To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

This Act may be cited as the “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014”.

(3) Division C–Department of Energy National Security Authorizations and Other Authorizations.

For purposes of this Act, the term “congressional defense committees” has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code.

The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purposes of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled “Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation” for this Act, jointly submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the Chairmen of the House and Senate Budget Committees, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage in the House acting first on the conference report or amendment between the Houses.

(a) Authority for multiyear procurement.—Subject to section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy may enter into a multiyear contract or contracts, beginning with the fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of E–2D aircraft for the Department of the Navy.

(b) Condition for out-year contract payments.—A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such later fiscal year.

(a) Cost limitation baseline for lead ship.—Subsection (a)(1) of section 122 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2104) is amended by striking “$10,500,000,000” and inserting “$12,887,000,000”.

(b) Additional factor for adjustment of limitation amount.—Subsection (b) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(7) The amounts of increases or decreases in costs of that ship that are attributable to the shipboard test program.”.

(c) Hull number.—Such section is further amended in subsections (a)(1), (a)(2), and (b), by striking “CVN–21” and inserting “CVN–78”.

(d) Requirements for CVN–79.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(1) QUARTERLY COST ESTIMATE.—The Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees on a quarterly basis a report setting forth the most current cost estimate for CVN–79 (as estimated by the program manager). Each cost estimate shall include the current percentage of completion of the program, the total costs incurred, and an estimate of costs at completion for ship construction, government-furnished equipment, and engineering and support costs.

“(2) LIMITATION.—If any report under paragraph (1) includes a cost estimate for CVN–79 in excess of the amount specified in subsection (a)(2), the Secretary may not make any payment of fees under any cost-type or incentive fee contract associated with CVN–79 until the program manager determines that the cost estimate for CVN–79 no longer exceeds the amount specified in subsection (a)(2).”.

(e) Conforming amendment.—The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:

“SEC. 122. Adherence to Navy cost estimates for CVN–78 class of aircraft carriers”.

SEC. 123. Repeal of requirements relating to procurement of future surface combatants.

SEC. 124. Modification of requirements to sustain Navy airborne intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities.

“(1) SUSTAINMENT OF US PACIFIC COMMAND.—The Secretary of the Navy shall maintain sufficient numbers of EP–3 Airborne Reconnaissance Integrated Electronic System II (ARIES II) Spiral 3 aircraft and Special Projects Aircraft version P909 to support the wartime operational plans of the United States Pacific Command using realistic basing assumptions.

“(2) SUSTAINMENT OF EP–3 AIRCRAFT FOR GLOBAL FORCE MANAGEMENT ALLOCATION PLAN.—The Secretary shall maintain sufficient numbers of EP–3 Airborne Reconnaissance Integrated Electronic System II Spiral 3 aircraft and associated personnel to sustain five such aircraft for allocation to the commanders of the combatant commands under the Global Force Management Allocation Plan.

“(A) extend the Spiral 3 Joint Common Configuration upgrade to include the twelfth EP–3 Airborne Reconnaissance Integrated Electronic System II Spiral 3 aircraft; and

“(B) correct electronic intelligence system obsolescence deficiencies on the EP–3 Airborne Reconnaissance Integrated Electronic System II Spiral 3 aircraft fleet and the Special Projects Aircraft version P909 fleet.

“(4) REQUIREMENTS OF COMBATANT COMMANDS FOR AIRBORNE MARITIME ISR CAPABILITIES.—The Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council shall coordinate with the commanders of the combatant commands (and, in particular, with the Commander of the United States Pacific Command and the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command) to determine requirements for the intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities and capacity to be provided by the Special Projects Aircraft version P909 fleet.

“(5) SUSTAINMENT OF SPECIAL PROJECTS AIRCRAFT.—The Secretary shall sustain sufficient numbers of Special Projects Aircraft version P909 and associated personnel to satisfy any requirements determined by the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council to be met through such aircraft under paragraph (4).

“(6) TERMINATION OF CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS.— (A) The requirements in paragraphs (1) and (2) shall expire with respect to the EP–3 Airborne Reconnaissance Integrated Electronic System II Spiral 3 aircraft when the multi-intelligence Broad Area Maritime System TRITON aircraft with signals intelligence capabilities equal or greater than the EP–3 Airborne Reconnaissance Integrated Electronic System II Spiral 3 aircraft reaches Initial Operational Capability (IOC).

“(B) The requirement in paragraph (5) shall expire when the Navy achieves Initial Operational Capability of a system providing capabilities equal to or greater than the Special Projects Aircraft version P909.”.

(a) Report required.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chief of Naval Operations shall, in coordination with the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the current concept of operations and expected survivability attributes of each of the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) sea frames.

(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall set forth the following:

(1) A review of the current concept of operations of the Littoral Combat Ship and a comparison of such concept of operations with the original concept of operations of the Littoral Combat Ship.

(2) An assessment of the ability of the Littoral Combat Ship to carry out the core missions of the Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower of the Navy.

(3) A comparison of the combat capabilities for the three missions assigned to the Littoral Combat Ship sea frames (anti-surface warfare, mine counter measures, anti-submarine warfare) with the combat capabilities for each of such missions of the systems the Littoral Combat Ship is replacing.

(4) An assessment of expected survivability of the Littoral Combat Ship sea frames in the context of the planned employment of the Littoral Combat Ship as described in the concept of operations.

(5) The current status of operational testing for the sea frames and the mission modules of the Littoral Combat Ship.

(7) A review of survivability testing, modeling, and simulation conducted to date on the two sea frames of the Littoral Combat Ship.

(8) An updated assessment of the endurance of the Littoral Combat Ship at sea with respect to maintenance, fuel use, and sustainment of crew and mission modules.

(9) An assessment of the adequacy of current ship manning plans for the Littoral Combat Ship, and an assessment the impact of increased manning on design changes and the endurance of the Littoral Combat Ship.

(10) A list of the casualty reports to date on each Littoral Combat Ship, including a description of the impact of such casualties on the design or ability of that Littoral Combat Ship to perform assigned missions.

(a) Consideration of upgrades of certain aircraft in recapitalization of fleet.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall consider, as part of the recapitalization of the tactical airlift fleet of the Air Force, upgrades to legacy C–130H aircraft designed to help such aircraft meet the fuel efficiency goals of the Department of the Air Force and retention of such aircraft, as so upgraded, in the tactical airlift fleet.

(b) Manner of upgrades.—The Secretary shall ensure that upgrades to the C–130H aircraft fleet are made in a manner that is proportional to the number of C–130H aircraft in the force structure of the regular Air Force, the Air Force Reserve, and the Air National Guard.

SEC. 133. Repeal of requirement for maintenance of certain retired KC–135E aircraft.

SEC. 134. Prohibition of procurement of unnecessary C–27J aircraft by the Air Force.

(a) Authority for multiyear procurement.—Subject to section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Air Force may enter into a multiyear contract or contracts, beginning with the fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of C–130J aircraft for the Department of the Air Force and the Department of the Navy.

(1) Armed, cargo, and utility helicopters provide the Department of Defense with critical capabilities to support operations in the air, on land, and at sea.

(2) According to the Aerospace Industries Association of America’s 2012 Year-End Review and Forecast, the United States military aircraft manufacturing sales declined by 2.4 percent between 2011 and 2012.

(3) According to the Aerospace Industries Association of America’s July 2012 report on the aerospace industrial base, aviation industry employment of aerospace research and development scientists and engineers numbering 140,000 in 1996 has declined to 40,000 in 2008.

(4) Today, five corporations manufacture all United States military helicopters.

(5) Helicopter program unpredictability and reduced defense procurement have a negative impact on the ability to recruit and retain a qualified and capable aerospace workforce thereby increasing risk for the helicopter industrial base’s ability to design, build, and support the next generation of manned and unmanned military helicopters.

(1) armed, cargo, and utility helicopters are instrumental to the Department of Defense’s ability to execute the President’s National Security Strategy;

(2) the Department of Defense should take into consideration the health and viability of the military helicopter industrial base in its analysis and decision making when building its annual research, development, and acquisition budget request; and

(3) the Department of Defense and Congress should endeavor to maintain budget and program predictability in order to attract and retain a skilled workforce to ensure the technological capabilities required to sustain the preeminence of the United States military helicopter fleets.

SEC. 212. Modification of requirements on biennial strategic plan for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.

(a) Elements of strategic plan.—Subsection (b) of section 2352 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

“(1) The strategic objectives of that agency, and the linkage between such objectives and the missions of the armed forces.”;

(2) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking “goals” and inserting “objectives”;

(4) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and

(5) in paragraph (3), as redesignated by paragraph (4) of this subsection, by striking “for the programs of that agency” and inserting “for programs demonstrating military systems to one or more of the armed forces”.

(b) Responsibility for submittal of plan.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended by striking “Secretary of Defense shall” and inserting “Director shall, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics,”.

(c) Effective date.—The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to biennial strategic plans for the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency that are submitted under section 2352 of title 10, United States Code (as amended by this section), after that date.

SEC. 213. Extension of authority for program to award prizes for advanced technology achievements.

SEC. 214. Five-year extension of pilot program to include technology protection features during research and development of certain defense systems.

SEC. 215. Extension of mechanisms to provide funds for defense laboratories for research and development of technologies for military missions.

SEC. 216. Sustainment or replacement of Blue Devil Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance System.

(a) Authority for sustainment.—The Secretary of the Air Force may procure the existing Blue Devil 1 Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Systems (in this section referred to as “Blue Devil 1 aircraft system”).

(b) Requirement for plan to replace in lieu of sustainment.—If the Secretary elects not to procure Blue Devil 1 aircraft systems under subsection (a), the Secretary shall, not later than 15 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth a plan to replace the capability provided by the Blue Devil 1 aircraft system with a comparable or improved capability that effectively combines wide-area motion imagery (WAMI) and near-vertical direction finding (NVDF) on the same airborne platform to enable detection, identification, and immediate precision location of targets through signals intelligence in order to permit tracking of targets through the motion imaging system.

(c) Requirements in achievement of replacement capability.—If the Secretary elects to replace the Blue Devil 1 aircraft system, the Secretary shall—

(1) coordinate with the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command to ensure that the replacement program for the Blue Devil 1 aircraft system meets the operational needs of the United States Special Operations Command;

(2) coordinate with the Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency to transfer to the Air Force the technology developed under the Wide-Area Network Detection program for operational integration of wide-area motion imagery and near-vertical direction finding data for effective target detection, identification, and tracking for incorporation, as practical and appropriate, into the replacement program for the Blue Devil 1 aircraft system; and

(3) make available, to all companies that the Secretary determines are credible potential competitors for the future provision of near-vertical direction finding capabilities to the Air Force, the Blue Moon near-vertical direction finding technology, including hardware, software, algorithms, and drawings developed by a federally funded research and development center.

(d) Appropriate committees of Congress defined.—In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—

(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and

(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

(1) The Ballistic Missile Defense Review of February 2010 stated as its first policy priority that “the United States will continue to defend the homeland against the threat of limited ballistic missile attack” and that “an essential element of the United States' homeland ballistic missile defense strategy is to hedge against future uncertainties, including both the uncertainty of future threat capabilities and the technical risks inherent to our own development plans”.

(2) The United States currently has an operational Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) system with 30 Ground-Based Interceptors (GBIs) deployed in Alaska and California, protecting all of the United States, including the East Coast, against the threat of limited ballistic missile attack from both North Korea and Iran. During 2013, senior military and civilian defense leaders have stated repeatedly that they have confidence in the ability of the current Ground-based Midcourse Defense system to protect the United States from limited ballistic missile attack from North Korea and Iran.

(3) On March 15, 2013, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel announced a series of planned steps to enhance United States homeland ballistic missile defense, to stay ahead of the future missile threat from North Korea and Iran. These steps include the deployment of 14 additional Ground-Based Interceptors at Fort Greely, Alaska, by 2017, a nearly 50 percent increase in the number of such interceptors deployed by the United States.

(4) In response to provocative behavior and public threats by North Korea to launch missiles at the United States, the Department of Defense took a number of actions to enhance United States homeland missile defense capabilities, including deployment of the Sea-Based X-band radar into the Pacific Ocean.

(5) Before the March 15, 2013, announcement by Secretary of Defense Hagel, General Robert Kehler, Commander of the United States Strategic Command, testified that “I am confident that we can defend against a limited attack from Iran, although we are not in the most optimum posture to do that today… it doesn’t provide total defense today”. Shortly after the announcement by Secretary Hagel, General Charles Jacoby, Commander of the United States Northern Command, testified that “we have the capability of limited defense right now. And I think it’s not optimum and I think that we’ve made some important steps forward in what was rolled out. And I think we need to continue to assess the threat and make sure we stay ahead of it”.

(6) As its highest near-term priority, the Missile Defense Agency is designing a correction to the problem that caused a December 2010 flight test failure of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system using the Capability Enhancement-II (CE-II) model of exo-atmospheric kill vehicle, and plans to demonstrate the correction through flight testing, including an intercept test, before resuming production, assembly, or refurbishment of additional Capability Enhancement-II kill vehicles.

(7) The Department of Defense has a program to improve the performance and reliability of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system. According to Department officials, the goal of the Ground-Based Interceptor reliability program is to double the number of threat Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs) that the current United States inventory of Ground-Based Interceptors could defeat, thereby effectively doubling the capability of the current Ground-based Midcourse Defense system.

(8) The Missile Defense Agency, working with the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation and with United States Strategic Command, has developed a comprehensive Integrated Master Test Plan (IMTP) for missile defense, with flight tests for the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system planned through fiscal year 2023, including salvo testing, multiple simultaneous engagement testing, and operational testing. The current test plan includes an additional intercept flight test using the Capability Enhancement-I kill vehicle, scheduled for mid-2013, to demonstrate the reliability enhancements to Ground-Based Interceptors quipped with that kill vehicle. The Director of Operational Test and Evaluation reviewed and approved the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system test plan and pace, including the plan to demonstrate the correction of the Capability Enhancement-II kill vehicle.

(9) In May, 2013, Vice Admiral James Syring, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency, testified to Congress that he is seeking to improve the performance and reliability of the Ground-Based Interceptors, and to make the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system “more operationally effective and cost-effective”, including by improving its sensors, discrimination, kill assessment, and battle management. He testified that these improvements are “absolutely needed” and are “equally important to interceptors” in terms of staying ahead of the threat.

(10) As part of its United States homeland defense hedging strategy, the Department of Defense has already decided upon or implemented a number of actions to improve the missile defense posture of the United States to stay ahead of the evolving threat of Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles from North Korea and Iran. These include the following actions:

(A) As announced by Secretary of Defense Hagel, the Department plans to deploy 14 additional Ground-Based Interceptors at Fort Greely, Alaska, by 2017, to deploy a second AN/TPY-2 radar in Japan, and to pursue an advanced kill vehicle technology development program.

(B) The Missile Defense Agency has completed construction of Missile Field-2 at Fort Greely, Alaska, with eight extra silos available to deploy the additional operational Ground-Based Interceptors announced by Secretary of Defense Hagel.

(C) The Department plans to refurbish the 6 prototype silos in Missile Field-1 at Fort Greely, Alaska, to deploy the additional Ground-Based Interceptors announced by Secretary of Defense Hagel.

(D) The Missile Defense Agency plans to deploy an in-flight interceptor communication system data terminal at Fort Drum, New York, to enhance the performance of Ground-Based Interceptors defending the eastern United States against possible future missile threats from Iran.

(E) The Missile Defense Agency is continuing the development and testing of the two-stage Ground-Based Interceptor for possible deployment in the future, if needed.

(F) The Missile Defense Agency plans to upgrade the early warning radars in Clear, Alaska, and Cape Cod, Massachusetts, to enhance the ability to defend the United States homeland against potential future Intercontinental Ballistic Missile threats from North Korea and Iran.

(G) The Missile Defense Agency is evaluating sites for a possible future United States homeland ballistic missile defense interceptor site in the United States, in compliance with section 227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239), and will complete an Environmental Impact Statement for the best suited sites by early 2016, in case the President decides to proceed with the deployment of such a site.

(11) As part of its United States homeland missile defense hedging strategy, the Department of Defense is considering additional options to enhance the future United States posture and capability to defend the homeland, including the feasibility, advisability, and affordability of deploying additional Ground-Based Interceptors beyond the 14 Ground-Based Interceptors announced by Secretary of Defense Hagel, including possibly at a missile defense site on the East Coast of the United States.

(12) In discussing the possible benefits of a potential additional missile defense interceptor site in the United States, General Jacoby testified that “exploring a third site is an important next step. What a third site gives me, whether it’s on the East Coast or an alternate location, would be increased battle space. That means increased opportunity for me to engage threats from either Iran or North Korea”.

(1) it is a national priority to defend the United States homeland against the threat of limited ballistic missile attack from North Korea and Iran;

(2) the currently deployed Ground-based Midcourse Defense system, with 30 Ground-Based Interceptors deployed in Alaska and California, provides protection of the entire United States homeland, including the East Coast, against the threat of limited ballistic missile attack from North Korea and Iran, although this capability can and should be improved;;

(3) it is essential for the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system to achieve the levels of reliability, availability, sustainability, and operational performance that will allow it to continue providing protection of the United States homeland against limited ballistic missile attack and to stay ahead of the threat as it develops;

(4) the Missile Defense Agency should, as its highest priority, correct the problem that caused the December 2010 Ground-based Midcourse Defense system flight test failure and demonstrate the correction through flight testing, including a successful intercept test, before resuming production of the Capability Enhancement-II kill vehicle, in order to provide confidence that the system will work as intended;

(5) the Department of Defense should continue to enhance the performance and reliability of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system, and enhance the capability of the Ballistic Missile Defense System (including through improved sensors, discrimination, kill assessment, exo-atmospheric kill vehicles, and battle management) to provide improved capability to defend the United States homeland against the evolving missile threats from North Korea and Iran;

(6) the Missile Defense Agency should continue its robust, rigorous, and realistic testing of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system, as described in the Integrated Master Test Plan, including salvo testing, multiple simultaneous engagement testing, and operational testing;

(7) the Department of Defense has taken a number of prudent, affordable, cost-effective, and operationally significant steps to hedge against the possibility of future growth in the ballistic missile threat to the United States homeland from North Korea and Iran, including the planned deployment of 14 additional Ground-Based Interceptors; and

(8) the Department of Defense should continue to evaluate the evolving long-range missile threat from North Korea and Iran and consider further possibilities for prudent, affordable, cost-effective, and operationally significant steps to improve the posture of the United States to defend the United States homeland against possible future growth in the threat from North Korea and Iran.

(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on potential future options for enhancing United States homeland ballistic missile defense.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:

(A) A description of the current assessment of the threat to the United States from long-range ballistic missiles of North Korea and Iran, and an assessment of the projected future threat through 2022, including a discussion of confidence levels and uncertainties in such threat assessment.

(B) A description of the current United States homeland ballistic missile defense capability to defend against the current threat of limited ballistic missile attack from North Korea and Iran.

(C) A description of planned improvements to the current United States homeland ballistic missile defense system, and the capability enhancements that would result from such planned improvements, including—

(i) deployment of 14 additional Ground-Based Interceptors at Fort Greely, Alaska;

(ii) missile defense upgrades of early warning radars at Clear, Alaska, and Cape Cod, Massachusetts;

(iii) deployment of an In-Flight Interceptor Communications System Data Terminal at Fort Drum, New York; and

(iv) improvements to the effectiveness and reliability of the Ground-Based Interceptors and the overall Ground-based Midcourse defense system.

(D) A description of potential additional future United States homeland ballistic missile defense options, in addition to those described in subparagraph (C), if future ballistic missile threats warrant deployment of such options to increase United States homeland ballistic missile defense capabilities, including—

(ii) deployment of a missile defense interceptor site in another location in the United States, other than on the East Coast;

(iii) expansion of Missile Field-1 at Fort Greely, Alaska, to an operationally available 20-silo configuration, to permit further interceptor deployments;

(iv) deployment of additional Ground-Based Interceptors for the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system at Fort Greely, Alaska, Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, or both;

(v) deployment of additional missile defense sensors, including possibly an X-band radar on the East Coast or elsewhere, to enhance system tracking and discrimination;

(vi) enhancements to the operational effectiveness, cost effectiveness, and overall performance of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system through improvements to system reliability, discrimination, battle management, exo-atmospheric kill vehicle capability, and related functions;

(vii) the potential for future enhancement and deployment of the Standard Missile-3 Block IIA interceptor to augment United States homeland ballistic missile defense;

(viii) missile defense options to defend the United States homeland against ballistic missiles that could be launched from vessels on the seas around the United States, including the Gulf of Mexico, or other ballistic missile threats that could approach the United States from the south, should such a threat arise in the future; and

(3) EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL OPTIONS.—For each option described under paragraph (2)(D), the Secretary shall provide an evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of such option. The evaluation of each such option shall include consideration of the following:

(4) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.—Based on the evaluation required by paragraph (3), the Secretary shall include in the report required by paragraph (1) such findings, conclusions, and recommendations as the Secretary considers appropriate for potential future options for United States homeland ballistic missile defense.

(5) FORM.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

(1) In the introduction to the Ballistic Missile Defense Review of February 2010, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates wrote that “I have made defending against near-term regional threats a top priority of our missile defense plans, programs and capabilities”.

(2) In describing the threat of regional ballistic missiles, the report of the Ballistic Missile Defense Review stated that “there is no uncertainty about the existence of regional threats. They are clear and present. The threat from short-range, medium-range, and intermediate-range ballistic missiles (SRBMs, MRBMs, and IRBMs) in regions where the United States deploys forces and maintains security relationships is growing at a particularly rapid pace”.

(3) North Korea has hundreds of regional ballistic missiles, including short-range Scud missiles and medium-range Nodong missiles. North Korea also has publicly displayed, but not flight-tested, intermediate-range Musudan missiles. These regional missiles can reach United States forces and allies in South Korea and Japan, and perhaps Guam. In the spring of 2013, North Korea made public threats to use nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles against South Korea, Japan, and Guam.

(4) In response to these threats from North Korea, the United States deployed Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense ships, armed with Standard Missile–3 interceptors, to the waters near the Korean Peninsula, and a Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) battery to Guam. It also deployed the Sea-Based X-band missile defense radar into the Pacific Ocean to enhance United States missile defense capabilities. On March 15, 2013, Secretary of Defense Hagel announced a series of planned steps to enhance missile defense, including the deployment of a second AN/TPY–2 missile defense radar in Japan to improve regional and homeland defense against North Korean missiles. As part of their response to the provocations of North Korea, South Korea deployed vessels equipped with Aegis missile defense radars, and Japan deployed its Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense ships, equipped with Standard Missile–3 interceptors.

(5) Iran has the largest inventory of regional ballistic missiles in the Middle East, with hundreds of missiles that can reach as far as southeastern Europe and all of the Middle East, including Israel. Iran is improving its existing missiles and developing new and longer-range regional missiles.

(6) In September 2009, President Barack Obama announced that he had accepted the unanimous recommendation of the Secretary of Defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff to establish a European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA) to missile defense, designed to protect deployed United States forces, allies, and partners in Europe against the large and growing threat of ballistic missiles from Iran.

(7) In November 2010, at the Lisbon Summit, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) decided to adopt the core mission of missile defense of its population, territory, and forces. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization agreed to enhance its missile defense command and control system, the Active Layered Theater Ballistic Missile Defense, to provide a North Atlantic Treaty Organization command and control capability. This is in addition to voluntary contributions of missile defense capabilities from individual nations.

(8) During 2011, the United States successfully implemented Phase 1 of the European Phased Adaptive Approach, including deployment of an AN/TPY–2 radar in Turkey, deployment of an Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense ship in the eastern Mediterranean Sea with Standard Missile–3 Block IA interceptors, and the establishment of a missile defense command and control system in Germany.

(9) Phase 2 of the European Phased Adaptive Approach is planned for deployment around 2015, and is planned to include the deployment of Standard Missile–3 Block IB interceptors on Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense ships and at an Aegis Ashore site in Romania.

(10) Phase 3 of the European Phased Adaptive Approach is planned for deployment around 2018, and is planned to include the deployment of Standard Missile–3 Block IIA interceptors on Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense ships and at an Aegis Ashore site in Poland.

(11) At the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Summit in Chicago in May 2012, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization announced it had achieved an “interim capability” for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization missile defense system, including initial capability of its Active Layered Theater Ballistic Missile Defense system at a command and control facility in Germany.

(12) The United States has a robust program of missile defense cooperation with Israel, including joint development of the Arrow Weapon System and the new Arrow–3 interceptor, designed to defend Israel against ballistic missiles from Iran. These jointly developed missile defense systems are designed to be interoperable with United States ballistic missile defenses, and these interoperable systems are tested in large joint military exercises, such as “Austere Challenge” in 2012. The United States has also deployed an AN/TPY–2 radar in Israel to enhance missile defense against missiles from Iran.

(13) The United States is working with the nations of the Gulf Cooperation Council on enhanced national and regional missile defense capabilities against the growing missile threat from Iran. As part of this effort, the United Arab Emirates plans to purchase two Terminal High Altitude Area Defense batteries, as well as other equipment. During 2012, the United States deployed an AN/TPY–2 radar in the United States Central Command area of responsibility to enhance missile defense capability of forward-deployed United States forces, allies, and partners against missiles from Iran.

(14) The United States has a strong program of missile defense cooperation with Japan, including the co-development of the Standard Missile–3 Block IIA interceptor for the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense system, intended to be deployed in Phase 3 of the European Phased Adaptive Approach, the Japanese fleet of Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense ships using Standard Missile–3 Block IA interceptors, and the United States deployment of two AN/TPY–2 radars in Japan.

(1) the threat from regional ballistic missiles, particularly from North Korea and Iran, is serious and growing, and puts at risk forward-deployed United States forces, allies, and partners in the Asia-Pacific region, Europe, and the Middle East;

(2) the Department of Defense has an obligation to provide force protection of forward-deployed United States forces and facilities from regional ballistic missile attack;

(3) the United States has an obligation to meet its security commitments to its allies, including ballistic missile defense commitments;

(4) the Department of Defense has a balanced program of investment and capabilities to provide for both homeland defense and regional defense against ballistic missiles, consistent with the Ballistic Missile Defense Review and with the prioritized and integrated needs of the commanders of the combatant commands;

(5) elements of United States regional missile defenses enhance and enable the homeland defense capabilities of the United States, including forward-deployed radars and defense of critical forward-deployed missile defense systems;

(6) the European Phased Adaptive Approach to missile defense is an appropriate and prudent response to the existing and growing ballistic missile threat from Iran to forward-deployed United States forces, allies, and partners in Europe;

(7) the Department of Defense should, as a high priority, continue to develop, test, and plan to deploy Phases 2 and 3 of the European Phased Adaptive Approach, including the planned Aegis Ashore sites in Romania and Poland;

(8) the Department of Defense should also continue with its other phased and adaptive regional missile defense efforts tailored to the Middle East and the Asia-Pacific region;

(9) European members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization are making valuable contributions to missile defense in Europe, by hosting elements of United States missile defense systems on their territories, through individual national contributions to missile defense capability, and by collective funding and development of the Active Layered Theater Ballistic Missile Defense system;

(10) the actions taken by the Department of Defense to improve its regional missile defense posture in response to the provocative actions and threats of North Korea were prudent and appropriate and demonstrated the flexible and adaptive nature of its regional missile defense capabilities, which allows for surge deployments to meet regional contingencies in a timely manner; and

(11) Japan and South Korea are making notable progress in enhancing their missile defense capabilities, in partnership with the United States, to protect against regional missiles from North Korea.

(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the status and progress of regional missile defense programs and efforts.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:

(A) A description of the overall risk assessment from the most recent Global Ballistic Defense Assessment of regional missile defense capabilities relative to meeting the operational needs of the commanders of the geographic combatant commands, including the need for force protection of United States forward-deployed forces and capabilities and for defense of allies and partners.

(B) An assessment whether the currently planned European Phased Adaptive Approach and other planned regional missile defense approaches and capabilities of the United States meet the integrated priorities of the commanders of the geographic combatant commands in an affordable and balanced manner.

(C) A description of the progress made in the development and testing of elements of systems intended for deployment in Phases 2 and 3 of the European Phased Adaptive Approach, including the Standard Missile–3 Block IB and IIA interceptors and the Aegis Ashore system.

(D) A description of the manner in which elements of regional missile defense architectures, such as forward-based X-band radars in Japan, Israel, Turkey, and the area of responsibility of the United States Central Command, contribute to the enhancement of the homeland defense of the United States.

(E) A description of the manner in which enhanced integration of offensive military capabilities and defensive missile defense capabilities will fit into regional missile defense planning and force structure assessments.

(3) FORM.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

(1) For more than a decade, the United States and Russia have discussed a variety of options for cooperation on shared early warning and ballistic missile defense. For example, on May 1, 2001, President George W. Bush spoke of a “new cooperative relationship” with Russia and said “it should be premised on openness, mutual confidence and real opportunities for cooperation, including the area of missile defense. It should allow us to share information so that each nation can improve its early warning capability, and its capability to defend its people and territory. And perhaps one day, we can even cooperate in a joint defense”.

(2) Section 1231 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 1654A–329) authorized the Department of Defense to establish in Russia a “joint center for the exchange of data from systems to provide early warning of launches of ballistic missiles and for notification of launches of such missiles”, also known as the Joint Data Exchange Center (JDEC).

(3) On March 31, 2008, Deputy Secretary of Defense Gordon England stated that “we have offered Russia a wide-ranging proposal to cooperate on missile defense—everything from modeling and simulation, to data sharing, to joint development of a regional missile defense architecture—all designed to defend the United States, Europe, and Russia from the growing threat of Iranian ballistic missiles. An extraordinary series of transparency measures have also been offered to reassure Russia. Despite some Russian reluctance to sign up to these cooperative missile defense activities, we continue to work toward this goal”.

(4) The February 2010 report of the Ballistic Missile Defense Review established as one of its central policy pillars that increased international missile defense cooperation is in the national security interest of the United States and, with regard to cooperation with Russia, the United States “is pursuing a broad agenda focused on shared early warning of missile launches, possible technical cooperation, and even operational cooperation”.

(5) At the November 2010 Lisbon Summit, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) decided to develop a missile defense system to “protect NATO European populations, territory and forces” and also to seek cooperation with Russia on missile defense. In its Lisbon Summit Declaration, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization reaffirmed its readiness to “invite Russia to explore jointly the potential for linking current and planned missile defense systems at an appropriate time in mutually beneficial ways”. The new NATO Strategic Concept adopted at the Lisbon Summit stated that “we will actively seek cooperation on missile defense with Russia”, that “NATO-Russia cooperation is of strategic importance”, and that “the security of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and Russia is intertwined”.

(6) In a December 18, 2010, letter to the leadership of the Senate, President Obama wrote that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization “invited Russia to cooperate on missile defense, which could lead to adding Russian capabilities to those deployed by NATO to enhance our common security against common threats. The Lisbon Summit thus demonstrated that the Alliance's missile defenses can be strengthened by improving NATO-Russian relations. This comes even as we have made clear that the system we intend to pursue with Russia will not be a joint system, and it will not in any way limit United States' or NATO's missile defense capabilities. Effective cooperation with Russia could enhance the overall efficiency of our combined territorial missile defenses, and at the same time provide Russia with greater security”.

(7) Section 221(a)(3) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4167) states that it is the sense of Congress “to support the efforts of the United States Government and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to pursue cooperation with the Russian Federation on ballistic missile defense relative to Iranian missile threats”.

(8) In a speech in Russia on March 21, 2011, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates cited “the NATO-Russian decision to cooperate on defense against ballistic missiles. We've disagreed before, and Russia still has uncertainties about the European Phased Adaptive Approach, a limited system that poses no challenges to the large Russian nuclear arsenal. However, we've mutually committed to resolving these difficulties in order to develop a roadmap toward truly effective anti-ballistic missile collaboration. This collaboration may include exchanging launch information, setting up a joint data fusion center, allowing greater transparency with respect to our missile defense plans and exercises, and conducting a joint analysis to determine areas of future cooperation”.

(9) In testimony to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate on April 13, 2011, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear and Missile Defense Policy Bradley H. Roberts stated that the United States has been pursuing a Defense Technology Cooperation Agreement with Russia since 2004, and that such an agreement is necessary “for the safeguarding of sensitive information in support of cooperation” on missile defense, and to “provide the legal framework for undertaking cooperative efforts”.

(10) In a March 2012 answer to a question from the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate on missile defense cooperation with Russia, Acting Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Jim Miller wrote that “I support U.S.-Russian cooperation on missile defenses first and foremost because it could improve the effectiveness of U.S. and NATO missile defenses, thereby improving the protection of the United States, our forces overseas, and our Allies. Missile defense cooperation with Russia is in the security interests of the United States, NATO, and Russia, first and foremost because it could strengthen capabilities across Europe to intercept Iranian missiles”. He also wrote that “[t]he United States has pursued missile defense cooperation with Russia with the clear understanding that we would not accept constraints on missile defense, and that we would undertake necessary qualitative and quantitative improvements to meet U.S. Security needs”.

(11) In February 2012, an international group of independent experts known as the Euro-Atlantic Security Initiative issued a report proposing missile defense cooperation between the United States (with its North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies) and Russia. The group, whose leaders included Stephen Hadley, the National Security Advisor to President George W. Bush, proposed that the nations share satellite and radar early warning data at joint cooperation centers in order to improve their ability to detect, track, and defeat medium-range and intermediate-range ballistic missiles from the Middle East.

(12) In a letter dated April 13, 2012, Robert Nabors, Assistant to the President and Director of the Office of Legislative Affairs, wrote that “it is Administration policy that we will only provide information to Russia that will enhance the effectiveness of our missile defenses. The Administration will not provide Russia with sensitive information that would in any way compromise our national security, including hit-to-kill technology and interceptor telemetry”.

(13) The May 20, 2012, NATO Chicago Summit Declaration included the following statement: “Given our shared security interests with Russia, we remain committed to cooperation on missile defense in the spirit of mutual trust and reciprocity, such as the recent [NATO-Russia Council] Theatre Missile Defense Exercise. Through ongoing efforts in the NATO-Russia Council, we seek to determine how independent NATO and Russian missile defense systems can work together to enhance European security. We look forward to establishing the proposed joint NATO-Russia Missile Data Fusion Centre and the joint Planning Operations Centre to cooperate on missile defense. We propose to develop a transparency regime based upon a regular exchange of information about the current respective missile defense capabilities of NATO and Russia”.

(14) The United States currently has agreements and programs of cooperation on shared early warning with eight nations in addition to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. The United States has developed procedures and mechanisms for sharing early warning information with partner nations while ensuring the protection of sensitive United States information.

(15) Russia and the United States each have ballistic missile launch early warning and detection and tracking sensors that could contribute to and enhance each others' ability to detect, track, and defend against ballistic missile threats from Iran.

(16) The Obama Administration has provided regular briefings to Congress on its discussions with Russia on possible missile defense cooperation.

(1) it is in the national security interest of the United States to pursue efforts at missile defense cooperation with Russia that would enhance the security of the United States, its North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies, and Russia, particularly against missile threats from Iran;

(2) the United States should pursue ballistic missile defense cooperation with Russia on both a bilateral basis and a multilateral basis with its North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies, particularly through the NATO-Russia Council, when it is in the national security interests of the United States to do so;

(3) missile defense cooperation with Russia should not “in any way limit United States' or NATO's missile defense capabilities”, as acknowledged in the December 18, 2010, letter from President Obama to the leadership of the Senate, and should be mutually beneficial and reciprocal in nature;

(4) the United States should not provide Russia with sensitive missile defense information that would in any way compromise United States national security, including “hit-to-kill” technology and interceptor telemetry;

(5) the United States should pursue missile defense cooperation with Russia in a manner that ensures that—

(A) United States classified information is appropriately safeguarded and protected from unauthorized disclosure;

(B) prior to entering into missile defense technology cooperation projects, the United States enters into a Defense Technology Cooperation Agreement with Russia that establishes the legal framework for a broad spectrum of potential cooperative defense projects; and

(C) such cooperation does not limit the missile defense capabilities of the United States or its North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies; and

(6) the sovereignty of the United States and its ability to unilaterally pursue its own missile defense program shall be protected.

(c) Limitation on use of funds To provide Russian Federation access to certain missile defense information.—No funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be used to provide the Russian Federation with sensitive missile defense information that would in any way compromise United States national security, including “hit-to-kill” technology and telemetry data for missile defense interceptors or target vehicles.

SEC. 234. Additional missile defense radar for the protection of the United States homeland.

(a) In general.—The Missile Defense Agency shall deploy an X-band radar, or other comparable sensor, at a location optimized to support the defense of the United States homeland against long-range ballistic missile threats.

(b) Funding.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated by section 201 for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation, Defense-wide, for the Missile Defense Agency for BMD Sensors (PE 63884C) as specified in the funding table in section 4201, $30,000,000 is available for initial costs toward deployment of the radar required by subsection (a).

SEC. 235. Evaluation of options for future ballistic missile defense sensor architectures.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct an evaluation of options and alternatives for future sensor architectures for ballistic missile defense in order to enhance United States ballistic missile defense capabilities.

(2) SCOPE OF EVALUATION.—In conducting the evaluation, the Secretary shall consider a wide range of options for a future sensor architecture for ballistic missile defense, including options for future development, integration, exploitation, and deployment of sensor systems and assets.

(3) OBJECTIVE.—The objective of the evaluation shall be to identify one or more future sensor architectures for ballistic missile defense that will result in an improvement of the performance of the Ballistic Missile Defense System in a cost-effective, operationally effective, timely, and affordable manner.

(b) Elements To be evaluated.—The evaluation required by subsection (a) shall include a consideration of the following:

(4) SENSOR ARCHITECTURE CAPABILITIES.—Maximization or improvement of sensor-related capabilities as follows:

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the results of the evaluation required by subsection (a). The report shall include such findings, conclusions, and recommendations on future sensor architectures for ballistic missile defense as the Secretary considers appropriate in light of the evaluation.

(2) FORM.—The report shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

SEC. 251. Annual Comptroller General of the United States report on the acquisition program for the VXX Presidential Helicopter.

(a) Annual GAO review.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct on an annual basis a review of the acquisition program for the VXX Presidential Helicopter aircraft.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1 each year, the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review of the acquisition program for the VXX Presidential Helicopter aircraft conducted under subsection (a) during the preceding year.

(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report under paragraph (1) shall include such matters as the Comptroller General considers appropriate to fully inform the congressional defense committees of the stage of the acquisition process for the VXX Presidential Helicopter aircraft covered by the review described in such report. Such matters may include the following:

(A) The extent to which the acquisition program for the VXX Presidential Helicopter aircraft is meeting cost, schedule, and performance goals.

(C) An assessment of the acquisition strategy for the program, including whether the strategy is consistent with acquisition management best practices identified by the Comptroller General for purposes of the program.

(1) the date on which the Navy awards a contract for full rate production for the VXX Presidential Helicopter aircraft; or

(2) the date on which the acquisition program for the VXX Presidential Helicopter aircraft is terminated.

SEC. 311. Sustainment of critical manufacturing capabilities within Army arsenals.

(1) MANUFACTURING REQUIREMENTS.—The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the military services and defense agencies, shall review current and expected manufacturing requirements across the military services and defense agencies to identify critical manufacturing competencies and supplies, components, end items, parts, assemblies, and sub-assemblies for which there is no or limited domestic commercial source and which are appropriate for manufacturing within an arsenal owned by the United States in order to support critical manufacturing capabilities.

(2) MECHANISMS FOR DETERMINING MANUFACTURING CAPABILITIES.—The Secretary shall review mechanisms within the Department for ensuring that appropriate consideration is given to the unique manufacturing capabilities of arsenals owned by the United States to fulfill manufacturing requirements of the Department of Defense for which there is no or limited domestic commercial capability.

(b) Report required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report including the results of the reviews conducted under subsection (a) and a description of actions planned to support critical manufacturing capabilities within arsenals owned by the United States.

(a) Modifications to strategic policy.—Section 2229(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall maintain a strategic policy on the programs of the Department of Defense for prepositioned materiel and equipment. Such policy shall take into account national security threats, strategic mobility, service requirements, and the requirements of the combatant commands, and shall address how the Department's prepositioning programs, both ground and afloat, align with national defense strategies and departmental priorities.

“(2) ELEMENTS.—The strategic policy required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:

“(A) Overarching strategic guidance concerning planning and resource priorities that link the Department of Defense's current and future needs for prepositioned stocks, such as desired responsiveness, to evolving national defense objectives.

“(B) A description of the Department's vision for prepositioning programs and the desired end state.

“(C) Specific interim goals demonstrating how the vision and end state will be achieved.

“(D) A description of the strategic environment, requirements for, and challenges associated with prepositioning.

“(E) Metrics for how the Department will evaluate the extent to which prepositioned assets are achieving defense objectives.

“(F) A framework for joint departmental oversight that reviews and synchronizes the military services’ prepositioning strategies to minimize potentially duplicative efforts and maximize efficiencies in prepositioned materiel and equipment across the Department of Defense.

“(3) JOINT OVERSIGHT.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish joint oversight of the military services’ prepositioning efforts to maximize efficiencies across the Department of Defense.”.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for implementation of the prepositioning strategic policy required under section 2229(a) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a).

(2) ELEMENTS.—The implementation plan required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:

(A) Detailed guidance for how the Department of Defense will achieve the vision, end state, and goals outlined in the strategic policy.

(B) A comprehensive list of the Department's prepositioned material and equipment programs.

(E) An assignment of roles and responsibilities for the implementation of the plan.

(G) A description of how the plan will be reviewed and assessed to monitor progress.

(c) Comptroller General report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Comptroller General of the United States shall review the implementation plan submitted under subsection (b) and the prepositioning strategic policy required under section 2229(a) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a), and submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the findings of such review and including any additional information relating to the propositioning strategic policy and plan that the Comptroller General determines appropriate.

SEC. 313. Extension and modification of authority for airlift transportation at Department of Defense rates for non-Department of Defense Federal cargoes.

(1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “airlift” and inserting “transportation”; and

(B) by striking “airlift” both places it appears and inserting “transportation”;

(C) by inserting “, and for military transportation services provided in support of foreign military sales,” after “Department of Defense”; and

SEC. 321. Modification of authorities on prioritization of funds for equipment readiness and strategic capability.

(a) Inclusion of Marine Corps in requirements.—Section 323 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (10 U.S.C. 229 note) is amended—

(1) in subsection (a), by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following new paragraph (2):

“(2) the Secretary of the Army to meet the requirements of the Army, and the Secretary of the Navy to meet the requirements of the Marine Corps, for that fiscal year, in addition to the requirements under paragraph (1), for the reconstitution of equipment and materiel in prepositioned stocks in accordance with requirements under the policy or strategy implemented under the guidelines in section 2229 of title 10, United States Code.”; and

(2) in subsection (b)(2), by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following new subparagraph (B):

“(B) the Army and the Marine Corps for the reconstitution of equipment and materiel in prepositioned stocks.”.

(b) Repeal of requirement for annual Army report and GAO review.—Such section is further amended by striking subsections (c) through (f) and inserting the following new subsection (c):

“(c) Contingency operation defined.—In this section, the term ‘contingency operation’ has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(13) of title 10, United States Code.”.

SEC. 322. Strategic policy for the retrograde, reconstitution, and replacement of operating forces used to support overseas contingency operations.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish a policy setting forth the programs and priorities of the Department of Defense for the retrograde, reconstitution, and replacement of units and materiel used to support overseas contingency operations. The policy shall take into account national security threats, the requirements of the combatant commands, the current readiness of the operating forces of the military departments, and risk associated with strategic depth and the time necessary to reestablish required personnel, equipment, and training readiness in such operating forces.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The policy required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:

(A) Establishment and assignment of responsibilities and authorities within the Department for oversight and execution of the planning, organization, and management of the programs to reestablish the readiness of redeployed operating forces.

(B) Guidance concerning priorities, goals, objectives, timelines, and resources to reestablish the readiness of redeployed operating forces in support of national defense objectives and combatant command requirements.

(C) Oversight reporting requirements and metrics for the evaluation of Department of Defense and military department progress on restoring the readiness of redeployed operating forces in accordance with the policy required under paragraph (1).

(D) A framework for joint departmental reviews of military services’ annual budgets proposed for retrograde, reconstitution, or replacement activities, including an assessment of the strategic and operational risk assumed by the proposed levels of investment across the Department of Defense.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The implementation plan required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:

(A) The assignment of responsibilities and authorities for oversight and execution of the planning, organization, and management of the programs to reestablish the readiness of redeployed operating forces.

(B) Establishment of priorities, goals, objectives, timelines, and resources to reestablish the readiness of redeployed operating forces in support of national defense objectives and combatant command requirements.

(C) A description of how the plan will be implemented, including a schedule with milestones to meet the goals of the plan.

(D) An estimate of the resources by military service and by year required to implement the plan, including an assessment of the risks assumed in the plan.

(3) UPDATES.—Not later than one year after submitting the plan required under paragraph (1), and annually thereafter for two years, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees an update on progress toward meeting the goals of the plan.

(c) Comptroller general report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for three years, the Comptroller General of the United States shall review the implementation plan submitted under subsection (b) and the policy required by subsection (a), and submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the findings of such review and progress made toward meeting the goals of the plan and including any additional information relating to the policy and plan that the Comptroller General determines appropriate.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a comprehensive strategy for improving asset visibility tracking and in-transit visibility across the Department of Defense, together with the plans of the military departments for implementing the strategy.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The strategy and implementation plans required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:

(B) A description of the issues to be addressed by the strategy, the scope of the strategy, and the process by which it was developed.

(D) A description of steps to achieve those results, as well as milestones and performance measures to gauge results.

(E) An estimate of the costs associated with executing the plan, and the sources and types of resources and investments, including skills, technology, human capital, information, and other resources, required to meet the goals and objectives.

(F) A description of roles and responsibilities for managing and overseeing the implementation of the strategy and the establishment of mechanisms for multiple stakeholders to coordinate their efforts throughout implementation and make necessary adjustments to the strategy based on performance.

(G) A description of a description of key factors external to the Department of Defense and beyond its control that could significantly affect the achievement of the long-term goals contained in the strategy.

(b) Comptroller general report.—Not later than one year after the strategy is submitted under subsection (a), the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth an assessment of the extent to which the strategy and its accompanying implementation plans—

(2) align to achieve the overarching asset visibility and in-transit visibility goals and objectives of the Department of Defense; and

(A) by striking “The report for a quarter” and inserting “Each report”; and

(B) by striking “(e), and (f)” and inserting “(f), and (g), and the reports for the second and fourth quarters of a calendar year shall also contain the information required by subsection (e)”;

(i) in subparagraph (A), by striking “, including the extent” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting the following: “, including an assessment of the manning of units (authorized versus assigned numbers of personnel) for units not scheduled for deployment and the timing of the arrival of personnel into units preparing for deployments.”; and

(ii) in subparagraph (B), by inserting “unit” before “personnel strength”;

“(B) Personnel assigned to a unit but not trained for the level of assigned responsibility or mission.

(D) in paragraph (3), as redesignated by subparagraph (C), by striking “Training commitments” and inserting “Mission rehearsals”;

(3) by redesignating subsections (e), (f), and (g) as subsections (f), (g), and (h), respectively;

(4) by inserting after subsection (d)(3), as redesignated by paragraph (1)(C), the following new subsection:

“(e) Logistics indicators.—The reports for the second and fourth quarters of a calendar year shall also include information regarding the active components of the armed forces (and an evaluation of such information) with respect to each of the following logistics indicators:”; and

(A) by redesignating paragraphs (5), (6), and (7) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively;

(B) in paragraph (1), as redesignated by subparagraph (A), by striking subparagraph (E); and

(i) in subparagraph (A), by striking “Maintenance” and inserting “Depot maintenance”; and

SEC. 333. Revision to requirement for annual submission of information regarding information technology capital assets.

SEC. 334. Modification of annual corrosion control and prevention reporting requirements.

“(i) provide a clear linkage between the corrosion control and prevention program of the military department and the overarching goals and objectives of the long-term corrosion control and prevention strategy developed and implemented by the Secretary of Defense under section 2228(d) of title 10, United States Code; and

“(ii) include performance measures to ensure that the corrosion control and prevention program is achieving the goals and objectives described in clause (i).”.

SEC. 341. Limitation on funding for United States Special Operations Command National Capital Region.

(a) Limitation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended for the United States Special Operations Command National Capital Region (USSOCOM–NCR) until 30 days after the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a report on the USSOCOM–NCR.

(b) Report elements.—The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following elements:

(3) An explanation of the impact of the USSOCOM-NCR on existing activities at United States Special Operations Command headquarters.

(4) A detailed, by fiscal year, breakout of the staffing and other costs associated with the USSOCOM-NCR over the future years defense program.

(5) A description of the relationship between the USSOCOM-NCR and the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict.

(6) A description of the role of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict in providing oversight of USSOCOM-NCR activities.

SEC. 342. Limitation on funding for Regional Special Operations Coordination Centers.

(a) Limitation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide, may be obligated or expended for the establishment of Regional Special Operations Coordination Centers (RSCCs).

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than September 30, 2013, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict, in coordination with the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the establishment of RSCCs.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall outline, at a minimum—

(D) the relevance to and coordination with other multilateral engagement activities and academic institutes supported by the geographic combatant commanders and the Department of State; and

SEC. 343. Limitation on availability of funds for Trans Regional Web Initiative (TRWI).

(a) Establishment of policy.—It is the policy of the United States that the Secretary of Defense shall take steps to reduce the separate development and fielding of service-specific combat and camouflage utility uniforms, in order to collectively adopt and field the same combat and camouflage utility uniforms for use by all members of the Armed Forces to the maximum extent practicable.

(b) Prohibition.—Except as provided in subsection (c), each military service shall be prohibited from adopting after the date of the enactment of this Act new designs for combat and camouflage utility uniforms, including uniforms reflecting changes to the fabric and camouflage patterns used in current combat and camouflage utility uniforms, unless—

(1) the combat or camouflage utility uniform will be adopted by all military services;

(2) the military service adopts a uniform currently in use by another military service; or

(3) the Secretary of Defense grants an exception, based on unique circumstances or requirements.

(c) Exception.—Nothing in subsection (b) shall be construed as prohibiting the development of combat and camouflage utility uniforms for use by personnel assigned to or operating in support of the unified combatant command for special operations forces described in section 167 of title 10, United States Code.

(d) Limitation on restrictions.—No military service may prevent another military service from authorizing the use of any combat or camouflage utility uniform.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue guidance to implement this section.

(A) require the secretaries of the military departments, in cooperation with the commanders of the combatant commands, including the unified combatant command for special operations forces, to collaborate on the development of joint criteria for the design, development, fielding, and characteristics of combat and camouflage utility uniforms;

(B) require the secretaries of the military departments to ensure that new combat and camouflage utility uniforms meet the geographic and operational requirements of the commanders of the combatant commands; and

(C) require the secretaries of the military departments to ensure that all new combat and camouflage utility uniforms achieve interoperability with all components of individual war fighter systems, including body armor, organizational clothing and individual equipment, and other individual protective systems.

(f) Repeal of policy.—Section 352 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84, 123 Stat. 2262; 10 U.S.C. 771 note prec.) is repealed.

SEC. 352. Authorization to institute a centralized, automated mail redirection system to improve the delivery of absentee ballots to military personnel serving outside the United States.

(a) In general.—The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as of September 30, 2014, as follows:

(b) End strength reductions.—The end strengths prescribed by subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve component shall be proportionately reduced by—

(1) the total authorized strength of units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component which are on active duty (other than for training) at the end of the fiscal year; and

(2) the total number of individual members not in units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component who are on active duty (other than for training or for unsatisfactory participation in training) without their consent at the end of the fiscal year.

(c) End strength increases.—Whenever units or individual members of the Selected Reserve of any reserve component are released from active duty during any fiscal year, the end strength prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected Reserve of such reserve component shall be increased proportionately by the total authorized strengths of such units and by the total number of such individual members.

(1) NATIONAL GUARD.—Within the limitation provided in section 10217(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, the number of non-dual status technicians employed by the National Guard as of September 30, 2014, may not exceed the following:

(2) ARMY RESERVE.—The number of non-dual status technicians employed by the Army Reserve as of September 30, 2014, may not exceed 595.

(3) AIR FORCE RESERVE.—The number of non-dual status technicians employed by the Air Force Reserve as of September 30, 2014, may not exceed 90.

(b) Non-dual status technicians defined.—In this section, the term “non-dual status technician” has the meaning given that term in section 10217(a) of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for operational support.

(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4401.

(b) Construction of authorization.—The authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) supersedes any other authorization of appropriations (definite or indefinite) for such purpose for fiscal year 2014.

SEC. 501. Service credit for cyberspace experience or advanced education upon original appointment as a commissioned officer.

(1) in subsections (a)(2) and (c), by inserting “or (g)” after “subsection (b)”; and

“(g) (1) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, if the Secretary of a military department determines that the number of commissioned officers with cyberspace-related experience or advanced education serving on active duty in an armed force under the jurisdiction of such Secretary is critically below the number needed, such Secretary may credit any person receiving an original appointment with a period of constructive service for the following:

“(A) Special experience or training in a particular cyberspace-related field if such experience or training is directly related to the operational needs of the armed force concerned.

“(B) Any period of advanced education in a cyberspace-related field beyond the baccalaureate degree level if such advanced education is directly related to the operational needs of the armed force concerned.

“(2) Constructive service credited an officer under this subsection shall not exceed one year for each year of special experience, training, or advanced education, and not more than three years total constructive service may be credited.

“(3) Constructive service credited an officer under this subsection is in addition to any service credited that officer under subsection (a) and shall be credited at the time of the original appointment of the officer.

“(4) The authority to award constructive service credit under this subsection expires on December 31, 2018.”.

SEC. 506. Information to be provided to boards considering officers for selective early removal from the reserve active-status list.

(3) by striking “, in the number specified by the Secretary by each grade and competitive category”; and

“(2) The Secretary of the military department concerned shall specify the number of officers described in paragraph (1) that a selection board convened under section 14101(b) of this title may recommend for removal from the reserve active-status list.

“(3) When the Secretary of the military department concerned submits a list of officers to a selection board convened under section 14101(b) of this title to consider officers for selection for removal from the reserve active-status list under this section, such list (except as provided in paragraph (4)) shall include each officer on the reserve active-status list in the same grade and competitive category whose position on the reserve active-status list is between that of the most junior officer in that grade and competitive category whose name is submitted to the board and that of the most senior officer in that grade and competitive category whose name is submitted to the board.

“(4) A list under paragraph (3) may not include an officer in that grade and competitive category who has been approved for voluntary retirement or who is to be involuntary retired under any provision of law during the fiscal year in which the selection board is convened or during the following fiscal year.”.

SEC. 507. Removal of restrictions on the transfer of officers between the active and inactive National Guard.

(a) Army National Guard.—During the period ending on December 31, 2016, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army:

(1) An officer of the Army National Guard who fills a vacancy in a federally recognized unit of the Army National Guard may be transferred from the active Army National Guard to the inactive Army National Guard.

(2) An officer of the Army National Guard transferred to the inactive Army National Guard pursuant to paragraph (1) may be transferred from the inactive Army National Guard to the active Army National Guard to fill a vacancy in a federally recognized unit.

(b) Air National Guard.—During the period ending on December 31, 2016, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Air Force:

(1) An officer of the Air National Guard who fills a vacancy in a federally recognized unit of the Air National Guard may be transferred from the active Air National Guard to the inactive Air National Guard.

(2) An officer of the Air National Guard transferred to the inactive Air National Guard pursuant to paragraph (1) may be transferred from the inactive Air National Guard to the active Air National Guard to fill a vacancy in a federally recognized unit.

SEC. 508. Limitation on certain cancellations of deployment of reserve component units within 180 days of scheduled date of deployment.

(a) Limitation.—The deployment of a unit of a reserve component of the Armed Forces described in subsection (b) may not be cancelled during the 180-day period ending on the date on which the unit is otherwise scheduled for deployment without the approval, in writing, of the Secretary of Defense.

(b) Covered deployments.—A deployment of a unit of a reserve component described in this subsection is a deployment whose cancellation as described in subsection (a) is due to the deployment of a unit of a regular component of the Armed Forces to carry out the mission for which the unit of the reserve component was otherwise to be deployed.

(c) Nondelegation of approval.—The Secretary may not delegate the approval of cancellations of deployments under subsection (a).

(d) Notice to Congress and Governors.—On approving the cancellation of deployment of a unit under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the Governor concerned a notice on the approval of cancellation of deployment of the unit.

(a) In general.—Subsection (a) of section 509 of title 32, United States Code, is amended by striking “may use” and inserting “shall use”.

(A) by striking “Secretary of Defense” and inserting “Chief of the National Guard Bureau”; and

(B) by striking “Secretary” and inserting “Chief of the National Guard Bureau”;

(A) by inserting “of Defense” after “Secretary” in the matter preceding subparagraph (A); and

(B) in subparagraph (A), by striking “, except that” and all that follows through “$62,500,000”; and

(c) Persons eligible to participate.—Subsection (e) of such section is amended by striking “Secretary of Defense” and inserting “Chief of the National Guard Bureau”.

(1) by striking “Secretary of Defense” and inserting “Chief of the National Guard Bureau”; and

(2) by striking “Secretary” and inserting “Chief of the National Guard Bureau”.

SEC. 511. Expansion and enhancement of authorities relating to protected communications of members of the Armed Forces and prohibited retaliatory actions.

(a) Expansion of prohibited retaliatory personnel actions.—Subsection (b) of section 1034 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting “or being perceived as making or preparing” after “making or preparing”;

(i) in clause (i), by inserting “or a representative of a Member of Congress” after “a Member of Congress”;

“(v) a court, grand jury, or court-martial proceeding, or an authorized official of the Department of Justice or another law enforcement agency; or”; and

(v) in clause (vi), as redesignated by clause (iii) of this subparagraph, by striking the period at the end and inserting “; or”; and

“(C) testimony, or otherwise participating in or assisting in an investigation or proceeding related to a communication under subparagraph (A) or (B), or filing, causing to be filed, participating in, or otherwise assisting in an action brought under this section.”; and

(2) in paragraph (2), by inserting after “any favorable action” the following: “, or a significant change in a member's duties or responsibilities not commensurate with the member's grade”.

(b) Inspector General investigations of allegations.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended—

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking “paragraph (3)” and inserting “paragraph (4)”;

(2) by redesignating paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) as paragraphs (4), (5), and (6), respectively;

“(3) A communication described in paragraph (2) shall not be excluded from the protections provided in this section because—

“(A) the communication was made to a person who participated in an activity that the member reasonably believed to be covered by paragraph (2);

“(B) the communication revealed information that had previously been disclosed;

“(F) the communication was made during the normal course of duties of the member.”; and

(B) by striking “paragraph (3)(D)” and inserting “paragraph (4)(D)”; and

(c) Inspector General investigations of underlying allegations.—Subsection (d) of such section is amended by striking “subparagraph (A) or (B) of subsection (c)(2)” and inserting “subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of subsection (c)(2)”.

(A) by striking “subsection (c)(3)(E)” both places it appears and inserting “subsection (c)(4)(E)”;

(B) by inserting “and the Secretary of the military department concerned” after “the Secretary of Defense”; and

(2) in paragraph (3), by inserting “and the Secretary of the military department concerned” after “the Secretary of Defense”.

(1) by redesignating subsections (f), (g), (h), and (i) as subsections (g), (h), (j), and (k), respectively; and

“(f) Action in case of violations.— (1) Not later than 30 days after receiving a report from the Inspector General under subsection (e), the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Secretary of the military department concerned, as applicable, shall determine whether there is sufficient basis to conclude whether a personnel action prohibited by subsection (b) has occurred, and, if so, shall order such action as is necessary to correct the record of a personnel action prohibited by subsection (b). Such Secretary shall take any appropriate disciplinary action against the individual who committed such prohibited personnel action.

“(2) If the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Secretary of the military department concerned, as applicable, determines that an order for corrective or disciplinary action is not appropriate, not later than 30 days after making the determination, such Secretary shall—

“(A) provide to the Secretary of Defense and the member or former member, a notice of the determination and the reasons for not taking action; or

“(B) refer the report to the appropriate board for the correction of military records for further review under subsection (g).”.

(f) Correction of records.—Subsection (g) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (e)(1) of this section, is further amended—

(1) in paragraph (1), by adding at the end the following new sentence: “In a case referred to a board by the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Secretary of a military department when such Secretary has determined that a personnel action prohibited by subsection (b) has occurred, the board shall review the matter.”; and

(2) in paragraph (3), by striking “board elects to hold” in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) and inserting “board holds”.

(g) Review.—Subsection (h) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (e)(1) of this section, is further amended by striking “subsection (f)” and inserting “subsection (g)”.

SEC. 512. Enhancement of protection of rights of conscience of members of the Armed Forces and chaplains of such members.

(a) In general.—Subsection (a)(1) of section 533 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1727; 10 U.S.C. prec. 1030 note) is amended—

(1) by striking “The Armed Forces shall accommodate the beliefs” and inserting “Unless it could have an adverse impact on military readiness, unit cohesion, and good order and discipline, the Armed Forces shall accommodate individual expressions of belief”;

(3) by striking “use such beliefs” and inserting “use such expression of belief”.

(b) Regulations.—The implementing regulations required by subsection (c) of such section shall be prescribed by not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. In prescribing such regulations, the Secretary of Defense shall consult with the official military faith-group representatives who endorse military chaplains.

SEC. 513. Department of Defense Inspector General reports on compliance with requirements for the protection of rights of conscience of members of the Armed Forces and their chaplains.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date on which the regulations required by subsection (c) of section 533 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1726; 10 U.S.C. prec. 1030 note) are prescribed, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth an assessment by the Inspector General of the compliance of the Department of Defense with that section.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:

(A) An analysis of the regulations referred to in paragraph (1) for purposes of implementing the requirements of section 533 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, and an analysis of the compliance of the Department of Defense with that section and such regulations. The analysis shall include a review of the use by the Secretary and the Department of policy recommendations from nongovernment organizations for purposes of that section and such regulations, and an assessment whether the Department is seeking a wide variety of perspectives from outside nongovernment organizations with respect to policy on religious beliefs and expression for such purposes.

(B) An anonymous survey of a representative sample of members of the Armed Forces as to whether they have experienced or witnessed adverse personnel actions, discrimination, or denials of promotion, schooling, training, or assignment in the Armed Forces based on conscience, moral principles, or religious beliefs.

