write_parts.c-54 : failed to open = [/local/etc/httpd/cgi-lis/txt_templates/compr_reg_crumb.txt]

Committee Reports

108th Congress (2003-2004)

House Report 108-152 - Part 1

House Report 108-152 - Part 1 3 of 3

This Report: To Accompany H.R.1375     Printer Friendly: HTML  |  PDF




{link: 'http://www.congress.gov:80/cgi-bin/cpquery?%26dbname=cp108%26r_n=hr152p1.108%26sel=DOC',title: 'THOMAS - Committee Report - House Report 108-152 - Part 1' }

FINANCIAL SERVICES REGULATORY RELIEF ACT OF 2003

19-006

108TH CONGRESS

REPT. 108-152

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

1st Session

Part 1
FINANCIAL SERVICES REGULATORY RELIEF ACT OF 2003

JUNE 12, 2003- Ordered to be printed
Mr. OXLEY, from the Committee on Financial Services, submitted the following
R E P O R T
together with
ADDITIONAL VIEWS
[To accompany H.R. 1375]
[Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office]

CONTENTS Page
Amendment 2
Purpose and Summary 30
Background and Need for Legislation 31
Hearings 32
Committee Consideration 32
Committee Votes 32
Committee Oversight Findings 34
Performance Goals and Objectives 34
New Budget Authority, Eintitlement Authority, and Tax Expenditures 34
Committee Cost Estimate 34
Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate 35
Federal Mandates Statement 43
Advisory Committee Statement 43
Constitutional Authority Statement 43
Applicability to Legislative Branch 43
Section-by-Section Analysis 44
Changes in Existing Law Make by the Bill, as Reported 57
Additional Views 138

AMENDMENT

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
TITLE I--NATIONAL BANK PROVISIONS
Sec. 101. National bank directors.
Sec. 102. Voting in shareholder elections.
Sec. 103. Simplifying dividend calculations for national banks.
Sec. 104. Repeal of obsolete limitation on removal authority of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Sec. 105. Repeal of intrastate branch capital requirements.
Sec. 106. Clarification of waiver of publication requirements for bank merger notices.
Sec. 107. Capital equivalency deposits for Federal branches and agencies of foreign banks.
Sec. 108. Equal treatment for Federal agencies of foreign banks.
Sec. 109. Maintenance of a Federal branch and a Federal agency in the same State.
Sec. 110. Business organization flexibility for national banks.
Sec. 111. Clarification of the main place of business of a national bank.
TITLE II--SAVINGS ASSOCIATION PROVISIONS
Sec. 201. Parity for savings associations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
Sec. 202. Investments by Federal savings associations authorized to promote the public welfare.
Sec. 203. Mergers and consolidations of Federal savings associations with nondepository institution affiliates.
Sec. 204. Repeal of statutory dividend notice requirement for savings association subsidiaries of savings and loan holding companies.
Sec. 205. Modernizing statutory authority for trust ownership of savings associations.
Sec. 206. Repeal of overlapping rules governing purchased mortgage servicing rights.
Sec. 207. Restatement of authority for Federal savings associations to invest in small business investment companies.
Sec. 208. Removal of limitation on investments in auto loans.
Sec. 209. Selling and offering of deposit products.
Sec. 210. Funeral- and cemetery-related fiduciary services.
Sec. 211. Repeal of qualified thrift lender requirement with respect to out-of-state branches.
Sec. 212. Small business and other commercial loans.
Sec. 213. Clarifying citizenship of Federal savings associations for Federal court jurisdiction.
Sec. 214. Clarification of applicability of certain procedural doctrines.
TITLE III--CREDIT UNION PROVISIONS
Sec. 301. Privately insured credit unions authorized to become members of a Federal home loan bank.
Sec. 302. Leases of land on Federal facilities for credit unions.
Sec. 303. Investments in securities by Federal credit unions.
Sec. 304. Increase in general 12-year limitation of term of Federal credit union loans to 15 years.
Sec. 305. Increase in 1 percent investment limit in credit union service organizations.
Sec. 306. Member business loan exclusion for loans to nonprofit religious organizations.
Sec. 307. Check cashing and money transfer services offered within the field of membership.
Sec. 308. Voluntary mergers involving multiple common-bond credit unions.
Sec. 309. Conversions involving common-bond credit unions.
Sec. 310. Credit union governance.
Sec. 311. Providing the National Credit Union Administration with greater flexibility in responding to market conditions.
Sec. 312. Exemption from pre-merger notification requirement of the Clayton Act.
Sec. 313. Treatment of credit unions as depository institutions under securities laws.
TITLE IV--DEPOSITORY INSTITUTION PROVISIONS
Sec. 401. Easing restrictions on interstate branching and mergers.
Sec. 402. Statute of limitations for judicial review of appointment of a receiver for depository institutions.
Sec. 403. Reporting requirements relating to insider lending.
Sec. 404. Amendment to provide an inflation adjustment for the small depository institution exception under the Depository Institution Management Interlocks Act.
Sec. 405. Enhancing the safety and soundness of insured depository institutions.
Sec. 406. Investments by insured savings associations in bank service companies authorized.
Sec. 407. Cross guarantee authority.
Sec. 408. Golden parachute authority and nonbank holding companies.
Sec. 409. Amendments relating to change in bank control.
TITLE V--DEPOSITORY INSTITUTION AFFILIATES PROVISIONS
Sec. 501. Clarification of cross marketing provision.
Sec. 502. Amendment to provide the Federal Reserve Board with discretion concerning the imputation of control of shares of a company by trustees.
Sec. 503. Eliminating geographic limits on thrift service companies.
Sec. 504. Clarification of scope of applicable rate provision.
TITLE VI--BANKING AGENCY PROVISIONS
Sec. 601. Waiver of examination schedule in order to allocate examiner resources.
Sec. 602. Interagency data sharing.
Sec. 603. Penalty for unauthorized participation by convicted individual.
Sec. 604. Amendment permitting the destruction of old records of a depository institution by the FDIC after the appointment of the FDIC as receiver.
Sec. 605. Modernization of recordkeeping requirement.
Sec. 606. Clarification of extent of suspension, removal, and prohibition authority of Federal banking agencies in cases of certain crimes by institution-affiliated parties.
Sec. 607. Streamlining depository institution merger application requirements.
Sec. 608. Inclusion of Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision in list of banking agencies regarding insurance customer protection regulations.
Sec. 609. Shortening of post-approval antitrust review period with the agreement of the Attorney General.
Sec. 610. Protection of confidential information received by Federal banking regulators from foreign banking supervisors.
Sec. 611. Prohibition on the participation in the affairs of bank holding company or Edge Act or agreement corporations by convicted individual.
Sec. 612. Clarification that notice after separation from service may be made by an order.
Sec. 613. Examiners of financial institutions.
Sec. 614. Parity in standards for institution-affiliated parties.
Sec. 615. Enforcement against misrepresentations regarding FDIC deposit insurance coverage.
Sec. 616. Compensation of Federal home loan bank directors.
Sec. 617. Extension of terms of Federal home loan bank directors.
Sec. 618. Biennial reports on the status of agency employment of minorities and women.
Sec. 619. Coordination of State examination authority.
TITLE VII--CLERICAL AND TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS
Sec. 701. Clerical amendments to the Home Owners' Loan Act.
Sec. 702. Technical corrections to the Federal Credit Union Act.
Sec. 703. Other technical corrections.
Sec. 704. Repeal of obsolete provisions of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956.

TITLE I--NATIONAL BANK PROVISIONS

SEC. 101. NATIONAL BANK DIRECTORS.

`SEC. 5146. REQUIREMENTS FOR BANK DIRECTORS.

SEC. 102. VOTING IN SHAREHOLDER ELECTIONS.

SEC. 103. SIMPLIFYING DIVIDEND CALCULATIONS FOR NATIONAL BANKS.

`SEC. 5199. NATIONAL BANK DIVIDENDS.

`5199. National bank dividends.'.

SEC. 104. REPEAL OF OBSOLETE LIMITATION ON REMOVAL AUTHORITY OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY.

SEC. 105. REPEAL OF INTRASTATE BRANCH CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS.

SEC. 106. CLARIFICATION OF WAIVER OF PUBLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR BANK MERGER NOTICES.

SEC. 107. CAPITAL EQUIVALENCY DEPOSITS FOR FEDERAL BRANCHES AND AGENCIES OF FOREIGN BANKS.

SEC. 108. EQUAL TREATMENT FOR FEDERAL AGENCIES OF FOREIGN BANKS.

SEC. 109. MAINTENANCE OF A FEDERAL BRANCH AND A FEDERAL AGENCY IN THE SAME STATE.

SEC. 110. BUSINESS ORGANIZATION FLEXIBILITY FOR NATIONAL BANKS.

`SEC. 5136C. ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS ORGANIZATION.

`5136C. Alternative business organization.'.

SEC. 111. CLARIFICATION OF THE MAIN PLACE OF BUSINESS OF A NATIONAL BANK.

TITLE II--SAVINGS ASSOCIATION PROVISIONS

SEC. 201. PARITY FOR SAVINGS ASSOCIATIONS UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940.

SEC. 202. INVESTMENTS BY FEDERAL SAVINGS ASSOCIATIONS AUTHORIZED TO PROMOTE THE PUBLIC WELFARE.

SEC. 203. MERGERS AND CONSOLIDATIONS OF FEDERAL SAVINGS ASSOCIATIONS WITH NONDEPOSITORY INSTITUTION AFFILIATES.

SEC. 204. REPEAL OF STATUTORY DIVIDEND NOTICE REQUIREMENT FOR SAVINGS ASSOCIATION SUBSIDIARIES OF SAVINGS AND LOAN HOLDING COMPANIES.

SEC. 205. MODERNIZING STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR TRUST OWNERSHIP OF SAVINGS ASSOCIATIONS.

SEC. 206. REPEAL OF OVERLAPPING RULES GOVERNING PURCHASED MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS.

SEC. 207. RESTATEMENT OF AUTHORITY FOR FEDERAL SAVINGS ASSOCIATIONS TO INVEST IN SMALL BUSINESS INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

SEC. 208. REMOVAL OF LIMITATION ON INVESTMENTS IN AUTO LOANS.

SEC. 209. SELLING AND OFFERING OF DEPOSIT PRODUCTS.

SEC. 210. FUNERAL- AND CEMETERY-RELATED FIDUCIARY SERVICES.

SEC. 211. REPEAL OF QUALIFIED THRIFT LENDER REQUIREMENT WITH RESPECT TO OUT-OF-STATE BRANCHES.

