table in section 4201 of that Act.

(3) EFFECT ON AUTHORIZATION AMOUNTS.—A transfer made from one account to another under the authority of this subsection shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for the account to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal to the amount transferred.

(4) CONSTRUCTION OF AUTHORITY.—The transfer authority under this subsection is in addition to any other transfer authority provided in this Act.

(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall direct the Defense Science Board to conduct a study of the effectiveness of the ground and space sensor system architecture for space situational awareness.

(b) Elements.—The study required by subsection (a) shall include an assessment of the following:

(1) Projected needs, based on current and future threats, for the ground and space sensor system during the five-, 10-, and 20-year periods beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.

(2) Capabilities of the ground and space sensor system to conduct defensive and offensive operations.

(3) Integration of ground and space sensors with ground processing, control, and battle management systems.

(4) Any other matters relating to space situational awareness the Secretary considers appropriate.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the study conducted under subsection (a).

(2) FORM OF REPORT.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in classified form with an unclassified summary.

SEC. 1631. Sense of the Senate on resolution limits on commercial space imagery.

(1) The Department of Defense and the security of the United States depend on the United States commercial space imaging industry for mapping, intelligence, battle damage assessment, coalition warfare, and humanitarian relief.

(2) The Department of Defense could benefit from the relaxation of the current limits on the resolution of the imagery that the United States commercial space imaging industry is permitted to sell because the industry will respond to larger market opportunities by increasing the quantity of spacecraft and the quality and diversity of the imagery and imagery-derived products the industry provides.

(3) The Department of Defense has a need to protect some places and events from the collection and sale of high-resolution imagery. That need could be met through existing licensing and contractual authorities that either permit the government to exercise direct control of specific collection tasking and image dissemination or to restrict collection.

(4) Instead of using the approach described in paragraph (3), the United States commercial space imaging industry has been prohibited from selling imagery over the vast majority of the planet where there are no national security sensitivities.

(5) Limits on the resolution of commercial space imaging have been relaxed somewhat in the past, but only when the United States commercial space imaging industry has faced competition from foreign providers of such imaging.

(1) the Secretary of Defense should support relaxation, as soon as practicable, of panchromatic, spectral, and infrared imagery resolution limits so that the United States commercial space imaging industry may promptly begin—

(2) the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy should provide a recommendation to Congress by April 1, 2015, on the design and development of a flexible and dynamic capability to control the collection and sale of commercial space imagery to protect national security.

(a) Designation of network.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall designate a network or network segment within the Department of Defense for the purpose of carrying out the cyberspace mapping pilot approved by the Cyber Investment Management Board.

(b) Recommendations.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Principal Cyber Advisor shall submit to the Secretary policy recommendations regarding the mapping of cyberspace to support the offensive and defensive operational requirements of the United States Cyber Command.

SEC. 1642. Review of cross domain solution policy and requirement for cross domain solution strategy.

(a) Review of policy.—The Secretary of Defense shall review the policies and guidance of the Department of Defense concerning the procurement, approval, and use of cross domain solutions by the Department of Defense.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall develop a strategy for procurement, approval, and use of cross domain solutions by the Department.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The strategy required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:

(A) Identification and assessment of the current cross domain solutions in use throughout the Department of Defense, including the relative capabilities of such solutions and any gaps in current capabilities.

(B) A determination of the requirements for cross domain solutions for enterprise applications as well as deployed warfighting operations, including operations with coalition partners.

(C) A plan to enable verification of compliance with Department of Defense policies regarding the use of cross domain solutions.

(D) A review of the current Department of Defense Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation Process for the applicability of such process to future virtualized cross domain technology.

(E) A plan to meet the cross domain solution requirements for the Defense Intelligence Information Enterprise that must operate within the Joint Information Environment and the Intelligence Community Information Technology Environment.

(a) Budgeting.—For the budget submitted by the President to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2017 and for the supporting information submitted along with such budget for the Department of Defense, and for each fiscal year thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall—

(1) develop a major force program category for the five year defense plan of the Department of Defense for the training, arming, and equipping of the cyber mission forces; and

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall assess the feasibility and advisability of establishing a transfer account to execute the funds contained in the major force program category required by subsection (a).

(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than April 1, 2015, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the assessment carried out under paragraph (1).

(B) CONTENTS.—The report required by subparagraph (A) shall include the following:

(i) The findings of the Secretary with respect to the assessment carried out under paragraph (1).

(ii) A recommendation as to whether a transfer account should be established as described in such paragraph.

SEC. 1644. Requirement for strategy to develop and deploy decryption service for the Joint Information Environment.

(a) Strategy required.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop a strategy to develop and deploy a decryption service that enables the efficient decryption and re-encryption of encrypted communications within the Joint Information Environment and through the Internet access points of the Joint Information Environment in a manner that allows the Secretary to inspect the content of such communications to detect cyber threats and insider threat activity.

(b) Elements.—The strategy required developed pursuant to subsection (a) shall include the following:

(c) Congressional briefing.—Not later than October 1, 2015, the Secretary shall brief the congressional defense committees and the congressional intelligence committees (as defined in section 4 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003)) on the strategy developed under subsection (a).

SEC. 1645. Reporting on penetrations into networks and information systems of operationally critical contractors.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish procedures that require an operationally critical contractor to report to the component of the Department of Defense designated by the Secretary pursuant to subsection (d)(2)(A) when a network or information system of such operationally critical contractor is successfully penetrated by a known or suspected advanced persistent threat actor.

(2) ADVANCED PERSISTENT THREATS.—For purposes of this section, advanced persistent threats shall consist of such threats as the Secretary shall specify for the procedures established under this subsection.

(1) DESIGNATION AND NOTIFICATION.—The procedures established pursuant to subsection (a) shall include a process for—

(B) notifying a contractor that it has been designated as an operationally critical contractor.

(2) RAPID REPORTING.—The procedures established pursuant to subsection (a) shall require each operationally critical contractor to rapidly report to the component of the Department designated pursuant to subsection (d)(2)(A) on each successful penetration of any network or information systems of such contractor. Each such report shall include the following:

(B) A sample of any malicious software, if discovered and isolated by the contractor, involved in such penetration.

(3) DEPARTMENT ASSISTANCE AND ACCESS TO EQUIPMENT AND INFORMATION BY DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL.—The procedures established pursuant to subsection (a) shall include mechanisms for Department personnel to—

(A) if requested, assist operationally critical contractors in detecting and mitigating penetrations; and

(B) upon request, obtain access to equipment or information of an operationally critical contractor necessary to conduct forensic analysis in addition to any analysis conducted by such contractor.

(4) PROTECTION OF TRADE SECRETS AND OTHER INFORMATION.—The procedures established pursuant to subsection (a) shall provide for the reasonable protection of trade secrets, commercial or financial information, and information that can be used to identify a specific person.

(5) DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION.—The procedures established pursuant to subsection (a) shall permit the dissemination of information obtained or derived through the procedures to agencies that conduct counterintelligence investigations for their use in such investigations.

(c) Issuance of procedures.—The Secretary shall establish the procedures required by subsection (a) by not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. The procedures shall take effect on the date of establishment.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of the Act, the Secretary shall complete an assessment of—

(A) requirements that were in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act for contractors to share information with Department components regarding successful penetrations into networks or information systems of contractors; and

(B) Department policies and systems for sharing information on successful penetrations into networks or information systems of Department contractors.

(2) ACTIONS FOLLOWING ASSESSMENT.—Upon completion of the assessment required by paragraph (1), the Secretary shall—

(A) designate a single Department component to receive reports from Department contractors or other governmental agencies on successful penetrations into Department contractor networks or information systems; and

(B) issue or revise guidance applicable to Department components that ensures the rapid sharing by the component designated pursuant to subparagraph (A) of information relating to successful penetrations into networks or information systems of contractors with other appropriate Department components.

(1) The term “contingency operation” has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(13) of title 10, United States Code.

(2) The term “operationally critical contractor” means a contractor designated by the Secretary for purposes of this section as a critical source of supply for airlift, sealift, intermodal transportation services, or logistical support that is essential to the mobilization, deployment, or sustainment of the Armed Forces in a contingency operation.

SEC. 1646. Sense of Congress on the future of the Internet and the .MIL top-level domain.

(1) advise the President to transfer the remaining role of the United States Government in the functions of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority to a global multi-stakeholder community only if the President is confident that the “.MIL” top-level domain and the Internet Protocol address numbers used exclusively by the Department of Defense for national security will remain exclusively used by the Department of Defense; and

(2) take all necessary steps to sustain the successful stewardship and good standing of the Internet root zone servers managed by components of the Department of Defense.

SEC. 1651. Extension of Secretary of Defense authority to engage in commercial activities as security for intelligence collection activities.

SEC. 1652. Authority for Secretary of Defense to engage in commercial activities as security for military operations abroad.

(a) Authority to engage in commercial activities as security for military operations.—Subsection (a) of section 431 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “and military operations” after “intelligence collection activities”.

(1) DEFINITIONS.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:

“(3) The term ‘congressional intelligence committees’ has the meaning given that term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).

“(A) with respect to a matter that pertains to a commercial activity undertaken under this subchapter to provide security for intelligence collection activities, the congressional defense committees and the congressional intelligence committees; and

“(B) with respect to a matter that pertains to a commercial activity undertaken under this subchapter to provide security for military operations, the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives.”.

(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 437 of such title is amended by striking subsection (c).

(c) Reporting of audits.—The second sentence of section 432(b)(2) of such title is amended to read as follows: “The results of any such audit shall be promptly reported to the appropriate congressional committees.”.

(d) Authority to waive other Federal laws when necessary to maintain security.—Section 433(b)(1) of such title is amended by inserting “or military operation” after “intelligence activity”.

(1) in subsection (a), by inserting “or military operation” after “intelligence activity”; and

(2) in subsection (b), by inserting “or military operations” after “intelligence activities”.

(f) Congressional oversight.—Section 437 of such title is amended, in subsections (a) and (b), by striking “congressional defense committees and the congressional intelligence committees” each place it appears and inserting “appropriate congressional committees”.

(1) SUBCHAPTER HEADING.— (A) The heading of subchapter II of chapter 21 of such title is amended to read as follows:

(B) The item relating to that subchapter in the table of subchapters at the beginning of such chapter is amended to read as follows:

(2) SECTION HEADING.— (A) The heading of section 431 of such title is amended to read as follows:

“§ 431. Authority to engage in commercial activities as security for intelligence collection activities and military operations.”.

(B) The item relating to that section in the table of sections at the beginning of subchapter II of chapter 21 of such title is amended to read as follows:

SEC. 1653. Extension of authority relating to jurisdiction over Department of Defense facilities for intelligence collection or special operations activities abroad.

(1) by striking “September 30, 2015” and inserting “September 30, 2017”; and

(a) Interim and objective automated records checks and continuous evaluation capability for personnel security.—

(1) INTERIM SYSTEM TO CONTINUOUSLY EVALUATE SECURITY STATUS OF COVERED PERSONNEL.— (A) Not later than September 30, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall establish an interim system with the capability to continuously evaluate the security status of—

(B) The Secretary shall ensure that the interim system established under subparagraph (A) serves as a means of developing requirements, lessons learned, business rules, privacy standards, and operational concepts applicable to the objective automated records checks and continuous evaluation capability required by the strategy developed under section 907(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66).

(i) The term “covered personnel” means the employees and contractors of the Department who have been determined eligible for and granted access to secret or top secret classified information by the Department of Defense Central Adjudication Facility.

(ii) The term “priority population” means the covered personnel who have been rated by the Secretary as high risk based on such factors as their access to sensitive information and their role in managing the movement and security of information.

(2) ENGINEERING TO SUPPORT AUTOMATION-ASSISTED INSIDER THREAT ANALYSES.—The Secretary shall ensure that the interim system established under paragraph (1)(A) and the objective automated records checks and continuous evaluation capability for initial investigations and reinvestigations required by the strategy developed under section 907(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66) are engineered to support automation-assisted insider threat analyses conducted across the law enforcement, personnel security, human resources, counterintelligence, physical security, network behavior monitoring, and cybersecurity activities of all the components of the Department of Defense, pursuant to Executive Order 13587.

(3) COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION PROCESS.—The Secretary shall ensure that the objective continuous evaluation capability required by section 907(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66) is—

(A) acquired through competitive processes to exploit advanced commercial technology; and

(B) designed as an open system to enable changing vendors and products as the commercial sector’s capabilities evolve.

(1) TEAM TO SUPPORT SENIOR AGENCY OFFICIAL WITH DEVELOPMENT OF CAPABILITY.— (A) The Secretary of Defense shall establish a team to provide assistance to the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, as the Senior Agency Official in the Department of Defense for insider threat detection and prevention pursuant to Executive Order 13587, in developing an integrated, automation-assisted insider threat capability.

(B) The Secretary shall ensure that the team established under subparagraph (A) is a multi-disciplinary management team composed of—

(i) operational and technical experts in counterintelligence, personnel security, law enforcement, human resources, physical security, network monitoring, cybersecurity, and privacy and civil liberties from relevant components of the Department; and

(ii) experts in information technology, large-scale data analysis, systems engineering, and program acquisition.

(2) DESIGNATION OF OFFICIAL TO BE RESPONSIBLE AND ACCOUNTABLE FOR DEVELOPING CAPABILITY.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Senior Agency Official, shall designate a senior official of the Department to be responsible and accountable for developing the integrated, automation-assisted insider threat capability referred to in paragraph (1).

(3) EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE TO SUPPORT SENIOR AGENCY OFFICIAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish an executive committee to support the Senior Agency Official in developing the integrated, automation-assisted insider threat capability referred to in paragraph (1), which shall include the following:

(4) PLAN REQUIRED.—Not later than September 30, 2015, the Secretary, acting through the Senior Agency Official, shall develop a plan to develop the integrated, automation-assisted insider threat capability referred to in paragraph (1), including an acquisition strategy, cost estimate, architecture, concept of operation, milestones, and schedule.

(1) subject to direction by the President and to the provisions of applicable statutes and Executive orders; and

(2) consistently with direction from the Suitability and Security Clearance Performance Accountability Council and the authorities of the Suitability Executive Agent and of the Security Executive Agent established under Executive Order 13467 (73 Fed. Reg. 38103).

SEC. 1655. Migration of Distributed Common Ground System of Department of the Army to an open system architecture.

(a) Migration required.—Not later than three years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall migrate the Distributed Common Ground System of the Department of the Army, including the Red Disk initiative under development at the Intelligence and Security Command, to an open system architecture to enable—

(1) competitive acquisition of components, services, and applications for the Distributed Common Ground System; and

(2) rapid competitive development and integration of new capabilities for the Distributed Common Ground System.

(b) Compliance with open system architecture standards.—In carrying out the migration required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall ensure that the Distributed Common Ground System—

(1) is in compliance with the open system architecture standards developed under the Defense Intelligence Information Enterprise by the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence; and

(2) reuses services and components of the Defense Intelligence Information Enterprise.

(c) Open system architecture defined.—In this section, the term “open system architecture” means, with respect to an information technology system, an integrated business and technical strategy that—

(1) employs a modular design and uses widely supported and consensus-based standards for key interfaces;

(2) is subjected to successful validation and verification tests to ensure key interfaces comply with widely supported and consensus-based standards; and

(3) uses a system architecture that allows components to be added, modified, replaced, removed, or supported by different vendors throughout the system's life-cycle in order to afford opportunities for enhanced competition and innovation while yielding—

SEC. 1702. Prohibition on use of fiscal year 2015 funds to reduce strengths of Army personnel.

SEC. 1703. Limitation on use of fiscal year 2015 funds for transfer or divestment of certain aircraft assigned to the Army National Guard.

(1) AIRCRAFT.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Army may be used to divest, retire, or transfer, or prepare to divest, retire, or transfer, any AH–64 Apache aircraft of the Army assigned to units of the Army National Guard as of January 15, 2014.

(2) PERSONNEL.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Army may be used to reduce personnel related to any AH–64 Apache aircraft of the Army National Guard below the levels of such personnel as of September 30, 2014.

(3) READINESS OF AIRCRAFT AND CREWS.—The Secretary of the Army shall ensure the continuing readiness of the AH–64 Apache aircraft referred to in paragraph (1) and the crews of such aircraft during fiscal year 2015, including through the allocation of funds for operation and maintenance and support of such aircraft and for personnel connected with such aircraft as described in paragraph (2).

(b) Scope of limitation.—Nothing in subsection (a) shall be construed to limit the use of funds described in that subsection for the training of members of the Army National Guard or Army Reserve who are pilots, crew, or mechanics of AH–64 Apache aircraft on any other aircraft.

(c) Exception.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), funds described in that subsection may be used for the transfer of not more than 48 AH–64 Apache aircraft from the Army National Guard to the regular Army if the Secretary of Defense certifies in writing to the congressional defense committees that such a transfer would not—

(2) degrade the Army National Guard in its role as the combat reserve of the Army; and

(a) Establishment.—There is established the National Commission on the Future of the Army (in this title referred to as the “Commission”).

(1) COMPOSITION.—The Commission shall be composed of eight members, of whom—

(B) one shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate;

(D) one shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives; and

(E) one shall be appointed by the Ranking Member of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives.

(2) APPOINTMENT DATE.—The appointments of the members of the Commission shall be made not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

(3) EFFECT OF LACK OF APPOINTMENT BY APPOINTMENT DATE.—If 1 or more appointments under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) is not made by the appointment date specified in paragraph (2), the authority to make such appointment or appointments shall expire, and the number of members of the Commission shall be reduced by the number equal to the number of appointments so not made. If an appointment under subparagraph (B), (C), (D), or (E) of paragraph (1) is not made by the appointment date specified in paragraph (2), the authority to make an appointment under such subparagraph shall expire, and the number of members of the Commission shall be reduced by the number equal to the number otherwise appointable under such subparagraph.

(4) EXPERTISE.—In making appointments under this subsection, consideration should be given to individuals with expertise in national and international security policy and strategy, military forces capability, force structure design, organization, and employment, and reserve forces policy.

(c) Period of appointment; vacancies.—Members shall be appointed for the life of the Commission. Any vacancy in the Commission shall not affect its powers, but shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment.

(d) Chair and vice chair.—The Commission shall select a Chair and Vice Chair from among its members.

(e) Initial meeting.—Not later than 30 days after the date on which all members of the Commission have been appointed, the Commission shall hold its initial meeting.

(g) Quorum.—A majority of the members of the Commission shall constitute a quorum, but a lesser number of members may hold hearings.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Commission shall undertake a comprehensive study of the structure of the Army, and policy assumptions related to the size and force mixture of the Army, in order—

(A) to make an assessment of the size and force mixture of the active component of the Army and the reserve components of the Army; and

(B) to make recommendations on the modifications, if any, of the structure of the Army that are necessary to fulfill current and anticipated mission requirements for the Army at acceptable levels of national risk and in a manner consistent with available resources and anticipated future resources.

(2) CONSIDERATIONS.—In undertaking the study required by subsection (a), the Commission shall give particular consideration to the following:

(i) has the depth and scalability to meet current and anticipated requirements of the combatant commands;

(ii) achieves cost-efficiency between the regular and reserve components of the Army, manages military risk, takes advantage of the strengths and capabilities of each, and considers fully burdened lifecycle costs;

(iii) ensures that the regular and reserve components of the Army have the capacity needed to support current and anticipated homeland defense and disaster assistance missions in the United States;

(iv) provides for sufficient numbers of regular members of the Army to provide a base of trained personnel from which the personnel of the reserve components of the Army could be recruited;

(v) maintains a peacetime rotation force to avoid exceeding operational tempo goals of 1:2 for active members of the Army and 1:5 for members of the reserve components of the Army; and

(vi) maximizes and appropriately balances affordability, efficiency, effectiveness, capability, and readiness.

(B) An evaluation and identification of force generation policies for the Army with respect to size and force mixture in order to best fulfill current and anticipated mission requirements for the Army in a manner consistent with available resources and anticipated future resources, including policies in connection with—

(v) maintenance of the reserve components as an operational reserve in order to maintain as much as possible the level of expertise and experience developed since September 11, 2001.

(C) An identification and evaluation of the distribution of responsibility and authority for the allocation of Army National Guard personnel and force structure to the States and territories.

(D) An identification and evaluation of the strategic basis or rationale, analytical methods, and decision-making processes for the allocation of Army National Guard personnel and force structure to the States and territories.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Commission shall also conduct a study of a transfer of Army National Guard AH–64 Apache aircraft from the Army National Guard to the regular Army.

(2) CONSIDERATIONS.—In conducting the study required by paragraph (1), the Commission shall consider the factors specified in subsection (a)(2).

(c) Report.—Not later than February 1, 2016, the Commission shall submit to the President and the congressional defense committees a report setting forth a detailed statement of the findings and conclusions of the Commission as a result of the studies required by subsections (a) and (b), together with its recommendations for such legislative and administrative actions as the Commission considers appropriate in light of the results of the studies.

(a) Hearings.—The Commission may hold such hearings, sit and act at such times and places, take such testimony, and receive such evidence as the Commission considers advisable to carry out its duties under this title.

(b) Information from federal agencies.—The Commission may secure directly from any Federal department or agency such information as the Commission considers necessary to carry out its duties under this title. Upon request of the Chair of the Commission, the head of such department or agency shall furnish such information to the Commission.

(c) Postal services.—The Commission may use the United States mails in the same manner and under the same conditions as other departments and agencies of the Federal Government.

(a) Compensation of members.—Each member of the Commission who is not an officer or employee of the Federal Government may be compensated at a rate not to exceed the daily equivalent of the annual rate of $155,400 for each day (including travel time) during which such member is engaged in the performance of the duties of the Commission. All members of the Commission who are officers or employees of the United States shall serve without compensation in addition to that received for their services as officers or employees of the United States.

(b) Travel expenses.—The members of the Commission shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized for employees of agencies under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, while away from their homes or regular places of business in the performance of services for the Commission.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Chair of the Commission may, without regard to the civil service laws and regulations, appoint and terminate an executive director and such other additional personnel as may be necessary to enable the Commission to perform its duties. The employment of an executive director shall be subject to confirmation by the Commission.

(2) COMPENSATION.—The Chair of the Commission may fix the compensation of the executive director and other personnel without regard to chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5, United States Code, relating to classification of positions and General Schedule pay rates, except that the rate of pay for the executive director and other personnel may not exceed the rate payable for level V of the Executive Schedule under section 5316 of such title.

(d) Detail of government employees.—Any Federal Government employee may be detailed to the Commission without reimbursement, and such detail shall be without interruption or loss of civil service status or privilege.

(e) Procurement of temporary and intermittent services.—The Chair of the Commission may procure temporary and intermittent services under section 3109(b) of title 5, United States Code, at rates for individuals which do not exceed the daily equivalent of the annual rate of basic pay prescribed for level V of the Executive Schedule under section 5316 of such title.

SEC. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by law.

(a) Expiration of authorizations after three years.—Except as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained in titles XXI through XXVII for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall expire on the later of—

(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2018.

(b) Exception.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to authorizations for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have been obligated before the later of—

(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for fiscal year 2018 for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, or contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program.

(a) Inside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Army: Inside the United States
State	Installation or Location	Amount
California	Concord	$15,200,000
	Fort Irwin	$45,000,000
Colorado	Fort Carson	$89,000,000
Hawaii	Fort Shafter	$311,400,000
Kentucky	Blue Grass Army Depot	$15,000,000
	Fort Campbell	$23,000,000
New York	Fort Drum	$27,000,000
Pennsylvania	Letterkenny Army Depot	$16,000,000
South Carolina	Fort Jackson	$52,000,000
Virginia	Joint Base Langley-Eustis	$7,700,000

(b) Outside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Army: Outside the United States
Country	Installation or Location	Amount
Cuba	Guantanamo Bay	$23,800,000
Japan	Kadena Air Base	$10,600,000

Army: Family Housing
State/Country	Installation or Location	Units	Amount
Illinois	Rock Island	33	$19,500,000
Korea	Camp Walker	90	$57,800,000

(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2014, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Army as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2101 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the following:

(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

(2) $225,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2101(a) for a Command and Control Facility at Fort Shafter, Hawaii).

(3) $6,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119) for cadet barracks at the United States Military Academy, New York).

(4) $78,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119), as amended by section 2105(d), for a Secure Administration/Operations Facility at Fort Belvoir, Virginia).

SEC. 2104. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004 project.

SEC. 2105. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 projects.

(1) IN GENERAL.—In executing the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2119) for Fort Drum, New York, for construction of an Aircraft Maintenance Hangar at the installation, the Secretary of the Army may provide a capital contribution to a public or private utility company in order for the utility company to extend the utility company’s gas line to the installation boundary.

(2) NO CHANGE IN SCOPE.—The capital contribution under subsection (a) shall not be construed as a change in the scope of work under section 2853 of title 10, United States Code.

(b) Fort Leonard Wood.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2119) for Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, for construction of Battalion Complex Facilities at the installation, the Secretary of the Army may construct the Battalion Headquarters with classrooms for a unit other than a Global Defense Posture Realignment unit.

(c) Fort McNair.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119) for Fort McNair, District of Columbia, for construction of a Vehicle Storage Building at the installation, the Secretary of the Army may construct up to 20,227 square feet of vehicle storage.

(d) Fort Belvoir.—The table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119) is amended in the item relating to Fort Belvoir, Virginia, by striking “$94,000,000” in the amount column and inserting “$172,000,000”.

(a) Extensions.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act (124 Stat. 4437), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.

Army: Extension of 2011 Project Authorizations
State	Installation or Location	Project	Amount
Georgia	Fort Benning	Land Acquisition	$12,200,000

(a) Extensions.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act (125 Stat. 1661), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.

Army: Extension of 2012 Project Authorizations
State	Installation or Location	Project	Amount
Georgia	Fort Benning	Land Acquisition	$5,100,000
	Fort Benning	Land Acquisition	$25,000,000
North Carolina	Fort Bragg	Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Maintenance Hangar	$54,000,000
Texas	Fort Bliss	Applied Instruction Building	$8,300,000
	Fort Bliss	Vehicle Maintenance Facility	$19,000,000
	Fort Hood	Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Maintenance Hangar	$47,000,000
Virginia	Fort Belvoir	Road and Infrastructure Improvements	$25,000,000

SEC. 2108. Limitation on construction of cadet barracks at United States Military Academy, New York.

SEC. 2109. Limitation on funding for family housing construction at Camp Walker, Republic of Korea.

(a) Limitation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for construction of military family housing units at Camp Walker, Republic of Korea, may be obligated or expended until 30 days following the delivery of the report required under subsection (b).

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1, 2015, the Secretary of the Army, in consultation with the Commander, U.S. Forces-Korea, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on future military family housing requirements in the Republic of Korea and potential courses of action for meeting those requirements.

(A) identify the number of authorized Command Sponsored Families, by location, in the Republic of Korea;

(B) validate that the number of authorized Command Sponsored Families identified pursuant to subparagraph (A) is necessary for operational effectiveness;

(C) identify and validate each key and essential Command Sponsored Family billet requiring on-post housing in the Republic of Korea;

(D) identify and validate the number of authorized Command Sponsored Families in excess of key and essential requiring on-post housing in the Republic of Korea;

(E) identify the number and estimated cost of on-post family housing units required to support the validated requirements;

(F) contain a plan for meeting the on-post family housing requirements in the Republic of Korea, including the source of funding; and

(G) contain a prioritized list of planned military construction projects to be funded with Special Measures Agreement funds over the future-years defense plan, including a certification that each proposed project is a higher priority than family housing.

(a) Inside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Inside the United States
State	Installation or Location	Amount
Arizona	Yuma	$16,608,000
California	Bridgeport	$16,180,000
	San Diego	$47,110,000
District of Columbia	Naval Support Activity Washington	$31,735,000
Florida	Jacksonville	$30,235,000
	Mayport	$20,520,000
Hawaii	Kaneohe Bay	$53,382,000
	Pearl Harbor	$9,698,000
Maryland	Annapolis	$120,112,000
	Indian Head	$15,346,000
	Patuxent River	$9,860,000
Nevada	Fallon	$31,262,000
North Carolina	Camp Lejeune	$50,706,000
	Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station	$41,588,000
Pennsylvania	Philadelphia	$23,985,000
South Carolina	Charleston	$35,716,000
Virginia	Dahlgren	$27,313,000
	Norfolk	$39,274,000
	Portsmouth	$9,743,000
	Quantico	$12,613,000
	Yorktown	$26,988,000
Washington	Bremerton	$30,234,000
	Port Angeles	$20,638,000
	Whidbey Island	$24,390,000

(b) Outside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installation or location outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Navy: Outside the United States
Country	Installation or Location	Amount
Bahrain Island	Southwest Asia	$27,826,000
Djibouti	Camp Lemonier	$9,923,000
Guam	Joint Region Marianas	$50,651,000
Japan	Iwakuni	$6,415,000
	Kadena Air Base	$19,411,000
	Marine Corps Air Station Futenma	$4,639,000
	Okinawa	$35,685,000
Spain	Rota	$20,233,000
Worldwide Unspecified	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	$38,985,000

(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2014, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Navy as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2201 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the following:

(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

(2) $90,112,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2201(a) for a Center for Cyber Security Studies Building at Annapolis, Maryland).