(C) An anonymous survey of a representative sample of military chaplains as to whether they have experienced or witnessed adverse personnel actions, discrimination, or denials of promotion, schooling, training, or assignment in the Armed Forces due to a refusal to perform any rite, ritual, or ceremony that violates their conscience, moral principles, or religious beliefs.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 18 months after the date on which the regulations required by subsection (c) of section 533 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 are prescribed, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the results of an investigation by the Inspector General into the compliance by the Armed Forces with the elements of the regulations on adverse personnel actions, discrimination, or denials of promotion, schooling, training, or assignment for members of the Armed Forces based on conscience, moral principles, or religious beliefs.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include an identification of the number of times the Inspector General or the Inspector General of a military department was contacted during the 18-month period beginning on the date the regulations were prescribed regarding an incident involving the conscience, moral principles, or religious beliefs of a member of the Armed Forces.

(c) Consultation.—In conducting any analysis, investigation, or survey for purposes of this section, the Inspector General shall consult with the Armed Forces Chaplains Board, as appropriate.

SEC. 521. Authority for joint professional military education Phase II instruction and credit to be offered and awarded through senior-level course of School of Advanced Military Studies of the United States Army Command and General Staff College.

“(E) The senior-level course of the School of Advanced Military Studies of the United States Army Command and General Staff College.”.

SEC. 522. Authority for Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences to support undergraduate and other medical education and training programs for military medical personnel.

(a) In general.—Section 2112(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(2) inserting after “advanced degrees” the following: “, undergraduate degrees, and certificates and certifications”.

(A) in the first sentence, by striking “located in or near the District of Columbia”;

(B) in the third sentence, by striking “in or near the District of Columbia”; and

(2) in subsection (e)(3) by inserting after “programs” the following: “, including undergraduate degree programs and certificate and certification programs,”.

SEC. 523. Expansion of eligibility for associate degree programs under the Community College of the Air Force.

“(3) Enlisted members of the armed forces other than the Air Force who are participating in joint-service medical training and education or are serving as instructors in such joint-service medical training and education.”.

SEC. 524. Additional requirements for approval of educational programs for purposes of certain educational assistance under laws administered by the Secretary of Defense.

(a) In general.—Chapter 101 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2006 the following new section:

“§ 2006a. Assistance for education and training: availability of certain assistance for use only at certain institutions of higher education

“(a) In general.—Effective as of August, 1, 2014, an individual eligible for assistance under a Department of Defense educational assistance program or authority covered by this section may, except as provided in subsection (b), only use such assistance for educational expenses incurred for an eligible program (as defined in section 481 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1088)) that—

“(1) is offered by an institution of higher education that has entered into, and is complying with, a program participation agreement under section 487 of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1094);

“(2) in the case of a program designed to prepare individuals for licensure or certification in any State, meets the instructional curriculum licensure or certification requirements of such State; and

“(3) in the case of a program designed to prepare individuals for employment pursuant to standards developed by a State board or agency in an occupation that requires approval or licensure for such employment, is approved or licensed by such State board or agency.

“(b) Waiver.—The Secretary of Defense may, by regulation, authorize the use of educational assistance under a Department of Defense educational assistance program or authority covered by this chapter for educational expenses incurred for a program of education that is not described in subsection (a) if the program—

“(1) is accredited and approved by a nationally recognized accrediting agency or association;

“(2) was not an eligible program described in subsection (a) at any time during the most recent two-year period;

“(3) is a program that the Secretary determines would further the purposes of the educational assistance programs or authorities covered by this chapter, or would further the education interests of students eligible for assistance under the such programs or authorities;

“(4) in the case of a program that prepares individuals for licensure or certification, includes instructional curriculum that satisfies the licensure or certification requirements of each State represented by the institution as being met by such program;

“(5) in the case of a program designed to prepare a student for employment in a recognized occupation requiring approval or licensure for employment by a State board or agency, the program is approved or licensed by such State board or agency; and

“(6) the institution providing the program does not provide any commission, bonus, or other incentive payment based directly or indirectly on success in securing enrollments or financial aid to any persons or entities engaged in any student recruiting or admission activities or in making decisions regarding the award of student financial assistance, except for the recruitment of foreign students residing in foreign countries who are not eligible to receive Federal student assistance.

“(1) The term ‘Department of Defense educational assistance programs and authorities covered by this section’ means the programs and authorities as follows:

“(A) The programs to assist military spouses in achieving education and training to expand employment and portable career opportunities under section 1784a of this title.

“(B) The authority to pay tuition for off-duty training or education of members of the armed forces under section 2007 of this title.

“(C) The program of educational assistance for members of the Selected Reserve under chapter 1606 of this title.

“(D) The program of educational assistance for reserve component members supporting contingency operations and certain other operations under chapter 1607 of this title.

“(E) Any other program or authority of the Department of Defense for assistance in education or training carried out under the laws administered by the Secretary of Defense that is designated by the Secretary, by regulation, for purposes of this section.

“(2) The term ‘institution of higher education’ has the meaning given that term in section 102 of the Higher Education Act for 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1002).”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 101 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2006 the following new item:

SEC. 525. Enhancement of mechanisms to correlate skills and training for military occupational specialties with skills and training required for civilian certifications and licenses.

(a) Improvement of information available to members of the Armed Forces about correlation.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretaries of the military departments, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall, to the maximum extent practicable, make information on civilian credentialing opportunities available to members of the Armed Forces beginning with, and at every stage of, training of members for military occupational specialties, in order to permit members—

(A) to evaluate the extent to which such training correlates with the skills and training required in connection with various civilian certifications and licenses; and

(B) to assess the suitability of such training for obtaining or pursuing such civilian certifications and licenses.

(2) COORDINATION WITH TRANSITION GOALS PLANS SUCCESS PROGRAM.—Information shall be made available under paragraph (1) in a manner consistent with the Transition Goals Plans Success (GPS) program.

(3) TYPES OF INFORMATION.—The information made available under paragraph (1) shall include, but not be limited to, the following:

(A) Information on the civilian occupational equivalents of military occupational specialties (MOS).

(B) Information on civilian license or certification requirements, including examination requirements.

(C) Information on the availability and opportunities for use of educational benefits available to members of the Armed Forces, as appropriate, corresponding training, or continuing education that leads to a certification exam in order to provide a pathway to credentialing opportunities.

(4) USE AND ADAPTATION OF CERTAIN PROGRAMS.—In making information available under paragraph (1), the Secretaries of the military departments may use and adapt appropriate portions of the Credentialing Opportunities On-line (COOL) programs of the Army and the Navy and the Credentialing and Educational Research Tool (CERT) of the Air Force.

(b) Improvement of access of accredited civilian credentialing and related entities to military training content.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretaries of the military departments, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall, to the maximum extent practicable consistent with national security and privacy requirements, make available to entities specified in paragraph (2), upon request of such entities, information such as military course training curricula, syllabi, and materials, levels of military advancement attained, and professional skills developed.

(B) Entities approved by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or by State approving agencies, for purposes of the use of educational assistance benefits under the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

(3) CENTRAL REPOSITORY.—The actions taken pursuant to paragraph (1) may include the establishment of a central repository of information on training and training materials provided members in connection with military occupational specialities that is readily accessible by entities specified in paragraph (2) in order to meet requests described in paragraph (1).

SEC. 526. Coverage of military occupational specialities relating to military information technology under pilot program on receipt of civilian credentials for skills required for military occupational specialties.

(1) to ensure that the Troops-to-Teachers Program is a priority of the nation’s commitment to the higher education of members of the Armed Forces; and

(2) to provide funds for the Troops-to-Teachers Program in order to help separating members of the Armed Forces and veterans who wish to transition into a teaching career.

SEC. 528. Conforming amendment relating to renaming of North Georgia College and State University as University of North Georgia.

SEC. 531. Prohibition on service in the Armed Forces by individuals who have been convicted of certain sexual offenses.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 37 of title 10, United States Code, is amended adding at the end the following new section:

“§ 657. Prohibition on service in the armed forces by individuals convicted of certain sexual offenses

“(a) Prohibition on commissioning or enlistment.—A person who has been convicted of an offense specified in subsection (b) under Federal or State law may not be processed for commissioning or permitted to enlist in the armed forces.

“(b) Covered offenses.—An offense specified in this subsection is any felony offense as follows:

“(4) An attempt to commit an offense specified in paragraph (1) through (3), as punishable under applicable Federal or State law.”.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 37 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

(b) Repeal of superseded prohibition.—Section 523 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1723; 10 U.S.C. 504 note) is repealed.

SEC. 532. Temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a member of the Armed Forces on active duty who is accused of committing a sexual assault or related offense.

(a) In general.—Chapter 39 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 673 the following new section:

“§ 674. Temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a member on active duty accused of committing a sexual assault or related offense

“(a) Guidance for timely consideration and action.—The Secretary concerned may provide guidance, within guidelines provided by the Secretary of Defense, for commanders regarding their authority to make a timely determination, and to take action, regarding whether a member of the armed forces serving on active duty who is alleged to have committed an offense under section 920, 920a, 920b, 920c, or 925 of this title (article 120, 120a, 120b, 120c, or 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) or an attempt to commit such an offense as punishable under section 880 of this title (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) should be temporarily reassigned or removed from a position of authority or from an assignment, not as a punitive measure, but solely for the purpose of maintaining good order and discipline within the member's unit.

“(b) Time for determination.—A determination described in subsection (a) may be made at any time afer receipt of notification of an unrestricted report of a sexual assault or other sex-related offense that identifies the member as an alleged perpetrator.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 39 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 673 the following new item:

(c) Additional training requirement for commanders.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide for inclusion of information and discussion regarding the availability and use of the authority described by section 674 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), as part of the training for new and prospective commanders at all levels of command required by section 585(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note).

SEC. 533. Issuance of regulations applicable to the Coast Guard regarding consideration of request for permanent change of station or unit transfer by victim of sexual assault.

SEC. 534. Inclusion and command review of information on sexual-related offenses in personnel service records of members of the Armed Forces.

(1) IN GENERAL.—If a complaint of a sexual-related offense is made against a member of the Armed Forces and the complaint is substantiated and the member is convicted by court-martial or receives non-judicial punishment or administrative action for such sexual-related offense, a notation to that effect shall be placed in the personnel service record of the member, regardless of the member's grade.

(2) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the inclusion of information in personnel service records under paragraph (1) is to alert commanders to the members of their command who have received courts-martial conviction, non-judicial punishment, or administrative action for sexual-related offenses in order to reduce the likelihood that repeat offenses will escape the notice of commanders.

(b) Limitation on placement.—A notation under subsection (a) may not be placed in the restricted section of the personnel service record of a member.

(c) Construction.—Nothing in subsection (a) or (b) may be construed to prohibit or limit the capacity of a member of the Armed Forces to challenge or appeal the placement of a notation, or location of placement of a notation, in the member's personnel service record in accordance with procedures otherwise applicable to such challenges or appeals.

(d) Substantiated complaints.—For purposes of implementing this section, the Secretary of Defense shall use the definition of substantiated developed for purposes of the annual report on sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces prepared under section 1631 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (10 U.S.C. 1561 note).

(e) Command review of history of sexual-Related offenses of members upon assignment or transfer to new unit.—

(1) REVIEW REQUIRED.—Under uniform regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the commanding officer of a facility, installation, or unit to which a member of the Armed Forces described in paragraph (2) is permanently assigned or transferred shall review the history of substantiated sexual offenses of the member in order to familiarize such officer with such history of the member.

(2) COVERED MEMBERS.—A member of the Armed Forces described in this paragraph is a member of the Armed Forces who, at the time of assignment or transfer as described in paragraph (1), has a history of one or more substantiated sexual offenses as documented in the personnel service record of such member or such other records or files as the Secretary shall specify in the regulations prescribed under paragraph (1).

SEC. 535. Enhanced responsibilities of Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office for Department of Defense sexual assault prevention and response program.

(a) In general.—Section 1611(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended by striking “shall—” and all that follows and inserting “shall do the following:

“(1) Oversee development and implementation of the comprehensive policy for the Department of Defense sexual assault prevention and response program, including guidance and assistance for the military departments in addressing matters relating to sexual assault prevention and response.

“(2) Serve as the single point of authority, accountability, and oversight for the sexual assault prevention and response program.

“(3) Undertake responsibility for the oversight of the implementation of the sexual assault prevention and response program by the Armed Forces.

“(4) Collect and maintain data of the military departments on sexual assault in accordance with section 1615.

“(5) Provide oversight to ensure that the military departments maintain documents relating to the following:

“(A) Allegations and complaints of sexual assault involving members of the Armed Forces.

“(B) Courts-martial or trials of members of the Armed Forces for offenses relating to sexual assault.

“(6) Act as liaison between the Department of Defense and other Federal and State agencies on programs and efforts relating to sexual assault prevention and response.

“(7) Oversee development of strategic program guidance and joint planning objectives for resources in support of the sexual assault prevention and response program, and make recommendations on modifications to policy, law, and regulations needed to ensure the continuing availability of such resources.

“(8) Provide to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs any records or documents on sexual assault in the Armed Forces, including restricted reports with the approval of the individuals who filed such reports, that are required by the Secretary for purposes of the administration of the laws administered by the Secretary.”.

(b) Collection and maintenance of data.—Subtitle A of title XVI of such Act (10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“SEC. 1615. Collection and maintenance of data of military departments on sexual assault prevention and response.

“(1) Collect from each military department on a quarterly and annual basis data of such military department on sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces in a manner consistent with the policy and procedures developed pursuant to section 586 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 1561 note) that protect the privacy of individuals named in records and the status of records.

“(2) Maintain data collected from the military departments under paragraph (1).

“(3) Assemble from the data collected and maintained under this section quarterly and annual reports on the involvement of members of the Armed Forces in incidents of sexual assault.

“(4) Develop metrics to measure the effectiveness of, and compliance with, training and awareness objectives of the military departments on sexual assault prevention and response.

“(5) Establish categories of information to be provided by the military departments in connection with reports on sexual assault prevention and response, including, but not limited to, the annual reports required by section 1631, and ensure that the submittals of the military departments for purposes of such reports include data within such categories.”.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1631(f) of such Act (10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended—

(A) by redesignating paragraphs (5) and (6) as paragraphs (6) and (7), respectively; and

“(5) The case synopsis shall indicate the unit of each member of the Armed Forces accused of committing a sexual assault and the unit of each member of the Armed Forces who is a victim of sexual assault.”.

(2) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.—The amendments made by paragraph (1) shall apply beginning with the report regarding sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces required to be submitted by March 1, 2014, under section 1631 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011.

SEC. 536. Comprehensive review of adequacy of training for members of the Armed Forces on sexual assault prevention and response.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a review of the adequacy of the training provided members of the Armed Forces on sexual assault prevention and response.

(2) RESPONSIVE ACTION.—Upon completion of the review under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall prescribe in regulations such modifications of the training provided members of the Armed Forces on sexual assault prevention and response as the Secretary considers appropriate to address any inadequacies in such training identified during the review.

(b) Review of personnel responsible for sexual assault prevention and response activities.—

(1) REVIEW OF PERSONNEL.—The Secretary shall carry out a review of the adequacy of the training, qualifications, and experience of each member of the Armed Forces and civilian employee of the Department of Defense who is assigned to a position that includes responsibility for sexual assault prevention and response within the Armed Forces for the discharge of such responsibility.

(2) ASSESSMENT OF CERTAIN ELEMENTS OF PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PROGRAM.—In carrying out the review under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall also conduct an assessment of the adequacy of the training and certifications required for certain such personnel by section 584 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1433; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note).

(3) RESPONSIVE PERSONNEL ACTIONS.—If as a result of the review under paragraph (1) the Secretary determines that any member or civilian employee described in that paragraph does not have the training, qualifications, or experience required to discharge the responsibility referred to in that paragraph, the Secretary shall take appropriate responsive actions, including—

(B) reassigning such member or civilian employee to duties other than sexual assault prevention and response and replacing such member or civilian with a member or civilian employee qualified to discharge such responsibility.

(4) RESPONSIVE ACTIONS REGARDING PROGRAM ELEMENTS.—Upon completion of the review under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall prescribe in regulations the following:

(A) Appropriate minimum levels of training, qualifications, and experience for members of the Armed Forces and civilian personnel of the Department for the discharge of responsibilities for sexual assault prevention and response within the Armed Forces.

(B) Such requirements for improvements in the training provided to members and civilian employees referred to in subparagraph (A) as the Secretary considers appropriate, including improvements to the training and certifications referred to in paragraph (2), in order to ensure that such members and civilian employees are properly trained and certified to discharge responsibilities for sexual assault prevention and response within the Armed Forces.

(C) Such requirements for improvements in the processes used to select and assign personnel to sexual assault prevention and response billets as the Secretary considers appropriate to ensure that the highest caliber candidates are selected and assigned to such billets.

(5) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth the following:

(A) The findings and responsive action taken based on review under paragraph (1).

(B) Recommendations of the Secretary for such legislative action as the Secretary considers appropriate—

(i) to improve training provided members of the Armed Forces on sexual assault and prevention; and

(ii) to ensure that sexual assault prevention and response positions are considered career enhancing assignments.

SEC. 537. Availability of Sexual Assault Response Coordinators for members of the National Guard and the Reserves.

“(2) AVAILABILITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVES.—The Secretary of the military department concerned shall ensure that each member of the National Guard or Reserve who—

“(A) is the victim of a sexual assault during the performance of duties as a member of the National Guard or Reserve; or

“(B) is the victim of a sexual assault committed by a member of the National Guard or Reserves,

has access to a Sexual Assault Response Coordinator not later than two business days following the date of such member's request for assistance from a Sexual Assault Response Coordinator.”.

SEC. 538. Retention of certain forms in connection with Restricted Reports and Unrestricted Reports on sexual assault involving members of the Armed Forces.

(a) Requirement for retention.—Subsection (a) of section 577 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1762; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended—

(1) by striking “At the request of a member of the Armed Forces who files a Restricted Report on an incident of sexual assault involving the member, the Secretary of Defense shall” and inserting “The Secretary of Defense shall”; and

(2) by striking “the Restricted Report” and inserting “a Restricted Report or Unrestricted Report on an incident of sexual assault involving a member of the Armed Forces”.

(b) Conforming amendment.—The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:

“SEC. 577. Retention of certain forms in connection with Restricted Reports and Unrestricted Reports on sexual assault involving members of the Armed Forces”.

SEC. 539. Special Victims' Counsel for victims of sexual assault committed by members of the Armed Forces.

(a) Special Victims' Counsel for certain victims of sexual assault committed by members of the Armed Forces.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretaries of the military departments shall each implement a program on the provision of a Special Victims' Counsel to members of the Armed Forces, and dependents of members, who are victims of a sexual assault committed by a member of the Armed Forces.

(2) QUALIFICATION.—An individual may not be designated as a Special Victims' Counsel under this subsection unless the individual is—

(A) a judge advocate who is a graduate of an accredited law school or is a member of the bar of a Federal court or the highest court of a State; and

(B) certified as competent to be designated as a Special Victims' Counsel by the Judge Advocate General of the Armed Force of which the individual is a member.

(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subparagraph (C), the duties of a Special Victims' Counsel shall include the provision of legal advice and assistance to a victim described in paragraph (1) in connection with criminal and civil legal matters related to the sexual assault committed against the victim, including the following:

(i) Legal advice and assistance regarding any potential criminal liability of the victim.

(ii) Legal advice and assistance regarding the victim’s responsibility to testify, and other duties to the court.

(iii) Legal advice regarding the potential for civil litigation against other parties (other than the Department of Defense).

(iv) Legal advice regarding any proceedings of the military justice process which the victim may observe.

(v) Legal advice and assistance regarding any proceeding of the military justice process in which the victim may participate as a witness or other party.

(vi) Legal advice and assistance regarding available military or civilian restraining or protective orders.

(vii) Legal advice and assistance regarding available military and veteran benefits.

(viii) Legal assistance in personal civil legal matters in connection with the sexual assault in accordance with section 1044 of title 10, United States Code.

(ix) Such other legal advice and assistance as the Secretary of the military department concerned shall specify for purposes of the program implemented under this subsection.

(B) NATURE OF RELATIONSHIP.—The relationship between a Special Victims' Counsel and a victim in the provision of legal advice and assistance shall be the relationship between an attorney and client.

“(b) Availability of Special Victims' Counsel for victims of sexual assault committed by members of the Armed Forces.— (1) A member of the armed forces, or a dependent of a member, who is the victim of a sexual assault described in paragraph (2) may be provided assistance by a Special Victims' Counsel.

“(2) A sexual assault described in this paragraph is any offense if alleged to have been committed by a member of the armed forces as follows:

“(A) Rape or sexual assault under section 920 of this title (article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

“(B) An attempt to commit an offense specified in subparagraph (A) as punishable under section 880 of this title (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

“(3) A member of the armed forces or dependent who is the victim of sexual assault described in paragraph (2) shall be informed of the availability of assistance under paragraph (1) as soon as the member or dependent seeks assistance from a Sexual Assault Response Coordinator, a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate, a military criminal investigator, a victim/witness liaison, a trial counsel, health care providers, or any other personnel designated by the Secretary of the military department concerned for purposes of this paragraph. The member or dependent shall also be informed that the assistance of a Special Victims' Counsel under paragraph (1) is optional and may be declined, in whole or in part, at any time.

“(4) Assistance of a Special Victims' Counsel under paragraph (1) shall be available to a member or dependent regardless of whether the member or dependent elects unrestricted or restricted (confidential) reporting of the sexual assault.”.

(2) REPORTING.—Subsection (c) of such section, as redesignated by paragraph (1)(A) of this subsection, is further amended in paragraph (2)—

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking “may” and inserting “shall, upon request,”; and

(A) by inserting “a Special Victims' Counsel,” after “a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate,”; and

(B) by striking “or a trial counsel” and inserting “a trial counsel, health care providers, or any other personnel designated by the Secretary of the military department concerned for purposes of this paragraph”.

(1) HEADING AMENDMENT.—The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:

“§ 1565b. Victims of sexual assault: access to legal assistance and services of Sexual Assault Coordinators, Sexual Assault Victim Advocates, and Special Victims' Counsels”.

(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 80 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 1565b and inserting the following new item:

SEC. 540. Sense of Congress on commanding officer responsibility for command climate free of retaliation.

(1) commanding officers are responsible for establishing a command climate in which sexual assault allegations are properly managed and fairly evaluated and a victim can report criminal activity, including sexual assault, without fear of retaliation, including ostracism and group pressure from other members of the command;

(2) the failure of commanding officers to maintain such a command climate is an appropriate basis for relief from their command positions; and

(3) senior officers should evaluate subordinate commanding officers on their performance in establishing a command climate as described in paragraph (1) during the regular periodic counseling and performance appraisal process prescribed by the Armed Force concerned for inclusion in the systems of records maintained and used for assignment and promotion selection boards.

SEC. 541. Commanding officer action on reports on sexual offenses involving members of the Armed Forces.

(a) Immediate action required.—A commanding officer who receives a report of a sexual-related offense involving a member of the Armed Forces in the chain of command of such officer shall act upon the report in accordance with subsection (b) immediately after receipt of the report by the commanding officer.

(b) Action required.—The action required by this subsection with respect to a report described in subsection (a) is the referral of the report to the military criminal investigation organization with responsibility for investigating that offense of the military department concerned or such other investigation service of the military department concerned as the Secretary of the military department concerned may specify for purposes of this section.

SEC. 542. Department of Defense Inspector General investigation of allegations of retaliatory personnel actions taken in response to making protected communications regarding sexual assault.

SEC. 543. Advancement of submittal deadline for report of independent panel on assessment of military response systems to sexual assault.

SEC. 544. Assessment of clemency in the military justice system and of database of alleged offenders of sexual assault as additional duties of independent panel on review and assessment of systems to respond to sexual assault cases.

(1) in subparagraph (B), by adding at the end the following new sentence: “The comparison shall also include an assessment of the opportunities for clemency provided in the military and civilian systems, the appropriateness of clemency proceedings in the military system, the manner in which clemency is used in the military system, and whether clemency in the military justice system could be reserved until the end of the military appeals process.”;

SEC. 545. Assessment of provisions and proposed provisions of law on sexual assault prevention and response as additional duties of independent panels for review and assessment of Uniform Code of Military Justice and judicial proceedings of sexual assault cases.

(a) Assessment as additional duties of panel on response systems to sexual assault crimes.—Paragraph (1) of section 576(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1760), as amended by section 544 of this Act, is further amended—

“(J) An assessment of the effectiveness of the provisions of law on sexual assault prevention and response in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, including the provisions establishing or amending requirements and authorities relating to sexual assault prevention and response.

“(K) An assessment of the potential effectiveness of the provisions of law on sexual assault prevention and response offered by Senators who are members of the Committee on Armed of the Senate in the markup by the Committee of the Bill to enact the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, and not adopted by the Committee during that markup for that Bill, including the provisions seeking to establish or amend requirements and authorities relating to sexual assault prevention and response.”.

(b) Assessment as additional duties of panel on judicial proceedings.—Paragraph (2) of such section is amended—

“(J) Monitor and assess the implementation of the provisions of law on judicial proceedings in connection with sexual assault in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, including provisions amending chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), and provisions establishing or amending other requirements and authorities relating to such judicial proceedings.

“(K) Assess the potential effectiveness of the provisions of law on judicial proceedings on sexual assault offered by Senators who are members of the Committee on Armed of the Senate in the markup by the Committee of the Bill to enact the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, and not adopted by the Committee during that markup for that Bill, including provisions seeking to amend chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), and provisions seeking to establish or amend other requirements and authorities relating to such judicial proceedings.”.

(c) Transmittal of provisions offered but not adopted.—The Chairman and Ranking Member of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate shall jointly transmit to the independent panels established pursuant to paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 576(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (126 Stat. 1758) the applicable provisions of law offered by Senators who are members of the Committee on Armed of the Senate in the markup by the Committee of the Bill to enact this Act, and not adopted by the Committee during that markup for that Bill, for purposes of the discharge by such panels of the additional duties arising under the amendments made by subsections (a) and (b).

SEC. 546. Assessment of compensation and restitution of victims of offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice as additional duty of independent panel on review and assessment of judicial proceedings of sexual assault cases.

SEC. 551. Elimination of five-year statute of limitations on trial by court-martial for additional offenses involving sex-related crimes.

(a) In general.—Subsection (a) of section 843 of title 10, United States Code (article 43 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by striking “rape, or rape of a child” and inserting “rape or sexual assault, or rape or sexual assault of a child”.

(b) Conforming amendment.—Subsection (b)(2)(B)(i) of such section (article) is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: “, unless the offense is covered by subsection (a)”.

(c) Effective date.—The amendments made by this section shall apply with respect to offenses committed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 552. Review of decisions not to refer charges of certain sexual offenses to trial by court-martial.

(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall require the Secretaries of the military departments to provide for review of decisions not to refer charges to trial by court-martial in cases where a specified sexual offense has been alleged by a victim of the alleged offense.

(b) Specified sexual offenses.—For purposes of this section, a specified sexual offense is any of the following:

(1) Rape or sexual assault under subsection (a) or (b) of section 920 of title 10, United States Code (article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

(2) Forcible sodomy under section 925 of title 10, United States Code (article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

(3) An attempt to commit an offense specified in paragraph (1) or (2) as punishable under section 880 of title 10, United States Code (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

(c) Review of cases not referred to court-martial following staff judge advocate recommendation of referral for trial.—In any case where a staff judge advocate, pursuant to section 834 of title 10, United States Code (article 34 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), recommends that charges of a specified sexual offense be referred to trial by court-martial and the convening authority decides not to refer the charges to a court-martial, the convening authority shall forward the case file to the Secretary of the military department concerned for review as a superior authorized to exercise general court-martial convening authority.

(d) Review of cases not referred to court-martial following staff judge advocate recommendation not to refer for trial.—In any case where a staff judge advocate, pursuant to section 834 of title 10, United States Code (article 34 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), recommends that charges of a specified sexual offense should not be referred to trial by court-martial and the convening authority decides not to refer the charges to a court-martial, the convening authority shall forward the case file for review by a superior commander authorized to exercise general court-martial convening authority.

(e) Elements of case file.—A case file forwarded to higher authority pursuant to subsection (c) or (d) shall include the following:

(1) All charges and specifications preferred under section 830 of title 10, United States Code (article 30 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

(2) All reports of investigations of such charges, including the military criminal investigative organization investigation report and the investigating officer’s report under section 832 of title 10, United States Code (article 32 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

(3) The written advice of the staff judge advocate to the convening authority pursuant to section 834 of title 10, United States Code (article 34 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), together with a certification by the staff judge advocate as to whether the facts as reported by the victim of the alleged offense or complaining witness, if true, would or would not constitute a specified sexual offense.

(4) A written statement explaining the reasons for the convening authority’s decision not to refer the charges to trial by court-martial.

(5) A certification that the victim of the alleged offense or complaining witness was informed of the convening authority’s decision to forward the case as provided in subsection (c) or (d).

(f) Notice on results or review.—The victim of the alleged offense shall be notified of the results of the review conducted under subsection (c) or (d) in the manner prescribed by the victims and witness assistance program of the Armed Force concerned.

(g) Allegation of specified sexual offense.—The Secretary of Defense shall require the Secretaries of the military departments to develop a system to ensure that a victim of an alleged offense has an opportunity to specify that the offense alleged is a specified sexual offense either at the time of making an unrestricted report of the allegation or during the criminal investigation of the allegation.

SEC. 553. Defense counsel interview of complaining witnesses in presence of trial counsel or outside counsel.

(1) by inserting “(a) Opportunity To obtain witnesses and other evidence.—” before “The trial counsel”;

(3) by inserting after subsection (a), as designated by paragraph (1), the following new subsection (b):

“(b) Interview of complaining witnesses by defense counsel.— (1) Upon notice by trial counsel to defense counsel of the name and address of the complaining witness or witnesses trial counsel intends to call to testify in any portion of an investigation under section 832 of this title (article 32) or a court-martial under this chapter, defense counsel shall make all requests to interview any such complaining witness through trial counsel.

“(2) If requested by a complaining witness subject to a request for interview under paragraph (1), any interview of the witness by defense counsel shall take place only in the presence of trial counsel, counsel for the witness, or outside counsel.”.

SEC. 554. Mandatory discharge or dismissal for certain sex-related offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice and trial of such offenses by general courts-martial.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 856 of title 10, United States Code (article 56 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—

“(b) While a person subject to this chapter who is found guilty of an offense under section 920, 920b, or 925 of this title (article 120, 120b, or 125) or an attempt to commit such an offense as punishable under section 880 of this title (article 80) shall be punished as a general court-martial may direct, such punishment must include, at a minimum, dismissal or dishonorable discharge.”.

(A) SECTION HEADING.—The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:

(B) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter VIII of chapter 47 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 856 and inserting the following new item:

(b) Jurisdiction limited to general courts-martial.—Section 818 of such title (article 18 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended—

(2) in the third sentence, by striking “However, a general court-martial” and inserting the following:

“(c) Consistent with section 810, 820, and 856(b) of this title (articles 19, 20, and 56(b)), only general courts-martial have jurisdiction over an offense specified in section 856(b)(2) of this title (article 56(b)(2)).”.

(c) Effective date.—The amendments made by this section shall take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 555. Limitation on authority of convening authority to modify findings of a court-martial.

(a) Limitation of authority to offenses that would not normally warrant trial by court-martial.—Subsection (c) of section 860 of title 10, United States Code (article 60 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—

(B) by striking “is not required. However,” and inserting “only with respect to a qualified offense. With respect to such an offense,”;

“(4) (A) In paragraph (3), the term ‘qualified offense’ means, except as provided in subparagraph (B), an offense under this chapter for which—

“(i) the maximum sentence of confinement that may be adjudged does not exceed one year; and

“(ii) the sentence adjudged does not include dismissal, a dishonorable or bad-conduct discharge, or confinement for more than six months.

“(v) Such other offenses as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe by regulation.”.

(b) Requirement for explanation in writing.—Such subsection is further amended by adding after paragraph (4), as added by subsection (a)(2), the following new paragraph:

“(5) If the convening authority or other person authorized to act under this section modifies the findings or sentence of a court-martial, such person shall prepare a written explanation for such modification. Such explanation shall be made a part of the record of trial and action thereon.”.

(c) Conforming amendment.—Subsection (e)(3) of such section (article) is amended in the first sentence by inserting “(if authorized to do so under subsection (c))” after “findings and sentence”.

(d) Effective date.—The amendments made by subsections (a) and (c) shall apply with respect to offenses committed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 556. Participation by complaining witnesses in clemency phase of courts-martial process.

“(5) (A) If an accused elects to submit matters for consideration by the convening authority under this subsection, a copy of any portion of such matters that refers to a complaining witness shall be provided to the complaining witness before the convening authority takes any action on the findings or sentence under this section.

“(B) (i) Upon receipt of matters under this paragraph, a complaining witness shall have 10 days to submit materials in response to such matters to the convening authority.

“(ii) If a complaining witness shows that additional time is required for submission of materials under this subparagraph, the convening authority or other person taking action under this section, for good cause, may extend the applicable period for submission of such materials for not more than an additional 20 days.

“(6) In any case in which findings and sentence have been adjudged for an offense involving a complaining witness, the complaining witness shall be provided an opportunity to submit matters to the convening authority for consideration prior to taking action under this section.

“(7) The convening authority shall not consider under this section any submitted matters that go to the character of a complaining witness unless such matters were presented at the court-martial.”.

SEC. 557. Secretary of Defense report on modifications to the Uniform Code of Military Justice to prohibit sexual acts and contacts between military instructors and trainees.

(a) Report required.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth the recommendations of the Secretary for such legislative action as the Secretary considers appropriate to modify chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), to prohibit sexual acts and contacts between military instructors and their trainees.

(b) Covered military instructors.—For purposes the report required by this section, military instructors shall include the following:

(6) Such other members of the Armed Forces as the Secretary considers appropriate for purposes of the report as having supervisory authority over new recruits in the Armed Forces undergoing basic training (or its equivalent).

SEC. 558. Sense of Senate on disposition of charges involving certain sexual misconduct offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice through courts-martial.

(1) any charge regarding an offense specified in subsection (b) should be disposed of by court-martial, rather than by non-judicial punishment or administrative action; and

(2) in the case of any charge regarding an offense specified in subsection (b) that is disposed of by non-judicial punishment or administrative action, rather than by court-martial, the disposition authority should include in the case file a justification for the disposition of the charge by non-judicial punishment or administrative action, rather than by court-martial.

(b) Covered offenses.—An offense specified in this subsection is any of the following offenses under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice):

(1) Rape or sexual assault under subsection (a) or (b) of section 920 of such chapter (article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

(2) Forcible sodomy under section 925 of such chapter (article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

(3) An attempt to commit an offense specified in paragraph (1) or (2), as punishable under section 880 of such chapter (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

SEC. 559. Sense of Senate on the discharge in lieu of court-martial of members of the Armed Forces who commit sexual-related offenses.

(1) the Armed Forces should be sparing in discharging in lieu of court-martial members of the Armed Forces who have committed rape, sexual assault, forcible sodomy, or attempts to commit such offenses, and should do so only when the facts of the case clearly warrant such discharge;

(2) whenever possible, the victims of offenses referred to in paragraph (1) should be consulted prior to the determination regarding whether to discharge the members who committed such offenses;

(3) commanding officers should consider the views of victims of offenses referred to in paragraph (1) when determining whether to discharge the members who committed such offenses in lieu of trying such members by court-martial; and

(4) the discharge of any member who is discharged as described in paragraph (1) should be characterized as Other Than Honorable.

SEC. 561. Modification of eligibility for appointment as Judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.

(a) Modification.—Section 942(b) of title 10, United States Code (article 142(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—

“(4) A person may not be appointed as a judge of the court within seven years after relief from active duty as a commissioned officer of a regular component of an armed force.”.

(b) Effective date.—The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to appointments to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces that occur on or after that date.

SEC. 562. Repeal of the offense of consensual sodomy under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

(a) Restatement of Article 125 with consensual sodomy omitted.—Section 925 of title 10, United States Code (article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:

“(a) Forcible sodomy.—Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex by force or without the consent of the other person is guilty of forcible sodomy and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

“(b) Bestiality.—Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with an animal is guilty of bestiality and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

“(c) Scope of offenses.—Penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete an offense under subsection (a) or (b).”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by striking the item relating to section 925 (article 125) and inserting the following new item:

SEC. 563. Prohibition of retaliation against members of the Armed Forces for reporting a criminal offense.

(a) Regulations on prohibition of retaliation required.—The Secretary of Defense shall, not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, prescribe regulations, or require the Secretaries of the military departments to prescribe regulations, that prohibit retaliation against an alleged victim or other member of the Armed Forces who reports a criminal offense. The regulations shall prescribe that a violation of the regulations is an offense punishable under section 892 of title 10, United States Code (article 92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

(b) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report setting forth the recommendations of the Secretary as to whether chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), should be amended to prohibit retaliation against an alleged victim or other member of the Armed Forces who reports a criminal offense.

(c) Retaliation.—For purposes of this section, retaliation shall include, as a minimum, taking or threatening to take any adverse personnel action, or failing to take or threatening not to take a favorable personnel action, with respect to a member of the Armed Forces because the member reported a criminal offense.

SEC. 564. Extension of crime victims' rights to victims of offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

(a) In general.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall recommend to the President modifications to the Manual for Courts-Martial, and prescribe such other regulations as the Secretary considers appropriate, to enforce the rights of victims of military crimes as specified in subsection (b) and to ensure compliance by responsible members of the Armed Forces and personnel of the Department of Defense with the obligations to enforce such rights.

(b) Rights.—The rights of victims of military crimes specified in this subsection are the following rights:

(2) The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public proceeding in an investigation under section 832 of title 10, United States Code (article 32 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), court-martial, involuntary plea hearing, pre-sentencing hearing, or parole hearing involving the offense or of any release or escape of the accused.

(3) The right not to be excluded from any public proceeding referred to in paragraph (2) unless the military judge or investigating officer, as applicable, after receiving clear and convincing evidence, determines that testimony by the victim would be materially altered if the victim heard other testimony at that proceeding.

(4) The right to be reasonably heard at any public proceeding referred to in paragraph (2).

(8) The right to be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy.

(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of the recommendations and regulations required by subsection (a), a victim of a military crime shall be any person who has suffered direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary harm as a result of the commission of—

(B) a violation of any other law if any portion of the investigation of such violation is conducted primarily by an element of the Department of Defense.

(2) UNDERAGE, INCOMPETENT, AND OTHER INDIVIDUAL VICTIMS.—For such purposes, in the case of a victim who is under 18 years of age, incompetent, incapacitated, or deceased, a victim of a military crime includes one of the following (in order of precedence): a spouse, legal guardian, parent, child, sibling, another family member, or another person designated by the military judge or other appropriate authority.

(3) INSTITUTIONAL ENTITY VICTIMS.—For such purposes, if a victim is an institutional entity, the victim of a military crime is an authorized representative of the entity.

(4) GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES EXCLUDED.—For such purposes, departments and agencies of the Federal Government, and agencies of State and local governments, are not victims of military crimes.

(d) Mechanisms for affording rights.—The recommendations and regulations required by subsection (a) shall include the following:

(1) Mechanisms for ensuring that victims of military crimes are afforded the rights specified in subsection (b) in all applicable proceedings.

(2) Mechanisms for ensuring that members of the Armed Forces and civilian personnel of the Department of Defense (including military judges, trial counsel, military criminal investigation organizations, services, and personnel, and other members and personnel of the Department of Defense engaged in the detection, investigation, or prosecution of offenses under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice)) make their best efforts to see that victims of military crimes are notified of, and accorded, the rights specified in subsection (b) in all applicable proceedings.

(3) Mechanisms for the enforcement of such rights, including such mechanisms for application for such rights and for consideration and disposition of applications for such rights as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate.

(4) The designation of an authority within the Department of Defense to receive and investigate complaints relating to the provision or violation of the rights of victims of military crimes.

(5) Disciplinary sanctions for members of the Armed Forces and other personnel of the Department of Defense who willfully or wantonly fail to comply with requirements relating to the rights of victims of military crimes.

SEC. 565. Modification of Manual for Courts-Martial to eliminate factor relating to character and military service of the accused in rule on initial disposition of offenses.

SEC. 571. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees.

(a) Assistance to schools with significant numbers of military dependent students.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 by section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301, $25,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of providing assistance to local educational agencies under subsection (a) of section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 20 U.S.C. 7703b).

(b) Local educational agency defined.—In this section, the term “local educational agency” has the meaning given that term in section 8013(9) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7713(9)).

SEC. 581. Matters relating to Medals of Honor and other medals of high precedence for members of the Armed Forces.

(1) ARMY.—Section 3744(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “medal of honor, distinguished-service cross, or” and inserting “distinguished-service cross or”.

(2) NAVY AND MARINE CORPS.—Section 6247 of such title is amended by striking “medal of honor,”.

(3) AIR FORCE.—Section 8744(a) of such title is amended by striking “medal of honor, Air Force cross, or” and inserting “Air Force cross or”.

(4) COAST GUARD.—Section 494 of title 14, United States Code, is amended by striking “medal of honor,” both places it appears.

(b) Standardization of time-limits for recommending and awarding Medal of Honor, service cross, or distinguished-service medal across the Armed Forces.—

(i) in paragraph (1), by striking “three years” and inserting “five years”; and

(ii) in paragraph (2), by striking “two years” and inserting “three years”; and

(B) in subsection (d)(1), by striking “two years” and inserting “three years”.

(i) in paragraph (1), by striking “three years” and inserting “five years”; and

(ii) in paragraph (2), by striking “two years” and inserting “three years”; and

(B) in subsection (d)(1), by striking “two years” and inserting “three years”.

SEC. 582. Recodification and revision of Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“(a) Establishment.—There shall be in the Department of the Army, the Department of the Navy, the Department of the Air Force, and the Department of Homeland Security, respectively, a roll designated as the ‘Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll’.

“(b) Enrollment.—The Secretary concerned shall enter and record on such roll the name of each person who has served on active duty in the armed forces and who has been awarded a medal of honor pursuant to section 3741, 6241, or 8741 of this title or section 491 of title 14.

“(1) IN GENERAL.—Each living person whose name is entered on the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll shall be furnished a certificate of enrollment on such roll.

“(2) ENTITLEMENT TO SPECIAL PENSION.—The Secretary concerned shall deliver to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs a certified copy of each certificate of enrollment issued under paragraph (1). Such copy shall authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to pay the special pension provided by section 1562 of title 38 to the person named in the certificate.”.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 57 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

(1) AUTOMATIC ENTITLEMENT.—Section 1562(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended—

(B) by striking “subsection (c) of section 1561 of this title” and inserting “section 1136(c)(2) of title 10”; and

(C) by striking “application therefor under section 1560 of this title” and inserting “such person's name is entered on the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll under section 1136(b) of title 10”.

(2) ELECTION TO DECLINE SPECIAL PENSION.—Section 1562 of such title is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(g) (1) A person who is entitled to a special pension under subsection (a) may elect not to receive such special pension by notifying the Secretary of such election in writing.

“(2) The Secretary, upon receipt of such election, shall cease payments of the special pension to such person.”.

(3) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 1562(a) of such title is further amended by striking “roll” and inserting “Roll”.

(1) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED PROVISIONS.—Sections 1560 and 1561 of title 38, United States Code, are repealed.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 15 of such title is amended by striking the items relating to sections 1560 and 1561.

(d) Effective date.—The amendments made by this section shall be effective with respect to medals of honor awarded on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 583. Authority for award of the Distinguished Service Cross to Robert F. Keiser for valor during the Korean War.

(a) Waiver of time limitations.—Notwithstanding the time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the Secretary of the Army may award the Distinguished Service Cross under section 3742 of that title to Robert F. Keiser for the acts of valor referred to in subsection (b).

(b) Action described.—The acts of valor referred to in subsection (a) are the actions of Robert F. Keiser as a member of the 2d Military Police Company, 2d Infantry Division during the Korean War.

SEC. 584. Authority for award of the Distinguished Service Cross to Sergeant First Class Patrick N. Watkins, Jr., for acts of valor during the Vietnam War.

(a) Waiver of time limitations.—Notwithstanding the time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the Secretary of the Army may award the Distinguished Service Cross under section 3742 of that title to Patrick N. Watkins, Jr., for the acts of valor referred to in subsection (b).

(b) Action described.—The acts of valor referred to in subsection (a) are the actions of Sergeant First Class Patrick N. Watkins, Jr., from August 22 to August 23, 1968, as a member of the United States Army serving in the grade of Sergeant First Class in the Republic of Vietnam while serving with Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 5th Special Forces Group (Airborne), 1st Special Forces Regiment.

SEC. 591. Additional requirements for accounting for members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees listed as missing.

(2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and

“(D) coordination of periodic briefing of families of missing persons about the efforts of the Department of Defense to account for those persons.”.

SEC. 592. Expansion of privileged information authorities to debriefing reports of certain recovered persons who were never placed in a missing status.

(a) Expansion of covered reports.—Section 1506 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(A) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and

“(2) The Secretary concerned shall withhold from personnel files under this section, as privileged information, any survival, evasion, resistance, and escape debriefing report provided by a person described in section 1501(c) of this title who is returned to United States control which is obtained under a promise of confidentiality made for the purpose of ensuring the fullest possible disclosure of information.”; and

(2) in subsection (f), by striking “paragraphs (2) and (3)” and inserting “paragraphs (3) and (4)”.

(b) Definition applicable to covered reports.—Section 1513 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(9) The term ‘survival, evasion, resistance, and escape debriefing’ means an interview conducted with a person described in section 1501(c) of this title who is returned to United States control in order to record the person's experiences while surviving, evading, resisting interrogation or exploitation, or escaping.”.

(a) Waiver of section 1009 adjustment.—The adjustment to become effective during fiscal year 2014 required by section 1009 of title 37, United States Code, in the rates of monthly basic pay authorized members of the uniformed services shall not be made.

(b) Increase in Basic Pay.—Effective on January 1, 2014, the rates of monthly basic pay for members of the uniformed services are increased by 1 percent.

SEC. 602. Repeal of authority relating to commencement of basic pay for members of the National Guard called into Federal service for less than 30 days.

(a) Repeal.—Section 204 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (c).

(b) Effective date.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to members of the National Guard who are called into Federal service for a period of less than 30 days on or after that date.

SEC. 603. Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates of basic allowance for housing under certain circumstances.

SEC. 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for reserve forces.

(2) Section 308c(i), relating to Selected Reserve affiliation or enlistment bonus.

(3) Section 308d(c), relating to special pay for enlisted members assigned to certain high-priority units.

(4) Section 308g(f)(2), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment bonus for persons without prior service.

(5) Section 308h(e), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service.

(6) Section 308i(f), relating to Selected Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service.

(7) Section 910(g), relating to income replacement payments for reserve component members experiencing extended and frequent mobilization for active duty service.

SEC. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for health care professionals.

(a) Title 10 authorities.—The following sections of title 10, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2013” and inserting “December 31, 2014”:

(2) Section 16302(d), relating to repayment of education loans for certain health professionals who serve in the Selected Reserve.

(b) Title 37 authorities.—The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2013” and inserting “December 31, 2014”:

(1) Section 302c-1(f), relating to accession and retention bonuses for psychologists.

(3) Section 302e(a)(1), relating to incentive special pay for nurse anesthetists.

(4) Section 302g(e), relating to special pay for Selected Reserve health professionals in critically short wartime specialties.

(7) Section 302k(f), relating to accession bonus for medical officers in critically short wartime specialties.

(8) Section 302l(g), relating to accession bonus for dental specialist officers in critically short wartime specialties.

SEC. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear officers.

(1) Section 312(f), relating to special pay for nuclear-qualified officers extending period of active service.

SEC. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities.

(3) Section 333(i), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for nuclear officers.

(4) Section 334(i), relating to special aviation incentive pay and bonus authorities for officers.

(5) Section 335(k), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for officers in health professions.

(9) Section 355(h), relating to retention incentives for members qualified in critical military skills or assigned to high priority units.

SEC. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 37 bonuses and special pays.

(5) Section 324(g), relating to accession bonus for new officers in critical skills.

(6) Section 326(g), relating to incentive bonus for conversion to military occupational specialty to ease personnel shortage.

(7) Section 327(h), relating to incentive bonus for transfer between Armed Forces.

SEC. 616. Correction of citation for extension of reimbursement authority for travel expenses for inactive-duty training outside of normal commuting distance and additional one-year extension.

(a) Correction of erroneous citation to former provision.—Effective as of January 2, 2013, and as if included therein as enacted, section 611(7) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1776) is amended by striking “Section 408a(e)” and inserting “Section 478a(e)”.

(b) Additional one-year extension.—Section 478a(e) of title 37, United States Code, as amended by section 611(7) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, as corrected by subsection (a), is further amended by striking “December 31, 2013” and inserting “December 31, 2014”.

SEC. 617. Expansion to all reserve components of stipend for registered nurses in critical specialties under health professions stipend program.

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following new subparagraph (B):

“(B) is eligible for appointment as a Reserve officer for service in a reserve component in a Nurse Corps or as a nurse; and”; and

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following new subparagraph (B):

“(B) the participant shall not be eligible to receive such stipend before being appointed as a Reserve officer for service in the Ready Reserve in a Nurse Corps or as a nurse; and”.

SEC. 631. Technical and standardizing amendments to Department of Defense travel and transportation authorities in connection with reform of such authorities.

(1) INCORPORATION OF ESCORTS OF DEPENDENTS UNDER GENERAL AUTHORITY.—Section 451(a)(2)(C) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by inserting before the period the following: “or as an escort or attendant for dependents of a member of the armed forces for necessary travel performed not later than one year after the member is unable to accompany the dependents who are incapable of traveling alone”.

(2) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED AUTHORITY.— (A) Section 1036 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.

(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 53 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 1036.

(b) Travel and transportation of dependent patients.—Section 1040 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking “round-trip transportation” and all that follows through “may be paid at the expense of the United States” and inserting “travel and transportation allowances may be furnished necessary attendants. The dependents and any attendants shall be provided such travel and transportation allowances as specified in regulations prescribed under section 464 of title 37.”; and

(1) INCORPORATION OF EXPENSES UNDER GENERAL AUTHORITY.—Section 453 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(g) Reimbursement for travel in connection with leave cancelled due to contingency operations.—A member may be reimbursed as specified in regulations prescribed under section 464 of this title for travel and related expenses incurred by the member as a result of the cancellation of previously approved leave when the leave is cancelled in conjunction with the member's participation in a contingency operation and the cancellation occurs within 48 hours of the time the leave would have commenced. The settlement for reimbursement under this subsection is final and conclusive.”.

(2) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED AUTHORITY.— (A) Section 1053a of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.

(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 53 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 1053a.

(d) Travel and transportation for travel for specialty health care.—Section 1074i of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1) in subsection (a), by striking “reimbursement for reasonable travel expenses” and inserting “travel and transportation allowances as specified in regulations prescribed under section 464 of title 37”; and

(2) in subsection (b), striking “Reimbursement for travel under exceptional circumstances.—The Secretary of Defense may provide reimbursement for reasonable travel expenses of” and inserting “Allowable travel and transportation under exceptional circumstances.—The Secretary of Defense may provide travel and transportation allowances as specified in the regulations referred to in subsection (a) for”.

(e) Travel and transportation in connection with the disposition of remains of members.—Section 1482(a)(8) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “and roundtrip transportation and prescribed allowances” and inserting “and travel and transportation allowances as specified in regulations prescribed under section 464 of title 37”.

(f) Travel and transportation in connection with funeral honors functions at funerals for veterans.—Section 1491(d)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “transportation (or reimbursement for transportation) and expenses” and inserting “travel and transportation allowances as specified in regulations prescribed under section 464 of title 37”.

(g) Repeal of redundant authority on motor vehicle transportation or storage for members undergoing PCS or extended deployment.—

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of section at the beginning of chapter 157 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 2634.

(h) Clarification of limitation on transportation of household goods.—Section 453(c)(3) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “(including packing, crating, and household goods in temporary storage)” and inserting “(including household goods in temporary storage, but excluding packing and crating)”.

SEC. 641. Clarification of prevention of retired pay inversion in the case of members whose retired pay is computed using high-three.

(a) Clarification.—Subsection (f) of section 1401a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(A) by striking “Prevention of retired pay inversions.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the” and inserting “Prevention of retired pay inversions for members with retired pay computed using final basic pay.—The”; and

(B) by inserting “who first became a member of a uniformed service before September 8, 1980, and” after “of an armed force”;

“(2) PREVENTION OF RETIRED PAY INVERSIONS FOR MEMBERS WITH RETIRED PAY COMPUTED USING HIGH-THREE.—Subject to subsections (d) and (e), the monthly retired pay of a member or former member of an armed force who first became a member of a uniformed service on or after September 8, 1980, may not be less, on the date on which the member or former member initially becomes entitled to such pay, than the monthly retired pay to which the member or former member would be entitled on that date if the member or former member had become entitled to retired pay on an earlier date, adjusted to reflect any applicable increases in such pay under this section. However, in the case of a member or former member whose retired pay is computed subject to section 1407(f) of this title, paragraph (1) (rather than the preceding sentence) shall apply in the same manner as if the member or former member first became a member of a uniformed service before September 8, 1980, but only with respect to a calculation as of the date on which the member or former member first became entitled to retired pay.”.

(b) Cross-reference amendments.—Such section is further amended by striking “subsection (f)(2)” in subsections (c)(1), (c)(2), (d), and (e) and inserting “subsection (f)(3)”.

(c) Applicability.—Paragraph (2) of section 1401a(f) of title 10, United States Code, as added by the amendment made by subsection (a)(3), applies to the computation of retired pay or retainer pay of any person who first became a member of a uniformed service on or after September 8, 1980, regardless of when the member first becomes entitled to retired or retainer pay.

(d) Technical amendments.—Such section is further amended by striking “before the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008” in subsections (d) and (e) and inserting “before January 28, 2008”.

SEC. 642. Effect on division of retired pay of election to receive combat-related special compensation after previous election to receive concurrent retirement and disability compensation.

(a) In general.—Section 1414(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(3) PAYMENTS BEFORE ELECTION TO RECEIVE COMBAT-RELATED SPECIAL COMPENSATION.— (A) An election by a member pursuant to paragraph (2) to change from receipt of retired pay in accordance with this section to receipt of special compensation in accordance with section 1413a of this title shall not affect payments made before the date of such election to the member’s spouse or former spouse pursuant to section 1408 of this title of disposable retired pay that a court treated as property for the purpose of issuing a final decree of divorce, dissolution, annulment, or legal separation, including a court ordered, ratified, or approved property settlement incident to such decree.

“(i) The term ‘court’ has the meaning given such term in section 1408(a)(1) of this title.

“(ii) The term ‘disposable retired pay’ has the meaning given such term in section 1408(a)(4) of this title.

“(iii) The term ‘final decree’ has the meaning given such term in section 1408(a)(3) of this title.

“(iv) The term ‘member’ has the meaning given such term in section 1408(a)(5) of this title.

“(v) The term ‘spouse or former spouse’ has the meaning given such term in section 1408(a)(6) of this title.”.

(b) Applicability.—Paragraph (3) of section 1414(d) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to payments made under section 1408 of title 10, United States Code, on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 643. Survivor Benefit Plan annuities for special needs trusts established for the benefit of dependent children incapable of self-support.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 1450 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

“(4) SPECIAL NEEDS TRUSTS FOR SOLE BENEFIT OF CERTAIN DEPENDENT CHILDREN.—Notwithstanding subsection (i), a supplemental or special needs trust established under subparagraph (A) or (C) of section 1917(d)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396p(d)(4)) for the sole benefit of a dependent child considered disabled under section 1614(a)(3) of that Act (42 U.S.C. 1382c(a)(3)) who is incapable of self-support because of mental or physical incapacity.”.

(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (i) of such section is amended by inserting “(a)(4) or” after “subsection”.

(1) in the subsection caption, by striking “and fiduciaries” and inserting “, fiduciaries, and special needs trusts”;

(B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and

“(C) a dependent child incapable of self-support because of mental or physical incapacity for whom a supplemental or special needs trust has been established under subparagraph (A) or (C) of section 1917(d)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396p(d)(4)).”;

(A) by redesignating subparagraphs (C) through (H) as subparagraphs (D) through (I), respectively;

“(C) In the case of an annuitant referred to in paragraph (1)(C), payment of the annuity to the supplemental or special needs trust established for the annuitant.”;

(C) in subparagraph (D), as redesignated by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, by striking “subparagraphs (D) and (E)” and inserting “subparagraphs (E) and (F)”; and

(i) by inserting “or (1)(C)” after “paragraph (1)(B)” in the matter preceding clause (i);

(iii) in clause (ii), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and

“(iii) procedures for determining when annuity payments to a supplemental or special needs trust shall end based on the death or marriage of the dependent child for which the trust was established.”; and

(4) in paragraph (3), by striking “or fiduciary” in the paragraph caption and inserting “, fiduciary, or trust”.

SEC. 644. Periodic notice to members of the Ready Reserve on early retirement credit earned for significant periods of active Federal status or active duty.

“(3) The Secretary concerned shall periodically notify each member of the Ready Reserve described by paragraph (2) of the current eligibility age for retired pay of such member under this section, including any reduced eligibility age by reason of the operation of that paragraph. Notice shall be provided by such means as the Secretary considers appropriate taking into account the cost of provision of notice and the convenience of members.”.

SEC. 645. Preservation of retiree dependent status for certain dependents upon death or permanent incapacitation of the retired member on whom dependent status is based.

“(3) In the case of an individual who is treated as a retiree dependent described in paragraph (1)(B) on the date on which the member providing the basis for such individual's dependent status under this section dies or becomes permanently incapacitated, no further certification of the individual as a retiree dependent on the basis of dependency for financial support shall be required or carried out for purposes of this section on or after that date.”.

SEC. 661. Enhanced role for the Department of Justice under the Military Lending Act.

(a) Enforcement by the Attorney General.—Subsection (f) of section 987 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(A) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General may commence a civil action in any appropriate district court of the United States against any person who—

“(ii) engages in a violation of this section that raises an issue of general public importance.

“(B) RELIEF.—In a civil action commenced under subparagraph (A), the court—

“(i) may grant any appropriate equitable or declaratory relief with respect to the violation of this section;

“(ii) may award all other appropriate relief, including monetary damages, to any person aggrieved by the violation; and

“(C) INTERVENTION.—Upon timely application, a person aggrieved by a violation of this section with respect to which the civil action is commenced may intervene in such action, and may obtain such appropriate relief as the person could obtain in a civil action under paragraph (5) with respect to that violation, along with costs and a reasonable attorney fee.

“(D) ISSUANCE AND SERVICE OF CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMANDS.—Whenever the Attorney General, or a designee, has reason to believe that any person may be in possession, custody, or control of any documentary material relevant to an investigation under this section, the Attorney General, or a designee, may, before commencing a civil action under subparagraph (A), issue in writing and cause to be served upon such person, a civil investigative demand requiring—

“(ii) that the custodian of such documentary material answer in writing written questions with respect to such documentary material; or

“(iii) the production of any combination of such documentary material or answers.

“(E) RELATIONSHIP TO FALSE CLAIMS ACT.—The statutory provisions governing the authority to issue, use, and enforce civil investigative demands under section 3733 of title 31 (known as the ‘False Claims Act’) shall govern the authority to issue, use, and enforce civil investigative demands under subparagraph (D), except that—

“(i) any reference in that section to false claims law investigators or investigations shall be applied for purposes of subparagraph (D) as referring to investigators or investigations under this section;

“(ii) any reference in that section to interrogatories shall be applied for purposes of subparagraph (D) as referring to written questions and answers to such need not be under oath;

“(iii) the statutory definitions for purposes of that section relating to ‘false claims law’ shall not apply; and

“(iv) provisions of that section relating to qui tam relators shall not apply.”.

(b) Consultation with Department of Justice.—Subsection (h)(3) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

SEC. 671. Authority to provide certain expenses for care and disposition of human remains that were retained by the Department of Defense for forensic pathology investigation.

(a) Disposition of remains of persons whose death is investigated by the Armed Forces Medical Examiner.—

(1) COVERED DECEDENTS.—Section 1481(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(10) To the extent authorized under section 1482(g) of this title, any person not otherwise covered by the preceding paragraphs whose remains (or partial remains) have been retained by the Secretary concerned for purposes of a forensic pathology investigation by the Armed Forces Medical Examiner under section 1471 of this title.”.

(2) AUTHORIZED EXPENSES RELATING TO CARE AND DISPOSITION OF REMAINS.—Section 1482 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(g) (1) The payment of expenses incident to the recovery, care, and disposition of the remains of a decedent covered by section 1481(a)(10) of this title is limited to those expenses that, as determined under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, would not have been incurred but for the retention of those remains for purposes of a forensic pathology investigation by the Armed Forces Medical Examiner under section 1471 of this title.

“(2) In a case covered by paragraph (1), if the person designated under subsection (c) to direct disposition of the remains of a decedent does not direct disposition of the remains that were retained for the forensic pathology investigation, the Secretary may pay for the transportation of those remains to, and interment or inurnment of those remains in, an appropriate place selected by the Secretary, in lieu of the transportation authorized to be paid under paragraph (8) of subsection (a).

“(3) In a case covered by paragraph (1), expenses that may be paid do not include expenses with respect to an escort under paragraph (8) of subsection (a), whether or not on a reimbursable basis.

“(4) The Secretary concerned may pay any other expenses relating to the remains of such a decedent that are authorized to be paid under this section only on a reimbursable basis. Amounts reimbursed to the Secretary concerned under this subsection shall be credited to appropriations available at the time of reimbursement for the payment of such expenses.”.

(b) Clarification of coverage of inurnment.—Section 1482(a)(9) of such title is amended by inserting “or inurnment” after “Interment”.

(c) Technical amendment.—Section 1482(f) of such title is amended by striking the third sentence and inserting the following new sentence: “The Secretary concerned may pay any other expenses relating to the remains of such a decedent that are authorized to be paid under this section only on a reimbursable basis.”.

SEC. 672. Extension of ongoing pilot programs under temporary Army incentive to provide additional recruitment incentives.

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking “The Secretary may not” and inserting “Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Secretary may not”;

“(2) AUTHORITY TO CONTINUE CERTAIN PILOT PROGRAMS.—The Secretary may continue through December 31, 2015, any pilot program carried out under the authority in this section that was ongoing as of December 31, 2012.”; and

(B) by striking “that paragraph” and inserting “the applicable paragraph of this subsection”.