SEC. 212. SMALL BUSINESS AND OTHER COMMERCIAL LOANS.

SEC. 213. CLARIFYING CITIZENSHIP OF FEDERAL SAVINGS ASSOCIATIONS FOR FEDERAL COURT JURISDICTION.

SEC. 214. CLARIFICATION OF APPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN PROCEDURAL DOCTRINES.

TITLE III--CREDIT UNION PROVISIONS

SEC. 301. PRIVATELY INSURED CREDIT UNIONS AUTHORIZED TO BECOME MEMBERS OF A FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK.

SEC. 302. LEASES OF LAND ON FEDERAL FACILITIES FOR CREDIT UNIONS.

SEC. 303. INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES BY FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONS.

SEC. 304. INCREASE IN GENERAL 12-YEAR LIMITATION OF TERM OF FEDERAL CREDIT UNION LOANS TO 15 YEARS.

SEC. 305. INCREASE IN 1 PERCENT INVESTMENT LIMIT IN CREDIT UNION SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS.

SEC. 306. MEMBER BUSINESS LOAN EXCLUSION FOR LOANS TO NONPROFIT RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS.

SEC. 307. CHECK CASHING AND MONEY TRANSFER SERVICES OFFERED WITHIN THE FIELD OF MEMBERSHIP.

SEC. 308. VOLUNTARY MERGERS INVOLVING MULTIPLE COMMON-BOND CREDIT UNIONS.

SEC. 309. CONVERSIONS INVOLVING COMMON-BOND CREDIT UNIONS.

SEC. 310. CREDIT UNION GOVERNANCE.

SEC. 311. PROVIDING THE NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION WITH GREATER FLEXIBILITY IN RESPONDING TO MARKET CONDITIONS.

SEC. 312. EXEMPTION FROM PRE-MERGER NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT OF THE CLAYTON ACT.

SEC. 313. TREATMENT OF CREDIT UNIONS AS DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS UNDER SECURITIES LAWS.

TITLE IV--DEPOSITORY INSTITUTION PROVISIONS

SEC. 401. EASING RESTRICTIONS ON INTERSTATE BRANCHING AND MERGERS.

SEC. 402. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF APPOINTMENT OF A RECEIVER FOR DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS.

`SEC. 2. APPOINTMENT OF RECEIVER FOR A NATIONAL BANK.

SEC. 403. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO INSIDER LENDING.

SEC. 404. AMENDMENT TO PROVIDE AN INFLATION ADJUSTMENT FOR THE SMALL DEPOSITORY INSTITUTION EXCEPTION UNDER THE DEPOSITORY INSTITUTION MANAGEMENT INTERLOCKS ACT.

SEC. 405. ENHANCING THE SAFETY AND SOUNDNESS OF INSURED DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS.

`SEC. 49. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENTS.

SEC. 406. INVESTMENTS BY INSURED SAVINGS ASSOCIATIONS IN BANK SERVICE COMPANIES AUTHORIZED.

SEC. 407. CROSS GUARANTEE AUTHORITY.

SEC. 408. GOLDEN PARACHUTE AUTHORITY AND NONBANK HOLDING COMPANIES.

SEC. 409. AMENDMENTS RELATING TO CHANGE IN BANK CONTROL.

TITLE V--DEPOSITORY INSTITUTION AFFILIATES PROVISIONS

SEC. 501. CLARIFICATION OF CROSS MARKETING PROVISION.

SEC. 502. AMENDMENT TO PROVIDE THE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD WITH DISCRETION CONCERNING THE IMPUTATION OF CONTROL OF SHARES OF A COMPANY BY TRUSTEES.

SEC. 503. ELIMINATING GEOGRAPHIC LIMITS ON THRIFT SERVICE COMPANIES.

SEC. 504. CLARIFICATION OF SCOPE OF APPLICABLE RATE PROVISION.

TITLE VI--BANKING AGENCY PROVISIONS

SEC. 601. WAIVER OF EXAMINATION SCHEDULE IN ORDER TO ALLOCATE EXAMINER RESOURCES.

SEC. 602. INTERAGENCY DATA SHARING.

SEC. 603. PENALTY FOR UNAUTHORIZED PARTICIPATION BY CONVICTED INDIVIDUAL.

SEC. 604. AMENDMENT PERMITTING THE DESTRUCTION OF OLD RECORDS OF A DEPOSITORY INSTITUTION BY THE FDIC AFTER THE APPOINTMENT OF THE FDIC AS RECEIVER.

SEC. 605. MODERNIZATION OF RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENT.

SEC. 606. CLARIFICATION OF EXTENT OF SUSPENSION, REMOVAL, AND PROHIBITION AUTHORITY OF FEDERAL BANKING AGENCIES IN CASES OF CERTAIN CRIMES BY INSTITUTION-AFFILIATED PARTIES.

SEC. 607. STREAMLINING DEPOSITORY INSTITUTION MERGER APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS.

SEC. 608. INCLUSION OF DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION IN LIST OF BANKING AGENCIES REGARDING INSURANCE CUSTOMER PROTECTION REGULATIONS.

SEC. 609. SHORTENING OF POST-APPROVAL ANTITRUST REVIEW PERIOD WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.

SEC. 610. PROTECTION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION RECEIVED BY FEDERAL BANKING REGULATORS FROM FOREIGN BANKING SUPERVISORS.

SEC. 611. PROHIBITION ON PARTICIPATION BY CONVICTED INDIVIDUAL.

SEC. 612. CLARIFICATION THAT NOTICE AFTER SEPARATION FROM SERVICE MAY BE MADE BY AN ORDER.

SEC. 613. EXAMINERS OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS.

`Sec. 212. Offer of credit to bank examiner

`Sec. 213. Acceptance of credit by bank examiner

`212. Offer of credit to bank examiner.
`213. Acceptance of credit by bank examiner.'.

SEC. 614. PARITY IN STANDARDS FOR INSTITUTION-AFFILIATED PARTIES.

SEC. 615. ENFORCEMENT AGAINST MISREPRESENTATIONS REGARDING FDIC DEPOSIT INSURANCE COVERAGE.

SEC. 616. COMPENSATION OF FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK DIRECTORS.

SEC. 617. EXTENSION OF TERMS OF FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK DIRECTORS.

SEC. 618. BIENNIAL REPORTS ON THE STATUS OF AGENCY EMPLOYMENT OF MINORITIES AND WOMEN.

SEC. 619. COORDINATION OF STATE EXAMINATION AUTHORITY.

TITLE VII--CLERICAL AND TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS

SEC. 701. CLERICAL AMENDMENTS TO THE HOME OWNERS' LOAN ACT.

`Sec. 5. Savings associations.
`Sec. 6. [Repealed.]'.

`SEC. 5. SAVINGS ASSOCIATIONS.'.

SEC. 702. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO THE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION ACT.

SEC. 703. OTHER TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS.

SEC. 704. REPEAL OF OBSOLETE PROVISIONS OF THE BANK HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1956.

PURPOSE AND SUMMARY

H.R. 1375, the Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act of 2003, is intended to alter or eliminate statutory banking provisions in order to reduce the regulatory compliance burden on insured depository institutions and improve their productivity, as well as to make needed technical corrections to current statutes. H.R. 1375 is also intended to counterbalance the additional regulatory burden placed on insured depository institutions in the USA Patriot Act to focus their compliance efforts on combating money laundering and terrorist financing.

BACKGROUND AND NEED FOR LEGISLATION

In 2001, Chairman Oxley requested that Federal and State financial regulators recommend legislative items that would provide regulatory relief for insured depository institutions. The regulators, as well as the financial services industry, submitted a number of wide-ranging proposals affecting banks, savings associations, and credit unions, resulting in the introduction of H.R. 3951, the Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act of 2002, which was approved last year by the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit and by the full Committee. Early this year, Chairman Oxley again requested that financial regulators recommend regulatory relief items. H.R. 1375, introduced by Congresswoman Capito, is essentially last year's bill with the addition of various provisions recommended by regulators.

For banks, H.R. 1375: (1) removes the prohibition on national and State banks from expanding across State lines by opening branches; (2) allows the use of subordinated debt instruments to meet eligibility requirements for national banks to benefit from Subchapter S tax treatment; (3) eliminates unnecessary and costly reporting requirements on banks regarding lending to bank officials; (4) changes the exemption from the prohibition on management interlocks for banks in metropolitan statistical areas from $20 million in assets to $100 million; and (5) streamlines bank merger application regulatory requirements.

For savings associations, the bill: (1) removes lending limits on small business and auto loans and increases the limit on other business loans; (2) gives these institutions parity with banks with respect to broker-dealer and investment adviser SEC registration requirements; (3) allows Federal thrifts to merge with one or more of their non-thrift subsidiaries or affiliates, the same as national banks; (4) permits investment in service companies without regard to geographic restrictions; and (5) gives thrifts the same authority as national and State banks to make investments primarily designed to promote community development.

For credit unions, the bill: (1) expands the investment authority of Federal credit unions; (2) increases the general limit on the term of Federal credit union loans from 12 to 15 years; (3) increases the limit on investment by Federal credit unions in credit union service organizations from 1 percent to 3 percent of shares and earnings; (4) permits privately insured credit unions to be eligible to join a Federal Home Loan Bank; and (5) eases restrictions on voluntary mergers between healthy credit unions.

For Federal financial regulatory agencies, the bill includes these provisions: (1) provides agencies the discretion to adjust the examination cycle for insured depository institutions to use agency resources in the most efficient manner; (2) allows the agencies to share confidential supervisory information concerning an examined institution; (3) modernizes agency recordkeeping requirements to allow use of optically imaged or computer scanned images; (4) clarifies that agencies may suspend or prohibit individuals charged with certain crimes from participation in the affairs of any depository institution and not only the institution with which the individual is associated; and (5) strengthens agency enforcement of written agreements when an institution-affiliated party or controlling shareholder agrees to provide capital to the depository institution.

All of these changes were the result of the Committee's hearing and consultation process with the affected parties, regulators, and the public. As a result of these, H.R. 1375 will allow financial institutions to devote more resources to the business of lending to consumers and less to compliance with outdated and unneeded regulations. Reducing regulatory burden should lower credit costs for consumers and help the economy recover.