(3) $274,099,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666) for an explosive handling wharf at Kitsap, Washington).

(4) $68,196,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2201(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2633) for ramp parking at Joint Region Marianas, Guam.

SEC. 2205. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 projects.

(a) Yuma.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666), for Yuma, Arizona, for construction of a Double Aircraft Maintenance Hangar, the Secretary of the Navy may construct up to approximately 70,000 square feet of additional apron to be utilized as a taxi-lane using amounts appropriated for this project pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 of such Act (125 Stat. 1667).

(b) Camp Pendleton.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666), for Camp Pendleton, California, for construction of an Infantry Squad Defense Range, the Secretary of the Navy may construct up to 9,000 square feet of vehicular bridge using amounts appropriated for this project pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 of such Act (125 Stat. 1667).

(c) Kings Bay.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666), for Kings Bay, Georgia, for construction of a Crab Island Security Enclave, the Secretary of the Navy may expand the enclave fencing system to three layers of fencing and construct two elevated fixed fighting positions with associated supporting facilities using amounts appropriated for this project pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 of such Act (125 Stat. 1667).

SEC. 2206. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2014 project.

(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201 of that Act (124 Stat. 4441) and extended by section 2207 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 991), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.

Navy: Extension of 2011 Project Authorization
Country	Installation or Location	Project	Amount
Bahrain	Southwest Asia	Navy Central Command Ammunition Magazines	$89,280,000
Guam	Naval Activities, Guam	Defense Access Roads Improvements	$66,730,000

(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201 of that Act (125 Stat. 1666), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.

Navy: Extension of 2012 Project Authorizations
State	Installation or Location	Project	Amount
California	Camp Pendleton	North Area Waste Water Conveyance	$78,271,000
	Camp Pendleton	Infantry Squad Defense Range	$29,187,000
	Twentynine Palms	Land Expansion	$8,665,000
Florida	Jacksonville	P–8A Hangar Upgrades	$6,085,000
Georgia	Kings Bay	Crab Island Security Enclave	$52,913,000
	Kings Bay	WRA Land/Water Interface	$33,150,000
Maryland	Patuxent River	Aircraft Prototype Facility Phase 2	$45,844,000

(a) Inside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2302(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Air Force: Inside the United States
State	Installation or Location	Amount
Alaska	Clear Air Force Station	$11,500,000
Arizona	Luke Air Force Base	$26,800,000
Kansas	McConnell Air Force Base	$34,400,000
Massachusetts	Hanscom Air Force Base	$13,500,000
Nevada	Nellis Air Force Base	$53,900,000
New Jersey	Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst	$5,900,000
Oklahoma	Tinker Air Force Base	$111,000,000
Texas	Joint Base San Antonio	$5,800,000

(b) Outside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2302(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Air Force: Outside the United States
Country	Installation or Location	Amount
Guam	Joint Region Marianas	$47,800,000
United Kingdom	Royal Air Force Croughton	$92,223,000

(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2014, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Air Force as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2301 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the following:

(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

(2) $107,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 992) for the CYBERCOM Joint Operations Center at Fort Meade, Maryland).

SEC. 2303. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2008 project.

(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2301 of that Act (124 Stat. 4444), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.

Air Force: Extension of 2011 Project Authorization
Country	Installation or Location	Project	Amount
Bahrain, Southwest Asia	Shaikh Isa Air Base	North Apron Expansion	$45,000,000

(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2301 of that Act (125 Stat. 1670), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.

Air Force: Extension of 2012 Project Authorizations
State/Country	Installation or Location	Project	Amount
Alaska	Eielson Air Force Base	Dormitory (168 RM)	$45,000,000
Italy	Sigonella Naval Air Station	UAS SATCOM Relay Pads and Facility	$15,000,000

SEC. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects.

(a) Inside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Defense Agencies: Inside the United States
State	Installation or Location	Amount
Arizona	Fort Huachuca	$1,871,000
California	Camp Pendleton	$11,841,000
	Coronado	$70,340,000
	Lemoore	$52,500,000
Colorado	Peterson Air Force Base	$15,200,000
CONUS Classified	Classified Location	$53,073,000
Georgia	Hunter Army Airfield	$7,692,000
	Robins Air Force Base	$19,900,000
Hawaii	Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam	$52,900,000
Kentucky	Fort Campbell	$18,000,000
Maryland	Fort Meade	$54,207,000
	Joint Base Andrews	$18,300,000
Mississippi	Stennis	$27,547,000
Michigan	Selfridge Air National Guard Base	$35,100,000
Nevada	Fallon	$20,241,000
New Mexico	Cannon Air Force Base	$23,333,000
North Carolina	Camp Lejeune	$52,748,000
	Fort Bragg	$93,136,000
	Seymour Johnson Air Force Base	$8,500,000
South Carolina	Beaufort	$40,600,000
South Dakota	Ellsworth Air Force Base	$8,000,000
Texas	Joint Base San Antonio	$38,300,000
Virginia	Craney Island	$36,500,000
	Defense Distribution Depot Richmond	$5,700,000
	Fort Belvoir	$7,239,000
	Joint Base Langley-Eustis	$41,200,000
	Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Story	$39,558,000
	Pentagon	$15,100,000

(b) Outside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Defense Agencies: Outside the United States
Country	Installation or Location	Amount
Australia	Geraldton	$9,600,000
Belgium	Brussels	$79,544,000
Cuba	Guantanamo Bay	$76,290,000
Japan	Misawa Air Base	$37,775,000
	Okinawa	$170,901,000
	Sasebo	$37,681,000

(a) Inside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for energy conservation projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Energy Conservation Projects: Inside the United States
State	Installation or Location	Amount
California	Edwards	$4,500,000
	Fort Hunter Liggett	$13,500,000
	Vandenberg	$2,965,000
Colorado	Fort Carson	$3,000,000
Florida	Eglin	$3,850,000
Georgia	Moody	$3,600,000
Hawaii	Marine Corps Base Hawaii	$8,460,000
Illinois	Naval Station Great Lakes	$2,190,000
Maine	Portsmouth Naval Shipyard	$2,740,000
Maryland	Fort Detrick	$2,100,000
Nebraska	Offutt	$2,869,000
North Carolina	Fort Bragg	$3,350,000
Oklahoma	Tinker	$4,609,000
Oregon	Oregon National Guard	$9,400,000
Utah	Dugway Proving Ground	$15,400,000
Virginia	Naval Station Norfolk	$11,360,000
	Pentagon	$2,120,000
Various Locations	Various Locations	$13,311,000

(b) Outside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for energy conservation projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Energy Conservation Projects: Outside the United States
Country	Installation or Location	Amount
Diego Garcia	Diego Garcia	$14,620,000
Dijbouti	Camp Lemonnier	$4,766,000
Germany	Spangdahlem	$4,800,000
Japan	Yokosuka	$8,030,000
Various Locations	Various Locations	$8,661,000

(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of Defense (other than the military departments) as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2401 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the following:

(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

(2) $79,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2128) for NSAW Recapitalize Building #1 at Fort Meade, Maryland).

(3) $141,039,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1672) for a data center at Fort Meade, Maryland).

(4) $50,500,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1672) for an Ambulatory Care Center at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland).

(5) $54,300,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1672) for an Ambulatory Care Center at Joint Base San Antonio, Texas).

(6) $656,168,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1673) for a hospital at the Rhine Ordnance Barracks, Germany).

(7) $281,325,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2640) for a hospital at Fort Bliss, Texas).

(8) $123,827,000 (the balance of the amount authorized as a Military Construction, Defense-Wide project by title X of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111–32; 123 Stat. 1888) for a data center at Camp Williams, Utah).

(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2401 of that Act (124 Stat. 4446), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.

Defense Agencies: Extension of 2011 Project Authorization
State	Installation or Location	Project	Amount
District of Columbia	Bolling Air Force Base	Cooling Tower Expansion	$2,070,000
		DIAC Parking Garage	$13,586,000
		Electrical Upgrades	$1,080,000

(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2401 of that Act (125 Stat. 1673), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.

Defense Agencies: Extension of 2012 Project Authorizations
State/Country	Installation or Location	Project	Amount
California	Coronado	Special Operations Forces Support Activity Operations Facility	$42,000,000
Germany	Baumholder	Wetzel-Smith Elementary School (Replacement)	$59,419,000
Italy	Vicenza	Vicenza High School (Replacement)	$41,864,000
Japan	Yokota Air Base	Yokota High School (Replace/Renovate)	$49,606,000
Virginia	Pentagon Reservation	Heliport Control Tower and Fire Station	$6,457,000
	Pentagon Reservation	Pentagon Memorial Pedestrian Plaza	$2,285,000

SEC. 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, defense-wide.

(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2014, for military construction and land acquisition for chemical demilitarization, as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under this section may not exceed the sum of the following:

(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

(2) $2,049,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2412 for ammunition demilitarization at Blue Grass Army Depot, Kentucky).

SEC. 2412. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2000 project.

(a) Modification.—The table in section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (division B of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 835), as most recently amended by section 2412 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4450), is amended—

(1) in the item relating to Blue Grass Army Depot, Kentucky, by striking “$746,000,000” in the amount column and inserting “$780,000,000”; and

(2) by striking the amount identified as the total in the amount column and inserting “$1,237,920,000”.

(b) Conforming amendment.—Section 2405(b)(3) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (division B of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 839), as most recently amended by section 2412 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4450), is further amended by striking “$723,200,000” and inserting “$757,200,000”.

SEC. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition projects.

Army National Guard: Inside the United States
State	Location	Amount
Maine	Augusta	$32,000,000
Maryland	Havre de Grace	$12,400,000
Montana	Helena	$38,000,000
New Mexico	Alamogordo	$5,000,000
North Dakota	Valley City	$10,800,000
Vermont	North Hyde Park	$4,400,000

Army Reserve
State	Location	Amount
California	Fresno	$22,000,000
	Riverside	$25,000,000
Colorado	Fort Carson	$5,000,000
New Jersey	Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst	$26,000,000
New York	Mattydale	$23,000,000
Virginia	Fort Lee	$16,000,000

SEC. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and land acquisition projects.

Navy Reserve Marine Corps Reserve
State	Location	Amount
Pennsylvania	Pittsburgh	$17,650,000
Washington	Naval Station Everett	$47,869,000
	Whidbey Island	$27,755,000

SEC. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition projects.

Air National Guard
State	Location	Amount
Arkansas	Fort Smith Municipal Airport	$13,200,000
Connecticut	Bradley International Airport	$16,306,000
Iowa	Des Moines Municipal Airport	$8,993,000
Michigan	W.K. Kellog Regional Airport	$6,000,000
New Hampshire	Pease International Trade Port	$41,902,000
Pennsylvania	Horsham Air Guard Station (Willow Grove)	$5,662,000

SEC. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects.

Air Force Reserve
State	Location	Amount
Arizona	Davis-Monthan Air Force Base	$14,500,000
Georgia	Robins Air Force Base	$27,700,000
North Carolina	Seymour Johnson Air Force Base	$9,800,000
Texas	Forth Worth	$3,700,000

SEC. 2611. Modification and extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 projects.

(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2602 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1678), for Kansas City, Kansas, for construction of an Army Reserve Center at that location, the Secretary of the Army may, instead of constructing a new facility in Kansas City, construct a new facility in the vicinity of Kansas City, Kansas.

(2) DURATION OF AUTHORITY.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorization set forth in subsection (a) shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.

(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2602 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1678), for Attleboro, Massachusetts, for construction of an Army Reserve Center at that location, the Secretary of the Army may, instead of constructing a new facility in Attleboro, construct a new facility in the vicinity of Attleboro, Massachusetts.

SEC. 2612. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 project.

(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2601 of that Act (124 Stat. 4452), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.

Extension of 2011 National Guard and Reserve Project Authorization
State	Location	Project	Amount
Puerto Rico	Camp Santiago	Multi Purpose Machine Gun Range	$9,200,000

SEC. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account.

SEC. 2702. Prohibition on conducting additional base realignment and closure (BRAC) round.

(a) In general.—Section 3(p)(5)(A)(i)(I) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(p)(5)(A)(i)(I)) is amended—

“(bb) pursuant to subparagraph (A), (B), (C), (D), or (E) of paragraph (3), that its principal office is located in a HUBZone described in paragraph (1)(E) (relating to base closure areas) (in this item referred to as the ‘base closure HUBZone’), and that not fewer than 35 percent of its employees reside in—

“(CC) a census tract the boundaries of which intersect the boundaries of the base closure HUBZone; or

“(DD) a census tract the boundaries of which are contiguous to a census tract described in subitem (BB) or (CC); or”.

(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 152(a)(2) of title I of division K of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (15 U.S.C. 632 note) is amended by striking “5 years” and inserting “8 years”.

(B) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 1698(b)(2) of National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (15 U.S.C. 632 note) is amended by striking “5 years” and inserting “8 years”.

(2) EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by paragraph (1) shall—

(i) a base closure area (as defined in section 3(p)(4)(D) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(p)(4)(D))) that, on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, is treated as a HUBZone described in section 3(p)(1)(E) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(p)(1)(E)) under—

(I) section 152(a)(2) of title I of division K of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (15 U.S.C. 632 note); or

(II) section 1698(b)(2) of National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (15 U.S.C. 632 note); and

(ii) a base closure area relating to the closure of a military instillation under the authority described in clauses (i) through (iv) of section 3(p)(4)(D) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(p)(4)(D)) that occurs on or after the date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2801. Clarification of authorized use of in-kind payments and in-kind contributions.

(a) In general.—Section 2687a(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1) in the subsection heading, by inserting “in-kind contributions” after “payments-in-kind”;

(2) in paragraph (1), by striking “a payment-in-kind contribution pursuant to” and inserting “payment-in-kind or as an in-kind contribution required by”;

(A) by striking “a payment-in-kind contribution” and inserting “payment-in-kind or an in-kind contribution required by a bilateral agreement with a host country”; and

(B) by striking “a payment-in-kind contribution” and inserting “payment-in-kind or by an in-kind contribution required by a bilateral agreement with a host country”; and

(A) by inserting “or in-kind contribution toward operating costs” after “does not apply to a military construction project”; and

(B) in subparagraph (C), by inserting “is a military construction project that” before “will cost less”.

(b) Conforming amendment.—Section 2802(d)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “payment-in-kind contributions” and inserting “payments-in-kind or in-kind contributions”.

SEC. 2803. Modification of minor military construction authority for projects to correct deficiencies that are life-, health-, or safety-threatening.

SEC. 2804. Extension of temporary, limited authority to use operation and maintenance funds for construction projects in certain areas outside the United States.

(1) in subsection (c)(1), by striking “shall not exceed” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting “shall not exceed $100,000,000 between October 1, 2014, and the earlier of December 31, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military activities of the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2016.”; and

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking “December 31, 2014” and inserting “December 31, 2015”; and

(B) in paragraph (2), by striking “fiscal year 2015” and inserting “fiscal year 2016”.

SEC. 2805. Limitation on construction projects in European Command area of responsibility.

(a) Limitation.—Except as provided in subjection (b), the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department may not award any contract in connection with a construction project authorized by this division to be carried out at an installation operated in the United States European Command area of responsibility until the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that—

(A) have been assessed as part of the basing assessment initiated by the Secretary of Defense on January 25, 2013 (known as the “European Infrastructure Consolidation Assessment”); and

(B) have been determined, pursuant to such assessment, to be of an enduring nature; and

(2) the specific military construction requirement most effectively meets combatant commander requirements at the authorized location.

(b) Exceptions.—Subsection (a) does not apply with respect to a construction project that—

(2) is funded through the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program or intended to specifically support the North Atlantic Treaty Organization; or

(3) is carried out under the authority of, and subject to the limits specified in, section 2805 of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 2806. Limitation on construction of new facilities at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

(a) Limitation.—None of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be used to construct new facilities at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba until the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that any new construction of facilities at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba has enduring military value independent of a high value detention mission.

(b) Rule of construction.—Nothing in subsection (a) shall be construed as limiting the ability of the Department of Defense to obligate or expend available funds to correct a deficiency that is life-threatening, health-threatening, or safety-threatening.

SEC. 2811. Deposit of reimbursed funds to cover administrative expenses relating to certain real property transactions.

(a) Authority to credit reimbursed funds to accounts currently available.—Section 2695(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(2) by striking “shall be credited to the appropriation” and inserting the following: “shall be credited, at the option of the Secretary concerned, to—

(3) by striking “were paid. Amounts so credited” and inserting the following: “were paid; or

“(B) an appropriation, fund, or account currently available to the Secretary for the purposes for which the expenses were paid.

(b) Prospective applicability.—The amendments made by subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to expenses incurred with appropriations provided to the Secretary of a military department before the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2812. Renewals, extensions, and succeeding leases for financial institutions operating on Department of Defense installations.

“(4) (A) Paragraph (1) does not apply to a renewal, extension, or succeeding lease by the Secretary concerned with a financial institution selected in accordance with the Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation providing for the selection of financial institutions to operate on military installations if each of the following applies:

“(i) The on-base financial institution was selected before the date of the enactment of this paragraph or competitive procedures are used for the selection of any new financial institutions.

“(ii) A current and binding operating agreement is in place between the installation commander and the selected on-base financial institution.

“(B) The renewal, extension, or succeeding lease shall terminate upon the termination of the operating agreement described in subparagraph (A)(ii).”.

(a) Restriction on use of funds.—Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated under this Act, and none of the amounts provided by the Government of Japan for construction activities on land under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense, may be obligated or expended to implement the realignment of Marine Corps forces from Okinawa to Guam or Hawaii until the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees each of the following:

(1) The report required by section 1068(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1945).

(2) Master plans for the construction of facilities and infrastructure to execute the Marine Corps distributed lay-down on Guam and Hawaii, including a detailed description of costs and the schedule for such construction.

(3) A plan, coordinated by all pertinent Federal agencies, detailing descriptions of work, costs, and a schedule for completion of construction, improvements, and repairs to the nonmilitary utilities, facilities, and infrastructure, if any, on Guam affected by the realignment of forces.

(b) Exceptions to restriction on use of funds.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may use funds described in such subsection for the following purposes:

(1) To complete additional analysis or studies required under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) for proposed actions on Guam or Hawaii.

(3) To carry out any military construction project for which an authorization of appropriations is provided in section 2204, as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

(4) To carry out the Government of Japan-funded construction of a Driver Convoy Course and an Urban Combat Skills Training Course at Andersen Air Force Base, Guam.

(c) Restriction on development of public infrastructure.—If the Secretary of Defense determines that any grant, cooperative agreement, transfer of funds to another Federal agency, or supplement of funds available in fiscal year 2014 under Federal programs administered by agencies other than the Department of Defense will result in the development (including repair, replacement, renovation, conversion, improvement, expansion, acquisition, or construction) of public infrastructure on Guam, the Secretary of Defense may not carry out such grant, transfer, cooperative agreement, or supplemental funding unless such grant, transfer, cooperative agreement, or supplemental funding is specifically authorized by law.

(1) DISTRIBUTED LAY-DOWN.—The term “distributed laydown” refers to the planned distribution of members of the Marine Corps in Okinawa, Guam, Hawaii, Australia, and possibly elsewhere that is contemplated in support of the joint statement of the United States–Japan Security Consultative Committee issued April 26, 2012, in the District of Columbia (April 27, 2012, in Tokyo, Japan) and revised on October 3, 2013, in Tokyo.

(2) MASTER PLAN.—The term “master plan” means documentation that provides the scope, cost, and schedule for each military construction project.

(3) PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE.—The term “public infrastructure” means any utility, method of transportation, item of equipment, or facility under the control of a public entity or State or local government that is used by, or constructed for the benefit of, the general public.

(a) Conveyance authorized.—The Secretary of the Navy may convey, without consideration, to the Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation (in this section referred to as the “Honolulu Authority”) all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 1.2 acres located at or in the nearby vicinity of Radford Drive and the Makalapa Gate, which is part of the Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, for the purpose of permitting the Honolulu Authority to use the property for the public benefit of a rail platform.

(b) Condition on use of revenues.—If the property conveyed under subsection (a) is used, consistent with such subsection, for a public purpose that results in the generation of revenue for the Honolulu Authority, the Honolulu Authority shall agree that any revenue generated by the use of the property shall be only for passenger rail transit purposes by depositing the revenues in a fund designated for passenger rail transit use.

(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Navy shall require the Honolulu Authority to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a). If amounts paid to the Secretary in advance exceed the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the Honolulu Authority.

(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received under paragraph (1) as reimbursement for costs incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover the costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.

(d) Description of property.—The exact acreage and legal description of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the Navy.

(e) Additional terms and conditions.—The Secretary of the Navy may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.

(A) to Arlington County, Virginia (in this section referred to as the “County”), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to one or more parcels of real property, together with any improvements thereon, located south of Columbia Pike and west of South Joyce Street in Arlington County, Virginia; and

(B) to the Commonwealth of Virginia (referred to in this section as the “Commonwealth”), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to one or more parcels of property east of Joyce Street in Arlington County, Virginia, necessary for the realignment of Columbia Pike and the Washington Boulevard-Columbia Pike interchange, as well as for future improvements to Interstate 395 ramps.

(2) PHASING.—The conveyances authorized under this paragraph may be accomplished through a phasing of several exchanges, if necessary.

(b) Consideration.—As consideration for the conveyances of real property under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall receive—

(1) from the County, all right, title, and interest of the County in and to one or more parcels of real property in the area known as the Southgate Road right-of-way, Columbia Pike right-of-way, and South Joyce Street right-of-way located in Arlington County, Virginia; and

(2) from the Commonwealth, all right, title, and interest of the Commonwealth in and to one or more parcels of property in the area known as the Columbia Pike right-of-way, and the Washington Boulevard-Columbia Pike interchange.

(c) Selection of property for conveyance.—The Memorandum of Understanding between the Department of the Army and Arlington County, signed in January 2013, shall be used as a guide in determining the properties to be exchanged. After consultation with the Commonwealth and the County, the Secretary shall determine the exact parcels to be exchanged and such determination shall be final. In selecting the properties to be exchanged under subsections (a) and (b), the parties shall, within their respective authorities, seek to—

(1) remove existing barriers to contiguous expansion of Arlington National Cemetery north of Columbia Pike through a realignment of Southgate Road to the western boundary of the former Navy Annex site;

(2) provide the County with sufficient property to construct a museum that honors the history of freedman’s village, as well as any other County or public use this is compatible with a location immediately adjacent to Arlington National Cemetery, one of our Nation’s most sacred shrines; and

(3) support the realignment and straightening of Columbia Pike, a redesign of the Washington Boulevard-Columbia Pike interchange, and future improvements to the Interstate 395 ramps.

(d) Description of property.—The exact acreage and legal description of the real property to be conveyed under this section shall be determined by surveys satisfactory to the Secretary, in consultation with the Commonwealth and the County.

(e) Terms and conditions.—The conveyances of real property authorized under this section shall be accomplished by one or more exchange agreements upon terms and conditions mutually satisfactory to the Secretary, the Commonwealth, and the County.

(f) Repeal of obsolete authority.—Section 2881 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2153) is hereby repealed.

SEC. 2833. Transfers of administrative jurisdiction, Camp Frank D. Merrill and Lake Lanier, Georgia.

(1) CAMP FRANK D. MERRILL.—Not later than September 30, 2015, the Secretary of Agriculture shall transfer to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Army for required Army force protection measures certain Federal land administered as part of the Chattahoochee National Forest, but permitted to the Secretary of the Army for Camp Frank D. Merrill in Dahlonega, Georgia, consisting of approximately 282 acres identified in the permit numbers 0018–01.

(2) LAKE LANIER PROPERTY.—In exchange for the land transferred under paragraph (1), the Secretary of the Army (acting through the Chief of Engineers) shall transfer to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of Agriculture certain Federal land administered by the Army Corps of Engineers and consisting of approximately 10 acres adjacent to Lake Lanier at 372 Dunlap Landing Road, Gainesville, Georgia.

(A) IN GENERAL.—On receipt of the land under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary of the Army shall—

(ii) maintain a public access road through the land or provide for alternative public access in coordination with the Secretary of Agriculture; and

(iii) make accommodations for public access and enjoyment of the land, when such public use is consistent with Army mission and force protection requirements.

(B) RETURN OF JURISDICTION.—The land transferred under subsection (a)(1) shall return to the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Agriculture, based on the best interests of the United States, if the Secretary of the Army determines that the transferred land is no longer needed for military purposes.

(A) IN GENERAL.—On receipt of the land under subsection (a)(2), the Secretary of Agriculture shall use the land for administrative purposes.

(ii) deposit the proceeds of a sale or exchange under clause (i) in the fund established under Public Law 90–171 (commonly known as the “Sisk Act”) (16 U.S.C. 484a); and

(iii) retain the proceeds for future acquisition of land within the Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forest, with the proceeds to remain available for expenditure without further appropriation or fiscal year limitation.

(c) Use and occupancy of National Forest System Land.—Use and occupancy of National Forest System Land by the Department of the Army, other than land transferred pursuant to this Act, shall continue to be subject to all laws (including regulations) applicable to the National Forest System.

(1) CRITICAL HABITAT DESIGNATION FOR DARTERS.—Nothing in the transfer required by subsection (a)(1) shall affect the prior designation of land within the Chattahoochee National Forest as critical habitat for the Etowah darter (Etheostoma etowahae) and the Holiday darter (Etheostoma brevistrum).

(2) FUTURE CRITICAL HABITAT LISTINGS AND DESIGNATIONS.—Nothing in the transfer required by subsection (a)(1) shall affect the operation of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) for future listing or designations of critical habitat.

(1) PREPARATION AND PUBLICATION.—The Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of Agriculture shall publish in the Federal Register a legal description and map of both parcels of land to be transferred under subsection (a).

(2) FORCE OF LAW.—The legal description and map filed under paragraph (1) for a parcel of land shall have the same force and effect as if included in this Act, except that the Secretaries may correct errors in the legal description and map.

(f) Reimbursement of costs.—The Secretary of the Army shall reimburse the Secretary of Agriculture for all costs related to the transfer required by subsection (a), including, at a minimum, any costs incurred by the Secretary of Agriculture to assist in the preparation of the legal description and maps required by subsection (e).

(a) Transfer authorized.—Upon a determination by the Secretary of the Army that the parcel of property at Camp Gruber, Oklahoma, conveyed by the war asset deed dated June 29, 1949, between the United States of America and the State of Oklahoma, or any portion there-of, is needed for national defense purposes, including military training, and that the transfer of the parcel is in the best interest of the Department of the Army, the Administrator of General Services shall execute the reversionary clause in the deed and immediately transfer administrative jurisdiction to the Department of the Army.

(b) Description of property.—The exact acreage and legal description of any real property to be transferred under subsection (a) may be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army.

(c) Additional term and conditions.—The Secretary may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with a transfer under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.

SEC. 2841. Establishment of memorial to the victims of the shooting at the Washington Navy Yard on September 16, 2013.

(a) Memorial authorized.—The Secretary of the Navy may permit a third party to establish and maintain a memorial dedicated to the victims of the shooting attack at the Washington Navy Yard that occurred on September 16, 2013.

(b) Location of memorial.—The Secretary may permit the memorial authorized by subsection (a) to be established at the Washington Navy Yard.

(c) Establishment of account.—An account shall be established on the books of the Treasury for the purpose of managing contributions received pursuant to paragraph (d).

(d) Acceptance of contributions.—The Secretary of the Navy may establish procedures under which the Secretary may solicit and accept monetary contributions or gifts of property for the purpose of the activities described in subsection (a). a

(e) Deposit of contributions.—Without regard to the limitations set forth under section 2601(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy shall deposit monetary contributions accepted under paragraph (d) in the account established under paragraph (c). The funds in the account established under paragraph (c) shall be available until expended without further appropriation, but only for the purposes described in subsection (a).

(f) Use of federal funds prohibited.—Federal funds may not be used to design, procure, prepare, install, or maintain the memorial authorized by subsection (a).

(g) Condition.—The memorial authorized by subsection (a) may not be established until the Secretary determines that an assured source of non-Federal funding has been established for the design, procurement, installation, and maintenance of the memorial in perpetuity.

(h) Design of memorial.—The final design of the memorial authorized by subsection (a) shall be subject to the approval of the Secretary.

(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2015 for the activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701.

(b) Authorization of new plant projects.—From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out new plant projects for the National Nuclear Security Administration as follows:

(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2015 for defense environmental cleanup activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701.

(b) Authorization of new plant projects.—From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out, for defense environmental cleanup activities, the following new plant projects:

SEC. 3111. Life-cycle cost estimates of certain atomic energy defense capital assets.