SEC. 711. Pilot program on increased collection of third-party reimbursements for health care services provided in military medical treatment facilities.

(a) Pilot program.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in coordination with the Secretaries of the military departments, carry out a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of using processes described in subsection (b) to increase the amounts collected under section 1095 of title 10, United States Code, from third-party payers for charges for health care services incurred by the United States at military medical treatment facilities.

(b) Covered processes.—The processes described in this subsection are commercially available enhanced recovery practices for medical payment collection, including rates and percentages of collection in accordance with industry standards for such practices.

(1) to facilitate the identification and analysis of best practices in connection with the processes described in subsection (b) that are used in nonmilitary health care facilities; and

(2) to permit a cost-benefit analysis of the processes used under the pilot program, including an analysis of—

(d) Location.—The Secretary shall carry out the pilot program at not less than two military installations of different military departments each of which meets the following criteria:

(1) Such installation has a military medical treatment facility with both inpatient and outpatient capabilities.

(2) The catchment area of such installation contains a significant-sized military beneficiary population who are potentially covered by third-party payers (as defined in section 1095(h)(1) of title 10, United States Code).

(e) Duration.—The Secretary shall commence the pilot program by not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall carry out the pilot program for two years.

(f) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the completion of the pilot program, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the pilot program. The report shall include the following:

(A) the processes described in subsection (b) that were used in the military medical treatment facilities included in the pilot program; and

(B) third-party collection processes used by similar military medical treatment facilities not included in the pilot program.

(3) An assessment of the feasibility and advisability of using processes described in subsection (b) to increase the amounts collected from third-party payers for charges for health care services incurred by the United States at military medical treatment facilities, including a cost-benefit analysis of the implementation of such processes for third-party collections for health care services at military medical treatment facilities.

(4) Such recommendations for legislative or administrative action to improve third-party collections for health care services at military medical treatment facilities as the Secretary considers appropriate in light of the pilot program.

SEC. 712. Sense of Senate on implementation of integrated electronic health records for the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs.

(1) The electronic health records systems used by the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs have been independently developed and implemented by each Department. As a result, and despite more than 15 years of efforts including numerous initiatives and programs, full interoperability between the systems has yet to be achieved.

(2) The lack of full interoperability between the health records systems negatively impacts members of the Armed Forces who separate from military service and transition to veteran status. Medical records may be lost, requiring patients to repeat tests, increase overall costs, and further exacerbate the backlog of disability claims at the Department of Veterans Affairs.

(3) The Government Accountability Office has identified several problems that the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs face in their efforts to achieve full interoperability of their health records systems. The Government Accountability Office points to the failure of the Departments to define performance goals and measures that would allow for program management and assessment of progress. The Government Accountability Office also highlights inadequate management in the Departments and the Interagency Program Office, which oversees the integration of Department of Defense and Department of Veterans Affairs medical records.

(4) The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 directed the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs to jointly develop and implement fully interoperable health record capabilities by September 30, 2009.

(1) despite clear congressional direction, years of effort, and the expenditure of significant resources, full electronic interoperability between the health records systems of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs has not been achieved;

(2) the Secretary of Defense, in collaboration with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, should fully staff the Interagency Program Office and provide it with a robust charter meeting the original intent of Congress;

(3) the Secretary of Defense, in collaboration with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, should establish challenging, but achievable, deadlines for the development and implementation of measures and goals for electronic health records for the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs, including measures and goals relating to—

(B) the ability of patients of both the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs to download their medical records (commonly referred to as the “Blue Button Initiative”);

(E) the acceleration of the exchange of real-time health care data between the Departments;

(F) the upgrade of the graphical user interface to display the new standardized health care data of the Departments; and

(G) the provision to members of the Armed Forces of access to an electronic copy of their health care records throughout the course of their military career; and

(4) the Interagency Program Office should establish a secure, remote, network-accessible computer storage system (commonly referred to as “cloud storage”) to—

(A) provide members of the Armed Forces and veterans the ability to upload their health care records; and

(B) allow medical providers of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs to access such records in the course of providing care to members of the Armed Forces and veterans.

SEC. 721. Report on provision of advanced prosthetics and orthotics to members of the Armed Forces and veterans.

(a) Report required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the plans of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs, respectively, to ensure that the most clinically appropriate prosthetics and orthotics are made available to injured members of the Armed Forces and veterans using technological advances as appropriate.

(b) Covered prosthetics and orthotics.—The prosthetics and orthotics to be covered by the report under subsection (a) shall include, but not be limited to, powered prosthetics and orthotics that will enable members of the Armed Forces and veterans who have suffered amputation and, in the case of orthotics wearers, other injuries with limb salvage, to restore functionality to the maximum extent practicable.

(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Veterans' Affairs of the Senate; and

(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Veterans' Affairs of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 801. Restatement and revision of requirements applicable to multiyear defense acquisitions to be specifically authorized by law.

(a) In general.—Subsection (i) of section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(i) Defense acquisitions specifically authorized by law.— (1) In the case of the Department of Defense, a multiyear contract in amount equal to or greater than $500,000,000 may not be entered into under this section unless the contract is specifically authorized by law in an Act other than an appropriations Act.

“(2) In submitting a request for a specific authorization by law to carry out a defense acquisition program using multiyear contract authority under this section, the Secretary shall include in the request a report containing preliminary findings of the agency head required in paragraphs (1) through (6) of subsection (a) together with the basis for such findings.

“(3) A multiyear contract may not be entered into under this section for a defense acquisition program that has been specifically authorized by law to be carried out using multiyear contract authority unless the Secretary of Defense certifies in writing, not later than 30 days before entry into the contract, that each of the following conditions is satisfied:

“(A) The Secretary has determined that each of the requirements in paragraphs (1) through (6) of subsection (a) will be met by such contract and has provided the basis for such determination to the congressional defense committees.

“(B) The Secretary's determination under subparagraph (A) was made after the completion of a cost analysis performed by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Analysis and such analysis supports the findings.

“(C) The system being acquired pursuant to such contract has not been determined to have experienced cost growth in excess of the critical cost growth threshold pursuant to section 2433(d) of this title within 5 years prior to the date the Secretary anticipates such contract (or a contract for advance procurement entered into consistent with the authorization for such contract) will be awarded.

“(D) A sufficient number of end items of the system being acquired under such contract have been delivered at or within the most current estimates of the program acquisition unit cost or procurement unit cost for such system to determine that current estimates of such unit costs are realistic.

“(E) During the fiscal year in which such contract is to be awarded, sufficient funds will be available to perform the contract in such fiscal year, and the future-years defense program for such fiscal year will include the funding required to execute the program without cancellation.

“(G) The proposed multiyear contract provides for production at not less than minimum economic rates given the existing tooling and facilities.

“(4) If for any fiscal year a multiyear contract to be entered into under this section is authorized by law for a particular procurement program and that authorization is subject to certain conditions established by law (including a condition as to cost savings to be achieved under the multiyear contract in comparison to specified other contracts) and if it appears (after negotiations with contractors) that such savings cannot be achieved, but that substantial savings could nevertheless be achieved through the use of a multiyear contract rather than specified other contracts, the President may submit to Congress a request for relief from the specified cost savings that must be achieved through multiyear contracting for that program. Any such request by the President shall include details about the request for a multiyear contract, including details about the negotiated contract terms and conditions.

“(5) (A) The Secretary may obligate funds for procurement of an end item under a multiyear contract for the purchase of property only for procurement of a complete and usable end item.

“(B) The Secretary may obligate funds appropriated for any fiscal year for advance procurement under a contract for the purchase of property only for the procurement of those long-lead items necessary in order to meet a planned delivery schedule for complete major end items that are programmed under the contract to be acquired with funds appropriated for a subsequent fiscal year (including an economic order quantity of such long-lead items when authorized by law).

“(6) The Secretary may make the certification under paragraph (3) notwithstanding the fact that one or more of the conditions of such certification are not met, if the Secretary determines that, due to exceptional circumstances, proceeding with a multiyear contract under this section is in the best interest of the Department of Defense and the Secretary provides the basis for such determination with the certification.

“(7) The Secretary may not delegate the authority to make the certification under paragraph (3) or the determination under paragraph (6) to an official below the level of Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics.”.

(b) Conforming amendment.—Subsection (a)(7) of such section is amended by striking “subparagaphs (C) through (F) of paragraph (1) of subsection (i)” and inserting “subparagraphs (C) through (F) of subsection (i)(3)”.

(c) Effective date.—The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to requests for specific authorization by law to carry out defense acquisition programs using multiyear contract authority that are made on or after that date.

SEC. 802. Extension of authority to acquire products and services produced in countries along a major route of supply to Afghanistan.

(a) Extension.—Subsection (f) of section 801 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2399), as amended by section 841(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1845), is further amended by striking “December 31, 2014” and inserting “December 31, 2015”.

(b) Clarification of authority.—Subsection (b)(1)(B) of such section is amended—

(1) by striking “and the NATO International Security Assistance Force” and inserting “or NATO forces”; and

(2) by striking “to Afghanistan” and inserting “to or from Afghanistan”.

(a) Updated report on program manager training and experience deficiencies.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees an updated version of the 2009 Department of Defense report entitled “OSD Study of Program Manager Training and Experience”. The updated version of the report shall address the personnel specified in subsection (b).

(b) Covered personnel.—The personnel to be addressed by the report required by subsection (a) shall be the acquisition personnel of the Department of Defense as follows:

(1) take into consideration the training, qualifications, and experience of covered personnel to perform acquisition program management functions for the Department of Defense;

(2) summarize assessments by covered personnel of the practicality and comprehensiveness of the training provided such personnel in acquisition program management;

(3) identify, describe, and analyze trends in the training and experience of covered personnel in acquisition program management between the time of the report referred to in subsection (a) and the updated version of the report as required by subsection (a); and

(4) set forth such recommendations for improvements to the training and experience of covered personnel in acquisition program management as the Secretary considers appropriate.

SEC. 821. Synchronization of cryptographic systems for major defense acquisition programs.

(a) In general.—Section 2366b(a)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

“(G) there is a plan to mitigate and account for any costs in connection with any anticipated de-certification of cryptographic systems and components during the production and procurement of the major defense acquisition program to be acquired; and”.

(b) Effective date.—The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to major defense acquisition programs which are subject to Milestone B approval on or after that date.

SEC. 822. Assessment of dedicated control system before Milestone B approval of major defense acquisition programs constituting a space program.

(a) In general.—As part of the certification required by section 2366b(a) of title 10, United States Code, before Milestone B approval of a space system, the milestone decision authority shall perform a business case analysis for any new or follow on satellite system using a dedicated control system instead of a shared control system.

(b) Sunset.—No business case analysis is required to be performed under subsection (a) for any Milestone B approval of a space system after December 31, 2019.

SEC. 823. Additional responsibility for product support managers for major weapon systems.

(2) in subparagraph (H), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and

SEC. 824. Comptroller General of the United States review of Department of Defense processes for the acquisition of weapon systems.

(a) Review required.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall carry out a comprehensive review of the processes and procedures of the Department of Defense for the acquisition of weapon systems.

(b) Objective of review.—The objective of the review required by subsection (a) shall be to identify the following:

(1) Processes and procedures that provide little or no value added, or for which any value added is outweighed by the cost or schedule delay of the processes or procedures.

(2) Elements of organizations and layers of review that are redundant or unnecessary, add cost, or create schedule delays to the acquisition of weapon systems without adding commensurate value.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the results of the review required by subsection (a).

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, the following:

(A) A statement of any processes, procedures, organizations, or layers of review that are recommended by the Comptroller General for modification or elimination, including the rationale for the modification or elimination recommended and the legislative or administrative action required to carry out the modification or elimination recommended.

(B) Such other findings and recommendations, including recommendations for legislative or administrative action, as the Comptroller General considers appropriate in light of the review required by subsection (a).

(3) CONSISTENCY WITH WSARA.—Any modification or elimination of a process, procedure, organization, or layer of review recommended in the report required by paragraph (1) shall be consistent with the requirements of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–23) and the amendments made by that Act.

SEC. 841. Maximum amount of allowable costs of compensation of contractor employees.

(a) Amendment to cost principles.—Section 2324(e)(1)(P) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1) by striking “the benchmark” and all that follows through “section 1127 of title 41” and inserting “$487,000 per year, adjusted annually to reflect the change in the Employment Cost Index for all workers, as calculated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics”; and

(2) by striking “scientists and engineers” and inserting “scientists, engineers, medical professionals, cybersecurity experts, and other workers with unique areas of expertise”.

(b) Review.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall review alternative benchmarks and industry standards for compensation and provide the congressional defense committees with the views of the Department of Defense as to whether any such benchmarks or standards would provide a more appropriate measure of allowable compensation for the purposes of section 2324(e)(1)(P) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a).

(c) Effective date.—The amendment mades by subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 2014, and shall apply with respect to costs of compensation incurred on or after that date under contracts entered into before, on, or after that date.

SEC. 842. Implementation by Department of Defense of certain recommendations of the Comptroller General of the United States on oversight of pensions offered by Department contractors.

(1) Assign responsibility within the Department of Defense for oversight of the reasonableness of the pension plans offered by Department contractors, including, in specific, the value of benefits earned by participants in such pension plans.

(2) Issue guidance on the measurement of the value of pension benefits that participants earn in a given year in order to permit the Department to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the total compensation provided employees by Department contractors.

(3) Issue guidance on the extent to which defined benefit pension plans are to be included in assessments of the reasonableness of compensation for executives of Department contractors.

(4) Issue guidance for the acquisition organizations of the Department, including the Defense Contract Management Activity and the Defense Contract Audit Activity, on the discount rate or rates that are acceptable for Department contractors to use in calculating person costs for forward pricing purposes.

SEC. 861. Extension of prohibition on contracting with the enemy in the United States Central Command theater of operations.

(a) Authority To terminate or void contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements and To restrict future award.—

(1) IDENTIFICATION OF PERSONS AND ENTITIES.—The Secretary of Defense shall designate in each geographic combatant command an element to carry out intelligence missions within the area of responsibility of such combatant command outside the United States to identify persons and entities that—

(A) provide funds received under a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement of the Department of Defense directly or indirectly to a person or entity who is supporting a force within the area of responsibility of such combatant command against which the United States is actively engaged in hostilities in accordance with the law of armed conflict; or

(B) fail to exercise due diligence to ensure that none of the funds received under a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement of the Department of Defense are provided directly or indirectly to a person or entity who is supporting a force within the area of responsibility of such combatant command against which the United States is actively engaged in hostilities in accordance with the law of armed conflict.

(2) NOTICE ON SUPPORTERS IDENTIFIED.—Upon the identification of a person or entity as meeting subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1), the element making the identification shall notify the commander of the combatant command concerned, and any deputies of the commander specified by the commander for purposes of this section, of such identification of such person or entity.

(3) RESPONSIVE ACTIONS.—Upon receipt of a notice under paragraph (2), the commander of the combatant command concerned may, in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, and the appropriate Chief of Mission, notify the heads of appropriate contracting activities, in writing, of such identification and request that the heads of such contracting activities exercise the authorities provided pursuant to paragraph (4) and in the Federal Acquisition Regulation, as revised pursuant to subsection (b), with respect to any contract, grant, or cooperative agreement that provides funding directly or indirectly to the person or entity covered by the notice.

(4) AUTHORITIES.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall revise the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to authorize the head of contracting activity in each geographic combatant command, pursuant to a request from the commander of a combatant command under paragraph (3)—

(A) to restrict the award of Department of Defense contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements that such head of contracting activity determines in writing would provide funding directly or indirectly to a person or entity that has been identified by the commander as supporting a force within the area of responsibility of such combatant command against which the United States is actively engaged in hostilities in accordance with the law of armed conflict;

(B) to terminate for default any Department contract, grant, or cooperative agreement upon a written determination by such head of contracting activity that the contractor, or the recipient of the grant or cooperative agreement, has failed to exercise due diligence to ensure that none of the funds received under the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement are provided directly or indirectly to a person or entity that has been identified by a commander of a combatant command as supporting a force within the area of responsibility of such combatant command against which the United States is actively engaged in hostilities in accordance with the law of armed conflict; or

(C) to void in whole or in part any Department contract, grant, or cooperative agreement upon a written determination by such head of contracting activity that the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement provides funding directly or indirectly to a person or entity that has been identified by a commander of a combatant command as supporting a force within the area of responsibility of such combatant command against which the United States is actively engaged in hostilities in accordance with the law of armed conflict

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Acquisition Regulation shall be revised to require that—

(A) the clause described in paragraph (2) shall be included in each covered contract, grant, and cooperative agreement of the Department of Defense that is awarded on or after the date of the enactment of this Act; and

(B) to the maximum extent practicable, each covered contract, grant, and cooperative agreement of the Department of Defense that is awarded before the date of the enactment of this Act shall be modified to include the clause described in paragraph (2).

(2) CLAUSE DESCRIBED.—The clause described in this paragraph is a clause that—

(A) requires the contractor, or the recipient of the grant or cooperative agreement, to exercise due diligence to ensure that none of the funds received under the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement are provided directly or indirectly to a person or entity that has been identified by a commander of a combatant command as supporting a force within the area of responsibility of such combatant command against which the United States is actively engaged in hostilities in accordance with the law of armed conflict; and

(B) notifies the contractor, or the recipient of the grant or cooperative agreement, of the authority of the head of the contracting activity to terminate or void the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement, in whole or in part.

(3) COVERED CONTRACT, GRANT, OR COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT.—In this subsection, the term “covered contract, grant, or cooperative agreement” means a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement with an estimated value in excess of $20,000.

(4) TREATMENT AS VOID.—For purposes of subsection (a)(4) and the exercise under subsection (a)(3) of the authorities in the Federal Acquisition Regulation pursuant to this subsection:

(A) A contract, grant, or cooperative agreement that is void is unenforceable as contrary to public policy.

(B) A contract, grant, or cooperative agreement that is void in part is unenforceable as contrary to public policy with regard to a segregable task or effort under the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement.

(c) Requirements following contract actions.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Acquisition Regulation shall be revised as follows:

(1) To require that any head of contracting activity taking an action pursuant to subsection (a)(3) or (a)(4) to terminate, void, or restrict a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement notify in writing the contractor or recipient of the grant or cooperative agreement, as applicable, of the action.

(2) To permit, in such manner as the Federal Acquisition Regulation as so revised shall provide, the contractor or recipient of a grant or cooperative agreement subject to an action taken pursuant to subsection (a)(3) or (a)(4) to terminate or void the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement, as the case may be, an opportunity to contest the action within 30 days of receipt of notice of the action.

(d) Annual review.—The commanders of the geographic combatant commands covered by subsection (a) shall, on an annual basis, review the lists of persons and entities previously identified pursuant to subsection (a)(1) in order to determine whether or not such persons and entities continue to warrant identification pursuant to that subsection. If a commander determines pursuant to such a review that a person or entity no longer warrants identification pursuant to subsection (a)(1), the commander shall notify the heads of contracting activities of the Department of Defense in writing of such determination.

(e) Protection of classified information.—Classified information relied upon to make an identification pursuant to subsection (a)(1) may not be disclosed to a contractor or a recipient of a grant or cooperative agreement with respect to which an action is taken pursuant to subsection (a)(3) or (a)(4), or to their representatives, in the absence of a protective order issued by a court of competent jurisdiction established under Article I or Article III of the Constitution of the United States that specifically addresses the conditions upon which such classified information may be so disclosed.

(1) RESPONSIBILITIES RELATING TO IDENTIFICATION AND REVIEW.—The commander of a geographic combatant command may delegate the responsibilities in subsection (a)(3) to any deputies of the commander specified by the commander pursuant to that subsection. The commander may delegate under any responsibilities under subsection (d) to the deputy commander of the combatant command. Any delegation of responsibilities under this paragraph shall be made in writing.

(2) NONDELEGATION OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTRACT ACTIONS.—The authority provided by subsections (a)(3) and (a)(4) to terminate, void, or restrict contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements may not be delegated below the level of head of contracting activity.

(g) Inclusion of information on contract actions in FAPIIS.—Upon the termination, voiding, or restriction of a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement pursuant to subsection (a)(3) or (a)(4), the head of contracting activity concerned shall provide for the inclusion in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), or other formal system of records on contractors or entities, of appropriate information on the termination, voiding, or restriction, as the case may be, of the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1 each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the use of the authorities in this section in the preceding calendar year, including the following:

(A) For each instance in which a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement was terminated or voided, or entry into contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements was restricted, pursuant to subsection (a)(3) or (a)(4), the following:

(ii) The value of the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement terminated or voided.

(iii) The value of all contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements of the Department of Defense in force with the person or entity concerned at the time the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement was terminated or voided.

(iv) Information on how the goods or services covered by the terminated or voided contract, grant, or cooperative agreement were otherwise obtained by the commander of the combatant command concerned.

(B) For each instance in which a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement of a person or entity identified pursuant to subsection (a)(2) was not terminated or voided pursuant to subsection (a)(3) or (a)(4), or the future award of contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements to such person or entity was not restricted pursuant to subsection (a)(3) or (a)(4), an explanation why such action was not taken.

(2) FORM.—Any report under this subsection may be submitted in classified form.

(1) The term “combatant command” means a command established pursuant to chapter 6 of title 10, United States Code.

(2) The term “head of contracting activity” has the meaning given that term in subpart 601 of part 1 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation.

(j) Sunset.—The provisions of this section shall cease to be effective on December 31, 2018.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth the plan of action of the Department of Defense to achieve the following:

(A) Implementation of the recommendations of the Comptroller General of the United States in the May 2013 report GAO 13–227 entitled “Significant Improvements Needed in Efforts to Address Improper Payment Requirements”.

(2) INFORMATION ON RECOMMENDATIONS NOT TO BE IMPLEMENTED.—If the plan of action does not provide for implementation of one or more of the recommendations of the Comptroller General described in paragraph (1)(A), the report shall include a description of each such recommendation and a detailed statement of the reasons why the plan of action does not include implementation of such recommendation.

(b) Appropriate committees of Congress defined.—In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—

(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; and

(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives.

(a) Conversion of position of Deputy Chief Management Officer to position of Under Secretary of Defense for Management.—

“(a) Appointment.—There is an Undersecretary of Defense for Management, appointed from civilian life by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The Under Secretary shall be appointed from among persons who have an extensive management background, as well as a concrete understanding of Department of Defense business operations.

“(b) Responsibility for discharge of certain statutory position requirements.— (1) In addition to the responsibilities specified in subsection (c), the Under Secretary of Defense for Management is also the following:

“(2) In the capacity of Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, the Under Secretary of Defense for Management shall exercise authority, direction, and control over the Information Assurance Directorate of the National Security Agency.

“(c) General responsibilities.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Management is responsible, subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense in the role of the Deputy Secretary as Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, for—

“(1) supervising the management of the business operations of the Department of Defense and adjudicating issues and conflicts in functional domain business policies;

“(2) establishing business strategic planning and performance management policies and the Department of Defense Strategic Management Plan;

“(3) establishing business information technology portfolio policies and overseeing investment management of that portfolio for the Department of Defense; and

“(4) establishing end-to-end process and standards policies and the Business Enterprise Architecture.

“(d) Precedence.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Management takes precedence in the Department of Defense after the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence.”.

(2) CONFORMING REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED AUTHORITY.—Section 132a of such title is repealed.

(3) CONTINUATION OF OFFICE.—Notwithstanding subsection (a) of section 137a of title 10, United States Code (as amended by paragraph (1)), the individual serving in the position of Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense as of the date of the enactment of this Act may serve as Under Secretary of Defense for Management under that section until a successor is appointed Under Secretary of Defense for Management as specified in that subsection.

(b) Clarification of order of precedence for the Principal Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense.—Subsection (d) of section 137b of such title, as redesignated by subsection (a)(1) of this section, is amended by striking “and the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense” and inserting “the Under Secretary of Defense for Management, and the officials serving in the positions specified in section 131(b)(4) of this title”.

(iii) by redesignating paragraphs (4) through (8) as paragraphs (3) through (7), respectively.

(i) in subsection (a), by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following new paragraph (2):

(ii) in subsection (b), by striking “the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense” and inserting “the Under Secretary of Defense for Management”.

(C) In section 2222, by striking “the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense” each place it appears in subsections (c)(2)(E), (d)(3), (f)(1)(D), (f)(1)(E), and (f)(2)(E) and inserting “the Under Secretary of Defense for Management”.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 4 of such title is amended—

(B) by striking the item relating to section 137a and inserting the following new items:

(3) EXECUTIVE SCHEDULE MATTERS.—Section 5314 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to the Deputy Chief Management Office of the Department of Defense and inserting the following new item:

SEC. 902. Supervision of Command Acquisition Executive of the United States Special Operations Command by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics.

(a) In general.—Section 167(e)(4)(C)(i) of title 10, United States Code, is amended in the matter preceding subclause (I) by inserting after “who shall” the following: “, subject to the direction of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics for acquisition programs expected to require the expenditure of at least $75,000,000 in research, development, test, and evaluation funds or such other programs as the Under Secretary shall designate as having high technology risk,”.

(b) Designation of responsible official in Office of USD for ATL.—Not later than 90 days after the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall designate an official within the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics who shall be responsible for providing oversight and direction to the Command Acquisition Executive of the United States Special Operations Command.

SEC. 903. Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command, Control, and Communications System.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 7 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 171 the following new section:

“§ 171a. Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command, Control, and Communications System

“(a) Establishment.—There is hereby established within the Department of Defense a council to be known as the ‘Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command, Control, and Communications System’ (in this section referred to as the ‘Council’).

“(2) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics.

“(5) Such other officers of the Department of Defense as the Secretary may designate.

“(c) Co-Chair.—The Council shall be co-chaired by the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics.

“(d) Responsibilities.— (1) The Council shall be responsible for oversight of the command, control, and communications system for the national leadership of the United States, including nuclear command, control, and communications.

“(2) In carrying out the responsibility specified in paragraph (1), the Council shall be responsible for the following with respect to the command, control, and communications system referred to in that paragraph:

“(E) Such other responsibilities as the Secretary of Defense shall specify for purposes of this section.

“(e) Annual reports.—At the same time each year the budget of the President for the fiscal year beginning in such year is submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, the Council shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the activities of the Council. Each report shall include the following:

“(1) A description and assessment of the activities of the Council during the previous fiscal year.

“(2) A description of the activities proposed to be undertaken by the Council during the period of the current fiscal-years defense program under section 221 of this title.

“(f) National leadership of the United States defined.—In this section, the term ‘national leadership of the United States’ means the following:

“(3) Such other civilian officials of the United States Government as the President shall designate for purposes of this section.”.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 7 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 171 the following new item:

(b) Report on establishment.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command, Control, and Communications System established by section 171a of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)), including the following:

(2) Such recommendations for legislative action as the Secretary considers appropriate to improve the authorities relating to the Council.

(3) A funding plan over the period of the current future-years defense program under section 221 of title 10, United States Code, to ensure a robust and modern nuclear command, control, and communications capability.

SEC. 904. Transfer of administration of Ocean Research Advisory Panel from Department of the Navy to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

(a) Authority for Ocean Research Advisory Panel.—Subsection (a) of section 7903 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(A) by inserting “, through the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” after “The Council”;

(B) by striking “Panel consisting” and inserting “Panel. The Panel shall consist”; and

(C) by striking “chairman” and inserting “Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, on behalf of the Council”;

(2) in paragraph (1), by striking “National Academy of Science” and inserting “National Academies”; and

(4) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively.

(1) by inserting “, through the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” after “The Council”;

(2) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as paragraphs (4) and (5), respectively; and

(3) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following new paragraphs (2) and (3):

“(2) To advise the Council on the determination of scientific priorities and needs.

“(3) To provide the Council strategic advice regarding national ocean program execution and collaboration.”.

(c) Funding to support activities of panel.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended by striking “Secretary of the Navy” and inserting “Secretary of Commerce”.

(a) Plan required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan for streamlining Department of Defense management headquarters by reducing the size of staffs, eliminating tiers of management, cutting functions that provide little or no added value, and consolidating overlapping and duplicative programs and offices.

(b) Scope of plan.—The plan required by subsection (a) shall specifically address staffing and services provided by military personnel, civilian personnel, and contractor personnel to each of the following:

(6) Headquarters, Department of the Army, including the Office of the Secretary of the Army, the Office of the Chief of Staff of the Army, and the Army Staff.

(8) The Office of the Secretary of the Navy, the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, and Headquarters, United States Marine Corps.

(10) Headquarters, Department of the Air Force, including the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, the Office of the Air Force Chief of Staff, and the Air Staff.

(c) Savings objective.—The objective of the plan required by subsection (a) shall be to reduce aggregate spending by the Department for management headquarters by not less than $100,000,000,000 over a ten fiscal-year period beginning with fiscal year 2015.

(1) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees the plan required by subsection (a).

(2) STATUS REPORT.—The Secretary shall include with the Department of Defense materials submitted to Congress with the budget of the President for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2025 (as submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code) a report describing the implementation of the plan required by subsection (a) during the preceding fiscal year and any modifications to the plan required due to changing circumstances. Each such report shall include the following:

(A) A summary of savings achieved for each organization covered by the plan in the fiscal year covered by such report.

(B) A description of the amount saved through reductions in military personnel, civilian personnel, and contract services personnel in the fiscal year covered by such report.

(C) In any case in which savings under the plan fall short of the objective of the plan for the fiscal year covered by such report, an explanation of the reasons for the shortfall.

(D) A description of any modifications to the plan made during the fiscal year covered by such report, and an explanation of the reasons for such modifications.

SEC. 906. Update of statutory statement of functions of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff relating to doctrine, training, and education.

(a) In general.—Paragraph (5) of section 153(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1) in subparagraph (B), by inserting “and technical standards, and executing actions,” after “policies”;

“(D) Formulating policies for concept development and experimentation for the joint employment of the armed forces.

“(E) Formulating policies for gathering, developing, and disseminating joint lessons learned for the armed forces.”.

(b) Conforming amendment.—The heading of such paragraph is amended by striking “Doctrine, training, and education” and inserting “Joint force development activities”.

SEC. 907. Modification of reference to major Department of Defense headquarters activities instruction.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, acting through the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, submit to Congress a report setting forth a comprehensive analysis comparing the cost, schedule, and performance of personnel security clearance investigations and reinvestigations for employees and contractor personnel of the Department of Defense that are conducted by the Office of Personnel Management with the cost, schedule, and performance of personnel security clearance investigations and reinvestigations for such personnel that are conducted by the components of the Department of Defense.

(2) ELEMENTS OF ANALYSIS.—The analysis under paragraph (1) shall do the following:

(A) Determine, for each of the Office of Personnel Management and the components of the Department that conduct personnel security investigations, the cost, schedule, and performance associated with personnel security investigations and reinvestigations of each type and level of clearance, and identify the elements that contribute to such cost, schedule, and performance.

(B) Identify mechanisms for permanently improving the transparency of the cost structure of personnel security investigations and reinvestigations.

(1) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary of Defense determines that the current approach for obtaining personnel security investigations and reinvestigations for employees and contractor personnel of the Department of Defense is not the most advantageous approach for the Department, the Secretary shall develop a plan, by not later than October 1, 2014, for the transition of personnel security investigations and reinvestigations to the approach preferred by the Secretary.

(2) CONSIDERATIONS.—In selecting the most advantageous approach preferred for the Department under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consider whether cost, schedule, and performance could be improved through increased reliance on private-sector entities to conduct, or provide supporting information for, personnel security investigations and reinvestigations for employees and contractor personnel of the Department.

(1) STRATEGY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly develop and implement a strategy to continuously modernize all aspects of personnel security for the Department of Defense with the objectives of lowering costs, increasing efficiencies, enabling and encouraging reciprocity, and improving security.

(A) METRICS REQUIRED.—In developing the strategy required by paragraph (1), the Secretary and the Director shall jointly establish metrics to measure the effectiveness of the strategy in meeting the objectives specified in that paragraph.

(B) REPORT.—At the same time the budget of the President for each of fiscal years 2015 through 2018 is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary and the Director shall jointly submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the metrics established under paragraph (1), including an assessment using the metrics of the effectiveness of the strategy in meeting the objectives specified in paragraph (1).

(3) ELEMENTS.—In developing the strategy required by paragraph (1), the Secretary and the Director shall consider, and may adopt, mechanisms for the following:

(A) Elimination of manual or inefficient processes in investigations and reinvestigations for personnel security, wherever practicable, and automating and integrating the elements of the investigation process, including in the following:

(iv) Investigation methods for the collection, analysis, storage, retrieval, and transfer of data and records.

(B) Elimination or reduction, where possible, of the use of databases and information sources that cannot be accessed and processed automatically electronically, or modification of such databases and information sources, if appropriate and cost-effective, to enable electronic access and processing.

(C) Access and analysis of government, publically available, and commercial data sources, including social media, that provide independent information pertinent to adjudication guidelines to improve quality and timeliness, and reduce costs, of investigations and reinvestigations.

(D) Use of government-developed and commercial technology for continuous monitoring and evaluation of government and commercial data sources that can identify and flag information pertinent to adjudication guidelines and eligibility determinations.

(E) Standardization of forms used for routine reporting required of cleared personnel (such as travel, foreign contacts, and financial disclosures) and use of continuous monitoring technology to access databases containing such reportable information to independently obtain and analyze reportable data and events.

(F) Establishment of an authoritative central repository of personnel security information that is accessible electronically at multiple levels of classification and eliminates technical barriers to rapid access to information necessary for eligibility determinations and reciprocal recognition thereof.

(G) Elimination or reduction of the scope of, or alteration of the schedule for, periodic reinvestigations of cleared personnel, when such action is appropriate in light of the information provided by continuous monitoring or evaluation technology.

(H) Electronic integration of personnel security processes and information systems with insider threat detection and monitoring systems, and pertinent law enforcement, counterintelligence and intelligence information, for threat detection and correlation.

(I) Determination of the net value of implementing phased investigative approaches designed to reach an adjudicative decision sooner than is currently achievable by truncating investigations based on thresholds where no derogatory information or clearly unacceptably derogatory information is obtained through initial background checks.

(4) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

(d) Reciprocity of clearances.—The Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly ensure that the transition of personnel security clearances between and among Department of Defense components, Department contractors, and Department contracts proceeds as rapidly and inexpensively as possible, including through the following:

(1) By providing for reciprocity of personnel security clearances among positions requiring personnel holding secret, top secret, or sensitive compartmented information clearances (the latter with a counterintelligence polygraph examination), to the maximum extent feasible consistent with national security requirements.

(2) By permitting personnel, when feasible and consistent with national security requirements, to begin work in positions requiring additional security requirements, such as a full-scope polygraph examination, pending satisfaction of such additional requirements.

(e) Benchmarks.—For purposes of carrying out the requirements of this section, the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly determine, by not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the following:

(1) The current level of mobility and personnel security clearance reciprocity of cleared personnel as personnel make a transition between Department of Defense components, between Department contracts, and between government and the private sector.

(2) The costs due to lost productivity in inefficiencies in such transitions arising from personnel security clearance matters.

(a) Report on establishment of military support division in National Clandestine Service.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, acting through the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation of the Department of Defense and in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence (acting through the Director of the Cost Analysis Improvement Group) and the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress an assessment of the savings and added effectiveness to be achieved in clandestine human intelligence collection by consolidating clandestine human intelligence collection operations in the National Clandestine Service of the Central Intelligence Agency through the establishment of a military support division in the National Clandestine Service.

(2) ASSUMPTION ON SUPERVISION OF DETAILED PERSONNEL.—For the purposes of the assessment required by paragraph (1), the Secretary and the Director of National Intelligence shall assume that the military and civilian case officers and support personnel in the military support division referred to in that paragraph shall be detailed to the National Clandestine Service under the supervision of a general or flag officer of the Armed Forces assigned to the National Clandestine Service.

(3) ELEMENTS.—The assessment required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:

(A) A determination whether savings could be achieved through the reduction of overhead and management by eliminating the clandestine human intelligence (HUMINT) management element at the Defense Intelligence Agency.

(B) The development and use of a methodology for comparing the effectiveness of the ratios of support personnel to deployed case officers maintained by the Central Intelligence Agency and the military support division referred to in paragraph (1), and a recommendation on an optimum ratio of support personnel to deployed case officers for the military support division.

(C) A determination whether institutional and procedural safeguards are available to ensure that the Department of Defense could rely on the National Clandestine Service, with the military support division referred to in paragraph (1), to support the human intelligence collection requirements of the Department, and, if so, a description of such safeguards.

(D) A determination of the advisability of conducting a pilot program on a military support division within the National Clandestine Service using available personnel.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than January 15, 2015, the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth an assessment of the implementation of the Defense Clandestine Service through September 30, 2014.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include an assessment of the following:

(A) The commitment and ability of the Armed Forces to provide and sustain qualified military case officers and to manage their careers effectively.

(B) The ability of the Defense Intelligence Agency to provide effective cover and support for case officers deployed overseas with the planned ratio of support personnel to case officers.

(C) Whether the locations overseas where capacity exists to deploy additional Department of Defense case officers can address the human intelligence collection needs of the Department.

(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and

(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

(a) Modification of radar.—The Secretary of Defense shall take appropriate actions to modify the radar system that will be deployed on the Broad Area Maritime Surveillance (BAMS) aircraft fleet of the Navy to provide a ground moving target indicator collection, processing, and dissemination capability that is comparable to the performance of such capability under the Global Hawk Block 40 Multi-Platform Radar Technology Insertion Program of the Air Force.

(b) Designation of aircraft fleet as joint asset.—The Secretary shall designate the Broad Area Maritime Surveillance aircraft fleet of the Navy as a joint asset available to support operational requirements of the unified combatant commands, including requirements for ground moving target indicator and signals intelligence support to commanders of air and ground components.

SEC. 934. Plan for transfer of Air Force C–12 Liberty Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance aircraft.

(a) Plan for transfer.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop and carry out a plan for the orderly transfer of the Air Force C–12 Liberty Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) aircraft to the Army and to the United States Special Operations Command or one of its component commands.

(1) ensure that the transfer does not affect ongoing intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance operations in Afghanistan and elsewhere around the world;

(2) identify the appropriate size, composition, and configuration of the fleet of manned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft of the Army;

(3) identify the appropriate size, composition, configuration, and disposition of the remaining fleet of Air Force C–12 Liberty Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance aircraft;

(4) provide for the modification of the Air Force Liberty C–12 Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance aircraft transferred under the plan to meet the long-term needs of the Army and the United States Special Operations Command; and

(5) include a timeline for the orderly transfer of Air Force Liberty C–12 Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance aircraft in manner consistent with the requirement in paragraph (1).

(c) Report.—Not later than the date on which the budget of the President for fiscal year 2015 is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the plan required by subsection (a).

(d) Prohibition on acquisition of certain system.—The Army may not acquire the Enhanced Medium Altitude Reconnaissance and Surveillance System in fiscal year 2014.

(e) Appropriate committees of Congress defined.—In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—

(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and

(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 941. Authorities, capabilities, and oversight of the United States Cyber Command.

(1) DETERMINATION OF NECESSITY OF ASSIGNMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Joint Chiefs of Staff, determine whether the United States Cyber Command requires signals intelligence (SIGINT) collection authorities to execute its missions in support of the Department of Defense, the other combatant commands, and the national cyber defense generally, whether in peacetime or conflict, including in the operational preparation of the environment.

(2) DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY.—If the Secretary determines pursuant to paragraph (1) that the United States Cyber Command requires signals intelligence collection authorities to execute its missions, the Secretary, as the executive agent of the President for signals intelligence pursuant to Executive Order No. 12333, shall, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, delegate appropriate signals intelligence collection authorities to the United States Cyber Command.

(b) Provision of certain operational capabilities.—The Secretary shall take such actions as the Secretary considers appropriate to provide the United States Cyber Command operational military units with infrastructure and equipment enabling access to the Internet and other types of networks in order to permit the United States Cyber Command to conduct its peacetime and wartime missions independently of the National Security Agency so as to avoid compromising sources and methods in the execution of military operations.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall review existing cyber ranges and adapt one or more such ranges, as necessary, to support training and exercises of cyber units that are assigned to execute offensive military cyber operations.

(2) ELEMENTS.—Each range so adapted under this subsection shall have the capability to support offensive military operations against targets that—

(B) must be compromised or neutralized immediately without regard to whether the adversary can detect and attribute the attack.

(1) DESIGNATION.—The Secretary shall designate, from among the existing personnel of the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, an official to act as the principal advisor to the Secretary on offensive military cyber forces. Any official so designated shall be an official who holds the official's current position by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

(2) RESPONSIBILITIES.—The official designated under this subsection shall have responsibility for the following:

(A) Resource management and oversight of the organizing, training, and equipping of offensive military cyber forces, including oversight of the planning, programming, and budgeting process for such forces.

(B) Such other matters relating to offensive military cyber forces as the Secretary shall specify for purposes of this subsection.

(e) Training of cyber personnel.—The Secretary shall establish and maintain training capabilities and facilities in the Armed Forces and, as the Secretary considers appropriate, at United States Cyber Command, to support the needs of the Armed Forces and the United States Cyber Command for personnel who are assigned offensive and defensive cyber missions in the Department of Defense.

(f) Sense of Congress on funding and management of personnel.—It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary should fund and manage personnel of the Department whose cyber operations responsibilities are primarily offensive in nature outside of the Military Intelligence Program (MIP) and the Information Systems Security Program.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide for the establishment of a joint software assurance center for the Department of Defense (in this section referred to as the “center”).

(2) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the center shall be to serve as a joint, Department-wide resource for efforts of the Department to ensure security in the software developed, acquired, maintained, and used by the Department.

(b) Discharge of establishment.—In providing for the establishment of the center, the Secretary shall consider whether the purpose of the center can be met by an existing software assurance center in the Department.

(c) Charter.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue a charter for the center. The charter shall set forth the following:

(1) The role of the center in supporting program offices in implementing the supply chain risk management strategy of the Department.

(2) The software assurance expertise and capabilities of the center, including policies, standards, requirements, best practices, contracting, training, testing, and code analysis and remediation.

(3) Requirements for the discharge by the center, in coordination with the Center for Assured Software of the National Security Agency, of a program of research and development to improve automated software code vulnerability analysis and testing tools.

(4) Requirements for the center to procure, manage, and distribute enterprise licenses for automated software vulnerability analysis tools.

(d) Report.—The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees, at the time of the submittal to Congress of the budget of the President for fiscal year 2016 (as submitted pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code), a report on the funding and management of the center. The report shall set forth such recommendations as the Secretary considers appropriate regarding the optimal placement of the center within the organizational structure of the Department, including responsibility for the funding and management of the center.

SEC. 943. Supervision of the acquisition of cloud computing capabilities for intelligence analysis.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, and the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council, supervise the following:

(A) Review, development, modification, and approval of requirements for cloud computing solutions for intelligence data analysis and storage by the Armed Forces and the Defense Agencies, including requirements for cross-domain, enterprise-wide discovery and correlation of data stored in cloud and non-cloud computing databases, relational and non-relational databases, and hybrid databases.

(B) Review, development, modification, approval, and implementation of plans for the competitive acquisition of cloud computing systems or services to meet requirements described in subparagraph (A), including plans for the transition from current computing systems to systems or services acquired.

(C) Development and implementation of plans to ensure that the cloud systems or services acquired pursuant to subparagraph (B) are interoperable and universally accessible and usable through attribute-based access controls.

(D) Integration of plans under subparagraphs (B) and (C) with enterprise-wide plans of the Armed Forces and the Department of Defense for the Joint Information Environment and the Defense Intelligence Information Environment.

(2) DIRECTION.—The Secretary shall provide direction to the Armed Forces and the Defense Agencies on the matters covered by paragraph (1) by not later than March 15, 2014.

(b) Integration with intelligence community efforts.—The Secretary shall coordinate with the Director of National Intelligence to ensure that activities under this section are integrated with the Intelligence Community Information Technology Enterprise in order to achieve interoperability, information sharing, and other efficiencies.

SEC. 944. Cyber vulnerabilities of Department of Defense weapon systems and tactical communications systems.

(a) Report required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the status of the capability of each military department to operate in non-permissive and hostile cyber environments.

(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:

(1) A description and assessment of potential cyber threats or threat systems to major weapon systems and tactical communications systems that could emerge in the next five years.

(2) A description and assessment of cyber vulnerabilities of current major weapons and tactical communications systems.

(3) A detailed description of the current strategy to detect, deter, and defend against cyber attacks on current and planned major weapon systems and tactical communications systems.

(4) An estimate of the costs anticipated to be incurred in addressing cyber vulnerabilities to Department of Defense weapons systems and tactical communications systems over the next five years

(c) Form.—The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

SEC. 945. Strategy on use of the reserve components of the Armed Forces to support Department of Defense cyber missions.

(a) Strategy required.—In developing the force structure to accomplish the cyber missions of the Department of Defense through United States Cyber Command, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a strategy for integrating the reserve components of the Armed Forces into the total force to support the cyber missions of the United States Cyber Command, including support for civil authorities, in the discharge of such missions.

(b) Actions required during development.—In developing the strategy, the Secretary shall do the following:

(1) In consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments and the Commander of the United States Cyber Command, identify the Department of Defense cyber mission requirements that could be discharged by members of the reserve components.

(2) In consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, ensure that the Governors of the several States, through the Council of Governors, as appropriate, have an opportunity to provide the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security an independent evaluation of State cyber capabilities, and State cyber needs that cannot be fulfilled through the private sector.

(3) Identify the existing capabilities and plans for cyber activities of the reserve components, including by the following:

(A) An identification of current positions in the reserve components serving Department cyber missions.

(C) An assessment of the manner in which the military departments plan to use the reserve components to meet total force resource requirements, and the effect of such plans on the potential ability of members of the reserve components to support the cyber missions of the United States Cyber Command.

(4) Assess whether the National Guard, when activated in a State status (either State Active Duty or in a duty status under title 32, United States Code) can operate under unique and useful authorities to support domestic cyber missions and requirements of the Department or the United States Cyber Command.

(5) Assess the appropriateness of hiring on a part-time basis non-dual status technicians who possess appropriate cyber security expertise for purposes of assisting the National Guard in protecting critical infrastructure and carrying out cyber security missions in defense of the United States homeland.

(A) attract and retain personnel with substantial, relevant cyber technical expertise who use those skills in the private sector;

(B) organize such personnel into units at the State, regional, or national level under appropriate command and control arrangements for Department cyber missions;

(7) Determine how the reserve components could contribute to total force solutions to cyber operations requirements of the United States Cyber Command.

(8) Develop an estimate of the personnel, infrastructure, and training required, and the costs that would be incurred, in connection with implementing the strategy for integrating the reserve components into the total force for support of the cyber missions of the Department and United States Cyber Command.

(c) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the strategy developed under this section. The report shall include a comprehensive description of the strategy, including the results of the actions required by subsection (b), and such other matters on the strategy as the Secretary considers appropriate.

(a) Interagency process for establishment of policy.—The President shall establish an interagency process to provide for the establishment of an integrated policy to control the proliferation of cyber weapons through unilateral and cooperative export controls, law enforcement activities, financial means, diplomatic engagement, and such other means as the President considers appropriate.

(b) Objectives.—The objectives of the interagency process established under subsection (a) shall be as follows:

(1) To identify the types of dangerous software that can and should be controlled through export controls, whether unilaterally or cooperatively with other countries.

(2) To identify the intelligence, law enforcement, and financial sanctions tools that can and should be used to suppress the trade in cyber tools and infrastructure that are or can be used for criminal, terrorist, or military activities while preserving the ability of governments and the private sector to use such tools for legitimate purposes of self-defense.

(3) To establish a statement of principles to control the proliferation of cyber weapons, including principles for controlling the proliferation of cyber weapons that can lead to expanded cooperation and engagement with international partners.

(c) Recommendations.—The interagency process established under subsection (a) shall develop, by not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, recommendations on means for the control of the proliferation of cyber weapons, including a draft statement of principles and a review of applicable legal authorities.

(a) Integrated policy.—The President shall establish an interagency process to provide for the development of an integrated policy to deter adversaries in cyberspace.

(b) Objective.—The objective of the interagency process established under subsection (a) shall be to develop a deterrence policy for reducing cyber risks to the United States and our allies.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the integrated policy developed pursuant to subsection (a).

(2) FORM.—The report under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

(a) Contingent preservation of certification during fiscal year 2014.—The Centers of Academic Excellence for Information Assurance shall not lose their certification as centers of academic excellence in fiscal year 2014 for failure to meet revised guidelines and criteria for such certification issued by the National Security Agency if the Centers qualify for certification as centers of academic excellence under guidelines and standards for such certification as of September 30, 2013.

(b) Assessment of proper body for accreditation or certification.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall, in consultation with the Secretary of Education and with the advice of the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity, determine whether either—

(1) information assurance has become a mature academic discipline that warrants the creation of a non-government national accreditation body for the development of curricula and other criteria for accrediting the information assurance programs of institutions of higher education; or

(2) a direct Government role is still required for the development of curricula and other criteria for certifying the information assurance programs of the existing Centers of Academic Excellence for Information Assurance.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to Congress a plan on the following:

(A) Implementing the determination made pursuant to subsection (b) on appropriate mechanisms for developing the curricula and other criteria for accrediting or certifying the the information assurance programs of the Centers of Academic Excellence for Information Assurance.

(B) Transitioning the responsibility specified in subparagraph (A) from the sole administration of the National Security Agency.

(2) CONSULTATION.—In developing the plan, the President shall consult with appropriate representatives of information assurance interests in all departments and agencies of the Federal Government, State and local governments, academia, and the private sector.

(3) CONFORMING OF PROCESS TO PROCESSES FOR OTHER ACADEMIC DISCIPLINES.—In developing the plan, the President shall seek to conform the accreditation or certification process for the Centers of Academic Excellence for Information Assurance to the peer-based accreditation practices used for all other established academic disciplines, including a process involving all appropriate constituency communities, and covering standards for curriculum, quality of instruction, contribution to the discipline, and supporting facilities.

(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this division for fiscal year 2014 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred.

(2) LIMITATION.—Except as provided in paragraph (3), the total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this section may not exceed $4,000,000,000.

(3) EXCEPTION FOR TRANSFERS BETWEEN MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS.—A transfer of funds between military personnel authorizations under title IV shall not be counted toward the dollar limitation in paragraph (2).

(b) Limitations.—The authority provided by subsection (a) to transfer authorizations—

(1) may only be used to provide authority for items that have a higher priority than the items from which authority is transferred; and

(2) may not be used to provide authority for an item that has been denied authorization by Congress.

(c) Effect on authorization amounts.—A transfer made from one account to another under the authority of this section shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for the account to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal to the amount transferred.

(d) Notice to Congress.—The Secretary shall promptly notify Congress of each transfer made under subsection (a).

(a) Establishment.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish a fund to be known as the “Department of Defense Readiness Restoration Fund” (in this section referred to as the “Fund”) in order to provide funds, in addition to other funds that may be available, for training activities of the Armed Forces (including flying hours and steaming days) and the maintenance of military equipment.

(b) Purpose.—The purpose of the Fund is to provide the Department of Defense with increased flexibility to transfer funds to high priority readiness accounts, where necessary to address significant shortfalls in funding otherwise available for the training activities of the Armed Forces (including flying hours and steaming days) and the maintenance of military equipment.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Fund shall be managed by a senior official of the Department of Defense designated by the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) for that purpose.

(2) CONSULTATION.—The senior official designated under paragraph (1) shall manage the Fund in consultation with the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Logistics and Materiel Readiness and the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Readiness.

(B) Any other amounts appropriated to, credited to, or deposited into the Fund by law.

(2) TRANSFERS.—The Secretary of Defense may transfer to the Fund, in accordance with established procedures governing such transfers, any unobligated funds available to the Department of Defense. Any amount so transferred shall be credited to the Fund.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the provisions of this subsection, amounts in the Fund shall be available to the Secretary of Defense for transfer to the operation and maintenance accounts of a military department or Defense Agency for expenditure for training activities of the Armed Forces (including flying hours and steaming days) and the maintenance of military equipment.

(2) LIMITATION.—Amounts in the Fund may not be obligated for any purpose other than purposes described in paragraph (1).

(3) PRIORITY IN READINESS NEEDS.—The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Logistics and Materiel Readiness and the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Readiness shall establish a process for identifying, evaluating, and prioritizing the key readiness needs of the Department and for ensuring that amounts in the Fund are made available for the highest priority readiness needs so identified.

(4) PERIOD OF AVAILABILITY.—The period of availability for obligation of amounts in the Fund shall not be affected by a transfer of such amounts under this section.

(5) EFFECT ON AUTHORIZATION AMOUNTS.—A transfer made from one account to another under the authority of this section shall be deemed to change the amount authorized for the account to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal to the amount transferred.

(1) TRANSFERS TO FUND.—The transfer of amounts to the Fund pursuant to subsection (d)(2) shall not be counted toward the dollar limitation on transfer authority in section 1001, any similar provision in an annual Act authorizing appropriations for a fiscal year for the Department of Defense, or any other provision of law imposing a ceiling on amounts that may be transferred by the Department.

(2) TRANSFERS FROM FUND.—The transfer of amounts from the Fund to a military department or Defense Agency pursuant to subsection (e)(1) shall not be counted toward the dollar limitation on transfer authority in section 1001, any similar provision in an annual Act authorizing appropriations for a fiscal year for the Department of Defense, or any other provision of law imposing a ceiling on amounts that may be transferred by the Department.

(1) TRANSFERS OF UNOBLIGATED FUNDS.—The authority to transfer unobligated funds to the Fund under subsection (d)(2) shall cease on September 30, 2014.

(2) TRANSFERS FROM FUND.—The authority to transfer amounts from the Fund under subsection (e) shall expire on April 1, 2015.

(3) EXCEPTIONS FROM TRANSFER LIMITATIONS.—The exception from the provisions of law referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (f) of transfers of amounts referred to in such paragraphs shall cease on September 30, 2014.

(h) Notice to Congress.—The Secretary of Defense shall promptly notify the congressional defense committees of each transfer under subsection (d)(2) or (e)(1).

(i) Annual report.—Not later than 60 days after the end of any fiscal year in which amounts are available in the Fund, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the operation of the Fund during such fiscal year. Each report shall include, for the fiscal year covered by such report, the following:

(1) A statement of the amounts transferred, appropriated, credited, or deposited to or into the Fund, and the source of such amounts.

(2) A description of the expenditures made from the Fund (including expenditures following a transfer of amounts in the Fund to a military department or Defense Agency), including the purpose of such expenditures.

(3) A description and assessment of the improvements to the readiness of the Department of Defense resulting from such expenditures.

(4) A statement of the balance in the Fund at the beginning and end of such fiscal year.

SEC. 1011. Extension of authority to support unified counter-drug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia.

(a) Extension.—Section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2042), as most recently amended by section 1010 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1907), is further amended—

(b) Notice to Congress on assistance.—Not later than 15 days before providing assistance under section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (as amended by subsection (a)) using funds available for fiscal year 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a notice setting forth the assistance to be provided, including the types of such assistance, the budget for such assistance, and the completion date for the provision of such assistance.

SEC. 1012. Extension of authority for joint task forces to provide support to law enforcement agencies conducting counter-terrorism activities.

SEC. 1013. Extension and expansion of authority to provide additional support for counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments.

(a) Extension.—Subsection (a)(2) of section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 111 Stat. 1881), as most recently amended by section 1006 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1557), is further amended by striking “2013” and inserting “2018”.

(b) Maximum amount of support.—Subsection (e)(2) of such section 1033, as so amended, is further amended by striking “2013” and inserting “2018”.

(c) Additional governments eligible To receive support.—Subsection (b) of such section 1033, as so amended, is further amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:

SEC. 1021. Modification of requirements for annual long-range plan for the construction of naval vessels.

(a) Annual naval vessel construction plan.—Subsection (b) of section 231 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(A) by striking “should be designed” both places it appears and inserting “shall be designed”; and

(B) by striking “is capable of supporting” both places it appears and inserting “supports”; and

(A) in subparagraph (B), by inserting “and capabilities” after “naval vessel force structure”; and

“(D) The estimated total cost of construction for each vessel used to determine estimated levels of annual funding under subparagraph (C).”.

(b) Assessment when construction plan does not meet force structure requirements.—Such section is further amended—

(1) by redesignating subsections (d), (e), and (f) as subsections (e), (f), and (g), respectively; and

“(d) Assessment when annual naval vessel construction plan does not meet force structure requirements.—If the annual naval vessel construction plan for a fiscal year under subsection (b) does not result in a force structure or capabilities that meet the requirements identified in subsection (b)(2)(B), the Secretary shall include with the defense budget materials for that fiscal year an assessment of the extent of the strategic and operational risk to national security associated with the reduced force structure of naval vessels over the period of time that the required force structure or capabilities are not achieved. Such assessment shall include an analysis whether the risks are acceptable, and plans to mitigate such risks. Such assessment shall be coordinated in advance with the commanders of the combatant commands and the Nuclear Weapons Council under section 179 of this title.”.

(a) Report required.—Not later than February 1, 2014, the Chief of Naval Operations shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on current and anticipated requirements for combatant vessels of the Navy over the next 30 years.

(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:

(1) A description of the naval capability requirements identified by the combatant commands in developing the Force Structure Assessment (FSA) in 2005 and revalidating that Assessment in 2010.

(2) The capabilities for each class of vessel that was assumed in the Force Structure Assessment.

(3) An assessment of the capabilities of the current fleet of combatant vessels of the Navy to meet current and anticipated requirements.

(4) An assessment the capabilities of the anticipated fleet of combatant vessels of the Navy to meet emerging threats over the next 30 years.

(5) An assessment of how the Navy will meet combatant command requirements for forward-deployed naval capabilities with a smaller number of ships and submarines.

(6) An assessment of how the Navy will manage the risk of massing a greater set of capabilities on a smaller number of ships while facing an expanding range of asymmetrical threats, such as—

(c) Form.—The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

SEC. 1023. Repeal of policy relating to propulsion systems of any new class of major combatant vessels of the strike forces of the United States Navy.

SEC. 1024. Clarification of sole ownership resulting from ship donations at no cost to the Navy.

(a) Clarification of transfer authority.—Subsection (a) of section 7306 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(a) Authority To make transfer.—The Secretary of the Navy may convey, by donation, all right, title, and interest to any vessel stricken from the Naval Vessel Register or any captured vessel, for use as a museum or memorial for public display in the United States, to—

“(1) any State, the District of Columbia, any Commonwealth or possession of the United States, or any municipal corporation or political subdivision thereof; or

(b) Clarification of limitations on liability and responsibility.—Subsection (b) of such section is amended to read as follows:

“(1) IMMUNITY OF UNITED STATES.—The United States and all departments and agencies thereof, and their officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity for any injury or damage to any person or property occurring on a vessel donated under this section.

“(2) IMPROVEMENTS, UPGRADES, AND REPAIRS.—Notwithstanding any other law, the United States and all departments and agencies thereof, and their officers and employees, shall have no responsibility or obligation to make, engage in, or provide funding for, any improvement, upgrade, modification, maintenance, preservation, or repair to a vessel donated under this section.”.

(c) Clarification that transfers to be made at no cost to united states.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended by inserting after “under this section” the following: “, the maintenance and preservation of that vessel as a museum or memorial, and the ultimate disposal of that vessel, including demilitarization of Munitions List items at the end of the useful life of the vessel as a museum or memorial,”.

(d) Application of environmental laws; definitions.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsections:

“(e) Application of environmental laws.—Nothing in this section shall affect the applicability of Federal, State, interstate, and local environmental laws and regulations, including the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.), to the Department of Defense or to a donee.

“(1) The term ‘nonprofit entity’ means any entity qualifying as an exempt organization under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

“(2) The term ‘Munitions List’ means the United States Munitions List created and controlled under section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).

“(3) The term ‘donee’ means any entity receiving a vessel pursuant to subsection (a).”.

(1) SECTION HEADING.—The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:

“§ 7306. Vessels stricken from Naval Vessel Register; captured vessels: conveyance by donation”.

(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 633 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 7306 and inserting the following new item:

SEC. 1031. Transfers to foreign countries of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

(a) Authority To transfer under certain circumstances.—The Secretary of Defense is authorized to transfer or release any individual detained at Guantanamo to the individual’s country of origin, or any other foreign country, if—

(1) the Secretary determines, following a review conducted in accordance with the requirements of section 1023 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 801 note) and Executive Order No. 13567, that the individual is no longer a threat to the national security of the United States;

(2) such transfer or release outside the United States is to effectuate an order affecting disposition of the individual by a court or competent tribunal of the United States having jurisdiction; or

(3) such individual has been tried in a court or competent tribunal of the United States having jurisdiction on charges based on the same conduct that serves as the basis for the determination that the individual is an enemy combatant and—

(B) has been convicted and has completed serving the sentence pursuant to the conviction.

(b) Determination required prior to transfer.—Except as provided in subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may transfer an individual detained at Guantanamo to the custody or control of the individual’s country origin, or any other foreign country, only if the Secretary determines that—

(1) actions that have been or are planned to be taken will substantially mitigate the risk of such individual engaging or reengaging in any terrorist or other hostile activity that threatens the United States or United States persons or interests; and

(c) Factors To Be considered in making determination.—In making the determination specified in subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall take into consideration the following factors:

(1) The recommendations of the Guantanamo Detainee Review Task Force established pursuant to Executive Order No. 13492 and the recommendations of the Periodic Review Boards established pursuant to No. Executive Order 13567, as applicable.

(2) Any confirmed case in which an individual transferred to the foreign country to which the individual is to be transferred subsequently engaged in terrorist or other other hostile activity that threatened the United States or United States persons or interests.

(3) Any actions taken by the United States or the foreign country to which the individual is to be transferred, or change in circumstances in such country, that reduce the risk of recidivism of the type described in paragraph (2).

(4) Any assurances provided by the government of the foreign country to which the individual is to be transferred, including that—

(A) such government maintains control over any facility at which the individual is to be detained if the individual is to be housed in a government-controlled facility; and

(B) such government has taken or agreed to take actions to substantially mitigate the risk of the individual engaging or reengaging in any terrorist or other hostile activity that threatens the United States or United States persons or interests.

(5) An assessment of the capacity, willingness, and past practices (if applicable) of the foreign country described in paragraph (4) in meeting any assurances it has provided, including assurances under paragraph (4) regarding its capacity and willingness to mitigate the risk of recidivism.