HEARINGS

The Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit held a hearing on March 27, 2003, on H.R. 1375. The following witnesses testified: The Honorable Mark Olson, Member, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; The Honorable Dennis Dollar, Chairman, National Credit Union Administration; Ms. Julie L. Williams, First Senior Deputy Comptroller and Chief Counsel, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency; Mr. William F. Kroener, III, General Counsel, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; Ms. Carolyn Buck, Chief Counsel, Office of Thrift Supervision; Mr. Gavin M. Gee, Director of Finance, Idaho Department of Finance, on behalf of the Conference of State Bank Supervisors; and Ms. Jerrie J. Lattimore, Administrator, Credit Union Division, State of North Carolina, on behalf of the National Association of State Credit Union Supervisors.

COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION

The Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit met in open session on April 9, 2003, and approved H.R. 1375 for full Committee consideration, as amended, by a voice vote.

The Committee on Financial Services met in open session on May 20, 2003, and ordered H.R. 1375 reported to the House, with an amendment, by a voice vote, a quorum being present.

COMMITTEE VOTES

Clause 3(b) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives requires the Committee to list the record votes on the motion to report legislation and amendments thereto. A motion by Mr. Oxley to report the bill to the House with a favorable recommendation was agreed to by a voice vote.

The following amendment was considered by a record vote. The names of Members voting for and against follow:

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Ms. Waters, no. 1b, striking section 609 (relating to the shortening of the antitrust review period), was not agreed to by a record vote of 27 yeas and 35 nays.

RECORD VOTE NO. FC-6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Representative             Aye Nay Present       Representative Aye Nay Present 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Oxley                        X               Mr. Frank (MA)   X             
Mr. Leach                        X                Mr. Kanjorski   X             
Mr. Bereuter                     X                   Ms. Waters   X             
Mr. Baker                        X                 Mr. Sanders*   X             
Mr. Bachus                       X                 Mrs. Maloney   X             
Mr. Castle                                        Mr. Gutierrez   X             
Mr. King                         X                Ms. Velazquez   X             
Mr. Royce                        X                     Mr. Watt   X             
Mr. Lucas (OK)                   X                 Mr. Ackerman                 
Mr. Ney                          X              Ms. Hooley (OR)   X             
Mrs. Kelly                       X              Ms. Carson (IN)   X             
Mr. Paul                         X                  Mr. Sherman   X             
Mr. Gillmor                      X               Mr. Meeks (NY)   X             
Mr. Ryun (KS)                    X                      Ms. Lee   X             
Mr. LaTourette                   X                   Mr. Inslee   X             
Mr. Manzullo                     X                    Mr. Moore       X         
Mr. Jones (NC)                   X                 Mr. Gonzalez                 
Mr. Ose                          X                  Mr. Capuano   X             
Mrs. Biggert                     X                     Mr. Ford   X             
Mr. Green (WI)                   X                 Mr. Hinojosa   X             
Mr. Toomey                       X               Mr. Lucas (KY)       X         
Mr. Shays                                           Mr. Crowley   X             
Mr. Shadegg                      X                     Mr. Clay                 
Mr. Fossella                                         Mr. Israel   X             
Mr. Gary G. Miller (CA)                                Mr. Ross                 
Ms. Hart                         X           Mrs. McCarthy (NY)                 
Mrs. Capito                      X                     Mr. Baca   X             
Mr. Tiberi                       X                 Mr. Matheson   X             
Mr. Kennedy (MN)                 X                    Mr. Lynch   X             
Mr. Feeney                       X              Mr. Miller (NC)   X             
Mr. Hensarling                   X                  Mr. Emanuel   X             
Mr. Garrett (NJ)                 X               Mr. Scott (GA)   X             
Mr. Murphy                       X               Mr. Davis (AL)   X             
Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite (FL)       X                                              
Mr. Barrett (SC)                 X                                              
Ms. Harris                       X                                              
Mr. Renzi                        X                                              
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Committee considered the following other amendments:

An amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mr. Oxley, no. 1a, making extensions of the terms of the Federal Home Loan Bank Directors prospective and clarifying the civil remedies that can be imposed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, was agreed to by a voice vote.

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mr. Lucas, no. 1b, clarifying the regulatory structure for State chartered, multi-State banks, was agreed to by a voice vote.

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mr. Bachus, no. 1c, striking section 614 (relating to standards for institution-affiliated parties), was withdrawn.

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mr. Ackerman, no. 1d, requiring any depository institution who reports negative information to a consumer reporting agency disclose that information to the consumer, was withdrawn.

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mr. Israel, no. 1e, providing protection of credit of people in combat or activated for military service, was withdrawn.

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mr. Gutierrez, no. 1f, requiring disclosures for wire transfers, was withdrawn.

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mr. Gillmor, no. 1g, prohibiting ILCs that are not financial in nature from exercising de novo branching authority, was withdrawn.

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mr. Kanjorski, no. 1h, striking section 301 (relating to privately insured credit union membership in the Federal Home Loan Bank), was not agreed to by a voice vote.

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mr. Leach, no. 1i, prohibiting all ILCs from engaging in de novo branching, was not agreed to by a voice vote.

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mr. Gutierrez, no. 1j, requiring a study by the Federal Reserve Board on the use of matricula consular cards, was withdrawn.

COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT FINDINGS

Pursuant to clause 3(c)(1) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee made findings that are reflected in this report.

PERFORMANCE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Pursuant to clause 3(c)(4) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee establishes the following performance related goals and objectives for this legislation:

This legislation makes important changes to banking statutes to significantly reduce the burden of outdated and unnecessary laws and regulations on banks, savings associations, and credit unions. The appropriate banking regulatory agencies will streamline regulatory compliance for insured depository institutions in order to improve the efficiency and productivity of those institutions in providing financial services to consumers.

NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY, ENTITLEMENT AUTHORITY, AND TAX EXPENDITURES

In compliance with clause 3(c)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee adopts as its own the estimate of budget authority, entitlement authority, or tax expenditures or revenues contained in the cost estimate prepared by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office pursuant to section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974.

COMMITTEE COST ESTIMATE

The Committee adopts as its own the cost estimate prepared by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office pursuant to section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974.

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE ESTIMATE

Pursuant to clause 3(c)(3) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the following is the cost estimate provided by the Congressional Budget Office pursuant to section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974:

U.S. Congress,

Congressional Budget Office,

Washington, DC, June 11, 2003.

Hon. MICHAEL G. OXLEY,
Chairman, Committee on Financial Services,
House of Representatives, Washington, DC.

DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: The Congressional Budget Office has prepared the enclosed cost estimate for H.R. 1375, the Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act of 2003.

If you wish further details on this estimate, we will be pleased to provide them. The CBO staff contacts are Kathleen Gramp and Jenny Lin (for federal costs), Pam Greene (for revenues), Victoria Heid Hall (for the state and local impact), and Judith Ruud.

Sincerely,

Douglas Holtz-Eakin,

Director.

Enclosure.

H.R. 1375--Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act of 2003

Summary: H.R. 1375 would affect the operations of financial institutions and the agencies that regulate them. Some provisions would address specific sectors: national banks could more easily operate as S corporations or adopt other alternative organizational structures; thrift institutions would be given some of the same investment, lending, and ownership options available to banks; credit unions would have new options for investments, lending, mergers, and leasing federal property; and certain privately insured credit unions could become members of the Federal Home Loan Bank system. The bill would provide the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) with new enforcement authorities and modify regulatory procedures governing certain types of transactions, such as the establishment of de novo branches and interstate mergers. It would also give agencies more flexibility in sharing data, retaining records, and scheduling examinations, and would limit the legal defenses that the United States could use against certain claims for monetary damages.

CBO estimates that enacting this bill would reduce federal revenues by $37 million over the next five years and by a total of $117 million over the 2004-2013 period. In addition, we estimate that direct spending would increase by $17 million over the next five years and by a total of $22 million over the 2004-2013 period.

H.R. 1375 contains intergovernmental mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA), but CBO estimates that the cost of complying with those requirements would not exceed the threshold for intergovernmental mandates established in UMRA ($59 million in 2003, adjusted annually for inflation).

H.R. 1375 contains several private-sector mandates. Those mandates would affect certain depository institutions, nondepository institutions that control depository institutions, uninsured banks, bank holding companies and their subsidiaries, savings and loan association holding companies and their subsidiaries, and Federal Home Loan banks. At the same time, the bill would relax some restrictions on the operations of certain financial institutions. CBO estimates that the aggregate direct cost of complying with the private-sector mandates in the bill would not exceed the annual threshold established in UMRA ($117 million in 2003, adjusted annually for inflation).

Estimated cost to the Federal Government: The estimated budgetary impact of H.R. 1375 is shown in the following table. The costs of this legislation fall within budget function 370 (commerce and housing credit).


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  By fiscal year, in millions of dollars--                                              
                                                                      2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHANGES IN REVENUES                                                                                                     
Estimated revenues:                                                                                                     
S Corporation status                                                    -2   -5   -8   -9  -11  -13  -14  -12  -12  -13 
Business organization flexibility                                        *    *    *    *   -1   -2   -2   -3   -4   -5 
Total 1                                                                 -2   -5   -8  -10  -12  -15  -17  -14  -16  -18 
CHANGES IN DIRECT SPENDING 2                                                                                            
Estimated budget authority                                               1    1    1    7    7    1    1    1    1    1 
Estimated outlays                                                        1    1    1    7    7    1    1    1    1    1 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Basis of estimate

Most of the budgetary impacts of this legislation would result from three provisions: section 101, which would make it easier for national banks to convert to S corporation status or alternative organization forms: section 214, which would limit the government's legal defenses against certain claims for monetary damages; and section 302, which would allow certain federal credit unions to lease federal land at no charge. For this estimate, CBO assumes that H.R. 1375 will be enacted in the fall of 2003.

H.R. 1375 also would affect the workload at agencies that regulate financial institutions. We estimate that the net change in agency spending would not be significant. Based on information from each of the agencies, CBO estimates that the change in administrative expenses--both costs and potential savings--would average less than $500,000 a year over the next several years. Expenditures of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), and the FDIC are classified as direct spending and would be covered by fees or insurance premiums paid by the institutions they regulate. Any change in spending by the Federal Reserve would affect net revenues, while adjustments in the budget of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) would be subject to appropriation.

Revenues

CBO estimates that enacting H.R. 1375 would reduce federal tax revenues collected from national and state-chartered banks and would have an insignificant effect on civil and criminal penalties collected for violations of the bill's provisions.

S Corporation Status. Under this bill, some national banks would find it easier to convert from C corporation status to S corporation status. Section 101 would allow directors of national banks to be issued subordinated debt to satisfy the requirement that directors of a bank own qualifying shares in the bank. This provision would effectively reduce the number of shareholders of a bank by removing directors from shareholder status, making it easier for banks to comply with the 75-shareholder limit that defines eligibility for subchapter S election.