(a) In general.—Subtitle A of title XLVII of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2741 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“SEC. 4714. Life-cycle cost estimates of certain atomic energy defense capital assets.

“(a) In general.—The Secretary of Energy shall ensure that an independent life-cycle cost estimate under Department of Energy Order 413.3 (relating to program management and project management for the acquisition of capital assets) of each capital asset described in subsection (b) is conducted before the asset achieves critical decision 2 in the acquisition process.

“(b) Capital assets described.—A capital asset described in this subsection is an atomic energy defense capital asset—

“(2) the purpose of which is to perform a limited-life, single-purpose mission.

“(c) Independent defined.—For purposes of subsection (a), the term ‘independent’, with respect to a life-cycle cost estimate of a capital asset, means that the life-cycle cost estimate is prepared by an organization independent of the project sponsor, using the same detailed technical and procurement information as the sponsor, to determine if the life-cycle cost estimate of the sponsor is accurate and reasonable.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of contents for such Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4713 the following new item:

SEC. 3112. Expansion of requirement for independent cost estimates on life extension programs and new nuclear facilities.

(1) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) as subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D), respectively;

(2) by inserting before subparagraph (B), as redesignated by paragraph (1), the following new subparagraph (A):

“(A) Each nuclear weapon system undergoing life extension at the completion of phase 6.1, relating to concept assessment.”; and

(3) in subparagraph (D), as redesignated by paragraph (1), by striking “critical decision 2” and inserting “critical decision 1 and before such facility achieves critical decision 2”.

SEC. 3113. Implementation of Phase I of Uranium Capabilities Replacement Project.

“(1) IN GENERAL.—Critical decision 3 in the acquisition process may not be approved for Phase I (subproject 06–D–141–04) until all processes (or substitute processes) that require Category I and II special nuclear material protection and are actively used to support the stockpile in building 9212—

“(A) are present in the facility to be built under Phase I with a technology readiness level of 7 or higher; or

“(B) can be accommodated in other facilities of the Y–12 National Security Complex with a technology readiness level of 7 or higher.

“(2) TECHNOLOGY READINESS LEVEL DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term ‘technology readiness level’ has the meaning given that term in Department of Energy Guide 413.3–4A (relating to technology readiness assessment).”.

SEC. 3114. Establishment of the Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health.

(a) Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health.—Subtitle B of the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 7384l et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(a) Establishment.— (1) Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of the Carl Levin National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, the President shall establish and appoint an Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health (in this section referred to as the ‘Board’).

“(2) The President shall make appointments to the Board in consultation with organizations with expertise on worker health issues in order to ensure that the membership of the Board reflects a proper balance of perspectives from the scientific, medical, legal, worker, worker families, and worker advocate communities.

“(3) The President shall designate a Chair of the Board from among its members.

“(1) advise the President concerning the review and approval of the site exposure matrix of the Department of Labor;

“(2) conduct periodic peer reviews of, and approve, medical guidance for claims examiners for claims under subtitle E with respect to the weighing of the medical evidence of claimants;

“(3) obtain periodic expert review of evidentiary requirements for claims under this subtitle related to lung disease regardless of approval;

“(4) provide oversight of industrial hygienists and staff physicians and consulting physicians of the Department and their reports to ensure quality, objectivity, and consistency; and

“(5) coordinate exchanges of data and findings with the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health established under section 3624 to the extent necessary.

“(c) Staff and powers.— (1) The President shall appoint a staff to facilitate the work of the Board. The staff of the Board shall be headed by a Director who shall be appointed under subchapter VIII of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code.

“(2) The President may authorize the detail of employees of Federal agencies to the Board as necessary to enable the Board to carry out its duties under this section. The detail of such personnel may be on a nonreimbursable basis.

“(3) The Board shall have same powers as the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health established under section 3624.

“(4) The Secretary shall employ outside contractors and specialists selected by the Board to support the work of the Board.

“(d) Expenses.—Members of the Board, other than full-time employees of the United States, while attending meetings of the Board or while otherwise serving at the request of the President, and while serving away from their homes or regular place of business, shall be allowed travel and meal expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence (as authorized by section 5703 of title 5, United States Code) for individuals in the Federal Government serving without pay.

“(e) Security clearances.— (1) The Secretary of Energy shall ensure that the members and staff of the Board, and the contractors performing work in support of the Board, are afforded the opportunity to apply for a security clearance for any matter for which such a clearance is appropriate.

“(2) The Secretary of Energy should, not later than 180 days after receiving a completed application for a security clearance for an individual under this subsection, make a determination of whether or not the individual is eligible for the clearance.

“(3) For fiscal year 2016 and each fiscal year thereafter, the Secretary of Energy shall include in the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the Department of Energy budget for that fiscal year (as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code) a report specifying the number of applications for security clearances under this subsection, the number of such applications granted, and the number of such applications denied.

“(f) Information.—The Secretary of Energy shall, in accordance with law, provide to the Board and the contractors of the Board, access to any information that the Board considers relevant to carry out its responsibilities under this section, including information such as Restricted Data (as defined in section 11 y. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2014(y))) and information covered by section 552a of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the ‘Privacy Act’).

“(1) IN GENERAL.—There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section.

“(2) TREATMENT AS DISCRETIONARY SPENDING.—Amounts appropriated to carry out this section—

“(A) shall not be appropriated to the account established under subsection (a) of section 151 of title I of division B of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2001 (Public Law 106–554; 114 Stat. 2763A–251); and

“(h) Sunset.—The Board shall terminate on the date that is 5 years after the date of the enactment of the Carl Levin National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015.”.

(b) Department of Labor response to the Office of the Ombudsman annual report; repeal of sunset date.—Section 3686 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 7385s–15) is amended—

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking “February 15” and inserting “July 30”; and

“(4) Not later than 180 days after the submission to Congress of the annual report under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Labor shall submit to Congress in writing, and post on the public Internet website of the Department of Labor, a response to the report that—

“(A) includes a statement of whether the Secretary agrees or disagrees with the specific issues raised by the Ombudsman in the report;

“(B) if the Secretary agrees with the Ombudsman on those issues, describes the actions to be taken to correct those issue; and

“(C) if the Secretary does not agree with the Ombudsman on those issues, describes the reasons the Secretary does not agree.”; and

(c) Offset.—The amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by section 3103 for other defense activities and made available as specified in the funding table in section 4701 is hereby decreased by $2,000,000, with the amount of the decrease to be allocated as follows:

SEC. 3115. Comments of Administrator for Nuclear Security on reports of Congressional Advisory Panel on the Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise.

SEC. 3116. Identification of amounts required for uranium technology sustainment in budget materials for fiscal year 2016.

“(a) Organization and mission.—The Maritime Administration is an administration in the Department of Transportation. The mission of the Maritime Administration is to foster, promote, and develop the merchant maritime industry of the United States.

“(b) Maritime administrator.—The head of the Maritime Administration is the Maritime Administrator, who is appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The Administrator shall report directly to the Secretary of Transportation and carry out the duties prescribed by the Secretary.

“(c) Deputy maritime administrator.—The Maritime Administration shall have a Deputy Maritime Administrator, who is appointed in the competitive service by the Secretary, after consultation with the Administrator. The Deputy Administrator shall carry out the duties prescribed by the Administrator. The Deputy Administrator shall be Acting Administrator during the absence or disability of the Administrator and, unless the Secretary designates another individual, during a vacancy in the office of Administrator.

“(d) Duties and powers vested in secretary.—All duties and powers of the Maritime Administration are vested in the Secretary.

“(e) Regional offices.—The Maritime Administration shall have regional offices for the Atlantic, Gulf, Great Lakes, and Pacific port ranges, and may have other regional offices as necessary. The Secretary shall appoint a qualified individual as Director of each regional office. The Secretary shall carry out appropriate activities and programs of the Maritime Administration through the regional offices.

“(f) Interagency and industry relations.—The Secretary shall establish and maintain liaison with other agencies, and with representative trade organizations throughout the United States, concerned with the transportation of commodities by water in the export and import foreign commerce of the United States, for the purpose of securing preference to vessels of the United States for the transportation of those commodities.

“(g) Detailing officers from armed forces.—To assist the Secretary in carrying out duties and powers relating to the Maritime Administration, not more than five officers of the armed forces may be detailed to the Secretary at any one time, in addition to details authorized by any other law. During the period of a detail, the Secretary shall pay the officer an amount that, when added to the officer's pay and allowances as an officer in the armed forces, makes the officer's total pay and allowances equal to the amount that would be paid to an individual performing work the Secretary considers to be of similar importance, difficulty, and responsibility as that performed by the officer during the detail.

“(1) CONTRACTS AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—In the same manner that a private corporation may make a contract within the scope of its authority under its charter, the Secretary may make contracts and cooperative agreements for the United States Government and disburse amounts to—

“(A) carry out the Secretary's duties and powers under this section, subtitle V of title 46, and all other Maritime Administration programs; and

“(B) protect, preserve, and improve collateral held by the Secretary to secure indebtedness.

“(2) AUDITS.—The financial transactions of the Secretary under paragraph (1) shall be audited by the Comptroller General. The Comptroller General shall allow credit for an expenditure shown to be necessary because of the nature of the business activities authorized by this section or subtitle V of title 46. At least once a year, the Comptroller General shall report to Congress any departure by the Secretary from this section or subtitle V of title 46. At least once a year, the Comptroller General shall report to Congress any departure by the Secretary from this section or subtitle V of title 46.

“(i) Grant administrative expenses.—Except as otherwise provided by law, the administrative and related expenses for the administration of any grant programs by the Maritime Administrator may not exceed 3 percent.

“(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, there are authorized to be appropriated such amounts as may be necessary to carry out the duties and powers of the Secretary relating to the Maritime Administration.

“(2) LIMITATIONS.—Only those amounts specifically authorized by law may be appropriated for the use of the Maritime Administration for—

“(B) construction-differential subsidies incident to the construction, reconstruction, or reconditioning of vessels;

“(E) expenses necessary for research and development activities, including reimbursement of the Vessel Operations Revolving Fund for losses resulting from expenses of experimental vessel operations;

“(I) other operations and training expenses related to the development of waterborne transportation systems, the use of waterborne transportation systems, and general administration.

“(3) TRAINING VESSELS.—Amounts may not be appropriated for the purchase or construction of training vessels for State maritime academies unless the Secretary has approved a plan for sharing training vessels between State maritime academies.”.

(a) In general.—Whenever a funding table in this division specifies a dollar amount authorized for a project, program, or activity, the obligation and expenditure of the specified dollar amount for the project, program, or activity is hereby authorized, subject to the availability of appropriations.

(b) Merit-based decisions.—A decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds with or to a specific entity on the basis of a dollar amount authorized pursuant to subsection (a) shall—

(1) be based on merit-based selection procedures in accordance with the requirements of sections 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States Code, or on competitive procedures; and

(c) Relationship to transfer and programming authority.—An amount specified in the funding tables in this division may be transferred or reprogrammed under a transfer or reprogramming authority provided by another provision of this Act or by other law. The transfer or reprogramming of an amount specified in such funding tables shall not count against a ceiling on such transfers or reprogrammings under section 1001 or section 1522 of this Act or any other provision of law, unless such transfer or reprogramming would move funds between appropriation accounts.

(d) Applicability to classified annex.—This section applies to any classified annex that accompanies this Act.

(e) Oral written communications.—No oral or written communication concerning any amount specified in the funding tables in this division shall supersede the requirements of this section.

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT (In Thousands of Dollars)
Line	Item	FY 2015 Request	Senate Authorized
	AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY
	FIXED WING
2	UTILITY F/W AIRCRAFT	13,617	13,617
3	AERIAL COMMON SENSOR (ACS) (MIP)	185,090	185,090
4	MQ–1 UAV	190,581	190,581
5	RQ–11 (RAVEN)	3,964	3,964
	ROTARY
6	HELICOPTER, LIGHT UTILITY (LUH)	416,617	612,617
	Risk reduction for buy of LUH to meet Army training fleet plans		[196,000]
7	AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN	494,009	494,009
8	AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN	157,338	157,338
12	UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP)	1,237,001	1,382,001
	Army unfunded priority only for Army National Guard		[145,000]
13	UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP)	132,138	132,138
14	CH–47 HELICOPTER	892,504	892,504
15	CH–47 HELICOPTER	102,361	102,361
	MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT
16	MQ–1 PAYLOAD (MIP)	26,913	26,913
18	GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP)	14,182	14,182
19	MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP)	131,892	131,892
20	AH–64 MODS	181,869	181,869
21	CH–47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS (MYP)	32,092	32,092
22	UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS	15,029	15,029
23	UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS	76,515	76,515
25	NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN	114,182	114,182
26	COMMS, NAV SURVEILLANCE	115,795	115,795
27	GATM ROLLUP	54,277	54,277
28	RQ–7 UAV MODS	125,380	125,380
	GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS
29	AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT	66,450	74,250
	At Army request transfer from APA 31		[7,800]
30	SURVIVABILITY CM	0	32,400
	At Army request transfer from APA 31		[32,400]
31	CMWS	107,364	60,164
	At Army request transfer to APA 29 and APA 30		[–47,200]
	OTHER SUPPORT
32	AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	6,847	6,847
33	COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT	29,231	29,231
34	AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS	48,081	48,081
35	AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL	127,232	127,232
36	INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES	1,203	1,203
37	LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET	2,931	2,931
	AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY TOTAL	5,102,685	5,436,685

	MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY
	SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM
2	LOWER TIER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AMD)	110,300	110,300
3	MSE MISSILE	384,605	384,605
	AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM
4	HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY	4,452	4,452
	ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS
5	JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY	77,668	77,668
6	TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY	50,368	50,368
7	TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY	19,984	19,984
8	GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS)	127,145	127,145
9	MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR)	21,274	21,274
	MODIFICATIONS
12	PATRIOT MODS	131,838	131,838
13	STINGER MODS	1,355	1,355
14	AVENGER MODS	5,611	5,611
15	ITAS/TOW MODS	19,676	19,676
16	MLRS MODS	10,380	10,380
17	HIMARS MODIFICATIONS	6,008	6,008
	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
18	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS	36,930	36,930
	SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES
19	AIR DEFENSE TARGETS	3,657	3,657
20	ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MISSILES)	1,522	1,522
21	PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT	4,710	4,710
	MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY TOTAL	1,017,483	1,017,483

	PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY
	TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES
1	STRYKER VEHICLE	385,110	385,110
	MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES
2	STRYKER (MOD)	39,683	39,683
3	FIST VEHICLE (MOD)	26,759	26,759
4	BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD)	107,506	144,506
	Army unfunded priority and industrial base risk mitigation		[37,000]
5	HOWITZER, MED SP FT 155MM M109A6 (MOD)	45,411	45,411
6	PALADIN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT (PIM)	247,400	247,400
7	IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE (M88A2 HERCULES)	50,451	126,364
	Army unfunded priority and industrial base risk mitigation		[75,913]
8	ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD)	2,473	2,473
9	ASSAULT BREACHER VEHICLE	36,583	36,583
10	M88 FOV MODS	1,975	1,975
11	JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE	49,462	8,262
	Early to need		[–41,200]
12	M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD)	237,023	261,023
	Army unfunded priority and industrial base risk mitigation		[24,000]
14	PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (TCV-WTCV)	6,478	6,478
	WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES
16	MORTAR SYSTEMS	5,012	5,012
17	XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM)	28,390	28,390
18	COMPACT SEMI-AUTOMATIC SNIPER SYSTEM	148	148
19	CARBINE	29,366	20,616
	At Army request transfer to WTCV 31 and RDTEA 70 and 86		[–8,750]
21	COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION	8,409	8,409
22	HANDGUN	3,957	3,957
	MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH
24	M777 MODS	18,166	18,166
25	M4 CARBINE MODS	3,446	6,446
	At Army request transfer from WTCV 19, 28, and 31		[3,000]
26	M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MODS	25,296	25,296
27	M249 SAW MACHINE GUN MODS	5,546	5,546
28	M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MODS	4,635	2,635
	At Army request transfer to WTCV 31 and RDTEA 70 and 86		[–2,000]
29	SNIPER RIFLES MODIFICATIONS	4,079	4,079
30	M119 MODIFICATIONS	72,718	72,718
31	M16 RIFLE MODS	1,952	0
	At Army request transfer to WTCV 31 and RDTEA 70 and 86		[–1,952]
32	MORTAR MODIFICATION	8,903	8,903
33	MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV)	2,089	2,089
	SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES
34	ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV)	2,005	2,005
35	PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV)	8,911	8,911
36	INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS	414	414
37	SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT (SOLDIER ENH PROG)	1,682	1,682
	PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY TOTAL	1,471,438	1,557,449

	PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY
	SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION
1	CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES	34,943	34,943
2	CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES	12,418	12,418
3	CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES	9,655	8,155
	Program decrease—ahead of need		[–1,500]
4	CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES	29,304	29,304
6	CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES	8,181	8,181
7	CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES	52,667	52,667
8	CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES	40,904	39,004
	Program decrease—ahead of need		[–1,900]
	MORTAR AMMUNITION
9	60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES	41,742	41,742
10	81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES	42,433	42,433
11	120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES	39,365	39,365
	TANK AMMUNITION
12	CARTRIDGES, TANK, 105MM AND 120MM, ALL TYPES	101,900	101,900
	ARTILLERY AMMUNITION
13	ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES	37,455	37,455
14	ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES	47,023	47,023
15	PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M982	35,672	35,672
16	ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL	94,010	79,010
	Program decrease—PGK		[–15,000]
	ROCKETS
19	SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES	945	945
20	ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES	27,286	27,286
	OTHER AMMUNITION
21	DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES	22,899	22,899
22	GRENADES, ALL TYPES	22,751	22,751
23	SIGNALS, ALL TYPES	7,082	7,082
24	SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES	11,638	11,638
	MISCELLANEOUS
25	AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES	3,594	3,594
27	CAD/PAD ALL TYPES	5,430	5,430
28	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION (AMMO)	8,337	8,337
29	AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT	14,906	14,906
30	FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO)	14,349	14,349
31	CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES	111	111
	PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT
32	PROVISION OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES	148,092	148,092
33	CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION	113,881	113,881
34	ARMS INITIATIVE	2,504	2,504
	PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY TOTAL	1,031,477	1,013,077

	OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY
	TACTICAL VEHICLES
1	TACTICAL TRAILERS/DOLLY SETS	7,987	7,987
2	SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED:	160	160
4	JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE	164,615	164,615
6	FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING EQUIP	8,415	8,415
7	FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV)	28,425	28,425
8	PLS ESP	89,263	89,263
13	TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS	38,226	38,226
14	MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP	91,173	91,173
15	MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS	14,731	14,731
	NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES
16	HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN	175	175
17	PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES	1,338	1,338
18	NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER	11,101	11,101
	COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS
19	WIN-T—GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK	763,087	638,087
	Point of Presence (POP) and Soldier Network Extension (SNE) delay		[–125,000]
20	SIGNAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM	21,157	21,157
21	JOINT INCIDENT SITE COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITY	7,915	7,915
22	JCSE EQUIPMENT (USREDCOM)	5,440	5,440
	COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
23	DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS	118,085	118,085
24	TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS	13,999	13,999
25	SHF TERM	6,494	6,494
26	NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (SPACE)	1,635	1,635
27	SMART-T (SPACE)	13,554	13,554
28	GLOBAL BRDCST SVC—GBS	18,899	18,899
29	MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (TAC SAT)	2,849	2,849
30	ENROUTE MISSION COMMAND (EMC)	100,000	100,000
	COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS
33	JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM	175,711	87,711
	Under execution of prior years funds		[–88,000]
34	MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR)	9,692	1,692
	Under execution of prior years funds		[–8,000]
35	RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2)	17,136	17,136
37	AMC CRITICAL ITEMS—OPA2	22,099	22,099
38	TRACTOR DESK	3,724	3,724
39	SPIDER APLA REMOTE CONTROL UNIT	969	969
40	SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM COMM/ELECTRONICS	294	294
41	TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS AND PROTECTIVE SYSTEM	24,354	24,354
42	UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE	17,445	17,445
43	RADIO, IMPROVED HF (COTS) FAMILY	1,028	1,028
44	FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE	22,614	22,614
	COMM—INTELLIGENCE COMM
46	CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE	1,519	1,519
47	ARMY CA/MISO GPF EQUIPMENT	12,478	12,478
	INFORMATION SECURITY
50	INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM-ISSP	2,113	2,113
51	COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC)	69,646	69,646
	COMM—LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS
52	BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS	28,913	28,913
	COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS
53	INFORMATION SYSTEMS	97,091	97,091
54	DEFENSE MESSAGE SYSTEM (DMS)	246	246
55	EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM	5,362	5,362
56	INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM	79,965	79,965
	ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA)
60	JTT/CIBS-M	870	870
61	PROPHET GROUND	55,896	55,896
63	DCGS-A (MIP)	128,207	128,207
64	JOINT TACTICAL GROUND STATION (JTAGS)	5,286	5,286
65	TROJAN (MIP)	12,614	12,614
66	MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP)	3,901	3,901
67	CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL(CHARCS)	7,392	7,392
	ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW)
68	LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR	24,828	24,828
70	AIR VIGILANCE (AV)	7,000	7,000
72	COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES	1,285	1,285
	ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV)
75	SENTINEL MODS	44,305	44,305
76	NIGHT VISION DEVICES	160,901	160,901
78	SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED MLRF	18,520	18,520
80	INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION FAMILY OF SYSTEMS	68,296	68,296
81	FAMILY OF WEAPON SIGHTS (FWS)	49,205	37,205
	Early to need		[–12,000]
82	ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP	4,896	4,896
83	PROFILER	3,115	3,115
84	MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (FIREFINDER RADARS)	4,186	4,186
85	JOINT BATTLE COMMAND—PLATFORM (JBC-P)	97,892	87,892
	Under execution of prior years funds		[–10,000]
86	JOINT EFFECTS TARGETING SYSTEM (JETS)	27,450	27,450
87	MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (LLDR)	14,085	14,085
88	MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM	29,040	29,040
89	COUNTERFIRE RADARS	209,050	128,650
	Excessive LRIP and concurrency		[–80,400]
	ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS
92	FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY	13,823	13,823
95	AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS	27,374	27,374
97	LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT (LCSS)	2,508	2,508
99	NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND SERVICE	21,524	21,524
100	MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS)	95,455	95,455
101	GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM-ARMY (GCSS-A)	118,600	118,600
102	INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPP	32,970	32,970
104	RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEYING INSTRUMENT SET	10,113	10,113
	ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION
105	ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION	9,015	9,015
106	AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP	155,223	140,223
	Reduce IT procurement		[–15,000]
107	GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEMS FAM	16,581	16,581
108	HIGH PERF COMPUTING MOD PGM (HPCMP)	65,252	65,252
110	RESERVE COMPONENT AUTOMATION SYS (RCAS)	17,631	17,631
	ELECT EQUIP—AUDIO VISUAL SYS (A/V)
112	ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SURVEYING EQUIPMENT)	5,437	5,437
	ELECT EQUIP—SUPPORT
113	PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (C-E)	426	426
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
113A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	3,707	3,707
	CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT
115	FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE)	937	937
116	BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS)	1,930	1,930
117	CBRN DEFENSE	17,468	17,468
	BRIDGING EQUIPMENT
119	TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON	5,442	5,442
120	COMMON BRIDGE TRANSPORTER (CBT) RECAP	11,013	11,013
	ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT
121	GRND STANDOFF MINE DETECTN SYSM (GSTAMIDS)	37,649	37,649
122	HUSKY MOUNTED DETECTION SYSTEM (HMDS)	18,545	18,545
123	ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM (RCSS)	4,701	4,701
124	EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS RECAPITALIZATION	6,346	6,346
125	EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD EQPMT)	15,856	15,856
126	REMOTE DEMOLITION SYSTEMS	4,485	4,485
127	< $5M, COUNTERMINE EQUIPMENT	4,938	4,938
	COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
128	HEATERS AND ECU'S	9,235	9,235
130	SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT	1,677	1,677
131	PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS)	16,728	16,728
132	GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM	84,761	84,761
134	FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT	15,179	15,179
135	CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM	28,194	28,194
137	FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS	41,967	41,967
138	ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENG SPT)	20,090	20,090
	PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT
139	QUALITY SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT	1,435	1,435
140	DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER	40,692	40,692
	MEDICAL EQUIPMENT
141	COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL	46,957	46,957
	MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT
142	MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS	23,758	23,758
143	ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ)	2,789	2,789
	CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
144	GRADER, ROAD MTZD, HVY, 6X4 (CCE)	5,827	5,827
145	SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING	14,926	14,926
147	COMPACTOR	4,348	4,348
148	HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR	4,938	4,938
149	TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED	34,071	34,071
150	ALL TERRAIN CRANES	4,938	4,938
151	PLANT, ASPHALT MIXING	667	667
153	ENHANCED RAPID AIRFIELD CONSTRUCTION CAPAP	14,924	14,924
154	CONST EQUIP ESP	15,933	15,933
155	ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONST EQUIP)	6,749	6,749
	RAIL FLOAT CONTAINERIZATION EQUIPMENT
156	ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP	10,509	10,509
157	ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (FLOAT/RAIL)	2,166	2,166
	GENERATORS
158	GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP	115,190	115,190
	MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT
160	FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS	14,327	14,327
	TRAINING EQUIPMENT
161	COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT	65,062	65,062
162	TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM	101,295	101,295
163	CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL TRAINER	13,406	13,406
164	AVIATION COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER	14,440	14,440
165	GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF ARMY TRAINING	10,165	10,165
	TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT (TMD)
166	CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT	5,726	5,726
167	INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT (IFTE)	37,482	37,482
168	TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION (TEMOD)	16,061	16,061
	OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
170	RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	2,380	2,380
171	PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3)	30,686	30,686
172	BASE LEVEL COMMON EQUIPMENT	1,008	1,008
173	MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA–3)	98,559	80,559
	Watercraft C4ISR early to need		[–18,000]
174	PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (OTH)	1,697	1,697
175	SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER TESTING	25,394	25,394
176	AMC CRITICAL ITEMS OPA3	12,975	12,975
	OPA2
180	INITIAL SPARES—C&E	50,032	50,032
	OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY TOTAL	4,893,634	4,537,234

	JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND
	STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE
4	OPERATIONS	115,058	0
	Program decrease		[–115,058]
	JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND TOTAL	115,058	0

	SUBTOTAL, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY	13,631,775	13,561,928

	AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY
	COMBAT AIRCRAFT
1	EA–18G	43,547	68,547
	Preserve option of buying more EA–18G aircraft		[25,000]
5	JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV	610,652	610,652
6	JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV	29,400	29,400
7	JSF STOVL	1,200,410	1,200,410
8	JSF STOVL	143,885	143,885
9	V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT)	1,487,000	1,487,000
10	V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT)	45,920	45,920
11	H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z)	778,757	778,757
12	H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z)	80,926	80,926
13	MH–60S (MYP)	210,209	210,209
15	MH–60R (MYP)	933,882	933,882
16	MH–60R (MYP)	106,686	106,686
17	P–8A POSEIDON	2,003,327	2,003,327
18	P–8A POSEIDON	48,457	48,457
19	E–2D ADV HAWKEYE	819,870	819,870
20	E–2D ADV HAWKEYE	225,765	225,765
	OTHER AIRCRAFT
23	KC–130J	92,290	92,290
26	MQ–4 TRITON	37,445	37,445
27	MQ–8 UAV	40,663	40,663
	MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT
29	EA–6 SERIES	10,993	10,993
30	AEA SYSTEMS	34,768	34,768
31	AV–8 SERIES	65,472	65,472
32	ADVERSARY	8,418	8,418
33	F–18 SERIES	679,177	679,177
34	H–46 SERIES	480	480
36	H–53 SERIES	38,159	38,159
37	SH–60 SERIES	108,850	108,850
38	H–1 SERIES	45,033	45,033
39	EP–3 SERIES	32,890	52,890
	SPIRAL 3 & ELINT KITS		[20,000]
40	P–3 SERIES	2,823	2,823
41	E–2 SERIES	21,208	21,208
42	TRAINER A/C SERIES	12,608	12,608
44	C–130 SERIES	40,378	40,378
45	FEWSG	640	640
46	CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES	4,635	4,635
47	E–6 SERIES	212,876	212,876
48	EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES	71,328	71,328
49	SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT	21,317	21,317
50	T–45 SERIES	90,052	90,052
51	POWER PLANT CHANGES	19,094	19,094
52	JPATS SERIES	1,085	1,085
54	COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT	155,644	155,644
55	COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES	157,531	157,531
56	COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM	1,958	1,958
57	ID SYSTEMS	38,880	38,880
58	P–8 SERIES	29,797	29,797
59	MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION	14,770	14,770
60	MQ–8 SERIES	8,741	8,741
61	RQ–7 SERIES	2,542	2,542
62	V–22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY	135,584	135,584
63	F–35 STOVL SERIES	285,968	285,968
64	F–35 CV SERIES	20,502	20,502
	AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
65	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS	1,229,651	1,194,651
	Reduce rate of growth in replenishment spares		[–35,000]
66	COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT	418,355	418,355
67	AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES	23,843	23,843
68	WAR CONSUMABLES	15,939	15,939
69	OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES	5,630	5,630
70	SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	65,839	65,839
71	FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION	1,768	1,768
	AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY TOTAL	13,074,317	13,084,317

	WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY
	MODIFICATION OF MISSILES
1	TRIDENT II MODS	1,190,455	1,201,455
	Additional FCET		[11,000]
	SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES
2	MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES	5,671	5,671
	STRATEGIC MISSILES
3	TOMAHAWK	194,258	276,258
	Maintain minimum sustaining rate of production		[82,000]
	TACTICAL MISSILES
4	AMRAAM	32,165	32,165
5	SIDEWINDER	73,928	73,928
6	JSOW	130,759	130,759
7	STANDARD MISSILE	445,836	445,836
8	RAM	80,792	80,792
11	STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITIONS (SOPGM)	1,810	1,810
12	AERIAL TARGETS	48,046	48,046
13	OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT	3,295	3,295
	MODIFICATION OF MISSILES
14	ESSM	119,434	119,434
15	HARM MODS	111,739	111,739
	SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES
16	WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES	2,531	2,531
17	FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW-ON	208,700	208,700
	ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
18	ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	73,211	73,211
	TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP
19	SSTD	6,562	6,562
20	MK–48 TORPEDO	14,153	14,153
21	ASW TARGETS	2,515	2,515
	MOD OF TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP
22	MK–54 TORPEDO MODS	98,928	98,928
23	MK–48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS	46,893	46,893
24	QUICKSTRIKE MINE	6,966	6,966
	SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
25	TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	52,670	52,670
26	ASW RANGE SUPPORT	3,795	3,795
	DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION
27	FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION	3,692	3,692
	GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS
28	SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS	13,240	13,240
	MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS
29	CIWS MODS	75,108	75,108
30	COAST GUARD WEAPONS	18,948	18,948
31	GUN MOUNT MODS	62,651	62,651
33	AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS	15,006	15,006
	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
35	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS	74,188	74,188
	WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY TOTAL	3,217,945	3,310,945

	PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC
	NAVY AMMUNITION
1	GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS	107,069	107,069
2	AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES	70,396	70,396
3	MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION	20,284	20,284
4	PRACTICE BOMBS	26,701	26,701
5	CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES	53,866	53,866
6	AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES	59,294	59,294
7	JATOS	2,766	2,766
8	LRLAP 6" LONG RANGE ATTACK PROJECTILE	113,092	113,092
9	5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION	35,702	35,702
10	INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION	36,475	36,475
11	OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION	43,906	43,906
12	SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO	51,535	51,535
13	PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION	11,652	11,652
14	AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION	4,473	4,473
	MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION
15	SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION	31,708	31,708
16	LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES	692	692
17	40 MM, ALL TYPES	13,630	13,630
18	60MM, ALL TYPES	2,261	2,261
19	81MM, ALL TYPES	1,496	1,496
20	120MM, ALL TYPES	14,855	14,855
22	GRENADES, ALL TYPES	4,000	4,000
23	ROCKETS, ALL TYPES	16,853	16,853
24	ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES	14,772	14,772
26	FUZE, ALL TYPES	9,972	9,972
27	NON LETHALS	998	998
28	AMMO MODERNIZATION	12,319	12,319
29	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	11,178	11,178
	PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC TOTAL	771,945	771,945

	SHIPBUILDING AND CONVERSION, NAVY
	OTHER WARSHIPS
1	CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM	1,300,000	1,300,000
2	VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE	3,553,254	3,553,254
3	VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE	2,330,325	2,330,325
04	CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS	0	46,000
	Transfer from OMN, line 360		[46,000]
6	DDG 1000	419,532	419,532
7	DDG–51	2,671,415	2,671,415
8	DDG–51	134,039	134,039
9	LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP	1,427,049	1,427,049
	AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS
10	LPD–17	12,565	12,565
14	LHA REPLACEMENT	29,093	29,093
15	JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL	4,590	4,590
	AUXILIARIES, CRAFT AND PRIOR YR PROGRAM COST
16	MOORED TRAINING SHIP	737,268	737,268
17	MOORED TRAINING SHIP	64,388	64,388
18	OUTFITTING	546,104	546,104
19	SHIP TO SHORE CONNECTOR	123,233	123,233
20	LCAC SLEP	40,485	85,485
	At USMC request transfer from RDTEN 53		[45,000]
21	COMPLETION OF PY SHIPBUILDING PROGRAMS	1,007,285	1,007,285
	SHIPBUILDING AND CONVERSION, NAVY TOTAL	14,400,625	14,491,625

	OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY
	SHIP PROPULSION EQUIPMENT
1	LM–2500 GAS TURBINE	7,822	7,822
2	ALLISON 501K GAS TURBINE	2,155	2,155
3	HYBRID ELECTRIC DRIVE (HED)	22,704	22,704
	GENERATORS
4	SURFACE COMBATANT HM&E	29,120	29,120
	NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT
5	OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT	45,431	45,431
	PERISCOPES
6	SUB PERISCOPES & IMAGING EQUIP	60,970	60,970
	OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT
7	DDG MOD	338,569	338,569
8	FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT	15,486	15,486
9	COMMAND AND CONTROL SWITCHBOARD	2,219	2,219
10	LHA/LHD MIDLIFE	17,928	17,928
11	LCC 19/20 EXTENDED SERVICE LIFE PROGRAM	22,025	22,025
12	POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT	12,607	12,607
13	SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	16,492	16,492
14	VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	74,129	74,129
15	LCS CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	36,206	36,206
16	SUBMARINE BATTERIES	37,352	37,352
17	LPD CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	49,095	49,095
18	ELECTRONIC DRY AIR	2,996	2,996
19	STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP	11,558	11,558
20	DSSP EQUIPMENT	5,518	5,518
22	LCAC	7,158	7,158
23	UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS	58,783	58,783
24	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	68,748	68,748
25	CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS	2,937	2,937
26	SUBMARINE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM	8,385	8,385
	REACTOR PLANT EQUIPMENT
28	REACTOR COMPONENTS	288,822	288,822
	OCEAN ENGINEERING
29	DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT	10,572	10,572
	SMALL BOATS
30	STANDARD BOATS	129,784	129,784
	TRAINING EQUIPMENT
31	OTHER SHIPS TRAINING EQUIPMENT	17,152	17,152
	PRODUCTION FACILITIES EQUIPMENT
32	OPERATING FORCES IPE	39,409	39,409
	OTHER SHIP SUPPORT
33	NUCLEAR ALTERATIONS	118,129	118,129
34	LCS COMMON MISSION MODULES EQUIPMENT	37,413	37,413
35	LCS MCM MISSION MODULES	15,270	15,270
36	LCS ASW MISSION MODULES	2,729	2,729
37	LCS SUW MISSION MODULES	44,208	44,208
38	REMOTE MINEHUNTING SYSTEM (RMS)	42,276	42,276
	SHIP SONARS
40	SPQ–9B RADAR	28,007	28,007
41	AN/SQQ–89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM	79,802	79,802
42	SSN ACOUSTICS	165,655	165,655
43	UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	9,487	9,487
44	SONAR SWITCHES AND TRANSDUCERS	11,621	11,621
	ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
46	SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM	24,221	24,221
47	SSTD	12,051	12,051
48	FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM	170,831	170,831
49	SURTASS	9,619	9,619
50	MARITIME PATROL AND RECONNSAISANCE FORCE	14,390	14,390
	ELECTRONIC WARFARE EQUIPMENT
51	AN/SLQ–32	214,582	214,582
	RECONNAISSANCE EQUIPMENT
52	SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT	124,862	124,862
53	AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS)	164	164
	SUBMARINE SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT
54	SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PROG	45,362	45,362
	OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
55	COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY	33,939	33,939
56	TRUSTED INFORMATION SYSTEM (TIS)	324	324
57	NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND SUPPORT SYSTEM (NTCSS)	18,192	18,192
58	ATDLS	16,768	16,768
59	NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NCCS)	5,219	5,219
60	MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT	42,108	42,108
62	NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS (SPACE)	15,232	15,232
63	AMERICAN FORCES RADIO AND TV SERVICE	4,524	4,524
64	STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP	6,382	6,382
	TRAINING EQUIPMENT
65	OTHER TRAINING EQUIPMENT	46,122	46,122
	AVIATION ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
66	MATCALS	16,999	16,999
67	SHIPBOARD AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL	9,366	9,366
68	AUTOMATIC CARRIER LANDING SYSTEM	21,357	21,357
69	NATIONAL AIR SPACE SYSTEM	26,639	26,639
70	FLEET AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS	9,214	9,214
71	LANDING SYSTEMS	13,902	13,902
72	ID SYSTEMS	34,901	34,901
73	NAVAL MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS	13,950	13,950
	OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
74	DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND & CONTROL	1,205	1,205
75	MARITIME INTEGRATED BROADCAST SYSTEM	3,447	3,447
76	TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I SYSTEMS	16,766	16,766
77	DCGS-N	23,649	23,649
78	CANES	357,589	357,589
79	RADIAC	8,343	8,343
80	CANES-INTELL	65,015	65,015
81	GPETE	6,284	6,284
82	INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST FACILITY	4,016	4,016
83	EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION	4,113	4,113
84	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	45,053	45,053
	SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS
85	SHIPBOARD TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS	14,410	14,410
86	SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION	20,830	20,830
88	COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M	14,145	14,145
89	SUBMARINE BROADCAST SUPPORT	11,057	11,057
90	SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT	67,852	67,852
	SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
91	SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS	13,218	13,218
92	NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL (NMT)	272,076	272,076
	SHORE COMMUNICATIONS
93	JCS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT	4,369	4,369
94	ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS	1,402	1,402
	CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT
95	INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP)	110,766	110,766
96	MIO INTEL EXPLOITATION TEAM	979	979
97	CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP	11,502	11,502
	OTHER ELECTRONIC SUPPORT
98	COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT	2,967	2,967
	SONOBUOYS
100	SONOBUOYS—ALL TYPES	182,946	182,946
	AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
101	WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	47,944	47,944
103	AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	76,683	76,683
106	METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT	12,575	12,575
107	DCRS/DPL	1,415	1,415
109	AIRBORNE MINE COUNTERMEASURES	23,152	23,152
114	AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	52,555	52,555
	SHIP GUN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT
115	SHIP GUN SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT	5,572	5,572
	SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT
118	SHIP MISSILE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	165,769	165,769
123	TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	61,462	61,462
	FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
126	STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP	229,832	229,832
	ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
127	SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS	66,020	66,020
128	ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	7,559	7,559
	OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
132	EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP	20,619	20,619
133	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	11,251	11,251
137	TRAINING DEVICE MODS	84,080	84,080
	CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
138	PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES	2,282	2,282
139	GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS	547	547
140	CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP	8,949	8,949
141	FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT	14,621	14,621
142	TACTICAL VEHICLES	957	957
143	AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT	8,187	8,187
144	POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT	2,942	2,942
145	ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION	17,592	17,592
146	PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES	1,177	1,177
	SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
147	MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT	10,937	10,937
148	OTHER SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	10,374	10,374
149	FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION	5,668	5,668
150	SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS	90,921	90,921
	TRAINING DEVICES
151	TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	22,046	22,046
	COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
152	COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	24,208	24,208
153	EDUCATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	874	874
154	MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	2,634	2,634
156	NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	3,573	3,573
157	OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	3,997	3,997
158	C4ISR EQUIPMENT	9,638	9,638
159	ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	21,001	21,001
160	PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT	94,957	94,957
161	ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY	87,214	72,214
	Program reduction		[–15,000]
	OTHER
164	NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE SERVICE	116,165	116,165
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
164A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	10,847	10,847
	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
165	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS	325,084	325,084
	OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY TOTAL	5,975,828	5,960,828

	PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS
	TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES
1	AAV7A1 PIP	16,756	16,756
2	LAV PIP	77,736	77,736
	ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS
3	EXPEDITIONARY FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM	5,742	5,742
4	155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER	4,532	4,532
5	HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM	19,474	19,474
6	WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION	7,250	7,250
	OTHER SUPPORT
7	MODIFICATION KITS	21,909	21,909
8	WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM	3,208	3,208
	GUIDED MISSILES
9	GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE	31,439	31,439
10	JAVELIN	343	343
11	FOLLOW ON TO SMAW	4,995	4,995
12	ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS SYSTEM-HEAVY (AAWS-H)	1,589	1,589
	OTHER SUPPORT
13	MODIFICATION KITS	5,134	5,134
	COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS
14	UNIT OPERATIONS CENTER	9,178	9,178
15	COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (C	12,272	12,272
	REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT
16	REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT	30,591	30,591
	OTHER SUPPORT (TEL)
17	COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM	2,385	2,385
	COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL)
19	ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC)	4,205	4,205
20	AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS	8,002	8,002
	RADAR + EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
21	RADAR SYSTEMS	19,595	19,595
22	Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar	89,230	89,230
23	RQ–21 UAS	70,565	70,565
	INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
24	FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM	11,860	11,860
25	INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	44,340	44,340
28	RQ–11 UAV	2,737	2,737
30	DCGS-MC	20,620	20,620
	OTHER COMM/ELEC EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
31	NIGHT VISION EQUIPMENT	9,798	9,798
32	NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE NETWORK (NGEN)	2,073	2,073
33	COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES	33,570	33,570
34	COMMAND POST SYSTEMS	38,186	38,186
35	RADIO SYSTEMS	64,494	64,494
36	COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS	72,956	72,956
37	COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT	43,317	43,317
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
37A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	2,498	2,498
	ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES
38	COMMERCIAL PASSENGER VEHICLES	332	332
39	COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES	11,035	11,035
	TACTICAL VEHICLES
40	5/4T TRUCK HMMWV (MYP)	57,255	57,255
41	MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS	938	938
44	JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE	7,500	7,500
45	FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS	10,179	10,179
	OTHER SUPPORT
46	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	11,023	11,023
	ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT
47	ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT	994	994
48	BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT	1,256	1,256
49	TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS	3,750	3,750
50	POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED	8,985	11,885
	USMC unfunded priority		[2,900]
51	AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	4,418	4,418
52	EOD SYSTEMS	6,528	6,528
	MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT
53	PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT	26,510	26,510
54	GARRISON MOBILE ENGINEER EQUIPMENT (GMEE)	1,910	1,910
55	MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP	8,807	8,807
56	FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION	128	128
	GENERAL PROPERTY
58	TRAINING DEVICES	3,412	3,412
59	CONTAINER FAMILY	1,662	1,662
60	FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT	3,669	3,669
62	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	4,272	4,272
	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
63	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS	16,210	16,210
	PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS TOTAL	983,352	986,252

	SUBTOTAL, DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY	38,424,012	38,605,912

	AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
	TACTICAL FORCES
1	F–35	3,553,046	3,553,046
2	F–35	291,880	291,880
3	KC–46A TANKER	1,582,685	1,582,685
	OTHER AIRLIFT
4	C–130J	482,396	482,396
5	C–130J	140,000	140,000
6	HC–130J	332,024	332,024
7	HC–130J	50,000	50,000
8	MC–130J	190,971	190,971
9	MC–130J	80,000	80,000
	MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT
12	CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C	2,562	2,562
	OTHER AIRCRAFT
13	TARGET DRONES	98,576	98,576
16	RQ–4	54,475	44,475
	Delayed trainer		[–10,000]
17	AC–130J	1	1
18	MQ–9	240,218	202,418
	Use available prior year funds for FY 15 requirements		[–37,800]
	STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT
20	B–2A	23,865	23,865
21	B–1B	140,252	140,252
22	B–52	180,148	180,148
23	LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES	13,159	13,159
	TACTICAL AIRCRAFT
25	F–15	387,314	387,314
26	F–16	12,336	12,336
27	F–22A	180,207	180,207
28	F–35 MODIFICATIONS	187,646	187,646
29	INCREMENT 3.2B	28,500	28,500
	AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT
30	C–5	14,731	14,731
31	C–5M	331,466	281,466
	Delayed installation of RERP kits		[–50,000]
33	C–17A	127,494	127,494
34	C–21	264	264
35	C–32A	8,767	8,767
36	C–37A	18,457	18,457
	TRAINER AIRCRAFT
38	GLIDER MODS	132	132
39	T–6	14,486	14,486
40	T–1	7,650	7,650
41	T–38	34,845	34,845
	OTHER AIRCRAFT
42	U–2 MODS	0	64,300
	Keep U–2 rather than enhance Global Hawk Block 30		[64,300]
44	KC–10A (ATCA)	34,313	34,313
45	C–12	1,960	1,960
48	VC–25A MOD	1,072	1,072
49	C–40	7,292	7,292
50	C–130	35,869	83,469
	C–130 enigine upgrades		[22,600]
	C–130 avionics modernization program		[25,000]
51	C–130J MODS	7,919	7,919
52	C–135	63,568	63,568
53	COMPASS CALL MODS	57,828	57,828
54	RC–135	152,746	152,746
55	E–3	16,491	16,491
56	E–4	22,341	22,341
58	AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM	160,284	160,284
59	FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT TERMINALS	32,026	32,026
60	H–1	8,237	8,237
61	H–60	60,110	60,110
62	RQ–4 MODS	21,354	21,354
63	HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS	1,902	1,902
64	OTHER AIRCRAFT	32,106	32,106
65	MQ–1 MODS	4,755	4,755
66	MQ–9 MODS	155,445	125,445
	Lynx radar		[–30,000]
69	CV–22 MODS	74,874	74,874
	AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
70	INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS	466,562	466,562
	COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
71	AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP	22,470	22,470
	POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT
74	B–2A	44,793	44,793
75	B–52	5,249	5,249
77	C–17A	20,110	20,110
78	CV–22 POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT	16,931	16,931
80	C–135	4,414	4,414
81	F–15	1,122	1,122
82	F–16	10,994	10,994
83	F–22A	5,929	5,929
84	OTHER AIRCRAFT	27	27
	INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS
85	INDUSTRIAL RESPONSIVENESS	21,363	21,363
	WAR CONSUMABLES
86	WAR CONSUMABLES	82,906	82,906
	OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES
87	OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES	1,007,276	1,007,276
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
87A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	69,380	69,380
	AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE TOTAL	11,542,571	11,526,671

	MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
	MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT—BALLISTIC
1	MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQ-BALLISTIC	80,187	80,187
	TACTICAL
3	JOINT AIR-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE	337,438	337,438
4	SIDEWINDER (AIM–9X)	132,995	132,995
5	AMRAAM	329,600	329,600
6	PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE	33,878	33,878
7	SMALL DIAMETER BOMB	70,578	18,047
	Delay in Milestone C and contract award		[–52,531]
	INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES
8	INDUSTR'L PREPAREDNS/POL PREVENTION	749	749
	CLASS IV
9	MM III MODIFICATIONS	28,477	28,477
10	AGM–65D MAVERICK	276	276
11	AGM–88A HARM	297	297
12	AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM)	16,083	16,083
13	SMALL DIAMETER BOMB	6,924	6,924
	MISSILE SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
14	INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS	87,366	87,366
	SPACE PROGRAMS
15	ADVANCED EHF	298,890	298,890
16	WIDEBAND GAPFILLER SATELLITES(SPACE)	38,971	38,971
17	GPS III SPACE SEGMENT	235,397	235,397
18	GPS III SPACE SEGMENT	57,000	57,000
19	SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC)	16,201	16,201
20	GLOBAL POSITIONING (SPACE)	52,090	52,090
21	DEF METEOROLOGICAL SAT PROG(SPACE)	87,000	0
	Program decrease		[–87,000]
22	EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH (INFRAST.)	750,143	750,143
23	EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH(SPACE)	630,903	630,903
24	SBIR HIGH (SPACE)	450,884	450,884
	SPECIAL PROGRAMS
28	SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS	60,179	60,179
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
28A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	888,000	888,000
	MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE TOTAL	4,690,506	4,550,975

	PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE
	ROCKETS
1	ROCKETS	4,696	4,696
	CARTRIDGES
2	CARTRIDGES	133,271	133,271
	BOMBS
3	PRACTICE BOMBS	31,998	31,998
4	GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS	148,614	157,414
	Readiness funding increase—PACOM unfunded priority list		[8,800]
5	JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION	101,400	101,400
	OTHER ITEMS
6	CAD/PAD	29,989	29,989
7	EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD)	6,925	6,925
8	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS	494	494
9	MODIFICATIONS	1,610	1,610
10	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	4,237	4,237
	FLARES
11	FLARES	86,101	86,101
	FUZES
12	FUZES	103,417	103,417
	SMALL ARMS
13	SMALL ARMS	24,648	24,648
	PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE TOTAL	677,400	686,200

	OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
	PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES
1	PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES	6,528	6,528
	CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES
2	MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE	7,639	7,639
3	CAP VEHICLES	961	961
4	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	11,027	11,027
	SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES
5	SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES	4,447	4,447
6	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	693	693
	FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT
7	FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES	10,152	10,152
	MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT
8	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	15,108	15,108
	BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT
9	RUNWAY SNOW REMOV & CLEANING EQUIP	10,212	10,212
10	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	57,049	57,049
	COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT(COMSEC)
11	COMSEC EQUIPMENT	106,182	106,182
12	MODIFICATIONS (COMSEC)	1,363	1,363
	INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS
13	INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT	2,832	2,832
14	INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIPMENT	32,329	29,329
	NCCT		[–3,000]
16	MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS	15,649	15,649
	ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS
17	AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & LANDING SYS	42,200	42,200
18	NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM	6,333	6,333
19	BATTLE CONTROL SYSTEM—FIXED	2,708	2,708
20	THEATER AIR CONTROL SYS IMPROVEMENTS	50,033	50,033
21	WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST	16,348	16,348
22	STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL	139,984	139,984
23	CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX	20,101	20,101
26	INTEGRATED STRAT PLAN & ANALY NETWORK (ISPAN)	9,060	9,060
	SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS
27	GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY	39,100	39,100
28	AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYS	19,010	19,010
29	MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL	11,462	11,462
30	AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM	37,426	37,426
31	COMBAT TRAINING RANGES	26,634	26,634
32	MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMM N	1,289	1,289
33	C3 COUNTERMEASURES	11,508	11,508
34	GCSS-AF FOS	3,670	3,670
35	DEFENSE ENTERPRISE ACCOUNTING AND MGMT SYSTEM	15,298	15,298
36	THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 SYSTEM	9,565	9,565
37	AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CTR-WPN SYS	25,772	25,772
	AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS
38	INFORMATION TRANSPORT SYSTEMS	81,286	112,586
	Transfer from OPAF 39		[31,300]
39	AFNET	122,228	90,928
	Transfer to OPAF 38		[–31,300]
41	USCENTCOM	16,342	16,342
	SPACE PROGRAMS
42	FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT TERMINALS	60,230	60,230
43	SPACE BASED IR SENSOR PGM SPACE	26,100	26,100
44	NAVSTAR GPS SPACE	2,075	2,075
45	NUDET DETECTION SYS SPACE	4,656	4,656
46	AF SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK SPACE	54,630	54,630
47	SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE	69,713	69,713
48	MILSATCOM SPACE	41,355	41,355
49	SPACE MODS SPACE	31,722	31,722
50	COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM	61,603	61,603
	ORGANIZATION AND BASE
51	TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT	50,335	50,335
53	RADIO EQUIPMENT	14,846	14,846
54	CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT	3,635	3,635
55	BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE	79,607	79,607
	MODIFICATIONS
56	COMM ELECT MODS	105,398	105,398
	PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE EQUIP
57	NIGHT VISION GOGGLES	12,577	12,577
58	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	31,209	31,209
	DEPOT PLANT+MTRLS HANDLING EQ
59	MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP	7,670	7,670
	BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
60	BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT	14,125	37,725
	ICBM training equipment		[23,600]
61	CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS	16,744	16,744
62	PRODUCTIVITY CAPITAL INVESTMENT	2,495	2,495
63	MOBILITY EQUIPMENT	10,573	10,573
64	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	5,462	5,462
66	DARP RC135	24,710	24,710
67	DCGS-AF	206,743	206,743
69	SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM	537,370	537,370
70	DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG.	77,898	77,898
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
70A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	13,990,196	13,990,196
	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
72	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS	32,813	32,813
	OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE TOTAL	16,566,018	16,586,618

	SUBTOTAL, DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE	33,476,495	33,350,464

	PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCAA
1	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	1,594	1,594
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA
2	MAJOR EQUIPMENT	4,325	4,325
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA
3	PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION	17,268	17,268
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA
8	INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY	10,491	10,491
10	TELEPORT PROGRAM	80,622	80,622
11	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	14,147	14,147
12	NET CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES)	1,921	1,921
13	DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK	80,144	80,144
15	CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE	8,755	8,755
16	WHITE HOUSE COMMUNICATION AGENCY	33,737	33,737
17	SENIOR LEADERSHIP ENTERPRISE	32,544	32,544
18	JOINT INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT	13,300	13,300
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA
20	MAJOR EQUIPMENT	7,436	7,436
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DMACT
21	MAJOR EQUIPMENT	11,640	11,640
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DODEA
22	AUTOMATION/EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT & LOGISTICS	1,269	1,269
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DSS
24	VEHICLES	1,500	1,500
25	MAJOR EQUIPMENT	1,039	1,039
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY
26	VEHICLES	50	50
27	OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT	7,639	7,639
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY
28	AEGIS BMD ADVANCE PROCUREMENT	68,880	68,880
29	THAAD	464,424	464,424
30	AEGIS BMD	435,430	435,430
31	BMDS AN/TPY–2 RADARS	48,140	48,140
32	AEGIS ASHORE PHASE III	225,774	225,774
34	IRON DOME	175,972	0
	Transfer to RDT&E, Defense-Wide Line 96		[–175,972]
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA
41	INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP)	3,448	3,448
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD
42	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD	43,708	43,708
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS
44	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS	10,783	10,783
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS
46	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS	29,599	29,599
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
46A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	540,894	540,894
	AVIATION PROGRAMS
47	MC–12	40,500	0
	Unjustified Request		[–40,500]
48	ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND SUSTAINMENT	112,226	112,226
49	MH–60 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM	3,021	3,021
50	NON-STANDARD AVIATION	48,200	48,200
52	MH–47 CHINOOK	22,230	22,230
53	RQ–11 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE	6,397	6,397
54	CV–22 MODIFICATION	25,578	25,578
56	MQ–9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE	15,651	21,351
	Capability Improvements		[5,700]
57	STUASL0	1,500	1,500
58	PRECISION STRIKE PACKAGE	145,929	145,929
59	AC/MC–130J	65,130	65,130
61	C–130 MODIFICATIONS	39,563	39,563
	SHIPBUILDING
63	UNDERWATER SYSTEMS	25,459	25,459
	AMMUNITION PROGRAMS
65	ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M	144,336	144,336
	OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS
68	INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS	81,001	81,001
70	DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS	17,323	17,323
71	OTHER ITEMS <$5M	84,852	84,852
72	COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS	51,937	51,937
74	SPECIAL PROGRAMS	31,017	31,017
75	TACTICAL VEHICLES	63,134	63,134
76	WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M	192,448	192,448
78	COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS	19,984	19,984
81	GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES	5,044	5,044
82	OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE	38,126	38,126
88	OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS	243,849	243,849
	CBDP
95	CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL SITUATIONAL AWARENESS	170,137	170,137
96	CB PROTECTION & HAZARD MITIGATION	150,392	150,392
	PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE TOTAL	4,221,437	4,010,665

	SUBTOTAL, DEFENSE-WIDE	4,221,437	4,010,665

	JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND
	JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND
1	JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND	20,000	20,000
	JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND TOTAL	20,000	20,000

	PRIOR YEAR RESCISSIONS
1	PRIOR YEAR RESCISSIONS	–265,685	0
	PRIOR YEAR RESCISSIONS TOTAL	–265,685	0

	TOTAL, TITLE I	89,508,034	89,548,969

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION(In Thousands of Dollars)
Line	ProgramElement	Item	FY 2015 Request	Senate Authorized
		RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY
		BASIC RESEARCH
1	0601101A	IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH	13,464	13,464
2	0601102A	DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES	238,167	238,167
3	0601103A	UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES	69,808	89,808
		Basic research program increase		[20,000]
4	0601104A	UNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH CENTERS	102,737	102,737
		SUBTOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH	424,176	444,176