(6) Any record of cooperation by the individual to be transferred with United States intelligence and law enforcement authorities, pursuant to a pre-trial agreement, while in the custody of or under the effective control of the Department of Defense, and any agreements and effective mechanisms that may be in place, to the extent relevant and necessary, to provide continued cooperation with United States intelligence and law enforcement authorities.

(d) Notification.—The Secretary of Defense shall notify the appropriate committees of Congress of a determination of the Secretary under subsection (a) or (b) not later than 30 days before the transfer or release of the individual under such subsection. Each notification shall include, at a minimum, the following:

(2) An explanation of why the transfer or release is in the national security interests of the United States.

(3) A description of any actions to be taken to mitigate the risks of recidivism by the individual to be transferred or released.

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

(2) The term “individual detained at Guantanamo” means any individual located at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of October 1, 2009, who—

(A) is not a citizen of the United States or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and

(ii) otherwise under detention at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

(f) Repeal of superseded authorities.—The following provisions of law are repealed:

(1) Section 1033 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4351).

(2) Section 1028 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1567; 10 U.S.C. 801 note).

(3) Section 1028 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1914; 10 U.S.C. 801 note).

SEC. 1032. Authority to temporarily transfer individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United States for emergency or critical medical treatment.

(a) Transfer for emergency or critical medical treatment authorized.—Notwithstanding section 1031(a), or any similar provision of law enacted after September 30, 2013, the Secretary of Defense may temporarily transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to a Department of Defense medical facility in the United States for the sole purpose of providing the individual medical treatment if the Secretary determines that—

(1) the Senior Medical Officer, Joint Task Force–Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, has determined that the medical treatment is necessary to prevent death or imminent significant injury or harm to the health of the individual;

(2) based on the recommendation of the Senior Medical Officer, Joint Task Force–Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the medical treatment is not available to be provided at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, without incurring excessive and unreasonable costs; and

(3) the Department of Defense has provided for appropriate security measures for the custody and control of the individual during any period in which the individual is temporarily in the United States under this subsection.

(b) Limitation on exercise of authority.—The authority of the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a) may be exercised only by the Secretary of Defense or by another official of the Department of Defense at the level of Under Secretary of Defense or higher.

(1) remain in the custody and control of the Secretary of Defense at all times; and

(2) be returned to United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as soon as feasible after a Department of Defense physician determines that—

(B) in consultation with the Commander, Joint Task Force–Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, any necessary follow-up medical care may reasonably be provided the individual at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

(d) Status while in United States.—An individual who is temporarily transferred under the authority in subsection (a), while in the United States—

(1) shall be considered to be paroled into the United States temporarily pursuant to section 212(d)(5)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(5)(A));

(2) shall not be permitted to apply for asylum under section 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1158), be placed in removal proceedings under section 240 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1229a), or be eligible to apply for admission into the United States; and

(3) shall not be permitted to avail himself of any right, privilege, or benefit of any law of the United States beyond those available to individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

(e) Judicial review precluded.—A decision not to grant a temporary transfer under subsection (a), or not to recommend the granting of such a transfer, shall not give rise to a judicial cause of action.

(f) Notification.—The Secretary of Defense shall notify the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives of any temporary transfer of an individual under the authority in subsection (a) not later than 5 days after the transfer of the individual under that authority.

(g) Individual detained at Guantanamo defined.—In this section, the term “individual detained at Guantanamo” has the meaning given that term in section 1031(e)(2).

SEC. 1033. Limitation on the transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

(a) In general.—Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2014 may be used to transfer, release, or assist in the transfer or release to or within the United States, its territories, or possessions of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or any other detainee who—

(1) is not a United States citizen or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and

(2) is or was held on or after January 20, 2009, at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by the Department of Defense.

(b) Transfer for detention and trial.—The Secretary of Defense may transfer a detainee described in subsection (a) to the United States for detention and trial if the Secretary—

(1) determines that the transfer is in the national security interest of the United States;

(2) determines that appropriate actions have been taken, or will be taken, to address any risk to public safety that could arise in connection with the detention and trial in the United States; and

(3) notifies the appropriate committees of Congress not later than 30 days before the date of the proposed transfer.

(1) A statement of the basis for the determination that the transfer is in the national security interest of the United States.

(2) A description of the actions the Secretary determines have been taken, or will be taken, to address any risk to public safety that could arise in connection with the detention and trial in the United States.

(d) Appropriate committees of Congress defined.—In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—

(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and

(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 1034. Clarification of procedures for use of alternate members on military commissions.

(1) NUMBER OF MEMBERS.—Subsection (a) of section 948m of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(i) by striking “at least five members” and inserting “at least five primary members and as many alternate members as the convening authority shall detail”; and

(ii) by adding at the end the following new sentence: “Alternate members shall be designated in the order in which they will replace an excused primary member.”; and

(A) by redesignating subsection (b) and (c) as subsections (d) and (e), respectively; and

(B) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsections (b) and (c):

“(b) Primary members.—Primary members of a military commission under this chapter are voting members.

“(c) Alternate members.— (1) A military commission may include alternate members to replace primary members who are excused from service on the commission.

“(2) Whenever a primary member is excused from service on the commission, an alternate member, if available, shall replace the excused primary member and the trial may proceed.”.

(3) EXCUSE OF MEMBERS.—Subsection (d) of such section, as redesignated by paragraph (2)(A), is amended—

(A) in the matter before paragraph (1), by inserting “primary or alternate” before “member”;

“(4) in the case of an alternate member, in order to reduce the number of alternate members required for service on the commission, as determined by the convening authority.”.

(4) ABSENT AND ADDITIONAL MEMBERS.—Subsection (e) of such section, as redesignated by paragraph (2)(A), is amended—

(iii) by inserting “and there are no remaining alternate members to replace the excused primary members” after “subsection (a)”; and

(B) by adding at the end the following new sentence: “An alternate member who was present for the introduction of all evidence shall not be considered to be a new or additional member.”.

(1) in subsection (a), by inserting “primary or alternate” before “members”; and

(2) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the following new sentence: “Nothing in this section prohibits the military judge from awarding to each party such additional peremptory challenges as may be required in the interests of justice.”.

“(4) The primary members present for a vote on a sentence need not be the same primary members who voted on the conviction if the requirements of section 948m(d) of this title are met.”.

SEC. 1041. Modification of responsibilities and reporting requirements of Nuclear Weapons Council.

(a) Responsibilities.—Subsection (d) of section 179 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(2) by redesignating paragraphs (11) and (12) as paragraphs (10) and (11), respectively.

(b) Annual report.—Subsection (g) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(6) A description of the joint efforts of the Department of Defense and the Department of Energy with respect to the physical protection of special nuclear material and the development of common physical protection standards for such material.”.

SEC. 1042. Modification of deadline for report on plan for nuclear weapons stockpile and nuclear weapons complex.

(1) in the subsection heading, by striking “on the plan” and all that follows through “control system” and inserting “required”;

(A) by striking “Together with the budget of the President submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for each of fiscal years 2013 through 2019, the President” and inserting “The President”; and

(B) by striking “control system.” and inserting the following: “control system—

“(A) together with the budget of the President submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for each of fiscal years 2013 and 2014; and

“(B) except as provided in paragraph (2), not later than 60 days after the submission of the budget of the President to Congress under that section for each of fiscal years 2015 through 2019.”;

“(2) EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR REPORT.—If the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy jointly determine that a report required by paragraph (1) for any of fiscal years 2015 through 2019 will not able to be transmitted to the committees specified in that paragraph by the time required under subparagraph (B) of that paragraph, such Secretaries shall—

“(A) promptly, and before the submission to Congress of the budget of the President for that fiscal year under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, notify those committees of the expected date for the transmission of the report; and

“(B) not later than 30 days after the submission of that budget to Congress, provide a briefing to those committees on the content of the report.”.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, shall estimate the costs of life extension activities for the following:

(2) SUBMISSION.—The Secretary shall submit the cost estimate required by paragraph (1) to the congressional defense committees not later than February 1, 2014.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, acting through the Director, shall compare the costs of life extension activities for the warheads referred to in subsection (a)(1), using the cost estimate required by that subsection, to the costs of replacing the W88 Trident II D5 missile warheads and the W78 intercontinental ballistic missile warheads with an interoperable warhead, using the cost estimate for phase 6.2A (relating to design definition and cost study) for the interoperable warhead.

(2) SUBMISSION.—The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the cost comparison required by paragraph (1) not later than April 1, 2014.

(c) Limitation on use of funds.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be obligated or expended for an interoperable warhead to replace the W88 Trident II D5 missile warheads and the W78 intercontinental ballistic missile warheads after the completion of phase 6.2A for the interoperable warhead until the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees the report on the cost comparison required by subsection (b).

SEC. 1044. Sense of Congress on ensuring the modernization of United States nuclear forces.

(a) Policy.—It is the policy of the United States to modernize or replace the triad of strategic nuclear delivery systems, to proceed with a robust stockpile stewardship program, and to maintain and modernize the nuclear weapons production capabilities that will ensure the safety, security, reliability, and performance of the United States nuclear arsenal at the New START Treaty levels and meet requirements for hedging against possible international developments or technical problems, in conformance with United States policies and to underpin deterrence.

(1) Congress is committed to providing the resources needed to achieve the objectives stated in subsection (a) at a minimum at the level set forth in the 10-year plan provided to Congress on an annual basis pursuant to section 1043 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81), as amended;

(2) Congress supports the modernization or replacement of the triad of strategic nuclear delivery systems: a heavy bomber and air-launched cruise missile, an ICBM, and an SSBN and SLBM; and

(3) the President and Congress should work together to meet the objectives stated in subsection (a) in the most cost-efficient manner possible.

SEC. 1045. Readiness and flexibility of intercontinental ballistic missile force.

(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense may, in a manner consistent with the obligations of the United States under international agreements—

(1) retain intercontinental ballistic missile launch facilities currently supporting deployed strategic nuclear delivery vehicles within the limit of 800 deployed and non-deployed strategic launchers;

(2) maintain intercontinental ballistic missiles on alert or operationally deployed status; and

(3) preserve intercontinental ballistic missile silos in operational or warm status.

(b) Report required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the feasibility and advisability of preserving intercontinental ballistic missile silos in operational or warm status.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 2 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“(a) Strategy required.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Commerce, develop and update from time to time a strategy on the availability and use of the electromagnetic spectrum to meet the national security requirements of the United States.

“(b) Periods covered by strategy.—The strategy shall cover each of the following periods (counting from the date of the issuance of the strategy or any update of the strategy):

“(c) Elements.—The strategy shall include the following (current as of the date of the issuance of the strategy or any update of the strategy):

“(1) An inventory of the uses of the electromagnetic spectrum for national security purposes and other purposes.

“(2) An estimate of the need for electromagnetic spectrum for national security and other purposes over each of the periods specified in subsection (b).

“(3) An estimate of the capacity to share electromagnetic spectrum over each of the period specified in subsection (b) among national security purposes and other purposes in accordance with the estimate developed under paragraph (2).

“(4) Plans to continue to use blocks of electromagnetic spectrum, or to relocate to or commence use of blocks of electromagnetic spectrum, over each of the periods specified in subsection (b).

“(5) An estimate of the costs of any plans to relocate to or commence use of blocks of electromagnetic spectrum, over each of the periods specified in subsection (b).

“(6) Any other matters that the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Commerce, considers appropriate for the strategy.

“(d) Frequency of updates.—The strategy shall be updated not less often than once every five years.

“(e) Form.—The strategy, and any update of the strategy, shall be issued in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.”.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 2 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

(b) Deadline for development of strategy.—The national security spectrum strategy required by section 119a of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)), shall be developed not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 1052. Department of Defense representation in dispute resolution regarding surrender of Department of Defense bands of electromagnetic frequencies.

“(3) DISPUTE RESOLUTION.—In the event of any dispute resolution process involving the surrender of use of such band of frequencies, the Secretary shall ensure the Department of Defense has adequate representation to convey its views.”.

SEC. 1053. Sense of Senate on parental rights of members of the Armed Forces in child custody determinations.

(a) Title 10, United States Code.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:

(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 23 is amended by striking the item relating to section 483.

(B) by redesignating subsections (j) and (k) as subsections (i) and (j), respectively.

(A) in subsection (a), by striking “Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary” and inserting “The Secretary”;

(bb) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively;

(iii) in subsection (b), as redesignated by clause (ii)(I), by striking “For each” and inserting “Content of reports.—(1) For each”;

(iv) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) of subsection (a) as paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively, of subsection (b), as redesignated by clause (ii)(I); and

(v) in paragraph (2), as redesignated by clause (iv), of subsection (b), as redesignated by clause (ii)(I), by striking “contract described in paragraph (1)” and inserting “contract described in subsection (a)”.

(ii) The item relating to such section in the table of sections at the beginning of subchapter IV of chapter 169 is amended to read as follows:

(13) Section 2885(a)(3) is amended by striking “If a project” and inserting “In the case of a project for new construction, if the project”.

(1) FISCAL YEAR 2009.—Section 903(b)(5) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 10 U.S.C. 2228 note) is amended to read as follows:

“(5) Not later than December 31 of each year, the corrosion control and prevention executive of a military department shall submit to the Secretary of Defense a report containing recommendations pertaining to the corrosion control and prevention program of the military department. Such report shall include recommendations for the funding levels necessary for the executive to carry out the duties of the executive under this section.”.

(2) FISCAL YEAR 2008.—The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) is amended as follows:

(i) in subparagraph (A), by striking “The Secretary” and inserting “Except as provided in subparagraph (D), the Secretary”; and

“(D) EXCEPTIONS.—Subparagraph (A) does not apply to determinations made with respect to the following individuals:

“(i) An individual described in paragraph (2)(C) who is otherwise sponsored by the Secretary of Defense, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, or the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

(3) FISCAL YEAR 2007.—The John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364) is amended as follows:

(ii) by redesignating subsections (d), (e), and (f) as subsections (c), (d), and (e), respectively.

(4) FISCAL YEAR 1999.—Section 1101 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261; 5 U.S.C. 3104 note) is amended by striking subsection (g).

(c) Security report.—Section 3151 of the Department of Energy Facilities Safeguards, Security, and Counterintelligence Enhancement Act of 1999 (subtitle D of title XXXI of Public Law 106–65; 42 U.S.C. 7383e) is repealed.

SEC. 1062. Report on plans for the disposition of the Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicle fleet.

(a) Report.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments and the commanders of the geographic combatant commands, submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the plans of the Department of Defense for the Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicle fleet.

(1) An enumeration of the number, type, and status of Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles that have been selected for integration into the overall tactical wheeled vehicle fleet across the Armed Forces, including the reserve components of the Armed Forces.

(2) An enumeration of the number, type, and status of Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles that have been selected for sustainment stocks, prepositioned stocks, or war reserve, or for training purposes.

(3) An enumeration of the number, type, and status of Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles that have been selected for divestiture or some other purpose.

(4) An analysis of the lessons learned from the rapid acquisition process used to procure Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles, and recommendations for future rapid acquisitions processes with respect to similar vehicles.

(5) A cost-benefit analysis of the proposed divestiture of Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles, and an identification of opportunities for, and impediments to, foreign military sale, transfer, or commercial reuse of vehicles proposed for divestiture.

(6) A description of the operations, sustainment, and modernization plans for Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles proposed for retention by the Armed Forces.

SEC. 1063. Report on foreign language support contracts for the Department of Defense.

(a) In general.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth an assessment of the current approach of the Department of Defense for managing foreign language support contracts for the Department.

(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall set forth the following:

(1) A description and analysis of the spending by the Department on all types of foreign language support services and products acquired by the components of the Department.

(2) An assessment, in light of the analysis under paragraph (1), whether adjustment are needed in the management of foreign language support contracts for Department in order to obtain efficiencies in contracts for all types of foreign language support for the Department.

(a) Report.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the Civil Air Patrol fleet.

(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:

(1) An assessment whether the current number of aircraft, operating locations, and types of aircraft in the Civil Air Patrol fleet are suitable for each of the following:

(A) Emergency missions in support of the Air Force, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, State and local governments, and others.

(B) Other operational missions in support of the Air Force, other Federal agencies, State and local governments, and others.

(C) Flight proficiency, flight training, and operational mission training and support for cadet orientation and cadet flight training programs in every State Civil Air Patrol wing.

(2) An assessment of the ideal overall size of the Civil Air Patrol aircraft fleet, including a description of the factors used in determining that size.

(3) An assessment of the process used by the Civil Air Patrol and the Air Force to determine aircraft operating locations, and whether State wing commanders are appropriately involved in that process.

(4) An assessment of the process used by the Civil Air Patrol, the Air Force, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and others to determine the type of aircraft and number of aircraft to be needed to support emergency, operational, and training missions.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the Eagle Vision system.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include a description and assessment of the various commands, components of the Armed Forces, and Defense Agencies to which control of the Eagle Vision system could be transferred from the Headquarters of the Air Force, including the actions to be completed before transfer, potential schedules for transfer, and the effects of transfer on the capabilities of the system or use of the system by other elements of the Department.

(b) Limitation on certain actions.—The Secretary of the Air Force may not undertake any changes to the organization or control of the Eagle Vision system until 90 days after the date of the submittal to the congressional defense committees of the report required by subsection (a).

(a) Extension of authority.—Subsection (b) of section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1599; 10 U.S.C. 168 note) is amended—

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking “September 30, 2014” and inserting “September 30, 2019”; and

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking “fiscal year 2012, 2013, or 2014” and inserting “a fiscal year ending on or before that date”.

(b) Update of policy guidance on authority.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy shall issue an update of the policy of the Department of Defense for assignment of civilian employees of the Department as advisors to foreign ministries of defense under the authority in section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, as amended by this section.

(d) Technical amendment.—Subsection (c)(4) of such section is amended by striking “carried out such by such” and inserting “carried out by such”.

(e) Date for submittal of Comptroller General of the United States report.—Subsection (d) of such section is amended by striking “December 30, 2013” and inserting “December 31, 2014”.

SEC. 1101. Extension of voluntary reduction-in-force authority for civilian employees of the Department of Defense.

SEC. 1102. Extension of authority to make lump sum severance payments to Department of Defense employees.

SEC. 1103. Expansion of protection of employees of nonappropriated fund instrumentalities from reprisals.

SEC. 1104. Extension of enhanced appointment and compensation authority for civilian personnel for care and treatment of wounded and injured members of the Armed Forces.

(a) Extension.—Subsection (c) of section 1599c of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “December 31, 2015” both places it appears and inserting “December 31, 2020”.

(2) by redesignating subsection (c), as amended by subsection (a) of this section, as subsection (b).

(c) Repeal of references to certain title 5 authorities.—Subsection (a)(2)(A) of such section is amended by striking “sections 3304, 5333, and 5753 of title 5” and inserting “section 3304 of title 5”.

SEC. 1105. Amount of educational assistance under Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation Defense Education Program.

SEC. 1106. Flexibility in employment and compensation of civilian faculty at certain additional Department of Defense schools.

SEC. 1107. Temporary authority for direct appointment to certain positions at Department of Defense research and engineering facilities.

(1) CANDIDATES FOR SCIENTIFIC AND ENGINEERING POSITIONS AT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY REINVENTION LABORATORIES.—The Secretary of Defense may appoint qualified candidates possessing a bachelor’s degree to positions described in paragraph (1) of subsection (b) as an employee in a laboratory described in that paragraph without regard to the provisions of subchapter I of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code (other than sections 3303 and 3328 of such title).

(2) VETERAN CANDIDATES FOR SIMILAR POSITIONS AT RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING FACILITIES.—The Secretary may appoint qualified veteran candidates to positions described in paragraph (2) of subsection (b) as an employee at a laboratory, agency, or organization specified in that paragraph without regard to the provisions of subchapter I of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code.

(1) CANDIDATES FOR SCIENTIFIC AND ENGINEERING POSITIONS.—The positions described in this paragraph are scientific and engineering positions in any laboratory designated by section 1105(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2486; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) as a Department of Defense science and technology reinvention laboratory.

(2) QUALIFIED VETERAN CANDIDATES.—The positions described in this paragraph are scientific, technical, engineering, and mathematics positions, including technicians, in the following:

(B) Any other Department of Defense research and engineering agency or organization designated by the Secretary for purposes of subsection (a)(2).

(1) IN GENERAL.—The authority under this section may not, in any calendar year and with respect to any laboratory, agency, or organization described in subsection (b), be exercised with respect to a number of candidates greater than the following:

(A) In the case of a laboratory described in subsection (b)(1) with respect to appointment authority under subsection (a)(1), the number equal to 1 percent of the total number of scientific and engineering positions in such laboratory that are filled as of the close of the fiscal year last ending before the start of such calendar year.

(B) In the case of a laboratory, agency, or organization described in subsection (b)(2) with respect to appointment authority under subsection (a)(2), the number equal to 1 percent of the total number of scientific, technical, engineering, mathematics, and technician positions in such laboratory, agency, or organization that are filled as of the close of the fiscal year last ending before the start of such calendar year.

(2) FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT BASIS.—For purposes of this subsection, positions and candidates shall be counted on a full-time equivalent basis.

(1) The term “employee” has the meaning given that term in section 2105 of title 5, United States Code.

(2) The term “veteran” has the meaning given that term in section 101 of title 38, United States Code.

(e) Sunset.—Appointments may not be made under this section after December 31, 2019.

SEC. 1108. Modernization of titles of nonappropriated fund instrumentalities for purposes of certain civil service laws.

SEC. 1201. Modification and extension of authorities relating to program to build the capacity of foreign military forces.

(a) Availability of funds.—Subsection (c)(5) of section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3456), as most recently amended by section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1979), is further amended—

(1) by striking “not more than $75,000,000 may be used during fiscal year 2010, not more than $75,000,000 may be used during fiscal year 2011, and”; and

(2) by striking “each of fiscal years 2012, 2013, and 2014” and inserting “each fiscal year through fiscal year 2018”.

(b) Extension of program authorization.—Subsection (g) of such section, as so amended, is further amended—

(1) by striking “September 30, 2014” and inserting “September 30, 2018”; and

(c) Report.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State, submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the scope of counterterrorism operations for which assistance is authorized to be provided under section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006. The report shall include the following:

(1) A statement of the purposes for which assistance may be provided under the authority of section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, consistent with the Presidential Policy Directive on United States Security Sector Assistance issued on April 5, 2013.

(2) A description of the types of activities that are appropriately within the scope of capacity building assistance under such authority.

(3) A description and assessment of the monitoring and evaluation procedures for such assistance, including measures of effectiveness applicable to counterterrorism capacity building activities under such authority.

(4) A prioritized list and discussion of the primary security threats as of the date of the report against which counterterrorism capacity building under such authority is or may be directed, in light of the end of combat operations in Iraq and the expected completion of combat operations by coalition forces in Afghanistan by December 2014.

(a) Authority.—Subsection (b)(1) of section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1625; 22 U.S.C. 2151 note) is amended—

(1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “forces, and” and inserting “forces, or”; and

(A) by striking “and” the second place it appears and inserting “or”; and

(b) Annual report requirement.—Subsection (m) of such section is amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1)—

(1) by striking “October 30, 2012, and annually thereafter” and inserting “October 30 each year”; and

(d) Repeal of statutory funding limitation.—Subsection (o) of such section is repealed.

(e) Redesignation of provisions.—Such section is further amended by redesignating subsections (p) and (q) as subsections (n) and (o), respectively.

SEC. 1203. Training of general purpose forces of the United States Armed Forces with military and other security forces of friendly foreign countries.

(a) In general.—Under regulations prescribed under subsection (d), general purpose forces of the United States Armed Forces may train with the military forces or other security forces of a friendly foreign country if the Secretary of Defense determines that it is in the national security interests of the United States to do so. Training may be conducted under this section only with the prior approval of the Secretary.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of a military department or the commander of a combatant command may pay, or authorize payment for, the incremental expenses incurred by a friendly foreign country as the direct result of training with general purpose forces of the United States Armed Forces pursuant to subsection (a).

(2) LIMITATION.—The amount of incremental expenses payable under paragraph (1) in any fiscal year may not exceed $15,000,000.

(c) Reports to Congress.—Not later than April 1 of each year following a fiscal year in which training is conducted pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representative a report on the training conducted pursuant to that subsection during that fiscal year. Each report shall specify, for the fiscal year covered by such report, the following:

(2) The type of training conducted, the duration of such training, the number of members of the United States Armed Forces involved in such training.

(3) The extent of participation in such training by foreign military forces and other security forces, including the number and service affiliation of foreign military and other security force personnel involved and the physical and financial contribution of each country specified in paragraph (1) in such training.

(4) The relationship of such training to other overseas training programs conducted by the United States Armed Forces, such as military exercise programs sponsored by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, military exercise programs sponsored by a combatant command, and military training activities sponsored by a military department (including deployments for training, short duration exercises, and other similar unit training events).

(5) A summary of the expenditures under subsection (b) in connection with such training.

(6) A description and assessment of the unique military training benefits for members of the United States Armed Forces involved in such training.

(d) Regulations.—Any training conducted pursuant to subsection (a) shall be conducted under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense for the administration of this section. The regulations shall be prescribed not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. The regulations shall establish accounting procedures to ensure that any expenditures pursuant to this section are accounted for and appropriate.

(1) The term “incremental expenses”, with respect to a friendly foreign country, means the reasonable and proper costs of rations, fuel, training ammunition, and transportation, and other goods and services consumed by such country as a direct result of that country’s participation in training conducted pursuant to subsection (a), except that such term does not include pay, allowances, and other normal costs of such country’s military or security force personnel.

(2) The term “other security forces” includes national security forces that conduct border and maritime security, but does not include civilian police.

(f) Expiration.—The authority under this section may not be exercised after September 30, 2018.

SEC. 1204. United States counterterrorism assistance and cooperation in North Africa.

(a) Strategic framework required.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in coordination with appropriate officials of the Executive Branch, develop a strategic framework for United States counterterrorism assistance and cooperation in the Sahel region of Africa, including for programs conducted under the Trans-Sahara Counter Terrorism Partnership, Operation Enduring Freedom–Trans Sahara, and related security assistance authorities.

(b) Elements.—The strategic framework required by subsection (a) shall include the following:

(1) An evaluation of the threat of terrorist organizations operating in the Sahel region to the national security of the United States.

(2) An identification on a regional basis of the primary objectives, priorities, and desired end-states of United States counterterrorism assistance and cooperation programs in the region, and of the resources required to achieve such objectives, priorities, and end-states.

(3) A methodology for assessing the effectiveness of United States counterterrorism assistance and cooperation programs in the region in making progress towards the objectives and desired end-states identified pursuant to paragraph (2), including an identification of key benchmarks of such progress.

(5) Plans for enhancing coordination among United States and international agencies for planning and implementation of United States counterterrorism assistance and cooperation programs for the region on a regional basis, rather than a country-by-country basis, in order to improve coordination among United States regional and bilateral counterterrorism assistance and cooperation programs in the region.

(c) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall jointly submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report that includes the following:

(1) A comprehensive description of the strategic framework required by subsection (a).

(2) A description of lessons learned regarding the organization and implementation of United States counterterrorism assistance and cooperation programs for the Sahel region of Africa, including an evaluation of the performance and commitment of regional partners in the Sahel region, including Mali in particular, in 2012 and 2013.

(d) Appropriate committees of Congress defined.—In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—

(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and

(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 1205. Assistance to the Government of Jordan for border security operations.

(a) Authority.—If the President determines that it is in the national security interests of the United States, the Secretary of Defense may furnish assistance, including on a reimbursement basis, to the armed forces of Jordan on such terms as the President considers appropriate for purposes of supporting and maintaining the ability of the armed forces of Jordan to maintain security along the border between Jordan and Syria.

(b) Funds Available.—The Secretary of Defense may use the following funds to furnish assistance pursuant to subsection (a):

(1) Funds authorized to be appropriated by section 1504 and available for the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4302.

(2) Funds authorized to be appropriated by title XV of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239) and available for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations pursuant to section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) that remain available for obligation and expenditure for such reimbursements as of October 1, 2013.

(1) LIMITATION ON AMOUNT.—The total amount of assistance, including reimbursements, provided under the authority in subsection (a) may not exceed the following:

(A) In the case of assistance using amounts available under subsection (b)(1), $75,000,000.

(B) In the case of assistance using amounts available under subsection (b)(2), $75,000,000.

(2) APPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN REGULATIONS.—The provision of any reimbursements as assistance under the authority in subsection (a) shall be subject to regulations applicable to reimbursements of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations under section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008.

(3) PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION.—The Secretary of Defense may not enter into any contractual obligation to provide assistance under subsection (a).

(1) NOTICE ON DETERMINATION TO USE AUTHORITY.—The President shall notify the congressional defense committees of the determination under subsection (a). Such notice shall include a full description of the reasons the President determines that the exercise of the authority in subsection (a) is the national security interests of the United States.

(2) NOTICE BEFORE EXERCISE.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees, not later than 15 days before providing assistance under the authority in subsection (a), a full description of the assistance to be provided (including the amount of assistance to be provided) and the timeline for the provision of such assistance.

(e) Expiration.—No assistance may be provided under the authority in subsection (a) after December 31, 2014.

SEC. 1206. Authority to conduct activities to enhance the capability of foreign countries to respond to incidents involving weapons of mass destruction.

(a) Authority.—The Secretary of Defense may, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security, provide assistance to the military and civilian first responders of a foreign country in order for that country to respond effectively to incidents involving weapons of mass destruction.

(b) Authorized elements.—Assistance provided under this section may include training, equipment, and supplies.

(c) Availability of funds for activities across fiscal years.—Amounts available for any fiscal year for the provision of assistance under the authority in subsection (a) may be used for an activity to provide such assistance that begins in that fiscal year but ends in the next fiscal year.

(d) Interagency coordination.—In carrying out this section, the Secretary of Defense shall comply with any otherwise applicable requirement for coordination or consultation within the executive branch.

SEC. 1207. Support of foreign forces participating in operations to disarm the Lord's Resistance Army.

(a) Authority.—Pursuant to the policy established by the Lord's Resistance Army Disarmament and Northern Uganda Recovery Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–172; 124 Stat. 1209), the Secretary of Defense may, with the concurrence of Secretary of State, provide logistic support, supplies and services, and intelligence support, to foreign forces participating in operations to mitigate and eliminate the threat posed by the Lord’s Resistance Army as follows:

(2) The national military forces of any other country determined by the Secretary of Defense to be participating in such operations.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for a fiscal year for the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance, not more than $50,000,000 may be utilized in such fiscal year to provide support under subsection (a).

(2) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS ACROSS FISCAL YEARS.—Amounts available under this subsection for a fiscal year for support under the authority in subsection (a) may be used for support under that authority that begins in such fiscal year but ends in the next fiscal year.

(c) Limitations.—The Secretary of Defense may not use the authority in subsection (a) to provide any type of support that is otherwise prohibited by any provision of law.

(d) Notice to congress on support To be provided.—Not less than 15 days before the date on which funds are obligated to provide support under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a notice setting forth the following:

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.

(2) The term “logistic support, supplies, and services” has the meaning given that term in section 2350(1) of title 10, United States Code.

(f) Expiration.—The authority provided under this section may not be exercised after the termination by the Secretary of Defense of Operation Observant Compass.

(g) Repeal of superseded authority.—Section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1624; 22 U.S.C. 2151 note) is repealed.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1619), as amended by section 1221 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1992), is further amended by striking “fiscal year 2013” each place it appears and inserting “fiscal year 2014”.

(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading of subsection (a) of such section is amended by striking “for fiscal year 2013”.

(b) Funds available during fiscal year 2014.—Subsection (a) of such section is further amended by striking “$200,000,000” and inserting “$60,000,000”.

(d) Review required.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, and the Government Accountability Office, shall submit to Congress a comprehensive report on lessons learned and best practices from execution of the Commanders’ Emergency Response Program (CERP) from Iraq and Afghanistan.

(e) Contents of report.—The report required by subsection (d) shall include a description of CERP best practices and lessons learned related to:

(1) Requirements, training, and/or certifications for CERP managers in the field and headquarters.

(2) Project planning, execution, management, closeout, sustainability, and transfer to host government.

(3) Project approval process, including appropriate approval levels for higher-value projects.

(7) Processes to maintain flexibility and rapid implementation of funds, but retain accountability of CERP projects.

(10) Recommendations for developing a CERP handbook for use by future CERP administrators.

SEC. 1212. Extension and modification of authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq.

(a) Extension and modification of authority.—Subsection (f) of section 1215 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended—

(1) by striking “(f)” and all that follows through “fiscal year 2013,” and inserting the following:

“(2) REQUIRED ELEMENTS OF TRAINING.—The training conducted under paragraph (1) shall include elements that promote the following:

(b) Limitation on amount.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended by striking “2012” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting “2014 may not exceed $209,000,000.”.

(1) by striking “fiscal year 2012 or fiscal year 2013” and inserting “fiscal year 2014”; and

(2) by striking “fiscal year 2012 or 2013, as the case may be,” and inserting “that fiscal year”.

(d) Updates of report on activities of OSCI.—Section 1211(d)(3) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1983) is amended—

(1) by striking “Update required.—Not later than September 30, 2013,” and inserting “Updates required.—Not later than September 30, 2013, and every 180 days thereafter until the authority in section 1215 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 expires,”; and

(2) by striking “including” and all that follows and inserting “including the following:

“(A) A description of any changes to the specific element or process described in subparagraphs (A) through (F) of paragraph (2).

“(B) An evaluation of the activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq based on the measures of effectiveness described in paragraph (2)(F) and a discussion of any determinations to expand, alter, or terminate specific activities of the Office based on those measures.

“(C) An evaluation of the effectiveness of the training provided pursuant to section 1215(f)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 in promoting respect for human rights, military professionalism, and respect for legitimate civilian authority in Iraq.”.

SEC. 1213. One-year extension and modification of authority to use funds for reintegration activities in Afghanistan.

(B) by striking “for fiscal year 2013” and inserting “for fiscal year 2014”; and

(2) in subsection (e), by striking “December 31, 2013” and inserting “December 31, 2014”.

SEC. 1214. One-year extension and modification of authority for program to develop and carry out infrastructure projects in Afghanistan.

(a) Extension of authority.—Section 1217(f) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4393), as most recently amended by section 1219 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1991), is further amended—

“(C) Up to $250,000,000 made available to the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance for fiscal year 2014.”; and

(b) Effective date.—The amendments made by this section shall take effect on October 1, 2013.

(1) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for the transition to the Government of Afghanistan, or a utility entity owned by the Government of Afghanistan, of the project management of projects funded with amounts authorized by this Act for the Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund. Such transition shall be planned to be completed by not later December 31, 2014.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following:

(A) A description of the projects to be transitioned as described in that paragraph, the cost of such projects, and the timelines for completion and other key implementation milestones for such projects.

(i) An estimate of the financial and other requirements necessary to manage such project, and sustain the infrastructure developed through such project, on an annual basis after the completion of such project.

(ii) An assessment of the capacity of the Government of Afghanistan or such utility entity to manage such project, and maintain and use the infrastructure developed through such project, after the completion of such project.

(iii) A description of any arrangements, and an estimate of associated costs, to support the Government of Afghanistan or such utility entity if the Government of Afghanistan or such utility entity, as the case may be, lacks the capacity (in either financial or human resources) to manage such project, or sustain the infrastructure developed through such project, following the completion of such project.

(C) An assessment of the ministries or organizations of Afghanistan that will be responsible for the management of such projects after transition, including an assessment of any critical institutional shortfalls of such ministries and organizations that must be addressed for such ministries and organization to acquire the capacity required to assume project management responsibilities for such projects.

SEC. 1215. Extension of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations.

(a) Extension of authority.—Subsection (a) of section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 1227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2000), is further amended by striking “fiscal year 2013” and inserting “fiscal year 2014”.

(b) Limitation on amount available.—Subsection (d)(1) of such section 1233, as so amended, is further amended by striking “during fiscal year 2013 may not exceed $1,650,000,000” and inserting “during fiscal year 2014 may not exceed $1,500,000,000”.

(c) Extension of notice requirement relating to reimbursement of Pakistan for support provided by Pakistan.—Section 1232(b)(6) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 1213(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1630), is further amended by striking “September 30, 2013” and inserting “September 30, 2014”.

(d) Extension of limitation on reimbursement of Pakistan pending certification on Pakistan.—Subsection (d) of section 1227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (126 Stat. 2000) is amended—

(1) in the subsection heading, by striking “in fiscal year 2013” and inserting “in certain fiscal years”; and

(2) in paragraph (1), by striking “Effective as of the date of the enactment of this Act, no amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act,” and inserting “No amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2013 or 2014,”.

SEC. 1216. Extension of logistical support for coalition forces supporting certain United States military operations.

SEC. 1217. Extension and improvement of the Iraqi special immigrant visa program.

“(c) Improved application process.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall improve the efficiency by which applications for special immigrant visas under section 1244(a) are processed so that all steps incidental to the issuance of such visas, including required screenings and background checks, are completed not later than 9 months after the date on which an eligible alien applies for such visa.”;

“(B) was or is employed in Iraq on or after March 20, 2003, for not less than 1 year, by, or on behalf of—

“(ii) a media or nongovernmental organization headquartered in the United States; or

“(iii) an organization or entity closely associated with the United States mission in Iraq that has received United States Government funding through an official and documented contract, award, grant, or cooperative agreement;”;

(II) in subparagraph (C), by striking “the United States Government” and inserting “an entity or organization described in subparagraph (B)”; and

(III) in subparagraph (D), by striking by striking “the United States Government.” and inserting “such entity or organization.”; and

“(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided under subparagraph (B), a recommendation”;

(II) by striking “the United States Government prior” and inserting “an entity or organization described in paragraph (1)(B) prior”; and

“(i) IN GENERAL.—An applicant who has been denied Chief of Mission approval required by subparagraph (A) shall—

“(II) be provided 120 days from the date of the decision to request reopening of the decision to provide additional information, clarify existing information, or explain any unfavorable information.

“(ii) SENIOR COORDINATOR.—The Secretary of State shall designate, in the Embassy of the United States in Baghdad, Iraq, a senior coordinator responsible for overseeing the efficiency and integrity of the processing of special immigrant visas under this section, who shall be given—

“(I) sufficiently high security clearance to review Chief of Mission denials in cases that appear to have relied upon insufficient or incorrect information; and

“(II) responsibility for ensuring that an applicant described in clause (i) receives the information described in clause (i)(I).”; and

“(C) FISCAL YEAR 2014.—Notwithstanding subparagraphs (A) and (B), and consistent with subsection (b), any unused balance of the total number of principal aliens who may be provided special immigrant status under this section in fiscal years 2008 through 2013 may be carried forward and provided through the end of fiscal year 2014.”; and

“(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit a report, with a classified annex, if necessary, to—

“(2) CONTENTS.—The report submitted under paragraph (1) shall describe the implementation of improvements to the processing of applications for special immigrant visas under section 1244(a), including information relating to—

“(A) enhancing existing systems for conducting background and security checks of persons applying for special immigrant status, which shall—

“(B) the financial, security, and personnel considerations and resources necessary to carry out this subtitle;

“(C) the number of aliens who have applied for special immigrant visas under section 1244 during each month of the preceding fiscal year;

“(D) the reasons for the failure to expeditiously process any applications that have been pending for longer than 9 months;

“(ii) for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to complete the adjudication of the Form I–360;

“(F) the average wait times for an applicant at each of the stages described in subparagraph (E);

“(G) the number of denials or rejections at each of the stages described in subparagraph (E); and

“(H) a breakdown of reasons for denials at by the Chief of Mission based on the categories already made available to denied special immigrant visa applicants in the denial letter sent to them by the Chief of Mission.

“(g) Public quarterly reports.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, and every 3 months thereafter, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall publish a report on the website of the Department of State that describes the efficiency improvements made in the process by which applications for special immigrant visas under section 1244(a) are processed, including information described in subparagraphs (C) through (H) of subsection (f)(2).”.

SEC. 1218. Extension and improvement of the Afghan special immigrant visa program.

“(ii) was or is employed in Afghanistan on or after October 7, 2001, for not less than 1 year, by, or on behalf of—

“(II) a media or nongovernmental organization headquartered in the United States; or

“(III) an organization or entity closely associated with the United States mission in Afghanistan that has received United States Government funding through an official and documented contract, award, grant, or cooperative agreement;”;

(ii) in clause (iii), by striking “the United States Government” and inserting “an entity or organization described in clause (ii)”; and

(iii) in clause (iv), by striking by striking “the United States Government.” and inserting “such entity or organization.”;

“(B) FAMILY MEMBERS.—An alien is described in this subparagraph if the alien is—

“(i) the spouse or minor child of a principal alien described in subparagraph (A) who is accompanying or following to join the principal alien in the United States; or

“(ii) (I) the spouse, child, parent, or sibling of a principal alien described in subparagraph (A), whether or not accompanying or following to join; and

“(II) has experienced or is experiencing an ongoing serious threat as a consequence of the qualifying employment of a principal alien described in subparagraph (A).”; and

(ii) by striking “the United States Government prior” and inserting “an entity or organization described in paragraph (2)(A)(ii) prior”; and

“(I) IN GENERAL.—An applicant who has been denied Chief of Mission approval shall—

“(bb) be provided 120 days from the date of receipt of such opinion to request reconsideration of the decision to provide additional information, clarify existing information, or explain any unfavorable information.

“(II) SENIOR COORDINATOR.—The Secretary of State shall designate, in the Embassy of the United States in Kabul, Afghanistan, a senior coordinator responsible for overseeing the efficiency and integrity of the processing of special immigrant visas under this section, who shall be given—

“(aa) sufficiently high security clearance to review Chief of Mission denials in cases that appear to have relied upon insufficient or incorrect information; and

“(bb) responsibility for ensuring that an applicant described in subclause (I) receives the information described in subclause (I)(aa).”;

(A) in the heading, by striking “Prohibition on fees.—” and inserting “Application process.—”;

“(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall improve the efficiency by which applications for special immigrant visas under paragraph (1) are processed so that all steps incidental to the issuance of such visas, including required screenings and background checks, are completed not later than 9 months after the date on which an eligible alien applies for such visa.

“(12) REPORT ON IMPROVEMENTS.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report, with a classified annex, if necessary, that describes the implementation of improvements to the processing of applications for special immigrant visas under this subsection, including information relating to—

“(A) enhancing existing systems for conducting background and security checks of persons applying for special immigrant status, which shall—

“(B) the financial, security, and personnel considerations and resources necessary to carry out this section;

“(C) the number of aliens who have applied for special immigrant visas under this subsection during each month of the preceding fiscal year;

“(D) the reasons for the failure to expeditiously process any applications that have been pending for longer than 9 months;

“(ii) for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to complete the adjudication of the Form I–360;

“(F) the average wait times for an applicant at each of the stages described in subparagraph (E);

“(G) the number of denials or rejections at each of the stages described in subparagraph (E); and

“(H) a breakdown of reasons for denials by the Chief of Mission based on the categories already made available to denied special immigrant visa applicants in the denial letter sent to them by the Chief of Mission.

“(13) PUBLIC QUARTERLY REPORTS.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, and every 3 months thereafter, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall publish a report on the website of the Department of State that describes the efficiency improvements made in the process by which applications for special immigrant visas under this subsection are processed, including information described in subparagraph (C) through (H) of paragraph (12).”.

SEC. 1219. Sense of Congress on commencement of new long-term nation building or large-scale infrastructure development projects in Afghanistan.

SEC. 1231. Two-year extension of authorization for non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities.

SEC. 1232. Element on 5th generation fighter program in annual report on military and security developments involving the People’s Republic of China.

“(20) The status of the 5th generation fighter program of the People's Republic of China, including an assessment of each individual aircraft type, estimated initial and full operational capability dates, and the ability of such aircraft to provide air superiority.”.

SEC. 1233. Prohibition on use of funds to enter into contracts or agreements with Rosoboronexport.

(a) Prohibition.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2013 may be used to enter into a contract, memorandum of understanding, or cooperative agreement with, to make a grant, to, or to provide a loan or loan guarantee to Rosoboronexport.

(b) National security waiver authority.—The Secretary of Defense may waive the applicability of subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that such a waiver is in the national security interests of the United States.

(1) NOTICE TO CONGRESS BEFORE OBLIGATION OF FUNDS.—Not later than 30 days before obligating funds pursuant to the waiver under subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a notice on the obligation of funds pursuant to the waiver.

(2) REPORT.—Not later than 15 days after the submittal of the notice under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report setting forth the following:

(A) An assessment of the number, if any, of S–300 advanced anti-aircraft missiles that Rosoboronexport has delivered to the Assad regime in Syria.

(B) A list of the known contracts, if any, that Rosoboronexport has signed with the Assad regime since January 1, 2013.

SEC. 1234. Modification of statutory references to former North Atlantic Treaty Organization support organizations and related agreements.

(a) Title 10, United States Code.—Section 2350d of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(A) by striking “Weapon System Partnership Agreements” and inserting “Support Partnership Agreements”; and

(B) in subparagraph (B), by striking “a specific weapon system” and inserting “activities”.

(2) by striking “NATO Maintenance and Supply Organization” each place it appears and inserting “NATO Support Organization and its executive agencies”; and

(3) by striking “Weapon System Partnership Agreement” each place it appears and inserting “Support Partnership Agreement”.

(b) Arms Export Control Act.—Section 21(e)(3) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2761(e)(3)) is amended—

(1) in subparagraphs (A) and (C)(i), by striking “Maintenance and Supply Agency of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization” and inserting “North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Support Organization and its executive agencies”;

(2) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking “weapon system partnership agreement”and inserting “support partnership agreement”; and

(3) in subparagraph (C)(i)(II), by striking “a specific weapon system” and inserting “activities”.

SEC. 1235. Technical correction relating to funding for NATO Special Operations Headquarters.

SEC. 1236. Strategy to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related materials in the Middle East and North Africa region.

(a) Strategy required.—The President shall establish a comprehensive strategy to advance cooperative efforts with the governments of countries in the Middle East and North Africa to reduce the threat from the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related materials in the Middle East and North Africa region.

(b) Elements.—In establishing the strategy required by subsection (a), the President shall ensure that the strategy—

(1) builds upon the current activities of the nonproliferation programs of the Department of Defense, the Department of State, the Department of Energy, and other agencies of the United States Government designed to mitigate the range of threats posed by weapons of mass destruction and related materials in the Middle East and North Africa region;

(2) addresses issues relating to the threat from the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related materials in the Middle East and North Africa region on a regional basis as well as on a country-by-country basis;

(3) includes a review of the activities and achievements in the Middle East and North Africa region of—

(B) the nonproliferation programs of the Department of State and the Department of Energy; and

(C) programs of other agencies of the United States Government designed to address nuclear, chemical, and biological safety and security issues;

(4) provides for the continued coordination of cooperative nonproliferation efforts within the United States Government; and

(5) mobilizes and leverages additional resources from countries that cooperate with the United States with respect to nonproliferation efforts, nongovernmental and multilateral organizations, and international institutions.

(1) an assessment of gaps in current cooperative efforts to reduce the threat from the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related materials in the Middle East and North Africa region;

(2) an articulation of the priorities of the United States with respect to reducing that threat;

(3) the establishment of appropriate metrics for determining success with respect to reducing that threat; and

(4) methods for ensuring that the strategy conforms to broader efforts by the United States to reduce the threat from weapons of mass destruction.

(d) Consultations.—In establishing the strategy required by subsection (a), the President shall consult with governmental and nongovernmental experts in matters relating to nonproliferation that present a diverse set of views.

(e) Submission of strategy and implementation plan.—Not later than March 31, 2014, the President shall submit the strategy required by subsection (a) and a plan for the implementation of the strategy to—

(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and

(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

(a) Specification of cooperative threat reduction programs.—For purposes of section 301 and other provisions of this Act, Cooperative Threat Reduction programs are the programs specified in section 1501 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (50 U.S.C. 2362 note).

(b) Fiscal year 2014 cooperative threat reduction funds defined.—As used in this title, the term “fiscal year 2014 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds” means the funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs.

(c) Availability of funds.—Funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs shall be available for obligation for fiscal years 2014, 2015, and 2016.

(a) Funding for specific purposes.—Of the $528,455,000 authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs, the following amounts may be obligated for the purposes specified:

(7) For activities designated as Other Assessments/Administrative Costs, $28,175,000.

(b) Report on obligation or expenditure of funds for other purposes.—No fiscal year 2014 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds may be obligated or expended for a purpose other than a purpose listed in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) until 15 days after the date that the Secretary of Defense submits to Congress a report on the purpose for which the funds will be obligated or expended and the amount of funds to be obligated or expended. Nothing in the preceding sentence shall be construed as authorizing the obligation or expenditure of fiscal year 2014 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for a purpose for which the obligation or expenditure of such funds is specifically prohibited under this title or any other provision of law.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), in any case in which the Secretary of Defense determines that it is necessary to do so in the national interest, the Secretary may obligate amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for a purpose listed in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) in excess of the specific amount authorized for that purpose.

(2) NOTICE-AND-WAIT REQUIRED.—An obligation of funds for a purpose stated in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) in excess of the specific amount authorized for such purpose may be made using the authority provided in paragraph (1) only after—

(A) the Secretary submits to Congress notification of the intent to do so together with a complete discussion of the justification for doing so; and

SEC. 1303. Extension of authority for utilization of contributions to the Cooperative Threat Reduction program.

(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.

(b) Use.—Amounts authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a) are authorized for—

(1) the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521); and

(2) the destruction of chemical warfare materiel of the United States that is not covered by section 1412 of such Act.

SEC. 1422. Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois.

(a) Authority for transfer of funds.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by section 1406 and available for the Defense Health Program for operation and maintenance, $143,087,000 may be transferred by the Secretary of Defense to the Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund established by subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2571. For purposes of subsection (a)(2) of such section 1704, any funds so transferred shall be treated as amounts authorized and appropriated specifically for the purpose of such a transfer.

(b) Use of transferred funds.—For the purposes of subsection (b) of such section 1704, facility operations for which funds transferred under subsection (a) may be used are operations of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, consisting of the North Chicago Veterans Affairs Medical Center, the Navy Ambulatory Care Center, and supporting facilities designated as a combined Federal medical facility under an operational agreement covered by section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4500).

(b) Use.—Amounts authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a) are authorized for—

(1) the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521); and

(2) the destruction of chemical warfare materiel of the United States that is not covered by section 1412 of such Act.

(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this title for fiscal year 2014 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred.

(2) LIMITATION.—The total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this subsection may not exceed $4,000,000,000.

(b) Terms and conditions.—Transfers under this section shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as transfers under section 1001.

(c) Additional authority.—The transfer authority provided by this section is in addition to the transfer authority provided under section 1001.

(a) Use and transfer of funds.—Subsections (b) and (c) of section 1514 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2439), as in effect before the amendments made by section 1503 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4649), shall apply to the funds made available to the Department of Defense for the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund for fiscal year 2014.

(b) Monthly obligations and expenditure reports.—Not later than 15 days after the end of each month of fiscal year 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense committees a report on the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund explaining monthly commitments, obligations, and expenditures by line of operation.

(a) Continuation of prior authorities and notice and reporting requirements.—Funds available to the Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2014 shall be subject to the conditions contained in subsections (b) through (g) of section 1513 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 428), as amended by section 1531(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4424).

(1) ACCEPTANCE OF CERTAIN EQUIPMENT.—The Secretary of Defense may accept equipment procured using funds authorized under prior Acts that was transferred to the security forces of Afghanistan and returned by such forces to the United States.

(2) TREATMENT AS DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STOCKS.—The equipment described in paragraph (1), and equipment not yet transferred to the security forces of Afghanistan that is determined by the Commander, Combined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan (or the Commander’s designee) to no longer be required for transfer to such forces, may be treated as stocks of the Department of Defense upon notification to the congressional defense committees of such treatment.

(3) REPORTS.—Not later than 30 days after the end of the first two fiscal year quarters of fiscal year 2014, and not later than 30 days after the end of each fiscal half-year thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the equipment accepted under paragraph (1) during such fiscal year quarter or half-year, as the case may be. Each report shall include, for the period covered by such report, a list of all equipment accepted under paragraph (1) that was treated as the stocks of the Department pursuant to paragraph (2).

SEC. 1533. Extension of authority for Task Force for Business and Stability Operations in Afghanistan.

(a) Extension.—Subsection (a) of section 1535 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4426), as most recently amended by section 1533 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2058), is further amended—

(1) in paragraph (6), by striking “and October 31, 2011, October 31, 2012, and October 31, 2013” and inserting “October, 31 of each of 2011 through 2014”; and

(2) in paragraph (8), by striking “September 30, 2013” and inserting “December 31, 2014”.

(b) Funding.—Subparagraph (B) of paragraph (4) of such subsection is amended—

(2) in clause (ii), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and

“(C) LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014.—None of the funds available for fiscal year 2014 pursuant to subparagraph (B)(iii) may be obligated to assist the Government of Afghanistan in the development of mining and oil and gas resources during fiscal year 2014 until the date on which the Secretary of Defense certifies to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives that the Government of Afghanistan has agreed to reimburse the Government of the United States for the amount of any such funds, from royalties received from mining or oil and gas contracts awarded by the Government of Afghanistan.”; and

(3) in subparagraph (D), as redesignated by paragraph (1), by inserting “of funds across fiscal years” after “Availability”.

(d) Conversion of update of implementation of transition action plan from quarterly to biannually.—Paragraph (7)(B) of such subsection is amended by striking “90 days” and inserting“180 days”.

SEC. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by law.

(a) Expiration of authorizations after three years.—Except as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained in titles XXI through XXVII for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall expire on the later of—

(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2017.

(b) Exception.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to authorizations for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have been obligated before the later of—

(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for fiscal year 2017 for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, or contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program.

(a) Inside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(1) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Army: Inside the United States
State	Installation or Location	Amount
Alaska	Fort Wainwright	$103,000,000
Colorado	Fort Carson	$242,200,000
Florida	Eglin Air Force Base	$4,700,000
Georgia	Fort Gordon	$61,000,000
Hawaii	Fort Shafter	$75,000,000
Kansas	Fort Leavenworth	$17,000,000
Kentucky	Fort Campbell	$4,800,000
Maryland	Aberdeen Proving Found	$21,000,000
	Fort Detrick	$7,100,000
Missouri	Fort Leonard Wood	$90,700,000
North Carolina	Fort Bragg	$5,900,000
Texas	Fort Bliss	$46,800,00
Virginia	Joint Base Langley-Eustis	$50,000,000
Washington	Joint Base Lewis McChord	$144,000,000
	Yakima	$9,100,000

(b) Outside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(2) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Army: Outside the United States
Country	Installation or Location	Amount
Kwajalein	Kwajalein Atoll	$63,000,000
Worldwide Classified	Classified Location	$33,000,000

(a) Construction and acquisition.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(5)(A) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the installation, in the number of units, and in the amount set forth in the following table:

Army: Family Housing
State	Installation	Units	Amount
Wisconsin	Fort McCoy	56	$23,000,000

(b) Planning and design.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(5)(A), the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $4,408,000.

(1) For military construction projects inside the United States authorized by section 2101(a), $882,300,000.

(2) For military construction projects outside the United States authorized by section 2101(b), $96,000,000.

(3) For unspecified minor military construction projects authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, $25,000,000.

(4) For architectural and engineering services and construction design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, $74,575,000.

(A) For construction and acquisition, planning and design, and improvement of military family housing and facilities, $27,408,000.

(B) For support of military family housing (including the functions described in section 2833 of title 10, United States Code), $512,871,000.

(6) For the construction of increment 2 of the Cadet Barracks at the United States Military Academy, New York, authorized by section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119), $42,000,000.

SEC. 2104. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 project.

SEC. 2105. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 project.

SEC. 2106. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004 project.

(a) Extensions.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act (124 Stat. 4437), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later:

Army: Extension of 2011 Project Authorizations
State/Country	Installation or Location	Project	Amount
California	Presidio Monterey	Advanced Individual Training Barracks	$63,000,000
Georgia	Fort Benning	Land Acquisition	$12,200,000
New Mexico	White Sands	Missile Range Barracks	$29,000,000
Germany	Wiesbaden Air Base	Access Control Point	$5,100,000

(a) Extensions.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2627), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act (123 Stat. 2628), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later.

Army: Extension of 2010 Project Authorizations
State/Country	Installation or Location	Project	Amount
Virginia	Fort Belvoir	Road and Access Control Point	$9,500,000
Washington	Fort Lewis	Fort Lewis-McCord AFB Joint Access	$9,000,000
Kuwait	Camp Arifjian	APS Warehouses	$82,000,000

SEC. 2109. Limitation on construction of cadet barracks at United States Military Academy, New York.

(a) Inside the united states.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(1) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Inside the United States
State	Installation or Location	Amount
California	Camp Pendleton	$13,124,000
	Coronado	$8,910,000
	San Diego	$34,331,000
	Twentynine Palms	$33,437,000
	Barstow	$14,998,000
	Point Mugu	$24,667,000
	Port Hueneme	$33,600,000
Florida	Jacksonville	$20,752,000
	Key West	$14,001,000
	Mayport	$16,093,000
Georgia	Albany	$16,610,000
	Savannah	$61,717,000
Hawaii	Kaneohe Bay	$236,982,000
	Pearl City	$30,100,000
	Pearl Harbor	$57,998,000
Illinois	Great Lakes	$35,851,000
Maine	Bangor	$13,800,000
	Kittery	$11,522,000
Maryland	Fort Meade	$83,988,000
Nevada	Fallon	$11,334,000
North Carolina	Camp Lejeune	$77,999,000
	New River	$45,863,000
Oklahoma	Tinker Air Force Base	$14,144,000
Rhode Island	Newport	$12,422,000
South Carolina	Charleston	$73,932,000
Virginia	Norfolk	$3,380,000
	Quantico	$38,374,000
	Yorktown	$18,700,000
	Dam Neck	$10,587,000
Washington	Whidbey Island	$117,649,000
	Bremerton	$18,189,000

(b) Outside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(2) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installation or location outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

(1) For military construction projects inside the United States authorized by section 2201(a), $1,205,054,000.

(2) For military construction projects outside the United States authorized by section 2201(b), $275,092,000.

Navy: Outside the United States
Country	Installation or Location	Amount
Djibouti	Camp Lemonier	$29,000,000
Guam	Joint Region Marianas	$232,704,000
Japan	Yokosuka	$7,568,000
	Camp Butler	$5,820,000

(3) For unspecified minor military construction projects authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, $19,740,000.

(4) For architectural and engineering services and construction design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, $89,830,000.

(A) For construction and acquisition, planning and design, and improvement of military family housing and facilities, $73,407,000.

(B) For support of military family housing (including functions described in section 2833 of title 10, United States Code), $389,844,000.

(6) For the construction of increment 3 of the Explosives Handling Wharf No. 2 at Kitsap, Washington, authorized by section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666), as modified by section 2205 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2124) $24,880,000.

SEC. 2205. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 project.

SEC. 2206. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 project.

SEC. 2207. One-year extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 project.

(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201 of that Act (124 Stat. 4441), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later.

Navy: Extension of 2011 Project Authorization
Country	Installation or Location	Project	Amount
Bahrain Island	Southwest Asia	Navy Central Command Ammunition Magazines	$89,280,000

SEC. 2208. Two-year extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 project.

(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201 of that Act (124 Stat. 4441), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.

Navy: Extension of 2011 Project Authorization
Country	Installation or Location	Project	Amount
Guam	Guam	Defense Access Roads Improvements	$66,730,000

(a) Inside the united states.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(1) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Air Force: Inside the United States
State	Installation or Location	Amount
Arizona	Luke Air Force Base	$26,900,000
California	Beale Air Force Base	$62,000,000
Florida	Tyndall Air Force Base	$9,100,000
Hawaii	Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam	$4,800,000
Kansas	McConnell Air Force Base	$219,120,000
Kentucky	Fort Campbell	$8,000,000
Maryland	Fort Meade	$358,000,000
	Joint Base Andrews	$30,000,000
Missouri	Whiteman Air Force Base	$5,900,000
Nevada	Nellis Air Force Base	$78,500,000
New Mexico	Cannon Air Force Base	$34,100,000
	Holloman Air Force Base	$2,250,000
	Kirtland Air Force Base	$30,500,000
North Dakota	Minot Air Force Base	$23,830,000
Oklahoma	Altus Air Force Base	$30,850,000
	Tinker Air Force Base	$8,600,000
Texas	Fort Bliss	$3,350,000
Utah	Hill Air Force Base	$32,000,000
Virginia	Joint Base Langley-Eustis	$4,800,000

(b) Outside the united states.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(2) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

(1) For military construction projects inside the United States authorized by section 2301(a), $972,600,000.

(2) For military construction projects outside the United States authorized by section 2301(b), $96,834,000.

Air Force: Outside the United States
Country	Installation or Location	Amount
Greenland	Thule Air Base	$43,904,000
Guam	Joint Region Marianas	$23,630,000
Mariana Islands	Saipan	$29,300,000

(3) For unspecified minor military construction projects authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, $20,448,000.

(4) For architectural and engineering services and construction design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, $11,314,000.

(A) For construction and acquisition, planning and design, and improvement of military family housing and facilities, $76,360,000.

(B) For support of military family housing (including functions described in section 2833 of title 10, United States Code), $388,598,000.

(6) For the construction of increment 3 of the United States Strategic Command Replacement Facility at Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska, authorized by section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of the Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1670), $136,000,000.

(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2301 of that Act (124 Stat. 4444), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later.

Air Force: Extension of 2011 Project Authorization
Country	Installation or Location	Project	Amount
Bahrain	Shaikh Isa Air Base	North Apron Expansion	$45,000,000

SEC. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects.

(a) Inside the united states.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(1) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Defense Agencies: Inside the United States
State	Installation or Location	Amount
Alaska	Clear Air Force Station	$17,204,000
	Fort Greely	$82,000,000
California	Miramar	$6,000,000
	Defense Distribution Depot-Tracy	$37,554,000
	Brawley	$23,095,000
Colorado	Fort Carson	$22,282,000
Florida	Hurlburt Field	$7,900,000
	Jacksonville	$7,500,000
	Tyndall Air Force Base	$9,500,000
	Key West	$3,600,000
	Panama City	$2,600,000
Georgia	Fort Benning	$43,335,000
	Fort Stewart	$44,504,000
	Moody Air Force Base	$3,800,000
	Hunter Army Airfield	$13,500,000
Hawaii	Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam	$2,800,000
	Ford Island	$2,615,000
Kentucky	Fort Campbell	$124,211,000
	Fort Knox	$303,023,000
Maryland	Aberdeen Proving Ground	$210,000,000
	Bethesda Naval Hospital	$66,800,000
Massachusetts	Hanscom Air Force Base	$36,213,000
New Jersey	Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst	$10,000,000
New Mexico	Holloman Air Force Base	$81,400,000
North Carolina	Camp Lejeune	$43,377,000
	Fort Bragg	$172,065,000
North Dakota	Minot Air Force Base	$6,400,000
Oklahoma	Tinker Air Force Base	$36,000,000
	Altus Air Force Base	$2,100,000
Pennsylvania	Defense Distribution Depot New Cumberland	$9,000,000
South Carolina	Beaufort	$41,324,000
Tennessee	Arnold Air Force Base	$2,200,000
Texas	Joint Base San Antonio	$12,600,000
Virginia	Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek - Story	$30,404,000
	Quantico	$40,586,000
	Dam Neck	$11,147,000
	DLA Aviation Richmond	$87,000,000
	Pentagon	$57,600,000
Washington	Whidbey Island	$10,000,000

(b) Outside the united states.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(2) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

(1) For military construction projects inside the United States authorized by section 2401(a), $1,723,239,000.