Income earned by banks taxed as C corporations is subject to the corporate income tax, and post-tax income distributed to shareholders is taxed again at individual income tax rates. Income earned by banks operating as S corporations is taxed only at the personal income tax rates of the banks' shareholders and is not subject to the corporate income tax. The average effective tax rate on S corporation income is lower than the average effective tax rate on C corporation income. CBO estimates that enacting this provision would reduce revenues by a total of $36 million over the next five years and by $100 million over the 2004-2013 period.

Based on information from the Federal Reserve Board, the OCC, and private trade associations, CBO expects that most of the banks that would be affected are small, although banks and bank holding companies with assets over $500 million would also be affected. In addition, states are likely to amend the rules for state-chartered banks to match those for national banks. CBO expects that most conversions to Subchapter S status would occur between 2004 and 2006 and that national banks would convert earlier than state-chartered banks.

Business Organization Flexibility. Under section 110 of this bill, the Comptroller of the Currency could allow national banks to organize in noncorporate form, for example as Limited Liability Corporations (LLCs) as defined by state law. LLCs generally choose to be taxed as partnerships. Only a few states currently allow banks to organize as LLCs, however, and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) currently taxes state-chartered bank-LLCs as C corporations. LLCs have more organizational flexibility than S corporations while retaining the corporate characteristic of limited liability.

Income earned by banks taxed as C corporations is subject to the corporate income tax, and post-tax income distributed to shareholders is taxed again at individual income tax rates. Income earned by partnerships--like that earned by S corporations--is taxed only at the personal income tax rates of the partners and is not subject to the corporate income tax. The average effective tax rate on partnerships is lower than the average effective tax rate on C corporation income but is similar to the average effective tax rate on S corporation income.

Based on information from the OCC, the FDIC, and private trade associations, CBO believes that it is quite possible that the OCC would alter its regulations to allow national banks to organize in noncorporate form. We expect that, over the next decade, most states that do not currently allow banks to organize as LLCs will begin allowing them to do so in order to be competitive. Under H.R. 1375, future IRS tax treatment of bank-LLCs is uncertain. CBO assumes that the IRS may allow bank-LLCs to be taxed as partnerships at some point in the next decade. The estimated revenue effects of section 110 reflect CBO's estimate of the likelihood of such IRS actions. CBO anticipates that banks forming as LLCs would most likely be newly chartered institutions and that, over the next decade, only a very limited number of banks would convert from C corporation or S corporation status to LLCs taxed as partnerships.

CBO estimates that enacting this provision would reduce federal revenues by a total of $1 million over the next five years and by $17 million over the 2004-2013 period.

Civil and Criminal Penalties. H.R. 1375 would make all depository institutions--not just insured institutions--subject to certain civil and criminal fines for violating rules regarding breach of trust, dishonesty, and certain other crimes. It also would authorize the FDIC to take enforcement action or impose civil penalties of up to $1 million a day on any individual, corporation, or other entity that falsely implies that deposits or other funds are insured by the agency. Based on information from the FDIC, CBO expects that enforcement actions would likely deter most individuals or institutions from violating rules regarding breach of trust, dishonesty, or certain other crimes. As a result, we estimate that any additional penalty collections under those provisions would not be significant.

Direct spending

CBO estimates that enacting H.R. 1375 would increase direct spending by a total of about $15 million over the 2004-2013 period to pay for increased litigation costs and larger payments for `goodwill' claims against the government. The bill also would reduce offsetting receipts collected from credit unions that lease federal facilities, and it could affect the cost of deposit insurance.

Monetary Damages in Goodwill Cases. Section 214 would preclude the use of certain legal defenses in claims for damages against the United States arising out of the implementation of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA). CBO estimates that enacting this provision would increase the cost of litigating and resolving such claims by a total of $15 million over the next five years.

Background on Goodwill Cases. Under section 214, courts could not dismiss a claim arising out of the implementation of FIRREA on the basis of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or similar defenses if the defense was based on a decision, opinion, or order of judgment entered by any court prior to July 1, 1996. On that date, the Supreme Court decided United States v. Winstar Corp., 518 U.S. 839 (1996), holding that the government became liable for damages in breach of contract when the accounting treatment of `supervisory goodwill' that it had previously approved was prevented by enactment of FIRREA. About 100 `goodwill' cases against the government are still pending before the courts, with claims totaling about $20 billion. CBO estimates that, under current law, such claims will cost the government about $1.5 billion over the 2004-2013 period. Judgments, settlements, and litigation expenses for such claims are paid from the FSLIC Resolution Fund, and such payments do not require appropriation action.

By eliminating some defenses currently available to the United States in such cases, section 214 would increase the likelihood that some claims would reach a hearing on the merits, thereby allowing cases to proceed further in the judicial process than may otherwise be likely. According to the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FDIC, this provision would affect only a few of the goodwill cases; claims in the affected cases could total about $200 million. (This provision also could affect cases in which the FDIC is the plaintiff as the receiver of a failed thrift, but any monetary awards to the FDIC would be intragovernmental payments and would have no affect on the federal budget.)

Estimated Cost of This Provision. CBO expects that enacting section 214 would increase the cost of litigation and potential settlements or judgments against the United States. Whether those costs are large or small would depend on the role those defenses would otherwise play in the outcome of each case. For example, the cost could be significant if the loss of those defenses resulted in a judgment for plaintiffs on the merits but could be negligible if the judgment were against the plaintiffs.

For this estimate, CBO assumes that defenses of res judicata and collateral estoppel would be just two of several possible defenses and other factors affecting awards of monetary damages and that barring them would therefore have a small effect on the potential costs of such claims. We estimate that enacting this provision would increase expected payments for such claims by about $10 million--or 5 percent of the roughly $200 million in claims that might be affected by this provision. Given the pace of such litigation, we expect that those added costs would occur in 2007 and 2008. In addition, CBO estimates that DOJ's administrative costs would increase by an average of about $1 million a year as a result of the added time and workload associated with those cases. This estimate is based on historical trends in the cost of litigating such claims.

Nongoodwill Cases. Because section 214 would not limit the affected claims to goodwill cases, this provision also could affect other types of claims for monetary damages arising out of the implementation of FIRREA that meet the criteria in the bill. This provision could encourage the filing of such claims that were resolved prior to July 1, 1996; however, DOJ is currently unaware of any such claims.

Offsetting Receipts From Federal Leases. Section 302 would allow federal agencies to lease land to federal credit unions without charge under certain conditions. Under existing law, agencies may allocate space in federal buildings without charge if at least 95 percent of the credit union's members are or were federal employees. Some credit unions, primarily those serving military bases, have leased federal land to build a facility. Prior to 1991, leases awarded by the Department of Defense (DoD) were free of charge and for terms of up to 25 years; a statutory change enacted that year limited the term of such leases to five years and required the lessee to pay a fair market value for the property. According to DoD, about 35 credit unions have leased land since 1991 and are paying a total of about $525,000 a year to lease federal property. Those proceeds are recorded as offsetting receipts, and any spending of those payments is subject to appropriation.

CBO expects that enacting this provision would result in a loss of offsetting receipts from all credit union leases. Those lessees currently paying a fee would stop making those payments after they renew their current leases, all of which should expire within the next five years. In addition, credit unions that have long-term, no-cost leases would be able to renew them without becoming subject to the fees they otherwise would pay under current law. CBO estimates that enacting this provision would cost a total of about $2 million over the next five years and an average of about $700,000 annually after 2008.

Deposit Insurance. Several provisions in the bill could affect the cost of federal deposit insurance. For example, the bill would streamline the approval process for mergers, branching, and affiliations, which could give eligible institutions the opportunity to diversify and compete more effectively with other financial businesses. In some cases, such efficiencies could reduce the risk of insolvency. It is also possible, however, the some of the new lending and investment options could increase the risk of losses to the deposit insurance funds.

CBO has no clear basis for predicting the direction or the amount of any change in spending for insurance that could result from the new investment, lending, and operational arrangements authorized by this bill. The net budgetary impact of such changes would be negligible over time, however, because any increase or decease in costs would be offset by adjustments in the insurance premiums paid by banks, thrifts, or credit unions.

Spending subject to appropriation

Section 201 provides thrift institutions with exemptions from broker-dealer and investment-advisor registration requirements similar to those accorded banks. Section 313 provides similar exemptions for federally insured credit unions. Based on information from the SEC, CBO estimates that the budgetary effects of those exemptions would not be significant.

Section 312 would exempt federally insured credit unions from filing certain acquisition or merger notices with the FTC. Under current law, the FTC charges filing fees ranging from $45,000 to $280,000, depending on the value of the transaction. The collection of such fees is contingent on appropriation action. Based on information from the FTC, CBO estimates that this exemption would have no significant effect on the amounts collected from such fees.

Estimated impact on state, local, and tribal governments: H.R. 1375 would preempt certain state laws and place new requirements on certain state agencies that regulate financial institutions. Both the preemptions and the new requirements would be mandates as defined in UMRA. CBO estimates that the cost of those mandates taken together would not exceed the threshold established in UMRA ($59 million in 2003, adjusted annually for inflation).

Section 209 would preempt certain state securities laws by prohibiting states from requiring agents representing a federal savings association to register as brokers or dealers if they sell deposit products (CDs) issued by the savings association. Such a preemption would impose costs (in the form of lost revenues) on those states that currently require such registration. Based on information from representatives of the securities industry and securities regulators, CBO estimates that losses to states as a result of this prohibition would total less than $1 million a year.

Section 301 would authorize certain privately insured credit unions to apply for membership in a Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB). Part of the application process would require state regulators of credit unions to determine whether an applicant is eligible for federal deposit insurance. This requirement would be a mandate, but because the regulators already make that determination under state law, the additional cost to comply with the requirement would be minimal.

Upon becoming members, those credit unions would be eligible for loans from the FHLB. To preserve the value of those loans, section 301 would preempt certain state contract laws that otherwise would allow defaulting credit unions to avoid certain contractual obligations. Because those credit unions are not currently eligible for membership in a federal home loan bank, and accordingly, have no contracts for credit, this preemption, while a mandate, would impose no costs on state, local, or tribal governments.

Section 302 would require state regulators of credit unions to provide certain information when requested by the NCUA. Because this provision would not require states to prepare any additional reports, merely to provide them to NCUA upon request, CBO estimates that the cost to states would be minimal.