		APPLIED RESEARCH
5	0602105A	MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY	28,006	28,006
6	0602120A	SENSORS AND ELECTRONIC SURVIVABILITY	33,515	33,515
7	0602122A	TRACTOR HIP	16,358	16,358
8	0602211A	AVIATION TECHNOLOGY	63,433	63,433
9	0602270A	ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY	18,502	18,502
10	0602303A	MISSILE TECHNOLOGY	46,194	46,194
11	0602307A	ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY	28,528	28,528
12	0602308A	ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND SIMULATION	27,435	27,435
13	0602601A	COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY	72,883	72,883
14	0602618A	BALLISTICS TECHNOLOGY	85,597	85,597
15	0602622A	CHEMICAL, SMOKE AND EQUIPMENT DEFEATING TECHNOLOGY	3,971	3,971
16	0602623A	JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM	6,853	6,853
17	0602624A	WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY	38,069	38,069
18	0602705A	ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES	56,435	56,435
19	0602709A	NIGHT VISION TECHNOLOGY	38,445	38,445
20	0602712A	COUNTERMINE SYSTEMS	25,939	25,939
21	0602716A	HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY	23,783	23,783
22	0602720A	ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY	15,659	15,659
23	0602782A	COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY	33,817	33,817
24	0602783A	COMPUTER AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY	10,764	10,764
25	0602784A	MILITARY ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY	63,311	63,311
26	0602785A	MANPOWER/PERSONNEL/TRAINING TECHNOLOGY	23,295	23,295
27	0602786A	WARFIGHTER TECHNOLOGY	25,751	25,751
28	0602787A	MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY	76,068	76,068
		SUBTOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH	862,611	862,611

		ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
29	0603001A	WARFIGHTER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	65,139	65,139
30	0603002A	MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	67,291	67,291
31	0603003A	AVIATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	88,990	88,990
32	0603004A	WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	57,931	57,931
33	0603005A	COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	110,031	110,031
34	0603006A	SPACE APPLICATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	6,883	6,883
35	0603007A	MANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	13,580	13,580
36	0603008A	ELECTRONIC WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	44,871	44,871
37	0603009A	TRACTOR HIKE	7,492	7,492
38	0603015A	NEXT GENERATION TRAINING & SIMULATION SYSTEMS	16,749	16,749
39	0603020A	TRACTOR ROSE	14,483	14,483
41	0603125A	COMBATING TERRORISM—TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	24,270	24,270
42	0603130A	TRACTOR NAIL	3,440	3,440
43	0603131A	TRACTOR EGGS	2,406	2,406
44	0603270A	ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY	26,057	26,057
45	0603313A	MISSILE AND ROCKET ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	44,957	44,957
46	0603322A	TRACTOR CAGE	11,105	11,105
47	0603461A	HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM	181,609	181,609
48	0603606A	LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	13,074	13,074
49	0603607A	JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM	7,321	7,321
50	0603710A	NIGHT VISION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	44,138	44,138
51	0603728A	ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS	9,197	9,197
52	0603734A	MILITARY ENGINEERING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	17,613	17,613
53	0603772A	ADVANCED TACTICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE AND SENSOR TECHNOLOGY	39,164	39,164
		SUBTOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	917,791	917,791

		ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES
54	0603305A	ARMY MISSLE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION	12,797	12,797
55	0603308A	ARMY SPACE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION	13,999	13,999
58	0603639A	TANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION	29,334	29,334
60	0603747A	SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY	9,602	9,602
61	0603766A	TACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM—ADV DEV	8,953	8,953
62	0603774A	NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT	3,052	3,052
63	0603779A	ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—DEM/VAL	7,830	7,830
65	0603790A	NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT	2,954	2,954
67	0603804A	LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ADV DEV	13,386	13,386
69	0603807A	MEDICAL SYSTEMS—ADV DEV	23,659	23,659
70	0603827A	SOLDIER SYSTEMS—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT	6,830	9,830
		At Army request transfer from WTCV 19, 28, and 31		[3,000]
72	0604100A	ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES	9,913	9,913
73	0604115A	TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES	74,740	74,740
74	0604120A	ASSURED POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING (PNT)	9,930	9,930
76	0604319A	INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INCREMENT 2–INTERCEPT (IFPC2)	96,177	66,177
		Program delay and funds requested early to need		[–30,000]
		SUBTOTAL, ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES	323,156	296,156

		SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION
79	0604201A	AIRCRAFT AVIONICS	37,246	37,246
81	0604270A	ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT	6,002	6,002
82	0604280A	JOINT TACTICAL RADIO	9,832	9,832
83	0604290A	MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR)	9,730	9,730
84	0604321A	ALL SOURCE ANALYSIS SYSTEM	5,532	5,532
85	0604328A	TRACTOR CAGE	19,929	19,929
86	0604601A	INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS	27,884	29,586
		Only for XM25 CDTEWS under execution of prior years funds		[–5,000]
		At Army request transfer from WTCV 19, 28, and 31		[6,702]
87	0604604A	MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLES	210	210
88	0604611A	JAVELIN	4,166	4,166
89	0604622A	FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES	12,913	12,913
90	0604633A	AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL	16,764	16,764
91	0604641A	TACTICAL UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLE (TUGV)	6,770	6,770
92	0604710A	NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS—ENG DEV	65,333	65,333
93	0604713A	COMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND EQUIPMENT	1,335	1,335
94	0604715A	NON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES—ENG DEV	8,945	8,945
96	0604741A	AIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE—ENG DEV	15,906	15,906
97	0604742A	CONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	4,394	4,394
98	0604746A	AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT	11,084	11,084
99	0604760A	DISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS (DIS)—ENG DEV	10,027	10,027
100	0604780A	COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (CATT) CORE	42,430	42,430
101	0604798A	BRIGADE ANALYSIS, INTEGRATION AND EVALUATION	105,279	105,279
102	0604802A	WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS—ENG DEV	15,006	15,006
103	0604804A	LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV	24,581	24,581
104	0604805A	COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS—ENG DEV	4,433	4,433
105	0604807A	MEDICAL MATERIEL/MEDICAL BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV	30,397	30,397
106	0604808A	LANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER—ENG DEV	57,705	57,705
108	0604818A	ARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE	29,683	29,683
109	0604820A	RADAR DEVELOPMENT	5,224	5,224
111	0604823A	FIREFINDER	37,492	37,492
112	0604827A	SOLDIER SYSTEMS—WARRIOR DEM/VAL	6,157	6,157
113	0604854A	ARTILLERY SYSTEMS—EMD	1,912	1,912
116	0605013A	INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	69,761	69,761
117	0605018A	INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPPS-A)	138,465	138,465
118	0605028A	ARMORED MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLE (AMPV)	92,353	92,353
119	0605030A	JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC)	8,440	8,440
120	0605031A	JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK (JTN)	17,999	17,999
121	0605035A	COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM)	145,409	145,409
122	0605350A	WIN-T INCREMENT 3—FULL NETWORKING	113,210	113,210
123	0605380A	AMF JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM (JTRS)	6,882	6,882
124	0605450A	JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM)	83,838	83,838
125	0605456A	PAC–3/MSE MISSILE	35,009	35,009
126	0605457A	ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD)	142,584	142,584
127	0605625A	MANNED GROUND VEHICLE	49,160	49,160
128	0605626A	AERIAL COMMON SENSOR	17,748	17,748
129	0605766A	NATIONAL CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION (MIP)	15,212	15,212
130	0605812A	JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT PH	45,718	45,718
131	0605830A	AVIATION GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	10,041	10,041
132	0210609A	PALADIN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT (PIM)	83,300	83,300
133	0303032A	TROJAN—RH12	983	983
134	0304270A	ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT	8,961	8,961
		SUBTOTAL, SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION	1,719,374	1,721,076

		RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
135	0604256A	THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT	18,062	18,062
136	0604258A	TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	10,040	10,040
137	0604759A	MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT	60,317	60,317
138	0605103A	RAND ARROYO CENTER	20,612	20,612
139	0605301A	ARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL	176,041	187,041
		Additional SSA operations (STRATCOM unfunded priority)		[11,000]
140	0605326A	CONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM	19,439	19,439
142	0605601A	ARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES	275,025	275,025
143	0605602A	ARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND TARGETS	45,596	45,596
144	0605604A	SURVIVABILITY/LETHALITY ANALYSIS	33,295	33,295
145	0605606A	AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION	4,700	4,700
146	0605702A	METEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT TO RDT&E ACTIVITIES	6,413	6,413
147	0605706A	MATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS	20,746	20,746
148	0605709A	EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS	7,015	7,015
149	0605712A	SUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING	49,221	49,221
150	0605716A	ARMY EVALUATION CENTER	55,039	55,039
151	0605718A	ARMY MODELING & SIM X-CMD COLLABORATION & INTEG	1,125	1,125
152	0605801A	PROGRAMWIDE ACTIVITIES	64,169	64,169
153	0605803A	TECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES	32,319	32,319
154	0605805A	MUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY	49,052	49,052
155	0605857A	ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT SUPPORT	2,612	2,612
156	0605898A	MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D	49,592	49,592
		SUBTOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT	1,000,430	1,011,430

		OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
158	0603778A	MLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM	17,112	17,112
159	0607141A	LOGISTICS AUTOMATION	3,654	3,654
160	0607664A	BIOMETRIC ENABLING CAPABILITY (BEC)	1,332	1,332
161	0607865A	PATRIOT PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT	152,991	152,991
194	0708045A	END ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES	76,225	76,225
162	0102419A	AEROSTAT JOINT PROJECT OFFICE	54,076	54,076
163	0203726A	ADV FIELD ARTILLERY TACTICAL DATA SYSTEM	22,374	22,374
164	0203728A	JOINT AUTOMATED DEEP OPERATION COORDINATION SYSTEM (JADOCS)	24,371	24,371
165	0203735A	COMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS	295,177	295,177
166	0203740A	MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM	45,092	45,092
167	0203744A	AIRCRAFT MODIFICATIONS/PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS	264,887	264,887
168	0203752A	AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM	381	381
169	0203758A	DIGITIZATION	10,912	10,912
170	0203801A	MISSILE/AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM	5,115	5,115
171	0203802A	OTHER MISSILE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS	49,848	49,848
172	0203808A	TRACTOR CARD	22,691	22,691
173	0205402A	INTEGRATED BASE DEFENSE—OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEV	4,364	4,364
174	0205410A	MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT	834	834
175	0205412A	ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEV	280	280
176	0205456A	LOWER TIER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AMD) SYSTEM	78,758	78,758
177	0205778A	GUIDED MULTIPLE-LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEM (GMLRS)	45,377	45,377
178	0208053A	JOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM	10,209	10,209
181	0303028A	SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES	12,525	12,525
182	0303140A	INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM	14,175	14,175
183	0303141A	GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM	4,527	4,527
184	0303142A	SATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE)	11,011	11,011
185	0303150A	WWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM	2,151	2,151
187	0305204A	TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES	22,870	22,870
188	0305208A	DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS	20,155	20,155
189	0305219A	MQ–1C GRAY EAGLE UAS	46,472	46,472
191	0305233A	RQ–7 UAV	16,389	16,389
192	0307665A	BIOMETRICS ENABLED INTELLIGENCE	1,974	1,974
193	0310349A	WIN-T INCREMENT 2—INITIAL NETWORKING	3,249	3,249
194A	9999999999	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	4,802	4,802
		SUBTOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	1,346,360	1,346,360

		TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY	6,593,898	6,599,600

		RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY
		BASIC RESEARCH
1	0601103N	UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES	113,908	133,908
		Basic research program increase		[20,000]
2	0601152N	IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH	18,734	18,734
3	0601153N	DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES	443,697	443,697
		SUBTOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH	576,339	596,339

		APPLIED RESEARCH
4	0602114N	POWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH	95,753	95,753
5	0602123N	FORCE PROTECTION APPLIED RESEARCH	139,496	139,496
6	0602131M	MARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY	45,831	45,831
7	0602235N	COMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH	43,541	43,541
8	0602236N	WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLIED RESEARCH	46,923	46,923
9	0602271N	ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH	107,872	107,872
10	0602435N	OCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED RESEARCH	45,388	45,388
11	0602651M	JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS APPLIED RESEARCH	5,887	5,887
12	0602747N	UNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH	86,880	86,880
13	0602750N	FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES APPLIED RESEARCH	170,786	170,786
14	0602782N	MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH	32,526	32,526
		SUBTOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH	820,883	820,883

		ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
15	0603114N	POWER PROJECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	37,734	37,734
16	0603123N	FORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	25,831	25,831
17	0603271N	ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	64,623	64,623
18	0603640M	USMC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION (ATD)	128,397	128,397
19	0603651M	JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	11,506	11,506
20	0603673N	FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	256,144	256,144
21	0603729N	WARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	4,838	4,838
22	0603747N	UNDERSEA WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	9,985	9,985
23	0603758N	NAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND DEMONSTRATIONS	53,956	53,956
24	0603782N	MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	2,000	2,000
		SUBTOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	595,014	595,014

		ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES
25	0603207N	AIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS	40,429	40,429
26	0603216N	AVIATION SURVIVABILITY	4,325	4,325
27	0603237N	DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONTROL	2,991	2,991
28	0603251N	AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS	12,651	12,651
29	0603254N	ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	7,782	7,782
30	0603261N	TACTICAL AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE	5,275	5,275
31	0603382N	ADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY	1,646	1,646
32	0603502N	SURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE COUNTERMEASURES	100,349	100,349
33	0603506N	SURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE	52,781	52,781
34	0603512N	CARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	5,959	5,959
35	0603525N	PILOT FISH	148,865	148,865
36	0603527N	RETRACT LARCH	25,365	25,365
37	0603536N	RETRACT JUNIPER	80,477	80,477
38	0603542N	RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL	669	669
39	0603553N	SURFACE ASW	1,060	1,060
40	0603561N	ADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT	70,551	70,551
41	0603562N	SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS	8,044	8,044
42	0603563N	SHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN	17,864	17,864
43	0603564N	SHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY STUDIES	23,716	23,716
44	0603570N	ADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS	499,961	499,961
45	0603573N	ADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS	21,026	21,026
46	0603576N	CHALK EAGLE	542,700	542,700
47	0603581N	LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS)	88,734	88,734
48	0603582N	COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION	20,881	20,881
49	0603595N	OHIO REPLACEMENT	849,277	849,277
50	0603596N	LCS MISSION MODULES	196,948	196,948
51	0603597N	AUTOMATED TEST AND RE-TEST (ATRT)	8,115	8,115
52	0603609N	CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS	7,603	7,603
53	0603611M	MARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES	105,749	38,049
		At USMC request transfer to RDTEN 183		[–7,000]
		At USMC request transfer to SCN 20		[–45,000]
		At USMC request transfer to OMMC 130		[–15,700]
54	0603635M	MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT SYSTEM	1,342	1,342
55	0603654N	JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT	21,399	21,399
56	0603658N	COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT	43,578	43,578
57	0603713N	OCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	7,764	7,764
58	0603721N	ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION	13,200	13,200
59	0603724N	NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM	69,415	69,415
60	0603725N	FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT	2,588	2,588
61	0603734N	CHALK CORAL	176,301	176,301
62	0603739N	NAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY	3,873	3,873
63	0603746N	RETRACT MAPLE	376,028	376,028
64	0603748N	LINK PLUMERIA	272,096	272,096
65	0603751N	RETRACT ELM	42,233	42,233
66	0603764N	LINK EVERGREEN	46,504	46,504
67	0603787N	SPECIAL PROCESSES	25,109	25,109
68	0603790N	NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT	9,659	9,659
69	0603795N	LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY	318	318
70	0603851M	JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TESTING	40,912	40,912
71	0603860N	JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS—DEM/VAL	54,896	54,896
73	0603925N	DIRECTED ENERGY AND ELECTRIC WEAPON SYSTEMS	58,696	58,696
74	0604112N	GERALD R. FORD CLASS NUCLEAR AIRCRAFT CARRIER (CVN 78—80)	43,613	43,613
75	0604122N	REMOTE MINEHUNTING SYSTEM (RMS)	21,110	21,110
76	0604272N	TACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (TADIRCM)	5,657	5,657
77	0604279N	ASE SELF-PROTECTION OPTIMIZATION	8,033	8,033
78	0604454N	LX (R)	36,859	36,859
79	0604653N	JOINT COUNTER RADIO CONTROLLED IED ELECTRONIC WARFARE (JCREW)	15,227	15,227
81	0604707N	SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) ARCHITECTURE/ENGINEERING SUPPORT	22,393	22,393
82	0604786N	OFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON DEVELOPMENT	202,939	0
		Halt program pending analysis demonstrating need		[–202,939]
83	0605812M	JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT PH	11,450	11,450
84	0303354N	ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT—MIP	6,495	6,495
85	0304270N	ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT—MIP	332	332
		SUBTOTAL, ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES	4,591,812	4,321,173

		SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION
86	0603208N	TRAINING SYSTEM AIRCRAFT	25,153	25,153
87	0604212N	OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT	46,154	46,154
88	0604214N	AV–8B AIRCRAFT—ENG DEV	25,372	25,372
89	0604215N	STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT	53,712	53,712
90	0604216N	MULTI-MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE DEVELOPMENT	11,434	11,434
91	0604218N	AIR/OCEAN EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING	2,164	2,164
92	0604221N	P–3 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM	1,710	1,710
93	0604230N	WARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM	9,094	9,094
94	0604231N	TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM	70,248	70,248
95	0604234N	ADVANCED HAWKEYE	193,200	193,200
96	0604245N	H–1 UPGRADES	44,115	44,115
97	0604261N	ACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS	23,227	23,227
98	0604262N	V–22A	61,249	61,249
99	0604264N	AIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	15,014	15,014
100	0604269N	EA–18	18,730	18,730
101	0604270N	ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT	28,742	28,742
102	0604273N	EXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT	388,086	388,086
103	0604274N	NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ)	246,856	246,856
104	0604280N	JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM—NAVY (JTRS-NAVY)	7,106	7,106
105	0604307N	SURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM ENGINEERING	189,112	189,112
106	0604311N	LPD–17 CLASS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION	376	376
107	0604329N	SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)	71,849	71,849
108	0604366N	STANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS	53,198	53,198
109	0604373N	AIRBORNE MCM	38,941	38,941
110	0604376M	MARINE AIR GROUND TASK FORCE (MAGTF) ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) FOR AVIATION	7,832	7,832
111	0604378N	NAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL—COUNTER AIR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING	15,263	15,263
112	0604404N	UNMANNED CARRIER LAUNCHED AIRBORNE SURVEILLANCE AND STRIKE (UCLASS) SYSTEM	403,017	403,017
113	0604501N	ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS	20,409	20,409
114	0604503N	SSN–688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION	71,565	71,565
115	0604504N	AIR CONTROL	29,037	29,037
116	0604512N	SHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS	122,083	122,083
118	0604522N	ADVANCED MISSILE DEFENSE RADAR (AMDR) SYSTEM	144,706	144,706
119	0604558N	NEW DESIGN SSN	72,695	72,695
120	0604562N	SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM	38,985	38,985
121	0604567N	SHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/ LIVE FIRE T&E	48,470	48,470
122	0604574N	NAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES	3,935	3,935
123	0604580N	VIRGINIA PAYLOAD MODULE (VPM)	132,602	132,602
124	0604601N	MINE DEVELOPMENT	19,067	19,067
125	0604610N	LIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT	25,280	25,280
126	0604654N	JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT	8,985	8,985
127	0604703N	PERSONNEL, TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND HUMAN FACTORS	7,669	7,669
128	0604727N	JOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS	4,400	4,400
129	0604755N	SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL)	56,889	56,889
130	0604756N	SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL)	96,937	96,937
131	0604757N	SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/EW)	134,564	134,564
132	0604761N	INTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING	200	200
133	0604771N	MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT	8,287	8,287
134	0604777N	NAVIGATION/ID SYSTEM	29,504	29,504
135	0604800M	JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD	513,021	513,021
136	0604800N	JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD	516,456	516,456
137	0605013M	INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	2,887	2,887
138	0605013N	INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	66,317	66,317
139	0605212N	CH–53K RDTE	573,187	573,187
140	0605220N	SHIP TO SHORE CONNECTOR (SSC)	67,815	67,815
141	0605450N	JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM)	6,300	6,300
142	0605500N	MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT (MMA)	308,037	308,037
143	0204202N	DDG–1000	202,522	202,522
144	0304231N	TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM—MIP	1,011	1,011
145	0304785N	TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS	10,357	10,357
146	0305124N	SPECIAL APPLICATIONS PROGRAM	23,975	23,975
		SUBTOTAL, SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION	5,419,108	5,419,108

		RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
147	0604256N	THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT	45,272	45,272
148	0604258N	TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	79,718	79,718
149	0604759N	MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT	123,993	123,993
150	0605126N	JOINT THEATER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION	4,960	4,960
151	0605152N	STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—NAVY	8,296	8,296
152	0605154N	CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES	45,752	45,752
154	0605804N	TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES	876	876
155	0605853N	MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT	72,070	72,070
156	0605856N	STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT	3,237	3,237
157	0605861N	RDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT	73,033	73,033
158	0605863N	RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT	138,304	138,304
159	0605864N	TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT	336,286	336,286
160	0605865N	OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY	16,658	16,658
161	0605866N	NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) SUPPORT	2,505	2,505
162	0605867N	SEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT	8,325	8,325
163	0605873M	MARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT	17,866	17,866
		SUBTOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT	977,151	977,151

		OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
168	0604402N	UNMANNED COMBAT AIR VEHICLE (UCAV) ADVANCED COMPONENT AND PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT	35,949	35,949
169	0604766M	MARINE CORPS DATA SYSTEMS	215	215
170	0605525N	CARRIER ONBOARD DELIVERY (COD) FOLLOW ON	8,873	8,873
172	0101221N	STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT	96,943	96,943
173	0101224N	SSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM	30,057	30,057
174	0101226N	SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT	4,509	4,509
175	0101402N	NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS	13,676	13,676
176	0203761N	RAPID TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION (RTT)	12,480	12,480
177	0204136N	F/A–18 SQUADRONS	76,216	76,216
179	0204163N	FLEET TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TACTICAL)	27,281	27,281
180	0204228N	SURFACE SUPPORT	2,878	2,878
181	0204229N	TOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION PLANNING CENTER (TMPC)	32,385	32,385
182	0204311N	INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM	39,371	39,371
183	0204413N	AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS (DISPLACEMENT CRAFT)	4,609	11,609
		At USMC request transfer from RDTEN 53		[7,000]
184	0204460M	GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR (G/ATOR)	99,106	99,106
185	0204571N	CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	39,922	39,922
186	0204574N	CRYPTOLOGIC DIRECT SUPPORT	1,157	1,157
187	0204575N	ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS SUPPORT	22,067	22,067
188	0205601N	HARM IMPROVEMENT	17,420	17,420
189	0205604N	TACTICAL DATA LINKS	151,208	151,208
190	0205620N	SURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION	26,366	26,366
191	0205632N	MK–48 ADCAP	25,952	25,952
192	0205633N	AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS	106,936	106,936
194	0205675N	OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS	104,023	104,023
195	0206313M	MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS	77,398	77,398
196	0206335M	COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (CAC2S)	32,495	32,495
197	0206623M	MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS SYSTEMS	156,626	156,626
198	0206624M	MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT	20,999	20,999
199	0206625M	USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (MIP)	14,179	14,179
200	0207161N	TACTICAL AIM MISSILES	47,258	47,258
201	0207163N	ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM)	10,210	10,210
206	0303109N	SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE)	41,829	41,829
207	0303138N	CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK ENTERPRISE SERVICES (CANES)	22,780	22,780
208	0303140N	INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM	23,053	23,053
209	0303150M	WWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM	296	296
212	0305160N	NAVY METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEAN SENSORS-SPACE (METOC)	359	359
213	0305192N	MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM (MIP) ACTIVITIES	6,166	6,166
214	0305204N	TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES	8,505	8,505
216	0305208M	DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS	11,613	11,613
217	0305208N	DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS	18,146	18,146
218	0305220N	RQ–4 UAV	498,003	498,003
219	0305231N	MQ–8 UAV	47,294	47,294
220	0305232M	RQ–11 UAV	718	718
221	0305233N	RQ–7 UAV	851	851
222	0305234N	SMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS (STUASL0)	4,813	4,813
223	0305239M	RQ–21A	8,192	8,192
224	0305241N	MULTI-INTELLIGENCE SENSOR DEVELOPMENT	22,559	22,559
225	0305242M	UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS (UAS) PAYLOADS (MIP)	2,000	2,000
226	0308601N	MODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT	4,719	4,719
227	0702207N	DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF)	21,168	21,168
228	0708011N	INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS	37,169	37,169
229	0708730N	MARITIME TECHNOLOGY (MARITECH)	4,347	4,347
229A	9999999999	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	1,162,684	1,162,684
		SUBTOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	3,286,028	3,293,028

		TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY	16,266,335	16,022,696

		RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF
		BASIC RESEARCH
1	0601102F	DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES	314,482	314,482
2	0601103F	UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES	127,079	147,079
		Basic research program increase		[20,000]
3	0601108F	HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH INITIATIVES	12,929	12,929
		SUBTOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH	454,490	474,490

		APPLIED RESEARCH
4	0602102F	MATERIALS	105,680	105,680
5	0602201F	AEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES	105,747	105,747
6	0602202F	HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH	81,957	81,957
7	0602203F	AEROSPACE PROPULSION	172,550	172,550
8	0602204F	AEROSPACE SENSORS	118,343	118,343
9	0602601F	SPACE TECHNOLOGY	98,229	98,229
10	0602602F	CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS	87,387	87,387
11	0602605F	DIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY	125,955	125,955
12	0602788F	DOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND METHODS	147,789	147,789
13	0602890F	HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH	37,496	37,496
		SUBTOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH	1,081,133	1,081,133

		ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
14	0603112F	ADVANCED MATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS	32,177	32,177
15	0603199F	SUSTAINMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (S&T)	15,800	15,800
16	0603203F	ADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS	34,420	34,420
17	0603211F	AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY DEV/DEMO	91,062	91,062
18	0603216F	AEROSPACE PROPULSION AND POWER TECHNOLOGY	124,236	124,236
19	0603270F	ELECTRONIC COMBAT TECHNOLOGY	47,602	47,602
20	0603401F	ADVANCED SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGY	69,026	69,026
21	0603444F	MAUI SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (MSSS)	14,031	14,031
22	0603456F	HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	21,788	21,788
23	0603601F	CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY	42,046	42,046
24	0603605F	ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY	23,542	23,542
25	0603680F	MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM	42,772	42,772
26	0603788F	BATTLESPACE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION	35,315	35,315
		SUBTOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	593,817	593,817

		ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES
27	0603260F	INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT	5,408	5,408
31	0603438F	SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY	6,075	6,075
32	0603742F	COMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY	10,980	10,980
33	0603790F	NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT	2,392	2,392
34	0603791F	INTERNATIONAL SPACE COOPERATIVE R&D	833	833
35	0603830F	SPACE SECURITY AND DEFENSE PROGRAM	32,313	32,313
37	0603851F	INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE—DEM/VAL	30,885	30,885
39	0603859F	POLLUTION PREVENTION—DEM/VAL	1,798	1,798
40	0604015F	LONG RANGE STRIKE	913,728	913,728
42	0604317F	TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER	2,669	2,669
45	0604422F	WEATHER SYSTEM FOLLOW-ON	39,901	39,901
49	0604800F	F–35—EMD	4,976	4,976
51	0604858F	TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM	59,004	59,004
54	0207110F	NEXT GENERATION AIR DOMINANCE	15,722	15,722
55	0207455F	THREE DIMENSIONAL LONG-RANGE RADAR (3DELRR)	88,825	88,825
56	0305164F	NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (USER EQUIPMENT) (SPACE)	156,659	156,659
		SUBTOTAL, ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES	1,372,168	1,372,168

		SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION
59	0604233F	SPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHT TRAINING	13,324	13,324
60	0604270F	ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT	1,965	1,965
61	0604281F	TACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE	39,110	39,110
62	0604287F	PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT	3,926	3,926
63	0604329F	SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)—EMD	68,759	68,759
64	0604421F	COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS	23,746	23,746
65	0604425F	SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS	9,462	9,462
66	0604426F	SPACE FENCE	214,131	214,131
67	0604429F	AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK	30,687	30,687
68	0604441F	SPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM (SBIRS) HIGH EMD	319,501	311,501
		Upgrade mobile ground units (STRATCOM unfunded priority)		[5,000]
		Hosted payload demonstration		[–5,000]
		Wide field of view test bed		[–8,000]
69	0604602F	ARMAMENT/ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT	31,112	31,112
70	0604604F	SUBMUNITIONS	2,543	2,543
71	0604617F	AGILE COMBAT SUPPORT	46,340	46,340
72	0604706F	LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS	8,854	8,854
73	0604735F	COMBAT TRAINING RANGES	10,129	10,129
75	0604800F	F–35—EMD	563,037	563,037
77	0604853F	EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE PROGRAM (SPACE)—EMD	0	100,000
		Liquid rocket engine		[100,000]
78	0604932F	LONG RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON	4,938	4,938
79	0604933F	ICBM FUZE MODERNIZATION	59,826	59,826
80	0605030F	JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC)	78	78
81	0605213F	F–22 MODERNIZATION INCREMENT 3.2B	173,647	173,647
82	0605214F	GROUND ATTACK WEAPONS FUZE DEVELOPMENT	5,332	5,332
83	0605221F	KC–46	776,937	776,937
84	0605223F	ADVANCED PILOT TRAINING	8,201	8,201
86	0605278F	HC/MC–130 RECAP RDT&E	7,497	7,497
87	0605431F	ADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE)	314,378	298,378
		Satellite contractor support		[–9,000]
		Protected tactical demonstration		[–7,000]
88	0605432F	POLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE)	103,552	103,552
89	0605433F	WIDEBAND GLOBAL SATCOM (SPACE)	31,425	31,425
90	0605458F	AIR & SPACE OPS CENTER 10.2 RDT&E	85,938	85,938
91	0605931F	B–2 DEFENSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM	98,768	98,768
92	0101125F	NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION	198,357	198,357
94	0207701F	FULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING	8,831	8,831
95	0307581F	NEXTGEN JSTARS	73,088	10,000
		Integrate exisitng technology in replacement		[–63,088]
		SUBTOTAL, SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION	3,337,419	3,350,331

97	0604256F	THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT	24,418	24,418
98	0604759F	MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT	47,232	47,232
99	0605101F	RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE	30,443	30,443
101	0605712F	INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION	12,266	12,266
102	0605807F	TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT	689,509	689,509
103	0605860F	ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE)	34,364	34,364
104	0605864F	SPACE TEST PROGRAM (STP)	21,161	21,161
104A		OPERATIONALLY RESPONSIVE SPACE	0	20,000
		Program Increase		[20,000]
105	0605976F	FACILITIES RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT	46,955	46,955
106	0605978F	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT	32,965	32,965
107	0606017F	REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION	13,850	13,850
108	0606116F	SPACE TEST AND TRAINING RANGE DEVELOPMENT	19,512	19,512
110	0606392F	SPACE AND MISSILE CENTER (SMC) CIVILIAN WORKFORCE	181,727	181,727
111	0308602F	ENTEPRISE INFORMATION SERVICES (EIS)	4,938	4,938
112	0702806F	ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT	18,644	18,644
113	0804731F	GENERAL SKILL TRAINING	1,425	1,425
114	1001004F	INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES	3,790	3,790
		SUBTOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT	1,183,199	1,203,199

		OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
115	0603423F	GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM III—OPERATIONAL CONTROL SEGMENT	299,760	299,760
118	0604618F	JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION	2,469	2,469
119	0605018F	AF INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM (AF-IPPS)	90,218	60,218
		Delayed contract award		[–30,000]
120	0605024F	ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE AGENCY	34,815	34,815
122	0101113F	B–52 SQUADRONS	55,457	55,457
123	0101122F	AIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM)	450	450
124	0101126F	B–1B SQUADRONS	5,353	5,353
125	0101127F	B–2 SQUADRONS	131,580	131,580
126	0101213F	MINUTEMAN SQUADRONS	139,109	139,109
127	0101313F	STRAT WAR PLANNING SYSTEM—USSTRATCOM	35,603	35,603
128	0101314F	NIGHT FIST—USSTRATCOM	32	32
130	0102326F	REGION/SECTOR OPERATION CONTROL CENTER MODERNIZATION PROGRAM	1,522	1,522
131	0105921F	SERVICE SUPPORT TO STRATCOM—SPACE ACTIVITIES	3,134	3,134
133	0205219F	MQ–9 UAV	170,396	170,396
136	0207133F	F–16 SQUADRONS	133,105	133,105
137	0207134F	F–15E SQUADRONS	261,969	261,969
138	0207136F	MANNED DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION	14,831	14,831
139	0207138F	F–22A SQUADRONS	156,962	156,962
140	0207142F	F–35 SQUADRONS	43,666	43,666
141	0207161F	TACTICAL AIM MISSILES	29,739	29,739
142	0207163F	ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM)	82,195	82,195
144	0207171F	F–15 EPAWSS	68,944	49,444
		Delays in pre-EMD phase		[–19,500]
145	0207224F	COMBAT RESCUE AND RECOVERY	5,095	5,095
146	0207227F	COMBAT RESCUE—PARARESCUE	883	883
147	0207247F	AF TENCAP	5,812	5,812
148	0207249F	PRECISION ATTACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT	1,081	1,081
149	0207253F	COMPASS CALL	14,411	14,411
150	0207268F	AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM	109,664	109,664
151	0207325F	JOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE (JASSM)	15,897	15,897
152	0207410F	AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC)	41,066	41,066
153	0207412F	CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER (CRC)	552	552
154	0207417F	AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM (AWACS)	180,804	180,804
155	0207418F	TACTICAL AIRBORNE CONTROL SYSTEMS	3,754	3,754
157	0207431F	COMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ACTIVITIES	7,891	7,891
158	0207444F	TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY-MOD	5,891	5,891
159	0207448F	C2ISR TACTICAL DATA LINK	1,782	1,782
161	0207452F	DCAPES	821	821
163	0207590F	SEEK EAGLE	23,844	23,844
164	0207601F	USAF MODELING AND SIMULATION	16,723	16,723
165	0207605F	WARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS	5,956	5,956
166	0207697F	DISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES	4,457	4,457
167	0208006F	MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS	60,679	60,679
169	0208059F	CYBER COMMAND ACTIVITIES	67,057	67,057
170	0208087F	AF OFFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS	13,355	13,355
171	0208088F	AF DEFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS	5,576	5,576
179	0301400F	SPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE	12,218	12,218
180	0302015F	E–4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER (NAOC)	28,778	28,778
181	0303131F	MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN)	81,035	81,035
182	0303140F	INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM	70,497	70,497
183	0303141F	GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM	692	692
185	0303601F	MILSATCOM TERMINALS	55,208	55,208
187	0304260F	AIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE	106,786	76,086
		ASIP 2C		[–30,700]
190	0305099F	GLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (GATM)	4,157	4,157
193	0305110F	SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE)	20,806	20,806
194	0305111F	WEATHER SERVICE	25,102	25,102
195	0305114F	AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, AND LANDING SYSTEM (ATCALS)	23,516	23,516
196	0305116F	AERIAL TARGETS	8,639	8,639
199	0305128F	SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES	498	498
200	0305145F	ARMS CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION	13,222	13,222
201	0305146F	DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES	360	360
206	0305173F	SPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER	3,674	3,674
207	0305174F	SPACE INNOVATION, INTEGRATION AND RAPID TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	2,480	2,480
208	0305179F	INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS)	8,592	8,592
209	0305182F	SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE)	13,462	13,462
210	0305202F	DRAGON U–2	5,511	11,311
		Keep U–2 rather than enhance Global Hawk Block 30		[5,800]
212	0305206F	AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS	28,113	28,113
213	0305207F	MANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS	13,516	13,516
214	0305208F	DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS	27,265	27,265
215	0305219F	MQ–1 PREDATOR A UAV	1,378	1,378
216	0305220F	RQ–4 UAV	244,514	108,514
		Keep U–2 rather than enhance Global Hawk Block 30		[–136,000]
217	0305221F	NETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGETING	11,096	2,296
		NCCT		[–8,800]
218	0305236F	COMMON DATA LINK (CDL)	36,137	36,137
219	0305238F	NATO AGS	232,851	232,851
220	0305240F	SUPPORT TO DCGS ENTERPRISE	20,218	20,218
221	0305265F	GPS III SPACE SEGMENT	212,571	212,571
222	0305614F	JSPOC MISSION SYSTEM	73,779	73,779
223	0305881F	RAPID CYBER ACQUISITION	4,102	4,102
225	0305913F	NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE)	20,468	20,468
226	0305940F	SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS	11,596	11,596
227	0306250F	CYBER OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	4,938	4,938
228	0308699F	SHARED EARLY WARNING (SEW)	1,212	1,212
230	0401119F	C–5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS (IF)	38,773	38,773
231	0401130F	C–17 AIRCRAFT (IF)	83,773	83,773
232	0401132F	C–130J PROGRAM	26,715	26,715
233	0401134F	LARGE AIRCRAFT IR COUNTERMEASURES (LAIRCM)	5,172	5,172
234	0401219F	KC–10S	2,714	2,714
235	0401314F	OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT	27,784	27,784
236	0401318F	CV–22	38,719	38,719
237	0401319F	PRESIDENTIAL AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT (PAR)	11,006	11,006
238	0408011F	SPECIAL TACTICS / COMBAT CONTROL	8,405	8,405
239	0702207F	DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF)	1,407	1,407
241	0708610F	LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (LOGIT)	109,685	97,185
		Reduce unjustified program growth		[–12,500]
242	0708611F	SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	16,209	16,209
243	0804743F	OTHER FLIGHT TRAINING	987	987
244	0808716F	OTHER PERSONNEL ACTIVITIES	126	126
245	0901202F	JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY	2,603	2,603
246	0901218F	CIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM	1,589	1,589
247	0901220F	PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION	5,026	5,026
248	0901226F	AIR FORCE STUDIES AND ANALYSIS AGENCY	1,394	1,394
249	0901279F	FACILITIES OPERATION—ADMINISTRATIVE	3,798	3,798
250	0901538F	FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	107,314	107,314
250A	9999999999	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	11,441,120	11,392,474
		Classified program reduction		[–16,700]
		Classified adjustment		[–31,946]
		SUBTOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	15,717,666	15,437,320

		TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF	23,739,892	23,512,458

		RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW
		BASIC RESEARCH
1	0601000BR	DTRA BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVE	37,778	37,778
2	0601101E	DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES	312,146	332,146
		Basic research program increase		[20,000]
3	0601110D8Z	BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES	44,564	34,564
		Faculty fellows program reduction		[–10,000]
4	0601117E	BASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SCIENCE	49,848	49,848
5	0601120D8Z	NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM	45,488	55,488
		Military Child STEM Education programs		[10,000]
6	0601228D8Z	HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES/MINORITY INSTITUTIONS	24,412	34,412
		Program increase		[10,000]
7	0601384BP	CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM	48,261	48,261
		SUBTOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH	562,497	592,497

		APPLIED RESEARCH
8	0602000D8Z	JOINT MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY	20,065	20,065
9	0602115E	BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY	112,242	112,242
11	0602234D8Z	LINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM	51,875	51,875
12	0602251D8Z	APPLIED RESEARCH FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF S&T PRIORITIES	41,965	31,965
		Program reduction		[–10,000]
13	0602303E	INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY	334,407	334,407
15	0602383E	BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE	44,825	44,825
16	0602384BP	CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM	226,317	226,317
18	0602668D8Z	CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH	15,000	7,500
		Program reduction		[–7,500]
20	0602702E	TACTICAL TECHNOLOGY	305,484	305,484
21	0602715E	MATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY	160,389	160,389
22	0602716E	ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY	179,203	179,203
23	0602718BR	WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT TECHNOLOGIES	151,737	151,737
24	0602751D8Z	SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE (SEI) APPLIED RESEARCH	9,156	9,156
25	1160401BB	SOF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	39,750	39,750
		SUBTOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH	1,692,415	1,674,915

		ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
26	0603000D8Z	JOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	26,688	26,688
27	0603121D8Z	SO/LIC ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT	8,682	8,682
28	0603122D8Z	COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT	69,675	69,675
29	0603133D8Z	FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING	30,000	20,000
		Program reduction		[–10,000]
30	0603160BR	COUNTERPROLIFERATION INITIATIVES—PROLIFERATION PREVENTION AND DEFEAT	283,694	283,694
32	0603176C	ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT	8,470	8,470
33	0603177C	DISCRIMINATION SENSOR TECHNOLOGY	45,110	45,110
34	0603178C	WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY	14,068	14,068
35	0603179C	ADVANCED C4ISR	15,329	15,329
36	0603180C	ADVANCED RESEARCH	16,584	16,584
37	0603225D8Z	JOINT DOD-DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	19,335	19,335
38	0603264S	AGILE TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (AT21)—THEATER CAPABILITY	2,544	2,544
39	0603274C	SPECIAL PROGRAM—MDA TECHNOLOGY	51,033	51,033
40	0603286E	ADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS	129,723	129,723
41	0603287E	SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY	179,883	179,883
42	0603288D8Z	ANALYTIC ASSESSMENTS	12,000	4,500
		Program reduction		[–7,500]
43	0603289D8Z	ADVANCED INNOVATIVE ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS	60,000	45,000
		Program reduction		[–15,000]
44	0603294C	COMMON KILL VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY	25,639	25,639
45	0603384BP	CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT	132,674	132,674
46	0603618D8Z	JOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	10,965	10,965
47	0603648D8Z	JOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS	131,960	111,960
		Program reduction		[–20,000]
52	0603680D8Z	DEFENSE-WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM	91,095	91,095
53	0603699D8Z	EMERGING CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	33,706	33,706
54	0603712S	GENERIC LOGISTICS R&D TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS	16,836	16,836
55	0603713S	DEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY	29,683	29,683
56	0603716D8Z	STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM	57,796	57,796
57	0603720S	MICROELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT	72,144	72,144
58	0603727D8Z	JOINT WARFIGHTING PROGRAM	7,405	7,405
59	0603739E	ADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES	92,246	92,246
60	0603760E	COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS	243,265	243,265
62	0603766E	NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY	386,926	366,926
		Program reduction		[–20,000]
63	0603767E	SENSOR TECHNOLOGY	312,821	312,821
64	0603769SE	DISTRIBUTED LEARNING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	10,692	10,692
65	0603781D8Z	SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE	15,776	15,776
66	0603826D8Z	QUICK REACTION SPECIAL PROJECTS	69,319	69,319
68	0603832D8Z	DOD MODELING AND SIMULATION MANAGEMENT OFFICE	3,000	3,000
71	0603941D8Z	TEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY	81,148	81,148
72	0604055D8Z	OPERATIONAL ENERGY CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENT	31,800	31,800
73	0303310D8Z	CWMD SYSTEMS	46,066	46,066
74	1160402BB	SOF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	57,622	57,622
		SUBTOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	2,933,402	2,860,902

		ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES
77	0603161D8Z	NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E ADC&P	41,072	41,072
79	0603600D8Z	WALKOFF	90,558	90,558
80	0603714D8Z	ADVANCED SENSORS APPLICATION PROGRAM	15,518	19,518
		Continue important test programs		[4,000]
81	0603851D8Z	ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM	51,462	51,462
82	0603881C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT	299,598	284,598
		THAAD 2.0 early to need		[–15,000]
83	0603882C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT	1,003,768	1,033,768
		GMD reliability and maintenance improvements		[30,000]
84	0603884BP	CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—DEM/VAL	179,236	179,236
85	0603884C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS	392,893	392,893
86	0603890C	BMD ENABLING PROGRAMS	410,863	410,863
87	0603891C	SPECIAL PROGRAMS—MDA	310,261	310,261
88	0603892C	AEGIS BMD	929,208	929,208
89	0603893C	SPACE TRACKING & SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM	31,346	31,346
90	0603895C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM SPACE PROGRAMS	6,389	6,389
91	0603896C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND AND CONTROL, BATTLE MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATI	443,484	443,484
92	0603898C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT WARFIGHTER SUPPORT	46,387	46,387
93	0603904C	MISSILE DEFENSE INTEGRATION & OPERATIONS CENTER (MDIOC)	58,530	58,530
94	0603906C	REGARDING TRENCH	16,199	16,199
95	0603907C	SEA BASED X-BAND RADAR (SBX)	64,409	64,409
96	0603913C	ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS	96,803	447,775
		Israeli Missile Defense Programs		[175,000]
		Transfer from Procurement, Defense-Wide Line 34		[175,972]
97	0603914C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST	386,482	386,482
98	0603915C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TARGETS	485,294	485,294
99	0603920D8Z	HUMANITARIAN DEMINING	10,194	10,194
100	0603923D8Z	COALITION WARFARE	10,139	10,139
101	0604016D8Z	DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION PROGRAM	2,907	7,907
		Program increase		[5,000]
102	0604250D8Z	ADVANCED INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES	190,000	190,000
103	0604400D8Z	DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (UAS) COMMON DEVELOPMENT	3,702	3,702
104	0604445J	WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE	53,000	53,000
106	0604775D8Z	DEFENSE RAPID INNOVATION FUND	0	75,000
		Program increase		[75,000]
107	0604787J	JOINT SYSTEMS INTEGRATION	7,002	7,002
108	0604828J	JOINT FIRES INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY TEAM	7,102	7,102
109	0604880C	LAND-BASED SM–3 (LBSM3)	123,444	123,444
110	0604881C	AEGIS SM–3 BLOCK IIA CO-DEVELOPMENT	263,695	263,695
113	0605170D8Z	SUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION	12,500	12,500
114	0303191D8Z	JOINT ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY (JET) PROGRAM	2,656	2,656
115	0305103C	CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE	961	961
		SUBTOTAL, ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES	6,047,062	6,497,034

		SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION
116	0604161D8Z	NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E SDD	7,936	7,936
117	0604165D8Z	PROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT	70,762	70,762
118	0604384BP	CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—EMD	345,883	335,883
		Program under-execution		[–10,000]
119	0604764K	ADVANCED IT SERVICES JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE (AITS-JPO)	25,459	25,459
120	0604771D8Z	JOINT TACTICAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (JTIDS)	17,562	17,562
121	0605000BR	WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT CAPABILITIES	6,887	6,887
122	0605013BL	INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	12,530	12,530
123	0605021SE	HOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY INITIATIVE	286	286
124	0605022D8Z	DEFENSE EXPORTABILITY PROGRAM	3,244	3,244
125	0605027D8Z	OUSD(C) IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES	6,500	6,500
126	0605070S	DOD ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION	15,326	15,326
127	0605075D8Z	DCMO POLICY AND INTEGRATION	19,351	19,351
128	0605080S	DEFENSE AGENCY INTIATIVES (DAI)—FINANCIAL SYSTEM	41,465	41,465
129	0605090S	DEFENSE RETIRED AND ANNUITANT PAY SYSTEM (DRAS)	10,135	10,135
130	0605210D8Z	DEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT CAPABILITIES	9,546	9,546
131	0303141K	GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM	14,241	14,241
132	0305304D8Z	DOD ENTERPRISE ENERGY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (EEIM)	3,660	3,660
		SUBTOTAL, SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION	610,773	600,773

		RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
133	0604774D8Z	DEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM (DRRS)	5,616	5,616
134	0604875D8Z	JOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT	3,092	3,092
135	0604940D8Z	CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT (CTEIP)	254,503	254,503
136	0604942D8Z	ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS	21,661	21,661
138	0605100D8Z	JOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST CAPABILITY (JMETC)	27,162	27,162
139	0605104D8Z	TECHNICAL STUDIES, SUPPORT AND ANALYSIS	24,501	24,501
142	0605126J	JOINT INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION (JIAMDO)	43,176	43,176
145	0605142D8Z	SYSTEMS ENGINEERING	44,246	44,246
146	0605151D8Z	STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—OSD	2,665	2,665
147	0605161D8Z	NUCLEAR MATTERS-PHYSICAL SECURITY	4,366	4,366
148	0605170D8Z	SUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION	27,901	27,901
149	0605200D8Z	GENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE)	2,855	2,855
150	0605384BP	CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM	105,944	105,944
156	0605502KA	SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATIVE RESEARCH	400	400
159	0605790D8Z	SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR)/ SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER	1,634	1,634
160	0605798D8Z	DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS	12,105	7,355
		Program reduction		[–4,750]
161	0605801KA	DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER (DTIC)	50,389	50,389
162	0605803SE	R&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT, TESTING AND EVALUATION	8,452	8,452
163	0605804D8Z	DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION	15,187	15,187
164	0605898E	MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D	71,362	71,362
165	0606100D8Z	BUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS	4,100	4,100
166	0203345D8Z	DEFENSE OPERATIONS SECURITY INITIATIVE (DOSI)	1,956	1,956
167	0204571J	JOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT	10,321	10,321
170	0303166J	SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO) CAPABILITIES	11,552	11,552
172	0305193D8Z	CYBER INTELLIGENCE	6,748	6,748
174	0804767D8Z	COCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND TRAINING TRANSFORMATION (CE2T2)	44,005	40,005
		Program decrease—historical under-execution		[–4,000]
175	0901598C	MANAGEMENT HQ—MDA	36,998	36,998
176	0901598D8W	MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS WHS	612	612
177A	9999999999	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	44,367	44,367
		SUBTOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT	887,876	879,126

		OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
178	0604130V	ENTERPRISE SECURITY SYSTEM (ESS)	3,988	3,988
179	0605127T	REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH (RIO) AND PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE INFORMATION MANA	1,750	1,750
180	0605147T	OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE SHARED INFORMATION SYSTEM (OHASIS)	286	286
181	0607210D8Z	INDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS AND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT	14,778	14,778
182	0607310D8Z	OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	2,953	2,953
183	0607327T	GLOBAL THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS (G-TSCMIS)	10,350	10,350
184	0607384BP	CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT)	28,496	28,496
185	0607828J	JOINT INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY	11,968	11,968
186	0208043J	PLANNING AND DECISION AID SYSTEM (PDAS)	1,842	1,842
187	0208045K	C4I INTEROPERABILITY	63,558	63,558
189	0301144K	JOINT/ALLIED COALITION INFORMATION SHARING	3,931	3,931
193	0302016K	NATIONAL MILITARY COMMAND SYSTEM-WIDE SUPPORT	924	924
194	0302019K	DEFENSE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION	9,657	9,657
195	0303126K	LONG-HAUL COMMUNICATIONS—DCS	25,355	25,355
196	0303131K	MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN)	12,671	12,671
197	0303135G	PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE (PKI)	222	222
198	0303136G	KEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE (KMI)	32,698	32,698
199	0303140D8Z	INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM	11,304	11,304
200	0303140G	INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM	125,854	155,854
		Sharkseer		[30,000]
201	0303140K	INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM	0	12,600
		Transfer from line 212 (PE 0305103K)		[3,200]
		Cyber Situational Awareness		[9,400]
202	0303150K	GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM	33,793	33,793
203	0303153K	DEFENSE SPECTRUM ORGANIZATION	13,423	13,423
204	0303170K	NET-CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES)	3,774	3,774
205	0303260D8Z	DEFENSE MILITARY DECEPTION PROGRAM OFFICE (DMDPO)	951	951
206	0303610K	TELEPORT PROGRAM	2,697	2,697
208	0304210BB	SPECIAL APPLICATIONS FOR CONTINGENCIES	19,294	19,294
212	0305103K	CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE	3,234	34
		Transfer to line 201 (PE 0303140K)		[–3,200]
213	0305125D8Z	CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION (CIP)	8,846	8,846
217	0305186D8Z	POLICY R&D PROGRAMS	7,065	7,065
218	0305199D8Z	NET CENTRICITY	23,984	23,984
221	0305208BB	DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS	5,286	5,286
224	0305208K	DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS	3,400	3,400
229	0305327V	INSIDER THREAT	8,670	8,670
230	0305387D8Z	HOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM	2,110	2,110
239	0708011S	INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS	22,366	22,366
240	0708012S	LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES	1,574	1,574
241	0902298J	MANAGEMENT HQ—OJCS	4,409	4,409
242	1105219BB	MQ–9 UAV	9,702	14,902
		Capability Improvements		[5,200]
243	1105232BB	RQ–11 UAV	259	259
245	1160403BB	AVIATION SYSTEMS	164,233	164,233
247	1160405BB	INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	9,490	9,490
248	1160408BB	OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS	75,253	75,253
252	1160431BB	WARRIOR SYSTEMS	24,661	24,661
253	1160432BB	SPECIAL PROGRAMS	20,908	20,908
259	1160480BB	SOF TACTICAL VEHICLES	3,672	3,672
262	1160483BB	MARITIME SYSTEMS	57,905	57,905
264	1160489BB	GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES	3,788	3,788
265	1160490BB	OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE	16,225	16,225
265A	9999999999	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	3,118,502	3,118,502
		SUBTOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	3,957,490	4,002,090

		TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW	16,766,084	17,181,906

		OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE
		MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
1	0605118OTE	OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION	74,583	74,583
2	0605131OTE	LIVE FIRE TEST AND EVALUATION	45,142	45,142
3	0605814OTE	OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES	48,013	48,013
		TOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT	167,738	167,738

		TOTAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE	167,738	167,738

		TOTAL, TITLE II	63,533,947	63,484,398

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(In Thousands of Dollars)
Line	Item	FY 2015 Request	Senate Authorized
	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY
	OPERATING FORCES
010	MANEUVER UNITS	969,281	969,281
020	MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES	61,990	61,990
030	ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE	450,987	450,987
040	THEATER LEVEL ASSETS	545,773	545,773
050	LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT	1,057,453	1,057,453
060	AVIATION ASSETS	1,409,347	1,409,347
070	FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT	3,592,334	3,592,334
080	LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS	411,388	411,388
090	LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE	1,001,232	1,186,832
	Readiness funding increase		[185,600]
100	BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT	7,428,972	7,428,972
110	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	2,066,434	2,179,434
	Facilities Sustainment		[18,750]
	Readiness funding increase—fully funds 6% CIP		[94,250]
120	MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS	411,863	411,863
130	COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS	179,399	179,399
170	COMBATANT COMMANDS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT	432,281	432,281
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	20,018,734	20,317,334

	MOBILIZATION
180	STRATEGIC MOBILITY	316,776	316,776
190	ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS	187,609	187,609
200	INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS	6,463	6,463
	SUBTOTAL, MOBILIZATION	510,848	510,848

	TRAINING AND RECRUITING
210	OFFICER ACQUISITION	124,766	124,766
220	RECRUIT TRAINING	51,968	51,968
230	ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING	43,735	43,735
240	SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS	456,563	456,563
250	SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING	886,529	886,529
260	FLIGHT TRAINING	890,070	890,070
270	PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION	193,291	193,291
280	TRAINING SUPPORT	552,359	552,359
290	RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING	466,927	466,927
300	EXAMINING	194,588	194,588
310	OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION	205,782	205,782
320	CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING	150,571	150,571
330	JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS	169,784	169,784
	SUBTOTAL, TRAINING AND RECRUITING	4,386,933	4,386,933

	ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
350	SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION	541,877	541,877
360	CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES	722,291	722,291
370	LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES	602,034	602,034
380	AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT	422,277	422,277
390	ADMINISTRATION	405,442	405,442
400	SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS	1,624,742	1,624,742
410	MANPOWER MANAGEMENT	289,771	289,771
420	OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT	390,924	390,924
430	OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT	1,118,540	1,118,540
440	ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES	241,234	241,234
450	REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT	243,509	243,509
460	FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT READINESS	200,615	200,615
470	INTERNATIONAL MILITARY HEADQUARTERS	462,591	462,591
480	MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS	27,375	27,375
525	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	1,030,411	1,030,411
	SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES	8,323,633	8,323,633

	UNDISTRIBUTED
530	UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–320,000
	Foreign currency fluctuation savings		[–48,900]
	Program decrease—overestimate of civilian personnel		[–250,000]
	Travel savings		[–21,100]
	SUBTOTAL, UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–320,000

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY	33,240,148	33,218,748

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES
	OPERATING FORCES
020	MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES	15,200	15,200
030	ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE	502,664	502,664
040	THEATER LEVEL ASSETS	107,489	107,489
050	LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT	543,989	543,989
060	AVIATION ASSETS	72,963	72,963
070	FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT	360,082	360,082
080	LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS	72,491	72,491
090	LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE	58,873	73,873
	Readiness funding increase		[15,000]
100	BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT	388,961	388,961
110	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	228,597	233,597
	Facilities Sustainment		[5,000]
120	MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS	39,590	39,590
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	2,390,899	2,410,899

	ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
130	SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION	10,608	10,608
140	ADMINISTRATION	18,587	18,587
150	SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS	6,681	6,681
160	MANPOWER MANAGEMENT	9,192	9,192
170	RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING	54,602	54,602
	SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES	99,670	99,670