(2) For military construction projects outside the United States authorized by section 2401(b), $339,120,000.

Defense Agencies: Outside the United States
Country	Installation or Location	Amount
Bahrain Island	Southwest Asia	$45,400,000
Belgium	Brussels	$67,613,000
Japan	Iwakuni	$34,000,000
	Kadena Air Base	$38,792,000
	Yokosuka	$10,600,000
	Atsugi	$4,100,000
	Torri Commo Station	$71,451,000
Korea	Camp Walker	$52,164,000
Worldwide Classified	Classified Location	$15,000,000

(3) For unspecified minor military construction projects under section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, $43,817,000.

(4) For contingency construction projects of the Secretary of Defense under section 2804 of title 10, United States Code, $10,000,000.

(5) For architectural and engineering services and construction design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, $237,838,000.

(6) For energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, $150,000,000.

(A) For support of military family housing (including functions described in section 2833 of title 10, United States Code), $55,845,000.

(B) For credits to the Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement Fund under section 2883 of title 10, United States Code, and the Homeowners Assistance Fund established under section 1013 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 3374), $1,780,000.

(8) For the construction of increment 8 of the Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases Stage I at Fort Detrick, Maryland, authorized by section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2007 (division B of Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2457), $13,000,000.

(9) For the construction of increment 5 of the hospital at Fort Bliss, Texas, authorized by section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2642), $100,000,000.

(10) For the construction of increment 3 of the High Performance Computing Center at Fort Meade, Maryland, authorized by section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1672), as amended by section 2404(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2131), $381,000,000.

(11) For the construction of increment 3 of the Medical Center Replacement at Rhine Ordnance Barracks, Germany, authorized by section 2401(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1673), as amended by section 2404(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2131), $76,545,000.

(12) For the construction of increment 2 of the Ambulatory Care Center at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, authorized by section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1673), $38,100,000.

(13) For the construction of increment 2 of the NSAW Recapitalize Building #1 at Fort Meade, Maryland, authorized by section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2127), $58,000,000.

(14) For the construction of increment 2 of the Aegis Ashore Missile Defense System Complex at Deveselu, Romania, authorized by section 2401(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2128), $85,000,000.

SEC. 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, Defense-wide.

SEC. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition projects.

(a) Inside the united states.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606(1) and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army National Guard locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Army National Guard: Inside the United States
State	Location	Amount
Alabama	Decatur	$4,000,000
Arkansas	Fort Chaffee	$21,000,000
Florida	Pinellas Park	$5,700,000
Illinois	Kankakee	$42,000,000
Massachusetts	Camp Edwards	$19,000,000
Michigan	Camp Grayling	$17,000,000
Minnesota	Stillwater	$17,000,000
Mississippi	Camp Shelby	$3,000,000
	Pascagoula	$4,500,000
Missouri	Whitman Air Force Base	$5,000,000
	Macon	$9,100,000
New York	New York	$31,000,000
Ohio	Ravenna Army Ammunition Plant	$5,200,000
Pennsylvania	Fort Indiantown Gap	$40,000,000
South Carolina	Greenville	$26,000,000
Texas	Fort Worth	$14,270,000
Wyoming	Afton	$10,200,000

(b) Outside the united states.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606(1) and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army National Guard locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Army National Guard: Outside the United States
Country	Location	Amount
Puerto Rico	Camp Santiago	$5,600,000

Army Reserve
State	Location	Amount
California	Fort Hunter Liggett	$16,500,000
	Camp Parks	$17,500,000
Maryland	Bowie	$25,500,000
New Jersey	Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst	$36,200,000
New York	Bullville	$14,500,000
North Carolina	Fort Bragg	$24,500,000
Wisconsin	Fort McCoy	$23,400,000

SEC. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and land acquisition projects.

Navy Reserve Marine Corps Reserve
State	Location	Amount
California	March Air Force Base	$11,086,000
Missouri	Kansas City	$15,020,000
Tennessee	Memphis	$4,330,000

SEC. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition projects.

Air National Guard
State	Installation	Amount
Alabama	Birmingham IAP	$8,500,000
Indiana	Hulman Regional Airport	$7,300,000
Maryland	Fort Meade	$4,000,000
	Martin State Airport	$12,900,000
Montana	Great Falls IAP	$22,000,000
New York	Fort Drum	$4,700,000
Ohio	Springfield Beckley-Map	$7,200,000
Pennsylvania	Fort Indiantown Gap	$7,700,000
Rhode Island	Quonset State Airport	$6,000,000
Tennessee	Mcghee-Tyson Airport	$18,000,000

SEC. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects.

(1) For the Department of the Army, for the Army National Guard of the United States, $320,815,000.

(3) For the Department of the Navy, for the Navy and Marine Corps Reserve, $32,976,000.

(4) For the Department of the Air Force, for the Air National Guard of the United States, $119,800,000.

(5) For the Department of the Air Force, for the Air Force Reserve, $45,659,000.

Air Force Reserve
State	Location	Amount
California	March Air Force Base	$19,900,000
Florida	Homestead Air Force Base	$9,800,000
Oklahoma	Tinker Air Force Base	$12,200,000

SEC. 2611. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 project.

(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorization set forth in the table in section 2604 of such Act (124 Stat. 4454) for Nashville International Airport, Tennessee, shall remain in effect until October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later.

State	Installation or Location	Project	Amount
Tennessee	Nashville International Airport	Intelligence Group and Remotely Piloted Aircraft Remote Split Operations Group	$5,500,000

(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2601 of that Act (124 Stat. 4452), for Camp Santiago, Puerto Rico, shall remain in effect until October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later.

State	Location	Project	Amount
Puerto Rico	Camp Santiago	Multi Purpose Machine Gun Range	$9,200,000

SEC. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account.

(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the 2005 base closure and realignment joint basing initiative.

(b) Elements.—The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following elements:

(1) An analysis and explanation of the costs necessary to implement the joint basing initiative.

(2) An analysis and explanation of any savings achieved to date and planned in future years, including quantifiable goals and a timeline for meeting such goals.

(4) An assessment of any additional savings that could be achieved through more rigorous management and streamlined administration of joint bases.

SEC. 2801. Modification of authorities to fund military construction through payments-in-kind and to use residual value payments-in-kind.

(a) Authorization requirement for military construction projects funded through payment-in-kind contributions.—Section 2802 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(d) (1) The requirement under subsection (a) for military construction projects to be authorized by law includes military construction projects funded through payment-in-kind contributions pursuant to bilateral agreements with host countries, other than particular military construction projects specified in bilateral agreements entered into before the date of the enactment of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, and military construction projects accepted as payment-in-kind contributions for the residual value of improvements made by the United States at military installations released to the host country under section 2921 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (division B of Public Law 101–501; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) .

“(2) The Secretary of Defense or the Secretary concerned shall include military construction projects covered under paragraph (1) in the budget justification documents for the Department of Defense submitted to Congress in connection with the budget submitted under 1105 of title 31.”.

(b) Restriction on use of payments-in-kind received as residual value payments.—Section 2921(g) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (division B of Public Law 101–501; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended to read as follows:

“(g) Use of payments-in-kind.— (1) A military construction project or facility improvement may be accepted as a payment-in-kind under this section only if such military construction project or facility improvement has been authorized by Congress.

“(2) Operating costs of United States forces may be funded through a payment-in-kind under this section only if the costs covered by such payment are included in the budget justification documents for the Department of Defense submitted to Congress in connection with the budget submitted under 1105 of title 31, United States Code.

“(3) If funds were previously appropriated for a military construction project, facility improvement, or operating costs subsequently paid for with payments-in-kind, the Secretary of Defense shall return to the Treasury funds in the amount equal to the value of the appropriated funds.”.

SEC. 2802. Extension and modification of temporary, limited authority to use operation and maintenance funds for construction projects in certain areas outside the United States.

(1) in subsection (a), by striking “The Secretary” and all that follows through “conditions:” and inserting “The Secretary of Defense may obligate appropriated funds available for operation and maintenance to carry out, inside the area of responsibility of the United States Central Command or certain countries in the area of responsibility of United States Africa Command, a construction project that the Secretary determines meets each of the following conditions:”;

(2) in subsection (c)(1), by striking “shall not exceed” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting “shall not exceed $100,000,000 between October 1, 2013, and December 31, 2014”;

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking “September 30, 2013” and inserting “December 31, 2014”; and

(B) in paragraph (2), by striking “fiscal year 2014” and inserting “fiscal year 2015”; and

“(i) Certain countries in the area of responsibility of United States Africa Command defined.—In this section, the term ‘certain countries in the area of responsibility of United States Africa Command’ means Kenya, Somalia, Ethiopia, Djibouti, Seychelles, Burundi, and Uganda.”.

SEC. 2811. Authority for acceptance of funds to cover administrative expenses associated with real property leases and easements.

(a) Authority.—Subsection (e)(1)(C) of section 2667 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new clause:

“(vi) Expenses incurred by the Secretary under this section and for easements under section 2668 of this title.”.

(b) Program expenses defined.—Subsection (i) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(4) The term ‘program expenses’ includes expenses related to developing, assessing, negotiating, executing, and managing lease and easement transactions, but does not include Government personnel costs.”.

(2) by striking “under paragraph (1) shall be” and all that follows through “was paid.” and inserting the following: “under paragraph (1) as reimbursement for the cost of furnishing utilities or services shall—

SEC. 2813. Modification of authority to enter into long-term contracts for receipt of utility services as consideration for utility systems conveyances.

SEC. 2814. Acquisition of real property at Naval Base Ventura County, California.

(a) Authority.—The Secretary of the Navy may acquire all right, title, and interest to property and improvements at Naval Base Ventura County, California, constructed pursuant to the former section 2828(g) of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 801 of the Military Construction Act, 1984 (Public Law 98–115; 97 Stat. 782).

(b) Use.—Upon acquiring the real property under subsection (a), the Secretary may use the improvements as provided in sections 2835 and 2835a of title 10, United States Code.

(a) Restriction on use of funds.—Except as provided in subsection (c), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated under this Act, and none of the amounts provided by the Government of Japan for construction activities on land under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense, may be obligated to implement the realignment of Marine Corps forces from Okinawa to Guam or Hawaii until each of the following occurs:

(1) The Commander of the United States Pacific Command provides to the congressional defense committees an assessment of the strategic and logistical resources needed to ensure the distributed lay-down of members of the Marine Corps in the United States Pacific Command Area of Responsibility meets the contingency operations plans.

(2) The Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees master plans for the construction of facilities and infrastructure to execute the Marine Corps distributed lay-down on Guam and Hawaii, including a detailed description of costs and the schedule for such construction.

(3) The Secretary of the Navy submits a plan to the congressional defense committees detailing the proposed investments and schedules required to restore facilities and infrastructure at Marine Corps Air Station Futenma.

(4) A plan coordinated by all pertinent Federal agencies is provided to the congressional defense committees detailing descriptions of work, costs, and a schedule for completion of construction, improvements, and repairs to the non-military utilities, facilities, and infrastructure, if any, on Guam affected by the realignment of forces.

(b) Restriction on development of public infrastructure.—If the Secretary of Defense determines that any grant, cooperative agreement, transfer of funds to another Federal agency, or supplement of funds available in fiscal year 2014 under Federal programs administered by agencies other than the Department of Defense will result in the development (including repair, replacement, renovation, conversion, improvement, expansion, acquisition, or construction) of public infrastructure on Guam, the Secretary of Defense may not carry out such grant, transfer, cooperative agreement, or supplemental funding unless such grant, transfer, cooperative agreement, or supplemental funding is specifically authorized by law.

(1) to complete additional analysis or studies required under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) for proposed actions on Guam or Hawaii;

(2) to initiate planning and design of construction projects at Andersen Air Force Base and Andersen South; and

(3) to carry out any military construction project for which an authorization of appropriations is provided in section 2204, as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

(1) DISTRIBUTED LAY-DOWN.—The term “distributed lay-down” refers to the planned distribution of members of the Marine Corps in Okinawa, Guam, Hawaii, Australia, and possibly elsewhere that is contemplated in support of the joint statement of the United States–Japan Security Consultative Committee issued April 26, 2012, in the District of Columbia (April 27, 2012, in Tokyo).

(2) PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE.—The term “public infrastructure” means any utility, method of transportation, item of equipment, or facility under the control of a public entity or State or local government that is used by, or constructed for the benefit of, the general public.

(a) Conveyances authorized.—The Secretary of the Navy may convey to the Hale Keiki School all right, title, and interest of the United States, or any portion thereof, in and to certain real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 11 acres located at or in the nearby vicinity of 153 Bougainville Drive, Honolulu, Hawaii (City and County of Honolulu Tax Map Key No. 9–9–02:37), which is part of the Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, before such real property, or any portion thereof, is made available for transfer pursuant to the Hawaiian Home Lands Recovery Act (title II of Public Law 104–42; 109 Stat. 357), for use by any other Federal agency, or for disposal under applicable laws.

(b) Consideration.—As consideration for a conveyance under subsection (a), the Hale Keiki School shall provide the United States, whether by cash payment, in-kind consideration described in section 2667(c) of title 10, United States Code, or a combination thereof, an amount that is not less than the fair market value of the conveyed property, as determined pursuant to an appraisal acceptable to the Secretary.

(1) ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER.—For a period of 180 days beginning on the date the Secretary makes a written offer to convey the property or any portion thereof under subsection (a), the Hale Keiki School shall have the exclusive right to accept such offer by providing written notice of acceptance to the Secretary within the specified 180-day time period. If the Secretary’s offer is not so accepted within the 180-day period, the offer shall expire.

(2) CONVEYANCE DEADLINE.—If the Hale Keiki School accepts the offer to convey the property or a portion thereof in accordance with paragraph (1), the conveyance shall take place not later than 2 years after the date of the Hale Keiki School's written acceptance, provided that the conveyance date may be extended for a reasonable period of time by mutual agreement of the parties, evidenced by a new lease or license executed by the parties prior to the end of the 2-year period.

(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary shall require the Hale Keiki School to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out a conveyance under subsection (a), including survey costs, related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected from the Hale Keiki School in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the Hale Keiki School. The Secretary may collect the costs from the Hale Keiki School in advance of incurring any costs and may pay the administrative costs of processing the conveyance as they are incurred or at any time thereafter.

(2) ASSUMPTION OF RISK OF PAYING COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.—In the event that the conveyance is not completed by the deadline set forth in subsection (c)(2), the amounts collected from the Hale Keiki School will not be refunded or reimbursed and the Hale Keiki School shall be considered to have assumed the risk of paying all costs of processing the conveyance after the offer has been accepted by the Hale Keiki School, regardless of whether or not the conveyance is ever actually completed.

(3) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received under paragraph (1) as reimbursement for costs incurred by the Secretary to carry out a conveyance under subsection (a) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover the costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.

(e) Description of property.—The exact acreage and legal description of any real property to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary.

(f) Additional term and conditions.—The Secretary may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with a conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.

(a) Authority to convey mt. soledad veterans memorial, san diego, california.—Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense may convey to an eligible entity as provided in this section all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial (in this section referred to as the “Memorial”).

(1) PRICE.—The Secretary shall select by public bid the eligible entity to which the Memorial is to be conveyed under subsection (a). The Secretary shall use good faith efforts to ensure the greatest possible return on such conveyance considering the conditions required under paragraph (2).

(2) CONDITIONS ON CONVEYANCE.—The conveyance of the Memorial under subsection (a) shall be subject to the following conditions:

(A) That the eligible entity to which the Memorial is conveyed accepts the Memorial in its condition at the time of the conveyance, commonly known as conveyance “as is”, and agrees to indemnify and hold the United States harmless from any liability resulting from the period of ownership of the Memorial by the United States.

(B) That the Memorial shall be maintained and used as a veterans memorial in perpetuity.

(C) That if the Secretary determines at any time that the Memorial is not being used as a veterans memorial, all right, title, and interest in and to the Memorial, including any improvements thereto, shall, at the option of the Secretary, revert to, and become the property of the United States, and the United States shall have the right of immediate entry unto the Memorial, without any right of compensation to the owner or any other person.

(3) LAND EXCHANGE.—Notwithstanding paragraph (1), if no eligible entity makes an acceptable bid for the Memorial or the Secretary determines, in the Secretary’s sole discretion, that a land exchange would be more beneficial to the United States, the Secretary may convey the Memorial to an eligible entity in exchange for real property of at least equal value if the real property offered in exchange is located adjacent to other real property of the United States and the Federal agency exercising administrative jurisdiction over that other real property agrees to accept administrative jurisdiction over the real property offered in exchange.

(1) REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.—The Secretary shall use any funds received from the conveyance under subsection (a) to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation, and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. Amounts to reimburse those costs from funds so received shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover those costs. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.

(2) DEPOSIT OF BALANCE.—The remainder of such funds, if any, shall be deposited into the account used to pay for the acquisition of the Memorial by the United States.

(d) Description of property.—The exact acreage and legal description of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a), and, in the case of a land exchange under subsection (b)(3), the real property offered in exchange, shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary.

(e) Additional terms and conditions.—The Secretary may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.

(f) Exemption from historic preservation requirements.—Sections 106 and 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470f, 470h–2) shall not apply to a conveyance under subsection (a).

(1) ELIGIBLE ENTITY.—The term “eligible entity” means a non-governmental entity that has a history of involvement in veterans affairs and has demonstrated to the Secretary, in the Secretary’s sole discretion, that the entity has the capability to operate and maintain the Memorial in accordance with this section.

(2) MT. SOLEDAD VETERANS MEMORIAL.—The term “Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial” means the memorial in San Diego, California, acquired by the United States pursuant to the Act of August 14, 2006, entitled “An Act to preserve the Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial in San Diego, California, by providing for the immediate acquisition of the memorial by the United States” (Public Law 109–272; 120 Stat. 770).

SEC. 2841. Redesignation of the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies as the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies.

(a) Redesignation.—The Department of Defense regional center for security studies known as the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies is hereby renamed the “Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies”.

(1) REFERENCE TO REGIONAL CENTERS FOR SECURITY STUDIES.—Subparagraph (B) of section 184(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

(2) ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS AND DONATIONS.—Subparagraph (B) of section 2611(a)(2) of such title is amended to read as follows:

(c) References.—Any reference to the Department of Defense Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the United States shall be deemed to be a reference to the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies.

(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2014 for the activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701.

(b) Authorization of new plant projects.—From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out new plant projects for the National Nuclear Security Administration as follows:

SEC. 3111. Establishment of Director for Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation in National Nuclear Security Administration.

(a) In general.—Subtitle A of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2401 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“(a) Establishment.—There is in the Administration a Director for Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation (in this section referred to as the ‘Director’), who is appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

“(b) Duties.— (1) The Director shall be the principal officer of the Administration responsible for communicating directly with the Administrator, the Deputy Secretary of Energy, and the Secretary of Energy with respect to cost estimation and program evaluation for the Administration.

“(2) The Administrator may not delegate responsibility for receiving or acting on communications from the Director with respect to cost estimation and program evaluation for the Administration.

“(c) Deputy Directors.—There shall be two deputy directors, who shall report directly to the Director, as follows:

“(d) Activities for cost estimation.— (1) The Director shall be the responsible for the following activities relating to cost estimation:

“(A) Prescribing policies and procedures for cost analysis and estimation by the Administration, including the determination of confidence levels with respect to cost estimates.

“(B) Reviewing cost estimates and evaluating the performance baseline for each major atomic energy defense acquisition program.

“(C) Establishing policies and procedures for developing technology readiness assessments for such programs that are consistent with the guidelines of the Department of Energy for technology readiness assessments.

“(D) Reviewing technology readiness assessments for such programs to ensure that such programs are meeting levels of confidence associated with appropriate overall system performance.

“(E) Reviewing costs and, if necessary, conducting independent cost estimates of projects covered by Department of Energy Order 413.3 (relating to program and project management for the acquisition of capital assets) (or a successor order) for the acquisition of capital assets for atomic energy defense activities.

“(2) A review, evaluation, or cost estimate conducted under subparagraph (B), (D), or (E) of paragraph (1) is an inherently governmental function and may not be conducted by a national security laboratory or a contractor of the Administration. The Director may use data collected by such a laboratory or contractor in conducting such a review, evaluation, or cost estimate.

“(A) The certification of the Director with respect to each review, evaluation, and cost estimate conducted under subparagraph (B), (D), or (E) of paragraph (1).

“(B) A statement of the confidence level of the Director with respect to each such review, evaluation, and cost estimate, including an identification of areas of uncertainty in each such review, evaluation, and cost estimate.

“(4) The Administrator shall transmit each review, evaluation, and cost estimate conducted under subparagraph (B), (D), or (E) of paragraph (1) to the congressional defense committees with any additional comments of the Administrator supporting or disputing the review, evaluation, or cost estimate.

“(e) Activities for program evaluation.— (1) The Director shall be responsible for the following activities relating to program evaluation:

“(A) Reviewing and commenting on policies and procedures for setting requirements for the future-years nuclear security program under section 3253 and for prioritizing and estimating the funding required by the Administration for that program.

“(B) Reviewing the future-years nuclear security program on an annual basis to ensure that the program is accurate and thorough.

“(C) Prescribing policies and procedures for initiating analyses of alternatives for major atomic energy defense acquisition programs.

“(D) As part of the planning, programming, and budgeting process of the Administration under sections 3251 and 3252, analyzing the planning phase of that process, preparing programmatic and fiscal year guidance, and managing the program review phase of that process.

“(E) Developing and managing the submittal of the Selected Acquisition Reports and independent cost estimates on nuclear weapons systems undergoing major life extension under section 4217 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2537).

“(F) Reviewing cost and schedule baselines for projects under section 4713 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2753) and managing notifications to the congressional defense committees of cost overruns under that section.

“(2) A review conducted under paragraph (1)(B) is an inherently governmental function and may not be conducted by a national security laboratory or a contractor of the Administration. The Director may use data collected by such a laboratory or contractor in conducting such a review.

“(3) The Director shall submit to Congress a report on any major programmatic deviations from the future-years nuclear security program discovered in conducting a review under paragraph (1)(B) at or about the time the budget of the President is submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for the next fiscal year.

“(f) Staff.—The Administrator shall ensure that the Director has sufficient numbers of personnel who have competence in technical and budgetary matters to carry out the functions required by this section.

“(g) Reports by Director.—The Director shall submit to Congress at or about the time that the budget of the President is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for each of fiscal years 2015 through 2018, a report that includes the following:

“(1) A description of activities related to developing accurate and timely budget formulation conducted by the Director during the calendar year preceding the submission of the report.

“(2) An assessment of efforts to develop accurate cost estimates and analyses, including of technology readiness assessments.

“(3) An assessment of deficiencies in developing an integrated list of requirements for programs and projects of the Administration using available resources.

“(4) A list of all major atomic energy defense acquisition programs and projects covered by Department of Energy Order 413.3 (or a successor order) for the acquisition of capital assets for atomic energy defense activities and a concise description of the status of each such program and project in meeting cost and critical milestones.

“(h) Briefing by Comptroller General of the United States.—Not later than 90 days after the Director submits a report to Congress under subsection (g), the Comptroller General of the United States shall brief Congress on the following:

“(1) The assessment of the Comptroller General with respect to the report submitted under subsection (g).

“(2) Recommendations for improving the ability of the Director to perform the functions required by this section, including recommendations with respect to the availability of personnel and resources to carry out those functions.

“(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the term ‘major atomic energy defense acquisition program’ means an atomic energy defense acquisition program of the Administration—

“(i) the total project cost of which is more than $50,000,000 (based on fiscal year 2012 constant dollars); or

“(ii) the total lifetime cost of which is more than $350,000,000 (based on fiscal year 2012 constant dollars).

“(B) EXCLUSION OF CAPITAL ASSETS ACQUISITION PROJECTS.—The term ‘major atomic energy defense acquisition program’ does not include a project covered by Department of Energy Order 413.3 (or a successor order) for the acquisition of capital assets for atomic energy defense activities.

“(2) PERFORMANCE BASELINE.—The term ‘performance baseline’, with respect to a major atomic energy defense acquisition program, means the key parameters with respect to performance, scope, cost, and schedule for the project budget of the program.”.

(b) Implementation plan.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for the implementation of section 3221 of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act, as added by subsection (a), that includes the following:

(1) An identification of the number of personnel required to support the Director for Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation, the Deputy Director for Cost Estimating, and the Deputy Director for Program Evaluation established under such section 3221.

(3) A plan for training such personnel through entities of the Department of Defense that conduct activities similar to the activities described in such section 3221 on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act.

(5) A plan for developing cost estimation and program evaluation activities jointly with the Department of Defense to the extent practicable and beneficial to both the National Nuclear Security Administration and the Department of Defense.

(c) Conforming amendment.—Section 5315 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

(d) Clerical amendment.—The table of contents for the National Nuclear Security Administration Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 3220 the following new item:

SEC. 3112. Plan for improvement and integration of financial management of nuclear security enterprise.

(a) In general.—Subtitle A of title XLVII of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2741 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“SEC. 4714. Plan for improvement and integration of financial management of nuclear security enterprise.

“(a) Plan required.— (1) The Administrator shall develop a plan for improving and integrating the financial management of the nuclear security enterprise.

“(A) A structure for the allocation of work to be used by the entities within the nuclear security enterprise for the activities carried out by those entities, including activities for which funds are transferred from the Department of Defense to the Administration.

“(B) A clear and easily understandable cost structure for each entity within the nuclear security enterprise.

“(C) A methodology for identifying costs for programs of record and base capabilities required for programs carried out by the nuclear security enterprise.

“(D) A system for monitoring those programs during the execution of those programs and to provide data to inform oversight of those programs.

“(E) A reporting system to be used by the entities within the nuclear security enterprise to facilitate analyses, projections, and comparisons of similar activities carried out by different entities within the nuclear security enterprise.

“(F) A plan for providing sufficient resources to implement the plan required by paragraph (1).

“(3) The Administrator shall submit the plan required by paragraph (1) to the congressional defense committees not later than February 15, 2014.

“(4) The Administrator shall implement the plan required by paragraph (1) by not later than the date that is 4 years after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.

“(b) Review by Comptroller General of the United States.— (1) Not later than the date that is 4 years and 6 months after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, the Comptroller General of the United States shall review the implementation of the plan required by subsection (a) and submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the results of the review.

“(2) For the first fiscal year that begins after the submission of the report required by paragraph (1) and each of the 3 fiscal years thereafter, the Comptroller General shall—

“(A) review the implementation of the plan required by subsection (a), with particular attention to elements of the plan that are not fully implemented; and

“(B) not later than 180 days after the end of the fiscal year, submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the results of the review.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of contents for the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4713 the following new item:

SEC. 3113. Certification of security measures at atomic energy defense facilities.

(a) In general.—Subtitle A of title XLV of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2651 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“SEC. 4510. Certification of security measures at atomic energy defense facilities.

“(a) In general.—Not later than January 1, 2014, and every 2 years thereafter, the Secretary of Energy shall—

“(1) review the security measures of each facility specified in subsection (b) that contains Category I or Category II special nuclear material; and

“(2) submit to the congressional defense committees a certification with respect to whether such measures—

“(A) provide for the effective protection of Category I and Category II special nuclear material; and

“(B) meet the standards and regulations of the Department of Energy for the physical protection of facilities and surrounding infrastructure containing such material.

“(b) Facilities specified.—The facilities specified in this subsection are the following:

“(3) The defense nuclear facilities at which defense environmental cleanup activities are occurring.

“(c) Plan for laboratories and facilities that do not meet standards.— (1) If the Secretary determines under subsection (a)(2) that the security measures of a facility specified in subsection (b) do not provide for the effective protection of Category I and Category II special nuclear material or do not meet the standards and regulations described in subsection (b), the Secretary shall develop and implement a plan for ensuring that such measures are improved to provide for effective protection of such material and to meet such standards and regulations in an expeditious manner.

“(2) The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees with the certification required by subsection (a)(2) the following:

“(A) Each plan developed under paragraph (1) with respect to a facility specified in subsection (b).

“(B) An estimate of the time required to ensure that the security measures of that facility provide for effective protection of Category I and Category II special nuclear material and meet the standards and regulations described in subsection (a)(2).

“(C) An assessment of whether it is in the national security interests of the United States to keep that facility in routine operations and, if so, a description of the temporary mitigating measures to be taken to maintain routine operations at the facility.

“(3) Not later than 30 days after the submission of the certification under subsection (a)(2), the Inspector General of the Department of Energy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report assessing the adequacy and effectiveness of each plan developed under paragraph (1).

“(d) Form of reports.—Each certification required by subsection (a)(2) and each plan and report required by subsection (c) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of contents for such Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4509 the following new item:

SEC. 3114. Plan for incorporating exascale computing into the stockpile stewardship program.

(a) In general.—Subtitle A of title XLII of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2521 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“SEC. 4219. Plan for incorporating exascale computing into the stockpile stewardship program.

“(a) Plan required.—The Administrator shall develop and carry out a plan to incorporate exascale computing into the stockpile stewardship program under section 4201 during the 20-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.

“(b) Milestones.—The plan required by subsection (a) shall include major programmatic milestones in the development of a prototype exascale computer for the stockpile stewardship program.

“(c) Coordination with other agencies.—In developing the plan required by subsection (a), the Administrator shall coordinate, as appropriate, with the Under Secretary of Energy for Science, the Secretary of Defense, and elements of the intelligence community (as defined in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 401a(4))).

“(d) Inclusion of costs in future-years nuclear security program.—The Administrator shall address the costs of incorporating exascale computing into the stockpile stewardship program in the estimated expenditures and proposed appropriations reflected in the future-years nuclear security program submitted under section 3253 of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2453).

“(e) Submission to Congress; report.— (1) The Administrator shall submit to the congressional defense committees, at or about the same time the budget of the President is submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, in each even-numbered year, the following:

“(B) A report that describes advances outside the United States in exascale computing for defense and nondefense applications.

“(2) Each plan and report submitted under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex if necessary.

“(f) Exascale computing defined.—In this section, the term ‘exascale computing’ means computing through the use of a computing machine that performs near or above 10 to the 18th power floating point operations per second.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of contents for such Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4218 the following new item:

(a) In general.—Subtitle A of title XLII of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2521 et seq.), as amended by section 3114, is further amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“(a) In general.—The Administration shall include in the plan required by 4203 a strategy for the integrated management of plutonium for stockpile and stockpile stewardship needs over a 20-year period.

“(b) Elements.—The strategy required by subsection (a) shall include the following:

“(1) An assessment of the baseline science issues necessary to understand plutonium aging under static and dynamic conditions under manufactured and nonmanufactured plutonium geometries.

“(2) An assessment of scientific and testing instrumentation for plutonium at elemental and bulk conditions.

“(3) An assessment of manufacturing and handling technology for plutonium and plutonium components.

“(4) An assessment of computational models of plutonium performance under static and dynamic loading, including manufactured and nonmanufactured conditions.

“(5) An identification of any capability gaps with respect to the assessments described in paragraphs (1) through (4).

“(6) An estimate of costs relating to the issues, instrumentation, technology, and models described in paragraphs (1) through (4) over the period covered by the future-years nuclear security program under section 3253 of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2453).

“(7) An estimate of the cost of eliminating the capability gaps identified under paragraph (5) over the period covered by the future-years nuclear security program.

“(8) Such other items as the Administrator considers important for the integrated management of plutonium for stockpile and stockpile stewardship needs.

“(c) Review.— (1) The Administrator shall enter into an arrangement with the National Academy of Sciences to review the strategy required by subsection (a).

“(2) The review required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted not later than one year after the submission of the first plan required under section 4203 that includes the strategy required by subsection (a).”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of contents for such Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4219, as added by section 3114, the following new item:

SEC. 3116. Authorization of modular building strategy as an alternative to the replacement project for the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building, Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico.

“(1) LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), no funds”; and

“(2) USE OF FUNDS FOR MODULAR BUILDING STRATEGY.—The Administrator for Nuclear Security may obligate and expend funds referred to in paragraph (1) for activities relating to a modular building strategy on and after the date that is 30 days after the date on which the Nuclear Weapons Council established under section 179 of title 10, United States Code, notifies the congressional defense committees that—

“(A) the modular building strategy meets requirements for maintaining the nuclear weapons stockpile over a 30-year period;

“(B) in fiscal year 2015, the National Nuclear Security Administration will begin the process of designing and building modular buildings in accordance with Department of Energy Order 413.3 (relating to relating to program management and project management for the acquisition of capital assets); and

“(C) the Administrator will include the costs of the modular building strategy in the estimated expenditures and proposed appropriations reflected in the future-years nuclear security program submitted under section 3253 of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2453).

“(3) MODULAR BUILDING STRATEGY DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term ‘modular building strategy’ means an alternative strategy to the replacement project that consists of constructing a series of modular structures, each of which is fully useable, to complement the function of the plutonium facility (PF-4) at Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, in accordance with all applicable safety and security standards of the Department of Energy.”.

SEC. 3118. Clarification of form of submission of cost estimates on life extension programs and new nuclear facilities.

“(3) Each cost estimate submitted under this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex if necessary.”.

SEC. 3121. Assessment of nuclear nonproliferation programs of the National Nuclear Security Administration.

(a) In general.—The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall enter into an arrangement with the National Academy of Sciences to conduct an assessment of existing and future nuclear nonproliferation programs of the National Nuclear Security Administration.

(b) Elements.—The assessment required by subsection (a) shall include an assessment of the following:

(1) The status of nuclear nonproliferation programs of the National Nuclear Security Administration as of the date of the enactment of this Act.

(4) Nuclear nonproliferation programs of the National Nuclear Security Administration with countries that have obtained nuclear weapons and are not parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, done at Washington, London, and Moscow July 1, 1968, and entered into force March 5, 1970 (21 UST 483) (commonly known as the “Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty”).

(5) Nuclear nonproliferation programs of the National Nuclear Security Administration with countries that are non-nuclear weapon state parties to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and are acquiring nuclear materials in violation of commitments under the Treaty.

(6) Nuclear nonproliferation programs to be carried out by the National Nuclear Security Administration during the 10-period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.

(c) Report required.—Not later than January 31, 2015, the Administrator shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the results of the assessment required by subsection (a).

SEC. 3122. Modification of reviews relating to cost-benefit analyses of management and operating contracts of the National Nuclear Security Administration.

“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall, except as provided in paragraph (2), review reports submitted to the congressional defense committees under subsection (a) or (d)(2) at such times as the Comptroller General, in consultation with such committees, determines appropriate.

“(2) EXCEPTION.—The Comptroller General may not conduct a review under paragraph (1) of a report relating to a contract to manage and operate a facility of the National Nuclear Security Administration while a protest concerning an alleged violation of a procurement statute or regulation brought under subchapter V of chapter 35 of title 31, United States Code, is pending with respect to that contract.”.

SEC. 3123. Modification of deadline for certain reports relating to program on scientific engagement for nonproliferation.

“(3) WAIVER.—The Administrator may waive the requirement under paragraph (1) to submit a report on a modification in the program under subsection (a) not later than 30 days before making the modification if the Administrator—

“(A) determines that the modification is urgent and necessary to the national security interests of the United States; and

“(B) not later than 30 days after making the modification, submits to the appropriate congressional committees—

“(ii) a justification for exercising the waiver authority under this paragraph.”; and

(4) in paragraph (4), as redesignated by paragraph (2), by striking “The report under paragraph (1)” and inserting “Each report submitted under paragraph (1) or (3)(B)”.

SEC. 3124. Modification of certain reports on cost containment for uranium capabilities replacement project.

“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the project referred to in subsection (a)—

“(A) not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and every 90 days thereafter through the date that is one year after such date of enactment; and

“(B) after the date that is one year after such date of enactment, at such times as the Comptroller General, in consultation with the congressional defense committees, determines appropriate, taking into consideration the critical decision points of the project (as defined in orders of the Department of Energy).”; and

(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking “and the progress on meeting the requirements of section 4713 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2753)”; and

SEC. 3125. Submission of interim report of Congressional Advisory Panel on the Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise.

SEC. 3131. Technical corrections to the National Nuclear Security Administration Act.

(a) Administrator for Nuclear Security.—Section 3212(c) of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2402(c)) is amended by striking “section 16(3) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(3))” and inserting “section 1702(c) of title 41, United States Code”.

(b) Status of Administration and contractor personnel.—Section 3220 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2410) is amended in subsection (a)(1)(A) and subsection (b) by inserting “(42 U.S.C. 7132(c)(3))” after “section 202(c)(3) of the Department of Energy Organization Act”.

(c) Government access to information and computers.—Section 3235(b) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2425(b)) is amended by inserting “(Public Law 99–508; 100 Stat. 1848)” after “of 1986”.

(d) Authority to establish certain positions.—Section 3241 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2441) is amended in the last sentence by—

(1) by striking “excepted positions established” and inserting “positions established”;

(3) by striking “nonexcepted position” and inserting “position not established under this section”.

(e) Separate treatment in budget.—Section 3251(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2451(a)) is amended by striking “the Congress” and inserting “Congress”.

(f) Future-years nuclear security program.—Section 3253(b) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2453(b)) is amended—

(1) by striking “five-fiscal year” each place it appears and inserting “five-fiscal-year”;

(2) by striking paragraph (5) and by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (5); and

(3) in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (5), as redesignated by paragraph (2), by striking “National Nuclear Security”.

(g) Compliance with Federal Acquisition Regulation.—Section 3262 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2462) is amended by striking “the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 401 et seq.)” and inserting “section 1303(a)(1) of title 41, United States Code”.

(h) Use of capabilities of national security laboratories.—Section 3264 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2464) is amended by inserting “of Energy” after “Secretary”.

(i) Definitions.—Section 3281(2)(F) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2471(2)(F)) is amended by striking “the Congress” and inserting “Congress”.

(j) Functions transferred.—Section 3291(d)(1) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2481(d)(1)) is amended by moving the flush text after subparagraph (B) 2 ems to the left.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 4002 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501) is amended—

(A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “In this division” and inserting “Except as otherwise provided, in this division”;

(B) by redesignating paragraphs (5), (6), (7), and (8) as paragraphs (6), (7), (9), and (10), respectively;

“(5) The terms ‘defense nuclear facility’ and ‘Department of Energy defense nuclear facility’ have the meaning given the term ‘Department of Energy defense nuclear facility’ in section 318 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286g).”;

(D) by inserting after paragraph (7), as redesignated by subparagraph (B), the following new paragraph (8):

“(8) The term ‘Nuclear Weapons Council’ means the Nuclear Weapons Council established by section 179 of title 10, United States Code.”; and

(E) in paragraph (10), as redesignated by subparagraph (B), by striking “restricted data” and inserting “Restricted Data”.

(A) NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE STEWARDSHIP PLAN.—Section 4203(e)(1) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2523(e)(1)) is amended in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by striking “established by section 179 of title 10, United States Code,”.

(B) REPORTS ON LIFE EXTENSION PROGRAMS.—Section 4216(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2536(a)) is amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by striking “established by section 179 of title 10, United States Code,”.

(C) SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORTS.—Section 4217(b) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2537(b)) is amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by striking “established under section 179 of title 10, United States Code,”.

(D) ADVICE ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE.—Section 4218 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2538) is amended—

(ii) in subsection (f)(1), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “established under section 179 of title 10, United States Code,”.

(E) REPORTS ON PERMANENT CLOSURES OF DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES.—Section 4422(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2602(a)) is amended by striking “(as defined in section 318 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286(g))”.

(F) PROHIBITION ON INTERNATIONAL INSPECTIONS.—Section 4501(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2651(a)) is amended by striking “restricted data” and inserting “Restricted Data”.

(G) REVIEW OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BEFORE DECLASSIFICATION AND RELEASE.—Section 4521 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2671) is amended by striking “restricted data” each place it appears and inserting “Restricted Data”.

(H) PROTECTION AGAINST INADVERTENT RELEASE OF RESTRICTED DATA AND FORMERLY RESTRICTED DATA.—Section 4522 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2672) is amended by striking subsection (g).

(J) PROHIBITION AND REPORT ON BONUSES TO CONTRACTORS.—Section 4802 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2782) is amended—

(K) TRANSFERS OF REAL PROPERTY.—Section 4831(f) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2811(f)) is amended by striking “section:” and all that follows through “(2) The terms” and inserting “section, the terms”.

(b) Restriction on certain licensing requirement.—Section 4103 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2513) is amended by inserting “; 94 Stat. 3197” after “Public Law 96–540”.

(1) STOCKPILE STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM.—Section 4201 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2521) is amended—

(A) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “for Nuclear Security”; and

(i) in paragraph (4)(D), by striking “Nevada national security site” and inserting “Nevada National Security Site”; and

(I) by striking subparagraphs (A) through (D) and inserting the following new subparagraph (A):

(2) STOCKPILE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.—Section 4204(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2524(a)) is amended by striking “for Nuclear Security”.

(3) ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE.—Section 4205 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2525) is amended—

(i) in the subsection heading, by striking “Definitions” and inserting “Definition”;

(ii) by striking “section:” and all that follows through “(2) The term” and inserting “section, the term”; and

(iii) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as clauses (i) and (ii), respectively, and by moving such clauses, as so redesignated, 2 ems to the left.

(4) NUCLEAR TEST BAN READINESS PROGRAM.—Section 4207 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2527) is amended—

(B) by redesignating subsections (b), (c), and (d) as subsections (a), (b), and (c), respectively;

(C) in subsection (a), as redesignated by subparagraph (B), by striking “Soviet Union” and inserting “Russian Federation”;

(D) in subsection (b), as redesignated by subparagraph (B), by striking “subsection (b)” and inserting “subsection (a)”; and

(ii) by striking “national nuclear weapons laboratories” and inserting “national security laboratories”.

(5) REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC REQUEST FOR NEW OR MODIFIED NUCLEAR WEAPONS.—Section 4209(d) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2529(d)) is amended by striking “the date of the enactment of this Act” each place it appears and inserting “December 2, 2002”.

(6) MANUFACTURING INFRASTRUCTURE.—Section 4212 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2532) is amended—

(A) in subsection (a)(2), by striking “Review” and inserting “Memorandum”; and

(B) in subsection (c), by striking “the Congress” and inserting “Congress”.

(7) REPORTS ON CRITICAL DIFFICULTIES.—Section 4213 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2533) is amended—

(i) in the subsection heading, by striking “plants” and inserting “facilities”; and

(ii) by striking “plant” each place it appears and inserting “facility”; and

(i) in the subsection heading, by striking “certification” and inserting “assessment”; and

(ii) by striking “included with the decision documents” and all that follows through “the President” and inserting “submitted to the President and Congress with the matters required to be submitted under section 4205(f)”.

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 4214.

(9) REPLACEMENT PROJECT FOR CHEMISTRY AND METALLURGY RESEARCH BUILDING.—Section 4215(d)(2) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2535(d)(2)) is amended by striking “National Nuclear Security”.

(10) ADVICE ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE.—Section 4218 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2538), as amended by subsection (a)(2)(D), is further amended—

(B) by redesignating subsections (b) through (g) as subsections (a) through (f), respectively; and

(C) in subsection (d), as redesignated by subparagraph (B), by striking “(under section 3159 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (Public Law 104–201; 42 U.S.C. 7274o))” and inserting “under section 4213”.

(A) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 4233 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2543) is—

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 4302.

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 4304.

(1) DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP ACCOUNT.—Section 4401 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2581) is amended—

(A) in the section heading, by striking “restoration and waste management” and inserting “cleanup”;

(B) in subsection (a), by striking “Restoration and Waste Management” and inserting “Cleanup”; and

(C) in subsection (b), by striking “environmental restoration and waste management” and inserting “defense environmental cleanup”.

(2) FUTURE USE PLANS FOR DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP.—Section 4402 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2582) is amended—

(A) in the section heading, by striking “environmental management program” and inserting “defense environmental cleanup”;

(B) in subsection (a), by striking “environmental restoration and waste management” and inserting “defense environmental cleanup”;

(ii) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively;

(D) in subsection (c)(2), by striking “for program direction in carrying out environmental restoration and waste management” and inserting “for defense environmental cleanup”;

(F) by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) as subsections (f) and (g), respectively; and

(i) by striking “an environmental restoration or waste management” and inserting “a defense environmental cleanup”; and

(ii) by striking “environmental restoration and waste management” and inserting “defense environmental cleanup”.

(3) FUTURE-YEARS DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PLAN.—Section 4402A of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2582A) is amended—

(A) in the section heading, by striking “management” and inserting “cleanup”;

(i) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “management” and inserting “cleanup”; and

(ii) in paragraph (1), by striking “environmental management” and inserting “defense environmental cleanup”; and

(4) INTEGRATED FISSILE MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PLAN.—Section 4403 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2583) is amended—

(i) by striking “the Office of Fissile Materials Disposition, the Office of Nuclear Energy, and the Office of Defense Programs” and inserting “the Office of Nuclear Energy, and the Administration”; and

(B) in subsection (b), by striking “March 31, 2000” and inserting “March 31, 2014”.

(5) BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REPORTS.—Section 4404 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2584) is repealed.

(6) ACCELERATED SCHEDULE FOR DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP ACTIVITIES.—Section 4405 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2585) is amended—

(A) in the section heading, by striking “environmental restoration and waste management” and inserting “defense environmental cleanup”;

(B) in subsection (a), by striking “environmental restoration and waste management” and inserting “defense environmental cleanup”;

(ii) by redesignating paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) as paragraphs (2), (3), and (4), respectively;

(i) by striking “environmental restoration or waste management” and inserting “defense environmental cleanup”; and

(ii) by striking “environmental restoration and waste management” and inserting “defense environmental cleanup”.

(7) DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM.—Section 4406 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2586) is amended—

(A) in the section heading, by striking “waste” and inserting “environmental”;

(8) REPORT ON DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP EXPENDITURES.—Section 4407 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2587) is amended—

(A) in the section heading, by striking “environmental restoration” and inserting “defense environmental cleanup”; and

(B) by striking “environmental restoration and waste management funds for defense activities” and inserting “defense environmental cleanup funds”.

(9) PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN PLANNING FOR DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP.—Section 4408 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2588) is amended—

(A) in the section heading, by striking “environmental restoration and waste management at defense nuclear facilities” and inserting “defense environmental cleanup”;

(B) by striking “Attorneys General” and inserting “attorneys general”; and

(C) by striking “environmental restoration and waste management” and inserting “defense environmental cleanup activities”.

(10) PROJECTS TO ACCELERATE CLOSURE ACTIVITIES.—Section 4421 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2601) is repealed.

(11) REPORTS IN CONNECTION WITH CLOSURES.—Section 4422 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2602) is amended—

(ii) by striking “environmental remediation and cleanup” and inserting “defense environmental cleanup”; and

(B) in subsection (b)(2), by striking “environmental restoration and other remediation and cleanup efforts” and inserting “defense environmental cleanup activities”.

(12) DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PRIVATIZATION PROJECTS.—Subtitle C of title XLIV of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2611) is repealed.

(13) HANFORD WASTE TANK CLEANUP PROGRAM.—Section 4442(b)(2) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2622(b)(2)) is amended by striking “responsible for” and all that follows through “aspects” and inserting “responsible for managing all aspects”.

(14) FUNDING FOR TERMINATION COSTS OF RIVER PROTECTION PROJECT.—Section 4444(2) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2624(2)) is amended by striking “environmental restoration and waste management” and inserting “defense environmental cleanup”.

(15) SAVANNAH RIVER SITE.—Subtitle E of title XLIV of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2631 et seq.) is amended by striking sections 4453A, 4453B, 4453C, and 4453D.

(16) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Title XLIV of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2581 et seq.) is amended—

(A) in the title heading, by striking “environmental restoration and waste management” and inserting “defense environmental cleanup”;

(B) in the subtitle heading for subtitle A, by striking “environmental restoration and waste management” and inserting “defense environmental cleanup”; and

(17) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for such Act is amended by striking the items relating to title XLIV and inserting the following new items:

(1) RESTRICTIONS ON ACCESS TO NATIONAL SECURITY LABORATORIES.—Section 4502 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2652) is amended—

(B) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections (b) and (c), respectively; and

(C) in paragraph (2) of subsection (c), as redesignated by subparagraph (B), by striking “as in effect on January 1, 1999”.

(2) COUNTERINTELLIGENCE POLYGRAPH PROGRAM.—Section 4504 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2654) is amended—

(3) NOTICE TO CONGRESS OF CERTAIN SECURITY AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE FAILURES.—Section 4505(e)(2) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2656(e)(2)) is amended by striking “the Congress” and inserting “Congress”.

(4) REPORT ON COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY PRACTICES.—Section 4507(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2658) is amended by striking “the Congress” and inserting “Congress”.

(5) AMOUNTS FOR DECLASSIFICATION ACTIVITIES.—Section 4525 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2675) is amended by striking subsection (c).

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for such Act is amended by striking the items relating to subtitle C of title XLV.

(1) APPOINTMENT OF CERTAIN PERSONNEL.—Section 4601(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2701(a)) is amended by striking paragraph (4).

(2) WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION PROGRAM.—Section 4602 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2702) is amended—

(A) in subsection (l), by striking “Public Law 101–512” and inserting “Public Law 101–12; 103 Stat. 16”; and

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 4603.

(4) WORKFORCE RESTRUCTURING PLACE.—Section 4604 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2704) is amended—

(A) in subsection (c)(6)(A), by inserting “(29 U.S.C. 2801 et seq.)” after “of 1998”; and

(B) in subsection (f)(1), by striking “the 236 H facility at Savannah River, South Carolina; and the Mound Laboratory, Ohio” and inserting “and the 236 H facility at Savannah River, South Carolina”.

(5) CERTIFICATES OF COMMENDATION.—Section 4605(b) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2705(b)) is amended by striking “Cold War” and inserting “cold war”.

(6) EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TRAINING.—Section 4621(b)(6) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2721(b)(6)) is amended by striking “environmental restoration and defense waste management” and inserting “defense environmental cleanup”.

(7) STOCKPILE STEWARDSHIP RECRUITMENT AND TRAINING PROGRAM.—Section 4622 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2722) is amended—

(A) in subsection (a), by striking “Sandia” and all that follows through “Los Alamos National Laboratory” and inserting “national security laboratories”; and

(B) in subsections (b) and (c), by striking “laboratories referred to in subsection (a)(1)” each place it appears and inserting “national security laboratories”.

(8) FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM.—Section 4623(b) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2723(b)) is amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by inserting “either of” after “who are”.

(9) WORKER PROTECTION.—Section 4641 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2731) is amended by striking subsection (e).

(10) SAFETY OVERSIGHT AND ENFORCEMENT.—Section 4642 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2732) is amended—

(11) MONITORING WORKERS EXPOSED TO HAZARDOUS AND RADIOACTIVE SUBSTANCES.—Section 4643 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2733) is amended—

(ii) in paragraph (3)(C), by inserting “and Measurements” after “Radiation Protection”;

(I) by striking “paragraph (1)(D)” and inserting “paragraph (1)(B)”; and

(iv) in paragraph (5), by striking “paragraph (1)(E)” and inserting “paragraph (1)”.

(12) PROGRAMS RELATING TO EXPOSURE ON HANFORD RESERVATION.—Section 4644(c) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2734(c)) is amended—

(A) by striking “the Congress” each place it appears and inserting “Congress”; and

(B) in paragraph (4), by inserting “and Prevention” after “Disease Control”.

(13) NOTIFICATION OF NUCLEAR CRITICALITY AND NON-NUCLEAR INCIDENTS.—Section 4646(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2736(a)) is amended by striking “Energy and” and inserting “Energy or”.

(1) REPROGRAMMING.—Section 4702(c) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2742(c)) is amended by striking “subsection (a)” and insert “this subsection”.

(2) TRANSFER OF DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP FUNDS.—Section 4710 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2750) is amended—

(A) in the section heading, by striking “management” and inserting “cleanup”;

(i) in the subsection heading, by striking “management” and inserting “cleanup”; and

(I) by striking “environmental restoration or waste management” and inserting “defense environmental cleanup”; and

(II) by striking “environmental management” and inserting “environmental cleanup”; and

(I) by striking “environmental management” and inserting “environmental cleanup”; and

(II) by striking “environmental restoration and waste management” and inserting “defense environmental cleanup”.

(3) TRANSFER OF WEAPONS ACTIVITIES FUNDS.—Section 4711(d) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2751(d)) is amended by striking “for Nuclear Security”.

(4) NOTIFICATION OF COST OVERRUNS.—Section 4713(a)(3) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2753(a)(3)) is amended—

(A) in the paragraph heading, by striking “management” and inserting “cleanup”; and

(B) in subparagraph (A), by striking “management” and inserting “cleanup”.

(5) USE OF FUNDS FOR PENALTIES UNDER ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS.—Section 4721(b)(2) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2761(b)(2)) is amended by striking “the Congress” and inserting “Congress”.

(6) RESTRICTION ON USE OF FUNDS TO PAY CERTAIN PENALTIES.—Section 4722 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2762) is amended—

(1) COSTS NOT ALLOWED UNDER COVERED CONTRACTS.—Section 4801(b)(1) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2781(b)(1)) is amended by striking “section 22 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 418b)” and inserting “section 1707 of title 41, United States Code”.

(2) CONTRACTOR LIABILITY FOR CERTAIN INJURIES OR LOSS OF PROPERTY.—Section 4803(b)(1) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2783(b)(1)) is amended by striking “by the Act of March 9, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 741–752), or by the Act of March 3, 1925 (46 U.S.C. App. 781–790)” and inserting “or by chapter 309 or 311 of title 46, United States Code”.

(3) USE OF FUNDS FOR LABORATORY-DIRECTED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.—Section 4812 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2792) is amended—

(B) by striking “General Limitations.—(1)” and inserting “Limitation on use of weapons activities funds.—”;

(i) by striking “environmental restoration, waste management, or nuclear materials and facilities stabilization” and inserting “defense environmental cleanup”; and

(ii) by striking “environmental restoration mission, waste management mission, or materials stabilization mission, as the case may be,” and inserting “defense environmental cleanup mission”.

(i) in the section heading, by striking “Limitation” and inserting “Report”;

(iii) by striking “(b) Annual report.—(1)” and inserting “(a) Report required.—”;

(iv) by striking “(2)” and inserting “(b) Preparation of report.—”; and

(v) by striking “(3)” and inserting “(c) Criteria used in preparation of report.—”.

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 4812A and inserting the following new item:

(5) CRITICAL TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIPS.—Section 4813 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2794) is amended—

(i) in paragraph (1), by striking subparagraph (C) and inserting the following new subparagraph (C):

“(C) that is a defense critical technology (as defined in section 2500 of title 10, United States Code).”; and

(ii) in paragraph (3)(B)(iii), by striking “Governments” and insert “governments”.

(6) CERTAIN TRANSFERS OF REAL PROPERTY.—Section 4831 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2811), as amended by subsection (a)(2)(K), is further amended by striking “Secretary of Energy” each place it appears other than in subsection (a)(1) and inserting “Secretary”.

(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 4832 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2812) is amended in the section heading by striking “plant managers of certain nuclear weapons production plants” and inserting “managers of certain nuclear weapons production facilities”.

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 4832 and inserting the following new item:

“(a) Organization and mission.—The Maritime Administration is an administration in the Department of Transportation. The mission of the Maritime Administration is to foster, promote, and develop the merchant maritime industry of the United States.

“(b) Maritime administrator.—The head of the Maritime Administration is the Maritime Administrator, who is appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The Administrator shall report directly to the Secretary of Transportation and carry out the duties prescribed by the Secretary.

“(c) Deputy maritime administrator.—The Maritime Administration shall have a Deputy Maritime Administrator, who is appointed in the competitive service by the Secretary, after consultation with the Administrator. The Deputy Administrator shall carry out the duties prescribed by the Administrator. The Deputy Administrator shall be Acting Administrator during the absence or disability of the Administrator and, unless the Secretary designates another individual, during a vacancy in the office of Administrator.

“(d) Duties and powers vested in secretary.—All duties and powers of the Maritime Administration are vested in the Secretary.

“(e) Regional offices.—The Maritime Administration shall have regional offices for the Atlantic, Gulf, Great Lakes, and Pacific port ranges, and may have other regional offices as necessary. The Secretary shall appoint a qualified individual as Director of each regional office. The Secretary shall carry out appropriate activities and programs of the Maritime Administration through the regional offices.

“(f) Interagency and industry relations.—The Secretary shall establish and maintain liaison with other agencies, and with representative trade organizations throughout the United States, concerned with the transportation of commodities by water in the export and import foreign commerce of the United States, for the purpose of securing preference to vessels of the United States for the transportation of those commodities.

“(g) Detailing officers from armed forces.—To assist the Secretary in carrying out duties and powers relating to the Maritime Administration, not more than five officers of the armed forces may be detailed to the Secretary at any one time, in addition to details authorized by any other law. During the period of a detail, the Secretary shall pay the officer an amount that, when added to the officer's pay and allowances as an officer in the armed forces, makes the officer's total pay and allowances equal to the amount that would be paid to an individual performing work the Secretary considers to be of similar importance, difficulty, and responsibility as that performed by the officer during the detail.

“(1) CONTRACTS AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—In the same manner that a private corporation may make a contract within the scope of its authority under its charter, the Secretary may make contracts and cooperative agreements for the United States Government and disburse amounts to—

“(A) carry out the Secretary's duties and powers under this section, subtitle V of title 46, and all other Maritime Administration programs; and

“(B) protect, preserve, and improve collateral held by the Secretary to secure indebtedness.

“(2) AUDITS.—The financial transactions of the Secretary under paragraph (1) shall be audited by the Comptroller General. The Comptroller General shall allow credit for an expenditure shown to be necessary because of the nature of the business activities authorized by this section or subtitle V of title 46. At least once a year, the Comptroller General shall report to Congress any departure by the Secretary from this section or subtitle V of title 46.

“(i) Grant administrative expenses.—Except as otherwise provided by law, the administrative and related expenses for the administration of any grant programs by the Maritime Administrator may not exceed 3 percent.

“(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, there are authorized to be appropriated such amounts as may be necessary to carry out the duties and powers of the Secretary relating to the Maritime Administration.

“(2) LIMITATIONS.—Only those amounts specifically authorized by law may be appropriated for the use of the Maritime Administration for—

“(B) construction-differential subsidies incident to the construction, reconstruction, or reconditioning of vessels;

“(E) expenses necessary for research and development activities, including reimbursement of the Vessel Operations Revolving Fund for losses resulting from expenses of experimental vessel operations;

“(I) other operations and training expenses related to the development of waterborne transportation systems, the use of waterborne transportation systems, and general administration.

“(3) TRAINING VESSELS.—Amounts may not be appropriated for the purchase or construction of training vessels for State maritime academies unless the Secretary has approved a plan for sharing training vessels between State maritime academies.”.

(a) In general.—Whenever a funding table in this division specifies a dollar amount authorized for a project, program, or activity, the obligation and expenditure of the specified dollar amount for the project, program, or activity is hereby authorized, subject to the availability of appropriations.

(b) Merit-based decisions.—A decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds with or to a specific entity on the basis of a dollar amount authorized pursuant to subsection (a) shall—

(1) be based on merit-based selection procedures in accordance with the requirements of sections 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States Code, or on competitive procedures; and

(c) Relationship to transfer and programming authority.—An amount specified in the funding tables in this division may be transferred or reprogrammed under a transfer or reprogramming authority provided by another provision of this Act or by other law. The transfer or reprogramming of an amount specified in such funding tables shall not count against a ceiling on such transfers or reprogrammings under section 1001 or section 1522 of this Act or any other provision of law, unless such transfer or reprogramming would move funds between appropriation accounts.

(d) Applicability to classified annex.—This section applies to any classified annex that accompanies this Act.

(e) Oral and written communications.—No oral or written communication concerning any amount specified in the funding tables in this division shall supersede the requirements of this section.

TITLE XLI—PROCUREMENT

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT.