Section 401 would expand an existing preemption of state laws related to mergers between insured depository institutions chartered in different states. Current law preempts state laws that restrict mergers between insured banks with different home states. This section would expand that preemption to cover mergers between insured banks and other insured depository institutions or trust companies with different home states. This expansion of a preemption would be a mandate under UMRA but would impose little or no cost on states.

Section 401 also would preempt state laws that regulate certain fiduciary activities performed by insured banks and other depository institutions. The bill would allow banks and trusts of a state (the home state) to locate a branch in another state (the host state) as long as the services provided by the branch are not in contravention of home state or host state law. Further, if the host state allows other types of entities to offer the same services as the branch bank or trust seeking to locate in the host state, home state approval of the branch would not be in contravention of host state law. This provision could preempt laws of the host state but would impose no costs on them.

Section 619 provides that, except where expressly provided in a cooperative agreement, only the bank supervisor of the home state of an insured state bank may impose supervisory fees on the bank. To the extent that state laws permit such charges, this provision would preempt state authority. However, based on information from the Conference of State Bank Supervisors, under current practice, host states rarely if ever charge such fees, and therefore, we estimate that enacting this provision would have no significant effect on state revenues.

Estimated impact on the private sector

H.R. 1375 contains several private-sector mandates as defined by UMRA. At the same time, the bill would relax some restrictions on the operations of certain financial institutions. CBO estimates that the aggregate direct costs of mandates in the bill would not exceed the annual threshold estimated in UMRA ($117 million in 2003, adjusted annually for inflation).

Mandates

The bill would impose mandates on depository institutions controlled by companies other than depository institution holding companies; nondepository institutions that control insured depository institutions; uninsured banks; bank holding companies and their subsidiaries; savings and loan association holding companies and their subsidiaries; and Federal Home Loan Banks. Mandates in the bill include an expansion of the authority of the FDIC over certain insured depositories and companies that control insured depositories, a prohibition on participation in the affairs of financial institutions of people convicted of certain crimes, and additional reporting requirements for FHLBs.

Expansion of the FDIC's Authorities. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act allowed new forms of affiliations among depositories and other financial services firms. Consequently, insured depository institutions may now be controlled by a company other than a depository institution holding company (DIHC). H.R. 1375 would amend current law to give the FDIC certain authorities concerning troubled or failing depository institutions held by those new forms of holding companies.

Under current law, if the FDIC suffers a loss from liquidating or selling a failed depository institution, the FDIC has the authority to obtain reimbursement from any insured depository institution within the same DIHC. Section 407 would expand the scope of the FDIC's reimbursement power to include all insured depository institutions controlled by the same company, not just those controlled by the same DIHC.

The cost of this mandate would depend, among other things, on the probability of failure of the additional institutions subject to this authority and the probability that the FDIC would incur a loss as a result of those failures. The new authority would apply only to a handful of depository institutions. Based on information from the FDIC, CBO estimates that the cost of this mandate would not be substantial.

In addition, section 408 would allow the FDIC to prohibit or limit any company that controls an insured depository from making `golden parachute' payments or indemnification payments to institution-affiliated parties of troubled or failing insured depositories. (Institution-affiliated parties include directors, officers, employees, and controlling shareholders. Institute-affiliated parties also include independent contractors such as accountants or lawyers who participate in violations of the law or undertake unsound business practices that may cause a financial loss to, or adverse effect on, the insured depository institution.)

Based on information from the FDIC, CBO expects that only a few institutions would be covered by the new authority. In the event that the FDIC exercises this authority, CBO expects that the cost to institutions of withholding such payments would be administrative in nature and minimal, if any.

Prohibitions on Convicted Individuals. Current law prohibits a person convicted of a crime involving dishonesty, a breach of trust, or money laundering from participating in the affairs of an insured depository institution without FDIC approval. The bill would extend that prohibition so that uninsured banks, bank holding companies and their subsidiaries, and savings and loan holding companies and their subsidiaries could not allow such persons to participate in their affairs without the prior written consent of their designated federal banking regulatory.

Assuming that those institutions already screen potential directors, officers, and employees for criminal offenses, the incremental cost of complying with this mandate would be small.

Reporting Requirements for Federal Home Loan Banks. Section 616 would require the Federal Home Loan Banks to report the compensation and expenses paid to directors in their annual reports. CBO expects that the cost of complying with this mandate would be minimal.

Estimate prepared by: Federal costs: Kathleen Gramp and Jenny Lin; Federal revenues: Pam Greene; Impact of state, local, and tribal governments: Victoria Heid Hall; Impact on the private sector: Judith Ruud.

Estimate approved by: Robert A. Sunshine, Assistant Director for Budget Analysis; G. Thomas Woodward, Assistant Director for Tax Analysis.

FEDERAL MANDATES STATEMENT

The Committee adopts as its own the estimate of Federal mandates prepared by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office pursuant to section 423 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.

ADVISORY COMMITTEE STATEMENT

No advisory committees within the meaning of section 5(b) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act were created by this legislation.

CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY STATEMENT

Pursuant to clause 3(d)(1) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee finds that the Constitutional Authority of Congress to enact this legislation is provided by Article 1, section 8, clause 1 (relating to the defense and general welfare of the United States), and clause 3 (relating to the power to regulate foreign and interstate commerce).

APPLICABILITY TO LEGISLATIVE BRANCH

The Committee finds that the legislation does not relate to the terms and conditions of employment or access to public services or accommodations within the meaning of section 102(b)(3) of the Congressional Accountability Act.

SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS OF THE LEGISLATION

Section 1. Short Title; Table of Contents

This section establishes the short title of the bill, the `Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act of 2003,' and provides a table of contents.

TITLE I--NATIONAL BANK PROVISIONS

Section 101. National bank directors

Currently, all directors of a national bank must own shares of the bank having an aggregate par value of at least $1,000, or an equivalent interest in the bank holding company that controls the bank. This requirement creates difficulties for some national banks that operate or wish to operate in subchapter S form. It effectively requires that all directors be shareholders, thus making it difficult or impossible for a bank to comply with the 75-shareholder limit that defines eligibility for the benefit of subchapter S tax treatment, which avoids double tax on the bank's earnings. This section permits the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to allow the use of a debt instrument that is subordinated to all other liabilities of the bank to satisfy the qualifying shares requirement by directors of banks operating in subchapter S status. Such a subordinated debt instrument would be closely equivalent to an equity capital interest, since the directors could only be repaid if all other claims of depositors and nondeposit creditors of the bank (including the FDIC) were first paid in full, and would therefore ensure that directors retain their personal stake in the financial soundness of the bank.

Section 102. Voting in shareholder elections

Current law imposes mandatory cumulative voting requirements on all national banks. This section permits a national bank to provide in its articles of association which method of electing its directors best suits its business goals and needs. A national bank would choose whether to allow cumulative voting.

Section 103. Simplifying dividend calculations for national banks

This section provides more flexibility than current law to a national bank to pay dividends as deemed appropriate by its board of directors. The current requirement that OCC's approval is necessary if the dividend exceeds a certain amount is retained.

Section 104. Repeal of obsolete limitation on removal authority of the Comptroller of the Currency

Under current law, all of the Federal banking agencies, except for the OCC, may remove a person who engages in certain improper conduct from the banking business. The determination of whether to remove an individual from a national bank is made by the Federal Reserve Board. This section would give OCC the same removal authority as the other banking agencies.

Section 105. Repeal of intrastate branch capital requirements

Currently, a national bank, in order to establish an intrastate branch in a State, must meet the capital requirements imposed by the State on State banks seeking to establish intrastate branches. This section eliminates this requirement. Branching restrictions are already imposed under other provisions of law to limit the operations of a bank if it is in troubled condition.

Section 106. Clarification of waiver of publication requirements for bank merger notices

This section clarifies that the requirement to publish a notice for shareholders that applies in the case of a consolidation or merger of a national bank with another bank located within the same State may be waived by OCC in emergency situations or by unanimous vote of the shareholders.

Section 107. Capital equivalency deposits for Federal branches and agencies of foreign banks

Under current law, Federal branches and agencies of foreign banks are required to hold capital equivalency deposits (CEDs) in Federal Reserve member banks, equal to at least 5 percent of the liabilities of the branch or agency. State branches and agencies are subject to similar asset pledge requirements, but State banking commissioners often have flexibility to adjust the requirement to take into account the circumstances of the institution involved. This section would give the Comptroller of the Currency similar discretion to adjust the amount of the CED; however, OCC may not permit a foreign bank to keep assets on deposit in an amount that is less than the amount required for a State branch or agency of a foreign bank under the laws and regulations of the State in which the Federal branch or agency is located.

Section 108. Equal treatment for Federal agencies of foreign banks

This section provides that Federal agencies of foreign banks have the same right as State agencies of foreign banks to receive limited foreign source uninsured deposits (deposits that are not from U.S. citizens or residents).

Section 109. Maintenance of a Federal branch and a Federal agency in the same State

Current law prohibits a foreign bank from operating both a Federal branch and a Federal agency in the same State. This section permits a foreign bank to maintain both a branch and an agency in those States that do not prohibit a foreign bank from maintaining both.

Section 110. Business organization flexibility for national banks

This section allows banks to choose among different forms of business organizations, as permitted by the Comptroller of the Currency. For example, if the Comptroller should permit a national bank to organize as a limited liability company (LLC), the bank may be able to take advantage of the pass-through tax treatment for LLCs under certain tax laws and eliminate double taxation, under which the same earnings are taxed both at the corporate level as income and at the shareholder level as dividends. The LLC structure may be particularly attractive for community banks and could provide a more flexible structure than a Subchapter S corporation.

Section 111. Clarification of the main place of business of a national bank

This section clarifies where a national bank's principal place of business is located for corporate status purposes.

TITLE II--SAVINGS ASSOCIATION PROVISIONS

Section 201. Parity for savings associations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940

This section gives thrift institutions parity with banks with respect to investment adviser and broker-dealer registration requirements.

Section 202. Investments by Federal savings associations authorized to promote the public welfare

This section gives Federal thrift institutions the same authority national banks and State member banks have to make investments primarily designed to promote the public welfare, directly or indirectly by investing in an entity primarily engaged in making public welfare investments. The provision establishes an aggregate limit on investments of 5 percent of a thrift's capital and surplus, unless the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) determines the thrift is adequately capitalized and that a higher amount poses no significant risk to the deposit insurance fund. In no case may the aggregate investments by a thrift exceed 10 percent of its capital and surplus. Thrifts may use this new community development investment authority without regard to the prohibition against acquiring or retaining corporate debt that is not of investment grade; no similar limit applies to banks.