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES	2,490,569	2,510,569

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG
	OPERATING FORCES
010	MANEUVER UNITS	660,648	683,648
	Readiness funding increase		[23,000]
020	MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES	165,942	165,942
030	ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE	733,800	733,800
040	THEATER LEVEL ASSETS	83,084	83,084
050	LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT	22,005	22,005
060	AVIATION ASSETS	920,085	920,085
070	FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT	680,887	680,887
080	LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS	69,726	69,726
090	LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE	138,263	138,263
100	BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT	804,517	804,517
110	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	490,205	495,205
	Facilities Sustainment		[5,000]
120	MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS	872,140	872,140
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	5,641,302	5,669,302

	ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
130	SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION	6,690	6,690
140	REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT	1,765	1,765
150	ADMINISTRATION	63,075	63,075
160	SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS	37,372	37,372
170	MANPOWER MANAGEMENT	6,484	6,484
180	OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT	274,085	260,285
	Program decrease for advertising		[–13,800]
	SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES	389,471	375,671

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG	6,030,773	6,044,973

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY
	OPERATING FORCES
010	MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS	4,947,202	4,947,202
020	FLEET AIR TRAINING	1,647,943	1,647,943
030	AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES	37,050	37,050
040	AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT	96,139	96,139
050	AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT	363,763	363,763
060	AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE	814,770	923,670
	Readiness funding increase		[108,900]
070	AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT	36,494	36,494
080	AVIATION LOGISTICS	350,641	350,641
090	MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS	3,865,379	3,865,379
100	SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING	711,243	711,243
110	SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE	5,296,408	5,296,408
120	SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT	1,339,077	1,339,077
130	COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS	708,634	708,634
140	ELECTRONIC WARFARE	91,599	91,599
150	SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE	207,038	207,038
160	WARFARE TACTICS	432,715	432,715
170	OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY	338,116	338,116
180	COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES	892,316	892,316
190	EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE	128,486	128,486
200	DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT	2,472	2,472
210	COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS	101,200	101,200
220	COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT	188,920	188,920
230	CRUISE MISSILE	109,911	109,911
240	FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE	1,172,823	1,174,123
	Additional FCET		[1,300]
250	IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT	104,139	104,139
260	WEAPONS MAINTENANCE	490,911	490,911
270	OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT	324,861	324,861
290	ENTERPRISE INFORMATION	936,743	936,743
300	SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION	1,483,495	1,587,495
	Facilities Sustainment		[18,750]
	Readiness funding increase—fully funds 6% CIP		[85,250]
310	BASE OPERATING SUPPORT	4,398,667	4,398,667
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	31,619,155	31,833,355

	MOBILIZATION
320	SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE	526,926	526,926
330	READY RESERVE FORCE	195	195
340	AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS	6,704	6,704
350	SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS	251,538	205,538
	Transfer to SCN, line4, for CVN 73 RCOH		[–46,000]
360	EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS	124,323	124,323
370	INDUSTRIAL READINESS	2,323	2,323
380	COAST GUARD SUPPORT	20,333	20,333
	SUBTOTAL, MOBILIZATION	932,342	886,342

	TRAINING AND RECRUITING
390	OFFICER ACQUISITION	156,214	156,214
400	RECRUIT TRAINING	8,863	8,863
410	RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS	148,150	148,150
420	SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING	601,501	601,501
430	FLIGHT TRAINING	8,239	8,239
440	PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION	164,214	164,214
450	TRAINING SUPPORT	182,619	182,619
460	RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING	230,589	230,589
470	OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION	115,595	115,595
480	CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING	79,606	79,606
490	JUNIOR ROTC	41,664	41,664
	SUBTOTAL, TRAINING AND RECRUITING	1,737,254	1,737,254

	ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
500	ADMINISTRATION	858,871	858,871
510	EXTERNAL RELATIONS	12,807	12,807
520	CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT	119,863	119,863
530	MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT	356,113	356,113
540	OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT	255,605	255,605
550	SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS	339,802	339,802
570	SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION	172,203	172,203
590	PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN	283,621	283,621
600	ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT	1,111,464	1,111,464
610	HULL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SUPPORT	43,232	43,232
620	COMBAT/WEAPONS SYSTEMS	25,689	25,689
630	SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS	73,159	73,159
640	NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE	548,640	548,640
700	INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS AND AGENCIES	4,713	4,713
705	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	531,324	531,324
	SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES	4,737,106	4,737,106

	UNDISTRIBUTED
710	UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–88,700
	Foreign currency fluctuation savings		[–74,200]
	Travel savings		[–14,500]
	SUBTOTAL, UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–88,700

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY	39,025,857	39,105,357

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS
	OPERATING FORCES
010	OPERATIONAL FORCES	905,744	939,544
	Readiness funding increase—SPMAGTFs in CENTCOM and SOUTHCOM		[33,800]
020	FIELD LOGISTICS	921,543	921,543
030	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	229,058	229,058
040	MARITIME PREPOSITIONING	87,660	87,660
050	SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	573,926	592,676
	Facilities Sustainment		[18,750]
060	BASE OPERATING SUPPORT	1,983,118	1,983,118
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	4,701,049	4,753,599

	TRAINING AND RECRUITING
070	RECRUIT TRAINING	18,227	18,227
080	OFFICER ACQUISITION	948	948
090	SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING	98,448	98,448
100	PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION	42,305	42,305
110	TRAINING SUPPORT	330,156	330,156
120	RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING	161,752	161,752
130	OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION	19,137	34,837
	At USMC request transfer from RDTEN 53		[15,700]
140	JUNIOR ROTC	23,277	23,277
	SUBTOTAL, TRAINING AND RECRUITING	694,250	709,950

	ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
150	SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION	36,359	36,359
160	ADMINISTRATION	362,608	353,415
	Program decrease—museum expansion		[–9,193]
180	ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT	70,515	70,515
185	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	44,706	44,706
	SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES	514,188	504,995

	UNDISTRIBUTED
190	UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–33,200
	Foreign currency fluctuation savings		[–28,400]
	Travel savings		[–4,800]
	SUBTOTAL, UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–33,200

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS	5,909,487	5,935,344

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES
	OPERATING FORCES
010	MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS	565,842	565,842
020	INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE	5,948	5,948
040	AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE	82,636	82,636
050	AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT	353	353
060	AVIATION LOGISTICS	7,007	7,007
070	MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS	8,190	8,190
080	SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING	556	556
090	SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE	4,571	4,571
100	COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS	14,472	14,472
110	COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES	119,056	119,056
120	WEAPONS MAINTENANCE	1,852	1,852
130	ENTERPRISE INFORMATION	25,354	25,354
140	SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION	48,271	53,271
	Facilities Sustainment		[5,000]
150	BASE OPERATING SUPPORT	101,921	101,921
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	986,029	991,029

	ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
160	ADMINISTRATION	1,520	1,520
170	MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT	12,998	12,998
180	SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS	3,395	3,395
190	ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT	3,158	3,158
	SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES	21,071	21,071

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES	1,007,100	1,012,100

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE
	OPERATING FORCES
010	OPERATING FORCES	93,093	93,093
020	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	18,377	18,377
030	SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION	29,232	34,232
	Facilities Sustainment		[5,000]
040	BASE OPERATING SUPPORT	106,447	106,447
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	247,149	252,149

	ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
050	SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION	914	914
060	ADMINISTRATION	11,831	11,831
070	RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING	8,688	8,688
	SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES	21,433	21,433

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE
	OPERATING FORCES
010	PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES	3,163,457	3,163,457
020	COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES	1,694,339	1,694,339
030	AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS)	1,579,178	1,579,178
040	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	6,119,522	6,119,522
050	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	1,453,589	1,472,339
	Facilities Sustainment		[18,750]
060	BASE SUPPORT	2,599,419	2,599,419
070	GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING	908,790	908,790
080	OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS	856,306	856,306
090	TACTICAL INTEL AND OTHER SPECIAL ACTIVITIES	800,689	792,689
	RC–135		[–8,000]
100	LAUNCH FACILITIES	282,710	282,710
110	SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS	397,818	397,818
120	COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT	871,840	860,840
	Program decrease—classified program		[–11,000]
130	COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS	237,348	217,348
	Program decrease—JECC		[–20,000]
130A	AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM	0	34,600
	Retain current AWACS fleet		[34,600]
130B	A–10 FLYING HOURS	0	188,400
	Retain current A–10 fleet		[188,400]
130C	A–10 WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUSTAINMENT	0	68,100
	Retain current A–10 fleet		[68,100]
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	20,965,005	21,235,855

	MOBILIZATION
140	AIRLIFT OPERATIONS	1,968,810	1,968,810
150	MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS	139,743	139,743
160	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	1,534,560	1,534,560
170	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	173,627	173,627
180	BASE SUPPORT	688,801	688,801
	SUBTOTAL, MOBILIZATION	4,505,541	4,505,541

	TRAINING AND RECRUITING
190	OFFICER ACQUISITION	82,396	82,396
200	RECRUIT TRAINING	19,852	19,852
210	RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC)	76,134	76,134
220	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	212,226	212,226
230	BASE SUPPORT	759,809	759,809
240	SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING	356,157	356,157
250	FLIGHT TRAINING	697,594	697,594
260	PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION	219,441	219,441
270	TRAINING SUPPORT	91,001	91,001
280	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	316,688	316,688
290	RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING	73,920	73,920
300	EXAMINING	3,121	3,121
310	OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION	181,718	181,718
320	CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING	147,667	147,667
330	JUNIOR ROTC	63,250	63,250
	SUBTOTAL, TRAINING AND RECRUITING	3,300,974	3,300,974

	ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
340	LOGISTICS OPERATIONS	1,003,513	1,013,813
	Readiness funding increase—PACOM unfunded priority list		[10,300]
350	TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES	843,449	843,449
360	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	78,126	78,126
370	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	247,677	247,677
380	BASE SUPPORT	1,103,442	1,103,442
390	ADMINISTRATION	597,234	597,234
400	SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS	506,840	506,840
410	OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES	892,256	892,256
420	CIVIL AIR PATROL	24,981	24,981
450	INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT	92,419	92,419
465	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	1,169,736	1,164,376
	Classified adjustment		[–5,360]
	SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES	6,559,673	6,564,613

	UNDISTRIBUTED
470	UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–69,200
	Foreign currency fluctuation savings		[–51,900]
	Travel savings		[–17,300]
	SUBTOTAL, UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–69,200

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE	35,331,193	35,537,783

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE
	OPERATING FORCES
010	PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES	1,719,467	1,719,467
020	MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS	211,132	211,132
030	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	530,301	530,301
040	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	85,672	90,672
	Facilities Sustainment		[5,000]
050	BASE SUPPORT	367,966	367,966
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	2,914,538	2,919,538

	ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
060	ADMINISTRATION	59,899	59,899
070	RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING	14,509	14,509
080	MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERS MGMT (ARPC)	20,345	20,345
090	OTHER PERS SUPPORT (DISABILITY COMP)	6,551	6,551
	SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES	101,304	101,304

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE	3,015,842	3,020,842

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG
	OPERATING FORCES
010	AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS	3,367,729	3,367,729
020	MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS	718,295	718,295
030	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	1,528,695	1,528,695
040	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	137,604	142,604
	Facilities Sustainment		[5,000]
050	BASE SUPPORT	581,536	581,536
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	6,333,859	6,338,859

	ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
060	ADMINISTRATION	27,812	27,812
070	RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING	31,188	31,188
	SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES	59,000	59,000

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG	6,392,859	6,397,859

	OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE
	OPERATING FORCES
010	JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF	462,107	462,107
020	SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/OPERATING FORCES	4,762,245	4,791,845
	USSOCOM NCR		[–5,000]
	USSOCOM RSCC		[–1,800]
	UFR Flying Hours		[36,400]
	UFR Unit Readiness Training		[20,000]
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	5,224,352	5,253,952

	TRAINING AND RECRUITING
030	DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY	135,437	135,437
040	NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY	80,082	80,082
050	SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/TRAINING AND RECRUITING	371,620	371,620
	SUBTOTAL, TRAINING AND RECRUITING	587,139	587,139

	ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
060	CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS	119,888	144,888
	Starbase		[25,000]
080	DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY	556,493	556,493
090	DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY	1,340,374	1,340,374
100	DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY	633,300	633,300
110	DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY	1,263,678	1,263,678
130	DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY	26,710	26,710
140	DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY	381,470	394,170
	PTAP funding increase		[12,700]
150	DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY	194,520	194,520
160	DEFENSE POW/MIA OFFICE	21,485	21,485
170	DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY	544,786	537,786
	Program decrease—Combatting terrorism fellowship		[–7,000]
180	DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE	527,812	527,812
200	DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY ADMINISTRATION	32,787	32,787
230	DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY	2,566,424	2,596,424
	Supplemental Impact Aid		[25,000]
	Disability Impact Aid		[5,000]
240	MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY	416,644	416,644
260	OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT	186,987	106,387
	Program decrease—ahead of need		[–80,600]
270	OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE	1,891,163	1,882,363
	Program decrease—BRAC 2015		[–4,800]
	Program decrease for DOD rewards program		[–4,000]
280	SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/ADMIN & SVC-WIDE ACTIVITIES	87,915	87,915
290	WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES	610,982	610,982
295	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	13,983,323	14,024,923
	Additional AFRICOM ISR Support		[60,000]
	DCS		[–18,400]
	SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES	25,386,741	25,399,641

	UNDISTRIBUTED
305	UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–29,800
	Foreign currency fluctuation savings		[–17,500]
	Travel savings		[–17,300]
	Blue water review		[5,000]
	SUBTOTAL, UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–29,800

	TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE	31,198,232	31,210,932

	MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS
010	US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEFENSE	13,723	13,723
010	OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND CIVIC AID	100,000	100,000
010	COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION ACCOUNT	365,108	365,108
010	ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD	212,875	212,875
030	ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY	201,560	201,560
040	ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY	277,294	277,294
050	ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE	408,716	408,716
060	ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE	8,547	8,547
070	ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES	208,353	208,353
080	OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS TRANSFER FUND	5,000	5,000
090	SUPPORT OF INTERNATIONAL SPORTING COMPETITIONS, DEFENSE	10,000	5,700
	Program decrease—SISC		[–4,300]
	TOTAL, MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS	1,811,176	1,806,876

	TOTAL, TITLE III	165,721,818	166,074,965

SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL(In Thousands of Dollars)
MILITARY PERSONNEL
MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS
MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS	128,957,593	128,910,683
Military Personnel Historical Underexecution		[–761,610]
Restore lost savings relating to retiree COLA		[500,000]
Restore assumed savings for TRICARE consolidation		[78,000]
Readiness funding increase—CTC rotations for Army National Guard		[45,000]
Reduction in meals-ready-to-eat		[–20,000]
Retain current A–10 fleet		[82,800]
Retain current AWACS fleet		[24,900]
Increase state ESGR personnel		[4,000]
SUBTOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS	128,957,593	128,910,683

MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH FUND CONTRIBUTIONS
MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH FUND CONTRIBUTIONS	6,236,092	6,236,092
SUBTOTAL, MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH FUND CONTRIBUTIONS	6,236,092	6,236,092

TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL	135,193,685	135,146,775

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS (In Thousands of Dollars)
	WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY
010	PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS	13,727	13,727
	TOTAL, WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY	13,727	13,727

	WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE
010	SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS (MEDICAL/DENTAL)	61,717	61,717
	TOTAL, WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE	61,717	61,717

	WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE
010	DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA)	44,293	39,293
	Program decrease—MREs		[–5,000]
	TOTAL, WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE	44,293	39,293

	WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA
010	WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA	1,114,731	1,314,731
	Restore Commissary Cut		[200,000]
	TOTAL, WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA	1,114,731	1,314,731

	TOTAL, ALL WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS	1,234,468	1,429,468

	NATIONAL SEA-BASED DETERRENCE FUND
010	NATIONAL SEA-BASED DETERRENCE FUND	0	100,000
	National Sea-based Deterrence Fund		[100,000]
	TOTAL, NATIONAL SEA-BASED DETERRENCE FUND	0	100,000

	CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION
010	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE	222,728	222,728
020	RDT&E	595,913	595,913
030	PROCUREMENT	10,227	10,227
	TOTAL, CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION	828,868	828,868

	OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
010	OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE	310,830	310,830
020	PROCUREMENT	1,000	1,000
	TOTAL, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL	311,830	311,830

	DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF
010	DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE	719,096	739,096
	Additional SOUTHCOM ISR Support		[20,000]
020	DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM	101,591	101,591
	TOTAL, DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF	820,687	840,687

	DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM
	DHP OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
010	IN-HOUSE CARE	8,799,086	8,799,086
020	PRIVATE SECTOR CARE	15,412,599	15,412,599
030	CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT	2,462,096	2,462,096
040	INFORMATION MANAGEMENT	1,557,347	1,557,347
050	MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES	366,223	366,223
060	EDUCATION AND TRAINING	750,866	750,866
070	BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS	1,683,694	1,683,694
070A	UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–78,000
	Reduction for anticipated cost of TRICARE consolidation		[–88,000]
	Mental Health Assessments		[10,000]
	SUBTOTAL, DHP OPERATION & MAINTENANCE	31,031,911	30,953,911

	DHP RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
090	R&D RESEARCH	10,317	10,317
100	R&D EXPLORATRY DEVELOPMENT	49,015	49,015
110	R&D ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT	226,410	226,410
120	R&D DEMONSTRATION/VALIDATION	97,787	97,787
130	R&D ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT	217,898	217,898
140	R&D MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT	38,075	38,075
150	R&D CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT	15,092	15,092
	SUBTOTAL, DHP RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT	654,594	654,594

	DHP PROCUREMENT
160	PROC INITIAL OUTFITTING	13,057	13,057
170	PROC REPLACEMENT & MODERNIZATION	283,030	283,030
180	PROC THEATER MEDICAL INFORMATION PROGRAM	3,145	3,145
190	PROC IEHR	9,181	9,181
	SUBTOTAL, DHP PROCUREMENT	308,413	308,413

	DHP UNDISTRIBUTED
190A	TRANSFERS TO THE VETERANS ADMINISTRATION	–161,857	–161,857
	SUBTOTAL, DHP UNDISTRIBUTED	–161,857	–161,857

	TOTAL, DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM	31,833,061	31,755,061

	TOTAL, TITLE XIV	35,028,914	35,265,914

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION(In Thousands of Dollars)
Account	State or Country and Installation	Project Title	Budget Request	Senate Authorized
Military Construction, Army
	California
MC, Army	Concord	Access Control Point	9,900	9,900
MC, Army	Concord	General Purpose Maintenance Shop	5,300	5,300
MC, Army	Fort Irwin	Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hangar	45,000	45,000
	Colorado
MC, Army	Fort Carson, Colorado	Aircraft Maintenance Hangar	60,000	60,000
MC, Army	Fort Carson, Colorado	Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hangar	29,000	29,000
	Guantanamo Bay, Cuba
MC, Army	Guantanamo Bay	Dining Facility	12,000	12,000
MC, Army	Guantanamo Bay	Health Clinic	11,800	11,800
	Hawaii
MC, Army	Fort Shafter	Command and Control Facility (Scif)	96,000	86,400
	Japan
MC, Army	Kadena Ab	Missile Magazine	10,600	10,600
	Kentucky
MC, Army	Blue Grass Army Depot	Consolidated Shipping Center	0	15,000
MC, Army	Fort Campbell, Kentucky	Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hangar	23,000	23,000
	New York
MC, Army	Fort Drum, New York	Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hangar	27,000	27,000
MC, Army	U.S. Military Academy	Cadet Barracks, Incr 3	58,000	58,000
	Pennsylvania
MC, Army	Letterkenny Army Depot	Rebuild Shop	16,000	16,000
	South Carolina
MC, Army	Fort Jackson	Trainee Barracks Complex 3, Ph1	52,000	52,000
	Virginia
MC, Army	Joint Base Langley-Eustis	Tactical Vehicle Hardstand	7,700	7,700
	Worldwide Unspecified
MC, Army	Unspecified Worldwide	Host Nation Support Fy15	33,000	33,000
MC, Army	Unspecified Worldwide	Minor Construction Fy15	25,000	25,000
MC, Army	Unspecified Worldwide	Planning and Design Fy15	18,127	18,127

Subtotal, Military Construction, Army	539,427	544,827
	<bold></bold>
Military Construction, Navy
	Arizona
MC, Navy	Yuma	Aviation Maintenance and Support Complex	16,608	16,608
	Bahrain Island
MC, Navy	Sw Asia	P–8a Hangar	27,826	27,826
	California
MC, Navy	Bridgeport	E-Lmr Communications Towers	16,180	16,180
MC, Navy	San Diego	Steam Distribution System Decentralization	47,110	47,110
	District of Columbia
MC, Navy	District of Columbia	Electronics Science and Technology Laboratory	31,735	31,735
	Djibouti
MC, Navy	Camp Lemonier, Djibouti	Entry Control Point	9,923	9,923
	Florida
MC, Navy	Jacksonville	Mh60 Parking Apron	8,583	8,583
MC, Navy	Jacksonville	P–8a Runway Thresholds and Taxiways	21,652	21,652
MC, Navy	Mayport	Lcs Operational Training Facility	20,520	20,520
	Guam
MC, Navy	Joint Region Marianas	Gse Shops at North Ramp	21,880	21,880
MC, Navy	Joint Region Marianas	Mwss Facilities at North Ramp	28,771	28,771
	Hawaii
MC, Navy	Kaneohe Bay	Facility Modifications for Vmu, Mwsd, & Ch53e	51,182	51,182
MC, Navy	Kaneohe Bay	Road and Infrastructure Improvements	2,200	2,200
MC, Navy	Pearl Harbor	Submarine Maneuvering Room Trainer Facility	9,698	9,698
	Japan
MC, Navy	Iwakuni	Security Mods Dpri Mc167–T (Cvw–5 E2d Ea–18g)	6,415	6,415
MC, Navy	Kadena Ab	Aircraft Maint Hangar Alterations and Sap-F	19,411	19,411
MC, Navy	MCAS Futenma	Hangar & Rinse Facility Modernizations	4,639	4,639
MC, Navy	Okinawa	Lhd Practice Site Improvements	35,685	35,685
	Maryland
MC, Navy	Annapolis	Center for Cyber Security Studies Building	120,112	30,000
MC, Navy	Indian Head	Advanced Energetics Research Lab Complex Ph 2	15,346	15,346
MC, Navy	Patuxent River	Atlantic Test Range Facility	9,860	9,860
	Nevada
MC, Navy	Fallon	Air Wing Training Facility	27,763	27,763
MC, Navy	Fallon	Facility Alteration for F–35 Training Mission	3,499	3,499
	North Carolina
MC, Navy	Camp Lejeune	2nd Radio Bn Complex, Phase I	0	50,706
MC, Navy	Cherry Point MCAS	Water Treatment Plant Replacement	41,588	41,588
	Pennsylvania
MC, Navy	Philadelphia	Ohio Replacement Power & Propulsion Facility	23,985	23,985
	South Carolina
MC, Navy	Charleston	Nuclear Power Operational Support Facility	35,716	35,716
	Spain
MC, Navy	Rota	Ship Berthing Power Upgrades	20,233	20,233
	Virginia
MC, Navy	Dahlgren	Missile Support Facility	27,313	27,313
MC, Navy	Norfolk	EOD Consolidated Ops & Logistics Facilities	39,274	39,274
MC, Navy	Portsmouth	Submarine Maintenance Facility	9,743	9,743
MC, Navy	Quantico	Ammunition Supply Point Expansion	12,613	12,613
MC, Navy	Yorktown	Bachelor Enlisted Quarters	19,152	19,152
MC, Navy	Yorktown	Fast Company Training Facility	7,836	7,836
	Washington
MC, Navy	Bremerton	Integrated Water Treatment Syst. Dd 1, 2, & 5	16,401	16,401
MC, Navy	Kitsap	Explosives Handling Wharf #2 (Inc)	83,778	83,778
MC, Navy	Kitsap	Regional Ship Maintenance Support Facility	0	13,833
MC, Navy	Port Angeles	Tps Port Angeles Forward Operating Location	20,638	20,638
MC, Navy	Whidbey Island	P–8a Aircraft Apron and Supporting Facilities	24,390	24,390
	Worldwide Unspecified
MC, Navy	Unspecified Worldwide	F–35c Facility Addition and Modification	16,594	16,594
MC, Navy	Unspecified Worldwide	F–35c Operational Training Facility	22,391	22,391
MC, Navy	Unspecified Worldwide	Mcon Design Funds	33,366	33,366
MC, Navy	Unspecified Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Construction	7,163	7,163

Subtotal, Military Construction, Navy	1,018,772	993,199
	<bold></bold>	<bold></bold>
Military Construction, AF
	Alaska
MC, AF	Clear AFS	Emergency Power Plant Fuel Storage	11,500	11,500
	Arizona
MC, AF	Luke AFB	F–35 Aircraft Mx Hangar—Sqdn #2	11,200	11,200
MC, AF	Luke AFB	F–35 Flightline Fillstands	15,600	15,600
	Guam
MC, AF	Joint Region Marianas	Guam Strike Fuel Systems Maint.hangar Inc 2	64,000	64,000
MC, AF	Joint Region Marianas	Par Low Observable / Corrosion Control / Composite Repair Shop	0	34,400
MC, AF	Joint Region Marianas	Prtc—Combat Comm Infrastr Facility	3,750	3,750
MC, AF	Joint Region Marianas	Prtc—Red Horse Logistics Facility	3,150	3,150
MC, AF	Joint Region Marianas	Prtc—Satellite Fire Station	6,500	6,500
	Kansas
MC, AF	Mcconnell AFB	KC–46a Adal Mobility Bag Strg Expansion	2,300	2,300
MC, AF	Mcconnell AFB	KC–46a Adal Regional Mx Tng Facility	16,100	16,100
MC, AF	Mcconnell AFB	KC–46a Alter Composite Mx Shop	4,100	4,100
MC, AF	Mcconnell AFB	KC–46a Alter Taxiway Foxtrot	5,500	5,500
MC, AF	Mcconnell AFB	KC–46a Fuselage Trainer	6,400	6,400
	Maryland
MC, AF	Fort Meade	Cybercom Joint Operations Center, Increment 2	166,000	166,000
	Massachusetts
MC, AF	Hanscom AFB	Dormitory (72 Rm)	13,500	13,500
	Nebraska
MC, AF	Offutt AFB	Usstratcom Replacement Facility- Incr 4	180,000	180,000
	Nevada
MC, AF	Nellis AFB	F–22 Flight Simulator Facility	14,000	14,000
MC, AF	Nellis AFB	F–35 Aircraft Mx Unit—4 Bay Hangar	31,000	31,000
MC, AF	Nellis AFB	F–35 Weapons School Facility	8,900	8,900
	New Jersey
MC, AF	Joint Base Mcguire-Dix-Lakehurst	Fire Station	5,900	5,900
	Oklahoma
MC, AF	Tinker AFB	KC–46a Depot Maint Complex Spt Infrastr	48,000	48,000
MC, AF	Tinker AFB	KC–46a Two-Bay Depot Mx Hangar	63,000	63,000
	Texas
MC, AF	Joint Base San Antonio	Fire Station	5,800	5,800
	United Kingdom
MC, AF	Croughton Raf	Jiac Consolidation—Phase 1	92,223	92,223
	Worldwide Unspecified
MC, AF	Various Worldwide	Planning and Design	10,738	10,738
MC, AF	Various Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Military Construction	22,613	22,613