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT (In Thousands of Dollars)
Line	Item	FY 2014 Request	Senate Authorized
	AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY
	FIXED WING
01	UTILITY F/W AIRCRAFT	19,730	19,730
03	AERIAL COMMON SENSOR (ACS) (MIP)	142,050	142,050
	Reduction of 4 EMARSS LRIP aircraft		[–114,700]
	Modification of transferred Liberty A/C		[114,700]
04	MQ–1 UAV	518,460	518,460
05	RQ–11 (RAVEN)	10,772	10,772
	ROTARY
06	HELICOPTER, LIGHT UTILITY (LUH)	96,227	96,227
07	AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN	608,469	608,469
08	AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN ADV PROC (CY)	150,931	150,931
12	UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP)	1,046,976	1,026,992
	Transfer to PE 0203774A at Army request		[–19,984]
12	UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP)	116,001	116,001
14	CH–47 HELICOPTER	801,650	801,650
15	CH–47 HELICOPTER ADV PROC (CY)	98,376	98,376
	MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT
16	MQ–1 PAYLOAD—UAS	97,781	97,781
17	GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP)	10,262	10,262
18	MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP)	12,467	12,467
19	AH–64 MODS	53,559	53,559
20	CH–47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS (MYP)	149,764	149,764
21	UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS	17,500	17,500
22	UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS	74,095	74,095
23	KIOWA MODS WARRIOR	184,044	184,044
24	NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN	152,569	152,569
25	COMMS, NAV SURVEILLANCE	92,779	92,779
26	GATM ROLLUP	65,613	65,613
27	RQ–7 UAV MODS	121,902	121,902
	GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS
28	AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT	47,610	47,610
29	SURVIVABILITY CM	5,700	5,700
30	CMWS	126,869	126,869
	OTHER SUPPORT
31	AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	6,809	6,809
32	COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT	65,397	65,397
33	AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS	45,841	45,841
34	AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL	79,692	79,692
35	INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES	1,615	1,615
36	LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET	2,877	2,877
	AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY Total	5,024,387	5,004,403

	MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY
	SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM
02	MSE MISSILE	540,401	540,401
	AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM
03	HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY	4,464	4,464
	ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS
04	JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY	110,510	110,510
05	TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY	49,354	49,354
06	TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY ADV PROC (CY)	19,965	19,965
07	GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS)	237,216	237,216
08	MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR)	19,022	19,022
	MODIFICATIONS
11	PATRIOT MODS	256,438	256,438
12	STINGER MODS	37,252	37,252
13	ITAS/TOW MODS	20,000	20,000
14	MLRS MODS	11,571	11,571
15	HIMARS MODIFICATIONS	6,105	6,105
	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
16	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS	11,222	11,222
	SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES
17	AIR DEFENSE TARGETS	3,530	3,530
18	ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MISSILES)	1,748	1,748
19	PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT	5,285	5,285
	MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY Total	1,334,083	1,334,083

	PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY
	TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES
01	STRYKER VEHICLE	374,100	374,100
	MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES
02	STRYKER (MOD)	20,522	20,522
03	FIST VEHICLE (MOD)	29,965	29,965
04	BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD)	158,000	158,000
05	HOWITZER, MED SP FT 155MM M109A6 (MOD)	4,769	4,769
06	PALADIN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT (PIM)	260,177	219,477
	Transfer to PE 0604854A at Army Request		[–40,700]
07	IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE (M88A2 HERCULES)	111,031	111,031
08	ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD)	2,500	2,500
09	ASSAULT BREACHER VEHICLE	62,951	62,951
10	M88 FOV MODS	28,469	28,469
11	JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE	2,002	2,002
12	M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD)	178,100	178,100
	SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES
14	PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (TCV-WTCV)	1,544	1,544
	WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES
15	INTEGRATED AIR BURST WEAPON SYSTEM FAMILY	69,147	0
	XM25 Counter Defilade Target Engagement		[–69,147]
18	MORTAR SYSTEMS	5,310	5,310
19	XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM)	24,049	24,049
21	CARBINE	70,846	21,254
	Individual Carbine early to need		[–49,592]
23	COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION	56,580	56,580
24	HANDGUN	300	300
	MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH
26	M777 MODS	39,300	39,300
27	M4 CARBINE MODS	10,300	10,300
28	M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MODS	33,691	33,691
29	M249 SAW MACHINE GUN MODS	7,608	7,608
30	M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MODS	2,719	2,719
31	SNIPER RIFLES MODIFICATIONS	7,017	7,017
32	M119 MODIFICATIONS	18,707	18,707
33	M16 RIFLE MODS	2,136	2,136
34	MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV)	1,569	1,569
	SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES
35	ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV)	2,024	2,024
36	PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV)	10,108	10,108
37	INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS	459	459
38	SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT (SOLDIER ENH PROG)	1,267	1,267
	PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY Total	1,597,267	1,437,828

	PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY
	SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION
2	CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES	112,167	87,167
	Program decrease		[–25,000]
3	CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES	58,571	53,571
	Program decrease		[–5,000]
4	CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES	9,858	9,858
5	CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES	80,037	55,037
	Program decrease		[–25,000]
7	CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES	16,496	6,196
	Program decrease		[–10,300]
8	CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES	69,533	50,033
	Program decrease		[–19,500]
9	CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES	55,781	55,781
	MORTAR AMMUNITION
10	60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES	38,029	38,029
11	81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES	24,656	24,656
12	120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES	60,781	60,781
	TANK AMMUNITION
13	CARTRIDGES, TANK, 105MM AND 120MM, ALL TYPES	121,551	121,551
	ARTILLERY AMMUNITION
14	ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES	39,825	39,825
15	ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES	37,902	37,902
16	PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M982	67,896	67,896
17	ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL	71,205	71,205
	ROCKETS
20	SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES	1,012	1,012
21	ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES	108,476	108,476
	OTHER AMMUNITION
22	DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES	24,074	24,074
23	GRENADES, ALL TYPES	33,242	33,242
24	SIGNALS, ALL TYPES	7,609	7,609
25	SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES	5,228	5,228
	MISCELLANEOUS
26	AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES	16,700	16,700
27	NON-LETHAL AMMUNITION, ALL TYPES	7,366	7,366
28	CAD/PAD ALL TYPES	3,614	3,614
29	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION (AMMO)	12,423	12,423
30	AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT	16,604	16,604
31	FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO)	14,328	14,328
32	CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES	108	108
	PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT
33	PROVISION OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES	242,324	242,324
34	CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION	179,605	179,605
35	ARMS INITIATIVE	3,436	3,436
	PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY Total	1,540,437	1,455,637

	OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY
	TACTICAL VEHICLES
1	TACTICAL TRAILERS/DOLLY SETS	4,000	4,000
2	SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED:	6,841	6,841
3	FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV)	223,910	223,910
4	FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING EQUIP	11,880	11,880
5	FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV)	14,731	14,731
6	PLS ESP	44,252	44,252
9	HVY EXPANDED MOBILE TACTICAL TRUCK EXT SERV	39,525	39,525
11	TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS	51,258	51,258
12	MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP	49,904	49,904
13	MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS	2,200	2,200
	NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES
14	HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN	400	400
15	PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES	716	716
16	NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER	5,619	5,619
	COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS
18	WIN-T—GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK	973,477	973,477
19	SIGNAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM	14,120	14,120
20	JOINT INCIDENT SITE COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITY	7,869	7,869
21	JCSE EQUIPMENT (USREDCOM)	5,296	5,296
	COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
22	DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS	147,212	147,212
23	TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS	7,998	7,998
24	SHF TERM	7,232	7,232
25	NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (SPACE)	3,308	3,308
26	SMART-T (SPACE)	13,992	13,992
28	GLOBAL BRDCST SVC—GBS	28,206	28,206
29	MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (TAC SAT)	2,778	2,778
	COMM—C3 SYSTEM
31	ARMY GLOBAL CMD & CONTROL SYS (AGCCS)	17,590	17,590
	COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS
32	ARMY DATA DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (DATA RADIO)	786	786
33	JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM	382,930	382,930
34	MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR)	19,200	19,200
35	RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2)	1,438	1,438
36	SINCGARS FAMILY	9,856	9,856
37	AMC CRITICAL ITEMS—OPA2	14,184	14,184
38	TRACTOR DESK	6,271	6,271
40	SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM COMM/ELECTRONICS	1,030	1,030
41	TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS AND PROTECTIVE SYSTEM	31,868	31,868
42	UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE	18,000	18,000
44	RADIO, IMPROVED HF (COTS) FAMILY	1,166	1,166
45	FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE	22,867	22,867
	COMM—INTELLIGENCE COMM
48	CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE	1,512	1,512
49	ARMY CA/MISO GPF EQUIPMENT	61,096	61,096
	INFORMATION SECURITY
50	TSEC—ARMY KEY MGT SYS (AKMS)	13,890	13,890
51	INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM-ISSP	23,245	23,245
52	BIOMETRICS ENTERPRISE	3,800	3,800
53	COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC)	24,711	24,711
	COMM—LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS
55	BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS	43,395	43,395
	COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS
57	INFORMATION SYSTEMS	104,577	104,577
58	DEFENSE MESSAGE SYSTEM (DMS)	612	612
59	EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM	39,000	39,000
60	INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM	248,477	248,477
	ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA)
64	JTT/CIBS-M	824	824
65	PROPHET GROUND	59,198	59,198
67	DCGS-A (MIP)	267,214	267,214
68	JOINT TACTICAL GROUND STATION (JTAGS)	9,899	9,899
69	TROJAN (MIP)	24,598	24,598
70	MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP)	1,927	1,927
71	CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL(CHARCS)	6,169	6,169
72	MACHINE FOREIGN LANGUAGE TRANSLATION SYSTEM-M	2,924	2,924
	ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW)
74	LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR	40,735	40,735
75	EW PLANNING & MANAGEMENT TOOLS (EWPMT)	13	13
76	ENEMY UAS	2,800	2,800
79	COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES	1,237	1,237
80	CI MODERNIZATION	1,399	1,399
	ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV)
82	SENTINEL MODS	47,983	47,983
83	SENSE THROUGH THE WALL (STTW)	142	142
84	NIGHT VISION DEVICES	202,428	202,428
85	LONG RANGE ADVANCED SCOUT SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM	5,183	5,183
86	NIGHT VISION, THERMAL WPN SIGHT	14,074	14,074
87	SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED MLRF	22,300	22,300
89	GREEN LASER INTERDICTION SYSTEM (GLIS)	1,016	1,016
90	INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION FAMILY OF SYSTEMS	55,354	55,354
91	ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP	800	800
92	PROFILER	3,027	3,027
93	MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (FIREFINDER RADARS)	1,185	1,185
94	JOINT BATTLE COMMAND—PLATFORM (JBC-P)	103,214	103,214
96	MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (LLDR)	26,037	26,037
97	MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM	23,100	23,100
98	COUNTERFIRE RADARS	312,727	312,727
	ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS
101	FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY	43,228	43,228
102	BATTLE COMMAND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT SYSTEM	14,446	14,446
103	FAAD C2	4,607	4,607
104	AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS	33,090	33,090
105	IAMD BATTLE COMMAND SYSTEM	21,200	21,200
107	LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT (LCSS)	1,795	1,795
109	NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND SERVICE	54,327	54,327
110	MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS)	59,171	59,171
111	GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM-ARMY (GCSS-A)	83,936	83,936
113	LOGISTICS AUTOMATION	25,476	25,476
114	RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEYING INSTRUMENT SET	19,341	19,341
	ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION
115	ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION	11,865	11,865
116	AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP	219,431	219,431
117	GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEMS FAM	6,414	6,414
118	HIGH PERF COMPUTING MOD PGM (HPCMP)	62,683	62,683
120	RESERVE COMPONENT AUTOMATION SYS (RCAS)	34,951	34,951
121	ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (A/V)	7,440	7,440
122	ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SURVEYING EQUIPMENT)	1,615	1,615
123	PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (C-E)	554	554
124	BCT EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES	20,000	20,000
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
124A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	3,558	3,558
	CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT
126	FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE)	762	762
127	BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS)	20,630	20,630
128	CBRN DEFENSE	22,151	22,151
	BRIDGING EQUIPMENT
130	TACTICAL BRIDGING	14,188	14,188
131	TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON	23,101	23,101
132	COMMON BRIDGE TRANSPORTER (CBT) RECAP	15,416	15,416
	ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT
134	GRND STANDOFF MINE DETECTN SYSM (GSTAMIDS)	50,465	50,465
135	ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM (RCSS)	6,490	6,490
136	EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS RECAPITALIZATION	1,563	1,563
137	EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD EQPMT)	20,921	20,921
138	REMOTE DEMOLITION SYSTEMS	100	100
139	< $5M, COUNTERMINE EQUIPMENT	2,271	2,271
	COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
140	HEATERS AND ECU'S	7,269	7,269
141	LAUNDRIES, SHOWERS AND LATRINES	200	200
142	SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT	1,468	1,468
143	PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS)	26,526	26,526
144	GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM	81,680	81,680
147	FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT	28,096	28,096
148	CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM	56,150	56,150
149	MORTUARY AFFAIRS SYSTEMS	3,242	3,242
150	FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS	38,141	38,141
151	ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENG SPT)	5,859	5,859
	PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT
152	DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER	60,612	60,612
	MEDICAL EQUIPMENT
153	COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL	22,042	22,042
154	MEDEVAC MISSON EQUIPMENT PACKAGE (MEP)	35,318	35,318
	MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT
155	MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS	19,427	19,427
156	ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ)	3,860	3,860
	CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
157	GRADER, ROAD MTZD, HVY, 6X4 (CCE)	2,000	2,000
159	SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING	36,078	36,078
160	MISSION MODULES—ENGINEERING	9,721	9,721
162	HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR	50,122	50,122
163	TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED	28,828	28,828
164	ALL TERRAIN CRANES	19,863	19,863
166	HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR (HMEE)	23,465	23,465
168	ENHANCED RAPID AIRFIELD CONSTRUCTION CAPAP	13,590	13,590
169	CONST EQUIP ESP	16,088	16,088
170	ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONST EQUIP)	6,850	6,850
	RAIL FLOAT CONTAINERIZATION EQUIPMENT
171	ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP	38,007	38,007
172	ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (FLOAT/RAIL)	10,605	10,605
	GENERATORS
173	GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP	129,437	129,437
	MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT
174	ROUGH TERRAIN CONTAINER HANDLER (RTCH)	1,250	1,250
175	FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS	8,260	8,260
	TRAINING EQUIPMENT
176	COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT	121,710	121,710
177	TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM	225,200	225,200
178	CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL TRAINER	30,063	30,063
179	AVIATION COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER	34,913	34,913
180	GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF ARMY TRAINING	9,955	9,955
	TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT (TMD)
181	CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT	8,241	8,241
182	INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT (IFTE)	67,506	67,506
183	TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION (TEMOD)	18,755	18,755
	OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
184	M25 STABILIZED BINOCULAR	5,110	5,110
185	RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	5,110	5,110
186	PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3)	62,904	62,904
187	BASE LEVEL COMMON EQUIPMENT	1,427	1,427
188	MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA–3)	96,661	96,661
189	PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (OTH)	2,450	2,450
190	SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER TESTING	11,593	11,593
191	AMC CRITICAL ITEMS OPA3	8,948	8,948
192	TRACTOR YARD	8,000	8,000
	OPA2
195	INITIAL SPARES—C&E	59,700	59,700
	OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY Total	6,465,218	6,465,218

	AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY
	COMBAT AIRCRAFT
1	EA–18G	2,001,787	2,001,787
3	F/A–18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET	206,551	206,551
5	JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV	1,135,444	1,135,444
6	JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV—ADV PROC (CY)	94,766	94,766
7	JSF STOVL	1,267,260	1,267,260
8	JSF STOVL—ADV PROC (CY)	103,195	103,195
9	V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT)	1,432,573	1,432,573
10	V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT)—ADV PROC (CY)	55,196	55,196
11	H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z)	749,962	749,962
12	H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z)—ADV PROC (CY)	71,000	71,000
13	MH–60S (MYP)	383,831	383,831
14	MH–60S (MYP)—ADV PROC (CY)	37,278	37,278
15	MH–60R (MYP)	599,237	599,237
16	MH–60R (MYP)—ADV PROC (CY)	231,834	231,834
17	P–8A POSEIDON	3,189,989	3,189,989
18	P–8A POSEIDON—ADV PROC (CY)	313,160	313,160
19	E–2D ADV HAWKEYE	997,107	997,107
20	E–2D ADV HAWKEYE—ADV PROC (CY)	266,542	266,542
	TRAINER AIRCRAFT
21	JPATS	249,080	249,080
	OTHER AIRCRAFT
22	KC–130J	134,358	134,358
23	KC–130J—ADV PROC (CY)	32,288	32,288
25	RQ–4 UAV—ADV PROC (CY)	52,002	52,002
26	MQ–8 UAV	60,980	60,980
28	OTHER SUPPORT AIRCRAFT	14,958	14,958
	MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT
29	EA–6 SERIES	18,577	18,577
30	AEA SYSTEMS	48,502	48,502
31	AV–8 SERIES	41,575	41,575
32	ADVERSARY	2,992	2,992
33	F–18 SERIES	875,371	875,371
34	H–46 SERIES	2,127	2,127
36	H–53 SERIES	67,675	67,675
37	SH–60 SERIES	135,054	135,054
38	H–1 SERIES	41,706	41,706
39	EP–3 SERIES	55,903	77,903
	12th aircraft to Spiral 3		[8,000]
	Sensor obsolescence		[14,000]
40	P–3 SERIES	37,436	37,436
41	E–2 SERIES	31,044	31,044
42	TRAINER A/C SERIES	43,720	43,720
43	C–2A	902	902
44	C–130 SERIES	47,587	47,587
45	FEWSG	665	665
46	CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES	14,587	14,587
47	E–6 SERIES	189,312	189,312
48	EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES	85,537	85,537
49	SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT	3,684	13,684
	Program office sustainment		[5,000]
	Sensor obsolescence		[5,000]
50	T–45 SERIES	98,128	98,128
51	POWER PLANT CHANGES	22,999	22,999
52	JPATS SERIES	1,576	1,576
53	AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT MODS	6,267	6,267
54	COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT	141,685	141,685
55	COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES	120,660	120,660
56	COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM	3,554	3,554
57	ID SYSTEMS	41,800	41,800
58	P–8 SERIES	9,485	9,485
59	MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION	14,431	14,431
60	MQ–8 SERIES	1,001	1,001
61	RQ–7 SERIES	26,433	26,433
62	V–22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY	160,834	160,834
63	F–35 STOVL SERIES	147,130	147,130
64	F–35 CV SERIES	31,100	31,100
	AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
65	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS	1,142,461	1,142,461
66	COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT	410,044	410,044
67	AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES	27,450	27,450
68	WAR CONSUMABLES	28,930	28,930
69	OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES	5,268	5,268
70	SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	60,306	60,306
71	FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION	1,775	1,775
	AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY Total	17,927,651	17,959,651

	WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY
	MODIFICATION OF MISSILES
1	TRIDENT II MODS	1,140,865	1,140,865
	SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES
2	MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES	7,617	7,617
	STRATEGIC MISSILES
3	TOMAHAWK	312,456	312,456
	TACTICAL MISSILES
4	AMRAAM	95,413	95,413
5	SIDEWINDER	117,208	117,208
6	JSOW	136,794	136,794
7	STANDARD MISSILE	367,985	367,985
8	RAM	67,596	67,596
9	HELLFIRE	33,916	33,916
11	STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITIONS (SOPGM)	6,278	6,278
12	AERIAL TARGETS	41,799	41,799
13	OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT	3,538	3,538
	MODIFICATION OF MISSILES
14	ESSM	76,749	76,749
15	HARM MODS	111,902	111,902
	SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES
16	WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES	1,138	1,138
17	FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW-ON	23,014	23,014
	ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
18	ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	84,318	84,318
	TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP
19	SSTD	3,978	3,978
20	ASW TARGETS	8,031	8,031
	MOD OF TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP
21	MK–54 TORPEDO MODS	125,898	125,898
22	MK–48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS	53,203	53,203
23	QUICKSTRIKE MINE	7,800	7,800
	SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
24	TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	59,730	59,730
25	ASW RANGE SUPPORT	4,222	4,222
	DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION
26	FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION	3,963	3,963
	GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS
27	SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS	12,513	12,513
	MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS
28	CIWS MODS	56,308	62,708
	Additional RMA kits		[6,400]
29	COAST GUARD WEAPONS	10,727	10,727
30	GUN MOUNT MODS	72,901	72,901
31	CRUISER MODERNIZATION WEAPONS	1,943	1,943
32	AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS	19,758	19,758
	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
34	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS	52,632	52,632
	WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY Total	3,122,193	3,128,593

	PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC
	NAVY AMMUNITION
1	GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS	37,703	37,703
2	AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES	65,411	65,411
3	MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION	20,284	20,284
4	PRACTICE BOMBS	37,870	37,870
5	CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES	53,764	53,764
6	AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES	67,194	67,194
7	JATOS	2,749	2,749
8	LRLAP 6" LONG RANGE ATTACK PROJECTILE	3,906	3,906
9	5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION	24,151	24,151
10	INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION	33,080	33,080
11	OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION	40,398	40,398
12	SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO	61,219	61,219
13	PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION	10,637	10,637
14	AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION	4,578	4,578
	MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION
15	SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION	26,297	26,297
16	LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES	6,088	6,088
17	40 MM, ALL TYPES	7,644	7,644
18	60MM, ALL TYPES	3,349	3,349
20	120MM, ALL TYPES	13,361	13,361
22	GRENADES, ALL TYPES	2,149	2,149
23	ROCKETS, ALL TYPES	27,465	27,465
26	FUZE, ALL TYPES	26,366	26,366
28	AMMO MODERNIZATION	8,403	8,403
29	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	5,201	5,201
	PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC Total	589,267	589,267

	SHIPBUILDING AND CONVERSION, NAVY
	OTHER WARSHIPS
1	CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM	944,866	944,866
3	VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE	2,930,704	2,930,704
4	VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE ADV PROC (CY)	2,354,612	2,354,612
5	CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS	1,705,424	1,705,424
6	CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS ADV PROC (CY)	245,793	245,793
7	DDG 1000	231,694	231,694
8	DDG–51	1,615,564	1,615,564
9	DDG–51 ADV PROC (CY)	388,551	388,551
10	LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP	1,793,014	1,793,014
	AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS
12	AFLOAT FORWARD STAGING BASE	524,000	579,300
	Navy requested adjustment		[55,300]
14	JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL	2,732	2,732
	AUXILIARIES, CRAFT AND PRIOR YR PROGRAM COST
16	MOORED TRAINING SHIP	183,900	183,900
17	OUTFITTING	450,163	450,163
19	LCAC SLEP	80,987	80,987
20	COMPLETION OF PY SHIPBUILDING PROGRAMS	625,800	725,800
	Help buy 3rd DDG–51 in FY 13		[100,000]
	SHIPBUILDING AND CONVERSION, NAVY Total	14,077,804	14,233,104

	OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY
	SHIP PROPULSION EQUIPMENT
1	LM–2500 GAS TURBINE	10,180	10,180
2	ALLISON 501K GAS TURBINE	5,536	5,536
3	HYBRID ELECTRIC DRIVE (HED)	16,956	16,956
	GENERATORS
4	SURFACE COMBATANT HM&E	19,782	19,782
	NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT
5	OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT	39,509	39,509
	PERISCOPES
6	SUB PERISCOPES & IMAGING EQUIP	52,515	52,515
	OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT
7	DDG MOD	285,994	285,994
8	FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT	14,389	14,389
9	COMMAND AND CONTROL SWITCHBOARD	2,436	2,436
10	LHA/LHD MIDLIFE	12,700	12,700
11	LCC 19/20 EXTENDED SERVICE LIFE PROGRAM	40,329	40,329
12	POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT	19,603	19,603
13	SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	8,678	8,678
14	VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	74,209	74,209
15	LCS CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	47,078	47,078
16	SUBMARINE BATTERIES	37,000	37,000
17	LPD CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	25,053	25,053
18	STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP	12,986	12,986
19	DSSP EQUIPMENT	2,455	2,455
20	CG MODERNIZATION	10,539	10,539
21	LCAC	14,431	14,431
22	UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS	36,700	36,700
23	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	119,902	119,902
24	CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS	3,678	3,678
25	SUBMARINE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM	8,292	8,292
	REACTOR PLANT EQUIPMENT
27	REACTOR COMPONENTS	286,744	286,744
	OCEAN ENGINEERING
28	DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT	8,780	8,780
	SMALL BOATS
29	STANDARD BOATS	36,452	36,452
	TRAINING EQUIPMENT
30	OTHER SHIPS TRAINING EQUIPMENT	36,145	36,145
	PRODUCTION FACILITIES EQUIPMENT
31	OPERATING FORCES IPE	69,368	69,368
	OTHER SHIP SUPPORT
32	NUCLEAR ALTERATIONS	106,328	106,328
33	LCS COMMON MISSION MODULES EQUIPMENT	45,966	45,966
34	LCS MCM MISSION MODULES	59,885	59,885
35	LCS SUW MISSION MODULES	37,168	37,168
	LOGISTIC SUPPORT
36	LSD MIDLIFE	77,974	77,974
	SHIP SONARS
38	SPQ–9B RADAR	27,934	27,934
39	AN/SQQ–89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM	83,231	83,231
40	SSN ACOUSTICS	199,438	199,438
41	UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	9,394	9,394
42	SONAR SWITCHES AND TRANSDUCERS	12,953	12,953
43	ELECTRONIC WARFARE MILDEC	8,958	8,958
	ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
44	SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM	24,077	24,077
45	SSTD	11,925	11,925
46	FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM	94,338	94,338
47	SURTASS	9,680	9,680
48	MARITIME PATROL AND RECONNSAISANCE FORCE	18,130	18,130
	ELECTRONIC WARFARE EQUIPMENT
49	AN/SLQ–32	203,375	203,375
	RECONNAISSANCE EQUIPMENT
50	SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT	123,656	123,656
51	AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS)	896	896
	SUBMARINE SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT
52	SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PROG	49,475	49,475
	OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
53	COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY	34,692	34,692
54	TRUSTED INFORMATION SYSTEM (TIS)	396	396
55	NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND SUPPORT SYSTEM (NTCSS)	15,703	15,703
56	ATDLS	3,836	3,836
57	NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NCCS)	7,201	7,201
58	MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT	54,400	54,400
59	SHALLOW WATER MCM	8,548	8,548
60	NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS (SPACE)	11,765	11,765
61	AMERICAN FORCES RADIO AND TV SERVICE	6,483	6,483
62	STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP	7,631	7,631
	TRAINING EQUIPMENT
63	OTHER TRAINING EQUIPMENT	53,644	53,644
	AVIATION ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
64	MATCALS	7,461	7,461
65	SHIPBOARD AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL	9,140	9,140
66	AUTOMATIC CARRIER LANDING SYSTEM	20,798	20,798
67	NATIONAL AIR SPACE SYSTEM	19,754	19,754
68	FLEET AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS	8,909	8,909
69	LANDING SYSTEMS	13,554	13,554
70	ID SYSTEMS	38,934	38,934
71	NAVAL MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS	14,131	14,131
	OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
72	DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND & CONTROL	3,249	3,249
73	MARITIME INTEGRATED BROADCAST SYSTEM	11,646	11,646
74	TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I SYSTEMS	18,189	18,189
75	DCGS-N	17,350	17,350
76	CANES	340,567	340,567
77	RADIAC	9,835	9,835
78	CANES-INTELL	59,652	59,652
79	GPETE	6,253	6,253
80	INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST FACILITY	4,963	4,963
81	EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION	4,664	4,664
82	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	66,889	66,889
	SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS
84	SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION	23,877	23,877
86	COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M	28,001	28,001
	SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS
87	SUBMARINE BROADCAST SUPPORT	7,856	7,856
88	SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT	74,376	74,376
	SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
89	SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS	27,381	27,381
90	NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL (NMT)	215,952	215,952
	SHORE COMMUNICATIONS
91	JCS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT	4,463	4,463
92	ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS	778	778
	CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT
94	INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP)	133,530	133,530
95	MIO INTEL EXPLOITATION TEAM	1,000	1,000
96	CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP	12,251	12,251
	OTHER ELECTRONIC SUPPORT
97	COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT	2,893	2,893
	SONOBUOYS
99	SONOBUOYS—ALL TYPES	179,927	179,927
	AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
100	WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	55,279	55,279
101	EXPEDITIONARY AIRFIELDS	8,792	8,792
102	AIRCRAFT REARMING EQUIPMENT	11,364	11,364
103	AIRCRAFT LAUNCH & RECOVERY EQUIPMENT	59,502	59,502
104	METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT	19,118	19,118
105	DCRS/DPL	1,425	1,425
106	AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT	29,670	29,670
107	AIRBORNE MINE COUNTERMEASURES	101,554	101,554
108	LAMPS MK III SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT	18,293	18,293
109	PORTABLE ELECTRONIC MAINTENANCE AIDS	7,969	7,969
110	OTHER AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	5,215	5,215
111	AUTONOMIC LOGISTICS INFORMATION SYSTEM (ALIS)	4,827	4,827
	SHIP GUN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT
112	NAVAL FIRES CONTROL SYSTEM	1,188	1,188
113	GUN FIRE CONTROL EQUIPMENT	4,447	4,447
	SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT
114	NATO SEASPARROW	58,368	58,368
115	RAM GMLS	491	491
116	SHIP SELF DEFENSE SYSTEM	51,858	51,858
117	AEGIS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	59,757	59,757
118	TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	71,559	71,559
119	VERTICAL LAUNCH SYSTEMS	626	626
120	MARITIME INTEGRATED PLANNING SYSTEM-MIPS	2,779	2,779
	FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
121	STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP	224,484	224,484
	ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
122	SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS	85,678	85,678
123	SUBMARINE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	3,913	3,913
124	SURFACE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	3,909	3,909
125	ASW RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	28,694	28,694
	OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
126	EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP	46,586	46,586
127	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	11,933	11,933
	OTHER EXPENDABLE ORDNANCE
128	ANTI-SHIP MISSILE DECOY SYSTEM	62,361	62,361
129	SURFACE TRAINING DEVICE MODS	41,813	41,813
130	SUBMARINE TRAINING DEVICE MODS	26,672	26,672
	CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
131	PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES	5,600	5,600
132	GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS	3,717	3,717
133	CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP	10,881	10,881
134	FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT	14,748	14,748
135	TACTICAL VEHICLES	5,540	5,540
136	AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT	5,741	5,741
137	POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT	3,852	3,852
138	ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION	25,757	25,757
139	PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES	1,182	1,182
	SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
140	MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT	14,250	14,250
141	OTHER SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	6,401	6,401
142	FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION	5,718	5,718
143	SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS	22,597	22,597
	TRAINING DEVICES
144	TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	22,527	22,527
	COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
145	COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	50,428	50,428
146	EDUCATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	2,292	2,292
147	MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	4,925	4,925
149	NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	3,202	3,202
151	OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	24,294	24,294
152	C4ISR EQUIPMENT	4,287	4,287
153	ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	18,276	18,276
154	PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT	134,495	134,495
155	ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY	324,327	324,327
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
156A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	12,140	12,140
	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
157	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS	317,234	317,234
	OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY Total	6,310,257	6,310,257

	PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS
	TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES
01	AAV7A1 PIP	32,360	32,360
02	LAV PIP	6,003	6,003
	ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS
03	EXPEDITIONARY FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM	589	589
04	155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER	3,655	3,655
05	HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM	5,467	5,467
06	WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION	20,354	20,354
	OTHER SUPPORT
07	MODIFICATION KITS	38,446	38,446
08	WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM	4,734	4,734
	GUIDED MISSILES
09	GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE	15,713	15,713
10	JAVELIN	36,175	36,175
12	ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS SYSTEM-HEAVY (AAWS-H)	1,136	1,136
	OTHER SUPPORT
13	MODIFICATION KITS	33,976	33,976
	COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS
14	UNIT OPERATIONS CENTER	16,273	16,273
	REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT
15	REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT	41,063	41,063
	OTHER SUPPORT (TEL)
16	COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM	2,930	2,930
	COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL)
18	ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC)	1,637	1,637
19	AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS	18,394	18,394
	RADAR + EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
20	RADAR SYSTEMS	114,051	114,051
21	RQ–21 UAS	66,612	66,612
	INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
22	FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM	3,749	3,749
23	INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	75,979	75,979
26	RQ–11 UAV	1,653	1,653
27	DCGS-MC	9,494	9,494
	OTHER COMM/ELEC EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
28	NIGHT VISION EQUIPMENT	6,171	6,171
	OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL)
29	COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES	121,955	121,955
30	COMMAND POST SYSTEMS	83,294	83,294
31	RADIO SYSTEMS	74,718	74,718
32	COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS	47,613	47,613
33	COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT	19,573	19,573
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
33A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	5,659	5,659
	ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES
34	COMMERCIAL PASSENGER VEHICLES	1,039	1,039
35	COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES	31,050	31,050
	TACTICAL VEHICLES
36	5/4T TRUCK HMMWV (MYP)	36,333	36,333
37	MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS	3,137	3,137
40	FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS	27,385	27,385
	OTHER SUPPORT
41	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	7,016	7,016
	ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT
42	ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT	14,377	14,377
43	BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT	24,864	24,864
44	TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS	21,592	21,592
45	POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED	61,353	61,353
46	AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	4,827	4,827
47	EOD SYSTEMS	40,011	40,011
	MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT
48	PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT	16,809	16,809
49	GARRISON MOBILE ENGINEER EQUIPMENT (GMEE)	3,408	3,408
50	MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP	48,549	48,549
51	FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION	190	190
	GENERAL PROPERTY
52	FIELD MEDICAL EQUIPMENT	23,129	23,129
53	TRAINING DEVICES	8,346	8,346
54	CONTAINER FAMILY	1,857	1,857
55	FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT	36,198	36,198
56	RAPID DEPLOYABLE KITCHEN	2,390	2,390
	OTHER SUPPORT
57	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	6,525	6,525
	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
58	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS	13,700	13,700
	PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS Total	1,343,511	1,343,511

	AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
	TACTICAL FORCES
1	F–35	3,060,770	3,060,770
2	F–35—ADV PROC (CY)	363,783	363,783
	OTHER AIRLIFT
5	C–130J	537,517	537,517
6	C–130J—ADV PROC (CY)	162,000	162,000
7	HC–130J	132,121	132,121
8	HC–130J—ADV PROC (CY)	88,000	88,000
9	MC–130J	389,434	389,434
10	MC–130J—ADV PROC (CY)	104,000	104,000
	HELICOPTERS
15	CV–22 (MYP)	230,798	230,798
	MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT
17	CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C	2,541	2,541
	OTHER AIRCRAFT
20	TARGET DRONES	138,669	138,669
22	AC–130J	470,019	470,019
24	RQ–4	27,000	27,000
27	MQ–9	272,217	242,217
	Prior year savings		[–30,000]
28	RQ–4 BLOCK 40 PROC	1,747	1,747
	STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT
29	B–2A	20,019	20,019
30	B–1B	132,222	132,222
31	B–52	111,002	111,002
32	LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES	27,197	27,197
	TACTICAL AIRCRAFT
33	A–10	47,598	47,598
34	F–15	354,624	354,624
35	F–16	11,794	11,794
36	F–22A	285,830	285,830
37	F–35 MODIFICATIONS	157,777	157,777
	AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT
38	C–5	2,456	2,456
39	C–5M	1,021,967	1,021,967
42	C–17A	143,197	143,197
43	C–21	103	103
44	C–32A	9,780	9,780
45	C–37A	452	452
	TRAINER AIRCRAFT
47	GLIDER MODS	128	128
48	T–6	6,427	6,427
49	T–1	277	277
50	T–38	28,686	28,686
	OTHER AIRCRAFT
52	U–2 MODS	45,591	45,591
53	KC–10A (ATCA)	70,918	70,918
54	C–12	1,876	1,876
55	MC–12W	5,000	5,000
56	C–20 MODS	192	192
57	VC–25A MOD	263	263
58	C–40	6,119	6,119
59	C–130	58,577	105,877
	C–130 avionics upgrades		[47,300]
61	C–130J MODS	10,475	10,475
62	C–135	46,556	46,556
63	COMPASS CALL MODS	34,494	34,494
64	RC–135	171,813	171,813
65	E–3	197,087	197,087
66	E–4	14,304	14,304
67	E–8	57,472	57,472
68	H–1	6,627	6,627
69	H–60	27,654	27,654
70	RQ–4 MODS	9,313	9,313
71	HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS	16,300	16,300
72	OTHER AIRCRAFT	6,948	6,948
73	MQ–1 MODS	9,734	9,734
74	MQ–9 MODS	102,970	68,470
	Lynx radar reduction		[–34,500]
76	RQ–4 GSRA/CSRA MODS	30,000	30,000
77	CV–22 MODS	23,310	23,310
	AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
78	INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS	463,285	463,285
	COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
79	AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP	49,140	49,140
	POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT
81	B–1	3,683	3,683
83	B–2A	43,786	43,786
84	B–52	7,000	7,000
87	C–17A	81,952	81,952
89	C–135	8,597	8,597
90	F–15	2,403	2,403
91	F–16	3,455	3,455
92	F–22A	5,911	5,911
	INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS
94	INDUSTRIAL RESPONSIVENESS	21,148	21,148
	WAR CONSUMABLES
95	WAR CONSUMABLES	94,947	94,947
	OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES
96	OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES	1,242,004	1,242,004
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
96A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	75,845	75,845
	AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE Total	11,398,901	11,381,701

	MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
	MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT—BALLISTIC
1	MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQ-BALLISTIC	39,104	39,104
	TACTICAL
2	JASSM	291,151	291,151
3	SIDEWINDER (AIM–9X)	119,904	119,904
4	AMRAAM	340,015	340,015
5	PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE	48,548	48,548
6	SMALL DIAMETER BOMB	42,347	42,347
	INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES
7	INDUSTR'L PREPAREDNS/POL PREVENTION	752	752
	CLASS IV
9	MM III MODIFICATIONS	21,635	21,635
10	AGM–65D MAVERICK	276	276
11	AGM–88A HARM	580	580
12	AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM)	6,888	6,888
13	SMALL DIAMETER BOMB	5,000	5,000
	MISSILE SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
14	INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS	72,080	72,080
	SPACE PROGRAMS
15	ADVANCED EHF	379,586	379,586
16	WIDEBAND GAPFILLER SATELLITES(SPACE)	38,398	38,398
17	GPS III SPACE SEGMENT	486,047	486,047
17	GPS III SPACE SEGMENT	–82,616	–82,616
18	GPS III SPACE SEGMENT	74,167	74,167
19	SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC)	5,244	5,244
20	GLOBAL POSITIONING (SPACE)	55,997	55,997
21	DEF METEOROLOGICAL SAT PROG(SPACE)	95,673	95,673
22	EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH(SPACE)	1,852,900	1,852,900
23	SBIR HIGH (SPACE)	583,192	583,192
	SPECIAL PROGRAMS
29	SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS	36,716	36,716
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
29A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	829,702	829,702
	MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE Total	5,343,286	5,343,286

	PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE
	ROCKETS
1	ROCKETS	15,735	15,735
	CARTRIDGES
2	CARTRIDGES	129,921	129,921
	BOMBS
3	PRACTICE BOMBS	30,840	30,840
4	GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS	187,397	187,397
5	JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION	188,510	188,510
	OTHER ITEMS
6	CAD/PAD	35,837	35,837
7	EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD)	7,531	7,531
8	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS	499	499
9	MODIFICATIONS	480	480
10	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	9,765	9,765
	FLARES
11	FLARES	55,864	55,864
	FUZES
13	FUZES	76,037	76,037
	SMALL ARMS
14	SMALL ARMS	21,026	21,026
	PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE Total	759,442	759,442

	OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
	PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES
1	PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES	2,048	2,048
	CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES
2	MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE	8,019	8,019
3	CAP VEHICLES	946	946
4	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	7,138	7,138
	SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES
5	SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES	13,093	13,093
6	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	13,983	13,983
	FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT
7	FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES	23,794	23,794
	MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT
8	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	8,669	8,669
	BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT
9	RUNWAY SNOW REMOV & CLEANING EQUIP	6,144	6,144
10	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	1,580	1,580
	COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT(COMSEC)
12	COMSEC EQUIPMENT	149,661	149,661
13	MODIFICATIONS (COMSEC)	726	726
	INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS
14	INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT	2,789	2,789
15	INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIPMENT	31,875	31,875
16	ADVANCE TECH SENSORS	452	452
17	MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS	14,203	14,203
18	AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & LANDING SYS	46,232	46,232
19	NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM	11,685	11,685
20	BATTLE CONTROL SYSTEM—FIXED	19,248	19,248
21	THEATER AIR CONTROL SYS IMPROVEMENTS	19,292	19,292
22	WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST	17,166	17,166
23	STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL	22,723	22,723
24	CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX	27,930	27,930
25	TAC SIGNIT SPT	217	217
	SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS
27	GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY	49,627	49,627
28	AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYS	13,559	13,559
29	MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL	11,186	11,186
30	AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM	43,238	43,238
31	COMBAT TRAINING RANGES	10,431	10,431
32	C3 COUNTERMEASURES	13,769	13,769
33	GCSS-AF FOS	19,138	19,138
34	THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 SYSTEM	8,809	8,809
35	AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CTR-WPN SYS	26,935	26,935
	AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS
36	INFORMATION TRANSPORT SYSTEMS	80,558	80,558
38	AFNET	97,588	97,588
39	VOICE SYSTEMS	8,419	8,419
40	USCENTCOM	34,276	34,276
	SPACE PROGRAMS
41	SPACE BASED IR SENSOR PGM SPACE	28,235	28,235
42	NAVSTAR GPS SPACE	2,061	2,061
43	NUDET DETECTION SYS SPACE	4,415	4,415
44	AF SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK SPACE	30,237	30,237
45	SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE	98,062	98,062
46	MILSATCOM SPACE	105,935	105,935
47	SPACE MODS SPACE	37,861	37,861
48	COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM	7,171	7,171
	ORGANIZATION AND BASE
49	TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT	83,537	83,537
50	COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER LOCATER	11,884	11,884
51	RADIO EQUIPMENT	14,711	14,711
52	CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT	10,275	10,275
53	BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE	50,907	50,907
	MODIFICATIONS
54	COMM ELECT MODS	55,701	55,701
	PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE EQUIP
55	NIGHT VISION GOGGLES	14,524	14,524
56	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	28,655	28,655
	DEPOT PLANT+MTRLS HANDLING EQ
57	MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP	9,332	9,332
	BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
58	BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT	16,762	16,762
59	CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS	33,768	33,768
60	PRODUCTIVITY CAPITAL INVESTMENT	2,495	2,495
61	MOBILITY EQUIPMENT	12,859	12,859
62	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	1,954	1,954
	SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS
64	DARP RC135	24,528	24,528
65	DCGS-AF	137,819	137,819
67	SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM	479,586	479,586
68	DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG.	45,159	45,159
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
68A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	14,519,256	14,519,256
	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
70	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS	25,746	25,746
	OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE Total	16,760,581	16,760,581

	PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCAA
1	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	1,291	1,291
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA
2	MAJOR EQUIPMENT	5,711	5,711
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA
3	PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION	47,201	47,201
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA
09	INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY	16,189	16,189
12	TELEPORT PROGRAM	66,075	66,075
13	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	83,881	83,881
14	NET CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES)	2,572	2,572
15	DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK	125,557	125,557
17	CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE	16,941	16,941
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA
18	MAJOR EQUIPMENT	13,137	13,137
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DMACT
19	MAJOR EQUIPMENT	15,414	15,414
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DODEA
20	AUTOMATION/EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT & LOGISTICS	1,454	1,454
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY
21	EQUIPMENT	978	978
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DSS
22	MAJOR EQUIPMENT	5,020	5,020
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY
23	VEHICLES	100	100
24	OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT	13,395	13,395
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY
26	THAAD	581,005	581,005
27	AEGIS BMD	580,814	580,814
28	BMDS AN/TPY–2 RADARS	62,000	62,000
29	AEGIS ASHORE PHASE III	131,400	131,400
31	IRON DOME	220,309	220,309
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA
39	INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP)	14,363	14,363
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD
40	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD	37,345	37,345
41	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, INTELLIGENCE	16,678	16,678
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS
42	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS	14,792	14,792
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS
43	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS	35,259	35,259
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
43A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	544,272	544,272
	AVIATION PROGRAMS
45	ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND SUSTAINMENT	112,456	112,456
46	MH–60 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM	81,457	81,457
47	NON-STANDARD AVIATION	2,650	2,650
48	U–28	56,208	56,208
49	MH–47 CHINOOK	19,766	19,766
50	RQ–11 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE	850	850
51	CV–22 MODIFICATION	98,927	98,927
52	MQ–1 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE	20,576	20,576
53	MQ–9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE	1,893	14,893
	Capability Improvements		[13,000]
55	STUASL0	13,166	13,166
56	PRECISION STRIKE PACKAGE	107,687	107,687
57	AC/MC–130J	51,870	51,870
59	C–130 MODIFICATIONS	71,940	71,940
	SHIPBUILDING
61	UNDERWATER SYSTEMS	37,439	37,439
	AMMUNITION PROGRAMS
63	ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M	159,029	159,029
	OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS
66	INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS	79,819	79,819
68	DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS	14,906	14,906
70	OTHER ITEMS <$5M	81,711	81,711
71	COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS	35,053	33,897
	CCFLIR—Transfer at USSOCOM Request		[–1,156]
74	SPECIAL PROGRAMS	41,526	41,526
75	TACTICAL VEHICLES	43,353	43,353
76	WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M	210,540	210,540
78	COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS	20,000	20,000
82	GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES	6,645	6,645
83	OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE	25,581	25,581
89	OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS	191,061	191,061
	CBDP
91	INSTALLATION FORCE PROTECTION	14,271	14,271
92	INDIVIDUAL PROTECTION	101,667	101,667
94	JOINT BIO DEFENSE PROGRAM (MEDICAL)	13,447	13,447
95	COLLECTIVE PROTECTION	20,896	20,896
96	CONTAMINATION AVOIDANCE	144,540	144,540
	PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE Total	4,534,083	4,545,927

	JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND
	JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND
01	JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND	98,800	98,800
	JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND Total	98,800	98,800

	TOTAL, PROCUREMENT	98,227,168	98,151,289

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars)
Line	Item	FY 2014 Request	Senate Authorized
	AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY
	FIXED WING
2	SATURN ARCH (MIP)	48,000	48,000
4	MQ–1 UAV	31,988	31,988
	ROTARY
9	AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIB NEW BUILD	142,000	142,000
11	KIOWA WARRIOR WRA	163,800	163,800
14	CH–47 HELICOPTER	386,000	386,000
	AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY Total	771,788	771,788

	MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY
	AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM
3	HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY	54,000	54,000
	ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS
7	GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS)	39,045	39,045
10	ARMY TACTICAL MSL SYS (ATACMS)—SYS SUM	35,600	35,600
	MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY Total	128,645	128,645

	PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY
	SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION
2	CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES	4,400	4,400
4	CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES	1,500	1,500
5	CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES	5,000	5,000
8	CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES	60,000	60,000
	MORTAR AMMUNITION
10	60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES	5,000	5,000
	ARTILLERY AMMUNITION
14	ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES	10,000	10,000
15	ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES	10,000	10,000
16	PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M982	11,000	11,000
	ROCKETS
21	ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES	57,000	57,000
	OTHER AMMUNITION
22	DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES	4,000	4,000
23	GRENADES, ALL TYPES	3,000	3,000
24	SIGNALS, ALL TYPES	8,000	8,000
	MISCELLANEOUS
28	CAD/PAD ALL TYPES	2,000	2,000
	PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY Total	180,900	180,900

	OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY
	TACTICAL VEHICLES
13	MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS	321,040	321,040
	COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS
60	INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM	25,000	25,000
	ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA)
67	DCGS-A (MIP)	7,200	7,200
71	CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL(CHARCS)	5,980	5,980
74	LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR	57,800	57,800
78	FAMILY OF PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE CAPABILITIE	15,300	15,300
79	COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES	4,221	4,221
91	ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP	1,834	1,834
96	MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (LLDR)	21,000	21,000
98	COUNTERFIRE RADARS	85,830	85,830
	COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
146	FORCE PROVIDER	51,654	51,654
147	FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT	6,264	6,264
	OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY Total	603,123	603,123

	JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND
	NETWORK ATTACK
1	ATTACK THE NETWORK	417,700	417,700
	JIEDDO DEVICE DEFEAT
2	DEFEAT THE DEVICE	248,886	248,886
	FORCE TRAINING
3	TRAIN THE FORCE	106,000	0
	Program decrease		[–106,000]
	STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE
4	OPERATIONS	227,414	182,414
	Program decrease		[–45,000]
	JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND Total	1,000,000	849,000

	COMBAT AIRCRAFT
11	H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z)	29,520	29,520
	OTHER AIRCRAFT
26	MQ–8 UAV	13,100	13,100
	MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT
31	AV–8 SERIES	57,652	57,652
33	F–18 SERIES	35,500	35,500
39	EP–3 SERIES	2,700	2,700
49	SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT	3,375	3,375
54	COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT	49,183	49,183
55	COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES	4,190	4,190
59	MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION	20,700	20,700
	AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
65	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS	24,776	24,776
	AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY Total	240,696	240,696

	WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY
	TACTICAL MISSILES
9	HELLFIRE	27,000	27,000
10	LASER MAVERICK	58,000	58,000
11	STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITIONS (SOPGM)	1,500	1,500
	WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY Total	86,500	86,500

	PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC
	NAVY AMMUNITION
1	GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS	11,424	11,424
2	AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES	30,332	30,332
3	MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION	8,282	8,282
6	AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES	31,884	31,884
11	OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION	409	409
12	SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO	11,976	11,976
13	PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION	2,447	2,447
14	AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION	7,692	7,692
	MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION
15	SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION	13,461	13,461
16	LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES	3,310	3,310
17	40 MM, ALL TYPES	6,244	6,244
18	60MM, ALL TYPES	3,368	3,368
19	81MM, ALL TYPES	9,162	9,162
20	120MM, ALL TYPES	10,266	10,266
21	CTG 25MM, ALL TYPES	1,887	1,887
22	GRENADES, ALL TYPES	1,611	1,611
23	ROCKETS, ALL TYPES	37,459	37,459
24	ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES	970	970
25	DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES	418	418
26	FUZE, ALL TYPES	14,219	14,219
	PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC Total	206,821	206,821

	OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY
	CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
135	TACTICAL VEHICLES	17,968	17,968
	OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY Total	17,968	17,968

	PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS
	GUIDED MISSILES
10	JAVELIN	29,334	29,334
11	FOLLOW ON TO SMAW	105	105
	OTHER SUPPORT
13	MODIFICATION KITS	16,081	16,081
	REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT
15	REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT	16,081	16,081
	OTHER SUPPORT (TEL)
17	MODIFICATION KITS	2,831	2,831
	COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL)
18	ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC)	8,170	8,170
	INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
23	INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	2,700	2,700
26	RQ–11 UAV	2,830	2,830
	OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL)
29	COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES	4,866	4,866
30	COMMAND POST SYSTEMS	265	265
	ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT
42	ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT	114	114
43	BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT	523	523
44	TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS	365	365
45	POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED	2,004	2,004
47	EOD SYSTEMS	42,930	42,930
	GENERAL PROPERTY
55	FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT	385	385
	PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS Total	129,584	129,584

	AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
	STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT
32	LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES	94,050	94,050
	OTHER AIRCRAFT
52	U–2 MODS	11,300	11,300
59	C–130	1,618	1,618
64	RC–135	2,700	2,700
	COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
79	AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP	6,000	6,000
	AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE Total	115,668	115,668

	MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
	TACTICAL
5	PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE	24,200	24,200
	MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE Total	24,200	24,200

	PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE
	ROCKETS
1	ROCKETS	326	326
	CARTRIDGES
2	CARTRIDGES	17,634	17,634
	BOMBS
4	GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS	37,514	37,514
5	JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION	84,459	84,459
	FLARES
11	FLARES	14,973	14,973
12	FUZES	3,859	3,859
	SMALL ARMS
14	SMALL ARMS	1,200	1,200
	PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE Total	159,965	159,965

	OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
	ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS
22	WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST	1,800	1,800
	SPACE PROGRAMS
46	MILSATCOM SPACE	5,695	5,695
	BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
59	CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS	60,600	60,600
61	MOBILITY EQUIPMENT	68,000	68,000
	SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS
68	DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG.	58,250	58,250
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
68A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	2,380,501	2,380,501
	OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE Total	2,574,846	2,574,846

	PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA
12	TELEPORT PROGRAM	4,760	4,760
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
41A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	78,986	78,986
	AMMUNITION PROGRAMS
62	ORDNANCE REPLENISHMENT	2,841	2,841
	OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS
66	INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS	13,300	13,300
84	SOLDIER PROTECTION AND SURVIVAL SYSTEMS	8,034	8,034
89	OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS	3,354	3,354
	PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE Total	111,275	111,275

	JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND
	JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND
1	JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND	15,000	15,000
	JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND Total	15,000	15,000

	TOTAL, PROCUREMENT	6,366,979	6,215,979

TITLE XLII—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION.

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION(In Thousands of Dollars)
Line	ProgramElement	Item	FY 2014 Request	Senate Authorized
		RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY
		BASIC RESEARCH
1	0601101A	IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH	21,803	21,803
2	0601102A	DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES	221,901	221,901
3	0601103A	UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES	79,359	79,359
4	0601104A	UNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH CENTERS	113,662	113,662
		BASIC RESEARCH TOTAL	436,725	436,725

		APPLIED RESEARCH
5	0602105A	MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY	26,585	26,585
6	0602120A	SENSORS AND ELECTRONIC SURVIVABILITY	43,170	43,170
7	0602122A	TRACTOR HIP	36,293	36,293
8	0602211A	AVIATION TECHNOLOGY	55,615	55,615
9	0602270A	ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY	17,585	17,585
10	0602303A	MISSILE TECHNOLOGY	51,528	51,528
11	0602307A	ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY	26,162	26,162
12	0602308A	ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND SIMULATION	24,063	24,063
13	0602601A	COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY	64,589	64,589
14	0602618A	BALLISTICS TECHNOLOGY	68,300	78,300
		WIAMan schedule adjustment		[10,000]
15	0602622A	CHEMICAL, SMOKE AND EQUIPMENT DEFEATING TECHNOLOGY	4,490	4,490
16	0602623A	JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM	7,818	7,818
17	0602624A	WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY	37,798	37,798
18	0602705A	ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES	59,021	59,021
19	0602709A	NIGHT VISION TECHNOLOGY	43,426	43,426
20	0602712A	COUNTERMINE SYSTEMS	20,574	20,574
21	0602716A	HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY	21,339	21,339
22	0602720A	ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY	20,316	20,316
23	0602782A	COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY	34,209	34,209
24	0602783A	COMPUTER AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY	10,439	10,439
25	0602784A	MILITARY ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY	70,064	70,064
26	0602785A	MANPOWER/PERSONNEL/TRAINING TECHNOLOGY	17,654	17,654
27	0602786A	WARFIGHTER TECHNOLOGY	31,546	31,546
28	0602787A	MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY	93,340	93,340
		APPLIED RESEARCH TOTAL	885,924	895,924

		ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
29	0603001A	WARFIGHTER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	56,056	56,056
30	0603002A	MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	62,032	62,032
31	0603003A	AVIATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	81,080	81,080
32	0603004A	WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	63,919	63,919
33	0603005A	COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	97,043	97,043
34	0603006A	SPACE APPLICATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	5,866	5,866
35	0603007A	MANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	7,800	7,800
36	0603008A	ELECTRONIC WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	40,416	40,416
37	0603009A	TRACTOR HIKE	9,166	9,166
38	0603015A	NEXT GENERATION TRAINING & SIMULATION SYSTEMS	13,627	13,627
39	0603020A	TRACTOR ROSE	10,667	10,667
41	0603125A	COMBATING TERRORISM—TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	15,054	15,054
42	0603130A	TRACTOR NAIL	3,194	3,194
43	0603131A	TRACTOR EGGS	2,367	2,367
44	0603270A	ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY	25,348	25,348
45	0603313A	MISSILE AND ROCKET ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	64,009	64,009
46	0603322A	TRACTOR CAGE	11,083	11,083
47	0603461A	HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM	180,662	180,662
48	0603606A	LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	22,806	22,806
49	0603607A	JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM	5,030	5,030
50	0603710A	NIGHT VISION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	36,407	36,407
51	0603728A	ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS	11,745	11,745
52	0603734A	MILITARY ENGINEERING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	23,717	23,717
53	0603772A	ADVANCED TACTICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE AND SENSOR TECHNOLOGY	33,012	33,012
		ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT TOTAL	882,106	882,106

		ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES
54	0603305A	ARMY MISSLE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION	15,301	15,301
55	0603308A	ARMY SPACE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION	13,592	13,592
56	0603619A	LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER—ADV DEV	10,625	10,625
58	0603639A	TANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION	30,612	30,612
59	0603653A	ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM (ATAS)	49,989	49,989
60	0603747A	SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY	6,703	6,703
61	0603766A	TACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM—ADV DEV	6,894	6,894
62	0603774A	NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT	9,066	9,066
63	0603779A	ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—DEM/VAL	2,633	2,633
64	0603782A	WARFIGHTER INFORMATION NETWORK-TACTICAL—DEM/VAL	272,384	272,384
65	0603790A	NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT	3,874	3,874
66	0603801A	AVIATION—ADV DEV	5,018	5,018
67	0603804A	LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ADV DEV	11,556	11,556
69	0603807A	MEDICAL SYSTEMS—ADV DEV	15,603	15,603
70	0603827A	SOLDIER SYSTEMS—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT	14,159	14,159
71	0603850A	INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE	79	79
72	0604115A	TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES	55,605	55,605
74	0604319A	INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INCREMENT 2–INTERCEPT (IFPC2)	79,232	79,232
75	0604785A	INTEGRATED BASE DEFENSE (BUDGET ACTIVITY 4)	4,476	4,476
76	0305205A	ENDURANCE UAVS	28,991	0
		LEMV termination		[–28,991]
		ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES TOTAL	636,392	607,401

		SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION
77	0604201A	AIRCRAFT AVIONICS	76,588	76,588
78	0604220A	ARMED, DEPLOYABLE HELOS	73,309	73,309
79	0604270A	ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT	154,621	154,621
80	0604280A	JOINT TACTICAL RADIO	31,826	31,826
81	0604290A	MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR)	23,341	23,341
82	0604321A	ALL SOURCE ANALYSIS SYSTEM	4,839	4,839
83	0604328A	TRACTOR CAGE	23,841	23,841
84	0604601A	INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS	79,855	79,855
85	0604604A	MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLES	2,140	2,140
86	0604611A	JAVELIN	5,002	5,002
87	0604622A	FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES	21,321	21,321
88	0604633A	AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL	514	514
93	0604710A	NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS—ENG DEV	43,405	43,405
94	0604713A	COMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND EQUIPMENT	1,939	1,939
95	0604715A	NON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES—ENG DEV	18,980	18,980
97	0604741A	AIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE—ENG DEV	18,294	18,294
98	0604742A	CONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	17,013	17,013
99	0604746A	AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT	6,701	6,701
100	0604760A	DISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS (DIS)—ENG DEV	14,575	14,575
101	0604780A	COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (CATT) CORE	27,634	27,634
102	0604798A	BRIGADE ANALYSIS, INTEGRATION AND EVALUATION	193,748	193,748
103	0604802A	WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS—ENG DEV	15,721	15,721
104	0604804A	LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV	41,703	41,703
105	0604805A	COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS—ENG DEV	7,379	7,379
106	0604807A	MEDICAL MATERIEL/MEDICAL BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV	39,468	39,468
107	0604808A	LANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER—ENG DEV	92,285	92,285
108	0604814A	ARTILLERY MUNITIONS—EMD	8,209	8,209
109	0604818A	ARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE	22,958	22,958
110	0604820A	RADAR DEVELOPMENT	1,549	1,549
111	0604822A	GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM (GFEBS)	17,342	227
		Excess to requirement		[–17,115]
112	0604823A	FIREFINDER	47,221	47,221
113	0604827A	SOLDIER SYSTEMS—WARRIOR DEM/VAL	48,477	48,477
114	0604854A	ARTILLERY SYSTEMS—EMD	80,613	121,313
		Transfer from WTCV 6 at Army Request		[40,700]
117	0605013A	INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	68,814	68,814
118	0605018A	INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPPS-A)	137,290	137,290
119	0605028A	ARMORED MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLE (AMPV)	116,298	116,298
120	0605030A	JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC)	68,148	68,148
121	0605380A	AMF JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM (JTRS)	33,219	33,219
122	0605450A	JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM)	15,127	15,127
124	0605456A	PAC–3/MSE MISSILE	68,843	68,843
125	0605457A	ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD)	364,649	364,649
126	0605625A	MANNED GROUND VEHICLE	592,201	592,201
127	0605626A	AERIAL COMMON SENSOR	10,382	10,382
128	0605766A	NATIONAL CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION (MIP)	21,143	21,143
129	0605812A	JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT PH	84,230	84,230
130	0303032A	TROJAN—RH12	3,465	3,465
131	0304270A	ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT	10,806	10,806
		SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION TOTAL	2,857,026	2,880,611

		RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
132	0604256A	THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT	16,934	16,934
133	0604258A	TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	13,488	13,488
134	0604759A	MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT	46,672	46,672
135	0605103A	RAND ARROYO CENTER	11,919	11,919
136	0605301A	ARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL	193,658	193,658
137	0605326A	CONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM	37,158	37,158
139	0605601A	ARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES	340,659	340,659
140	0605602A	ARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND TARGETS	66,061	66,061
141	0605604A	SURVIVABILITY/LETHALITY ANALYSIS	43,280	43,280
143	0605606A	AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION	6,025	6,025
144	0605702A	METEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT TO RDT&E ACTIVITIES	7,349	7,349
145	0605706A	MATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS	19,809	19,809
146	0605709A	EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS	5,941	5,941
147	0605712A	SUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING	55,504	55,504
148	0605716A	ARMY EVALUATION CENTER	65,274	65,274
149	0605718A	ARMY MODELING & SIM X-CMD COLLABORATION & INTEG	1,283	1,283
150	0605801A	PROGRAMWIDE ACTIVITIES	82,035	82,035
151	0605803A	TECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES	33,853	38,853
		Internet mapping		[5,000]
152	0605805A	MUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY	53,340	53,340
153	0605857A	ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT SUPPORT	5,193	5,193
154	0605898A	MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D	54,175	54,175
		RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT TOTAL	1,159,610	1,164,610

		OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
156	0603778A	MLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM	110,576	110,576
157	0607141A	LOGISTICS AUTOMATION	3,717	3,717
159	0607865A	PATRIOT PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT	70,053	70,053
160	0102419A	AEROSTAT JOINT PROJECT OFFICE	98,450	98,450
161	0203726A	ADV FIELD ARTILLERY TACTICAL DATA SYSTEM	30,940	30,940
162	0203735A	COMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS	177,532	177,532
163	0203740A	MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM	36,495	36,495
164	0203744A	AIRCRAFT MODIFICATIONS/PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS	257,187	277,171
		Transfer from APA 11 at Army request		[19,984]
165	0203752A	AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM	315	315
166	0203758A	DIGITIZATION	6,186	6,186
167	0203801A	MISSILE/AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM	1,578	1,578
168	0203802A	OTHER MISSILE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS	62,100	62,100
169	0203808A	TRACTOR CARD	18,778	18,778
170	0208053A	JOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM	7,108	7,108
173	0303028A	SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES	7,600	7,600
174	0303140A	INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM	9,357	9,357
175	0303141A	GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM	41,225	41,225
176	0303142A	SATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE)	18,197	18,197
177	0303150A	WWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM	14,215	14,215
179	0305204A	TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES	33,533	33,533
180	0305208A	DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS	27,622	27,622
181	0305219A	MQ–1C GRAY EAGLE UAS	10,901	10,901
182	0305232A	RQ–11 UAV	2,321	2,321
183	0305233A	RQ–7 UAV	12,031	12,031
185	0307665A	BIOMETRICS ENABLED INTELLIGENCE	12,449	12,449
186	0708045A	END ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES	56,136	56,136
186A	9999999999	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	4,717	4,717
		OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT TOTAL	1,131,319	1,151,303
		TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY	7,989,102	8,018,680

		RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY
		BASIC RESEARCH
1	0601103N	UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES	112,617	112,617
2	0601152N	IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH	18,230	18,230
3	0601153N	DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES	484,459	484,459
		BASIC RESEARCH TOTAL	615,306	615,306

		APPLIED RESEARCH
4	0602114N	POWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH	104,513	104,513
5	0602123N	FORCE PROTECTION APPLIED RESEARCH	145,307	145,307
6	0602131M	MARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY	47,334	47,334
7	0602235N	COMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH	34,163	34,163
8	0602236N	WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLIED RESEARCH	49,689	49,689
9	0602271N	ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH	97,701	97,701
10	0602435N	OCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED RESEARCH	45,685	45,685
11	0602651M	JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS APPLIED RESEARCH	6,060	6,060
12	0602747N	UNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH	103,050	103,050
13	0602750N	FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES APPLIED RESEARCH	169,710	169,710
14	0602782N	MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH	31,326	31,326
		APPLIED RESEARCH TOTAL	834,538	834,538

		ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
15	0603114N	POWER PROJECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	48,201	48,201
16	0603123N	FORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	28,328	28,328
19	0603271N	ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	56,179	56,179
20	0603640M	USMC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION (ATD)	132,400	132,400
21	0603651M	JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	11,854	11,854
22	0603673N	FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	247,931	247,931
23	0603729N	WARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	4,760	4,760
25	0603758N	NAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND DEMONSTRATIONS	51,463	51,463
26	0603782N	MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	2,000	2,000
		ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT TOTAL	583,116	583,116

		ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES
27	0603207N	AIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS	42,246	42,246
28	0603216N	AVIATION SURVIVABILITY	5,591	5,591
29	0603237N	DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONTROL	3,262	3,262
30	0603251N	AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS	74	74
31	0603254N	ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	7,964	7,964
32	0603261N	TACTICAL AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE	5,257	5,257
33	0603382N	ADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY	1,570	1,570
34	0603502N	SURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE COUNTERMEASURES	168,040	168,040
35	0603506N	SURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE	88,649	88,649
36	0603512N	CARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	83,902	83,902
37	0603525N	PILOT FISH	108,713	108,713
38	0603527N	RETRACT LARCH	9,316	9,316
39	0603536N	RETRACT JUNIPER	77,108	77,108
40	0603542N	RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL	762	762
41	0603553N	SURFACE ASW	2,349	2,349
42	0603561N	ADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT	852,977	852,977
43	0603562N	SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS	8,764	8,764
44	0603563N	SHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN	20,501	20,501
45	0603564N	SHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY STUDIES	27,052	27,052
46	0603570N	ADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS	428,933	428,933
47	0603573N	ADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS	27,154	27,154
48	0603576N	CHALK EAGLE	519,140	519,140
49	0603581N	LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS)	406,389	406,389
50	0603582N	COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION	36,570	36,570
51	0603609N	CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS	8,404	8,404
52	0603611M	MARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES	136,967	136,967
53	0603635M	MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT SYSTEM	1,489	1,489
54	0603654N	JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT	38,422	38,422
55	0603658N	COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT	69,312	69,312
56	0603713N	OCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	9,196	9,196
57	0603721N	ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION	18,850	18,850
58	0603724N	NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM	45,618	45,618
59	0603725N	FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT	3,019	3,019
60	0603734N	CHALK CORAL	144,951	144,951
61	0603739N	NAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY	5,797	5,797
62	0603746N	RETRACT MAPLE	308,131	308,131
63	0603748N	LINK PLUMERIA	195,189	195,189
64	0603751N	RETRACT ELM	56,358	56,358
65	0603764N	LINK EVERGREEN	55,378	55,378
66	0603787N	SPECIAL PROCESSES	48,842	48,842
67	0603790N	NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT	7,509	7,509
68	0603795N	LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY	5,075	5,075
69	0603851M	JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TESTING	51,178	51,178
70	0603860N	JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS—DEM/VAL	205,615	205,615
72	0604272N	TACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (TADIRCM)	37,227	37,227
73	0604279N	ASE SELF-PROTECTION OPTIMIZATION	169	169
74	0604653N	JOINT COUNTER RADIO CONTROLLED IED ELECTRONIC WARFARE (JCREW)	20,874	20,874
75	0604659N	PRECISION STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM	2,257	2,257
76	0604707N	SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) ARCHITECTURE/ENGINEERING SUPPORT	38,327	38,327
77	0604786N	OFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON DEVELOPMENT	135,985	35,985
		Adjust program to more realistic schedule		[–100,000]
78	0605812M	JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT PH	50,362	50,362
79	0303354N	ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT—MIP	8,448	8,448
80	0304270N	ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT—MIP	153	153
		ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES TOTAL	4,641,385	4,541,385

		SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION
81	0604212N	OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT	40,558	40,558
82	0604214N	AV–8B AIRCRAFT—ENG DEV	35,825	35,825
83	0604215N	STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT	99,891	99,891
84	0604216N	MULTI-MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE DEVELOPMENT	17,565	17,565
85	0604218N	AIR/OCEAN EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING	4,026	4,026
86	0604221N	P–3 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM	1,791	1,791
87	0604230N	WARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM	11,725	11,725
88	0604231N	TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM	68,463	68,463
89	0604234N	ADVANCED HAWKEYE	152,041	152,041
90	0604245N	H–1 UPGRADES	47,123	47,123
91	0604261N	ACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS	30,208	30,208
92	0604262N	V–22A	43,084	43,084
93	0604264N	AIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	11,401	11,401
94	0604269N	EA–18	11,138	11,138
95	0604270N	ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT	34,964	34,964
96	0604273N	VH–71A EXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT	94,238	94,238
97	0604274N	NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ)	257,796	257,796
98	0604280N	JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM—NAVY (JTRS-NAVY)	3,302	3,302
99	0604307N	SURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM ENGINEERING	240,298	240,298
100	0604311N	LPD–17 CLASS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION	1,214	1,214
101	0604329N	SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)	46,007	46,007
102	0604366N	STANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS	75,592	75,592
103	0604373N	AIRBORNE MCM	117,854	117,854
104	0604376M	MARINE AIR GROUND TASK FORCE (MAGTF) ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) FOR AVIATION	10,080	10,080
105	0604378N	NAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL—COUNTER AIR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING	21,413	21,413
106	0604404N	UNMANNED CARRIER LAUNCHED AIRBORNE SURVEILLANCE AND STRIKE (UCLASS) SYSTEM	146,683	146,683
107	0604501N	ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS	275,871	275,871
108	0604503N	SSN–688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION	89,672	89,672
109	0604504N	AIR CONTROL	13,754	13,754
110	0604512N	SHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS	69,615	69,615
112	0604558N	NEW DESIGN SSN	121,566	121,566
113	0604562N	SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM	49,143	49,143
114	0604567N	SHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/ LIVE FIRE T&E	155,254	175,254
		Increased LHA–8 design efforts		[20,000]
115	0604574N	NAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES	3,689	3,689
116	0604601N	MINE DEVELOPMENT	5,041	5,041
117	0604610N	LIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT	26,444	26,444
118	0604654N	JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT	8,897	8,897
119	0604703N	PERSONNEL, TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND HUMAN FACTORS	6,233	6,233
120	0604727N	JOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS	442	442
121	0604755N	SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL)	130,360	130,360
122	0604756N	SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL)	50,209	50,209
123	0604757N	SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/EW)	164,799	164,799
124	0604761N	INTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING	1,984	1,984
125	0604771N	MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT	9,458	9,458
126	0604777N	NAVIGATION/ID SYSTEM	51,430	51,430
127	0604800M	JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD	512,631	512,631
128	0604800N	JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD	534,187	534,187
129	0605013M	INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	5,564	5,564
130	0605013N	INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	69,659	69,659
132	0605212N	CH–53K RDTE	503,180	503,180
133	0605450N	JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM)	5,500	5,500
134	0605500N	MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT (MMA)	317,358	317,358
135	0204202N	DDG–1000	187,910	187,910
136	0304231N	TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM—MIP	2,140	2,140
137	0304785N	TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS	9,406	9,406
138	0305124N	SPECIAL APPLICATIONS PROGRAM	22,800	22,800
		SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION TOTAL	5,028,476	5,048,476

		MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
139	0604256N	THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT	43,261	43,261
140	0604258N	TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	71,872	71,872
141	0604759N	MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT	38,033	38,033
142	0605126N	JOINT THEATER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION	1,352	1,352
143	0605152N	STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—NAVY	5,566	5,566
144	0605154N	CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES	48,345	48,345
146	0605804N	TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES	637	637
147	0605853N	MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT	76,585	76,585
148	0605856N	STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT	3,221	3,221
149	0605861N	RDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT	72,725	72,725
150	0605863N	RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT	141,778	141,778
151	0605864N	TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT	331,219	331,219
152	0605865N	OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY	16,565	16,565
153	0605866N	NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) SUPPORT	3,265	3,265
154	0605867N	SEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT	7,134	7,134
155	0605873M	MARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT	24,082	24,082
156	0305885N	TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC ACTIVITIES	497	497
		MANAGEMENT SUPPORT TOTAL	886,137	886,137

		OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
159	0604227N	HARPOON MODIFICATIONS	699	699
160	0604402N	UNMANNED COMBAT AIR VEHICLE (UCAV) ADVANCED COMPONENT AND PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT	20,961	20,961
162	0604766M	MARINE CORPS DATA SYSTEMS	35	35
163	0605525N	CARRIER ONBOARD DELIVERY (COD) FOLLOW ON	2,460	2,460
164	0605555N	STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT	9,757	9,757
165	0101221N	STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT	98,057	98,057
166	0101224N	SSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM	31,768	31,768
167	0101226N	SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT	1,464	1,464
168	0101402N	NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS	21,729	21,729
169	0203761N	RAPID TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION (RTT)	13,561	13,561
170	0204136N	F/A–18 SQUADRONS	131,118	131,118
171	0204152N	E–2 SQUADRONS	1,971	1,971
172	0204163N	FLEET TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TACTICAL)	46,155	46,155
173	0204228N	SURFACE SUPPORT	2,374	2,374
174	0204229N	TOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION PLANNING CENTER (TMPC)	12,407	12,407
175	0204311N	INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM	41,609	41,609
176	0204413N	AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS (DISPLACEMENT CRAFT)	7,240	7,240
177	0204460M	GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR (G/ATOR)	78,208	78,208
178	0204571N	CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	45,124	45,124
179	0204574N	CRYPTOLOGIC DIRECT SUPPORT	2,703	2,703
180	0204575N	ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS SUPPORT	19,563	19,563
181	0205601N	HARM IMPROVEMENT	13,586	13,586
182	0205604N	TACTICAL DATA LINKS	197,538	197,538
183	0205620N	SURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION	31,863	31,863
184	0205632N	MK–48 ADCAP	12,806	12,806
185	0205633N	AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS	88,607	88,607
187	0205675N	OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS	116,928	116,928
188	0206313M	MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS	178,753	178,753
189	0206623M	MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS SYSTEMS	139,594	118,719
		Marine Personnel Carrier program deferred		[–20,875]
190	0206624M	MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT	42,647	42,647
191	0206625M	USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (MIP)	34,394	34,394
192	0207161N	TACTICAL AIM MISSILES	39,159	39,159
193	0207163N	ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM)	2,613	2,613
194	0208058N	JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL (JHSV)	986	986
199	0303109N	SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE)	66,231	66,231
200	0303138N	CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK ENTERPRISE SERVICES (CANES)	24,476	24,476
201	0303140N	INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM	23,531	23,531
206	0305160N	NAVY METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEAN SENSORS-SPACE (METOC)	742	742
207	0305192N	MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM (MIP) ACTIVITIES	4,804	4,804
208	0305204N	TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES	8,381	8,381
211	0305208M	DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS	5,535	5,535
212	0305208N	DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS	19,718	19,718
213	0305220N	RQ–4 UAV	375,235	375,235
214	0305231N	MQ–8 UAV	48,713	48,713
215	0305232M	RQ–11 UAV	102	102
216	0305233N	RQ–7 UAV	710	710
217	0305234N	SMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS (STUASL0)	5,013	5,013
219	0305239M	RQ–21A	11,122	11,122
220	0305241N	MULTI-INTELLIGENCE SENSOR DEVELOPMENT	28,851	28,851
221	0308601N	MODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT	5,116	5,116
222	0702207N	DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF)	28,042	28,042
223	0708011N	INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS	50,933	50,933
224	0708730N	MARITIME TECHNOLOGY (MARITECH)	4,998	4,998
224A	9999999999	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	1,185,132	1,185,132
		OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT TOTAL	3,385,822	3,364,947
		TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY	15,974,780	15,873,905

		RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF
		BASIC RESEARCH
1	0601102F	DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES	373,151	373,151
2	0601103F	UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES	138,333	138,333
3	0601108F	HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH INITIATIVES	13,286	13,286
		BASIC RESEARCH TOTAL	524,770	524,770

		APPLIED RESEARCH
4	0602102F	MATERIALS	116,846	116,846
5	0602201F	AEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES	119,672	119,672
6	0602202F	HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH	89,483	89,483
7	0602203F	AEROSPACE PROPULSION	197,546	197,546
8	0602204F	AEROSPACE SENSORS	127,539	127,539
9	0602601F	SPACE TECHNOLOGY	104,063	104,063
10	0602602F	CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS	81,521	81,521
11	0602605F	DIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY	112,845	112,845
12	0602788F	DOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND METHODS	138,161	138,161
13	0602890F	HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH	40,217	40,217
		APPLIED RESEARCH TOTAL	1,127,893	1,127,893

		ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
14	0603112F	ADVANCED MATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS	39,572	39,572
15	0603199F	SUSTAINMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (S&T)	12,800	12,800
16	0603203F	ADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS	30,579	30,579
17	0603211F	AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY DEV/DEMO	77,347	77,347
18	0603216F	AEROSPACE PROPULSION AND POWER TECHNOLOGY	149,321	149,321
19	0603270F	ELECTRONIC COMBAT TECHNOLOGY	49,128	49,128
20	0603401F	ADVANCED SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGY	68,071	68,071
21	0603444F	MAUI SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (MSSS)	26,299	26,299
22	0603456F	HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	20,967	20,967
23	0603601F	CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY	33,996	33,996
24	0603605F	ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY	19,000	19,000
25	0603680F	MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM	41,353	41,353
26	0603788F	BATTLESPACE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION	49,093	49,093
		ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT TOTAL	617,526	617,526

		ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES
28	0603260F	INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT	3,983	3,983
29	0603287F	PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT	3,874	3,874
32	0603438F	SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY	27,024	27,024
33	0603742F	COMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY	15,899	15,899
34	0603790F	NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT	4,568	4,568
35	0603791F	INTERNATIONAL SPACE COOPERATIVE R&D	379	379
36	0603830F	SPACE PROTECTION PROGRAM (SPP)	28,764	28,764
38	0603851F	INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE—DEM/VAL	86,737	86,737
40	0603859F	POLLUTION PREVENTION—DEM/VAL	953	953
42	0604015F	LONG RANGE STRIKE	379,437	379,437
44	0604317F	TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER	2,606	2,606
45	0604327F	HARD AND DEEPLY BURIED TARGET DEFEAT SYSTEM (HDBTDS) PROGRAM	103	103
47	0604337F	REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION	16,018	16,018
49	0604458F	AIR & SPACE OPS CENTER	58,861	58,861
50	0604618F	JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION	2,500	2,500
51	0604635F	GROUND ATTACK WEAPONS FUZE DEVELOPMENT	21,175	21,175
52	0604857F	OPERATIONALLY RESPONSIVE SPACE	0	10,000
		Program increase		[10,000]
53	0604858F	TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM	13,636	13,636
54	0105921F	SERVICE SUPPORT TO STRATCOM—SPACE ACTIVITIES	2,799	2,799
55	0207455F	THREE DIMENSIONAL LONG-RANGE RADAR (3DELRR)	70,160	70,160
56	0305164F	NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (USER EQUIPMENT) (SPACE)	137,233	137,233
		ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES TOTAL	876,709	886,709

		SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION
58	0603260F	INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT	977	977
61	0604233F	SPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHT TRAINING	3,601	3,601
62	0604270F	ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT	1,971	1,971
64	0604281F	TACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE	51,456	36,256
		Unjustified request		[–15,200]
65	0604287F	PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT	50	50
66	0604329F	SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)—EMD	115,000	115,000
67	0604421F	COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS	23,930	23,930
68	0604425F	SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS	400,258	400,258
69	0604429F	AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK	4,575	4,575
70	0604441F	SPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM (SBIRS) HIGH EMD	352,532	352,532
71	0604602F	ARMAMENT/ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT	16,284	16,284
72	0604604F	SUBMUNITIONS	2,564	2,564
73	0604617F	AGILE COMBAT SUPPORT	17,036	17,036
74	0604706F	LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS	7,273	7,273
75	0604735F	COMBAT TRAINING RANGES	33,200	33,200
78	0604800F	F–35—EMD	816,335	816,335
79	0604851F	INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE—EMD	145,442	145,442
80	0604853F	EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE PROGRAM (SPACE)—EMD	27,963	27,963
81	0604932F	LONG RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON	5,000	5,000
82	0604933F	ICBM FUZE MODERNIZATION	129,411	129,411
83	0605213F	F–22 MODERNIZATION INCREMENT 3.2B	131,100	131,100
84	0605221F	KC–46	1,558,590	1,558,590
85	0605229F	CSAR HH–60 RECAPITALIZATION	393,558	393,558
86	0605278F	HC/MC–130 RECAP RDT&E	6,242	6,242
87	0605431F	ADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE)	272,872	272,872
88	0605432F	POLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE)	124,805	124,805
89	0605433F	WIDEBAND GLOBAL SATCOM (SPACE)	13,948	13,948
90	0605931F	B–2 DEFENSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM	303,500	303,500
91	0101125F	NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION	67,874	67,874
94	0207701F	FULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING	4,663	4,663
97	0401318F	CV–22	46,705	46,705
		SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION TOTAL	5,078,715	5,063,515

		MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
99	0604256F	THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT	17,690	17,690
100	0604759F	MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT	34,841	34,841
101	0605101F	RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE	32,956	32,956
103	0605712F	INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION	13,610	13,610
104	0605807F	TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT	742,658	742,658
105	0605860F	ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE)	14,203	14,203
106	0605864F	SPACE TEST PROGRAM (STP)	13,000	13,000
107	0605976F	FACILITIES RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT	44,160	44,160
108	0605978F	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT	27,643	27,643
109	0606323F	MULTI-SERVICE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING INITIATIVE	13,935	13,935
110	0606392F	SPACE AND MISSILE CENTER (SMC) CIVILIAN WORKFORCE	192,348	192,348
111	0702806F	ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT	28,647	28,647
112	0804731F	GENERAL SKILL TRAINING	315	315
114	1001004F	INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES	3,785	3,785
		MANAGEMENT SUPPORT TOTAL	1,179,791	1,179,791

		OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
115	0603423F	GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM III—OPERATIONAL CONTROL SEGMENT	383,500	383,500
117	0604445F	WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE	5,000	5,000
118	0605018F	AF INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM (AF-IPPS)	90,097	90,097
119	0605024F	ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE AGENCY	32,086	32,086
121	0101113F	B–52 SQUADRONS	24,007	24,007
122	0101122F	AIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM)	450	450
123	0101126F	B–1B SQUADRONS	19,589	19,589
124	0101127F	B–2 SQUADRONS	100,194	100,194
125	0101313F	STRAT WAR PLANNING SYSTEM—USSTRATCOM	37,448	37,448
128	0102326F	REGION/SECTOR OPERATION CONTROL CENTER MODERNIZATION PROGRAM	1,700	1,700
130	0203761F	WARFIGHTER RAPID ACQUISITION PROCESS (WRAP) RAPID TRANSITION FUND	3,844	3,844
131	0205219F	MQ–9 UAV	128,328	128,328
133	0207131F	A–10 SQUADRONS	9,614	9,614
134	0207133F	F–16 SQUADRONS	177,298	177,298
135	0207134F	F–15E SQUADRONS	244,289	244,289
136	0207136F	MANNED DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION	13,138	13,138
137	0207138F	F–22A SQUADRONS	328,542	328,542
138	0207142F	F–35 SQUADRONS	33,000	33,000
139	0207161F	TACTICAL AIM MISSILES	15,460	15,460
140	0207163F	ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM)	84,172	84,172
142	0207224F	COMBAT RESCUE AND RECOVERY	2,582	2,582
143	0207227F	COMBAT RESCUE—PARARESCUE	542	542
144	0207247F	AF TENCAP	89,816	13,016
		Reduction fighter communications POD		[–76,800]
145	0207249F	PRECISION ATTACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT	1,075	1,075
146	0207253F	COMPASS CALL	10,782	10,782
147	0207268F	AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM	139,369	139,369
149	0207325F	JOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE (JASSM)	6,373	6,373
150	0207410F	AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC)	22,820	22,820
151	0207412F	CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER (CRC)	7,029	7,029
152	0207417F	AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM (AWACS)	186,256	186,256
153	0207418F	TACTICAL AIRBORNE CONTROL SYSTEMS	743	743
156	0207431F	COMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ACTIVITIES	4,471	4,471
158	0207444F	TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY-MOD	10,250	10,250
159	0207448F	C2ISR TACTICAL DATA LINK	1,431	1,431
160	0207449F	COMMAND AND CONTROL (C2) CONSTELLATION	7,329	7,329
161	0207452F	DCAPES	15,081	15,081
162	0207581F	JOINT SURVEILLANCE/TARGET ATTACK RADAR SYSTEM (JSTARS)	13,248	23,148
		Continue T–3 testing operations		[9,900]
163	0207590F	SEEK EAGLE	24,342	24,342
164	0207601F	USAF MODELING AND SIMULATION	10,448	10,448
165	0207605F	WARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS	5,512	5,512
166	0207697F	DISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES	3,301	3,301
167	0208006F	MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS	62,605	62,605
169	0208059F	CYBER COMMAND ACTIVITIES	68,099	68,099
170	0208087F	AF OFFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS	14,047	14,047
171	0208088F	AF DEFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS	5,853	5,853
179	0301400F	SPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE	12,197	12,197
180	0302015F	E–4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER (NAOC)	18,267	18,267
181	0303131F	MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN)	36,288	36,288
182	0303140F	INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM	90,231	100,231
		ASACoE program		[10,000]
183	0303141F	GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM	725	725
185	0303601F	MILSATCOM TERMINALS	140,170	140,170
187	0304260F	AIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE	117,110	117,110
190	0305099F	GLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (GATM)	4,430	4,430
191	0305103F	CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE	2,048	2,048
192	0305105F	DOD CYBER CRIME CENTER	288	288
193	0305110F	SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE)	35,698	35,698
194	0305111F	WEATHER SERVICE	24,667	24,667
195	0305114F	AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, AND LANDING SYSTEM (ATCALS)	35,674	35,674
196	0305116F	AERIAL TARGETS	21,186	21,186
199	0305128F	SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES	195	195
200	0305145F	ARMS CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION	1,430	1,430
201	0305146F	DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES	330	330
206	0305173F	SPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER	3,696	3,696
207	0305174F	SPACE INNOVATION, INTEGRATION AND RAPID TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	2,469	2,469
208	0305179F	INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS)	8,289	8,289
209	0305182F	SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE)	13,345	13,345
211	0305202F	DRAGON U–2	18,700	18,700
212	0305205F	ENDURANCE UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES	3,000	3,000
213	0305206F	AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS	37,828	50,328
		Blue Devil Replacement WAMI/NVDF		[15,000]
		Unjustified amount		[–2,500]
214	0305207F	MANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS	13,491	13,491
215	0305208F	DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS	7,498	7,498
216	0305219F	MQ–1 PREDATOR A UAV	3,326	3,326
217	0305220F	RQ–4 UAV	134,406	134,406
218	0305221F	NETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGETING	7,413	7,413
219	0305236F	COMMON DATA LINK (CDL)	40,503	40,503
220	0305238F	NATO AGS	264,134	264,134
221	0305240F	SUPPORT TO DCGS ENTERPRISE	23,016	23,016
222	0305265F	GPS III SPACE SEGMENT	221,276	221,276
223	0305614F	JSPOC MISSION SYSTEM	58,523	58,523
224	0305881F	RAPID CYBER ACQUISITION	2,218	2,218
226	0305913F	NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE)	50,547	50,547
227	0305940F	SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS	18,807	18,807
229	0308699F	SHARED EARLY WARNING (SEW)	1,079	1,079
230	0401115F	C–130 AIRLIFT SQUADRON	400	400
231	0401119F	C–5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS (IF)	61,492	61,492
232	0401130F	C–17 AIRCRAFT (IF)	109,134	109,134
233	0401132F	C–130J PROGRAM	22,443	22,443
234	0401134F	LARGE AIRCRAFT IR COUNTERMEASURES (LAIRCM)	4,116	4,116
238	0401314F	OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT	44,553	44,553
239	0408011F	SPECIAL TACTICS / COMBAT CONTROL	6,213	6,213
240	0702207F	DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF)	1,605	1,605
242	0708610F	LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (LOGIT)	95,238	95,238
243	0708611F	SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	10,925	10,925
244	0804743F	OTHER FLIGHT TRAINING	1,347	1,347
245	0808716F	OTHER PERSONNEL ACTIVITIES	65	65
246	0901202F	JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY	1,083	1,083
247	0901218F	CIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM	1,577	1,577
248	0901220F	PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION	5,990	5,990
249	0901226F	AIR FORCE STUDIES AND ANALYSIS AGENCY	786	786
250	0901279F	FACILITIES OPERATION—ADMINISTRATIVE	654	654
251	0901538F	FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	135,735	135,735
251A	9999999999	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	11,874,528	11,874,528
		Reduction to classified program		[–70,000]
		Increase to classified program		[70,000]
		OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT TOTAL	16,297,542	16,253,142
		TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF	25,702,946	25,653,346

		RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW
		BASIC RESEARCH
1	0601000BR	DTRA BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVE	45,837	45,837
2	0601101E	DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES	315,033	315,033
3	0601110D8Z	BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES	11,171	11,171
4	0601117E	BASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SCIENCE	49,500	49,500
5	0601120D8Z	NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM	84,271	84,271
6	0601228D8Z	HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES/MINORITY INSTITUTIONS	30,895	30,895
7	0601384BP	CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM	51,426	51,426
		BASIC RESEARCH TOTAL	588,133	588,133

		APPLIED RESEARCH
8	0602000D8Z	JOINT MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY	20,065	20,065
9	0602115E	BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY	114,790	114,790
11	0602234D8Z	LINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM	46,875	41,875
		MIT LL reduction		[–5,000]
13	0602251D8Z	APPLIED RESEARCH FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF S&T PRIORITIES	45,000	30,000
		PSC S&T reduction		[–15,000]
14	0602303E	INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY	413,260	418,260
		Plan X increase		[5,000]
15	0602304E	COGNITIVE COMPUTING SYSTEMS	16,330	16,330
17	0602383E	BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE	24,537	24,537
18	0602384BP	CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM	227,065	227,065
20	0602668D8Z	CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH	18,908	18,908
		Assuring effective missions		[–2,000]
		Automated software analysis tools		[2,000]
21	0602670D8Z	HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB) APPLIED RESEARCH	0	5,000
		HSCB Apl Res extension		[5,000]
22	0602702E	TACTICAL TECHNOLOGY	225,977	225,977
23	0602715E	MATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY	166,654	166,654
24	0602716E	ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY	243,469	243,469
25	0602718BR	WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT TECHNOLOGIES	175,282	175,282
26	0602751D8Z	SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE (SEI) APPLIED RESEARCH	11,107	11,107
27	1160401BB	SPECIAL OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	29,246	29,246
		APPLIED RESEARCH TOTAL	1,778,565	1,768,565

		ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
28	0603000D8Z	JOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	26,646	26,646
29	0603121D8Z	SO/LIC ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT	19,420	19,420
30	0603122D8Z	COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT	77,792	60,792
		Reduction due to redundancy		[–17,000]
31	0603160BR	COUNTERPROLIFERATION INITIATIVES—PROLIFERATION PREVENTION AND DEFEAT	274,033	274,033
32	0603175C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY	309,203	279,203
		Directed energy—DPALS		[–5,000]
		Advanced Technology—unsustainable growth		[–25,000]
34	0603225D8Z	JOINT DOD-DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	19,305	19,305
35	0603264S	AGILE TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (AT21)—THEATER CAPABILITY	7,565	7,565
36	0603274C	SPECIAL PROGRAM—MDA TECHNOLOGY	40,426	40,426
37	0603286E	ADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS	149,804	149,804
38	0603287E	SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY	172,546	172,546
39	0603384BP	CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT	170,847	170,847
40	0603618D8Z	JOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	9,009	9,009
41	0603648D8Z	JOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS	174,428	164,428
		JCTD reduction		[–10,000]
42	0603662D8Z	NETWORKED COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIES	20,000	5,000
		Net Comm reduction		[–15,000]
45	0603668D8Z	CYBER SECURITY ADVANCED RESEARCH	19,668	19,668
		Assuring effective missions		[–3,000]
		Automated software analysis tools		[3,000]
46	0603670D8Z	HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB) ADVANCED RESEARCH	0	5,000
		HSCB Adv Dev extension		[5,000]
47	0603680D8Z	DEFENSE-WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM	34,041	59,041
		IBIF		[25,000]
48	0603699D8Z	EMERGING CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	61,971	61,971
50	0603712S	GENERIC LOGISTICS R&D TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS	20,000	20,000
51	0603713S	DEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY	30,256	30,256
52	0603716D8Z	STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM	72,324	72,324
53	0603720S	MICROELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT	82,700	82,700
54	0603727D8Z	JOINT WARFIGHTING PROGRAM	8,431	8,431
55	0603739E	ADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES	117,080	117,080
57	0603760E	COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS	239,078	239,078
59	0603766E	NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY	259,006	259,006
60	0603767E	SENSOR TECHNOLOGY	286,364	286,364
61	0603769SE	DISTRIBUTED LEARNING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	12,116	12,116
62	0603781D8Z	SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE	19,008	19,008
63	0603826D8Z	QUICK REACTION SPECIAL PROJECTS	78,532	58,532
		Quick & Rapid Reaction Fund reduction		[–20,000]
65	0603828J	JOINT EXPERIMENTATION	12,667	12,667
66	0603832D8Z	DOD MODELING AND SIMULATION MANAGEMENT OFFICE	41,370	41,370
69	0603941D8Z	TEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY	92,508	92,508
70	0604055D8Z	OPERATIONAL ENERGY CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENT	52,001	52,001
71	0303310D8Z	CWMD SYSTEMS	52,053	55,053
		Program increase		[3,000]
72	1160402BB	SPECIAL OPERATIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	46,809	46,809
		ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT TOTAL	3,109,007	3,050,007

		ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES
75	0603161D8Z	NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E ADC&P	63,641	63,641
76	0603527D8Z	RETRACT LARCH	19,152	19,152
77	0603600D8Z	WALKOFF	70,763	70,763
79	0603714D8Z	ADVANCED SENSORS APPLICATION PROGRAM	17,230	19,230
		Sustain testing effort		[2,000]
80	0603851D8Z	ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM	71,453	71,453
81	0603881C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT	268,990	268,990
82	0603882C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT	1,033,903	1,033,903
83	0603884BP	CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—DEM/VAL	196,237	196,237
84	0603884C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS	315,183	345,183
		Additional homeland missile defense radar		[30,000]
86	0603890C	BMD ENABLING PROGRAMS	377,605	377,605
87	0603891C	SPECIAL PROGRAMS—MDA	286,613	286,613
88	0603892C	AEGIS BMD	937,056	937,056
89	0603893C	SPACE TRACKING & SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM	44,947	44,947
90	0603895C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM SPACE PROGRAMS	6,515	6,515
91	0603896C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND AND CONTROL, BATTLE MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATI	418,355	418,355
92	0603898C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT WARFIGHTER SUPPORT	47,419	47,419
93	0603904C	MISSILE DEFENSE INTEGRATION & OPERATIONS CENTER (MDIOC)	52,131	52,131
94	0603906C	REGARDING TRENCH	13,864	13,864
95	0603907C	SEA BASED X-BAND RADAR (SBX)	44,478	44,478
96	0603913C	ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS	95,782	245,782
		Arrow Weapon System Improvements		[30,000]
		Arrow–3 Interceptor		[20,000]
		David's Sling short-range BMD		[100,000]
97	0603914C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST	375,866	375,866
98	0603915C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TARGETS	495,257	495,257
99	0603920D8Z	HUMANITARIAN DEMINING	11,704	11,704
100	0603923D8Z	COALITION WARFARE	9,842	9,842
101	0604016D8Z	DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION PROGRAM	3,312	3,312
102	0604250D8Z	ADVANCED INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES	130,000	100,000
		Adv Innov Tech reduction		[–30,000]
103	0604400D8Z	DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (UAS) COMMON DEVELOPMENT	8,300	8,300
104	0604445J	WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE	30,000	30,000
105	0604670D8Z	HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB) RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING	0	5,000
		HSCB Modeling R&E extension		[5,000]
106	0604775D8Z	DEFENSE RAPID INNOVATION PROGRAM	0	150,000
		RIP		[150,000]
108	0604787J	JOINT SYSTEMS INTEGRATION	7,402	7,402
110	0604828J	JOINT FIRES INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY TEAM	7,506	7,506
111	0604880C	LAND-BASED SM–3 (LBSM3)	129,374	129,374
112	0604881C	AEGIS SM–3 BLOCK IIA CO-DEVELOPMENT	308,522	308,522
115	0303191D8Z	JOINT ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY (JET) PROGRAM	3,169	3,169
116	0305103C	CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE	946	946
		ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES TOTAL	5,902,517	6,209,517

		SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION
118	0604161D8Z	NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E SDD	8,155	8,155
119	0604165D8Z	PROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT	65,440	65,440
120	0604384BP	CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—EMD	451,306	451,306
122	0604764K	ADVANCED IT SERVICES JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE (AITS-JPO)	29,138	29,138
123	0604771D8Z	JOINT TACTICAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (JTIDS)	19,475	19,475
124	0605000BR	WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT CAPABILITIES	12,901	12,901
125	0605013BL	INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	13,812	13,812
126	0605021SE	HOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY INITIATIVE	386	386
127	0605022D8Z	DEFENSE EXPORTABILITY PROGRAM	3,763	3,763
128	0605027D8Z	OUSD(C) IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES	6,788	6,788
129	0605070S	DOD ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION	27,917	27,917
130	0605075D8Z	DCMO POLICY AND INTEGRATION	22,297	22,297
131	0605080S	DEFENSE AGENCY INTIATIVES (DAI)—FINANCIAL SYSTEM	51,689	51,689
132	0605210D8Z	DEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT CAPABILITIES	6,184	6,184
133	0303141K	GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM	12,083	12,083
134	0305304D8Z	DOD ENTERPRISE ENERGY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (EEIM)	3,302	3,302
		SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION TOTAL	734,636	734,636

		MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
135	0604774D8Z	DEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM (DRRS)	6,393	6,393
136	0604875D8Z	JOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT	2,479	2,479
137	0604940D8Z	CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT (CTEIP)	240,213	240,213
138	0604942D8Z	ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS	2,127	2,127
139	0604943D8Z	THERMAL VICAR	8,287	8,287
140	0605100D8Z	JOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST CAPABILITY (JMETC)	31,000	31,000
141	0605104D8Z	TECHNICAL STUDIES, SUPPORT AND ANALYSIS	24,379	24,379
143	0605117D8Z	FOREIGN MATERIEL ACQUISITION AND EXPLOITATION	54,311	54,311
144	0605126J	JOINT INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION (JIAMDO)	47,462	47,462
146	0605130D8Z	FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING	12,134	12,134
147	0605142D8Z	SYSTEMS ENGINEERING	44,237	39,237
		SE transfer to DT&E		[–5,000]
148	0605151D8Z	STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—OSD	5,871	5,871
149	0605161D8Z	NUCLEAR MATTERS-PHYSICAL SECURITY	5,028	5,028
150	0605170D8Z	SUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION	6,301	6,301
151	0605200D8Z	GENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE)	6,504	6,504
152	0605384BP	CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM	92,046	92,046
158	0605790D8Z	SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR)/ SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER (S	1,868	1,868
159	0605798D8Z	DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS	8,362	8,362
160	0605801KA	DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER (DTIC)	56,024	46,024
		DTIC reduction		[–10,000]
161	0605803SE	R&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT, TESTING AND EVALUATION	6,908	6,908
162	0605804D8Z	DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION	15,451	20,451
		DT&E transfer from SE		[5,000]
164	0605898E	MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D	71,659	71,659
165	0606100D8Z	BUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS	4,083	4,083
167	0203345D8Z	DEFENSE OPERATIONS SECURITY INITIATIVE (DOSI)	5,306	5,306
168	0204571J	JOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT	2,097	2,097
172	0303166J	SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO) CAPABILITIES	8,394	8,394
175	0305193D8Z	CYBER INTELLIGENCE	7,624	7,624
178	0804767D8Z	COCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND TRAINING TRANSFORMATION (CE2T2)	43,247	43,247
179	0901598C	MANAGEMENT HQ—MDA	37,712	37,712
180	0901598D8W	MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS WHS	607	607
	9999999999	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	54,914	54,914
		MANAGEMENT SUPPORT TOTAL	913,028	903,028

		OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
182	0604130V	ENTERPRISE SECURITY SYSTEM (ESS)	7,552	7,552
183	0605127T	REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH (RIO) AND PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE INFORMATION MANA	3,270	3,270
184	0605147T	OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE SHARED INFORMATION SYSTEM (OHASIS)	287	287
185	0607210D8Z	INDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS AND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT	14,000	14,000
186	0607310D8Z	OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	1,955	1,955
187	0607327T	GLOBAL THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS (G-TSCMIS)	13,250	13,250
188	0607384BP	CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT)	13,026	13,026
190	0607828J	JOINT INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY	12,652	12,652
191	0208043J	PLANNING AND DECISION AID SYSTEM (PDAS)	3,061	3,061
192	0208045K	C4I INTEROPERABILITY	72,726	72,726
194	0301144K	JOINT/ALLIED COALITION INFORMATION SHARING	6,524	6,524
201	0302016K	NATIONAL MILITARY COMMAND SYSTEM-WIDE SUPPORT	512	512
202	0302019K	DEFENSE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION	12,867	12,867
203	0303126K	LONG-HAUL COMMUNICATIONS—DCS	36,565	36,565
204	0303131K	MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN)	13,144	13,144
205	0303135G	PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE (PKI)	1,060	1,060
206	0303136G	KEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE (KMI)	33,279	33,279
207	0303140D8Z	INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM	10,673	10,673
208	0303140G	INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM	181,567	181,567
210	0303150K	GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM	34,288	34,288
211	0303153K	DEFENSE SPECTRUM ORGANIZATION	7,741	7,741
212	0303170K	NET-CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES)	3,325	3,325
213	0303260D8Z	DEFENSE MILITARY DECEPTION PROGRAM OFFICE (DMDPO)	1,246	1,246
214	0303610K	TELEPORT PROGRAM	5,147	5,147
216	0304210BB	SPECIAL APPLICATIONS FOR CONTINGENCIES	17,352	17,352
220	0305103K	CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE	3,658	3,658
221	0305125D8Z	CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION (CIP)	9,752	9,752
225	0305186D8Z	POLICY R&D PROGRAMS	3,210	4,210
		CRRC extension		[1,000]
227	0305199D8Z	NET CENTRICITY	21,602	21,602
230	0305208BB	DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS	5,195	5,195
233	0305208K	DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS	3,348	3,348
235	0305219BB	MQ–1 PREDATOR A UAV	641	641
238	0305387D8Z	HOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM	2,338	2,338
239	0305600D8Z	INTERNATIONAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY AND ARCHITECTURES	4,372	4,372
247	0708011S	INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS	24,691	24,691
248	0708012S	LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES	4,659	4,659
249	0902298J	MANAGEMENT HQ—OJCS	3,533	3,533
250	1105219BB	MQ–9 UAV	1,314	13,314
		Capability Improvements		[12,000]
254	1160403BB	AVIATION SYSTEMS	156,561	156,561
256	1160405BB	SPECIAL OPERATIONS INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	7,705	7,705
257	1160408BB	SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS	42,620	42,620
261	1160431BB	WARRIOR SYSTEMS	17,970	17,970
262	1160432BB	SPECIAL PROGRAMS	7,424	7,424
268	1160480BB	SOF TACTICAL VEHICLES	2,206	2,206
271	1160483BB	MARITIME SYSTEMS	18,325	19,481
		CCFLIR—Transfer at USSOCOM Request		[1,156]
274	1160489BB	SOF GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES	3,304	3,304
275	1160490BB	SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE	16,021	16,021
275A	9999999999	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	3,773,704	3,773,704
		OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT TOTAL	4,641,222	4,655,378

		UNDISTRIBUTED
276		UNDISTRIBUTED		–100,000
		DARPA undistributed reduction		[–100,000]
		UNDISTRIBUTED TOTAL		–100,000

		TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW	17,667,108	17,809,264

		OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE
		MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
1	0605118OTE	OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION	75,720	75,720
2	0605131OTE	LIVE FIRE TEST AND EVALUATION	48,423	48,423
3	0605814OTE	OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES	62,157	62,157
		MANAGEMENT SUPPORT TOTAL	186,300	186,300
		TOTAL, OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE	186,300	186,300

		TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL	67,520,236	67,541,495

SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.

SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars)
Line	ProgramElement	Item	FY 2014 Request	Senate Authorized
		RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY
		SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION
87	0604622A	FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES	7,000	7,000
		SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION TOTAL	7,000	7,000
		TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY	7,000	7,000

		RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY
		OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
224A	9999999999	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	34,426	34,426
		OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT TOTAL	34,426	34,426
		TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY	34,426	34,426

		RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF
		OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
251A	9999999999	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	9,000	9,000
		OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT TOTAL	9,000	9,000
		TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF	9,000	9,000

		RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW
		OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
275A	9999999999	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	66,208	66,208
		OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT TOTAL	66,208	66,208
		TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW	66,208	66,208

		TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL	116,634	116,634

TITLE XLIII—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(In Thousands of Dollars)
Line	Item	FY 2014 Request	Senate Authorized
	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY
	OPERATING FORCES
010	MANEUVER UNITS	888,114	1,084,014
	Readiness funding increase		[195,900]
020	MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES	72,624	72,624
030	ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE	617,402	617,402
040	THEATER LEVEL ASSETS	602,262	602,262
050	LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT	1,032,484	1,032,484
060	AVIATION ASSETS	1,287,462	1,303,262
	Readiness funding increase		[15,800]
070	FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT	3,559,656	3,769,556
	Readiness funding increase		[209,900]
080	LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS	454,477	454,477
090	LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE	1,481,156	1,681,156
	Readiness funding increase		[200,000]
100	BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT	7,278,154	7,278,154
110	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	2,754,712	2,754,712
120	MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ'S	425,271	425,271
130	COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS	185,064	180,064
	Unjustified growth		[–5,000]
170	COMBATANT COMMANDERS ANCILLARY MISSIONS	463,270	463,270
	OPERATING FORCES TOTAL	21,102,108	21,718,708

	MOBILIZATION
180	STRATEGIC MOBILITY	360,240	360,240
190	ARMY PREPOSITIONING STOCKS	192,105	192,105
200	INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS	7,101	7,101
	MOBILIZATION TOTAL	559,446	559,446

	TRAINING AND RECRUITING
210	OFFICER ACQUISITION	115,992	115,992
220	RECRUIT TRAINING	52,323	52,323
230	ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING	43,589	43,589
240	SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS	453,745	453,745
250	SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING	1,034,495	1,034,495
260	FLIGHT TRAINING	1,016,876	1,016,876
270	PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION	186,565	186,565
280	TRAINING SUPPORT	652,514	652,514
290	RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING	485,500	485,500
300	EXAMINING	170,912	170,912
310	OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION	251,523	251,523
320	CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING	184,422	184,422
330	JUNIOR ROTC	181,105	181,105
	TRAINING AND RECRUITING TOTAL	4,829,561	4,829,561

	ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
350	SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION	690,089	690,089
360	CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES	774,120	774,120
370	LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES	651,765	651,765
380	AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT	453,051	453,051
390	ADMINISTRATION	487,737	487,737
400	SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS	1,563,115	1,563,115
410	MANPOWER MANAGEMENT	326,853	326,853
420	OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT	234,364	234,364
430	OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT	1,212,091	1,212,091
440	ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES	243,540	243,540
450	REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT	241,101	241,101
460	BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT	226,291	226,291
470	SUPPORT OF NATO OPERATIONS	426,651	426,651
480	MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS	27,248	27,248
480A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	1,023,946	1,023,946
	ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES TOTAL	8,581,962	8,581,962

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY	35,073,077	35,689,677

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES
	OPERATING FORCES
010	MANEUVER UNITS	1,621	1,621
020	MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES	24,429	24,429
030	ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE	657,099	657,099
040	THEATER LEVEL ASSETS	122,485	122,485
050	LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT	584,058	584,058
060	AVIATION ASSETS	79,380	79,380
070	FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT	471,616	471,616
080	LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS	74,243	74,243
090	LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE	70,894	70,894
100	BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT	569,801	569,801
110	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	294,145	330,545
	Readiness funding increase		[36,400]
120	MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ'S	51,853	51,853
	OPERATING FORCES TOTAL	3,001,624	3,038,024

	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
130	SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION	10,735	10,735
140	ADMINISTRATION	24,197	24,197
150	SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS	10,304	10,304
160	MANPOWER MANAGEMENT	10,319	10,319
170	RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING	37,857	37,857
	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES TOTAL	93,412	93,412

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES	3,095,036	3,131,436

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG
	OPERATING FORCES
010	MANEUVER UNITS	800,880	800,880
020	MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES	178,650	178,650
030	ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE	771,503	771,503
040	THEATER LEVEL ASSETS	98,699	98,699
050	LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT	38,779	38,779
060	AVIATION ASSETS	922,503	922,503
070	FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT	761,056	761,056
080	LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS	62,971	62,971
090	LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE	233,105	233,105
100	BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT	1,019,059	1,019,059
110	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	712,139	786,339
	Readiness funding increase		[74,200]
120	MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ'S	1,013,715	1,013,715
	OPERATING FORCES TOTAL	6,613,059	6,687,259

	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
130	SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION	10,812	10,812
140	REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT	1,551	1,551
150	ADMINISTRATION	78,284	78,284
160	SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS	46,995	46,995
170	MANPOWER MANAGEMENT	6,390	6,390
180	RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING	297,105	297,105
	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES TOTAL	441,137	441,137

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG	7,054,196	7,128,396

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY
	OPERATING FORCES
010	MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS	4,952,522	4,985,022
	Readiness funding increase		[32,500]
020	FLEET AIR TRAINING	1,826,404	1,837,604
	Readiness funding increase		[11,200]
030	AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES	38,639	38,639
040	AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT	90,030	90,030
050	AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT	362,700	362,700
060	AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE	915,881	915,881
070	AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT	35,838	36,446
	Readiness funding increase		[608]
080	AVIATION LOGISTICS	379,914	379,914
090	MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS	3,884,836	3,984,336
	Readiness funding increase		[99,500]
100	SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING	734,852	796,252
	Readiness funding increase		[61,400]
110	SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE	5,191,511	5,197,211
	Readiness funding increase		[5,700]
120	SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT	1,351,274	1,477,474
	Readiness funding increase		[126,200]
130	COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS	701,316	701,316
140	ELECTRONIC WARFARE	97,710	97,710
150	SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE	172,330	172,330
160	WARFARE TACTICS	454,682	454,682
170	OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY	328,406	328,406
180	COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES	946,429	946,429
190	EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE	142,249	142,249
200	DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT	2,603	3,263
	Readiness funding increase		[660]
210	COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS	102,970	102,970
220	COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT	199,128	196,128
	Classified program decrease		[–3,000]
230	CRUISE MISSILE	92,671	92,671
240	FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE	1,193,188	1,193,188
250	IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT	105,985	105,985
260	WEAPONS MAINTENANCE	532,627	532,627
270	OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT	304,160	304,160
280	ENTERPRISE INFORMATION	1,011,528	1,011,528
290	SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION	1,996,821	2,096,821
	Readiness funding increase		[100,000]
300	BASE OPERATING SUPPORT	4,460,918	4,460,918
	OPERATING FORCES TOTAL	32,610,122	33,044,890

	MOBILIZATION
310	SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE	331,576	331,576
320	AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS	6,638	6,638
330	SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS	222,752	222,752
340	EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS	73,310	73,310
350	INDUSTRIAL READINESS	2,675	2,675
360	COAST GUARD SUPPORT	23,794	23,794
	MOBILIZATION TOTAL	660,745	660,745

	TRAINING AND RECRUITING
370	OFFICER ACQUISITION	148,516	148,516
380	RECRUIT TRAINING	9,384	9,384
390	RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS	139,876	139,876
400	SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING	630,069	630,069
410	FLIGHT TRAINING	9,294	9,294
420	PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION	169,082	169,082
430	TRAINING SUPPORT	164,368	164,368
440	RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING	241,733	241,733
450	OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION	139,815	139,815
460	CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING	94,632	94,632
470	JUNIOR ROTC	51,373	51,373
	TRAINING AND RECRUITING TOTAL	1,798,142	1,798,142

	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
480	ADMINISTRATION	886,088	886,088
490	EXTERNAL RELATIONS	13,131	13,131
500	CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT	115,742	115,742
510	MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT	382,150	382,150
520	OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT	268,403	268,403
530	SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS	317,293	317,293
550	SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION	207,128	207,128
570	PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN	295,855	295,855
580	ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT	1,140,484	1,140,484
590	HULL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SUPPORT	52,873	52,873
600	COMBAT/WEAPONS SYSTEMS	27,587	27,587
610	SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS	75,728	75,728
620	NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE	543,026	543,026
680	INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS AND AGENCIES	4,965	4,965
680A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	545,775	545,775
	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES TOTAL	4,876,228	4,876,228

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY	39,945,237	40,380,005

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS
	OPERATING FORCES
010	OPERATIONAL FORCES	837,012	837,012
020	FIELD LOGISTICS	894,555	894,555
030	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	223,337	279,337
	Readiness funding increase		[56,000]
040	MARITIME PREPOSITIONING	97,878	97,878
050	SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	774,619	774,619
060	BASE OPERATING SUPPORT	2,166,661	2,166,661
	OPERATING FORCES TOTAL	4,994,062	5,050,062

	TRAINING AND RECRUITING
070	RECRUIT TRAINING	17,693	17,693
080	OFFICER ACQUISITION	896	896
090	SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING	100,806	100,806
100	PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION	46,928	46,928
110	TRAINING SUPPORT	356,426	356,426
120	RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING	179,747	179,747
130	OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION	52,255	52,255
140	JUNIOR ROTC	23,138	23,138
	TRAINING AND RECRUITING TOTAL	777,889	777,889

	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
150	SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION	43,816	43,816
160	ADMINISTRATION	305,107	305,107
180	ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT	87,500	87,500
180A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	46,276	46,276
	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES TOTAL	482,699	482,699

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS	6,254,650	6,310,650

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES
	OPERATING FORCES
010	MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS	586,620	588,520
	Readiness funding increase		[1,900]
020	INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE	7,008	7,008
040	AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE	100,657	109,557
	Readiness funding increase		[8,900]
050	AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT	305	305
060	AVIATION LOGISTICS	3,927	3,927
070	MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS	75,933	75,933
080	SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING	601	601
090	SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE	44,364	44,364
100	COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS	15,477	15,477
110	COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES	115,608	115,608
120	WEAPONS MAINTENANCE	1,967	1,967
130	ENTERPRISE INFORMATION	43,726	43,726
140	SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION	69,011	69,011
150	BASE OPERATING SUPPORT	109,604	109,604
	OPERATING FORCES TOTAL	1,174,808	1,185,608

	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
160	ADMINISTRATION	2,905	2,905
170	MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT	14,425	14,425
180	SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS	2,485	2,485
190	ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT	3,129	3,129
	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES TOTAL	22,944	22,944

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES	1,197,752	1,208,552

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RES
	OPERATING FORCES
010	OPERATING FORCES	96,244	96,244
020	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	17,581	17,581
030	SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION	32,438	32,438
040	BASE OPERATING SUPPORT	95,259	95,259
	OPERATING FORCES TOTAL	241,522	241,522

	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
050	SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION	894	894
060	ADMINISTRATION	11,743	11,743
070	RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING	9,158	9,158
	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES TOTAL	21,795	21,795

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RES	263,317	263,317

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE
	OPERATING FORCES
010	PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES	3,295,814	3,515,814
	Readiness funding increase		[220,000]
020	COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES	1,875,095	1,875,095
030	AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS)	1,559,109	1,589,109
	Increase for ranges		[30,000]
040	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	5,956,304	6,146,304
	Readiness funding increase		[190,000]
050	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	1,834,424	1,909,424
	Readiness funding increase		[75,000]
060	BASE SUPPORT	2,779,811	2,779,811
070	GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING	913,841	913,841
080	OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS	916,837	916,837
100	TACTICAL INTEL AND OTHER SPECIAL ACTIVITIES	720,349	720,349
110	LAUNCH FACILITIES	305,275	305,275
120	SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS	433,658	433,658
130	COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT	1,146,016	1,123,616
	Classified program decrease		[–22,400]
140	COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS	231,830	231,830
	OPERATING FORCES TOTAL	21,968,363	22,460,963

	MOBILIZATION
150	AIRLIFT OPERATIONS	2,015,902	2,015,902
160	MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS	147,216	147,216
170	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	1,556,232	1,556,232
180	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	167,402	167,402
190	BASE SUPPORT	707,040	707,040
	MOBILIZATION TOTAL	4,593,792	4,593,792

	TRAINING AND RECRUITING
200	OFFICER ACQUISITION	102,334	102,334
210	RECRUIT TRAINING	17,733	17,733
220	RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC)	94,600	94,600
230	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	217,011	217,011
240	BASE SUPPORT	800,327	800,327
250	SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING	399,364	399,364
260	FLIGHT TRAINING	792,275	792,275
270	PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION	248,958	248,958
280	TRAINING SUPPORT	106,741	106,741
290	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	319,331	339,331
	Readiness funding increase		[20,000]
300	RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING	122,736	122,736
310	EXAMINING	3,679	3,679
320	OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION	137,255	137,255
330	CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING	176,153	176,153
340	JUNIOR ROTC	67,018	67,018
	TRAINING AND RECRUITING TOTAL	3,605,515	3,625,515

	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
350	LOGISTICS OPERATIONS	1,103,684	1,103,684
360	TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES	919,923	919,923
370	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	56,601	56,601
380	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	281,061	281,061
390	BASE SUPPORT	1,203,305	1,203,305
400	ADMINISTRATION	593,865	593,865
410	SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS	574,609	574,609
420	OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES	1,028,600	1,028,600
430	CIVIL AIR PATROL	24,720	24,720
460	INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT	89,008	89,008
460A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	1,227,796	1,227,796
	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES TOTAL	7,103,172	7,103,172

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE	37,270,842	37,783,442

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE
	OPERATING FORCES
010	PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES	1,857,951	1,857,951
020	MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS	224,462	224,462
030	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	521,182	521,182
040	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	89,704	98,404
	Readiness funding increase		[8,700]
050	BASE SUPPORT	360,836	360,836
	OPERATING FORCES TOTAL	3,054,135	3,062,835

	ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
060	ADMINISTRATION	64,362	64,362
070	RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING	15,056	15,056
080	MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERS MGMT (ARPC)	23,617	23,617
090	OTHER PERS SUPPORT (DISABILITY COMP)	6,618	6,618
100	AUDIOVISUAL	819	819
	ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES TOTAL	110,472	110,472

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE	3,164,607	3,173,307

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG
	OPERATING FORCES
010	AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS	3,371,871	3,371,871
020	MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS	720,305	720,305
030	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	1,514,870	1,514,870
040	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	296,953	325,153
	Readiness funding increase		[28,200]
050	BASE SUPPORT	597,303	597,303
	OPERATING FORCES TOTAL	6,501,302	6,529,502

	ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES
060	ADMINISTRATION	32,117	32,117
070	RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING	32,585	32,585
	ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES TOTAL	64,702	64,702

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG	6,566,004	6,594,204

	OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE
	OPERATING FORCES
010	JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF	472,239	472,239
020	SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND	5,261,463	5,239,663
	USSOCOM RSCC		[–14,700]
	USSOCOM NCR Contractor Support		[–7,100]
	OPERATING FORCES TOTAL	5,733,702	5,711,902

	TRAINING AND RECRUITING
040	DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY	157,397	157,397
050	NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY	84,899	84,899
	TRAINING AND RECRUITING TOTAL	242,296	242,296

	ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
060	CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS	144,443	166,142
	Starbase		[21,699]
080	DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY	612,207	612,207
090	DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY	1,378,606	1,378,606
110	DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY	763,091	763,091
120	DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY	1,326,243	1,326,243
140	DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY	29,933	29,933
150	DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY	462,545	462,545
160	DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY	222,979	222,979
170	DEFENSE POW/MIA OFFICE	21,594	21,594
180	DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY	788,389	769,389
	Regional centers for security centers—undistributed decrease		[–12,000]
	Combating terrorism fellowship program		[–7,000]
190	DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE	546,603	546,603
210	DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY ADMINISTRATION	35,151	35,151
220	DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY	438,033	438,033
240	DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY	2,713,756	2,743,756
	Supplemental Impact Aid		[25,000]
	Disability Impact Aid		[5,000]
250	MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY	256,201	256,201
270	OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT	371,615	98,315
	Program decrease		[–273,300]
280	OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE	2,010,176	2,003,176
	OUSD(P) program decrease		[–7,000]
290	WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES	616,572	616,572
290A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	14,283,558	14,308,558
	Reduction to Operation Observant Compass		[–15,000]
	Increase to Operation Observant Compass		[40,000]
	ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES TOTAL	27,021,695	26,799,094

	TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE	32,997,693	32,753,292

	MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS
010	US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEFENSE	13,606	13,606
010	OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND CIVIC AID	109,500	109,500
010	COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION ACCOUNT	528,455	528,455
010	ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD	256,031	256,031
050	ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY	298,815	298,815
070	ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY	316,103	316,103
090	ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE	439,820	439,820
110	ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE	10,757	10,757
130	ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES	237,443	237,443
150	OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS TRANSFER FUND	5,000	5,000
	TOTAL, MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS	2,215,530	2,215,530

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE	175,097,941	176,631,808

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars)
Line	Item	FY 2014 Request	Senate Authorized
	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY
	OPERATING FORCES
010	MANEUVER UNITS	217,571	217,571
020	MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES	8,266	8,266
030	ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE	56,626	56,626
040	THEATER LEVEL ASSETS	4,209,942	4,209,942
050	LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT	950,567	943,567
	NSHQ—Transfer at DoD Request		[–7,000]
060	AVIATION ASSETS	474,288	474,288
070	FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT	1,349,152	1,485,452
	BuckEye terrain data increase		[56,300]
	Transfer from JIEDDO—Train the Force		[80,000]
080	LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS	655,000	655,000
090	LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE	301,563	301,563
100	BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT	706,214	706,214
140	ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES	11,519,498	11,519,498
150	COMMANDERS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM	60,000	60,000
160	RESET	2,240,358	2,240,358
	OPERATING FORCES TOTAL	22,749,045	22,878,345

	ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
350	SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION	4,601,356	4,601,356
380	AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT	17,418	17,418
400	SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS	110,000	110,000
420	OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT	94,820	94,820
430	OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT	54,000	54,000
450	REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT	250,000	250,000
480A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	1,402,994	1,402,994
	ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES TOTAL	6,530,588	6,530,588

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY	29,279,633	29,408,933

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES
	OPERATING FORCES
030	ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE	6,995	6,995
050	LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT	2,332	2,332
070	FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT	608	608
100	BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT	33,000	33,000
	OPERATING FORCES TOTAL	42,935	42,935

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES	42,935	42,935

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG
	OPERATING FORCES
010	MANEUVER UNITS	29,314	29,314
020	MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES	1,494	1,494
030	ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE	15,343	15,343
040	THEATER LEVEL ASSETS	1,549	1,549
060	AVIATION ASSETS	64,504	64,504
070	FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT	31,512	31,512
100	BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT	42,179	42,179
120	MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ'S	11,996	11,996
	OPERATING FORCES TOTAL	240,826	240,826

	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
160	SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS	1,480	1,480
	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES TOTAL	1,480	1,480

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG	199,371	199,371

	AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND
	MINISTRY OF DEFENSE
010	SUSTAINMENT	2,735,603	2,735,603
020	INFRASTRUCTURE	278,650	278,650
030	EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION	2,180,382	2,180,382
040	TRAINING AND OPERATIONS	626,550	626,550
	MINISTRY OF DEFENSE TOTAL	5,821,185	5,821,185

	MINISTRY OF INTERIOR
060	SUSTAINMENT	1,214,995	1,214,995
080	EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION	54,696	54,696
090	TRAINING AND OPERATIONS	626,119	626,119
	MINISTRY OF INTERIOR TOTAL	1,895,810	1,895,810

	DETAINEE OPS
110	SUSTAINMENT	7,225	7,225
140	TRAINING AND OPERATIONS	2,500	2,500
	DETAINEE OPS TOTAL	9,725	9,725

	TOTAL, AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND	7,726,720	7,726,720

	AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND
	AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND
010	POWER	279,000	250,000
	Unjustified expenditure		[–29,000]
	AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND TOTAL	279,000	250,000

	TOTAL, AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND TOTAL	279,000	250,000

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY
	OPERATING FORCES
010	MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS	845,169	845,169
030	AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES	600	600
040	AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT	17,489	17,489
050	AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT	78,491	78,491
060	AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE	162,420	162,420
070	AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT	2,700	2,700
080	AVIATION LOGISTICS	50,130	50,130
090	MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS	949,539	949,539
100	SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING	20,226	20,226
110	SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE	1,679,660	1,679,660
130	COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS	37,760	37,760
160	WARFARE TACTICS	25,351	25,351
170	OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY	20,045	20,045
180	COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES	1,212,296	1,212,296
190	EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE	10,203	10,203
250	IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT	127,972	127,972
260	WEAPONS MAINTENANCE	221,427	221,427
290	SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION	13,386	13,386
300	BASE OPERATING SUPPORT	110,940	110,940
	OPERATING FORCES TOTAL	5,585,804	5,585,804

	MOBILIZATION
340	EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS	18,460	18,460
360	COAST GUARD SUPPORT	227,033	227,033
	MOBILIZATION TOTAL	245,493	245,493

	TRAINING AND RECRUITING
400	SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING	50,269	50,269
430	TRAINING SUPPORT	5,400	5,400
	TRAINING AND RECRUITING TOTAL	55,669	55,669

	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
480	ADMINISTRATION	2,418	2,418
490	EXTERNAL RELATIONS	516	516
510	MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT	5,107	5,107
520	OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT	1,411	1,411
530	SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS	2,545	2,545
550	SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION	153,427	153,427
580	ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT	8,570	8,570
620	NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE	1,425	1,425
680A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	5,608	5,608
	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES TOTAL	181,027	181,027

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY	6,067,993	6,067,993

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS
	OPERATING FORCES
010	OPERATIONAL FORCES	992,190	992,190
020	FIELD LOGISTICS	559,574	559,574
030	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	570,000	570,000
060	BASE OPERATING SUPPORT	69,726	69,726
	OPERATING FORCES TOTAL	2,191,490	2,191,490

	TRAINING AND RECRUITING
110	TRAINING SUPPORT	108,270	134,270
	Transfer from JIEDDO—Train the Force		[26,000]
	TRAINING AND RECRUITING TOTAL	108,270	134,270

150	SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION	365,555	365,555
160	ADMINISTRATION	3,675	3,675
180A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	825	825
	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES TOTAL	370,055	370,055

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS	2,669,815	2,695,815

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES
	OPERATING FORCES
010	MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS	17,196	17,196
020	INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE	200	200
040	AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE	6,000	6,000
070	MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS	12,304	12,304
090	SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE	6,790	6,790
110	COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES	13,210	13,210
	TOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	55,700	55,700

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES	55,700	55,700

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE
	OPERATING FORCES
010	OPERATING FORCES	11,124	11,124
040	BASE OPERATING SUPPORT	1,410	1,410
	TOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	12,534	12,534

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE	12,534	12,534

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE
	OPERATING FORCES
010	PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES	1,712,393	1,712,393
020	COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES	836,104	836,104
030	AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS)	14,118	14,118
040	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	1,373,480	1,373,480
050	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	122,712	122,712
060	BASE SUPPORT	1,520,333	1,520,333
070	GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING	31,582	31,582
080	OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS	147,524	147,524
110	LAUNCH FACILITIES	857	857
120	SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS	8,353	8,353
130	COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT	50,495	50,495
	OPERATING FORCES TOTAL	5,886,185	5,886,185

	MOBILIZATION
150	AIRLIFT OPERATIONS	3,091,133	3,091,133
160	MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS	47,897	47,897
170	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	387,179	387,179
180	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	7,043	7,043
190	BASE SUPPORT	68,382	68,382
	MOBILIZATION TOTAL	3,601,634	3,601,634

	TRAINING AND RECRUITING
200	OFFICER ACQUISITION	100	100
210	RECRUIT TRAINING	478	478
240	BASE SUPPORT	19,256	19,256
250	SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING	12,845	12,845
260	FLIGHT TRAINING	731	731
270	PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION	607	607
280	TRAINING SUPPORT	720	720
320	OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION	152	152
	TRAINING AND RECRUITING TOTAL	34,889	34,889

	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
350	LOGISTICS OPERATIONS	86,273	86,273
360	TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES	2,511	2,511
390	BASE SUPPORT	19,887	19,887
400	ADMINISTRATION	3,493	3,493
410	SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS	152,086	152,086
420	OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES	269,825	269,825
460	INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT	117	117
460A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	16,558	16,558
	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES TOTAL	550,750	550,750

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE	10,005,224	10,005,224

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE
	OPERATING FORCES
030	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	26,599	26,599
050	BASE SUPPORT	6,250	6,250
	OPERATING FORCES TOTAL	32,849	32,849

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE	32,849	32,849

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG
	OPERATING FORCES
020	MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS	22,200	22,200
	OPERATING FORCES TOTAL	22,200	22,200

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG	22,200	22,200

	OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE
	OPERATING FORCES
020	SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND	2,222,868	2,229,868
	NSHQ—Transfer at DoD Request		[7,000]
	OPERATING FORCES TOTAL	2,277,917	2,284,917

	ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
080	DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY	27,781	27,781
090	DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY	45,746	45,746
120	DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY	76,348	76,348
140	DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY	99,538	99,538
160	DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY	9,620	9,620
180	DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY	1,950,000	1,950,000
240	DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY	100,100	100,100
280	OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE	38,227	38,227
290	WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES	2,784	2,784
290A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	1,862,066	1,862,066
	ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES TOTAL	4,212,210	4,212,210

	TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE	6,435,078	6,442,078

	TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE	62,829,052	62,962,352

TITLE XLIV—MILITARY PERSONNEL

SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL.

SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL(In Thousands of Dollars)
Item	FY 2014 Request	Senate Authorized
MILITARY PERSONNEL
MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS
MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS	130,399,881	130,129,881
Permanent Change of Station Travel		[–150,000]
Undistributed reduction consistent with pace of drawdown		[–120,000]
SUBTOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS	130,399,881	130,129,881

MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH FUND CONTRIBUTIONS
MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH FUND CONTRIBUTIONS	6,676,750	6,676,750
SUBTOTAL, MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH FUND CONTRIBUTIONS	6,676,750	6,676,750

TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL	137,076,631	136,806,631

SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.

SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars)
Item	FY 2014 Request	Senate Authorized
MILITARY PERSONNEL
MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS
MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS	9,689,307	9,689,307
SUBTOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS	9,689,307	9,689,307

MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH FUND CONTRIBUTIONS
MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH FUND CONTRIBUTIONS	164,033	164,033
SUBTOTAL, MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH FUND CONTRIBUTIONS	164,033	164,033

TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL	9,853,340	9,853,340

TITLE XLV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS.

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS (In Thousands of Dollars)
Line	Item	FY 2014 Request	Senate Authorized
	WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY
010	PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS	25,158	25,158
	TOTAL, WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY	25,158	25,158

	WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE
030	FUEL COSTS	61,731	61,731
	TOTAL, WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE	61,731	61,731

	WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE
010	DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA)	46,428	46,428
	TOTAL, WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE	46,428	46,428

	WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA
010	WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA	1,412,510	1,412,510
	TOTAL, WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA	1,412,510	1,412,510

	TOTAL, ALL WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS	1,545,827	1,545,827

	NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND
020	MPF MLP	134,917	22,717
	Navy requested adjustment		[–112,200]
030	POST DELIVERY AND OUTFITTING	43,404	43,404
050	LG MED SPD RO/RO MAINTENANCE	116,784	116,784
060	DOD MOBILIZATION ALTERATIONS	60,703	60,703
070	TAH MAINTENANCE	19,809	19,809
080	RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT	56,058	56,058
090	READY RESERVE FORCE	299,025	299,025
	TOTAL, NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND	730,700	618,500

	DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM
	DHP O&M
010	IN-HOUSE CARE	8,880,738	8,880,738
020	PRIVATE SECTOR CARE	15,842,732	15,842,732
030	CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT	2,505,640	2,505,640
040	INFORMATION MANAGEMENT	1,450,619	1,450,619
050	MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES	368,248	368,248
060	EDUCATION AND TRAINING	733,097	733,097
070	BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS	1,872,660	1,872,660
070A	UNDISTRIBUTED, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE	0	218,000
	Restore Tricare savings		[218,000]
	SUBTOTAL, DHP O&M	31,653,734	31,871,734
	DHP RDT&E
080	R&D RESEARCH	9,162	9,162
090	R&D EXPLORATRY DEVELOPMENT	47,977	47,977
100	R&D ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT	291,156	291,156
110	R&D DEMONSTRATION/VALIDATION	132,430	132,430
120	R&D ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT	161,674	161,674
130	R&D MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT	72,568	72,568
140	R&D CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT	14,646	14,646
	SUBTOTAL, DHP RDT&E	729,613	729,613
	DHP PROCUREMENT
170	PROC INITIAL OUTFITTING	89,404	89,404
180	PROC REPLACEMENT & MODERNIZATION	377,577	377,577
190	PROC IEHR	204,200	204,200
	SUBTOTAL, DHP PROCUREMENT	671,181	671,181

	TOTAL, DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM	33,054,528	33,272,528

	CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION
01	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE	451,572	451,572
02	RDT&E	604,183	604,183
03	PROCUREMENT	1,368	1,368
	TOTAL, CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION	1,057,123	1,057,123

	DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF
010	DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER DRUG ACTIVITIES	815,965	810,125
	Joint Interagency Task Force—West (PC3309)		[–3,000]
	U.S. European Comman Counternarcotics Hedquaters Support (PC2346)		[–1,640]
	U.S. Special Operations Forces Support to U.S. European Command (PC6505)		[–1,200]
030	DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM	122,580	122,580
	TOTAL, DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF	938,545	932,705

	OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
010	OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE	311,131	347,031
	Program increase		[35,900]
030	PROCUREMENT	1,000	1,000
	TOTAL, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL	312,131	348,031

	TOTAL, OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS	37,638,854	37,774,714

SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.

SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars)
Line	Item	FY 2014 Request	Senate Authorized
	WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY
010	PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS	44,732	44,732
	TOTAL, WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY	44,732	44,732

	WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE
030	FUEL COSTS	88,500	88,500
	TOTAL, WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE	88,500	88,500

	WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE
010	DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA)	131,678	131,678
	TOTAL, WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE	131,678	131,678

	TOTAL, ALL WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS	264,910	264,910

	DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM
	DHP O&M
010	IN-HOUSE CARE	375,958	375,958
020	PRIVATE SECTOR CARE	382,560	382,560
030	CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT	132,749	132,749
040	INFORMATION MANAGEMENT	2,238	2,238
050	MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES	460	460
060	EDUCATION AND TRAINING	10,236	10,236
	SUBTOTAL, DHP O&M	904,201	904,201

	TOTAL, DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM	904,201	904,201

	DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF
010	DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER DRUG ACTIVITIES	376,305	376,305
	TOTAL, DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF	376,305	376,305

	OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
010	OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE	10,766	10,766
	TOTAL, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL	10,766	10,766

	TOTAL, OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS	1,556,182	1,556,182

TITLE XLVI—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION.

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION(In Thousands of Dollars)
Account	State or Country and Installation	Project Title	Budget Request	Senate Authorized
ACTIVE SERVICIES MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
	Alaska
ARMY	Ft Wainwright	Aviation Battalion Complex	45,000	45,000
ARMY	Ft Wainwright	Aviation Storage Hangar	58,000	58,000
	Colorado
ARMY	Ft Carson, CO	Fire Station	12,000	12,000
ARMY	Ft Carson, CO	Headquarters Building	33,000	33,000
ARMY	Ft Carson, CO	Aircraft Maintenance Hangar	73,000	73,000
ARMY	Ft Carson, CO	Aircraft Maintenance Hangar	66,000	66,000
ARMY	Ft Carson, CO	Runway	12,000	12,000
ARMY	Ft Carson, CO	Simulator Building	12,200	12,200
ARMY	Ft Carson, CO	Central Energy Plant	34,000	34,000
	Florida
ARMY	Eglin AFB	Automated Sniper Field Fire Range	4,700	4,700
	GA
ARMY	Ft Gordon	Adv Individual Training Barracks Cplx, Ph2	61,000	61,000
	Hawaii
ARMY	Ft Shafter	Command and Control Facility—Admin	75,000	75,000
	Kansas
ARMY	Ft Leavenworth	Simulations Center	17,000	17,000
	Kentucky
ARMY	Ft Campbell, KY	Battlefield Weather Support Facility	4,800	4,800
	Maryland
ARMY	Aberdeen Proving Gnd	Operations and Maintenance Facilities	21,000	21,000
ARMY	Ft Detrick	Hazardous Material Storage Building	4,600	4,600
ARMY	Ft Detrick	Entry Control Point	2,500	2,500
	Missouri
ARMY	Ft Leonard Wood	Adv Individual Training Barracks Cplx, Ph1	86,000	86,000
ARMY	Ft Leonard Wood	Simulator Building	4,700	4,700
	New York
ARMY	U.S. Military Academy	Cadet Barracks, Incr 2	42,000	42,000
	NC
ARMY	Ft Bragg	Command and Control Facility	5,900	5,900
	Texas
ARMY	Ft Bliss	Control Tower	10,800	10,800
ARMY	Ft Bliss	Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Complex	36,000	36,000
	Virginia
ARMY	Jt Base Langley-Eustis	Adv Individual Training Barracks Cplx, Ph3	50,000	50,000
	Washington
ARMY	Yakima	Automated Multipurpose Machine Gun Range	9,100	9,100
ARMY	Jt Base Lewis-Mcchord	Airfield Operations Complex	37,000	37,000
ARMY	Jt Base Lewis-Mcchord	Aircraft Maintenance Hangar	79,000	79,000
ARMY	Jt Base Lewis-Mcchord	Aviation Battalion Complex	28,000	28,000
	Kwajalein
ARMY	Kwajalein Atoll	Pier	63,000	63,000
	Worldwide Classified
ARMY	Classified Location	Company Operations Complex	33,000	33,000
	Worldwide Unspec
ARMY	Unspec Worldwide	Minor Construction Fy14	25,000	25,000
ARMY	Unspec Worldwide	Planning and Design Fy14	41,575	41,575
ARMY	Unspec Worldwide	Host Nation Support Fy14	33,000	33,000

SUBTOTAL, ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION	1,119,875	1,119,875

NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
	California
NAVY	Barstow	Engine Dynamometer Facility	14,998	14,998
NAVY	Camp Pendleton, CA	Ammunition Supply Point Upgrade	13,124	13,124
NAVY	Point Mugu	Aircraft Engine Test Pads	7,198	7,198
NAVY	Point Mugu	Bams Consolidated Maintenance Hangar	17,469	17,469
NAVY	Port Hueneme	Unaccompanied Housing Conversion	33,600	33,600
NAVY	San Diego	Steam Plant Decentralization	34,331	34,331
NAVY	Twentynine Palms, CA	Camp Wilson Infrastructure Upgrades	33,437	33,437
NAVY	Coronado	H–60 Trainer Facility	8,910	8,910
	Florida
NAVY	Jacksonville	P–8a Training & Parking Apron Expansion	20,752	20,752
NAVY	Key West	Aircraft Crash/Rescue & Fire Headquarters	14,001	14,001
NAVY	Mayport	Lcs Logistics Support Facility	16,093	16,093
	GA
NAVY	Albany	Weapons Storage and Inspection Facility	15,600	15,600
NAVY	Albany	Cers Dispatch Facility	1,010	1,010
NAVY	Savannah	Townsend Bombing Range Land Acq—Phase 1	61,717	61,717
	Hawaii
NAVY	Kaneohe Bay	Armory Addition and Renovation	12,952	12,952
NAVY	Kaneohe Bay	3rd Radio Bn Maintenance/Operations Complex	25,336	25,336
NAVY	Kaneohe Bay	Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Upgrades	31,820	31,820
NAVY	Kaneohe Bay	Aircraft Maintenance Expansion	16,968	16,968
NAVY	Kaneohe Bay	Aviation Simulator Modernization/Addition	17,724	17,724
NAVY	Kaneohe Bay	Mv–22 Parking Apron and Infrastructure	74,665	74,665
NAVY	Kaneohe Bay	Mv–22 Hangar	57,517	57,517
NAVY	Pearl City	Water Transmission Line	30,100	30,100
NAVY	Pearl Harbor	Drydock Waterfront Facility	22,721	22,721
NAVY	Pearl Harbor	Submarine Production Support Facility	35,277	35,277
	Illinois
NAVY	Great Lakes	Unaccompanied Housing	35,851	35,851
	Maine
NAVY	Bangor	Nctams Vlf Commercial Power Connection	13,800	13,800
NAVY	Kittery	Structural Shops Consolidation	11,522	11,522
	Maryland
NAVY	Ft Meade	Marforcybercom HQ-Ops Building	83,988	83,988
	Nevada
NAVY	Fallon	Wastewater Treatment Plant	11,334	11,334
	NC
NAVY	Camp Lejeune, NC	Operations Training Complex	22,515	22,515
NAVY	Camp Lejeune, NC	Landfill—Phase 4	20,795	20,795
NAVY	Camp Lejeune, NC	Steam Decentralization—Camp Johnson	2,620	2,620
NAVY	Camp Lejeune, NC	Steam Decentralization—Hadnot Point	13,390	13,390
NAVY	Camp Lejeune, NC	Steam Decentralization—BEQ Nodes	18,679	18,679
NAVY	New River	Corrosion Control Hangar	12,547	12,547
NAVY	New River	Ch–53k Maintenance Training Facility	13,218	13,218
NAVY	New River	Regional Communication Station	20,098	20,098
	Oklahoma
NAVY	Tinker AFB	Tacamo E–6B Hangar	14,144	14,144
	Rhode Island
NAVY	Newport	Hewitt Hall Research Center	12,422	12,422
	South Carolina
NAVY	Charleston	Nuclear Power Operational Training Facility	73,932	73,932
	Virginia
NAVY	Dam Neck	Aerial Target Operation Consolidation	10,587	10,587
NAVY	Norfolk	Pier 11 Power Upgrades for Cvn–78	3,380	3,380
NAVY	Quantico	Atc Transmitter/Receiver Relocation	3,630	3,630
NAVY	Quantico	Fuller Road Improvements	9,013	9,013
NAVY	Quantico	Academic Instruction Facility Tecom Schools	25,731	25,731
NAVY	Yorktown	Small Arms Ranges	18,700	18,700
	Washington
NAVY	Whidbey Island	Ea–18g Facility Improvements	32,482	32,482
NAVY	Whidbey Island	P–8a Hangar and Training Facilities	85,167	85,167
NAVY	Bremerton	Integrated Water Treatment Sys Dry Docks 3&4	18,189	18,189
NAVY	Kitsap	Explosives Handling Wharf #2 (Inc)	24,880	24,880
	Guam
NAVY	Jt Region Marianas	Bams Forward Operational & Maintenance Hangar	61,702	61,702
NAVY	Jt Region Marianas	Aircraft Maintenance Hangar—North Ramp	85,673	0
NAVY	Jt Region Marianas	Modular Storage Magazines	63,382	63,382
NAVY	Jt Region Marianas	X-Ray Wharf Improvements	53,420	53,420
NAVY	Jt Region Marianas	Emergent Repair Facility Expansion	35,860	35,860
NAVY	Jt Region Marianas	Dehumidified Supply Storage Facility	17,170	17,170
NAVY	Jt Region Marianas	Sierra Wharf Improvements	1,170	1,170
	Japan
NAVY	Yokosuka	Communication System Upgrade	7,568	7,568
NAVY	Camp Butler	Airfield Security Upgrades	5,820	5,820
	Djibouti
NAVY	Camp Lemonier, Djibouti	Armory	6,420	6,420
NAVY	Camp Lemonier, Djibouti	Unaccompanied Housing	22,580	22,580
	Worldwide Unspec
NAVY	Unspec Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Construction	19,740	19,740
NAVY	Unspec Worldwide	Mcon Design Funds	89,830	89,830

SUBTOTAL, NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION	1,700,269	1,614,596

AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
	Arizona
AF	Luke AFB	F–35 Field Training Detachment	5,500	5,500
AF	Luke AFB	F–35 Sq Ops/Aircraft Maintenance Unit #3	21,400	21,400
	California
AF	Beale AFB	Distributed Common Ground Station Ops Bldg	62,000	62,000
	Florida
AF	Tyndall AFB	F–22 Munitions Storage Complex	9,100	9,100
	Hawaii
AF	Jt Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam	C–17 Modernize Hgr 35, Docks 1&2	4,800	4,800
	Kansas
AF	Mcconnell AFB	KC–46a 1–Bay Maintenance Hangar (Air Force Requested Change)		32,000
AF	Mcconnell AFB	KC–46a 2–Bay Corrosion/Fuel Hangar (Air Force Requested Change)		82,000
AF	Mcconnell AFB	KC–46a 3–Bay General Purpose Maintenance Hangar (Air Force Requested Change)		80,000
AF	Mcconnell AFB	KC–46a Adal Flight Simulator Buildings (Air Force Requested Change)		2,150
AF	Mcconnell AFB	KC–46a Alter Aircraft Parking Apron (Air Force Requested Change)		2,200
AF	Mcconnell AFB	KC–46a Alter Apron Fuels Distribution Systems (Air Force Requested Change)		12,800
AF	Mcconnell AFB	KC–46a Alter Miscellaneous Facilities (Air Force Requested Change)		970
AF	Mcconnell AFB	KC–46a Pipeline Student Dormitory (Air Force Requested Change)		7,000
	Kentucky
AF	Ft Campbell, KY	19th Air Support Operations Sqdrn Expansion	8,000	8,000
	Maryland
AF	Ft Meade	Cybercom Joint Operations Center, Increment 1	85,000	85,000
AF	Jt Base Andrews	Helicopter Operations Facility	30,000	30,000
	Missouri
AF	Whiteman AFB	Wsa Mop Igloos and Assembly Facility	5,900	5,900
	Nebraska
AF	Offutt AFB	Usstratcom Replacement Facility, Incr 3	136,000	136,000
	Nevada
AF	Nellis AFB	Dormitory (240 Rm)	35,000	35,000
AF	Nellis AFB	F–35 Alt Mission Equip (Ame) Storage	5,000	5,000
AF	Nellis AFB	F–35 Parts Store	9,100	9,100
AF	Nellis AFB	F–35 Fuel Cell Hangar	9,400	9,400
AF	Nellis AFB	Add Rpa Weapons School Facility	20,000	20,000
	New Mexico
AF	Cannon AFB	Airmen and Family Readiness Center	5,500	5,500
AF	Cannon AFB	Satellite Dining Facility	6,600	6,600
AF	Cannon AFB	Dormitory (144 Rm)	22,000	22,000
AF	Holloman AFB	F–16 Aircraft Covered Washrack and Pad	2,250	2,250
AF	Kirtland AFB	Nuclear Systems Wing & Sustainment Center (Ph	30,500	30,500
	North Dakota
AF	Minot AFB	B–52 Adal Aircraft Maintenance Unit	15,530	15,530
AF	Minot AFB	B–52 Munitions Storage Igloos	8,300	8,300
	Oklahoma
AF	Tinker AFB	KC–46a Land Acquisition	8,600	8,600
AF	Altus AFB	KC–46a Ftu Adal Fuel Systems Maintenance Dock for Hangar (Air Force Requested Change)		3,350
AF	Altus AFB	KC–46a Ftu Adal Squadron Operations/AMU (Air Force Requested Change)		7,400
AF	Altus AFB	KC–46a Ftu Ftc Simulator Facility (Air Force Requested Change)		12,600
AF	Altus AFB	KC–46a Ftu Fuselage Trainer (Air Force Requested Change)		6,300
AF	Altus AFB	KC–46a Renovate Facility for 97 Og and 97 Mxts (Air Force Requested Change)		1,200
	Texas
AF	Ft Bliss	F–16 Bak 12/14 Aircraft Arresting System	3,350	3,350
	Utah
AF	Hill AFB	Fire Crash Rescue Station	18,500	18,500
AF	Hill AFB	F–35 Aircraft Mx Unit Hangar 45e Ops #1	13,500	13,500
	Virginia
AF	Jt Base Langley-Eustis	4–Bay Conventional Munitions Inspection Bldg	4,800	4,800
	Greenland
AF	Thule Ab	Thule Consolidation, Phase 2	43,904	43,904
	Guam
AF	Jt Region Marianas	Par—Tanker Gp Mx Hangar/AMU/Sqd Ops	132,600	0
AF	Jt Region Marianas	Par—Fuel Sys Hardened Bldgs	20,000	0
AF	Jt Region Marianas	Par—Strike Tactical Missile Mxs Facility	10,530	10,530
AF	Jt Region Marianas	Prtc Red Horse Airfield Operations Facility	8,500	8,500
AF	Jt Region Marianas	Prtc Sf Fire Rescue & Emergency Mgt	4,600	4,600
	Mariana Islands
AF	Saipan	Par—Maintenance Facility	2,800	2,800
AF	Saipan	Par—Airport Pol/Bulk Storage Ast	18,500	18,500
AF	Saipan	Par—Hazardous Cargo Pad	8,000	8,000
	United Kingdom
AF	Royal AF Lakenheath	Guardian Angel Operations Facility	22,047	0
AF	Croughton Raf	Main Gate Complex	12,000	0
	Worldwide Unspec
AF	Unspec Worldwide	KC–46a Mob #1 Facility Projects	192,700	0

		Air Force Requested Change		[–192,700]
	Worldwide Unspec
AF	Unspec Worldwide	KC–46a Ftu Facility Projects	63,000	0

		Air Force Requested Change		[–63,000]
	Worldwide Unspec
AF	Unspec Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Construction	20,448	20,448
AF	Unspec Worldwide	Planning & Design	11,314	11,314

SUBTOTAL, AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION	1,156,573	964,196

DEFENSE-WIDE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
	Belgium
DEFW	Brussels	NATO Headquarters Facility	38,513	38,513
DEFW	Brussels	NATO Headquarters Fit-Out	29,100	29,100
	Worldwide Unspec
DEFW	Unspec Worldwide	Energy Conservation Investment Prgm	150,000	150,000
DEFW	Unspec Worldwide	Contingency Construction	10,000	10,000
	Hawaii
DISA	Ford Island	DISA Pacific Facility Upgrades	2,615	2,615
	California
DLA	Defense Dist Depot-Tracy	General Purpose Warehouse	37,554	37,554
DLA	Miramar	Replace Fuel Pipeline	6,000	6,000
	Florida
DLA	Jacksonville	Replace Fuel Pipeline	7,500	7,500
DLA	Panama City	Replace Ground Vehicle Fueling Facility	2,600	2,600
DLA	Tyndall AFB	Replace Fuel Pipeline	9,500	9,500
	GA
DLA	Moody AFB	Replace Ground Vehicle Fueling Facility	3,800	3,800
DLA	Hunter Army Airfield	Replace Fuel Island	13,500	13,500
	Hawaii
DLA	Jt Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam	Alter Warehouse Space	2,800	2,800
	New Jersey
DLA	Jt Base Mcguire-Dix-Lakehurst	Replace Fuel Distribution Components	10,000	10,000
	New Mexico
DLA	Holloman AFB	Replace Hydrant Fuel System	21,400	21,400
	North Dakota
DLA	Minot AFB	Replace Fuel Pipeline	6,400	6,400
	Oklahoma
DLA	Altus AFB	Replace Refueler Parking	2,100	2,100
DLA	Tinker AFB	Replace Fuel Distribution Facilities	36,000	36,000
	Pennsylvania
DLA	Def Dist Depot New Cumberland	Upgrade Public Safety Facility	5,900	5,900
DLA	Def Dist Depot New Cumberland	Upgrade Hazardous Material Warehouse	3,100	3,100
	Tennessee
DLA	Arnold AF Base	Replace Ground Vehicle Fueling Facility	2,200	2,200
	Virginia
DLA	Def Dist Depot Richmond	Operations Center Phase 1	87,000	87,000
	Washington
DLA	Whidbey Island	Replace Fuel Pier Breakwater	10,000	10,000
	Japan
DLA	Atsugi	Replace Ground Vehicle Fueling Facility	4,100	4,100
DLA	Iwakuni	Construct Hydrant Fuel System	34,000	34,000
DLA	Yokosuka	Upgrade Fuel Pumps	10,600	10,600
	United Kingdom
DLA	Raf Mildenhall	Replace Fuel Storage	17,732	0
	GA
DODEA	Ft Benning	Faith Middle School Addition	6,031	6,031
DODEA	Ft Benning	White Elemtary School Replacement	37,304	37,304
DODEA	Ft Stewart, GA	Diamond Elementary School Replacement	44,504	44,504
	Kentucky
DODEA	Ft Campbell, KY	Marshall Elementary School Replacement	38,591	38,591
DODEA	Ft Campbell, KY	Fort Campbell High School Replacement	59,278	59,278
DODEA	Ft Knox	Consolidate/Replace Van Voorhis-Mudge Es	38,023	38,023
	Massachusetts
DODEA	Hanscom AFB	Hanscom Primary School Replacement	36,213	36,213
	NC
DODEA	Ft Bragg	Consolidate/Replace Pope Holbrook Elementary	37,032	37,032
	South Carolina
DODEA	Beauft	Bolden Elementary/Middle School Replacement	41,324	41,324
	Virginia
DODEA	Quantico	Quantico Middle/High School Replacement	40,586	40,586
	Germany
DODEA	Kaiserlautern Ab	Kaiserslautern Elementary School Replacement	49,907	0
DODEA	Ramstein Ab	Ramstein High School Replacement	98,762	0
DODEA	Weisbaden	Hainerberg Elementary School Replacement	58,899	0
DODEA	Weisbaden	Wiesbaden Middle School Replacement	50,756	0
	Japan
DODEA	Kadena Ab	Kadena Middle School Addition/Renovation	38,792	38,792
	Korea
DODEA	Camp Walker	Daegu Middle/High School Replacement	52,164	52,164
	United Kingdom
DODEA	Royal AF Lakenheath	Lakenheath High School Replacement	69,638	0
	Alaska
MDA	Clear AFS	Bmds Upgrade Early Warning Radar	17,204	17,204
MDA	Ft Greely	Mechanical-Electrical Bldg Missile Field #1	82,000	82,000
	Romania
MDA	Deveselu, Romania	Aegis Ashore Missile Def Sys Cmplx, Increm. 2	85,000	85,000
	Worldwide Classified
MDA	Classified Location	an/Tpy–2 Radar Site	15,000	15,000
	Maryland
NSA	Ft Meade	NSAW Recapitalize Building #1/Site M Inc 2	58,000	58,000
NSA	Ft Meade	High Performance Computing Capacity Inc 3	431,000	381,000
	California
SOCOM	Brawley	SOF Desert Warfare Training Center	23,095	23,095
	Colorado
SOCOM	Ft Carson, CO	SOF Group Support Battalion	22,282	22,282
	Florida
SOCOM	Hurlburt Field	SOF Add/Alter Operations Facility	7,900	7,900
SOCOM	Key West	SOF Boat Docks	3,600	3,600
	Kentucky
SOCOM	Ft Campbell, KY	SOF Group Special Troops Battalion	26,342	26,342
	NC
SOCOM	Camp Lejeune, NC	SOF Performance Resiliency Center	14,400	14,400
SOCOM	Camp Lejeune, NC	SOF Sustainment Training Complex	28,977	28,977
SOCOM	Ft Bragg	SOF Upgrade Training Facility	14,719	14,719
SOCOM	Ft Bragg	SOF Engineer Training Facility	10,419	10,419
SOCOM	Ft Bragg	SOF Civil Affairs Battalion Annex	37,689	37,689
SOCOM	Ft Bragg	SOF Language and Cultural Center	64,606	64,606
SOCOM	Ft Bragg	SOF Combat Medic Skills Sustain. Course Bldg	7,600	7,600
	Virginia
SOCOM	Dam Neck	SOF Human Performance Center	11,147	11,147
SOCOM	Jt Exp Base Little Creek—Story	SOF Logsu Two Operations Facility	30,404	30,404
	Japan
SOCOM	Torri Commo Station	SOF Facility Augmentation	71,451	71,451
	United Kingdom
SOCOM	Raf Mildenhall	SOF Squadron Operations Facility	11,652	0
SOCOM	Raf Mildenhall	SOF Hangar/AMU	24,371	0
SOCOM	Raf Mildenhall	SOF Airfiled Pavements	24,077	0
SOCOM	Raf Mildenhall	SOF Mrsp and Parts Storage	6,797	0
	Kentucky
TMA	Ft Knox	Ambulatory Health Center	265,000	75,000
	Maryland
TMA	Aberdeen Proving Gnd	Public Health Command Lab Replacement	210,000	75,000
TMA	Bethesda Naval Hospital	Mech & Electrical Improvements	46,800	46,800
TMA	Bethesda Naval Hospital	Parking Garage	20,000	20,000
TMA	Ft Detrick	USAMRIID Replacement Stage 1, Incr 8	13,000	13,000
TMA	Jt Base Andrews	Ambulatory Care Center Inc 2	76,200	38,100
	New Mexico
TMA	Holloman AFB	Medical Clinic Replacement	60,000	60,000
	Texas
TMA	Ft Bliss	Hospital Replacement Incr 5	252,100	100,000
TMA	Jt Base San Antonio	Sammc Hyperbaric Facility Addition	12,600	12,600
	Bahrain Island
TMA	Sw Asia	Medical/Dental Clinic Replacement	45,400	45,400
	Germany
TMA	Rhine Ordnance Barracks	Medical Center Replacement, Incr 3	151,545	76,545
	Virginia
WHS	Pentagon	Pfpa Support Operations Center	14,800	14,800
WHS	Pentagon	Boundary Channel Access Control Point	6,700	6,700
WHS	Pentagon	Army Navy Drive Tour Bus Drop Off	1,850	0
WHS	Pentagon	Raven Rock Exterior Cooling Tower	4,100	4,100
WHS	Pentagon	Raven Rock Administrative Facility Upgrade	32,000	32,000
	Worldwide Unspec
DEFW	Unspec Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Construction	3,000	3,000
DLA	Unspec Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Construction	7,430	7,430
DODEA	Unspec Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Construction	5,409	5,409
MDA	Unspec Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Construction	2,000	2,000
NSA	Unspec Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Construction	1,500	1,500
SOCOM	Unspec Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Construction	5,170	5,170
TJS	Unspec Worldwide	Exercise Related Minor Construction	9,730	9,730
TMA	Unspec Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Construction	9,578	9,578
DEFW	Unspec Worldwide	Planning and Design	50,192	50,192
DODEA	Unspec Worldwide	Planning and Design	75,905	75,905
MDA	Unspec Worldwide	Planning & Design	10,891	10,891
NSA	Unspec Worldwide	Planning and Design	57,053	57,053
SOCOM	Unspec Worldwide	Planning and Design	36,866	36,866
WHS	Unspec Worldwide	Planning and Design	6,931	6,931

SUBTOTAL, DEFENSE-WIDE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION	3,985,300	2,930,659
SUBTOTAL, ACTIVE SERVICES MILITARY CONSTRUCTION	7,962,017	6,629,326


NATIONAL GUARD MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
	Alabama
ARMY	Decatur	National Guard Readiness Center Add/Alt	4,000	4,000
	Arkansas
ARMY	Ft Chaffee	Scout/Recce Gunnery Complex	21,000	21,000
	Florida
ARMY	Pinellas Park	Ready Building	5,700	5,700
	Illinois
ARMY	Kankakee	Readiness Center	14,000	14,000
ARMY	Kankakee	Aircraft Maintenance Hangar	28,000	28,000
	Massachusetts
ARMY	Camp Edwards	Enlisted Barracks, Transient Training Add	19,000	19,000
	Michigan
ARMY	Camp Grayling	Enlisted Barracks, Transient Training	17,000	17,000
	Minnesota
ARMY	Stillwater	Readiness Center	17,000	17,000
	Mississippi
ARMY	Camp Shelby	Water Supply/Treatment Building, Potable	3,000	3,000
ARMY	Pascagoula	Readiness Center	4,500	4,500
	Missouri
ARMY	Macon	Vehicle Maintenance Shop	9,100	9,100
ARMY	Whiteman AFB	Aircraft Maintenance Hangar	5,000	5,000
	New York
ARMY	New York	Readiness Center Add/Alt	31,000	31,000
	Ohio
ARMY	Ravenna Army Ammu Plant	Sanitary Sewer	5,200	5,200
	Pennsylvania
ARMY	Ft Indiantown Gap	Aircraft Maintenance Instructional Building	40,000	40,000
	South Carolina
ARMY	Greenville	Vehicle Maintenance Shop	13,000	13,000
ARMY	Greenville	Readiness Center	13,000	13,000
	Texas
ARMY	Ft Worth	Armed Forces Reserve Center Add	14,270	14,270
	Wyoming
ARMY	Afton	National Guard Readiness Center	10,200	10,200
	Puerto Rico
ARMY	Camp Santiago	Maneuver Area Training & Equipment Site Addit	5,600	5,600
	Worldwide Unspec
ARMY	Unspec Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Construction	12,240	12,240
ARMY	Unspec Worldwide	Planning and Design	29,005	29,005

SUBTOTAL, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD MILITARY CONSTRUCTION	320,815	320,815

AIR NATIONAL GUARD MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
	Alabama
AF	Birmingham IAP	Add to and Alter Distributed Ground Station F	8,500	8,500
	Indiana
AF	Hulman Regional Airport	Add/Alter Bldg 37 for Dist Common Ground Sta	7,300	7,300
	Maryland
AF	Ft Meade	175th Network Warfare Squadron Facility	4,000	4,000
AF	Martin State Airport	Cyber/ISR Facility	8,000	8,000
	Montana
AF	Great Falls IAP	Intra-Theater Airlift Conversion	22,000	22,000
	New York
AF	Ft Drum, New York	Mq–9 Flight Training Unit Hangar	4,700	4,700
	Ohio
AF	Springfield Beckley-Map	Alter Intelligence Operations Facility	7,200	7,200
	Pennsylvania
AF	Ft Indiantown Gap	Communications Operations and Training Facili	7,700	7,700
	Rhode Island
AF	Quonset State Airport	C–130J Flight Simulator Training Facility	6,000	6,000
	Tennessee
AF	Mcghee-Tyson Airport	Tec Expansion- Dormitory & Classroom Facility	18,000	18,000
	Worldwide Unspec
AF	Various Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Construction	13,000	13,000
AF	Various Worldwide	Planning and Design	13,400	13,400

SUBTOTAL, AIR NATIONAL GUARD MILITARY CONSTRUCTION	119,800	119,800
SUBTOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD MILITARY CONSTRUCTION	440,615	440,615


RESERVE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
ARMY RESERVE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
	California
ARMY	Camp Parks	Army Reserve Center	17,500	17,500
ARMY	Ft Hunter Liggett	Tass Training Center (Ttc)	16,500	16,500
	Maryland
ARMY	Bowie	Army Reserve Center	25,500	25,500
	New Jersey
ARMY	Jt Base Mcguire-Dix-Lakehurst	Consolidated Dining Facility	13,400	13,400
ARMY	Jt Base Mcguire-Dix-Lakehurst	Central Issue Facility	7,900	7,900
ARMY	Jt Base Mcguire-Dix-Lakehurst	Automated Multipurpose Machine Gun (Mpmg)	9,500	9,500
ARMY	Jt Base Mcguire-Dix-Lakehurst	Modified Record Fire Range	5,400	5,400
	New York
ARMY	Bullville	Army Reserve Center	14,500	14,500
	NC
ARMY	Ft Bragg	Army Reserve Center	24,500	24,500
	Wisconsin
ARMY	Ft Mccoy	Access Control Point/Mail/Freight Center	17,500	17,500
ARMY	Ft Mccoy	Nco Academy Dining Facility	5,900	5,900
	Worldwide Unspec
ARMY	Unspec Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Construction	1,748	1,748
ARMY	Unspec Worldwide	Planning and Design	14,212	14,212

SUBTOTAL, ARMY RESERVE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION	174,060	174,060

NAVY RESERVE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
	California
NAVY	March AFB	NOSC Moreno Valley Reserve Training Center	11,086	11,086
	Missouri
NAVY	Kansas City	Reserve Training Center—Belton, Missouri	15,020	15,020
	Tennessee
NAVY	Memphis	Reserve Boat Maintenance and Storage Facility	4,330	4,330
	Worldwide Unspec
NAVY	Unspec Worldwide	Usmcr Planning and Design	1,040	1,040
NAVY	Unspec Worldwide	Mcnr Planning & Design	1,500	1,500

SUBTOTAL, NAVY RESERVE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION	32,976	32,976

AIR FORCE RESERVE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
	California
AF	March AFB	Joint Regional Deployment Processing Center,	19,900	19,900
	Florida
AF	Homestead AFS	Entry Control Complex	9,800	9,800
	Oklahoma
AF	Tinker AFB	Air Control Group Squadron Operations	12,200	12,200
	Worldwide Unspec
AF	Various Worldwide	Unspecified Minor Construction	1,530	1,530
AF	Various Worldwide	Planning and Design	2,229	2,229

SUBTOTAL, AIR FORCE RESERVE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION	45,659	45,659
SUBTOTAL, RESERVE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION	252,695	252,695

TOTAL, MILITARY CONSTRUCTION MAJOR ACCOUNTS	8,655,327	7,322,636

CHEM-DEMIL
	Kentucky
ARMY	Blue Grass Army Depot	Ammunition Demilitarization Facility, Ph Xiv	122,536	122,536

SUBTOTAL, CHEM-DEMIL	122,536	122,536

NATO SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM
	Worldwide Unspec
DEFW	NATO Security Investment Prgm	NATO Security Investment Prgm	239,700	239,700

SUBTOTAL, NATO SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM	239,700	239,700

MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
ARMY FAMILY HOUSING
ARMY FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION
	Wisconsin
ARMY	Ft Mccoy	Family Housing New Construction (56 Units)	23,000	23,000
	Germany
ARMY	South Camp Vilseck	Family Housing New Construction (29 Units)	16,600	0
	Worldwide Unspec
ARMY	Unspec Worldwide	Family Housing P & D	4,408	4,408

SUBTOTAL, ARMY FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION	44,008	27,408

ARMY FAMILY HOUSING O&M
	Worldwide Unspec
ARMY	Unspec Worldwide	Utilities	96,907	96,907
ARMY	Unspec Worldwide	Management Account	54,433	54,433
ARMY	Unspec Worldwide	Services	13,536	13,536
ARMY	Unspec Worldwide	Furnishings	33,125	33,125
ARMY	Unspec Worldwide	Miscellaneous	646	646
ARMY	Unspec Worldwide	Leased Housing	180,924	180,924
ARMY	Unspec Worldwide	Maintenance of Real Property Facilities	107,639	107,639
ARMY	Unspec Worldwide	Military Housing Privitization Initiative	25,661	25,661

SUBTOTAL, ARMY FAMILY HOUSING O&M	512,871	512,871
SUBTOTAL, ARMY FAMILY HOUSING	556,879	540,279

NAVY FAMILY HOUSING
NAVY FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION
	Worldwide Unspec
NAVY	Unspec Worldwide	Improvements	68,969	68,969
NAVY	Unspec Worldwide	Design	4,438	4,438

SUBTOTAL, NAVY FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION	73,407	73,407

NAVY FAMILY HOUSING O&M
	Worldwide Unspec
NAVY	Unspec Worldwide	Utilities Account	94,313	94,313
NAVY	Unspec Worldwide	Furnishings Account	21,073	21,073
NAVY	Unspec Worldwide	Management Account	60,782	60,782
NAVY	Unspec Worldwide	Miscellaneous Account	362	362
NAVY	Unspec Worldwide	Services Account	20,596	20,596
NAVY	Unspec Worldwide	Leasing	74,962	74,962
NAVY	Unspec Worldwide	Maintenance of Real Property	90,122	90,122
NAVY	Unspec Worldwide	Privatization Support Costs	27,634	27,634

SUBTOTAL, NAVY FAMILY HOUSING O&M	389,844	389,844
SUBTOTAL, NAVY FAMILY HOUSING	463,251	463,251

AIR FORCE FAMILY HOUSING
AIR FORCE FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION
	Worldwide Unspec
AF	Unspec Worldwide	Improvements	72,093	72,093
AF	Unspec Worldwide	Planning and Design	4,267	4,267

SUBTOTAL, AIR FORCE FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION	76,360	76,360

AIR FORCE FAMILY HOUSING O&M
	Worldwide Unspec
AF	Unspec Worldwide	Utilities Account	70,532	70,532
AF	Unspec Worldwide	Management Account	53,044	53,044
AF	Unspec Worldwide	Services Account	16,862	16,862
AF	Unspec Worldwide	Furnishings Account	39,470	39,470
AF	Unspec Worldwide	Miscellaneous Account	1,954	1,954
AF	Unspec Worldwide	Leasing	54,514	54,514
AF	Unspec Worldwide	Maintenance (Rpma Rpmc)	110,786	110,786
AF	Unspec Worldwide	Housing Privatization	41,436	41,436

SUBTOTAL, AIR FORCE FAMILY HOUSING O&M	388,598	388,598
SUBTOTAL, AIR FORCE FAMILY HOUSING	464,958	464,958

DEFENSE-WIDE FAMILY HOUSING
DEFENSE-WIDE FAMILY HOUSING O&M
	Worldwide Unspec
DLA	Unspec Worldwide	Utilities Account	288	288
NSA	Unspec Worldwide	Utilities Account	12	12
DIA	Unspec Worldwide	Furnishings Account	3,196	3,196
DLA	Unspec Worldwide	Furnishings Account	20	20
DLA	Unspec Worldwide	Services Account	32	32
DLA	Unspec Worldwide	Management Account	418	418
NSA	Unspec Worldwide	Furnishings Account	67	67
DIA	Unspec Worldwide	Leasing	40,433	40,433
NSA	Unspec Worldwide	Leasing	10,994	10,994
DLA	Unspec Worldwide	Maintenance of Real Property	311	311
NSA	Unspec Worldwide	Maintenance of Real Property	74	74

SUBTOTAL, DEFENSE-WIDE FAMILY HOUSING O&M	55,845	55,845
SUBTOTAL, DEFENSE-WIDE FAMILY HOUSING	55,845	55,845

DOD FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND
	Worldwide Unspec
DEFW	Unspec Worldwide	Family Housing Improvement Fund	1,780	1,780

SUBTOTAL, DOD FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND	1,780	1,780

TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING	1,542,713	1,526,113

BASE REALIGNMENT & CLOSURE
ARMY BASE REALIGNMENT & CLOSURE
	Worldwide Unspec
ARMY	BRAC, Army	Base Realignment and Closure	180,401	180,401

SUBTOTAL, ARMY BASE REALIGNMENT & CLOSURE	180,401	180,401

NAVY BASE REALIGNMENT & CLOSURE
	Worldwide Unspec
NAVY	BRAC, Navy	Base Realignment & Closure	108,300	108,300
NAVY	Unspec Worldwide	Don–172: NWS Seal Beach, Concord, CA	5,766	5,766
NAVY	Unspec Worldwide	Don–138: NAS Brunswick, ME	993	993
NAVY	Unspec Worldwide	Don–157: Mcsa Kansas City, MO	40	40
NAVY	Unspec Worldwide	Don–84: JRB Willow Grove & Cambria Reg Ap	1,216	1,216
NAVY	Unspec Worldwide	Don–100: Planing, Design and Management	7,277	7,277
NAVY	Unspec Worldwide	Don–101: Various Locations	20,988	20,988

SUBTOTAL, NAVY BASE REALIGNMENT & CLOSURE	144,580	144,580

AIR FORCE BASE REALIGNMENT & CLOSURE
	Worldwide Unspec
AF	Unspec Worldwide	Dod BRAC Activities—AF	126,376	126,376

SUBTOTAL, AIR FORCE BASE REALIGNMENT & CLOSURE	126,376	126,376

TOTAL, BASE REALIGNMENT & CLOSURE	451,357	451,357

TOTAL, MILITARY CONSTRUCTION SECONDARY ACCOUNTS	2,356,306	2,339,706

GRAND TOTAL, MILITARY CONSTRUCTION	11,011,633	9,662,342

TITLE XLVII—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS.

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS(In Thousands of Dollars)
Program	FY 2014 Request	Senate Authorized
ELECTRICITY DELIVERY & ENERGY RELIABILITY
ELECTRICITY DELIVERY & ENERGY RELIABILITY
INFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY & ENERGY RESTORATION (HS)	16,000	0
Not a defense function		[–16,000]
TOTAL, ELECTRICITY DELIVERY & ENERGY RELIABILITY	16,000	0

NUCLEAR ENERGY
IDAHO SITEWIDE SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY	94,000	94,000
TOTAL, NUCLEAR ENERGY	94,000	94,000

WEAPONS ACTIVITIES
LIFE EXTENSION PROGRAMS AND MAJOR ALTERATIONS
B61 LIFE EXTENSION PROGRAM	537,044	537,044
W76 LIFE EXTENSION PROGRAM	235,382	235,382
W78/88–1 LIFE EXTENSION PROGRAM	72,691	72,691
W88 ALT 370	169,487	169,487
TOTAL, STOCKPILE ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN	1,014,604	1,014,604

STOCKPILE SYSTEMS
B61 STOCKPILE SYSTEMS	83,536	83,536
W76 STOCKPILE SYSTEMS	47,187	47,187
W78 STOCKPILE SYSTEMS	54,381	54,381
W80 STOCKPILE SYSTEMS	50,330	50,330
B83 STOCKPILE SYSTEMS	54,948	54,948
W87 STOCKPILE SYSTEMS	101,506	101,506
W88 STOCKPILE SYSTEMS	62,600	62,600
TOTAL, STOCKPILE SYSTEMS	454,488	454,488

WEAPONS DISMANTLEMENT AND DISPOSITION
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE	49,264	49,264

STOCKPILE SERVICES
PRODUCTION SUPPORT	321,416	321,416
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT	26,349	26,349
R&D CERTIFICATION AND SAFETY	191,259	191,259
MANAGEMENT, TECHNOLOGY, AND PRODUCTION	214,187	214,187
PLUTONIUM SUSTAINMENT	156,949	156,949
TOTAL, STOCKPILE SERVICES	910,160	910,160
TOTAL, DIRECTED STOCKPILE WORK	2,428,516	2,428,516

CAMPAIGNS:
SCIENCE CAMPAIGN
ADVANCED CERTIFICATION	54,730	54,730
PRIMARY ASSESSMENT TECHNOLOGIES	109,231	109,231
DYNAMIC MATERIALS PROPERTIES	116,965	116,965
ADVANCED RADIOGRAPHY	30,509	30,509
SECONDARY ASSESSMENT TECHNOLOGIES	86,467	86,467
TOTAL, SCIENCE CAMPAIGN	397,902	397,902

ENGINEERING CAMPAIGN
ENHANCED SURETY	51,771	51,771
WEAPON SYSTEMS ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT TECHNOLOGY	23,727	23,727
NUCLEAR SURVIVABILITY	19,504	19,504
ENHANCED SURVEILLANCE	54,909	54,909
TOTAL, ENGINEERING CAMPAIGN	149,911	149,911

INERTIAL CONFINEMENT FUSION IGNITION AND HIGH YIELD CAMPAIGN
IGNITION	80,245	80,245
SUPPORT OF OTHER STOCKPILE PROGRAMS	15,001	15,001
DIAGNOSTICS, CRYOGENICS AND EXPERIMENTAL SUPPORT	59,897	59,897
PULSED POWER INERTIAL CONFINEMENT FUSION	5,024	5,024
JOINT PROGRAM IN HIGH ENERGY DENSITY LABORATORY PLASMAS	8,198	8,198
FACILITY OPERATIONS AND TARGET PRODUCTION	232,678	232,678
TOTAL, INERTIAL CONFINEMENT FUSION AND HIGH YIELD CAMPAIGN	401,043	401,043

ADVANCED SIMULATION AND COMPUTING CAMPAIGN	564,329	564,329

READINESS CAMPAIGN
COMPONENT MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT	106,085	106,085
TRITIUM READINESS	91,695	91,695
TOTAL, READINESS CAMPAIGN	197,780	197,780
TOTAL, CAMPAIGNS	1,710,965	1,710,965

NUCLEAR PROGRAMS
NUCLEAR OPERATIONS CAPABILITY	265,937	265,937
CAPABILITIES BASED INVESTMENTS	39,558	39,558
CONSTRUCTION:
12–D–301 TRU WASTE FACILITIES, LANL	26,722	26,722
11–D–801 TA–55 REINVESTMENT PROJECT PHASE 2, LANL	30,679	30,679
07–D–220 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE TREATMENT FACILITY UPGRADE PROJECT, LANL	55,719	55,719
06–D–141 PED/CONSTRUCTION, URANIUM CAPABILITIES REPLACEMENT PROJECT Y–12	325,835	325,835
TOTAL, CONSTRUCTION	438,955	438,955
TOTAL, NUCLEAR PROGRAMS	744,450	744,450

SECURE TRANSPORTATION ASSET
OPERATIONS AND EQUIPMENT	122,072	122,072
PROGRAM DIRECTION	97,118	97,118
TOTAL, SECURE TRANSPORTATION ASSET	219,190	219,190

SITE STEWARDSHIP
NUCLEAR MATERIALS INTEGRATION	17,679	17,679
CORPORATE PROJECT MANAGEMENT	13,017	13,017

MINORITY SERVING INSTITUTION PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM	14,531	14,531

ENTERPRISE INFRASTRUCTURE
SITE OPERATIONS	1,112,455	1,112,455
SITE SUPPORT	109,561	109,561
SUSTAINMENT	433,764	433,764
FACILITIES DISPOSITION	5,000	5,000
SUBTOTAL, ENTERPRISE INFRASTRUCTURE	1,660,780	1,660,780
TOTAL, SITE STEWARDSHIP	1,706,007	1,706,007

DEFENSE NUCLEAR SECURITY
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE	664,981	664,981
CONSTRUCTION:
14–D–710 DAF ARGUS, NNSS	14,000	14,000
TOTAL, DEFENSE NUCLEAR SECURITY	678,981	678,981

NNSA CIO ACTIVITIES	148,441	148,441

LEGACY CONTRACTOR PENSIONS	279,597	279,597
SUBTOTAL, WEAPONS ACTIVITIES	7,916,147	7,916,147

ADJUSTMENTS
USE OF PRIOR YEAR BALANCES	–47,738	–47,738
TOTAL, ADJUSTMENTS	–47,738	–47,738
TOTAL, WEAPONS ACTIVITIES	7,868,409	7,868,409

DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION
DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION PROGRAMS
GLOBAL THREAT REDUCTION INITIATIVE	424,487	424,487

DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION R&D
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE	388,838	388,838

NONPROLIFERATION AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY	141,675	141,675

INTERNATIONAL MATERIAL PROTECTION AND COOPERATION	369,625	369,625

FISSILE MATERIALS DISPOSITION
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
U.S. PLUTONIUM DISPOSITION	157,557	157,557
U.S. URANIUM DISPOSITION	25,000	25,000
TOTAL, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE	182,557	182,557
CONSTRUCTION:
99–D–143 MIXED OXIDE FUEL FABRICATION FACILITY, SAVANNAH RIVER, SC	320,000	400,000
Program increase		[80,000]
TOTAL, CONSTRUCTION	320,000	400,000
TOTAL, U.S. SURPLUS FISSILE MATERIALS DISPOSITION	502,557	582,557
TOTAL, FISSILE MATERIALS DISPOSITION	502,557	582,557

LEGACY CONTRACTOR PENSIONS	93,703	93,703
TOTAL, DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION PROGRAMS	1,920,885	2,000,885

NUCLEAR COUNTERTERRORISM INCIDENT RESPONSE PROGRAM	181,293	181,293

COUNTERTERRORISM AND COUNTERPROLIFERATION PROGRAMS	74,666	74,666
SUBTOTAL, DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION	2,176,844	2,256,844

ADJUSTMENTS
USE OF PRIOR YEAR BALANCES	–36,702	–36,702
TOTAL, ADJUSTMENTS	–36,702	–36,702
TOTAL, DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION	2,140,142	2,220,142

NAVAL REACTORS
NAVAL REACTORS OPERATIONS AND INFRASTRUCTURE	455,740	453,740
Excess to need		[–2,000]
NAVAL REACTORS DEVELOPMENT	419,400	419,400
OHIO REPLACEMENT REACTOR SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	126,400	126,400
S8G PROTOTYPE REFUELING	144,400	144,400
PROGRAM DIRECTION	44,404	44,404
CONSTRUCTION:
14–D–902 KL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION LABORATORY EXPANSION, KAPL	1,000	1,000
14–D–901 SPENT FUEL HANDLING RECAPITALIZATION PROJECT, NRF	45,400	45,400
13–D–905 REMOTE-HANDLED LOW-LEVEL WASTE FACILITY, INL	21,073	21,073
13–D–904 KS RADIOLOGICAL WORK AND STORAGE BUILDING, KSO	600	2,600
Program increase		[2,000]
NAVAL REACTOR FACILITY, ID	1,700	1,700
TOTAL, CONSTRUCTION	69,773	71,773
SUBTOTAL, NAVAL REACTORS	1,260,117	1,260,117

ADJUSTMENTS:
USE OF PRIOR YEAR BALANCES (NAVAL REACTORS)	–13,983	–13,983
TOTAL, NAVAL REACTORS	1,246,134	1,246,134

OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR
OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR	397,784	397,784
TOTAL, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR	397,784	397,784

DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP
CLOSURE SITES:
CLOSURE SITES ADMINISTRATION	4,702	4,702

HANFORD SITE:
RIVER CORRIDOR AND OTHER CLEANUP OPERATIONS	393,634	413,634
Program increase		[20,000]
CENTRAL PLATEAU REMEDIATION	513,450	513,450
RICHLAND COMMUNITY AND REGULATORY SUPPORT	14,701	14,701
TOTAL, HANFORD SITE	921,785	941,785

IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY:
IDAHO CLEANUP AND WASTE DISPOSITION	362,100	392,100
Program increase		[30,000]
IDAHO COMMUNITY AND REGULATORY SUPPORT	2,910	2,910
TOTAL, IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY	365,010	395,010

NNSA SITES
LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY	1,476	1,476
NUCLEAR FACILITY D & D SEPARATIONS PROCESS RESEARCH UNIT	23,700	23,700
NEVADA	61,897	61,897
SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES	2,814	2,814
LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY	219,789	259,789
Program increase		[40,000]
TOTAL, NNSA SITES AND NEVADA OFF-SITES	309,676	349,676

OAK RIDGE RESERVATION:
OR NUCLEAR FACILITY D & D	73,716	73,716
OR CLEANUP AND DISPOSITION	115,855	125,855
Program increase		[10,000]
OR RESERVATION COMMUNITY AND REGULATORY SUPPORT	4,365	4,365
TOTAL, OAK RIDGE RESERVATION	193,936	203,936

OFFICE OF RIVER PROTECTION:
WASTE TREATMENT AND IMMOBILIZATION PLANT
01–D–416 A-E/ORP-0060 / MAJOR CONSTRUCTION	690,000	690,000

TANK FARM ACTIVITIES
RAD LIQUID TANK WASTE STABILIZATION AND DISPOSITION	520,216	570,216
Program increase		[50,000]
TOTAL, OFFICE OF RIVER PROTECTION	1,210,216	1,260,216

SAVANNAH RIVER SITES:
SAVANNAH RIVER RISK MANAGEMENT OPERATIONS	432,491	432,491
SR COMMUNITY AND REGULATORY SUPPORT	11,210	11,210

RADIOACTIVE LIQUID TANK WASTE:
RADIOACTIVE LIQUID TANK WASTE STABILIZATION AND DISPOSITION	552,560	702,560
Program increase		[150,000]
CONSTRUCTION:
05–D–405 SALT WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY, SAVANNAH RIVER	92,000	92,000
TOTAL, CONSTRUCTION	92,000	92,000
TOTAL, RADIOACTIVE LIQUID TANK WASTE	644,560	794,560
TOTAL, SAVANNAH RIVER SITE	1,088,261	1,238,261

WASTE ISOLATION PILOT PLANT
WASTE ISOLATION PILOT PLANT	203,390	236,390
Program increase		[33,000]
TOTAL, WASTE ISOLATION PILOT PLANT	203,390	236,390

PROGRAM DIRECTION	280,784	300,784
Program increase		[20,000]
PROGRAM SUPPORT	17,979	17,979

SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY:
OAK RIDGE RESERVATION	18,800	18,800
PADUCAH	9,435	9,435
PORTSMOUTH	8,578	8,578
RICHLAND/HANFORD SITE	69,078	79,078
Program increase		[10,000]
SAVANNAH RIVER SITE	121,196	131,196
Program increase		[10,000]
WASTE ISOLATION PILOT PROJECT	4,977	4,977
WEST VALLEY	2,015	2,015
TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	24,091	34,091
Program increase		[10,000]
SUBTOTAL, DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP	4,853,909	8,902,461

URANIUM ENRICHMENT D&D FUND CONTRIBUTION (LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL)	463,000	0
Program decrease		[–463,000]

TOTAL, DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP	5,316,909	5,236,909

OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES
HEALTH, SAFETY AND SECURITY
HEALTH, SAFETY AND SECURITY	143,616	143,616
PROGRAM DIRECTION	108,301	108,301
TOTAL, HEALTH, SAFETY AND SECURITY	251,917	251,917

SPECIALIZED SECURITY ACTIVITIES	196,322	196,322

OFFICE OF LEGACY MANAGEMENT
LEGACY MANAGEMENT	163,271	163,271
PROGRAM DIRECTION	13,712	13,712
TOTAL, OFFICE OF LEGACY MANAGEMENT	176,983	176,983

DEFENSE RELATED ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER	38,979	38,979
CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER	79,857	79,857
TOTAL, DEFENSE RELATED ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT	118,836	118,836

OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS	5,022	5,022
SUBTOTAL, OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES	749,080	749,080
TOTAL, OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES	749,080	749,080