Section 203. Mergers and consolidations of Federal savings associations with non-depository institution affiliates

This section gives Federal thrift institutions the authority to merge with one or more of their non-thrift affiliates, equivalent to recently-enacted authority for national banks. Thrifts would continue to have the authority to merge with other depository institutions, but could not merge with other kinds of entities.

Section 204. Repeal of statutory dividend notice requirement for savings association subsidiaries of savings and loan holding companies

This section eliminates the requirement that any thrift institution owned by a savings and loan holding company must notify OTS 30 days before paying a dividend. Instead, OTS would have the discretion to require prior notice and could establish reasonable conditions on the payment of dividends.

Section 205. Modernizing statutory authority for trust ownership of savings associations

This section conforms the treatment of trusts that own thrift institutions to the treatment of trusts that own banks.

Section 206. Repeal of overlapping rules governing purchased mortgage servicing rights

This section repeals the overlapping, obsolete requirements governing purchased mortgage servicing rights (PMSRs) in the Home Owners' Loan Act (HOLA). Section 475 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 will continue to govern the valuation of PMSRs for savings associations and other depository institutions. Section 475 already permits overriding the valuation limit, and repealing this provision will simply eliminate potential confusion without sacrificing safety and soundness objectives.

Section 207. Restatement of authority for Federal savings associations to invest in small business investment companies

This section restates recently-enacted statutory authority for Federal savings associations to invest in small business investment companies (SBICs) and entities established to invest solely in SBICs. Savings associations are subject to an aggregate 5 percent of capital limit on such investments.

Section 208. Removal of limitation on investments in auto loans

Federal savings associations are currently limited in making automobile loans to 35 percent of total assets. This asset limitation is removed by this section.

Section 209. Selling and offering of deposit products

This section exempts insurance agents, who represent a Federal savings association in selling FDIC-insured certificate of deposit products, from registering as securities law agents under State law. Safeguards are provided, so that agents may not accept deposits or make withdrawals for any customer of the savings association, may not sell CDs for any entity that is not subject to Federal or State regulation or sell CDs that are not Federally insured, and may not create a secondary market in CDs or otherwise add features to CDs independent of the savings association.

Section 210. Funeral- and cemetery-related fiduciary services

This section authorizes a funeral director or cemetery operator to engage a Federal savings association to act in any fiduciary capacity, including holding funds deposited in trust or escrow by the funeral director or cemetery operator.

Section 211. Repeal of qualified thrift lender requirement with respect to out-of-State branches

Under current law, Federal savings associations must meet the qualified thrift lender (QTL) test both as an entity operating regionally or nationally and in each State where there are branches. This section eliminates the requirement to meet the QTL test on a State-by-State basis, only requiring savings associations to meet the test on the basis of entire multi-State operations.

Section 212. Small business and other commercial loans

For Federal savings associations, this section eliminates the lending limit on small business loans and increases the lending limit on other business loans from 10 percent to 20 percent of assets.

Section 213. Clarifying citizenship of Federal savings associations for Federal court jurisdiction

This section treats Federal savings associations for corporate purposes as being located in the State in which the thrift has its home office.

Section 214. Clarification of applicability of certain procedural doctrines

This section is intended to ensure that all institutions having claims for relief under the Supreme Court's 1996 decision in United States v. Winstar, 518 U.S. 839 (1996) which held that the government breached its contracts with institutions that purchased failing thrifts at the government's request when it implemented the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA), are treated equally in seeking to have those claims adjudicated in the Federal courts.

TITLE III--CREDIT UNION PROVISIONS

Section 301. Privately insured credit unions authorized to become members of a Federal Home Loan Bank

This section permits privately insured credit unions to apply to become members of a Federal Home Loan Bank. Currently, only Federally insured credit unions may become members. The State regulator of a privately insured credit union applying for Federal Home Loan Bank membership would have to certify that the credit union meets the eligibility requirements for Federal deposit insurance before it would qualify for membership in the Federal Home Loan Bank system. The section clarifies that the Federal Home Loan Bank System's superlien--which gives the System priority in the event that one of its borrowers becomes insolvent--remains in effect notwithstanding any conflicting State law. The section requires that the statutorily mandated annual audit of any entity that provides private deposit insurance to credit unions must be submitted to the Federal Housing Finance Board and the National Credit Union Administration.

Section 302. Leases of land on Federal facilities for credit unions

This section gives military and civilian authorities responsible for buildings erected on Federal property the discretion to extend to credit unions that finance the construction of credit union facilities on Federal land real estate leases at minimal charge.

Section 303. Investments in securities by Federal credit unions

The Federal Credit Union Act limits the investment authority of Federal credit unions to loans, government securities, deposits in other financial institutions, and certain other limited investments. This section provides additional investment authority to purchase for the credit union's own account certain investment securities of investment grade. The total amount of the investment securities of any one obligor or maker could not exceed 10 percent of the credit union's net worth.

Section 304. Increase in general 12-year limitation of term of Federal credit union loans to 15 years

Currently, Federal credit unions are authorized to make loans to members, to other credit unions, and to credit union service organizations. The Federal Credit Union Act imposes various restrictions on these authorities, including a 12-year maturity limit that is subject to limited exceptions. This section would allow loan maturities up to 15 years, or longer terms as permitted by the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) Board.

Section 305. Increase in 1 percent investment limit in credit union service organizations

The Federal Credit Union Act authorizes Federal credit unions to invest in organizations providing services to credit unions and credit union members. An individual Federal credit union, however, may invest in aggregate no more than one percent of its shares and undivided earnings in these organizations, commonly known as credit union service organizations or CUSOs. This section raises the limit to three percent.

Section 306. Member business loan exclusion for loans to non-profit religious organizations

This section excludes loans or loan participations by Federal credit unions to non-profit religious organizations from the member business loan limit contained in the Federal Credit Union Act.

Section 307. Check cashing and money transfer services offered within the field of membership

Federal credit unions are currently authorized to provide check cashing and money transfer services to members. This section allows Federal credit unions to provide those services to anyone eligible to become a member.

Section 308. Voluntary mergers involving multiple common bond credit unions

In voluntary mergers of multiple bond credit unions, NCUA has determined that it must consider not transferring employee groups over 3,000 from the merging credit union and requiring such groups to spin off and form separate credit unions. This section provides that this numerical limitation does not apply in voluntary mergers.

Section 309. Conversions involving common bond credit unions

This section requires that when a single or multiple common bond credit union voluntarily merges with or converts to a community credit union, NCUA must establish the criteria whereby it may determine that a member group or other portion of a credit union's existing membership, located outside the community, can be satisfactorily served and remain within the credit union's field of membership.

Section 310. Credit union governance

This section gives Federal credit union boards flexibility to expel a member who is disruptive to the operations of the credit union, including harassing personnel and creating safety concerns, without the need for a two-thirds vote of the membership present at a special meeting as required by current law. Federal credit unions are authorized to limit the length of service of their boards of directors to ensure broader representation from the membership. Finally, this section allows Federal credit unions to reimburse board of director volunteers for wages they would otherwise forfeit by participating in credit union affairs.

Section 311. Providing the National Credit Union Administration with greater flexibility in responding to market conditions

Under this section, in determining whether to lift the usury ceiling for Federal credit unions, NCUA will consider rising interest rates or whether prevailing interest rate levels threaten the safety and soundness of individual credit unions.

Section 312. Exemption from pre-merger notification requirement of the Clayton Act

This section gives Federally insured credit unions the same exemption as banks and thrift institutions from pre-merger notification requirements and fees imposed by Federal antitrust law.

Section 313. Treatment of credit unions as depository institutions under securities laws

This section gives Federally insured credit unions exceptions, similar to those provided banks, from broker-dealer and investment adviser registration requirements.

TITLE IV--DEPOSITORY INSTITUTION PROVISIONS

Section 401. Easing restrictions on interstate branching and mergers

This section removes the prohibition in current law on national and State banks expanding through de novo interstate branching. Currently, banks may expand in this fashion only if a State's law expressly permits interstate branching. This section clarifies that a State member bank may establish a de novo interstate branch under the same terms and conditions applicable to national banks. The authority for a State to prohibit an out-of-State bank or bank holding company from acquiring, through merger or acquisition, an in-State bank that has not existed for at least five years is eliminated. Insured banks are authorized to acquire by merger or consolidation another insured depository institution (including a savings association) or an uninsured trust company that has a different home State than the acquiring insured bank.

This section permits a State bank supervisor to authorize State trust companies it supervises to act in a fiduciary capacity on an interstate basis either with or without interstate offices. Those activities must not be in contravention of State law, but will not be deemed to contravene State law to the extent that a host State grants to its trust institutions the fiduciary powers sought to be exercised on an interstate basis. This authority parallels existing authority of national banks and national trust companies under the National Bank Act.

Section 402. Statute of limitations for judicial review of appointment of a receiver for depository institutions

This section provides greater consistency in Federal law governing how much time an insured depository institution has to challenge the appointment of a receiver.

Section 403. Reporting requirements relating to insider lending

This section eliminates certain reporting requirements currently imposed on banks and their executive officers and principal shareholders related to lending by banks to insiders. This would not alter restrictions on the ability of banks to make insider loans or limit the ability of Federal banking agencies to take enforcement action against a bank or its insiders for violation of lending limits.

Section 404. Amendment to provide an inflation adjustment for the small depository institution exception under the Depository Institution Management Interlocks Act

The Depository Institutions Management Interlocks Act prohibits depository organizations from having interlocking management officials, if the depositories are located or have an affiliate located in the same metropolitan statistical area, primary metropolitan statistical area, or consolidated metropolitan statistical area. This statutory prohibition does not apply to depository organizations that have less than $20 million in assets. This section increases the exemption limit to $100 million in assets.

Section 405. Enhancing the safety and soundness of insured depository institutions

This section provides that the Federal banking agencies may enforce conditions imposed in writing and written agreements, in which an institution-affiliated party or controlling shareholder agrees to provide capital to the depository institution. Transfers to depository institutions to bolster their capital will not be reversed if the institution-affiliated party or controlling shareholder later becomes bankrupt. This section also clarifies existing FDIC authority as receiver or conservator to enforce written conditions or agreements.

Section 406. Investments by insured savings associations in bank service companies authorized

Bank service companies allow one or more banks to establish a subsidiary or participate in a joint venture with other banks to provide banking or related services. Activities are limited to services for depository institutions, such as check sorting and posting and bookkeeping. This section permits thrifts to invest in a bank service company on the same basis as banks, but otherwise preserves current structure, terms, limits, and conditions. It permits banks to invest in thrift service companies as well.