Subtotal, Military Construction, AF	811,774	846,174
	<bold></bold>	<bold></bold>
Military Construction, Defense-Wide
	Arizona
MC, Def-Wide	Fort Huachuca	Jitc Building 52120 Renovation	1,871	1,871
	Australia
MC, Def-Wide	Geraldton	Combined Communications Gateway Geraldton	9,600	9,600
	Belgium
MC, Def-Wide	Brussels	Brussells Elementary/High School Replacement	41,626	41,626
MC, Def-Wide	Brussels	NATO Headquarters Facility	37,918	37,918
	California
MC, Def-Wide	Camp Pendleton, California	SOF Comm/Elec Maintenance Facility	11,841	11,841
MC, Def-Wide	Coronado	SOF Logistics Support Unit 1 Ops Facility #1	41,740	41,740
MC, Def-Wide	Coronado	SOF Support Activity Ops Facility #2	28,600	28,600
MC, Def-Wide	Lemoore	Replace Fuel Storage & Distribution Fac.	52,500	52,500
	Colorado
MC, Def-Wide	Peterson AFB	Dental Clinic Replacement	15,200	15,200
	Conus Classified
MC, Def-Wide	Classified Location	SOF Skills Training Facility	53,073	53,073
	Georgia
MC, Def-Wide	Hunter Army Airfield	SOF Company Operations Facility	7,692	7,692
MC, Def-Wide	Robins AFB	Replace Hydrant Fuel System	19,900	19,900
	Germany
MC, Def-Wide	Rhine Ordnance Barracks	Medical Center Replacement Incr 4	259,695	59,695
	Guantanamo Bay, Cuba
MC, Def-Wide	Guantanamo Bay	Replace Fuel Tank	11,100	11,100
MC, Def-Wide	Guantanamo Bay	W.t. Sampson E/M and Hs Consolid./Replacement	65,190	65,190
	Hawaii
MC, Def-Wide	Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam	Replace Fuel Tanks	3,000	3,000
MC, Def-Wide	Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam	Upgrade Fire Supression & Ventilation Sys.	49,900	49,900
	Japan
MC, Def-Wide	Misawa Ab	Edgren High School Renovation	37,775	37,775
MC, Def-Wide	Okinawa	Killin Elementary Replacement/Renovation	71,481	71,481
MC, Def-Wide	Okinawa	Kubasaki High School Replacement/Renovation	99,420	99,420
MC, Def-Wide	Sasebo	E.j. King High School Replacement/Renovation	37,681	37,681
	Kentucky
MC, Def-Wide	Fort Campbell, Kentucky	SOF System Integration Maintenance Office Fac	18,000	18,000
	Maryland
MC, Def-Wide	Fort Meade	NSAW Campus Feeders Phase 1	54,207	54,207
MC, Def-Wide	Fort Meade	NSAW Recapitalize Building #1/Site M Inc 3	45,521	45,521
MC, Def-Wide	Joint Base Andrews	Construct Hydrant Fuel System	18,300	18,300
	Michigan
MC, Def-Wide	Selfridge ANGB	Replace Fuel Distribution Facilities	35,100	35,100
	Mississippi
MC, Def-Wide	Stennis	SOF Applied Instruction Facility	10,323	10,323
MC, Def-Wide	Stennis	SOF Land Acquisition Western Maneuver Area	17,224	17,224
	Nevada
MC, Def-Wide	Fallon	SOF Tactical Ground Mob. Vehicle Maint Fac.	20,241	20,241
	New Mexico
MC, Def-Wide	Cannon AFB	SOF Squadron Operations Facility (Sts)	23,333	23,333
	North Carolina
MC, Def-Wide	Camp Lejeune, NC	Lejeune High School Addition/Renovation	41,306	41,306
MC, Def-Wide	Camp Lejeune, NC	SOF Intel/Ops Expansion	11,442	11,442
MC, Def-Wide	Fort Bragg	SOF Battalion Operations Facility	37,074	37,074
MC, Def-Wide	Fort Bragg	SOF Tactical Equipment Maintenance Facility	8,000	8,000
MC, Def-Wide	Fort Bragg	SOF Training Command Building	48,062	48,062
MC, Def-Wide	Seymour Johnson AFB	Replace Hydrant Fuel System	8,500	8,500
	South Carolina
MC, Def-Wide	Beaufort	Replace Fuel Distibution Facilities	40,600	40,600
	South Dakota
MC, Def-Wide	Ellsworth AFB	Construct Hydrant System	8,000	8,000
	Texas
MC, Def-Wide	Fort Bliss	Hospital Replacement Incr 6	131,500	131,500
MC, Def-Wide	Joint Base San Antonio	Medical Clinic Replacement	38,300	38,300
	Virginia
MC, Def-Wide	Craney Island	Replace & Alter Fuel Distibution Facilities	36,500	36,500
MC, Def-Wide	Def Dist Depot Richmond	Replace Access Control Point	5,700	5,700
MC, Def-Wide	Fort Belvoir	Parking Lot	7,239	7,239
MC, Def-Wide	Joint Base Langley-Eustis	Hopsital Addition/Cup Replacement	41,200	41,200
MC, Def-Wide	Joint Exp Base Little Creek	SOF Human Performance Center	11,200	11,200
MC, Def-Wide	Joint Exp Base Little Creek	SOF Indoor Dynamic Range	14,888	14,888
MC, Def-Wide	Joint Exp Base Little Creek	SOF Mobile Comm Det Support Facility	13,500	13,500
MC, Def-Wide	Pentagon	Redundant Chilled Water Loop	15,100	15,100
	Worldwide Unspecified
MC, Def-Wide	Unspecified Worldwide	Contingency Construction	9,000	9,000
MC, Def-Wide	Unspecified Worldwide	Ecip Design	10,000	10,000
MC, Def-Wide	Unspecified Worldwide	Energy Conservation Investment Program	150,000	150,000
MC, Def-Wide	Unspecified Worldwide	Exercise Related Minor Construction	8,581	8,581
MC, Def-Wide	Unspecified Worldwide	Planning & Design	38,704	38,704
MC, Def-Wide	Unspecified Worldwide	Planning and Design	24,425	24,425
MC, Def-Wide	Unspecified Worldwide	Planning and Design	745	745
MC, Def-Wide	Unspecified Worldwide	Planning and Design	42,387	42,387
MC, Def-Wide	Unspecified Worldwide	Planning and Design	599	599
MC, Def-Wide	Unspecified Worldwide	Planning and Design	1,183	1,183
MC, Def-Wide	Unspecified Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Construction	2,700	2,700
MC, Def-Wide	Unspecified Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Construction	4,100	4,100
MC, Def-Wide	Unspecified Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Construction	5,932	5,932
MC, Def-Wide	Unspecified Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Construction	6,846	6,846
MC, Def-Wide	Unspecified Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Construction	2,000	2,000
MC, Def-Wide	Unspecified Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Construction	10,334	10,334
MC, Def-Wide	Unspecified Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Milcon	2,994	2,994
MC, Def-Wide	Various Worldwide	Planning and Design	24,197	24,197

Subtotal, Military Construction, Defense-Wide	2,061,890	1,861,890

Military Construction, Army National Guard
	Maine
MC, ARNG	Augusta	National Guard Reserve Center	30,000	30,000
	Maryland
MC, ARNG	Havre DE Grace	National Guard Readiness Center	12,400	12,400
	Montana
MC, ARNG	Helena	National Guard Readiness Center Add/Alt	38,000	38,000
	New Mexico
MC, ARNG	Alamagordo	Readiness Cener Add/Alt	0	5,000
	North Dakota
MC, ARNG	Valley City	National Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop	10,800	10,800
	Vermont
MC, ARNG	North Hyde Park	National Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop	4,400	4,400
	Worldwide Unspecified
MC, ARNG	Unspecified Worldwide	Planning and Design	17,600	17,600
MC, ARNG	Unspecified Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Construction	13,720	13,720

Subtotal, Military Construction, Army National Guard	126,920	131,920

Military Construction, Air National Guard
	Arkansas
MC, ANG	Ft Smith Municipal Airport	Consolidated Scif	0	13,200
	Connecticut
MC, ANG	Bradley IAP	Construct C–130 Fuel Cell and Corrosion Contr	16,306	16,306
	Iowa
MC, ANG	Des Moines Map	Remotely Piloted Aircraft and Targeting Group	8,993	8,993
	Michigan
MC, ANG	W. K. Kellog Regional Airport	Rpa Beddown	6,000	6,000
	New Hampshire
MC, ANG	Pease International Trade Port	KC–46a Adal Airfield Pavements & Hydrant Syst	7,100	7,100
MC, ANG	Pease International Trade Port	KC–46a Adal Fuel Cell Building 253	16,800	16,800
MC, ANG	Pease International Trade Port	KC–46a Adal Maint Hangar Building 254	18,002	18,002
	Pennsylvania
MC, ANG	Willow Grove Arf	Rpa Operations Center	5,662	5,662
	Worldwide Unspecified
MC, ANG	Various Worldwide	Planning and Design	7,700	7,700
MC, ANG	Various Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Construction	8,100	8,100

Subtotal, Military Construction, Air National Guard	94,663	107,863
	<bold></bold>	<bold></bold>
Military Construction, Army Reserve
	California
MC, Army Res	Riverside	Army Reserve Center, Phase Ii	0	25,000
MC, Army Res	Fresno	Army Reserve Center/AMSA	22,000	22,000
	Colorado
MC, Army Res	Fort Carson, Colorado	Training Building Addition	5,000	5,000
	New Jersey
MC, Army Res	Joint Base Mcguire-Dix-Lakehurst	Army Reserve Center	26,000	26,000
	New York
MC, Army Res	Mattydale	Army Reserve Center/AMSA	23,000	23,000
	Virginia
MC, Army Res	Fort Lee	Tass Training Center	16,000	16,000
	Worldwide Unspecified
MC, Army Res	Unspecified Worldwide	Planning and Design	8,337	8,337
MC, Army Res	Unspecified Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Construction	3,609	3,609

Subtotal, Military Construction, Army Reseserve	103,946	128,946
	<bold></bold>
Military Construction, Navy Reseserve
	Pennsylvania
MC, Navy Res	Pittsburgh	Reserve Training Center—Pittsburgh, PA	17,650	17,650
	Washington
MC, Navy Res	Everett	Joint Reserve Intelligence Center	0	47,869
MC, Navy Res	Whidbey Island	C–40 Aircraft Maintenance Hangar	27,755	27,755
	Worldwide Unspecified
MC, Navy Res	Unspecified Worldwide	Mcnr Planning & Design	2,123	2,123
MC, Navy Res	Unspecified Worldwide	Mcnr Unspecified Minor Construction	4,000	4,000

Subtotal, Military Construction, Navy Reserve	51,528	99,397
	<bold></bold>	<bold></bold>
Military Construction, AF Reseserve
	Arizona
MC, AF Res	Davis-Monthan AFB	Guardian Angel Operations	0	14,500
	Georgia
MC, AF Res	Robins AFB	Afrc Consolidated Mission Complex, Ph I	27,700	27,700
	North Carolina
MC, AF Res	Seymour Johnson AFB	KC–135 Tanker Parking Apron Expansion	9,800	9,800
	Texas
MC, AF Res	Fort Worth	EOD Facility	3,700	3,700
	Worldwide Unspecified
MC, AF Res	Various Worldwide	Planning and Design	6,892	6,892
MC, AF Res	Various Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Military Construction	1,400	1,400

Subtotal, Military Construction, AF Reserve	49,492	63,992
	<bold></bold>	<bold></bold>
Chemical Demilitarization Construction
	Kentucky
Chem Demil	Blue Grass Army Depot	Ammunition Demilitarization Ph Xv	38,715	38,715

Subtotal, Chemical Demilitarization Construction	38,715	38,715
	<bold></bold>	<bold></bold>
NATO Security Investment Program
	Worldwide Unspecified
NATO SIP	NATO Security Investment Program	NATO Security Investment Program	199,700	174,700

Subtotal, NATO Security Investment Program	199,700	174,700
	<bold></bold>	<bold></bold>
Total, Military Construction	5,096,827	4,991,623
	<bold></bold>	<bold></bold>
Family Housing
Family Housing Construction, Army
	Illinois
FHC, Army	Rock Island	Family Housing New Construction	19,500	19,500
	Korea
FHC, Army	Camp Walker	Family Housing New Construction	57,800	57,800
	Worldwide Unspecified
FHC, Army	Unspecified Worldwide	Family Housing P & D	1,309	1,309

Subtotal, Family Housing Construction, Army	78,609	78,609
	<bold></bold>	<bold></bold>
Family Housing O&M, Army
	Worldwide Unspecified
FHO, Army	Unspecified Worldwide	Furnishings	14,136	14,136
FHO, Army	Unspecified Worldwide	Leased Housing	112,504	112,504
FHO, Army	Unspecified Worldwide	Maintenance of Real Property Facilities	65,245	65,245
FHO, Army	Unspecified Worldwide	Management Account	3,117	3,117
FHO, Army	Unspecified Worldwide	Management Account	43,480	43,480
FHO, Army	Unspecified Worldwide	Military Housing Privitization Initiative	20,000	20,000
FHO, Army	Unspecified Worldwide	Miscellaneous	700	700
FHO, Army	Unspecified Worldwide	Services	9,108	9,108
FHO, Army	Unspecified Worldwide	Utilities	82,686	82,686

Subtotal, Family Housing O&M, Army	350,976	350,976
	<bold></bold>	<bold></bold>
Family Housing Construction, Navy and Marine Corps
	Worldwide Unspecified
FHC, N/MC	Unspecified Worldwide	Design	472	472
FHC, N/MC	Unspecified Worldwide	Improvements	15,940	15,940

Subtotal, Family Housing Construction, Navy and Marine Corps	16,412	16,412
	<bold></bold>	<bold></bold>
Family Housing O&M, Navy and Marine Corps
	Worldwide Unspecified
FHO, N/MC	Unspecified Worldwide	Furnishings Account	17,881	17,881
FHO, N/MC	Unspecified Worldwide	Leasing	65,999	65,999
FHO, N/MC	Unspecified Worldwide	Maintenance of Real Property	97,612	97,612
FHO, N/MC	Unspecified Worldwide	Management Account	55,124	55,124
FHO, N/MC	Unspecified Worldwide	Miscellaneous Account	366	366
FHO, N/MC	Unspecified Worldwide	Privatization Support Costs	27,876	27,876
FHO, N/MC	Unspecified Worldwide	Services Account	18,079	18,079
FHO, N/MC	Unspecified Worldwide	Utilities Account	71,092	71,092

Subtotal, Family Housing O&M, Navy and Marine Corps	354,029	354,029
	<bold></bold>	<bold></bold>
Family Housing O&M, AF
	Worldwide Unspecified
FHO, AF	Unspecified Worldwide	Furnishings Account	38,543	38,543
FHO, AF	Unspecified Worldwide	Housing Privatization	40,761	40,761
FHO, AF	Unspecified Worldwide	Leasing	43,651	43,651
FHO, AF	Unspecified Worldwide	Maintenance	99,934	99,934
FHO, AF	Unspecified Worldwide	Management Account	47,834	47,834
FHO, AF	Unspecified Worldwide	Miscellaneous Account	1,993	1,993
FHO, AF	Unspecified Worldwide	Services Account	12,709	12,709
FHO, AF	Unspecified Worldwide	Utilities Account	42,322	42,322

Subtotal, Family Housing O&M, AF	327,747	327,747
	<bold></bold>	<bold></bold>
Family Housing O&M, Defense-Wide
	Worldwide Unspecified
FHO, DW	Unspecified Worldwide	Furnishings Account	3,362	3,362
FHO, DW	Unspecified Worldwide	Furnishings Account	20	20
FHO, DW	Unspecified Worldwide	Furnishings Account	746	746
FHO, DW	Unspecified Worldwide	Leasing	42,083	42,083
FHO, DW	Unspecified Worldwide	Leasing	11,179	11,179
FHO, DW	Unspecified Worldwide	Maintenance of Real Property	344	344
FHO, DW	Unspecified Worldwide	Maintenance of Real Property	2,128	2,128
FHO, DW	Unspecified Worldwide	Management Account	378	378
FHO, DW	Unspecified Worldwide	Services Account	31	31
FHO, DW	Unspecified Worldwide	Utilities Account	170	170
FHO, DW	Unspecified Worldwide	Utilities Account	659	659

Subtotal, Family Housing O&M, Defense-Wide	61,100	61,100
	<bold></bold>	<bold></bold>
Family Housing Improvement Fund
	Worldwide Unspecified
FHIF	Unspecified Worldwide	Family Housing Improvement Fund	1,662	1,662

Subtotal, Family Housing Improvement Fund	1,662	1,662
	<bold></bold>	<bold></bold>
Total, Family Housing	1,190,535	1,190,535

Base Realignment and Closure
Defense Base Closure Account—Army
	Worldwide Unspecified
BRAC—Army	Base Realignment & Closure, Army	Base Realignment and Closure	84,417	84,417

Subtotal, Defense Base Closure Account—Army	84,417	84,417

Defense Base Closure Account—Navy
	Worldwide Unspecified
BRAC—Navy	Base Realignment & Closure, Navy	Base Realignment & Closure	57,406	57,406
BRAC—Navy	Unspecified Worldwide	Don–100: Planing, Design and Management	7,682	7,682
BRAC—Navy	Unspecified Worldwide	Don–101: Various Locations	21,416	21,416
BRAC—Navy	Unspecified Worldwide	Don–138: NAS Brunswick, ME	904	904
BRAC—Navy	Unspecified Worldwide	Don–157: Mcsa Kansas City, MO	40	40
BRAC—Navy	Unspecified Worldwide	Don–172: NWS Seal Beach, Concord, CA	6,066	6,066
BRAC—Navy	Unspecified Worldwide	Don–84: JRB Willow Grove & Cambria Reg Ap	1,178	1,178

Subtotal, Defense Base Closure Account—Navy	94,692	94,692
	<bold></bold>	<bold></bold>
Defense Base Closure Account—AF
	Worldwide Unspecified
BRAC—AF	Unspecified Worldwide	Dod BRAC Activities—Air Force	90,976	90,976

Subtotal, Defense Base Closure Account—AF	90,976	90,976
	<bold></bold>	<bold></bold>
Total, Base Realignment and Closure	270,085	270,085

Grand Total, Military Construction & Family Housing	6,557,447	6,452,243

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS(In Thousands of Dollars)
Program	FY 2015 Request	Senate Authorized
Discretionary Summary By Appropriation
Energy Programs
Nuclear energy	104,000	104,000

Advisory Board
Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health	0	2,000

Atomic Energy Defense Activities
National nuclear security administration:
Weapons activities	8,314,902	8,314,902
Defense nuclear nonproliferation	1,555,156	1,840,156
Naval reactors	1,377,100	1,377,100
Federal salaries and expenses	410,842	403,342
Total, National nuclear security administration	11,658,000	11,935,500

Environmental and other defense activities:
Defense environmental cleanup	5,327,538	4,864,538
Other defense activities	753,000	751,000
Total, Environmental & other defense activities	6,080,538	5,615,538
Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities	17,738,538	17,551,038
Total, Discretionary Funding	17,842,538	17,657,038

Nuclear Energy
Idaho sitewide safeguards and security	104,000	104,000
Total, Nuclear Energy	104,000	104,000

Advisory Board
Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health	0	2,000
Total, Advisory Board	0	2,000

Weapons Activities
Directed stockpile work
B61 Life extension program	643,000	643,000
W76 Life extension program	259,168	259,168
W88 Alt 370	165,400	165,400
Cruise missile warhead life extension program	9,418	16,918

Stockpile systems
B61 Stockpile systems	109,615	109,615
W76 Stockpile systems	45,728	45,728
W78 Stockpile systems	62,703	62,703
W80 Stockpile systems	70,610	70,610
B83 Stockpile systems	63,136	63,136
W87 Stockpile systems	91,255	91,255
W88 Stockpile systems	88,060	88,060
Total, Stockpile systems	531,107	531,107

Weapons dismantlement and disposition
Operations and maintenance	30,008	30,008

Stockpile services
Production support	350,942	350,942
Research and development support	29,649	29,649
R&D certification and safety	201,479	201,479
Management, technology, and production	241,805	241,805
Plutonium sustainment	144,575	144,575
Tritium readiness	140,053	140,053
Total, Stockpile services	1,108,503	1,108,503
Total, Directed stockpile work	2,746,604	2,754,104

Campaigns:
Science campaign
Advanced certification	58,747	58,747
Primary assessment technologies	112,000	112,000
Dynamic materials properties	117,999	117,999
Advanced radiography	79,340	79,340
Secondary assessment technologies	88,344	88,344
Total, Science campaign	456,430	456,430

Engineering campaign
Enhanced surety	52,003	52,003
Weapon systems engineering assessment technology	20,832	20,832
Nuclear survivability	25,371	25,371
Enhanced surveillance	37,799	37,799
Total, Engineering campaign	136,005	136,005

Inertial confinement fusion ignition and high yield campaign
Ignition	77,994	77,994
Support of other stockpile programs	23,598	23,598
Diagnostics, cryogenics and experimenta support	61,297	61,297
Pulsed power inertial confinement fusion	5,024	5,024
Joint program in high energy density laboratory plasmas	9,100	9,100
Facility operations and target production	335,882	328,382
Total, Inertial confinement fusion and high yield campaign	512,895	505,395

Advanced simulation and computing campaign	610,108	610,108

Readiness Campaign
Nonnuclear readiness	125,909	125,909
Total, Readiness campaign	125,909	125,909
Total, Campaigns	1,841,347	1,833,847

Readiness in technical base and facilities (RTBF)
Operations of facilities
Kansas City Plant	125,000	125,000
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory	71,000	71,000
Los Alamos National Laboratory	198,000	198,000
Nevada National Security Site	89,000	89,000
Pantex	75,000	75,000
Sandia National Laboratory	106,000	106,000
Savannah River Site	81,000	81,000
Y–12 National security complex	151,000	151,000
Total, Operations of facilities	896,000	896,000

Program readiness	136,700	136,700
Material recycle and recovery	138,900	138,900
Containers	26,000	26,000
Storage	40,800	40,800
Maintenance and repair of facilities	205,000	205,000
Recapitalization	209,321	209,321
Subtotal, Readiness in technical base and facilities	1,652,721	1,652,721
Construction:
15–D–613 Emergency Operations Center, Y–12	2,000	2,000
15–D–612 Emergency Operations Center, LLNL	2,000	2,000
15–D–611 Emergency Operations Center, SNL	4,000	4,000
15–D–301 HE Science & Engineering Facility, PX	11,800	11,800
15–D–302, TA–55 Reinvestment project, Phase 3, LANL	16,062	16,062
12–D–301 TRU waste facilities, LANL	6,938	6,938
11–D–801 TA–55 Reinvestment project Phase 2, LANL	10,000	10,000
07–D–220-04 Transuranic liquid waste facility, Lanl	15,000	15,000
06–D–141 PED/Construction, UPF Y–12, Oak Ridge, TN	335,000	335,000
Total, Construction	402,800	402,800
Total, Readiness in technical base and facilities	2,055,521	2,055,521

Secure transportation asset
Operations and equipment	132,851	132,851
Program direction	100,962	100,962
Total, Secure transportation asset	233,813	233,813

Nuclear counterterrorism incident response	173,440	173,440

Counterterrorism and Counterproliferation Programs	76,901	76,901

Site stewardship
Environmental projects and operations	53,000	53,000
Nuclear materials integration	16,218	16,218
Minority serving institution partnerships program	13,231	13,231
Total, Site stewardship	82,449	82,449

Defense nuclear security
Operations and maintenance	618,123	618,123
Total, Defense nuclear security	618,123	618,123

Information technology and cybersecurity	179,646	179,646

Legacy contractor pensions	307,058	307,058
Subtotal, Weapons activities	8,314,902	8,314,902

Total, Weapons Activities	8,314,902	8,314,902

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation
Global threat reduction initiative
Global threat reduction initiative	333,488	373,488
Total, Global threat reduction initiative	333,488	373,488

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D
Operations and maintenance	360,808	390,808
Nonproliferation and international security	141,359	141,359

International material protection and cooperation	305,467	375,467

Fissile materials disposition
Operations and maintenance
U.S. plutonium disposition	85,000	85,000
U.S. uranium disposition	25,000	25,000
Total, Operations and maintenance	110,000	110,000
Construction:
99–D–143 Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility, Savannah River, SC	196,000	341,000
99–D–141–02 Waste Solidification Building, Savannah River, SC	5,125	5,125
Total, Construction	201,125	346,125

Total, Fissile materials disposition	311,125	456,125
Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs	1,452,247	1,737,247

Legacy contractor pensions	102,909	102,909
Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation	1,555,156	1,840,156

Naval Reactors
Naval reactors operations and infrastructure	412,380	412,380
Naval reactors development	425,700	425,700
Ohio replacement reactor systems development	156,100	156,100
S8G Prototype refueling	126,400	126,400
Program direction	46,600	46,600
Construction:
15–D–904 NRF Overpack Storage Expansion 3	400	400
15–D–903 KL Fire System Upgrade	600	600
15–D–902 KS Engineroom team trainer facility	1,500	1,500
15–D–901 KS Central office building and prototype staff facility	24,000	24,000
14–D–901 Spent fuel handling recapitalization project, NRF	141,100	141,100
13–D–905 Remote-handled low-level waste facility, INL	14,420	14,420
13–D–904 KS Radiological work and storage building, KSO	20,100	20,100
10-D–903, Security upgrades, KAPL	7,400	7,400
08–D–190 Expended Core Facility M–290 receiving/discharge station, Naval Reactor Facility, ID	400	400
Total, Construction	209,920	209,920
Subtotal, Naval Reactors	1,377,100	1,377,100

Total, Naval Reactors	1,377,100	1,377,100

Federal Salaries And Expenses
Program direction	410,842	403,342

Defense Environmental Cleanup
Closure sites:
Closure sites administration	4,889	4,889
Hanford site:
River corridor and other cleanup operations	332,788	332,788
Central plateau remediation:
Central plateau remediation	474,292	474,292
Construction
15–D–401 Containerized sludge (Rl-0012)	26,290	26,290
Total, Central plateau remediation	500,582	500,582

Richland community and regulatory support	14,701	14,701
Total, Hanford site	848,071	848,071

Idaho National Laboratory:
Idaho cleanup and waste disposition	364,293	364,293
Idaho community and regulatory support	2,910	2,910
Total, Idaho National Laboratory	367,203	367,203

NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory	1,366	1,366
Nuclear facility D & D Nevada	64,851	64,851
Sandia National Laboratories	2,801	2,801

Los Alamos National Laboratory
Los Alamos National Laboratory	196,017	196,017
Construction:
15–D–406 Hexavalent chromium D & D (Vl-Lanl-0030)	28,600	28,600
Total, Los Alamos National Laboratory	224,617	224,617
Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites	293,635	293,635

Oak Ridge Reservation:
OR Nuclear facility D & D	73,155	73,155
Construction
14–D–403 Outfall 200 Mercury Treatment Facility	9,400	9,400
Total, OR Nuclear facility D & D	82,555	82,555

U233 Disposition Program	41,626	41,626

OR cleanup and disposition
OR cleanup and disposition	71,137	71,137
Construction:
15–D–405—Sludge Buildout	4,200	4,200
Total, OR cleanup and disposition	75,337	75,337

OR reservation community and regulatory support	4,365	4,365
Solid waste stabilization and disposition
Oak Ridge technology development	3,000	3,000
Total, Oak Ridge Reservation	206,883	206,883

Office of River Protection:
Waste treatment and immobilization plant
01–D–416 A-D/ORP-0060 / Major construction	575,000	575,000
01–D–16E Pretreatment facility	115,000	115,000
Total, Waste treatment and immobilization plant	690,000	690,000

Tank farm activities
Rad liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition	522,000	522,000
Construction:
15–D–409 Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System, Hanford	23,000	23,000
Total, Tank farm activities	545,000	545,000
Total, Office of River protection	1,235,000	1,235,000

Savannah River sites:
Savannah River risk management operations:
Savannah River risk management operations	416,276	416,276

SR community and regulatory support	11,013	11,013

Radioactive liquid tank waste:
Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition	553,175	553,175
Construction:
15–D–402—Saltstone Disposal Unit #6	34,642	34,642
05–D–405 Salt waste processing facility, Savannah River	135,000	135,000
Total, Construction	169,642	169,642
Total, Radioactive liquid tank waste	722,817	722,817
Total, Savannah River site	1,150,106	1,150,106

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
Waste isolation pilot plant	216,020	216,020

Program direction	280,784	280,784
Program support	14,979	14,979

Safeguards and Security:
Oak Ridge Reservation	16,382	16,382
Paducah	7,297	7,297
Portsmouth	8,492	8,492
Richland/Hanford Site	63,668	63,668
Savannah River Site	132,196	132,196
Waste Isolation Pilot Project	4,455	4,455
West Valley	1,471	1,471
Total, Safeguards and Security	233,961	233,961
Technology development	13,007	13,007
Subtotal, Defense environmental cleanup	4,864,538	4,864,538

Legislative Proposal
Uranium enrichment D&D fund contribution	463,000	0
Subtotal Legislative Proposal	463,000	0

Total, Defense Environmental Cleanup	5,327,538	4,864,538

Other Defense Activities
Specialized security activities	202,152	202,152

Environment, health, safety and security
Environment, health, safety and security	118,763	117,763
Program direction	62,235	62,235
Total, Environment, Health, safety and security	180,998	179,998

Independent enterprise assessments
Independent enterprise assessments	24,068	24,068
Program direction	49,466	49,466
Total, Independent enterprise assessments	73,534	73,534

Office of Legacy Management
Legacy management	158,639	157,639
Program direction	13,341	13,341
Total, Office of Legacy Management	171,980	170,980

Defense related administrative support
Chief financial officer	46,877	46,877
Chief information officer	71,959	71,959
Total, Defense related administrative support	118,836	118,836

Office of hearings and appeals	5,500	5,500
Subtotal, Other defense activities	753,000	751,000
Total, Other Defense Activities	753,000	751,000