Section 407. Cross guarantee authority

This section clarifies the scope of cross guarantee liability to include all insured depository institutions commonly controlled by the same company. The assessment of liability by the FDIC would continue to be only against the insured depository institution commonly controlled with the defaulting institution.

Section 408. Golden parachute authority and nonbank holding companies

This section clarifies that the FDIC could prohibit or limit a nonbank holding company's golden parachute payment or indemnification payment to institution-affiliated parties.

Section 409. Amendments relating to change in bank control

The Change in Bank Control Act authorizes Federal banking agencies to disapprove a change-in-control notice within a set period of time. Change-in-control notices are subject to strict time periods for disapproval and extensions of time beyond 45 days are available only in limited circumstances. This section allows Federal banking agencies to extend the time for review of the notice to consider business plan information, which is already collected, and to use that information in determining whether to disapprove the notice.

TITLE V--DEPOSITORY INSTITUTION AFFILIATES PROVISIONS

Section 501. Clarification of cross marketing provision

The cross marketing provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act were enacted to provide a safeguard against the mixing of banking and commerce. Cross marketing could lead to the integration of a portfolio company into a bank's operations, making the portfolio company a de facto division of a bank. If, however, the portfolio company was not under the control of the financial holding company, it could not function as a division of a subsidiary bank. This section provides that the cross marketing prohibition would only apply to entities controlled by a financial holding company. `Control' for this purpose would be determined pursuant to the definitional provisions of section 2 of the Bank Holding Company Act. Cross-marketing arrangements between depository institutions and non-financial companies would be authorized when the shares of those companies are owned or controlled by a securities firm or its affiliate.

Section 502. Amendment to provide the Federal Reserve Board with discretion concerning the imputation of control of shares of a company by trustees

Currently, any shares held by a trust for the benefit of a bank holding company, or its shareholders, members, or employees are deemed to be controlled by the company. This is intended to prevent a bank holding company from evading restrictions on the acquisition of shares of banks and nonbanking companies by having such shares acquired by a trust controlled by the company, either directly or through its management, shareholders, or employees. This section allows the Federal Reserve Board to waive this so-called attribution rule in circumstances where the Board determines such action is appropriate.

Section 503. Eliminating geographic limits on thrift service companies

This section permits Federal thrift institutions to invest in service companies without regard to geographic restrictions.

Section 504. Clarification of scope of applicable rate provision

Currently, an insured depository institution chartered with a home office in a State that has a constitutional usury ceiling may charge an interest rate on loans equal to the rate charged by national banks or Federal savings associations located in the State. This section permits finance companies located in these States to charge the same rates as national and State banks.

TITLE VI--BANKING AGENCY PROVISIONS

Section 601. Waiver of examination schedule in order to allocate examiner resources

This section permits the appropriate Federal banking agencies to adjust the examination cycle of insured depository institutions to ensure that examiner resources are allocated in a manner that provides for the safety and soundness of insured depository institutions. This section permits the agencies, when necessary for safety and soundness purposes, to adjust their mandatory examination schedules to use their resources in the most efficient manner.

Section 602. Interagency data sharing

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act gave the Federal Reserve Board authority to provide confidential supervisory information concerning an examined entity to another supervisory authority, an officer, director, or receiver of the examined entity, or any other person determined by the supervisory agency to be appropriate. This section gives the same authority to all Federal banking agencies.

Section 603. Penalty for unauthorized participation by convicted individual

Currently, a person convicted of a crime involving dishonesty or a breach of trust may not participate in the affairs of an insured depository institution without FDIC approval. Certain special purpose banks and foreign banking institutions operate without insured status (e.g., trust banks and foreign branches). This section extends the prohibition to include uninsured national and State member banks and uninsured offices of foreign banks.

Section 604. Amendment permitting the destruction of old records of a depository institution by the FDIC after the appointment of the FDIC as receiver

This section modifies the requirement for retention of old records of a failed insured depository institution when a receiver is appointed. The FDIC is authorized to destroy records that are ten or more years old at the time of its appointment as receiver, unless directed not to do so by a court or a government agency or prohibited by law.

Section 605. Modernization of recordkeeping requirement

This section allows Federal banking agencies to rely upon records preserved electronically, such as optically imaged or computer scanned images. Currently, agencies are permitted to use photographic records in place of original records for all purposes, including introduction into evidence in courts. This section gives agencies the flexibility to rely on appropriate new technology, while maintaining the requirement that agencies prescribe the manner of the preservation of records, to ensure their reliability, regardless of the technology used.

Section 606. Clarification of extent of suspension, removal, and prohibition authority of Federal banking agencies in cases of certain crimes by institution-affiliated parties

This section clarifies that the appropriate Federal banking agency may suspend or prohibit individuals charged with certain crimes from participation in the affairs of any depository institution and not only the insured depository with which the institution affiliated party is or was associated. The agency may also use the prohibition authority even when the institution with which the individuals were associated ceases to exist.

Section 607. Streamlining depository institution merger application requirements

This section streamlines application requirements by eliminating the requirement that each Federal banking agency request a competitive factors report from the other three Federal banking agencies as well as from the Attorney General. The amendment decreases the number to two, with the Attorney General continuing to be required to consider the competitive factors involved in each merger transaction and the FDIC, as insurer, receiving notice even where it is not the appropriate banking agency for the particular merger.

Section 608. Inclusion of Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision in list of banking agencies regarding insurance customer protection regulations

The four Federal banking agencies are required by current law to publish insurance customer protection regulations. OTS has the same responsibilities in this connection as FDIC, OCC, and the Federal Reserve Board, with one exception, i.e., current law provides for preemption of State law in certain circumstances, if the banking agencies, except for OTS, jointly determine the Federal protections are greater than comparable State protections. This section adds OTS to the list of banking agencies responsible for making the preemption determination.

Section 609. Shortening of post-approval antitrust review waiting period for bank acquisitions and mergers with the agreement of the Attorney General

Currently, banks and bank holding companies must delay consummating any bank acquisition or merger for at least 15 days after the transaction has been approved by a Federal banking agency. This waiting period is designed to allow the Attorney General to challenge the transaction, if the Attorney General believes the transaction would significantly harm competition. This section would allow the banking agency to reduce the waiting period to 5 days, only in cases where the Attorney General has agreed in advance that the acquisition or merger would not have serious anticompetitive effects. In such circumstances, a longer waiting period is not needed to allow the Attorney General to review the transaction and merely delays the ability of the banking organizations to achieve their business objectives. This section does not shorten the time period for private parties to challenge the banking agency's approval of the transaction under the Community Reinvestment Act or banking laws.

Section 610. Protection of confidential information received by Federal banking regulators from foreign banking supervisors

This section is intended to facilitate the sharing of information by ensuring that Federal banking agencies may hold confidential any nonpublic supervisory information obtained from a foreign regulatory authority. This would not affect the ability of Congress or a defendant in an action instituted by a banking agency to obtain such information.

Section 611. Prohibition on the participation by convicted individual

This section would prohibit a person convicted of a criminal offense involving dishonesty, a breach of trust, or money laundering from participating in the affairs of a bank holding company or any of its nonbank subsidiaries or an Edge or Agreement Corporation, without the consent of the Federal Reserve Board, and from participating in the affairs of a savings and loan holding company or any of its nonthrift subsidiaries, without the consent of the Office of Thrift Supervision.

Section 612. Clarification that notice after separation from service may be made by an order

The Federal Deposit Insurance Act ensures that Federal banking agencies may take enforcement action against a person for conduct that occurred during his or her affiliation with a banking organization, even if the person resigns. Because such enforcement actions may take the form of both notices and orders, this section clarifies that those protections apply regardless of how the enforcement action is styled.

Section 613. Examiners of financial institutions

This section authorizes limited waivers from the prohibition on examiners accepting credit from a bank being examined, if the examiner fully discloses the nature and circumstances of the loan and receives a determination from the examiner's employer that the loan would not affect the integrity of the examination. Examiners are permitted to receive credit cards on terms and conditions no more favorable to the examiner than those generally applicable to other consumers.

Section 614. Parity in standards for institution-affiliated parties

In recent years, bank regulators have seen an increase in audit and internal control deficiencies at many insured institutions, some of which have caused operating losses and failures. Currently, independent contractors, such as accountants, attorneys, and appraisers, are treated more leniently from an enforcement standpoint than directors, officers, and others. To be within its enforcement jurisdiction, a bank regulator must first establish that an independent contractor is an `institution-affiliated party.' This section holds independent contractors to a standard closer to other institution-affiliated parties, by removing a statutory requirement that the Federal banking agencies demonstrate that an independent contractor acted `knowingly or recklessly' when participating in violations of law or regulation, breaches of fiduciary duty, or unsafe or unsound practices.

Section 615. Enforcement against misrepresentations regarding FDIC deposit insurance coverage

This section authorizes the FDIC to take enforcement actions and impose civil monetary penalties of up to $1 million per day on any individual, corporation, or other entity for misrepresentation of FDIC insurance coverage.

Section 616. Compensation of Federal Home Loan Bank directors

Currently, a limit is placed on the compensation of directors of Federal Home Loan Bank boards. This section allows each Federal Home Loan Bank to pay its board members reasonable compensation for the time required of them and necessary expenses.

Section 617. Extension of terms of Federal Home Loan Bank directors

Currently, the term of each Federal Home Loan Bank director, whether elected or appointed, is three years. This section extends the term to four years and provides that terms are staggered with one-quarter of the terms expiring each year. The extension would apply only prospectively, not to the terms of existing directors.

Section 618. Biennial reports on the status of agency employment of minorities and women

This section requires that, before December 31, 2003 and the end of each two-year period thereafter, each of the Federal banking agencies submit a report to Congress on the status of the employment by the agency of minority individuals and women.

Section 619. Coordination of State examination authority

This section is intended to improve coordination of supervision of multi-State State-chartered banks, by clarifying how State-chartered institutions with branches in more than one State are examined. While giving primacy of supervision to the chartering or home State, this section requires the home State bank supervisor to abide by any written cooperative agreement relating to coordination of exams and joint participation in exams, with the host State supervisor where an out-of-State branch is located. Unless otherwise permitted by a cooperative agreement, only the home State supervisor may charge State supervisory fees on the bank. If a branch in a host State resulted from certain interstate merger transactions, the host State supervisor may, with written notice to the home State supervisor, examine the branch for compliance with host State consumer protection laws. If permitted by a cooperative agreement or if the out-of-State bank is in a troubled condition, the host State supervisor may participate in the examination of the bank by the home State supervisor to ascertain that branch activities are not conducted in an unsafe or unsound manner. If the host State supervisor determines that a branch is violating host State consumer protection laws, the supervisor may, with written notice to the home State supervisor, undertake enforcement actions. This section does not limit in any way the authority of Federal banking regulators and does not affect State taxation authority.

TITLE VII--CLERICAL AND TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS

Section 701. Clerical amendments to Home Owners' Loan Act

This section corrects the table of contents for the Home Owners' Loan Act (HOLA). The Financial Regulatory Relief and Economic Efficiency Act of 2000 repealed section 6 of HOLA but did not conform the table of contents. The section also corrects the captions for sections 4(a) and 5 of HOLA, to eliminate confusion over the scope of the sections.

Section 702. Technical corrections to the Federal Credit Union Act

This section makes technical and conforming amendments to the Federal Credit Union Act.

Section 703. Other technical corrections

This section makes technical corrections to title 18, United States Code.

Section 704. Repeal of obsolete provisions of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956

This section eliminates certain outdated provisions of the Bank Holding Company Act that no longer have any effect.

CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW MADE BY THE BILL, AS REPORTED

REVISED STATUTES OF THE UNITED STATES

* * * * * * *

T I T L E L X I I.

NATIONAL BANKS.

C H A P T E R O N E.

ORGANIZATION AND POWERS.

Sec.
5133. Formation of national banking associations.
* * * * * * *
5136C. Alternative business organization.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

SEC. 5136C. ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS ORGANIZATION.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

SEC. 5146. REQUIREMENTS FOR BANK DIRECTORS.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

C H A P T E R T H R E E.

REGULATION OF THE BANKING BUSINESS.

Sec.
5190. Place of business of banking associations.
* * * * * * *
[Struck out->][ 5199. Dividends. ][<-Struck out]
5199. National bank dividends.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

SEC. 5199. NATIONAL BANK DIVIDENDS.

* * * * * * *

C H A P T E R F O U R.

DISSOLUTION AND RECEIVERSHIP.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

-

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE ACT

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

SEC. 5. DEPOSIT INSURANCE.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

SEC. 11A. FSLIC RESOLUTION FUND.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

SEC. 19. PENALTY FOR UNAUTHORIZED PARTICIPATION BY CONVICTED INDIVIDUAL.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

SEC. 43. DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS LACKING FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

SEC. 44. INTERSTATE BANK MERGERS.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

SEC. 47. INSURANCE CUSTOMER PROTECTIONS.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

SEC. 49. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENTS.

-

NATIONAL BANK CONSOLIDATION AND MERGER ACT

* * * * * * *

SEC. 2. CONSOLIDATION OF BANKS WITHIN THE SAME STATE.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

SEC. 4. INTERSTATE CONSOLIDATIONS AND MERGERS.

* * * * * * *

-

INTERNATIONAL BANKING ACT OF 1978

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

SEC. 15. COOPERATION WITH FOREIGN SUPERVISORS.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

-

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

* * * * * * *

DEFINITIONS AND APPLICATION OF TITLE

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

REGISTRATION AND REGULATION OF BROKERS AND DEALERS

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

-

INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940

TITLE II--INVESTMENT ADVISERS

* * * * * * *

DEFINITIONS

* * * * * * *

SEC. 210A. CONSULTATION.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

-

SECTION 10 OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940

AFFILIATIONS OF DIRECTORS

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

-

HOME OWNERS' LOAN ACT

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE AND TABLE OF CONTENTS.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Sec. 1. Short title and table of contents.
* * * * * * *
[Struck out->][ Sec. 5. Federal savings associations. ][<-Struck out]
[Struck out->][ Sec. 6. Liquid asset requirements. ][<-Struck out]
Sec. 5. Savings associations.
Sec. 6. [Repealed.]
* * * * * * *

SEC. 4. SUPERVISION OF SAVINGS ASSOCIATIONS.

* * * * * * *

[Struck out->][ SEC. 5. FEDERAL SAVINGS ASSOCIATIONS. ][<-Struck out]

SEC. 5. SAVINGS ASSOCIATIONS.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

SEC. 10. REGULATION OF HOLDING COMPANIES.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

-

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ACT

* * * * * * *

ELIGIBILITY OF MEMBERS AND NONMEMBER BORROWERS

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

MANAGEMENT OF BANKS

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

[Struck out->][ The annual compensation ][<-Struck out]
In the case of the-- may not exceed--
Chairperson
$25,000
Vice Chairperson
$20,000
All other members
$15,000.

* * * * * * *

-

FEDERAL CREDIT UNION ACT

* * * * * * *

TITLE I--FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONS

DEFINITIONS

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

POWERS

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

SEC. 107A. LIMITATION ON MEMBER BUSINESS LOANS.

* * * * * * *

MEMBERSHIP

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

MANAGEMENT

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

EXPULSION AND WITHDRAWAL

* * * * * * *

CERTAIN POWERS OF BOARD

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

SPACE IN FEDERAL BUILDINGS OR FEDERAL LAND

* * * * * * *

TITLE II--SHARE INSURANCE

INSURANCE OF MEMBER ACCOUNTS AND ELIGIBILITY PROVISIONS

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

REPORTS OF CONDITION; CERTIFIED STATEMENTS; PREMIUMS FOR INSURANCE

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

EXAMINATION OF INSURED CREDIT UNIONS

* * * * * * *

TERMINATION OF INSURANCE; CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS; SUSPENSION AND/OR REMOVAL OF DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, AND COMMITTEE MEMBERS; TAKING POSSESSION OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

SEC. 206A. REGULATION AND EXAMINATION OF CREDIT UNION ORGANIZATIONS AND SERVICE PROVIDERS.

* * * * * * *

PAYMENT OF INSURANCE

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

SEC. 216. PROMPT CORRECTIVE ACTION.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

TITLE III--CENTRAL LIQUIDITY FACILITY

* * * * * * *

MEMBERSHIP

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

ANNUAL REPORT

* * * * * * *

-

SECTION 7A OF THE CLAYTON ACT

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

-

FEDERAL RESERVE ACT

* * * * * * *

STATE BANKS AS MEMBERS.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

-

BANK HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1956

* * * * * * *

DEFINITIONS

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

ACQUISITION OF BANK SHARES OR ASSETS

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

INTERESTS IN NONBANKING ORGANIZATIONS

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

SAVING PROVISION

* * * * * * *

-

SECTION 2 OF THE NATIONAL BANK RECEIVERSHIP ACT

SEC. 2. APPOINTMENT OF RECEIVER FOR A NATIONAL BANK.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

-

SECTION 106 OF THE BANK HOLDING COMPANY ACT AMENDMENTS OF 1970

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

-

SECTION 203 OF THE DEPOSITORY INSTITUTION MANAGEMENT INTERLOCKS ACT

* * * * * * *

-

BANK SERVICE COMPANY ACT

SHORT TITLE AND DEFINITIONS

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

AMOUNT OF INVESTMENT IN BANK SERVICE COMPANY

PERMISSIBLE BANK SERVICE COMPANY ACTIVITIES FOR DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS

PERMISSIBLE BANK SERVICE COMPANY ACTIVITIES FOR OTHER PERSONS

* * * * * * *

PRIOR APPROVAL FOR INVESTMENTS IN BANK SERVICE COMPANIES

* * * * * * *

REGULATION AND EXAMINATION OF BANK SERVICE COMPANIES

* * * * * * *

-

TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE

* * * * * * *

PART I--CRIMES

* * * * * * *

CHAPTER 11--BRIBERY, GRAFT, AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Sec.
201. Bribery of public officials and witnesses.
* * * * * * *
[Struck out->][ 212. Offer of loan or gratuity to bank examiner. ][<-Struck out]
[Struck out->][ 213. Acceptance of loan or gratuity by bank examiner. ][<-Struck out]
212. Offer of credit to bank examiner.
213. Acceptance of credit by bank examiner.
* * * * * * *

[Struck out->][ Sec. 212. Offer of loan or gratuity to bank examiner ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ Sec. 213. Acceptance of loan or gratuity by bank examiner ][<-Struck out]

* * * * * * *

Sec. 212. Offer of credit to bank examiner

Sec. 213. Acceptance of credit by bank examiner

CHAPTER 61--LOTTERIES

* * * * * * *

Sec. 1306. Participation by financial institutions

* * * * * * *

ADDITIONAL VIEWS

Section 614 of this legislation would repeal a provision of title IX of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act (FIRREA), which established a `knowingly and reckless' standard for banking agency administrative actions against `institution affiliated' parties, like appraisers, accountants or lawyers. The effect of this provision would be to subject independent contractors to the banking agencies' enforcement authority merely as a result of their status.

I have several concerns regarding section 614 of this bill, which I expressed in both the subcommittee and full committee. This provision would subject third parties--who do not participate in the financial institution's management--to the same enforcement penalties as management, even though they are not charged with the responsibility of running the institution. These outside contractors have no control over internal bank underwriting and operational decisionmaking. This proposed change in law would contradict the intent of FIRREA which enhanced the enforcement powers of the regulatory agencies in a way that recognized the distinction between powerful insiders who control their institutions and those hired independent contractors who perform specialized services for them.

Moreover, it is not clear to me that the agencies do not have sufficient authority to bring the necessary enforcement actions under current law. Under current law, the banking agencies are empowered to bring administrative enforcement proceedings against a depository institution or an `institution affiliated party' of that bank. Such proceedings include civil money penalties, suspension or removal, and temporary and permanent cease and desist orders. The agencies can assess massive fines of up to $1 million a day, seek restitution, or remove a professional from rendering services to an insured institution. Why would the agencies need any more authority?

Lastly, I don't understand why a provision that imposes new burdens on industry is being included in a bill that calls for regulatory relief. Section 614 is a new provision that was added to this year's Regulatory Relief bill at the eleventh hour in response to the banking regulators. The provision has not been the subject of any substantive debate nor has there been time for input from the affected industries.

We in Congress must be very deliberative before we grant broad administrative enforcement authority. Administrative enforcement actions are brought by agency staff, heard by an administrative law judge, and ultimately decided by the agency itself. The agencies are the judge and the jury, and in some cases their sentences can be draconian. Although a decision can be appealed in the federal courts, deference is traditionally given to the agencies. Such administrative process does not provide the type of due process that should be afforded to third party independent consultants who are not `insiders.'

As this bill moves forward in the legislative process, I hope my concerns will be addressed.

SPENCER BACHUS.



This Report: To Accompany H.R.1375     Printer Friendly: HTML  |  PDF
3 of 3